COVID-19 vaccine safety during pregnancy and breastfeeding in women with autoimmune diseases: results from the COVAD study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine safety in pregnant and breastfeeding women with autoimmune diseases (AID) in the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study.

METHODS

Delayed-onset (>7 days) vaccine-related adverse events (AE), disease flares and AID-related treatment modifications were analysed upon diagnosis of AID vs healthy controls (HC) and the pregnancy/breastfeeding status at the time of at least one dose of vaccine.

RESULTS

Among the 9201 participants to the self-administered online survey, 6787 (73.8%) were women. Forty pregnant and 52 breastfeeding patients with AID were identified, of whom the majority had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine (100% and 96.2%, respectively). AE were reported significantly more frequently in pregnant than in non-pregnant patients (overall AE 45% vs 26%, P = 0.01; minor AE 40% vs 25.9%, P = 0.03; major AE 17.5% vs 4.6%, P < 0.01), but no difference was found in comparison with pregnant HC. No difference was observed between breastfeeding patients and HC with respect to AE. Post-vaccination disease flares were reported by 17.5% of pregnant and 20% of breastfeeding patients, and by 18.3% of age- and disease-matched non-pregnant and non-breastfeeding patients (n = 262). All pregnant/breastfeeding patients who experienced a disease flare were managed with glucocorticoids; 28.6% and 20% of them required initiation or change in immunosuppressants, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study provides reassuring insights into the safety of COVID-19 vaccines administered to women with AID during the gestational and post-partum periods, helping overcome hesitant attitudes, as the benefits for the mother and for the fetus by passive immunization appear to outweigh potential risks.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in adolescent and adult patients with juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: tolerability and impact on disease activity

OBJECTIVES

JSLE has a severe presentation and a remitting course. Patients with JSLE carry an increased vulnerability to infections, which also act as triggers of disease flare. Thus, vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an important tool in JSLE. The objective of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, including the booster, in a monocentric cohort of JSLE patients.

METHODS

Clinical records of JSLE patients who received at least one dose of any anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were retrospectively reviewed. Data about disease activity, treatment, anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and COVID-19 infection were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-five JSLE patients received at least one dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while 46 patients completed the schedule with the booster. The rate of mild-moderate adverse events was 66%, mainly comprising fever, fatigue, arthromyalgias and pain at injection site. The rate of adverse events after the booster was similar to that registered after the first two doses. No significant changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in BILAG and SLEDAI were observed. Disease flare rate (mainly LN) after immunization was 10.8%. Flares occurred predominantly in patients with moderate disease activity before immunization; accordingly, SLEDAI ≥4 identified patients at risk of flare while Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) plays a protective role against post-vaccination flare.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in JSLE is well tolerated; a strict clinical monitoring and a thoughtful choice of vaccination timing should be devoted to patients not in LLDAS due to the risk of post-vaccine flare.

Outcomes in children with rheumatic diseases following COVID-19 vaccination and infection: data from a large two-center cohort study in Thailand

Introduction

Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is effective in protecting patients from severe COVID-19 infection. Disease flare-up following immunization in children with rheumatic disorders may result in patient reluctance to receive the vaccine. Underlying rheumatic diseases or the use of immunosuppressive drugs may influence the outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination and infection. We aimed to describe outcomes in children with rheumatic diseases following COVID-19 immunization and infection.

Methods

This retrospective study was performed at two large academic centers in Thailand. During the COVID-19 pandemic, all patients were routinely queried about COVID-19-related conditions. We included patients with rheumatic diseases aged <18 years who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine or had a history of COVID-19 infection with more than 6 months of recorded follow-up after the last vaccine dose or COVID-19 illness. Demographic information and data on clinical symptoms, disease activity, treatment, outcomes, and COVID-19 vaccination and infection were collected.

Results

A total of 479 patients were included. Most (229; 47.81%) patients had juvenile idiopathic arthritis, followed by connective tissue diseases (189; 39.46%), vasculitis syndromes (42; 8.76%), and other rheumatic diseases (19; 3.97%). Approximately 90% of patients received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination, and half of the patients had COVID-19 infection. Among patients, 10.72% and 3.27% developed a flare after COVID-19 vaccination and COVID-19 illness, respectively. Flare severity after COVID immunization and infection was mainly mild to moderate. The predictor of flare after COVID-19 vaccination was the use of prednisolone ≥10 mg/day before vaccination (hazard ratio: 2.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-3.97, p = 0.037). Inactive disease before receiving the COVID-19 vaccination was a predictor of inactive status after a flare (hazard ratio: 2.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-8.40; p = 0.043). Overall, 3.36% and 1.61% of patients experienced a new onset of rheumatic disease after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and after COVID-19 infection, respectively.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 vaccine is recommended for children with rheumatic disease, particularly those who are in stable condition. After COVID-19 vaccination, patients-especially those with active disease before vaccination or those receiving concurrent prednisolone doses of ≥10 mg/day-should be closely monitored.

