1
|
Pollak KI, Davenport CA, Duck V, Falls A, Pepka S, Parente V, Jackson LR, Johnson KS. Discriminatory and valuing communication behaviors in cardiology encounters. Patient Education and Counseling 2024; 123:108224. [PMID: 38395022 PMCID: PMC10997491 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many have found racial differences in clinician-patient communication using validated codebooks that represent effective communication. No codebooks used for examining racial differences, however, have included patient input. In this paper, we describe creating codebook with Black patient advocates to determine if we could reliably code discriminatory/valuing communication and assess racial differences in these behaviors. METHODS We created a codebook for discriminatory/valuing communication behaviors with the input of Black patient advocates. We used the codebook to analyze data from 101 audio recorded encounters between White cardiologists and Black and White patients. We examined the differences in the prevalence of behaviors in cardiology encounters. RESULTS In comparison to White patients, cardiologists made fewer tailoring statements to their Black patients (68% vs. 49%, p = 0.07). Coders found 4 instances of stereotyping behaviors and only Black patients (p = 0.12). We found no significant associations between any of the other outcomes and patient race. Black patients had a lower incidence of tailoring statements (p = 0.13), lower incidence of interrupting statements (p = 0.16), and higher rushed global score (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS We found that coders can reliably identify discriminatory/valuing behaviors in cardiology encounters. Future work should apply these codes to other datasets to assess their validity and generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | - Veronica Duck
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Allison Falls
- Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sara Pepka
- Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Victoria Parente
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly S Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kutner JS, Pollak KI, Kehl KA, Ritchie CS. Advancing the Science of Palliative Care: Contributions of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group. J Palliat Med 2024. [PMID: 38324008 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC) formed to lead, catalyze, and empower a community of scientists to build an evidence base to ensure high-quality care and optimal well-being for persons with serious illness and their caregivers. The PCRC grew to 630 members representing 220 distinct sites. The PCRC awarded 44 pilot grant awards (total investment $1.4 million), resulting in $15.8 million in extramural grant funding, supported monthly webinars, an annual mentorship selective, "Clinical Trials Intensives," research consultation, and grant review. Among the 169 Clinical Trials Intensive participants, 74 subsequently achieved extramural grant award funding with direct costs of over $139 million. The PCRC supported the submission of extramural research applications and fostered community through annual meetings, special interest groups, newsletters, and its website. The PCRC filled an important void in serious illness science and set the stage for the next era of advancing serious illness research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean S Kutner
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Karen A Kehl
- Division of Extramural Science Programs, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christine S Ritchie
- Department of Medicine and Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hantzmon SV, Davenport CA, Das Gupta MN, Adekunle TA, Gaither SE, Olsen MK, Pinheiro SO, Johnson KS, Mahoney H, Falls A, Lloyd L, Pollak KI. Race differences in patient trust and distrust from audio-recorded cardiology encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2024; 119:108083. [PMID: 37989068 PMCID: PMC10842896 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many have reported racial disparities in self-reported trust in clinicians but have not directly assessed expressions of trust and distrust in physician-patient encounters. We created a codebook to examine racial differences in patient trust and distrust through audio-recorded cardiologist-patient interactions. METHODS We analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of audio-recorded outpatient cardiology encounters (50 White and 51 Black patients). We created a codebook for trust and distrust that was applied to recordings between White cardiologists and White and Black patients. We assessed differences in trust, distrust, and guardedness while adjusting for patient age, sex, and first appointment with the cardiologist. RESULTS Compared to White patients, Black patients had significantly lower expressions of trust ([IRR] [95 % CI]: 0.59 [0.41, 0.84]) and a significantly lower mean guarded/open score ([β] [95 % CI] -0.38 [-0.71, -0.04]). There was no statistically significant association between race and odds of at least one distrustful expression (OR [95 % CI] 1.36 [0.37, 4.94]). CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS We found that coders can reliably identify patient expressions of trust and distrust rather than relying on problematic self-reported measures. Results suggest that White clinicians can improve their communication with Black patients to increase expressions of trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah V Hantzmon
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Maya N Das Gupta
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Temi A Adekunle
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah E Gaither
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Maren K Olsen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sandro O Pinheiro
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly S Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hannah Mahoney
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Allison Falls
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lauren Lloyd
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adekunle TA, Knowles JM, Hantzmon SV, DasGupta MN, Pollak KI, Gaither SE. A qualitative analysis of trust and distrust within patient-clinician interactions. PEC Innov 2023; 3:100187. [PMID: 37457672 PMCID: PMC10339236 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Trust represents a key quality of strong clinician-patient relationships.1 Many have attempted to assess patient-reported trust. However, most trust measures suffer from ceiling effects, with no variability, making it not possible to examine predictors of trust and distrust. Rather than rely on patient reports, we created a codebook for instances of trust and distrust from actual patient-clinician encounters. Methods Three coders conducted a qualitative analysis of audio recordings among patient-cardiologist outpatient encounters. Results We identified trust and distrust based on vocal and verbal cues in the interactions. We found consistent patterns that indicated patient trust and distrust. Conclusion Overall, this work empirically validates a new more accurate measurement of trust for patient-doctor interactions. Innovation We are the first to use audio recordings to identify verbal markers of trust and distrust in patient-clinician interactions. From this work, others can code trust and distrust in recorded encounters rather than rely on self-report measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Temi A. Adekunle
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joy M. Knowles
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah V. Hantzmon
