1
|
Blanc-Durand F, Yaniz-Galende E, Llop-Guevara A, Genestie C, Serra V, Herencia-Ropero A, Klein C, Berton D, Lortholary A, Dohollou N, Desauw C, Fabbro M, Malaurie E, Bonichon-Lamaichhane N, Dubot C, Kurtz JE, de Rauglaudre G, Raban N, Chevalier-Place A, Ferron G, Kaminsky MC, Kramer C, Rouleau E, Leary A. Corrigendum to "A RAD51 functional assay as a candidate test for homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer". Gynecol Oncol 2023:S0090-8258(23)00299-8. [PMID: 37271667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Félix Blanc-Durand
- Medical Oncology, Gynecology Unit, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Alba Llop-Guevara
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Violeta Serra
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Christophe Klein
- Center of Cellular Imaging and Cytometry, INSERM UMRS 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Berton
- Medical Oncology, GINECO & Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Alain Lortholary
- Medical Oncology, GINECO-Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France
| | - Nadine Dohollou
- Medical Oncology, Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitain, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Michel Fabbro
- Medical Oncology, ICM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuelle Malaurie
- Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | | | - Coraline Dubot
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | | | - Nadia Raban
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and CHU La Milétrie, Poitiers, France
| | | | - Gwenael Ferron
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Marie-Christine Kaminsky
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Les-, Nancy, France
| | - Claire Kramer
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Medical Oncology, Gynecology Unit, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France; INSERM UMR981, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blanc-Durand F, Yaniz-Galende E, Llop-Guevara A, Genestie C, Serra V, Herencia-Ropero A, Klein C, Berton D, Lortholary A, Dohollou N, Desauw C, Fabbro M, Malaurie E, Bonichon-Lamaichhane N, Dubot C, Kurtz JE, de Rauglaudre G, Raban N, Chevalier-Place A, Ferron G, Kaminsky MC, Kramer C, Rouleau E, Leary A. A RAD51 functional assay as a candidate test for homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 171:106-113. [PMID: 36868112 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), defined as BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAmut) or high genomic instability, is used to identify ovarian cancer (OC) patients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitors. While these tests are useful, they are imperfect. Another approach is to measure the capacity of tumor cells to form RAD51 foci in the presence of DNA damage using an immunofluorescence assay (IF). We aimed to describe for the first time this assay in OC and correlate it to platinum response and BRCAmut. METHODS Tumor samples were prospectively collected from the randomized CHIVA trial of neoadjuvant platinum +/- nintedanib. IF for RAD51, GMN and gH2AX was performed on FFPE blocks. Tumors were considered RAD51-low if ≤10% of GMN-positive tumor cells had ≥5 RAD51 foci. BRCAmut were identified by NGS. RESULTS 155 samples were available. RAD51 assay was contributive for 92% of samples and NGS available for 77%. gH2AX foci confirmed the presence of significant basal DNA damage. 54% of samples were considered HRD by RAD51 and presented higher overall response rates to neoadjuvant platinum (P = 0.04) and longer progression-free survival (P = 0.02). In addition, 67% of BRCAmut were HRD by RAD51. Among BRCAmut, RAD51-high tumors seem to harbor poorer response to chemotherapy (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS We evaluated a functional assay of HR competency. OC demonstrate high levels of DNA damage, yet 54% fail to form RAD51 foci. These RAD51-low OC tend to be more sensitive to neoadjuvant platinum. The RAD51 assay also identified a subset of RAD51-high BRCAmut tumors with unexpected poor platinum response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Félix Blanc-Durand
- Medical Oncology, Gynecology Unit, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Alba Llop-Guevara
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Violeta Serra
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Christophe Klein
- Center of Cellular Imaging and Cytometry, INSERM UMRS 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Berton
- Medical Oncology, GINECO & Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Alain Lortholary
- Medical Oncology, GINECO-Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France
| | - Nadine Dohollou
- Medical Oncology, Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitain, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Michel Fabbro
- Medical Oncology, ICM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuelle Malaurie
- Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | | | - Coraline Dubot
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | | | - Nadia Raban
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and CHU La Milétrie, Poitiers, France
| | | | - Gwenael Ferron
- Medical Oncology, GINECO and Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Claire Kramer
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Medical Oncology, Gynecology Unit, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France; INSERM UMR981, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferron G, De Rauglaudre G, Becourt S, Delanoy N, Joly F, Lortholary A, You B, Bouchaert P, Malaurie E, Gouy S, Kaminsky MC, Meunier J, Alexandre J, Berton D, Dohollou N, Dubot C, Floquet A, Favier L, Venat-Bouvet L, Fabbro M, Louvet C, Lotz JP, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Desauw C, Del Piano F, Leheurteur M, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Rastkhah M, Follana P, Gantzer J, Ray-Coquard I, Pujade-Lauraine E. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without nintedanib for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Lessons from the GINECO double-blind randomized phase II CHIVA trial. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:186-194. [PMID: 36706645 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
AIM The oral anti-angiogenic therapy nintedanib prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with chemotherapy after primary surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The randomized phase II CHIVA trial evaluated the impact of combining nintedanib with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable FIGO stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer received 3-4 cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel every 3 weeks as NACT before interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by 2-3 post-operative cycles. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either nintedanib 200 mg twice daily or placebo on days 2-21 every 3 weeks during NACT (omitting peri-operative cycles), and then as maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was PFS. RESULTS Between January 2013 and May 2015, 188 patients were randomized (124 to nintedanib, 64 to placebo). PFS was significantly inferior with nintedanib (median 14.4 versus 16.8 months with placebo; hazard ratio 1.50, p = 0.02). Overall survival (OS) was also inferior (median 37.7 versus 44.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio 1.54, p = 0.054). Nintedanib was associated with increased toxicity (grade 3/4 adverse events: 92% versus 69%, predominantly hematologic and gastrointestinal), lower response rate by RECIST (35% versus 56% before IDS), and lower IDS feasibility (58% versus 77%) versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS Adding nintedanib to chemotherapy and in maintenance as part of NACT for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer cannot be recommended as it increases toxicity and compromises chemotherapy efficacy (IDS, PFS, OS). CLINICALTRIALS govregistration: NCT01583322.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwénaël Ferron
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
| | | | | | - Nicolas Delanoy
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), APHP. Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
| | - Florence Joly
- Centre François Baclesse, Oncologie Médicale, Unicaen, Caen, France.
