1
|
Alturkistani A, Beaney T, Greenfield G, Costelloe CE. Patient portal registration and healthcare utilisation in general practices in England: a longitudinal cohort study. BJGP Open 2024:BJGPO.2023.0106. [PMID: 38128967 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2023.0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient portals introduced in most of England's general practices since 2015 have the potential to improve healthcare efficiency. There is a paucity of information on the use of patient portals within the NHS general practices and the potential impact on healthcare utilisation. AIM To investigate the association between patient portal registration and care utilisation (measured by the number of general practice consultations) among general practice patients. DESIGN & SETTING A longitudinal analysis using electronic health record data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). METHOD We analysed patients registered for patient portals (n = 284 666), aggregating their consultations 1 year before and 1 year after registration. We ran a multilevel negative binomial regression model to examine patient portal registration's association with face-to-face and remote consultations. RESULTS Patients who registered to the portal had a small decrease in the total number of face-to-face consultations after registering to the patient portal (incidence rate ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93 to 0.94). Patients who registered to the portal had an increase in the total number of remote consultations after registering to the portal (incidence rate ratio = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.18). CONCLUSION The study found minor changes in consultation numbers post-patient portal registration, notably with an increase in remote consultations. While causality between portal registration and consultation number remains unclear, the potential link between patient portal use and healthcare utilisation warrants further investigation, especially within the NHS, where portal impacts are not well-studied. Detailed portal utilisation data could clarify this relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrar Alturkistani
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Global Digital Health Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Beaney
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ceire E Costelloe
- Health Informatics, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lammila-Escalera E, Greenfield G, Pan Z, Nicholls D, Majeed A, Hayhoe BW. A systematic review of interventions to improve medication adherence in adults with mental-physical multimorbidity in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2024:BJGP.2023.0406. [PMID: 38429109 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication non-adherence is a significant contributor to healthcare inefficiency, resulting in poor medication management, impaired patient outcomes and ineffective symptom control. This review summarises interventions targeting medication adherence for adults with mental-physical multimorbidity, in primary healthcare settings. METHODS A systematic review of literature was conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched for relevant studies. Data were extracted and synthesized using narrative synthesis. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) was used to classify intervention types. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) quality assessment tool. RESULTS Eleven studies representing 2,279 patients were included. All interventions examined were classified into one EPOC domain, which was delivery arrangements. All included studies examined patients with a physical condition, alongside depression. Seven studies examining coordination of care and management of care processes interventions reported significant improvements in medication adherence attributed to the intervention. Four studies considering the use of information and communication technology observed no changes in medication adherence. CONCLUSION Interventions that coordinate and manage healthcare processes may help improve how patients adhere to their medication regimes, particularly in patients with mental-physical multimorbidity. However, we still need to better understand how digital health technology can support patients in following their medication regimes. As we face the growing challenges of treating multimorbidity, everyone involved in health services - from providers to policymakers - must be receptive to a more integrated approach to the delivery of healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ziyang Pan
- Imperial College London, Primary Care and Public Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dasha Nicholls
- Imperial College London, Department of Brain Sciences, London, United Kingdom
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Imperial College London, Primary Care and Public Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benedict Wj Hayhoe
- Imperial College London School of Public Health, Primary Care and Public Health, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cicek M, Greenfield G, Nicholls D, Majeed A, Hayhoe B. Predictors of unplanned emergency hospital admissions among patients aged 65+ with multimorbidity and depression in Northwest London during and after the Covid-19 lockdown in England. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0294639. [PMID: 38394234 PMCID: PMC10890757 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Individuals with multimorbidity have an increased likelihood of using unplanned secondary care including emergency department visits and emergency hospitalisations. Those with mental health comorbidities are affected to a greater extent. The Covid-19 pandemic has negatively impacted on psychosocial wellbeing and multimorbidity care, especially among vulnerable older individuals. AIM To examine the risk of unplanned hospital admissions among patients aged 65+ with multimorbidity and depression in Northwest London, England, during- and post-Covid-19 lockdown. METHODS Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis with the Discover-NOW database for Northwest London was conducted. The overall sample consisted of 20,165 registered patients aged 65+ with depression. Two time periods were compared to observe the impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on emergency hospital admissions between 23rd March 2020 to 21st June 2021 (period 1) and equivalent-length post-lockdown period from 22nd June 2021 to 19th September 2022 (period 2). Multivariate logistic regression was conducted on having at least one emergency hospital admission in each period against sociodemographic and multimorbidity-related characteristics. RESULTS The odds of having an emergency hospitalisation were greater in men than women (OR = 1.19 (lockdown); OR = 1.29 (post-lockdown)), and significantly increased with age, higher deprivation, and greater number of comorbidities in both periods across the majority of categories. There was an inconclusive pattern with ethnicity; with a statistically significant protective effect among Asian (OR = 0.66) and Black ethnicities (OR = 0.67) compared to White patients during post-lockdown period only. CONCLUSION The likelihood of unplanned hospitalisation was higher in men than women, and significantly increased with age, higher deprivation, and comorbidities. Despite modest increases in magnitude of risk between lockdown and post-lockdown periods, there is evidence to support proactive case-review by multi-disciplinary teams to avoid unplanned admissions, particularly men with multimorbidity and comorbid depression, patients with higher number of comorbidities and greater deprivation. Further work is needed to determine admission reasons, multimorbidity patterns, and other clinical and lifestyle predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meryem Cicek
- Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London (ARC NWL), Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London (ARC NWL), Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dasha Nicholls
- Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London (ARC NWL), Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London (ARC NWL), Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London (ARC NWL), Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wasan T, Hayhoe B, Cicek M, Lammila-Escalera E, Nicholls D, Majeed A, Greenfield G. The effects of community interventions on unplanned healthcare use in patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review. J R Soc Med 2024; 117:24-35. [PMID: 37449474 PMCID: PMC10858714 DOI: 10.1177/01410768231186224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarise the impact of community-based interventions for multimorbid patients on unplanned healthcare use. The prevalence of multimorbidity (co-existence of multiple chronic conditions) is rapidly increasing and affects one-third of the global population. Patients with multimorbidity have complex healthcare needs and greater unplanned healthcare usage. Community-based interventions allow for continued care of patients outside hospitals, but few studies have explored the effects of these interventions on unplanned healthcare usage. DESIGN A systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Cochrane Library online databases were searched. Studies were screened and underwent risk of bias assessment. Data were synthesised using narrative synthesis. SETTING Community-based interventions. PARTICIPANTS Patients with multimorbidity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Unplanned healthcare usage. RESULTS Thirteen studies, including a total of 6148 participants, were included. All included studies came from high-income settings and had elderly populations. All studies measured emergency department attendances as their primary outcome. Risk of bias was generally low. Most community interventions were multifaceted with emphasis on education, self-monitoring of symptoms and regular follow-ups. Four studies looked at improved care coordination, advance care planning and palliative care. All 13 studies found a decrease in emergency department visits post-intervention with risk reduction ranging from 0 (95% confidencec interval [CI]: -0.37 to 0.37) to 0.735 (95% CI: 0.688-0.785). CONCLUSIONS Community-based interventions have potential to reduce emergency department visits in patients with multimorbidity. Identification of specific successful components of interventions was challenging given the overlaps between interventions. Policymakers should recognise the importance of community interventions and aim to integrate aspects of these into existing healthcare structures. Future research should investigate the impact of such interventions with broader participant characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tavleen Wasan
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Meryem Cicek
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Elena Lammila-Escalera
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Dasha Nicholls
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porras-Segovia A, Pascual-Sanchez A, Greenfield G, Creese HM, Saxena S, Hargreaves D, Nicholls D. Early Risk Factors for Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviours: A UK Population-Based Study of 219,581 People. Behav Sci (Basel) 2023; 14:16. [PMID: 38247668 PMCID: PMC10812924 DOI: 10.3390/bs14010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Mental disorders are a major problem among young people. To identify early risk factors of self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITB) among young adults with mental health problems, this case-control study drew data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a primary care database covering 8% of the UK population. We explored the role of early factors (presenting at 8-14 years old) for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in young adulthood (age 18-25 years) by performing logistic regressions. Our sample consisted of 219,581 participants, of which 6.51% had at least one SITB in young adulthood. Early risk factors for SITB included early NSSI, suicidal ideation, sexual abuse, behavioural problems, and mood and psychotic symptoms. Frequency of GP visits had a protective effect. Lack of access to mortality data, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status was a limitation of the current study. In conclusion, early symptoms in late childhood/early adolescence can be the start of long-standing problems going into adult life. The training of primary care providers in suicide risk assessment and proper co-ordination with child and adolescent mental health services are crucial for suicide prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Porras-Segovia
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London W12 7T, UK
- Health Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Pascual-Sanchez
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London W12 7T, UK
- CAMHS Enhanced Treatment Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK (H.-M.C.)
| | - Hanna-Marie Creese
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK (H.-M.C.)
| | - Sonia Saxena
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK (H.-M.C.)
