Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) post-smolts challenged two or nine weeks after seawater-transfer show differences in their susceptibility to salmonid alphavirus subtype 3 (SAV3)

Background

Pancreas disease (PD), caused by salmonid alphavirus (SAV), is an important disease affecting salmonid aquaculture. It has been speculated that Atlantic salmon post-smolts are more prone to infections in the first few weeks following seawater- transfer. After this period of seawater acclimatization, the post-smolts are more robust and better able to resist infection by pathogens. Here we describe how we established a bath immersion (BI) model for SAV subtype 3 (SAV3) in seawater. We also report how this challenge model was used to study the susceptibility of post-smolts to SAV3 infection in two groups of post-smolts two weeks or nine weeks after seawater - transfer.

Methods

Post-smolts, two weeks (Phase-A) or nine weeks (Phase-B) after seawater- transfer, were infected with SAV3 by BI or intramuscular injection (IM) to evaluate their susceptibility to infection. A RT-qPCR assay targeting the non-structural protein (nsP1) gene was performed to detect SAV3-RNA in blood, heart tissue and electropositive-filtered tank-water. Histopathological changes were examined by light microscope, and the presence of SAV3 antigen in pancreas tissue was confirmed using immuno-histochemistry.

Results

Virus shedding from the Phase-B fish injected with SAV3 (IM Phase-B) was markedly lower than that from IM Phase-A fish. A lower percentage of viraemia in Phase-B fish compared with Phase-A fish was also observed. Viral RNA in hearts from IM Phase-A fish was higher than in IM Phase-B fish at all sampling points (p < 0.05) and a similar trend was also seen in the BI groups. Necrosis of exocrine pancreatic cells was observed in all infected groups. Extensive histopathological changes were found in Phase-A fish whereas milder PD-related histopathological lesions were seen in Phase-B fish. The presence of SAV3 in pancreas tissue from all infected groups was also confirmed by immuno-histochemical staining.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that post-smolts are more susceptible to SAV3 infection two weeks after seawater-transfer than nine weeks after transfer. In addition, the BI challenge model described here offers an alternative SAV3 infection model when better control of the time-of-infection is essential for studying basic immunological mechanisms and disease progression.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12985-016-0520-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Sequence analysis and structure prediction of enoyl-CoA hydratase from Avicennia marina: implication of various amino acid residues on substrate-enzyme interactions

Enoyl-CoA hydratase catalyzes the hydration of 2-trans-enoyl-CoA into 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA. The present study focuses on the correlation between the functional and structural aspects of enoyl-CoA hydratase from Avicennia marina. We have used bioinformatics tools to construct and analyze 3D homology models of A. marina enoyl-CoA hydratase (AMECH) bound to different substrates and inhibitors and studied the residues involved in the ligand-enzyme interaction. Structural information obtained from the models was compared with those of the reported crystal structures. We observed that the overall folds were similar; however, AMECH showed few distinct structural changes which include structural variation in the mobile loop, formation and loss of certain interactions between the active site residues and substrates. Some changes were also observed within specific regions of the enzyme. Glu106 is almost completely conserved in sequences of the isomerases/hydratases including AMECH while Glu86 which is the other catalytic residue in most of the isomerases/hydratases is replaced by Gly and shows no interaction with the substrate. Asp114 is located within 4Å distance of the catalytic water which makes it a probable candidate for the second catalytic residue in AMECH. Another prominent feature of AMECH is the presence of structurally distinct mobile loop having a completely different coordination with the hydrophobic binding pocket of acyl portion of the substrate.