A Flare Risk Index Informed by Select Immune Mediators in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is marked by immune dysregulation linked to varied clinical disease activity. Using a unique longitudinal cohort of SLE patients, this study sought to identify optimal immune mediators informing an empirically refined flare risk index (FRI) reflecting altered immunity prior to clinical disease flare.

METHODS

Thirty-seven SLE-associated plasma mediators were evaluated by microfluidic immunoassay in 46 samples obtained in SLE patients with an imminent clinical disease flare (preflare) and 53 samples obtained in SLE patients without a flare over a corresponding period (pre-nonflare). SLE patients were selected from a unique longitudinal cohort of 106 patients with classified SLE (meeting the American College of Rheumatology 1997 revised criteria for SLE or the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 revised criteria for SLE). Autoantibody specificities, hybrid SLE Disease Activity Index (hSLEDAI) scores, clinical features, and medication usage were also compared at preflare (mean ± SD 111 ± 47 days prior to flare) versus pre-nonflare (99 ± 21 days prior to nonflare) time points. Variable importance was determined by random forest analysis with logistic regression subsequently applied to determine the optimal number and type of analytes informing a refined FRI.

RESULTS

Preflare versus pre-nonflare differences were not associated with demographics, autoantibody specificities, hSLEDAI scores, clinical features, nor medication usage. Forward selection and backward elimination of mediators ranked by variable importance resulted in 17 plasma mediator candidates differentiating preflare from pre-nonflare visits. A final combination of 11 mediators best informed a newly refined FRI, which achieved a maximum sensitivity of 97% and maximum specificity of 98% after applying decision curve analysis to define low, medium, and high FRI scores.

CONCLUSION

We verified altered immune mediators associated with imminent disease flare, and a subset of these mediators improved the FRI to identify SLE patients at risk of imminent flare. This molecularly informed, proactive management approach could be critical in prospective clinical trials and the clinical management of lupus.

COVID-19 Vaccination experience in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis treated at a single VA Medical Center

Background

Following the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccines, there has been uncertainty as to whether receiving the COVID-19 vaccine will result in overactivation of the immune system and subsequently lead to an autoimmune disease flare.

The purpose of this study was to assess whether rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who received the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine are at increased risk for disease flare.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective and prospective study at the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center between 12/2021 and 2/2022. We included 100 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were actively on immunosuppressive therapy and received three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. A survey questionnaire was used to collect data about their RA and if they developed symptoms post vaccination. Our primary end point was to determine incidence of flare of RA after COVID-19 vaccine. Secondary end points were to estimate the side effect profile from the vaccine, and to check if patients developed a COVID-19 infection after they received the vaccine.

Results

None of the patients reported symptoms of RA flare within two months of receiving the 3 doses of the vaccine. Most common vaccine side effects were soreness over the injection site (n=14), headache (n=11), fatigue(n=7) and myalgias(n=4). 5 patients developed a COVID-19 infection prior to receiving the vaccine, 8 after being vaccinated, 3 of the 8 within 5 months from the second dose and 5 out of the 8 within 3 months from the third vaccine dose.

Conclusion

RA patients receiving the COVID-19 Pfizer mRNA vaccine do not appear to commonly develop major symptoms, flares or side effects following the vaccine. Further research with larger numbers of patients with rheumatoid arthritis as well as those with other autoimmune disease is needed to better understand the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine.

C-Reactive protein rise in rheumatology patients following COVID-19 vaccination

Objective

The aim was to determine the proportion of patients with inflammatory arthritis who have a flare of their rheumatological disease within 4 weeks of receiving a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, using CRP as a surrogate marker.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of notes for patients with inflammatory arthritis within 30 days of their COVID-19 vaccine. An electronic database (DAWN) was used to identify all patients who were currently on a DMARD or biologic therapy. This was then correlated with vaccine data from the National Immunisation and Vaccination System (NIVS) and CRP within 30 days of their vaccination.

Results

From the DAWN database, 1620 adults were identified (mean age 61 years, 64% female). Three types of vaccinations were administered: AstraZeneca (AZ), BioNTech-Pfizer or Moderna. Vaccine uptake was 1542 of 1620 (95.2% for the first dose), 1550 of 1620 (95.7% for the second dose) and 1437 of 1620 (88.7% for the third dose). One hundred and ninety-two of 1542 patients (12.5%) had a CRP rise of >10 mg/l within 30 days of their vaccine, which was higher than the baseline flare rate of 8.6% (P = 0.0004).

Conclusion

Patients with inflammatory arthritis and on DMARDs have a high uptake of COVID-19 vaccine (95%), which is greater than the national average. A CRP rise >10 mg/l within 30 days of vaccination was observed in ∼1 in 10 patients in our study population after all three doses. There might be a slight increase in disease flare in patients with inflammatory arthritis after COVID-19 vaccinations, and additional research is required to assess this association further.

