Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in hospitalized adults with severe or critical COVID-19 (Bari-SolidAct): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Baricitinib has shown efficacy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, but no placebo-controlled trials have focused specifically on severe/critical COVID, including vaccinated participants.

METHODS

Bari-SolidAct is a phase-3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling participants from June 3, 2021 to March 7, 2022, stopped prematurely for external evidence. Patients with severe/critical COVID-19 were randomised to Baricitinib 4 mg once daily or placebo, added to standard of care. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 60 days. Participants were remotely followed to day 90 for safety and patient related outcome measures.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-nine patients were screened, 284 randomised, and 275 received study drug or placebo and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analyses (139 receiving baricitinib and 136 placebo). Median age was 60 (IQR 49-69) years, 77% were male and 35% had received at least one dose of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. There were 21 deaths at day 60 in each group, 15.1% in the baricitinib group and 15.4% in the placebo group (adjusted absolute difference and 95% CI - 0.1% [- 8·3 to 8·0]). In sensitivity analysis censoring observations after drug discontinuation or rescue therapy (tocilizumab/increased steroid dose), proportions of death were 5.8% versus 8.8% (- 3.2% [- 9.0 to 2.7]), respectively. There were 148 serious adverse events in 46 participants (33.1%) receiving baricitinib and 155 in 51 participants (37.5%) receiving placebo. In subgroup analyses, there was a potential interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on 60-day mortality. In a subsequent post hoc analysis there was a significant interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on the occurrence of serious adverse events, with more respiratory complications and severe infections in vaccinated participants treated with baricitinib. Vaccinated participants were on average 11 years older, with more comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

This clinical trial was prematurely stopped for external evidence and therefore underpowered to conclude on a potential survival benefit of baricitinib in severe/critical COVID-19. We observed a possible safety signal in vaccinated participants, who were older with more comorbidities. Although based on a post-hoc analysis, these findings warrant further investigation in other trials and real-world studies. Trial registration Bari-SolidAct is registered at NCT04891133 (registered May 18, 2021) and EUClinicalTrials.eu ( 2022-500385-99-00 ).

Patient Participation in Clinical Trials of Oncology Drugs and Biologics Preceding Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration

IMPORTANCE

Several studies have estimated the financial inputs for successful drug development. Such analyses do not capture the large investment that patient study participants commit to drug development.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the volume of patients required to achieve a first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for a new anticancer drug or biologic therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included a random sample of prelicense oncology drugs and biologics with a trial site in the United States that were launched into clinical efficacy testing between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010. Drugs and biologics were identified using ClinicalTrials.gov registration records. Total patient enrollment was captured over an 8-year span, and each intervention was classified based on whether it received FDA approval and was deemed as having intermediate or substantial value according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF) score. Secondarily, the association between patient numbers and intervention characteristics was tested. Data were analyzed in February 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURE

The prespecified primary outcome was the number of patients enrolled in prelicense trials per FDA approval.

RESULTS

A total of 120 drugs and biologics were included in our study, with 84 (70.0%) targeted agents, 20 (16.7%) immunotherapies, and 71 (59.2%) novel agents. A total of 13 drugs and biologics (10.8%; 95% CI, 5.3%-16.8%) in our sample gained FDA approval within 8 years, of which 1 (7.7%) was deemed of intermediate value and 3 (23.1%) were deemed of substantial value using ASCO-VF scoring. Overall, 158 810 patients were enrolled in 1335 trials testing these drugs and biologics, 47 913 (30.2%) in trials that led to FDA approval and 110 897 (69.8%) in trials that did not. An estimated 12 217 (95% CI, 7970-22 215) patient study participants contributed to prelicense trials per FDA approval. The estimated number of patients needed to produce a single FDA-approved drug or biologic of intermediate or substantial ASCO-VF clinical value was 39 703 (95% CI, 19 391-177 991).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this cohort study make visible the substantial patient investment required for prelicense oncology drug development. Such analyses can be used to devise policies that maximize the clinical impact of research on a per-patient basis.

Comparison between protocols and publications for prognostic and predictive cancer biomarker studies

BACKGROUND

Method prespecification in study protocols is important for controlling bias in reports. The primary goal of this study was to assess potential for discordance between study protocols and publications reporting predictive or prognostic cancer biomarker research. Secondary objectives included comparing characteristics of publications with accessible protocols compared to those without.

