"It's a big added stress on top of being so ill": The challenges facing people prescribed cannabis in the UK

BACKGROUND

This paper reports on the first qualitative study to interview people prescribed cannabis in the UK. Cannabis is a class B controlled substance under the 1971 Misuse of Drugs (MoD) Act, but a 2018 change to UK regulations provided for the prescription of cannabis for medical purposes. Relatively few people have been able to access a prescription, despite this policy change. This paper examines their experiences.

METHODS

Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 people with a prescription for cannabis, or their carers. Data was analysed using a reflextive thematic analysis approach. The findings are discussed using a zemiology (social harms) perspective which provides a language for critical reflection on the current cannabis policy context.

RESULTS

All participants reported that cannabis had significantly improved their mental and/or physical health, across a broad range of conditions. Many had been able to reduce their use of conventional medicines and reported that cannabis had relatively few side effects. Despite the potentially life-enhancing benefits of cannabis medicine, patients in the UK face multiple barriers to access. These include a lack of funding streams, bureaucratic supply problems, and a lack of training for doctors and police. Even for the few people able to obtain a prescription, the ongoing criminalisation of cannabis in the UK contributed to their experiences of stigmatisation. This often made it difficult and anxiety-inducing to take their medicine in public spaces.

CONCLUSION

The UK government's lack of implementation of medical cannabis legalisation, combined with their ongoing prohibition position, is producing multiple harms to people who need cannabis medicine. The policy context is perpetuating stigmatising attitudes to cannabis which, as we demonstrate, contribute to social harms. We make recommendations on equality of patient access, and highlight the importance of education and policy change as means of combatting stigma.

Following Affirmative and Negated Rules

Rules are often stated in a negated manner ("no trespassing") rather than in an affirmative manner ("stay in your lane"). Here, we build on classic research on negation processing and, using a finger-tracking design on a touchscreen, we show that following negated rather than affirmative rules is harder as indicated by multiple performance measures. Moreover, our results indicate that practice has a surprisingly limited effect on negated rules, which are implemented more quickly with training, but this effect comes at the expense of reduced efficiency. Only affirmative rules are thus put into action efficiently, highlighting the importance of tailoring how rules are communicated to the peculiarities of the human mind.

In utero and childhood exposure to alcohol and old age mortality: Evidence from the temperance movement in the US

Previous research suggests the relevance of in-utero insults and early-life circumstances for a wide array of life cycle outcomes. This research note joins this strand of studies by exploring the long-run mortality effects of in-utero and early-life exposure to alcohol accessibility. In so doing, we take advantage of the prohibition movement during the early part of the twentieth century that generated quasi-natural reductions in alcohol consumption. We use Social Security Administration Death Master Files linked to the full-count 1940 census and compare the longevity of male individuals exposed to the prohibition during in-utero and early childhood (1900-1930) as a result of statewide and federal alcohol ban to those wet counties after the law change to before. The results suggest an intent-to-treat effect of 0.17 years higher longevity as a result of prohibition. A back-of-an-envelope calculation suggests a minimum treatment-on-treated effect of 1.7 years impact. Furthermore, we show that these effects are not driven by other county-level demographic and socioeconomic changes, endogenous selection of births, and preexisting trends in the outcome. Our findings contribute to the growing body of research that explores the in-utero and childhood circumstances on long-term health outcomes.

Nine Insights From 10 Years of Legal Cannabis for Nonmedical Purposes

Whereas the 20th century could be largely characterized as the age of cannabis prohibition, the 21st century may ultimately be known as the era of cannabis legalization. Although several countries and subnational jurisdictions have relaxed laws to allow cannabis to be used for medical purposes, the policy landscape shifted dramatically in 2012 when voters in Colorado and Washington passed ballot initiatives to allow cannabis to be sold to adults for nonmedical purposes. Since then, Canada, Uruguay, and Malta have legalized nonmedical cannabis, and >47% of the US population live in states that have passed laws allowing commercial production and for-profit retail sales. Some countries are now implementing pilot programs for legal supply (eg, the Netherlands, Switzerland), and others are seriously contemplating changing their laws (eg, Germany, Mexico). This commentary offers 9 insights from the first 10 years of legal cannabis for nonmedical purposes, with the goal of informing policy discussions in places considering, implementing, or revising their approach to cannabis legalization: (1) cannabis prices are declining in places with commercial regimes and this matters for several outcomes; (2) noncommercial models are being implemented and seriously considered in some places; (3) policy discussions about cannabis taxes are evolving; (4) the number of cannabis products available in commercial regimes is proliferating; (5) emerging research on higher potency cannabis products raises some public health concerns, but there is still a lot to learn; (6) social equity is playing a larger role in many legalization debates; (7) it takes time to move consumers to the legal market; (8) data collection about cannabis consumption is getting better, but there is much work to do; and (9) ongoing methodological advances should improve our understanding of cannabis policy changes.

