Thrombosis in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: Analysis of a large national database

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis in the neonatal population is rare, but increasing. Its incidence and management are not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the incidence, associated factors, and management of thrombosis in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) population.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of infants admitted to a Pediatrix Medical Group-affiliated NICU from 1997 through 2015. We determined the prevalence of venous and arterial thrombosis, and assessed demographic characteristics and known risk factors. Categorical variables were compared with the Pearson χ2 test and continuous variables with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify associated factors. The primary outcome was incidence of thrombosis. Secondary analyses investigated correlations between clinical and demographic characteristics and thrombosis.

RESULTS

Among 1 158 755 infants, we identified 2367 (0.20%) diagnosed with thrombosis. In a multivariable regression analysis, prematurity, male sex, congenital heart disease, sepsis, ventilator support, vasopressor receipt, central venous catheter, invasive procedures, and receipt of erythropoietin were associated with increased risk of thrombosis, while Black race and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with reduced risk. The majority of infants diagnosed with thrombosis (73%) received no anticoagulation, but anticoagulant use in infants with thrombosis was higher than those without (27% versus 0.2%, P < .001). Thrombosis in infants was associated with higher mortality (11% versus 2%, P < .001) and longer hospital stays (57 days, [interquartile range (IQR) 28--100] versus 10 days, [IQR 6--22], P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest national study to date, we found that thrombosis in NICU patients is associated with prematurity, low birth weight, sepsis, and invasive procedures.

The Developing Balance of Thrombosis and Hemorrhage in Pediatric Surgery: Clinical Implications of Age-Related Changes in Hemostasis

Bleeding and thrombosis in critically ill infants and children is a vexing clinical problem. Despite the relatively low incidence of bleeding and thrombosis in the overall pediatric population relative to adults, these critically ill children face unique challenges to hemostasis due to extreme physiologic derangements, exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and membranes, and major vascular endothelial injury or disruption. Caring for pediatric patients on extracorporeal support, recovering from solid organ transplant or invasive surgery, and after major trauma is often complicated by major bleeding or clotting events. As our ability to care for the youngest and sickest of these children increases, the gaps in our understanding of the clinical implications of developmental hemostasis have become increasingly important. We review the current understanding of the development and function of the hemostatic system, including the complex and overlapping interactions of coagulation proteins, platelets, fibrinolysis, and immune mediators from the neonatal period through early childhood and to young adulthood. We then examine scenarios in which our ability to effectively measure and treat coagulation derangements in pediatric patients is limited. In these clinical situations, adult therapies are often extrapolated for use in children without taking age-related differences in pediatric hemostasis into account, leaving clinicians confused and impacting patient outcomes. We discuss the limitations of current coagulation testing in pediatric patients before turning to emerging ideas in the measurement and management of pediatric bleeding and thrombosis. Finally, we highlight opportunities for future research which take into account this developing balance of bleeding and thrombosis in our youngest patients.

Validation of the Omni: A Novel, Multimodality, and Longitudinal Surgical Skills Assessment

OBJECTIVE

The breadth of technical skills included in general surgery training continues to expand. The current competency-based training model requires assessment tools to measure acquisition, learning, and mastery of technical skill longitudinally in a reliable and valid manner. This study describes a novel skills assessment tool, the Omni, which evaluates performance in a broad range of skills over time.

DESIGN

The 5 Omni tasks, consisting of open bowel anastomosis, knot tying, laparoscopic clover pattern cut, robotic needle drive, and endoscopic bubble pop, were developed by general surgery faculty. Component performance metrics assessed speed, accuracy, and quality, which were scaled into an overall score ranging from 0 to 10 for each task. For each task, ANOVAs with Scheffé's post hoc comparisons and Pearson's chi-squared tests compared performance between 6 resident cohorts (clinical years (CY1-5) and research fellows (RF)). Paired samples t-tests evaluated changes in performance across academic years. Cronbach's alpha coefficient determined the internal consistency of the Omni as an overall assessment.

SETTING

The Omni was developed by the Department of Surgery at Duke University. Annual assessment and this research study took place in the Surgical Education and Activities Lab.

PARTICIPANTS

All active general surgery residents in 2 consecutive academic years spanning 2015 to 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 62 general surgery residents completed the Omni and 39 (67.2%) of those residents completed the assessment in 2 consecutive years. Based on data from all residents' first assessment, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among CY cohorts for bowel anastomosis, robotic, and laparoscopic task metrics. By pair-wise comparisons, mean bowel anastomosis scores distinguished CY1 from CY3-5 and CY2 from CY5. Mean robotic scores distinguished CY1 from RF, and mean laparoscopic scores distinguished CY1 from RF, CY3, and CY5 in addition to CY2 from CY3. Mean scores in performance on the knot tying and endoscopic tasks were not significantly different. Statistically significant improvement in mean scores was observed for all tasks from year 1 to year 2 (all p < 0.02). The internal consistency analysis revealed an alpha coefficient of 0.656.

CONCLUSIONS

The Omni is a novel composite assessment tool for surgical technical skill that utilizes objective measures and scoring algorithms to evaluate performance. In this pilot study, 3 tasks demonstrated discriminative ability of performance by CY, and all 5 tasks demonstrated construct validity by showing longitudinal improvement in performance. Additionally, the Omni has adequate internal consistency for a formative assessment. These results suggest the Omni holds promise for the evaluation of resident technical skill and early identification of outliers requiring intervention.

Jejunal arterial access for retrograde mesenteric stenting

Endovascular approaches have replaced open surgical revascularization in most patients with mesenteric ischemia; however, flush ostial occlusions may not be amenable to traditional antegrade access. Retrograde mesenteric stenting has been previously described, but this technique requires a formal laparotomy and dissection of the proximal superior mesenteric artery. We present here a modification of this technique that requires only a "mini-laparotomy" and no open vascular repair of the superior mesenteric artery as well as a review of our initial institutional experience with this procedure. Our approach differs from previously described work by minimizing mesenteric dissection, avoiding the need for repair of an arteriotomy, and limiting the size of the laparotomy incision in this population of profoundly comorbid patients.

Renal medullary carcinoma: A national analysis of 159 patients

BACKGROUND

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is an aggressive malignancy seen predominantly in young males with sickle cell trait. RMC is poorly understood, with fewer than 220 cases described in the medical literature to date. We used a large national registry to define the typical presentation, treatments, and outcomes of this rare tumor.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients under 40 years of age diagnosed with RMC from 1998 to 2011. An analysis of patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and overall survival (OS) was undertaken, and factors associated with mortality were identified using multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 159 patients with RMC were identified, of whom a majority were male (71%), African American (87%), and had metastatic disease (71%). Median tumor size was 6 cm and median survival was 7.7 months. Most patients underwent surgery (60%) and chemotherapy (65%). Few patients received radiation (12%). Patients with metastatic disease had a significantly worse median survival (4.7 vs. 17.8 months, P < 0.001) and were less likely to receive surgery (42% vs. 91%, P < 0.001). Age and tumor size did not appear to impact OS.

CONCLUSION

In the largest cohort to date of patients with RMC, we found a dismal median survival of less than 8 months. Age and tumor size were not associated with OS. Metastatic disease at presentation was the main negative prognostic indicator in RMC and was present in a majority of patients at the time of diagnosis.