Lifestyle coaching is feasible in fatigued brain tumor patients: A phase I/feasibility, multi-center, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial

Background

There are no effective treatments for brain tumor-related fatigue. We studied the feasibility of two novel lifestyle coaching interventions in fatigued brain tumor patients.

Methods

This phase I/feasibility multi-center RCT recruited patients with a clinically stable primary brain tumor and significant fatigue (mean Brief Fatigue Inventory [BFI] score ≥ 4/10). Participants were randomized in a 1-1-1 allocation ratio to: Control (usual care); Health Coaching ("HC", an eight-week program targeting lifestyle behaviors); or HC plus Activation Coaching ("HC + AC", further targeting self-efficacy). The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment and retention. Secondary outcomes were intervention acceptability, which was evaluated via qualitative interview, and safety. Exploratory quantitative outcomes were measured at baseline (T0), post-interventions (T1, 10 weeks), and endpoint (T2, 16 weeks).

Results

n = 46 fatigued brain tumor patients (T0 BFI mean = 6.8/10) were recruited and 34 were retained to endpoint, establishing feasibility. Engagement with interventions was sustained over time. Qualitative interviews (n = 21) suggested that coaching interventions were broadly acceptable, although mediated by participant outlook and prior lifestyle. Coaching led to significant improvements in fatigue (improvement in BFI versus control at T1: HC=2.2 points [95% CI 0.6, 3.8], HC + AC = 1.8 [0.1, 3.4], Cohen's d [HC] = 1.9; improvement in FACIT-Fatigue: HC = 4.8 points [-3.7, 13.3]; HC + AC = 12 [3.5, 20.5], d [HC and AC] = 0.9). Coaching also improved depressive and mental health outcomes. Modeling suggested a potential limiting effect of higher baseline depressive symptoms.

Conclusions

Lifestyle coaching interventions are feasible to deliver to fatigued brain tumor patients. They were manageable, acceptable, and safe, with preliminary evidence of benefit on fatigue and mental health outcomes. Larger trials of efficacy are justified.

Radiation treatment of benign tumours in NF2-related-schwannomatosis: a national study of 266 irradiated patients showing a significant increase in malignancy/malignant progression

Background

Radiation treatment of benign tumours in tumour-predisposition syndromes is controversial, but short-term studies from treatment centres suggests safety despite apparent radiation associated malignancy being reported. We determined whether radiation treatment in NF2-related-schwannomatosis patients is associated with increased rates of subsequent malignancy-(M)/malignant progression-(MP).

Methods

All UK patients with NF2 were eligible if they had a clinical/molecular diagnosis. Cases were NF2 patients treated with radiation for benign tumours. Controls were matched for treatment location with surgical/medical treatments based on age and year of treatment. Prospective data collection began in 1990 with addition of retrospective cases to 1969. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for malignancy incidence and survival. Outcomes were CNS M/MP (2cm annualised diameter growth) and survival from index tumour treatment.

Results

1345 NF2 patients, 266 (133-Male) underwent radiation treatments between 1969-2021 with median first radiotherapy aged 32.9-(IQR=22.4-46.0). Nine subsequent CNS malignancies/malignant progressions were identified in cases with only four in 1079 untreated-(p<0.001). Lifetime and 20-year CNS M/MP was ~6% in all irradiated patients-(4.9% for VS radiotherapy) versus <1% in the non-irradiated population-(p<0.001/0.01). Controls were well-matched for age at NF2 diagnosis and treatment-(Males=133-50%) and had no M/MP in the CNS post index-tumour treatment-(p=0.0016). Thirty-year survival from index tumour treatment was 45.62%-(95%CI=34.0–56.5) for cases and 66.4%-(57.3–74.0) for controls-(p=0.02), but was non-significantly worse for VS radiotherapy.

Conclusion

-NF2 patients should not be offered radiotherapy as first line treatment of benign tumours and should be given a frank discussion of the potential 5% excess absolute risk of M/MP.

Study protocol: PreOperative Brain Irradiation in Glioblastoma (POBIG) - A phase I trial

Background

Glioblastoma is a high-grade aggressive neoplasm whose outcomes have not changed in decades. In the current treatment pathway, tumour growth continues and remains untreated for several weeks post-diagnosis. Intensified upfront therapy could target otherwise untreated tumour cells and improve the treatment outcome. POBIG will evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-fraction preoperative radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, assessed by the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and maximum tolerated irradiation volume (MTIV).

Methods

POBIG is an open-label, dual-centre phase I dose and volume escalation trial that has received ethical approval. Patients with a new radiological diagnosis of glioblastoma will be screened for eligibility. This is deemed sufficient due to the high accuracy of imaging and to avoid treatment delay. Eligible patients will receive a single fraction of preoperative radiotherapy ranging from 6 to 14 Gy followed by their standard of care treatment comprising maximal safe resection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fr) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide). Preoperative radiotherapy will be directed to the part of the tumour that is highest risk for remaining as postoperative residual disease (hot spot). Part of the tumour will remain unirradiated (cold spot) and sampled separately for diagnostic purposes. Dose/volume escalation will be guided by a Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) model. Translational opportunities will be afforded through comparison of irradiated and unirradiated primary glioblastoma tissue.

Discussion

POBIG will help establish the role of radiotherapy in preoperative modalities for glioblastoma.

Trial registration

NCT03582514 (clinicaltrials.gov).

European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL)

The management of primary central nervous system (PCNSL) is one of the most controversial topics in neuro-oncology because of the complexity of the disease and the limited number of controlled studies available. In 2021, given recent advances and the publication of practice-changing randomized trials, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) created a multidisciplinary task force to update the previously published evidence-based guidelines for immunocompetent adult patients with PCNSL and added a section on immunosuppressed patients. The guideline provides consensus considerations and recommendations for the treatment of PCNSL, including intraocular manifestations and specific management of the elderly. The main changes from the previous guideline include strengthened evidence for the consolidation with ASCT in first-line treatment, prospectively assessed chemotherapy combinations for both young and elderly patients, clarification of the role of rituximab even though the data remain inconclusive, of the role of new agents, and the incorporation of immunosuppressed patients and primary ocular lymphoma. The guideline should aid the clinicians in everyday practice and decision making and serve as a basis for future research in the field.

Surgery versus radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: Shared decision making in a multidisciplinary clinic

Background

Our neurosurgical unit adopted a model of shared decision-making (SDM) based on multidisciplinary clinics for vestibular schwannoma (VS). A unique feature of this clinic is the interdisciplinary counseling process with a surgeon presenting the option of surgery, an oncologist radiosurgery or radiotherapy, and a specialist nurse advocating for the patient.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. All new patients seen in the combined VS clinic and referred from the skull base multidisciplinary team (MDT) from beginning of June 2013 to end of January 2019 were included. Descriptive statistics and frequency analysis were carried out for the full cohort.

Results

Three hundred and fifty-four patients presenting with new or previously untreated VS were included in the analysis. In our cohort, roughly one-third of patients fall into each of the treatment strategies with slightly smaller numbers of patients undergoing surgery than watch, wait and rescan (WWR) ,and SRS (26.6% vs. 32.8% and 37.9%, respectively).