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Maya N. DasGupta
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah E. Gaither
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
- Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khouri A, Stephens MJ, Young J, Galyean P, Knettel BA, Cherenack EM, Zickmund S, Watt MH, Bartlett J, Pollak KI, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A, Suneja G. Cancer Treatment Decision-Making for People Living With HIV: Physician-Reported Barriers, Facilitators, and Recommendations. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2023; 94:482-489. [PMID: 37949449 PMCID: PMC10642692 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000003300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with the general cancer population, people living with HIV (PLWH) and cancer are less likely to receive treatment and have significantly elevated cancer-specific mortality for many common cancer types. Physician recommendations drive the cancer therapy that patients receive, yet there is limited information assessing how cancer treatment decisions are made for people living with HIV and cancer. We sought to understand oncologist decision-making in PLWH and cancer by eliciting barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for enhancing care delivery. SETTING Participants were recruited between May 2019 and May 2021 from one academic medical center in the western United States (n = 13), another in the southeastern United States (n = 7), and community practices nationwide (n = 5). METHODS Using an inductive qualitative approach, we conducted in-depth interviews with 25 oncologists from two academic medical centers and community practices. RESULTS Facilitators of cancer care delivery included readily available information regarding HIV status and stage, interdepartmental communication, and antiviral therapy adherence. Barriers included a lack of formal education on HIV malignancies, perceptions of decreased life expectancy, fear of inadvertent disclosure, and drug-drug interactions. Recommendations included improved provider communication, patient social and mental health resources, and continuing education opportunities. CONCLUSION The study revealed drivers of cancer treatment decision-making, highlighting physician-reported barriers and facilitators, and recommendations to support treatment decision-making. This is the first known study examining oncologists' perceptions of caring for PLWH. Given that cancer is a leading cause of death among PLWH, there is an urgent need to improve care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Khouri
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Maya J. Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jeanette Young
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Patrick Galyean
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Brandon A. Knettel
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Susan Zickmund
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Melissa H. Watt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - John Bartlett
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Peter A. Ubel
- Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC; and
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Salt Lake City VA Center for Informatics, Decision Enhancement, and Surveillance (IDEAS), Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bansal S, Willis R, Barks MC, Pollak KI, Brandon D, Kaye EC, Lemmon ME. Supporting Disclosure of Unmet Mental Health Needs among Parents of Critically Ill Infants. J Pediatr 2023; 262:113596. [PMID: 37399922 PMCID: PMC10757990 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize (1) the prevalence of mental health discussion and (2) facilitators of and barriers to parent disclosure of mental health needs to clinicians. STUDY DESIGN Parents of infants with neurologic conditions in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units participated in a longitudinal decision-making study from 2018 through 2020. Parents completed semi-structured interviews upon enrollment, within 1 week after a conference with providers, at discharge, and 6 months post-discharge. We used a conventional content analysis approach and NVIVO 12 to analyze data related to mental health. RESULTS We enrolled 61 parents (n = 40 mothers, n = 21 fathers) of 40 infants with neurologic conditions in the intensive care unit. In total, 123 interviews were conducted with 52 of these parents (n = 37 mothers, n = 15 fathers). Over two-thirds of parents (n = 35/52, 67%) discussed their mental health in a total of 61 interviews. We identified two key domains when approaching the data through the lens of mental health: (1) self-reported barriers to communicating mental health needs: parents shared uncertainty about the presence or benefit of support, a perceived lack of mental health resources and emotional support, and concerns about trust; (2) self-reported facilitators and benefits of communicating mental health needs: parents described the value of supportive team members, connecting to peer support, and speaking to a mental health professional or neutral third party. CONCLUSIONS Parents of critically ill infants are at high risk of unmet mental health needs. Our results highlight modifiable barriers and actionable facilitators to inform interventions to improve mental health support for parents of critically ill infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simran Bansal
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Rheaya Willis
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mary C Barks
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Debra Brandon
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC
| | - Erica C Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Monica E Lemmon
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaur E, Arezina J, Bryant L, Pollak KI, Harrison G, Bender Atik R, Coates J, Hardicre NK, Sicklen R, Horwood K, Lardner T, Arnold J, Wallace R, Johnson J. Adapting a communication coaching intervention for obstetric sonographers delivering unexpected news: A qualitative study. Ultrasound 2023; 31:273-283. [PMID: 37929254 PMCID: PMC10621488 DOI: 10.1177/1742271x221147860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Despite widespread recognition that communicating unexpected news during obstetric ultrasound examinations is challenging, there is a dearth of research investigating how to teach evidence-based communication to sonographers. Communication Coaching is a supportive, positive method that has previously been associated with improvements in communication, patient satisfaction, and reduced burnout in clinicians. However, to date, no study has coached sonographers. This study explored stakeholders' views on a proposed Communication Coaching intervention and used these data to adapt the intervention for use with qualified obstetric sonographers. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who have a vested interest in unexpected news delivery and thematic analysis was conducted on the data. Eight sonographers, six people with lived experience of receiving unexpected news and six representatives from third-sector organisations who support expectant parents were recruited (18 women; 2 men, aged between 21 and 75 years). Results Participants viewed the planned Communication Coaching intervention favourably and suggested adaptations. The two main themes were (1) the practicalities of coaching, and (2) content. The first theme had four subthemes: (a) brief and flexible structure, (b) online modality, (c) sensitive and positive coach and (d) organisational awareness. The second theme had three subthemes: (a) specific language and behaviour recommendations, (b) adaptable to different service-users and situations and (c) confer relevant emotional skills and techniques. Conclusions Communication Coaching could be a feasible and acceptable intervention for qualified sonographers if specific, limited adaptations are made as recommended by the stakeholders. Further evaluation of the intervention in practice is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essie Kaur
