1
|
Lee J, Nicosia M, Hong ES, Silver DJ, Li C, Bayik D, Watson DC, Lauko A, Kay KE, Wang SZ, Johnson S, McGraw M, Grabowski MM, Kish DD, Desai AB, Goodman WA, Cameron SJ, Okada H, Valujskikh A, Fairchild RL, Ahluwalia MS, Lathia JD. Sex-Biased T-cell Exhaustion Drives Differential Immune Responses in Glioblastoma. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:2090-2105. [PMID: 37378557 PMCID: PMC10481130 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-0869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Sex differences in glioblastoma (GBM) incidence and outcome are well recognized, and emerging evidence suggests that these extend to genetic/epigenetic and cellular differences, including immune responses. However, the mechanisms driving immunologic sex differences are not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that T cells play a critical role in driving GBM sex differences. Male mice exhibited accelerated tumor growth, with decreased frequency and increased exhaustion of CD8+ T cells in the tumor. Furthermore, a higher frequency of progenitor exhausted T cells was found in males, with improved responsiveness to anti-PD-1 treatment. Moreover, increased T-cell exhaustion was observed in male GBM patients. Bone marrow chimera and adoptive transfer models indicated that T cell-mediated tumor control was predominantly regulated in a cell-intrinsic manner, partially mediated by the X chromosome inactivation escape gene Kdm6a. These findings demonstrate that sex-biased predetermined behavior of T cells is critical for inducing sex differences in GBM progression and immunotherapy response. SIGNIFICANCE Immunotherapies in patients with GBM have been unsuccessful due to a variety of factors, including the highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in GBM. This study demonstrates that sex-biased T-cell behaviors are predominantly intrinsically regulated, further suggesting sex-specific approaches can be leveraged to potentially improve the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy in GBM. See related commentary by Alspach, p. 1966. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 1949.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juyeun Lee
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael Nicosia
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ellen S. Hong
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Daniel J. Silver
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Cathy Li
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Defne Bayik
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Dionysios C. Watson
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Hematology/Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Adam Lauko
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Kristen E. Kay
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sabrina Z. Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Sadie Johnson
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mary McGraw
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Danielle D. Kish
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amar B. Desai
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Wendy A. Goodman
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Scott J. Cameron
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California
| | - Anna Valujskikh
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert L. Fairchild
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Justin D. Lathia
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alban TJ, Grabowski MM, Otvos B, Bayik D, Wang W, Zalavadia A, Makarov V, Troike K, McGraw M, Rabljenovic A, Lauko A, Neumann C, Roversi G, Waite KA, Cioffi G, Patil N, Tran TT, McCortney K, Steffens A, Diaz CM, Brown JM, Egan KM, Horbinski CM, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Rajappa P, Vogelbaum MA, Bucala R, Chan TA, Ahluwalia MS, Lathia JD. The MIF promoter SNP rs755622 is associated with immune activation in glioblastoma. JCI Insight 2023; 8:e160024. [PMID: 37252795 PMCID: PMC10371339 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.160024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Intratumoral heterogeneity is a defining hallmark of glioblastoma, driving drug resistance and ultimately recurrence. Many somatic drivers of microenvironmental change have been shown to affect this heterogeneity and, ultimately, the treatment response. However, little is known about how germline mutations affect the tumoral microenvironment. Here, we find that the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs755622 in the promoter of the cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is associated with increased leukocyte infiltration in glioblastoma. Furthermore, we identified an association between rs755622 and lactotransferrin expression, which could also be used as a biomarker for immune-infiltrated tumors. These findings demonstrate that a germline SNP in the promoter region of MIF may affect the immune microenvironment and further reveal a link between lactotransferrin and immune activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler J. Alban
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology, and
| | - Matthew M. Grabowski
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Balint Otvos
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Defne Bayik
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Wesley Wang
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Institute for Genomic Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics and Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ajay Zalavadia
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Vlad Makarov
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology, and
| | - Katie Troike
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Mary McGraw
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anja Rabljenovic
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Adam Lauko
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Chase Neumann
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Gustavo Roversi
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Kristin A. Waite
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Trans-Divisional Research Program, Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Gino Cioffi
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Trans-Divisional Research Program, Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nirav Patil
- University Hospitals Research and Education Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Thuy T. Tran
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kathleen McCortney
- Departments of Pathology and Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alicia Steffens
- Departments of Pathology and Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - J. Mark Brown
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kathleen M. Egan
- Departments of Pathology and Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Craig M. Horbinski
- Departments of Pathology and Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Trans-Divisional Research Program, Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Prajwal Rajappa
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Institute for Genomic Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics and Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael A. Vogelbaum
- Departments of Cancer Epidemiology and Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Richard Bucala
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Timothy A. Chan
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology, and
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Justin D. Lathia
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences and Imaging Core, Lerner Research Institute
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bayik D, Bartels CF, Lovrenert K, Watson DC, Zhang D, Kay K, Lee J, Lauko A, Johnson S, Lo A, Silver DJ, McGraw M, Grabowski M, Mohammadi AM, Veglia F, Fan Y, Vogelbaum MA, Scacheri P, Lathia JD. Correction: Distinct Cell Adhesion Signature Defines Glioblastoma Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subsets. Cancer Res 2023; 83:1757. [PMID: 37183658 PMCID: PMC10183804 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
|
4
|
Watson DC, Bayik D, Storevik S, Moreino SS, Sprowls SA, Han J, Augustsson MT, Lauko A, Sravya P, Røsland GV, Troike K, Tronstad KJ, Wang S, Sarnow K, Kay K, Lunavat TR, Silver DJ, Dayal S, Joseph JV, Mulkearns-Hubert E, Ystaas LAR, Deshpande G, Guyon J, Zhou Y, Magaut CR, Seder J, Neises L, Williford SE, Meiser J, Scott AJ, Sajjakulnukit P, Mears JA, Bjerkvig R, Chakraborty A, Daubon T, Cheng F, Lyssiotis CA, Wahl DR, Hjelmeland AB, Hossain JA, Miletic H, Lathia JD. GAP43-dependent mitochondria transfer from astrocytes enhances glioblastoma tumorigenicity. Nat Cancer 2023; 4:648-664. [PMID: 37169842 PMCID: PMC10212766 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00556-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The transfer of intact mitochondria between heterogeneous cell types has been confirmed in various settings, including cancer. However, the functional implications of mitochondria transfer on tumor biology are poorly understood. Here we show that mitochondria transfer is a prevalent phenomenon in glioblastoma (GBM), the most frequent and malignant primary brain tumor. We identified horizontal mitochondria transfer from astrocytes as a mechanism that enhances tumorigenesis in GBM. This transfer is dependent on network-forming intercellular connections between GBM cells and astrocytes, which are facilitated by growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43), a protein involved in neuron axon regeneration and astrocyte reactivity. The acquisition of astrocyte mitochondria drives an increase in mitochondrial respiration and upregulation of metabolic pathways linked to proliferation and tumorigenicity. Functionally, uptake of astrocyte mitochondria promotes cell cycle progression to proliferative G2/M phases and enhances self-renewal and tumorigenicity of GBM. Collectively, our findings reveal a host-tumor interaction that drives proliferation and self-renewal of cancer cells, providing opportunities for therapeutic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dionysios C Watson
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Defne Bayik
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Simon Storevik
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Jianhua Han
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Adam Lauko
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Palavalasa Sravya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Katie Troike
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Sabrina Wang
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Kristen Kay
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Taral R Lunavat
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Molecular Neurogenetics Unit-West, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel J Silver
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sahil Dayal
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Erin Mulkearns-Hubert
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Joris Guyon
- University of Bordeaux, INSERM, BRIC, Pessac, France
| | - Yadi Zhou
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Juliana Seder
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Laura Neises
- Cancer Metabolism Group, Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | | | - Johannes Meiser
- Cancer Metabolism Group, Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Andrew J Scott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Jason A Mears
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rolf Bjerkvig
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- NorLux Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Abhishek Chakraborty
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Thomas Daubon
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, IBGC, Bordeaux, France
| | - Feixiong Cheng
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Costas A Lyssiotis
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel R Wahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Hrvoje Miletic
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
- Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grabowski MM, Watson DC, Chung K, Lee J, Bayik D, Lauko A, Alban T, Melenhorst JJ, Chan T, Lathia JD, Ahluwalia MS, Mohammadi AM. Spatial immunosampling of MRI-defined glioblastoma regions reveals immunologic fingerprint of non-contrast enhancing, infiltrative tumor margins. medRxiv 2023:2023.03.09.23285970. [PMID: 36945620 PMCID: PMC10029063 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.09.23285970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) treatment includes maximal safe resection of the core and MRI contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor. Complete resection of the infiltrative non-contrast-enhancing (NCE) tumor rim is rarely achieved. We established a safe, semi-automated workflow for spatially-registered sampling of MRI-defined GBM regions in 19 patients with downstream analysis and biobanking, enabling studies of NCE, wherefrom recurrence/progression typically occurs. Immunophenotyping revealed underrepresentation of myeloid cell subsets and CD8+ T cells in the NCE. While NCE T cells phenotypically and functionally resembled those in matching CE tumor, subsets of activated (CD69hi) effector memory CD8+ T cells were overrepresented. Contrarily, CD25hi Tregs and other subsets were underrepresented. Overall, our study demonstrated that MRI-guided, spatially-registered, intraoperative immunosampling is feasible as part of routine GBM surgery. Further elucidation of the shared and spatially distinct microenvironmental biology of GBM will enable development of therapeutic approaches targeting the NCE infiltrative tumor to decrease GBM recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M. Grabowski