Conclusion

In our experience, the combined surgery/oncology/specialist nurse clinic streamlines the patient experience for those with a VS suitable for either microsurgical or SRS/radiotherapy treatment. Decision-making in this population of patients is complex and when presented with all treatment options patients do not necessarily choose the least invasive option as a treatment. The unique feature of our clinic is the multidisciplinary counseling process with a specialist nurse advocating and guiding the patient. Treatment options are likely to become more rather than less complex in future years making combined clinics more valuable than ever in the SDM process.

Prolonged Transfusion-Dependent Temozolomide-Induced Thrombocytopaenia in Glioblastoma: Risk Factors Remain Elusive

AIMS

Temozolomide-induced thrombocytopaenia is well-recognised; clinical-course varies widely. Aims: To identify risk factors for prolonged thrombocytopaenia; improve patient-care; inform trial design.

METHOD

Glioblastoma (GBM) patients requiring platelet transfusion were identified. (Local policy: transfuse when plt count ≤ 30 x 109/L). Inclusion criteria: First-line-standard-of-care temozolomide-chemo-radiotherapy (TMZ-CRT). Case-notes reviewed for demographics, blood-counts, radiotherapy and treatment parameters. Thrombocytopaenia grading: CTCAE V5. Date of onset measured from start of TMZ-CRT to date of platelets < 100 x 109/L, and to date of first instance of ≥ grade 3 thrombocytopaenia. Thrombocytopaenia duration: time to platelet count recovery to ≥ 100x109/L.

RESULTS

Between 2017-2021, 69 patients required platelet transfusion; 68/69 identified on routine monitoring. 49 patients were analysed (6:no CRT; 5:trial study drug; 7:≥ 2nd line treatment; 2:inadequate data). Median age: 59 (range 25-73); 61% female. First incidence of thrombocytopaenia during concurrent TMZ-CRT: 27/49 patients; during adjuvant TMZ in 22/49 (13/22 following 6-week-TMZ-CRT, 9/22 following 3-week-TMZ-CRT). In concurrent patients, median time to thrombocytopaenia: 33 days (range 23-38); median duration: 44 days (range 20-105; 5 not recovered); number of transfusions: 1-2:9 pts; 3-4:6pts; 5-7:3pts; 8-10:7pts; >10:2pts. Of 22 adjuvant patients transfused, 8/22 developed ≥G3 thrombocytopaenia post-cycle-2; 19/22 resolved after 1 or 2 transfusions. Thrombocyopaenia was associated with ≥G3 neutropaenia in 11% of patients requiring <5 transfusions vs 75% requiring ≥ 5. Comparison of < 5 vs ≥ 5 transfusion-patients did not identify differences in any demographic or treatment parameters.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for prolonged TMZ-induced thrombocytopenia vs swiftly-resolving thrombocytopaenia remain elusive. This needs to be reflected in consent processes and in design of clinical trials.

Multifocal and Multicentric Glioblastomas: A 10 Year Single Centre Experience

AIMS

The aims of this study are to share our experience of a large series of multifocal/multicentric glioblastomas (mGBM) and analyse the clinical, histological/molecular and neuroimaging characteristics as well as the outcomes of the patients in order to inform and contribute to future patient care.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective single centre study of all multifocal/multicentric glioblastomas treated at our institution over a 10 year period. Data was collected from electronic patient records including patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, treatment plans and histopathology/molecular findings. Time to recurrence/progression and overall survival was assessed.

RESULTS

1158 glioblastomas were treated surgically over this time period of which 121 multifocal/multicentric tumours were identified (10.4%). The median age at diagnosis was 63 years with a slight male predominance (54.5%). Half of all patients (61/121) presented with focal neurological deficits. 69% of patients underwent a craniotomy for diagnosis/debulking of the larger enhancing component of the tumour whilst 31% underwent only a biopsy. The median time to recurrence/progression was 154 days. Median length of survival was 269 days. Those who underwent craniotomy had significantly prolonged survival compared to biopsy alone 301 vs 198 days (p= 0.027) as did those who had a near total resection 401 vs 269 for subtotal resection (P=0.006) and those < 60 years (p=< 0.001). 88% of patients were IDH1 wildtype. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy confer a significant survival advantage when compared with no further treatment (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Near total resection of the larger enhancing component and post-operative chemo/radiotherapy can offer prolonged survival in patients with mGBM.

P11.64.A Long-term follow up and translational data from the ReoGlio phase Ib trial of GM-CSF and intravenous pelareorep (Reovirus) alongside standard of care in GBM

BACKGROUND

We previously reported safety data from a phase Ib, open-label study of intravenous oncolytic virus pelareorep with GM-CSF alongside standard chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma confirming that the combination is well tolerated. We now report on long-term follow up and analysis of translational samples from tumour and blood in a subset of patients.

METHODS

15 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were treated with GM-CSF 50μg subcutaneously on days 1-3 and intravenous pelareorep on days 4-5 in weeks 1 and 4 of chemoradiotherapy, and subsequently in week 1 of each adjuvant temozolomide course: 7 patients received 1x1010TCID50 (dose level 1); 8 received 3x1010TCID50 (dose level 2). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of pelareorep and GM-CSF with standard chemoradiotherapy. Following a protocol amendment we also collected survival data in all patients up to August 2021. Serial blood samples were taken from three patients, at baseline, during chemoradiotherapy and in the first adjuvant cycle. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analysed for immune checkpoint expression by flow cytometry, RNAseq gene expression and T-cell receptor clonality, whilst plasma cytokines were quantified by Luminex.

RESULTS

This combination was well tolerated with 87% of patients completing treatment as planned. Survival data analysis showed that median OS was 12.6 months in dose level 1 and 16.1 months in dose level 2, median OS for all patients was 13.1 months. The 24-month survival estimate for all patients was 25.0%, 16.7% for dose level 1 and 33.3% for dose level 2. One patient in dose level 1 remains alive at 43 months post registration without further treatment. Laboratory data showed that pelareorep infusion resulted in inflammatory cytokine and chemokine secretion, immune checkpoint modulation, and upregulation of inflammatory pathways. There was also increased peripheral clonal tumour-specific T-cell proliferation following pelareorep infusion.

CONCLUSION

Although based on small numbers, these long-term follow up data suggest this may be an active combination in a subset of GBM patients. Translational data confirm that pelareorep potentially activates tumour-targeting immune pathways in GBM, with consequential immune checkpoint modulation. These data support a combination clinical trial of pelareorep, radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade in GBM.

The Management and Outcomes of Patients with Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Brain Metastases

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) in patients with extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (EP–NENs) are rare, and limited clinical information is available. The aim of this study was to detail the clinicopathological features, management and outcomes in patients with EP–NENs who developed BMs. Methods: A retrospective single-centre analysis of consecutive patients with EP–NENs (August 2004–February 2020) was conducted. Median overall survival (OS)/survival from BMs diagnosis was estimated (Kaplan–Meier). Results: Of 730 patients, 17 (1.9%) had BMs, median age 61 years (range 15–77); 8 (53%) male, unknown primary NEN site: 40%. Patients with BMs had grade 3 (G3) EP–NENs 11 (73%), G2: 3 (20%), G1: 1 (7%). Eight (53%) had poorly differentiated NENs, 6 were well-differentiated and 1 was not recorded. Additionally, 2 (13%) patients had synchronous BMs at diagnosis, whilst 13 (87%) developed BMs metachronously. The relative risk of developing BMs was 7.48 in patients with G3 disease vs. G1 + G2 disease (p = 0.0001). Median time to the development of BMs after NEN diagnosis: 15.9 months (range 2.5–139.5). Five patients had a solitary BM, 12 had multiple BMs. Treatment of BMs were surgery (n = 3); radiotherapy (n = 5); 4: whole brain radiotherapy, 1: conformal radiotherapy (orbit). Nine (53%) had best supportive care. Median OS from NEN diagnosis was 23.6 months [95% CI 15.2–31.3]; median time to death from BMs diagnosis was 3.0 months [95% CI 0.0–8.3]. Conclusion: BMs in patients with EP–NENs are rare and of increased risk in G3 vs. G1 + G2 EP–NENs. Survival outcomes are poor, and a greater understanding is needed to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Abstract CT569: Combination of reovirus (pelareorep) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alongside standard chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (temozolomide) for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM): Long term follow up results of the ReoGlio phase Ib trial

