1
|
Carril-Ajuria L, Lavaud P, Dalban C, Negrier S, Gravis G, Motzer RJ, Chevreau C, Tannir NM, Oudard S, McDermott DF, Laguerre B, Hammers HJ, Barthelemy P, Plimack ER, Borchiellini D, Gross-Goupil M, Jiang R, Lee CW, de Silva H, Rini BI, Escudier B, Albigès L. Validation of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2024; 204:114048. [PMID: 38653033 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outcomes across different solid tumors, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer. Data regarding the prognostic and/or predictive role of LIPI in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are still scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether LIPI could be predictive of survival in mRCC patients. METHODS We used patient level data from three different prospective studies (NIVOREN trial: nivolumab; TORAVA trial: VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy (TT); CheckMate 214: nivolumab-ipilimumab vs sunitinib). LIPI was calculated based on a derived neutrophils/(leukocyte-neutrophil) ratio > 3 and lactate-dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal, classifying patients into three groups (LIPI good, 0 factors;LIPI intermediate (int), 1 factor;LIPI poor, 2 factors) and/or into two groups (LIPI good, 0 factors;LIPI int/poor, 1-2 factors) according to trial sample size. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS In the Nivolumab dataset (n = 619), LIPI was significantly associated with OS (LIPI-good 30.1 vs 13.8 months in the LIPI int/poor; HR= 0.47) and PFS (HR=0.74). In the VEGF/VEGFR-TT dataset (n = 159), only a correlation with PFS was observed. In the CheckMate214 dataset (n = 1084), LIPI was significantly associated with OS (nivolumab-ipilimumab OS LIPI good vs int/poor: HR=0.55, p < 0.0001; sunitinib: OS LIPI good vs int/poor: 0.38, p < 0.0001) in both treatment groups in univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment-LIPI correlated with worse survival outcomes in mRCC treated with either ICI or antiangiogenic therapy, confirming LIPI's prognostic role in mRCC irrespective of systemic treatment used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cecile Dalban
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Leon Bernard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Nizar M Tannir
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Oncology department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu EY, Berry WR, Gurney H, Retz M, Conter HJ, Laguerre B, Fong PCC, Ferrario C, Todenhöfer T, Gravis G, Piulats JM, Emmenegger U, Shore ND, Romano E, Mourey L, Li XT, Poehlein CH, Schloss C, Appleman LJ, de Bono JS. Pembrolizumab and Enzalutamide in Patients with Abiraterone Acetate-Pretreated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Cohort C of the Phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:509-518. [PMID: 37940446 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited responses have been observed in patients treated with enzalutamide after disease progression on abiraterone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but androgen receptor signaling impacts T-cell function. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide in mCRPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients in cohort C of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study, who received ≥4 wk of treatment with abiraterone acetate in the prechemotherapy mCRPC state and experienced treatment failure or became drug-intolerant, were included. INTERVENTION Pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 wk plus enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoints were safety, the confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, and the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 on blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) on BICR and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 102 patients received pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide. Median follow-up was 51 mo (interquartile range 37-56). The confirmed PSA response rate was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16-33%). The confirmed ORR was 11% (95% CI 2.9-25%; 4/38 patients; two complete responses). Median rPFS was 6.0 mo (95% CI 4.1-6.3). Median OS was 20 mo (95% CI 17-24). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 94 patients (92%); grade 3-5 TRAEs occurred in 44 patients (43%). The incidence of treatment-related rash was higher with combination therapy than expected from the safety profile of each drug. One patient (1.0%) died of a TRAE (cause unknown). Study limitations include the single-arm design. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide had limited antitumor activity in patients who received prior abiraterone treatment without previous chemotherapy for mCRPC, with a safety profile consistent with the individual profiles of each agent. PATIENT SUMMARY Pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide showed limited antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The KEYNOTE-365 trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02861573.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Y Yu
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | - Howard Gurney
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Margitta Retz
- University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Urban Emmenegger
- Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Emanuela Romano
- Department of Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Loic Mourey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mourey L, Rainho LT, Dalban C, Carril-Ajuria L, Negrier S, Chevreau C, Gravis G, Thibault C, Laguerre B, Barthelemy P, Borchiellini D, Gross-Goupil M, Geoffrois L, Rolland F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Tantot F, Chaput N, Naigeon M, Teixeira M, Escudier B, Flippot R, Albiges L. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in elderly patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Analysis of the NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 201:113589. [PMID: 38382153 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immune checkpoint inhibitors are standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma but their activity and safety in elderly patients is insufficiently explored. We evaluated outcomes of elderly patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN phase 2 trial (NCT03013335) and conducted exploratory circulating biomarker analyses. METHODS Patients with mRCC were treated with nivolumab after at least one antiangiogenic therapy. The main endpoint of this analysis was safety in patients ≥ 70 years old (y.o), as per the rate of treatment-related grade 3-5 events (TRAE). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival. Exploration of candidate biomarkers associated with aging included baseline circulating cytokines involved in inflammation, adhesion, immune checkpoints, angiogenesis (IL6, IL7, IL8, BAFF, CXCL13, VCAM-1, 4-1BB, VEGF). RESULTS Of 720 patients, 515 were < 70 y.o and 205 ≥ 70 y.o. Patients ≥ 70 y.o exhibited numerically less IMDC poor risk disease (21.0% vs 26.9%), sarcomatoid component (4.9% vs 9.8%) or brain metastases (5.9% vs. 14.7%), but more previous treatment lines (≥ 2 in 54.1% vs 48.5%). TRAE were higher in patients ≥ 70 y.o (24.9% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.033). Respective ORR (19.2% vs. 22.1%) and median PFS (4.5 versus 3.0 months, HR 0.97 [95%CI 0.81-1.15]) were similar. Overall survival was shorter in patients ≥ 70 y.o (19.3 versus 26.9 months, HR 1.26 [95%CI 1.04-1.51]), but not significantly in a competitive risk model. Only V-CAM1 and 4-1BB were found to be increased in patients ≥ 70 y.o. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab displayed higher grade 3/4 TRAE but manageable toxicity in elderly patients, with sustained activity. Elderly patients did not display specific inflammatory or angiogenic circulating profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïc Mourey
- IUCT-Oncopole Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Larissa Tames Rainho
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Lucía Carril-Ajuria
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Gwenaëlle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, CNRS, CRCM, Immunity and Cancer Team, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Nathalie Chaput
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, UMS CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Marie Naigeon
- Immunomonitoring Laboratory, UMS CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Marcus Teixeira
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Bernard Escudier
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France; Immunomonitoring Laboratory, UMS CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France; Immunomonitoring Laboratory, UMS CNRS3655 & INSERM US23, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carneiro F, Vinceneux A, Larroquette M, Rony M, Carril L, Laguerre B, Blazevic I, Bartelemy P, Teyssonneau D, Goujon M, Linassier C, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Roubaud G, Mourey L, Albiges L, Gravis G, Gross-Goupil M, Cancel M. Gastrointestinal metastases in renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter GETUG (Groupe d'Étude des Tumeurs Uro-Génitales) study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 199:113534. [PMID: 38241819 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), bone and visceral metastases have a poor prognosis, while endocrine gland metastases have a more favorable prognosis. Gastrointestinal metastases (GIMs) are rare, and their prognosis is still poorly understood. OBJECTIVES To report clinical presentations, patient characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and prognosis of GIMs from RCC. METHODS We retrospectively collected data from RCC patients presenting GIMs, in 10 French GETUG centers, between 2000 and 2021. RESULTS We identified 74 patients with 87 GIMs, mostly gastric or duodenal. The median age at GIM diagnosis was 69 years and 76% of patients already had other metastases. GIMs occurred after a median duration of 5.4 years (IC95%=[4.2-7.1]) and 1.9 years (IC95%=[1.2-3.8]) from RCC diagnosis and first metastasis, respectively. GIMs were symptomatic in 52 patients (70%), with anemia in 41 patients (55%) and/or gastrointestinal bleeding in 31 patients (42%). Only 22 asymptomatic patients (30%) were fortuitously diagnosed. GIM management consisted of systemic treatment only in 29 GIMs (33%), local treatment only in 23 GIMs (26%), and both local and systemic treatment in 18 GIMs (21%). For 17 GIMs (20%), there was no therapeutic modification. After diagnosis of GIM, median overall survival was 19 months. CONCLUSION We report the largest retrospective cohort of GIMs in RCC patients. They should be suspected in case of anemia or gastrointestinal bleeding in any patient with a history of RCC. Their management varies widely depending on their location in the digestive tract and whether or not they are symptomatic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Carneiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - A Vinceneux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - M Larroquette
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Rony
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - L Carril
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - B Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugène Marquis Cancer Center, Rennes, France
| | - I Blazevic
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - P Bartelemy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - D Teyssonneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Goujon
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | - C Linassier
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - A Thiery-Vuillemin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - L Mourey
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - L Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - G Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - M Gross-Goupil
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Cancel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pfister C, Gravis G, Flechon A, Chevreau C, Mahammedi H, Laguerre B, Guillot A, Joly F, Soulie M, Allory Y, Harter V, Culine S. Perioperative dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (VESPER): survival endpoints at 5 years in an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:255-264. [PMID: 38142702 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00587-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal perioperative chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is not defined. The VESPER (French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group and French Association of Urology V05) trial reported improved 3-year progression-free survival with dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, but not in the overall perioperative setting. In this Article, we report on the secondary endpoints of overall survival and time to death due to bladder cancer at 5-year follow-up. METHODS VESPER was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 28 university hospitals or comprehensive cancer centres in France, in which adults (age ≤18 years and ≤80 years) with primary bladder cancer and histologically confirmed muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma were randomly allocated (1:1; block size four) to treatment with dd-MVAC (every 2 weeks for a total of six cycles) or GC (every 3 weeks for a total of four cycles). Overall survival and time to death due to bladder cancer (presented as 5-year cumulative incidence of death due to bladder cancer) was analysed by intention to treat (ITT) in all randomly assigned patients. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method with the treatment groups compared with log-rank test stratified for mode of administration of chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) and lymph node involvement. Time to death due to bladder cancer was analysed with an Aalen model for competing risks and a Fine and Gray regression model stratified for the same two covariates. Results were presented for the total perioperative population and for the neoadjuvant and adjuvant subgroups. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01812369, and is complete. FINDINGS From Feb 25, 2013, to March 1, 2018, 500 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 493 were included in the final ITT population (245 [50%] in the GC group and 248 [50%] in the dd-MVAC group; 408 [83%] male and 85 [17%] female). 437 (89%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 5·3 years (IQR 5·1-5·4); 190 deaths at the 5-year cutoff were reported. In the perioperative setting (total ITT population), we found no evidence of association of overall survival at 5 years with dd-MVAC treatment versus GC treatment (64% [95% CI 58-70] vs 56% [50-63], stratified hazard ratio [HRstrat] 0·79 [95% CI 0·59-1·05]). Time to death due to bladder cancer was increased in the dd-MVAC group compared with in the GC group (5-year cumulative incidence of death: 27% [95% CI 21-32] vs 40% [34-46], HRstrat 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·84]). In the neoadjuvant subgroup, overall survival at 5 years was improved in the dd-MVAC group versus the GC group (66% [95% CI 60-73] vs 57% [50-64], HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·52-0·97]), as was time to death due to bladder cancer (5-year cumulative incidence: 24% [18-30] vs 38% [32-45], HR 0·55 [0·39-0·78]). In the adjuvant subgroup, the results were not conclusive due to the small sample size. Bladder cancer progression was the cause of death for 157 (83%) of the 190 deaths; other causes of death included cardiovascular events (eight [4%] deaths), deaths related to chemotherapy toxicity (four [2%]), and secondary cancers (four [2%]). INTERPRETATION Our results on overall survival at 5 years were in accordance with the primary endpoint analysis (3-year progression-free survival). We found no evidence of improved overall survival with dd-MVAC over GC in the perioperative setting, but the data support the use of six cycles of dd-MVAC over four cycles of GC in the neoadjuvant setting. These results should impact practice and future trials of immunotherapy in bladder cancer. FUNDING French National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Pfister
- Department of Urology, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France; Clinical Investigation Center, Onco-Urology, Inserm 1404, Rouen, France.