Effectiveness and Safety of Belimumab in Chinese Lupus Patients: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study

Objective: The effectiveness and safety of belimumab in Chinese lupus patients with different disease activities were investigated in a real-world setting. Method: Patients who received 10 mg/kg belimumab intravenously on weeks 0, 2, and 4, and then every 4 weeks on a background of standard-of-care (SoC) therapy and had a follow-up of more than 6 months were enrolled from four centers in China. They were stratified according to the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score at baseline as the moderate/severe (SELENA-SLEDAI > 6) or mild subgroups (SELENA-SLEDAI ≤ 6). Attainment of the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) or remission on treatment was analyzed in all patients. The SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) were evaluated for patients with moderate/severe disease and mild disease, respectively. Patients in the control arm with SoC alone from previous metformin lupus trials were selected by propensity score matching (PSM) as the reference group. Results: 224 SLE patients with a mean follow-up of 11.7 months receiving belimumab were enrolled in this observational study, of which 126 and 98 were in the moderate/severe and mild subgroup, respectively. At 12 months, 54.76% of the patients attained LLDAS and 28.57% attained remission. Lower daily prednisone at baseline were independently associated with 12-month LLDAS. Further, 87% of the subgroup with moderate/severe disease achieved SRI-4 at 12 months and a high SLEDAI at baseline was its predictive factor. For the mild subgroup, a reduced flare rate was observed compared with PSM reference (17.5%, vs. 38.6%, p = 0.021). Infection events, particularly viral infections and pneumonia were recorded in 7 and 6 patients, respectively. Conclusion: Our real-world data supported the effectiveness and safety of belimumab in Chinese lupus patients.

Pregnancy outcomes among Egyptian women with systemic lupus erythematosus: A prospective cohort study

Pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represent a high-risk group. The aim of this study is to describe the pregnancy outcomes among SLE patients who were followed prospectively at a conjoint high-risk pregnancy/rheumatology clinic from 2007 to 2021 and to identify predictors of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. This study included 201 singleton pregnancies of 123 women with SLE. Their mean age was 27.16 ± 4.80 years, and their mean disease duration was 7.35 ± 5.46 years. Secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was diagnosed in 77 (38.3%) pregnancies. The pregnancy was planned in 104 (51.7%) pregnancies. Flares occurred in 83 (41.3%) and pre-eclampsia in 15 (7.5%) pregnancies. Full-term pregnancy occurred in 93 (46.3%), fetal loss (miscarriage and intra-uterine fetal death) in 41 (20.4%), and prematurity in 67 (33.3%) of the pregnancies, respectively. Seven neonates died from complications of prematurity, and another one died from cardiac congenital anomalies. In the multivariate analyses, unplanned pregnancy was associated with eight times higher risk of disease flare OR = 7.92 (p < 0.001), lupus nephritis flare during pregnancy increased the odds of pre-eclampsia occurrence four times OR = 3.98 (p = 0.02), while disease flares during pregnancy predicted prematurity OR = 2.49, p = 0.049. Patients with secondary APS had three times increased risk of fetal loss OR = 2.97, p = 0.049. To conclude, unplanned pregnancy, disease flares, and APS have been identified as predictors for adverse maternal and/or fetal outcomes. Pregnancy planning is necessary to reduce maternal and fetal complications.

Immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in children with paediatric rheumatic diseases: a scoping review

Children with paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRDs) are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable disease. Safe and effective vaccination is central to preventive care in PRD patients; however, uncertainty surrounding immunogenicity and safety has contributed to suboptimal vaccination. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment effect on immunogenicity to vaccination in PRD patients and assess vaccine safety, specifically adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) and disease flare. Scoping review. In this scoping review, a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted from 2014 to 23 August 2022 to identify observational studies evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of commonly used vaccinations in PRD patients. The primary outcome was immunogenicity (defined as seroprotection and protective antibody concentrations), with secondary outcomes describing AEFI and disease flare also extracted. Due to extensive heterogeneity related to diagnostic and vaccination variability, narrative synthesis was used to describe the findings of each study. Study quality was assessed via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022307212). The search yielded 19 studies evaluating immunogenicity to vaccination and incidence of AEFI and disease flares in this population, which were of acceptable quality. Corticosteroids did not have deleterious effects on vaccine response. Treatment with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs generally had no effect immunogenicity in PRD patients. While patients exhibited adequate seroprotection, protective antibody levels were lower in patients on some immunosuppressant agents. Varicella infections were recorded post vaccination in several patients with low protective antibody levels undergoing treatment with DMARDs and corticosteroids. Most vaccines appear safe and effective in PRD patients, despite immunosuppressant treatment. Booster vaccinations should be considered with some studies highlighting inadequate seroprotection following primary course of vaccinations with acceleration of antibody decline over time. There was limited evidence to support avoiding live vaccines in PRD patients.