| | - Alain Lortholary
- Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France.
| | - Benoît You
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, EA3738 Centre pour l'Innovation en Cancérologie de LYon (CICLY), Lyon, France; GINECO-GINEGEPS, Paris, France.
| | - Patrick Bouchaert
- Hôpital de la Milétrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Pôle Régional de Cancérologie, Service d'Oncologie, Poitiers, France.
| | - Emmanuelle Malaurie
- Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Oncologie Radiothérapie, Créteil, France.
| | - Sebastien Gouy
- Gustave Roussy, Gynécologie Médicale, Villejuif, France.
| | | | - Jérôme Meunier
- Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, Service Oncologie Médicale, Orléans, France.
| | - Jérôme Alexandre
- Université de Paris Cité, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin Port Royal, Paris, France.
| | - Dominique Berton
- ICO Centre René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod, Saint Herblain, France.
| | - Nadine Dohollou
- Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord, Oncologie Radiothérapie, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Coraline Dubot
- Hôpital René Huguenin, Institut Curie, Oncologie Médicale, Saint Cloud, France.
| | | | - Laure Favier
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, Oncologie Médicale, Dijon, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Christophe Desauw
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille - Hôpital Huriez, Lille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Justine Gantzer
- ICANS, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg-Europe, Strasbourg, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Helissey C, Cavallero S, Guitard N, Thery H, Parnot C, Schernberg A, Mondot S, Christopoulos C, Malek K, Malaurie E, Chargari C, Francois S. Urinary proteome as a prognostic factor in the deterioration of the quality of life of patients with localized prostate cancer during radiotherapy: Radiotoxicity Bladder Biomarkers (RABBIO) prospective trial. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
344 Background: Despite improvements in radiation techniques, pelvic radiotherapy is responsible for acute and delayed bladder adverse events, defined as radiation cystitis (CysR). About 50% of irradiated patients present acute symptoms and experience a significant decrease in their quality of life (QOL). The pathophysiology of CysR is not well understood, which limits our ability to study this process and develop treatments. The RABBIO study evaluates the correlation of urinary biomarkers with the intensity of acute CysR and the QOL of patients, assessed with the digital telemonitoring platform Cureety. Methods: Patients with intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer eligible for localized radiotherapy were included. Urinary biomarkers were analyzed before the start of radiotherapy, and at weeks (W) 4, 12 and 48 of irradiation. Between sample collection visits, patients completed various questionnaires related to radiation cystitis symptoms and QOL using a digital remote monitoring platform. Upon receipt of the questionnaires, an algorithm processed the information and classify patients according to the severity of symptoms and adverse events reported according to CTCAE. We also collected FACT-P questionnaires at baseline, W4 and W12. We correlated the levels of urinary biomarkers with the severity of acute CysR symptoms and patient-reported QOL. Results: The study started in March 2022, with 15 patients included to date. The median age was 76 (range 65-99). 80% (15/17) presented a localized prostate cancer de novo and 20% presented a biochemical recurrence. The compliance was 100% at baseline, 93% at W4 and 100% at W12. We collected a total of 172 AE questionnaires over the duration of the study so far, of which 61.0% (105/172) indicated a correct health status and 31.4% (54/172) a compromised status. The mean (range) FACT-P score at baseline for all patients was 33.9 (24 – 40), which changed to 29.8 (20 – 35) at W4, and 38.7 (37 – 42) at W12. Elevated SHBG (p=0.019, r=-0.93) and decreased IL8 (p=0.034, r=0.91) at baseline correlated with worse FACT-P score at W4. Conclusions: This prospective study is the first to explore the overexpression of inflammatory proteins in fluid biopsies from patients with symptoms of acute CysR. Our first results revealed that an elevated SHBG and a decreased IL8 in urine at baseline were a prognostic factor in the deterioration of QOL for localized prostate cancer patients during radiotherapy. The results of this study will allow us to develop strategies to limit radiation damage to the bladder and improve the QOL of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05246774 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Helissey
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, HIA Bégin, Saint-Mandé, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Cavallero
- Department of Radiation Biological Effects, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-Sur-Orge, France
| | - Nathalie Guitard
- French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute- IRBA, Bretigny, France
| | - Hélène Thery
- French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute- IRBA, Bretigny, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Karim Malek
- Le-Raincy Montfermeil General Hospital, Montfermeil, France
| | | | - Cyrus Chargari
- French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute- IRBA, Bretigny, France
| | - Sabine Francois
- Department of Radiation Biological Effects, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-Sur-Orge, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Racadot S, Thennevet I, Ouldbey Y, Kaminsky MC, Bosset M, Martin L, Tao Y, Sire C, de Raucourt D, Alfonsi M, Malaurie E, Tourani JM, Fournel P, Vauleon E, Modesto A, Rolland F, Metzger S, Pommier P, Chabaud S, Dussart S. Afatinib maintenance therapy following post-operative radiochemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Results from the phase III randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study BIB2992ORL (GORTEC 2010-02). Eur J Cancer 2023; 178:114-127. [PMID: 36434888 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated the efficacy and safety of afatinib maintenance therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with macroscopically complete resection and adjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT). METHODS This French multicentric randomised phase III double-blind placebo-controlled study included adult patients with ECOG-PS≤2, normal haematological, hepatic and renal functions, and non-metastatic, histologically confirmed HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx, with macroscopically complete resection and adjuvant RCT (≥2 cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 J1, J22, J43 and 66Gy (2Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week, conventional or intensity modulated radiotherapy ≥60Gy). Randomised patients were planned to receive either afatinib (afa arm) or placebo (control arm (C)) as maintenance therapy for one year. Primary endpoint was disease free survival (DFS). A 15% improvement in DFS was expected at 2 years with afatinib (from 55 to 70%). RESULTS Among the 167 patients with resected HNSCC included in 19 cancer centres and hospitals from Dec 2011, 134 patients were randomised to receive one-year maintenance afatinib or placebo (afa:67; C:67). Benefit/risk ratio was below assumptions and independent advisory committee recommended to stop the study in Feb 2017, the sponsor decided premature study discontinuation, with a 2-year follow-up for the last randomised patient. 2y-DFS was 61% (95% CI 0.48-0.72) in the afatinib group and 64% (95% CI 0.51-0.74) in the placebo group (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.70-1.80). CONCLUSION Maintenance therapy with afatinib compared with placebo following post-operative RCT in patients with HNSCC did not significantly improve 2y-DFS and should not be recommended in this setting outside clinical trials. CLINICALTRIALS gov identifier NCT01427478.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séverine Racadot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France.
