The role of public policy in reducing moped and scooter injuries in South Carolina

INTRODUCTION

Mopeds and electric scooters have grown in popularity in recent years. A South Carolina (SC) law was passed on November 19, 2018, aimed to regulate mopeds and scooters. This study aims to evaluate whether this SC law was associated with a decrease in the moped injury rate in a Level 1 Trauma Center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of trauma registry data was used to identify a cohort of patients 14 years and older who came to a Level 1 trauma center for a moped/scooter accident between January 2014 - December 2022. The proportion of moped injuries before and after the passing of the law was calculated. The chi-square test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were used to compare differences in proportions for categorical factors and continuous factors, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 350 moped injury cases were identified. There was a significant decrease in the moped injury rate after the passing of the 2018 SC law (0.9 % vs 1.8 %, p<0.001). Additionally, those treated post-law implementation were significantly older (47.4 vs 43.2 years, p = 0.013) and more likely to be male (95.5 % vs 87.9 %, p = 0.025) than those treated pre-law. Patients treated post-law were significantly more likely to be uninsured (45.1 % vs 42.7 %, p = 0.009) and less likely to have commercial (16.2 % vs 20.1 %, p = 0.009), or government (29.7 % vs 35.6 %, p = 0.009) health insurance compared to those treated pre-law. There was no significant difference between the two groups in Glascow Coma Scale, Injury severity score, Trauma Injury Severity Score, or rate of fatalities.

CONCLUSION

After the implementation of a SC law, we found that the local proportion of injuries due to moped and scooter accidents was significantly lower than pre-law proportions. These findings suggest that public policies aimed at increasing regulations for mopeds may decrease the rate of injury, but not severity, from moped use.

Comparison of injuries among motorcycle, moped and bicycle traffic accident victims

OBJECTIVE

Motorcycles, moped scooters and bicycles are commonly involved in traffic accidents and riders often suffer significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare and categorize the different injury patterns and fractures suffered by riders of each vehicle type after a traffic accident.

METHODS

Data from a level 1 trauma center in Las Vegas, Nevada were analyzed. Traffic accident victims riding a motorcycle, moped, or bicycle from 2013 to 2017 were included. Injury location and fracture location were assigned to six and sixteen categorical locations, respectively. Descriptive statistics, including frequency counts for categorical data and mean for continuous data, were calculated for the full sample and for each of the vehicle types. Logistic regression was performed on race, categorized age, vehicle type and helmet use to calculate adjusted odds ratios for injury type between the three groups.

RESULTS

Of the 2115 patients, 1372 were motorcyclists, 356 were moped scooter riders and 387 were bicyclists. Overall the vast majority of injuries reported were of the extremities or pelvic girdle (62.2%), and this was true regardless of vehicle type. Head and neck injuries were significantly more common in bicyclists (39.5%) and moped riders (34.6%), than in motorcyclists (22.7%). Helmet use was substantially lower in the moped (34%) and bicycle (20%) groups compared to the motorcycle group (85%). The most common fractures regardless of vehicle type were of the skull/face, rib, vertebral, and tibia/fibula with slight variations between vehicle groups.

CONCLUSION

Similarities were seen in the most common fracture and injury patterns between the three groups. Head and neck injuries were much more common in moped and bicycle riders compared to motorcyclists. This is most likely due to the significantly higher percentage of motorcycle riders who wore a helmet. Counseling regarding helmet and protective equipment use, especially among moped and bicycle riders is essential to reduce head injuries.

Traumatic brain injury among two-wheeled motor vehicle riders in Utsunomiya, Japan: a comparison between mopeds and motorcycles

PURPOSE

Two-wheeled motor vehicles are dichotomized into mopeds and motorcycles (MCs) based on their engine capacity. While efforts have been made, mostly by European researchers, to evaluate the possible difference in the frequency/severity of riders' traumatic brain injury (TBI) between the two categories, the results have been inconsistent.

METHODS

To evaluate whether such differences exist in Japan, a single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted on two-wheeled motor vehicle riders wearing a helmet during high-energy road traffic accident (RTA). Between January 2011 and December 2017, 127 moped and 128 MC helmeted riders involved in RTAs had been treated in our institution.

RESULTS

Moped riders were significantly older than MC riders (50.7 ± 25.0 years vs. 35.1 ± 18.6 years, p = 0.04). The frequency of TBI was significantly higher in moped riders than in MC riders (21.3% vs. 10.9%; p = 0.03). However, the frequency of other bodily injuries did not differ significantly. Among the riders with TBI, neither injury severity nor outcomes differed significantly. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the presence of altered mental status was predictive of TBI (OR 23.398; 95% CI 9.187-59.586; p < 0.001). Moped riders trended to have a higher likelihood of sustaining TBI (OR 2.122; 95% CI 0.870-5.178; p = 0.098).

CONCLUSIONS

Mopeds are frequently utilized by elderly in Japan, which may have been causally associated with the higher frequency of TBI in moped riders, while other causes, including the difference in helmet type, may also be involved. This study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective design, and multi-center prospective studies are warranted.

Investigate moped-car conflicts in China using a naturalistic driving study approach

PROBLEM

Mopeds are a popular transportation mode in Europe and Asia. Moped-related traffic accidents account for a large proportion of crash fatalities. To develop moped-related crash countermeasures, it is important to understand the characteristics of moped-related conflicts.

METHOD

Naturalistic driving study data were collected in Shanghai, China from 36 car drivers. The data included 2,878h and 78,296km driven from 13,149 trips. Moped-car conflicts were identified and examined from the passenger car driver's perspective using kinematic trigger algorithms and manual video reduction.