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jane Arezina
- Specialist Science Education Department (SSED), Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise Bryant
- Division of Psychological & Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gill Harrison
- Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), London, UK
- School of Health & Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Roxanne Sicklen
- Barnet Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Barnet, UK
| | | | - Teresa Lardner
- Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme, Public Health Commissioning and Operations, NHS England, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Wallace
- Royal Gwent Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK
| | - Judith Johnson
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mroz EL, McDarby M, Kutner JS, Arnold RM, Bylund CL, Pollak KI. Empathic communication between clinicians, patients, and care partners in palliative care encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 114:107811. [PMID: 37244131 PMCID: PMC10526983 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Palliative care encounters often involve empathic opportunities conveyed by patients and their care partners. In this secondary analysis, we examined empathic opportunities and clinician responses with attention to how presence of multiple care partners and clinicians shapes empathic communication. METHODS We used the Empathic Communication Coding System (ECCS) to characterize emotion-focused, challenge-focused, and progress-focused empathic opportunities and responses in 71 audio-recorded palliative care encounters in the US. RESULTS Patients expressed more emotion-focused empathic opportunities than did care partners; care partners expressed more challenge-focused empathic opportunities than did patients. Care partners initiated empathic opportunities more frequently when more care partners were present, though they expressed fewer as the number of clinicians increased. When more care partners and more clinicians were present, clinicians had fewer low-empathy responses. CONCLUSION The number of care partners and clinicians present affect empathic communication. Clinicians should be prepared for empathic communication focal points to shift depending on the number of care partners and clinicians present. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Findings can guide development of resources to prepare clinicians to meet emotional needs in palliative care discussions. Interventions can coach clinicians to respond empathically and pragmatically to patients and care partners, particularly when multiple care partners are in attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily L Mroz
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, United States.
| | - Meghan McDarby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Jean S Kutner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, United States
| | - Robert M Arnold
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, United States
| | - Carma L Bylund
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, United States
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, United States; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Granados I, D'Agostino EM, Skinner AC, Neshteruk CD, Pollak KI. Neighborhood Public Transportation Access and Adolescent Body Mass Index: Results from the FLASHE Study. Child Obes 2023. [PMID: 37610857 DOI: 10.1089/chi.2023.0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Background: Prior investigators have examined the relationship between neighborhood public transportation access and physical activity among adolescents, but research is lacking on the association with obesity in this age group. This study examines the association between neighborhood public transportation access and adolescent BMI using a national sample. Methods: We used cross-sectional data from the Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating study, a national survey (2014) that assessed physical activity and diet, among adolescents (aged 12-17 years, N = 1737) and their parents. We ran crude and adjusted linear regression models to test the association between neighborhood-level public transportation access (less prevalent and prevalent) and individual participant-level BMI z-scores. Results: The analytic sample included 336 adolescents (50% female; 69% had healthy weight; 28% had overweight or obesity). Adjusted models showed a positive relationship between high public transportation access and adolescent z-BMI (b = 0.25, confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.01 to 0.50). In stratified analyses, high public transportation access was associated with higher z-BMI for high school students (b = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.23-0.91), males (b = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.09-0.87), and adolescents in households with an income below $99,999 (0.29, 95% CI: 0.02-0.56). Conclusion: Neighborhood public transportation access is associated with adolescent BMI, but the direction of this association varies across urban adolescent demographic subgroups. Further research is needed to clarify the relationships between individual and social-environmental factors that impact public transportation access and its association with adolescent BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isa Granados
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Center for Childhood Obesity Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emily M D'Agostino
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Center for Childhood Obesity Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Asheley C Skinner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Center for Childhood Obesity Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cody D Neshteruk
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Center for Childhood Obesity Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schlichte L, Setji N, Walter J, Acker Y, Casarett D, Pollak KI, Steinhauser K, Check DK, Lakis K, Schmid L, Ma JE. The Use of Templates for Documenting Advance Care Planning Conversations: A Descriptive Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 66:123-136. [PMID: 37080478 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT While professional societies and expert panels have recommended quality indicators related to advance care planning (ACP) documentation, including using structured documentation templates, it is unclear how clinicians document these conversations. OBJECTIVE To explore how clinicians document ACP, specifically, which components of these conversations are documented. METHODS A codebook was developed based on existing frameworks for ACP conversations and documentation. ACP documentation from a hospital medicine quality improvement project conducted from November 2019 to April 2021 were included and assessed. Documentation was examined for the presence or absence of each component within the coding schema. Clinician documented ACP using three different note types: template (only template prompts were used), template plus (authors added additional text to the template), and free text only. ACP note components were analyzed by note type and author department. RESULTS A total of 182 ACP notes were identified and reviewed. The most common note type was template plus (58%), followed by free text (28%) and template (14%). The most frequent components across all note types were: important relationships to patient (92%), and discussion of life-sustaining treatment preferences (87%). There was considerable heterogeneity in the components across note types. The presence of components focused on treatment decisions and legal paperwork differed significantly between note types (P < 0.05). Components on preference for medical information, emotional state, or spiritual support were rarely included across all note types. CONCLUSION This study provides a preliminary exploration of ACP documentation and found that templates may influence what information is documented after an ACP conversation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Schlichte