Development of a claims-based flare algorithm for systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To develop a claims-based algorithm identifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares using a linked claims-electronic medical record (EMR) dataset.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of linked administrative claims and EMR data spanning 1 January 2003 to 31 March 2019. Included were adult SLE patients with at least 12 months of continuous enrollment in claims data, 12 months of clinical activity in EMR, and an absence of malignancies excluding basal and squamous cell carcinoma. Patient follow-up was divided into 30-day windows, and a proxy SLEDAI-2K score based on the EMR data was calculated for each 30-day period. A flare was defined as an increase of at least 4 from the baseline score. A series of potential flare predictor variables identified in claims were based on a combination of established variables from a previous algorithm, with the addition of other SLE-related indicators based on clinical input. Logistic regression models were built to predict monthly SLE flares.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria identified 2427 patients. Results from a logistic model with forward selection capping the number of variables at 10 performed well with a c-statistic of 0.76 and a Brier score of 0.07. The top five predictors were any inpatient admission (OR = 4.76), outpatient office visit (OR = 3.04), MRI (OR = 2.26), ER visit (OR = 2.25), and number of rheumatology visits (OR = 1.75); p < .01 for all.

CONCLUSIONS

The final algorithm shows promise in providing an alternative and more streamlined way for identifying likely flares in administrative claims data that will advance the study of SLE within the context of flares.

Baseline Factors Associated with Self-reported Disease Flares Following COVID-19 Vaccination among Adults with Systemic Rheumatic Disease: Results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Vaccine Survey

OBJECTIVE

To examine the frequency of, and risk factors for, disease flare following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with systemic rheumatic disease (SRD).

METHODS

An international study was conducted from April 2 to August 16, 2021, using an online survey of 5619 adults with SRD for adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, including flares of disease requiring a change in treatment. We examined risk factors identified a priori based on published associations with SRD activity and SARS-CoV-2 severity, including demographics, SRD type, comorbidities, vaccine type, cessation of immunosuppressive medications around vaccination, and history of reactions to non-COVID-19 vaccines, using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Flares requiring a change in treatment following COVID-19 vaccination were reported by 4.9% of patients. Compared with rheumatoid arthritis, certain SRD, including systemic lupus erythematosus (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.03, 2.20), psoriatic arthritis (OR 1.95, 95%CI 1.20, 3.18), and polymyalgia rheumatica (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.08, 2.48) were associated with higher odds of flare, while idiopathic inflammatory myopathies were associated with lower odds for flare (OR 0.54, 95%CI 0.31-0.96). The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was associated with higher odds of flare relative to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.07, 1.95), as were a prior reaction to a non-COVID-19 vaccine (OR 2.50, 95%CI 1.76, 3.54) and female sex (OR 2.71, 95%CI 1.55, 4.72).

CONCLUSION

SRD flares requiring changes in treatment following COVID-19 vaccination were uncommon in this large international study. Several potential risk factors, as well as differences by disease type, warrant further examination in prospective cohorts.

Flare rates and factors determining flare occurrence in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who achieved low disease activity or remission: results from a prospective cohort study

Objective

To investigate the frequency and determinants of flare in Chinese patients with lupus, focusing on the effect of glucocorticoid (GC) tapering on flare in patients who achieved low disease activity or remission.

Methods

We collected baseline and follow-up data from all consecutive patients in a prospective lupus cohort between January 2017 and December 2020. We defined low disease activity using the lupus low disease activity status (LLDAS), applied the DORIS (Definitions of Remission in SLE) for remission criteria and then assessed flare using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index.

Results

Among a total of 185 patients enrolled, 139 exhibited low disease activity or remission with a median follow-up of 29.8 (21.2–35.2) months. The flare rates after achievement of LLDAS, clinical remission and complete remission on treatment were 0.23, 0.12 and 0.1 per patient-year, respectively. In contrast, the flare rate of patients who never achieved remission or LLDAS was 0.49 per patient-year. In patients with LLDAS or remission achievement, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that lower C3 level at the time of first achieving LLDAS or clinical remission was an independent predictive factor for subsequent flares. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly lower flare-free survival during the subsequent follow-up in patients with GC withdrawal compared with those maintained on a low dose of prednisone (≤7.5 mg/day) (HR=6.94, 95% CI 1.86 to 25.86, p=0.004). However, no significant differences in flare were observed in patients maintained on different low doses of prednisone (>5 mg/day and ≤7.5 mg/day vs >2.5 mg/day and ≤5 mg/day vs >0 mg/day and ≤2.5 mg/day) (p=0.200).

Conclusions

Target achievement significantly lowered the rate of subsequent flare, from the perspective of both stricter targets and longer period in targets. C3 level was a strong predictor of flare in patients who have achieved treatment targets. Although GC tapering to minimal doses was feasible, its withdrawal may accelerate the risk of recurrence.

Rheumatologic Manifestations of Post SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

It has been over a year since the first documented case of the COVID-19 virus was recorded. Since that time, our understanding of this virus has continually evolved, however, its wide-ranging effects are still unfolding. Similar to previously studied viral infections, severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been shown to lead to a degree of autoimmunity in patients who are recovering from its effects. Due to its effects on the innate immune system such as the toll-like receptors and complement system, a varying degree of pro-inflammatory markers can become widespread in those who continue to recover from the virus. This case series offers a unique perspective on how COVID-19 has had dramatic effects on those already suffering from inflammatory rheumatic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or fibromyalgia. As the ever-lasting effects of COVID-19 are still unfolding, this case series is one of few to discuss the development and changes of patients with rheumatic conditions. This study hopes to encourage larger studies to be done on the effects of COVID-19 on autoimmune conditions.