RESULTS

A total of 119 moped-car conflicts were identified, including 74 high g-force conflicts and 45 low g-force events. These conflicts were classified into 22 on-road configurations where both similarities and differences were found as compared to Western Countries. The majority of the conflicts occurred on secondary main roads and branch roads. Hard braking was the primary response that the car drivers made to these conflicts rather than hard steering.

DISCUSSIONS

The identified on-road vehicle-moped conflict configurations in Shanghai, China may be attributed to the complicated traffic environment and risky behavior of moped riders. The lower prevalence of hard steering in Shanghai as compared to the United States may be due to the lower speeds at event onsets or less available steering space, e.g., less available shoulder area on Chinese urban roads.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of moped-car conflicts may impact the design of active safety countermeasures on passenger cars. The pilot data from Shanghai urban areas suggest that countermeasures developed for China may require some modifications to those developed for the United States and European countries, although this recommendation may not be conclusive given the small sample size of the study. Future studies with large samples may help better understand the characteristics of moped-car conflicts.

Impact of Helmet Use on Injury and Financial Burden of Motorcycle and Moped Crashes in Hawai'i: Analysis of a Linked Statewide Database

Helmet use reduces injury severity, disability, hospital length of stay, and hospital charges in motorcycle riders. The public absorbs billions of dollars annually in hospital charges for unhelmeted, uninsured motorcycle riders. We sought to quantify, on a statewide level, the healthcare burden of unhelmeted motorcycle and moped riders. We examined 1,965 emergency medical service (EMS) reports from motorcycle and moped crashes in Hawai'i between 2007-2009. EMS records were linked to hospital medical records to assess associations between vehicle type, helmet use, medical charges, diagnoses, and final disposition. Unhelmeted riders of either type of vehicle suffered more head injuries, especially skull fractures (adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 4.48, P < .001, compared to helmeted riders). Motorcyclists without helmets were nearly three times more likely to die (adjusted OR 2.85, P = .001). Average medical charges were almost 50% higher for unhelmeted motorcycle and moped riders, with a significant (P = .006) difference between helmeted ($27,176) and unhelmeted ($40,217) motorcycle riders. Unhelmeted riders were twice as likely to self-pay (19.3%, versus 9.8% of helmeted riders), and more likely to have Medicaid or a similar income-qualifying insurance plan (13.5% versus 5.0%, respectively). Protective associations with helmet use are stronger among motorcyclists than moped riders, suggesting the protective effect is augmented in higher speed crashes. The public financial burden is higher from unhelmeted riders who sustain more severe injuries and are less likely to be insured.

Powered two-wheeler drivers' risk of hitting a pedestrian in towns

INTRODUCTION

The risk of collision between pedestrians and powered two-wheelers is poorly understood today. The objective of this research is to determine the risk for powered two-wheeler drivers of hitting and injuring a pedestrian per kilometer driven in towns and to compare this risk with that run by four-wheeled vehicle drivers.

METHOD

Using the bodily injury accidents recorded by the police on nine roads in the city of Marseille in 2011 and a campaign of observations of powered two-wheeler traffic, we estimated the risk per kilometer driven by powered two-wheeler drivers of hitting a pedestrian and compared it with the risk run by four-wheeled vehicle drivers.

RESULTS

The results show that the risk for powered two-wheeler drivers of hitting and injuring a pedestrian is significantly higher than the risk run by four-wheeled vehicle drivers. On the nine roads studied, it is on average 3.33 times higher (95% CI: 1.63; 6.78). Taking four more years into account made it possible to consolidate these results and to tighten the confidence interval.

CONCLUSION

There does indeed seem to be problems in the interactions between pedestrians and powered two-wheeler users in urban traffic. These interaction problems lead to a higher risk of hitting and injuring a pedestrian for powered two-wheeler drivers than for four-wheeled vehicle drivers. The analysis of the police reports suggests that part of this increased risk comes from filtering maneuvers by powered two-wheelers.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Possible countermeasures deal with the urban street layout. Measures consisting in reducing the width and the number of traffic lanes to a strict minimum and installing medians or pedestrian islands could be an effective way for the prevention of urban accidents between pedestrians and powered two-wheelers.

Powered two-wheeler drivers' crash risk associated with the use of bus lanes

CONTEXT

Authorizing powered two-wheeler drivers to drive in lanes reserved to buses is a measure that is sometimes mentioned to improve mobility conditions for these users. But what effect would this measure have on the safety of these users and on the safety of the other users with whom they share the traffic space?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to contribute elements to help answer this question. More precisely, the objective is to estimate the risk of having an accident per kilometer driven by powered two-wheeler drivers who drive in bus lanes and to compare this risk with that of powered two-wheeler drivers who drive in general traffic lanes.

METHOD

Using the bodily injury accidents recorded by the police over two years on 13 roads in the city of Marseille and a campaign of periodical observations of powered two-wheeler traffic, we estimated the risk per kilometer driven by powered two-wheeler drivers who drive in bus lanes and compared it with that of drivers who do not drive in them.

RESULTS

The results show that the risk for powered two-wheeler drivers who drive in bus lanes of being involved in a bodily injury accident is significantly higher than the risk run by drivers who drive in general traffic lanes. For the 13 roads studied, it is on average 3.25 times higher (95% CI: 2.03; 5.21).

CONCLUSION

In the current situation, powered two-wheeler drivers who drive in bus lanes are less safe than those who drive in general traffic lanes. The analysis of police reports suggests that part of this increased risk comes from collisions between automobile drivers turning right and powered two-wheelers driving in the bus lane who continue straight ahead.