Application of blinatumomab, a bispecific anti-CD3/CD19 T-cell engager, in treating severe systemic sclerosis: A case study

Systemic sclerosis, a severe inflammatory autoimmune disease, shares a common thread with cancer through the underlying mechanism of inflammation. This inflammatory milieu not only drives the immune dysregulation characteristic of autoimmune diseases but also plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of cancer. Among the cellular components involved, B cells have emerged as key players in hematologic tumor and autoimmune disease, contributing to immune dysregulation and persistent tissue fibrosis in systemic sclerosis, as well as tumor progression and immune evasion in cancer. Consequently, novel therapeutic strategies targeting B cells hold promise in both conditions. Recent exploration of CD19 CAR T cells in severe systemic sclerosis patients has shown great potential, but also introduced possible risks and drawbacks associated with viral vectors, prolonged CAR T cell persistence, lengthy production timelines, high costs, and the necessity of conditioning patients with organotoxic and fertility-damaging chemotherapy. Given these challenges, alternative CD19-depleting approaches are of high interest for managing severe systemic autoimmune diseases. Here, we present the pioneering use of blinatumomab, a bispecific anti-CD3/anti-CD19 T cell engager in a patient with progressive, severe systemic sclerosis, offering a promising alternative for such challenging cases.

Colitis induced by IL-17A-inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Interleukin (IL)-17A is essential for intestinal mucosal integrity, contributing to the prevention of detrimental immunity such as infectious colitis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Indeed, neutralization of IL-17A has been abandoned as a therapeutic principle in IBD because of increased disease activity. However, it is controversial whether IL-17A inhibitors increase the risk of developing colitis in patients who do not have underlying IBD. Here, we present two cases of different forms of colitis that occurred during treatment with two IL-17A inhibitors, secukinumab and ixekizumab.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

We report the case of a 35-year-old female with SAPHO (synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis) syndrome who was admitted due to severe colitis with bloody diarrhea, fever, abdominal pain and weight loss after receiving secukinumab for 3 months as well as the case of a 41-year-old male with psoriatic arthritis who presented himself to the outpatient clinic with bloody stools, abdominal pain and nausea 5 months after changing his therapy from secukinumab to ixekizumab. In both patients, treatment with IL-17A-inhibitors was stopped and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were started. Both patients recovered, are clinically stable and show no more signs of active colitis.

CONCLUSION

The role of IL-17A inhibitors in the pathogenesis of infectious colitis and new-onset IBD is not fully understood and requires further research. Patients receiving IL-17A-inhibitor therapy should be carefully screened and notified of the possible side effects.

The protective effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases compared to the general population-A comparison of two German registries

Objectives

To investigate, whether inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) inpatients are at higher risk to develop a severe course of SARS-CoV-2 infections compared to the general population, data from the German COVID-19 registry for IRD patients and data from the Lean European Survey on SARS-CoV-2 (LEOSS) infected patients covering inpatients from the general population with SARS-CoV-2 infections were compared.

Methods

4310 (LEOSS registry) and 1139 cases (IRD registry) were collected in general. Data were matched for age and gender. From both registries, 732 matched inpatients (LEOSS registry: n = 366 and IRD registry: n = 366) were included for analyses in total.

Results

Regarding the COVID-19 associated lethality, no significant difference between both registries was observed. Age > 65°years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis and the use of rituximab were associated with more severe courses of COVID-19. Female gender and the use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNF-I) were associated with a better outcome of COVID-19.

Conclusion

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) patients have the same risk factors for severe COVID-19 regarding comorbidities compared to the general population without any immune-mediated disease or immunomodulation. The use of rituximab was associated with an increased risk for severe COVID-19. On the other hand, the use of TNF-I was associated with less severe COVID-19 compared to the general population, which might indicate a protective effect of TNF-I against severe COVID-19 disease.

Impact of Risk Factors on COVID-19 Outcomes in Unvaccinated People With Rheumatic Diseases: A Comparative Analysis of Pandemic Epochs Using the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry

OBJECTIVE

Approximately one third of individuals worldwide have not received a COVID-19 vaccine. Although studies have investigated risk factors linked to severe COVID-19 among unvaccinated people with rheumatic diseases (RDs), we know less about whether these factors changed as the pandemic progressed. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with severe COVID-19 in unvaccinated individuals in different pandemic epochs corresponding to major variants of concern.

METHODS

Patients with RDs and COVID-19 were entered into the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry between March 2020 and June 2022. An ordinal logistic regression model (not hospitalized, hospitalized, and death) was used with date of COVID-19 diagnosis, age, sex, race and/or ethnicity, comorbidities, RD activity, medications, and the human development index (HDI) as covariates. The main analysis included all unvaccinated patients across COVID-19 pandemic epochs; subanalyses stratified patients according to RD types.

RESULTS

Among 19,256 unvaccinated people with RDs and COVID-19, those who were older, male, had more comorbidities, used glucocorticoids, had higher disease activity, or lived in lower HDI regions had worse outcomes across epochs. For those with rheumatoid arthritis, sulfasalazine and B-cell-depleting therapy were associated with worse outcomes, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were associated with improved outcomes. In those with connective tissue disease or vasculitis, B-cell-depleting therapy was associated with worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes were similar throughout pandemic epochs in unvaccinated people with RDs. Ongoing efforts, including vaccination, are needed to reduce COVID-19 severity in this population, particularly in those with medical and social vulnerabilities identified in this study.

The efficacy and safety of systemic corticosteroids as first line treatment for granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Granulomatous and lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (gl-ILD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Corticosteroids are recommended as first-line treatment for gl-ILD, but evidence for their efficacy is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed the effect of high-dose corticosteroids (≥0.3 mg/kg prednisone equivalent) on gl-ILD, measured by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans, and pulmonary function test (PFT) results.

METHODS

Patients who had received high-dose corticosteroids but no other immunosuppressive therapy at the time (n = 56) and who underwent repeated HRCT scanning or PFT (n = 39) during the retrospective and/or prospective phase of the Study of Interstitial Lung Disease in Primary Antibody Deficiency (STILPAD) were included in the analysis. Patients without any immunosuppressive treatment were selected as controls (n = 23). HRCT scans were blinded, randomized, and scored using the Hartman score. Differences between the baseline and follow-up HRCT scans and PFT were analyzed.

RESULTS

Treatment with high-dose corticosteroids significantly improved HRCT scores and forced vital capacity. Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity significantly improved in both groups. Of 18 patients, for whom extended follow-up data was available, 13 achieved a long-term, maintenance therapy independent remission. All patients with relapse were retreated with corticosteroids, but only one-fifth of them responded. Two opportunistic infections were found in the corticosteroid treatment group, while overall infection rate was similar between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy with high-dose corticosteroids improved HRCT scans and PFT results of patients with gl-ILD and achieved long-term remission in 42% of patients. It was not associated with major side effects. Low-dose maintenance therapy provided no benefit and efficacy was poor in relapsing disease.

Efficacy of subcutaneous vs intravenous infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized phase III trial

OBJECTIVES

The primary endpoint of the pivotal phase III study of infliximab (IFX) s.c. demonstrated non-inferiority of s.c. to i.v. IFX, based on 28-joint DAS-CRP (DAS28-CRP) improvement at week (W) 22 (NCT03147248). This post-hoc analysis investigated whether numerical differences in efficacy outcomes at W30/54 were statistically significant, using conservative imputation methods.

METHODS

Patients with active RA and inadequate response to MTX received IFX i.v. 3 mg/kg at W0 and W2 (induction) and were randomized (1:1) to IFX s.c. 120 mg every 2 weeks or i.v. 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks thereafter (maintenance). Patients randomized to IFX i.v. switched to IFX s.c. from W30-54. This post-hoc analysis compared efficacy outcomes for s.c. and i.v. groups pre-switch (W30) and post-switch (W54) using last observation carried forward (LOCF) and non-responder imputation (NRI) methods.

RESULTS

Of 343 randomized patients, 165 (IFX s.c.) and 174 (IFX i.v.) were analysed. At W30, significantly improved outcomes were identified with s.c. vs i.v. IFX for DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR/Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)/Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) scores (LOCF); ACR/good EULAR responses, DAS28-CRP/Boolean remission, and DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR/CDAI/SDAI low disease activity and remission (LOCF and/or NRI); and minimal clinically important difference in HAQ score (LOCF and NRI). After switching to IFX s.c. from IFX i.v., fewer significant between-group differences were identified at W54.

