1
|
Clark AD, Myers TC, Steury TD, Krzton A, Yanes J, Barber A, Barry J, Barua S, Eaton K, Gosavi D, Nance R, Pervaiz Z, Ugochukwu C, Hartman P, Stevison LS. Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in biology. PeerJ 2024; 12:e16824. [PMID: 38436005 PMCID: PMC10906259 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Authors are often faced with the decision of whether to maximize traditional impact metrics or minimize costs when choosing where to publish the results of their research. Many subscription-based journals now offer the option of paying an article processing charge (APC) to make their work open. Though such "hybrid" journals make research more accessible to readers, their APCs often come with high price tags and can exclude authors who lack the capacity to pay to make their research accessible. Here, we tested if paying to publish open access in a subscription-based journal benefited authors by conferring more citations relative to closed access articles. We identified 146,415 articles published in 152 hybrid journals in the field of biology from 2013-2018 to compare the number of citations between various types of open access and closed access articles. In a simple generalized linear model analysis of our full dataset, we found that publishing open access in hybrid journals that offer the option confers an average citation advantage to authors of 17.8 citations compared to closed access articles in similar journals. After taking into account the number of authors, Journal Citation Reports 2020 Quartile, year of publication, and Web of Science category, we still found that open access generated significantly more citations than closed access (p < 0.0001). However, results were complex, with exact differences in citation rates among access types impacted by these other variables. This citation advantage based on access type was even similar when comparing open and closed access articles published in the same issue of a journal (p < 0.0001). However, by examining articles where the authors paid an article processing charge, we found that cost itself was not predictive of citation rates (p = 0.14). Based on our findings of access type and other model parameters, we suggest that, in the case of the 152 journals we analyzed, paying for open access does confer a citation advantage. For authors with limited budgets, we recommend pursuing open access alternatives that do not require paying a fee as they still yielded more citations than closed access. For authors who are considering where to submit their next article, we offer additional suggestions on how to balance exposure via citations with publishing costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda D. Clark
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
- Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Tanner C. Myers
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Todd D. Steury
- College of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Ali Krzton
- Auburn University Libraries, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Julio Yanes
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Angela Barber
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Jacqueline Barry
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Subarna Barua
- Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Katherine Eaton
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Devadatta Gosavi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Rebecca Nance
- Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Zahida Pervaiz
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Chidozie Ugochukwu
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Patricia Hartman
- Auburn University Libraries, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Laurie S. Stevison
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
White RKA, Angelo A, Fitchett D, Fraser M, Hayes L, Howie J, Richardson E, White B. Only two out of five articles by New Zealand researchers are free-to-access: a multiple API study of access, citations, cost of Article Processing Charges (APC), and the potential to increase the proportion of open access. PeerJ 2021; 9:e11417. [PMID: 34123586 PMCID: PMC8164411 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We studied journal articles published by researchers at all eight New Zealand universities in 2017 to determine how many were freely accessible on the web. We wrote software code to harvest data from multiple sources, code that we now share to enable others to reproduce our work on their own sample set. In May 2019, we ran our code to determine which of the 2017 articles were open at that time and by what method; where those articles would have incurred an Article Processing Charge (APC) we calculated the cost if those charges had been paid. Where articles were not freely available we determined whether the policies of publishers in each case would have allowed deposit in a non-commercial repository (Green open access). We also examined citation rates for different types of access. We found that, of our 2017 sample set, about two out of every five articles were freely accessible without payment or subscription (41%). Where research was explicitly said to be funded by New Zealand’s major research funding agencies, the proportion was slightly higher at 45%. Where open articles would have incurred an APC we estimated an average cost per article of USD1,682 (for publications where all articles require an APC, that is, Gold open access) and USD2,558 (where APC payment is optional, Hybrid open access) at a total estimated cost of USD1.45m. Of the paid options, Gold is by far more common for New Zealand researchers (82% Gold, 18% Hybrid). In terms of citations, our analysis aligned with previous studies that suggest a correlation between publications being freely accessible and, on balance, slightly higher rates of citation. This is not seen across all types of open access, however, with Diamond OA achieving the lowest rates. Where articles were not freely accessible we found that a very large majority of them (88% or 3089 publications) could have been legally deposited in an institutional repository. Similarly, only in a very small number of cases had a version deposited in the repository of a New Zealand university made the difference between the publication being freely accessible or not (125 publications). Given that most New Zealand researchers support research being open, there is clearly a large gap between belief and practice in New Zealand’s research ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anton Angelo
- Library, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Deborah Fitchett
- Learning, Teaching and Library, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Moira Fraser
- Library, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Luqman Hayes
- Library, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jessica Howie
- Library, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Emma Richardson
- Libraries and Learning Services, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Bruce White
- Office of the Provost, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clayson PE, Baldwin SA, Larson MJ. The open access advantage for studies of human electrophysiology: Impact on citations and Altmetrics. Int J Psychophysiol 2021; 164:103-111. [PMID: 33774077 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Barriers to accessing scientific findings contribute to knowledge inequalities based on financial resources and decrease the transparency and rigor of scientific research. Recent initiatives aim to improve access to research as well as methodological rigor via transparency and openness. We sought to determine the impact of such initiatives on open access publishing in the sub-area of human electrophysiology and the impact of open access on the attention articles received in the scholarly literature and other outlets. Data for 35,144 articles across 967 journals from the last 20 years were examined. Approximately 35% of articles were open access, and the rate of publication of open-access articles increased over time. Open access articles showed 9 to 21% more PubMed and CrossRef citations and 39% more Altmetric mentions than closed access articles. Green open access articles (i.e., author archived) did not differ from non-green open access articles (i.e., publisher archived) with respect to citations and were related to higher Altmetric mentions. These findings demonstrate that open-access publishing is increasing in popularity in the sub-area of human electrophysiology and that open-access articles enjoy the "open access advantage" in citations similar to the larger scientific literature. The benefit of the open access advantage may motivate researchers to make their publications open access and pursue publication outlets that support it. In consideration of the direct connection between citations and journal impact factor, journal editors may improve the accessibility and impact of published articles by encouraging authors to self-archive manuscripts on preprint servers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E Clayson
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America.
| | - Scott A Baldwin
- Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States of America
| | - Michael J Larson
- Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States of America; Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|