ESE Clinical Practice Guideline on functioning and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in pregnancy

Pregnancies are rare in women with pituitary adenomas, which may relate to hormone excess from secretory subtypes such as prolactinomas or corticotroph adenomas. Decreased fertility may also result from pituitary hormone deficiencies due to compression of the gland by large tumours and/or surgical or radiation treatment of the lesion. Counselling premenopausal women with pituitary adenomas about their chance of conceiving spontaneously or with assisted reproductive technology, and the optimal pre-conception treatment, should start at the time of initial diagnosis. The normal physiological changes during pregnancy need to be considered when interpreting endocrine tests in women with pituitary adenomas. Dose adjustments in hormone substitution therapies may be needed across the trimesters. When medical therapy is used for pituitary hormone excess, consideration should be given to the known efficacy and safety data specific to pregnant women for each therapeutic option. In healthy women, pituitary gland size increases during pregnancy. Since some pituitary adenomas also enlarge during pregnancy, there is a risk of visual impairment, especially in women with macroadenomas or tumours near the optic chiasm. Pituitary apoplexy represents a rare acute complication of adenomas requiring surveillance, with surgical intervention needed in some cases. This guideline describes the choice and timing of diagnostic tests and treatments from the pre-conception stage until after delivery, taking into account adenoma size, location and endocrine activity. In most cases, pregnant women with pituitary adenomas should be managed by a multidisciplinary team in a centre specialised in the treatment of such tumours.

What is the efficacy of switching to weekly pegvisomant in acromegaly patients well controlled on combination therapy?

CONTEXT

Although combination therapy of acromegaly with long-acting somatostatin analogs (LA-SSAs) and pegvisomant (PEGV) normalizes insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) levels in the majority of patients, it requires long-term adherence. Switching from combination therapy to monotherapy with weekly PEGV could improve patients' comfort, but the efficacy is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of switching to PEGV monotherapy in patients well controlled on combination therapy of LA-SSAs and PEGV.

DESIGN

Single-center, open-label observational pilot study. LA-SSA therapy was discontinued at baseline and all patients were switched to PEGV monotherapy for 12 months. If IGF1 levels exceeded 1.0 times upper limit of normal (ULN), PEGV dose was increased by 20 mg weekly.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study included 15 subjects (eight males), with a median age of 58 years (range 35-80) on combination therapy of high-dose LA-SSAs and weekly PEGV for >6 months, and IGF1 levels within the normal range. Treatment efficacy was assessed by measuring serum IGF1 levels.

RESULTS

After 12 months of weekly PEGV monotherapy, serum IGF1 levels of 73% of the subjects remained controlled. In one patient, LA-SSA had to be restarted due to recurrence of headache. IGF1 levels increased from a baseline level of 0.62 × ULN (range 0.30-0.84) to 0.83 × ULN (0.30-1.75) after 12 months, while the median weekly PEGV dose increased from 60 (30-80) mg to 80 (50-120) mg.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that switching from combination therapy of LA-SSAs and PEGV to PEGV monotherapy can be a viable treatment option for acromegaly patients without compromising efficacy.

Ghrelin- and GH-induced insulin resistance: no association with retinol-binding protein-4

OBJECTIVE

Supraphysiological levels of ghrelin and GH induce insulin resistance. Serum levels of retinol-binding protein-4 (RBP4) correlate inversely with insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to determine whether ghrelin and GH affect RBP4 levels in human subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To study GH-independent effects of ghrelin, seven hypopituitary men undergoing replacement therapy with GH and hydrocortisone were given ghrelin (5 pmol/kg per min) and saline infusions for 300 min in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Circulating RBP4 levels were measured at baseline and during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp on both study days. To study the direct effects of GH, nine healthy men were treated with GH (2 mg at 2200 h) and placebo for 8 days in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Serum RBP4 levels were measured before and after treatment, and insulin sensitivity was measured by the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique.