CONCLUSION

IFX s.c. showed improved efficacy at W30 compared with IFX i.v., and the reduced between-group difference in efficacy outcomes at W54 after switching supports the results suggesting benefits of IFX s.c. compared with IFX i.v. at W30.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClincialTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03147248, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03147248.

Management of a patient with common variable immunodeficiency and hepatopathy

BACKGROUND

Common variable Immunodeficiency (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency disorder and the most common form of severe antibody deficiency. Both children and adults are affected and clinical manifestations vary widely. Often, CVID manifests with infections, autoimmune phenomena or chronic lung disease, but it also frequently affects the liver. The differential diagnoses of hepatopathies in CVID patients are diverse and the characteristics of CVID patients often make it difficult to determine the correct diagnosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 39-year-old patient with CVID and elevated liver enzymes, nausea and unintended weight loss, who was referred to our clinic with the suspected diagnose of autoimmune hepatitis or immunoglobulin-induced hepatopathy. Prior, the patient had undergone an extensive diagnostic work-up including liver biopsy but viral hepatitides had only been investigated serologically - with negative antibody results. We searched for viral nucleic acid by polymerase chain reaction and detected hepatitis E virus-RNA. Antiviral therapy was started and the patient recovered quickly.

CONCLUSION

Hepatopathies in CVID patients are common with a broad spectrum of possible causes. While treating CVID patients, the distinct diagnostic and therapeutic requirements of the CVID patients should be closely considered and diagnosed by the appropriate measures.

Safety and efficacy of secukinumab in patients with giant cell arteritis (TitAIN): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The treatment of giant cell arteritis with glucocorticoid-sparing agents is an unmet medical need. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of secukinumab, an anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with giant cell arteritis.

METHODS

We conducted a Bayesian randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 2 study at 11 clinics or hospitals in Germany. Patients aged 50 years or older with new-onset or relapsing giant cell arteritis who were naive to biological therapy and already receiving glucocorticoids with a prednisolone equivalent dose of 25-60 mg/day were eligible for inclusion. Participants were assigned (1:1) to receive 300 mg secukinumab or placebo subcutaneously once a week up to week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter. In both treatment groups, prednisolone dose was tapered down to 0 mg over a 26-week period. Patients, investigator staff, and clinical trial team were masked to the treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the median proportion (Bayesian analysis) of patients with sustained remission until week 28 in the full analysis set (ie, all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment, analysed according to treatment assigned at randomisation). Sustained remission rate of the placebo group from a previous trial of tocilizumab in patients with giant cell arteritis was used to derive the prior distribution of placebo sustained remission rate for the primary endpoint. The safety of secukinumab was assessed in the safety set (ie, all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, analysed according to study treatment received). This trial is completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03765788.

FINDINGS

Of the 65 patients who were assessed for eligibility, 52 patients (median age 75 years [IQR 69-79]; 35 [67%] female and 17 [33%] male, 52 [100%] White) were enrolled between Jan 30, 2019 and March 30, 2020 and were randomly assigned to receive secukinumab (n=27) or placebo (n=25). Four of 27 patients in the secukinumab group and eight of 25 patients in the placebo group discontinued treatment by week 28 of the study. On the basis of the Bayesian analysis, the median proportion of patients in sustained remission until week 28 was 70% (95% credibility interval 52-85) in the secukinumab group versus 20% (12-30) in the placebo group. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the secukinumab (27 [100%] of 27 patients had any adverse event) and placebo groups (24 [96%] of 25 patients had any adverse event); the most common adverse events were hypertension (six [22%] of 27 patients in the secukinumab group and eight [32%] of 25 patients in the placebo group) and nasopharyngitis (five [19%] of 27 patients in the secukinumab group and five [20%] of 25 patients in the placebo group). Two patients (one in each group) died during the study, neither of which was considered to be related to study treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with active giant cell arteritis had a higher sustained remission rate in the secukinumab group than in the placebo group at week 28, in combination with glucocorticoid taper regimen. Secukinumab was tolerated well with no new safety concerns. This proof-of-concept phase 2 study further supports the development of secukinumab as a treatment option for people with giant cell arteritis.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharma.

A patient with Takayasu arteritis presenting with malignant hypertension: a case report

Background

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a rare large-vessel vasculitis primarily affecting the aorta and its proximal branches. The manifestation of TA is variable, ranging from asymptomatic cases to severe organ dysfunction secondary to vascular damage, which often delays diagnosis.

Case summary

Here, we present a 37-year-old male patient suffering from visual impairment and malignant hypertension. Emergency fundoscopy showed large left subretinal bleeding and bilateral signs of hypertensive retinopathy. Echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging showed mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and signs of hypertensive cardiomyopathy. Evaluation for secondary causes of arterial hypertension did not reveal an underlying disease, and the patient was discharged with optimal medical therapy. He was re-admitted after 11 days with fever of unknown origin, fatigue, and elevated inflammatory markers. The diagnosis of TA was finally established using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography scan and sonography of carotid and subclavian arteries. Anti-inflammatory combination therapy for active, severe TA with ophthalmologic involvement was initiated using high-dose glucocorticoids and the tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor adalimumab to minimize drug-related risks. The patient was scheduled for multidisciplinary follow-up appointments, including specialist consultation in rheumatology, angiology, cardiology, diabetology, and ophthalmology.

Discussion

This case highlights the diversity of initial symptoms, the challenges of TA diagnosis, and the importance of comprehensive evaluation for rare secondary causes of arterial hypertension. Individualized acute and long-term care necessitates multidisciplinary management of immunosuppressive therapy, secondary organ involvement, and concomitant diseases.

Characteristics and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections among double-vaccinated and triple-vaccinated patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the clinical profile of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in at least double-vaccinated patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs).

METHODS

Data from the physician-reported German COVID-19-IRD registry collected between February 2021 and July 2022 were analysed. SARS-CoV-2 cases were stratified according to patients' vaccination status as being not vaccinated, double-vaccinated or triple-vaccinated prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection and descriptively compared. Independent associations between demographic and disease features and outcome of breakthrough infections were estimated by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 2314 cases were included in the analysis (unvaccinated n=923, double-vaccinated n=551, triple-vaccinated n=803, quadruple-vaccinated n=37). SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred after a median of 151 (range 14-347) days in patients being double-vaccinated, and after 88 (range 14-270) days in those with a third vaccination. Hospitalisation was required in 15% of unvaccinated, 8% of double-vaccinated and 3% of triple-vaccinated/quadruple-vaccinated patients (p<0.001). Mortality was 2% in unvaccinated, 1.8% in the double-vaccinated and 0.6% in triple-vaccinated patients. Compared with unvaccinated patients, double-vaccinated (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.62) and triple-vaccinated (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.21) patients showed a significant lower risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisation. Using multivariable analysis, the third vaccination was significantly associated with a lower risk for COVID-19-related death (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Our cross-sectional data of COVID-19 infections in patients with IRD showed a significant reduction of hospitalisation due to infection in double-vaccinated or triple-vaccinated patients compared with those without vaccination and even a significant reduction of COVID-19-related deaths in triple-vaccinated patients. These data strongly support the beneficial effect of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IRD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EuDRACT 2020-001958-21.

A rare side effect of methotrexate therapy: drug-induced osteopathy with multiple fractures of the lower limb

Methotrexate is associated with bone lesions that are rare and, although presenting with a typical localisation to the lower extremities and appearing with a characteristic radiologic morphology, largely unknown and often misdiagnosed as osteoporotic insufficiency fractures. The correct and early diagnosis, however, is key for treatment and prevention of further osteopathology. Here, we present a patient with rheumatoid arthritis who developed multiple painful insufficiency fractures in the left foot (processus anterior calcanei, tuber calcanei) and in the right lower leg and foot (anterior and dorsal calcaneus and at the cuboid and distal tibia) during therapy with methotrexate, which were all misdiagnosed as osteoporotic. The fractures occurred between 8 months and 35 months after starting methotrexate. Discontinuation of methotrexate resulted in rapid pain relief and no further fractures have occurred. This case powerfully demonstrates the importance of raising awareness of methotrexate osteopathy in order to take appropriate therapeutic measures, including and perniciously discontinuing methotrexate.