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmette Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Aude Flechon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | | - Hakim Mahammedi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jean Perrin Cancer Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugène Marquis Cancer Center, Rennes, France
| | - Aline Guillot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, St Priest, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - Michel Soulie
- Department of Urology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Department of Pathology, Curie Institute, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Valentin Harter
- North-West Canceropole Data Center, Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - Stéphane Culine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Siefker-Radtke AO, Matsubara N, Park SH, Huddart RA, Burgess EF, Özgüroğlu M, Valderrama BP, Laguerre B, Basso U, Triantos S, Akapame S, Kean Y, Deprince K, Mukhopadhyay S, Loriot Y. Erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer with select FGFR alterations: cohort 2 of the randomized phase III THOR trial. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:107-117. [PMID: 37871702 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erdafitinib is an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved to treat locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in patients with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations (FGFRalt) who progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy. FGFR-altered tumours are enriched in luminal 1 subtype and may have limited clinical benefit from anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] treatment. This cohort in the randomized, open-label phase III THOR study assessed erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab in anti-PD-(L)1-naive patients with mUC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients ≥18 years with unresectable advanced/mUC, with select FGFRalt, disease progression on one prior treatment, and who were anti-PD-(L)1-naive were randomized 1 : 1 to receive erdafitinib 8 mg once daily with pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg or pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS The intent-to-treat population (median follow-up 33 months) comprised 175 and 176 patients in the erdafitinib and pembrolizumab arms, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between erdafitinib and pembrolizumab [median 10.9 versus 11.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.51; P = 0.18]. Median PFS for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab was 4.4 and 2.7 months, respectively (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.70-1.10). ORR was 40.0% and 21.6% (relative risk 1.85; 95% CI 1.32-2.59) and median duration of response was 4.3 and 14.4 months for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab, respectively. 64.7% and 50.9% of patients in the erdafitinib and pembrolizumab arms had ≥1 grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs); 5 (2.9%) and 12 (6.9%) patients, respectively, had AEs that led to death. CONCLUSIONS Erdafitinib and pembrolizumab had similar median OS in this anti-PD-(L)1-naive, FGFR-altered mUC population. Outcomes with pembrolizumab were better than assumed and aligned with previous reports in non- FGFR-altered populations. Safety results were consistent with the known profiles for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A O Siefker-Radtke
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - N Matsubara
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - S H Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - R A Huddart
- Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - E F Burgess
- Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, USA
| | - M Özgüroğlu
- Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - B P Valderrama
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - B Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - U Basso
- Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - S Triantos
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, USA
| | - S Akapame
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, USA
| | - Y Kean
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, USA
| | - K Deprince
- Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | - Y Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guilhem-Ducléon G, Dalban C, Negrier S, Gravis G, Laguerre B, Chevreau C, Oudard S, Barthelemy P, Ladoire S, Boughalem E, Borchiellini D, Linassier C, Nenan S, Flippot R, Albiges L, Goupil MG. Impact of First Line Antiangiogenic Therapy Duration on Nivolumab Outcome in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated in the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:643-652. [PMID: 37635052 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and immune checkpoint are 2 main therapeutic targets. We investigated the impact of duration exposure to antiangiogenic on immunotherapy clinical outcomes in metastatic ccRCC. METHODS Patients from NIVOREN trial who received nivolumab after only 1 prior antiangiogenic therapy were included. Response rate, clinical benefit, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were prospectively analyzed depending on the duration of the first line (< 6 months, ≥6 months) and exploratory in patients with long first line exposure (≥18 months). The circulating levels of 8 plasma proteins and cytokines at baseline were collected and compared according to first line antiangiogenic duration. RESULTS Among 354 patients, 127 (36%) and 227 (64%) patients had received first line antiangiogenic for < 6months and ≥ 6months respectively. Respective duration of first line therapy was not associated with objective response to nivolumab (20.5% vs. 23.9%, P = .50), or PFS (HR 0.92; P = .421). Median OS was respectively 16.6 and 31.3 months in the <6 and ≥6 months subgroups respectively. Adjusted on international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium risk, age and metastatic site, OS was longer in patients with longer treatment duration in the first line setting (HR 0.73; P = .017). Duration of first line VEGFR TKI was independent from circulating levels of 8 proteins and cytokines at nivolumab baseline. CONCLUSION Nivolumab activity in second line is independent from first-line duration of VEGFR TKI. However, first line VEGFR TKI duration ≥ 6 months is associated with longer OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cécile Dalban
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre de Lutte Contre Le Cancer, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Elouen Boughalem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, 49055 Angers, France
| | - Delphine Borchiellini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Claude Linassier
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Bretonneau et Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | | | - Ronan Flippot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Marine Gross Goupil
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Billon E, Dalban C, Oudard S, Chevreau C, Laguerre B, Barthélémy P, Borchiellini D, Geoffrois L, Negrier S, Joly F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Gross-Goupil M, Rolland F, Priou F, Mahammedi H, Tantot F, Escudier B, Chabaud S, Albiges L, Gravis G. Adrenal Metastases Are Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN Phase 2 Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00200-6. [PMID: 37813745 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glandular metastases (GMs; adrenal gland, pancreas, thyroid, ovary, breast, or prostate) are rare in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). Previous studies have indicated that GM patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy experience significantly longer overall survival (OS). OBJECTIVES To assess outcomes for mccRCC with or without GMs treated with nivolumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN phase 2 trial evaluated the activity and safety of nivolumab in patients with mccRCC who experienced failure of antiangiogenic therapies (NCT03013335). In this ancillary study, patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of at least one GM. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was OS; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and the objective response rate (ORR). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models are used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with pancreatic metastases and patients with adrenal metastases. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab between February 2016 and July 2017, 217 had GMs, of whom 151/217 had adrenal metastases and 86/217 had pancreatic metastasis. Patients with adrenal metastases had worse 12-mo OS (64% vs 71.1%) and 6-mo PFS (27.2% vs 36.6%) and a lower objective response rate (12.5%, 95% CI 7.6%-19.0%, vs 23.2%, 95% CI 19.8-27.0%; p = 0.005) than patients without adrenal metastases. Conversely, univariate analysis showed that patients with pancreatic metastases had significantly better 12-mo OS (82.3% vs 67.9%; HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.85) in comparison to patients with nonpancreatic GMs. On multivariable analysis, only adrenal metastasis remained associated with adverse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS Adrenal metastasis is an independent prognostic factor for poor response and survival in the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN trial. Limited activity with nivolumab was observed for patients with mccRCC with adrenal metastases. These results warrant an evaluation of the prognostic value of adrenal metastases in patients treated with immunotherapy combinations with ipilimumab or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study showed that metastasis in the adrenal glands could be an independent factor associated with poor response to immunotherapy and survival for patients with metastatic kidney cancer. It would be useful to evaluate the prognostic value of adrenal gland metastasis in patients treated with immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy agents combined with drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilien Billon
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
| | | | - Stephane Oudard
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Frank Priou
- CHD Vendee-Hopital Les Oudairies, La Roche-Sur-Yon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Orlando V, Drubay D, Lavaud P, Faivre L, Lesaunier F, Delva R, Gravis G, Rolland F, Priou F, Ferrero JM, Houede N, Mourey L, Theodore C, Krakowski I, Berdah JF, Baciuchka M, Laguerre B, Fléchon A, Grosse-Goupil M, Cojean-Zelek I, Oudard S, Labourey JL, Chinet-Charrot P, Legouffe E, Lagrange JL, Linassier C, Deplanque G, Beuzeboc P, Davin JL, Martin AL, Brihoum M, Culine S, Teuff GL, Fizazi K. Very Long-Term Complete Remission Can Be Achieved in Men With High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer and a Very High PSA Value: An Analysis of the GETUG 12 Phase 3 Trial. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:615.e1-615.e8. [PMID: 37263910 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a well-known prognostic parameter in men with prostate cancer. The treatment of men with very high PSA values and apparently no detectable metastases is not fully established. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ancillary analysis from the GETUG 12 phase 3 trial. Patients with non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer by bone and computerized tomography (CT) scan were randomly assigned to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel plus estramustine or ADT alone. Relapse-free survival (RFS), clinical RFS, metastases-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for different levels of PSA (50 ng/mL, 75 ng/mL, and 100 ng/mL). The relationship between PSA and outcomes was studied using residual-based approaches and spline functions. RESULTS The median follow-up was 12 years (range: 0-15.3). Baseline PSA (<50 ng/mL, n = 328; ≥50ng/mL, n = 85) was associated with improved RFS (P = .0005), cRFS (P = .0024), and MFS (P = .0068). The 12-year RFS rate was 46.33% (CI 40.59-51.86), 33.59% (CI 22.55-44.97), and 11.76% (1.96-31.20) in men with PSA values <50 ng/mL (n = 328), 50-100 ng/mL (n = 68), and ≥100 ng/mL (n = 17), respectively. Exploratory analyses revealed no deviation from the linear relationship assumption between PSA and the log hazard of events. CONCLUSIONS Men with apparently localized prostate cancer and a high baseline PSA value have a reasonable chance of being long-term disease-free when treated with curative intent combining systemic and local therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Damien Drubay
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Pernelle Lavaud
- Department of cancer medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Laura Faivre
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Remy Delva
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Gwenaëlle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Frédéric Rolland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Frank Priou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche-sur-Yon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Nadine Houede
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Nimes, Nimes, France
| | - Loic Mourey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Ivan Krakowski
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France
| | | | - Marjorie Baciuchka
- Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Marseille, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Isabelle Cojean-Zelek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Eric Legouffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinique Valdegour, Nîmes, France
| | - Jean-Léon Lagrange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hopital Henri Mondor, Université Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
| | - Claude Linassier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - Gaël Deplanque
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Swiss
| | - Philippe Beuzeboc
- Oncology and Supportive Care Department, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | | | | | | | - Stéphane Culine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Gwénaël Le Teuff
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Department of cancer medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lefort F, Dalban C, Gross-Goupil M, Laguerre B, Chabaud S, Escudier B, Albiges L. Association of Corticosteroids With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nivolumab. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1295-1298. [PMID: 37440214 PMCID: PMC10346501 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
This nonrandomized controlled trial ancillary study evaluates the survival outcomes associated with corticosteroid use during nivolumab treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Félix Lefort
- Medical Oncology, CHU Bordeaux-Hopital St André, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Bernard Escudier
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy–Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy–Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thibault C, Fléchon A, Albiges L, Joly C, Barthelemy P, Gross-Goupil M, Chevreau C, Coquan E, Rolland F, Laguerre B, Gravis G, Pécuchet N, Elaidi RT, Timsit MO, Brihoum M, Auclin E, de Reyniès A, Allory Y, Oudard S. Gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab for kidney metastatic collecting duct and medullary carcinomas: Results of a prospective phase II trial (BEVABEL-GETUG/AFU24). Eur J Cancer 2023; 186:83-90. [PMID: 37054556 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are rare entities with a poor outcome. First-line metastatic treatment is based on gemcitabine + platinum chemotherapy (GC) regimen but retrospective data suggest enhanced anti-tumour activity with the addition of bevacizumab. Therefore, we performed a prospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of GC + bevacizumab in metastatic RMC/CDC. METHODS We conducted a phase 2 open-label trial in 18 centres in France in patients with metastatic RMC/CDC and no prior systemic treatment. Patients received bevacizumab plus GC up to 6 cycles followed, for non-progressive disease, by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The co-primary end-points were objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (ORR-6; PFS-6). PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end-points. At interim analysis, the trial was closed due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. RESULTS From 2015 to 2019, 34 of the 41 planned patients have been enroled. After a median follow-up of 25 months, ORR-6 and PFS-6 were 29.4% and 47.1%, respectively. Median OS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6-24.2). Seven patients (20.6%) discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicities (hypertension, proteinuria, colonic perforation). Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 82% patients, the most common being haematologic toxicities and hypertension. Two patients experienced grade 5 toxicity (subdural haematoma related to bevacizumab and encephalopathy of unknown origin). CONCLUSION Our study showed no benefit for bevacizumab added to chemotherapy in metastatic RMC and CDC with higher than expected toxicity. Consequently, GC regimen remains a therapeutic option for RMC/CDC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers INSERM UMR-S 1138, Paris, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre hospitalo-Universitaire, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Elodie Coquan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Frédéric Rolland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblin, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Pécuchet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin, Saint Mandé F-94160, France
| | - Réza-Thierry Elaidi
- ARTIC: Association pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie, Paris, France
| | - Marc-Olivier Timsit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP-Centre, France
| | | | - Edouard Auclin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Aurélien de Reyniès
- Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, laboratoire SeQOIA, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers INSERM UMR-S 1138, Paris, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Department of Anatomopathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris 75248, France
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, PARCC, INSERM U970, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Culine S, Harter V, Krucker C, Gravis G, Fléchon A, Chevreau C, Mahammedi H, Laguerre B, Guillot A, Joly F, Fontugne J, Allory Y, Pfister C. Refining the Characterization and Outcome of Pathological Complete Responders after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Lessons from the Randomized Phase III VESPER (GETUG-AFU V05) Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061742. [PMID: 36980628 PMCID: PMC10046214 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is the optimal treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In recent years, the VESPER trial showed a statistically significant higher progression-free survival with dd-MVAC (dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) compared to GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin). In the present report, we refine the characterization and outcome of patients whose cystectomy specimens were pathologically free of cancer (pathological complete response, pCR). We confirm that these patients portend a better outcome as compared to patients with invasive disease (≥pT1N0) at cystectomy. Nested variant and lymphovascular invasion were identified as adverse predictive factors of pCR. Progression-free survival probability three years after pCR on cystectomy was about 85%, regardless of the NAC regimen. A lower creatinine clearance and the delivery of less than four cycles were associated with a higher risk of relapse. Predicting the efficacy of NAC remains a major challenge. The planned analysis of molecular subtypes in the VESPER trial could help predict which patients may achieve complete response and better outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Culine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Nord, Université de Paris Cité, Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-142-494-247
| | - Valentin Harter
- North-West Canceropole Data Center, Baclesse Cancer Center, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Clémentine Krucker
- CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmette Institute, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICR-IUCT Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Hakim Mahammedi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jean Perrin Cancer Center, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugène Marquis Cancer Center, 35042 Rennes, France
| | - Aline Guillot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baclesse Cancer Center, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Jacqueline Fontugne
- CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Yves Allory
- CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Christian Pfister
- Department of Urology, Clinical Investigation Center, Inserm 1404, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yu EY, Piulats JM, Gravis G, Fong PCC, Todenhöfer T, Laguerre B, Arranz JA, Oudard S, Massard C, Heinzelbecker J, Nordquist LT, Carles J, Kolinsky MP, Augustin M, Gurney H, Tafreshi A, Li XT, Qiu P, Poehlein CH, Schloss C, de Bono JS. Corrigendum to "Pembrolizumab plus Olaparib in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Long-term Results from the Phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 Cohort A Study" [Eur Urol 83 (2023) 15-26]. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e87. [PMID: 36528479 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Y Yu
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | | | - Peter C C Fong
- Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Jose A Arranz
- General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Stephane Oudard
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Massard
- Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Julia Heinzelbecker
- Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | | | - Joan Carles
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Ali Tafreshi
- University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Ping Qiu
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Velev M, Dalban C, Chevreau C, Gravis G, Negrier S, Laguerre B, Gross-Goupil M, Ladoire S, Borchiellini D, Geoffrois L, Joly F, Priou F, Barthelemy P, Laramas M, Narciso B, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Berdah JF, Ferrari V, Dominique Thomas Q, Mione C, Curcio H, Oudard S, Tantot F, Escudier B, Chabaud S, Albiges L, Thibault C. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: Results of the GETUG-AFU26-NIVOREN multicentre phase II study. Eur J Cancer 2023; 182:66-76. [PMID: 36746010 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bone metastases (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with a poor prognosis based on retrospective studies evaluating antiangiogenic agents. Few data are available regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with bone metastatic RCC. NIVOREN is a multicentre prospective study in which patients were treated with nivolumab after the failure of antiangiogenic agents. We aim to assess the impact of BM on prognosis, and the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients enrolled in the NIVOREN trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with BM at inclusion were included in our study. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and skeletal-related events (SRE). RESULTS Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab, 194 presented BM at inclusion. The median follow-up was 23.9 months. Median OS was 17.9 months in patients with BM versus 26.1 months in patients without BM (p = 0.0023). The difference was not statistically significant after adjustment (p = 0.0707). The median PFS was shorter in patients with BM even after adjustment (2.8 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.0045), as well as the ORR (14.8% versus 23.3%). SRE occurred for 36% of patients with BM. A post-hoc analysis evaluating the impact of bone-targeting agents (BTA) on SRE incidence showed a significant benefit of BTA on the incidence of SRE (OR = 0.367, CI95% [0.151-0.895]). CONCLUSION Nivolumab is associated with shorter PFS, and lower ORR in RCC patients with BM. Our study suggests that BTA in association with immunotherapy decreases the incidence of SRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud Velev
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Service d'oncologie médicale, Université Paris Cité, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
| | - Cécile Dalban
- Centre Léon Bérard Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France.
