Safety and Immunogenicity of a Revaccination With a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine in Older Adults: A Phase 2b Study

BACKGROUND

In the previous (parent) study, 2 doses of different formulations of an investigational vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus (RSVPreF3 OA) were well tolerated and immunogenic in older adults. This multicenter phase 2b extension study assessed safety and immunogenicity of a revaccination (third) dose of the 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E formulation.

METHODS

In total, 122 older adults (60-80 years), previously vaccinated with 2 doses of RSVPreF3-AS01E formulations (containing 30, 60, or 120 μg RSVPreF3 antigen), received an additional 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E dose 18 months after dose 2. Vaccine safety was evaluated in all participants up to 6 months and immunogenicity in participants who received 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E doses until 1 month after dose 3.

RESULTS

Similar to the parent study, mostly mild-to-moderate solicited adverse events and no vaccine-related serious adverse events or potential immune-mediated disorders were reported. Neutralizing titers and cell-mediated immune responses persisted for 18 months after 2-dose vaccination. Dose 3 increased RSV-specific neutralizing titers against RSV-A and RSV-B and median CD4+ T-cell frequencies. After dose 3, RSV-specific neutralizing titers but not CD4+ T-cell frequencies were below levels detected 1 month after dose 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Revaccination with 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E 18 months after dose 2 is well tolerated and immunogenic in older adults.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04657198; EudraCT, 2020-000692-21.

The respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein vaccine attenuates the severity of respiratory syncytial virus-associated disease in breakthrough infections in adults ≥60 years of age

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a contagious pathogen causing acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Symptoms range from mild upper respiratory tract infections to potentially life-threatening lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD). In adults ≥60 years old, vaccine efficacy of a candidate vaccine for older adults (RSVPreF3 OA) was 71.7% against RSV-ARI and 82.6% against RSV-LRTD (AReSVi-006/NCT04886596). We present the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the same trial at the end of the first RSV season in the northern hemisphere (April 2022).

Methods

In this phase 3 trial, adults aged ≥60 years were randomized (1:1) to receive one dose of RSVPreF3 OA vaccine or placebo. PROs were assessed using InFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO), Short Form-12 (SF-12), and EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Peak FLU-PRO Chest/Respiratory scores during the first 7 days from ARI episode onset were compared using a Wilcoxon test. Least squares mean (LSMean) of SF-12 physical functioning (PF) and EQ-5D health utility scores were estimated using mixed effects models.

Results

In the RSVPreF3 OA group (N = 12,466), 27 first RSV-ARI episodes were observed versus 95 in the Placebo group (N = 12,494). Median peak FLU-PRO Chest/Respiratory scores were lower in RSVPreF3 OA (1.07) versus Placebo group (1.86); p = 0.0258. LSMean group differences for the PF and EQ-5D health utility score were 7.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.86, 23.85; p = 0.4125) and 0.0786 (95% CI: -0.0340, 0.1913; p = 0.1695).

Conclusions

The RSVPreF3 OA vaccine, in addition to preventing infection, attenuated the severity of RSV-associated symptoms in breakthrough infections, with trends of reduced impact on PF and health utility.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine Is Efficacious in Older Adults With Underlying Medical Conditions

BACKGROUND

Older adults with chronic cardiorespiratory or endocrine/metabolic conditions are at increased risk of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related acute respiratory illness (RSV-ARI) and severe respiratory disease. In an ongoing, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicountry, phase 3 trial in ≥60-year-old participants, an AS01E-adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) was efficacious against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (RSV-LRTD), severe RSV-LRTD, and RSV-ARI. We evaluated efficacy and immunogenicity among participants with coexisting cardiorespiratory or endocrine/metabolic conditions that increase the risk of severe RSV disease ("conditions of interest").

METHODS

Medically stable ≥60-year-old participants received 1 dose of RSVPreF3 OA or placebo. Efficacy against first RSV-LRTD and RSV-ARI episodes was assessed in subgroups with/without coexisting cardiorespiratory or endocrine/metabolic conditions of interest. Immunogenicity was analyzed post hoc in these subgroups.

