Abstract
Stimulant drugs used for treating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) increase signal-detection accuracy in five-choice serial reaction-time procedures. These increases may result from drug-induced increases in control exerted by the stimuli that prompt responses, which was assessed in the present study. Mice were trained with food reinforcement to nose poke into one of five holes after its illumination (signal), and effects of methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and pentobarbital were assessed. Subsequently, the time from trial onset to signal was changed from fixed to variable for one group of subjects. A 'warning' stimulus (change in ambient lighting) preceding the signal was added for a second group. Effects of the drugs were reassessed. Dose-related increases in accuracy of signal detection (nose pokes in hole where a signal was displayed) were obtained with methylphenidate and d-amphetamine, but not with pentobarbital. When the presignal time was variable, increases in signal detection were not obtained with either stimulant. When a warning stimulus preceded the signal, the increases in accuracy were similar to those obtained without the warning stimulus. Hence, a procedure that increased vigilance demand (using a variable prestimulus period) eliminated the effects of drugs useful in treating ADHD, whereas a procedure that decreased vigilance demand (adding the warning light) had no appreciable effects on the response to stimulant drugs. Taken together, the present results suggest that the five-choice serial reaction-time has predictive validity for selecting drugs effective for treating ADHD, although effects can depend critically on the stimulus conditions used and the vigilance required by the procedure.
Collapse