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Service d'oncologie médicale, 1 Av. Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100, Toulouse, France.
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Service d'oncologie médicale, 232 Bd de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
| | - Sylvie Negrier
- Centre Léon Bérard, université Lyon I, Service oncologie médicale, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France.
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Centre Eugene Marquis, Service d'oncologie médicale, Av. de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque CS 44229, 35000, Rennes, France.
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Bordeaux University Hospital, Service d'oncologie medicale, Hôpital Pellegrin, Pl. Amélie Raba Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, Service d'oncologie médicale, 1 Rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France.
| | - Delphine Borchiellini
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Service d'oncologie médicale, 33 Av. de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
| | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Service d'oncologie médicale, 6 Av. de Bourgogne, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - Florence Joly
- Centre François Baclesse, Service d'oncologie médicale, 3 Av. du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France.
| | - Frank Priou
- Centre Hospitalier de Vendée, Service d'oncologie médicale, Bd Stéphane Moreau, 85000, La Roche sur Yon, France.
| | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Service d'oncologie médicale, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Mathieu Laramas
- Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, Service d'oncologie médicale, Av. des Maquis du Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France.
| | - Berangère Narciso
- Tours University Hospital, Service d'oncologie médicale, 2 Bd Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France.
| | - Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin
- Hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Service d'oncologie médicale, 3 Bd Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
| | - Jean-François Berdah
- Centre Hospitalier de Hyères, Service d'oncologie médicale, Centre hospitalier d'Ajaccio, 27 Av. Impératrice Eugénie, 20000 Ajaccio, France.
| | - Victoria Ferrari
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Service d'oncologie médicale, 33 Av. de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
| | - Quentin Dominique Thomas
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier University, Service d'oncologie médicale, Parc Euromédecine, 208 Av. des Apothicaires, 34090, Montpellier, France.
| | - Cécile Mione
- Université Clermont-Ferrand, 28 Pl. Henri Dunant, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - Hubert Curcio
- Centre François Baclesse, Service d'oncologie médicale, 3 Av. du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Stephane Oudard
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Service d'oncologie médicale, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
| | | | - Bernard Escudier
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Service d'oncologie médicale, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
| | | | - Laurence Albiges
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Service d'oncologie médicale, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Constance Thibault
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Service d'oncologie médicale, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vano YA, Phan L, Simonaggio A, Bennamoun M, Pannier D, Chevreau C, Borchiellini D, Maillet D, Gross-Goupil M, Laguerre B, Tournigand C, Barthelemy P, Coquan E, Gravis G, Sun CM, Meylan M, Fridman WH, Sautès-Fridman C, Elaidi R, Oudard S. Overall survival (OS) and efficacy results of second-line treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated in the randomized phase II BIONIKK trial. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
607 Background: To date, no biomarker of efficacy of nivolumab+/-ipilimumab (N+/-I) or anti-VEGFR TKI has been prospectively validated in mRCC. The BIONIKK trial showed promising objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) with these treatments in first line (L1) after selection by tumour molecular group. We report OS and efficacy results of the second-line (L2) treatment. Methods: BIONIKK is a French multicentre non-comparative phase II trial, randomising 199 mRCC pts to receive N (58), NI (101) or TKI (40) in L1 according to four molecular groups (ccrcc1-4). ORR and PFS were already reported. With an additional follow-up of ≥20 months, we report OS from randomization and from the start of L2, as well as ORR and PFS with a TKI in L2 by molecular group. Results: With a median follow-up of 42.1 months (40.5-45.2), 86 (43%) patients died: 27/58 (46.5%), 39/101 (39%) and 20/40 (50%) in the N, NI, and TKI arm, respectively. Median OS were 43.4 months (95%CI=31.4-NR) with N, 52.7 months (95%CI=46-NR) with NI and 38.1 months (95%CI=33.2-NR) with TKI (table). 175 (88%) patients discontinued first-line treatment, including 20 deaths, and 129 (74%) received a L2, 38/58 (65.5%), 64/101 (63%), and 27/40 (67.5%) after N, NI and TKI, respectively. The most frequent L2 received after N+/-I was a TKI in 96/102 (94%) pts, including cabozantinib in 49, sunitinib/pazopanib in 32, axitinib in 13, and lenvatinib in 2. N was the most frequent L2 after TKI, 20/27 (74%). ORR with TKI in L2 was 28.5% (10/35) after N, 39% (24/61) after NI and 80% (4/5) after TKI, with marked benefit in ccrcc2 pts (table). The mPFS with TKI in L2 was 8.2 (95%CI=6.9-19.3) after N, 11.4 (95%CI= 8.9-16.8) after NI, and 12.1 (95%CI =11.4-NR) months after TKI, with a higher benefit in ccrcc2 pts (vs. ccrcc1+4, p=0.04). Conversely, ORR and mPFS with N after TKI in ccrcc2-pts were 12.5% (2/16) and 5.4 (2.6-NR) months, respectively. Median OS L2 was reported in the table. The updated ORR and PFS in L1 will presented at the Meeting, as well as PFS2 and efficacy by TKI type in L2. Conclusions: We report for the first-time OS and L2 efficacy results by molecular group in a randomized trial. Molecular selection also has an impact on treatment efficacy in L2. These results, together with those reported in L1, can inform clinicians on the best treatment sequence in L1-2. Clinical trial information: NCT02960906 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yann-Alexandre Vano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP.Centre – Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Letuan Phan
- ARTIC - Association pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie; Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP. Centre – Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Audrey Simonaggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP.Centre – Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Mostefa Bennamoun
- Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Diane Pannier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | - Delphine Borchiellini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Denis Maillet
- Department of Medical Oncology, IMMUCARE, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices de Lyon (IC-HCL); Faculté de médecine de Saint Etienne, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux - Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène - Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP - Université de Paris Est, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Elodie Coquan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Universite, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Cheng-Ming Sun
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Meylan
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Wolf-Hervé Fridman
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Sautès-Fridman
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Réza Elaidi
- ARTIC - Association pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie; Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP. Centre – Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Stephane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP.Centre – Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Powles T, Tomczak P, Park SH, Venugopal B, Ferguson T, Symeonides SN, Hajek J, Gurney H, Chang YH, Lee JL, Sarwar N, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Gross-Goupil M, Mahave M, Haas NB, Sawrycki P, Burgents JE, Xu L, Imai K, Quinn DI, Choueiri TK, Choueiri T, Park SH, Venugopal B, Ferguson TR, Hajek J, Lin TP, Symeonides SN, Lee JL, Sawrycki P, Haas NB, Gurney HP, Mahave M, Sarwar N, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Gross-Goupil M, Chevreau C, Burke JM, Doshi G, Melichar B, Topart D, Oudard S, Kopyltsov E, Hammers HJ, Quinn DI, Alva A, Menezes JDJ, Silva AGE, Winquist EW, Hamzaj A, Procopio G, Karaszewska B, Nowakowska-Zajdel EM, Alekseev BY, Gafanov RA, Izmailov A, Semenov A, Afanasyev SG, Lipatov ON, Powles TB, Srinivas S, McDermott D, Kochuparambil ST, Davis ID, Peltola K, Sabbatini R, Chung J, Shkolnik MI, Matveev VB, Gajate Borau P, McCune S, Hutson TE, Dri A, Sales SC, Yeung C, Alcala Castro CM, Bostrom P, Laguerre B, Buttigliero C, de Giorgi U, Fomin EA, Zakharia Y, Hwang C, Singer EA, Yorio JT, Waterhouse D, Kowalyszyn RD, Alfie MS, Yanez Ruiz E, Buchler T, Kankaanranta K, Ferretti G, Kimura G, Nishimura K, Masumori N, Tamada S, Kato H, Kitamura H, Danielewicz I, Wojcik-Tomaszewska J, Sala Gonzalez N, Chiu KY, Atkins MB, Heath E, Rojas-Uribe GA, Gonzalez Fernandez ME, Feyerabend S, Pignata S, Numakura K, Cybulska Stopa B, Zukov R, Climent Duran MA, Maroto Rey PJ, Montesa Pino A, Chang CH, Vengalil S, Waddell TS, Cobb PW, Hauke R, Anderson DM, Sarantopoulos J, Gourdin T, Zhang T, Jayram G, Fein LE, Harris C, Beato PMM, Flores F, Estay A, Rubiano JA, Bedke J, Hauser S, Neisius A, Busch J, Anai S, Tsunemori H, Sawka D, Sikora-Kupis B, Arranz JA, Delgado I, Chen CH, Gunderson E, Tykodi S, Koletsky A, Chen K, Agrawal M, Kaen DL, Sade JP, Tatangelo MD, Parnis F, Barbosa FM, Faucher G, Iqbal N, Marceau D, Paradis JB, Hanna N, Acevedo A, Ibanez C, Villanueva L, Galaz PP, Durango IC, Manneh R, Kral Z, Holeckova P, Hakkarainen H, Ronkainen H, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Tartas S, Goebell PJ, Grimm MO, Hoefner T, Wirth M, Panic A, Schultze-Seemann W, Yokomizo A, Mizuno R, Uemura H, Eto M, Tsujihata M, Matsukawa Y, Murakami Y, Kim M, Hamberg P, Marczewska-Skrodzka M, Szczylik C, Humphreys AC, Jiang P, Kumar B, Lu G, Desai A, Karam JA, Keogh G, Fleming M, Zarba JJ, Leiva VE, Mendez GA, Harris SJ, Brown SJ, Antonio Junior JN, Costamilan RDC, Rocha RO, Muniz D, Brust L, Lalani AK, Graham J, Levesque M, Orlandi F, Kotasek R, Deville JL, Borchiellini D, Merseburger A, Rink M, Roos F, McDermott R, Oyama M, Yamamoto Y, Tomita Y, Miura Y, Ioritani N, Westgeest H, Kubiatowski T, Bal W, Girones Sarrio R, Rowe J, Prow DM, Senecal F, Hashemi-Sadraei N, Cole SW, Kendall SD, Richards DA, Schnadig ID, Gupta M. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as post-nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-564): 30-month follow-up analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1133-1144. [PMID: 36055304 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00487-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-564 study showed improved disease-free survival with adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo after surgery in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma at an increased risk of recurrence. The analysis reported here, with an additional 6 months of follow-up, was designed to assess longer-term efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab versus placebo, as well as additional secondary and exploratory endpoints. METHODS In the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial, adults aged 18 years or older with clear cell renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence were enrolled at 213 hospitals and cancer centres in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Eligible participants had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had undergone nephrectomy 12 weeks or less before randomisation, and had not received previous systemic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via central permuted block randomisation (block size of four) to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by metastatic disease status (M0 vs M1), and the M0 group was further stratified by ECOG performance status and geographical region. All participants and investigators involved in study treatment administration were masked to the treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival by investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly assigned to a treatment). Safety was assessed in the safety population, comprising all participants who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or placebo. As the primary endpoint was met at the first interim analysis, updated data are reported without p values. This study is ongoing, but no longer recruiting, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03142334. FINDINGS Between June 30, 2017, and Sept 20, 2019, 994 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n=496) or placebo (n=498). Median follow-up, defined as the time from randomisation to data cutoff (June 14, 2021), was 30·1 months (IQR 25·7-36·7). Disease-free survival was better with pembrolizumab compared with placebo (HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·50-0·80]). Median disease-free survival was not reached in either group. The most common all-cause grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (in 14 [3%] of 496 participants) and increased alanine aminotransferase (in 11 [2%]) in the pembrolizumab group, and hypertension (in 13 [3%] of 498 participants) in the placebo group. Serious adverse events attributed to study treatment occurred in 59 (12%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and one (<1%) participant in the placebo group. No deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab. INTERPRETATION Updated results from KEYNOTE-564 support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy as a standard of care for participants with renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Powles
- Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK; Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Piotr Tomczak
- Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Balaji Venugopal
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Stefan N Symeonides
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, UK; Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Howard Gurney
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Jae Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Piotr Sawrycki
- Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony im L Rydygiera w Toruniu, Torun, Poland
| | | | - Lei Xu
- Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | - David I Quinn
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Linch M, Ferrario C, Stoeckle M, Laguerre B, Arranz Arija J, Todenhöfer T, Fong P, Piulats Rodriguez J, Berry W, Emmenegger U, Mourey L, Mar N, Appleman L, Joshua A, Conter H, Li X, Schloss C, Poehlein C, de Bono J, Yu E. 1389P Two-year follow-up of KEYNOTE-365 cohort D: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus abiraterone acetate (abi) and prednisone in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
18
|
Rassy E, Dalban C, Colomba E, Derosa L, Silva CAC, Negrier S, Chevreau C, Gravis G, Oudard S, Laguerre B, Barthelemy P, Goupil MG, Geoffrois L, Rolland F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Joly F, Ladoire S, Tantot F, Escudier B, Albiges L. Efficacy and safety of concomitant proton pump inhibitor and nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma: results of the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN multicenter phase II study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:488-494. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
19
|
