Trends in the Management of Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures

PURPOSE

To describe management trends of fifth metacarpal neck (5MCN) fractures within a large health care system. We aimed to define patient and surgeon factors associated with nonsurgical versus surgical treatment, as well as to identify factors associated with receiving care only in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We identified all 5MCN fractures within our system for the years 2012-2020 and recorded baseline demographics for cases. Injury, treatment, and fracture characteristics were all recorded. For fractures treated nonsurgically, we determined the type of immobilization used (if any) and recorded whether patients were seen only in the ED or received subsequent outpatient follow-up. Demographic comparisons were made between groups, and adjusted logistic regression models were generated to predict the odds of having a surgical 5MCN fracture or being seen in the ED only.

RESULTS

There were 611 5MCN fractures over an 8-year period, of which 10% were treated surgically. During the first half of the study period, 8% of isolated cases were treated surgically compared with 7% of cases in the second half. Soft dressings were increasingly used. There were no nonsurgically managed cases that underwent subsequent surgical procedures for symptomatic nonunion or malunion. Twenty-one percent of patients were seen only in the ED. Fracture angulation, associated injuries, insurance status, and treatment by a hand surgeon were all significantly associated with an increased likelihood of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the 611 5MCN fractures identified, 90% were treated nonsurgically. Patient and surgeon factors were associated with increased odds of surgery. Of patients who sought care for 5MCN injuries, >20% received no follow-up care outside of the ED. These data can be used to assess future changes in management trends and suggest that nonunion and symptomatic malunions are uncommon occurrences.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

A Comparison of Amyloid Deposition in Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Release

PURPOSE

Previous investigations assessing the incidence of amyloidosis detected with biopsy during carpal tunnel release (CTR) have focused on open CTR (OCTR). Prior authors have suggested that biopsy may be more technically challenging during endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR). Our purpose was to compare differences in the incidence of amyloid deposition detected during ECTR versus OCTR.

METHODS

We reviewed all primary ECTR and OCTR during which a biopsy for amyloid was obtained between February 2022 and June 2023. All procedures were performed by five upper-extremity surgeons from a single institution. Congo red staining was used to determine the presence of amyloid deposition in either the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) or tenosynovium. All positive cases underwent subtype analysis and protein identification through liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Baseline demographics were recorded for each case, and the incidence of positive biopsy was compared between ECTR and OCTR cases.

RESULTS

A total of 282 cases were included for analysis (143 ECTR and 139 OCTR). The mean age was 67 years, and 45% of cases were women. Baseline demographics were similar except for a significantly higher incidence of diabetes in OCTR cases (13% vs 33%). Overall, 13% of CTR cases had a positive biopsy. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of amyloid deposition detected during biopsy in ECTR cases (3.5%) compared with OCTR cases (23%).

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsy performed during ECTR may result in a lower incidence of amyloid detection. Future basic science investigation may be necessary to determine histologic differences between tenosynovium proximal and distal to the leading edge of the TCL. When surgeons plan a biopsy during surgical release of the carpal tunnel, an open approach may be advantageous.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

A Comparison of Early Complication Rates of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release With and Without Resident Involvement

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rates of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) relative to orthopedic resident trainee involvement in the procedure.

METHODS

All patients undergoing isolated, elective ECTR by two attending surgeons within a 59-month period were analyzed. Cases were categorized as the following according to the degree of resident involvement: ECTR performed by attending with either no resident or a resident as an assistant (group 1), resident performing a portion of the procedure (group 2), and resident performing the entire procedure (group 3). Early postoperative complications and/or intraoperative conversion to an open procedure were the outcomes of interest. We used a noninferiority design, hypothesizing that resident involvement would not be associated with inferior outcomes compared with cases without resident involvement. Multiple logistic regression models, adjusted for patient demographic and surgical characteristics, were fit to assess the relationship between resident involvement groups and complication/conversion outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1,167 ECTR cases (895 patients) were performed and returned for postoperative follow-up for at least 2 weeks after surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter for group 1 cases versus group 2 and 3 cases. The early postoperative complication and conversion rates were 1.7% and 1.0%, respectively. Superficial infection (1.2%), deep infection (0.3%), and transient neuropraxia (0.3%) occurred infrequently and did not differ relative to resident involvement. No differences in the odds of complication and/or conversion relative to resident involvement were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of ECTR performed entirely or in part by attending-supervised resident trainees were not inferior to ECTR performed by an attending surgeon regarding the odds of experiencing complications or conversion to an open procedure. With appropriate supervision, ECTR can be performed safely by orthopedic and plastic surgery residents.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Intraoperative Conversion From Endoscopic to Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review and Case Series

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, outcomes, and complications associated with conversion from endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) to open carpal tunnel release (OCTR).

METHODS

A retrospective case review of all patients who underwent ECTR over 4 years by 2 fellowship-trained hand surgeons at a single academic center was performed. We recorded outcomes and the reason for conversion in patients who underwent conversion to an OCTR. Baseline demographics and surgical complications were compared between the 2 groups. A systematic review was performed to define the incidence and reasons for conversion from ECTR to OCTR. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we included clinical studies of ECTR from 2000 to 2021.

RESULTS

In the retrospective series, 9 of 892 (1.02%) ECTR cases underwent conversion to an OCTR at the time of the index procedure. One of 9 converted cases had transient neurapraxia involving the recurrent motor branch after surgery compared with 0 cases in the group that underwent ECTR without conversion. Improvements in the visual analog scale for pain and QuickDASH were noted at a mean of 46 weeks after surgery in the group that underwent conversion to OCTR. The systematic review identified an incidence of conversion of 0.62%. The most common reasons for conversion to OCTR in the case series and systematic review were poor visualization due to hypertrophic tenosynovium and aberrant nerve anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of intraoperative conversion from ECTR to OCTR during the index procedure was 1.02%, with the most common reasons for conversion being poor visualization due to hypertrophic tenosynovium and aberrant nerve anatomy. Patients who undergo conversion from ECTR to OCTR demonstrate improvements in pain and disability, similar to patients who undergo ECTR without conversion.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

The Effect of an Intraoperative Real-Time Counter on Radiation Exposure Events During Operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

PURPOSE

Occupational radiation exposure can have adverse health consequences for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine if utilization of an intraoperative, real-time radiograph counter results in decreased radiation exposure events (REEs) during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

We reviewed all cases of isolated ORIF DRFs performed at a single center from January 2021 to February 2023. All cases performed on or after January 1, 2022 used an intraoperative radiograph counter, referred to as a "shot-clock" (SC) group. Cases prior to this date were performed without a SC and served as a control group (NoSC group). Baseline demographics, fracture, and surgical characteristics were recorded. Final intraoperative radiographs were reviewed to record reduction parameters (radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance). REEs, fluoroscopy exposure times, and total radiation doses milligray (mGy) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 160 ORIF DRF cases were included in the NoSC group, and 135 were included in the SC group. The NoSC group had significantly more extra-articular fractures compared with the SC group. Reduction parameters after ORIF were similar between groups. The mean number of REEs decreased by 48% in the SC group. Cases performed with the SC group had significantly lower total radiation doses (0.8 vs 0.5 mGy) and radiation exposure times (41.9 vs 24.2 seconds). Mean operative times also decreased for the SC group (70 minutes) compared with that for the NoSC group (81 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

A real-time intraoperative radiograph counter was associated with decreased REEs, exposure times, and total radiation doses during ORIF DRFs. Cases performed with a SC had significantly shorter operative times without compromising reduction quality. Using an intraoperative SC counter during cases requiring fluoroscopy may aid in decreasing radiation exposure, which serves as an occupational hazard for hand and upper-extremity surgeons.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Adherence to Complication Reporting for Randomized Controlled Trials Contained in Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Purpose

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are frequently used in creating recommendations contained within clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, investigations outside of hand surgery have reported that RCTs within CPGs infrequently report complications and harms-related data. Our purpose was to assess adherence to complication reporting and harms-related outcomes contained in the Consolidated Standards for Reporting (CONSORT) Extension of Harms and Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) reporting checklists for RCTs within the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) CPGs for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods

We identified all RCTs within the AAOS CTS CPGs. All therapeutic RCTs and diagnostic studies were included. We used the CONSORT Harms Checklist criteria to assess adherence to the reporting of adverse events for therapeutic RCTs and the STARD criteria to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the articles. We defined adequate compliance as adherence to ≥50% of the checklist items.