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dionysios C. Watson
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kunho Chung
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Juyeun Lee
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Defne Bayik
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Tyler Alban
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Timothy Chan
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Justin D. Lathia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Alireza M. Mohammadi
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitchell K, Sprowls SA, Arora S, Shakya S, Silver DJ, Goins CM, Wallace L, Roversi G, Schafer RE, Kay K, Miller TE, Lauko A, Bassett J, Kashyap A, D'Amato Kass J, Mulkearns-Hubert EE, Johnson S, Alvarado J, Rich JN, Holland EC, Paddison PJ, Patel AP, Stauffer SR, Hubert CG, Lathia JD. WDR5 represents a therapeutically exploitable target for cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Genes Dev 2023; 37:86-102. [PMID: 36732025 PMCID: PMC10069451 DOI: 10.1101/gad.349803.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastomas (GBMs) are heterogeneous, treatment-resistant tumors driven by populations of cancer stem cells (CSCs). However, few molecular mechanisms critical for CSC population maintenance have been exploited for therapeutic development. We developed a spatially resolved loss-of-function screen in GBM patient-derived organoids to identify essential epigenetic regulators in the SOX2-enriched, therapy-resistant niche and identified WDR5 as indispensable for this population. WDR5 is a component of the WRAD complex, which promotes SET1 family-mediated Lys4 methylation of histone H3 (H3K4me), associated with positive regulation of transcription. In GBM CSCs, WDR5 inhibitors blocked WRAD complex assembly and reduced H3K4 trimethylation and expression of genes involved in CSC-relevant oncogenic pathways. H3K4me3 peaks lost with WDR5 inhibitor treatment occurred disproportionally on POU transcription factor motifs, including the POU5F1(OCT4)::SOX2 motif. Use of a SOX2/OCT4 reporter demonstrated that WDR5 inhibitor treatment diminished cells with high reporter activity. Furthermore, WDR5 inhibitor treatment and WDR5 knockdown altered the stem cell state, disrupting CSC in vitro growth and self-renewal, as well as in vivo tumor growth. These findings highlight the role of WDR5 and the WRAD complex in maintaining the CSC state and provide a rationale for therapeutic development of WDR5 inhibitors for GBM and other advanced cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Mitchell
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Samuel A Sprowls
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Sonali Arora
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | - Sajina Shakya
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Daniel J Silver
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Christopher M Goins
- Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA;
| | - Lisa Wallace
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Gustavo Roversi
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Rachel E Schafer
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Kristen Kay
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Tyler E Miller
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Adam Lauko
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - John Bassett
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | - Anjali Kashyap
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Jonathan D'Amato Kass
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Erin E Mulkearns-Hubert
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Sadie Johnson
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Joseph Alvarado
- Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Jeremy N Rich
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - Eric C Holland
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | - Patrick J Paddison
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | - Anoop P Patel
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Shaun R Stauffer
- Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Christopher G Hubert
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA;
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bayik D, Bartels CF, Lovrenert K, Watson DC, Zhang D, Kay K, Lee J, Lauko A, Johnson S, Lo A, Silver DJ, McGraw M, Grabowski M, Mohammadi AM, Veglia F, Fan Y, Vogelbaum MA, Scacheri P, Lathia JD. Distinct Cell Adhesion Signature Defines Glioblastoma Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subsets. Cancer Res 2022; 82:4274-4287. [PMID: 36126163 PMCID: PMC9664137 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-3840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
In multiple types of cancer, an increased frequency in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) is associated with worse outcomes and poor therapeutic response. In the glioblastoma (GBM) microenvironment, monocytic (m) MDSCs represent the predominant subset. However, the molecular basis of mMDSC enrichment in the tumor microenvironment compared with granulocytic (g) MDSCs has yet to be determined. Here we performed the first broad epigenetic profiling of MDSC subsets to define underlying cell-intrinsic differences in behavior and found that enhanced gene accessibility of cell adhesion programs in mMDSCs is linked to their tumor-accelerating ability in GBM models upon adoptive transfer. Mouse and human mMDSCs expressed higher levels of integrin β1 and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) compared with gMDSCs as part of an enhanced cell adhesion signature. Integrin β1 blockade abrogated the tumor-promoting phenotype of mMDSCs and altered the immune profile in the tumor microenvironment, whereas treatment with a DPP-4 inhibitor extended survival in preclinical GBM models. Targeting DPP-4 in mMDSCs reduced pERK signaling and their migration towards tumor cells. These findings uncover a fundamental difference in the molecular basis of MDSC subsets and suggest that integrin β1 and DPP-4 represent putative immunotherapy targets to attenuate myeloid cell-driven immune suppression in GBM. SIGNIFICANCE Epigenetic profiling uncovers cell adhesion programming as a regulator of the tumor-promoting functions of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in glioblastoma, identifying therapeutic targets that modulate the immune response and suppress tumor growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Defne Bayik
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Cynthia F. Bartels
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Katreya Lovrenert
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Dionysios C. Watson
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Duo Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kristen Kay
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
| | - Juyeun Lee
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
| | - Adam Lauko
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Western Reserve University, Medical Science Training Program, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Alice Lo
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
| | - Daniel J. Silver
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mary McGraw
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor Center, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
| | | | | | - Filippo Veglia
- Department of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Yi Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Peter Scacheri
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justin D. Lathia
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor Center, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Watson D, Bayik D, Lauko A, Sprowls S, Deshpande G, Wilifford S, Troike K, Silver D, Wang S, Seder J, Kay K, Hjelmeland A, Lathia J. TMIC-69. MITOCHONDRIAL TRANSFER FROM ASTROCYTES ENHANCES METABOLISM AND DRIVES PROLIFERATION OF GLIOBLASTOMA. Neuro Oncol 2022. [PMCID: PMC9661311 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.1112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Mitochondrial transfer occurs both in stroke (central nervous system) and inflammatory pain (peripheral nerves). However, its role in glioblastoma (GBM) remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that mitochondrial transfer from non-malignant to GBM cells supports tumor metabolism and growth. Using transgenic mice expressing fluorophore-tagged mitochondria, we found that ~50% of orthotopically-implanted mouse GBM cells acquire mitochondria. Brain-resident cells, especially astrocytes, were the primary mitochondrial donors in vitro and in vivo. Mitochondrial transfer also occurred from immortalized human astrocytes to patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in vitro at rates of 15-35%. GBM cells that acquired mitochondria expressed higher levels of the ATP-synthase subunit ATP5A and produced more ATP, while metabolomics revealed multiple upregulated pathways in recipient cells. These data point to increased metabolic activity in recipient cells. In vivo, mouse GBM cells that acquired mitochondria were more likely to be in S/G2/M cell cycle phases. We observed a similar effect in PDX that acquired astrocyte mitochondria in vitro, suggesting that transfer drives GBM proliferation. Using sorted mouse and human GBM cells with/without in vitro astrocyte mitochondrial acquisition, we found that mitochondrial transfer promoted in vitro self-renewal and in vivo tumorigenicity, leading to significant reduction in survival and increased penetrance in orthotopic GBM models. Transfer in mouse and human systems was contact-dependent and was abrogated by physical separation of donor and recipient cells by transwell inserts. Pharmacologic inhibition of cytoskeleton and gap junctions did not affect transfer rate, while blocking growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43) function by c-Jun N-terminus kinase inhibition decreased transfer rate by 15-30%, suggesting a potential role of GAP43. Taken together, mitochondrial transfer comprises a fundamental, protumorigenic mechanism of GBM, enhancing metabolic activity and driving tumor cell proliferation. Elucidating the molecular machinery regulating astrocyte mitochondrial transfer and its downstream protumorigenic effects will lead to therapeutic opportunities targeting this understudied tumor microenvironment interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dionysios Watson
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Defne Bayik
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Adam Lauko
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , USA
| | - Samuel Sprowls
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , USA
| | | | | | - Katie Troike
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , USA
| | - Daniel Silver
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , USA
| | - Sabrina Wang
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , USA
| | | | - Kristen Kay
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | | | - Justin Lathia
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lauko A, Volovetz J, Turaga SM, Bayik D, Silver DJ, Mitchell K, Mulkearns-Hubert EE, Watson DC, Desai K, Midha M, Hao J, McCortney K, Steffens A, Naik U, Ahluwalia MS, Bao S, Horbinski C, Yu JS, Lathia JD. SerpinB3 drives cancer stem cell survival in glioblastoma. Cell Rep 2022; 40:111348. [PMID: 36103817 PMCID: PMC9513382 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite therapeutic interventions for glioblastoma (GBM), cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive recurrence. The precise mechanisms underlying CSC resistance, namely inhibition of cell death, are unclear. We built on previous observations that the high cell surface expression of junctional adhesion molecule-A drives CSC maintenance and identified downstream signaling networks, including the cysteine protease inhibitor SerpinB3. Using genetic depletion approaches, we found that SerpinB3 is necessary for CSC maintenance, survival, and tumor growth, as well as CSC pathway activation. Knockdown of SerpinB3 also increased apoptosis and susceptibility to radiation therapy. SerpinB3 was essential to buffer cathepsin L-mediated cell death, which was enhanced with radiation. Finally, we found that SerpinB3 knockdown increased the efficacy of radiation in pre-clinical models. Taken together, our findings identify a GBM CSC-specific survival mechanism involving a cysteine protease inhibitor, SerpinB3, and provide a potential target to improve the efficacy of GBM therapies against therapeutically resistant CSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Josephine Volovetz
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Soumya M Turaga
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
| | - Defne Bayik
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Daniel J Silver
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Kelly Mitchell
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Erin E Mulkearns-Hubert
