Evaluating tumor cell- and T cell-derived extracellular vesicles as potential biomarkers of cancer and immune cell competence

INTRODUCTION

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) produced by tumors, also called tumor-derived exosomes (TEX), have been implicated in inducing immune cell suppression in vitro and in vivo. The development of a novel category of noninvasive biomarkers for precision oncology remains an unmet need, and TEX emerge as a promising liquid tumor biopsy component.

AREAS COVERED

TEX play a critical role in monitoring cancer presence/progression and in reprograming of anti-tumor effector T cells to producers of EVs with pro-tumor activity. TEX are a subset of circulating EVs. Their separation by immune capture from EVs derived from nonmalignant cells allows for TEX phenotypic/functional assessments. TEX cross-talking with CD3(+) T cells induce the release of CD3(+) small EV (sEV), whose cargo of suppressor proteins resembles that of TEX and further contributes to cancer-induced immune suppression. While TEX recapitulate the genetic/molecular phenotype of tumor cells, CD3(+) sEV might serve as 'T cell liquid biopsy.'

EXPERT OPINION

Preclinical explorations of the role in cancer body fluids of TEX and CD3(+) sEV as cancer biomarkers suggest that these EV subsets may qualify as liquid tumor biopsy noninvasive components in the near future. Their potential to simultaneously serve as noninvasive liquid tumor biopsy and T cell biopsy remains to be validated in future clinical trials.

The Role of Tumor-Derived Exosomes (TEX) in Shaping Anti-Tumor Immune Competence

Emerging studies suggest that extracellular vesicles (EVs) mediating intercellular communication in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a key role in driving cancer progression. Tumor-derived small EVs or exosomes (TEX) enriched in immunosuppressive proteins or in microRNAs targeting suppressive pathways in recipient cells contribute to reprogramming the TME into a cancer-promoting milieu. The adenosinergic pathway is an acknowledged major contributor to tumor-induced immune suppression. TEX carry the components of this pathway and utilize ATP to produce adenosine (ADO). TEX-associated ADO emerges as a key factor in the suppression of T cell responses to therapy. Here, the significance of the ADO pathway in TEX is discussed as a highly effective mechanism of cancer-driven immune cell suppression and of resistance to immune therapies.

Tumor-Derived Exosomes (TEX) and Their Role in Immuno-Oncology

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a key role in health and disease, including cancer. Tumors produce a mix of EVs differing in size, cellular origin, biogenesis and molecular content. Small EVs (sEV) or exosomes are a subset of 30-150 nm (virus-size) vesicles originating from the multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and carrying a cargo that in its content and topography approximates that of a parent cell. Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) present in all body fluids of cancer patients, are considered promising candidates for a liquid tumor biopsy. TEX also mediate immunoregulatory activities: they maintain a crosstalk between the tumor and various non-malignant cells, including immunocytes. Effects that EVs exert on immune cells may be immunosuppressive or immunostimulatory. Here, we review the available data for TEX interactions with immunocytes, focusing on strategies that allow isolation from plasma and separation of TEX from sEV produced by non-malignant cells. Immune effects mediated by either of the subsets can now be distinguished and measured. The approach has allowed for the comparison of molecular and functional profiles of the two sEV fractions in plasma of cancer patients. While TEX carried an excess of immunosuppressive proteins and inhibited immune cell functions in vitro and in vivo, the sEV derived from non-malignant cells, including CD3(+)T cells, were variably enriched in immunostimulatory proteins and could promote functions of immunocytes. Thus, sEV in plasma of cancer patients are heterogenous, representing a complex molecular network which is not evident in healthy donors' plasma. Importantly, TEX appear to be able to reprogram functions of non-malignant CD3(+)T cells inducing them to produce CD3(+)sEV enriched in immunosuppressive proteins. Ratios of stimulatory/inhibitory proteins carried by TEX and by CD3(+)sEV derived from reprogrammed non-malignant cells vary broadly in patients and appear to negatively correlate with disease progression. Simultaneous capture from plasma and functional/molecular profiling of TEX and the CD3(+)sEV fractions allows for defining their role as cancer biomarkers and as monitors of cancer patients' immune competence, respectively.

The potential role of tumor-derived exosomes in diagnosis, prognosis, and response to therapy in cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small extracellular vesicles (sEV) produced by tumors and called TEX mediate communication and regulate the tumor microenvironment. As a 'liquid tumor biopsy' and with the ability to induce pro-tumor reprogramming, TEX offer a promising approach to monitoring cancer progression or response to therapy.

AREAS COVERED

TEX isolation from body fluids and separation by immunoaffinity capture from other EVs enables TEX molecular and functional characterization in vitro and in vivo. TEX carry membrane-bound PD-L1 and a rich cargo of other proteins and nucleic acids that reflect the tumor content and activity. TEX transfer this cargo to recipient cells, activating various molecular pathways and inducing pro-tumor transcriptional changes. TEX may interfere with immune therapies, and TEX plasma levels correlate with patients' responses to therapy. TEX induce local and systemic alterations in immune cells which may have a prognostic value.