- Duke University School of Medicine (L.S.), Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Noppon Setji
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (N.S., J.W., D.C., K.S., J.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan Walter
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (N.S., J.W., D.C., K.S., J.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yvonne Acker
- Patient Safety and Quality, Duke University Health System (Y.A.), Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Casarett
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (N.S., J.W., D.C., K.S., J.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences (K.I.P., K.S., D.K.C.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Cancer Prevention and Control (K.I.P., K.S.), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Karen Steinhauser
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (N.S., J.W., D.C., K.S., J.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences (K.I.P., K.S., D.K.C.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Cancer Prevention and Control (K.I.P., K.S.), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) (K.S.), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Devon K Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences (K.I.P., K.S., D.K.C.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kristen Lakis
- Office of Culture and Wellbeing Hub (K.L.), Duke University Health System, Durham North Carolina, USA
| | - Lorrie Schmid
- Social Sciences Research Institute (L.S.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jessica E Ma
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (N.S., J.W., D.C., K.S., J.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (J.M.), Durham VA Health System, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gupta MND, Hantzmon SV, Kutner JS, Arnold RM, Duck V, Mahoney H, Willis E, Pollak KI. Patient and Caregiver Expression of Reluctance and Ambivalence During Palliative Care Encounters. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:1391-1394. [PMID: 37410538 PMCID: PMC10541930 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Context: Patients with serious illness and their caregivers often face challenging decisions. When faced with these decisions, patients and caregivers may display signs of ambivalence and reluctance toward end-of-life decision making. Methods: We recruited 22 palliative care clinicians to participate in a communication coaching study. Clinicians audio recorded four of their palliative care encounters with adult patients and family caregivers. A team of 5 coders used inductive coding methods to create a codebook and then coded instances of patients and caregivers expressing ambivalence and reluctance. They also coded when the decision-making process was initiated and whether a decision was made. The group coded 76 encounters, and 10% (n = 8) of those encounters were double coded to assess inter-rater reliability. Results: We found that ambivalence occurred in 82% (n = 62) of the encounters, while reluctance occurred in 75% (n = 57) of the encounters. The overall prevalence of either was 89% (n = 67). The presence of ambivalence was negatively associated with a decision being made once initiated (r = -0.29, p = 0.06). Conclusion: We found that coders can reliably identify patient and caregiver reluctance and ambivalence. Further, reluctance and ambivalence occur frequently in palliative care encounters. When patients and caregivers have ambivalence, decision making might be hampered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya N. Das Gupta
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah V. Hantzmon
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jean S. Kutner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert M. Arnold
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Veronica Duck
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hannah Mahoney
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ethan Willis
- Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pollak KI, Olsen MK, Yang H, Prose N, Jackson LR, Pinheiro SO, Dunbar TK, Johnson KS. Effect of a Coaching Intervention to Improve Cardiologist Communication: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:544-553. [PMID: 37036721 PMCID: PMC10087090 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Communication between cardiologists and patients can significantly affect patient comprehension, adherence, and satisfaction. To our knowledge, a coaching intervention to improve cardiologist communication has not been tested. Objective To evaluate the effect of a communication coaching intervention to teach evidence-based communication skills to cardiologists. Design, Setting, and Participants This 2-arm randomized clinical trial was performed at outpatient cardiology clinics at an academic medical center and affiliated community clinics, and from February 2019 through March 2020 recruited 40 cardiologists and audio recorded 161 patients in the preintervention phase and 240 in the postintervention phase. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to January 2023. Interventions Half of the cardiologists were randomized to receive a coaching intervention that involved three 1:1 sessions, 2 of which included feedback on their audio-recorded encounters. Communication coaches taught 5 skills derived from motivational interviewing: (1) sitting down and making eye contact with all in the room, (2) open-ended questions, (3) reflective statements, (4) empathic statements, and (5) "What questions do you have?" Main Outcomes and Measures Coders unaware of study arm coded these behaviors in the preintervention and postintervention audio-recorded encounters (objective communication). Patients completed a survey after the visit to report perceptions of communication quality (subjective communication). Results Analysis included 40 cardiologists (mean [SD] age, 47 [9] years; 7 female and 33 male) and 240 patients in the postintervention phase (mean [SD] age, 58 [15] years; 122 female, 118 male). When controlling for preintervention behaviors, cardiologists in the intervention vs control arm were more likely to make empathic statements (intervention: 52 of 117 [44%] vs control: 31 of 113 [27%]; P = .05); to ask, "What questions do you have?" (26 of 117 [22%] vs 6 of 113 [5%]; P = .002); and to respond with empathy when patients expressed negative emotions (mean ratio of empathic responses to empathic opportunities, 0.50 vs 0.20; P = .004). These effects did not vary based on patient or cardiologist race or sex. We found no arm differences for open-ended questions or reflective statements and were unable to assess differences in patient ratings due to ceiling effects. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, a communication coaching intervention improved 2 key communication behaviors: expressing empathy and eliciting questions. Empathic communication is a harder-level skill that may improve the patient experience and information comprehension. Future work should explore how best to assess the effect of communication coaching on patient perceptions of care and clinical outcomes and determine its effectiveness in larger, more diverse samples of cardiologists. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03464110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn I. Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maren K. Olsen