RESULTS

In total, 12 467 participants received RSVPreF3 OA and 12 499 received placebo. Of these, 39.6% (RSVPreF3 OA) and 38.9% (placebo) had ≥1 coexisting condition of interest. The median efficacy follow-up was 6.7 months. Efficacy against RSV-LRTD was high in participants with ≥1 condition of interest (94.6%), ≥1 cardiorespiratory (92.1%), ≥1 endocrine/metabolic (100%), and ≥2 conditions of interest (92.0%). Efficacy against RSV-ARI was 81.0% in participants with ≥1 condition of interest (88.1% for cardiorespiratory, 79.4% for endocrine/metabolic conditions) and 88.0% in participants with ≥2 conditions of interest. Postvaccination neutralizing titers were at least as high in participants with ≥1 condition of interest as in those without.

CONCLUSIONS

RSVPreF3 OA was efficacious against RSV-LRTD and RSV-ARI in older adults with coexisting medical conditions associated with an increased risk of severe RSV disease.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04886596.

Efficacy and safety of respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in older adults over 2 RSV seasons

BACKGROUND

The adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) was efficacious against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (RSV-LRTD) in ≥60-year-olds over 1 RSV season. We evaluated efficacy and safety of 1 RSVPreF3 OA dose and of 2 RSVPreF3 OA doses given 1 year apart against RSV-LRTD over 2 RSV seasons post-dose 1.

METHODS

In this phase 3, blinded trial, ≥60-year-olds were randomized (1:1) to receive RSVPreF3 OA or placebo pre-season 1. RSVPreF3 OA recipients were re-randomized (1:1) to receive a second RSVPreF3 OA dose (RSV_revaccination group) or placebo (RSV_1dose group) pre-season 2; participants who received placebo pre-season 1 received placebo pre-season 2 (placebo group). Efficacy of both vaccine regimens against RSV-LRTD was evaluated over 2 seasons combined (confirmatory secondary objective, success criterion: lower limits of 2-sided confidence intervals [CIs] around efficacy estimates >20%).

RESULTS

The efficacy analysis comprised 24,967 participants (RSV_1dose: 6227, RSV_revaccination: 6242, placebo: 12,498). Median efficacy follow-up was 17.8 months. Efficacy over 2 seasons of 1 RSVPreF3 OA dose was 67.2% (97.5% CI: 48.2-80.0) against RSV-LRTD and 78.8% (95% CI: 52.6-92.0) against severe RSV-LRTD. Efficacy over 2 seasons of a first dose followed by revaccination was 67.1% (97.5% CI: 48.1-80.0) against RSV-LRTD and 78.8% (95% CI: 52.5-92.0) against severe RSV-LRTD. Reactogenicity/safety of the revaccination dose were similar to dose 1.

CONCLUSION

One RSVPreF3 OA dose was efficacious against RSV-LRTD over 2 RSV seasons in ≥60-year-olds. Revaccination 1 year post-dose 1 was well tolerated but did not seem to provide additional efficacy benefit in the overall study population. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04886596.

Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity, and Safety of AS01E-adjuvanted RSV Prefusion F Protein-based Candidate Vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) When Co-administered With a Seasonal Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults: Results of a Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Co-administration of vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza can be considered given their overlapping seasonality, and may increase vaccine uptake and compliance. In this phase 3, open-label, randomized study, we evaluated the immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of the AS01E-adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein-based candidate vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) when co-administered with a seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-QIV) in older adults.

METHODS

Participants aged ≥60 years (randomized 1:1) received either RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV simultaneously on day 1 (Co-Ad group) or FLU-QIV on day 1 followed by RSVPreF3 OA on day 31 (sequential administration [SA] group). The co-primary objectives were to demonstrate noninferiority of RSVPreF3 OA in terms of RSV-A neutralization geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio and FLU-QIV in terms of hemagglutination inhibition GMT ratio for each FLU-QIV strain, when co-administered versus when administered alone at 1-month post-vaccination. Noninferiority was demonstrated if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interview of the group GMT ratio (SA/Co-Ad) was ≤1.5. Secondary descriptive objectives comprised additional immunogenicity assessments, reactogenicity, and safety.