Background: Oncolytic viruses are of increasing interest as an immunologic approach to treating glioma. We previously reported safety data from a phase Ib, open-label study of intravenous pelareorep with GM-CSF alongside standard chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and confirmed that the combination is tolerable. Following agreement from the relevant ethics authorities we have now completed long term follow up data on all patients treated in the study to investigate whether there is a signal of impact on survival. METHODS: 15 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were treated with GM-CSF 50μg subcutaneously on days 1-3 and pelareorep on days 4-5 in weeks 1 and 4 of chemoradiotherapy, and subsequently in week 1 of each adjuvant temozolomide course: 7 patients received 1x1010TCID50 (dose level 1); 8 received 3x1010TCID50 (dose level 2). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of pelareorep and GM-CSF with standard chemoradiotherapy. Following end of study patients were followed up as per institutional practice. Ethical approval was granted to collect survival data in all patients who survived beyond study closure up to June 2021.

Results: We showed that using intravenous pelareorep with GM-CSF alongside standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with GBM was tolerable with 87% of patients completing treatment as planned. Survival data analysis showed that median OS was 12.6 months for patients in dose level 1 and 16.1 months in dose level 2, giving median OS for all patients 13.1 months. It was notable however that a small number of patients survived beyond 24 months. The 24-month survival estimate for all patients was 33%, 16.7% for dose level 1 and 50% for dose level 2. One patient in dose level 2 remains alive at 42 months.

Conclusion: We previously reported that intravenous delivery of pelareorep with standard chemoradiotherapy is tolerable in newly diagnosed GBM. Although based on small numbers, these long-term follow up data suggest that this may be an active combination in a subset of GBM patients and further randomized studies are warranted.

Citation Format: Susan C. Short, Jessica Kendall, Anthony Chalmers, Catherine McBain, Alan Melcher, Adel Samson, Rachel Phillip, Sarah Brown. Combination of reovirus (pelareorep) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alongside standard chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (temozolomide) for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM): Long term follow up results of the ReoGlio phase Ib trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT569.

Temozolomide and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype: post-hoc analysis of the EORTC randomized phase 3 CATNON trial

PURPOSE

In a post-hoc analysis of the CATNON trial (NCT00626990), we explored whether adding temozolomide to radiotherapy improves outcome in patients with IDH1/2wt anaplastic astrocytomas with molecular features of glioblastoma (redesignated as glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype in the 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumors).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

From the randomized phase 3 CATNON study examining the addition of adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide to radiotherapy in anaplastic astrocytomas, we selected a subgroup of IDH1/2wt and H3F3Awt tumors with presence of TERT promoter mutations and/or EGFR amplifications and/or combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of chromosome 10. Molecular abnormalities including MGMT promoter methylation status were determined by next-generation sequencing, DNA methylation profiling, and SNaPshot analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 751 patients entered in the CATNON study, 670 had fully molecularly characterized tumors. 159 of these tumors met the WHO 2021 molecular criteria for glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. Of these patients, 47 received radiotherapy only and 112 received a combination of radiotherapy and temozolomide. There was no added effect of temozolomide on either overall survival (HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.82-1.71) or progression-free survival (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.61-1.24). MGMT promoter methylation was prognostic for overall survival, but was not predictive for outcome to temozolomide treatment either with respect to overall survival or progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype temozolomide treatment did not add benefit beyond that observed from radiotherapy, regardless of MGMT promoter status. These findings require a new well-powered prospective clinical study to explore the efficacy of temozolomide treatment in this patient population.

Early Therapeutic Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Rationale and Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glioblastoma is the commonest primary brain cancer in adults whose outcomes are amongst the worst of any cancer. The current treatment pathway comprises surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy though unresectable diffusely infiltrative tumour cells remain untreated for several weeks post-diagnosis. Intratumoural heterogeneity combined with increased hypoxia in the postoperative tumour microenvironment potentially decreases the efficacy of adjuvant interventions and fails to prevent early postoperative regrowth, called rapid early progression (REP). In this review, we discuss the clinical implications and biological foundations of post-surgery REP. Subsequently, clinical interventions potentially targeting this phenomenon are reviewed systematically.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early interventions include early systemic chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, local therapies delivered during surgery (including Gliadel wafers, nanoparticles and stem cell therapy) and several radiotherapy techniques. We critically appraise and compare these strategies in terms of their efficacy, toxicity, challenges and potential to prolong survival. Finally, we discuss the most promising strategies that could benefit future glioblastoma patients. There is biological rationale to suggest that early interventions could improve the outcome of glioblastoma patients and they should be investigated in future trials.

Afatinib and radiotherapy, with or without temozolomide, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results of a phase I trial

Background

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Amplification or overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene, part of the ErbB family, occur in approximately 40% and 60% of patients with GBM, respectively. We present data from a dose-finding study of the ErbB inhibitor afatinib in combination with radiotherapy (RT), with or without temozolomide (TMZ), in patients with GBM.

Methods

This was a phase I, open-label, 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial in patients with newly-diagnosed, histologically-confirmed grade 4 malignant glioma and proven O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene promoter methylation status. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of continuous daily afatinib when given in combination with RT, with (regimen M) or without (regimen U) concomitant TMZ treatment.

Results

Fifty-five patients were enrolled; 36 received ≥ 1 dose of trial medication (regimen M, n = 20, regimen U, n = 16). Afatinib was discontinued by all patients during the study. Reasons for afatinib discontinuation (regimen M/U) included disease progression (45%/50%), dose-limiting toxicity (10%/0%), and other adverse events (AEs; 35%/38%). The most frequently reported AEs with either regimen were diarrhea and rash, with no new safety signals identified. The MTD was determined as afatinib 30 mg in combination with daily TMZ and RT, and afatinib 40 mg in combination with RT alone.

Conclusions

This study identified the MTD for afatinib in combination with RT, with and without TMZ, in patients with GBM. Further studies of afatinib in patients with GBM are warranted and should be based on appropriate biomarker-based preselection.

Trial registration

NCT00977431 (first posted September 15, 2009).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03877-6.

Disease course of neurofibromatosis type 2: a 30-year follow-up study of 353 patients seen at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on the disease course of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) to guide clinical trial design.