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hongqiu Yang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Neil Prose
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Larry R. Jackson
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sandro O. Pinheiro
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - T. Kayla Dunbar
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kimberly S. Johnson
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parente VM, Nagy G, Pollak KI. Patient- and Family-Centered Hospital Care-The Need for Structural Humility. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:553-554. [PMID: 37010842 PMCID: PMC10947776 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
This Viewpoint discusses communication between clinicians and caregivers of racial and ethnic minoritized groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria M Parente
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gabriela Nagy
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Henry V, Stephens MJ, Galyean P, Young J, Zickmund S, Knettel BA, Bartlett J, Watt MH, Pollak KI, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A, Suneja G. Improving Cancer Care for People Living With HIV: A Qualitative Study of Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:60-67. [PMID: 36724857 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer is now the leading cause of non-AIDS death in the US population with HIV. People living with HIV (PLWH) are known to have lower cancer treatment rates and worse cancer outcomes. Disparate cancer treatment is driven by health system, patient, and clinician factors. Little attention has been given to the factors oncologists consider when making cancer treatment recommendations to PLWH. This study sought to examine oncologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices that influence cancer treatment decision-making. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study used qualitative methods to explore oncologists' treatment decision-making processes for PLWH and cancer. The sample included 25 radiation, medical, and surgical oncologists from 2 academic centers and 5 community practices. The interview domains were developed from the Andersen Healthcare Utilization Model, the Health Belief Model, and the PEN-3 Model, as well as our prior survey research. RESULTS This study describes elements of cancer treatment decision-making for PLWH. Oncologists highlighted the need for formal HIV education to support cancer treatment. One main concern with patient-provider interactions pertained to maintaining patient confidentiality during clinical encounters. Lastly, the importance of multidisciplinary care among health care providers allowed oncologists to facilitate both cancer care and logistical support. CONCLUSIONS As cancer becomes an increasingly common cause of death among PLWH, it is critical to understand the drivers of the observed disparities in cancer treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to describe oncologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward patients who have a comorbid diagnosis of HIV and cancer. Several themes for future interventions emerge, including HIV training for cancer care providers, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, enhancing HIV education for oncology learners and clinicians, and minimizing implicit bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valencia Henry
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Spartanburg, South Carolina
| | - Maya J Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Patrick Galyean
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jeanette Young
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Susan Zickmund
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Brandon A Knettel
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John Bartlett
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Melissa H Watt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter A Ubel
- Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Salt Lake City VA Center for Informatics, Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS), Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lemmon ME, Barks MC, Bansal S, Bernstein S, Kaye EC, Glass HC, Ubel PA, Brandon D, Pollak KI. The ALIGN Framework: A Parent-Informed Approach to Prognostic Communication for Infants With Neurologic Conditions. Neurology 2023; 100:e800-e807. [PMID: 36456199 PMCID: PMC9984217 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000201600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Clinicians often communicate complex, uncertain, and distressing information about neurologic prognosis to parents of critically ill infants. Although communication tools have been developed in other disciplines and settings, none address the unique needs of the neonatal and pediatric neurology context. We aimed to develop a parent-informed framework to guide clinicians in communicating information about neurologic prognosis. METHODS Parents of infants with neurologic conditions in the intensive care unit were enrolled in a longitudinal study of shared decision-making from 2018 to 2020. Parents completed semistructured interviews following recorded family meetings with the health care team, at hospital discharge, and 6 months after discharge. All interviews targeted information about parent preferences for prognostic disclosure. We analyzed the data using a conventional content analysis approach. Two study team members independently coded all interview transcripts, and discrepancies were resolved in consensus. We used NVIVO 12 qualitative software to index and organize codes. RESULTS Fifty-two parents of 37 infants completed 123 interviews. Parents were predominantly mothers (n = 37/52, 71%) with a median age of 31 (range 19-46) years. Half were Black (n = 26/52, 50%), and a minority reported Hispanic ethnicity (n = 2/52, 4%). Inductive analysis resulted in the emergence of 5 phases of prognostic communication (Approach, Learn, Inform, Give support, and Next steps: ALIGN): (1) Approach: parents appreciated receiving consistent information about their child's neurologic outcome from clinicians who knew their child well. (2) Learn: parents valued when clinicians asked them how they preferred receiving information and what they already knew about their child's outcome prior to information delivery. (3) Inform: parents valued honest, thorough, and balanced information that disclosed prognostic uncertainty and acknowledged room for hope. (4) Give support: parents valued empathic communication and appreciated clinicians who offered real-time emotional support. (5) Next steps: parents appreciated clinicians who connected them to resources, including peer support. DISCUSSION The ALIGN framework offers a novel, parent-informed strategy to effectively communicate neurologic prognosis. Although ALIGN represents key elements of a conversation about prognosis, each clinician can adapt this framework to their own approach. Future work will assess the effectiveness of this framework on communication quality and prognostic understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica E Lemmon
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.