RESULTS

Of the 885 participants who received one dose of the study vaccines, 837 were included in the per protocol set. Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. Both co-primary objectives were met for both vaccines. Reported adverse events in both groups were mild-to-moderate, with a low frequency of grade 3 events.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this study demonstrate that RSVPreF3 OA can be co-administered with FLU-QIV. Co-administration is well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION

NCT04841577.

Anaphylaxis in Clinical Trials of Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablets

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus method to identify anaphylaxis in sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials. Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) queries (SMQs) are standardized groupings of MedDRA terms used in drug safety monitoring.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a method to identify potential anaphylaxis in SLIT-tablet trials using SMQ searches and case definitions of anaphylaxis adopted from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.

METHODS

The SMQ search tool contained 2 criteria including treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs): (1) narrow MedDRA terms related to anaphylaxis and (2) all AEs with broad MedDRA terms from at least 2 of 3 categories (respiratory/skin/cardiovascular) occurring on the same day. Criteria were applied to a pooled data set of all subjects from 48 timothy grass, ragweed, house dust mite, and tree SLIT-tablet trials (SLIT-tablet, N = 8200; placebo, N = 7033). Additional search strategies were any treatment-emergent AE with MedDRA preferred term "hypersensitivity" and epinephrine administrations. Identified potential cases underwent blinded independent medical expert review. Nonanaphylaxis cases were designated local AEs or mild to moderate systemic reactions.

RESULTS

Using the SMQ search tool and after subsequent medical review, 8 anaphylaxis cases were identified; 3 were considered treatment-related, resulting in a proportion of anaphylaxis cases/subject of 0.02% (2 of 8200) with SLIT-tablet and 0.01% (1 of 7033) with placebo. One additional anaphylaxis case related to SLIT-tablet was identified by the preferred term "hypersensitivity." The 3 anaphylaxis cases associated with SLIT-tablet treatment were not life-threatening. The epinephrine administration rate was 17 of 8200 (0.2%) with SLIT-tablet treatment and 2 of 7033 (0.03%) with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

SMQ search criteria for identifying potential anaphylaxis related to SLIT were developed. Anaphylaxis was rare for SLIT-tablets.

Safety and immunogenicity of a respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein (RSVPreF3) candidate vaccine in older Japanese adults: A phase I, randomized, observer-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes lower respiratory tract infection, with a high burden of disease among adults ≥60 years. This study assessed the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of an investigational adjuvanted RSV vaccine (RSVPreF3/AS01_B) in Japanese adults aged 60-80 years.

METHODS

Forty participants were randomized to receive two doses of RSVPreF3/AS01_B or the placebo, in a 1:1 ratio, two months apart, in this placebo-controlled study. Solicited administration-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected within 7 days and unsolicited AEs within 30 days post-vaccination. Serious AEs (SAEs) and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were collected throughout the study (12 months post-dose 2). RSVPreF3-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentrations and neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers against RSV-A were evaluated on day (D)1, D31, D61, D91 and those against RSV-B on D1, D31, D91.

RESULTS

Solicited AEs were reported more frequently in RSVPreF3/AS01_B recipients (80.0%-90.0%) than in placebo recipients (10.0%-20.0%). Two RSVPreF3/AS01_B recipients experienced grade 3 solicited AEs. Rate of unsolicited AEs were similar (30.0%-35.0%) in both groups. No RSVPreF3/AS01_B recipient reported SAEs/pIMDs, while one placebo recipient reported two SAEs that were unrelated to vaccination. Baseline RSVPreF3-specific IgG and RSV-A/-B nAb levels were above the assay cut-off values. In the RSVPreF3/AS01_B group, RSVPreF3-specific IgG concentrations increased 12.8-fold on D31 and 9.2-fold on D91 versus baseline while nAb titers increased 7.3-fold (RSV-A) and 8.4-fold (RSV-B) on D31 and 6.3-fold (RSV-A) and 9.9-fold (RSV-B) on D91.

CONCLUSIONS

The RSVPreF3/AS01_B vaccine was well tolerated and immunogenic in older Japanese adults.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04090658.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of acute respiratory infection, lower respiratory tract disease, clinical complications, and death in older adults. There is currently no licensed vaccine against RSV infection.