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Dionysios C Watson
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Kiran Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Manav Midha
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Jing Hao
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Kathleen McCortney
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Alicia Steffens
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Ulhas Naik
- Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | | | - Shideng Bao
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Craig Horbinski
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Jennifer S Yu
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Brain tumors remain one of the most difficult tumors to treat and, depending on the diagnosis, have a poor prognosis. Of brain tumors, glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant glioma and has a dismal prognosis, with only about 5% of patients alive five years after diagnosis. While advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapies are rapidly improving outcomes in a variety of other cancers, the standard of care for GBM has largely remained unaltered since 2005. There are many well-studied challenges that are either unique to brain tumors (i.e., blood-brain barrier and immunosuppressive environment) or amplified within GBM (i.e., tumor heterogeneity at the cellular and molecular levels, plasticity, and cancer stem cells) that make this disease particularly difficult to treat. While we touch on all these concepts, the focus of this review is to discuss the immense inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity and advances in our understanding of tumor cell plasticity and epigenetics in GBM. With each improvement in technology, our understanding of the complexity of tumoral heterogeneity and plasticity improves and we gain more clarity on the causes underlying previous therapeutic failures. However, these advances are unlocking new therapeutic opportunities that scientists and physicians are currently exploiting and have the potential for new breakthroughs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States; Medical Scientist Training Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Alice Lo
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States; Medical Scientist Training Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States; Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lauko A, Kotecha R, Barnett A, Li H, Tatineni V, Ali A, Patil P, Mohammadi AM, Chao ST, Murphy ES, Angelov L, Suh JH, Barnett GH, Pennell NA, Ahluwalia MS. Author Correction: Impact of KRAS mutation status on the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer brain metastases. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1147. [PMID: 35039661 PMCID: PMC8763914 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05489-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine MSTP, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.,Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Addison Barnett
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vineeth Tatineni
- Department of Internal Medicine, Summa Health, Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Assad Ali
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pradnya Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine MSTP, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine MSTP, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine MSTP, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nathan A Pennell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. .,Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 North Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bayik D, Bartels C, Lovrenert K, Watson D, Kay K, Lauko A, Scacheri P, Lathia J. IMMU-21. DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF ADHESION MOLECULES DEFINES MYELOID CELL INFILTRATION IN GLIOBLASTOMA AND COMPRISES A THERAPEUTIC TARGET. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
A potently immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment facilitates progression of glioblastoma (GBM). Immunotherapies have had variable success in improving the outcome of GBM patients, suggesting that there is a need to gain insight into the mechanisms of immunosuppression. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) associate with poor prognosis and treatment resistance of GBM patients, but the distinct role of individual populations is not well-defined. We previous showed that monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs) accumulated in tumors of mice and patients, while granulocytic MDSCs (gMDSCs) mainly remained in the circulation. Furthermore, nonspecific targeting of mMDSCs with chemotherapies provided therapeutic benefit in preclinical models of GBM, suggesting that mMDSCs drive disease progression. To investigate the differential function of mMDSCs versus gMDSCs in GBM, we adoptively transferred bone marrow-derived MDSC subsets into tumor-bearing mice. Mice that received mMDSCs succumbed to disease sooner compared to control mice, which was not observed with gMDSC transfer. To determine the basis of this pro-tumorigenic activity of mMDSCs, we performed ATAC-sequencing and comparison of differentially accessible regions indicated that cell adhesion pathways were significantly upregulated in mMDSCs. Aligned with this epigenetic profile, mMDSCs from bone marrow and blood had significantly higher surface integrin β1 and integrin β7 expression compared to gMDSCs. To evaluate the role of integrins in MDSC behavior, we pre-treated mMDSCs with anti-integrin β1 prior to adoptive transfer. Blockade of integrin β1 interfered with the pro-tumorigenic role of mMDSCs compared to isotype controls. Similarly, blockade of integrin β1 and integrin β7 systemically extended the survival duration of tumor-bearing mice. Finally, high expression of integrin β1 and integrin β7 served as a poor prognostic indicator in GBM patients. Our findings indicate that modulation of immunosuppressive myeloid cells by leveraging differences in adhesion mechanisms represents a potential immunotherapeutic option for GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dionysios Watson
- University Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Shaker Heights, OH, USA
| | - Kristen Kay
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam Lauko
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Justin Lathia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mitchell K, Alvarado J, Goins C, Martinez S, Macdonald J, Silver DJ, Roversi G, Kay K, Schafer R, Kashyap A, Lauko A, Mulkearns-Hubert EE, Johnson S, Rich JN, Stauffer S, Hubert C, Lathia J. STEM-14. THE WRAD COMPLEX REPRESENTS A THERAPEUTIC TARGET FOR CANCER STEM CELLS IN GLIOBLASTOMA. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) progression and resistance to conventional therapies is driven in part by cells within the tumor with stem cell properties including quiescence, self-renewal and drug efflux potential. It is thought that eliminating these cancer stem cells (CSCs) is a key component to successful clinical management of GBM. However, currently, few known molecular mechanisms driving CSCs can be exploited for therapeutic development. Core transcription factors such as SOX2, OLIG2, OCT4 and NANOG maintain the CSC state in GBM. Our laboratory recently uncovered a self-renewal signaling axis involving RBBP5 that is necessary and sufficient for CSC maintenance through driving expression of these core stem cell maintenance transcription factors. RBBP5 is a component of the WRAD complex, which promotes Lys4 methylation of histone H3 to positively regulate transcription. We hypothesized that targeting RBBP5 could be a means to disrupt epigenetic programs that maintain CSCs in stemness transcriptional states. We found that genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of the WRAD complex reduced CSC growth, self-renewal and tumor initiation potential. WRAD inhibitors partially dissembled the WRAD complex and reduced H3K4 trimethylation both globally and at the promoters of key stem cell maintenance transcription factors. Using a CSC reporter system, we demonstrated that WRAD complex inhibition decreased growth of SOX2/OCT4 expressing CSCs in a concentration-dependent manner as quantified by live imaging. Overall, our studies assess the function of the WRAD complex and the effect of WRAD complex inhibitors in preclinical models and specifically on the stem cell state for the first time in GBM. Studying the functions of the WRAD complex in CSCs may improve understanding of GBM pathogenesis and elucidate how CSCs survive despite aggressive chemotherapy and radiation. Our ongoing studies aim to develop brain penetrant inhibitors targeting the WRAD complex as an anti-CSC strategy that could potentially synergize with standard of care treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Daniel J Silver
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Kristen Kay
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rachel Schafer
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Adam Lauko
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Justin Lathia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lauko A, Turaga SM, Volovetz J, Bayik D, Bao S, Yu J, Lathia J. STEM-15. SerpinB3 DRIVES CANCER STEM CELL SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Despite therapeutic interventions for glioblastoma (GBM), self-renewing, therapy-resistant populations of cells referred to as cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive recurrence. Previously, we identified the unique expression of junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A) on CSCs and demonstrated that JAM-A is both necessary and sufficient for self-renewal and tumor growth. Moreover, we determined that JAM-A signals via Akt in GBM CSCs to sustain pluripotency transcription factor activity; however, the entire signaling network has yet to be fully elucidated. To further delineate this pathway, we immunoprecipitated JAM-A from patient-derived GBM CSCs and performed mass spectrometry to determine JAM-A binding proteins. This led to the identification of the cysteine protease inhibitor SerpinB3 as a putative JAM-A binding partner. Using in vitro CSC functional assays, we show that SerpinB3 is necessary for CSC maintenance and survival. In an in vivo orthotopic xenograft model, knockdown of SerpinB3 extended survival. Mechanistically, knockdown of SerpinB3 led to decreased expression of TGF-β, Myc, WNT, and Notch signaling, known regulators of the CSC state. Additionally, knockdown of SerpinB3 increases susceptibility to radiation therapy. SerpinB3 is essential for buffering cells against cathepsin-mediated cell death, and we found that elevated lysosomal membrane permeability after radiation leads to cathepsin release into the cytoplasm. As a result, SerpinB3 knockdown cells have a diminished capacity to inhibit cathepsin-driven cell death after radiation. The addition of the cathepsin inhibitor E64D partially rescues the SerpinB3 knockdown, however, SerpinB3 mutants that are unable to inhibit cathepsins fail to do the same. Taken together, our findings, identify a novel GBM CSC-specific survival mechanism involving a previously uninvestigated cysteine protease inhibitor, SerpinB3, and provide a potential target to increase the efficacy of standard of care GBM therapies against therapy-resistant CSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Justin Lathia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lauko A, Kotecha R, Barnett A, Li H, Tatineni V, Ali A, Patil P, Mohammadi AM, Chao ST, Murphy ES, Angelov L, Suh JH, Barnett GH, Pennell NA, Ahluwalia MS. Impact of KRAS mutation status on the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer brain metastases. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18174. [PMID: 34518623 PMCID: PMC8438061 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97566-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have resulted in improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, data demonstrating the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC brain metastases (NSCLCBM) is limited. We analyzed overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLCBM treated with ICIs within 90 days of NSCLCBM diagnosis (ICI-90) and compared them to patients who never received ICIs (no-ICI). We reviewed 800 patients with LCBM who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 at a major tertiary care institution, 97% of whom received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for local treatment of BM. OS from BM was compared between the ICI-90 and no-ICI groups using the Log-Rank test and Cox proportional-hazards model. Additionally, the impact of KRAS mutational status on the efficacy of ICI was investigated. After accounting for known prognostic factors, ICI-90 in addition to SRS led to significantly improved OS compared to no-ICI (12.5 months vs 9.1, p < 0.001). In the 109 patients who had both a known PD-L1 expression and KRAS status, 80.4% of patients with KRAS mutation had PD-L1 expression vs 61.9% in wild-type KRAS patients (p = 0.04). In patients without a KRAS mutation, there was no difference in OS between the ICI-90 vs no-ICI cohort with a one-year survival of 60.2% vs 54.8% (p = 0.84). However, in patients with a KRAS mutation, ICI-90 led to a one-year survival of 60.4% vs 34.1% (p = 0.004). Patients with NSCLCBM who received ICI-90 had improved OS compared to no-ICI patients. Additionally, this benefit appears to be observed primarily in patients with KRAS mutations that may drive the overall benefit, which should be taken into account in the development of future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine MSTP, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.,Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Addison Barnett