Yu EY, Kolinsky MP, Berry WR, Retz M, Mourey L, Piulats JM, Appleman LJ, Romano E, Gravis G, Gurney H, Bögemann M, Emmenegger U, Joshua AM, Linch M, Sridhar S, Conter HJ, Laguerre B, Massard C, Li XT, Schloss C, Poehlein CH, de Bono JS. Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel and Prednisone in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Long-term Results from the Phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 Cohort B Study. Eur Urol 2022; 82:22-30. [PMID: 35397952 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) frequently receive docetaxel after they develop resistance to abiraterone or enzalutamide and need more efficacious treatments. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel and prednisone in patients with mCRPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The trial included patients with mCRPC in the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 cohort B study who were chemotherapy naïve and who experienced failure of or were intolerant to ≥4 wk of abiraterone or enzalutamide for mCRPC with progressive disease within 6 mo of screening. INTERVENTION Pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) every 3 wk (Q3W), docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV Q3W, and prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoints were safety, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, and the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression; the disease control rate (DCR) and duration of response (DOR) according to RECIST v1.1 by BICR; ORR, DCR, DOR, and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 3-modified RECIST v1.1 by BICR; and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Among 104 treated patients, 52 had measurable disease. The median time from allocation to data cutoff (July 9, 2020) was 32.4 mo, during which 101 patients discontinued treatment, 81 (78%) for disease progression. The confirmed PSA response rate was 34% and the confirmed ORR (RECIST v1.1) was 23%. Median rPFS and OS were 8.5 mo and 20.2 mo, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 100 patients (96%). Grade 3-5 TRAEs occurred in 46 patients (44%). Seven AE-related deaths (6.7%) occurred (2 due to treatment-related pneumonitis). Limitations of the study include the single-arm design and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab plus docetaxel and prednisone demonstrated antitumor activity in chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide for mCRPC. Safety was consistent with profiles for the individual agents. Further investigation is warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab combined with the chemotherapy drug docetaxel and the steroid prednisone for patients with metastatic prostate cancer resistant to androgen deprivation therapy , and who never received chemotherapy. The combination showed antitumor activity and manageable safety in this patient population. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02861573.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, G4-830, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | - William R Berry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Center Cary, Cary, NC, USA
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Loic Mourey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Josep M Piulats
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leonard J Appleman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Emanuela Romano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Howard Gurney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin Bögemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Urban Emmenegger
- Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre and Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Linch
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospital and UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Srikala Sridhar
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, UHN Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Henry J Conter
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Western Ontario, Brampton, ON, Canada
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Christophe Massard
- Department of Drug Development, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus and Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus and Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Xin Tong Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Charles Schloss
- Department of Medical Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | | | - Johann S de Bono
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kammerer-Jacquet SF, Gandon C, Dugay F, Laguerre B, Peyronnet B, Mathieu R, Verhoest G, Bensalah K, Leroy X, Aubert S, Vermaut C, Escande F, Verkarre V, Compérat E, Ambrosetti D, Pedeutour F, Belaud-Rotureau MA, Rioux-Leclercq N. Comprehensive study of 9 novel cases of TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinoma: an aggressive tumor with frequent PDL1 expression. Histopathology 2022; 81:228-238. [PMID: 35562857 DOI: 10.1111/his.14683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES First described in 2014, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with TFEB amplification (6p21) is a rare molecular subgroup whose diagnosis is challenging. The prognosis and therapeutic implications remain unclear. METHODS We report here the clinical, histological, immunohistochemical and genetic features of 9 novel cases. The pathological and immunohistochemical features were centrally reviewed by expert uropathologists. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed the diagnosis and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed to determine quantitative genomic alterations. We also performed an exhaustive review of the literature and compiled our data. RESULTS TFEB-amplified RCC were locally advanced with initial lymph node involvement in one case and liver metastasis in another case. They were high-grade eosinophilic tumors with papillary/pseudopapillary architecture, frequent positivity for melanocytic markers and frequent PDL1 expression. FISH demonstrated high-level TFEB amplification in 6 cases. One case showed concomitant TFEB translocation. CGH analysis identified complex alterations with frequent losses of 1p, 2q, 3p, 6p, and frequent 6p and 8q gains. VEGFA co-amplification was identified in all cases with a lower level than TFEB. The prognosis was poor with five patients having lymph node or distant metastases. CONCLUSION TFEB-amplified RCC is a rare molecular subgroup with variable morphology whose diagnosis is confirmed by FISH analysis. The complex alterations identified by CGH are consistent with an aggressive clinical behavior. The co-amplification of VEGFA and the expression of PDL1 could suggest a potential benefit from antiangiogenics and targeted immunotherapy in combination for these aggressive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Camille Gandon
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Frederic Dugay
- UMR 6290-IGDR, Rennes, France.,Department of Cytogenetics, University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Xavier Leroy
- Univ.Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Pathology, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Sebastien Aubert
- Univ.Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Pathology, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Catherine Vermaut
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Fabienne Escande
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Virginie Verkarre
- Department of Pathology, HEGP, AP-HP-centre, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Pedeutour
- Laboratory of Solid Tumor Genetics, University Hospital of Nice-Côte d'Azur University, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice (IRCAN), CNRS UMR 7284/INSERM U1081, Nice, France
| | - Marc-Antoine Belaud-Rotureau
- UMR 6290-IGDR, Rennes, France.,Department of Cytogenetics, University Hospital, Rennes, France.,Department of Oncology, Eugène Marquis Centre, Rennes, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fizazi K, Foulon S, Carles J, Roubaud G, McDermott R, Fléchon A, Tombal B, Supiot S, Berthold D, Ronchin P, Kacso G, Gravis G, Calabro F, Berdah JF, Hasbini A, Silva M, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Latorzeff I, Mourey L, Laguerre B, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Martin E, El Kouri C, Escande A, Rosello A, Magne N, Schlurmann F, Priou F, Chand-Fouche ME, Freixa SV, Jamaluddin M, Rieger I, Bossi A. Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Lancet 2022; 399:1695-1707. [PMID: 35405085 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00367-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 231] [Impact Index Per Article: 115.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer supplements androgen deprivation therapy with either docetaxel, second-generation hormonal therapy, or radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abiraterone plus prednisone, with or without radiotherapy, in addition to standard of care. METHODS We conducted an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design (PEACE-1) at 77 hospitals across Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Romania, Spain, and Switzerland. Eligible patients were male, aged 18 years or older, with histologically confirmed or cytologically confirmed de novo metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (or 2 due to bone pain). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to standard of care (androgen deprivation therapy alone or with intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks), standard of care plus radiotherapy, standard of care plus abiraterone (oral 1000 mg abiraterone once daily plus oral 5 mg prednisone twice daily), or standard of care plus radiotherapy plus abiraterone. Neither the investigators nor the patients were masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival. Abiraterone efficacy was first assessed in the overall population and then in the population who received androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel as standard of care (population of interest). This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01957436. FINDINGS Between Nov 27, 2013, and Dec 20, 2018, 1173 patients were enrolled (one patient subsequently withdrew consent for analysis of his data) and assigned to receive standard of care (n=296), standard of care plus radiotherapy (n=293), standard of care plus abiraterone (n=292), or standard of care plus radiotherapy plus abiraterone (n=291). Median follow-up was 3·5 years (IQR 2·8-4·6) for radiographic progression-free survival and 4·4 years (3·5-5·4) for overall survival. Adjusted Cox regression modelling revealed no interaction between abiraterone and radiotherapy, enabling the pooled analysis of abiraterone efficacy. In the overall population, patients assigned to receive abiraterone (n=583) had longer radiographic progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·54, 99·9% CI 0·41-0·71; p<0·0001) and overall survival (0·82, 95·1% CI 0·69-0·98; p=0·030) than patients who did not receive abiraterone (n=589). In the androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel population (n=355 in both with abiraterone and without abiraterone groups), the HRs were consistent (radiographic progression-free survival 0·50, 99·9% CI 0·34-0·71; p<0·0001; overall survival 0·75, 95·1% CI 0·59-0·95; p=0·017). In the androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel population, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 217 (63%) of 347 patients who received abiraterone and 181 (52%) of 350 who did not; hypertension had the largest difference in occurrence (76 [22%] patients and 45 [13%], respectively). Addition of abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy plus docetaxel did not increase the rates of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, or neuropathy compared with androgen deprivation therapy plus docetaxel alone. INTERPRETATION Combining androgen deprivation therapy, docetaxel, and abiraterone in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival with a modest increase in toxicity, mostly hypertension. This triplet therapy could become a standard of care for these patients. FUNDING Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Sanofi, and the French Government.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | - Stéphanie Foulon
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Joan Carles
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ray McDermott
- Cancer Trials Ireland, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Stéphane Supiot
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Dominik Berthold
- Centre Pluridisciplinaire d'Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Gabriel Kacso
- Amethyst Radiotherapy Center, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Gwenaëlle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Escande
- Strasbourg Oncologie Libérale, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alvar Rosello
- Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Nicolas Magne
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, St Priest en Jarez, France
| | | | | | | | - Salvador Villà Freixa
- Institut Català d'Oncologia, Cap de Servei Oncologia Radioteràpica, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain
| | | | | | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pfister C, Gravis G, Fléchon A, Chevreau C, Mahammedi H, Laguerre B, Guillot A, Joly F, Soulié M, Allory Y, Harter V, Culine S. Dose-Dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin or Gemcitabine and Cisplatin as Perioperative Chemotherapy for Patients With Nonmetastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of the GETUG-AFU V05 VESPER Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2013-2022. [PMID: 35254888 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal perioperative chemotherapy regimen for patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer is not defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between February 2013 and March 2018, 500 patients were randomly assigned in 28 French centers and received either six cycles of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) once every 2 weeks or four cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) once every 3 weeks before surgery (neoadjuvant group) or after surgery (adjuvant group). We report the primary end point of the GETUG-AFU V05 VESPER trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01812369): progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years. Secondary end points were time to progression and overall survival. RESULTS Four hundred thirty-seven patients (88%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 60% of patients received the planned six cycles in the dd-MVAC arm, 84% received four cycles in the GC arm, and thereafter, 91% and 90% of patients underwent surgery, respectively. Organ-confined response (< ypT3N0) was observed more frequently in the dd-MVAC arm (77% v 63%, P = .001). In the adjuvant group, 40% of patients received six cycles in the dd-MVAC arm, and 81% of patients received four cycles in the GC arm. For all patients in the clinical trial, 3-year PFS was improved in the dd-MVAC arm, but the study did not meet its primary end point (3-year rate: 64% v 56%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.02], P = .066); nevertheless, the dd-MVAC arm was associated with a significantly longer time to progression (3-year rate: 69% v 58%, HR = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50 to 0.93], P = .014). In the neoadjuvant group, PFS at 3 years was significantly higher in the dd-MVAC arm (66% v 56%, HR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.96], P = .025). CONCLUSION In the VESPER trial, dd-MVAC improved 3-years PFS over GC. In the neoadjuvant group, a better bladder tumor local control and a significant improvement in 3-year PFS were observed in the dd-MVAC arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Pfister
- Department of Urology, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France.,Clinical Investigation Center, Onco-Urology, Inserm 1404, Rouen, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmette Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | | - Hakim Mahammedi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jean Perrin Cancer Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugène Marquis Cancer Center, Rennes, France
| | - Aline Guillot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, St Priest, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - Michel Soulié
- Department of Urology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Department of Pathology, Curie Institute, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Valentin Harter
- North-West Canceropole Data Center, Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - Stéphane Culine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Faculté de Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Billon E, Dalban C, Oudard S, Chevreau C, Laguerre B, Barthélémy P, Borchiellini D, Geoffrois L, Negrier S, Joly F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Gross-Goupil M, Rolland F, Priou F, Mahammedi H, Tantot F, Escudier B, Chabaud S, Albiges L, Gravis G. Association of adrenal metastases with outcomes in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) treated with nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
