Biochemical diagnosis of Cushing's disease: Screening and confirmatory testing

Due to the variable clinical features and its rarity diagnosis of Cushing's disease (CD) is often delayed. Clearly, awareness for CD needs to be raised, accompanied by the availability of simple and accurate screening tests. Late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC), 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST), and urinary free cortisol (UFC) have all been extensively studied, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. However, each of those well-established tests has its own distinctive features, making it preferable in specific clinical conditions and patient groups. To choose the most appropriate test in individual patients, an expert endocrinologist should be consulted. This review will discuss the pitfalls for each of those tests.

Accuracy of Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome

CONTEXT

The diagnosis of Cushing syndrome (CS) can be challenging. It remains to be determined which diagnostic tests are the most accurate.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the accuracy of diagnostic tests for CS using contemporary meta-analytic techniques (hierarchical models).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews (inception until August 3, 2018).

STUDY SELECTION

Studies performed in adults that determined the accuracy of one or more diagnostic tests: overnight 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST), 2-day low-dose DST (2d DST), 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC), late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC), midnight serum cortisol (MSC), and the dexamethasone-suppressed CRH (dex-CRH) and desmopressin (dex-DDAVP) tests.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently extracted data and performed methodological assessments.

DATA SYNTHESIS

One hundred thirty-nine studies (14 140 participants) were included in the analysis. The respective sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) estimates include the following: DST 98.6% (96.9%-99.4%), 90.6% (86.4%-93.6%), 10.5 (7.2-15.3), and 0.016 (0.007-0.035); 2d DST 95.3% (91.3%-97.5%), 92.8% (85.7%-96.5%), 13.2 (6.47-27.1), and 0.051 (0.027-0.095); UFC 94.0% (91.6%-95.7%), 93.0% (89.0%-95.5%), 13.3 (8.47-21.0), and 0.065 (0.046-0.092); LNSC 95.8% (93.%-97.2%), 93.4% (90.7%-95.4%), 14.6 (10.3-20.7), and 0.045 (0.030-0.066); MSC 96.1% (93.5%-97.6%), 93.2% (88.1%-96.3%), 14.2 (7.96-25.2), and 0.042 (0.026-0.069); and dex-CRH 98.6% (90.4%-99.8%), 85.9% (67.6%-94.7%), 7.0 (2.80-17.6), and 0.016 (0.002-0.118). A single study evaluated dex-DDAVP. Meta-regression and a novel network meta-analytic approach suggest that DST is the most sensitive while UFC is the least sensitive.

CONCLUSIONS

All of the included diagnostic tests for CS are highly sensitive and specific. It appears that the DST is the most sensitive while the UFC is less sensitive. The specificity of all first-line tests appears comparable.

Bedtime Salivary Cortisol and Cortisone by LC-MS/MS in Healthy Adult Subjects: Evaluation of Sampling Time

The measurement of late-night salivary cortisol is a mainstay in the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. Furthermore, the measurement of salivary cortisol is useful in assessing the cortisol awakening response. Because the salivary glands express 11-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, the measurement of salivary cortisone may improve the performance of salivary corticosteroid measurements. We measured salivary cortisol by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and salivary cortisol and cortisone by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in only 50 µL of saliva sampled from 54 healthy subjects (aged 20 to 64 years). We allowed patients to sample at their normal bedtime (2025 to 2400 hours) to answer a common question as to whether sampling at the normal bedtime is equivalent to the standard required sampling at 2300 to 2400 hours. We found that the salivary cortisol and cortisone results by LC-MS/MS correlated well with salivary cortisol measured with the US Food and Drug Administration-cleared EIA. Furthermore, the upper limit of normal of salivary cortisol by EIA for bedtime samples was lower than the previously published upper limit of normal with sampling required at 2300 to 2400 hours. There were no significant effects of age or sex on any of the salivary steroid measurements. We conclude that (i) salivary cortisol and cortisone can be reliably measured by LC-MS/MS in small volumes of saliva and (ii) that patients can be evaluated using saliva sampled at their normal bedtime, rather than being required to stay awake until 2300 to 2400 hours.

Influence of age, gender and body mass index on late-night salivary cortisol in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) is one of the most reliable tests to screen for endogenous Cushing syndrome. This test is simple, inexpensive and noninvasive and has high sensitivity and specificity. The aim of our study was to analyze the putative influence of age, gender and body mass index (BMI) on LNSC levels in a healthy population.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study conducted in healthy adults. Midnight saliva samples were collected at home. Participants refrained from teeth brushing, eating or drinking for 2 h prior to collection. Salivary cortisol measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital (number 140073).

RESULTS

We evaluated 122 nonsmoking healthy volunteers. Mean age was 35±14 years (range, 18-74 years); 63% were women. Mean BMI was 24±3 kg/m2, blood pressure 115/74 mmHg and fasting plasma glucose 4.8±0.5 mmol/L. LNSC presented a non-Gaussian distribution; the median was 3.58 (range, 0.55-8.55) nmol/L (0.13 [range, 0.02-0.31] μg/dL), and the 97.5th percentile (P97.5) was 8.3 nmol/L (0.3 μg/dL). Multiple linear regression disclosed a significant positive association between salivary cortisol levels and age (r2=0.21, p<0.001), but no association with gender (p=0.105) or BMI (p=0.119). Accordingly, participants aged >50 years had significantly higher salivary cortisol as compared to those aged <50 years (5.24 nmol/L [0.19 μg/dL] vs. 3.31 nmol/L [0.12 μg/dL], respectively, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum reference value (P97.5) of LNSC was set at 8.3 nmol/L (0.3 μg/dL) using ECLIA. Advanced age was associated with higher LNSC levels, with no evident influence of gender or BMI.