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vineeth Tatineni
- Department of Internal Medicine, Summa Health, Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Assad Ali
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pradnya Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine MSTP, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine MSTP, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine MSTP, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nathan A Pennell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. .,Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 North Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lauko A, Thapa B, Sharma M, Muhsen BA, Barnett A, Rauf Y, Borghei-Razavi H, Tatineni V, Patil P, Mohammadi A, Chao S, Murphy ES, Angelov L, Suh J, Barnett GH, Nowacki AS, Pennell N, Ahluwalia MS. Author Correction: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio influences impact of steroids on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer brain metastases. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18212. [PMID: 34497288 PMCID: PMC8426399 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96915-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA‑51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Bicky Thapa
- Foedtert and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Mayur Sharma
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Baha'eddin A Muhsen
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Addison Barnett
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yasmeen Rauf
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Pradnya Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alireza Mohammadi
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA‑51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel Chao
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA‑51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John Suh
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA‑51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro‑Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amy S Nowacki
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA‑51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nathan Pennell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lauko A, Thapa B, Sharma M, Muhsen B, Barnett A, Rauf Y, Borghei-Razavi H, Tatineni V, Patil P, Mohammadi A, Chao S, Murphy ES, Angelov L, Suh J, Barnett GH, Nowacki AS, Pennell N, Ahluwalia MS. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio influences impact of steroids on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer brain metastases. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7490. [PMID: 33820922 PMCID: PMC8021556 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85328-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Steroids are often utilized to manage patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (NSCLCBM). Steroids and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been associated with decreased overall survival (OS) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We retrospectively investigated patients treated with ICI after the diagnosis of NSCLCBM at a single tertiary care institution examing the impact of steroids and NLR. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. 171 patients treated with ICI for NSCLCBM were included. Thirty-six received steroids within 30 days of the start of ICI, and 53 patients had an NLR ≥ 5 before the start of ICI. Upfront steroids was associated with decreased OS on multivariable analysis (median OS 10.5 vs. 17.9 months, p = .03) and intracranial PFS (5.0 vs. 8.7 months, p = .045). NLR ≥ 5 was indicative of worse OS (10.5 vs. 18.4 months, p = .04) but not intracranial PFS (7.2 vs. 7.7 months, p = .61). When NLR and upfront steroids are modeled together, there is a strong interaction (p = .0008) indicating that the impact of steroids depended on the patient’s NLR. In a subgroup analysis, only in patients with NLR < 4 was there a significant difference in OS with upfront steroids (26.1 vs. 15.6 months, p = .032). The impact of steroids on the efficacy of ICI in patients with NSCLCBM is dependent on the patient's NLR underscoring its importance in these patients. Patients with a low NLR, steroid use decreases the efficacy of ICI. These results can inform clinicians about the impact of steroids in patients treated with ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA-51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Bicky Thapa
- Foedtert and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Mayur Sharma
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Baha'eddin Muhsen
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Addison Barnett
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yasmeen Rauf
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Pradnya Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alireza Mohammadi
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA-51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel Chao
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA-51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John Suh
- Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA-51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Rosa Ella Burkhart Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amy S Nowacki
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine At Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Ave, CA-51, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nathan Pennell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Turaga SM, Silver DJ, Bayik D, Paouri E, Peng S, Lauko A, Alban TJ, Borjini N, Stanko S, Naik UP, Keri RA, Connor JR, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Rubin JB, Berens M, Davalos D, Lathia JD. JAM-A functions as a female microglial tumor suppressor in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1591-1601. [PMID: 32592484 PMCID: PMC7690368 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor and has a dismal prognosis. Previously, we identified that junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM-A), a cell adhesion molecule, is highly elevated in human GBM cancer stem cells and predicts poor patient prognosis. While JAM-A is also highly expressed in other cells in the tumor microenvironment, specifically microglia and macrophages, how JAM-A expression in these cells affects tumor growth has yet to be determined. The goal of this study was to understand the role of microenvironmental JAM-A in mediating GBM growth. METHODS Male and female wild-type (WT) and JAM-A-deficient mice were transplanted intracranially with the syngeneic glioma cell lines GL261 and SB28 and were assessed for differences in survival and microglial activation in tumors and in vitro. RNA-sequencing was performed to identify differentially regulated genes among all genotypes, and differences were validated in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS We found that JAM-A-deficient female mice succumbed to GBM more quickly compared with WT females and JAM-A-deficient and male WT mice. Analysis of microglia in the tumors revealed that female JAM-A-deficient microglia were more activated, and RNA-sequencing identified elevated expression of Fizz1 and Ifi202b specifically in JAM-A-deficient female microglia. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that JAM-A functions to suppress pathogenic microglial activation in the female tumor microenvironment, highlighting an emerging role for sex differences in the GBM microenvironment and suggesting that sex differences extend beyond previously reported tumor cell-intrinsic differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumya M Turaga
- Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel J Silver
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Defne Bayik
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Evi Paouri
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sen Peng
- Cancer and Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Adam Lauko
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tyler J Alban
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nozha Borjini
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sarah Stanko
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ulhas P Naik
- Cardeza Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ruth A Keri
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Pharmacology and Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - James R Connor
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joshua B Rubin
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael Berens
- Cancer and Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Dimitrios Davalos
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lauko A, Turaga S, Volovetz J, Bayik D, Naik U, Lathia J. STEM-07. IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL CSC SIGNALING AXIS CONTAINING JAM-A/SERPINB3/TGF-BETA. Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Despite therapeutic interventions including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, multiple clones of treatment resistant cells repopulate the tumor, resulting in recurrence and a high rate of mortality in glioblastoma. Effective targeting of these cancer stem cells (CSCs) has been limited by our incomplete understanding of the intracellular signaling mechanisms maintaining the CSC state. Our laboratory previously identified junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A) on CSCs and, through functional studies, demonstrated that JAM-A is both necessary and sufficient for self-renewal and tumor growth. We determined that JAM-A signals via Akt in GBM CSCs to sustain pluripotency transcription factor activity; however, the intermediate signaling network is yet to be fully elucidated. Therefore, our goal was to delineate the pathway downstream of JAM-A. To achieve this, we immunoprecipitated JAM-A from GBM CSCs and performed mass spectrometry leading to the identification of the serine/cysteine protease inhibitor SerpinB3. While SerpinB3 has a functional role in lung adenocarcinoma, breast, pancreas, as well as in hepatocellular carcinoma, there is limited information in GBM or CSCs, and its relationship to JAM-A is yet to be elucidated. Using in vitro CSC functional assays, we observed that SerpinB3 is necessary for the maintenance of CSCs. Additionally, in an intracranial implantation model of GBM the knockdown of SerpinB3 extended the survival of mice. Knockdown of SerpinB3 in multiple GBM CSCs models also led to decreased expression of TGF-β, a known regulator of the CSC state. We also observed that SerpinB3 stabilizes JAM-A expression and further studies are investigating the mechanism of this stabilization, identifying the specific interaction sites of JAM-A and Serpin B3, and determining how TGF-β alters the association through positive and negative feedback mechanisms. Taken together, these data highlight the role of SerpinB3 in GBM CSCs and provides a novel target to inhibit the JAM-A-mediated CSC maintenance as a next-generation GBM therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Soumya Turaga
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | - Ulhas Naik
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bayik D, Zhou Y, Lo A, Park C, Hong C, Vail D, Watson D, Roversi G, Lauko A, Silver D, Alban T, Otvos B, Grabowski M, Sorensen M, Sims P, Kristensen B, Horbinski C, Vogelbaum M, Hwang TH, Khalil A, Iavarone A, Ahluwalia M, Cheng F, Lathia J. IMMU-10. GENOMIC DIFFERENCES UNDERLIE MYELOID-DERIVED SUPPRESSOR CELL SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN GLIOBLASTOMA. Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
A potently immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment facilitates progression of glioblastoma (GBM). We previously demonstrated that myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) subsets promote tumorigenesis in a sex-specific manner, contributing to sexual dimorphism in GBM incidence and prognosis. Our findings indicated that proliferating monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs) accumulate in tumors of male mice and patients, while female tumor-bearing mice had an increase in circulating granulocytic MDSC (gMDSC) frequency, and a high gMDSC gene signature correlated with worse outcome of female patients. However, the mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism of MDSC heterogeneity remain understudied and can provide insights for improved immunotherapy response. Using syngeneic mouse glioma models and sequencing approaches, we show that expression of Y-chromosome-linked genes correlates with upregulation of multiple RNA transcription-related pathways specifically in male mMDSCs. Consistently, adoptive transfer of male mMDSCs but not gMDSCs worsened GBM outcome in male recipients, while the transfer of sex-matched mMDSCs did not impact survival of female mice. In contrast to this cell-intrinsic regulatory pathway, sex steroids had no impact on MDSC profile, as castration or ovariectomy failed to alter MDSC subset accumulation patterns in GBM-bearing mice. Correspondingly, IL-1β, which we had identified as a female-specific drug target, was highly expressed in female but not male gMDSCs. Single-cell sequencing revealed that circulating but not tumor-infiltrating gMDSCs were the primary source of IL-1β and that its neutralization provided a female-specific survival advantage by reducing circulating gMDSCs. This was accompanied by declines in tumor infiltration of microglia, microglia activation status and tumor cell proliferation. In vitro, IL-1β inhibition reduced viability and expression of activation markers by primary microglia. These findings highlight a peripheral gMDSC-microglia communication axis mediated by IL-1β signaling in females with GBM and indicate that expression differences in MDSC subsets represent opportunities for improved immunotherapy efficacy while accounting for sex as a biological variable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yadi Zhou