348 Background: Glandular metastases (GMs) (adrenal, pancreas, thyroid, ovary, breast, or prostate) are rare in mccRCC. Several studies have observed significantly longer overall survival (OS) for GM patients treated with anti-angiogenic therapy. This study assesses outcomes from mccRCC treated with nivolumab with or without GMs. Methods: The GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN, phase II trial assessed the activity and safety of nivolumab in pts with mccRCC who failed antiangiogenic therapies (NCT03013335). Pts were stratified in two subgroups according to the presence of at least one GM. Specific analyzes were performed for pancreatic and adrenal metastases. Primary endpoint was OS, secondary endpoint were progression free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). Results: Between February 2016 and July 2017, among 720 patients treated by nivolumab 217 patients had GM (151: adrenal and 86: pancreatic metastases). Clinical characteristics were comparable between the two subgroups except for IMDC poor subgroup (19% vs 28%) and for Furhman grade IV (13.5% vs 23.4%) for GM and non GM respectively. Median time between metastatic disease and nivolumab was 3.2 years (y) vs 2 y for GM and non GM respectively and 2.8 vs 2.1 y with or without adrenal metastasis. There was no statistical difference in outcomes between pts with or without GMs. However, pts with adrenal metastases had worse OS (12-months survival: 64% vs 71.1%; HR 1.51 (1.19-1.92)); shorter PFS (6-months survival: 27.2% vs 36.6%; HR 1.29 (1.07-1.57)) and lower ORR (12.5% [7.6%; 19.0%] vs 23.2% [19.8%; 27.0%]; p = 0.005) than non-adrenal metastases. Conversely, patients with pancreatic metastases had significantly longer overall survival (12-months survival: 82.3% vs 67.9%; HR 0.59 (0.40-0.85)) in univariate analysis compared to non-pancreatic metastases. In multivariate analysis, only adrenal metastasis remained associated with dismal prognosis (Table). Conclusions: Adrenal metastasis is an independent poor prognostic factor for response and survival in the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN phase II trial. Limited activity with nivolumab is observed for patients with adrenal metastases from mccRCC without difference with previous anti angiogenic therapy. Molecular characterization could help to identify the angiogenic profile of adrenal metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT03013335. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Sylvie Negrier
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frederic Rolland
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Frank Priou
- CHD Vendee-Hopital Les Oudairies, La Roche-Sur-Yon, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Laurence Albiges
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes Aix-Mareseille Université, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Velev M, Dalban C, Chevreau C, Gravis G, Negrier S, Laguerre B, Gross-Goupil M, Ladoire S, Ferrari V, Geoffrois L, Curcio H, Priou F, Thomas QD, Mione C, Barthélémy P, Tantot F, Escudier B, Chabaud S, Albiges L, Thibault C. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma patients with BONE metastases: Results of the GETUG: AFU 26 nivoren multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
342 Background: Bone metastases (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with a poor prognosis based on retrospective studies in which patients were treated with antiangiogenic agents. Since the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, few data are available regarding the prognosis impact of BM or the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with bones metastatic RCC. GETUG-AFU26-NIVOREN (NIVOREN) is a French multicenter prospective study in which patients were treated with nivolumab after failure of one or more antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We therefore aim to evaluate the impact of BM on prognosis, and the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with BM enrolled in NIVOREN trial. Methods: All adult patients with BM at inclusion were included in our study. The primary endpoint of this ancillary study was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with BM. Clinical data were collected prospectively, except for SRE data which were collected retrospectively in a complementary consent report form. Results: Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab in the NIVOREN study, 194 had BM at inclusion. After a median follow-up of 23.9 months, the median OS was 17.9 months in patients with BM versus 26.1 months in patients without BM (HR = 1.42 CI95% [1.13-1.79], p = 0.0023). After adjustment on sex, age, IMDC group and line of treatments, the difference was not significant (HR = 1.24, CI95% [0.98-1.56], p = 0.0707). The median PFS was shorter in patients with BM even after adjustment (2.8 versus 4.6 months, HR = 1.30 CI95% [1.08-1.56]), as well as the ORR (14.8% versus 23.3%). The safety profile was similar between patients with or without BM at inclusion. The incidence of SRE in the BM population was 36% during the treatment period with nivolumab. A post-hoc analysis evaluating the impact of bone-targeting agents in association with nivolumab on SRE incidence was performed. There was a statistically significant benefit in patients treated with bone-targeting agents on the incidence of SRE (OR = 0.367, CI95% [0.151-0.895], p = 0.0276). Conclusions: Nivolumab is associated with shorter OS, PFS, and lower ORR in patients with BM. Our study confirms, in the era of immunotherapy that patients with BM are associated with poorer prognosis and suggests that association with bone-targeting agents decreases the incidence of SRE. Clinical trial information: 2015-004117-24.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud Velev
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Frank Priou
- Centre Hospitalier de Vendée, La Roche Sur Yon, France
| | | | - Cécile Mione
- Université Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Laurence Albiges
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ferrario C, Piulats JM, Linch MD, Stoeckle M, Laguerre B, Arranz JA, Todenhöfer T, Fong PC, Berry WR, Emmenegger U, Mourey L, Mar N, Appleman LJ, Joshua AM, Conter HJ, Li XT, Schloss C, Poehlein CH, De Bono JS, Yu EY. Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus abiraterone acetate (abi) and prednisone (p) in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from KEYNOTE-365 cohort D. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
118 Background: Abi + p is a standard of care for mCRPC. Cohort D of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573) was used to evaluate safety and efficacy of the PD-1 inhibitor pembro + abi and p in patients (pts) who had not received chemotherapy for mCRPC. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive pts who had not previously used next-generation hormonal agents (NHAs) for mCRPC or were intolerant to enzalutamide or for whom enzalutamide was ineffective for mCRPC, whose disease progressed ≤6 months before screening, and who had ECOG PS score 0/1 were eligible. Enrolled pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + abi 1000 mg PO QD and p 5 mg PO BID. Primary end points were PSA response rate (PSA decrease ≥50% from baseline), confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review, and safety. Secondary end points included rPFS per PCWG3-modified RECIST v1.1, DCR (CR + PR + SD or non-CR/non-PD ≥6 mo), DOR, OS, time to symptomatic skeletal-related event, radiographic bone progression, and radiographic soft tissue progression. Results: Of 103 treated pts, 35.9% had RECIST-measurable disease and 26.2% had previously received enzalutamide. Median (range) time from enrollment to data cutoff was 17.6 (9.7-27.0) months. Confirmed PSA response rate in all 103 pts was 56.3%. Overall, 78.6% of pts had a reduction in PSA level from baseline (confirmed and unconfirmed). For 37 pts with RECIST-measurable disease, ORR was 16.2% (1 CR; 5 PRs) overall, 7.7% for those who previously received enzalutamide (n = 13) and 21.7% for those who had not previously received NHAs (n = 23). Two pts with RECIST-nonmeasurable disease had a CR. DOR was not reached (NR; range, 2.1+ to 19.4+ mo); 4 pts had a response ≥12 months. DCR was 44.7% overall, 11.1% in pts who previously received enzalutamide (n = 27), and 57.3% in pts who had not previously used NHAs (n = 75). Additional analyses are listed in the table. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were experienced by 90.3% of pts; 36.9% experienced grade 3-5 TRAEs. Overall, 18.4% of pts had a grade 3/4 ALT laboratory elevation and 12.6% had a grade 3/4 AST elevation. Five pts died of AEs; 1 was treatment-related (myasthenic syndrome). Conclusions: Pembro + abi and p showed antitumor activity in chemotherapy-naive pts with mCRPC. Safety was generally consistent with individual profiles of each agent, although there was an increased incidence of grade 3/4 ALT/AST laboratory elevations than reported for the individual treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573. [Table: see text]
Collapse
|
26
|
Todenhöfer T, Piulats J, Ferrario C, Linch M, Stoeckle M, Laguerre B, Arranz J, Fong P, Berry W, Emmenegger U, Mourey L, Mar N, Appleman L, Joshua A, Conter H, Li X, Schloss C, Poehlein C, De Bono J, Yu E. KEYNOTE-365 cohort D: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus abiraterone acetate (abi) and prednisone in chemotherapy (chemo)–naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Eur Urol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(22)00608-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
27
|
Appleman L, Todenhoefer T, Berry W, Gurney H, Retz M, Conter H, Laguerre B, Fong P, Ferrario C, Gravis G, Piulats J, Emmenegger U, Shore N, Romano E, Mourey L, Li XT, Poehlein C, Schloss C, Bono JD, Yu E. 347 KEYNOTE-365 cohort C: pembrolizumab + enzalutamide in patients with abiraterone acetate–pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)—data after minimum of 22 months of follow-up. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPrevious data from cohort C of phase 1b/2 study KEYNOTE-365 (NCT02861573) showed that PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab + enzalutamide was well tolerated and showed antitumor activity in patients with abiraterone acetate–pretreated mCRPC. Updated data after a minimum of 22 months of follow-up are presented.MethodsPatients in the prechemotherapy mCRPC state who were intolerant to ≥4 weeks‘ treatment with abiraterone acetate or for whom this treatment failed, had progressive disease ≤6 months before screening, and had ECOG PS 0-2 were enrolled. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W + enzalutamide 160 mg orally QD. Primary end points were PSA response rate (decrease ≥50% from baseline), confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), and safety. Secondary end points were time to PSA progression; DCR (CR or PR of any duration + SD or non-CR/non-PD ≥6 months) and DOR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR; rPFS per PCWG3-modified RECIST v1.1 by BICR; and OS.ResultsOf 103 enrolled patients, 102 were treated. Median age was 70.0 years (range, 43–87); 29.4% of patients were PD-L1+; 37.3% had RECIST-measurable disease. Median follow-up (time from enrollment to data cutoff) was 40.2 months (range, 22.3–49.9). Confirmed PSA response rate in patients with baseline PSA measurement (N = 101) was 23.8%. Median time to PSA progression was 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.5–4.4). In 38 patients with measurable disease, ORR was 10.5% (2 CR; 2 PR). Median DOR was 11.8 months (4.3 to 38.3+ months); 1 patient had a response ≥12 months. DCR for the total population was 33.3%. Median (95% CI) rPFS was 6.0 months (4.1–6.3); rPFS at 12 months was 30.1%. Median (95% CI) OS was 20.1 months (16.9–25.2); OS at 12 months was 76.2%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 92.2% of patients; most common (≥20%) were fatigue (39.2%), nausea (21.6%), and rash (21.6%). Grade 3–5 TRAEs occurred in 42.2%, most commonly rash (7.8%) and fatigue (5.9%). Four patients died of AEs: 1 death was treatment-related (unknown cause).ConclusionsAfter a minimum follow-up of 22 months, pembrolizumab + enzalutamide continued to show antitumor activity in abiraterone acetate–pretreated mCRPC. The safety profile of pembrolizumab + enzalutamide was generally consistent with individual profiles of each agent. There was a higher incidence than typically reported for the individual agents of all-grade (21.6%) and grade 3 (7.8%) rash, which resolved with standard-of-care treatment. The combination is being further evaluated in the phase 3 study KEYNOTE-641.AcknowledgementsMedical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Matthew Grzywacz, PhD, of ApotheCom (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Funding for this research was provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrialsgov, identifier: NCT02861573Ethics ApprovalThe study and the protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board or ethics committee at each site.
Collapse
|
28
|
Piulats J, Ferrario C, Linch M, Stoeckle M, Laguerre B, Arranz J, Todenhoefer T, Fong P, Berry W, Emmenegger U, Mourey L, Mar N, Appleman L, Joshua A, Conter H, Li XT, Schloss C, Poehlein C, Bono JD, Yu E. 351 KEYNOTE-365 cohort D: pembrolizumab plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundTreatment with abiraterone acetate + prednisone can improve outcomes in mCRPC patients with or without prior chemotherapy. Cohort D of phase 1b/2 study KEYNOTE-365 (NCT02861573) evaluated safety and efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab + abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients who had not received chemotherapy for mCRPC.MethodsPatients were enrolled who had not received second-generation hormonal manipulation for mCRPC or failed/were intolerant to enzalutamide for mCRPC; had progressive disease ≤6 months before screening; and had ECOG PS 0/1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W + abiraterone acetate 1000 mg orally QD and prednisone 5 mg orally BID. Primary end points: safety, PSA response rate (PSA decrease ≥50% from baseline), and confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points: rPFS per PCWG3-modified RECIST v1.1, DCR, DOR, and OS.ResultsOne hundred three patients were treated. Median (range) age was 70.0 (46–89) years, 30.1% were PD-L1+, 35.9% had RECIST-measurable disease, 18.4% had visceral disease, and 26.2% had previously received enzalutamide only. Median (range) time from enrollment to data cutoff was 17.6 (9.7–27.0) months. Confirmed PSA response rate in patients with PSA measurement at baseline (n=103) was 56.3%. For 37 patients with RECIST-measurable disease, ORR was 16.2% (1 CR; 5 PRs); 2 patients with RECIST-nonmeasurable disease had CR. In total population, 5 patients had a response ≥6 months; DCR was 44.7%. ORR for RECIST-measurable patients was 7.7% for those who previously received enzalutamide only (n=13) and 21.7% for those who had not previously received NHAs (n=23); DCR was 11.1% in all patients who previously received enzalutamide (n=27) and 57.3% in all patients who had not received NHAs (n=75). Median (95% CI) rPFS was 15.1 (9.2-NR) months; rPFS at 12 months was 54.9%. Median (95% CI) OS was NR (23.3 months-NR); OS at 12 months was 82.9%. Sixty-nine patients (67.0%) discontinued treatment, mostly because of progressive disease (37.9%). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were experienced by 90.3% of patients and most common (≥15%) were ALT increase (22.3%), AST increase (17.5%), asthenia (16.5%), and diarrhea (16.5%); 36.9% experienced grade 3–5 TRAEs. There were 18.4%/12.5% grade 3 or 4 ALT/AST laboratory elevations. Five patients died of AEs; 1 was treatment related (myasthenic syndrome).ConclusionsPembrolizumab + abiraterone acetate and prednisone demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. Safety was generally consistent with individual profiles of each agent. There was an increased incidence of grade 3–4 ALT/AST laboratory elevations.AcknowledgementsMedical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Matthew Grzywacz, PhD, of ApotheCom (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Funding for this research was provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrialsgov, identifier: NCT02861573Ethics ApprovalThe study and the protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board or ethics committee at each site.