METHODS

A prospective database of patients meeting NF2 diagnostic criteria, reviewed between 1990 and 2020, was evaluated. Follow-up to first vestibular schwannoma (VS) intervention and death was assessed by univariate analysis and stratified by age at onset, era referred, and inheritance type. Interventions for NF2-related tumors were assessed. Cox regression was performed to determine the relationship between individual factors from time of diagnosis to NF2-related death.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty-three patients were evaluated. During 4643.1 follow-up years from diagnosis to censoring, 60 patients (17.0%) died. The annual mean number of patients undergoing VS surgery or radiotherapy declined, from 4.66 and 1.65, respectively, per 100 NF2 patients in 1990-1999 to 2.11 and 1.01 in 2010-2020, as the number receiving bevacizumab increased (2.51 per 100 NF2 patients in 2010-2020). Five patients stopped bevacizumab to remove growing meningioma or spinal schwannoma. 153/353 (43.3%) had at least one neurosurgical intervention/radiation treatment within 5 years of diagnosis. Patients asymptomatic at diagnosis had longer time to intervention and better survival compared to those presenting with symptoms. Those symptomatically presenting <16 and >40 years had poorer overall survival than those presenting at 26-39 years (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively) but those presenting between 16 and 39 had shorter time to VS intervention. Individuals with de novo constitutional variants had worse survival than those with de novo mosaic or inherited disease (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Understanding disease course improves prognostication, allowing for better-informed decisions about care.

Adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma (CATNON; EORTC study 26053-22054): second interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

The CATNON trial investigated the addition of concurrent, adjuvant, and both current and adjuvant temozolomide to radiotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas. The benefit of concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy and relevance of mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes remain unclear.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done in 137 institutions across Australia, Europe, and North America included patients aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas and a WHO performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) centrally using a minimisation technique to radiotherapy alone (59·4 Gy in 33 fractions; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy), radiotherapy with concurrent oral temozolomide (75 mg/m2 per day), radiotherapy with adjuvant oral temozolomide (12 4-week cycles of 150-200 mg/m2 temozolomide given on days 1-5), or radiotherapy with both concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were stratified by institution, WHO performance status score, age, 1p loss of heterozygosity, the presence of oligodendroglial elements on microscopy, and MGMT promoter methylation status. The primary endpoint was overall survival adjusted by stratification factors at randomisation in the intention-to-treat population. A second interim analysis requested by the independent data monitoring committee was planned when two-thirds of total required events were observed to test superiority or futility of concurrent temozolomide. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00626990.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 4, 2007, and Sept 11, 2015, 751 patients were randomly assigned (189 to radiotherapy alone, 188 to radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide, 186 to radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, and 188 to radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide). Median follow-up was 55·7 months (IQR 41·0-77·3). The second interim analysis declared futility of concurrent temozolomide (median overall survival was 66·9 months [95% CI 45·7-82·3] with concurrent temozolomide vs 60·4 months [45·7-71·5] without concurrent temozolomide; hazard ratio [HR] 0·97 [99·1% CI 0·73-1·28], p=0·76). By contrast, adjuvant temozolomide improved overall survival compared with no adjuvant temozolomide (median overall survival 82·3 months [95% CI 67·2-116·6] vs 46·9 months [37·9-56·9]; HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·52-0·79], p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities were haematological, occurring in no patients in the radiotherapy only group, 16 (9%) of 185 patients in the concurrent temozolomide group, and 55 (15%) of 368 patients in both groups with adjuvant temozolomide. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy, but not concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy, was associated with a survival benefit in patients with 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma. Clinical benefit was dependent on IDH1 and IDH2 mutational status.

FUNDING

Merck Sharpe & Dohme.

Non-IDH1-R132H IDH1/2 mutations are associated with increased DNA methylation and improved survival in astrocytomas, compared to IDH1-R132H mutations

Somatic mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase genes IDH1 and IDH2 occur at high frequency in several tumour types. Even though these mutations are confined to distinct hotspots, we show that gliomas are the only tumour type with an exceptionally high percentage of IDH1^R132H mutations. Patients harbouring IDH1^R132H mutated tumours have lower levels of genome-wide DNA-methylation, and an associated increased gene expression, compared to tumours with other IDH1/2 mutations ("non-R132H IDH1/2 mutations"). This reduced methylation is seen in multiple tumour types and thus appears independent of the site of origin. For 1p/19q non-codeleted glioma (astrocytoma) patients, we show that this difference is clinically relevant: in samples of the randomised phase III CATNON trial, patients harbouring tumours with IDH mutations other than IDH1^R132H have a better outcome (hazard ratio 0.41, 95% CI [0.24, 0.71], p = 0.0013). Such non-R132H IDH1/2-mutated tumours also had a significantly lower proportion of tumours assigned to prognostically poor DNA-methylation classes (p < 0.001). IDH mutation-type was independent in a multivariable model containing known clinical and molecular prognostic factors. To confirm these observations, we validated the prognostic effect of IDH mutation type on a large independent dataset. The observation that non-R132H IDH1/2-mutated astrocytomas have a more favourable prognosis than their IDH1^R132H mutated counterpart indicates that not all IDH-mutations are identical. This difference is clinically relevant and should be taken into account for patient prognostication.

Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumour that almost inevitably progresses or recurs after first line standard of care. There is no consensus regarding the best treatment/s to offer people upon disease progression or recurrence. For the purposes of this review, progression and recurrence are considered as one entity.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of further treatment/s for first and subsequent progression or recurrence of glioblastoma (GBM) among people who have received the standard of care (Stupp protocol) for primary treatment of the disease; and to prepare a brief economic commentary on the available evidence.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase electronic databases from 2005 to December 2019 and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in the Cochrane Library; Issue 12, 2019). Economic searches included the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) up to 2015 (database closure) and MEDLINE and Embase from 2015 to December 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative non-randomised studies (NRSs) evaluating effectiveness of treatments for progressive/recurrent GBM. Eligible studies included people with progressive or recurrent GBM who had received first line radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data to a pre-designed data extraction form. We conducted network meta-analyses (NMA) and ranked treatments according to effectiveness for each outcome using the random-effects model and Stata software (version 15). We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 42 studies: these comprised 34 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 non-randomised studies (NRSs) involving 5236 participants. We judged most RCTs to be at a low risk of bias and NRSs at high risk of bias. Interventions included chemotherapy, re-operation, re-irradiation and novel therapies either used alone or in combination. For first recurrence, we included 11 interventions in the network meta-analysis (NMA) for overall survival (OS), and eight in the NMA for progression-free survival (PFS). Lomustine (LOM; also known as CCNU) was the most common comparator and was used as the reference treatment. No studies in the NMA evaluated surgery, re-irradiation, PCV (procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine), TMZ re-challenge or best supportive care. We could not perform NMA for second or later recurrence due to insufficient data. Quality-of-life data were sparse. First recurrence (NMA findings) Median OS across included studies in the NMA ranged from 5.5 to 12.6 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 1.5 months to 4.2 months. We found no high-certainty evidence that any treatments tested were better than lomustine. These treatments included the following. Bevacizumab plus lomustine: Evidence suggested probably little or no difference in OS between bevacizumab (BEV) combined with lomustine (LOM) and LOM monotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 0.75 to 1.10; moderate-certainty evidence), although BEV + LOM may improve PFS (HR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.74; low-certainty evidence). Bevacizumab monotherapy: Low-certainty evidence suggested there may be little or no difference in OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.76) and PFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.38; low-certainty evidence) between BEV and LOM monotherapies; more evidence on BEV is needed. Regorafenib (REG): REG may improve OS compared with LOM (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.76; low-certainty evidence). Evidence on PFS was very low certainty and more evidence on REG is needed. Temozolomide (TMZ) plus Depatux-M (ABT414): For OS, low-certainty evidence suggested that TMZ plus ABT414 may be more effective than LOM (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.92) and may be more effective than BEV (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.89; low-certainty evidence). This may be due to the TMZ component only and more evidence is needed. Fotemustine (FOM): FOM and LOM may have similar effects on OS (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.57, low-certainty evidence). Bevacizumab and irinotecan (IRI): Evidence on BEV + irinotecan (IRI) versus LOM for both OS and PFS is very uncertain and there is probably little or no difference between BEV + IRI versus BEV monotherapy (OS: HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.30; moderate-certainty evidence). When treatments were ranked for OS, FOM ranked first, BEV + LOM second, LOM third, BEV + IRI fourth, and BEV fifth. Ranking does not take into account the certainty of the evidence, which also suggests there may be little or no difference between FOM and LOM. Other treatments Three studies evaluated re-operation versus no re-operation, with or without re-irradiation and chemotherapy, and these suggested possible survival advantages with re-operation within the context of being able to select suitable candidates for re-operation. A cannabinoid treatment in the early stages of evaluation, in combination with TMZ, merits further evaluation. Second or later recurrence Limited evidence from three heterogeneous studies suggested that radiotherapy with or without BEV may have a beneficial effect on survival but more evidence is needed. Evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions about the best radiotherapy dosage. Other evidence suggested that there may be little difference in survival with tumour-treating fields compared with physician's best choice of treatment. We found no reliable evidence on best supportive care. Severe adverse events (SAEs) The BEV+LOM combination was associated with significantly greater risk of SAEs than LOM monotherapy (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.66, high-certainty evidence), and ranked joint worst with cediranib + LOM (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.29 to 4.90; high-certainty evidence). LOM ranked best and REG ranked second best. Adding novel treatments to BEV was generally associated with a higher risk of severe adverse events compared with BEV alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For treatment of first recurrence of GBM, among people previously treated with surgery and standard chemoradiotherapy, the combination treatments evaluated did not improve overall survival compared with LOM monotherapy and were often associated with a higher risk of severe adverse events. Limited evidence suggested that re-operation with or without re-irradiation and chemotherapy may be suitable for selected candidates. Evidence on second recurrence is sparse. Re-irradiation with or without bevacizumab may be of value in selected individuals, but more evidence is needed.

Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomised, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma

Background

Survival in patients with IDH1/2-mutant (mt) anaplastic astrocytomas is highly variable. We have used the prospective phase 3 CATNON trial to identify molecular factors related to outcome in IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients.

Methods

The CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-codeleted anaplastic glioma to 59.4 Gy radiotherapy +/− concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide. The presence of necrosis and/or microvascular proliferation was scored at central pathology review. Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip arrays were used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis and the determination of copy number variations (CNV). Two DNA methylation-based tumor classifiers were used for risk stratification. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using 1 of the 2 glioma-tailored NGS panels. The primary endpoint was overall survival measured from the date of randomization.

Results

Full analysis (genome-wide DNA methylation and NGS) was successfully performed on 654 tumors. Of these, 432 tumors were IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytomas. Both epigenetic classifiers identified poor prognosis patients that partially overlapped. A predictive prognostic Cox proportional hazard model identified that independent prognostic factors for IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients included; age, mini-mental state examination score, treatment with concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide, the epigenetic classifiers, PDGFRA amplification, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, PI3K mutations, and total CNV load. Independent recursive partitioning analysis highlights the importance of these factors for patient prognostication.

Conclusion

Both clinical and molecular factors identify IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients with worse outcome. These results will further refine the current WHO criteria for glioma classification.

Actinomycin D downregulates Sox2 and improves survival in preclinical models of recurrent glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) has been extensively researched over the last few decades, yet despite aggressive multimodal treatment, recurrence is inevitable and second-line treatment options are limited. Here, we demonstrate how high-throughput screening (HTS) in multicellular spheroids can generate physiologically relevant patient chemosensitivity data using patient-derived cells in a rapid and cost-effective manner. Our HTS system identified actinomycin D (ACTD) to be highly cytotoxic over a panel of 12 patient-derived glioma stemlike cell (GSC) lines. ACTD is an antineoplastic antibiotic used in the treatment of childhood cancers. Here, we validate ACTD as a potential repurposed therapeutic for GBM in 3-dimensional GSC cultures and patient-derived xenograft models of recurrent glioblastoma.

METHODS

Twelve patient-derived GSC lines were screened at 10 µM, as multicellular spheroids, in a 384-well serum-free assay with 133 FDA-approved compounds. GSCs were then treated in vitro with ACTD at established half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50). Downregulation of sex determining region Y-box 2 (Sox2), a stem cell transcription factor, was investigated via western blot and through immunohistological assessment of murine brain tissue.

RESULTS

Treatment with ACTD was shown to significantly reduce tumor growth in 2 recurrent GBM patient-derived models and significantly increased survival. ACTD is also shown to specifically downregulate the expression of Sox2 both in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that, as predicted by our HTS, ACTD could deplete the cancer stem cell population within the tumor mass, ultimately leading to a delay in tumor progression.

KEY POINTS

1. High-throughput chemosensitivity data demonstrated the broad efficacy of actinomycin D, which was validated in 3 preclinical models of glioblastoma.2. Actinomycin D downregulated Sox2 in vitro and in vivo, indicating that this agent could target the stem cell population of GBM tumors.

A Position Statement on the Utility of Interval Imaging in Standard of Care Brain Tumour Management: Defining the Evidence Gap and Opportunities for Future Research

Objectiv e

To summarise current evidence for the utility of interval imaging in monitoring disease in adult brain tumours, and to develop a position for future evidence gathering while incorporating the application of data science and health economics.

Methods

Experts in 'interval imaging' (imaging at pre-planned time-points to assess tumour status); data science; health economics, trial management of adult brain tumours, and patient representatives convened in London, UK. The current evidence on the use of interval imaging for monitoring brain tumours was reviewed. To improve the evidence that interval imaging has a role in disease management, we discussed specific themes of data science, health economics, statistical considerations, patient and carer perspectives, and multi-centre study design. Suggestions for future studies aimed at filling knowledge gaps were discussed.

Results

Meningioma and glioma were identified as priorities for interval imaging utility analysis. The "monitoring biomarkers" most commonly used in adult brain tumour patients were standard structural MRI features. Interval imaging was commonly scheduled to provide reported imaging prior to planned, regular clinic visits. There is limited evidence relating interval imaging in the absence of clinical deterioration to management change that alters morbidity, mortality, quality of life, or resource use. Progression-free survival is confounded as an outcome measure when using structural MRI in glioma. Uncertainty from imaging causes distress for some patients and their caregivers, while for others it provides an important indicator of disease activity. Any study design that changes imaging regimens should consider the potential for influencing current or planned therapeutic trials, ensure that opportunity costs are measured, and capture indirect benefits and added value.

Conclusion

Evidence for the value, and therefore utility, of regular interval imaging is currently lacking. Ongoing collaborative efforts will improve trial design and generate the evidence to optimise monitoring imaging biomarkers in standard of care brain tumour management.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of olaparib and temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma: results of the phase I OPARATIC trial

BACKGROUND

The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib potentiated radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy in preclinical glioblastoma models but brain penetration was poor. Clinically, PARP inhibitors exacerbate the hematological side effects of TMZ. The OPARATIC trial was conducted to measure penetration of recurrent glioblastoma by olaparib and assess the safety and tolerability of its combination with TMZ.