EXPERT OPINION

TEX have a special advantage as potential cancer biomarkers. Their cargo emerges as a correlate of developing or progressing malignant disease; their phenotype mimics that of the tumor; and their functional reprogramming of immune cells provides a reading of the patients' immune status prior and post immunotherapy. Validation of TEX and T-cell-derived sEV as cancer biomarkers is an impending future task.

Signaling of Tumor-Derived sEV Impacts Melanoma Progression

Small extracellular vesicles (sEV or exosomes) are nanovesicles (30–150 nm) released both in vivo and in vitro by most cell types. Tumor cells produce sEV called TEX and disperse them throughout all body fluids. TEX contain a cargo of proteins, lipids, and RNA that is similar but not identical to that of the “parent” producer cell (i.e., the cargo of exosomes released by melanoma cells is similar but not identical to exosomes released by melanocytes), possibly due to selective endosomal packaging. TEX and their role in cancer biology have been intensively investigated largely due to the possibility that TEX might serve as key component of a “liquid tumor biopsy.” TEX are also involved in the crosstalk between cancer and immune cells and play a key role in the suppression of anti-tumor immune responses, thus contributing to the tumor progression. Most of the available information about the TEX molecular composition and functions has been gained using sEV isolated from supernatants of cancer cell lines. However, newer data linking plasma levels of TEX with cancer progression have focused attention on TEX in the patients’ peripheral circulation as potential biomarkers of cancer diagnosis, development, activity, and response to therapy. Here, we consider the molecular cargo and functions of TEX as potential biomarkers of one of the most fatal malignancies—melanoma. Studies of TEX in plasma of patients with melanoma offer the possibility of an in-depth understanding of the melanoma biology and response to immune therapies. This review features melanoma cell-derived exosomes (MTEX) with special emphasis on exosome-mediated signaling between melanoma cells and the host immune system.

CD44v3 protein-carrying tumor-derived exosomes in HNSCC patients' plasma as potential noninvasive biomarkers of disease activity

The molecular cargo of tumor-cell-derived exosomes (TEX) mimics that of parental tumor cells. Thus, TEX could potentially serve as noninvasive biomarkers of cancer progression. However, separation of TEX from non-TEX in patients’ plasma requires tumor antigen-specific detection reagents. CD44v3 has been of interest as a potential biomarker of disease progression in HNSCC, because its overexpression in tumor cells associates with poor outcome. Here, CD44v3+ TEX immunocaptured from plasma of 44 HNSCC patients and 7 healthy donors (HDs) were evaluated as potential biomarkers of disease activity and stage. Exosomes were isolated from plasma of by size exclusion chromatography. Using anti-CD44v3 or anti-CD3 mAbs on beads, CD44v3+ TEX CD3(-)TEX-enriched exosomes were immunocaptured from supernatants of nonmalignant or HNSCC cell lines and from patients’ plasma. On-bead flow cytometry was used for the detection of FAS-L, PD-L1, TGFF-β. CSPG4 or EGFR on exosomes. The TEX expression profiles were correlated to clinicopathological parameters. Relative florescence intensity (RFI) values for CD44v3 were higher (p < .01) on TEX from HNSCC cell lines or on CD44v3+ CD3(-) plasma-derived exosomes. RFI values of CD44v3 on CD3(-) exosomes were higher (p < .005) in patients than in HDs and correlated (p < .05) with the UICC stage and lymph node metastasis. In HNSCC patients, CD44v3+ exosomes higher levels of immunosuppressive proteins compared to CD44v3(-) exosomes (p < .05-p < .005), and RFI values for these markers correlated with higher disease stages and lymph node metastasis. Isolation of CD44v3+ exosomes by immunocapture allowed for enrichment of TEX which are potentially promising liquid biomarkers of the tumor burden and disease stage in HNSCC.

Challenges in Exosome Isolation and Analysis in Health and Disease

A growing body of evidence emphasizes the important role exosomes in different physiological and pathological conditions. Exosomes, virus-size extracellular vesicles (EVs), carry a complex molecular cargo, which is actively processed in the endocytic compartment of parental cells. Exosomes carry and deliver this cargo to recipient cells, serving as an intercellular communication system. The methods for recovery of exosomes from supernatants of cell lines or body fluids are not uniformly established. Yet, studies of the quality and quantity of exosome cargos underlie the concept of "liquid biopsy." Exosomes are emerging as a potentially useful diagnostic tool and a predictor of disease progression, response to therapy and overall survival. Although many novel approaches to exosome isolation and analysis of their cargos have been introduced, the role of exosomes as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers of disease remains unconfirmed. This review considers existing challenges to exosome validation as disease biomarkers. Focusing on advantages and limitations of methods for exosome isolation and characterization, approaches are proposed to facilitate further progress in the development of exosomes as biomarkers in human disease.