[Rheumatological side effects of checkpoint inhibitors and their treatment]

The spectrum of tumors for which checkpoint inhibitor (CI) treatment is used is constantly expanding. The European Medicines Agency has currently approved nine CIs: one anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) CI, one anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) CI, four anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) CIs and three anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) CIs. By blocking immune checkpoints the physiological downregulation of T cell activity against autologous tissue is prevented. This results in an immunologically unregulated activation of T cells directed against malignant cells. Healthy tissue also expresses antigens and thereby continuously activates autologous T cells. Thus, the blockade of immune checkpoints can lead to T cell activity against healthy tissue (immune-related adverse events, irAE). The irAEs can occur in any organ system and approximately 10% of all patients under CI treatment develop rheumatological irAEs, mostly arthralgia and myalgia. The classification criteria of rheumatological diseases do not need to be met to initiate treatment and the primary goal of treatment of irAEs is to enable continuation of CI treatment. Rheumatological irAEs should be recognized and treated quickly. In the treatment of musculoskeletal irAEs, three stages can be defined. In the first stage, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or intra-articular as well as systemic glucocorticoids are used. In the second stage, conventional synthetic and in the third stage, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are used. The most severe musculoskeletal irAE is myositis with cardiac and/or respiratory involvement and/or myasthenia gravis. In addition to high-dose glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulins or plasma exchange are used in treatment.

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update

OBJECTIVES

To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.

METHODS

An international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3-6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.

Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the open-label, randomised controlled ORAL Surveillance trial

OBJECTIVES

To characterise infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in ORAL Surveillance.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, patients with RA aged≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times per day or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with first events/100 patient-years) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for infections, overall and by age (50-<65 years; ≥65 years). Probabilities of infections were obtained (Kaplan-Meier estimates). Cox modelling identified infection risk factors.

RESULTS

IRs/HRs for all infections, serious infection events (SIEs) and non-serious infections (NSIs) were higher with tofacitinib (10>5 mg two times per day) versus TNFi. For SIEs, HR (95% CI) for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, respectively, were 1.17 (0.92 to 1.50) and 1.48 (1.17 to 1.87). Increased IRs/HRs for all infections and SIEs with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi were more pronounced in patients aged≥65 vs 50-<65 years. SIE probability increased from month 18 and before month 6 with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, respectively. NSI probability increased before month 6 with both tofacitinib doses versus TNFi. Across treatments, the most predictive risk factors for SIEs were increasing age, baseline opioid use, history of chronic lung disease and time-dependent oral corticosteroid use, and, for NSIs, female sex, history of chronic lung disease/infections, past smoking and time-dependent Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein.

CONCLUSIONS

Infections were higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi. Findings may inform future treatment decisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02092467.

[Development of quality standards for patients with rheumatoid arthritis for use in Germany]

Despite a qualitatively and structurally good care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, there are still potentially amendable deficits in the quality of care. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has therefore decided to ask a group of experts including various stakeholders to develop quality standards (QS) for the care of patients with RA in order to improve the quality of care. The QS are used to determine and quantitatively measure the quality of care, subject to relevance and feasibility. The recently published NICE and ASAS standards and a systematic literature search were used as the basis for development. A total of 8 QS, now published for the first time, were approved with the intention to measure and further optimize the quality of care for patients with RA in Germany.

Tocilizumab for the Treatment of Familial Mediterranean Fever-A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study

Background: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the IL-6 receptor antibody Tocilizumab (TCZ) in the treatment of Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF). Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase II trial in adult patients with active FMF and an inadequate response or intolerance to colchicine (crFMF). The physician’s global assessment of disease activity (PGA), based on a five-point scale for six symptoms, was used as a clinical score, which had to be >2 at screening, together with elevated c-reactive protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and serum amyloid A (SAA) levels, to be eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either receive monthly TCZ or a placebo over a period of 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the number of patients achieving an adequate response to treatment at week 16, defined as a PGA of ≤2 and normalized ESR or CRP and normalized SAA. Results: We randomized 25 patients with a median age of 31 years. At week 16, an adequate treatment response was achieved by two patients in the TCZ and none of the patients in the placebo arm (p = 0.089). SAA levels normalized with TCZ, but not with the placebo (p = 0.015). Conclusion: In this first randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with active crFMF, more patients in the TCZ arm experienced a response to treatment in comparison to those receiving the placebo. As the prevention of amyloidosis is a major treatment goal in FMF, the normalization of SAA in TCZ-treated patients is essential. These findings have to be confirmed in a larger trial.

Reactive arthritis after SARS-CoV-2 infection

SARS-CoV-2 has been recognised as a potential trigger of inflammatory arthritis in individuals with inflammatory rheumatic diseases as well as in previously unaffected individuals. However, new-onset arthritis after COVID-19 is a heterogeneous phenomenon that complicates differential diagnosis. For example, acute arthritis with features of viral arthritis has been reported after COVID-19, as has crystal-induced arthritis. Arthritides mimicking reactive arthritis (ReA) have also been described, but these patients often do not fulfil the typical features of ReA: several reports describe cases of patients older than 45 years at the onset of arthritis, and the characteristic genetic feature of ReA, HLA-B27, is rarely found. Because viral infections are much less likely to cause ReA than bacterial infections, and respiratory infections are rarely the cause of ReA, it is currently unknown whether SARS-CoV-2 can cause true ReA. Here, we report the case of a 30-year-old patient who presented with acute pain, swelling and redness in the left metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and ankle 7 days after resolution of a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Diagnostics revealed arthritis of the MTP2, synovitis of the upper ankle with significant joint effusion and peritendinitis of the flexor tendons. Based on the clinical manifestations and diagnostic test results, ReA appeared to be the most likely cause. A screening for typical ReA-associated infections was negative. The patient was treated with NSAIDs and intra-articular and systemic glucocorticoids. At a follow-up visit after discontinuation of glucocorticoids, the patient was symptom-free. Overall, we observed a ReA with typical clinical, genetic and patient characteristics after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and we conclude that a direct association with COVID-19 is highly plausible.

Environmental and societal factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic disease: an observational study

Background

Differences in the distribution of individual-level clinical risk factors across regions do not fully explain the observed global disparities in COVID-19 outcomes. We aimed to investigate the associations between environmental and societal factors and country-level variations in mortality attributed to COVID-19 among people with rheumatic disease globally.

Methods

In this observational study, we derived individual-level data on adults (aged 18-99 years) with rheumatic disease and a confirmed status of their highest COVID-19 severity level from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance (GRA) registry, collected between March 12, 2020, and Aug 27, 2021. Environmental and societal factors were obtained from publicly available sources. The primary endpoint was mortality attributed to COVID-19. We used a multivariable logistic regression to evaluate independent associations between environmental and societal factors and death, after controlling for individual-level risk factors. We used a series of nested mixed-effects models to establish whether environmental and societal factors sufficiently explained country-level variations in death.

Findings

14 044 patients from 23 countries were included in the analyses. 10 178 (72·5%) individuals were female and 3866 (27·5%) were male, with a mean age of 54·4 years (SD 15·6). Air pollution (odds ratio 1·10 per 10 μg/m3 [95% CI 1·01-1·17]; p=0·0105), proportion of the population aged 65 years or older (1·19 per 1% increase [1·10-1·30]; p<0·0001), and population mobility (1·03 per 1% increase in number of visits to grocery and pharmacy stores [1·02-1·05]; p<0·0001 and 1·02 per 1% increase in number of visits to workplaces [1·00-1·03]; p=0·032) were independently associated with higher odds of mortality. Number of hospital beds (0·94 per 1-unit increase per 1000 people [0·88-1·00]; p=0·046), human development index (0·65 per 0·1-unit increase [0·44-0·96]; p=0·032), government response stringency (0·83 per 10-unit increase in containment index [0·74-0·93]; p=0·0018), as well as follow-up time (0·78 per month [0·69-0·88]; p<0·0001) were independently associated with lower odds of mortality. These factors sufficiently explained country-level variations in death attributable to COVID-19 (intraclass correlation coefficient 1·2% [0·1-9·5]; p=0·14).

Interpretation

Our findings highlight the importance of environmental and societal factors as potential explanations of the observed regional disparities in COVID-19 outcomes among people with rheumatic disease and lay foundation for a new research agenda to address these disparities.

Funding

American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology.

Consensus statement on blocking interleukin-6 receptor and interleukin-6 in inflammatory conditions: an update

BACKGROUND

Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6Rα antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway.