| | | | - Yaelle Ouldbey
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | | - Mathieu Bosset
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre de radiothérapie Marie Curie, Hopital privé Drôme Ardèche, Valence, France
| | - Laurent Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Guillaume le Conquérant, Le Havre, France
| | - Yungan Tao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Christian Sire
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud, Hôpital du Scorff, Lorient, France
| | | | - Marc Alfonsi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - Emmanuelle Malaurie
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Créteil, France
| | | | - Pierre Fournel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Elodie Vauleon
- Department of Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Anouchka Modesto
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Claudius Régaud, Toulouse Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Frédéric Rolland
- Department of Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Séverine Metzger
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Pascal Pommier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Dussart
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berton D, Floquet A, Lescaut W, Baron G, Kaminsky MC, Toussaint P, Largillier R, Savoye AM, Alexandre J, Delbaldo C, Malaurie E, Barletta H, Bosacki C, Garnier-Tixidre C, Follana P, Laharie-Mineur H, Briac Levache C, Valenza B, Dechartres A, Mollon-Grange D, Selle F. Real-World Experience of Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment for Ovarian Cancer: The GINECO ENCOURAGE Cohort of 468 French Patients. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:711813. [PMID: 34616296 PMCID: PMC8489574 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.711813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Bevacizumab-containing therapy is considered a standard-of-care front-line option for stage IIIB–IV ovarian cancer based on results of randomized phase 3 trials. The multicenter non-interventional ENCOURAGE prospective cohort study assessed treatment administration and outcomes in the French real-world setting. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years with planned bevacizumab-containing therapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. The primary objective was to assess the safety profile of front-line bevacizumab in routine clinical practice; secondary objectives were to describe patient characteristics, indications/contraindications for bevacizumab, treatment regimens and co-medications, follow-up and monitoring, progression-free survival, and treatment at recurrence. In this non-interventional study, treatment was administered as chosen by the investigator and participation in the trial had no influence on the management of the disease. Results: Of 1,290 patients screened between April 2013 and February 2015, 468 were eligible. Most patients (86%) received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or equivalent, typically with carboplatin (99%) and paclitaxel (98%). The median duration of bevacizumab was 12.2 (range 0–28, interquartile range 6.9–14.9) months; 8% of patients discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicity. The most common adverse events were hypertension (38% of patients), fatigue (35%), and bleeding (32%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Most physicians (90%) reported blood pressure measurement immediately before each bevacizumab infusion and almost all (97%) reported monitoring for proteinuria before each bevacizumab infusion. Median progression-free survival was 17.4 (95% CI, 16.4–19.1) months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI, 58–67%). The most commonly administered chemotherapies at recurrence were carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Discussion: Clinical outcomes and tolerability with bevacizumab in this real-life setting are consistent with randomized trial results, notwithstanding differences in the treated patient population and treatment schedule. Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01832415.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gabriel Baron
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Centre d'Épidémiologie Clinique, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Claire Bosacki
- Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Bruno Valenza
- Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Fréjus, Saint-Raphaël, France
| | - Agnès Dechartres
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | | | - Frédéric Selle
- Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Falandry C, Rousseau F, Mouret-Reynier MA, Tinquaut F, Lorusso D, Herrstedt J, Savoye AM, Stefani L, Bourbouloux E, Sverdlin R, D'Hondt V, Lortholary A, Brachet PE, Zannetti A, Malaurie E, Venat-Bouvet L, Trédan O, Mourey L, Pujade-Lauraine E, Freyer G. Efficacy and Safety of First-line Single-Agent Carboplatin vs Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel for Vulnerable Older Adult Women With Ovarian Cancer: A GINECO/GCIG Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:853-861. [PMID: 33885718 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Single-agent carboplatin is often proposed instead of a conventional carboplatin-paclitaxel doublet in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer. Such an approach could have a detrimental effect on outcomes for these patients. Objective To compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of single-agent carboplatin every 3 weeks, weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or conventional every-3-weeks carboplatin-paclitaxel in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This international, open-label, 3-arm randomized clinical trial screened 447 women 70 years and older with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer by determining their Geriatric Vulnerability Score; 120 patients with a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 3 or higher were stratified by country and surgical outcome. Enrollment took place at 48 academic centers in France, Italy, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and Canada from December 11, 2013, to April 26, 2017. Final analysis database lock April 2019. Data analysis was performed from February 1 to December 31, 2019. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of (1) carboplatin, area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2, every 3 weeks; (2) single-agent carboplatin, AUC 5 mg/mL·min or AUC 6 mg/mL·min, every 3 weeks; or (3) weekly carboplatin, AUC 2 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 60 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was treatment feasibility, defined as the ability to complete 6 chemotherapy cycles without disease progression, premature toxic effects-related treatment discontinuation, or death. Results A total of 120 women were randomized. The mean and median age was 80 (interquartile range, 76-83; range, 70-94) years; 43 (36%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 4 and 13 (11%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 5; 40 (33%) had stage IV disease. During its third meeting, the independent data monitoring committee's recommendation led to the termination of the trial because single-agent carboplatin was associated with significantly worse survival. Six cycles were completed in 26 of 40 (65%), 19 of 40 (48%), and 24 of 40 (60%) patients in the every-3-weeks combination, single-agent carboplatin, and weekly combination groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were less common with the standard every-3-weeks combination (17 of 40 [43%]) than single-agent carboplatin or weekly combination therapy (both 23 of 40 [58%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 patients (2 of 40 [5%] in each combination group). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial shows that compared with every-3-weeks or weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens, single-agent carboplatin was less active with significantly worse survival outcomes in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02001272.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Falandry
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Étude des Cancers de l'Ovaire et du sein (GINECO), Laboratoire CarMEN, INSERM U1060/INRA U1397, Université Lyon 1, INSA de Lyon, and Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | | | | - Fabien Tinquaut
- GINECO and Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer (MITO) and Fondazione Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, and Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jørn Herrstedt
- Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO), Odense University Hospital, Odense, and Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Robert Sverdlin
- GINECO and Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Loïc Mourey
- GINECO and Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Gilles Freyer
- GINECO and Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Blanc-Durand F, Yaniz E, Genestie C, Rouleau E, Berton D, Lortholary A, Dohollou N, Desauw C, Fabbro M, Malaurie E, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Dubot C, Kurtz JE, De Rauglaudre G, Raban N, Abdeddaim C, Ferron G, Kaminsky MC, Llop-Guevara A, Leary A. Evaluation of a RAD51 functional assay in advanced ovarian cancer, a GINECO/GINEGEPS study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5513 Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), defined as BRCA1/2 mutation ( BRCAmut)or high genomic instability, is currently used to identify patients (pts) with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitors. While these genomic tests are useful, they are imperfect: some BRCAm EOC demonstrate primary PARPi resistance and some HR-proficient benefit. Another approach to evaluate HRD is to measure the capacity of tumor cells to recruit nuclear RAD51 foci during S/G2 phase in the presence of double strand DNA damage using multiplexed immunofluorescence (IF) for RAD51, geminin (GMN) and yH2AX. We aimed to describe for the 1st time HRD using this RAD51 functional assay in EOC and correlate RAD51 status to platinum response and BRCAmut. Methods: Tumor samples and clinical data were collected prospectively from pts in the randomized CHIVA trial of neoadjuvant platinum chemotherapy +/- nintedanib. IF for RAD51, GMN, and DAPI was performed on a 3uM slide from FFPE blocks, where feasible, yH2AX was positively scored on a consecutive slide. Tumors were considered RAD51-deficient if < 10% of gem+ tumor cells (TC) had > 5 RAD51+ foci. BRCAmut were identified by NGS. Results: 155 baseline chemotherapy naïve EOC samples were available. All were advanced stage (IIIC/IV), 75% were G3, 7% G2, 2% G1, and 16% grade UK. A contributive RAD51 result was obtained for 90% (139/155) of samples. Contributive NGS results were available for 130 samples. Overall, yH2AX scores were high (median % TC+: 86%, IQR: 56%-100%) confirming the presence of significant basal DNA damage in high grade EOC. Only 8 samples were yH2AX-low, including two of the three G1 tumors. In contrast, 55% (76/155) of samples were considered RAD51-deficient (score < 10%). With regard to outcome, pts with RAD51-deficient tumors had significantly higher overall response rates to neoadjuvant platinum (68% vs 37%, p = 0.04) and significantly longer median progression-free survival (HR 0.50, IC95% 0.25-0.98, p = 0.02). Considering BRCA status, 15% of tumors harbored a deleterious BRCAmut and 67% of these were RAD51-deficient. Importantly among BRCAmut EOC, the RAD51-proficient tumors had significantly poorer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR = 17% vs 75%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: We evaluated a novel functional assay of HR functionality in advanced EOC. The assay requires minimal tissue and yields contributive results in 90% of cases. Overall, EOC demonstrate high levels of basal DNA damage, yet 55% fail to recruit RAD51 foci during S/G2 cell cycle phase. These RAD51-deficient EOC have improved outcome after neoadjuvant platinum. Conversely, the RAD51 assay also identified a small subset of RAD51-high BRCAmut tumors with poor platinum response. Whether this RAD51 functional assay may also predict PARP inhibitor benefit is currently being investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisa Yaniz
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Inserm U981, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Dominique Berton
- GINECO & Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Alain Lortholary
- Institut of Cancerology Catherine de Sienne GINECO-Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Coraline Dubot
- GINECO and Institut Curie-Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | | | - Nadia Raban
- GINECO and CHU La Milétrie, Poitiers, France
| | - Cyril Abdeddaim
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer-Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robelin P, Tod M, Colomban O, Lachuer J, Ray-Coquard I, Rauglaudre GD, Joly F, Chevalier-Place A, Combe P, Lortholary A, Hamizi S, Raban N, Ferron G, Meunier J, Berton-Rigaud D, Alexandre J, Kaminsky MC, Dubot C, Leary A, Malaurie E, You B. Comparative analysis of predictive values of the kinetics of 11 circulating miRNAs and of CA125 in ovarian cancer during first line treatment (a GINECO study). Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:256-263. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
10
|