METHODS

Preclinical pharmacokinetic studies evaluated olaparib tissue distribution in rats and tumor-bearing mice. Adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma received various doses and schedules of olaparib and low-dose TMZ in a 3 + 3 design. Suitable patients received olaparib prior to neurosurgical resection; olaparib concentrations in plasma, tumor core and tumor margin specimens were measured by mass spectrometry. A dose expansion cohort tested tolerability and efficacy of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Radiosensitizing effects of olaparib were measured by clonogenic survival in glioblastoma cell lines.

RESULTS

Olaparib was a substrate for multidrug resistance protein 1 and showed no brain penetration in rats but was detected in orthotopic glioblastoma xenografts. Clinically, olaparib was detected in 71/71 tumor core specimens (27 patients; median, 496 nM) and 21/21 tumor margin specimens (9 patients; median, 512.3 nM). Olaparib exacerbated TMZ-related hematological toxicity, necessitating intermittent dosing. RP2D was olaparib 150 mg (3 days/week) with TMZ 75 mg/m2 daily for 42 days. Fourteen (36%) of 39 evaluable patients were progression free at 6 months. Olaparib radiosensitized 6 glioblastoma cell lines at clinically relevant concentrations of 100 and 500 nM.

CONCLUSION

Olaparib reliably penetrates recurrent glioblastoma at radiosensitizing concentrations, supporting further clinical development and highlighting the need for better preclinical models.

INNV-27. BT-LIFE (BRAIN TUMOURS, LIFESTYLE INTERVENTIONS, AND FATIGUE EVALUATION): LESSONS LEARNED FROM RUNNING A NOVEL MULTI-SECTORAL RESEARCH TRIAL

BACKGROUND

BT-LIFE is a multi-centre RCT of novel lifestyle coaching treatments for fatigued brain tumour patients. To our knowledge it is also the first example of ‘multi-sectoral research’ to combine healthcare, private, and charity sectors in this population. To maximise learning, the trial team devised a structured reflection opportunity to ask, “What went well and what would we do differently next time?”

METHOD

After trial closedown we convened a six-hour ‘focus group’ for management, principle investigators, research assistants, interventionists, qualitative researchers, trial statisticians, and the funder. Discussion was structured using a ‘timeline’ wall-chart which attendees freely populated with post-it notes summarising learning points from the trial. Minutes were taken in duplicate.

RESULTS

In total n=19 team members contributed. Many points were study-specific and will be used internally to plan a larger trial. Among points of wider interest, examples of success included: using regular teleconferences to co-ordinate a cohesive and highly collaborative team; obtaining secure nhs.net email addresses to facilitate multi-sectoral communication; and the clear value of employing one part-time research assistant per centre instead of relying on busy clinical staff to recruit. General future learning points included: speak to the prospective sponsor and ethical committees when writing the grant application to avoid pitfalls and facilitate faster opening if funding is secured; consider preceding emails with a phone call to ‘lay the ground’ in time-sensitive situations; identify staff training requirements as early as possible and cascade aggressively; and be sensitive to the fact that inter-sectoral attitudes and practices may vary widely and need actively monitored and managed. Therefore frequent and secure communication, pro-active problem-spotting, and inter-sectoral value alignment appear critical for success.

CONCLUSION

BT-LIFE provides many useful lessons for anyone interested in running multi-sectoral research.

CTIM-14. PELAREOREP AND GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR (GM-CSF) WITH STANDARD CHEMORADIOTHERAPY/ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE FOR GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM) PATIENTS: REOGLIO PHASE I TRIAL RESULTS

BACKGROUND

Oncolytic viruses represent a novel treatment approach in GBM through oncolytic targeting as well as local immune activation. We designed a phase Ib, open-label study of intravenous reovirus (pelareorep) with GM-CSF alongside standard chemoradiotherapy to assess safety and tolerability.

METHODS

15 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were treated with GM-CSF 50mg subcutaneously (days 1–3) and pelareorep (days 4–5) in weeks 1 and 4 of chemoradiotherapy, and week 1 of adjuvant temozolomide course: 7 patients received 1x1010TCID50 (dose level 1); 8 received 3x1010TCID50 (dose level 2). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of pelareorep and GM-CSF with standard chemoradiotherapy. Secondary objectives were to gain preliminary assessment of the activity of the combination and assess treatment compliance.

RESULTS

1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and 20 SAEs were experienced overall; median number of SAEs per patient was 2. Commonest SAEs were nervous system disorders, predominantly seizures. SARs included fever/flu-like episodes (n=5), fall (n=1) and headache (n=1). Two SUSARs occurred in dose level 2, classed as vascular disorders manifesting as hypotension episodes – one was a DLT. Suspected relationship of SARs: pelareorep (n=6); temozolomide (n=1); radiotherapy (n=1); all study drugs (n=1). 87% of patients (n=13) completed chemoradiotherapy without unplanned delays. Adjuvant treatment was delayed in 21% of cycles overall, with the majority due to inadequate haematology/biochemistry values (44% of delays). Pelareorep was omitted in 4 instances in 4 patients during chemoradiotherapy and omitted in 4 instances in 3 patients during adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSION

We present the first clinical data using intravenous pelareorep with GM-CSF alongside standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with GBM, suggesting that the combination is tolerable. Further analysis is underway and efficacy results will be ready for presentation at the conference. This work was supported by CRUK, The Brain Tumour Charity, Yorkshire Cancer Research and Oncolytics Biotech Inc.

NCMP-04. INCIDENCE AND OUTCOMES OF BRAIN METASTASES IN PATIENTS WITH EXTRA-PULMONARY NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) incidence in patients with extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (EP-NENs) is unclear, with no available management recommendations. This study aimed to review the clinical presentation, management and survival outcomes of patients with EP-NENs and BMs at a European Centre of Excellence.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre analysis of consecutive patients with EP-NENs (Aug 2004-Feb 2020) was conducted. Median overall survival (OS)/survival from BMs diagnosis were estimated (Kaplan Meier).

RESULTS

Of 786 patients, 15 (1.9%) had BMs, median age 61y (range 15–77); 8 (53%) male, primary NEN site: unknown 40%; oesophageal 13%; small bowel 13%; pancreas 13%; gastric 7%; cervix 7% and bladder 7%. Most patients with BMs had grade 3 (G3) NENs (11, 73%), 3 (20%) were G2 and 1 (7%)G1. Eight (53%) had poorly-differentiated NENs, 6 well-differentiated and 1 not recorded. Two (13%) patients had synchronous BMs at diagnosis, whilst 13 (87%) developed BMs metachronously. Median time to development of BMs after initial NEN diagnosis: 15.9 months (range 2.5–139.5). Five patients had a solitary BM, 4 had 2–9 lesions and 6 had &gt;10 BMs. The most commonly affected sites were the cerebrum (13, 87%), cerebellum (6, 40%), leptomeninges (2, 13%) and orbit (1, 7%). The most common presenting symptoms were limb weakness, headache, confusion, visual disturbance (each n=3, 20%), seizures (2, 13%), word-finding difficulty (2, 13%) and facial weakness/ptosis (1, 7%). Median OS from initial NEN diagnosis was 23.6-months [95%-CI 15.2–31.3]; median time to death from BMs diagnosis was 3.0-months [95%-CI 0.0–8.3]. Treatment of BMs was surgery (n=3); radiotherapy (n=6); 5 had WBRT, one localised radiotherapy (orbit). Six (40%) had best supportive care.