METHODS

A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document.

RESULTS

The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers.

AB0344 EFFICACY OF SUBCUTANEOUS INFLIXIMAB (CT-P13 SC) COMPARED WITH INTRAVENOUS INFLIXIMAB IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background

Subcutaneous (SC) CT-P13 is the first and only subcutaneous formulation of infliximab (IFX) approved by the EMA.1 In the pivotal study (NCT03147248), non-inferiority of SC IFX to intravenous (IV) was demonstrated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) C-reactive protein (CRP) improvement at Week 22, with a statistically significant treatment difference of 0.27 (95% CI 0.02, 0.52) favoring the SC versus the IV arm.2,3 At Week 30, numerical differences in efficacy outcomes were shown between SC and IV IFX favoring SC IFX. IV group patients switched to SC IFX by Week 30, and the difference between the groups was reduced at Week 54.2

Objectives

To investigate whether there was a statistically significant difference between SC and IV IFX at Weeks 30 and 54 in the phase 3 pivotal study of CT-P13 SC using conservative missing imputation methods.

Methods

Patients with active RA who had an inadequate response to MTX received IV IFX 3mg/kg at Weeks 0 and 2 for induction and were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive SC IFX 120mg every 2 weeks or IV 3mg/kg every 8 weeks thereafter for maintenance. Patients who were randomized to receive IV IFX switched to SC at Week 30. In this post-hoc analysis, non-responder imputation (NRI) and last observation carried forward (LOCF) methods were used to investigate whether the difference in efficacy outcomes between SC and IV IFX at Weeks 30 and 54 was statistically significant. Assessments included EULAR (CRP/ESR)/ACR response; remission rate and low disease activity (LDA) rate based on DAS28 (CRP/ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI); Boolean remission rate; and the proportion of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ).

Results

Of the 343 randomized patients, 165 patients who received SC IFX and 174 patients who received IV IFX from the efficacy population were included in the analysis. There was a statistically significant difference in SC IFX compared to IV treated patients at Week 30 using both NRI and LOCF methods in almost all the clinical variables. However, the difference in efficacy outcomes between SC IFX and IV was reduced at Week 54 after the IV group switched to SC. This supports the improved efficacy of SC IFX at Week 30. Some of the key results (EULAR [CRP] responses, LDA rates based on DAS28 [CRP], CDAI, and SDAI) were presented in Figure 1. Analysis using LOCF and NRI methods yielded consistent results across most of the efficacy outcomes.

Figure 1.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between SC IFX and IV IFX in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

*P<0.05.

P-value for difference in proportion between SC and IV treatment group was obtained by asymptotic Wald test.

Low disease activity based on DAS28 (CRP) (< 3.2), CDAI (eatment group AI (≤ 11.0).

Conclusion

Statistical analyses using conservative missing imputation methods showed significantly greater improvements in clinical outcomes with SC IFX compared to IV at Week 30 in patients with RA. Between-group differences was reduced at Week 54, suggesting improved responses after switching from IV to SC.

References

[1]Remsima summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/remsima-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Published 2021. Accessed 10 January 2022.

[2]Westhovens R, Wiland P, Zawadzki M, et al. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous CT-P13 in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized phase I/III trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(5):2277-2287.

[3]Combe B, Allanore Y, Alten R, et al. Comparative efficacy of subcutaneous (CT-P13) and intravenous infliximab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-regression of individual patient data from two randomised trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):119.

Disclosure of Interests

Arnaud Constantin Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Boehringer, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Boehringer, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, MSD, UCB, Roche,Janssen, Novartis, Sandoz, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Janssen, Novartis, Sandoz, Christopher John Edwards Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Celltrion, Chugai, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Chugai, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: Celltrion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Joao Eurico Fonseca Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Ache, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Florenzo Iannone Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, MSD, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, MSD, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: BMS, MSD, Edward Keystone Speakers bureau: Amgen, AbbVie, Celltrion, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Janssen Inc., Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celltrion, Myriad Autoimmune, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Janssen Inc, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Samsung Bioepsis, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Merck, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Hendrik Schulze-Koops Consultant of: Celltrion, Taeksang Kwon Employee of: Celltrion Healthcare, Seungmin Kim Employee of: Celltrion Healthcare, Sangwook Yoon Employee of: Celltrion Healthcare, Dong-Hyeon Kim Employee of: Celltrion Healthcare, Gahee Park Employee of: Celltrion Inc., DaeHyun Yoo Speakers bureau: Celltrion, Celltrion Healthcare

POS1246 COVID-19 IN RITUXIMAB TREATED PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Background

At the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the influence of anti-inflammatory therapy on the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) was unknown. In the meantime, several data indicate an association of severe courses of COVID-19 with the use of rituximab (RTX).

Objectives

To gather further knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 infections in RTX-treated IRD patients, data from the German COVID-19-IRD-registry were analysed.

Methods

Hospitalisation was used as a surrogate of COVID-19 severity. Baseline characteristics, disease features, medication and outcome of COVID-19 were compared in RTX-treated inpatients and outpatients.

Results

In total, 3592 cases were reported in the registry, which included 130 RTX patients (3.6%) for our analysis. RTX-treated inpatients were older than RTX-treated outpatients (median age 63 y vs 56 y, p=0.007). Patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis treated with RTX (n=32) showed a significant higher COVID-19 related hospitalisation rate (33% vs 11%, p=0.005), which was not the case for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (49% vs 50%). Cardiovascular comorbidities were reported more frequently in hospitalised RTX-treated patients (20% vs. 6%, p=0.032). More than 50% of the RTX-treated inpatients developed COVID-19 related complications, e.g. acute respiratory distress syndrome. The median time period between the last RTX treatment and SARS-CoV-2 infection was shorter in inpatients than in non-hospitalised patients (3 (range 0-17) vs. 4 months (range -29), p=0.039). The COVID-19 related mortality rate was 14% (n=19) in RTX-treated IRD patients. In RTX-treated inpatients and outpatients, there were no relevant differences with respect to the use of concomitant glucocorticoids or other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, disease activity, median last RTX dose or median number of immunomodulatory drugs prior to RTX treatment.

Conclusion

In addition to general risk factors, such as age and comorbidities, it is already known that IRD patients treated with RTX show a higher rate of severe COVID-19. In our registry, RTX-treated patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis appear to be at even higher risk to develop severe COVID-19 compared to other IRD. Moreover, the shorter the time since the last RTX treatment, the higher seems to be the risk of developing severe COVID-19. This might be explained by a more profound B-cell depletion in the first weeks after RTX treatment warranting further studies.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OP0043 TOCILIZUMAB SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES SERUM AMYLOID A IN PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL MEDITERRANEAN FEVER – DATA FROM THE PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TOFFIFE STUDY

Background

Uncontrolled inflammation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) can lead to severe organ failure due to amyloidosis. Colchicine is still the standard treatment and the only therapy that has been proven to reduce the risk for amyloidosis. Besides colchicine the Interleukin (IL)1-antagonists Anakinra and Canakinumab are approved, but new treatment options are still needed. The IL-6 antagonist Tocilizumab (TCZ) effectively reduces inflammation and is approved in several other rheumatic indication. Here we present data from our phase II study TCZ for the treatment of FMF – TOFFIFE.

Objectives

To explore the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in FMF.

Methods

The TOFFIFE study was a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of TCZ in patients with colchicine resistant (cr)FMF. The physician’s global assessment of disease activity (PGA) based on a 5 point-scale for 6 symptoms (range 0-24) was used as a clinical score and had to be >2 at screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either receive monthly TCZ intravenously with 8 mg/kg bodyweight or placebo over a period of 24 weeks. Patients with inadequate response after week 12 had the opportunity to receive open label TCZ at week 16. The primary endpoint was the number of patients achieving an adequate response to treatment at week 16, defined as a PGA ≤ 2 + normalized ESR or CRP (the item that led to inclusion had to be normalized) + normalized SAA. Secondary endpoints included normalization of SAA during treatment and safety of TCZ in FMF patients.

Results

25 patients were randomized with a median age of 31 years (range 18 - 53y), of which 14 (56%) were female. At week 16, which was the timepoint for the primary end point, 2 (15.4%) patients in the TCZ arm reached the primary end point with a PGA ≤ 2 and normalization of SAA and CRP and/or ESR but none of the patients in the placebo arm. Therefore, the superiority of TCZ compared to placebo could be shown concerning the pre-specified significance level of α=0.2 (p=0.089). SAA levels normalized with TCZ but not with PBO. This difference between TCZ und PBO was highly significant; SAA p < 0.015. At week 28 with 17 remaining patients and after having had the opportunity for a rescue treatment at week 16, the responder rates (PGA ≤ 2 + normalization of SAA, ESR and/or CRP) were 25% (n=1) in those patients who changed from placebo to TCZ (n=4) and 20% (n=2) in those patients who continued with TCZ (n=10). Of note, all 3 patients remaining on PBO were non-responders (p= 0.642). In 75% of patients (n=3) CRP and in 50% SAA (n=2) normalized after changing to TCZ. No new safety aspects occurred.

Conclusion

In this first randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with active crFMF TCZ significantly reduced and normalized SAA levels. The trial met the primary endpoint to demonstrate the superiority of TCZ over PBO although only a small numerical difference was found. Nevertheless, the proportion of patients with a successful TCZ-therapy was lower than expected due to very strict response criteria; patients had to achieve a complete remission with a PGA ≤2 (on a 0-24 scale) and normalization of the inflammatory parameters (CRP/ESR and SAA). This required no or only mildest symptoms during the last 4 weeks. A larger multicenter study is therefore justifiable and needs to clarify the benefit of TCZ treatment in FMF.

Figure 1.

Secondary endpoint: Serum Amyloid A over time, showing a clear reduction in the TCZ but not in the PBO arm and rerise of SAA after discontinuation after week 28. Normal SAA value = < 10mg/l. Outliers > 100mg/l were excluded in this graph.

Disclosure of Interests

Jörg Henes Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Consultant of: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Grant/research support from: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Sebastian Saur: None declared, David M Kofler: None declared, Claudia Kedor: None declared, Christoph Meisner: None declared, Martin Krusche Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Ina Kötter Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Consultant of: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Theodoros Xenitidis: None declared, Hendrik Schulze-Koops Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Consultant of: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Eugen Feist Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai, Consultant of: SOBI, Novartis, Roche/Chugai.

POS0679 CLINICAL OUTCOMES UP TO WEEK (W) 48 IN THE ONGOING FILGOTINIB (FIL) LONG-TERM EXTENSION (LTE) TRIAL OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) PATIENTS (pts) WITH INADEQUATE RESPONSE (IR) TO METHOTREXATE (MTX) INITIALLY TREATED WITH FIL OR ADALIMUMAB (ADA) DURING THE PHASE 3 PARENT STUDY (PS)

Background

The preferential Janus kinase-1 inhibitor FIL is approved for treatment of moderate to severe active RA in Europe and Japan.

Objectives

Efficacy and safety of FIL were assessed in pts with IR to MTX who completed a Phase 3 trial (NCT02889796)1 and enrolled in an LTE (NCT03025308).

Methods

Pts completing the PS1 on study drug were eligible to enter the LTE (data cutoff: June 1, 2020). Median exposure: 2.2 years (y). Efficacy data to W48 are reported for 4 treatment groups (all with background MTX): pts receiving FIL 200 mg (FIL200) or FIL 100 mg (FIL100) in the PS and continuing their dose in LTE (FIL200/FIL200, FIL100/FIL100) and ADA pts rerandomized, double blind, to FIL200 or FIL100 for LTE (ADA/FIL200, ADA/FIL100); safety data are reported.

Results

As of June 1, 2020, 522/571 (91%) FIL200/FIL200, 502/570 (88%) FIL100/FIL100, 118/128 (92%) ADA/FIL200, and 115/130 (89%) ADA/FIL100 pts remained on study drug. LTE baseline disease characteristics were similar between groups: mean duration of RA approximately 8.7 y; DAS28(CRP) 2.55, and mean concurrent MTX dosage was 15.0 mg/week. Proportions of pts achieving ACR20/50/70, DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2, <2.6, and CDAI ≤10, ≤2.8 were generally maintained in all LTE groups through W48 (Figure 1). Numerically greater proportions of pts met response criteria at W48 in the FIL200 groups vs FIL100, regardless of PS treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAE), serious AEs, and AEs Grade ≥3 were largely comparable between groups and lowest in ADA/FIL100. There were 10 deaths (Table 1). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs)/100 pt-y of exposure for deaths were lower for FIL/FIL vs ADA/FIL.

Table 1.

EAIRs of TEAEs in LTE, as of June 1, 2020

1TEAE, n (%)3FIL200+MTX → FIL200+MTX6ADA+MTX → FIL200+MTX9FIL100+MTX → FIL100+MTX12ADA+MTX → FIL100+MTX2EAIR (95% CI)4n=5717n=12810n=57013n=1305PYE=859.48PYE=197.811PYE=852.314PYE=192.6TEAE429 (75.1)91 (71.1)443 (77.7)88 (67.7)49.9 (45.4, 54.9)46.0 (37.5, 56.5)52.0 (47.4, 57.0)45.7 (37.1, 56.3)TEAE Grade ≥364 (11.2)15 (11.7)72 (12.6)7 (5.4)7.4 (5.8, 9.5)7.6 (4.6, 12.6)8.4 (6.7, 10.6)3.6 (1.7, 7.6)TE serious AE52 (9.1)13 (10.2)60 (10.5)9 (6.9)6.1 (4.6, 7.9)6.6 (3.8, 11.3)7.0 (5.5, 9.1)4.7 (2.4, 9.0)Death3 (0.5)2 (1.6)3 (0.5)2 (1.5)0.3 (0.1, 1.1)1.0 (0.3, 4.0)0.4 (0.1, 1.1)1.0 (0.3, 4.2)TE infections243 (42.6)52 (40.6)249 (43.7)43 (33.1)28.3 (24.9, 32.1)26.3 (20.0, 34.5)29.2 (25.8, 33.1)22.3 (16.6, 30.1)TE serious infections7 (1.2)2 (1.6)13 (2.3)1 (0.8)0.8 (0.4, 1.7)1.0 (0.3, 4.0)1.5 (0.9, 2.6)0.5 (0.1, 3.7)Opportunistic infections2 (0.4)02 (0.4)00.2 (0, 0.8)0 (0, 1.9)0.2 (0, 0.8)0 (0, 1.9)TE herpes zoster16 (2.8)5 (3.9)13 (2.3)1 (0.8)1.9 (1.1, 3.0)2.5 (1.1,6.1)1.5 (0.9, 2.6)0.5 (0.1, 3.7)TE MACE (adjudicated)1 (0.2)03 (0.5)3 (2.3)01 (0, 0.6)0 (0, 1.9)0.4 (0.1, 1.1)1.6 (0.5, 4.8)TE DVT/PE (adjudicated)3 (0.5)03 (0.5)00.3 (0.1, 1.0)0 (0, 1.9)0.4 (0.1, 1.0)0 (0, 1.9)Malignancies (excluding NMSC)5 (0.9)3 (2.3)4 (0.7)00.6 (0.2, 1.4)1.5 (0.5, 4.7)0.5 (0.1, 1.2)0 (0, 1.9)NMSC3 (0.5)02 (0.4)00.3 (0.1, 1.0)0 (0, 1.9)0.2 (0, 0.8)0 (0, 1.9)

DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancer; PE, pulmonary embolism; TE, treatment-emergent

Figure 1.

Conclusion

During the LTE through W48, response rates generally were maintained for FIL/FIL and ADA/FIL pts. Though there were differences between LTE groups, safety was largely comparable and consistent with PS observations1 and previously reported results from 7 trials2: rates of AEs of special interest were low; all confidence intervals were overlapping. Limitation: the LTE was not formally randomized for comparison between FIL/FIL and ADA/FIL treatment groups, the groups were of unequal size, and the switch from ADA to FIL for LTE was by design, rather than based on disease activity.

References

[1]Combe B et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:848–58.

[2]Winthrop K et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72(suppl 10); abstract 0229.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA. Medical writing support was provided by Claudine Bitel, PhD, of AlphaScientia, LLC, San Francisco, CA; and funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA.

Disclosure of Interests

Bernard Combe Speakers bureau: BMS, Eli Lilly & Co., Gilead Sciences, Inc., MSD, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly & Co., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai, Yoshiya Tanaka Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Astellas, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Daiichi- Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and YL Biologics, Consultant of: AbbVie, Ayumi, Daiichi- Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Sanofi, and Taisho, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Takeda, Paul Emery Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Samsung, and Sandoz, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, and Samsung, Alena Pechonkina Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Albert Kuo Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Qi Gong Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Katrien Van Beneden Shareholder of: Galapagos NV, Employee of: Galapagos NV, Vijay Rajendran Shareholder of: Galapagos NV, Employee of: Galapagos NV, Hendrik Schulze-Koops Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie and Novartis

OP0179 CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOMES OF SARS-CoV-2 BREAKTHROUGH INFECTIONS AMONG DOUBLE AND TRIPLE VACCINATED PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Background

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines offer the most effective way to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19. Recent data indicate sufficient immune response after vaccination in most patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) on immunomodulatory treatments.

Objectives

To investigate the clinical profile of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections among double and triple vaccinated patients with IRD.

Methods

Data from the German COVID-19-IRD registry, collected by treating rheumatologists between February 2021 and January 2022 were analysed. Patients double or triple vaccinated against COVID-19 ≥14 days prior to proven SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified, and type of IRD, vaccine, immunomodulation, comorbidities and outcome of the infection were compared with 737 unvaccinated IRD-patients with COVID-19.

Results

In total, 271 cases of breakthrough infections were reported, 250 patients (91%) had received two doses of vaccines, 21 (9%) patients three. More than 70% of the patients received Pfizer/Biontech vaccine for the first, second and third vaccination. The median time from second/third vaccine dose to infection was 148 days (range 14-302) days. Most of the patients were diagnosed with inflammatory joint diseases (Table 1). Most of the patients were treated with methotrexate (Table 1). The use of Januskinase inhibitors(i) was more frequently reported in double vaccinated patients (10.4% vs 4.8%), whereas tumor necrosis (TNF)i were reported more often in triple vaccinated patients (33.3% vs. 22.8). Hospitalisation rate was higher in unvaccinated IRD-patients than in vaccinated ones, while fatality rate was similar in unvaccinated and double vaccinated patients. Although the rate of comorbidities and median age were higher in triple-vaccinated patients, infected patients showed a lower rate of hospitalisation, neither COVID-19 related complications, nor the need of oxygen treatment or death.

Table 1.

Profile of vaccinated IRD patients

unvaccinated2ndvaccination3rdvaccinationNumber (737)%Number (250)%Number (21)%Age56 (18-93)57 (22-90)63 (35-88)Female47864.915863.21361.9BMI26.8 (17-53)26.7 (17-55)25.4 (18-41)Inflammatory rheumatic disease (multiple selections possible)Inflammatory joint diseases56175.918674.41676.2Connective tissue diseases10112.8301229.6Vasculitis719.6228.8314.3Other IRD638.52911.614.8Immunomodulation (multiple selections possible)Glucocorticoid21228.86726.8523.8Methotrexate27036.69036838.1Azathioprine192.672.8//Cyclosporine30.410.4//Leflunomide506.872.8//Hydroxychloroquine7910.7239.214.8Sulfasalazine202.793.6//JAKi547.32610.414.8TNFi15821.45722.8733.3Abatacept91.231.2//Rituximab212.8114.414.8Other biologics597.93212.829.6Mycophenolate15241.6//Immunoglobulines20.310.4//Apremilast40.5////Cyclophosphamide10.110.4//No immunomodulation7410228.814.8No/low disease activity62584.822389.21885.7Moderate/high disease activity10213.82710.8314.3ComorbiditiesCardiovascular diseases32944.6130521361.9Diabetes mellitus7610.32510//Osteoporosis435.8218.429.5Chronic renal failure405.4166.4419Cancer/history of cancer152.0104314.3COPD253.4104//ILD162.272.8//Bronchial asthma344.6166.4//Pregnancy70.910.414.8No comorbidity25434.59738.8523.8Complications due to COVID-19Hospitalisation13518.32911.629.5Oxygen treatment11415.5249.6//Invasive ventilation253.493.6//Death162.272.8//

Conclusion

In this cohort of triple-vaccinated IRD patients no fatal courses and no COVID-19 related complications were reported, although median age and rate of comorbidities were higher compared to double-vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. These results support the general recommendations to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 disease by administering three doses of vaccine, especially in patients with older age, presence of comorbidities, and on immunomodulatory treatment.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OA29 Clinical outcomes up to week 48 of filgotinib treatment in an ongoing long-term extension trial of RA patients with inadequate response to methotrexate initially treated with filgotinib or adalimumab during the Phase 3 Parent Trial

Background/Aims

The preferential Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor filgotinib (FIL) is approved for treatment of moderately to severely active RA in Europe and Japan. We assessed efficacy and safety of FIL in patients (pts) with inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR) who completed a Phase 3 trial (NCT02889796) and went on to enroll in a long-term extension (LTE; NCT03025308).

Methods

Pts who completed the parent study (PS) on study drug were eligible to enter the LTE. LTE data cutoff was June 1, 2020, and safety data are reported to that date, with median exposure 2.2 years. Efficacy data to W48 are reported for 4 treatment groups (all with background MTX): pts who received FIL 200mg (FIL200) or FIL 100mg (FIL100) in the PS and continued their dose in LTE (FIL200/FIL200, FIL100/FIL100) and ADA pts who were re-randomized, double blind, to FIL200 or FIL100 for LTE (ADA/FIL200, ADA/FIL100). ACR20/50/70 response rates, DAS28[CRP] ≤3.2 and &lt;2.6, and CDAI ≤10 and ≤2.8 are reported. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR)/100 pt-years of exposure of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and AEs of special interest (AESIs) are summarized.

Results

As of June 1, 2020, 522/571 (91%) FIL200/FIL200, 502/570 (88%) FIL100/FIL100, 118/128 (92%) ADA/FIL200, and 115/130 (89%) ADA/FIL100 pts were still on study drug. LTE baseline (BL) disease characteristics were similar between groups: mean duration of RA was approximately 8.7 years; DAS28(CRP) was 2.55 and mean MTX dosage was 15.0 mg/week. Proportions of pts achieving ACR20/50/70, DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2, &lt;2.6, and CDAI ≤10, ≤2.8 were maintained in all 4 LTE groups through W48. Numerically greater proportions of pts met response criteria at W48 in the FIL200 groups vs FIL100, regardless of PS treatment. TEAEs, serious AEs, and AEs Grade ≥3 were largely comparable between groups and lowest in ADA/FIL100 pts. There were 3 deaths in each PS FIL group and 2 in each PS ADA group; EAIRs for deaths were lower for FIL/FIL groups compared with ADA/FIL groups. Opportunistic infections occurred only in FIL/FIL pts (2 in each group). Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC; n = 5) occurred only in FIL/FIL groups, and malignancies excluding NMSC occurred in all groups except ADA/FIL100.

Conclusion

During the LTE through W48, response rates were maintained for FIL/FIL and ADA/FIL pts. Though there were differences between LTE groups, safety was largely comparable and consistent with that observed in the PS and in previously reported results of safety data from 7 trials: rates of AESIs were low, and all confidence intervals were overlapping. Limitation: the LTE was not formally randomized for comparison between FIL/FIL and ADA/FIL treatment groups, the groups were of unequal size, and the switch from ADA to FIL for LTE was by design, rather than based on disease activity.

Disclosure

B. Combe: Consultancies; AbbVie; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; and Sanofi. Member of speakers’ bureau; for BMS; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; MSD; Pfizer; Roche- Chugai; and UCB. Grants/research support; Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai. Y. Tanaka: Consultancies; Eli Lilly, Daiichi- Sankyo, Taisho, Ayumi, Sanofi, GSK, Abbvie. Member of speakers’ bureau; Daiichi- Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Abbvie, Astellas, Pfizer, Sanofi, Asahi-kasei, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Gilead, Janssen. Grants/research support; Abbvie, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Asahi-Kasei, Eisai, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo. P. Emery: Consultancies; AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Samsung, and Sandoz. Grants/research support; AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, and Samsung. A. Pechonkina: Shareholder/stock ownership; employee and shareholder in Gilead Sciences, Inc. A. Kuo: Shareholder/stock ownership; employee and shareholder in Gilead Sciences, Inc. Q. Gong: Shareholder/stock ownership; employee and shareholder in Gilead Sciences, Inc. K. Van Beneden: Shareholder/stock ownership; employee of and shareholder in Galapagos, NV. V. Rajendran: Shareholder/stock ownership; employee of and shareholder in Galapagos, NV. H. Schulze-Koops: Consultancies; from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis- Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. Grants/research support; AbbVie and Novartis.

EULAR recommendations for the management and vaccination of people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the context of SARS-CoV-2: the November 2021 update

The first EULAR provisional recommendations on the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) in the context of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), largely based on expert opinion, were published in June 2020. Since then, an unprecedented number of clinical studies have accrued in the literature. Several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been approved for population-wide vaccination programmes in EULAR-affiliated countries. Studies regarding vaccination of patients with (inflammatory) RMDs have released their first results or are underway.EULAR found it opportune to carefully review to what extent the initially consensus expert recommendations stood the test of time, by challenging them with the recently accumulated body of scientific evidence, and by incorporating evidence-based advice on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. EULAR started a formal (first) update in January 2021, performed a systematic literature review according to EULAR's standard operating procedures and completed a set of updated overarching principles and recommendations in July 2021. Two points to consider were added in November 2021, because of recent developments pertaining to additional vaccination doses.

Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous ianalumab (VAY736) in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-finding trial

BACKGROUND

Sjögren's syndrome is an autoimmune disease characterised by dry eyes and mouth, systemic features, and reduced quality of life. There are no disease-modifying treatments. A new biologic, ianalumab (VAY736), with two modes of suppressing B cells, has previously shown preliminary efficacy. This dose-finding trial aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of different subcutaneous doses of ianalumab in patients with moderate to severe primary Sjögren's syndrome.

METHODS

VAY736A2201 was a randomised, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-finding study done in 56 centres in 19 countries. Patients aged 18-75 years with primary Sjögren's syndrome with moderate to severe disease activity (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology [EULAR] Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index [ESSDAI] score ≥6) and symptom severity (EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index score ≥5) were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous placebo or ianalumab (5 mg, 50 mg, or 300 mg) every 4 weeks for 24 weeks using a secure, online randomisation system. Randomisation was stratified by the ESSDAI score at baseline (≥10 or <10). Study personnel and patients were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the change in ESSDAI score from baseline to 24 weeks in all randomly assigned patients. Dose-related change in disease activity (ESSDAI) from baseline at week 24 was assessed by multiple comparison procedure with modelling analysis. Safety was measured in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02962895.

FINDINGS

Between June 27, 2017, and Dec 06, 2018, 293 patients were screened, 190 of whom were randomly assigned (placebo n=49, ianalumab 5 mg n=47, ianalumab 50 mg n=47, ianalumab 300 mg n=47). Statistically significant dose-responses were seen for overall disease activity (ESSDAI score) in four of the five dose-response models tested (p<0·025 in four models, p=0·060 in one model). The ESSDAI score decreased from baseline in all ianalumab groups, with the maximal ESSDAI score change from baseline observed in the ianalumab 300 mg group: placebo-adjusted least-squares mean change from baseline -1·92 points (95% CI -4·15 to 0·32; p=0·092). There were four serious adverse events in three patients considered treatment-related (pneumonia [n=1] and gastroenteritis [n=1] in the placebo group; appendicitis plus tubo-ovarian abscess in the same patient in the ianalumab 50 mg group).

INTERPRETATION

The study met its primary objective, showing a dose-related decrease in disease activity as measured by ESSDAI at week 24. Overall, ianalumab was well tolerated and safe, with no increase in infections. To our knowledge, this is the first large, randomised, controlled trial in primary Sjögren's syndrome that met its primary endpoint, and its results mean there is potential for more studies of this mechanism in the future.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Effect of dose adjustments on the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of an open-label, long-term extension study (ORAL Sequel)

Introduction/objectives

We assess the impact of switching versus staying on the same tofacitinib dose on efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

ORAL Sequel was an open-label, long-term extension study of patients with RA receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID for up to 9.5 years. Tofacitinib doses could be switched during the study at investigator discretion. In this post hoc analysis, data from ORAL Sequel were stratified into four groups: 5 → 10 mg BID (Dose-up); 5 mg BID (Stay-on 5); 10 → 5 mg BID (Dose-down); and 10 mg BID (Stay-on 10). Efficacy assessments over 12 months included: change from baseline in 4-component Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28), and DAS28 minimum clinically important difference, remission, and low disease activity (LDA) rates. Safety was assessed for the study duration.

Results

Generally, DAS28 improvements and minimum clinically important difference rates were significantly greater (p < 0.05) in Dose-up versus Stay-on 5 up to month 12. DAS28 remission rates were significantly greater in Dose-up versus Stay-on 5 at month 12. Change from baseline in DAS28 was similar in Dose-down and Stay-on 10. No significant differences in DAS28 LDA rates were observed between groups. Safety data were similar overall across the four groups.

Conclusion

In patients with RA receiving open-label tofacitinib, this analysis found that some benefited from increasing dose from 5 to 10 mg BID and did not find that reducing dose from 10 to 5 mg BID affected efficacy or that dose switching in either direction affected safety.

Study registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00413699. Registered December 20, 2006. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00413699

Key Points • This post hoc analysis of data from the long-term extension study, ORAL Sequel, assessed the impact of dose switching between tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID), at the investigator’s discretion, on efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). • Dosing up from tofacitinib 5 to 10 mg BID was associated with improved efficacy up to 12 months versus staying on 5 mg BID, and dosing down from 10 to 5 mg BID was not generally associated with a significant loss of efficacy. • Safety outcomes were generally consistent across dose groups and did not change markedly after switching dose in either direction. • These findings can help to inform physicians on what may be expected in terms of efficacy and safety when adjusting tofacitinib dose according to clinical need. The recommended tofacitinib dosage for the treatment of RA in most jurisdictions is 5 mg BID.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-021-05908-z.

2021 update of the EULAR points to consider on the use of immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR points to consider (PtCs) on the use of immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19.

METHODS

According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review up to 14 July 2021 was conducted and followed by a consensus meeting of an international multidisciplinary task force. The new statements were consolidated by formal voting.

RESULTS

We updated 2 overarching principles and 12 PtC. Evidence was only available in moderate to severe and critical patients. Glucocorticoids alone or in combination with tocilizumab are beneficial in COVID-19 cases requiring oxygen therapy and in critical COVID-19. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors (baricitinib and tofacitinib) is promising in the same populations of severe and critical COVID-19. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma may find application in early phases of the disease and in selected subgroups of immunosuppressed patients. There was insufficient robust evidence for the efficacy of other immunomodulators with further work being needed in relation to biomarker-based stratification for IL-1 therapy CONCLUSIONS: Growing evidence supports incremental efficacy of glucocorticoids alone or combined with tocilizumab/Janus kinase inhibitors in moderate to severe and critical COVID-19. Ongoing studies may unmask the potential application of other therapeutic approaches. Involvement of rheumatologists, as systemic inflammatory diseases experts, should be encouraged in clinical trials of immunomodulatory therapy in COVID-19.

TNFi is associated with positive outcome, but JAKi and rituximab are associated with negative outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with RMD

Introduction

Several risk factors for severe COVID-19 specific for patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) have been identified so far. Evidence regarding the influence of different RMD treatments on outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection is still poor.

Methods

Data from the German COVID-19-RMD registry collected between 30 March 2020 and 9 April 2021 were analysed. Ordinal outcome of COVID-19 severity was defined: (1) not hospitalised, (2) hospitalised/not invasively ventilated and (3) invasively ventilated/deceased. Independent associations between demographic and disease features and outcome of COVID-19 were estimated by multivariable ordinal logistic regression using proportional odds model.

Results

2274 patients were included. 83 (3.6%) patients died. Age, male sex, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, chronic lung diseases and chronic kidney disease were independently associated with worse outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Compared with rheumatoid arthritis, patients with psoriatic arthritis showed a better outcome. Disease activity and glucocorticoids were associated with worse outcome. Compared with methotrexate (MTX), TNF inhibitors (TNFi) showed a significant association with better outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.6, 95% CI0.4 to 0.9). Immunosuppressants (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and ciclosporin) (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.9), Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.7) and rituximab (OR 5.4, 95% CI 3.3 to 8.8) were independently associated with worse outcome.

Conclusion

General risk factors for severity of COVID-19 play a similar role in patients with RMDs as in the normal population. Influence of disease activity on COVID-19 outcome is of great importance as patients with high disease activity—even without glucocorticoids—have a worse outcome. Patients on TNFi show a better outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection than patients on MTX. Immunosuppressants, rituximab and JAKi are associated with more severe course.