METHODS

In an ongoing, international, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adults 60 years of age or older to receive a single dose of an AS01_E-adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein-based candidate vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) or placebo before the RSV season. The primary objective was to show vaccine efficacy of one dose of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease, confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), during one RSV season. The criterion for meeting the primary objective was a lower limit of the confidence interval around the efficacy estimate of more than 20%. Efficacy against severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease and RSV-related acute respiratory infection was assessed, and analyses according to RSV subtype (A and B) were performed. Safety was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 24,966 participants received one dose of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine (12,467 participants) or placebo (12,499). Over a median follow-up of 6.7 months, vaccine efficacy against RT-PCR-confirmed RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease was 82.6% (96.95% confidence interval [CI], 57.9 to 94.1), with 7 cases (1.0 per 1000 participant-years) in the vaccine group and 40 cases (5.8 per 1000 participant-years) in the placebo group. Vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 62.4 to 99.9) against severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (assessed on the basis of clinical signs or by the investigator) and 71.7% (95% CI, 56.2 to 82.3) against RSV-related acute respiratory infection. Vaccine efficacy was similar against the RSV A and B subtypes (for RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease: 84.6% and 80.9%, respectively; for RSV-related acute respiratory infection: 71.9% and 70.6%, respectively). High vaccine efficacy was observed in various age groups and in participants with coexisting conditions. The RSVPreF3 OA vaccine was more reactogenic than placebo, but most adverse events for which reports were solicited were transient, with mild-to-moderate severity. The incidences of serious adverse events and potential immune-mediated diseases were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine had an acceptable safety profile and prevented RSV-related acute respiratory infection and lower respiratory tract disease and severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease in adults 60 years of age or older, regardless of RSV subtype and the presence of underlying coexisting conditions. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; AReSVi-006 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04886596.).

2139. Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of a Respiratory Syncytial Virus prefusion F (RSVPreF3) candidate vaccine co-administered with the seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine in older adults

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can cause severe respiratory disease in older adults (OAs). However, there is no approved vaccine against RSV disease in OAs. Co-administration of vaccines against RSV and influenza could be considered given their overlapping seasonality. Here, we assessed the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of an RSV prefusion F Older Adult (RSVPreF3 OA) investigational vaccine when co-administered with the seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-QIV) in OAs.

Methods

In this Phase 3, open-label, controlled, multi-country study (NCT04841577), OAs aged ≥ 60 years recruited in New Zealand, Panama and South Africa were randomized 1:1 to receive either RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV simultaneously on day 1 (Co-Ad group), or FLU-QIV on day 1 and RSVPreF3 OA on day 31 (Control group). The co-primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of i) RSVPreF3 OA in terms of RSV-A neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) ratio and ii) FLU-QIV in terms of hemagglutinin inhibition antibody GMT ratio for each Flu strain when co-administered versus when administered alone. Blood samples were collected from all participants pre vaccination and 1 month post vaccination. Non-inferiority was demonstrated if the upper limit (UL) of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the group GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was ≤ 1.5. Secondary descriptive outcomes included reactogenicity and safety.

Results

885 participants received at least 1 dose of the study interventions. Of these, 838 were included in the per protocol set at 1 month post vaccination. The demographic characteristics of the participants were similar across groups. The study co-primary objectives were met; for both vaccines, the UL of the 95% CI of the GMT ratio was ≤ 1.5 (Table 1). The observed safety events were balanced between Co-Ad and Control groups (Table 2). The reactogenicity profile of the Co-ad group compared with the Control group was driven by the RSVPreF3 OA investigational vaccine.

Conclusion

Our results support simultaneous seasonal vaccination with RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV in adults ≥ 60 years, as co-administration elicits a statistically non-inferior immune response to the administration of each vaccine alone, with no safety concerns identified.