| | - Dougal Hargreaves
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK
| | - Dasha Nicholls
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London W12 7T, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kerr G, Greenfield G, Hayhoe B, Gaughran F, Halvorsrud K, Pinto da Costa M, Rehill N, Raine R, Majeed A, Costelloe C, Neves AL, Beaney T. Attendance at remote versus in-person outpatient appointments in an NHS Trust. J Telemed Telecare 2023:1357633X231216501. [PMID: 38128925 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x231216501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the growing use of remote appointments within the National Health Service, there is a need to understand potential barriers of access to care for some patients. In this observational study, we examined missed appointments rates, comparing remote and in-person appointments among different patient groups. METHODS We analysed adult outpatient appointments at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust in Northwest London in 2021. Rates of missed appointments per patient were compared between remote versus in-person appointments using negative binomial regression models. Models were stratified by appointment type (first or a follow-up). RESULTS There were 874,659 outpatient appointments for 189,882 patients, 29.5% of whom missed at least one appointment. Missed rates were 12.5% for remote first appointments and 9.2% for in-person first appointments. Remote and in-person follow-up appointments were missed at similar rates (10.4% and 10.7%, respectively). For remote and in-person appointments, younger patients, residents of more deprived areas, and patients of Black, Mixed and 'other' ethnicities missed more appointments. Male patients missed more in-person appointments, particularly at younger ages, but gender differences were minimal for remote appointments. Patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) missed more first appointments, whether in-person or remote. In follow-up appointments, patients with LTCs missed more in-person appointments but fewer remote appointments. DISCUSSION Remote first appointments were missed more often than in-person first appointments, follow-up appointments had similar attendance rates for both modalities. Sociodemographic differences in outpatient appointment attendance were largely similar between in-person and remote appointments, indicating no widening of inequalities in attendance due to appointment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Kerr
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - Fiona Gaughran
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Mariana Pinto da Costa
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London, London, UK
| | | | - Rosalind Raine
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames, London, UK
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - Ceire Costelloe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Ana Luisa Neves
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Beaney
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carvalho JM, Li E, Hayhoe B, Beaney T, Majeed A, Greenfield G, Neves AL. Validating a framework to guide the implementation of high-quality virtual primary care: an international eDelphi study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e080565. [PMID: 38040428 PMCID: PMC10693863 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an urgent need to support primary care organisations in implementing safe and high-quality virtual consultations. We have previously performed qualitative research to capture the views of 1600 primary care physicians across 20 countries on the main benefits and challenges of using virtual consultations. Subsequently, a prototype of a framework to guide the implementation of high-quality virtual primary care was developed. AIM To explore general practitioners' perspectives on the appropriateness and relevance of each component of the framework's prototype, to further refine it and optimise its practical use in primary care facilities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Participants will be primary care physicians with active experience providing virtual care, recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. This study will use a systematic and iterative online Delphi research approach (eDelphi), with a minimum of three rounds. A pre-round will be used to circulate items for initial feedback and adjustment. In subsequent rounds, participants will be asked to rate the relevance of the framework's components. Consensus will be defined as >70% of participants agreeing/strongly agreeing or disagreeing/strongly disagreeing with a component. Data will be collected using structured online questionnaires. The primary outcome of the study will be a list of the essential components to be incorporated in the final version of the framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received ethical approval conceded by the Imperial College London Science, Engineering and Technology Research Ethics Committee (SETREC) (reference no .6559176/2023). Anonymous results will be made available to the public, academic organisations and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edmond Li
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Beaney
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ana Luísa Neves
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alturkistani A, Greenfield G, Beaney T, Norton J, Costelloe CE. Cross-sectional analyses of online appointment booking and repeat prescription ordering user characteristics in general practices of England in the years 2018-2020. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068627. [PMID: 37827735 PMCID: PMC10583059 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the characteristics of the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) respondents using the different functionalities of the online services in the context of England's National Health Service General Practices. We hypothesised that respondents who are older, with lower socioeconomic status and non-white ethnicity would be less likely to use online services, while long-term conditions might increase their usage. DESIGN Cross-sectional study using respondent-level data from the GPPS in England of the years 2018, 2019 and 2020. We assessed the association between online services use and respondent characteristics using two-level mixed-effects logistic regression. PARTICIPANTS Survey respondents of the GPPS 2018-2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Online appointment booking and online repeat prescription ordering. RESULTS 1 807 049 survey respondents were included in this study. 15% (n=263 938) used online appointment booking in the previous 12 months, and 19% (n=339 449) had ordered a repeat prescription in the previous 12 months. Respondents with a long-term condition, on regular multiple medications, who have deafness or hearing loss and who are from the lowest deprivation quintile were more likely to have used online services. Male respondents (compared with females) and respondents with black and other ethnicity compared with white ethnicity were less likely to use online services. Respondents over 85 years old were less likely to use online appointment booking and online repeat prescription ordering compared with the younger age groups. CONCLUSIONS Specific groups of respondents were more likely to use online services such as patients with long-term conditions or those with deafness or hearing loss. While online services could provide efficiency to patients and practices it is essential that alternatives continue to be provided to those that cannot use or choose not to use online services. Understanding the different patients' needs could inform solutions to increase the uptake and use of the services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrar Alturkistani
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Beaney
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - John Norton
- Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, National Institute for Health Research, London, UK
| | - Ceire E Costelloe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Campbell K, Greenfield G, Li E, O'Brien N, Hayhoe B, Beaney T, Majeed A, Neves AL. The Impact of Virtual Consultations on the Quality of Primary Care: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e48920. [PMID: 37647117 PMCID: PMC10500356 DOI: 10.2196/48920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adoption of virtual consultations, catalyzed by the COVID-19 pandemic, has transformed the delivery of primary care services. Owing to their rapid global proliferation, there is a need to comprehensively evaluate the impact of virtual consultations on all aspects of care quality. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the impact of virtual consultations on the quality of primary care. METHODS A total of 6 databases were searched. Studies that evaluated the impact of virtual consultations, for any disease, were included. Title and abstract screening and full-text screening were performed by 2 pairs of investigators. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis of the results was performed. RESULTS In total, 30 studies (5,469,333 participants) were included in this review. Our findings suggest that virtual consultations are equally effective to or more effective than face-to-face care for the management of certain conditions, including mental illness, excessive smoking, and alcohol consumption. Overall, 4 studies indicated positive impacts on some aspects of patient-centeredness; however, a negative impact was noted on patients' perceived autonomy support (ie, the degree to which people perceive those in positions of authority to be autonomy supportive). Virtual consultations may reduce waiting times, lower patient costs, and reduce rates of follow-up in secondary and tertiary care settings. Evidence for the impact on clinical safety is extremely limited. Evidence regarding equity was considerably mixed. Overall, it appears that virtual care is more likely to be used by younger, female patients, with disparities among other subgroups depending on contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review demonstrated that virtual consultations may be as effective as face-to-face care and have a potentially positive impact on the efficiency and timeliness of care; however, there is a considerable lack of evidence on the impacts on patient safety, equity, and patient-centeredness, highlighting areas where future research efforts should be devoted. Capitalizing on real-world data, as well as clinical trials, is crucial to ensure that the use of virtual consultations is tailored according to patient needs and is inclusive of the intended end users. Data collection methods that are bespoke to the primary care context and account for patient characteristics are necessary to generate a stronger evidence base to inform future virtual care policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Campbell
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edmond Li
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Niki O'Brien
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Beaney
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Luísa Neves
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barber S, Otis M, Greenfield G, Razzaq N, Solanki D, Norton J, Richardson S, Hayhoe BWJ. Improving Multidisciplinary Team Working to Support Integrated Care for People with Frailty Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Integr Care 2023; 23:23. [PMID: 37303477 PMCID: PMC10253239 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Multidisciplinary team (MDT) working is essential to optimise and integrate services for people who are frail. MDTs require collaboration. Many health and social care professionals have not received formal training in collaborative working. This study investigated MDT training designed to help participants deliver integrated care for frail individuals during the Covid-19 pandemic. Researchers utilised a semi-structured analytical framework to support observations of the training sessions and analyse the results of two surveys designed to assess the training process and its impact on participants knowledge and skills. 115 participants from 5 Primary Care Networks in London attended the training. Trainers utilised a video of a patient pathway, encouraged discussion of it, and demonstrated the use of evidence-based tools for patient needs assessment and care planning. Participants were encouraged to critique the patient pathway, reflect on their own experiences of planning and providing patient care. 38% of participants completed a pre-training survey, 47% a post-training survey. Significant improvement in knowledge and skills were reported including understanding roles in contributing to MDT working, confidence to speak in MDT meetings, using a range of evidence-based clinical tools for comprehensive assessment and care planning. Greater levels of autonomy, resilience, and support for MDT working were reported. Training proved effective; it could be scaled up and adopted to other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Barber
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, UK
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Michaela Otis
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, UK
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Nasrin Razzaq
- Harrow CCG The Heights, Middlesex 59-65 Lowlands Road Harrow HA1 3AW, UK
| | - Deepa Solanki
- Integrated Care Education, Harrow ICP and Training Hub, UK
| | - John Norton
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Sonia Richardson