CASE PRESENTATION

Seven patients were identified with new manifestations of rheumatic conditions, which included 3 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, 2 cases of polymyalgia rheumatica, 1 case of reactive arthritis, and 1 case of cutaneous lupus. Post-COVID syndrome was also diagnosed in 7 other patients. Rheumatoid arthritis patients presented with symptoms 4-5 weeks after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Symptoms of polyarticular joint pain, swelling, and morning stiffness were reported in this group. These patients were treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and experienced an improvement of symptoms on follow up. Two cases of Polymyalgia Rheumatica were identified in patients that were previously diagnosed with COVID-19 six weeks prior. One patient had no significant past medical history and the other patient had a history of Rheumatoid Arthritis, which was well controlled. These patients experienced weakness and tenderness in the proximal joints with elevated levels of ESR and CRP. They were treated with prednisone and showed improvement. Reactive Arthritis was diagnosed in 1 patient who presented with swelling in both hands and wrists 1-2 after being diagnosed with COVID-19. This patient began to experience symptoms of Reactive Arthritis 1-2 days after resolution of initial COVID-19 symptoms and this persisted for 3 months. Patient was managed with methylprednisolone injections and NSAIDs, which improved her symptoms. Post-COVID syndrome was identified in 7 patients. All patients were female and had a history of well controlled fibromyalgia. Patients generally experienced fatigue, headaches, and memory fog, which had variable onset from a few days and up to 4 weeks after being diagnosed with COVID-19. One patient had a complete recovery of her symptoms at follow-up 3 months after the initial presentation. The other 6 patients continued to report symptoms of Post-COVID syndrome at follow up. Patients were managed with lifestyle modifications and their previous fibromyalgia treatment.

CONCLUSION

While cases of COVID-19 continue to rise, complications of this disease are still being discovered. Those who initially recover from COVID-19 may experience new onset rheumatic conditions, worsening of previously diagnosed rheumatic conditions, or Post-COVID Syndrome. As we continue to learn more about the effects of COVID-19, the awareness of these manifestations will play a key role in the appropriate management of these patients.

Hydroxychloroquine blood levels predicts flare in childhood-onset lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

Low hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels are predictors of flare in adult lupus. Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) has high morbidity with renal involvement in up to 80% of cases. The aim of this study is to determine the HCQ cut-off levels which predicts flare in childhood-onset lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Sixty LN patients on HCQ use for at least 6-months were prospectively evaluated at baseline (BL) and about 6-months later for cSLE flare and HCQ blood levels (ng/mL) measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

There were 19 patients (32%) with flare, during the study with median SLEDAI increase of 4 (0-8). Median (IQR) BL HCQ levels of the flare group were lower compared to stable patients [557.5 (68.6-980.3) vs. 1061.9 (534.8-1590.0 ng/mL); p=0.012]. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that HCQ levels≤1075 ng/mL were associated with a 5.08 (95%CI 1.28-20.13; p=0.021) times increased risk of flare. Six-month HCQ levels revealed that most patients 24/54 (44%) had persistently low levels (≤1075) during follow-up. Among those, 11/24 (46%) had flare. Multiple logistic regression analysis including prednisone use, baseline SLEDAI-2K, adherence based on pharmacy refill and BL HCQ blood levels as possible predictors of flare revealed that only HCQ blood level was independently associated with flare (OR 0.999, 95%CI 0.998-1.0, p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that HCQ blood cut-off level under 1075 ng/mL predicts flare in childhood-onset LN patients under prescribed HCQ dose of 4.0-5.5 mg/kg/day. We further observed that most of these patients have compliance issues reinforcing the need for a close surveillance particularly in those with levels below the defined cut-off.

Rituximab-Associated Flare of Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis

Background

Patients with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV) can develop disease flare after rituximab administration. The objective of our study was to describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics, predisposing factors, and outcomes of patients with rituximab-associated flare of CV.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center until March 25, 2020.

Results

Among 64 patients with CV who received rituximab therapy in our center, 14 (22%) developed disease flare. Median age was 67.5 years. Seven patients (50%) had type II CV and the other half had either type I (n = 6) or type III (n = 1). Twelve patients (86%) had an underlying B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder as the cause of their CV. CV flare occurred after a median time of 5.5 days (range: 2–8 days). The organ systems most involved were the skin (n = 10), kidneys (n = 5), and peripheral nerves (n = 3). Five patients (36%) developed acute kidney injury (AKI), 3 of whom presented with nephritic syndrome secondary to biopsy-proven membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Treatment was directed against the underlying disease in addition to supportive care. Patients who developed flare were more likely to have B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder as the underlying etiology of their CV (P = 0.03). Eight patients (57%) died after a median time of 27 months.

Conclusions

Rituximab-associated flare can occur in all types of CV, tends to arise approximately 2 days and less than 1 week after rituximab administration, and is more likely to happen in patients with an underlying B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. It does not indicate treatment failure, and rituximab should not be abandoned altogether. AKI is a common manifestation, and mortality rate at 2 years is high.

