Lectin Activity of the TcdA and TcdB Toxins of Clostridium difficile

Clostridium difficile is a major cause of hospital-acquired antibiotic-associated diarrhea. C. difficile produces two cytotoxins, TcdA and TcdB; both toxins are multidomain proteins that lead to cytotoxicity through the modification and inactivation of small GTPases of the Rho/Rac family. Previous studies have indicated that host glycans are targets for TcdA and TcdB, with interactions thought to be with both α- and β-linked galactose. In the current study, screening of glycan arrays with different domains of TcdA and TcdB revealed that the binding regions of both toxins interact with a wider range of host glycoconjugates than just terminal α- and β-linked galactose, including blood groups, Lewis antigens, N-acetylglucosamine, mannose, and glycosaminoglycans. The interactions of TcdA and TcdB with ABO blood group and Lewis antigens were assessed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The blood group A antigen was the highest-affinity ligand for both toxins. Free glycans alone or in combination were unable to abolish Vero cell cytotoxicity by TcdB. SPR competition assays indicate that there is more than one glycan binding site on TcdB. Host glycoconjugates are common targets of bacterial toxins, but typically this binding is to a specific structure or related structures. The binding of TcdA and TcdB is to a wide range of host glycans providing a wide range of target cells and tissues in vivo.

Glycomics and Proteomics Approaches to Investigate Early Adenovirus-Host Cell Interactions

Adenoviruses as most viruses rely on glycan and protein interactions to attach to and enter susceptible host cells. The Adenoviridae family comprises more than 80 human types and they differ in their attachment factor and receptor usage, which likely contributes to the diverse tropism of the different types. In the past years, methods to systematically identify glycan and protein interactions have advanced. In particular sensitivity, speed and coverage of mass spectrometric analyses allow for high-throughput identification of glycans and peptides separated by liquid chromatography. Also, developments in glycan microarray technologies have led to targeted, high-throughput screening and identification of glycan-based receptors. The mapping of cell surface interactions of the diverse adenovirus types has implications for cell, tissue, and species tropism as well as drug development. Here we review known adenovirus interactions with glycan- and protein-based receptors, as well as glycomics and proteomics strategies to identify yet elusive virus receptors and attachment factors. We finally discuss challenges, bottlenecks, and future research directions in the field of non-enveloped virus entry into host cells.

•

Adenovirus entry into cells is guided by specific glycan and protein interactions.

•

Glycan arrays and shotgun glycomics methods are valuable technologies to identify virus–glycan interactions.

•

Shotgun proteomics and ligand-based receptor capture are powerful methods for proteinaceous receptor discovery.

•

A combination of shotgun glycomics and proteomics with CRISPR/Cas9 and RNAi validation holds the promise of generating a systems biology view of virus entry processes.

Sheep primary cells as in vitro models to investigate Mycoplasma agalactiae host cell interactions

Appropriate infection models are imperative for the understanding of pathogens like mycoplasmas that are known for their strict host and tissue specificity, and lack of suitable cell and small animal models has hindered pathogenicity studies. This is particularly true for the economically important group of ruminant mycoplasmas whose virulence factors need to be elucidated for designing effective intervention strategies. Mycoplasma agalactiae serves as a useful role model especially because it is phylogenetically very close to M. bovis and causes similar symptoms by as yet unknown mechanisms. Here, we successfully prepared and characterized four different primary sheep cell lines, namely the epithelial and stromal cells from the mammary gland and uterus, respectively. Using immunohistochemistry, we identified vimentin and cytokeratin as specific markers to confirm the typical cell phenotypes of these primary cells. Furthermore, M. agalactiae’s consistent adhesion and invasion into these primary cells proves the reliability of these cell models. Mimicking natural infections, mammary epithelial and stromal cells showed higher invasion and adhesion rates compared to the uterine cells as also seen via double immunofluorescence staining. Altogether, we have generated promising in vitro cell models to study host–pathogen interactions of M. agalactiae and related ruminant pathogens in a more authentic manner.

The study is an important step forward in developing in vitro models that will facilitate analyses of Mycoplasma agalactiae and related ruminant mycoplasmas' host–pathogen interactions at the molecular level.