RESULTS

Ghrelin acutely decreased peripheral insulin sensitivity. Serum RBP4 concentrations decreased in response to insulin infusion during the saline experiment (mg/l): 43.2±4.3 (baseline) vs 40.4±4.2 (clamp), P<0.001, but this effect was abrogated during ghrelin infusion (mg/l): 42.4±4.5 (baseline) vs 42.9±4.7 (clamp), P=0.73. In healthy subjects, serum RBP4 levels were not affected by GH administration (mg/l): 41.7±4.1 (GH) vs 43.8±4.6 (saline), P=0.09, although GH induced insulin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

i) Serum RBP4 concentrations decrease in response to hyperinsulinemia, ii) ghrelin abrogates the inhibitory effect of insulin on circulating RBP4 concentrations, and iii) ghrelin as well as GH acutely induces insulin resistance in skeletal muscle without significant changes in circulating RBP4 levels.

Heart valve disease among patients with hyperprolactinemia: a nationwide population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Increased risk of heart valve disease during treatment with certain dopamine agonists, such as cabergoline, has been observed in patients with Parkinson's disease. The same compound is used to treat hyperprolactinemia, but it is unknown whether this also associates with heart valve disease.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to assess the incidence of diagnosed heart valve disease and cardiac valve surgery among patients with hyperprolactinemia, compared with a general population cohort in Denmark.

DESIGN

This was a nationwide, population-based, cohort study based on a nationwide hospital registry.

METHODS

We identified 2381 hyperprolactinemia patients with a first-time diagnosis recorded from 1994 through 2010 in the registry, with no previous hospital diagnosis of heart valve disease. Each patient was compared with 10 age- and gender-matched comparison cohort members from the general population. The association between hyperprolactinemia and heart valve disease was analyzed with Cox's proportional hazards regression, controlling for potential confounding factors. To assess the risk of cardiac valve surgery and avoid ascertainment bias, a subanalysis was made in a cohort of 2,387 hyperprolactinemia patients with no previous cardiac valve surgery and 23,870 comparison cohort members.

RESULTS

Nineteen hyperprolactinemic patients (0.80%) were diagnosed with heart valve disease during a total of 17,759.8 yr of follow-up, compared with 75 persons (0.31%) in the comparison cohort during 179,940.6 yr of follow-up [adjusted hazard ratio 2.27 (95% confidence interval 1.35-3.82)]. Seven of the 10 patients treated with cabergoline and diagnosed with heart valve disease were asymptomatic and diagnosed on the basis of an echocardiography performed as a safety measure. However, only two patients with hyperprolactinemia (0.08%) underwent surgery, compared with 28 persons in the general population cohort (0.12%) [adjusted hazard ratio 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.13-2.42)].

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the present register-based study do not support that hyperprolactinemia or its treatment is associated with an increased risk of clinically significant heart valve disease.

Acute peripheral metabolic effects of intraarterial ghrelin infusion in healthy young men

CONTEXT

Ghrelin is the endogenous agonist for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R). Intravenous administration of ghrelin induces insulin resistance and hyperglycemia and increases the levels of free fatty acids (FFA).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether these effects are mediated directly by ghrelin in skeletal muscle tissue.

DESIGN

This study was single blinded, randomized, and placebo controlled. Eight healthy men (25.5 ± 3.1 years) received 240 min of intraarterial ghrelin infusion (4.2 ng × kg(-1) × min(-1)) into one femoral artery and intraarterial placebo infusion into the contralateral artery. Simultaneous blood samples were drawn from both femoral veins and muscle biopsies were obtained from both legs during both a basal period and during a hyperinsulinemic and euglycemic clamp period.

RESULTS

Ghrelin significantly elevated venous FFA levels and venous dilution of palmitate, suggestive of increased lipolysis. Glucose metabolism was unchanged, and there were no direct effects on pertinent enzymes in the insulin signaling cascade. The metabolic clearance rate of acyl ghrelin was 12.5 ± 3.3 ml × kg(-1) × min(-1). Acyl and desacyl ghrelin levels both increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that ghrelin may stimulate lipolysis directly in skeletal muscle.