Results

We identified 82 therapeutic RCTs and 90 diagnostic accuracy articles within the AAOS CTS CPG. For therapeutic RCTs, we found that the average compliance with the published checklists was 19%. For diagnostic studies, the average compliance with checklists was found to be 55%. Eleven therapeutic RCTs (13%) and 60 diagnostic studies (67%) were determined to have adequate compliance for the CONSORT and STARD checklists, respectively.

Conclusions

Randomized controlled trials in the AAOS CPGs for CTS have low compliance with the CONSORT Extension for Harms Checklist. Although the overall adherence to the items published in the STARD statement for diagnostic accuracy evaluation remains higher, future efforts should be made to improve the adherence rates to both checklists.

Clinical relevance

Improved standardization of complication reporting may aid in comparing outcomes across multiple clinical investigations of upper-extremity procedures.

Statistical Literacy in Hand and Upper-Extremity Patients

Purpose

Statistical literacy is the ability of a patient to apply basic statistical concepts to their health care. Understanding statistics is a critical component of shared decision making. The purpose of this investigation was to define levels of statistical literacy in an upper-extremity (UE) patient population. We aimed to determine if patient demographics would be associated with statistical literacy.

Methods

An electronic survey was administered to a consecutive series of UE patients at a single institution. We recorded baseline demographics, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores, the Berlin Numeracy Test (BNT), and General Health Numeracy Test. We also included a surgical risk question, which asked: "Approximately 3% of patients who get carpal tunnel surgery develop an infection. If 100 patients get this surgery, how many would you expect to develop an infection?" A covariate-controlled adjusted odds ratio reflecting the association between each statistical literacy outcome measure and patient characteristics was reported.

Results

A total 254 surveys were administered, 148 of which were completed and included. Fifty percent of respondents had a high-school education or less. For the BNT, 78% scored in the bottom quartile, and 52% incorrectly answered all questions. For the General Health Numeracy Test, 34% answered 0 or 1/6 questions correctly. For the surgical risk question, 24% of respondents answered incorrectly. Respondents who had a college or graduate degree had 2.62 times greater odds (95% confidence interval, 1.09-6.32) of achieving a BNT score in a higher quartile than patients who did not have a college or graduate degree.

Conclusions

Overall levels of statistical literacy are low for UE patients.

Clinical relevance

When engaging in management discussions and shared decision making, UE surgeons should assume low levels of statistical literacy. Consideration of alternative formats, such as frequencies, video-based materials, and pictographs, may be warranted when discussing outcomes and risks of surgical procedures.

Analysis of Terminated Hand and Wrist-Related Clinical Trials

Purpose

While clinical trials provide high-quality evidence guiding medical decision-making, early trial termination can result in both lost time and resources. Our purpose was to investigate the rate of and reasons for clinical trial termination for hand and wrist-related conditions and identify study characteristics associated with early trial termination.

Methods

The ClinicalTrials.gov database was queried for all hand and wrist-related clinical trials. All terminated and completed trials were reviewed, with characteristics and reasons for termination recorded. Study characteristics included type, purpose, intervention assessed, enrollment, group allocation, blinding, trial phase, sponsor type, and geographic region. Chi-square test was used to identify associations between trial characteristics and terminated versus completed status.

Results

A total of 793 hand and wrist-related clinical trials were identified, with 77 trials (10%) terminated prior to completion. The most common reason for termination was "recruitment/retention difficulty," reported in 37 (48%) terminated trials. In comparing competed versus terminated trials, primary purpose (nonobservational studies), enrollment (<50 patients), and geographic region (North America) were all significantly more likely to be terminated. Terminated trials were more likely to have an intervention type investigating a specific device or drug.

Conclusions

Early trial termination for hand and wrist-related conditions is common (10%), with patient recruitment and retention identified as the leading cause of termination. Trials involving potential commercial incentives (those investigating a device or drug) were associated with an increased rate of trial termination.

Clinical relevance

An emphasis on patient enrollment during study design may aid in mitigating the most common cause of early clinical trial termination.

Defining Nonunion for Metacarpal Fractures: A Systematic Review

Purpose

Our purpose was to assess how nonunion of the metacarpals has been defined in prior investigations with respect to both clinical and radiographic criteria. We hypothesized that the definitions of nonunion would be highly variable.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase databases for clinical articles related to the treatment of metacarpal fractures (surgical and nonsurgical) from 2010 to 2021. Included articles were searched to assess how nonunion was defined based on clinical and radiographic criteria. We assessed the treatment type, method of union assessment, time to union, and incidence of union as well as article factors such as the following: date of publication, level of evidence, and publishing journal.

Results

A total of 641 articles were identified, of which 102 were included for a definition of nonunion and 97 were included for the assessment of clinical management and outcomes. Of the included articles, 62% contained level IV evidence. A definition of nonunion was provided in 47% of the articles. Radiographic criteria alone, clinical criteria alone, or a combination of the 2 was used in 22%, 6%, and 19% of the cases, respectively, to define nonunion. The most common definition of nonunion was presence of fracture-site tenderness (with no time defined) in 20 articles (20%), followed by lack of radiographic healing at 6 months (15%). In the 97 included articles, the total number of fracture cases was 4,435 and nonunion was reported in 0.45%. Cases with nonunion were reported in a total of six articles that used a variety of treatment modalities.

Conclusions

The definition of metacarpal nonunion remains highly variable and lacks standardization with respect to clinical and radiographic criteria.

Clinical relevance

Standardizing the definition of nonunion for metacarpal fractures would allow for more accurate assessments of the incidence of this complication and may aid in improving diagnostic and management strategies.

Fifty Most-Cited Research Articles in Elbow Surgery: A Modern Reading List

Purpose

Bibliometric analysis is a common method for evaluating current trends within a scientific field. The primary aim of this study was to define and analyze the 50 most frequently cited articles in the field of elbow surgery, both of all time and those published during the 21st century.

Methods

We searched the Journal Citation Report to identify articles related to elbow surgery within academic journals. Articles were sorted by total citations. The overall top 50 articles and those published since 2000 were identified, and data were collected, including title, journal of publication, publication year, country of publication, citation density, level of evidence, article type, institution, and sex of the lead and senior authors, and inclusion on the reference list for the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination within the last 5 years. Descriptive statistics were reported, and correlation analysis was performed using Spearman test.

Results

For the most-cited elbow surgery articles, "fracture" was overall the most reported topic, whereas "lateral epicondylosis" and "fracture" were equal for those published since 2000. The United States was the most represented overall and for articles published since 2000. Women comprised 1/50 (2%) of lead authors overall, increasing to 8/50 (16%) for articles published during the 21st century. Most articles in during both periods contained level IV evidence, with level I evidence appearing infrequently (4%). Six percent of the most-cited articles of all time had appeared on the reference list of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination within the past 5 years.

Conclusions

The top 50 most-cited elbow surgery articles often assess fracture and lateral epicondylosis, most commonly originating from the United States. Level IV retrospective series comprises over half of the articles on this list. Women remain underrepresented as authors.

Clinical Relevance

This study provides a modern reading list for upper-extremity surgeons about impactful elbow surgery articles.

Trends in the Utilization of Computed Tomography in Operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Purpose

To identify patient, surgeon, and injury characteristics associated with preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan utilization for operative distal radius fractures (DRF). In addition, we aimed to determine if preoperative CT was associated with treatment methods other than isolated volar-locked plating (VLP).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all operatively treated adult DRFs within our health care system from 2016 to 2020. Baseline demographics, injury, treatment characteristics, and the fellowship training of the 44 included surgeons were recorded. We compared cases with and without a preoperative CT, and an adjusted logistic regression model was generated to determine the odds of having a preoperative CT.

Results

A total of 1,204 operatively treated DRFs performed by 44 surgeons were included. CT utilization increased during the study period. Intra-articular fractures accounted for 76% of cases, and preoperative CT scans were ordered in 243 of 1240 cases (20%). Overall, isolated VLP was used in 83% of cases. Cases with a preoperative CT were more likely to be treated with an alternative method of fixation (such as dorsal plating). The adjusted logistic regression model demonstrated that male sex (OR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.26), intra-articular fractures (OR 3.11; 95% CI: 1.87, 5.81), and associated fractures (OR 2.69; 95% CI: 1.82, 3.98) had a significantly increased odds of having a preoperative CT. Fellowship training was not associated with increased CT utilization overall, but hand surgeons were more likely to use a CT in Orthopaedic Trauma Association-C3 fractures.

Conclusions

Patient and injury characteristics are associated with CT utilization in operative DRFs. Preoperative CTs are associated with alternative fixation approaches, as cases with a CT were more likely to use fixation methods other than isolated VLP. The costs and benefits of CT scans must be carefully weighed against whether this modality adds value or improves outcomes in treating DRFs.