Impact of three years of prohibition on extent and pattern of alcohol use in Bihar: Observations and insights from the National Family Health Survey

Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 was promulgated in the state and a complete prohibition on alcohol was declared within the state of Bihar. We aimed to assess the impact of the prohibition on extent and pattern of alcohol use in the state of Bihar using the National Family Health Survey data. We also compared the data from Bihar with the data for the whole country, its neighbouring states and the state of Gujarat. There was a 41.78% reduction in the proportion of men who reported alcohol use in Bihar. Among those who reported alcohol use proportion of those who used 'almost every day' reduced by 29.72%. There was a 69.56% reduction in the proportion of women in Bihar who reported alcohol use. There was a significant increase in proportion of men reporting use of tadi madi and country liquor. Since the prohibition of alcohol in the state of Bihar there has been a reduction in self-reported alcohol use among men and women. However, alcohol use continues to be reported in the state even after the prohibition. There are states in the country that have similar extent of alcohol use as compared to Bihar, despite lack of prohibition. This warrants a relook at the policy to address what the prohibition could not achieve.

Paulo Freire: Review of "The Pedagogy of the Oppressed" : 1st Edition, Penguin Random House UK, London, 2017

Book review of “The Pedagogy of the Oppressed” by Paulo Freire.

No smoking signs with strong smoking symbols induce weak cravings: an fMRI and EEG study

No smoking signs (NSSs) that combine smoking symbols (SSs) and prohibition symbols (PSs) represent common examples of reward and prohibition competition. To evaluate how SSs within NSSs influence their effectiveness in guiding reward vs. prohibition, we studied 93 male smokers. We collected self-reported craving ratings (N=30), cue reactivity under fMRI/EEG (N=33), and smoking-behavior anticipation for paired NSSs and SSs (N=30). We found that NSS-induced cravings were negatively correlated with SS-induced cravings and PS-induced inhibition. fMRI indicated that both correlations were mediated by activation of the inferior frontal gyrus and precuneus, suggesting that the effects of SSs and PSs interact with each other. EEG revealed that the prohibition response occurs after the cigarette response, indicating that the cigarette response might be precluded by the prohibition, supporting the effect of SSs in discouraging smoking. Moreover, stronger SSs induced stronger slow positive waves and late positive potentials, and the stronger the late positive potentials, the stronger the late positive potentials. Both the amplitudes of late positive potentials and slow positive waves were positively correlated with the amplitude of N2, which was positively correlated with the attention grabbed score by the NSS. In addition, the weaker the NSS-induced craving, the greater the smoking behavior anticipation reduction, indicating the capability of NSSs to decrease smoking behavior. Our study provides empirical evidence for selecting the most effective NSSs: those combining strong SS and PS, offering insights about competition between cigarette reward and prohibition and providing neural evidence on how cigarette reward and prohibition interact.

"We Who Champion the Unborn": Racial Poisons, Eugenics, and the Campaign for Prohibition

Dr. Caleb Williams Saleeby was the author of Parenthood and Race Culture, one of the first monographs on eugenics and the book that popularized the term "racial poison." The goal of eradicating the racial poisons and the harm they caused - particularly infant morbidity and mortality - provided common ground for early 20th century reformers, and their concerns fed the growing support for legal prohibition of alcohol.

[Alcohol as cultural asset-a historical, anthropological, and therapeutic perspective on alcohol consumption and its social role in western societies]

Alkohol ist die dominante Droge in westlichen Gesellschaften mit einer Geschichte, die sich vom Mittelalter über die Kolonialzeit bis in die Gegenwart zieht. Die historische Variabilität seines Konsums hat schon immer das Verständnis alkoholbezogener Probleme beeinflusst. Bis heute sind der öffentliche Diskurs über Suchterkrankungen und die Gestaltung des Versorgungssystems von Versatzstücken überholter Theorien geprägt, was zur Stigmatisierung und Diskriminierung betroffener Personen beitragen kann. Neben einem Überblick über die historische Entwicklung des Alkoholkonsums wird die soziokulturelle Diversität im Umgang und in der Einschätzung des Alkoholgebrauchs in westlichen Gesellschaften beleuchtet und ihre Relevanz für klinische Interventionen bewertet. Die Gründung einer bundesweiten Taskforce zur Gestaltung des Versorgungssystems wird empfohlen, um Kurzinterventionen und weitere wirksame Verfahren in der klinischen Praxis zu implementieren.

A multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for evaluating and appraising government policy responses to non medical heroin use

BACKGROUND

Globally, non-medical heroin use is generating significant public health and social harms, and drug policy about heroin is a controversial field that encompasses many complex issues. Policy responses to illegal heroin markets have varied from militarized eradication of the opium poppy and harsh punishment of users, to more tolerant harm reduction approaches with decriminalized possession and use.

METHODS

This paper reports the outcomes of a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) on four generic regulatory regimes of heroin: prohibition, decriminalisation, state control and free market. Invited experts on drug harms, addiction, criminology and drug policy developed a comprehensive set of 27 policy outcome criteria against which these drug policy regimes were assessed.

RESULTS

State control of heroin was identified as the preferred policy option although other policy regimes scored better on specific outcome criteria. The free market model scored better than decriminalisation, with absolute prohibition scoring worst on every criterium. The ranking of the regimes was robust to variations in the criterion-specific weights.

CONCLUSION

The implications of these findings for the development of future policy responses to heroin and opioids generally are discussed in detail. Despite increasing overdose deaths and an opioid epidemic in North America, prohibition remains the predominant policy approach to heroin regulation at present. It is hoped that the current paper adds to the discussion of finding a valid regulatory alternative.

Tracing a path for opium gum from Mexico as a safe supply harm reduction measure for Canada

Historically, the poppy plant has had multiple uses including as a food product and with medical uses in pain relief; today it is most commonly known as the plant from which heroin is derived. The United Nations international drug control regime currently only allows legal poppy production for medical use in 19 countries. Although Mexico is the third largest illegal poppy producer in the world, no Latin American country is currently allowed to legally produce poppies. Meanwhile, the United States and Canada are experiencing an overdose crisis due in large part to the adulteration and substitution of heroin with fentanyl and its analogues, while the price of opium gum has dropped 80% in the last two years in poppy producing areas of Mexico. The prohibition of opium has wide ranging health and development impacts that bring up a moral imperative regarding the safe supply of diverse opium-based products -including opium gum and heroin- that urgently need to be explored and addressed. Opium gum can be used orally or smoked, reducing riskier modes of administration and possible fatal overdoses. This article discusses the political and legal possibilities of safely supplying opium gum and manually extracted heroin from Mexico to Canada as a public health, harm reduction and development policy.

"The Offspring of Drunkards": Gender, Welfare, and the Eugenic Politics of Birth Control and Alcohol Reform in the United States

The social politics of women's alcohol use is controversial given current debates over maternal-fetal health, fetal alcohol syndrome, and debates about welfare. Exploring the early twentieth century intersections of Prohibition, birth control reform, and alcohol politics reveals the historical roots of current recommendations surrounding women, alcohol, and public assistance.

Evaluating trends and stakeholders in the international drug control regime complex

This article examines the recent trends in international, in particular multilateral, drug policy and the implications of these changes for shifting alignments and coalitions of actors and stakeholders. It places these changes in the context of the system's historical developments and applies previously unutilised analyses of other international governance structures. It suggests that the the international drug control system is undergoing a long-term process of fragmentation and evolution towards a 'regime complex'. In the short to medium term it suggests that exogenous challenges to the system remain somewhat limited. This is due to institutional battles over issue suzerainty and a limited funding incentive for other agencies to become involved. Instead, endogenous challenges and changes within the system represent the main avenues of adaptation. It continues on to suggest that in the longer term these endogenous changes will encourage and accelerate exogenous interactions with the system from other regimes and issue areas and thereby expand the terrain for cross-issue and cross-sectoral engagements. Thus, the short to medium term trends within drug control, while in some cases appearing to be in stasis or moving backwards, continue the overarching trend of regime fragmentation and shifting into an archetypal regime complex.

Extended lockdown and India's alcohol policy: a qualitative analysis of newspaper articles

Objectives

Since 25th March 2020 India went into a complete and extended lockdown. Alcohol production, sales, and purchase were barred with this overnight prohibition order. We conducted a qualitative analysis of the media reports published within the first month of the nationwide lockdown with the objectives (a) using the media reports as indications of possible public health impact and population response of a sudden alcohol prohibition in India, (b) suggesting areas for future research.