Impact of growth hormone receptor blockade on substrate metabolism during fasting in healthy subjects

CONTEXT

Experimental studies in GH-deficient patients and in healthy subjects receiving somatostatin-infusion suggest that GH is an important regulator of substrate metabolism during fasting. These models may not adequately reflect the selective effects of GH, and GH receptor (GHR) blockade offers a new model to define the metabolic role of GH.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of GHR blockade on substrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity during fasting.

DESIGN

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 10 healthy young men.

INTERVENTION

After 36 h of fasting with saline or pegvisomant (GHR blockade), the subjects were studied during a 4-h basal period and 2.5-h hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.

MAIN OUTCOME

We measured whole-body and forearm glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism, peripheral insulin sensitivity, and acyl and desacyl ghrelin.

RESULTS

GHR blockade significantly suppressed circulating free fatty acids (1226 +/- 83 vs. 1074 +/- 65 micromol/liter; P = 0.03) and ketone bodies (3080 +/- 271 vs. 2015 +/- 235 micromol/liter; P <or= 0.01), as well as forearm uptake of free fatty acids (0.341 +/- 0.150 vs. 0.004 +/- 0.119 micromol/100 ml x min; P < 0.01) and lipid oxidation (1.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.1 mg/kg x min; P = 0.03) in the basal period. By contrast, IGF-I levels in either serum or peripheral tissues were not impacted by GHR blockade, and protein metabolism was also unaffected. Basal glucose levels were elevated by GHR blockade, but insulin sensitivity was similar; this was associated with an increased acyl/desacyl ghrelin ratio.

CONCLUSION

GHR blockade, without changes in circulating or tissue IGF-I levels, selectively suppresses lipid mobilization and oxidation after short-term fasting. This supports the notion that stimulation of lipolysis is a primary and important effect of GH.

Impact of fasting on growth hormone signaling and action in muscle and fat

CONTEXT

Whether GH promotes IGF-I production or lipolysis depends on nutritional status, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of fasting on GH-mediated changes in substrate metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and signaling pathways.

DESIGN

We conducted a randomized crossover study.

SUBJECTS

Ten healthy men (age 24.3 +/- 0.6 yr, body mass index 23.1 +/- 0.4 kg/m(2)) participated.

INTERVENTION

A GH bolus administered 1) postabsorptively and 2) in the fasting state (37.5 h). Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue biopsies were taken, and a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp was performed on both occasions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Metabolic clearance rate (MCR) of GH, substrate metabolism, and insulin sensitivity were measured. Biopsies were subjected to Western blotting for expression of signaling proteins and to RT-PCR for expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling protein 3 and IGF-I mRNA.

RESULTS

Fasting was associated with reduced MCR of GH (P < 0.01), enhanced lipolytic responsiveness to GH, decreased insulin sensitivity (P < 0.01), and reduced IGF-I bioactivity (P = 0.04). After the GH bolus, phosphorylation of signal transducers and activators of transcription protein 5b (pSTAT5b) were observed in both conditions; however, the phospho-STAT5b/STAT5b ratio was significantly decreased in the fasting state (muscle P = 0.02 and fat P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The combination of fasting and GH exposure translates into enhanced lipolysis, reduced IGF-I activity and insulin sensitivity, and blunted activation of the Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT pathway. Whether this change in signaling activity is related to the change in MCR of GH and/or the concomitant shift in the metabolic effects of GH merits future attention.

Ghrelin infusion in humans induces acute insulin resistance and lipolysis independent of growth hormone signaling

OBJECTIVE

Ghrelin is a gut-derived peptide and an endogenous ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor. Exogenous ghrelin stimulates the release of GH (potently) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) (moderately). Ghrelin is also orexigenic, but its impact on substrate metabolism is controversial. We aimed to study direct effects of ghrelin on substrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity in human subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Six healthy men underwent ghrelin (5 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1)) and saline infusions in a double-blind, cross-over study to study GH signaling proteins in muscle. To circumvent effects of endogenous GH and ACTH, we performed a similar study in eight hypopituitary adults but replaced with GH and hydrocortisone. The methods included a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, muscle biopsies, microdialysis, and indirect calorimetry.