Level of evidence

Prognostic II.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Examination Maneuvers for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

Our purpose was to assess the diagnostic validity (sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp)) of physical examination maneuvers for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This meta-analysis utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Studies assessing exam maneuvers (including components of the CTS-6) for CTS were identified in MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) and Embase (Excerpta Medica Database) databases. Assessed maneuvers assessed included: Phalen's test, Tinel's sign, Durkan test, scratch-collapse test, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM), and static 2-point discrimination (2PD) test. Data extracted included: article name, total number of subjects/hands, type of exam, and exam Sn/Sp. Forest plots were presented to display the estimated Sn/Sp and boxplots were used to demonstrate the locality, spread, and skewness of the Sn/Sp through the quartiles. After screening 570 articles, 67 articles involving 8924 hands were included. Forty-eight articles assessed Phalen's test, 45 assessed Tinel's sign, 21 assessed the Durkan test, seven assessed the scratch-collapse test, 11 assessed SWM, and six assessed the static 2PD test. Phalen's test demonstrated the greatest median Sn (0.70, (Q1, Q3): (0.51, 0.85)), followed by the Durkan test (0.67, (Q1, Q3): (0.46, 0.82)). 2PD demonstrated the highest median Sp (0.90, (Q1, Q3): (0.88, 0.90)), followed by SWM (0.85, (Q1, Q3): (0.51, 0.89)). There is considerable variability with respect to the validity of physical exam tests used in the diagnosis of CTS. Upper-extremity surgeons should be aware of inherent limitations for individual exam maneuvers. In the absence of a uniformly accepted diagnostic gold standard, a combination of exams, along with pertinent patient history, should guide the diagnosis of CTS.

An Analysis of Formal Patient Complaints, Risk, and Malpractice Events Involving Orthopedic Trauma Surgeons During a 10-Year Period

Formal patient complaints and malpractice events involving orthopedic trauma surgeons (OTSs) can have substantial career implications. Our purpose was to analyze formal patient complaints, risk events, and malpractice events against OTSs during a 10-year period. We reviewed all formal patient complaints within our institution's patient advocacy database involving 9 fellowship-trained OTSs throughout a decade. Complaints were categorized using the Patient Complaint Analysis System. Potential risk and malpractice events involving the OTSs were recorded. A control group of all patients seen by the surgeons during the study period was created. Demographics between patients with complaints and the control group were analyzed, as were malpractice, risk, and complaint rates between the surgeons. Of 33,770 patients, 136 filed a formal complaint (0.40%). There were 29 malpractice claims and 2 malpractice lawsuits. The care and treatment domain accounted for the highest percentage of complaints (36%), followed by the access and availability domain (26%). Results of the logistic regression analysis indicated that private insurance (odds ratio, 1.58) and operative treatment (odds ratio, 3.65) were significantly associated with complaints. Despite statistically significant differences in the rates of complaint and risk events between surgeons, malpractice events did not differ. The rate of patient complaints within a large orthopedic trauma practice during a 10-year period was 0.40%. Patients with private insurance and those treated operatively were more likely to file a complaint. Whereas complaint rates among surgeons varied, there was no significant difference in the rate of malpractice events. Understanding patient complaint rates and categorizations may allow surgeons to target areas for improvement. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):121-127.].

Online Information Related to Symptoms of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Google Search Analysis

Introduction While Google is frequently used to access internet-based health resources, the quality of online health information remains variable. Our purpose was to assess suggested resources identified through Google search features for common symptoms related to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods Two searches were performed. The first, labeled "symptom-related," included the terms "hand numbness," "hand tingling," and "hand falling asleep." The second, labeled "CTS-specific," included "carpal tunnel syndrome," "carpal tunnel surgery," and "carpal tunnel release." A novel feature of Google's search engine is to display similar searches made by other users ("People Also Ask" snippet). For each search, the first 100 results snippets and the associated website links were recorded. A list of unique questions was compiled and classified into 1 of 3 categories using the Rothwell classification: fact, policy, or value. Questions were also classified based on the diagnoses suggested by the query. Website authorship was determined, and the corresponding links were categorized by two independent reviewers. Results The "symptom-related" searches yielded 175 unique questions and 130 unique website links, and the "CTS-specific" searches yielded a total of 243 questions and 179 unique links. For "symptom-related" searches, 65% of questions suggested a diagnosis, with CTS being suggested as a diagnosis for only 3% of questions. In contrast, CTS was suggested by 92% of questions in "CTS-specific" searches. In both searches, nearly 75% of questions were classified as "facts." Commercial websites were the most common in both searches. Conclusion Google searches for common symptoms of median nerve compression rarely yield information related to CTS.

Publicly Disclosed Pricing for Common Upper-Extremity Procedures: An Analysis of Hospital Chargemasters

BACKGROUND

American hospitals are required to provide price transparency data (known as a chargemaster) for medical services, which is intended to allow consumers to accurately estimate the cost of medical services. Our purpose was to identify hospital compliance in publishing chargemaster documents and to assess the price information published for common upper-extremity services and procedures.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available chargemaster data from 122 hospitals, which included the top-20-ranked Honor Roll hospitals from US News and World Report and 2 top-ranked hospitals from each state. Chargemaster files were accessed for each hospital, and price information was recorded for 10 common upper-extremity procedures including radiographs, injections, and surgeries. Mean procedural prices were compared between academic and nonacademic hospitals.

RESULTS

Chargemaster files were able to be accessed for 107 (88%) of 122 institutions. Price estimates for imaging studies were more frequently reported (73%) than those of procedures (23%-41%). With 50 hospitals reporting a price estimate, carpal tunnel injection was the most frequently reported procedure, whereas trigger finger release was the least frequently reported (41% and 23%, respectively). Wide price ranges were noted, with mean charges for a total shoulder arthroplasty listed as US $51 723 (range, US $247-US $364 024). Mean prices between academic and nonacademic hospital systems were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

While most (88%) of the included hospitals have been compliant with publishing their price transparency files, price estimates for common upper-extremity procedures and imaging studies are inconsistently reported and, when present, demonstrate high levels of price variability between and within hospital systems.

Race and Ethnicity Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Upper-Extremity Journals

PURPOSE

Hand surgery remains one of the least racially and ethnically diverse subspecialties in all of medicine, and minority patients demonstrate overall worse health care outcomes compared with White patients. Our purpose was to determine the frequency of race and ethnicity reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in journals with an upper-extremity (UE) focus.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by searching EMBASE and MEDLINE for RCTs contained in peer-reviewed journals with an UE focus. All articles from 2000 to 2021 were included. Information such as article sample size, center type, funding, and location was recorded. We assessed each article to determine whether demographic information, including race and ethnicity, was reported for study participants.

RESULTS

A total of 481 RCTs in 9 UE journals were included. For UE RCTs, 96% of studies reported age, 90% reported sex, and 5% reported either race or ethnicity. Demographic information about economic status, insurance status, mental health, educational level, and marital status were each reported in <10% of RCTs. Racial representation was highest for White participants (80%) and lowest among American Indian participants. Of studies conducted within the United States, all racial groups except for White patients were underrepresented compared with census data.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic data related to race and ethnicity for patients involved in UE RCTs are infrequently reported. When reported, the racial demographics of UE RCT patients do not match the demographics of the patients in United States. Black patients remain underrepresented in RCTs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Academic journals mandating the reporting of demographic data related to race may aid in improved reporting and allow for subsequent aggregation within systematic reviews to assess outcomes for racial minorities.

Median Nerve and Carpal Tunnel Morphology Before and After Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A 6-Year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to describe structural and morphological features of the median nerve and carpal tunnel on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies obtained before, immediately after, 6 weeks after, and 6 years after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 9 patients with a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) underwent ECTR. Standardized MRI studies were obtained before ECTR, immediately after ECTR, and 6 weeks and 6 years after surgery. Structural and morphological features of the median nerve and carpal tunnel were measured and assessed for each study with comparisons made between each time point.

RESULTS

All 9 patients had complete symptom resolution postoperatively. On the immediate postoperative MRI, there was a discrete gap in the transverse carpal ligament in all patients. There was retinacular regrowth noted at 6 weeks in all cases. The median nerve cross-sectional area and the anterior-posterior dimension of the carpal tunnel at the level of the hamate increased immediately after surgery and these changes were maintained at 6 years.

CONCLUSIONS

We defined structural and morphological changes on MRI for the median nerve and carpal tunnel in patients with continued symptom resolution 6 years after ECTR. Changes in median nerve and carpal tunnel morphology that occur immediately after surgery remain unchanged at mid-term follow-up in asymptomatic patients. Established imaging criteria for CTS may not apply to postoperative patients. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to be of limited clinical utility in the workup of persistent or recurrent CTS.

The Reliability of the CTS-6 for Examiners With Varying Levels of Clinical Experience

PURPOSE

To assess the interrater reliability of the CTS-6 for examiners with varying levels of clinical expertise. We also aimed to analyze this instrument's sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp), using the CTS-6 score obtained by a hand surgeon as a reference standard.

METHODS

Three examining groups consisting of medical students, occupational hand therapists, and hand surgeons examined a consecutive series of patients in an academic upper-extremity clinic. A total of 3 examiners (1 from each group) recorded a CTS-6 score for each patient. The examiners were blinded to the scores from the other groups. The interrater reliability was determined between the groups with respect to the diagnosis of CTS and the individual CTS-6 components. Sn and Sp were calculated for each of the groups using the CTS-6 obtained by the hand surgeons as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Two hundred seven patients were included. For the diagnosis of CTS (CTS-6 score of 12 or greater as determined by a hand surgeon), there was substantial agreement between the 3 groups (Fleiss kappa 0.73; 95% CI [0.65 -0.82]; P < .05). For individual CTS-6 components, the agreement between the groups was highest for assessing subjective numbness and lowest for assessing a Tinel sign (Fleiss kappa of 0.77 and 0.49, respectively). The Sn/Sp for diagnosing CTS was 87%/91% for the medical student group and 81%/95% for the occupational hand therapist group.

CONCLUSIONS

The CTS-6 can be reliably used as a screening and diagnostic tool for CTS by clinicians with a variety of experience levels and without specific fellowship training in upper-extremity surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic I.

A Comparison of Acute Versus Chronic Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery Using Primary Suture Anchor Repair and Local Soft Tissue Advancement

Purpose

To assess patient satisfaction and functional outcomes of primary suture anchor repair with local soft tissue advancement for both acute and chronic thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patient charts who had undergone operative UCL repair between 2006 and 2013. Patients who had more than 8 weeks between the time of injury and surgery were classified as having chronic injuries. In both acute and chronic cases, a primary suture anchor repair of the ligament was performed with local soft tissue advancement. For each patient, baseline demographics, operative complications, and associated injuries were recorded along with visual analog scale pain scores; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; and their return to work or sport status. Comparisons of outcomes and complications were made between the groups (acute vs chronic injuries).

Results

Among the 36 patients who met our inclusion criteria, both the acute (n = 19) and chronic (n = 17) groups were similar with regards to major or minor comorbidities, visual analog scale scores; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; return to work or sport status; or patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

Patients with both acute and chronic thumb UCL injuries have similarly acceptable functional outcomes, postoperative pain, and satisfaction. Primary suture anchor repair without ligament reconstruction appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients’ thumb UCL injuries, even in the chronic setting.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

The Effect of Salary Compensation for Time Spent Teaching in an Orthopaedic Residency Program: An Analysis of Teaching Performance Reviews

INTRODUCTION

Although there has been a recent emphasis on standardized resident assessments within Accrediation Council for Graduate Medical Education programs, assessments of faculty teaching performance and effectiveness are less frequent. Our purpose was to compare the teaching performance of orthopaedic surgery faculty receiving compensation for time spent teaching with faculty without compensation.

METHODS

For this prospective investigation, we collected anonymous resident reviews of 23 orthopaedic faculty within a rural, academic orthopaedic residency program over 2 academic years. Performance reviews of the faculty used a validated assessment of clinical teaching effectiveness with nine domains (faculty knowledge, organization, enthusiasm, rapport, involvement in learning experiences, feedback, clinical skill, accessibility, and overall effectiveness). A composite teaching effectiveness score was determined by adding each of the scores from the individual domains. We compared reviews for faculty members with and without compensation for time spent teaching.

RESULTS

A total of 202 performance reviews for 23 orthopaedic faculty were analyzed. Most of the faculty were male (91%), and 61% received compensation for teaching. No demographic differences were observed between the two faculty groups. Notable differences between the groups were noted in three domains: enthusiasm, ability to establish rapport as well as direction, and feedback. Faculty compensated for teaching demonstrated a markedly higher composite teaching effectiveness score than those without compensation.

DISCUSSION

These data suggest that orthopaedic faculty compensated for teaching responsibilities provide a better educational experience for resident trainees compared with faculty without compensation for teaching. Future studies should aim to assess varying compensation models for teaching responsibilities across different departments.

The Ability of Upper Extremity Surgeons to Assess Patient's Functional Status

PURPOSE

To compare surgeon and patient assessment of upper extremity functional status at the time of initial consultation. We hypothesized that surgeons and patients demonstrate low levels of agreement with respect to assessing pain scores, functional status, and self-efficacy.

METHODS

One hundred forty-three consecutive new patients were evaluated by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons. Patients completed a Numeric Pain Rating Scale as well as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE), Pain Interference (PI), and Self-Efficacy (SE) instruments. Surgeons provided their own estimates of patient function on each questionnaire at the conclusion of the visit and were blinded to the results of the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the duration of the study. Estimation errors, which represent the absolute value of the difference between the patient's actual score and the surgeon's estimated score on each questionnaire, were calculated for each questionnaire.

RESULTS

As a group, surgeons assumed that the PROMIS UE and SE scores were higher than the patients' actual scores and assumed that patients had lower PROMIS PI scores than were actually reported. Mean estimation errors for all PROMIS instruments were greater than 10 points and larger than the SD for these instruments in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper extremity surgeons demonstrate difficulty assessing their patient's self-reported functional status, pain interference, and level of self-efficacy during initial consultations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although formalized PROMs are infrequently administered in orthopedic clinics, increased utilization of these questionnaires would allow for a more accurate baseline functional assessment. When evaluating new patients in the outpatient clinic, surgeons should recognize the potential limitations of their assessments of patient-reported function.

Analysis of Gender Diversity Within Hand Surgery Fellowship Programs

PURPOSE

To define and compare gender diversity among faculty and trainees within hand surgery fellowship programs.

METHODS

We determined the gender of each program director for all orthopedic residency and fellowship programs. Specific to hand fellowship programs, we determined the gender of the fellowship director and all faculty members for all plastic surgery and orthopedic hand fellowship programs. Lists of prior hand surgery fellows from 2014 to 2019 were obtained from official program websites or program coordinators. The gender distribution of the hand fellowship program directors and faculty was compared to the prior fellows.

RESULTS

Hand surgery fellowship programs had the second highest percentage of female fellowship directors (13%) behind orthopedic oncology (27%). Within hand surgery, 614 total faculty positions were identified, and 15% were female. Of the 89 hand surgery programs evaluated, 36 (60%) had at least 1 female faculty member. For the 849 prior fellows identified, 213 (25%) were female, and 79% of programs had at least 1 female fellow. Hand programs led by a female director did not have a higher percentage of prior female fellows compared to programs led by a male director (26% vs 25%). Programs with a female fellowship director were as likely to have had at least 1 prior female fellow compared to programs with a male fellowship director.

CONCLUSIONS

For orthopedic subspecialties, hand surgery fellowship programs had the second highest percentage of female fellowship directors (13%). While mentorship plays an important role in surgical education, hand fellowship programs with female faculty did not appear to attract more female fellows or faculty.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Hand fellowship programs should recognize that the presence of female faculty may not be a primary factor in fellowship selection for female applicants, and further study into recruiting qualified female candidates should be encouraged.

Technology, Social Media, and Telemedicine Utilization for Rural Hand and Upper-Extremity Patients

PURPOSE

To define technology and social media use among rural upper-extremity patients. In addition, we aimed to assess how patients use social media in relation to health care and their willingness to participate in telemedicine programs.

METHODS

An anonymous multiple-choice written survey was administered to 550 upper-extremity patients at 4 rural outreach clinics. Demographic information was obtained, as was social media use, habits and interests. We compared both users and nonusers of social media to define demographic differences between these groups.

RESULTS

A total of 412 patients completed surveys and were included in our analysis (75%); 225 reported using social media (55%). Of the respondents, 67% had a high school education or less and 60% reported an income of less than $50,000/y with an unemployment rate of 58%. In addition, 28% reported not owning a smartphone and 20% lacked home Internet access. Multivariable regression demonstrated that age, female sex, and home Internet access were all independently associated with increased social media use. Facebook was the most frequently used social media platform. Moreover, 42% were interested in telemedicine and social media users were significantly more likely to be interested in telemedicine programs compared with non-social media users.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a population of rural and economically disadvantaged upper-extremity patients, 55% currently use social media; 32% used these platforms to research health conditions. Whereas younger female patients with home Internet access were more likely to use social media, older patients were more likely to use these platforms to research health conditions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As more health information moves on-line and as telemedicine programs continue to evolve, some rural upper-extremity patients may still have technological barriers in the form of smartphone and computer ownership as well as a lack of home Internet access.

Analysis of driving simulator performance for post-call orthopaedic surgery residents

PURPOSE

Despite the associations between workhours, fatigue and motor vehicle accidents, driving abilities for residents post-call have been infrequently analysed. Our purpose was to compare orthopaedic surgery resident performance on a driving simulator after a night of call compared with their baseline.

STUDY DESIGN

All residents from a single orthopaedic programme were asked to complete baseline and post-call driving simulator assessments and surveys. The primary outcome measure was brake reaction time (BRT) and secondary outcome measures included lane variance, speed variance and accidents on the driving simulator.

RESULTS

All 19 orthopaedic residents agreed to participate. Compared with the baseline assessment, residents demonstrated significantly higher levels of sleepiness on the Stanford Sleepiness Scale post-call (1.6 vs 3.4; p<0.0001). Despite higher levels of fatigue post-call, there was no statistically significant differences between baseline and post-call assessments for mean BRT, accidents, lane variation and speed variation.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that for orthopaedic residents, driving simulator performance does not appear to be worse after a single night of call compared with baseline. Future collaborative, multicentre investigations on post-call driving safety that incorporate different call types and frequencies are necessary to better define the impact of post-call fatigue on driving performance. Recognising that motor vehicle accidents remain the leading cause of death for people under the age of 30 years, these continued areas of study are necessary to truly establish a culture of resident safety.

The 70° Supinated Oblique View: A Cadaveric Analysis to Determine Ideal Radial Styloid Screw Position in Locked Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures

Background: Defining an intraoperative radiographic view to best determine the radial styloid screw position in locked volar plating of distal radius fractures may improve fixation and aid in decreasing cortical penetration and implant complication. We used a cadaveric model to demonstrate a reproducible, oblique radiographic view to identify the radial styloid screw position. Methods: Nine fresh-frozen elbow-to-fingertip cadavers were used for this study. A 2.4-mm variable angle volar distal radius locking plate was applied to the distal radius. A Kirschner wire (K-wire) was inserted into the radial styloid through the plate. Placement of the K-wire through the tip of the styloid at the cortical edge was confirmed through a separate radial incision. A second K-wire was placed through the radius shaft into the ulna to aid in angular measurements. Live fluoroscopic imaging was used as the forearm was brought from full 90° of supination toward neutral. Once the K-wire was abutting the cortical edge, rotation ceased, and a goniometer was used to measure the angle of forearm rotation. This was repeated for a total of 3 repetitions on each specimen. Results: The average angle of supination best depicting the position of the radial styloid screw was 68.5° (range = 64.3°-70.5°). Conclusions: Radial styloid screw fixation in locked volar plating of distal radius fractures increases the ultimate strength to failure, but screw penetration and tendon irritation can occur. The 70° supinated oblique intraoperative view provides the most accurate evaluation of the position of the radial styloid screw.

Opioid Versus Nonopioid Analgesia After Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized, Prospective Study

Background: The purpose of this investigation was to compare pain control and patient satisfaction for conventional postoperative opioid analgesia and nonopioid multimodal analgesia after elective open or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods: As part of a randomized, prospective study, patients undergoing primary, elective CTR were randomized to receive either postoperative opioids or nonopioid medications as part of a multimodal pain control strategy. Patients currently taking opioids were excluded. Patients completed a postoperative pain journal and completed the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and satisfaction ratings at their 2-week visit. Results: A total of 68 patients were included. Preoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to pain scores, coping skills, or carpal tunnel symptoms. At 2 weeks postoperatively, patients in the nonopioid group had lower average NPRS and QuickDASH scores. Patients who took opioids consumed an average of 5 pills. No patient randomized to the nonopioid group required any opioids. Patients in the nonopioid group demonstrated lower early postoperative NPRS scores. Patient satisfaction with their pain control regimen and outcome was not significantly different between the 2 groups at any time point. Conclusions: Nonopioid medications as part of a perioperative pain control strategy demonstrate improved pain scores compared with opioid medications with similar patient satisfaction and functional outcomes. Considering the risks associated with the use of opioid analgesics, we recommend against prescribing opioids after CTR, particularly in patients not currently taking narcotic medications.

Comparison of Editor, Reviewer, and Author Demographics in The Journal of Hand Surgery

Purpose

To determine whether demographic differences exist among editors, reviewers, and authors in The Journal of Hand Surgery (JHS). We aimed to test the null hypothesis that there would be no difference among these 3 groups with respect to gender, geographic location, academic productivity, and financial relationships with industry.

Methods

Editors, reviewers, and physician authors were identified for 2018 JHS. Gender and geographic location were recorded for each person. We used the Scopus database to determine the Hirsch index (h-index) as well as the number of publications and citations for members of each group. Industry payment information was obtained using the Open Payments Web site.

Results

The editor group contained 20% women compared with the author group (17% women). Authors (59%) were less likely to be from the United States compared with editors (91%) and reviewers (88%). Editors were found to have a higher h-index (16) compared with reviewers (14) and authors (12). Authors demonstrated significantly higher mean total payments from industry ($41,738) compared with editors ($13,712) and reviewers ($20,457).

Conclusions

In 2018, there appeared to be an even distribution with respect to gender among editors, authors and reviewers in the JHS. International editors and reviewers are relatively under-represented compared to authors. Whereas editors and reviewers demonstrated higher h-indices compared with authors, JHS authors had significantly higher mean total payments in the Open Payments database.

Clinical relevance

Defining demographics, academic productivity, and conflicts of interest for journal editors, reviewers, and authors may aid in identifying potential sources of both author and peer review bias.

Current Trends in WALANT Surgery: A Survey of American Society for Surgery of the Hand Members

Purpose

To define self-reported WALANT use among American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) members. We aimed to define surgeon and practice demographics relative to WALANT use and identify potential barriers for WALANT implementation.

Methods

An anonymous multiple-choice survey was electronically distributed to all active ASSH members. Incomplete surveys were included in the final analysis. Surgeons were asked to provide reasons for not performing WALANT, which were categorized based on general themes. We compared practice and surgeon demographic information relative to WALANT use.

Results

Of 3,826 ASSH members, 869 responded (23%). A total of 79% of respondents had performed at least one WALANT procedure; 62% currently incorporated WALANT into their practice. Hospital-owned outpatient surgery centers were the most common location for WALANT procedures (31%). Canadian surgeons were more likely to use WALANT, compared with US and international surgeons. Surgeons with fewer years in practice and higher-volume surgeons were more likely to use WALANT. There was no statistically significant association between either practice or income structure and WALANT use. For carpal tunnel release (CTR), 13% did not offer patients WALANT, whereas 43% offered WALANT to all patients. Moreover, 51% of surgeons reported that anesthesia staff was required to be present for WALANT cases at their institution. In determining reasons for not using WALANT, 16% reported that they preferred a tourniquet for visualization. Only 2% had concerns regarding epinephrine use in the hand.

Conclusions

The results of this survey illustrate current WALANT use among ASSH members and defines the demographics of those employing WALANT. Lack of familiarity with WALANT and an acceptance of the use of epinephrine in the hand has increased from prior ASSH surveys. Lack of familiarity with the technique, concerns regarding operating room efficiency, and patient preferences remain considerable barriers to more widespread adoption of WALANT procedures.

Type of study/level of evidence

Economic and Decision Analysis V.

Telemedicine in Hand and Upper-Extremity Surgery

Smartphones, computers, and Internet access continue to become more available to both patients and physicians. As these technologies develop with respect to health care, opportunities for telemedicine visits continue to emerge. The purpose of this review article was to analyze the current use and potential applications of telemedicine in hand and upper-extremity surgery. Although the literature pertaining to the use of telemedicine in hand surgery is limited, videoconferencing visits may provide benefits to patients. Particularly in rural and underserved regions, patients can decrease considerable travel burdens. Potential applications for this technology include remote inpatient and emergency room consultations, outpatient clinic visits, and postoperative care. There are unique considerations with respect to confidentiality and security. As with any new technology, it is important to analyze safety concerns. Future randomized, prospective investigations are necessary to define the economic implications of telemedicine programs more clearly within hand and upper-extremity surgery.

Incidence and Reason for Readmission and Unscheduled Health Care Contact After Distal Radius Fracture

Background: Understanding risk factors for readmission may help decrease the rate of these costly events. The purpose of this study is to define the incidence of 30-day readmission and unscheduled health care contact (UHC) after distal radius fracture (DRF). In addition, we aim to define risk factors for readmission and UHC. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who sustained a DRF at our trauma center was performed. We recorded baseline demographics, fracture characteristics, and treatment. Any UHC or readmission (including emergency department [ED] visits) was documented. Reasons for readmission and UHC were stratified by cause. We utilized a case-control design comparing patients readmitted within 30 days after DRF versus those who were not, as well as patients with and without UHC. Results: About 353 patients were identified. The 30-day incidence of readmission after DRF was 7% with 2% of patients readmitted for reasons related to their fracture. Twenty percent of patients had UHC within 30 days, most frequently due to pain. Patients with anxiety or depression and those with open fractures were more likely to be readmitted. Patients with UHC were younger, more likely to have depression or anxiety, and more likely to have undergone operative treatment. Conclusions: For patients sustaining DRF, we report a 30-day readmission rate of 7% with 20% of patients having UHC. Patients with depression or anxiety were more likely to be both readmitted and have UHC. Identifying risk factors for readmission during initial presentation may help reduce readmissions. Improving pain relief strategies early may aid in decreasing the burden of UHC.

The Handshake Test: A Nonverbal Assessment of Coping Strategies and Functional Status in Patients with Atraumatic Upper-Extremity Conditions

BACKGROUND

Maladaptive coping strategies can lead to less functional improvement after upper-extremity surgery. It remains uncertain how well surgeons can recognize signs of less effective coping strategies in patients in the absence of formalized questionnaires. Our purpose is to determine if the "Handshake Test" can be used to identify patients with less effective coping strategies. We hypothesize that a simple physical examination finding (a refusal or inability to shake hands) is associated with higher pain level, maladaptive coping strategies and decreased functional status.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 246 consecutive new patients presenting to one of three surgeons with atraumatic upper-extremity conditions. Patients completed a pain scale (NPRS) and PROMIS instruments including Self-Efficacy (SE) for Managing Symptoms, Pain Interference (PI) and Upper Extremity (UE). Each surgeon recorded a refusal to shake hands as part of a normal greeting, referred to as a "positive Handshake Test".

RESULTS

200 patients (81%) patients completed all outcome measures and were included in our analysis. 8% demonstrated a positive Handshake Test. Patients with a positive Handshake Test were more likely to use tobacco; otherwise baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Patients with a positive Handshake Test demonstrated higher pain scores (NPRS and PROMIS PI), lower levels of self-efficacy and worse self-reported functional status on the PROMIS UE.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with atraumatic upper-extremity conditions, those with a positive Handshake Test report higher pain levels, lower self-efficacy, and decreased self-reported functional status than patients who can perform a handshake. This simple test can aid in identifying patients with less effective coping strategies, allowing surgeons to guide patients towards interventions to improve both illness behavior and functional outcomes.Level of Evidence: II.

Comparison of Radiographic and Intraoperative Visual Assessment of Scaphotrapezoid Joint Arthritis in Patients With End-Stage Carpometacarpal Arthritis of the Thumb Base

Background: The purpose of this investigation is to compare the radiographic and intraoperative assessment of scaphotrapezoid (ST) joint arthritis in patients with end-stage carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis of the thumb base. We aim to define the incidence of ST arthritis in this population and determine whether radiographic features such as lunate morphology, dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI), and scapholunate (SL) diastasis are associated with the incidence of ST arthritis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with end-stage CMC arthritis of the thumb treated operatively with trapeziectomy. Preoperative wrist radiographs were reviewed, and the presence of ST arthritis was determined using the Sodha classification. Lunate morphology, DISI, and SL diastasis were noted. Intraoperative grading of ST arthritis was assessed using a modified Brown classification. The specificity and sensitivity of radiographic assessment was compared with the gold standard of intraoperative direct visualization. Results: In total, 302 thumbs met inclusion criteria. End-stage ST joint arthritis determined by intraoperative visual inspection was noted in 31% of cases. No radiographic or demographic variables were found to be risk factors for ST arthritis. Plain radiographs were 47% sensitive and 94% specific in their ability to detect end-stage ST joint arthritis. Conclusions: We report a 31% incidence of end-stage ST joint arthritis in surgically treated patients with CMC arthritis based on visual inspection which is lower than previous literature. Wrist radiographs demonstrate a 47% sensitivity and 94% specificity in predicting end-stage ST joint arthritis. It is imperative to directly visualize the ST joint after trapeziectomy, as radiographs demonstrate poor sensitivity.

The Use of Preoperative Dynamic Ultrasound to Predict Ulnar Nerve Stability Following In Situ Decompression for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

PURPOSE

To assess the use of preoperative, dynamic ultrasound to predict ulnar nerve instability following in situ decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome.

METHODS

Prior to undergoing in situ decompression, 43 consecutive patients underwent dynamic ultrasound to assess the stability of the ulnar nerve during elbow flexion. The dynamic ultrasound findings were compared with the intraoperative assessment of nerve stability following in situ decompression.

RESULTS

The preoperative dynamic ultrasound agreed with intraoperative findings in 38 of 43 patients (88%). Physical examination of ulnar nerve stability agreed with the intraoperative findings in 5 of 43 patients (12%). For the 5 of 43 cases in which the dynamic ultrasound did not correlate with the degree of ulnar nerve stability after in situ decompression, dynamic ultrasound overestimated the degree of ulnar nerve stability in 4 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative dynamic ultrasound can be used to accurately predict the degree of ulnar nerve instability following in situ decompression.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Upper Extremity Trauma Resulting From Agricultural Accidents: Mechanism and Severity for Patients With and Without Upper Extremity Injury

BACKGROUND

Farming remains the most dangerous occupation in the United States and upper extremity (UE) injuries occur frequently in agricultural accidents. The purpose of this study is to describe the injury mechanisms, severity, and health care costs of UE injuries resulting from agricultural accidents and to compare patients with and without injuries to the UE.

METHODS

We performed a 6-year retrospective review of our level I trauma center registry from January 2006 to May 2013, identifying all patients injured in an agricultural accident. Data collection included baseline demographics, injury type and mechanism, costs and treatment. Patients with UE injuries were compared with those without UE injuries.

RESULTS

Ninety-six of 273 patients (35%) sustained an UE injury with fractures of the phalanx and radius/ulna occurring most frequently. Patients with UE injuries were more likely to be injured from table saws ( P = .0003) and farm machinery ( P < .0001). Twenty-one percent with UE injuries sustained a mangled extremity. Patients with UE injuries were more likely to require surgery (68% vs 36%, P < .0001) and were more likely to be readmitted (17% vs 5%, P = .0007) with risk factors for readmission including age >18 years, falls from height, and surgery. Mean hospital charges were $95 147.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients sustaining agricultural UE injuries have longer lengths of stay and more frequently require surgery despite similar hospital charges compared with non-UE injured patients. Hospital readmissions occur frequently for patients with UE injuries. Understanding injury mechanisms and the epidemiology of these potentially devastating and costly injuries may help guide agricultural injury prevention programs.

Anatomic Assessment of K-Wire Trajectory for Transverse Percutaneous Fixation of Small Finger Metacarpal Fractures: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this cadaveric study is to evaluate the trajectory of percutaneous transverse Kirschner wire (K-wire) placement for fifth metacarpal fractures relative to the sagittal profile of the fifth metacarpal in order to develop a targeting strategy for the treatment of fifth metacarpal fractures.

METHODS

Using 12 unmatched fresh human upper limbs, we evaluated the trajectory of percutaneous transverse K-wire placement relative to the sagittal profile of the fifth metacarpal in order to develop a targeting strategy for treatment of fifth metacarpal fractures. The midpoint of the small and ring finger metacarpals in the sagittal plane was identified at 3 points. At each point, a K-wire was inserted from the small finger metacarpal into the midpoint of the ring finger metacarpal ("center-center" position).

RESULTS

The angle of the transverse K-wire relative to the table needed to achieve a center-center position averaged 20.8°, 18.9°, and 16.7° for the proximal diaphysis, middiaphysis, and the collateral recess, respectively. Approximately 80% of transversely placed K-wires obtained purchase in the long finger metacarpal.