CONCLUSION

BMs in patients with EP-NENs are rare and predominantly in G3 NENs, with diverse intracranial distribution. Although uncommon, BMs from NENs behave aggressively and greater understanding is needed to improve therapeutic outcomes.

INNV-24. THE EXPERIENCE OF FATIGUED BRAIN TUMOUR PATIENTS RECEIVING INNOVATIVE LIFESTYLE INTERVENTIONS: QUALITATIVE RESULTS FROM THE BT-LIFE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

BACKGROUND

Most brain tumour patients report clinically significant fatigue. Here, we aimed to explore patients’ views of the experience, acceptability and usefulness of participating in a trial of novel lifestyle interventions for fatigue.

METHODS

Qualitative sub-study within the ‘BT-LIFE’ multi-centre phase II RCT (submitted separately). Fatigued adult primary brain tumour patients in receipt of one of the trial interventions (‘Health Coaching’: eight coaching sessions targeting lifestyle behaviours; plus or minus ‘Activation Coaching’: two additional interviews targeting motivation to change) took part in a semi-structured interview following completion of the interventions. A realist approach to the ‘framework’ method was used to analyse verbatim transcripts, with inductive and deductive codes assigned to the realist domains of Context-Mechanism-Outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty themes and 53 sub-themes were derived from the data. Patients’ (n= 21) understanding of and engagement with the interventions were influenced by their expectations, attitudes to life, and experience of living with a brain tumour. Behaviour change was supported by goal-setting, monitoring using a weekly diary, the motivational ‘push’ by coaches, and family/ social support where available. Barriers to engagement included technical diary difficulties, time limitations including work and holiday schedules, and interference from life events. Most patients described beneficial changes in health behaviours, self-efficacy, and general health and wellbeing. About half indicated actual improvement in fatigue levels; others reported no direct change but they could now cope better with fatigue. A minority experienced no change or worsening fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Most fatigued brain tumour patients were able to make positive changes after lifestyle coaching, despite physical and cognitive impairments. However, their experiences were varied. Those for whom the interventions were a good ‘fit’ with their pre-existing outlook, lifestyle, and physical and emotional capabilities, appeared to achieve most benefit. These qualitative findings will inform further work addressing the disabling symptom of brain tumour-related fatigue.

An audit of the management of elderly patients with glioblastoma in the UK: have recent trial results changed treatment?

Aim:

We investigated uptake of short-course chemo-radiotherapy and compared outcomes with other treatment schedules in elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

Methods:

Patients aged 65 or over with a diagnosis of GBM were identified from an 18-month period from three centers in the UK. The primary end point of this study was overall survival from the date of diagnosis.

Results:

The analysis included 210 patients. Overall median survival was 5.0 months. Approximately 31.9% of patients received combined chemoradiation; multivariate analysis showed that patients who received standard chemoradiation were at a reduced risk of death than those receiving hypofractionated chemoradiation.

Discussion:

In this retrospective study, patients treated with standard chemoradiation experienced better outcomes than patients receiving hypofractionated chemoradiation. Patient selection likely contributed to these findings.

High content screening of patient-derived cell lines highlights the potential of non-standard chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults, yet survival outcomes remain poor. First line treatment is well established, however disease invariably recurs and improving prognosis is challenging. With the aim of personalizing therapy at recurrence, we have established a high content screening (HCS) platform to analyze the sensitivity profile of seven patient-derived cancer stem cell lines to 83 FDA-approved chemotherapy drugs, with and without irradiation.

METHODS

Seven cancer stem cell lines were derived from patients with GBM and, along with the established cell line U87-MG, each patient-derived line was cultured in tandem in serum-free conditions as adherent monolayers and three-dimensional neurospheres. Chemotherapeutics were screened at multiple concentrations and cells double-stained to observe their effect on both cell death and proliferation. Sensitivity was classified using high-throughput algorithmic image analysis.

RESULTS

Cell line specific drug responses were observed across the seven patient-derived cell lines. Few agents were seen to have radio-sensitizing effects, yet some drug classes showed a marked difference in efficacy between monolayers and neurospheres. In vivo validation of six drugs suggested that cell death readout in a three-dimensional culture scenario is a more physiologically relevant screening model and could be used effectively to assess the chemosensitivity of patient-derived GBM lines.

CONCLUSION

The study puts forward a number of non-standard chemotherapeutics that could be useful in the treatment of recurrent GBM, namely mitoxantrone, bortezomib and actinomycin D, whilst demonstrating the potential of HCS to be used for personalized treatment based on the chemosensitivity profile of patient tumor cells.

PARADIGM-2: Two parallel phase I studies of olaparib and radiotherapy or olaparib and radiotherapy plus temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, with treatment stratified by MGMT status

Glioblastoma has a dismal prognosis and molecular targeted agents have failed to improve outcomes to date. PARADIGM-2 is a phase I dose escalation study evaluating olaparib plus radiotherapy ± temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, using MGMT methylation status to stratify patients and inform treatment schedules.

Interim results from the CATNON trial (EORTC study 26053-22054) of treatment with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma: a phase 3, randomised, open-label intergroup study

BACKGROUND

The role of temozolomide chemotherapy in newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas, which are associated with lower sensitivity to chemotherapy and worse prognosis than 1p/19q co-deleted tumours, is unclear. We assessed the use of radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in adults with non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas.

METHODS

This was a phase 3, randomised, open-label study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma with WHO performance status scores of 0-2. The randomisation schedule was generated with the electronic EORTC web-based ORTA system. Patients were assigned in equal numbers (1:1:1:1), using the minimisation technique, to receive radiotherapy (59·4 Gy in 33 fractions of 1·8 Gy) alone or with adjuvant temozolomide (12 4-week cycles of 150-200 mg/m² temozolomide given on days 1-5); or to receive radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide 75 mg/m² per day, with or without adjuvant temozolomide. The primary endpoint was overall survival adjusted for performance status score, age, 1p loss of heterozygosity, presence of oligodendroglial elements, and MGMT promoter methylation status, analysed by intention to treat. We did a planned interim analysis after 219 (41%) deaths had occurred to test the null hypothesis of no efficacy (threshold for rejection p<0·0084). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00626990.

FINDINGS

At the time of the interim analysis, 745 (99%) of the planned 748 patients had been enrolled. The hazard ratio for overall survival with use of adjuvant temozolomide was 0·65 (99·145% CI 0·45-0·93). Overall survival at 5 years was 55·9% (95% CI 47·2-63·8) with and 44·1% (36·3-51·6) without adjuvant temozolomide. Grade 3-4 adverse events were seen in 8-12% of 549 patients assigned temozolomide, and were mainly haematological and reversible.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma. Further analysis of the role of concurrent temozolomide treatment and molecular factors is needed.

FUNDING

Schering Plough and MSD.

Brain tumor research in the United Kingdom: current perspective and future challenges. A strategy document from the NCRI Brain Tumor CSG

The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) is a partnership of charity and government research funders whose purpose is to improve health and quality of life by accelerating progress in cancer-related research through collaboration. Under this umbrella, the NCRI Brain Tumor Clinical Studies Group is focused on improving clinical outcomes for adult patients with brain and central nervous system tumors, including those with brain metastasis from other primary sites. This document discusses the current state of clinical brain tumor research in the United Kingdom and the challenges to increasing study and trial opportunities for patients. The clinical research priorities are defined along with a strategy to strengthen the existing brain tumor research network, improve access to tissue and imaging and to develop the future leadership for brain tumor research in the United Kingdom. This strategy document may serve as a framework for other organizations and countries.