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Benedict W. J. Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alturkistani A, Greenfield G, Beaney T, Norton J, Costelloe CE. Ethnicity, deprivation, and the use of patient portals in England’s general practices 2018-2020. Eur J Public Health 2022; 32:ckac129.302. [PMCID: PMC9593947 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient portals are made available and widely promoted in healthcare systems in the USA and Europe. These technologies can help patients access healthcare, receive timely treatment, and manage their health through services such as appointment booking and repeat prescription ordering. However, it is not clear if all patients who need the services are using them. This study explored patient portal use (online appointment booking and repeat prescription ordering features) and patient characteristics among NHS England GP practice patients. Methods The study used cross-sectional participant-level data from the GP Patient Survey (GPPS) of 2018, 2019, and 2020. Performing multilevel regression analysis, we explored the association between patient portal feature use and ethnicity and deprivation and controlled for eight other patient characteristics and one GP practice level characteristic, and modelled GP practice as a random effect in the model. Results In the fully adjusted model controlled for all patient characteristics and GP characteristics, participants of the Black and Other ethnic groups were less likely to have used online appointment booking (OR: 0.84, 95% CI:0.81, 0.86, and OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.99, respectively) and online repeat prescription ordering (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.74-0.78 and OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75-0.81, respectively) compared to the White ethnic group. Association with patient portal use increased proportionally with reduced deprivation ranking. Conclusions In NHS England GP practices, certain ethnic minority groups and high deprivation ranking is associated with a reduced likelihood of using patient portals. If patient portals are the only route to access services, it is likely to lead to inequalities in use by some patient groups introducing unfair access to the services. Patients could continue to be provided with alternatives to patient portals to prevent potential inequities in access to services. Key messages • Patient portals are widely used in the healthcare system and can benefit all patients given that disparities are prevented by understanding patient groups who cannot access portals. • Understanding patient groups less likely to use patient portals could help adapt healthcare system services and meet the needs of all patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Alturkistani
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - G Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - T Beaney
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - J Norton
- National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
| | - CE Costelloe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, London, UK
- Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lammila-Escalera E, Greenfield G, Barber S, Nicholls D, Majeed A, Hayhoe BWJ. A Systematic Review of Interventions that Use Multidisciplinary Team Meetings to Manage Multimorbidity in Primary Care. Int J Integr Care 2022; 22:6. [PMID: 36348941 PMCID: PMC9585979 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings could facilitate coordination of care for individuals living with multimorbidity, yet there is limited evidence on their effectiveness. We hence explored the common characteristics of MDT meetings in primary care and assessed the effectiveness of interventions that include such meetings, designed to improve outcomes for adults living with multimorbidity. Methods A systematic review of literature was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE. A narrative synthesis was performed, extracting study and MDT meeting characteristics, in addition to any outcomes reported. Results Four randomised controlled trials that were conducted in the United States of America were identified as eligible, recruiting a total of 3,509 adults living with multimorbidity. Common MDT meeting themes include regular frequency of discussion, the absence of patient involvement and the participation of three or four multiprofessionals. Significant improvements were observed in response to interventions with an MDT component across most measures, yet this trend did not extend to physical health outcomes. Discussion It is unclear if the results in this review are sufficient to support the widespread implementation of MDT meetings in primary care, for adults living with multimorbidity. Due to the paucity of studies collated, further research is required to inform widespread implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susan Barber
- Imperial College London, UK
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Woodcock T, Greenfield G, Lalvani A, Majeed A, Aylin P. Patient outcomes following emergency admission to hospital for COVID-19 compared with influenza: retrospective cohort study. Thorax 2022:thoraxjnl-2021-217858. [PMID: 35896404 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examine differences in posthospitalisation outcomes, and health system resource use, for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 during the UK's first pandemic wave in 2020, and influenza during 2018 and 2019. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used routinely collected primary and secondary care data. Outcomes, measured for 90 days follow-up after discharge were length of stay in hospital, mortality, emergency readmission and primary care activity. RESULTS The study included 5132 patients admitted to hospital as an emergency, with COVID-19 and influenza cohorts comprising 3799 and 1333 patients respectively. Patients in the COVID-19 cohort were more likely to stay in hospital longer than 10 days (OR 3.91, 95% CI 3.14 to 4.65); and more likely to die in hospital (OR 11.85, 95% CI 8.58 to 16.86) and within 90 days of discharge (OR 7.92, 95% CI 6.20 to 10.25). For those who survived, rates of emergency readmission within 90 days were comparable between COVID-19 and influenza cohorts (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.29), while primary care activity was greater among the COVID-19 cohort (incidence rate ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.37). CONCLUSIONS Patients admitted for COVID-19 were more likely to die, more likely to stay in hospital for over 10 days and interact more with primary care after discharge, than patients admitted for influenza. However, readmission rates were similar for both groups. These findings, while situated in the context of the first wave of COVID-19, with the associated pressures on the health system, can inform health service planning for subsequent waves of COVID-19, and show that patients with COVID-19 interact more with healthcare services as well as having poorer outcomes than those with influenza.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Woodcock
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK .,School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.,School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ajit Lalvani
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections, Imperial College London National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.,School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Aylin
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.,School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nachiappan N, Mackinnon S, Ndayizeye JP, Greenfield G, Hargreaves D. Barriers to accessing health care among young people in 30 low‐middle income countries. Health Sci Rep 2022; 5:e733. [PMID: 35873403 PMCID: PMC9297382 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies focusing on high‐income countries have shown that young people often face greater barriers to accessing healthcare than older adults. However, in low‐middle income countries (LMICs), there have been a paucity of cross‐country, quantitative studies highlighting these barriers. Aim This exploratory study aims to provide a scoping review of the publicly available Demographic and Heath Survey (DHS) data with a view to form the basis for further work. Materials and methods Data on insurance coverage, agency, and access to evidence‐based family planning from 30 countries in the DHS were compared between age groups. Data on 586,250 participants 15–24 years (33% male) and 854,660 participants 25–49 years (16% male) from 30 LMICs were analyzed. Results Significantly greater barriers to accessing healthcare were observed across six variables in younger population when compared to older adults across all survey questions with an average of 8.4% point difference. Also, there was wide country‐level variation: the maximum differences between age groups were 33% points; Rwanda was the only country with no age differences. Discussion This study highlights several possible themes for future research into improving access to healthcare for young people. These themes include more detailed evaluation of country‐specific policies to reduced barriers to healthcare for young people and further research into the causative factors that can influence healthcare utilization by young people. Conclusion Our analysis showcases increased barriers to healthcare access for young people in LMICs. We argue that they can only be improved by targeted policies and direct community engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitish Nachiappan
- School of Public Health Imperial College School of Medicine London UK
| | - Shona Mackinnon
- Division of Basic Medical Sciences University of Global Health Equity Kigali Rwanda
| | - Jean P. Ndayizeye
- Division of Basic Medical Sciences University of Global Health Equity Kigali Rwanda
| | - Geva Greenfield
- School of Public Health Imperial College School of Medicine London UK
| | - Dougal Hargreaves
- School of Public Health Imperial College School of Medicine London UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nakubulwa MA, Greenfield G, Pizzo E, Magusin A, Maconochie I, Blair M, Bell D, Majeed A, Sathyamoorthy G, Woodcock T. To what extent do callers follow the advice given by a non-emergency medical helpline (NHS 111): A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267052. [PMID: 35446886 PMCID: PMC9022858 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
National Health Service (NHS) 111 helpline was set up to improve access to urgent care in England, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of first-contact health services. Following trusted, authoritative advice is crucial for improved clinical outcomes. We examine patient and call-related characteristics associated with compliance with advice given in NHS 111 calls. The importance of health interactions that are not face-to-face has recently been highlighted by COVID-19 pandemic. In this retrospective cohort study, NHS 111 call records were linked to urgent and emergency care services data. We analysed data of 3,864,362 calls made between October 2013 and September 2017 relating to 1,964,726 callers across London. A multiple logistic regression was used to investigate associations between compliance with advice given and patient and call characteristics. Caller’s action is ‘compliant with advice given if first subsequent service interaction following contact with NHS 111 is consistent with advice given. We found that most calls were made by women (58%), adults aged 30–59 years (33%) and people in the white ethnic category (36%). The most common advice was for caller to contact their General Practitioner (GP) or other local services (18.2%) with varying times scales. Overall, callers followed advice given in 49% of calls. Compliance with triage advice was more likely in calls for children aged <16 years, women, those from Asian/Asian British ethnicity, and calls made out of hours. The highest compliance was among callers advised to self-care without the need to contact any other healthcare service. This is one of the largest studies to describe pathway adherence following telephone advice and associated clinical and demographic features. These results could inform attempts to improve caller compliance with advice given by NHS 111, and as the NHS moves to more hybrid way of working, the lessons from this study are key to the development of remote healthcare services going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mable Angela Nakubulwa
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Pizzo
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Magusin
- NHS North and East London Commissioning Support Unit, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Maconochie
- Department of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Division of Medicine, St. Mary’s Hospital–Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mitch Blair
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Bell
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ganesh Sathyamoorthy
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Woodcock
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hargreaves D, Mates E, Menon P, Alderman H, Devakumar D, Fawzi W, Greenfield G, Hammoudeh W, He S, Lahiri A, Liu Z, Nguyen PH, Sethi V, Wang H, Neufeld LM, Patton GC. Strategies and interventions for healthy adolescent growth, nutrition, and development. Lancet 2022; 399:198-210. [PMID: 34856192 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01593-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Adolescence is a pivotal point in the life course, characterised by transformative physical, cognitive, and emotional growth, an openness to change, and a drive to reshape the social environment. It offers unique opportunities to adopt changes in diet and physical activity that can persist into later life. Yet pre-existing nutritional problems, including micronutrient deficiencies, food insecurity, and poor-quality diets, persist at the same time as adolescents face the rapid emergence of an obesity epidemic. Adolescent growth and nutrition has been largely overlooked in intervention and policy research. Most intervention studies have emphasised micronutrient supplementation, with few taking into account the multiple drivers of adolescent diets. This Series paper highlights that effective interventions and policies will need to cut across sectors; be supported by multifaceted and multilevel policy; and extend across education, health, food systems, social protection, and digital media. Better data standardisation and systems will be essential in coordinating and monitoring these responses. In a context of shifts in planetary ecosystems and commercial drivers, resilient food systems will need to both ensure access to healthy and affordable foods and provide the infrastructure and incentives for continuing physical activity. Intergenerational partnerships with young people will be essential in bringing about transformative change and ensuring that food policies reflect their needs and aspirations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dougal Hargreaves
- Mohn Centre for Children's Health and Wellbeing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Purnima Menon
- International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Harold Alderman
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Delan Devakumar
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wafai Fawzi
- Departments of Global Health, Epidemiology, and Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Weeam Hammoudeh
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, Birzeit, West Bank, occupied Palestinian territory
| | - Shanshan He
- Youth Nework for the Lancet Standing Commission on Adolescent Health and Wellbeing, Beijing, China
| | | | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | | | | | - Haijun Wang
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | | | - George C Patton