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alice Lo
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel Vail
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dionysios Watson
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ahmad Khalil
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lauko A, Mu Z, Gutmann DH, Naik UP, Lathia JD. Junctional Adhesion Molecules in Cancer: A Paradigm for the Diverse Functions of Cell-Cell Interactions in Tumor Progression. Cancer Res 2020; 80:4878-4885. [PMID: 32816855 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-1829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Tight junction (TJ) proteins are essential for mediating interactions between adjacent cells and coordinating cellular and organ responses. Initial investigations into TJ proteins and junctional adhesion molecules (JAM) in cancer suggested a tumor-suppressive role where decreased expression led to increased metastasis. However, recent studies of the JAM family members JAM-A and JAM-C have expanded the roles of these proteins to include protumorigenic functions, including inhibition of apoptosis and promotion of proliferation, cancer stem cell biology, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. JAM function by interacting with other proteins through three distinct molecular mechanisms: direct cell-cell interaction on adjacent cells, stabilization of adjacent cell surface receptors on the same cell, and interactions between JAM and cell surface receptors expressed on adjacent cells. Collectively, these diverse interactions contribute to both the pro- and antitumorigenic functions of JAM. In this review, we discuss these context-dependent functions of JAM in a variety of cancers and highlight key areas that remain poorly understood, including their potentially diverse intracellular signaling networks, their roles in the tumor microenvironment, and the consequences of posttranslational modifications on their function. These studies have implications in furthering our understanding of JAM in cancer and provide a paradigm for exploring additional roles of TJ proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Zhaomei Mu
- Cardeza Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David H Gutmann
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ulhas P Naik
- Cardeza Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. .,Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
The development of brain metastases occurs in 10–20% of all patients with cancer. Brain metastases portend poor survival and contribute to increased cancer mortality and morbidity. Despite multimodal treatment options, which include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, 5-year survival remains low. Besides, our current treatment modalities can have significant neurological comorbidities, which result in neurocognitive decline and a decrease in a patient’s quality of life. However, innovations in technology, improved understanding of tumor biology, and new therapeutic options have led to improved patient care. Novel approaches in radiotherapy are minimizing the neurocognitive decline while providing the same therapeutic benefit. In addition, advances in targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors are redefining the management of lung and melanoma brain metastases. Similar approaches to brain metastases from other primary tumors promise to lead to new and effective therapies. We are beginning to understand the appropriate combination of these novel approaches with our traditional treatment options. As advances in basic and translational science and innovative technologies enter clinical practice, the prognosis of patients with brain metastases will continue to improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Yasmeen Rauf
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alban TJ, Bayik D, Otvos B, Rabljenovic A, Leng L, Jia-Shiun L, Roversi G, Lauko A, Momin AA, Mohammadi AM, Peereboom DM, Ahluwalia MS, Matsuda K, Yun K, Bucala R, Vogelbaum MA, Lathia JD. Glioblastoma Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subsets Express Differential Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Receptor Profiles That Can Be Targeted to Reduce Immune Suppression. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1191. [PMID: 32625208 PMCID: PMC7315581 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The application of tumor immunotherapy to glioblastoma (GBM) is limited by an unprecedented degree of immune suppression due to factors that include high numbers of immune suppressive myeloid cells, the blood brain barrier, and T cell sequestration to the bone marrow. We previously identified an increase in immune suppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in GBM patients, which correlated with poor prognosis and was dependent on macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). Here we examine the MIF signaling axis in detail in murine MDSC models, GBM-educated MDSCs and human GBM. We found that the monocytic subset of MDSCs (M-MDSCs) expressed high levels of the MIF cognate receptor CD74 and was localized in the tumor microenvironment. In contrast, granulocytic MDSCs (G-MDSCs) expressed high levels of the MIF non-cognate receptor CXCR2 and showed minimal accumulation in the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, targeting M-MDSCs with Ibudilast, a brain penetrant MIF-CD74 interaction inhibitor, reduced MDSC function and enhanced CD8 T cell activity in the tumor microenvironment. These findings demonstrate the MDSC subsets differentially express MIF receptors and may be leveraged for specific MDSC targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler J. Alban
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Defne Bayik
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Balint Otvos
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Anja Rabljenovic
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Lin Leng
- Departments of Medicine, Pathology, and Epidemiology & Public Health, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Leu Jia-Shiun
- Department of Neurology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gustavo Roversi
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Adam Lauko
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Arbaz A. Momin
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Alireza M. Mohammadi
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - David M. Peereboom
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | - Kyuson Yun
- Department of Neurology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Richard Bucala
- Departments of Medicine, Pathology, and Epidemiology & Public Health, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | | - Justin D. Lathia
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bayik D, Zhou Y, Park C, Hong C, Vail D, Silver DJ, Lauko A, Roversi G, Watson DC, Lo A, Alban TJ, McGraw M, Sorensen M, Grabowski MM, Otvos B, Vogelbaum MA, Horbinski C, Kristensen BW, Khalil AM, Hwang TH, Ahluwalia MS, Cheng F, Lathia JD. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subsets Drive Glioblastoma Growth in a Sex-Specific Manner. Cancer Discov 2020; 10:1210-1225. [PMID: 32300059 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) that block antitumor immunity are elevated in glioblastoma (GBM) patient blood and tumors. However, the distinct contributions of monocytic (mMDSC) versus granulocytic (gMDSC) subsets have yet to be determined. In mouse models of GBM, we observed that mMDSCs were enriched in the male tumors, whereas gMDSCs were elevated in the blood of females. Depletion of gMDSCs extended survival only in female mice. Using gene-expression signatures coupled with network medicine analysis, we demonstrated in preclinical models that mMDSCs could be targeted with antiproliferative agents in males, whereas gMDSC function could be inhibited by IL1β blockade in females. Analysis of patient data confirmed that proliferating mMDSCs were predominant in male tumors and that a high gMDSC/IL1β gene signature correlated with poor prognosis in female patients. These findings demonstrate that MDSC subsets differentially drive immune suppression in a sex-specific manner and can be leveraged for therapeutic intervention in GBM. SIGNIFICANCE: Sexual dimorphism at the level of MDSC subset prevalence, localization, and gene-expression profile constitutes a therapeutic opportunity. Our results indicate that chemotherapy can be used to target mMDSCs in males, whereas IL1 pathway inhibitors can provide benefit to females via inhibition of gMDSCs.See related commentary by Gabrilovich et al., p. 1100.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1079.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Defne Bayik
- Cancer Impact Area and Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yadi Zhou
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Chihyun Park
- Quantitative Health Science, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Changjin Hong
- Quantitative Health Science, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel Vail
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel J Silver
- Cancer Impact Area and Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Adam Lauko
- Cancer Impact Area and Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gustavo Roversi
- Cancer Impact Area and Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Dionysios C Watson
- Cancer Impact Area and Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alice Lo
- Cancer Impact Area and Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tyler J Alban
- Cancer Impact Area and Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mary McGraw
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mia Sorensen
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Matthew M Grabowski
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Balint Otvos
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Craig Horbinski
- Department of Pathology and Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bjarne Winther Kristensen
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ahmad M Khalil
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tae Hyun Hwang
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Quantitative Health Science, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Feixiong Cheng
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Cancer Impact Area and Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. .,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.,Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lauko A, Ali A, Sagar S, Barnett A, Li H, Chao S, Stevens G, Pennell N, Peereboom D, Yu J, Murphy E, Angelov L, Funchain P, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. CMET-18. IMPACT OF KRAS MUTATION STATUS ON THE EFFICACY OF IMMUNOTHERAPY IN LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASES. Neuro Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Immunotherapy is increasingly used in patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (NSCLCBM). KRAS mutations are associated with worse prognosis and there is no FDA approved targeted therapy. KRAS mutations are associated with increased expression of PD-L1. We evaluated the outcomes of NSCLCBM with KRAS mutations treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
METHODS
We reviewed 800 patients with NSCLCBM treated at our tertiary care center. 226 had known KRAS mutational status, 121 of which received immunotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from either the start of immunotherapy (when both groups received immunotherapy) or from the date of diagnosis of brain metastasis. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Proportional hazard model were utilized to determine differences in OS and the Chi-square test was utilized to determine differences in PD-L1 expression.
RESULTS
In 109 patients where both KRAS and PD-L1 status were known, KRAS mutations had greater PD-L1 expression (80.1% vs 61.9% positive, p=0.04). There was no difference in OS between KRAS mutant vs KRAS wild-type patients treated with immunotherapy. Median survival from the start of immunotherapy was 15.6 vs 15.5 months respectively (p=0.7), after adjusting for age, KPS, lesion number and extra-cranial metastasis (HR = .91, p=.7). Patients with KRAS mutations treated with immunotherapy versus those who received chemotherapy had a 1-year OS from the diagnosis of brain metastasis of 60.9% vs 38.7% respectively (trending towards significance, p=0.05). KRAS wild-type patients treated with immunotherapy versus those who did not receive immunotherapy had a 1-year OS from the diagnosis of brain metastasis of 61.9% vs 62.5% (p=0.85), respectively.