Lecuru F, Pujade-Lauraine E, Hamizi S, Caumont-Prim A, Raban N, Malaurie E, Pautier P, Kaminsky-Forrett MC, Meunier J, Alexandre J, Berton-Rigaud D, Dohollou N, Dubot C, Floquet A, Favier L, Venat-Bouvet L, Fabbro M, Louvet C, Lortholary A, Ferron G. Surrogate endpoint of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients (pts) treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): Results of the CHIVA randomized phase II GINECO study. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz250.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Berton-Rigaud D, Floquet A, Mollon-Grange D, Dechartres A, Lescaut W, Kaminsky-Forrett MC, Tredan O, Largillier R, Savoye A, Alexandre J, Delbaldo C, Malaurie E, Barletta H, Bosacki C, Tixidre CG, Follana P, Laharie-Mineur H, Levaché CB, Pujade-Lauraine E, Selle F. Use of bevacizumab (Bev) in real life for first-line (fl) treatment of ovarian cancer (OC)/ The GINECO ENCOURAGE cohort of 500 French patients. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz250.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
12
|
Robelin P, Tod M, Colomban O, Ray-Coquard I, De Rauglaudre G, Florence J, Chevalier A, combe P, Lortholary A, Hamizi S, Raban N, Ferron G, Meunier J, Berton-Rigaud D, Alexandre J, Kaminsky-Forrett MC, Dubot C, Leary A, Malaurie E, You B. Comparison of 11 circulating miRNAs and CA125 kinetics in ovarian cancer during first line treatment: Data from the randomized CHIVA trial (a GINECO-GCIG study). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz268.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
13
|
Ferron G, De Rauglaudre G, Chevalier A, Combe P, Joly F, Lortholary A, Raban N, Hamizi S, Malaurie E, Kaminsky MC, Pautier P, Meunier J, Alexandre J, Berton-Rigaud D, Floquet A, Venat-Bouvet L, Favier L, Dohollou N, Dubot C, Ray-Coquard IL. Impact of adding nintedanib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients: The CHIVA double-blind randomized phase II GINECO study. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.5512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5512 Background: Nintedanib, an oral inhibitor of VEGF-FGF-PDGF receptors, has been shown to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) when added to adjuvant chemotherapy after primary surgery (duBois A, Lancet Oncol 2015). CHIVA trial explored the role of nintedanib in combination with NACT. Methods: Patients (pts) with FIGO stage IIIC-IV chemotherapy-naive AEOC considered as unresectable after laparoscopic evaluation were randomized (2:1) to be treated with 3 to 4 cycles (cy) of carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) (CP) before interval debulking surgery (IDS) followed by 2 to 3 cy of CP for a total of 6 cy, plus either 200 mg of Nin (armA) or placebo (armB) twice daily on days 2–21 q3week at cy 1&2, 5&6 and maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: Between Jan. 2013 and May 2015, 188 pts were included (124 arm A, 64 arm B) with a median Peritoneal Cancer Index of 22 (range 19-27). Pts characteristics were well balanced between both arms. Median PFS was 14.4 mos (95%CI 12.2-15.4) and 16.8 (13.3-21.4) in arm A and B respectively (HR:1.50, p=0.02). Median OS was 37.7 mos (29.8-41.0) and 44.1 (32.7-not reached) in arm A and B respectively (HR:1.54, p=0.053). Arm A was associated with more toxicity compared to arm B respectively (Grade 3&4 adverse events: 92 versus 71%), with increased early treatment discontinuation before the 3rd cy (14.5 vs 6.2%) & CP dose reduction (12% vs 0%). Pts in Arm A reported inferior RECIST ORR to pre-IDS therapy compared to Arm B (35.1 vs 55.9%). IDS was performed significantly less frequently in arm A (58.1%) vs arm B (76.6%). However among pts who underwent IDS, complete surgical cytoreduction rate (76%) and peri/postoperative complication rate (11.2%) were similar in both arms. Conclusions: The addition of nintedanib to NACT increases toxicity and compromise chemotherapy efficacy leading to a reduced rate of IDS and worse PFS and OS for advanced EOC patient. Clinical trial information: 2011-006288-23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Pierre Combe
- GINECO and Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Nadia Raban
- GINECO and CHU La Milétrie, Poitiers, France
| | - Salima Hamizi
- GINECO and Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | | | | | | | - Jérome Meunier
- GINECO and Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, Orleans, France
| | | | - Dominique Berton-Rigaud
- GINECO and Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | | | - Laure Favier
- GINECO and Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Coraline Dubot
- GINECO and Centre René Huguenin, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Villanueva C, Yazbek G, Beuzeboc P, Viel E, Dohollou N, Luporsi E, Eymard JC, Levy E, Mouret-Reynier MA, Dourthe LM, Malaurie E, Madelenat M, Denden A, Antoine EC. Breast cancer (BC) treatment (tx) with everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) in hormone receptor positive (HR+)/ HER2-negative (HER2−) postmenopausal women: Final analysis of the French observational TANGO study. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy272.325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
15
|
Dubot C, Bourbouloux E, Mir O, Kirscher S, Rigal O, Ferrero JM, Cure H, Blot E, Allouache D, Cottu P, Romieu G, Lefeuvre C, Malaurie E, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Lacroix-Triki M, Rollot F, Peyro-Saint-Paul H, Orsini C, Bonnetain F, Brain E. Abstract OT3-3-02: ASTER 70s UNICANCER phase III trial: Can a genomic prognosticator help tailoring adjuvant systemic treatment for luminal breast carcinoma in elderly women? Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-ot3-3-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) added to hormonal therapy (HT) compared with HT alone remains debated for women >70 with ER+ HER2- breast cancer (BC). Selection of valid indications might be improved by the use of better prognosticator. This trial compares the impact of both strategies on overall survival (OS) according to Genomic Grade (GG).
Following surgery, ∼2,000 patients (Pts) will have a GG performed centrally on FFPE specimens by RT-PCR. Those with a high risk (high or equivocal GG) will be randomized to HT alone vs CT+HT. Pts with a low GG will be followed as an observational cohort.
OS (all deaths) is the primary endpoint. Secondary objectives include competing events, cost-effectiveness and Q-TWiST analysis, geriatric dimension, willingness and health-related quality of life including specific ELD15. Translational research will focus on prognostic biomarkers and pharmacogenetics.
Statistical design: sample size based on 4-year OS benefit favouring CT (87.5 vs 80%; HR 0.60); bilateral test α=0.05, β=0.20; 129 events expected in 700 randomized Pts enrolled over 4 years.
From 04/12-05/14, 67 centres in France and Belgium have included 990 Pts aged 70-92.
Only 31 GG evaluations were not performed (tumour blocks not available, 14; consent withdrawal or central pathology review discordance, 7 each; treatment choice, 3). In the main recruiting site, the study was not proposed to 20% of pre-screened Pts mostly because of team choice (50%) and inclusion criteria (25%). Amongst those informed, 66% accepted to participate. Median time to get GG information was 17 days (11-25) from sending tumour sample to providing the information to patient.