METHODS

Publications reporting predictive or prognostic cancer biomarker research were identified from 15 major journals, 2012-2015. Protocols were sought online or through repeated queries of corresponding authors. The following four items were extracted: (1) biomarkers, (2) biospecimen/assays, (3) sample size, (4) endpoints. We defined "explicit discordance" as the presence of major inconsistencies on these items.

RESULTS

Of 149 eligible publications, we obtained 19 eligible protocols online (13%). Out of a random sample of 103 publications where protocols were not available online, 12 protocols (12%) were furnished by corresponding authors; 8 (8% of authors) explicitly stated the absence of a protocol. Among 24 retrospective cohort studies, no protocol could be accessed. We found explicit discordance between publications and protocols for 18 studies (58%), in particular choice of biomarkers (36%), biospecimen/assays (6%), or endpoints (29%).

CONCLUSION

Protocols are generally not accessible or not used for cancer biomarker studies. Publications were often explicitly discordant with protocols, particularly regarding biomarkers and endpoints. Our findings point to common unaddressed risk of bias in publications of major journals reporting the relationship between cancer biomarkers and clinical endpoints.

Design of a Physical Activity Program to Prevent Functional Decline in Onco-Geriatric Patients (CAPADOGE): A Randomized Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND

Cancer in older patient favours the development of frailty: feeling of exhaustion, loss of weight, decreased muscle strength, slow gait speed, and low physical activity.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of adapted physical activity phone advices in limiting the cancer-induced loss of autonomy and frailty phenotype development.

DESIGN

Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Patients (>70y) undergoing curative treatment for cancer (n=400) will be recruited from 12 centres.

INTERVENTION

The intervention consists in phoned personalized physical activity advices related to strength, aerobic, balance, proprioception, and flexibility. The contacts are performed twice a month during six months and then monthly until 1 year. The intervention complements the PNNS booklet advices (National Nutritional Health Program). The trial compares «individualized phone advices + PNNS» to «usual care + PNNS».

MEASUREMENTS

Functional, cognitive, clinical and self-reported data are assessed before treatment and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 month follow-up. The primary outcome is the proportion of subjects with a one-year decreased SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery) score of one point or more, as compared to baseline. The secondary outcomes include quality of life items, rate of hospitalizations, institutionalizations, mortality, Fried phenotype at 1 and 2 years, and the SPPB score at 2 years.

DISCUSSION

This large trial will provide clinical data of the effects of an exercise advices intervention in older patients during cancer therapy on function and cognition evolution, and quality of life. The possibilities of minimizing the development of frailty phenotype due to these advices will be explored.

Innovations for phase I dose-finding designs in pediatric oncology clinical trials

Phase I oncology clinical trials are designed to identify the optimal dose that will be recommended for phase II trials. In pediatric oncology, the conduct of those trials raises specific challenges, as the disease is rare with limited therapeutic options. In addition, the tolerance profile is known from adult trials. This paper provides a review of the major recent developments in the design of these trials, inspired by the need to cope with the specific challenges of dose finding in cancer pediatric oncology. We reviewed simulation studies comparing designs dedicated to address these challenges. We also reviewed the design used in published dose-finding trials in pediatric oncology over the period 2009-2014. Three main fields of innovation were identified. First, designs that were developed in order to relax the rules for more flexible inclusions. Second, methods to incorporate data emerging from adult studies. Third, designs accounting for toxicity evaluation at repeated cycles in pediatric oncology. In addition to this overview, we propose some further directions for designing pediatric dose-finding trials.

French multicentre clinical evaluation of helical TomoTherapy for anal cancer in a cohort of 64 consecutive patients

Purpose/Objectives

To assess feasibility and toxicity of Helical TomoTherapy® for treating anal cancer patients.