Disclosures

Nathali Montenegro, MD, GSK: Support for the present abstract/study Lorena Noriega-Aguirre, MD, ScD, Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Honoraria|Astra Zeneca: Support for attending meetings and/or travel|Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria|Boehringer Ingelheim: Support for attending meetings and/or travel|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Support for the present abstract/study|Novartis: Honoraria Mohammed Bensellam, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Agency worker on assignment at GSK Nathalie De Schrevel, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Ownership Interest Sherine Kuriyakose, MSc, GSK: GSK Employee Axel Lambert, MSc, GSK: GSK Employee Aurélie Olivier, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: I’m an employee of GSK Biologicals|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Ownership Interest Veronica Hulstrøm, PhD MD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee.

LB745. Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Prefusion F Protein Candidate Vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) is Efficacious in Adults ≥ 60 Years of Age (YOA)

Background

RSV-associated acute respiratory infections (ARI), particularly lower respiratory tract diseases (LRTD), present a significant disease burden in older adults. Currently, there are no approved vaccines against RSV. We present results from an ongoing study designed to demonstrate the vaccine efficacy (VE) of the AS01_E-adjuvanted RSVPreF3 OA in adults ≥ 60 YOA.

Methods

This ongoing, phase 3, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-country study (NCT04886596) enrolled adults ≥ 60 YOA from the northern and southern hemispheres. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive a single dose of RSVPreF3 OA or placebo before the RSV season. The primary objective was to demonstrate VE of a single dose of RSVPreF3 OA in preventing RSV-confirmed LRTD during one RSV season (criterion: lower limit of VE confidence interval [CI] > 20%). VE is reported also against severe RSV-confirmed LRTD, RSV-confirmed ARI, RSV-confirmed LRTD and RSV-confirmed ARI by RSV subtype (RSV-A and RSV-B), and RSV-confirmed LRTD by age, baseline comorbidity and frailty status. RSV-A/B was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR.

Results

A total of 26,664 participants were enrolled, of whom 24,966 (RSVPreF3 OA: 12,467; placebo: 12,499) were included in the exposed set and 24,960 (RSVPreF3 OA: 12,466; placebo: 12,494) in the efficacy analysis. The mean age was 69.5 (±6.5) years and 51.7% were women. Over a median follow-up of 6.7 months (maximum 10.1 months), 47 RSV-confirmed LRTD episodes were reported (RSVPreF3 OA: 7; placebo: 40), resulting in a VE of 82.6% (96.95% CI: 57.9–94.1), thus the primary objective was met. Consistently high VE across the clinical spectrum of RSV disease, from RSV-confirmed ARI (71.7% [95% CI: 56.2–82.3]) to severe RSV-confirmed LRTD (94.1% [95% CI: 62.4–99.9]) was observed. High VE was seen in different age groups and regardless of RSV subtype, baseline comorbidity or pre-frail status (Figure 1). Cumulative incidence curves for RSV-confirmed LRTD and RSV-confirmed ARI showed persistent efficacy throughout the follow-up (Figure 2).

Conclusion

A single RSVPreF3 OA dose is highly efficacious against RSV-confirmed LRTD and RSV-confirmed ARI in adults ≥ 60 YOA, regardless of RSV disease severity, RSV subtype, baseline comorbidity and pre-frail status.

Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.

Abstract and information is also available at the following link : Efficacy results for GSK's older adult RSV vaccine (investis.com).