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Greenfield G, Okoli O, Quezada-Yamamoto H, Blair M, Saxena S, Majeed A, Hayhoe B. Characteristics of frequently attending children in hospital emergency departments: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e051409. [PMID: 34663662 PMCID: PMC8523960 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarise the literature on frequent attendances to hospital emergency departments (EDs) and describe sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of children who attend EDs frequently. SETTING Hospital EDs. PARTICIPANTS Children <21 years, attending hospital EDs frequently. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes measures were defined separately in each study, and were predominantly the number of ED attendances per year. RESULTS We included 21 studies representing 6 513 627 children. Between 0.3% and 75% of all paediatric ED users were frequent users. Most studies defined four or more visits per year as a 'frequent ED' usage. Children who were frequent ED users were more likely to be less than 5 years old. In the USA, patients with public insurance were more likely to be frequent attenders. Frequent ED users more likely to be frequent users of primary care and have long-term conditions; the most common diagnoses were infections and gastroenteritis. CONCLUSIONS The review included a wide range of information across various health systems, however, children who were frequent ED users have some universal characteristics in common. Policies to reduce frequent attendance might usefully focus on preschool children and supporting primary care in responding to primary care oriented conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geva Greenfield
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Olivia Okoli
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Harumi Quezada-Yamamoto
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mitch Blair
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Saxena
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Greenfield G, Shmueli L, Harvey A, Quezada-Yamamoto H, Davidovitch N, Pliskin JS, Rawaf S, Majeed A, Hayhoe B. Patient-initiated second medical consultations-patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044033. [PMID: 34561250 PMCID: PMC8475134 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review the characteristics and motivations of patients seeking second opinions, and the impact of such opinions on patient management, satisfaction and cost effectiveness. DATA SOURCES Embase, Medline, PsycINFO and Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) databases. STUDY DESIGN A systematic literature search was performed for terms related to second opinion and patient characteristics. Study quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We included articles focused on patient-initiated second opinions, which provided quantitative data on their impact on diagnosis, treatment, prognosis or patient satisfaction, described the characteristics or motivating factors of patients who initiated a second opinion, or the cost-effectiveness of patient-initiated second opinions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Thirty-three articles were included in the review. 29 studies considered patient characteristics, 19 patient motivating factors, 10 patient satisfaction and 17 clinical agreement between the first and second opinion. Seeking a second opinion was more common in women, middle-age patients, more educated patients; and in people having a chronic condition, with higher income or socioeconomic status or living in central urban areas. Patients seeking a second opinion sought to gain more information or reassurance about their diagnosis or treatment. While many second opinions confirm the original diagnosis or treatment, discrepancies in opinions had a potential major impact on patient outcomes in up to 58% of cases. No studies reported on the cost effectiveness of patient initiated second opinions. CONCLUSIONS This review identified several demographic factors associated with seeking a second opinion, including age, gender, health status, and socioeconomic status. Differences in opinion received, and in the impact of change in opinion, varies significantly between medical specialties. More research is needed to understand the cost effectiveness of second opinions and identify patient groups most likely to benefit from second opinions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geva Greenfield
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, UK
| | - Liora Shmueli
- Department of Management, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Amy Harvey
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, UK
| | - Harumi Quezada-Yamamoto
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, UK
| | - Nadav Davidovitch
- Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Joseph S Pliskin
- Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Salman Rawaf
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Woods JB, Greenfield G, Majeed A, Hayhoe B. Clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of individual mental health workers colocated within primary care practices: a systematic literature review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e042052. [PMID: 33268432 PMCID: PMC7713190 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mental health disorders contribute significantly to the global burden of disease and lead to extensive strain on health systems. The integration of mental health workers into primary care has been proposed as one possible solution, but evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness of this approach is unclear. We reviewed the clinical and cost effectiveness of mental health workers colocated within primary care practices. DESIGN Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES We searched the Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC) and Global Health databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA All quantitative studies published before July 2019 were eligible for the review; participants of any age and gender were included. Studies did not need to report a certain outcome measure or comparator in order to be eligible. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted using a standardised table; however, pooled analysis proved unfeasible. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool and the Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. RESULTS Fifteen studies from four countries were included. Mental health worker integration was associated with mental health benefits to varied populations, including minority groups and those with comorbid chronic diseases. Furthermore, the interventions were correlated with high patient satisfaction and increases in specialist mental health referrals among minority populations. However, there was insufficient evidence to suggest clinical outcomes were significantly different from usual general practitioner care. CONCLUSIONS While there appear to be some benefits associated with mental health worker integration in primary care practices, we found insufficient evidence to conclude that an onsite primary care mental health worker is significantly more clinically or cost effective when compared with usual general practitioner care. There should therefore be an increased emphasis on generating new evidence from clinical trials to better understand the benefits and effectiveness of mental health workers colocated within primary care practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Baptiste Woods
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Primary Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Greenfield G, Blair M, Aylin PP, Saxena S, Majeed A, Bottle A. Characteristics of frequent paediatric users of emergency departments in England: an observational study using routine national data. Emerg Med J 2020; 38:146-150. [PMID: 33199272 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frequent attendances of the same users in emergency departments (ED) can intensify workload pressures and are common among children, yet little is known about the characteristics of paediatric frequent users in EDs. AIM To describe the volume of frequent paediatric attendance in England and the demographics of frequent paediatric ED users in English hospitals. METHOD We analysed the Hospital Episode Statistics dataset for April 2014-March 2017. The study included 2 308 816 children under 16 years old who attended an ED at least once. Children who attended four times or more in 2015/2016 were classified as frequent users. The preceding and subsequent years were used to capture attendances bordering with the current year. We used a mixed effects logistic regression with a random intercept to predict the odds of being a frequent user in children from different sociodemographic groups. RESULTS One in 11 children (9.1%) who attended an ED attended four times or more in a year. Infants had a greater likelihood of being a frequent attender (OR 3.24, 95% CI 3.19 to 3.30 vs 5 to 9 years old). Children from more deprived areas had a greater likelihood of being a frequent attender (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.59 vs least deprived). Boys had a slightly greater likelihood than girls (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.06). Children of Asian and mixed ethnic groups were more likely to be frequent users than those from white ethnic groups, while children from black and 'other' had a lower likelihood (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05; OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06; OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.90; OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.92, respectively). CONCLUSION One in 11 children was a frequent attender. Interventions for reducing paediatric frequent attendance need to target infants and families living in deprived areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mitch Blair
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul P Aylin
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Saxena
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Bottle
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Han SM, Greenfield G, Majeed A, Hayhoe B. Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e23482. [PMID: 33031045 PMCID: PMC7655728 DOI: 10.2196/23482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There has been growing international interest in performing remote consultations in primary care, particularly amidst the current COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, the evidence surrounding the safety of remote consultations is inconclusive. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in remote consultations is an important aspect of patient safety that needs to be addressed. Objective This study aimed to summarize evidence on the impact of remote consultation in primary care with regard to antibiotic prescribing. Methods Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for literature published since the databases’ inception to February 2020. Peer-reviewed studies conducted in primary health care settings were included. All remote consultation types were considered, and studies were required to report any quantitative measure of antibiotic prescribing to be included in this systematic review. Studies were excluded if there were no comparison groups (face-to-face consultations). Results In total, 12 studies were identified. Of these, 4 studies reported higher antibiotic-prescribing rates, 5 studies reported lower antibiotic-prescribing rates, and 3 studies reported similar antibiotic-prescribing rates in remote consultations compared with face-to-face consultations. Guideline-concordant prescribing was not significantly different between remote and face-to-face consultations for patients with sinusitis, but conflicting results were found for patients with acute respiratory infections. Mixed evidence was found for follow-up visit rates after remote and face-to-face consultations. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to confidently conclude that remote consulting has a significant impact on antibiotic prescribing in primary care. However, studies indicating higher prescribing rates in remote consultations than in face-to-face consultations are a concern. Further, well-conducted studies are needed to inform safe and appropriate implementation of remote consulting to ensure that there is no unintended impact on antimicrobial resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Min Han
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Alturkistani A, Qavi A, Anyanwu PE, Greenfield G, Greaves F, Costelloe C. Patient Portal Functionalities and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Diabetes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18976. [PMID: 32960182 PMCID: PMC7539164 DOI: 10.2196/18976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient portal use could help improve the care and health outcomes of patients with diabetes owing to functionalities, such as appointment booking, electronic messaging (e-messaging), and repeat prescription ordering, which enable patient-centered care and improve patient self-management of the disease. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to summarize the evidence regarding patient portal use (portals that are connected to electronic health care records) or patient portal functionality use (eg, appointment booking and e-messaging) and their reported associations with health and health care quality outcomes among adult patients with diabetes. METHODS We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases and reported the review methodology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and two reviewers assessed the full texts of relevant studies and performed data extraction and quality assessments of the included studies. We used the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tool to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Data were summarized through narrative synthesis. RESULTS Twelve studies were included in this review. Five studies reported overall patient portal use and its association with diabetes health and health care quality outcomes. Six studies reported e-messaging or email use-associated outcomes, and two studies reported prescription refill-associated outcomes. The reported health outcomes included the associations of patient portal use with blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and BMI. Few studies reported health care utilization outcomes such as office visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. A limited number of studies reported overall quality of care for patients with diabetes who used patient portals. CONCLUSIONS The included studies mostly reported improved glycemic control outcomes for patients with diabetes who used patient portals. However, limitations of studying the effects of patient portals exist, which do not guarantee whether the outcomes reported are completely the result of patient portal use or if confounding factors exist. Randomized controlled trials and mixed-methods studies could help understand the mechanisms involved in health outcome improvements and patient portal use among patients with diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019141131; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019141131. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/14975.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrar Alturkistani
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ambar Qavi
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Emeka Anyanwu
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Felix Greaves
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ceire Costelloe
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alturkistani A, Greenfield G, Greaves F, Aliabadi S, Jenkins RH, Costelloe C. Patient Portal Functionalities and Uptake: Systematic Review Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e14975. [PMID: 32734928 PMCID: PMC7428936 DOI: 10.2196/14975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient portals are digital health tools adopted by health care organizations. The portals are generally connected to the electronic health record of the health care organization and offer patients functionalities such as access to the medical record, ability to order repeat prescriptions, make appointments, or message the health care provider. Patient portals may be beneficial for both patients and the health care system. Patient portals can widely differ from one context to another due to the differences in the portal functionalities and capabilities and it is anticipated that outcomes associated with the functionalities also differ. Current systematic reviews report outcomes associated with patient portal uptake but do not explicitly specify the patient portal functionalities. Objective The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence on health and health care quality outcomes associated with patient portal use among adult (18 years or older) patients. The review research questions are as follows: What kind of health outcomes do tethered patient portals and patient portal functionalities contribute to in adult patients (18 years or older)? and What kind of health care quality outcomes, including health care utilization outcomes, do tethered patient portals and patient portal functionalities contribute to in adult patients (18 years or older)? Methods The systematic review will be conducted by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases for relevant literature. The review inclusion criteria will be studies about adult patients (18 years or older), studies only about tethered patient portals, and studies with or without a comparator. We will report patient portal–associated health and health care quality outcomes based on the patient portal functionalities. All quantitative primary study types will be included. Risk of bias of included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s quality assessment tools. Data will be synthesized using narrative synthesis and will be reported according to the patient portal functionalities, country, disease, and health care system model. Results Searches will be conducted in September 2019, and the review is anticipated to be completed by the end of June 2020. Conclusions This systematic review will provide an overview of health and health care quality outcomes associated with patient portal use among adult patients, providing detailed information about the functionalities of the portals and their associations with the outcomes. The review could potentially help patient portal evaluation studies by providing insights into outcomes associated with the different functionalities of patient portals. Trial Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019141131; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=141131 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/14975
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrar Alturkistani
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Felix Greaves
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shirin Aliabadi
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosemary H Jenkins
- Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ceire Costelloe
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ruzangi J, Blair M, Cecil E, Greenfield G, Bottle A, Hargreaves DS, Saxena S. Trends in healthcare use in children aged less than 15 years: a population-based cohort study in England from 2007 to 2017. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033761. [PMID: 32371509 PMCID: PMC7228511 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe changing use of primary care in relation to use of urgent care and planned hospital services by children aged less than 15 years in England in the decade following major primary care reforms from 2007 to 2017 DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. METHODS We used linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink to study children's primary care consultations and use of hospital care including emergency department (ED) visits, emergency and elective admissions to hospital and outpatient visits to specialists. RESULTS Between 1 April 2007 and 31 March 2017, there were 7 604 024 general practitioner (GP) consultations, 981 684 ED visits, 287 719 emergency hospital admissions, 2 253 533 outpatient visits and 194 034 elective admissions among 1 484 455 children aged less than 15 years. Age-standardised GP consultation rates fell (-1.0%/year) to 1864 per 1000 child-years in 2017 in all age bands except infants rising by 1%/year to 6722 per 1000/child-years in 2017. ED visit rates increased by 1.6%/year to 369 per 1000 child-years in 2017, with steeper rises of 3.9%/year in infants (780 per 1000 child-years in 2017). Emergency hospital admission rates rose steadily by 3%/year to 86 per 1000 child-years and outpatient visit rates rose to 724 per 1000 child-years in 2017. CONCLUSIONS Over the past decade since National Health Service primary care reforms, GP consultation rates have fallen for all children, except for infants. Children's use of hospital urgent and outpatient care has risen in all ages, especially infants. These changes signify the need for better access and provision of specialist and community-based support for families with young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Ruzangi
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mitch Blair
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Cecil
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Bottle
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Dougal S Hargreaves
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Saxena
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Greenfield G, Blair M, Aylin PP, Saxena S, Majeed A, Hoffman M, Bottle A. Frequent attendances at emergency departments in England. Emerg Med J 2020; 37:597-599. [PMID: 32300044 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A small proportion of patients referred to as 'frequent attenders' account for a large proportion of hospital activity such as ED attendances and admissions. There is a lack of recent, national estimates of the volume of frequent ED attenders. We aimed to estimate the volume and age distribution of frequent ED attenders in English hospitals. METHOD We included all attendances at all major EDs across England in the financial year 2016-2017. Patients who attended three times or more were classified as frequent attenders. We used a logistic regression model to predict the odds of being a frequent attender by age group. RESULTS 14 829 519 attendances were made by 10 062 847 patients who attended at least once. 73.5% of ED attenders attended once and accounted for 49.8% of the total ED attendances. 9.5% of ED attenders attended three times or more; they accounted for 27.1% of the ED attendances. While only 1.2% attended six times or more, their contribution was 7.6% of the total attendances. Infants and adults aged over 80 years were significantly more likely to be frequent attenders than adults aged 30-59 years (OR=2.11, 95% CI 2.09 to 2.13, OR=2.22, 95% CI 2.20 to 2.23, respectively). The likelihood of hospital admission rose steeply with the number of attendances a patient had. CONCLUSION One in 10 patients attending the ED are frequent attenders and account for over a quarter of attendances. Emergency care systems should consider better ways of reorganising health services to meet the needs of patients who attend EDs frequently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mitch Blair
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul P Aylin
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Saxena
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maurice Hoffman
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Northwest London, London, UK
| | - Alex Bottle
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bitan Y, Parmet Y, Greenfield G, Teng S, Cook RI, Nunnally ME. Making Sense of the Cognitive Task of Medication Reconciliation Using a Card Sorting Task. Hum Factors 2019; 61:1315-1325. [PMID: 30912979 PMCID: PMC6820122 DOI: 10.1177/0018720819837037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore cognitive strategies clinicians apply while performing a medication reconciliation task, handling incomplete and conflicting information. BACKGROUND Medication reconciliation is a method clinicians apply to find and resolve inconsistencies in patients' medications and medical conditions lists. The cognitive strategies clinicians use during reconciliation are unclear. Controlled lab experiments can explore how clinicians make sense of uncertain, missing, or conflicting information and therefore support the development of a human performance model. We hypothesize that clinicians apply varied cognitive strategies to handle this task and that profession and experience affect these strategies. METHOD 130 clinicians participated in a tablet-based experiment conducted in a large American teaching hospital. They were asked to simulate medication reconciliation using a card sorting task (CaST) to organize medication and medical condition lists of a specific clinical case. Later on, they were presented with new information and were asked to add it to their arrangements. We quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed the ways clinicians arranged patient information. RESULTS Four distinct cognitive strategies were identified ("Conditions first": n = 76 clinicians, "Medications first": n = 7, "Crossover": n = 17, and "Alternating": n = 10). The strategy clinicians applied was affected by their experience (p = .02) but not by their profession. At the appearance of new information, clinicians moved medication cards more frequently (75.2 movements vs. 49.6 movements, p < .001), suggesting that they match medications to medical conditions. CONCLUSION Clinicians apply various cognitive strategies while reconciling medications and medical conditions. APPLICATION Clinical information systems should support multiple cognitive strategies, allowing flexibility in organizing information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuval Bitan
- Yuval Bitan, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 1 Ben Gurion Blvd., Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel; e-mail:
| | | | | | - Shelly Teng
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shmueli L, Shmueli E, Pliskin JS, Balicer RD, Davidovitch N, Hekselman I, Greenfield G. Second opinion utilization by healthcare insurance type in a mixed private-public healthcare system: a population-based study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025673. [PMID: 31352409 PMCID: PMC6661653 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the utilisation (overall and by specialty) and the characteristics of second-opinion seekers by insurance type (either health fund or supplementary insurance) in a mixed private-public healthcare. DESIGN An observational study. SETTING Secondary care visits provided by a large public health fund and a large supplementary health insurance in Israel. PARTICIPANTS The entire sample included 1 392 907 patients aged 21 years and above who visited at least one specialist over an 18 months period, either in the secondary care or privately via the supplementary insurance. OUTCOMES MEASURES An algorithm was developed to identify potential second-opinion instances in the dataset using visits and claims data. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify characteristics of second-opinion seekers by the type of insurance they used. RESULTS 143 371 (13%) out of 1 080 892 patients who had supplementary insurance sought a single second opinion, mostly from orthopaedic surgeons. Relatively to patients who sought second opinion via the supplementary insurance, second-opinion seekers via the health fund tended to be females (OR=1.2, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.23), of age 40-59 years (OR=1.36, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.42) and with chronic conditions (OR=1.13, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.18). In contrast, second-opinion seekers via the supplementary insurance tended to be native-born and established immigrants (OR=0.79, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.84), in a high socioeconomic level (OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.37 to 0. 4) and living in central areas (OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.9). CONCLUSIONS Certain patient profiles tended to seek second opinions via the supplementary insurance more than others. People from the centre of the country and with a high socioeconomic status tended to do so, as medical specialists tend to reside in central urban areas. Further research is recommended to examine the availability of medical specialists by specialty and residence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liora Shmueli
- Department of Management, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Erez Shmueli
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Joseph S Pliskin
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Ran D Balicer
- Epidemiology, Ben-Gurion University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nadav Davidovitch
- Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Igal Hekselman
- Clalit Mushlam Health Insurance, Bnei Brak, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shmueli L, Davidovitch N, Pliskin JS, Hekselman I, Balicer RD, Greenfield G. Reasons, perceived outcomes and characteristics of second-opinion seekers: are there differences in private vs. public settings? BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:238. [PMID: 31014323 PMCID: PMC6480844 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4067-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In most countries, patients can get a second opinion (SO) through public or private healthcare systems. There is lack of data on SO utilization in private vs. public settings. We aim to evaluate the characteristics of people seeking SOs in private vs. public settings, to evaluate their reasons for seeking a SO from a private physician and to compare the perceived outcomes of SOs given in a private system vs. a public system. Methods A cross-sectional national telephone survey, using representative sample of the general Israeli population (n = 848, response rate = 62%). SO utilization was defined as seeking an additional clinical opinion from a specialist within the same specialty, on the same medical concern. We modeled SO utilization in a public system vs. a private system by patient characteristics using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results 214 of 339 respondents who obtained a SO during the study period, did so in a private practice (63.1%). The main reason for seeking a SO from a private physician rather than a physician in the public system was the assumption that private physicians are more professional (45.7%). However, respondents who obtained a private SO were neither more satisfied from the SO (p = 0.45), nor felt improvement in their perceived clinical outcomes after the SO (p = 0.37). Low self-reported income group, immigrants (immigrated to Israel after 1989) and religious people tended to seek SOs from the public system more than others. Conclusions The main reason for seeking a SO from private physicians was the assumption that they are more professional. However, there were no differences in satisfaction from the SO nor perceived clinical improvement. As most of SOs are sought in the private system, patient misconceptions about the private market superiority may lead to ineffective resource usage and increase inequalities in access to SOs. Ways to improve public services should be considered to reduce health inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liora Shmueli
- Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Nadav Davidovitch
- Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Joseph S Pliskin
- Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Igal Hekselman
- Clalit Mushlam Health Insurance Systems, Clalit Health Services, 1 Ben Gurion, 5120149, Bnei Brak, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ran D Balicer
- Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, 101 Arlozorov, 62098, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St. Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Woringer M, Dharmayat KI, Greenfield G, Bottle A, Ray KK. American Heart Association's Cholesterol CarePlan as a Smartphone-Delivered Web App for Patients Prescribed Cholesterol-Lowering Medication: Protocol for an Observational Feasibility Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e9017. [PMID: 30679150 PMCID: PMC6365873 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.9017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adoption of healthy lifestyle and compliance with cholesterol-lowering medication reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The use of digital tools and mobile technology may be important for sustaining positive behavioral change. Objective The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of administering the Cholesterol CarePlan Web app developed by the American Heart Association aimed at improving lifestyle and medication adherence among patients prescribed cholesterol-lowering medication. The secondary objective is to assess the Web app’s efficacy. Methods A prospective, observational feasibility study will be conducted to demonstrate whether the Web app may be successfully taken up by patients and will be associated with improved clinical and behavioral outcomes. The study will aim to recruit 180 study participants being prescribed cholesterol-lowering medication for at least 30 days across 14 general practices in London, England. Potentially eligible patients will be invited to use the Web app on a smartphone and visit general practice for three 20-minute clinical assessments of blood pressure, height, weight, smoking, and nonfasting cholesterol over 24 weeks. The feasibility of administering the Web app will be judged by recruitment and dropout statistics and the sociodemographic and comorbidity profile of consenting study participants, consenting nonparticipants, and all potentially eligible patients. Acceptability will be assessed using patients’ readiness to embrace new technologies, the usability of the Web app, and patient satisfaction. The efficacy of the Web app will be assessed by changes in medication adherence and clinical risk factors by levels of the Web app compliance. Results This study is currently funded by the American Heart Association. Initial study recruitment will take place between February and July 2018 followed by patient follow-up. Patient level data will be obtained in January 2019. Data analysis will be completed by February 2019. Results will be submitted for publication in March 2019. Conclusions The potential of an app to improve patients’ lifestyle and management of cholesterol may inform the design of a randomized controlled trial and the delivery of more effective CVD prevention programs. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/9017
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Alex Bottle
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
This article provides an analysis of the skills that health professionals and patients employ in reaching diagnosis and decision-making in telemedicine consultations. As governmental priorities continue to emphasize patient involvement in the management of their disease, there is an increasing need to accurately capture the provider–patient interactions in clinical encounters. Drawing on conversation analysis of 10 video-mediated consultations in 3 National Health Service settings in England, this study examines the interaction between patients, General Practitioner (GPs), nurses, and consultants during diagnosis and decision-making, with the aim to identify the range of skills that participants use in the process and capture the interprofessional communication and patient involvement in the diagnosis and decision-making phases of telemedicine consultations. The analysis shows that teleconsultations enhance collaborative working among professionals and enable GPs and nurses to develop their skills and actively participate in diagnosis and decision-making by contributing primary care–specific knowledge to the consultation. However, interprofessional interaction may result in limited patient involvement in decision-making. The findings of this study can be used to inform training programs in telemedicine that focus on the development of effective skills for professionals and the provision of information to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannis Pappas
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Jitka Vseteckova
- Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolas Mastellos
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gurch Randhawa
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lee PA, Greenfield G, Pappas Y. Patients' perception of using telehealth for type 2 diabetes management: a phenomenological study. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:549. [PMID: 30005696 PMCID: PMC6045870 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3353-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing body of evidence that supports the uses of telehealth to monitor and manage people with diabetes at a distance. Despite this, the uptake of telehealth has been low. The objective of this study is to explore patients’ perceptions of using telehealth for type 2 diabetes management. Methods Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 10 patients from the NHS Newham area in London, UK. Data were collected using recorded semi-structured interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and the analysis was guided by the phenomenological analysis approach. Results We identified three main themes for facilitating positive patient experience or acceptance of telehealth and these included: technology consideration, service perceptions and empowerment. All patients asserted that they were pleased with the technology and many also proclaimed that they could not see themselves being without it. Moreover, very few negative views were reported with respect to the use of telehealth. Conclusion The patients’ perceived telehealth as a potential to enhance their quality of life, allow them to live independently at home as well as help them take and be in more control over their own health state. The findings of this study therefore supports the use of telehealth for the routine care of people with type 2 diabetes. However, one must interpret the results with caution due to limitations identified in the sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puikwan A Lee
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yannis Pappas
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lee PA, Greenfield G, Pappas Y. The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:495. [PMID: 29940936 PMCID: PMC6019730 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3274-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing body of evidence to support the use of telehealth in monitoring HbA1c levels in people living with type 2 diabetes. However, the overall magnitude of effect is yet unclear due to variable results reported in existing systematic reviews. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials to create an evidence-base for the effectiveness of telehealth interventions on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods Electronic databases including The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, HMIC, and PsychINFO were searched to identify relevant systematic reviews published between 1990 and April 2016, supplemented by references search from the relevant reviews. Two independent reviewers selected and reviewed the eligible studies. Of the 3279 references retrieved, 4 systematic reviews reporting in total 29 unique studies relevant to our review were included. Both conventional pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were performed. Results Evidence from pooling four systematic reviews found that telehealth interventions produced a small but significant improvement in HbA1c levels compared with usual care (MD: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.73 to − 0.36). The greatest effect was seen in telephone-delivered interventions, followed by Internet blood glucose monitoring system interventions and lastly interventions involving automatic transmission of SMBG using a mobile phone or a telehealth unit. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that telehealth is effective in controlling HbA1c levels in people living with type 2 diabetes. However there is need for better quality primary studies as well as systematic reviews of RCTs in order to confidently conclude on the impact of telehealth on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3274-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puikwan A Lee
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yannis Pappas
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Peters
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Komwong D, Greenfield G, Zaman H, Majeed A, Hayhoe B. Clinical pharmacists in primary care: a safe solution to the workforce crisis? J R Soc Med 2018; 111:120-124. [PMID: 29480743 DOI: 10.1177/0141076818756618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daoroong Komwong
- 1 Department of Pharmacy, 293644 Sirindhorn College of Public Health , Praboromarajchanok Institute of Health Workforce Development, Chon Buri 20000, Thailand
| | - Geva Greenfield
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Hadar Zaman
- 3 School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, 1905 University of Bradford , West Yorkshire BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Rosenberg-Wohl
- 1 Department of Medicine, 12224 University of California, San Francisco , CA 94143, USA
| | - Geva Greenfield
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- 2 Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Blair M, Poots AJ, Lim V, Hiles S, Greenfield G, Crehan C, Kugler B, Boreham C. Preschool children who are frequent attenders in emergency departments: an observational study of associated demographics and clinical characteristics. Arch Dis Child 2018; 103:19-23. [PMID: 28768622 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unscheduled visits to emergency departments (ED) have increased in the UK in recent years. Children who are repeat attenders are relatively understudied. AIMS To describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of preschoolers who attend ED a large District General Hospital. METHOD/STUDY DESIGN Observational study analysing routinely collected ED operational data. Children attending four or more visits per year were considered as 'frequent attenders'. Poisson regression was used with demographic details (age, sex, ethnicity, sociodemographic status) to predict number of attendances seen in the year. We further analysed detailed diagnostic characteristics of a random sample of 10% of attendees. MAIN FINDINGS 10 169 patients visited in the 12-month period with 16 603 attendances. 655 individuals attended on 3335 occasions. 6.4% of this population accounted for 20.1% of total visits. In the 10% sample, there were 304 attendances, and 69 (23%) had an underlying chronic long-standing illness (CLSI). This group were 2.4 times more likely to be admitted as inpatients compared with those without such conditions, median length of stay of 6.2 hours versus 2.5 hours (p=NS). CONCLUSIONS Frequent ED attenders fall broadly into two distinct clinical groups: those who habitually return with self-limiting conditions and those with or without exacerbation of underlying CLSI. Both groups may be amenable to both additional nursing and other forms of community support to enhance self-care and continuity of care. Further research is required to increase our understanding of specific individual family and health system factors that predict repeat attendance in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitch Blair
- Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alan J Poots
- NIHR CLAHRC Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Valencia Lim
- NIHR CLAHRC Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Hiles
- Department of R and D, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- NIHR CLAHRC Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline Crehan
- Department of Paediatrics, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Beverley Kugler
- Department of Paediatrics, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Amati F, Banks C, Greenfield G, Green J. Predictors of outcomes for patients with common mental health disorders receiving psychological therapies in community settings: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf) 2017; 40:e375-e387. [DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- F Amati
- NIHR CLAHRC NWL, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - C Banks
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Training and Education, School of Public Health, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - G Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J Green
- CNWL NHS Foundation Trust, Academic Lead at NIHR CLAHRC NWL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Shmueli L, Davidovitch N, Pliskin JS, Balicer RD, Hekselman I, Greenfield G. Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res 2017; 6:67. [PMID: 29221461 PMCID: PMC5721599 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-017-0191-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Seeking a second-opinion (SO) is a common clinical practice that can optimize treatment and reduce unnecessary procedures and risks. We aim to characterize the composition of the population of SO seekers, their reasons for seeking a SO and choosing a specific physician, and their perceived outcomes following the SO. Methods A cross-sectional national telephone survey, using a representative sample of the general Israeli population (n = 848, response rate = 62%). SO utilization was defined as seeking an additional clinical opinion from a specialist within the same specialty, for the same medical concern. We describe the characteristics of respondents who obtained SOs, their reasons for doing so and their perceived outcomes: (1) Satisfaction with the SO; (2) Experiencing health improvement after receiving a SO; (3) A difference in the diagnosis or treatment suggested in the first opinions and the second opinions; (4) Preference of the SO over the first one. Results Most of the respondents who sought a SO (n = 344) were above 60 years old, secular, living with a partner, perceived their income to be above average and their health status to be not so good. For the patients who utilized SOs, orthopedic surgeons were sought out more than any other medical professional.Reasons for seeking a SO included doubts about diagnosis or treatment (38%), search for a sub-specialty expert (19%) and dissatisfaction with communication (19%). SO seekers most frequently chose a specific specialist based on a recommendation from a friend or a relative (33%). About half of the SO seekers also searched for information on the internet. Most of the respondents who sought a SO mentioned that they were satisfied with it (84%), felt health improvement (77%), mentioned that there was a difference between the diagnosis or treatment between the first opinion and the SO (56%) and preferred the SO over the first one (91%). Conclusions Clinical uncertainty or dissatisfaction with patient-physician communication were the main reasons for seeking a SO. Policy makers should be aware that many patients choose a physician for a SO based on recommendations made outside the medical system. We recommend creating mechanisms that help patients in the complicated process of seeking a SO, suggest specialists who are suitable for the specific medical problem of the patient, and provide tools to reconcile discrepant opinions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13584-017-0191-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liora Shmueli
- Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
| | - Nadav Davidovitch
- Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Joseph S Pliskin
- Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Ran D Balicer
- Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, 101 Arlozorov, 62098, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Igal Hekselman
- Clalit Mushlam Health Insurance Systems, Clalit Health Services, 1 Ben Gurion, 5120149, Bnei Brak, Israel
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St. Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Geva Greenfield
- The Reynolds Building, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Poots AJ, Amati F, Greenfield G, Green J. ISQUA16-1136IMPROVING ACCESS AND OUTCOMES IN COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES. Int J Qual Health Care 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw104.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
- Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kimberley Foley
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Greenfield R, Busink E, Wong CP, Riboli-Sasco E, Greenfield G, Majeed A, Car J, Wark PA. Truck drivers' perceptions on wearable devices and health promotion: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:677. [PMID: 27475984 PMCID: PMC4967500 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3323-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Professional truck drivers, as other shift workers, have been identified as a high-risk group for various health conditions including cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, sleep apnoea and stress. Mobile health technologies can potentially improve the health and wellbeing of people with a sedentary lifestyle such as truck drivers. Yet, only a few studies on health promotion interventions related to mobile health technologies for truck drivers have been conducted. We aimed to explore professional truck drivers’ views on health promotion delivered via mobile health technologies such as wearable devices. Methods We conducted a phenomenological qualitative study, consisting of four semi-structured focus groups with 34 full-time professional truck drivers in the UK. The focus groups were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic content analysis. We discussed drivers’ perceptions of their health, lifestyle and work environment, and their past experience and expectations from mobile health technologies. Results The participants viewed their lifestyle as unhealthy and were aware of possible consequences. They expressed the need and wish to change their lifestyle, yet perceived it as an inherent, unavoidable outcome of their occupation. Current health improvement initiatives were not always aligned with their working conditions. The participants were generally willing to use mobile health technologies such as wearable devices, as a preventive measure to avoid prospect morbidity, particularly cardiovascular diseases. They were ambivalent about privacy and the risk of their employer’s monitoring their clinical data. Conclusions Wearable devices may offer new possibilities for improving the health and wellbeing of truck drivers. Drivers were aware of their unhealthy lifestyle. They were interested in changing their lifestyle and health. Drivers raised concerns regarding being continuously monitored by their employer. Health improvement initiatives should be aligned with the unique working conditions of truck drivers. Future research is needed to examine the impact of wearable devices on improving the health and wellbeing of professional drivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rama Greenfield
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Ellen Busink
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Cybele P Wong
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Eva Riboli-Sasco
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Josip Car
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.,Health Services and Outcomes Research Programme, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Imperial College & Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Petra A Wark
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, The Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Urgent care centres (UCCs) co-located within an emergency department were developed to reduce the numbers of inappropriate emergency department admissions. Since then various UCC models have developed, including a novel general practitioner (GP)-led UCC that incorporates both GPs and emergency nurse practitioners (ENPs). Traditionally these two groups do not work alongside each other within an emergency setting. Although good teamwork is crucial to better patient outcomes, there is little within the literature about the development of a team consisting of different healthcare professionals in a novel healthcare setting. Our aim was therefore to describe staff members' perspectives of team development within the GP-led UCC model. DESIGN Open-ended semistructured interviews, analysed using thematic content analysis. SETTING GP-led urgent care centres in two academic teaching hospitals in London. PARTICIPANTS 15 UCC staff members including six GPs, four ENPs, two receptionists and three managers. RESULTS Overall participants were positive about the interprofessional team that had developed and recognised that this process had taken time. Hierarchy within the UCC setting has diminished with time, although some residual hierarchical beliefs do appear to remain. Staff appreciated interdisciplinary collaboration was likely to improve patient care. Eight key facilitating factors for the team were identified: appointment of leaders, perception of fair workload, education on roles/skill sets and development of these, shared professional understanding, interdisciplinary working, ED collaboration, clinical guidelines and social interactions. CONCLUSIONS A strong interprofessional team has evolved within the GP-led UCCs over time, breaking down traditional professional divides. Future implementation of UCC models should pro-actively incorporate the eight facilitating factors identified from the outset, to enable effective teams to develop more quickly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Morton
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Agnieszka Igantowicz
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shamini Gnani
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wilkinson EL, O’Mahen HA, Fearon P, Halligan S, King DX, Greenfield G, Dunkley-Bent J, Ericksen J, Milgrom J, Ramchandani PG. Adapting and testing a brief intervention to reduce maternal anxiety during pregnancy (ACORN): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:156. [PMID: 27006007 PMCID: PMC4804571 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1274-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND National guidelines in the UK, United States of America, Canada, and Australia have recently stressed the importance of identifying and treating antenatal anxiety and depression. However, there is little research into the most effective and acceptable ways of helping women manage their symptoms of anxiety and stress during pregnancy. Research indicates the necessity to consider the unique needs and concerns of perinatal populations to ensure treatment engagement, highlighting the need to develop specialised treatments which could be integrated within routine antenatal healthcare services. This trial aims to develop a brief intervention for antenatal anxiety, with a focus on embedding the delivery of the treatment within routine antenatal care. METHODS/DESIGN This study is a two-phase feasibility trial. In phase 1 we will develop and pilot a brief intervention for antenatal anxiety, blended with group support, to be led by midwives. This intervention will draw on cognitive behavioural principles and wider learning from existing interventions that have been used to reduce anxiety in expectant mothers. The intervention will then be tested in a pilot randomised controlled trial in phase 2. The following outcomes will be assessed: (1) number of participants meeting eligibility criteria, (2) number of participants consenting to the study, (3) number of participants randomised, (4) number of sessions completed by those in the intervention arm, and (5) number of participants completing the post-intervention outcome measures. Secondary outcomes comprise: detailed feedback on acceptability, which will guide further development of the intervention; and outcome data on symptoms of maternal and paternal anxiety and depression, maternal quality of life, quality of couple relationship, mother-child bonding, infant temperament and infant sleep. DISCUSSION The study will provide important data to inform the design of a future full-scale randomised controlled trial of a brief intervention for anxiety during pregnancy. This will include information on its acceptability and feasibility regarding implementation within current antenatal services, which will inform whether ultimately this provision could be rolled out widely in healthcare settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95282830 . Registered on 29 October 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther L. Wilkinson
- />Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
- />Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, Stephenson House, 75 Hampstead Road, London, NW1 2PL UK
- />Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | - Heather A. O’Mahen
- />University of Exeter, Mood Disorders Research Centre, Perry Road, Exeter, EX4 4QG UK
| | - Pasco Fearon
- />Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Sarah Halligan
- />Department of Psychology, 2 South, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Dorothy X. King
- />Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
- />Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, Stephenson House, 75 Hampstead Road, London, NW1 2PL UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- />School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Reynolds Building, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan’s Road, London, W6 8RP UK
| | | | - Jennifer Ericksen
- />Parent-Infant Research Institute, Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, Centaur Building, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Road, Heidelberg Heights, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Jeannette Milgrom
- />Parent-Infant Research Institute, Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, Centaur Building, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Road, Heidelberg Heights, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- />Psychological Sciences, Level 12, Redmond Barry Building 115, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
| | - Paul G. Ramchandani
- />Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, 7th Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
