Effects of the stress hyperglycemia ratio on long-term mortality in patients with triple-vessel disease and acute coronary syndrome

AIMS

Risk assessment for triple-vessel disease (TVD) remain challenging. Stress hyperglycemia represents the regulation of glucose metabolism in response to stress, and stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is recently found to reflect true acute hyperglycemic status. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of SHR and its role in risk stratification in TVD patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

A total of 3812 TVD patients with ACS with available baseline SHR measurement were enrolled from two independent centers. The endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between SHR and cardiovascular mortality. The SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) II (SSII) was used as the reference model in the model improvement analysis.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 219 (5.8%) TVD patients with ACS suffered cardiovascular mortality. TVD patients with ACS with high SHR had an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality after robust adjustment for confounding (high vs. median SHR: adjusted hazard ratio 1.809, 95% confidence interval 1.160-2.822, P = 0.009), which was fitted as a J-shaped pattern. The prognostic value of the SHR was found exclusively among patients with diabetes instead of those without diabetes. Moreover, addition of SHR improved the reclassification abilities of the SSII model for predicting cardiovascular mortality in TVD patients with ACS.

CONCLUSIONS

The high level of SHR is associated with the long-term risk of cardiovascular mortality in TVD patients with ACS, and is confirmed to have incremental prediction value beyond standard SSII. Assessment of SHR may help to improve the risk stratification strategy in TVD patients who are under acute stress.

Propensity score-matched analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting versus second-generation drug-eluting stents for triple-vessel disease

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the mid-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with those of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) for triple-vessel disease.

METHODS

Between February 2010 and December 2015, 607 patients underwent primary isolated CABG and 264 patients underwent PCI with second-generation DESs (everolimus-eluting stent, biolimus-eluting stent or zotarolimus-eluting stent) for triple-vessel disease with or without left main disease. We compared the CABG group with the second-generation DES group using propensity score matching analysis. The study end points were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 238 pairs of patients were successfully matched (C-statistic 0.762). The mean number of distal anastomoses in the CABG group was 4.7 and that of implanted stents in the second-generation DES group was 2.8. The 30-day mortality was similar between the groups (0.8% vs 0.4%; P = 0.564). The median follow-up period was 3.4 years in the CABG group and 3.8 years in the second-generation DES group. Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death and cerebrovascular accidents, the incidence of myocardial infarction [hazard ratio (HR) 11.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.32-214.15, P = 0.003] and repeat revascularization (HR 3.78; 95% CI 2.35-6.38; P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the second-generation DES group than in the CABG group. This resulted in a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.61-3.24; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CABG might be superior to PCI with second-generation DESs for treatment of triple-vessel disease in terms of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Mini-Sternotomy in the Treatment of Triple-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease

We have developed off-pump coronary artery bypass approach with lower distal mini-sternotomy (TM-OPCAB) for multivessel coronary revascularization. The aim of this retrospective study is to provide evidence for the feasibility and safety of this technique in the treatment of triple-vessel diseases.Two hundred eighty-eight patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease who underwent TM-OPCAB or standard off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (S-OPCAB) were included in this study after propensity-score matching. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of all patients and compared their demographic data, intra- and perioperative details, as well as short-term and long-term outcomes.TM-OPCAB resulted in significantly shorter periods of time on ventilation (P = 0.0222), shorter postoperative in-hospital stays (P < 0.0001), and lower blood transfusion rates (P = 0.0013) than S-OPCAB. Transit-time flow measurement showed there was no significant difference in postoperative graft patency between both groups. Within the 30-day post-surgical period, no death or occurrence of stroke was observed in patients undergoing TM-OPCAB or S-OPCAB. After an average of 35 months of follow-up, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that overall survival and the percentage of patients freed from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar between both groups. Additionally, the rate of repeat revascularization was slightly lower in the TM-OPCAB group (1.4%) than in the S-OPCAB group (2.2%), although there was no statistical difference noted.Our findings suggest that TM-OPCAB is technically feasible and safe for use in revascularization procedures in patients with triple-vessel diseases.

[Comparative Study Of Coronary Artery Disease In Diabetics And Non-Diabetics In The Department Of Cardiology Of Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital]

The aim of this study was to compare the features of coronary artery disease between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A case-control study was carried out from 1 May 2013 to 31 July 2015 in the department of cardiology of Aristide le Dantec university hospital. Forty-five diabetic patients and forty-five non-diabetic patients who underwent coronary angiography and / or angioplasty were included.

RESULTS

There was a male predominance with a sex ratio of 1.6 in both groups. The mean age was 62.26 years for diabetics and 59.06 years for non-diabetics (p = 0.6). In diabetics, symptomatology was dominated by silent ischemia (48.9%) versus typical angina pain (68.9%) in non-diabetics. Myocardial infarction was the most common indication of coronary angiography in both groups. Coronary angiography revealed one-vessel disease (46.6% versus 41.7% p = 0.822), double vessel disease (26.7% versus 41.7% p = 0.091) and triple vessel disease (26.7% versus 16.6% p = 0.561). Angioplasty was indicated in 37.8% of diabetics versus 63.9% of non-diabetics. Nine diabetic patients and three non-diabetic patients had an indication of coronary artery bypass grafting.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the greater frequency of silent ischemia and multiple-vessel disease in diabetics as well as a more frequent indication of coronary artery bypass grafting in these patients.