Of 932 cases with GG report, 374 (40%), 187 (20%) and 362 (39%) were low, equivocal and high GG respectively; 9 tests (1%) failed for technical reasons. The proportion of high-risk tumours (high/equivocal GG 59%) is similar to that observed in general BC populations (40% to 60%) and only 21 of high-risk cases were not randomized (consent withdrawal, 6; treatment choice, 5; laboratory values, 4; tumour phenotype not confirmed or distant metastasis, 3 each).
With 75% of target recruitment in < 2 years, we confirm the feasibility of such innovative multicentre program in an usually underserved population. This might help to better select adjuvant strategy in the elderly BC population and to avoid jeopardising any benefit if stymied by uncontrolled side effects.
Citation Format: Coraline Dubot, Emmanuelle Bourbouloux, Olivier Mir, Sylvie Kirscher, Olivier Rigal, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Herve Cure, Emmanuel Blot, Djelila Allouache, Paul Cottu, Gilles Romieu, Claudia Lefeuvre, Emmanuelle Malaurie, Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Florence Rollot, Hélène Peyro-Saint-Paul, Christine Orsini, Franck Bonnetain, Etienne Brain. ASTER 70s UNICANCER phase III trial: Can a genomic prognosticator help tailoring adjuvant systemic treatment for luminal breast carcinoma in elderly women? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-3-02.
Collapse
|
16
|
Rusu T, Ekoume I, Henault S, Malaurie E, Poullain S. PS-067 Peripheral neuropathy induced by oxaliplatin: risk factors. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000639.392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
17
|
Dubot C, Bourbouloux E, Mir O, Kirscher S, Rigal O, Ferrero JM, Curé H, Blot E, Allouache D, Cottu P, Romieu G, Lefeuvre C, Malaurie E, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Lacroix-Triki M, Rollot F, Peyro-Saint-Paul H, Orsini C, Bonnetain F, Brain E. ASTER 70s UNICANCER phase III Trial: Can a genomic prognosticator help tailoring adjuvant systemic treatment for luminal breast carcinoma in elderly women? J Geriatr Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2014.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
18
|
Ferron G, Lesoin A, Ray-Coquard I, Joly Lobbedez F, De Rauglaudre G, Meunier J, Pecuchet N, Lortholary A, Kaminsky-Forrett M, Malaurie E, Hamizi S, Berton-Rigaud D, Louvet C, Alexandre J, Pujade-Lauraine E. Randomized Double Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase Ii Trial of Nintedanib Versus Placebo in Advanced Ovarian Cancer (Oc) Patients Treated with Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy (Nacx) and Interval Debulking Surgery (Ids):The Chiva Trial from Gineco. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu338.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
19
|
Dubot C, Tazi Y, Bourbouloux E, Kirscher S, Rigal O, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Ferrero J, Curé H, Blot E, Allouache D, Romieu G, Cottu P, Malaurie E, Terret C, Lacroix MT, Rollot F, Paul HPS, Orsini C, Bonnetain F, Brain E. Aster 70S Unicancer Phase III Trial : Adjuvant Treatment for Women Over 70 with Luminal Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu327.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
20
|
Dubot C, Bourbouloux E, Tazi Y, Cure H, Ferrero JM, Romieu G, Rigal O, Allouache D, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Kirscher S, Ladoire S, Malaurie E, Blot E, Rollot F, Terret C, Baffert S, Lacroix-Triki M, Falandry C, Poggionovo C, Peyro Saint Paul HP, Orsini C, Latouche A, Bonnetain F, Girre V, Brain E. Abstract OT3-1-10: ASTER 70s (UNICANCER phase III trial): Is personalized adjuvant treatment for women over 70 with luminal breast cancer the way to go? Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-ot3-1-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The question of the additional benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) compared to hormonal therapy alone (HT) for women >70 with ER+ / HER2- breast cancer (BC) and aggressive characteristics is still unsolved. This trial compares the impact of both strategies on overall survival (OS).
Trial design
Following surgery, ∼2,000 patients will have a Genomic Grade (GG) centrally performed on FFPE specimens. Those with a high or equivocal GG will be randomized HT alone vs HT+CT. Patients with low GG will be followed as an observational cohort. The study, on-going in France since April 2012, has been recently activated in Belgium.
Eligibility criteria
Any ER+ HER2- BC after complete surgery, M0, any pT or pN. Normal organ functions. No specific BC treatment before surgery. Contralateral BC, invasive BC after ductal carcinoma in situ and isolated local invasive relapse when adjuvant systemic treatment is considered are all eligible. Multifocal or bilateral are eligible according to focus with worst GG. The G8 screening tool is used as stratification criteria for randomization.
Specific aims
OS (all deaths) is the primary endpoint. Secondary objectives include competing events, cost-effectiveness and Q-TWiST analysis, geriatric dimension, acceptability/willingness and health-related quality of life including specific ELD15. The Lee's 4-year mortality score is calculated. Translational research will focus on prognostic biomarkers and pharmacogenetic, investigating also the impact of treatments on putative ageing biomarkers as CRAMP, stathmin, EF-1α and chitinase and telomeres length.
Statistical methods
Sample size based on 4-year OS (87.5 vs 80%), bilateral test, α = 0.05, β = 0.20 and HR = 0.60.
In total, 129 events are expected, requiring 340 patients/arm. Considering those lost to follow-up, ∼700 patients in total should be included (5 extra patients/year).
Present accrual and target accrual
As of May 2013, 43 centres have included 406 Patients aged 70-88.
Only 14 GG evaluations were not performed for the following reasons: Patients consent withdrawal (n = 3), tumour block not available for the GG test (n = 5), CT not a treatment option anymore (patients or investigator's decision) (n = 2) or tumour status (ER+/HER2-) not confirmed by central review (n = 4). 8 GG evaluations are on-going.
Of 384 cases with GG report, 160 (42%), 151 (39%) and 65 (17%) were respectively GG-1 (low risk), GG-3 (high risk) and GG-EQ (equivocal); 8 (2%) tests failed for technical reasons. The proportion of high GG in the study (53%) is similar to those observed in previous studies in general BC populations (40% to 60%).