What Is a Flare? The Manitoba Living With IBD Study

BACKGROUND

Flare is a poorly defined term used by patients and clinicians to indicate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) status. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of a single-item 7-point flare indicator relative to other measures of disease flare.

METHODS

The longitudinal Manitoba Living with IBD Study followed persons with IBD for 1 year; they completed biweekly online surveys and provided 3 stool samples. Disease flare on a single-item flare indicator with 7 possible responses developed for the study was defined by report of symptoms as "moderately" or "much" worse. The flare indicator was evaluated against 5 measures of disease activity: fecal calprotectin score (FCAL), a 2-point disease status indicator, a 4-point flare certainty indicator, the IBD Symptom Index short form (SIBDSI), and the short form IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ). Participants in a flare, based on the 7-point measure, were matched to a nonflaring participant, and a stool sample was collected.

RESULTS

Of the 155 IBD participants, almost half (n = 74) experienced a flare. Of those who flared, 97.0% endorsed active IBD on the 2-point indicator (controls 42.5%; P < .001); 91.9% endorsed active IBD on the 4-point certainty indicator (controls 32.9%; P < .001); 90.5% endorsed active disease on the SIBDSI (controls 34.2%; P < .001); and 48.5% had an elevated FCAL (controls 34.3%; P < .05). The mean SIBDQ was lower for the flare group compared with controls (43.9 [SD 11.1] vs 58.3 [SD 8.5]; P < .001), indicating worse disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-point flare indicator robustly identified symptomatic flares. This patient self-report indicator reflected meaningful changes in more complex clinical indices and had only weak concordance with the presence of inflammation.

DMARD-free remission as novel treatment target in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review of achievability and sustainability

Objectives

Although current treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suggest tapering disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), it is unclear whether DMARD-free remission (DFR) is an achievable and sustainable outcome. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature to determine the prevalence and sustainability of DFR and evaluated potential predictors for DFR.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in March 2019 in multiple databases. All clinical trials and observational studies reporting on discontinuation of DMARDs in RA patients in remission were included. Our quality assessment included a general assessment and assessment of the description of DFR. Prevalence of DFR and its sustainability and flares during tapering and after DMARD stop were summarised. Also, potential predictors for achieving DFR were reviewed.

Results

From 631 articles, 51 were included, comprising 14 clinical trials and 5 observational studies. DFR definition differed, especially for the duration of DMARD-free state. Considering only high- and moderate-quality studies, DFR was achieved in 5.0%–24.3% and sustained DFR (duration>12 months) in 11.6%–19.4% (both relative to the number of patients eligible for tapering). Flares occurred frequently during DMARD tapering (41.8%–75.0%) and in the first year after achieving DFR (10.4%–11.8%), while late flares, >1 year after DMARD-stop, were infrequent (0.3%–3.5%). Many patient characteristics lacked association with DFR. Absence of autoantibodies and shared epitope alleles increased the chance of achieving DFR.

Conclusions

DFR is achievable in RA and is sustainable in ~10%–20% of patients. DFR can become an important outcome measure for clinical trials and requires consistency in the definition. Considering the high rate of flares in the first year after DMARD stop, a DMARD-free follow-up of >12 months is advisable to evaluate sustainability.

Are remission and low disease activity state ideal targets for pregnancy planning in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus? A multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether disease remission or low disease activity state at the beginning of pregnancy in SLE patients is associated with better pregnancy outcome.

METHODS

pregnancies in SLE patients prospectively monitored by pregnancy clinics at four rheumatology centres were enrolled. Patient demographics and clinical information were collected at baseline (pregnancy visit before 8 weeks of gestation) including whether patients were in remission according to DORIS criteria and and/or Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine predictors of disease flare and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) including preeclampsia, preterm delivery, small for gestational age infant, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine fetal death.

RESULTS

347 pregnancies were observed in 281 SLE patients. Excluding early pregnancy losses, 212 pregnancies (69.7%) occurred in patients who were in remission at baseline, 33 (10.9%) in patients in LLDAS, and the remainder in active patients. 73 flares (24%) were observed during pregnancy or puerperium, and 105 (34.5%) APOs occurred. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients in disease remission or taking hydroxychloroquine were less likely to have disease flare, while a history of lupus nephritis increased the risk. The risk of APOs was increased in patients with shorter disease duration, while being on hydroxychloroquine resulted a protective variable. An almost significant association between complete remission and a decreased risk of APOs was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal planning with a firm treat-to-target goal of disease remission is an important strategy to reduce the risk of disease flares and severe obstetrical complications in SLE pregnancies.

