Ligand-Free Signaling of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: Physiology, Pharmacology, and Genetics

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous sensors and regulators of cellular functions. Each GPCR exists in complex aggregates with multiple resting and active conformations. Designed to detect weak stimuli, GPCRs can also activate spontaneously, resulting in basal ligand-free signaling. Agonists trigger a cascade of events leading to an activated agonist-receptor G-protein complex with high agonist affinity. However, the ensuing signaling process can further remodel the receptor complex to reduce agonist affinity, causing rapid ligand dissociation. The acutely activated ligand-free receptor can continue signaling, as proposed for rhodopsin and μ opioid receptors, resulting in robust receptor activation at low agonist occupancy with enhanced agonist potency. Continued receptor stimulation can further modify the receptor complex, regulating sustained ligand-free signaling-proposed to play a role in opioid dependence. Basal, acutely agonist-triggered, and sustained elevated ligand-free signaling could each have distinct functions, reflecting multi-state conformations of GPCRs. This review addresses basal and stimulus-activated ligand-free signaling, its regulation, genetic factors, and pharmacological implications, focusing on opioid and serotonin receptors, and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR). The hypothesis is proposed that ligand-free signaling of 5-HT2A receptors mediate therapeutic effects of psychedelic drugs. Research avenues are suggested to close the gaps in our knowledge of ligand-free GPCR signaling.

Transport of Maternally Administered Pharmaceutical Agents Across the Placental Barrier In Vitro

To understand the transport of pharmaceutical agents and their effects on developing fetus, we have created a placental microsystem that mimics structural phenotypes and physiological characteristic of a placental barrier. We have shown the formation of a continuous network of epithelial adherens junctions and endothelial cell-cell junctions confirming the integrity of the placental barrier. More importantly, the formation of elongated microvilli under dynamic flow condition is demonstrated. Fluid shear stress acts as a mechanical cue triggering the microvilli formation. Pharmaceutical agents were administered to the maternal channel, and the concentration of pharmaceutical agents in fetal channel for coculture and control models were evaluated. In fetal channel, the coculture model exhibited about 2.5 and 2.2% of the maternal initial concentration for naltrexone and 6β-naltrexol, respectively. In acellular model, fetal channel showed about 10.5 and 10.3% of the maternal initial concentration for naltrexone and 6β-naltrexol, respectively. Gene expressions of epithelial cells after direct administration of naltrexone and 6β-naltrexol to the maternal channel and endothelial cells after exposure due to transport through placental barrier are also reported.

Biased Opioid Antagonists as Modulators of Opioid Dependence: Opportunities to Improve Pain Therapy and Opioid Use Management

Opioid analgesics are effective pain therapeutics but they cause various adverse effects and addiction. For safer pain therapy, biased opioid agonists selectively target distinct μ opioid receptor (MOR) conformations, while the potential of biased opioid antagonists has been neglected. Agonists convert a dormant receptor form (MOR-μ) to a ligand-free active form (MOR-μ*), which mediates MOR signaling. Moreover, MOR-μ converts spontaneously to MOR-μ* (basal signaling). Persistent upregulation of MOR-μ* has been invoked as a hallmark of opioid dependence. Contrasting interactions with both MOR-μ and MOR-μ* can account for distinct pharmacological characteristics of inverse agonists (naltrexone), neutral antagonists (6β-naltrexol), and mixed opioid agonist-antagonists (buprenorphine). Upon binding to MOR-μ*, naltrexone but not 6β-naltrexol suppresses MOR-μ*signaling. Naltrexone blocks opioid analgesia non-competitively at MOR-μ*with high potency, whereas 6β-naltrexol must compete with agonists at MOR-μ, accounting for ~100-fold lower in vivo potency. Buprenorphine's bell-shaped dose-response curve may also result from opposing effects on MOR-μ and MOR-μ*. In contrast, we find that 6β-naltrexol potently prevents dependence, below doses affecting analgesia or causing withdrawal, possibly binding to MOR conformations relevant to opioid dependence. We propose that 6β-naltrexol is a biased opioid antagonist modulating opioid dependence at low doses, opening novel avenues for opioid pain therapy and use management.

Kinetics and inhibition of the formation of 6beta-naltrexol from naltrexone in human liver cytosol

AIMS

To determine the kinetics of the formation of 6beta-naltrexol from naltrexone in human liver cytosol, and to investigate the role of potential inhibitors.

METHODS

The kinetics of the formation of 6 beta-naltrexol from naltrexone were examined in eight human liver cytosol preparations using h.p.l.c. to quantify 6 beta-naltrexol and, the extent of inhibition of 6 beta-naltrexol formation was determined using chemical inhibitors. The formation of 6 beta-naltrexol and the back reaction of 6 beta-naltrexol to naltrexone were also examined in a microsomal preparation.

RESULTS

The Vmax, Km and CLint values for the formation of 6 beta-naltrexol from naltrexone were in the ranges of 16-45 nmol mg-1 protein h-1, 17-53 microM and 0.3-2.2 ml h-1 mg-1 protein, respectively. The steroid hormones testosterone (Ki = 0.3 +/- 0.1 microM) and dihydrotestosterone (Ki = 0.7 +/- 0.4 microM) were the most potent competitive inhibitors of 6 beta-naltrexol formation, with naloxone, menadione and corticosterone also producing > 50% inhibition at a concentration of 100 microM. The opioid agonists morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone and hydromorphone, and a range of benzodiazepines showed < 20% inhibition at 100 microM. In the microsomal preparation, there was no formation of naltrexone from 6beta-naltrexol nor any formation of 6beta-naltrexol from naltrexone.

CONCLUSIONS

The intersubject variability in the kinetic parameters of 6beta-naltrexol formation could play a role in the efficacy of and patient compliance with naltrexone treatment. This variability could be due in part to a genetic polymorphism of the dihydrodiol dehydrogenase DD4, one of the enzymes reported to be responsible for the formation of 6beta-naltrexol from naltrexone. DD4 also has hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity which could account for the potent inhibition by the steroid hormones testosterone and dihydrotestosterone. The clinical significance of the latter finding remains to be established.