Methods

We performed thematic and content analysis of 350 articles published online in national newspapers between the 26th March, 2020 and 25th April, 2020. Initial inductive, followed by deductive coding was done in this exploratory thematic analysis.

Results

The thematic analysis revealed four main themes: the beneficial aspects of the policy, the harmful aspects of the policy, non-compliance and attempts to change and / or subvert the policy, popularity and level of public buy-in of the policy. We generated relevant sub-themes under main themes. Two additional themes, not directly related to the sudden prohibition, were use of stigmatizing language and ethical concerns. The content analysis showed the frequency of the appearance of the main themes and proportions of sub-themes and codes under those main themes.

Conclusion

The harms, perceived from the media reports, should be balanced against the potential benefits. Absence of a national-level alcohol policy was made apparent by the reflexive, disconnected, and conflictual measures. Future research could systematically examine the potential ramifications of alcohol prohibition on public health, social, and economic aspects.

COVID-19 and forced alcohol abstinence in India: The dilemmas around ethics and rights

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, as with other countries across the world, the Central and State Governments of India initiated several measures to slow down the spread of the virus and to 'flatten the curve'. One such measure was a 'total lockdown' for several weeks across the country. A complex and unexpected outcome of the lockdown which has medical, ethical, economic, and social dimensions is related to alcohol consumption. The lockdown and consequent acute non-availability of alcohol resulted in people with alcohol dependence going into withdrawals, black marketing of alcohol, and in extreme cases suicide resulting from the alleged frustration of not having access to alcohol. The health dilemmas around this situation are biological (e.g. pushing people into risky situations-potentially fatal alcohol withdrawal, consumption of illicit or other non-consumable alcohol) and psychosocial (e.g. isolation increasing the risk of relapses, loss of control over the decision to abstain which can be detrimental to recovery, restriction of access to services for alcohol problems). The legal and rights-related dilemmas are centred around whether States have the right to impinge on individual autonomy on the grounds of public health, the capacity of the health systems to provide appropriate services to cope with those who will struggle with the unavailability of alcohol, the constitutionality of the Central government's impinging on jurisdiction of states under the guise of a health emergency caused by the pandemic, and the ability of the State to make unbiased decisions about this issue when it is highly dependent on the revenue from the sale of alcohol and associated industries. The way forward could be a pragmatic and utilitarian approach involving continued access to alcohol, while observing all physical distancing norms necessary during the pandemic, for those who want to continue drinking; and implementing innovative measures such as tele-counselling for those who wish not to return back to drinking.

Alcohol treatment systems in Muslim majority countries: Case study of alcohol treatment policy in Iran

BACKGROUND

Alcohol is a leading risk factor for death and disability globally. Due to the Islamic prohibition of alcohol consumption, alcohol policy is an under-studied and sensitive topic in Muslim majority countries (MMCs). In addition, drinkers in these countries may face barriers to treatment access due to stigma or the legal status of alcohol. Using Iran as a case study this paper explores how alcohol treatment is planned and delivered in the complex environment of an MMC.

METHOD

We searched academic and grey literature, clinical manuals, guidelines and policy documents for information on the development and implementation of alcohol treatment policy in Iran. The search was conducted in English, Persian and Arabic. We conducted 6 consultations to verify information obtained. We analysed information based on the Walt & Gilson health policy analysis triangle, which identifies context, process, actors and content as key factors for understanding policy.

RESULTS

Iran initiated an alcohol-specific national strategy in 2011-2012 that aims to prevent, reduce and treat alcohol use disorders. This strategy has been designed to be implemented on a multi-sectoral level. Screening and prevention are mainly initiated in primary health care and cases are referred accordingly. Alcohol treatment is provided in specialised outpatient and inpatient settings. Due to contextual factors such as stigma, feasibility and affordability, alcohol outpatient units are planned to be integrated into existing public/ private drug addiction treatment facilities. However, the Ministry of Health has faced many challenges in implementing this pilot project. To date only small numbers of outpatient and inpatient units have formally commenced offering alcohol treatment.

CONCLUSION

Implementing alcohol treatment has been challenging for Iran. Approval of new treatment programs may not be seen as a priority because of the low prevalence of alcohol use disorders in the country. Also, policy makers are implementing treatment services with caution due to the existing alcohol prohibition for the country's Muslim majority population. Barriers to treatment seeking need to be addressed at the micro and macro levels. Support from international agencies such as the WHO could assist MMCs to develop appropriate services that are feasible for their unique alcohol policy environment.