DISCUSSION
KRAS mutations are associated with increased PD-L1 expression. Use of immunotherapy negates the poor outcomes seen traditionally in patients with NSCLCBM and KRAS mutations and it improves survival compared to use of chemotherapy. Our experience supports the use of immunotherapy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Assad Ali
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Hong Li
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Barnett A, Lauko A, Li H, Ali A, Sagar S, Chao S, Pennell N, Peereboom D, Stevens G, Angelov L, Yu J, Murphy E, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. CMET-12. EFFICACY OF UPFRONT IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS IN LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASIS. Neuro Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
INTRO/OBJECTIVE
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes in a subset of patients with lung cancer. However, data describing the efficacy of ICI in lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM) is limited. We analyzed overall survival (OS) in patients with LCBM treated with upfront ICI, defined as having received ICI within 90-days of LCBM diagnosis, compared to non-ICI therapies.
METHODS
We reviewed 665 patients with LCBM diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 at a major tertiary care institution. Of those patients, 240 received ICI, 164 of which received ICI after 90-days and 76 received ICI within 90-days. Propensity score (PS) was calculated by logistic regression model including age, KPS, number of baseline brain lesions, and presence of extra-cranial metastasis (ECM) at time of LCBM diagnosis. OS from LCBM diagnosis between PS matched cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier, the Log-Rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS
Prior to PS matching, median survival between ICI and non-ICI cohorts was not significantly different (10.9 months for both, p=0.81), although more ICI patients had ECM (57.1% vs 40.9%, p=0.006). Following PS matching, the ICI (n=76) and non-ICI (n=76) cohorts had median age (62.4 vs 62.3 years), KPS (80 for both), lesion number (2 for both), and ECM (56.6% for both). Of matched patients, 94% received SRS, 52% received WBRT, and 29% underwent surgical resection. Compared to non-ICI, the ICI cohort had a 2-year OS hazard ratio=0.87 (95% CI=0.58–1.31, p=0.51). Median and 1-year survival were not significantly different between ICI and non-ICI cohorts (median: 10.9 vs 9.1 months; 1-yr: 43.0% vs 42.4%).
CONCLUSION
Patients with LCBM who received ICI within 90-days of their diagnosis did not have improvement in OS compared to patients who received non-ICI therapies. Evaluation of clinical factors that may affect the efficacy and durability of immunotherapy is ongoing and will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hong Li
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Assad Ali
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Barnett A, Sagar S, Lauko A, (Auston) Wei W, Chao S, Peereboom D, Stevens G, Angelov L, Yu J, Murphy E, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. CMET-36. IMMUNOTHERAPY VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE IN MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH KNOWN BRAF STATUS. Neuro Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
INTRO/OBJECTIVE
A mutation of the BRAF protein is seen in approximately 50% of melanoma patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard therapy in melanoma patients independent of a patient’s BRAF status. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the impact of BRAF status in patients treated with ICI compared to non-ICI systemic therapy on overall survival (OS) in patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM).
METHODS
We reviewed 351 patients with MBM treated at our tertiary care center between 2000 and 2018. Of these, 144 had known BRAF status, 71 of which were BRAF mutant and 73 were BRAF wild-type. OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis of MBM to compare the efficacy of ICI to other systemic therapies. Many of these patients received multiple lines of treatment including targeted therapies at some point during their care. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to determine differences in OS.
RESULTS
Eighty-four percent of patients received local therapy that included either surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or whole brain radiation therapy. In BRAF wild-type patients, 40 received ICI and 33 underwent non-ICI systemic therapy with a median survival (5.6 vs 7.1 months) and 2-year survival (28% vs 32%), respectively (p=0.64). Of the BRAF mutant patients, 33 received ICI and 38 did not with a median survival (17.1 vs 9.0 months) and 2-year survival (36% and 19%), respectively (p=0.014). When controlling for age, KPS, ECM, and number of lesions, BRAF mutant MBM patients treated with ICI compared to non-ICI had an OS hazard ratio, HR=0.4 (95% CI=0.21 – 0.78, p=0.0069).
CONCLUSION
ICI therapy in BRAF mutant MBM patients results in improved OS compared to those with non-ICI systemic therapy. No such difference was observed in the BRAF wild-type cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bayik D, Silver D, Park C, Watson D, Sorensen M, Roversi G, Lauko A, Alban T, Lo A, Sims P, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Kristensen B, Hyun Hwang T, Khalil A, Iavarone A, Cheng F, Lathia J. IMMU-01. MYELOID-DERIVED SUPPRESSOR CELL HETEROGENEITY DRIVES GLIOBLASTOMA PROGRESSION IN A SEX-DEPENDENT MANNER. Neuro Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
An immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment is a major factor facilitating glioblastoma (GBM) progression and therapeutic resistance. Immunotherapies have had variable success in improving the outcome of GBM patients, suggesting that there is a need to gain insight into the mechanisms of immunosuppression. Our group previously demonstrated that myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) expand in GBM patients and infiltrate tumors, where they suppress the activity of cytotoxic cells. However, the mechanisms by which individual MDSC subsets promote tumorigenesis remain understudied. Using the syngeneic mouse glioma models GL261, CT-2A and SB28, we show that monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs) are prevalent in tumors and that their frequency is significantly higher in males, who constitute 60% of GBM patients and have a worse prognosis than females. mMDSC abundance was further associated with poor survival, and male mice reached morbidity endpoint earlier. Consistent with preclinical observations, male GBM patient specimens had significantly more IBA+CD204+ immunosuppressive myeloid cells compared to female GBM tissue. In contrast, female tumor-bearing mice had a two-fold increase in circulating granulocytic MDSC (gMDSC) frequency, while this population remained unchanged in males. Female-to-male bone marrow chimeras demonstrated that intrinsic discrepancies in immune cell characteristics drive the sex differences in survival. Consistent with the differential MDSC accumulation pattern, targeting gMDSCs with anti-Ly6G neutralizing antibodies extended the lifespan of female mice without providing a survival advantage to males. However, mMDSCs were protected from the anti-Ly6C depletion strategy due to their systemic and local proliferation, as indicated by ex vivo Ki-67 staining and subsequently confirmed by gene expression analysis. Drug-prediction algorithms using the differential RNA sequencing profiles demonstrated that mMDSCs can be targeted by chemotherapeutics, while immunomodulatory drugs are effective against gMDSCs. Collectively, these findings indicate that MDSC subset variation might represent a therapeutic opportunity for improved therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapies while accounting for sex as a biological variable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Defne Bayik
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniel Silver
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Chihyun Park
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dionysios Watson
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mia Sorensen
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Gustavo Roversi
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tyler Alban
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alice Lo
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter Sims
- Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Bjarne Kristensen
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tae Hyun Hwang
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ahmad Khalil
- Case Western Reserve University Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Antonio Iavarone
- Columbia University Institute for Cancer Genetics, New York, NY, USA
| | - Feixiong Cheng
- Cleveland Clinic Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Justin Lathia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sagar S, Lauko A, Barnett A, (Auston) Wei W, Chao S, Peereboom D, Stevens G, Angelov L, Yu J, Murphy E, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. CMET-23. IMPACT OF SYSTEMIC THERAPY IN MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASIS. Neuro Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Melanoma is the third most common malignancy that results in brain metastasis and is associated with a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 9 months. In recent years, management of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) by surgery and radiation [stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT)] has been bolstered by targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
METHODS
351 patients, treated for MBM at our tertiary care center from 2000–2018, were grouped into: received chemotherapy, ICI, or targeted therapy. 34% of patients treated with ICI had received other systemic therapies as well as part of their management. OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis of the brain metastases. The Kaplan Meier analysis was utilized to determine median OS and difference in OS was determined by utilizing the Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS
The median survival after the diagnosis of brain metastasis was 10.4, 11.96, and 7.06 months in patients who received ICI, chemotherapy and targeted therapy respectively. A multivariate model was developed including the type of systemic therapy, presence of extracranial metastases, age, KPS and number of intracranial lesions. 114 patients underwent SRS alone, 56 underwent SRS and WBRT, 43 underwent SRS and surgical removal, 28 had surgical removal, SRS and WBRT, and 78 had no intracranial therapy. Compared to patients who received chemotherapy, patients who received immunotherapy had a hazard ratio, HR = 0.628 (confidence interval = 0.396 – 0.994, p-value = 0.047). Presence of EC metastases (HR= 1.25, p-value < .001), lower KPS (HR = .97, p-value < .0001) and multiple brain lesions (HR = 1.117, p-value < .0001) were associated with significantly worse OS.