microRNA modified tumor-derived exosomes as novel tools for maturation of dendritic cells

Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) are known by their immune suppression effects as well as initiation mediators in cancer progression and metastasis. Meanwhile, they are appropriate sources to induce immunity against tumor cells, as consist of tumor specific and associated antigens. The aim of the current study is modifying TEX with microRNA miR-155, miR-142, and let-7i, to enhance their immune stimulation ability and induce potent dendritic cells (DC). For this, exosomes were isolated from mouse mammalian breast cancer cell line; 4T1, and subjected to miR-155, miR-142, and let-7i by electroporation. Immature DCs were generated from mouse bone marrow in the presence of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). To mature DCs, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), TEX, and modified TEX were used. The expression level of miRNAs and their target genes (IL-6, IL-17, IL-1b, TGFβ, SOCS1, KLRK1, IFNγ, and TLR4) was determined. TEX were nanovesicles with spheroid morphology which expressed CD81, CD63, and TSG101, as exosome markers, at protein level. MHCII, CD80, and CD40 as maturation markers were assessed by flow cytometry. Overexpression of miRNAs were confirmed in exosomes and mDCs. Up and downregulation of target genes confirmed the gene network in DC maturation. We found that Let-7i could efficiently induce the DC maturation, as well as miR-142 and miR-155 have enhancing effects. These findings reveal that the modified TEX would be a hopeful cell-free vaccine for the cancer treatment.

Potential roles of tumor-derived exosomes in angiogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) and their role in tumor progression by accelerating angiogenesis are of great current interest. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying TEX-blood vessels cross-talk may lead to improvements in current diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer. Areas covered: For solid tumors, an adequate blood supply is of critical importance for their development, growth and metastasis. TEX, virus-size vesicles which circulate freely throughout body fluids and accumulate in the tumor microenvironment (TME), have been recognized as a new contributor to angiogenesis. TEX serve as a communication system between the tumor and various normal cells and are responsible for functional reprogramming of these cells. The molecular and genetic cargos that TEX deliver to the recipient cells involved in angiogenesis promote its induction and progression. The targeted inhibition of TEX pro-angiogenic functions might be a novel therapeutic approach for control of tumor progression. Expert opinion: TEX circulating in body fluids of cancer patients carry a complex molecular and genetic cargo and are responsible for phenotypic and functional reprogramming of endothelial cells and other normal cells residing in the TME.

The emerging role of plasma exosomes in diagnosis, prognosis and therapies of patients with cancer

Exosomes, small (30-150nm) extracellular vesicles of endocytic origin, are present in all body fluids of cancer patients. Tumor-derived exosomes, TEX, emerge as potentially promising non-invasive biomarkers of tumor progression and of immune cell dysfunction in cancer. Exosomes isolated from plasma by size exclusion chromatography can be fractionated into TEX and non-TEX by immune capture on beads. Profiling of molecular and genetic contents of TEX shows that levels if immunosuppressive proteins, such as PD-L1, carried by TEX associate with disease progression. The data suggest that TEX have a to serve as tumor surrogates, while immune cell-derived exosomes might serve as biomarkers of immune dysfunction in cancer.

The Dichotomy of Tumor Exosomes (TEX) in Cancer Immunity: Is It All in the ConTEXt? Vaccines (Basel). 2015;3:1019-1051. [PMID: 26694473 PMCID: PMC4693230 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines3041019]

Exosomes are virus-sized nanoparticles (30–130 nm) formed intracellularly as intravesicular bodies/intralumenal vesicles within maturing endosomes (“multivesicular bodies”, MVBs). If MVBs fuse with the cell’s plasma membrane, the interior vesicles may be released extracellularly, and are termed “exosomes”. The protein cargo of exosomes consists of cytosolic, membrane, and extracellular proteins, along with membrane-derived lipids, and an extraordinary variety of nucleic acids. As such, exosomes reflect the status and identity of the parent cell, and are considered as tiny cellular surrogates. Because of this closely entwined relationship between exosome content and the source/status of the parental cell, conceivably exosomes could be used as vaccines against various pathologies, as they contain antigens associated with a given disease, e.g., cancer. Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) have been shown to be potent anticancer vaccines in animal models, driving antigen-specific T and B cell responses, but much recent literature concerning TEX strongly places the vesicles as powerfully immunosuppressive. This dichotomy suggests that the context in which the immune system encounters TEX is critical in determining immune stimulation versus immunosuppression. Here, we review literature on both sides of this immune coin, and suggest that it may be time to revisit the concept of TEX as anticancer vaccines in clinical settings.