Results of the OPARATIC trial: A phase I dose escalation study of olaparib in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (GBM)

2022

Background: Olaparib, a small molecule inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), may improve GBM outcomes by enhancing cytotoxic effects of ionising radiation and TMZ. Clinical development of PARP inhibitors has been restricted by exacerbation of hematological toxicity. We investigated tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) of olaparib and safety and tolerability of its combination with TMZ. Methods: Dose escalation explored different schedules of olaparib (tablet formulation) with 42 day cycles of daily low dose TMZ. A dose expansion cohort evaluated the maximum tolerated schedule. PK analysis was performed on tumor and blood samples from patients undergoing neurosurgical resection, who received 4 olaparib doses pre-operatively. Results: 48 patients were recruited (median age 51(18-68); 29 male, 19 female) of whom 27 underwent surgery and 35 received olaparib/TMZ and were evaluable. 13 evaluable patients received expansion dose schedule (median age 54(21-67); 9 male, 4 female). Olaparib was detected in 73 of 74 tumor core specimens from 27 patients; mean conc. 588nM (97-1374nM), and in 27 of 28 tumor margin specimens from 10 patients; mean conc. 500nM (97-1237nM). Margin: core ratios ranged from 0.2–3.9(mean 1.2); tumor: plasma ratios ranged from 0.01 to 0.9 (mean 0.25). Olaparib dosing on days 1-5 was hindered by myelosuppression. Expansion cohort dose was defined as TMZ 75 mg/m2daily plus olaparib 150 mg (OD) days 1-3 weekly. Of 13 evaluable patients receiving expansion dose-schedule, 9 completed cycle 1, 2 completed cycle 2 and 2 completed cycle 3. Currently 45% of the evaluable patients remain progression-free at 6 months, with 2 still on treatment (full data set May2017). Of 35 evaluable patients, 24 experienced AE Grade ≥3 (see Table). Conclusions: Olaparib penetrates both core and margins of recurrent GBM despite failing to penetrate the intact brain barrier in pre-clinical heathy rodent models. Combination with extended low dose TMZ is safe and well tolerated, yielding encouraging 6 month progression-free survival rates. Clinical trial information: NCT01390571. [Table: see text]

A Cancer Research UK First Time in Human Phase I Trial of IMA950 (Novel Multipeptide Therapeutic Vaccine) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

To perform a two-cohort, phase I safety and immunogenicity study of IMA950 in addition to standard chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. IMA950 is a novel glioblastoma-specific therapeutic vaccine containing 11 tumor-associated peptides (TUMAP), identified on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) surface receptors in primary human glioblastoma tissue.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were HLA-A*02-positive and had undergone tumor resection. Vaccination comprised 11 intradermal injections with IMA950 plus granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) over a 24-week period, beginning 7 to 14 days prior to initiation of chemoradiotherapy (Cohort 1) or 7 days after chemoradiotherapy (Cohort 2). Safety was assessed according to NCI CTCAE Version 4.0 and TUMAP-specific T-cell immune responses determined. Secondary observations included progression-free survival (PFS), pretreatment regulatory T cell (Treg) levels, and the effect of steroids on T-cell responses.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were recruited. Related adverse events included minor injection site reactions, rash, pruritus, fatigue, neutropenia and single cases of allergic reaction, anemia and anaphylaxis. Two patients experienced grade 3 dose-limiting toxicity of fatigue and anaphylaxis. Of 40 evaluable patients, 36 were TUMAP responders and 20 were multi-TUMAP responders, with no important differences between cohorts. No effect of pretreatment Treg levels on IMA950 immunogenicity was observed, and steroids did not affect TUMAP responses. PFS rates were 74% at 6 months and 31% at 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

IMA950 plus GM-CSF was well-tolerated with the primary immunogenicity endpoint of observing multi-TUMAP responses in at least 30% of patients exceeded. Further development of IMA950 is encouraged. Clin Cancer Res; 22(19); 4776-85. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Lowenstein and Castro, p. 4760.

Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Cediranib plus Gefitinib with Cediranib plus Placebo in Subjects with Recurrent/Progressive Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, failed to show benefit over lomustine in relapsed glioblastoma. One resistance mechanism for cediranib is up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This study aimed to determine if dual therapy with cediranib and the oral EGFR inhibitor gefitinib improved outcome in recurrent glioblastoma.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This was a multi-center randomized, two-armed, double-blinded phase II study comparing cediranib plus gefitinib versus cediranib plus placebo in subjects with first relapse/first progression of glioblastoma following surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and radiologic response rate. Recruitment was terminated early following suspension of the cediranib program. 38 subjects (112 planned) were enrolled with 19 subjects in each treatment arm. Median PFS with cediranib plus gefitinib was 3.6 months compared to 2.8 months for cediranib plus placebo (HR; 0.72, 90% CI; 0.41 to 1.26). Median OS was 7.2 months with cediranib plus gefitinib and 5.5 months with cediranib plus placebo (HR; 0.68, 90% CI; 0.39 to 1.19). Eight subjects (42%) had a partial response in the cediranib plus gefitinib arm versus five patients (26%) in the cediranib plus placebo arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Cediranib and gefitinib in combination is tolerated in patients with glioblastoma. Incomplete recruitment led to the study being underpowered. However, a trend towards improved survival and response rates with the addition of gefitinib to cediranib was observed. Further studies of the combination incorporating EGFR and VEGF inhibition are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01310855.

Vascular biomarkers derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI predict response of vestibular schwannoma to antiangiogenic therapy in type 2 neurofibromatosis

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic therapy of vestibular schwannoma (VS) in type 2 neurofibromatosis can produce tumor shrinkage with response rates of 40%-60%. This study examines the predictive value of parameter-derived MRI in this setting.

METHODS

Twelve patients with 20 VSs were recruited. Each had at least one rapidly growing tumor. Patients were treated with bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients with stable or reduced VS volume were maintained at 2.5-5 mg every 4 weeks after 6 months. Those who failed treatment had their bevacizumab discontinued. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI performed prior to treatment using a high temporal resolution technique, and data were analyzed to allow measurement of contrast transfer coefficient (K(trans)), vascular fraction (v(p)), extravascular-extracellular fraction (v(e)). Relaxation rate (R1(N)) was measured using a variable flip angle technique. Apparent diffusional coefficient (ADC) was calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging. The predictive power of microvascular parameters and ADC were examined using logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Responding tumors were larger (P < .001), had lower R1(N) (P < .001), and higher K(trans) (P < .05) and ADC (P < .01). They showed increases in R1(N) (P < .01) and reduction of K(trans) (P < .01) and ADC (P < .01). Modeling to predict response demonstrated significant independent predictive power for R1(N) (Β = - 0.327, P < .001), and K(trans) (Β = 0.156, P < .05). Modeling to predict percentage change in tumor volume at 90 days identified baseline tumor volume (Β = 5.503, P < .05), R1(N) (Β = - 5.844, P < .05), and K(trans) (Β = 5.622, P < .05) as independent significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis, biomarkers from DCE-MRI are predictive of VS volume response to inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition.