Risk of Postoperative Ischemic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Patients Operated for Cancer

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment for ischemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI) is done routinely before surgery, but the increase in risks associated with surgery is not known. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of arterial ischemic events during the first year after oncological surgery.

METHODS

We used Swedish healthcare databases to identify 443,300 patients who underwent cancer surgery between 1987 and 2016 and 4,127,761 matched comparison subjects. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke during the hospitalization with logistic regression and calculated 1-year cumulative incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes after discharge.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidences of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke during the first postoperative year were 1.33% and 1.25%, respectively. In the comparison cohort, the corresponding 1-year cumulative incidences were 1.04% and 1.00%. During the hospitalization, the OR for myocardial infarction was 8.81 (95% CI 8.24-9.42) and the OR for ischemic stroke was 6.71 (95% CI 6.22-7.23). After discharge, the average HR during follow-up for 365 days was 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.93) for myocardial infarction and 1.02 (95% CI 0.99-1.05) for ischemic stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an overall increased risk of IS and MI during the first year after cancer surgery that was attributable to events occurring during the hospitalization period. After discharge from the hospital, the overall risk of myocardial infarction was lower among the cancer surgery patients than among matched comparison subjects.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events After Surgery for Cancer

Importance

The risks and benefits of thromboprophylaxis therapy after cancer surgery are debated. Studies that determine thrombosis risk after cancer surgery with high accuracy are needed.

Objectives

To evaluate 1-year risk of venous thromboembolic events after major cancer surgery and how these events vary over time.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This register-based retrospective observational matched cohort study included data on the full population of Sweden between 1998 and 2016. All patients who underwent major surgery for cancer of the bladder, breast, colon or rectum, gynecologic organs, kidney and upper urothelial tract, lung, prostate, or gastroesophageal tract were matched in a 1:10 ratio with cancer-free members of the general population on year of birth, sex, and county of residence. Data were analyzed from February 13 to December 5, 2023.

Exposure

Major surgery for cancer.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was incidence of venous thromboembolic events within 1 year after the surgery. Crude absolute risks and risk differences of events within 1 year and adjusted time-dependent cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of postdischarge events were calculated.

Results

A total of 432 218 patients with cancer (median age, 67 years [IQR, 58-75 years]; 68.7% women) and 4 009 343 cancer-free comparators (median age, 66 years [IQR, 57-74 years]; 69.3% women) were included in the study. The crude 1-year cumulative risk of pulmonary embolism was higher among the cancer surgery population for all cancers, with the following absolute risk differences: for bladder cancer, 2.69 percentage points (95% CI, 2.33-3.05 percentage points); for breast cancer, 0.59 percentage points (95% CI 0.55-0.63 percentage points); for colorectal cancer, 1.57 percentage points (95% CI, 1.50-1.65 percentage points); for gynecologic organ cancer, 1.32 percentage points (95% CI, 1.22-1.41 percentage points); for kidney and upper urinary tract cancer, 1.38 percentage points (95% CI, 1.21-1.55 percentage points); for lung cancer, 2.61 percentage points (95% CI, 2.34-2.89 percentage points); for gastroesophageal cancer, 2.13 percentage points (95% CI, 1.89-2.38 percentage points); and for prostate cancer, 0.57 percentage points (95% CI, 0.49-0.66 percentage points). The cause-specific HR of pulmonary embolism comparing patients who underwent cancer surgery with matched comparators peaked just after discharge and generally plateaued 60 to 90 days later. At 30 days after surgery, the HR was 10 to 30 times higher than in the comparison cohort for all cancers except breast cancer (colorectal cancer: HR, 9.18 [95% CI, 8.03-10.50]; lung cancer: HR, 25.66 [95% CI, 17.41-37.84]; breast cancer: HR, 5.18 [95% CI, 4.45-6.05]). The hazards subsided but never reached the level of the comparison cohort except for prostate cancer. Similar results were observed for deep vein thrombosis.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found an increased rate of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer surgery. The risk persisted for about 2 to 4 months postoperatively but varied between cancer types. The increased rate is likely explained by the underlying cancer disease and adjuvant treatments. The results highlight the need for individualized venous thromboembolism risk evaluation and prophylaxis regimens for patients undergoing different surgery for different cancers.

OptiBra study, a randomized controlled trial on optimal postoperative bra support after breast cancer surgery

AIM

This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare two different postoperative bras after breast cancer surgery and evaluate their impact on primary outcome pain.

METHOD

The study included 201 patients scheduled for primary surgery (breast conserving surgery with sentinel node biopsy or axillary clearance, mastectomy, or mastectomy with primary implant reconstruction with sentinel node biopsy or axillary clearance). Participants were randomized to either a soft bra or stable bra with compression. The patients were recommended to use the bra 24 h/day for 3 weeks, record daily pain (NRS), analgesic use and hours of bra use.

RESULTS

Follow up was completed by 184 patients. No significant differences between the arms were found considering pain score over time, neither day 1-14, nor after 3 weeks. Sixty-eight percent of all patients, regardless of randomization, reported pain during the first 14 days. After 3 weeks 46% still reported pain in the operated breast. Among these, patients randomized to the stable bra with compression reported significantly lower pain score than those randomized to the soft bra. Patients who used the stable bra with compression reported significantly higher levels of comfort, sense of security during activity, less difficulty moving the arm, as well as support and stability for the operated breast compared to those using the soft bra.

CONCLUSION

Using a stable bra with compression is the optimal evidence-based choice after breast cancer surgery to reduce remaining pain 3 weeks after surgery, increasing mobility, comfort, and sense of security.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04059835 at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Survival Outcomes, Digital TILs, and On-treatment PET/CT During Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer: Results from the Randomized PREDIX HER2 Trial

PURPOSE

PREDIX HER2 is a randomized Phase II trial that compared neoadjuvant docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (THP) with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2-positive breast cancer. Rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) did not differ between the two groups. Here, we present the survival outcomes from PREDIX HER2 and investigate metabolic response and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) as prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 202 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were enrolled and 197 patients received six cycles of either THP or T-DM1. Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Assessment with PET/CT was performed at baseline, after two and six treatment cycles. TILs were assessed manually at baseline biopsies, while image-based evaluation of TILs [digital TILs (DTIL)] was performed in digitized full-face sections.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 5.21 years, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in terms of EFS [HR = 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-2.91], RFS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.24-1.93), or OS (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.09-2.82). Higher SUVmax at cycle 2 (C2) predicted lower pCR (ORadj = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87; P = 0.005) and worse EFS (HRadj = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.41; P < 0.001). Baseline TILs and DTILs provided additional prognostic information to clinical parameters and C2 SUVmax.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes following neoadjuvant T-DM1 were similar to neoadjuvant THP. SUVmax after two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer may be an independent predictor of both short- and long-term outcomes. Combined assessment with TILs may facilitate early selection of poor responders for alternative treatment strategies.

Combined assessment of metabolic response and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes as a predictor of outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: Results from the randomized PREDIX HER2 trial

593

Background: Abundance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is prognostic in early HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). Response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) according to positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) has been shown to predict pathologic complete response (pCR). There is paucity of data regarding long-term prognostication using PET-CT and the potential value of the combined assessment of both these biomarkers. Methods: PREDIX HER2 (NCT02568839) is a prospective randomized phase 2 trial that compared standard NAT (docetaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab) with trastuzumab emtansine, in patients with HER2-positive BC. Overall, 202 patients were included (197 evaluable) and the primary efficacy analysis showed no difference in pCR or event-free survival (EFS) between the two groups (Hatschek, JAMA Oncology 2021). Assessment with fluorine 18–labeled fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT was performed at baseline and after 2 and 6 treatment cycles, and SUVmax was evaluated as a continuous variable. TILs were assessed at baseline biopsies according to guidelines from the International TIL Working Group (J.H.). The aim of this secondary analysis was to investigate the combined assessment of TIL and PET-CT as an early predictor of response to NAT. Results: Overall, 112 patients underwent baseline PET-CT and 109 after C2, whereas 173 had baseline TIL. In multivariable analysis, baseline SUVmax did not predict pCR (ORadj= 1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p = 0.259) or EFS (HRadj= 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.17, p = 0.117). In contrast, higher SUVmax at C2 predicted lower pCR (ORadj= 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.87, p = 0.005) and worse EFS (HRadj= 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.34, p = 0.01). Baseline TIL > 10% (median cut-off) provided additional prognostic information to clinical parameters (stage and hormone receptor expression) and C2 SUVmax (LR-Δχ2 = 7.19, p = 0.007; ORadj= 3.52, 95% CI 1.37 – 9.06, p = 0.009). 75% of patients with high TIL and C2 SUVmax < 2.49 achieved pCR, compared with 13.8% of those with low TIL and high C2 SUVmax and 39.1%-41.3% for the intermediate groups (p = 0.001). Conclusions: SUVmax after two cycles of NAT for HER2-positive BC is an independent predictor of both short- and long-term outcomes. A combined assessment with TIL may facilitate early selection of good responders for de-escalation and poor responders for alternative treatment strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT02568839.

Abstract P3-18-03: Long-term outcomes for breast conservation plus radiotherapy versus mastectomy in early breast cancer after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: Results from the Swedish national breast cancer register (NKBC)

Background: Population-based studies have consistently shown improved long-term outcomes with breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy (RT) vs. mastectomy in primarily operated breast cancer (BC) patients. However, the survival impact of type of local therapy following modern neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is unclear. Methods: The population-based Swedish National Breast Cancer Register (NKBC), a prospectively collected population-based cohort, was used to identify female BC patients who were diagnosed from January, 2007 until December, 2017 and received NST in the Stockholm region. Patients were divided into BCS+RT and mastectomy groups, and the prognostic factors reflecting the response to NST like pathologic complete response (pCR) and Neo-bioscore calculated by pre/postoperative TNM stage, nuclear grade, and receptors status, were used for stratification. Disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards model, which enables covariates like age, St Gallen subtypes, cTNM and ypTNM stages to be balanced between the two groups. Results: Among 1,409 eligible women, 456 (32.4%) were treated with BCS+RT, and 953 (67.6%) with mastectomy. Overall, 87 (6.2%) local recurrences, 256 (18.2%) distant metastases, and 282 (20.0%) deaths occurred over a median follow-up of 61 months. Patients diagnosed during later years, younger patients, patients with earlier stage and higher-grade tumors were more likely to receive BCS+RT. After adjusting for age at diagnosis, Neo-bioscore, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, significant improvements for BCS+RT compared with mastectomy were observed in DFS (weighted-multivariate hazard ratio (HR), 0.51; 95%CI, 0.28-0.93; median 5-year DFS: 79.1% vs 73.6%) and DMFS (HR, 0.44; 95%CI, 0.23-0.82; median 5-year DMFS: 83.7% vs 74.8%), but no difference was identified in LRFS (HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.29-3.07; median 5-year LRFS: 89.9% vs 92.0%) or OS (HR, 0.7; 95%CI, 0.34-1.45; median 5-year OS: 88.4% vs 81.2%). The DFS benefit was observed regardless of pCR status, but varied by Neo-bioscore. Patients with Neo-bioscore 4-7 treated with BCS+RT had better DFS (HR, 0.31; 95%CI, 0.12-0.81) compared with those undergoing mastectomy, whereas low-risk patients with Neo-bioscore 0-3 had similar DFS between the two groups. Both triple negative (N=252; HR for DFS, 0.26; 95%CI, 0.07-0.97) and HER2-positive (N=533; HR for DFS, 0.24, 95%CI, 0.09-0.68) BC patients benefited from BCS+RT, but not patients with luminal tumors (N=589; HR for DFS, 0.82, 95%CI, 0.31-2.18). Similarly, superior DFS with BCS+RT was also seen in patients with neoadjuvant anti-HER2 targeted therapy (N=505; HR, 0.19; 95%CI, 0.05-0.75) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (N=594; HR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.21-1.06), but not among those receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (N=162; HR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0. 1-2.85). Conclusion: After adjusting for response to NST and other confounders, BCS+RT was associated with reduced risks of tumor recurrence or metastasis compared with mastectomy. This benefit was more pronounced in patients with high Neo-bioscore, indicating that Neo-bioscore rather than pCR status has the potential to tailor breast surgery after NST. Further studies with larger sample size or prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Citation Format: Kang Wang, Aafke Duinmeijer, Alexios Matikas, Renske Altena, Hemming Johansson, Hanna Fredholm, Theodoros Foukakis. Long-term outcomes for breast conservation plus radiotherapy versus mastectomy in early breast cancer after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: Results from the Swedish national breast cancer register (NKBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-18-03.

The Natural History of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast - An Overview

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a heterogenous disease and its natural history cannot be directly observed as surgical removal is part of the current standard of care. Studies of incompletely excised breast lesions that were considered benign after biopsy, but at review years later were recognized as DCIS, offers some insight to the natural history of DCIS. Summarizing these retrospective data; 14-53 % of the cases retrospectively diagnosed as DCIS progressed to invasive breast cancer (IBC) during follow-up. While observations from retrospective re-evaluation of biopsies and autopsies adds epidemiological input for understanding the natural history of DCIS, the most important results are still awaited from the ongoing prospective studies on active surveillance of DCIS. These studies with collected data on patient characteristics, life-style and environmental factors, as well as tumor and stromal metabolomics and genomics, will probably further elucidate the natural history of DCIS and how the disease should be treated in the future.

Local Recurrence after Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Comprehensive Overview

Patients with DCIS have an excellent long-term prognosis with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival around 98%. Treatment has the goal to prevent the development of an invasive breast cancer and to minimize the risk for a second breast cancer event, and published studies have shown a substantial decrease in invasive local recurrence rates over time. Approximately 50% of the local recurrences after BCS for a primary DCIS are invasive and 8.5% of them node-positive. Experiencing an ipsilateral invasive recurrence after a primary DCIS does significantly increase the risk of breast cancer death, while this is not seen after a DCIS recurrence. Radical surgery remains crucial to minimize the risk of local recurrence, and adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence by at least 50%. At recurrence, a repeat-BCS should be considered as it offers a good local control in properly selected patients and an overall and breast cancer-specific survival comparable to that seen after mastectomy.

Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Docetaxel vs Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is presently approved for treatment of advanced breast cancer and after incomplete response to neoadjuvant therapy, but the potential of T-DM1 as monotherapy is so far unknown.

Objective

To assess pathologic complete response (pCR) to standard neoadjuvant therapy of combination docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (DTP) vs T-DM1 monotherapy in patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized phase 2 trial, conducted at 9 sites in Sweden, enrolled 202 patients between December 1, 2014, and October 31, 2018. Participants were 18 years or older, with ERBB2-positive tumors larger than 20 mm and/or verified lymph node metastases. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of DTP (standard group) or T-DM1 (investigational group). Crossover was recommended at lack of response or occurrence of intolerable toxic effects. Assessment with fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed at baseline and after 2 and 6 treatment cycles.

Main Outcome and Measures

Pathologic complete response, defined as ypT0 or Tis ypN0. Secondary end points were clinical and radiologic objective response; event-free survival, invasive disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival; safety; health-related quality of life (HRQoL); functional and biological tumor characteristics; and frequency of breast-conserving surgery.

Results

Overall, 202 patients were randomized; 197 (99 women in the standard group [median age, 51 years (range, 26-73 years)] and 98 women in the investigational group [median age, 53 years (range, 28-74 years)]) were evaluable for the primary end point. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 45 patients in the standard group (45.5%; 95% CI 35.4%-55.8%) and 43 patients in the investigational group (43.9%; 95% CI 33.9%-54.3%). The difference was not statistically significant (P = .82). In a subgroup analysis, the pCR rate was higher in hormone receptor-negative tumors than in hormone receptor-positive tumors in both treatment groups (45 of 72 [62.5%] vs 45 of 125 [36.0%]). Three patients in the T-DM1 group experienced progression during therapy. In an exploratory analysis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at 10% or more (median) estimated pCR significantly (odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.42-5.36; P = .003). Response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET-CT revealed a relative decrease of maximum standardized uptake value by more than 31.3% (median) was associated with pCR (odds ratio, 6.67, 95% CI, 2.38-20.00; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, treatment with standard neoadjuvant combination DTP was equal to T-DM1.

Trial Registrations

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02568839; EudraCT number: 2014-000808-10.

One-year follow-up of health-related quality of life in the Swedish PREDIX HER 2 trial, evaluating docetaxel, trastuzumab sc, pertuzumab versus trastuzumab emtansine as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer

590

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy combining docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (DTP) was compared to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in the randomised phase II PREDIX HER2 trial. Patients, ≥18 years with HER2 positive breast cancer, ≥20mm or with verified lymph node metastases, were randomised to six courses of DTP (Standard group) or T-DM1 (Experimental group) before surgery. After operation patients in the Standard arm received two, and those in the Experimental arm four courses of EC. Since there were no differences in proportions of complete response at surgery and in the event-free survival between the groups, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is of special interest. Methods: HRQoL was measured, using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 + EORTC QLQ-BR23, before randomisation, after six courses before surgery, at three months and one year after surgery. Results: Response rate for the questionnaires varied between 87% and 99% for the 198 included patients. There were no between-group differences at baseline. Results after six courses revealed statistically significant differences (p≤0.01), favouring the Experimental group on 12 out of 21 of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 variables (Physical-, Role-, and Social- functioning, Global quality of Life, Fatigue, Dyspnea, and Diarrhea, Body image, Sexual functioning, Sexual enjoyment, Systemic therapy side effects and Upset by hair loss). Three months after surgery, however, statistically significant differences in favour of the Standard group were found for six variables (Physical functioning, Nausea/vomiting, Dyspnea, Constipation, Systemic therapy side effects, Upset by hair loss). No other between group differences were found with one exception: lower levels of Breast symptoms in the Experimental group. One possible explanation is that patients in the Experimental group were still on chemotherapy at that assessment point, whereas the majority in the Standard group had terminated their treatment. No differences were found between the groups at the one-year after surgery follow-up, where the levels on most variables had returned to baseline values. Conclusions: HRQoL was better in the Experimental group during neoadjuvant treatment. Three months after surgery, however, HRQoL was in favour or the Standard arm. HRQoL returned to baseline levels for most variables at the one-year follow-up and no between-group differences were found. Clinical trial information: NCT02568839 .

Docetaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab versus trastuzumab emtansine as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: Results from the Swedish PREDIX HER2 trial identifying a new potential de-escalation standard?

501

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy produces high rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and is the standard of care in HER2 positive breast cancer; however, the optimal treatment regimen remains to be established. Methods: In this randomized phase II study patients ≥18 years with HER2 positive breast cancer > 20mm or verified lymph node metastases were randomized to 6 courses of docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (DTP, group A) or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, group B), q 21 days. The protocol allowed switch to the competing treatment upon lack of response or drug-related severe toxicity. Patients received postoperative epirubicin+cyclophosphamide, trastuzumab for a total of one year and endocrine therapy. Accrual was completed in October 2018 after randomization of 202 patients, data on pCR were available for 190 at the time for this abstract submission. Median age, 52 years (26-74), menopausal status, histological type and grade were well balanced between the treatment groups. 62.6% of the tumors were hormone receptor (HR) positive. Results: Primary endpoint was pathological objective response. 190 patients completed the protocol-specified preoperative treatment. pCR was achieved in 45.3% of patients, 46.4% in patients treated with DTP and 44.1% with T-DM1 (chi-sq., p = 0.75). In HR-positive tumors, pCR was obtained in 35.3% of patients, 35.9% in group A vs. 34.6% in group B (p = 0.87); in HR-negative tumors, the overall pCR rate was 62.0%, 66.7% in group A vs. 57.9% in group B (p = 0.45). Severe (grade 3/4) toxicity was reported at 68 occasions related to DTP, compared with 16 related to T-DM1, 26 vs. 3 caused by febrile neutropenia. Significantly better quality of life was reported by patients treated with T-DM1. Conclusions: Our data on TDM-1 demonstrates similar efficacy and less toxicity, in particular for patients with HER2 and HR positive cancers, being a potential new standard for neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02568839.

