Major intracranial arterial stenosis influence association between baseline blood pressure and clinical outcomes after thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between baseline blood pressure (BP) and clinical outcomes after thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in different intracranial arterial stenosis subgroups.

METHODS

AIS patients from multicenter with intravenous thrombolysis were retrospectively enrolled from January 2013 to December 2021. We categorized participants into severe (≥ 70%) and nonsevere (< 70%) stenosis of major intracranial arteries subgroups. The primary outcome was unfavorable functional outcome defined as 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥2. The association coefficients between baseline BP and functional outcomes were estimated in general linear regression model. The interactive effect was tested to determine the influence of intracranial arterial stenosis on the association between BP and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 329 patients were included. Severe subgroup was detected in 151 patients with average age of 70.5. Association between baseline diastolic BP (DBP) and unfavorable functional outcome in intracranial artery stenosis subgroups was significantly different (p for interaction < .05). In nonsevere subgroup, higher baseline DBP was associated with higher risk of unfavorable outcome (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.20, p = .009) compared with severe subgroup (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.08, p = .341). Besides, intracranial artery stenosis also modified association between baseline systolic BP (SBP) and 3-month death (p for interaction < .05). In severe subgroup, higher baseline SBP was associated with decreased 3-month death risk (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1, p = .044) compared with nonsevere subgroup (OR 1, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.07, p = .908).

CONCLUSIONS

The major intracranial artery state modulates association between baseline BP and 3-month clinical outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis.

Baseline and Cumulative Blood Pressure in Predicting the Occurrence of Cardiovascular Events

Background: Both baseline blood pressure (BP) and cumulative BP have been used to estimate cardiovascular event (CVE) risk of higher BP, but which one is more reliable for recommendation to routine clinical practice is unclear.

Methods: In this prospective study, conducted in the Kailuan community of Tanshan City, China, a total of 95,702 participants free of CVEs at baseline (2006–2007) were included and followed up until 2017. Time-weighted cumulative BP that expresses the extent of cumulative BP exposure is defined as the sum of the mean of two consecutive systolic or diastolic BP times the interval between the two determinations, then normalized by the total follow-up duration. Incident CVEs during 2006–2017 were confirmed by review of medical records. We performed a competing risk regression analysis to assess CVE risk of the different durations of higher BP exposure. ROC analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of higher BP on CVE occurrence.

Results: We found that when the risk of higher BP on CVE occurrence was estimated based on time-weighted cumulative BP, the hazard ratios (HRs) increased with the increase in duration of higher BP exposure in each of the four BP groups: <120/<80, 120–129/<80, 130–139/80–89, and ≥140/≥90 mmHg; this time trend also occurred across the four different BP groups, with the higher BP group exhibiting CVE risk earlier during the follow-up. These results were confirmed by the same analysis performed on participants without baseline hypertension. However, such reasonable time trends did not occur when a single baseline BP was used as the primary estimation. We also demonstrated that the predictive values of baseline systolic and diastolic BP that predict CVE occurrence were only 0.6–3.2 and 0.2–3.1% lower, respectively, than those of cumulative BP combined with baseline BP during follow-up.

Conclusions: Baseline BP remains a useful indicator for predicting future occurrence of CVEs. Nevertheless, time-weighted cumulative BP could more reliably estimate the CVE risk of higher BP exposure than baseline BP.

Impact of baseline blood pressure on the magnitude of blood pressure lowering by nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system: refreshing the Wilder's principle

Background

The objective of the study was to investigate the relationship between baseline blood pressure (BP) and the magnitude of BP reduction in patients with essential hypertension treated with nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (NGTS).

Methods and patients

One hundred and thirty-eight patients with essential hypertension were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm, open-label study. NGTS was administered for 24 weeks to achieve target BP of 140/90 mmHg. The dose could be uptitrated to 60 mg/d in case of unsatisfactory BP reduction after 4-week treatment. Home blood pressure measurement was recorded through the initial 1–14 days, and office BP and heart rate were evaluated at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks.

Results

One hundred and seventeen patients (84.8%) completed the study, and their average BP decreased by 19.0/11.3 mmHg after 24 weeks. The reduction of either systolic or diastolic BP was positively correlated with baseline BP at weeks 2, 4, or 24 after treatment (r=0.603–0.762, all p<0.05). The maximal BP reduction was observed in 83% of patients at 4 weeks of treatment even though the dose of nifedipine remained unchanged (30 mg/day).

Conclusion

These findings show that BP reduction is greatly influenced by the baseline level. Patients with high baseline BP had maximum reduction after treatment with NGTS, and the maximal antihypertensive efficacy of NGTS could appear even at 4 weeks after treatment initiation.