RESULTS

In healthy subjects, ghrelin-induced GH secretion translated into acute GH receptor signaling in muscle. In the absence of GH and cortisol secretion, ghrelin acutely decreased peripheral, but not hepatic, insulin sensitivity together with stimulation of lipolysis. These effects occurred without detectable suppression of AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation (an alleged second messenger for ghrelin) in skeletal muscle.

CONCLUSIONS

Ghrelin infusion acutely induces lipolysis and insulin resistance independently of GH and cortisol. We hypothesize that the metabolic effects of ghrelin provide a means to partition glucose to glucose-dependent tissues during conditions of energy shortage.

Cardiovascular effects of intravenous ghrelin infusion in healthy young men

Ghrelin infusion improves cardiac function in patients suffering from cardiac failure, and bolus administration of ghrelin increases cardiac output in healthy subjects. The cardiovascular effects of more continuous intravenous ghrelin exposure remain to be studied. We therefore studied the cardiovascular effects of a constant infusion of human ghrelin at a rate of 5 pmol/kg per minute for 180 min. Fifteen healthy, young (aged 23.2 +/- 0.5 yr), normal-weight (23.0 +/- 0.4 kg/m(2)) men volunteered in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. With the subjects remaining fasting, peak myocardial systolic velocity S', tissue tracking TT, left ventricular ejection fraction EF, and endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilatation were measured. Ghrelin infusion increased S' 9% (P = 0.002) and TT 10% (P < 0.001), whereas EF, resting blood flow velocity, and endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilatation did not change (P = 0.13). This was associated with a peak in serum growth hormone after 60 min of infusion (37.77 +/- 5.27 ng/ml, P < 0.001), a doubling of free fatty acid levels (P = 0.001), and a 1.6-fold increase in cortisol levels (P < 0.05), whereas glucose and catecholamine levels were constant. In conclusion, supraphysiological levels of ghrelin stimulate left ventricular function in terms of S' and TT in healthy young normal-weight men without changing resting blood flow velocity and endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilatation. The effects did not translate into detectable increments in EF.

Constant intravenous ghrelin infusion in healthy young men: clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolic effects

Ghrelin levels fluctuate rapidly and dynamically with surges before meal times and postprandial troughs, and ghrelin increases appetite and food intake. Circulating ghrelin correlates negatively with body mass index (BMI), but obese individuals have a reduced postprandial decrease in ghrelin levels. Whether this reflects changes in secretion or clearance of ghrelin is uncertain. We therefore studied the pharmacokinetics of ghrelin in relation to anthropometric and biochemical measures. We also studied the effects of ghrelin on hormones and metabolites. In fasting humans, we used a constant infusion rate of ghrelin lasting 180 min at 5 pmol.kg body wt(-1).min(-1) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Serum ghrelin (s-ghrelin; total levels) was distributed and eliminated according to a two-compartment model. s-Ghrelin initial half-life was 24 +/- 2 min and terminal half-life 146 +/- 36 min, respectively. Mean residence time (MRT) of ghrelin was 93 +/- 16 min. MRT correlated positively with both BMI (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) and high-density cholesterol (HDL) levels (r = 0.75, P < 0.001). Serum insulin levels remained constant during ghrelin infusion, whereas plasma glucose increased 0.3 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (P < 0.01) and free fatty acid levels more than doubled (to 1.03 +/- 0.08 mmol/l, P < 0.001), translating into a significant reduction of insulin sensitivity (P < 0.001). In conclusion, 1) we describe novel pharmacokinetics of ghrelin that are useful when tailoring ghrelin infusion rates in clinical experiments, 2) BMI and HDL correlate positively with MRT of infused ghrelin, and 3) supraphysiological ghrelin levels impair insulin sensitivity.

The ghrelin response to exercise before and after growth hormone administration

CONTEXT

We have previously shown that exercise-induced GH release is not mediated by ghrelin, but it remains to be studied whether the increase in GH may suppress postexercise ghrelin levels.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to characterize systemic ghrelin levels after exercise with and without concomitant GH administration.

DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTION

Group A: Twenty-nine elite athletes (age, 18-37 yr) were studied after a maximal exercise test. Group B: In a double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study, 32 healthy subjects (age, 18-33 yr) were randomized to placebo, GH 0.1 IU/kg per day, or GH 0.2 IU/kg per day for 4 wk. These subjects performed a multistage fitness test to assess maximum oxygen uptake at baseline and after 4 wk. We measured total circulating ghrelin levels before and immediately after exercise and at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after exercise.

RESULTS

Group A: Serum ghrelin levels after exercise decreased significantly (P < 0.01). Group B: Exercise at baseline was associated with a significant lowering of ghrelin levels after exercise (P < 0.0001). In addition, 4 wk of high-dose GH were followed by a further approximately 20% reduction in basal and after exercise serum ghrelin (micrograms per liter): 0.78 (range 0.52-1.17) vs. 0.63 (range 0.50-0.91), P < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Ghrelin levels decrease significantly after exercise in elite athletes and healthy subjects. 2) High-dose GH suppresses ghrelin levels. 3) These data support the hypothesis that GH feedback inhibits ghrelin secretion.

Role of ghrelin in growth hormone-deficient patients

Ghrelin is the endogenous ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagog receptor and exogenous ghrelin is a strong stimulator of GH secretion. Whether endogenous ghrelin is a major regulator of GH release remains dubious, but there is increasing evidence to suggest that ghrelin exhibits direct effects on appetite regulation. Systemic ghrelin levels in patients with GH deficiency (GHD) are normal, whereas GH substitution moderately suppresses ghrelin. Certain subgroups of GHD do respond to ghrelin with significant GH release, but the clinical implications are uncertain. Administration of ghrelin or a synthetic GH secretagog in other conditions with low GH levels, such as obesity and aging, has also been performed in controlled trials and has been shown to translate into insulin-like growth factor-I stimulation and changes in body composition; however, long-term data are not available. Even though ghrelin does not seem to be abnormal in patients with classic GHD, these patients constitute an interesting model for studying GH- and adrenocorticotropic hormone-independent effects of ghrelin.

Effects of GH replacement therapy in adults on serum levels of leptin and ghrelin: the role of lipolysis

OBJECTIVE

The regulation and function of systemic ghrelin levels appear to be associated with food intake and energy balance rather than GH. Since GH, in turn, acutely induces lipolysis and insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, we aimed to study the isolated and combined effects of GH, free fatty acids (FFAs) and insulin sensitivity on circulating ghrelin levels in human subjects.

DESIGN

Seven GH-deficient patients (aged 37 +/- 4 years (mean +/- s.e.)) were studied on four occasions in a 2 x 2 factorial design with and without GH substitution and with and without administration of acipimox, which lowers FFA levels by inhibition of the hormone-sensitive lipase, in the basal state and during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.

RESULTS

Serum FFA levels decreased with acipimox administration irrespective of GH status. The GH-induced reduction in insulin sensitivity was countered by acipimox. Fasting ghrelin levels decreased insignificantly during GH administration alone, but were reduced by 33% during co-administration of GH and acipimox (Aci) (in ng/l): 860 +/- 120 (-GH - Aci), 711 +/- 130 (-GH + Aci), 806 +/- 130 (+GH - Aci), 574 +/- 129 (+GH + Aci), P < 0.01. The clamp was associated with a further, moderate lowering of ghrelin. GH and acipimox induced a reciprocal 25% increase in serum leptin levels (microg/l): 11.2 +/- 4.4 (-GH - Aci), 11.7 +/- 4.4 (-GH + Aci), 11.5 +/- 4.4 (+GH - Aci), 13.9 +/- 4.2 (+GH + Aci), P = 0.005.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that antilipolysis via suppression of the hormone-sensitive lipase in combination with GH administration is associated with significant and reciprocal changes in ghrelin and leptin.