CONCLUSIONS
Addition of ICI significantly improves the OS in MBM compared to chemotherapy. Lower performance status, multiple brain metastases, and EC metastases are associated with poor OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Otvos B, Grabowski M, Alban T, Golubovsky J, Neumann C, Rabjlenovic A, Bayik D, Lauko A, Bucala R, Vogelbaum M, Lathia J. GENE-26. HOST GENETIC VARIATIONS IN MACROPHAGE MIGRATION INHIBITOR FACTOR CONFER WORSE PROGNOSIS IN GLIOBLASTOMA. Neuro Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Genetic and systemic prognostic factors have been identified in glioblastoma (GBM) that correlate with survival, but patient-specific genomic risk factors that impact prognosis or response to immunotherapies have not been elucidated. GBM promotes an immune suppressive microenvironment via many mechanisms including the production of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) by GBM cancer stem cells, which activates myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Increased circulating and intracranial MDSCs as well as intratumoral MIF expression in GBM patients portend a worse overall prognosis. Endogenous MIF expression is dependent on two genetic microsatellite loci: single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and CATT repeats within the promoter. To determine whether these genetic variations were linked to GBM development and/or prognosis, we assessed peripheral nucleated blood from 520 GBM patients for the MIF SNPs and CATT repeats. MIF microsatellite frequencies were similar between the normal population and GBM patients indicating loci variability was not a risk factor for GBM development. However, newly diagnosed IDH wild-type GBM patients with a minor allele SNP who received standard of care therapy had a 3.1 month shorter progression free survival (PFS), and a 4.3 month shorter overall survival (OS) when compared to patients with two major allele SNPs. This association was seen also with the CATT-repeat analyses. Furthermore, in a multivariate analysis for PFS that included age, sex, Karnofsky performance status, MGMT methylation status, 1p/19q co-deletion, and SNP status as covariates, only age and SNP status were independently associated with shorter PFS. Taken together, patients with variant MIF microsatellite loci experienced shorter PFS and decreased OS compared to those with the most common loci. These results are currently being validated in a separate 1700 patient cohort with the intent of understanding how MIF expression influences myeloid populations within the GBM microenvironment and then developing novel peripheral GBM screening markers for aggressiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tyler Alban
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Chase Neumann
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Defne Bayik
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Justin Lathia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ramgopal A, Lauko A, Rotz S, Hanna R. Safety of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in beta-thalassemia patients with chronic hepatitis C infections treated at a pediatric center. Pediatr Transplant 2019; 23:e13520. [PMID: 31209983 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The outcome of allogeneic HCT in patients previously infected with HCV is a widely debated topic and rarely reported in the pediatric and young adult age group given the small population of affected patients. New medications directly targeting HCV have induced virologic cures for over 90% of patients, and their use in the pretransplant setting may improve outcomes for patients infected with HCV. We describe two patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia major who underwent matched sibling donor bone marrow transplantation, one with a myeloablative regimen and one with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. Allogeneic HCT appears feasible in patients with HCV infection that clear viremia prior to conditioning therapy and with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. Further investigation is warranted to better define transplant risks in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Ramgopal
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Adam Lauko
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Seth Rotz
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rabi Hanna
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lauko A, Ali A, Sagar S, Barnett A, Li H, Chao S, Pennell N, Stevens G, Peereboom D, Yu J, Murphy E, Angelov L, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. THER-09. IMPACT OF KRAS MUTATION STATUS ON THE EFFICACY OF IMMUNOTHERAPY IN LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASES. Neurooncol Adv 2019. [PMCID: PMC7213262 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy is increasingly used in patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (NSCLCBM). KRAS mutations are associated with worse prognosis and there is no FDA approved targeted therapy. KRAS mutations are associated with increased expression of PD-L1. We evaluated the outcomes of NSCLCBM with KRAS mutations treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). METHODS: We reviewed 800 patients with NSCLCBM treated at our tertiary care center. 226 had known KRAS mutational status, 121 of which received immunotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from either the start of immunotherapy (when both groups received immunotherapy) or from the date of diagnosis of brain metastasis. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Proportional hazard model were utilized to determine differences in OS and the Chi-square test was utilized to determine differences in PD-L1 expression. RESULTS: In 109 patients where both KRAS and PD-L1 status were known, KRAS mutations had greater PD-L1 expression (80.1% vs 61.9% positive, p=0.04). There was no difference in OS between KRAS mutant vs KRAS wild-type patients treated with immunotherapy. Median survival from the start of immunotherapy was 15.6 vs 15.5 months respectively (p=0.7), after adjusting for age, KPS, lesion number and extra-cranial metastasis (HR = .91, p=.7). Patients with KRAS mutations treated with immunotherapy versus those who received chemotherapy had a 1-year OS from the diagnosis of brain metastasis of 60.9% vs 38.7% respectively (trending towards significance, p=0.05). KRAS wild-type patients treated with immunotherapy versus those who did not receive immunotherapy had a 1-year OS from the diagnosis of brain metastasis of 61.9% vs 62.5% (p=0.85), respectively. DISCUSSION: KRAS mutations are associated with increased PD-L1 expression. Use of immunotherapy negates the poor outcomes seen traditionally in patients with NSCLCBM and KRAS mutations and it improves survival compared to use of chemotherapy. Our experience supports the use of immunotherapy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Assad Ali
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Hong Li
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lauko A, Sagar S, Barnett A, Wei W, Chao S, Stevens G, Peereboom D, Yu J, Murphy E, Angelov L, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. THER-10. IMPACT OF BRAF MUTATIONAL STATUS ON THE EFFICACY OF IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES. Neurooncol Adv 2019. [PMCID: PMC7213464 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: BRAF mutations occur in 50% of melanoma patients. Targeted agents – BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immunotherapy improve survival of melanoma patients with BRAF mutations. These agents have intracranial efficacy as shown in clinical trials. However, the efficacy of immunotherapies (immune checkpoint blockade) in melanoma brain metastases and the correlation with BRAF status is not as well characterized. METHODS: We reviewed 351 patients with melanoma brain metastases treated at our tertiary care center between 2000 and 2018, 75 of which received immunotherapy with known BRAF mutational status. Two-year, 5-year, and median overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start of immunotherapy to compare the efficacy of immunotherapy in BRAF mutant and BRAF wild type patients using the log-rank test. RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis of brain metastasis, the median age was 61 (23–87) years, median KPS was 80 (50–100), number of intracranial lesions was 2 (1–15), and 79% had extra-cranial metastases. Sixty-three patients were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 27 underwent whole brain radiation (WBRT) and 21 underwent surgery. When treated with immunotherapy, BRAF mutant and BRAF wild type median survival was 15.7 months (95% CI=9.4 – 42.4) and 6.9 (95% CI=4.1– 26.7) months (p-value=0.205), respectively. Two-year BRAF mutant and BRAF wild type survival was 35% (95% CI=21 – 58) and 28% (95% CI=16 – 51), and 5-year survival was 22% (95% CI=10 – 46) and 23% (95% CI=11 – 47), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty percent of patients with BRAF mutant and BRAF wild-type patients treated with immunotherapy derive a long-term benefit from immunotherapy and multimodality treatment and are alive 5 years from diagnosis of brain metastases. This was rarely seen in the pre-immunotherapy era in melanoma brain metastases. There was no difference in outcome based on the BRAF mutational status with use of immunotherapy in melanoma brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Wei Wei
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Barnett A, Lauko A, Ali A, Li H, Sagar S, Chao S, Pennell N, Peereboom D, Stevens G, Angelov L, Yu J, Murphy E, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. THER-16. EFFICACY OF UPFRONT IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS IN LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASIS. Neurooncol Adv 2019. [PMCID: PMC7213459 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have resulted in improved outcomes in a subset of patients with lung cancer. However, data describing the efficacy of ICI in lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM) is limited. We analyzed overall survival (OS) in patients with LCBM treated with upfront ICI, defined as having received ICI within 90 days of LCBM diagnosis, compared to non-ICI therapies. METHODS: We reviewed 665 patients with LCBM who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 at a major tertiary care institution. Of those patients, 240 received ICI, 164 of which received ICI after 90 days and 76 received ICI within 90 days. Propensity score (PS) was calculated using a logistic regression model including age, KPS, number of baseline brain lesions, and presence of extra-cranial metastasis (ECM) at the time of BM diagnosis. OS from BM diagnosis between PS matched cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier, the Log-Rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Prior to PS matching, median survival between ICI and non-ICI cohorts was not significantly different (10.9 months for both, p=0.81), although more ICI patients had ECM (57.1% vs 40.9%, p=0.006). Following PS matching, the ICI (n=76) and non-ICI (n=76) cohorts had a median age (62.4 vs 62.3 years), KPS (80 for both), lesion number (2 for both), and ECM (56.6% for both). Of matched patients, 94% received SRS, 52% received WBRT, and 29% underwent surgical resection. Compared to non-ICI, the ICI cohort has a 2-year OS hazard ratio, HR=0.87 (95% CI=0.58–1.31, p=0.51). Median and 1-year survival were not significantly different between ICI and non-ICI cohorts (median: 10.9 vs 9.1 months; 1-yr: 43.0% vs 42.4%). CONCLUSION: Patients with BM from primary lung cancer who received ICI within 90 days of their BM diagnosis did not have improvement in OS compared to patients who received non-ICI therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Assad Ali
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hong Li
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Barnett A, Sagar S, Lauko A, Wei W, Chao S, Peereboom D, Stevens G, Angelov L, Yu J, Murphy E, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. THER-13. IMMUNOTHERAPY VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE IN MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH KNOWN BRAF STATUS. Neurooncol Adv 2019. [PMCID: PMC7213394 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A mutation of the BRAF protein is seen in approximately 50% of melanoma patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard therapy in melanoma patients independent of a patient’s BRAF status. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the impact of BRAF status in patients treated with ICI compared to non-ICI systemic therapy on overall survival (OS) in patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM). METHODS: We reviewed 351 patients with MBM treated at our tertiary care center between 2000 and 2018. Of these, 144 had known BRAF status, 71 of which were BRAF mutant and 73 were BRAF wild-type. OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis of brain metastasis to compare the efficacy of ICI to other systemic therapies. Many of these patients received multiple lines of treatment including targeted therapies at some point during their care. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to determine differences in OS. RESULTS: Eighty-four percent of patients received local therapy that included either surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery or whole brain radiation therapy. In BRAF wild-type patients, 40 received ICI and 33 underwent non-ICI systemic therapy with a median survival (5.6 vs 7.1 months) and 2-year survival (28% vs 32%), respectively (p=0.64). Of the BRAF mutant patients, 33 received ICI and 38 did not with a median survival (17.1 vs 9.0 months) and 2-year survival (36% and 19%), respectively (p=0.014). When controlling for age, KPS, ECM, and number of lesions, BRAF mutant MBM patients treated with ICI compared to non-ICI had an OS hazard ratio, HR=0.4 (95% CI=0.21 – 0.78, p=0.0069). CONCLUSIONS: ICI therapy in BRAF mutant MBM patients results in improved OS compared to those with non-ICI systemic therapy. No such difference was observed in the BRAF wild-type cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Wei Wei