Disclosures

Michael G. Ison, MD MS, GlaxoSmithKline: Advisor/Consultant|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support Alberto Papi, MD, CHIESI, ASTRAZENECA, GSK, BI, MENARINI, NOVARTIS, ZAMBON, MUNDIPHARMA, SANOFI, AVILLION: Honoraria|CHIESI, ASTRAZENECA, GSK, NOVARTIS, SANOFI, IQVIA, AVILLION, ELPEN PHARMACEUTICALS: Advisor/Consultant|CHIESI, ASTRAZENECA, GSK, NOVARTIS, SANOFI, IQVIA, AVILLION, ELPEN PHARMACEUTICALS: Board Member|CHIESI, ASTRAZENECA, GSK, SANOFI: Grant/Research Support Joanne M. Langley, MD, GSK, Merck, Medicago, Sanofi, VBI, VIDO, Entos, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Isabel Leroux-Roels, PhD MD, Curevac: payment to my institution for the conduct of clinical trials|GSK: payment to my institution for the conduct of clinical trials|ICON Genetics: payment to my institution for the conduct of clinical trials|Janssen Vaccines (J&J): Board Member|Janssen Vaccines (J&J): payment to my institution for the conduct of clinical trials|Osivax: payment to my institution for the conduct of clinical trials Federico Martinon-Torres, MD, PhD, Assoc. Prof, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi, Merck, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, Biofabri, Janssen, Novavax: Advisor/Consultant|GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi, Merck, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, Biofabri, Janssen, Novavax: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi, Merck, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, Biofabri, Janssen, Novavax: Honoraria|GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi, Merck, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, Biofabri, Janssen, Novavax: Clínical trials fees paid to my institution Tino F. Schwarz, Prof. Dr. MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Advisor/Consultant Richard N. Van Zyl-Smit, PhD MD, MSD, Pfizer, GSK, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cipla, J&J, Glenmark: Advisor/Consultant|MSD, Pfizer, GSK, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cipla, J&J, Glenmark: Honoraria Nancy Dezutter, PhD, PharmD, GlaxoSmithKline: GSK employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Nathalie De Schrevel, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline: GSK employee Laurence Fissette, Master in Statistics, GlaxoSmithKline: GSK employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Marie-Pierre David, Master in Statistics, GlaxoSmithKline: GSK employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Marie Van Der Wielen, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: GSK employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Lusine Kostanyan, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: GSK employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Veronica Hulstrøm, PhD MD, GlaxoSmithKline: GSK employee.

96. A Candidate Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Prefusion F Protein Investigational Vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) Is Immunogenic when Administered in Adults ≥ 60 Years of Age: Results at 6 Months after Vaccination

Background

RSV infections are frequent and can lead to respiratory complications in older adults (OA). However, there is no licensed RSV vaccine yet. Here we present immunogenicity results up to month (M) 6 after vaccination with the RSVPreF3 OA.

Methods

In this phase 3 multi-country ongoing study (NCT04732871), adults ≥ 60 years of age were randomized (3:1:1) to receive RSVPreF3 OA and to be followed up for 3 years. All participants received a dose of RSVPreF3 on day (D) 1. Humoral immune (HI) and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses were measured in subsets of participants at pre-vaccination (D1), D31 and M6. HI outcomes included RSV-A and RSV-B neutralizing antibody (NAb) geometric mean titers (GMTs) and RSVPreF3-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs). The CMI response was assessed in terms of frequency of RSVPreF3-specific CD4⁺ T-cells and CD8⁺ T-cells expressing at least 2 activation markers including at least 1 cytokine among CD40L, 4-1BB, IL-2, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-13, IL-17 (polypositive T-cells).

Results

A total of 1653 participants received a dose of RSVPreF3 OA. Of these, 987 participants were included in the HI subset and 566 in the CMI subset at D1. The RSV-A and RSV-B GMTs and RSVPreF3-specific IgG GMCs increased between D1 and D31 followed by a decline until M6. At D31, RSV-A and RSV-B NAb GMTs were 10.5-fold and 7.8-fold higher than pre-vaccination (Figure), and RSVPreF3-specific IgG antibody GMCs was 12.2-fold higher than pre-vaccination levels. At M6, the RSV-A and RSV-B GMTs were 4.4-fold and 3.5-fold, and RSVPreF3-specific IgG antibody GMCs were 4.7-fold above pre-vaccination levels. The RSVPreF3-specific polypositive CD4⁺ T-cell median frequency (events/10⁶ cells) increased from 191 (below assay quantification limit) to 1339 at D31 and declined to 666 (above assay quantification limit) by M6. No RSVPreF3-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response was detected after RSVPreF3 OA vaccination.

Conclusion

In adults ≥ 60 years of age, 1 dose of RSVPreF3 OA was shown to be immunogenic, with both high HI and specific CMI responses at D31 post-vaccination and remained 3.5–4.7 fold above pre-vaccination levels at M6. This study will continue to monitor the immunogenicity of RSVPreF3 OA up to 3 years.

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.