Methods

From 2007 to 2011, 64 patients were consecutively treated with TomoTherapy® in three centres for locally advanced squamous-cell anal carcinoma (T2 > 4 cm or N positive). Prescribed doses were 45 Gy to the pelvis including inguinal nodes and 59.4 Gy to the primary site and involved nodes with fractions of 1.8 Gy, five days a week. A positional Megavoltage Computed Tomography was performed before each treatment session. All acute and late toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Median follow-up was 22.9 months. Fifty-four women and 10 men were treated (median age: 62 years). Nineteen patients (29.7 %) had T2, 16 patients (25.0 %) T3, and 27 patients (42.2 %) T4 tumours. Thirty-nine patients (60.9 %) had nodal involvement. Median tumour size was 45 mm (range, 10–110 mm). Seven patients had a colostomy before treatment initiation. Fifty-seven patients received concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU/cisplatin or 5-FU/mitomycin-based therapy). Forty-seven patients (73.4 %) experienced a complete response, 13 a partial response or local recurrence, and 11 had salvage surgery; among these, six became complete responders, three experienced metastatic failure, and two local failure. At least four patients experienced metastatic recurrence (concomitant to a local failure for one patient). The two-year overall survival was 85.6 % (95 %CI [71.1 %–93.0 %]), and the one-year disease-free survival, and colostomy-free survival were 68.7 % (95 %CI [54.4 %–79.4]), and 75.5 % (95 %CI [60.7 %–85.3 %]) respectively. Overall survival, disease-free survival and colostomy free-survival were significantly better for women than men (p = 0.002, p = 0.004, and p = 0.002 respectively). Acute grade ≥3 toxicity included dermatologic (46.9 % of patients), gastrointestinal (20.3 %), and hematologic (17.2 %) toxicity. Acute grade 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in one patient. No grade 5 event was observed.

Conclusions

TomoTherapy® for locally advanced anal cancer is feasible. In our three centres of expertise, this technique appeared to produce few acute gastrointestinal toxicities. However, high rates of dermatologic toxicity were observed. The therapeutic efficacy was within the range of expectations and similar to previous studies in accordance with the high rates of locally advanced tumours and nodal involvement.

90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, fludarabine, busulfan and antithymocyte globulin reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant conditioning for patients with advanced and high-risk B-cell lymphomas

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) refractory to initial chemotherapy or relapsing after autologous stem-cell transplantation have a poor prognosis. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen can be a therapeutic option. However, the high incidence of relapse remains a challenging issue. We speculated that the incorporation of (90)Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan into a fludarabine-based RIC regimen would improve the lymphoma control without overwhelming toxicity. Our aim was to evaluate the safety of (90)Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan in association with such a regimen in a prospective multicenter phase II trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with advanced lymphoma from five distinct institutions were included between February 2008 and October 2010. Thirty patients in complete or partial response after failure of a median of 3 (range, 2-4) previous chemotherapy regimens including autologous transplant in 29 were evaluable for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at day 100 post-transplant that was the primary end point.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 29-60 months), the 2-year event-free and overall survivals of the whole study group were both 80% [95 confidence interval (CI) 60.8% to 90.5%). The 100-day and 2-year post-transplant cumulative incidences of NRM were 3.3% (95% CI 0.2% to 14.9%) and 13.3% (95% CI 5.4% to 33.2%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 6.7% (95% CI 1.7% to 25.4%). The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease were 27% and 14%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For chemosensitive advanced high-risk B-cell lymphoma, the addition of (90)Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan to a RIC regimen based on fludarabine, busulfan and antithymocyte globulin followed by allogeneic transplant is safe and highly effective. clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00607854.

A new approach to integrate toxicity grade and repeated treatment cycles in the analysis and reporting of phase I dose-finding trials

BACKGROUND

Safety assessment beyond the dose-limiting toxicity evaluation period provides relevant information to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of a new treatment. We retrospectively analyzed three phase I trials to illustrate two indicators: per-cycle probability of graded toxicity and cumulative probability of severe toxicity over the treatment period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from two continual reassessment method (CRM) trials (T1: aviscumine in solid tumors with short time on treatment; T2: erlotinib + radiotherapy in brainstem gliomas with longer time on treatment) and one 3 + 3 design (T3: liposomal doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide combination in ovarian carcinoma). The probability of severe and moderate or severe toxicity per cycle was estimated at each dose level with mixed proportional odds model. The cumulative probability of severe toxicity was also estimated with the time-to-event CRM.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included in the three trials; 94, 96 and 72 treatment cycles were administered, in T1, T2 and T3, respectively. Moderate toxicities were at least twice as frequent as severe toxicities. An increased probability of toxicity over time was detected in T3 [P = 0.04; per-cycle probability of severe toxicity: 27% (cycle 1) to 59% (cycle 6) at the RP2D]. At the RP2D, 37% of patients experienced at least one severe toxicity over the first six cycles in T2, and 78% in T3.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedicated methods can be used to analyze toxicities from all cycles of treatment. They do not delay accrual and should be integrated in the analysis and reporting of phase I dose-finding trials.