| | - Mary C Barks
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Simran Bansal
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Sarah Bernstein
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Erica C Kaye
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Hannah C Glass
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Peter A Ubel
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Debra Brandon
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.E.L., M.C.B., S. Bansal, S. Bernstein), Population Health Sciences (M.E.L., K.I.P.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; University of Utah School of Medicine (S. Bernstein), Salt Lack City; Department of Oncology (E.C.K.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (E.C.K.), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (H.C.G.), University of California, San Francisco; Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy (P.A.U.), Duke University, Durham; and Duke University School of Nursing (D.B.), Durham; Cancer Prevention and Control (KIP), Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Durieux BN, Zverev SR, Tarbi EC, Kwok A, Sciacca K, Pollak KI, Tulsky JA, Lindvall C. Development of a keyword library for capturing PRO-CTCAE-focused "symptom talk" in oncology conversations. JAMIA Open 2023; 6:ooad009. [PMID: 36789287 PMCID: PMC9912707 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives As computational methods for detecting symptoms can help us better attend to patient suffering, the objectives of this study were to develop and evaluate the performance of a natural language processing keyword library for detecting symptom talk, and to describe symptom communication within our dataset to generate insights for future model building. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of 121 transcribed outpatient oncology conversations from the Communication in Oncologist-Patient Encounters trial. Through an iterative process of identifying symptom expressions via inductive and deductive techniques, we generated a library of keywords relevant to the Patient-Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) framework from 90 conversations, and tested the library on 31 additional transcripts. To contextualize symptom expressions and the nature of misclassifications, we qualitatively analyzed 450 mislabeled and properly labeled symptom-positive turns. Results The final library, comprising 1320 terms, identified symptom talk among conversation turns with an F1 of 0.82 against a PRO-CTCAE-focused gold standard, and an F1 of 0.61 against a broad gold standard. Qualitative observations suggest that physical symptoms are more easily detected than psychological symptoms (eg, anxiety), and ambiguity persists throughout symptom communication. Discussion This rudimentary keyword library captures most PRO-CTCAE-focused symptom talk, but the ambiguity of symptom speech limits the utility of rule-based methods alone, and limits to generalizability must be considered. Conclusion Our findings highlight opportunities for more advanced computational models to detect symptom expressions from transcribed clinical conversations. Future improvements in speech-to-text could enable real-time detection at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte N Durieux
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Samuel R Zverev
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,NYU School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elise C Tarbi
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Department of Nursing, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Anne Kwok
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kate Sciacca
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Department of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA,Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - James A Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Corresponding Author: Charlotta Lindvall, MD, PhD, Department of Psychosocial Oncology & Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW670, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Reid HW, Parente V, Gupta MD, Hantzmon S, Olsen MK, Yang H, Jackson LR, Johnson KS, Pollak KI. Examining the relationship between clinician communication and patient participatory behaviors in cardiology encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:3473-3478. [PMID: 36137906 PMCID: PMC9903298 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Examine the association of coder ratings of cardiologist behaviors and global scores of cardiologist communication style with patient participation in clinic encounters. METHODS We coded transcripts of clinic encounters for patient participatory behaviors: asking questions, assertive statements, and expressing negative emotions; clinician behavior counts: reflective statements, open-ended questions, empathic statements, and eliciting questions. We used general linear regression models to examine associations of mean number of patient participatory behaviors with clinician behaviors. RESULTS Our sample included 161 patients of 40 cardiologists. Patient female gender was associated with on average 2.1 (CI: 0.06, 4.1; p = 0.04) more patient participatory behaviors. In an adjusted model, clinician reflective statements were associated with on average 0.3 (CI: 0.04, 0.4; p = 0.02) more patient participatory behaviors. A clinician making at least one empathic statement was associated with on average 3.7 (CI: 0.2, 7.1; p = 0.04) more patient participatory behaviors. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that some individual clinician behaviors are associated with higher patient participation in cardiology encounters. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinician reflective and empathic statements may be important targets in communication training to increase patient participation. SECTION Communication Studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victoria Parente
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Maya Das Gupta
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, USA
| | - Sarah Hantzmon
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, USA
| | - Maren K Olsen
- Duke University Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, USA; Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, USA
| | - Hongqiu Yang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly S Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA; Center for Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA; Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Parente VM, Reid HW, Robles J, Johnson KS, Svetkey LP, Sanders LL, Olsen MK, Pollak KI. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Communication Quality During Family-Centered Rounds. Pediatrics 2022; 150:e2021055227. [PMID: 36345704 PMCID: PMC9724176 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-055227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in communication quality during family centered rounds. METHODS We conducted an observational study of family-centered rounds on hospital day 1. All enrolled caregivers completed a survey following rounds and a subset consented to audio record their encounter with the medical team. We applied a priori defined codes to transcriptions of the audio-recorded encounters to assess objective communication quality, including medical team behaviors, caregiver participatory behaviors, and global communication scores. The surveys were designed to measure subjective communication quality. Incident Rate Ratios (IRR) were calculated with regression models to compare the relative mean number of behaviors per encounter time minute by race and ethnicity. RESULTS Overall, 202 of 341 eligible caregivers completed the survey, and 59 had accompanying audio- recorded rounds. We found racial and ethnic differences in participatory behaviors: English-speaking Latinx (IRR 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.8) Black (IRR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-0.8), and Spanish-speaking Latinx caregivers (IRR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5) participated less than white caregivers. Coder-rated global ratings of medical team respect and partnership were lower for Black and Spanish-speaking Latinx caregivers than white caregivers (respect 3.1 and 2.9 vs 3.6, P values .03 and .04, respectively: partnership 2.4 and 2.3 vs 3.1, P values .03 and .04 respectively). In surveys, Spanish-speaking caregivers reported lower subjective communication quality in several domains. CONCLUSIONS In this study, Black and Latinx caregivers were treated with less partnership and respect than white caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hadley W. Reid