Health-related quality of life in the Swedish PREDIX HER2 trial, evaluating docetaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab versus trastuzumab emtansine as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer

583

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy combining docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (DTP) was compared to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in the randomized phase 2 PREDIX HER2 trial. Patients, ≥18 years with HER2 positive breast cancer, ≥20mm or with verified lymph node metastases, were randomized to six courses of DTP (Standard arm) or T-DM1 (Experimental arm). Primary endpoint was pathological objective response to primary medical therapy at post-treatment surgery. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was a secondary outcome, and is of specific interest as there was no difference between the randomization groups regarding the main endpoint (results presented in a separate abstract sent to ASCO 2019, Bergh et al.). Methods: Of 202 randomized patients, 190 are available for evaluation at this point. HRQoL was measured, using EORTC QLQ-C30 + EORTC QLQ-BR23, at baseline before randomization and after six courses. Results: No differences between the randomization arms were found at baseline. Results after six courses, based on 163 patients (86%) and adjusted to baseline values, revealed statistical significant differences (p≤0.01), favoring the experimental T-DM1 arm on 7 out of 15 of the EORTC QLQ-C30 variables (Physical functioning, Role functioning, Social functioning, Global quality of Life, Fatigue, Dyspnea, and Diarrhea). For the breast cancer specific questionnaire (EORTC-BR23), the experimental arm scored statistically significantly better on 5 out of 7 subscales (Body image, Sexual functioning, Sexual enjoyment, Systemic therapy side effects and Upset by hair loss). All of the statistical significant differences were of moderate or large clinical significance (≥10 scale scores). No differences between the randomization arms were found for the remaining HRQoL variables. Conclusions: The experimental arm reported better HRQoL than the control arm after six courses. Trastuzumab emtansine may be a useful treatment alternative due to better HRQoL and lower toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02568839.

Breast cancer in young women and prognosis: How important are proliferation markers?

AIM

Compared to middle-aged women, young women with breast cancer have a higher risk of systemic disease. We studied expression of proliferation markers in relation to age and subtype and their association with long-term prognosis.

METHODS

Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was studied in 504 women aged <40 years and 383 women aged ≥40 years from a population-based cohort. Information on patient characteristics, treatment and follow-up was collected from medical records. Tissue microarrays were produced for analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor (PR), Her2, Ki-67 and cyclins.

RESULTS

Young women with luminal tumours had significantly higher expression of Ki-67 and cyclins. Proliferation markers were prognostic only within this subtype. Ki-67 was a prognostic indicator only in young women with luminal PR+ tumours. The optimal cut-off for Ki-67 varied by age. High expression of cyclin E1 conferred a better DDFS in women aged <40 years with luminal PR- tumours (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47 [0.24-0.92]). Age <40 years was an independent risk factor of DDFS exclusively in women with luminal B PR+ tumours (HR 2.35 [1.22-4.50]). Young women with luminal B PR- tumours expressing low cyclin E1 had a six-fold risk of distant disease compared with luminal A (HR 6.21 [2.17-17.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

The higher expression of proliferation markers in young women does not have a strong impact on prognosis. Ki-67 is only prognostic in the subgroup of young women with luminal PR+ tumours. The only cyclin adding prognostic value beyond subtype is cyclin E1. Age is an independent prognostic factor only in women with luminal B PR+ tumours.

[Worse prognosis for young women with breast cancer]

Breast cancer in young women is uncommon, but the second most frequent cause of death in this age group. Young women with breast cancer have a worse prognosis than middle-aged women, with a higher risk of local recurrence, distant disease and breast cancer death. This can partly be explained by diagnosis at a later stage, and a higher proportion of tumors with unfavourable characteristics. However, in women with tumors of the luminal B subtype, low age remained an independent prognostic factor of DDFS and LRFS after correction for stage, tumor characteristics and treatment. Treatment of young women with breast cancer requires special skills to deal with the age group-specific questions concerning heredity, sexuality, fertility, and pregnancy.