Collapse
|
29
|
Aldea M, Lam L, Orillard E, Llacer Perez C, Saint-Ghislain M, Gravis G, Fléchon A, Roubaud G, Barthelemy P, Ricci F, Priou F, Neviere Z, Beaufils M, Laguerre B, Hardy AC, Helissey C, Ratta R, Borchiellini D, Pobel C, Joly F, Castro E, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Baciarello G, Fizazi K. Cabazitaxel activity in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with and without DNA damage repair defects. Eur J Cancer 2021; 159:87-97. [PMID: 34742160 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cabazitaxel was shown to improve overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after abiraterone/enzalutamine and docetaxel failure, though benefit by the presence of DNA damage repair (DDR) defects is unknown. With the advent of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in partially overlapping indications with cabazitaxel, we aimed to determine cabazitaxel activity in men with mCRPC according to their DDR status. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter study that enrolled patients with mCRPC treated with cabazitaxel who had undergone DDR tumour tissue profiling. Patients with at least one deleterious germline or somatic alterations were considered DDR positive (DDR+). Each DDR + patient has been matched with a DDR negative (DDR-) from the same institution who underwent the same test. An exploratory cohort of patients found to be DDR + by liquid biopsy was also included. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) decline≥50% (PSA50), PSA progression-free survival (PFS, PSA-PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), clinical PFS or radiographic PFS (c/rPFS) and OS were evaluated. RESULTS Among 190 men (95 DDR+, 95 DDR-) with tissue sequencing, PSA50 was achieved with cabazitaxel in 29/92 (32%) and 33/92 (36%) in patients with DDR+ and DDR- (P = 0.64). The median rPFS was 5.33 months [95%CI 4.34-7.04] versus 5.75 months [95%CI 4.67-7.27] (P = 0.55). The median OS was 15.4 months [95%CI 12.16-26.6] and 11.5 months [95%CI 9.76-14.4] (P = 0.036), respectively. No PSA50 responses on cabazitaxel were observed in BRCA1/2 patients previously treated with PARPi (n = 10). Similar outcomes with cabazitaxel were observed in the liquid biopsy cohort (n = 63 DDR+). CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that cabazitaxel is active in patients with mCRPC regardless of their DDR status, although its activity in men pretreated with a PARPi may be lower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Aldea
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, 114 Edouard Vaillant Street, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurent Lam
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Edouard Vaillant Street, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Emeline Orillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Casilda Llacer Perez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospitales Virgen de La Victoria y Regional de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, S/N, 29010, Málaga, Spain
| | - Mathilde Saint-Ghislain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, 3 Avenue Du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg/ICANS Strasbourg, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France
| | - Francesco Ricci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Frank Priou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée, Boulevard Stéphane Moreau, 85000, La Roche-sur-Yon, France
| | - Zoe Neviere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, 3 Avenue Du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Mathilde Beaufils
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque Avenue, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Anne-Claire Hardy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Privé des Côtes D'Armor, 10 François Jacob Street, 22190, Plérin, France
| | - Carole Helissey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital D'Instruction des Armées Begin, 69 Paris Avenue, 94160, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Raffaele Ratta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Foch, 40 Worth Street, 92150, Suresnes, France
| | - Delphine Borchiellini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Cote D'Azur, 33 Valombrose Avenue, 06100, Nice, France
| | - Cedric Pobel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20 Leblanc Street, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, 3 Avenue Du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Elena Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospitales Virgen de La Victoria y Regional de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, S/N, 29010, Málaga, Spain
| | - Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Giulia Baciarello
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, 114 Edouard Vaillant Street, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, 114 Edouard Vaillant Street, 94805, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pfister C, Gravis G, Flechon A, Chevreau C, Mahammedi H, Laguerre B, Guillot A, Joly F, Soulié M, Allory Y, Harter V, Culine S. Dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin et cisplatin (DD-MVAC) versus gemcitabine et cisplatin (GC) comme chimiothérapie péri-opératoire dans le cancer de vessie localisé infiltrant le muscle. résultats de la phase III GETUG/AFU vesper V05. Prog Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.08.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
31
|
Cancel M, Fromont G, Blonz C, Chevreau C, Rioux-Leclercq N, Laguerre B, Oudard S, Gross-Goupil M, Gravis G, Goldwasser F, Rolland F, Delva R, Moise L, Emambux S, Vassal C, Zanetta S, Penel N, Fléchon A, Barthélémy P, Saldana C, Lefort F, Escudier B, Linassier C, Albiges L. Everolimus or sunitinib as first-line treatment of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective study of the GETUG group (Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Génitales). Eur J Cancer 2021; 158:1-11. [PMID: 34619467 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two phase II trials (NCT00688753 and NCT00541008) reported efficacy data of sunitinib and everolimus in first-line treatment of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (mpRCC). Although most patients receive sunitinib or a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor in first- and second-line treatment, the optimal strategy remained unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 23 centres of the Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Urogénitales group, after centralised pathological review, we analysed retrospectively progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with mpRCC treated in first-line treatment (PFS-1) with sunitinib or everolimus (primary end-point), PFS in second-line treatment (PFS-2), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), overall sequence and prognostic factors for OS (secondary end-points). RESULTS One hundred thirty-eight patients (119 men and 19 women), median age 62.5 years, with mpRCC type 1 (n = 24) or non-type 1 (n = 114), received first-line sunitinib (n = 107) or everolimus (n = 31). With a median follow-up of 92 months, we found no significant difference between the treatment groups in terms of PFS-1 (5.5 versus 6.2 months) and DCR (69% versus 83%). Ninety-eight patients received a second-line treatment, 69% with mTOR inhibitors after sunitinib and 100% with tyrosine kinase inhibitors after everolimus, with similar DCR (64% versus 58%), median PFS-2 (3.4 versus 4.8 months) and OS (16.0 versus 20.3 months). No factor was prognostic for PFS-1, whereas leukocytosis, anaemia and the time from diagnosis to first systemic therapy < 1 year were prognostic for OS. We found no prognostic difference between both pRCC subtypes. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Database Consortium risk factors were prognostic for OS. CONCLUSION Sunitinib and everolimus had similar efficacy in first-line treatment of patients with mpRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Cancel
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Bretonneau Tours, France
| | | | - Cyriac Blonz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT Oncopole - CLCC Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Stéphane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Frédéric Rolland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Rémy Delva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Laura Moise
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Sheik Emambux
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU La Milétrie, Poitiers, France
| | - Cécile Vassal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Lille University and Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Barthélémy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Félix Lefort
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bernard Escudier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Alves Costa Silva C, Derosa L, Dalban C, Colomba E, Negrier S, Chevreau C, Gravis G, Oudard S, Laguerre B, Barthelemy P, Borchiellini D, Gross-Goupil M, Geoffrois L, Rolland F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Joly F, Ladoire S, Tantot F, Escudier B, Albiges L. 697P Impact of β-blockers (BB) on outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with nivolumab (N). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
33
|
Yu E, Piulats J, Gravis G, Fong P, Todenhöfer T, Laguerre B, Arranz J, Oudard S, Massard C, Stoeckle M, Nordquist L, Carles J, Huang M, Li Y, Qiu P, Poehlein C, Schloss C, de Bono J. 73P Association between homologous recombination repair mutations and response to pembrolizumab (pembro) plus olaparib (ola) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): KEYNOTE-365 Cohort A biomarker analysis. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
34
|
Pfister C, Gravis G, Flechon A, Chevreau C, Mahammedi H, Laguerre B, Guillot A, Joly F, Soulie M, Allory Y, Harter V, Culine S. 652O Dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) or gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): Results of the GETUG/AFU VESPER V05 phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
35
|
Derosa L, Alves Costa Silva C, Dalban C, Colomba E, Negrier S, Chevreau C, Gravis G, Oudard S, Laguerre B, Barthelemy P, Borchiellini D, Gross-Goupil M, Geoffrois L, Rolland F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Joly F, Ladoire S, Tantot F, Escudier B, Albiges L. 657MO Antibiotic (ATB) therapy and outcome from nivolumab (N) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts): Results of the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN multicentric phase II study. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
36
|
Pobel C, Auclin E, Teyssonneau D, Laguerre B, Cancel M, Boughalem E, Noel J, Brachet PE, Maillet D, Barthelemy P, Helissey C, Thibault C, Oudard S. Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenges in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Med 2021; 10:6304-6309. [PMID: 34382352 PMCID: PMC8446560 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenges may be a treatment option in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had a good initial response to cabazitaxel and who are still fit to receive it. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of multiple rechallenges. Patients and methods We retrospectively identified 22 mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel and/or androgen receptor‐targeted agents who received multiple cabazitaxel rechallenges in 9 French centers. Cabazitaxel was initiated at a dose of 25 mg/m2 q3week. A reduced dose (20 mg/m2 q3w) or an alternative schedule (mainly 16 mg/m2 q2w) was increasingly used for subsequent rechallenges. Progression‐free survival, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response, best clinical response, and grade ≥3 toxicities were collected. Overall survival was calculated from various time points. Results Twenty‐two patients with an initial response to cabazitaxel were rechallenged at least twice. The median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 at first cabazitaxel treatment, 6 at first rechallenge, and 5 at subsequent rechallenges. Median progression‐free survival at first rechallenge was 9.6 months and 5.6 months at second rechallenge. Median overall survival was 50.9 months from the first cabazitaxel dose, 114.9 months from first life‐extending therapy initiation in mCRPC, and 105 months from mCRPC diagnosis. There was no cumulative grade ≥3 neuropathy or nail disorder and one case of febrile neutropenia. Conclusion Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenges may be a treatment option without cumulative toxicity in heavily pretreated patients having a good response to first cabazitaxel use and still fit to receive it. Novelty & Impact Statements Patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer can be treated with Cabazitaxel after docetaxel and androgen receptor‐targeted agent. This chemotherapy can be used multiple times with efficacy and manageable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cedric Pobel
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Edouard Auclin
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Elouen Boughalem
- Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Johanna Noel
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Denis Maillet
- Oncology Department, University hospital of Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Medical Oncology, University Hospital Strasbourg / Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Carole Helissey
- Clinical Research Unit, Military Hospital Begin, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Khene ZE, Kokorian R, Mathieu R, Gasmi A, Nathalie RL, Solène-Florence KJ, Shariat S, de Crevoisier R, Laguerre B, Bensalah K. Metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: computed tomography texture analysis as predictive biomarkers of survival in patients treated with nivolumab. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:2087-2093. [PMID: 34338919 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-02003-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate the value of image-based texture analysis for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (cCCR) treated with nivolumab. METHODS This retrospective study included 48 patients with metastatic cCCR treated with nivolumab. Nivolumab was used as a second- or third-line monotherapy. Texture analysis of metastatic lesions was performed on CT scanners obtained within 1 month before treatment. Texture features related to the gray-level histogram, gray-level co-occurrence, run-length matrix features, autoregressive model features, and Haar wavelet feature were extracted. Lasso penalized Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of PFS and OS. RESULTS Median PFS and OS were 5.7 and 13.8 months. 39 patients experienced progression and 27 died. The Lasso penalized Cox regression analysis identified three texture parameters as potential predictors of PFS: skewness, S.2.2. Correlat and S.1.1. SumVarnc. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed skewness (HR (95% CI) 1.49 [1.21-1.85], p < 0.001) as an independent predictor of PFS. Regarding OS, the Lasso penalized Cox regression analysis identified three texture parameters as potential predictors of OS: S20SumVarnc, S22Contrast and S22Entropy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed S22Entropy (HR (95% CI) 1.68 (1.31-2.14), p < 0.001) as an independent predictor of OS. CONCLUSIONS Results from this preliminary study suggest that CT texture analysis might be a promising quantitative imaging tool that predicts oncological outcomes after starting nivolumab treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zine-Eddine Khene
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France. .,Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France. .,LTSI, Inserm U1099, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
| | - Romain Kokorian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Anis Gasmi
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Renaud de Crevoisier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France.,LTSI, Inserm U1099, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.,LTSI, Inserm U1099, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Méjean A, Ravaud A, Thezenas S, Chevreau C, Bensalah K, Geoffrois L, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Cormier L, Lang H, Guy L, Gravis G, Rolland F, Linassier C, Lechevallier E, Oudard S, Laguerre B, Gross-Goupil M, Bernhard JC, Colas S, Albiges L, Lebret T, Treluyer JM, Timsit MO, Escudier B. Sunitinib Alone or After Nephrectomy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is There Still a Role for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy? Eur Urol 2021; 80:417-424. [PMID: 34187771 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CARMENA trial in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) demonstrated that treatment with sunitinib alone was noninferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by sunitinib (nephrectomy-sunitinib). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to provide updated overall survival (OS) outcomes of CARMENA and assess whether some subgroups may still benefit from upfront CN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS CARMENA was a phase III trial in 450 patients with mRCC enrolled from 2009 to 2017. INTERVENTION Patients in the intention-to-treat population received nephrectomy-sunitinib (standard of care [SOC]; n = 226) or sunitinib alone (n = 224). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Primary endpoint was OS, assessed using an updated data cut-off (October 2018; median OS event-free follow-up, 36.6 mo). Patients were reclassified by risk using International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Sunitinib alone was noninferior to nephrectomy-sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.19; p = 0.8) and demonstrated longer median OS (19.8 mo vs 15.6 mo, respectively). For patients with two or more IMDC risk factors, OS was significantly longer with sunitinib alone than with nephrectomy-sunitinib (31.2 mo vs 17.6 mo, respectively; HR, 0.65; p = 0.03). For patients with one IMDC risk factor, OS was longer for nephrectomy-sunitinib versus sunitinib alone although not significantly (31.4 mo vs 25.2 mo; HR, 1.30; p = 0.2). The post hoc nature of the subgroup analyses may limit their interpretation. CONCLUSIONS Sunitinib alone was noninferior compared with nephrectomy-sunitinib, suggesting that CN should not be considered SOC in patients with mRCC requiring systemic treatment. Certain subgroups, including patients with one IMDC risk factor, may still benefit from upfront CN. PATIENT SUMMARY We assessed the survival of patients with metastatic kidney cancer in a clinical trial. Patients treated with sunitinib on its own had the same survival as patients who had surgery before sunitinib treatment. We conclude that surgery may not be necessary for some patients with metastatic kidney cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Méjean