Disclosures

Tino F. Schwarz, Prof. Dr. MD, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Pfizer, Alexion, Bavarian Nordic, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Biontech, MSD: Grants|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Honoraria John E. Ervin, MD, The Alliance for Multispecialty Research – KCM: Contractual agreement for conduct of study protocol Charles Andrews, MD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Institutional grant|Merck and Boehringer Ingelheim: Consulting fees outside of the submitted work Delphine Collete, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Stocks/Bonds Magali de Heusch, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Stocks/Bonds Nathalie De Schrevel, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Ownership Interest Bruno Salaun, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Stocks/Bonds Marc Lievens, MSc, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Stocks/Bonds Céline Maréchal, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Stocks/Bonds Phoebe Nakanwagi, Master’s in Biostatistics, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee Veronica Hulstrøm, PhD MD, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA: Employee.

Safety and immunogenicity of a respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVPreF3) candidate vaccine in older adults: phase I/II randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The aim was to investigate safety and immunogenicity of vaccine formulations against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) containing the stabilized prefusion conformation of RSV fusion protein (RSVPreF3).

METHODS

This phase I/II, randomized, controlled, observer-blind study enrolled 48 young adults (YA; 18-40 years) and 1005 older adults (OA; 60-80 years) between January and August 2019. Participants were randomized into equally sized groups to receive two doses of unadjuvanted (YA and OA) or AS01-adjuvanted (OA) vaccine or placebo two months apart. Vaccine safety and immunogenicity were assessed until one (YA) or 12 months (OA) after second vaccination.

RESULTS

The RSVPreF3 vaccines boosted humoral (RSVPreF3-specific IgG and RSV-A neutralizing antibody) responses, which increased in an antigen-concentration-dependent manner and were highest post-dose one. Compared to pre-vaccination, the geometric mean frequencies of polyfunctional CD4+ T-cells increased after each dose and were significantly higher in adjuvanted than unadjuvanted vaccinees. Post-vaccination immune responses persisted until end of follow-up. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild-to-moderate and transient. Despite a higher observed reactogenicity of AS01-containing vaccines, no safety concerns were identified for any assessed formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on safety and immunogenicity profiles, the AS01E-adjuvanted vaccine containing 120 μg of RSVPreF3 was selected for further clinical development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03814590; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03814590.

Safety of Timothy Grass Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet in Children: Pooled Analyses of Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Timothy grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets are indicated for children with allergic rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVE

To use pooled analyses to assess the short- and long-term tolerability and safety of timothy grass SLIT-tablet in children.

METHODS

Data from 9 double-blinded, randomized European or North American trials that included children with allergic rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis treated up to 3 years with once-daily timothy grass SLIT-tablet or placebo were pooled.

RESULTS

In all, 1818 (timothy grass SLIT-tablet, n = 923; placebo, n = 895) subjects were included in the analysis. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was 86% in the SLIT-tablet group and 83% in the placebo group, and the frequency of treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) was 59% and 23%, respectively. Most (98%) TRAEs were mild to moderate in severity. The 2 most common TRAEs with SLIT-tablet were oral pruritus (33%) and throat irritation (19%), which had a median onset of 1 day and recurrence of 14.5 and 5 days, respectively. In all, 8% of subjects in the SLIT-tablet group and 2% in the placebo group discontinued because of AEs. There were 7 serious AEs assessed as related to SLIT-tablet, 1 systemic allergic reaction (severe with a drop in blood pressure), 3 epinephrine administrations, no eosinophilic esophagitis events, and no serious airway obstructions. The safety profile was similar in subjects across geographic regions and with and without asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled data indicate that short- and long-term timothy grass SLIT-tablet is well tolerated in children, regardless of geographic region. AEs were generally local, mild, and transient allergic reactions.

Adipocyte size and cellular expression of caveolar proteins analyzed by confocal microscopy

Caveolae are abundant in adipocytes and are involved in the regulation of lipid accumulation, which is the main volume determinant of these cells. We have developed and applied a confocal microscopic technique for measuring individual cellular expression of the caveolar proteins cavin-1 and caveolin-1 along with the size of individual adipocytes. The technique was applied on collagenase isolated adipocytes from ad libitum fed Sprague-Dawley rats of different age (4–26 wk) and weight (103–629 g). We found that cellular expression of caveolar proteins was variable (SD of log expression in the range from 0.25 to 0.65). Regression analysis of protein expression on adipocyte size revealed that the expression of the caveolar proteins cavin-1 and caveolin-1 on adipocytes from individual rats was tightly related to adipocyte cell surface area (mean coefficient of regression was 0.83 for cavin and 0.77 for caveolin), indicating that caveolar density was the same in membranes from all cells within a biopsy. This intrinsic relation remained unchanged with animal age, but adipocytes from animals with increasing age showed a decrease in mean expression of caveolar proteins per unit cell surface. The different relation between adipocyte size and cellular expression levels of caveolar proteins within and between individuals of different age shows that caveolar density is an age-sensitive characteristic of adipocytes.

