Stroke-related mortality analysis in Paraná, Brazil, over 10 years

BACKGROUND

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and disability around the world.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the age- and sex-specific mortality rates related to stroke in the state of Paraná, Brazil, between 2007 and 2016.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, residents in the state of Paraná were selected by death certificates (from 2007-2016); the basic cause of death was stroke. A descriptive analysis was performed, and mortality rates were calculated with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each year.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2016, there were 62,607 deaths in the state of Paraná due to stroke. Most individuals had medical assistance before death (85.7% in 2007 versus 83.9% in 2016), and most of these deaths occurred in hospitals (73.6% in 2007 versus 74.8% in 2016). Death rates due to stroke increased from 138 (95% CI 135-142) to 163 (95% CI 159-166) per 100,000 inhabitants. This raise occurred mainly in those over 79 years old. For the ages groups of 34 to 44 and 44 to 54 years, mortality rate decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

In the past 15 years, despite the advances in the diagnosis and treatment of stroke, there has been an increase in mortality due to stroke in the state of Paraná. This fact is possibly associated with the aging of the population because there was a more pronounced increase in the group over 79 years old. Thus, new health strategies are necessary to improve the survival and quality of life of poststroke individuals.

Store-and-forward teleneurology results in a large Brazilian city

Background Neurology is a high-demand specialty with long waiting lines. Some pathologies require rapid decision-making. Through technology, telemedicine can allow neurological patients to have faster access to specialized assessment. In store-and-forward telemedicine, the specialist physician evaluates data collected by a general practitioner and optimizes screening.

Objective The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of asynchronous telemedicine, used to refer patients from primary care to neurology, in the city of Curitiba, in southern Brazil.

Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients referred from primary care to neurology between September 2019 and February 2020. After a request is made by a general medical doctor for a specialist's opinion, 5 neurologists with complete access to patients' records are tasked with the decision-making. The main variables analyzed were clinical reasons for telemedicine request, neurologist decision, final diagnosis, indication for diagnostic procedures, and subsequent follow-up.

Results Between September 2019 and February 2020, 1,035 asynchronous telemedicine consultations were performed. Headache (30.43%), epilepsy (19.03%), and dementia (15.85%) accounted for almost two-thirds of the primary care requests; one-third of the cases (33.62%) required a complementary diagnostic procedure. More than 70% of the cases did not require face-to-face assessment by a neurologist.

Conclusions In this study, store-and-forward teleneurology successfully reduced the need for in-visit consultation in 70% of cases. Further studies should identify the best opportunities for teleneurology in the city of Curitiba to facilitate better integrated care between primary care providers and neurologists.

Is the Mini-Mental State Examination the best cognitive screening test for less educated people?

OBJECTIVE

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) results are strongly influenced by educational level. The Brief Cognitive Screening Battery (BCSB) is an alternative assessment tool that provides more accurate results in individuals with less education. Our aim was to compare the MMSE and BCSB as screening tests.

METHODS

The MMSE and BCSB were assessed in 112 participants by two evaluators blind to the other test's result. Participants were classified according to their level of education. The influence of education level was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and multiple comparison tests.

RESULTS

Scores of the MMSE (p < 0.0001) and the clock-drawing test (p < 0.0001) were influenced by education level but the delayed recall test score was not (p = 0.0804). The verbal fluency test (p = 0.00035) was influenced only by higher educational levels. It took three minutes less to apply the MMSE than to apply the BCSB (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the delayed recall test and the verbal fluency test of the BCSB are better than the MMSE and clock-drawing test as tools for evaluating cognition in people with limited education.