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Alain Ravaud
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Simon Thezenas
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Karim Bensalah
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Luc Cormier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Hervé Lang
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laurent Guy
- Gabriel Montpied Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Clermont Auvergne University, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Stephane Oudard
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Sandra Colas
- Paris Descartes Necker-Cochin Clinical Research Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Jean-Marc Treluyer
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marc-Olivier Timsit
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Courcier J, Dalban C, Laguerre B, Ladoire S, Barthélémy P, Oudard S, Joly F, Gravis G, Chevreau C, Geoffrois L, Deluche É, Rolland F, Topart D, Culine S, Négrier S, Mahammedi H, Tantot F, Jamet A, Escudier B, Flippot R, Albigès L. Primary Renal Tumour Response in Patients Treated with Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results from the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN Trial. Eur Urol 2021; 80:325-329. [PMID: 34103181 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Primary tumour response may impact therapeutic strategies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but remains unknown in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We aimed to describe the response of the primary tumour in patients who did not undergo upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (uCN) and were treated with nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN phase 2 trial. Primary tumour response was prospectively assessed, as well as the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Among 720 patients, 111 did not undergo uCN, mainly patients with intermediate (45%) and poor (49%) International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk. In the 111 patients, nivolumab was used in the second line for 63% of patients and the third line or more for 37%, with an ORR of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1025%); with a median follow-up of 24.5 mo (95% CI 21.6-27.1), median PFS was 2.7 mo (95% CI 2.5-4.0) and median OS was 15.9 mo (95% CI 9.5-19.8). A total of 67 patients had an evaluable primary renal lesion, four of whom (6%) experienced shrinkage of more than 30%. Overall, patients who did not undergo uCN had adverse baseline characteristics and nivolumab activity against the primary tumour was limited. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we observed that nivolumab was associated with a limited response of the primary tumour in previously treated patients with metastatic kidney cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Courcier
- Department of Urology, UPEC-Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Stéphane Oudard
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Gwénaëlle Gravis
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | | | - Lionel Geoffrois
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Delphine Topart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montpellier University Hospital, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Stéphane Culine
- Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Antoine Jamet
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Bernard Escudier
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurence Albigès
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bardet F, Dalban C, Chevreau C, Negrier S, Laguerre B, Gravis G, Gross-Goupil M, Oudard S, Barthélémy P, Ferrero JM, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Mahammedi H, Narciso B, Geoffrois L, Tantot F, Escudier B, Ladoire S, Albiges L. Prognosis impact of serous metastases (SMs) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients in the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e16566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e16566 Background: Nivolumab monotherapy (N) is a standard of care for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after failure of antiangiogenic therapies. IMDC criteria is the established prognostic model in anyline of systemic treatment including with N. While liver, bone and brain have been reported to convey a dismal prognosis, little is known about the pejorative prognostic impact of serous metastatic sites (pleura, peritoneum, pericardium) in patients receiving anti-PD (L) -1 treatment. Methods: We aimed to assess survival, and activity of N in patients included in the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN phase II prospective trial ( NCT03013335 ), according to serous metastases (SMs). Results: Overall, 720 patients with metastatic ccRCC, and treated with N. Baseline RECIST metastases data were available for 708 patients included in this analysis. Among them, 142 (20%) had SMs (pleura, n=91 ; peritoneum, n=50 ; pericardium, n=1). Median PFS (4.5 vs 2.6 mo ; HR :1.31 ; p=0.0079), and OS (26.1 vs 15 mo ; HR :1.67 ; p<0.0001) were significantly lower in patients with SMs. The dismal prognostic impact was observed both with pleura and peritoneum SMs. These 2 sites were not significantly associated. Using multivariate Cox models, SMs remained significantly associated with poor survival, independently of IMDC category, gender, age, and number of previous lines of therapy. Objective response rate in patients with SMs was not significantly different from others patients (16.4 vs 22.1%; p=0.147). SMs were not statistically associated with known poor prognosis metastatic sites (cerebral, bone, and liver.) Conclusions: SMs are a strong independent prognostic impact in patients receiving N for metastatic ccRCC Poor prognostic metastatic sites should be considered when assessing the prognosis of patients with metastatic ccRCC
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sylvie Negrier
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | | | - Stephane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, APHP. Centre, France; Paris University, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, University of Paris Sud, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Carril-Ajuria L, Colomba E, Cerbone L, Romero-Ferreiro C, Crouzet L, Laguerre B, Thibault C, Vicier C, de Velasco G, Fléchon A, Saldana C, Benusiglio PR, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Guillaud-Bataille M, Gaignard P, Scoazec JY, Richard S, Caron O, Escudier B, Albiges L. Response to systemic therapy in fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2021; 151:106-114. [PMID: 33975058 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fumarate hydratase-deficient (FHdef) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare entity associated with the hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome with no standard therapy approved. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of different systemic treatments in this population. METHODS We performed a multicentre retrospective analysis of Fhdef RCC patients to determine the response to systemic treatments. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). The two latter were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Twenty-four Fhdef RCC patients were identified, and 21 under systemic therapy were included in the analysis: ten received cabozantinib, 14 received sunitinib, nine received "other antiangiogenics" (sorafenib, pazopanib, and axitinib), three received erlotinib-bevacizumab (E-B), three received mTOR inhibitors, and 11 received immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). ORR for treatments were 50% for cabozantinib, 43% for sunitinib, 63% for "other antiangiogenics," and 30% for E-B, whereas ORR was 0% for mTOR inhibitors and 18% for ICBs. The median TTF (mTTF) was significantly higher with antiangiogenics (11.6 months) than with mTOR inhibitors (4.4 months) or ICBs (2.7 months). In the first-line setting, antiangiogenics presented a higher ORR compared with nivolumab-ipilimumab (64% versus 25%) and a significantly superior mTTF (11.0 months vs 2.5 months; p = 0.0027). The median OS from the start of the first systemic treatment was 44.0 months (95% confidence interval: 13.0-95.0). CONCLUSIONS We report the first European retrospective study of Fhdef RCC patients treated with systemic therapy with a remarkably long median OS of 44.0 months. Our results suggest that antiangiogenics may be superior to ICB/mTOR inhibitors in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Carril-Ajuria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emeline Colomba
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Luigi Cerbone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Laurence Crouzet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Vicier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Guillermo de Velasco
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Carolina Saldana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor Créteil AP-HP, France
| | - Patrick R Benusiglio
- UF d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique et Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université F-75013 Paris, France
| | | | - Marine Guillaud-Bataille
- UF d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique et Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université F-75013 Paris, France; Service de Génétique, Molecular Genetic Department, GRCC, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Pauline Gaignard
- Biochemistry Department, Hôpital Bicêtre, APHP Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre F-94275, France
| | - Jean-Yves Scoazec
- Department of Pathology, University Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphane Richard
- Réseau National de Référence pour Cancers Rares de l'Adulte PREDIR labellisé par l'INCa, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Génétique Oncologique EPHE, PSL Research University, Paris, France; UMR9019 CNRS Genome Integrity and Cancers, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Caron
- Laboratory Integrative Tumor Immunology and Genetic Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Bernard Escudier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Réseau National de Référence pour Cancers Rares de l'Adulte PREDIR labellisé par l'INCa, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Réseau National de Référence pour Cancers Rares de l'Adulte PREDIR labellisé par l'INCa, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Guigay J, Aupérin A, Fayette J, Saada-Bouzid E, Lafond C, Taberna M, Geoffrois L, Martin L, Capitain O, Cupissol D, Castanie H, Vansteene D, Schafhausen P, Johnson A, Even C, Sire C, Duplomb S, Evrard C, Delord JP, Laguerre B, Zanetta S, Chevassus-Clément C, Fraslin A, Louat F, Sinigaglia L, Keilholz U, Bourhis J, Mesia R. Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin versus platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:463-475. [PMID: 33684370 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30755-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results from a phase 2 trial of the TPEx chemotherapy regimen (docetaxel-platinum-cetuximab) showed promising results, with a median overall survival of 14·0 months in first-line recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the TPEx regimen with the standard of care EXTREME regimen (platinum-fluorouracil-cetuximab) in this setting. METHODS This was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial, done in 68 centres (cancer centres, university and general hospitals, and private clinics) in France, Spain, and Germany. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic HNSCC unsuitable for curative treatment; had at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using the TenAlea website by investigators or delegated clinical research associates to the TPEx regimen or the EXTREME regimen, with minimisation by ECOG performance status, type of disease evolution, previous cetuximab treatment, and country. The TPEx regimen consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2, both intravenously on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (intravenously 400 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly subsequently). Four cycles were repeated every 21 days with systematic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support at each cycle. In case of disease control after four cycles, intravenous cetuximab 500 mg/m2 was continued every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The EXTREME regimen consisted of fluorouracil 4000 mg/m2 on day 1-4, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (400 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly subsequently) all delivered intravenously. Six cycles were delivered every 21 days followed by weekly 250 mg/m2 cetuximab as maintenance therapy in case of disease control. G-CSF support was not mandatory per the protocol in the EXTREME regimen. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population; safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of chemotherapy or cetuximab. Enrolment is closed and this is the final analysis. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02268695. FINDINGS Between Oct 10, 2014, and Nov 29, 2017, 541 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment regimens (271 to TPEx, 270 to EXTREME). Two patients in the TPEx group had major deviations in consent forms and were not included in the final analysis. Median follow-up was 34·4 months (IQR 26·6-44·8) in the TPEx group and 30·2 months (25·5-45·3) in the EXTREME group. At data cutoff, 209 patients had died in the TPEx group and 218 had died in the EXTREME group. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (median 14·5 months [95% CI 12·5-15·7] in the TPEx group and 13·4 months [12·2-15·4] in the EXTREME group; hazard ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·74-1·08]; p=0·23). 214 (81%) of 263 patients in the TPEx group versus 246 (93%) of 265 patients in the EXTREME group had grade 3 or worse adverse events during chemotherapy (p<0·0001). In the TPEx group, 118 (45%) of 263 patients had at least one serious adverse event versus 143 (54%) of 265 patients in the EXTREME group. 16 patients in the TPEx group and 21 in the EXTREME group died in association with adverse events, including seven patients in each group who had fatal infections (including febrile neutropenia). Eight deaths in the TPEx group and 11 deaths in the EXTREME group were assessed as treatment related, most frequently sepsis or septic shock (four in each treatment group). INTERPRETATION Although the trial did not meet its primary endpoint, with no significant improvement in overall survival with TPEx versus EXTREME, the TPEx regimen had a favourable safety profile. The TPEx regimen could provide an alternative to standard of care with the EXTREME regimen in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, especially for those who might not be good candidates for up-front pembrolizumab treatment. FUNDING Merck Santé and Chugai Pharma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joël Guigay
- Department of Medical Oncology and Research, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, FHU Oncoage, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
| | - Anne Aupérin
- Biostatistic and Epidemiology Unit, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat 1018 INSERM, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jérôme Fayette
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, FHU Oncoage, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Cédrik Lafond
- Department of Medical Oncology, ILC Centre Jean Bernard/Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France
| | - Miren Taberna
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català de Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Laurent Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinique des Ormeaux, Le Havre, France
| | - Olivier Capitain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Didier Cupissol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Hélène Castanie
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Privé le Confluent, Sainte Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
| | - Damien Vansteene
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alison Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Caroline Even
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Christian Sire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France
| | - Sophie Duplomb
- Department of Medical Oncology, HCL, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France
| | - Camille Evrard
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Delord
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Brigitte Laguerre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Sylvie Zanetta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Cécile Chevassus-Clément