Adiponectin and its response to thiazolidinediones are associated with insulin-mediated glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetic patients and their first-degree relatives

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their first-degree relatives (FDRs) are characterized by hypoadiponectinaema and insulin resistance. In T2D patients, plasma adiponectin and insulin sensitivity (SI) increase in response to thiazolidinediones (TZDs). These findings suggest a role for adiponectin in the regulation of SI. We studied the relationship between plasma adiponectin and glucose and lipid metabolism and the effect of troglitazone (200 mg/day) for 12 weeks in 19 normoglycaemic, obese FDR and 20 obese T2D patients, using euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamps, glycolytic flux calculations and indirect calorimetry. Plasma adiponectin was similar in both groups, despite higher glucose disposal (Rd), glucose oxidation and glycolytic flux and lower lipid oxidation during insulin stimulation in FDR compared with T2D patients. Plasma adiponectin correlated with insulin-stimulated Rd, non-oxidative glucose disposal (NOGD), glucose storage and SI in both groups after adjustment for sex and body fat. The troglitazone-mediated upregulation of plasma adiponectin was associated with increased insulin-stimulated Rd, NOGD and glucose storage in both groups. No effect on endogenous glucose production was observed. In FDR, plasma adiponectin correlated with insulin-stimulated glycogen synthase activity and the troglitazone-induced increase in plasma adiponectin correlated with the improvement in insulin-stimulated Rd and SI after adjustment for sex and body fat. In conclusion, plasma adiponectin in weight-matched FDR and T2D patients is comparably low and correlates with insulin-mediated glucose uptake and storage. Moreover, these data provide evidence for an adiponectin-dependent insulin-sensitizing effect of TZDs at an early stage before development of T2D and that this effect is exerted mainly on insulin-mediated glucose metabolism.

Evaluation of metabolic risk markers in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Adiponectin, ghrelin, leptin and body composition in hirsute PCOS patients and controls

OBJECTIVE

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients are abdominally obese and are at increased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome. Low adiponectin and ghrelin levels in PCOS patients could be caused by insulin resistance as well as high testosterone levels.

DESIGN

Adiponectin and ghrelin levels were evaluated in 51 hirsute PCOS patients referred to the outpatient clinic of an academic, tertiary care medical centre and in 63 weight-matched female controls. Relationships between adiponectin, ghrelin, leptin, body composition, testosterone and insulin were examined.

METHODS

Measurements of body composition including waist-hip-ratio (WHR), body mass index (BMI) and whole body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan measures of body fat mass. Measurements of fasting levels of adiponectin, ghrelin, leptin, androgen status, oestradiol, lipid variables and insulin during follicular phase.

RESULTS

Adiponectin levels were significantly decreased in obese PCOS patients compared with weight-matched controls (geometric mean (-2 to 2 s.d.) 5.3 (2.5-11.1) vs 7.3 (3.0-17.4) mg/l, P<0.05). Mean ghrelin was significantly lower in hirsute PCOS patients than in controls (0.6 (0.3 to 1.4) vs 0.8 (0.4 to 1.7) microg/l, P<0.001) and this remained significant after subdividing subjects according to waist circumference and BMI. During multiple regression analysis, testosterone correlated positively with adiponectin and negatively with ghrelin independent of BMI, WHR and total fat mass.

CONCLUSION

Obese hirsute PCOS patients demonstrated significantly lower adiponectin levels than weight-matched controls suggesting a very high risk for the metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, ghrelin levels were decreased in hirsute PCOS patients and showed a significant, negative correlation with testosterone independent of body composition.