Hormone Therapy for Cancer Is a Risk Factor for Relapse of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Exposure to hormone contraception has been associated with an increased risk of relapse of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Little is known about the effects of cancer therapies, specifically hormone therapies, on the course of IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study, collecting data from 5 medical centers, on patients with IBD who received a subsequent diagnosis of breast or prostate cancer from 1997 through 2018. For patients with quiescent IBD at their cancer diagnosis, the primary outcome was relapse of IBD. For patients with active IBD at their cancer diagnosis, the primary outcome was IBD remission.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 447 patients with IBD (44% with Crohn's disease, 53% with ulcerative colitis, and 3% with IBD unclassified) who had either breast (78%) or prostate (22%) cancer. At their cancer diagnosis, 400 patients (90%) had inactive IBD, and 47 (10%) had active IBD. Among patients with inactive IBD, 112 (28%) developed active IBD. Previous exposure to steroids, immunomodulators, or biologics was associated with IBD relapse after a cancer diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] for steroids, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.18-2.71; HR for immunomodulators, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.38-3.55; HR for biologics, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.01-5.36). Hormone monotherapy (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.21-3.29) and combination cytotoxic and hormone therapy (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.01-3.43) was associated with IBD relapse. Among 34 patients who received only cytotoxic chemotherapy, 75% remained in remission from IBD at 250 months compared with 42% of those who received hormone monotherapy (log rank, 0.02). Among patients with active IBD at their cancer diagnosis, 14 (30%) entered remission from IBD, but there were no significant factors of achieving IBD remission.

CONCLUSIONS

In a multicenter retrospective study, we found that patients with IBD and breast or prostate cancer who receive hormone therapy have an increased risk for relapse of IBD and related adverse outcomes.

Clinical and radiologic analysis of on-demand use of etanercept for disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis for 2 years: The RESUME study: A case-control study

To reduce costs of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), we evaluated the efficacy of repeated etanercept (ETN) discontinuation and restarting in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a case-control study.Thirty-one bDMARD-naive RA patients with moderate to high disease activity received ETN until low disease activity (LDA) was achieved, after which ETN was discontinued. Upon flaring, ETN was readministered with observation every 2 months for 2 years, and radiographically evaluated in comparison with a historical control group treated continuously with ETN. Statistical methods including Fisher exact test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis test, multiple regression analysis, and Student t test were conducted as appropriate.Thirteen patients with inadequate response to ETN were withdrawn from the study, and 5 had no flare-up after ETN discontinuation. In the remaining 13 patients, ETN was used on-demand to maintain LDA. Multivariate analysis revealed that MTX was significantly correlated with ETN. All 13 patients achieved LDA at final follow-up. Although joint damage progressed in patients using ETN on-demand, structural damage progression in the on-demand group was not significantly different from that in controls.On-demand use of ETN for flaring reduced disease activity but not structural damage in 50% of patients (though not significantly). However, inhibition of joint damage was achieved in 50% of patients after 2 years, supporting on-demand use of ETN as a treatment option for patients with RA who cannot afford bDMARD or targeted synthetic DMARD therapy.

Environmental factors associated with disease flare in juvenile and adult dermatomyositis

Objective

The aim was to assess environmental factors associated with disease flare in juvenile and adult dermatomyositis (DM).

Methods

An online survey of DM patients from the USA and Canada examined smoking, sun exposure, infections, medications, vaccines, stressful life events and physical activity during the 6 months before flares, or in the past 6 months in patients without flares. Differences were evaluated by χ 2 and Fisher's exact tests, and significant univariable results were examined in multivariable logistic regression. Residential locations before flare were correlated with the National Weather Service UV index.

Results

Of 210 participants (164 juvenile and 46 adult DM), 134 (63.8%) experienced a disease flare within 2 years of the survey. Subjects more often reported disease flare after sun exposure [odds ratio (OR) = 2.0, P = 0.03], although use of photoprotective measures did not differ between those with and without flare. Urinary tract infections (OR = 16.4, P = 0.005) and gastroenteritis (OR = 3.2, P = 0.04) were more frequent in the preceding 6 months in those who flared. Subjects who flared recently used NSAIDS (OR = 3.0, P = 0.0003), blood pressure medicines (OR = 3.5, P = 0.049) or medication for depression or mood changes (OR = 12.9, P = 0.015). Moving to a new house (OR = 10.3, P = 0.053) was more common in those who flared. Only sun exposure (OR = 2.2) and NSAIDs (OR = 1.9) were significant factors in multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

Certain classes of environmental agents that have been associated with the initiation of DM, including sun exposure and medications, may also play a role in disease flares.

Rheumatoid Arthritis: Are psychological factors effective in disease flare?

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is clinically an undulant disease, and reasons for flare or remission vary. We aimed to identify factors potentially associated with disease flare and remission.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-four patients with RA who were admitted to our center between January 2010 and January 2016 were included. Disease activity was evaluated using disease activity score 28 (DAS 28); functional status was evaluated using the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (m-HAQ), a questionnaire that comprises flare or remission domains such as psychological stress and mood status, physical trauma, nutrition regimen, infection, antibiotic use, and seasonal weather changes. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were used to identify if patients had a mood disorder. Four subscales of Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale-2 (AIMS-2) (level of tension, mood, general perception of health, and satisfaction with health) were used to determine patient quality of life.

RESULTS

Of the 274 patients, 261 were female (95.3%) and 13 were male (4.7%); the mean age was 52.10±9.41 years. According to patients' perception, the most frequent reasons for joint symptoms were psychological stress/mood disorder (86.1%), followed by infection (49.6%) and trauma (46.4%). The most frequent factors for remission of symptoms were antibiotic use (42.7%), cold weather (34.3%), and hot weather (19%).