- Biostatistic and Epidemiology Unit, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat 1018 INSERM, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Aldéric Fraslin
- Biostatistic and Epidemiology Unit, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat 1018 INSERM, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ricard Mesia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català de Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pobel C, Auclin E, Teyssonneau D, Laguerre B, Cancel M, Boughalem E, Noel J, Brachet PE, Maillet D, Barthelemy P, Helissey C, Thibault C, Oudard S. Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A therapeutic option to increase overall survival? J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
97 Background: Cabazitaxel rechallenge could be a more efficient therapy with an acceptable toxicity than docetaxel in the treatment of patients with a metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients from 9 centers in France who received 3 lines or more of cabazitaxel from February 2012 to July 2020. Cabazitaxel schedule differed between patients: 25 mg/m2 q3w, 20 mg/m2 q3w, 16 mg/m2 q2w or 10 mg/m2 weekly. Efficacy was assessed by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from each cabazitaxel line start. Only toxicities grade ≥ 3 were reported. Results: Twenty-two patients were included. The median follow-up from mCRPC was 94.7 months, median age at initial diagnosis was 59.5 years old, median ISUP score at diagnosis was 4 and median PSA at diagnosis was 55 ng/ml. Median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 at first-line, 6 at first rechallenge, and 5 for subsequent rechallenges. Median OS from mCRPC diagnosis was 105 months. Median PFS from cabazitaxel line start was 11.8 months at first use, 9.6 for first rechallenge and 5.6 in second rechallenge (table). Only one case of febrile neutropenia and 6 events of grade ≥ 3 toxicity were reported. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge could efficiently extend OS with manageable toxicities for patients. Even if anti-PARP therapy and immunotherapy are promising treatments, cabazitaxel rechallenge could be also a relevant therapeutic option for long responder patients. Specific biomarkers should be explored to predict the efficacy of cabazitaxel rechallenge. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cedric Pobel
- Oncology department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Edouard Auclin
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Johanna Noel
- Oncology department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Denis Maillet
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | | | - Carole Helissey
- Clinical Research Unit, Military Hospital Begin, Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Oncology department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Stephane Oudard
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mourey L, Dalban C, Negrier S, Chevreau C, Gravis G, Thibault C, Laguerre B, Barthelemy P, Borchiellini D, Gross-Goupil M, Geoffrois L, Rolland F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Joly F, Ladoire S, Tantot F, Escudier B, Albiges L. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in older patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma: Results of a sub-group analysis of the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
331 Background: NIVOREN GETUG AFU 26 study, is a french multicenter prospective study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Nivolumab (N) in a broad “real world setting” in mRCC after failure of 1 or 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Methods: Between February 2016 and July 2017, 729 pts were enrolled across 27 institutions. Primary objective of the trial was safety assessed by grade ≥ 3 treatment related adverse event (TRAE). We report here results of older patients above 70 years old ([70;75[; [75;80[; ≥ 80) compared with their younger counterparts. Results: Overall, 720 patients were treated (median age 64 (22;90)). Among them 205 pts were ≥ 70 (28.5%) divided as follow: [70-75[:107 (14.9%) / [75-80[: 68 (9,4%) / ≥ 80: 30 (4,2%). Patients’ characteristics (Table) were similar in younger and older patients except for IMDC risk groups (IMDC) classification with less poor prognostic in pts ≥ 75 and fewer brain metastasis in pts ≥ 70. Treatment duration was similar across age groups despite a rate of discontinuation for TRAE increasing with age. Regarding efficacy, there was a non-significant trend toward improved response rate and progression free survival and lower specific survival with increasing age. Conclusions: In this large “real world” setting study a significant number of old pts were included. Prognostic profile appears better in older pts included. There is no signal for an excess of toxicity in this population and efficacy is comparable to younger patients. Age alone should not prevent prescribing N in mRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03013335 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loic Mourey
- Institut Claudius Regaud/IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Sylvie Negrier
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Oncology department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Frederic Rolland
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Department of Medical Oncology, St Herblain, France
| | | | - Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rolland M, Faouzi S, Chaltiel L, Dumont C, Geoffrois L, Gross-Goupil M, Laguerre B, Guerin M, Doucet L, Roubaud G, Tardy M, Oudard S, Flechon A, Tosi D, Mahammedi H, Chevreau C, Pouessel D, Fizazi K. Adaptation of chemotherapy to the decline tumor markers in patients with poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumors:Real-world French experience. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
385 Background: Personalized chemotherapy based on tumor marker decline is the new standard in poor prognosis germ-cell tumor in Europe since 2014 (GETUG 13, Lancet, Fizazi et al). The purpose of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of the princeps study in patients not selected in clinical routine between 2014 and 2018. Methods: Patients (pts) were eligible if they had at least one criteria of IGCCCG classification for poor prognosis group. They had to be treated according the study terms of GETUG 13 study and did not received prior treatment. They had to received 1 BEP (Bleomycin, Etoposide, Cisplatin). Tumor markers (HCG and AFP) were dosed between day 18 and 21. Then, they received 3 additional BEP if they had favorable tumor marker decline or intensive chemotherapy if they had unfavorable decline. Results: This retrospective study included 104 patients in 14 french centers treated between 2013 and 2018: 22,1 % (n = 23) in the favorable group (Fav), 77,9 % (n = 81) in the unfavorable group (Unfav). Thirty-two pts had PS ≥ 2. In Unfav, there were more pts with HCG > 50 000 UI/L (44,2 % vs 13 %, p = 0,0067), neutrophil-to-lymphocyt ratio was also higher (median 6,4 vs 4,5, p = 0,0199). At cycle 1, all pts received BEP in Fav and 87,5 % (n = 70) in Unfav. After chemotherapy and surgery, 65,2 % in Fav and 41,3 % in Unfav obtained complete response. At 30 months (median follow-up), Fav-OS was 80,5 % (IC95% 55,8 – 92,2) and Unfav-OS was 64,4 % (IC95% 52 – 74,4). At 30 months, rates were 69,6 % (IC95% 46,6 -84,2) and 63.5 % (IC95% 51,9 – 73) respectively. In GETUG 13 study, 3-years OS was 84 % in Fav and 73 % on Unfav; 3-years PFS was 70 % and 59 % respectively. Seven pts died because of toxicity in Unfav (No one in Fav). Neuropathy, anemia and thrombopenia were more frequent in Unfav. Salvage high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell transplant was required in 4 (66,7 %) pts in Fav and 8 (36,4 %) pts in Unfav. Conclusions: This study showed a reproducibility of the princeps study in terms of PFS and OS. Toxicity seemed more important in real world. For the congress, results will be reported with 50 additional pts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Faouzi
- Gustave Roussy Institute and University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Clement Dumont
- Department of Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephane Oudard
- Georges Pompidou Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Aude Flechon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Diego Tosi
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy and University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Colomba E, Flippot R, Dalban C, Negrier S, Chevreau C, Gravis G, Oudard S, Laguerre B, Barthelemy P, Gross Goupil M, Geoffrois L, Rolland F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Joly F, Ladoire S, Tantot F, Escudier B, Albiges L. Association of statins and nivolumab activity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Results from the phase II nivoren—GETUG AFU 26 trial. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
359 Background: Statins are HMG-CoA inhibitors that regulate several mechanisms involved in tumor growth, including mitochondrial metabolism, activation of oncogenic signaling pathways, and immune modulation. Population-based studies showed that statin intake may be negatively associated with RCC onset. The impact of statins on response to immunotherapy in mRCC is unknown. Herein we study the association between statin administration and outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the NIVOREN-GETUG AFU 26 phase II trial (NCT03013335). Methods: Patients with mRCC who failed previous VEGFR inhibitors were included. We assessed nivolumab activity, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to statin intake at baseline. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v4.0. Results: Overall,133 patients were treated with statins at baseline among 702 evaluable for concomitant therapies (19%). Among them, median age was 68 (49-90), 84% were male, 85% had a performance status ≥ 80%, 42% were overweight and 20% obese. Patients treated with statins had mostly good (23%) or intermediate (58%) IMDC risk, 64% had grade 3 or 4 tumors, and nivolumab was given in a third line setting or more in 55%. Median follow-up was 23.9 months (95%CI 23.0-24.5) in the overall cohort. The ORR was 26% in patients treated with statins, PFS 5.0 months (CI95% 3.0 – 5.5), OS 27.9 months (CI95% 19.4-30.3). Outcomes of patients with or without statins did not differ significantly. Similar rates of grade 3-5 TRAE were reported in patients with (20%) or without (18%) statin intake. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate statin intake and outcomes with nivolumab in patients with mRCC. Despite numerically higher ORR, statins were not significantly associated with improved outcomes. These data require other analyzes considering other factors such as BMI and other comorbidities. Further studies may help better understand the interplay between immunity and metabolic reprogramming in RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emeline Colomba
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Sylvie Negrier
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Stephane Oudard
- Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Frederic Rolland
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Department of Medical Oncology, St Herblain, France
| | | | - Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Albiges L, Fléchon A, Chevreau C, Topart D, Gravis G, Oudard S, Tourani JM, Geoffrois L, Meriaux E, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Barthélémy P, Ladoire S, Laguerre B, Perrot V, Billard A, Escudier B, Gross-Goupil M. Real-world evidence of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from the CABOREAL Early Access Program. Eur J Cancer 2020; 142:102-111. [PMID: 33253997 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world data on cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is limited. This study (CABOREAL) reports treatment patterns and outcomes for patients treated with cabozantinib through the French Early Access Program. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicentre (n = 26), observational, retrospective study enrolled patients with mRCC who had received ≥1 dose of cabozantinib. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; subgroups were compared using the log-rank test. A multiple Cox regression model assessed predictive factors of OS after cabozantinib initiation. RESULTS Four hundred and ten recruited patients started treatment between September 2016 and February 2018: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥2, 39.3%; poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk, 31.7%; 0-1, 2 and ≥3 previous treatment lines, 25.3%, 33.4% and 41.2%, respectively; bone metastases, 55.9%; brain metastases, 16.8%. Median (min-max) follow-up was 14.4 (0-30) months. Overall, 57.0% of patients had a dose reduction, 15.6% an alternative dose schedule. The median average daily dose was 40.0 mg. Median (quartile [Q]1-Q3) treatment duration was 7.6 (0.1-29.1) months, median OS was 14.4 months, and the 12-month OS rate was 56.5% (95% confidence interval: 51.5-61.2). Most patients (54.4%) received subsequent treatment. Predictive factors associated with longer OS were body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 (p = 0.0021), prior nephrectomy (p = 0.0109), favourable or intermediate IMDC risk (p < 0.0001) and cabozantinib initiation at 60 mg/day (p = 0.0486). CONCLUSIONS In the largest real-world study to date, cabozantinib was effective in unselected, heavily pretreated patients with mRCC. Initiation at 60 mg/day was associated with improved outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT03744585.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Gwenaëlle Gravis
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pfister C, Gravis G, Flechon A, Soulie M, Guy L, Laguerre B, Mottet N, Joly F, Allory Y, Harter V, Culine S. Essai GETUG/AFU-V05 VESPER phase III randomisée de chimiothérapie périopératoire (schéma MVAC dose-dense ou GC) dans le cancer de vessie infiltrant localisé. Résultats sur la toxicité de la chimiothérapie et la réponse histologique. Prog Urol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
49
|
Beuselinck B, Van Brussel T, Verbiest A, Vanmechelen M, Couchy G, Oudard S, Elaïdi R, Roussel E, Albersen M, Debruyne P, Baldewijns M, Machiels JP, Richard V, Verschaeve V, Wolter P, Rioux-Leclercq N, Laguerre B, Zucman-Rossi J, Lambrechts D. Validation of the Correlation Between Single Nucleotide Polymorphism rs307826 in VEGFR3 and Outcome in Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sunitinib. KCA 2020. [DOI: 10.3233/kca-200086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previously, we have shown a correlation between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs307826 in vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR3) and outcome in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) patients treated with sunitinib. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate this finding in an independent patient series. METHODS: m-ccRCC patients receiving sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy were included in a validation cohort. Endpoints were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We also updated survival data of our discovery cohort as described previously. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were included in the validation cohort. rs307826 AG/GG-carriers had a shorter PFS (8 versus 12 months, p = 0.04) and a trend towards a shorter OS (18 versus 27 months, p = 0.22) compared to AA-carriers. In the total series of 168 patients (from the discovery cohort, as described previously, and the validation cohort), rs307826 AG/GG-carriers had a poorer RR (29% versus 53%, p = 0.008), PFS (8 versus 15 months, p = 0.0002) and OS (22 versus 31 months, p = 0.004) compared to AA-carriers. rs307826 was independently associated with PFS and OS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: VEGFR3 rs307826 seems to be associated with outcome on sunitinib in m-ccRCC. Its impact highlights the role of VEGFR3 in ccRCC pathogenesis and as a target of sunitinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Beuselinck
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Laboratory for Experimental Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Van Brussel
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annelies Verbiest
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Laboratory for Experimental Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maxime Vanmechelen
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Laboratory for Experimental Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Stéphane Oudard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Université Paris-5 René Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Reza Elaïdi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Université Paris-5 René Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philip Debruyne
- Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium, and Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Marcella Baldewijns
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jean-Pascal Machiels
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Richard
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Ambroise Paré, Mons, Belgium
| | - Vincent Verschaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Pascal Wolter
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Nikolaus-Hospital Eupen, Eupen, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Diether Lambrechts
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Guillaume Z, Colomba-Blameble E, Barthélémy P, Saldana C, Dumont C, Laguerre B, Maillet D, Vicier C, Rolland F, Borchiellini D, Thouvenin J, Albiges L, Auclin E, Oudard S, Thibault C. 735P Metastatic renal medullary and collecting duct carcinoma in the era of antiangiogenic and immune checkpoint inhibitors: A multicentric retrospective study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|