TYK2 inhibition and its potential in the treatment of chronic inflammatory immune diseases

Immune-mediated chronic inflammatory diseases have emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Western countries over the last decades. Although multiple putative factors have been suspected to be causally related to the diseases, their overarching etiology remains unknown. This review article summarizes the current state of scientific knowledge and understanding of the role of non-receptor tyrosine kinases, with a special focus on the Janus kinase TYK2 in autoimmune and immune mediated diseases as well as on the clinical properties of its inhibition. A panel of experts in the field discussed the scientific evidence and molecular rationale for TYK2 inhibition and its clinical application. Reviewing this meeting, we aim at providing an integrated overview of the clinical profile of TYK2 inhibition and its potential in targeted pharmacological therapy of chronic autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases, with a special focus on inflammatory diseases of the skin.

Hyperechogenic intimal lesions and wall thickness of the temporal and facial arteries in elderly patients with arterial occlusions of the eye

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of arteriosclerosis, characterised by hyperechogenic intimal lesions (HIL), with wall thickness of the temporal and facial arteries in elderly patients with ocular arterial occlusions.

METHODS

Patients suffering from non-arteritic ocular perfusion disorders were included. High-resolution compression sonography (18 MHz) images of the temporal arteries (frontal and parietal branch at the upper margin of the auricle) and facial arteries (at the crossing point of the artery over the mandible) were analysed for the presence of HIL (grade 0: absent; grade 1: moderate; grade 2: severe). Characteristics of patients with and without evidence of HIL >grade 1 were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 330 cranial artery segments of 55 patients were analysed. HIL ≥grade 1 was present in 13.0% of all artery segments and in 38.1% of all patients. Patients with HIL ≥grade 1 in at least one arterial segment displayed significantly increased maximum wall thickness of the temporal arteries (0.62±0.23 mm vs 0.50±0.13 mm; p<0.01) and facial arteries (0.71±0.20 mm vs 0.54±0.19 mm; p=0.01). Patients with at least one temporal or facial artery segment with HIL were older, more often male and more frequently suffered from diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

The presence of HIL goes along with a significantly increased wall thickness of the temporal and facial arteries. These findings should be considered when interpreting the results of sonography of the cranial arteries in the diagnostic workup of suspected giant cell arteritis.

A survey to evaluate knowledge, perceptions and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccinations among rheumatologists in Germany

The objective is to evaluate the attitude of rheumatologists regarding the use of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). From February 2nd until March 15th, 2021, rheumatologists from Germany were asked to participate anonymously in a survey addressing their attitude with respect to COVID-19 vaccinations of IRD patients. The survey was completed by 214 participants (107 men, 103 women, 4 unspecified). More than half of the physicians (61%) were working in rheumatologic private practices and 62% had more than 20 years of experience in rheumatology. 90% reported to be at least confidential in handling issues of COVID-19 vaccination and 99% would recommend COVID-19 vaccination for IRD patients. The majority would not recommend to stop or reduce immunomodulatory drugs for vaccination except for rituximab. More than 70% would prefer vaccination with a mRNA vaccine for their IRD patients. This study shows that almost all rheumatologists in Germany support the COVID-19 vaccination for their IRD patients without reducing or terminating the actual immunomodulatory medication to potentially improve the response to the vaccine. This attitude is in accordance with the current recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology regarding COVID-19 vaccination in IRD patients, and indicates that these have been well accepted and work in everyday clinical practice.

[German registry www.Covid19-Rheuma.de : Status report after 1 year of the pandemic]

The COVID-19 registry ( www.covid19-rheuma.de ) of the German Society of Rheumatology was the first registry for the acquisition and systemic evaluation of viral infections in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD). This has enabled rapid generation of scientific data that will help to improve the care of patients with IRD in the context of the pandemic. In addition to confirming general risk factors, such as patient age and comorbidities (e.g. cardiovascular, chronic lung and kidney diseases), the use of glucocorticoids and the disease activity of the rheumatic disease could be identified as disease-specific independent risk factors for the need of hospitalization due to COVID-19. Evaluations of the continuously growing cohort of patients with IRD and COVID-19 enable recommendations for patient care to be based on better evidence. Cooperation with international rheumatology registries (e.g. European COVID-19 registry for IRD) enables analyses of aggregated cohorts of patients with IRD and COVID-19 for international comparisons and statistically even more reliable statements.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated sarcoidosis: A usually benign disease that does not require immunotherapy discontinuation

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the clinical patterns of sarcoidosis triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The ImmunoCancer International Registry is a big data-sharing multidisciplinary network from 18 countries dedicated to evaluating the clinical research of immune-related adverse events related to cancer immunotherapies.

RESULTS

We identified 32 patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis. Underlying cancer included mainly melanoma (n = 24). Cancer immunotherapy consisted of monotherapy in 19 cases (anti-PD-1 in 18 and ipilimumab in 1) or combined ipilimumab + nivolumab in 13. The time median interval between initiation of ICI and sarcoidosis diagnosis was 3 months (range, 2-29 months). The use of combined ICI was associated with a shorter delay in developing sarcoidosis symptoms. The disease was symptomatic in 19 (59%) cases with mostly cutaneous, respiratory and general symptoms. The organs involved included mainly the mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 32), the lungs (n = 11), the skin (n = 10) and the eyes (n = 5). Pulmonary computed tomography studies showed bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy in all cases. There was no severe manifestation. Specific systemic therapy was required in only 12 patients (37%): oral glucocorticoids in 9, and hydroxychloroquine in 3. ICIs were held in 25 patients (78%) and definitively discontinued in 18 (56%) patients. Seven patients continued ICI treatment with a second flare in one case. In six additional patients, an ICI was reintroduced with no harm, and sarcoidosis relapsed in one of them.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that ICI-related sarcoidosis seems to have a specific profile, possibly more benign than that of idiopathic sarcoidosis, and does not necessarily imply ICI discontinuation.

The Joint Vasculitis Registry in German-speaking countries (GeVas) - a prospective, multicenter registry for the follow-up of long-term outcomes in vasculitis

Background

Vasculitides comprise a group of rare diseases which affect less than 5 in 10.000 individuals. Most types of vasculitis can become organ- and life-threatening and are characterized by chronicity, high morbidity and relapses, altogether resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have been either monocentric or mainly retrospective – studies with a prospective design mostly consisted of rather small cohorts of 100 to 200 patients.

The aim of the Joint Vasculitis Registry in German-speaking countries (GeVas) is to record all patients who have been recently diagnosed with vasculitis or who have changed their treatment due to a relapse (inception cohort). In GeVas, data are collected prospectively in a multicenter design in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. By this approach, courses of vasculitis and their outcomes can be monitored over an extended period.

Methods

GeVas is a prospective, web-based, multicenter, clinician-driven registry for the documentation of organ manifestations, damage, long-term progress and other outcomes of various types of vasculitis. The registry started recruiting in June 2019. As of October 2020, 14 centers have been initiated and started recruiting patients in Germany. Involvement of sites in Austria and the German-speaking counties of Switzerland is scheduled in the near future.

Discussion

In June 2019, we successfully established a prospective multicenter vasculitis registry being the first of its kind in German-speaking countries. The participating centers are currently recruiting, and systematic analysis of long-term vasculitis outcomes is expected in the ensuing period.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien): DRKS00011866. Registered 10 May 2019.

Dysregulated immunity in PID patients with low GARP expression on Tregs due to mutations in LRRC32

Immune dysregulation diseases are characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and may have severe disease courses. The identification of the genetic causes of these diseases therefore has critical clinical implications. We performed whole-exome sequencing of patients with immune dysregulation disorders and identified two patients with previously undescribed mutations in LRRC32, which encodes glycoprotein A repetitions predominant (GARP). These patients were characterized by markedly reduced numbers and frequencies of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs with mutated LRRC32 exhibited strongly diminished cell-surface GARP expression and reduced suppressor function. In a model of conditional Garp deficiency in mice, we confirmed increased susceptibility to inflammatory diseases once GARP expression on Tregs was decreased. Garp deficiency led to an unstable Treg phenotype due to diminished Foxp3 protein acetylation and stability. Our study reinforces the understanding of the immunological mechanisms of immune dysregulation and expands the knowledge on the immunological function of GARP as an important regulator of Treg stability.