Breast cancer in young women: poor survival despite intensive treatment

Background

Breast cancer is uncommon in young women and correlates with a less favourable prognosis; still it is the most frequent cancer in women under 40, accounting for 30–40% of all incident female cancer. The aim of this study was to study prognosis in young women, quantifying how much stage at diagnosis and management on the one hand, and tumour biology on the other; each contribute to the worse prognosis seen in this age group.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In a registry based cohort of women aged 20–69 (n = 22 017) with a primary diagnosis of invasive breast cancer (1992–2005), women aged 20–34 (n = 471), 35–39 (n = 858) and 40–49 (n = 4789) were compared with women aged 50–69 years (n = 15 899). The cumulative 5-year relative survival ratio and the relative excess mortality (RER) were calculated. The cumulative 5-year relative survival ratio was lowest in women aged 20–34. The RER was 2.84 for women aged 20–34 and decreased with increasing age (RER 1.76 and 1.17 for women aged 35–39 and 40–49, respectively). The excess risk was, however, present only in disease stages I and II. For women aged 20–34 with stage I disease RER was 4.63, and 6.70 in the subgroup with tumour size 1–10 mm. The absolute difference in stage I between the youngest and the reference groups amounted to nearly 8%, with a 90% 5-year survival in women aged 20–34. In stages IIa and IIb, the relative excess risk was not as dramatic, but the absolute differences approached 15%. The youngest women with small tumours generally received more aggressive treatment than women in older age groups.

Conclusions

After correction for stage, tumour characteristics and treatment, age remained an independent risk factor for breast cancer death in women <35 years of age. The excess risk for young women was only seen in early stages of disease and was most pronounced in women with small tumours. Young women affected by breast cancer have a high risk of dying compared to their middle-aged counterparts even if diagnosed early and receiving an intense treatment.

Allelic loss is heterogeneous throughout the tumor in colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 17p and 18q in colorectal carcinoma has been depicted as a potential prognostic marker for the disease. However, conclusions vary among reports, and evidence of clinically useful genetic prognostic markers is still lacking. As a rule, single biopsies are used. In this study, the authors hypothesized that an important cause of earlier contradictory results was the heterogeneity of colorectal neoplasms.

METHODS

In this study, DNA originating in each quadrant of tumors from 64 patients with colorectal carcinoma was analyzed. Microsatellite markers for chromosome 18q and 17p were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and automatically analyzed.

RESULTS

The authors found that, regardless of stage, LOH and non-LOH in both 17p and 18q varied among biopsies within the tumors in a random fashion. LOH in 18q was detected in all 4 quadrants in 22% and in 1 of 4, 2 of 4, or 3 of 4 quadrants in 56% of the tumors, whereas 22% of the tumors were homogeneously without LOH in 18q. LOH 17p was distributed similarly throughout the tumors and was present in 1 of 4, 2 of 4, or 3 of 4 of the quadrants in 44%. The authors also reexamined a subset of tumors by subdividing one biopsy from each into four. Analysis of the microsatellite markers then yielded identical results. No correlation between the degree of LOH status and patient survival was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

LOH status within a colorectal tumor is extensively heterogeneous. However, it is more homologous on a lower macroscopic level. For relevant genetic analysis, multiple biopsies and DNA sampling preceded by careful morphologic examination must be standard in the preparation of DNA.

Protein structures from distance inequalities

A computer method for folding protein backbones from distance inequalities is presented. It involves an algorithm that uses a novel approach for handling inequalities through the minimization of a continuous energy function. Tests of the folding algorithm have been carried out on a small protein, the 6PTI (bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor) with 56 amino acid residues, and on a medium-size protein, the 1TRM (rat trypsin) with 223 amino acid residues. Reconstructions based on a real-valued distance matrix led to folded three-dimensional structures with root-mean-square values of 0.04 A when compared with the crystallographic data. The obtained root-mean-square measures were of the order of 1 A, when distance inequalities were used for the reconstruction. Subsequently, the folding approach has been applied to distance inequalities predicted by neural network techniques that use the amino acid sequence as the only input. The inaccuracy in the inequalities predicted by the neural network was the reason for the root-mean-square value of 5.2 A. An error analysis of the method for reconstruction was performed and showed that no more than 3% inaccurate distance inequalities could be corrected for. Finally, a simple technique for root-mean-square comparisons of different protein structures is discussed.