CONCLUSION

Psychological stress and mood status are independent factors for relapse periods in patients with RA. These should be considered particularly in patients who are resistant to different treatment regimens and in whom any other reason for disease flare is not obvious.

Efficacy and Safety of Escalation of Adalimumab Therapy to Weekly Dosing in Pediatric Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adalimumab in inducing and maintaining remission in children with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease was shown in the IMAgINE 1 trial (NCT00409682). As per protocol, nonresponders or patients experiencing flare(s) on every other week (EOW) maintenance dosing could escalate to weekly dosing; we aimed to determine the therapeutic benefits of weekly dose escalation in this subpopulation.

METHODS

Week 52 remission and response rates were assessed in patients who escalated to weekly dosing from their previous EOW schedule, which was according to randomized treatment dose (higher dose [HD] adalimumab [≥40 kg, 40 mg EOW; <40 kg, 20 mg EOW] or lower dose [LD; ≥40 kg, 20 mg EOW; <40 kg, 10 mg EOW]). Adverse events were reported for patients remaining on EOW dosing and patients receiving weekly dosing.

RESULTS

Escalation to weekly dosing occurred in 48/95 (50.5%) patients randomized to LD and 35/93 (37.6%) patients randomized to HD adalimumab (P = 0.076). Week 52 remission and response rates were 18.8% and 47.9% for patients receiving LD adalimumab weekly and 31.4% and 57.1% for patients receiving HD adalimumab weekly, respectively (LD versus HD, P = 0.19 for remission; P = 0.41 for response). Adverse event rates were similar for patients receiving EOW and weekly adalimumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly adalimumab dosing was clinically beneficial for children with Crohn's disease who experienced nonresponse or flare on EOW dosing. No increased safety risks were observed with weekly dosing.

It's not just the joints, it's the whole thing: qualitative analysis of patients' experience of flare in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Flare is a commonly used term in arthritis, including PsA, but remains undefined. This study seeks to explore patients' experience of flare.

METHODS

Eighteen semi-structured interviews were undertaken with patients with PsA in an informal clinical setting. Patients were purposively sampled from specialist clinic lists to reflect the major elements of the psoriatic disease spectrum. Approximately one-third of patients reported themselves to be in a flare state at the time of the interview. Transcripts underwent thematic analysis according to the recommendations of Braun and Clarke (Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101). NVivo software was utilized, with initial coding reflecting the source data, such as pain, feeling miserable and feeling slowed down. Codes were then grouped into associated clusters. These clusters and the interrelationships were then summarized into emergent themes.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 44 years, and patients' average disease duration was 4.5 years. Nine main overarching themes pertaining to flare were identified: physical symptoms, social withdrawal, psychological symptoms, fatigue, loss of normal function, triggers, management of pre-flare, management of flare and timing. These show some degree of overlap and are interlinked, with some degree of temporality emerging as related to patients' experience of flare.

CONCLUSION

This study has identified a number of components of flare in PsA from the patient perspective. Although the emergent themes are of an overlapping and interactive nature, it is clear that flare in PsA is more than a swollen or tender joint count as measured in clinical practice.

Evidence that abnormally large seasonal declines in vitamin D status may trigger SLE flare in non-African Americans

Cross-sectional studies have shown that low vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D)) is associated with increased systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity. This study is the first to assess the temporal relationship between 25(OH)D levels and onset of SLE flare. This assessment was made possible because of the specimen bank and database of the Ohio SLE Study (OSS), a longitudinal study of frequently relapsing SLE that involved regular bimonthly patient follow-up. We identified for this study 82 flares from 46 patients that were separated by at least 8 months from previous flares. Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured at 4 and 2 months before flare, and at the time of flare (a flare interval). We found that for flares occurring during low daylight months (LDM, Oct-Mar), 25(OH)D levels were decreased at the time of flare, but only in non-African American (non-AA) patients (32% decrease at flare, compared to 4 months prior, p < 0.001). To control for seasonal effects, we also measured 25(OH)D levels in the LDM "no-flare" intervals, which were intervals that matched to the same calendar months of the patients' LDM flare intervals, but that didn't end in flare (n = 24). For these matches, a significant decrease occurred in 25(OH)D levels during the flare intervals (18.1% decrease, p < 0.001), but not during the matching no-flare intervals (6.2% decrease, p = 0.411). For flares occurring during high daylight months (HDM), 25(OH)D levels changed only in non-AA patients, increasing slightly (5.6%, p = 0.010). Analysis of flare rates for the entire OSS cohort (n = 201 flares) revealed a tendency for higher flare rates during LDM compared to HDM, but again only in non-AA patients (p = 0.060). Flare rates were lower during HDM for non-AA patients compared to AA patients (p = 0.028). In conclusion, in non-AA SLE patients, unusually large declines in 25(OH)D during LDM may be mechanistically related to SLE flare, whereas relatively high 25(OH)D levels during HDM may protect against flare.