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sagar S, Lauko A, Barnett A, Wei W, Chao S, Peereboom D, Stevens G, Angelov L, Yu J, Murphy E, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. THER-02. IMPACT OF SYSTEMIC THERAPY IN MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASIS. Neurooncol Adv 2019. [PMCID: PMC7213196 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Melanoma brain metastasis is associated with a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 9 months. In recent years, management of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) by surgery and radiation [stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT)] has been bolstered by targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). METHODS: 351 patients, who underwent treatment for MBM at our tertiary care center from 2000 to 2018, were grouped into those that received chemotherapy, ICI, or targeted therapy. Thirty-four percent of patients treated with ICI had received other systemic therapies as well as part of their management. OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis of the brain metastases. The Kaplan Meier analysis was utilized to determine median OS and difference in OS was determined by utilizing the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The median survival after the diagnosis of brain metastasis was 10.4, 11.96, and 7.06 months in patients who received ICI, chemotherapy and targeted therapy respectively. A multivariate model was developed including the type of systemic therapy, presence of extracranial metastases, age, KPS and number of intracranial lesions. 114 patients underwent SRS alone, 56 underwent SRS and WBRT, 43 underwent SRS and surgical removal, 28 had surgical removal, SRS and WBRT, and 78 had no intracranial therapy. Compared to patients who received chemotherapy, patients who received immunotherapy had a hazard ratio, HR = 0.628 (confidence interval = 0.396 – 0.994, p-value = 0.047). Presence of EC metastases (HR= 1.25, p-value < .001), lower KPS (HR = .97, p-value < .0001) and multiple brain lesions (HR = 1.117, p-value < .0001) were associated with significantly worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of ICI significantly improves the OS in MBM compared to chemotherapy. Lower performance status, multiple brain metastases, and EC metastases are associated with poor OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Wei Wei
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lauko A, Thapa B, Muhsen B, Borghei-Razavi H, Wei W, Chao S, Stevens G, Peereboom D, Yu J, Murphy E, Angelov L, Mohammadi A, Suh J, Barnett G, Pennell N, Ahluwalia M. THER-14. INFLUENCE OF CLINICAL PARAMETERS ON THE EFFICACY OF IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASES (NSCLCBM). Neurooncol Adv 2019. [PMCID: PMC7213173 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (NSCLCBM) patients have a dismal prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have resulted in improved outcomes in a subset of patients, although limited information exists on the impact of ICI in patients with NSCLCBM. METHODS: We reviewed 121 NSCLCBM (2012–2018) patients treated at our tertiary care center. All patients received at least 2 cycles of ICI therapy after diagnosis of NSCLCBM. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the start of ICI therapy to date of death, progression or last follow up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival and were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Median age was 62 years (39–81) and median KPS was 90. Eighty-six patient received Nivolumab, 7 Atezolizumab, 25 Pembrolizumab, and 3 patients received multiple ICI over the course of their treatment for NSCLCBM. One hundred and twelve patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery. Nine patients were treated with ICI alone and 25 patients underwent surgical resection. Median OS for the entire cohort was 558 (303–1159) days and median PFS was 220 (114–512) days. Twenty-four patients received oral steroids within the first 28 days of ICI (median prednisone equivalent dose of 27 mg). Patients on upfront steroid therapy had a median PFS of 148 days vs 301 days in patients not on upfront steroids (p-value .0095). Complete blood count at the start of ICI was available for 87 patients and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios (NLR) were calculated. Patients with NLR at the start of ICI above 5 (n=33) had a median overall survival of 337 days compared to 558 days when NLR was below 5 (p-value .038). CONCLUSION: Use of steroids at initiation or within first 28 days of ICI therapy and NLR of greater than 5 are associated with worse outcomes in NSCLCBM treated with ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Wei Wei
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Defne Bayik
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Liver Center of Excellence, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Thapa B, Lauko A, Borghei-Razavi H, Suh J, Chao S, Murphy E, Pennell N, Velcheti V, Angelov L, Mohammadi A, Vogelbaum M, Barnett G, Ahluwalia M. CMET-09. IMPACT OF STEROIDS ON THE EFFICACY OF IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASES. Neuro Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy148.222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - John Suh
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Brain metastasis is a common complication of advanced malignancies, especially, lung cancer, breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Traditionally surgery, when indicated, and radiation therapy, either as whole-brain radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery, constituted the major treatment options for brain metastases. Until recently, most of the systemic chemotherapy agents had limited activity for brain metastases. However, with the advent of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy agents, there has been renewed interest in using these agents in the management of brain metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma, lung cancer, kidney cancer, and bladder cancer among others. They modulate the immune system to recognize tumor antigens as "non-self" antigens and mount an immune response against them. Initial studies of using immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastases have shown promising activity, and several clinical trials are currently underway. Studies are also assessing the combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy in brain metastases. The results of these ongoing clinical trials have the potential to change the therapeutic paradigm in patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, S73, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Bicky Thapa
- Fairview Hospital-Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, S73, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
214 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are revolutionizing the treatment of multiple advanced malignancies, however, there is limited data on the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in brain metastasis. We conducted a study to analyze the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with brain metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC), Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), and Melanoma treated with either Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab or a combination. Methods: After IRB approval, we retrospectively evaluated patients with brain metastasis treated at our tertiary care institution from 2011-2017 who underwent immunotherapy and one or more of the following; whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or systemic chemotherapy. Univariable and multivariable analysis was utilized to analyze OS and PFS. Volumetric analysis to assess treatment response is ongoing. Results: A total of 128 patients were identified with a median age of 60.6 years. 49% of patients were male; 77% of patients had a good (0 or 1) ECOG performance scores at the time of the brain metastasis; 83 patients had supratentorial brain metastasis, 11 had infratentorial and 24 had both. The prevalence of mutations was 34% in NSCLC patients, 58% in melanoma, and 0% in RCC. The median OS from the start of immunotherapy was not reached for RCC and was 17.1 and 28.9 months for Melanoma and NSCLC respectively. Median PFS was 5.9, 6.7 and 3.6 months for RCC, Melanoma, and NSCLC respectively. On multivariable analysis, SRS, sex and the number of cycles of immunotherapy had statistically significant hazard ratios. Conclusions: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are efficacious in the treatment of brain metastasis. Further analysis including response criteria using volumetric analysis is ongoing and final results will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lauko
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Bicky Thapa
- Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Thapa B, Shah B, Lauko A, Ahluwalia M. CMET-01. EFFICACY AND OUTCOME OF ANTI-PD1 THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASIS. Neuro Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox168.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
43
|
Müller-Greven G, Carlin CR, Burgett ME, Ahluwalia MS, Lauko A, Nowacki AS, Herting CJ, Qadan MA, Bredel M, Toms SA, Lathia JD, Hambardzumyan D, Sarkaria JN, Hamerlik P, Gladson CL. Macropinocytosis of Bevacizumab by Glioblastoma Cells in the Perivascular Niche Affects their Survival. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:7059-7071. [PMID: 28912141 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to VEGF, is used routinely in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, very little is known regarding the effects of bevacizumab on the cells in the perivascular space in tumors.Experimental Design: Established orthotopic xenograft and syngeneic models of GBM were used to determine entry of monoclonal anti-VEGF-A into, and uptake by cells in, the perivascular space. Based on the results, we examined CD133+ cells derived from GBM tumors in vitro Bevacizumab internalization, trafficking, and effects on cell survival were analyzed using multilabel confocal microscopy, immunoblotting, and cytotoxicity assays in the presence/absence of inhibitors.Results: In the GBM mouse models, administered anti-mouse-VEGF-A entered the perivascular tumor niche and was internalized by Sox2+/CD44+ tumor cells. In the perivascular tumor cells, bevacizumab was detected in the recycling compartment or the lysosomes, and increased autophagy was found. Bevacizumab was internalized rapidly by CD133+/Sox2+-GBM cells in vitro through macropinocytosis with a fraction being trafficked to a recycling compartment, independent of FcRn, and a fraction to lysosomes. Bevacizumab treatment of CD133+ GBM cells depleted VEGF-A and induced autophagy thereby improving cell survival. An inhibitor of lysosomal acidification decreased bevacizumab-induced autophagy and increased cell death. Inhibition of macropinocytosis increased cell death, suggesting macropinocytosis of bevacizumab promotes CD133+ cell survival.Conclusions: We demonstrate that bevacizumab is internalized by Sox2+/CD44+-GBM tumor cells residing in the perivascular tumor niche. Macropinocytosis of bevacizumab and trafficking to the lysosomes promotes CD133+ cell survival, as does the autophagy induced by bevacizumab depletion of VEGF-A. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 7059-71. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëlle Müller-Greven
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,School of Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
| | - Cathleen R Carlin
- Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Monica E Burgett
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,School of Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Adam Lauko
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amy S Nowacki
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Cameron J Herting
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maha A Qadan
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,School of Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
| | - Markus Bredel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Steven A Toms
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger, Pennsylvania
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Cell and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Petra Hamerlik
- Brain Tumor Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Candece L Gladson
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. .,Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|