Imatinib mesylate in scleroderma-associated diffuse skin fibrosis: a phase II multicentre randomized double-blinded controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor-β signalling pathways which may play a role in systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated skin changes.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed primarily at assessing the efficacy of imatinib mesylate in scleroderma skin fibrosis.

METHODS

We performed a phase II double-blinded trial on patients with scleroderma with either morphoea involving > 20% of body surface area or SSc with extensive skin involvement: modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) ≥ 20/51. Each patient was randomized to receive either imatinib mesylate 400 mg or placebo daily for a total of 6 months, and then was followed up 6 months after therapy discontinuation. Skin fibrosis was assessed by mRSS and measurement of the dermal thickness using skin biopsies performed at inclusion and at 6 months of treatment. In addition, quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire for Scleroderma) was recorded at each visit, and pulmonary function before and after intervention.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included in the study with a mean age of 48·9 years (range 30-71): 25 had a diagnosis of a SSc and three of diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. Demographic data, frequency of organ involvement of SSc and mRSS were comparable between groups. At 6 months, the proportion of variation of mRSS from inclusion was not statistically significantly different between the two groups (median +0·10 in imatinib group vs. -0·16 in placebo group, P = 0·098). Similarly, changes in dermal thickness, quality of life and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of imatinib 400 mg daily to improve skin fibrosis of diffuse scleroderma after 6 months of treatment based on validated outcome measurements.

International experts’ panel for the development of guidelines for the definition of time to event endpoints in clinical trials (DATECAN project): Results for pancreatic cancer

4053

Background: Variability in the definition of survival endpoints in oncology trials was identified (Mathoulin et al.JCO 2008). Lack of a formal consensus could cause this, which limits inter-trial comparisons. The DATECAN project aimed at obtaining a formal consensus recommendation for defining survival endpoints for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the following cancer sites: pancreas, sarcoma/GISTs, breast, colorectal, gastric/œsophagus, head and neck, kidney-bladder. We report results for pancreatic cancer. Methods: Based on a literature review of RCTs (2006-2009), we identified survival endpoints and events currently used. A 2-round modified Delphi method using RAND scoring (range:1-9) was used to reach consensus. Academic research groups were contacted for participation in order to select clinicians and methodologists for Pilot and Scoring groups (>30 experts/localization). Results: The Pilot group identified 14 endpoints that needed definition through consensus, such as progression free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure, time to quality of life deterioration. Endpoint definitions were seeked by disease setting (detectable disease vs not). Amongst the 52 European experts contacted, 33 and 30 participated to the 1st and 2nd round respectively. The experts scored a total of 204 events; a consensus was reached for 25 (12%) at the 1st round and 156 (76%) at the 2nd round. As example PFS was defined as time interval between the date of randomization, and the day of first local, regional progression or occurrence of distant metastases (including liver or non liver metastases) or occurrence of 2nd pancreatic cancer or death (all causes), whichever occurs first. The consensus was finalized during a face-to-face meeting organized during the ESMO 2011 congress and general rules were proposed for final ratification. Conclusions: Based on this consensus, an European charter is being finalized and proposed for endorsement to all academic groups in order to harmonize results and to allow formal comparisons of pancreatic RCTs. The impact of these definitions on trial results will be also investigated in a further project.

Adjuvant prophylactic regional radiotherapy versus observation in stage I Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentric prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of stage I Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) usually includes wide local excision (WLE) combined with irradiation of the tumor bed (ITB). No randomized study has ever been conducted in MCC. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of prophylactic adjuvant radiotherapy on the regional nodes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized open controlled study, patients for a stage I MCC treated by WLE and ITB were randomly assigned to regional adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation. Overall survival (OS) and probability of regional recurrence (PRR) were primary end points. Progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerance of irradiation were secondary end points.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included before premature interruption of the trial, due to a drop in the recruitment mainly due to the introduction of the sentinel node dissection in the management of MCC. No significant improvement in OS (P = 0.989) or PFS (P = 0.4) could be demonstrated after regional irradiation, which, however, significantly reduced the PRR (P = 0.007) with 16.7% regional recurrence rate in the observation arm versus 0% in the treatment arm. The treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The adjuvant regional irradiation significantly decreased the PRR in MCC, but benefit in survival could not be demonstrated.