Of 216 GG-3/-EQ cases, 4 were not randomized because of distant metastases detected during extensive work-up (n = 3) and Patient refusal of CT treatment before randomization (n = 1). Five randomizations are on-going.
GG determination was obtained in 384 leading to randomization in 207, totalizing so far 30% of the projected recruitment for the primary objective. This confirms the feasibility of such multicentre strategic program with an innovative prognostic signature in the elderly BC population.
Contact information
c-orsini@unicancer.fr.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT3-1-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dubot
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - E Bourbouloux
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - Y Tazi
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - H Cure
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - J-M Ferrero
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - G Romieu
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - O Rigal
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - D Allouache
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - S Abadie-Lacourtoisie
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - S Kirscher
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - S Ladoire
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - E Malaurie
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - E Blot
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - F Rollot
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - C Terret
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - S Baffert
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - M Lacroix-Triki
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - C Falandry
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - C Poggionovo
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - HP Peyro Saint Paul
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - C Orsini
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - A Latouche
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - F Bonnetain
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - V Girre
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - E Brain
- Hôpital René Huguenin / Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; ICO - Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest -site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHI de Créteil, Creteil, France; CH Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France; Centre Saint-Yves, Vannes, France; Institut Curie - Hôpital Claudius Regaud, Paris, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; Qiagen Marseille SA, Marseille, France; UNICANCER, Paris, France; CNAM, Paris, France; CHU Besançon, Besancon, France; CHD de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Racadot S, Mercier M, Dussart S, Dessard-Diana B, Bensadoun RJ, Martin M, Malaurie E, Favrel V, Housset M, Durdux C, Journel C, Calais G, Huet J, Pillet G, Hennequin C, Haddad E, Diana C, Blaska-Jaulerry B, Henry-Amar M, Géhanno P, Baillet F, Mazeron JJ. Randomized clinical trial of post-operative radiotherapy versus concomitant carboplatin and radiotherapy for head and neck cancers with lymph node involvement. Radiother Oncol 2008; 87:164-72. [PMID: 18222010 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2007] [Revised: 12/30/2007] [Accepted: 12/30/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Post-operative radiotherapy is indicated for the treatment of head and neck cancers. In vitro, chemotherapy potentiates the cytotoxic effects of radiation. We report the results of a randomized trial testing post-operative radiotherapy alone versus concomitant carboplatin and radiotherapy for head and neck cancers with lymph node involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study involved patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for head and neck cancers with histological evidence of lymph node involvement. Patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (54-72Gy, 30-40 fractions, 6-8 weeks) or identical treatment plus concomitant Carboplatin (50mg/m(2) administered by IV infusion twice weekly). RESULTS Between February 1994 and June 2002, 144 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 106 months (95% confidence interval (CI) [92-119]), the 2-year rate of loco-regional control was 73% (95% CI: 0.61-0.84) in the combined treatment group and 68% (95% CI: 0.57-0.80) in the radiotherapy group (p=0.26). Overall survival did not differ significantly between groups (hazard ratio for death, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.60; p=0.81). CONCLUSIONS Twice-weekly administration of carboplatin concomitant to post-operative radiotherapy did not improve local control or overall survival rates in this population of patients with node-positive head and neck cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séverine Racadot
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lyon, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vieillefond A, Beuzeboc P, Mignot L, Banu E, Priou F, Malaurie E, Dalivoust P, Muracciole X, Sibony M, Oudard S. HER2 status in urothelial bladder cancer (UC): screening of patients eligible for a phase II randomized study of gemcitabine plus platinum salt with or without trastuzumab. J Clin Oncol 2005. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.4700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. Vieillefond
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - P. Beuzeboc
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - L. Mignot
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - E. Banu
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - F. Priou
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - E. Malaurie
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - P. Dalivoust
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - X. Muracciole
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - M. Sibony
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| | - S. Oudard
- Cochin Hosp, Paris, France; Curie Institute, Paris, France; Foch Hosp, Suresnes, France; Georges Pompidou European Hosp, Paris, France; La Roche sur Yon Hosp, La Roche sur Yon, France; Intercommunal Creteil Hosp, Creteil, France; Ambroise Pare Hosp, Marseille, France; La Timone Hosp, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
du Bois A, Combe M, Rochon J, Jackisch C, Malaurie E, Lueck HJ, Loibl S, Schroeder W, Burges A, Weber B. Epirubicin/paclitaxel/carboplatin (TEC) vs paclitaxel/carboplatin (TC) in first-line treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) FIGO stages IIB–IV. An AGO-GINECO Intergroup phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.5007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. du Bois
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Combe
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - J. Rochon
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - C. Jackisch
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - E. Malaurie
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - H. J. Lueck
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - S. Loibl
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - W. Schroeder
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - A. Burges
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - B. Weber
- Dpt. Gyn & Gyn Oncol, HSK, Wiesbaden, Germany; GINECO, Study Group, France; AGO, Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Germany; University Hospital Dep. Obst. and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Dep. of Gynaecology, Bremen, Germany; Dpt OB/GYN Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We have investigated the AAG and its genetic variants concentrations in plasma samples of 61 patients suffering from different types of cancers. DESIGN AND METHODS The patients were shared out in three groups, breast, lung, and ovary cancers groups. AAG concentration was measured by an immunonephelometric method and the phenotype was determined, after desialylation of plasma by analytical isoelectric focusing. Detection of AAG variants was made by immunoblotting and their proportions were determined by laser densitometry analysis. A population of 74 healthy individuals served as controls. RESULTS The plasma concentrations of AAG in the breast and lung cancer groups were 2.5 times increased, while in the ovary cancer group, the concentrations were 1.6 times increased. AAG concentrations in the cancer population ranged between 0.45 and 2.85 g/L (mean value 1.12 +/- 0.51 g/L). The proportions of the ORM1 and ORM2 variants were similar to those in the healthy population. In breast and lung cancer groups, the relative concentrations of genetic variants were increased more than 2.5 fold, whereas a 1. 6-fold increase was observed in the ovary cancer group. CONCLUSIONS These results show that AAG plasma concentrations are increased in these types of cancers and that changes in the expression of the genetic variants of AAG could also occur according to the type of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Duché
- Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Pharmacologie, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Créteil Cedex, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tourani JM, Pfister C, Berdah JF, Benhammouda A, Salze P, Monnier A, Paule B, Guillet P, Chretien Y, Brewer Y, Di Palma M, Untereiner M, Malaurie E, Tadrist Z, Pavlovitch JM, Hauteville D, Mejean A, Azagury M, Mayeur D, Lucas V, Krakowski I, Larregain-Fournier D, Abourachid H, Andrieu JM, Chastang C. Outpatient treatment with subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon alfa administration in combination with fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a sequential nonrandomized phase II study. Subcutaneous Administration Propeukin Program Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:2505-13. [PMID: 9667271 DOI: 10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We report the results of the Subcutaneous Administration Propeukin Program (SCAPP) II trial of an outpatient treatment in renal cell carcinoma using interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha) administered subcutaneously in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU). The objective of this multicenter trial was to confirm that the combination of IL-2, IFN-alpha, and 5-FU leads to a response rate greater than 20%. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were included in this study. During the induction phase of the treatment, which lasted 10 weeks, IL-2 and IFN-alpha were administered subcutaneously three times a week for 8 weeks at doses of 18 MIU and 9 MIU, respectively. During these 8 weeks, every Monday, 5-FU was administered at a dose of 750 mg by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes. After evaluation, responding patients or patients with stable disease (SD) were given maintenance treatment, until disease progression (PD) or the appearance of unacceptable toxicity. Each maintenance cycle consisted of a 2-week treatment followed by a three-week rest period. During treatment, IL-2 and IFN-alpha were administered subcutaneously three times a week at doses of 18 MIU and 9 MIU, respectively. Every Monday, 5-FU was administered at a dose of 750 mg by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes. RESULTS This trial was closed when the sixth sequential analysis showed the lack of benefit from this combination. At the end of the induction period, of 62 patients, 12 (19%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 31%) reached an objective response, including one complete response (CR), 16 presented with SD, and 27 showed PD. Twenty-seven patients (43%) developed severe toxicity that required reduction of the planned doses (13 patients), delayed treatment (eight patients), or treatment termination (six patients). Seventeen patients were given maintenance treatment. One- and 2-year survival rates were estimated at 55% and 33%, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 15% in 11 patients who presented with three poor-prognosis factors and 41% in 51 patients who initially presented with no, one, or two poor-prognosis factors (P = .04). CONCLUSION As in other recently published studies that used 5-FU, IL-2, and IFN-alpha, the multicenter SCAPP II trial in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma generated severe toxicity. This sequential trial failed to confirm the favorable results previously obtained by Atzpodien and Sella with this combination of three drugs. Its efficacy, assessed on the response and survival rates, is near to the results observed in programs that used IL-2 alone given subcutaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Tourani
- Unité d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Laënnec, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Simon N, Dailly E, Combes O, Malaurie E, Lemaire M, Tillement JP, Urien S. Role of lipoproteins in the plasma binding of SDZ PSC 833, a novel multidrug resistance-reversing cyclosporin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 45:173-5. [PMID: 9491834 PMCID: PMC1873350 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00663.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The plasma binding of the cyclosporin D analogue SDZ PSC 833 was investigated in vitro. METHODS The plasma total binding constant (corresponding to the bound-to-free concentration or binding ratio) was determined at 37 degrees C by the erythrocyte partitioning technique on plasma samples from three healthy volunteers and three cancer patients. Lipoproteins were also removed from plasma samples from three healthy volunteers by a standard ultracentrifugal technique. RESULTS SDZ PSC 833 plasma binding was 97.8 +/- 1.1% and 97.3 +/- 0.2% in samples from three healthy volunteers and three cancer patients respectively. More than 95% of blood SDZ PSC 833 was distributed in plasma. When the original plasma samples of three individuals were delipidated, SDZ PSC 833 binding was strongly decreased (58% bound to plasma proteins) and when lipoproteins were resuspended in the delipidated plasma samples to produce varying lipoprotein plasma concentrations, the binding increased continuously with the fraction of added lipoproteins. When lipoproteins were resuspended to restore the original lipoprotein plasma content, the % plasma-bound SDZ PSC 833 increased to 98.2%, close to the value observed with the original plasma (98.7%). CONCLUSIONS These results clearly indicate that SDZ PSC 833 plasma binding is mainly determined by lipoproteins and that in blood, most of SDZ PSC 833 is distributed in plasma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Simon
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris XII, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Khayat D, Borel C, Azab M, Paraisot D, Malaurie E, Bouloux C, Weil M. Phase I study of Datelliptium chloride, hydrochloride given by 24-h continuous intravenous infusion. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 30:226-8. [PMID: 1628372 DOI: 10.1007/bf00686318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Datelliptium chloride, hydrochloride (SR 95 156B, NSC 626718X, DHE) was studied in a phase I trial of escalating doses given on a single 24-h continuous intravenous infusion schedule. Doses were escalated from 40 to 500 mg/m2 in 19 patients who received a total of 24 courses. Courses were repeated after a minimal interval of 3 weeks. Local venous toxicity occurred at low doses (less than or equal to 100 mg/m2) and was circumvented by the use of a central venous access for higher doses. Other clinical adverse events occurred (greater than or equal to 330 mg/m2), including moderate nausea and vomiting, mild diarrhea, dry mouth, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and fatigue. All of these side effects were reversible and none was dose-limiting. The dose-limiting toxicity was related to hepatic laboratory-test abnormalities in the form of reversible elevations of levels of serum bilirubin and liver enzymes at doses of greater than or equal to 330 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose for this schedule is 500 mg/m2. Hematologic toxicity was minimal and non-dose-limiting. Neither drug-related deaths nor objective complete or partial responses were observed. However, a minor response and a long-term disease stabilization were obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Khayat
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|