Alcohol policy in Iran: Policy content analysis

BACKGROUND

Muslim majority countries (MMCs) typically have limited alcohol policy development due to Islamic prohibition of alcohol consumption. In response to recent increases in alcohol consumption and related harms, MMCs have introduced civil alcohol policies, ranging from total prohibition to European-style regulations. Using Iran as a case study, we describe how alcohol prohibition is translated into policy in the face of influences from globalisation.

METHODS

We collected information from publicly available literature and policy documents, because of the sensitivity of the topic of alcohol in Iran. The search was conducted in English and Persian. We verified information through consultations with policy actors. We also reviewed newspapers over periods just before the 1979 Islamic revolution, and before and after the 2011 alcohol policy (2008-2010; 2014-2016) was introduced. We analysed policy content based on WHO policy recommendations and used the Walt & Gilson health framework to identify policy content, context, actors and process.

RESULTS

Despite its broad approach of civil prohibition with concessions for the non-Muslim population, Iran has developed approaches to reduce the harmful impacts of alcohol and adopted nine of ten policy interventions recommended by WHO. Pricing policy was the only intervention not used. We identified contextual challenges, such as resources, stigma and cultural offence that influence policy development.

CONCLUSION

MMCs face challenges in creating civil alcohol policies. Iran has taken steps, including a national alcohol strategy, to reduce alcohol-related harms. The socio-cultural, governance and historical context have shaped Iran's adaptation of policy interventions recommended by WHO.

Impacts of alcohol availability on Tribal lands where alcohol is prohibited: A community-partnered qualitative investigation

On a Northern Plains reservation where alcohol was prohibited, we investigated community members' views on the impacts of alcohol availability. Our methods combined elements of Tribal community participatory research with qualitative inquiry to elicit these perspectives. We used rapid appraisal techniques to conduct confidential interviews with 31 key leaders representing 7 relevant major community systems, and representing a variety of perspectives. Topics included respondents' understandings of the current systems of alcohol availability and use on the reservation, the impacts of these systems on reservation residents, and possible ways to measure these impacts. Respondents reported impacts on individuals, families, and the tribe overall. Alcohol-related problems shaped and were shaped by a constellation of social-ecological conditions: kinship, housing, employment, public/social service capacity, and the supply of alcohol in nearby off-reservation areas, as well as inter-governmental relationships and the spiritual life of reservation residents. A variety of social-structural determinants magnified alcohol impacts, so that the problem drinking of a small number of individuals could have broad effects on their families and the entire community. Our participatory qualitative methods enabled us to directly include the voices as well as the personal experiences and expertise of community members in this presentation. These methods may be broadly applied within policy analysis to identify ways to reduce harms related to alcohol and other drugs for Indigenous communities.

Propagating the Haze? Community and professional perceptions of cannabis cultivation and the impacts of prohibition

BACKGROUND

Recent decades have seen substantial changes in the UK cannabis landscape, including increased domestic production, the ascendancy of stronger strains (namely 'skunk') and the drug's reclassification under the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act. Resultantly, cannabis retains significance in the consciousness, priorities and policy agendas of communities, drug services and criminal justice agencies.

METHODS

This paper presents an empirical study, which examined both perceptions and impacts of cannabis cultivation and its control within a North-West English borough. It draws on qualitative research with samples of professionals, practitioners, resident groups, cannabis users, cannabis users' families and cannabis cultivators themselves.

FINDINGS

The findings suggest that cannabis cultivation was not a uniformly familiar concept to respondents, who had limited knowledge and experience of its production. Across all participant groups, the transmission of accurate information was lacking, with individuals instead drawing on the reductionist drug discourse (Taylor, 2016) to fill knowledge deficits. Consequently, some participants conflated cannabis cultivation with wider prohibitionist constructions of drug markets, resulting in the diffusion of misinformation and an amplification of anxieties. In contrast, other participants construed cultivation as making economic sense during austerity, justifying such tolerance through inverse adherence to the same narrow socio-cultural construction of drugs i.e. that cultivation carried comparatively less harms than real drug markets. Enforcement mechanisms also drew on generic prohibitionist conceptions, assuming cultivators to be unconstrained, autonomous actors in need of punishment; a belief which lacked nuanced understanding of the local terrain where vulnerable individuals cultivating under duress played a key role in the supply chain.

CONCLUSION

The paper concludes with a call for the provision of accessible information/education; the need to challenge and reconceptualise the assumed autonomy and resultant punity directed at all cannabis cultivators; and a subsequent need to reassess established forms of legal (and increasingly social) enforcement.

When Do Adolescents Accept or Defy to Maternal Prohibitions? The Role of Social Domain and Communication Style

Drawing upon both Social-Cognitive Domain Theory and Self-Determination Theory, the goal of the present multi-informant study was to test whether the correlates of maternal prohibitions depend on what is prohibited (i.e., the content of the social domain involved), thereby contrasting moral with friendship prohibitions, as well on how the prohibition is communicated, thereby contrasting an autonomy-supportive with a controlling communication style. In a sample of adolescents (N = 196; mean age = 13.9 years; 63 % female) and their mothers (N = 185; mean age = 44 years), we first examined mean-level differences between the two domains in terms of mothers' degree and style of prohibition, as well as on a number of developmental outcomes (i.e., adolescents' legitimacy perceptions, internalization, and oppositional defiance). Both adolescents and mothers reported more maternal involvement in the moral domain (e.g., higher scores for degree of prohibition and controlling communication style). In addition, adolescents reported greater perceived legitimacy and less oppositional defiance in the moral domain (as compared to the friendships domain). Second, we tested whether associations between degree and style of prohibition and the developmental outcomes were moderated by social domain. Whereas associations between degree of prohibition and developmental outcomes either were non-significant or moderated by domain, the associations with communication style were more domain-invariant, with an autonomy-supportive style generally yielding an adaptive pattern of correlates and with a controlling style relating to maladaptive outcomes. The discussion focuses on similarities and differences in the characteristics and correlates of both types of prohibitions.

Harm reduction as a complex adaptive system: A dynamic framework for analyzing Tanzanian policies concerning heroin use

Contrary to popular belief, policies on drug use are not always based on scientific evidence or composed in a rational manner. Rather, decisions concerning drug policies reflect the negotiation of actors' ambitions, values, and facts as they organize in different ways around the perceived problems associated with illicit drug use. Drug policy is thus best represented as a complex adaptive system (CAS) that is dynamic, self-organizing, and coevolving. In this analysis, we use a CAS framework to examine how harm reduction emerged around heroin trafficking and use in Tanzania over the past thirty years (1985-present). This account is an organizational ethnography based on of the observant participation of the authors as actors within this system. We review the dynamic history and self-organizing nature of harm reduction, noting how interactions among system actors and components have coevolved with patterns of heroin us, policing, and treatment activities over time. Using a CAS framework, we describe harm reduction as a complex process where ambitions, values, facts, and technologies interact in the Tanzanian sociopolitical environment. We review the dynamic history and self-organizing nature of heroin policies, noting how the interactions within and between competing prohibitionist and harm reduction policies have changed with patterns of heroin use, policing, and treatment activities over time. Actors learn from their experiences to organize with other actors, align their values and facts, and implement new policies. Using a CAS approach provides researchers and policy actors a better understanding of patterns and intricacies in drug policy. This knowledge of how the system works can help improve the policy process through adaptive action to introduce new actors, different ideas, and avenues for communication into the system.

The impact of the prohibition of benzylpiperazine (BZP) "legal highs" on the availability, price and strength of BZP in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Legal highs containing benzylpiperazine (BZP) were widely sold in New Zealand until BZP was prohibited in 2008. We examined the impact the prohibition had on the availability and price of BZP over following years.

METHODS

Two national population surveys of BZP use were conducted in 2006 and 2009. Four annual targeted surveys of frequent drug users (FDU) were conducted from 2007-2010. Availability and price measures were obtained. Inflation-adjusted real retail prices were calculated. Other drug markets were monitored as quasi-controls.

RESULTS

The proportion of BZP users from the general population who considered the availability of BZP to be 'very easy' declined from 76% in 2006 to 21% in 2009. The proportion who thought BZP had become 'harder' to obtain increased from 5% in 2006 to 71% in 2009. The proportion who reported the price of BZP was 'higher' increased from 27% in 2006 to 51% in 2009. FDU who considered the availability of BZP to be 'very easy' declined from 98% in 2007 to 15% in 2008, and then increased to 42% by 2010. The real retail price of a BZP tablet increased from $9.86 in 2007 to $15.83 in 2010. The proportion who considered the price of BZP to be 'increasing' rose from 3% in 2007 to 47% in 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of BZP declined immediately following its prohibition. Availability recovered in subsequent years, but not to the pre-prohibition legal level. The price of BZP increased slowly over a number of years following the prohibition.