CONCLUSIONS

These results can serve as a guide to help surgeons in the accurate placement of percutaneous K-wires for small finger metacarpal fractures and may aid in surgeon training.

Predictors of Recurrence After Corticosteroid Injection for Trigger Digits

BACKGROUND

We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence of trigger digit following corticosteroid injection.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients 18 years and older who presented to a single fellowship-trained hand surgeon with a symptomatic trigger digit during a 1-year period. Baseline demographic data were recorded. Patients with persistent trigger digit after a single injection were offered a second injection. Patients refusing a second injection were excluded from our analysis. Patients with persistent symptoms after 2 injections were offered surgery. For patients with diabetes mellitus, additional information regarding method of disease control and hemoglobin A_1c level was recorded.

RESULTS

The overall success of corticosteroid injection was 84% with 16% of patients requiring surgical release. Of the 240 patients successfully treated with injection, 99 (41%) required a second injection. Injections resulted in persistent triggering in 15% of patients with diabetes and 17% of patients without diabetes. A multivariate regression analysis revealed that the 2 strongest risk factors for requiring surgical release were patient age and patients whose fourth digit of the right hand was injected. Diabetes was not a risk factor for persistent triggering after corticosteroid injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings can be used to counsel patients prior to their initial injection and suggest that patients with diabetes can be managed with corticosteroid injection with equal efficacy compared with patients without diabetes.

The Use of Residual Collagenase for Single Digits With Multiple-Joint Dupuytren Contractures

PURPOSE

Standard 0.58 mg (0.25 mL) collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) preparations result in unused CCH that is often discarded. Our purpose was to assess the results on Dupuytren contractures affecting both the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints in the same digit utilizing an injection containing the maximum CCH volume that can be withdrawn from a single vial.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients with MCP and PIP cords in the same digit received a single treatment with 2 injections totaling 0.30 mL distributed between the MCP and the PIP cords and underwent manipulation approximately 24 hours later. Reduction in contracture, clinical success, and complications were assessed 30 days after manipulation.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (34 digits) had a mean preinjection flexion contracture of 50° at the MCP joint and 53° at the PIP joint. Clinical success (reduction in joint contracture to 0°-5° of full extension 30-days postmanipulation) was noted in 65% of MCP cords and 38% of PIP joint cords. We had a 24% incidence of skin tears, which correlated with the degree of preinjection contracture.

CONCLUSIONS

For Dupuytren contractures involving the MCP and PIP joints in the same digit, distributing the maximum amount of CCH that can be withdrawn from a single vial provides efficacy at both joints that is similar to that reported in previously published series, with a comparable complication rate. Utilizing excess CCH typically discarded may provide cost savings.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Levels of Evidence for Hand Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination

Background: Although analyses of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) subspecialty content domains have been performed, few studies have analyzed the levels of evidence (LoEs) for journal articles used as references to create OITE questions. We present an analysis of reference characteristics and question taxonomy for the hand surgery content domain on the OITE. We aim to determine whether level of evidence (LoE) for hand surgery questions have increased over a 15-year period. Methods: All questions and references in the hand surgery content domain on the OITE from 1995-1997 and 2010-2012 were reviewed. The taxonomic classification was determined for each question. Publication characteristics were defined for each reference, and each primary journal article was assigned a LoE. Results: A total of 129 questions containing 222 references met inclusion criteria: 76 questions from 1995-1997 and 53 from 2010-2012. The Journal of Hand Surgery American and European Volumes, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American and British Volumes, and the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons were the most frequently cited journals overall. Recent examinations were more likely to have Buckwalter T3 complex clinical management questions. There was a statically significant increase in the LoE used to create hand questions on the 2010-2012 compared with the 1995-1997 OITE. Conclusions: Primary journal articles cited on the hand surgery content domain of the OITE frequently included recent publications from both general and subspecialty journals. More recent examination questions appear to test clinical management scenarios. LoE for hand questions has increased over a 15-year period. Our results can be used as a guide to help prepare orthopedic residents for the OITE.

Levels of Evidence for Foot and Ankle Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: 15-Year Trends

BACKGROUND

The foot and ankle (FA) content domain is a component of the orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE). Levels of evidence (LoE) have been infrequently studied on the OITE. The purpose of this study is to determine if LoE for primary journal articles referenced for FA questions increased over a 15-year period. We also aim to determine if reference characteristics and question taxonomy have changed during this period.

METHODS

All 132 questions and 261 references in the FA content domain from 1995 to 1997 and from 2010 to 2012 were included. We defined the characteristics of each reference and taxonomy of each question. Every primary journal article was assigned a LoE based on American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines.

RESULTS

Foot & Ankle International (FAI) was the most frequently cited journal. The change in the distribution of the Buckwalter classifications was statistically significant (p = 0.0286) with an increase in the number of clinical management questions. There were more level I studies on the 2010 to 2012 OITE (p = 0.0478) 6/54 (11%) of questions on the 2010 to 2012 OITE cited level I or II evidence compared with 3/78 (4%) on the 1995 to 1997 examinations (p = 0.1035).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a trend toward improved LoE for journal articles within the FA content domain on the OITE over a 15-year period, particularly when analyzing the increase in level I studies. FAI is the most frequently cited journal and questions increasingly test clinical management concepts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our results can be used to help improve resident self-study and suggest that reviewing recent FAI articles may aid OITE preparation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic Science.

Analysis of Orthopedic Resident Ability to Apply Levels of Evidence Criteria to Scientific Articles

OBJECTIVE

In the era of evidence-based medicine, understanding study design and levels of evidence (LoE) criteria is an important component of resident education and aids practicing surgeons in making informed clinical decisions. The purpose of this study is to analyze the ability of orthopedic residents to accurately determine LoE criteria for published articles compared with medical students.

DESIGN

Basic science article.

SETTING

Geisinger Medical Center (Danville, PA), tertiary referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 25 U.S. orthopedic residents and 15 4th year medical students interviewing for a residency position in orthopedic surgery voluntarily participated and provided baseline demographic information. A total of 15 articles from the American Volume of Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery were identified. Study participants were provided with the article title, the abstract, and the complete methods section. The assigned LoE designation was withheld and access to the LoE criteria used by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery was provided. Each participant was assigned a study type and LoE designation for each article.

RESULTS

There were more correct responses regarding the article type (67%) than for LoE designation (39%). For LoE, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.30. The percentage of correct responses for article type and LoE increased with more years of training (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002). Although residents had a higher proportion of correct LoE responses overall than medical students, this difference did not reach statistical significance (42% vs. 35%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Although improvements in accurately determining both article type and LoE were seen among residents with increasing years of training, residents were unable to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement for determining LoE or article type when compared with medical students. Strategies to improve resident understanding of LoE guidelines need to be incorporated into orthopedic residencies, especially when considering the increased emphasis on evidence-based medicine.

Airborne Exposure of Methyl Methacrylate During Simulated Total Hip Arthroplasty and Fabrication of Antibiotic Beads

As the use of cement remains prevalent in orthopedic surgery, so do concerns over the safety of its active ingredient, methyl methacrylate (MMA). The Occupational Health and Safety Agency (OSHA) limits the airborne exposure to 100 parts per million (ppm) averaged over an 8 hour period. We measured MMA exposure to operating room personnel during simulated total hip arthroplasty (THA), antibiotic bead fabrication and simulated spill of MMA. Cumulative and peak exposures during simulated THA and antibiotic bead fabrication did not exceed OSHA limits of 100ppm. Vacuum mixing and greater distance from the vapor source reduced measured MMA exposure. Spilled MMA led to prolonged and elevated MMA levels. MMA levels returned to a negligible level in all scenarios by 20 minutes after mixing.

Orthopaedic trauma in the Anabaptist community: epidemiology and hospital charges

This study aims to define the epidemiology of orthopaedic trauma in the rural Anabaptist community and analyze the hospital charges associated with their treatment. The authors performed a retrospective review of 79 Amish and 40 Mennonite patients who had been seen in their rural level I trauma center emergency department for an orthopaedic injury from January 2006 to May 2013. Data collection included baseline demographics, injury mechanism and severity, injury complex, operative interventions, outcomes, and hospital charges. Amish and Mennonite groups were similar except for a higher percentage of males in the Mennonite group. For Amish patients, occupational injuries (52%) and buggy accidents (16%) accounted for the highest percentage of admissions. Eighty-seven percent sustained at least one fracture, most commonly of the hand (11%). Amish patients were statistically more likely to sustain fractures of the spine, and Mennonite patients were more likely to sustain fractures of the foot and femur. Over half of patients required surgery (58%). Total hospital charges did not differ based between the groups. Amish patients completed outpatient follow-up less frequently than Mennonite patients. Anabaptist patients are at risk for a variety of orthopaedic injuries related to their unique lifestyle and vocations. Socioreligious beliefs must be taken into consideration when educating these patients regarding postinjury care, as attendance at outpatient follow-up is low. Understanding the types of injuries that these patients sustain can help create strategies to prevent costly transportation and agricultural accidents within the Anabaptist community.

Levels of evidence have increased for musculoskeletal trauma questions on the orthopaedic in-training examination

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if the levels of evidence for primary journal articles used as references for musculoskeletal trauma questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) have increased over a 15-year period.

DESIGN

Basic science article.

SETTING

Geisinger Medical Center (Danville, PA), tertiary referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

All 329 questions in the musculoskeletal trauma content domain on the OITE from 1995 to 1997 and 2010 to 2012 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics for each question and each reference were recorded. References were categorized as a textbook, a journal review article, an instructional course lecture, or a primary journal article. For each primary journal article, the level of evidence for the article was determined in accordance with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Levels of Evidence Guidelines.

RESULTS

The level of evidence used for primary journal articles demonstrated a statistically significant increase from 1995 to 1997 to 2010 to 2012. Overall, 27% of primary journal articles cited on the 1995 to 1997 OITEs were level I, II, or III studies, increasing to 43% during the 2010 to 2012 period (p = 0.04). The Buckwalter classification for the OITE questions changed significantly between the 2 periods, with questions from 2010 to 2012 including more T1 questions (25% vs 39%) and fewer T3 questions (46% vs 39%, p = 0.016). The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma were the most frequently cited journals overall.

CONCLUSIONS

The levels of evidence for primary journal articles cited on the OITE for questions within the musculoskeletal trauma content domain have increased between 1995 and 2012. Our analysis can be used as a guide to help examinees prepare for musculoskeletal trauma questions on the OITE and as an aid in core curriculum development.

The incidence of trigger digit after carpal tunnel release in diabetic and nondiabetic patients

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at greater risk for developing postoperative trigger digits (TD) after carpal tunnel release (CTR) compared with patients without diabetes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our electronic medical records identified all patients who had undergone CTR by a single hand fellowship-trained surgeon from September 2007 through May 2012. For patients with DM, additional information regarding method of disease control and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was recorded. We recorded HbA1c levels 3 months before and 3 months after CTR. The location and time to development of postoperative, new-onset TD were recorded for each case. Statistical testing included chi-square or Student t test and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 1,217 CTRs, 214 had DM. Of the 1,003 CTRs in cases without DM, 3% developed TD within 6 months of CTR and 4% within 1 year of CTR, compared with 8% and 10%, respectively, for diabetic cases. A multivariate regression analysis revealed DM as a significant risk factor for developing TD after CTR at 6 and 12 months. We found no significant association between HbA1c level at the time of CTR and the likelihood of developing TD.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of TD after CTR was higher in the diabetic population compared with a nondiabetic cohort. The presence of DM rather than its severity was the most important factor for developing TD. Preoperative counseling for patients with DM undergoing CTR may alert them to the possibility of developing TD.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Magnetic resonance imaging after endoscopic carpal tunnel release

PURPOSE

To determine with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the morphologic changes in the carpal tunnel and median nerve 3 months after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR).

METHODS

We enrolled patients who had complete resolution of numbness and pain by 6 weeks after ECTR. Patients who met these inclusion criteria received an MRI at 3 months after surgery. Images were analyzed to determine whether median nerve morphology changes and discrete gap or separation of the flexor retinaculum could be appreciated on MRI.

RESULTS

There were 17 patients screened and 15 met the inclusion criteria. Three-month MRI in all patients demonstrated changes in the flexor retinaculum over the median nerve. In all 15 patients, a distinct gap or separation in the fibers of the flexor retinaculum overlying the median nerve could not be appreciated. Median nerve width-to-height ratios at the level of the pisiform and at the hook of the hamate were 2.4 and 2.1, respectively. Median nerve cross-sectional area was 14.1 at the pisiform and 13.3 at the hook of the hamate.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI of patients 3 months after successful ECTR does not demonstrate a discrete gap or separation in the flexor retinaculum overlying the median nerve but may be useful for evaluating median nerve morphology.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Anomalous tendon to the middle finger for sagittal band reconstruction: report of 2 cases

Multiple techniques with good outcomes have been described for sagittal band reconstruction. We describe 2 cases of sagittal band reconstruction using an anomalous slip of the extensor tendon to the middle finger. This anomalous slip can be a resource for surgical reconstruction that can add stability to primary sagittal band repair.

Use of an integrated, anatomic-based, orthopaedic resident education curriculum: a 5-year retrospective review of its impact on orthopaedic in-training examination scores

INTRODUCTION

Experts have called for a comprehensive didactic curriculum in orthopaedic residency training. This study examined the effects of an anatomic-based, integrated conference program on annual Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) scores at a single orthopaedic residency program.

METHODS

We implemented a new, integrated, anatomic-based curriculum in January 2005. Differences between scores were analyzed by postgraduate year (PGY) of training. OITE scores (percentile ranking and raw scores) of year 1 (PGY-2) through year 4 (PGY-5) residents exposed to the curriculum (2005-2009) were compared to prior PGY-2 through PGY-5 residents (2000-2004) who had experienced the previous unstructured curriculum. To evaluate for cohort effects, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step I scores for these 2 groups were also compared.

RESULTS

Eight residents were exposed to the new conference program and 8 to the prior conference program. All residents' percentile rankings improved after exposure to the curriculum, although improvement was not statistically significant for all participants. The most dramatic improvements in OITE scores were seen for PGY-4 and PGY-5 residents, which improved from 65th to 91st percentile (P  =  .03) and from 66th to 91st percentile (P  =  .06), respectively. There were no differences between the cohorts in USMLE Step I scores.

DISCUSSION

Initiation of an integrated, anatomic-based, resident conference program had a positive impact on resident performance on the OITE.

Anomalous extensor tendons to the long finger: a cadaveric study of incidence

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and anatomic insertion sites of extensor medii proprius and extensor indicis medii communis tendons to the long finger in cadaveric dissection and to describe the insertion of the extensor medii proprius.

METHODS

Thirty randomly selected adult cadavers, 44 upper extremities, were examined for the presence or absence of an anomalous extensor tendon to the long finger. If present, tendon origin and insertion sites were documented, and the width of the tendon was evaluated.

RESULTS

The extensor medii proprius was observed in 4 of 44 extremities, an incidence of 9%. The extensor indicis medii communis was observed in 7 of 44 extremities, an incidence of 16%. Tendon widths for both the extensor medii proprius and extensor indicis medii communis specimens ranged from 1.5 to 3.0 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of an anomalous slip of tendon to the long finger might be higher than previously reported, with a combined incidence of 25% in this cadaveric study. This anomalous slip can be a resource for surgical reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The presence of anomalous tendinous slips to the long finger can be easily overlooked. Understanding the anatomical relationships, incidence, and donor tendon availability of these anomalous tendons might aid with surgical planning.

Predicting the outcome of revision carpal tunnel release

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that the result of steroid injection in the carpal tunnel in a patient with recurrent carpal tunnel symptoms would serve as a good predictor of the outcome of later carpal tunnel release (CTR).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent revision CTR for recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome over a 2-year period at our institution. A total of 28 wrists in 23 patients met inclusion criteria. We evaluated patients to determine whether preoperative factors or the result of injection predicted the outcome of revision CTR. We used a multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict surgical success when multiple preoperative findings were considered.

RESULTS

Of the 23 wrists that had relief from injection, 20 had symptom improvement with surgery. Although they did not reach statistical significance, the sensitivity and positive predictive value for injection alone predicted outcome of revision CTR in 87%. No patient characteristic or physical examination finding predicted successful revision CTR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis combining preoperative injection results with physical examination findings (numbness and/or motor weakness in median nerve distribution, positive Durkin test, and positive Phalen test) provided a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

In a small group of patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, cortisone injection into the carpal tunnel was not, by itself, a statistically significant predictor of successful revision surgery. However, relief from injection as a diagnostic test for predicting successful revision CTR was found to have both a high sensitivity and a positive predictive value. Coupled with the components of the physical examination, injection provides a good screening test to establish surgical success with revision CTR.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.