- />Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, Stephenson House, 75 Hampstead Road, London, NW1 2PL UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Greenfield G, Ignatowicz A, Gnani S, Bucktowonsing M, Ladbrooke T, Millington H, Car J, Majeed A. Staff perceptions on patient motives for attending GP-led urgent care centres in London: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e007683. [PMID: 26769775 PMCID: PMC4735149 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES General practitioner (GP)-led urgent care centres were established to meet the growing demand for urgent care. Staff members working in such centres are central in influencing patients' choices about which services they use, but little is known about staff perceptions of patients' motives for attending urgent care. We hence aimed to explore their perceptions of patients' motives for attending such centres. DESIGN A phenomenological, qualitative study, including semistructured interviews. The interviews were analysed using thematic content analysis. SETTING 2 GP-led urgent care centres in 2 academic hospitals in London. PARTICIPANTS 15 staff members working at the centres including 8 GPs, 5 emergency nurse practitioners and 2 receptionists. RESULTS We identified 4 main themes: 'Confusion about choices', 'As if increase of appetite had grown; By what it fed on', 'Overt reasons, covert motives' and 'A question of legitimacy'. The participants thought that the centres introduce convenient and fast access for patients. So convenient, that an increasing number of patients use them as a regular alternative to their community GP. The participants perceived that patients attend the centres because they are anxious about their symptoms and view them as serious, cannot get an appointment with their GP quickly and conveniently, are dissatisfied with the GP, or lack self-care skills. Staff members perceived some motives as legitimate (an acute health need and difficulties in getting an appointment), and others as less legitimate (convenience, minor illness, and seeking quicker access to hospital facilities). CONCLUSIONS The participants perceived that patients attend urgent care centres because of the convenience of access relative to primary care, as well as sense of acuity and anxiety, lack self-care skills and other reasons. They perceived some motives as more legitimate than others. Attention to unmet needs in primary care can help in promoting balanced access to urgent care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Agnieszka Ignatowicz
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shamini Gnani
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Tim Ladbrooke
- London Central and West Unscheduled Care Collaborative, London, UK
| | - Hugh Millington
- Charing Cross Hospital Emergency Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Josip Car
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kassianos AP, Ignatowicz A, Greenfield G, Majeed A, Car J, Pappas Y. "Partners rather than just providers…": A qualitative study on health care professionals' views on implementation of multidisciplinary group meetings in the North West London Integrated Care Pilot. Int J Integr Care 2015; 15:e032. [PMID: 26351410 PMCID: PMC4560079 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2015] [Revised: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multidisciplinary group meetings are one of the key drivers of facilitating integrated care. Health care professionals attending such groups have a key role in the success of these discussions and hence, in the forming of multi-professional integrated care. The study aimed to explore the professionals' experiences and views of participating and implementing the groups in integrated care context. METHODS A qualitative study including 25 semi-structured interviews with professionals participating in the Northwest London Integrated Care Pilot analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS Participants mentioned a number of benefits of participating in the meetings, including shared learning and shared decision-making between different services and specialties. Yet, they perceived barriers that diminish the efficiency of the groups, such as time constraints, group dynamics and technicalities. The participants felt that the quality of discussions and facilitation could be improved, as well as technical arrangements that would make them easier to participate. Most of the participants perceived the groups to be beneficial for providers mostly questioning the benefits for patient care. CONCLUSION Findings provide an insight into how health professionals' views of their participation to the multidisciplinary group meetings can be more effectively translated into more tangible benefits to the patients. To benefit patient care, the multidisciplinary groups need to be more patient-oriented rather than provider-oriented, while overcoming professional boundaries for participating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelos P Kassianos
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Agnieszka Ignatowicz
- Social Science and Systems in Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Primary Care, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Josip Car
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yannis Pappas
- Health Servicers Research, Institute of Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ignatowicz A, Greenfield G, Pappas Y, Car J, Majeed A, Harris M. Achieving provider engagement: providers' perceptions of implementing and delivering integrated care. Qual Health Res 2014; 24:1711-20. [PMID: 25212855 PMCID: PMC4232313 DOI: 10.1177/1049732314549024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The literature on integrated care is limited with respect to practical learning and experience. Although some attention has been paid to organizational processes and structures, not enough is paid to people, relationships, and the importance of these in bringing about integration. Little is known, for example, about provider engagement in the organizational change process, how to obtain and maintain it, and how it is demonstrated in the delivery of integrated care. Based on qualitative data from the evaluation of a large-scale integrated care initiative in London, United Kingdom, we explored the role of provider engagement in effective integration of services. Using thematic analysis, we identified an evolving engagement narrative with three distinct phases: enthusiasm, antipathy, and ambivalence, and argue that health care managers need to be aware of the impact of professional engagement to succeed in advancing the integrated care agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Josip Car
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Greenfield G, Ignatowicz AM, Belsi A, Pappas Y, Car J, Majeed A, Harris M. Wake up, wake up! It's me! It's my life! patient narratives on person-centeredness in the integrated care context: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:619. [PMID: 25471663 PMCID: PMC4261575 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0619-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centered care emphasizes a holistic, humanistic approach that puts patients first, at the center of medical care. Person-centeredness is also considered a core element of integrated care. Yet typologies of integrated care mainly describe how patients fit within integrated services, rather than how services fit into the patient's world. Patient-centeredness has been commonly defined through physician's behaviors aimed at delivering patient-centered care. Yet, it is unclear how 'person-centeredness' is realized in integrated care through the patient voice. We aimed to explore patient narratives of person-centeredness in the integrated care context. METHODS We conducted a phenomenological, qualitative study, including semi-structured interviews with 22 patients registered in the Northwest London Integrated Care Pilot. We incorporated Grounded Theory approach principles, including substantive open and selective coding, development of concepts and categories, and constant comparison. RESULTS We identified six themes representing core 'ingredients' of person-centeredness in the integrated care context: "Holism", "Naming", "Heed", "Compassion", "Continuity of care", and "Agency and Empowerment", all depicting patient expectations and assumptions on doctor and patient roles in integrated care. We bring examples showing that when these needs are met, patient experience of care is at its best. Yet many patients felt 'unseen' by their providers and the healthcare system. We describe how these six themes can portray a continuum between having own physical and emotional 'Space' to be 'seen' and heard vs. feeling 'translucent', 'unseen', and unheard. These two conflicting experiences raise questions about current typologies of the patient-physician relationship as a 'dyad', the meanings patients attributed to 'care', and the theoretical correspondence between 'person-centeredness' and 'integrated care'. CONCLUSIONS Person-centeredness is a crucial issue for patients in integrated care, yet it was variably achieved in the current pilot. Patients in the context of integrated care, as in other contexts, strive to have their own unique physical and emotional 'space' to be 'seen' and heard. Integrated care models can benefit from incorporating person-centeredness as a core element.
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma is one of the most common long-term conditions worldwide, which places considerable pressure on patients, communities and health systems. The major international clinical guidelines now recommend the inclusion of self management programmes in the routine management of patients with asthma. These programmes have been associated with improved outcomes in patients with asthma. However, the implementation of self management programmes in clinical practice, and their uptake by patients, is still poor. Recent developments in mobile technology, such as smartphone and tablet computer apps, could help develop a platform for the delivery of self management interventions that are highly customisable, low-cost and easily accessible. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility of using smartphone and tablet apps to facilitate the self management of individuals with asthma. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register (CAGR), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health Library, Compendex/Inspec/Referex, IEEEXplore, ACM Digital Library, CiteSeer(x) and CAB abstracts via Web of Knowledge. We also searched registers of current and ongoing trials and the grey literature. We checked the reference lists of all primary studies and review articles for additional references. We searched for studies published from 2000 onwards. The latest search was run in June 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared self management interventions for patients with clinician-diagnosed asthma delivered via smartphone apps to self management interventions delivered via traditional methods (e.g. paper-based asthma diaries). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methods expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Our primary outcomes were symptom scores; frequency of healthcare visits due to asthma exacerbations or complications and health-related quality of life. MAIN RESULTS We included two RCTs with a total of 408 participants. We found no cluster RCTs, controlled before and after studies or interrupted time series studies that met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Both RCTs evaluated the effect of a mobile phone-based asthma self management intervention on asthma control by comparing it to traditional, paper-based asthma self management. One study allowed participants to keep daily entries of their asthma symptoms, asthma medication usage, peak flow readings and peak flow variability on their mobile phone, from which their level of asthma control was calculated remotely and displayed together with the corresponding asthma self management recommendations. In the other study, participants recorded the same readings twice daily, and they received immediate self management feedback in the form of a three-colour traffic light display on their phones. Participants falling into the amber zone of their action plan twice, or into the red zone once, received a phone call from an asthma nurse who enquired about the reasons for their uncontrolled asthma.We did not conduct a meta-analysis of the data extracted due to the considerable degree of heterogeneity between these studies. Instead we adopted a narrative synthesis approach. Overall, the results were inconclusive and we judged the evidence to have a GRADE rating of low quality because further evidence is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. In addition, there was not enough information in one of the included studies to assess the risk of bias for the majority of the domains. Although the other included study was methodologically rigorous, it was not possible to blind participants or personnel in the study. Moreover, there are concerns in both studies in relation to attrition bias and other sources of bias.One study showed that the use of a smartphone app for the delivery of an asthma self management programme had no statistically significant effect on asthma symptom scores (mean difference (MD) 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.25), asthma-related quality of life (MD of mean scores 0.02, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.39), unscheduled visits to the emergency department (OR 7.20, 95% CI 0.37 to 140.76) or frequency of hospital admissions (odds ratio (OR) 3.07, 95% CI 0.32 to 29.83). The other included study found that the use of a smartphone app resulted in higher asthma-related quality of life scores at six-month follow-up (MD 5.50, 95% CI 1.48 to 9.52 for the physical component score of the SF-12 questionnaire; MD 6.00, 95% CI 2.51 to 9.49 for the mental component score of the SF-12 questionnaire), improved lung function (PEFR) at four (MD 27.80, 95% CI 4.51 to 51.09), five (MD 31.40, 95% CI 8.51 to 54.29) and six months (MD 39.20, 95% CI 16.58 to 61.82), and reduced visits to the emergency department due to asthma-related complications (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.99). Both studies failed to find any statistical differences in terms of adherence to the intervention and occurrence of other asthma-related complications. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The current evidence base is not sufficient to advise clinical practitioners, policy-makers and the general public with regards to the use of smartphone and tablet computer apps for the delivery of asthma self management programmes. In order to understand the efficacy of apps as standalone interventions, future research should attempt to minimise the differential clinical management of patients between control and intervention groups. Those studies evaluating apps as part of complex, multicomponent interventions, should attempt to tease out the relative contribution of each intervention component. Consideration of the theoretical constructs used to inform the development of the intervention would help to achieve this goal. Finally, researchers should also take into account: the role of ancillary components in moderating the observed effects, the seasonal nature of asthma and long-term adherence to self management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José S Marcano Belisario
- School of Public Health, Imperial College LondonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public HealthLondonUK
| | - Kit Huckvale
- School of Public Health, Imperial College LondonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public HealthLondonUK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- School of Public Health, Imperial College LondonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public HealthLondonUK
| | | | - Laura H Gunn
- Stetson UniversityIntegrative Health Science421 N Woodland BlvdUnit 8317DeLandUSA32723
| |
Collapse
|