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joanna Robles
- Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kimberly S. Johnson
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine
- Center for Aging and Human Development
- Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Maren K. Olsen
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
- Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pollak KI, Gao X, Kennedy D, Youssef-Elgamal A, Morales A, Huntington J, Chuang E, Ross A. Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-based communication coaching model among hospital clinicians. PEC Innov 2022; 1:100072. [PMID: 37213762 PMCID: PMC10194122 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective Communication coaching shows promise for improving clinician communication yet few have assessed the feasibility of having peers coach each other. We conducted a proof-of-concept study to test the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-based communication coaching program in an inpatient setting. Methods We trained three clinician communication coaches (two physicians and one physician assistant) and randomized half of the 27 clinicians working on the general medicine floor to receive coaching. The coaching involved shadowing and providing feedback on real-time encounters with patients. We collected data on feasibility of providing the coaching, quantitative and qualitative ratings of acceptability of the coaching both from the clinician and the coach perspective, and clinician burnout. Results We found the peer coaching to be feasible and acceptable. Quantitative and qualitative reports support the merit of the coaching; most clinicians who received the coaching reported making changes in their communication. Clinicians in the intervention arm reported less burnout than those who did not receive the coaching. Conclusions This proof-of-concept pilot showed that peer coaches can provide communication coaching and that clinicians and coaches viewed the coaching as acceptable and might change communication. The coaching also seems to show promise on burnout. We provide lessons learned and thoughts about how to improve the program. Innovation Teaching clinicians to coach each other is innovative. We conducted a pilot that shows promise for feasibility, acceptability of clinicians coaching each other to communicate better, and a signal that it can help improve clinician burnout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn I. Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Corresponding author at: 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 602, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
| | - Xiaomei Gao
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Danielle Kennedy
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Adia Ross
- Duke Regional Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mroz EL, McDarby M, Arnold RM, Bylund CL, Kutner JS, Pollak KI. Empathic Communication in Specialty Palliative Care Encounters: An Analysis of Opportunities and Responses. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:1622-1628. [PMID: 35426742 PMCID: PMC9836699 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Although empathic responding is considered a core competency in specialty palliative care (PC), patterns of empathic communication in PC encounters are not well understood. Objectives: In this secondary analysis, we delineate types and frequency of empathic communication and examine relationships between patient empathic opportunities and clinician responses. Design: We used the Empathic Communication Coding System to analyze empathic opportunities across three types: emotion (i.e., negative affective state), progress (i.e., stated recent positive life event or development), and challenge (i.e., stated problem or recent, negative life-changing event) and clinician responses. Setting/Subjects: Transcripts from a pilot randomized trial of communication coaching in specialty PC encounters (N = 71) audio-recorded by 22 PC clinicians at two sites in the United States: an academic health system and a community-based hospice and PC organization. Results: Empathic opportunities were frequent across encounters; clinicians often responded empathically to those opportunities (e.g., confirming or acknowledging patients' emotions or experiences). Even though challenge empathic opportunities occurred most frequently, clinicians responded empathically more often to progress opportunities (i.e., 93% of the time) than challenge opportunities (i.e., 75% of the time). One in 12 opportunities was impeded by the patient or a family member changing the topic before the clinician could respond. Conclusions: PC patients frequently express emotions, share progress, or divulge challenges as empathic opportunities. Clinicians often convey empathy in response and can differentiate their empathic responses based on the type of empathic opportunity. PC communication research and training should explore which empathic responses promote desired patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily L. Mroz
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Meghan McDarby
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Robert M. Arnold
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carma L. Bylund
- Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jean S. Kutner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barlet MH, Barks MC, Ubel PA, Davis JK, Pollak KI, Kaye EC, Weinfurt KP, Lemmon ME. Characterizing the Language Used to Discuss Death in Family Meetings for Critically Ill Infants. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2233722. [PMID: 36197666 PMCID: PMC9535532 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Communication during conversations about death is critical; however, little is known about the language clinicians and families use to discuss death. Objective To characterize (1) the way death is discussed in family meetings between parents of critically ill infants and the clinical team and (2) how discussion of death differs between clinicians and family members. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal qualitative study took place at a single academic hospital in the southeast US. Patients were enrolled from September 2018 to September 2020, and infants were followed up longitudinally throughout their hospitalization. Participants included families of infants with neurologic conditions who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit and had a planned family meeting to discuss neurologic prognosis or starting, not starting, or discontinuing life-sustaining treatment. Family meetings were recorded, transcribed, and deidentified before being screened for discussion of death. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the language used to reference death during family meetings between parents and clinicians. Conventional content analysis was used to analyze data. Results A total of 68 family meetings involving 36 parents of 24 infants were screened; 33 family meetings (49%) involving 20 parents (56%) and 13 infants (54%) included discussion of death. Most parents involved in discussion of death identified as the infant's mother (13 [65%]) and as Black (12 [60%]). Death was referenced 406 times throughout the family meetings (275 times by clinicians and 131 times by family members); the words die, death, dying, or stillborn were used 5% of the time by clinicians (13 of 275 references) and 15% of the time by family members (19 of 131 references). Four types of euphemisms used in place of die, death, dying, or stillborn were identified: (1) survival framing (eg, not live), (2) colloquialisms (eg, pass away), (3) medical jargon, including obscure technical terms (eg, code event) or talking around death with physiologic terms (eg, irrecoverable heart rate drop), and (4) pronouns without an antecedent (eg, it). The most common type of euphemism used by clinicians was medical jargon (118 of 275 references [43%]). The most common type of euphemism used by family members was colloquialism (44 of 131 references [34%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this qualitative study, the words die, death, dying, or stillborn were rarely used to refer to death in family meetings with clinicians. Families most often used colloquialisms to reference death, and clinicians most often used medical jargon. Future work should evaluate the effects of euphemisms on mutual understanding, shared decision-making, and clinician-family relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary C. Barks
- Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter A. Ubel
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - J. Kelly Davis
- Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Erica C. Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kevin P. Weinfurt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Monica E. Lemmon
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dunbar TK, Olsen MK, Yang H, Kennedy D, Jackson LR, Thomas KL, Alkon A, Prose NS, Pollak KI. Characteristics Associated with Burnout among Cardiologists in an Academic Medical Setting: Baseline Survey Results from a Communication Coaching RCT. Behav Sci (Basel) 2022; 12:362. [PMID: 36285931 PMCID: PMC9598081 DOI: 10.3390/bs12100362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinician burnout poses risks not just to clinicians but also to patients and the health system. Cardiologists might be especially prone to burnout due to performing high-risk procedures, having to discuss serious news, and treating diseases that incur significant morbidity and mortality. Few have attempted to examine which cardiologists might be at higher risk of burnout. Knowing at-risk cardiologists can help frame resilience interventions. METHODS We enrolled 41 cardiologists across five ambulatory cardiology clinics into a randomized controlled trial where we assessed the Maslach Burnout Inventory at baseline. We used bivariate analyses to assess associations between cardiologist demographics and burnout. RESULTS Cardiologists reported low burnout for depersonalization and personal accomplishment and moderate levels for emotional exhaustion. Female cardiologists reported emotional exhaustion scores in the "low" range (M = 12.3; SD = 10.06), compared to male cardiologists whose score was in the "moderate" range 19.6 (SD = 9.59; p = 0.113). Cardiologists who had greater than 15 years in practice reported higher mean scores of emotional exhaustion, indicating moderate burnout (M = 20.0, SD = 10.63), compared to those with less than 15 years in practice (M = 16.6, SD = 9.10; p = 0.271). CONCLUSIONS In this sample, unlike prior studies, male cardiologists reported more burnout. Consistent with prior work, mid-level cardiologists might be at highest risk of emotional exhaustion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travia Kayla Dunbar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Maren K. Olsen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Hongqiu Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Larry R. Jackson
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Aviel Alkon
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Neil S. Prose
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Research Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Domlyn AM, Crowder C, Eisenson H, Pollak KI, Davis JM, Calhoun PS, Wilson SM. Implementation mapping for tobacco cessation in a federally qualified health center. Front Public Health 2022; 10:908646. [PMID: 36117603 PMCID: PMC9478793 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation mapping (IM) is a promising five-step method for guiding planning, execution, and maintenance of an innovation. Case examples are valuable for implementation practitioners to understand considerations for applying IM. This pilot study aimed to determine the feasibility of using IM within a federally qualified health center (FQHC) with limited funds and a 1-year timeline. Methods An urban FQHC partnered with an academic team to employ IM for implementing a computerized strategy of tobacco cessation: the 5A's (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange). Each step of IM was supplemented with theory-driven methods and frameworks. Data collection included surveys and interviews with clinic staff, analyzed via rapid data analysis. Results Medical assistants and clinicians were identified as primary implementers of the 5A's intervention. Salient determinants of change included the perceived compatibility and relative priority of 5A's. Performance objectives and change objectives were derived to address these determinants, along with a suite of implementation strategies. Despite indicators of adoptability and acceptability of the 5A's, reductions in willingness to adopt the implementation package occurred over time and the intervention was not adopted by the FQHC within the study timeframe. This is likely due to the strain of the COVID-19 pandemic altering health clinic priorities. Conclusions Administratively, the five IM steps are feasible to conduct with FQHC staff within 1 year. However, this study did not obtain its intended outcomes. Lessons learned include the importance of re-assessing barriers over time and ensuring a longer timeframe to observe implementation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel M. Domlyn
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham, NC, United States
| | | | - Howard Eisenson
- Lincoln Community Health Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States
| | - James M. Davis
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Patrick S. Calhoun
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Sarah M. Wilson
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wesevich A, Key-Solle M, Kandakatla A, Feeney C, Pollak KI, LeBlanc TW. Utilization of Text Messages to Supplement Rounding Communication: a Randomized Feasibility Study. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:2991-2997. [PMID: 35212877 PMCID: PMC9485328 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07285-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragmented communication with patients and families during hospitalizations often leaves patients confused about the daily plan. OBJECTIVE To pilot a supplemental text message-based platform for improving bidirectional communication about the clinical plan and patients' goals. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial PARTICIPANTS: Thirty adult patients, thirty caregivers of pediatric patients, and the interns caring for them on inpatient general medicine and pediatric services. INTERVENTIONS Patients and caregivers were texted or emailed daily to report their personal goal and assess their understanding of the team's clinical plan. Interns were texted daily to report the team's clinical plan and to assess their understanding of the patient's personal goal. MAIN MEASURES Primary outcomes were feasibility, defined as survey response rates, and acceptability. Secondary outcomes were patient comprehension of the clinical plan, trainee comprehension of the patient's goal, patient-centered communication scores, and educational satisfaction scores. KEY RESULTS Thirty adult patients, thirty caregivers of pediatric patients, fourteen general medicine interns, and six general pediatric interns enrolled. Intervention feasibility was met, with survey response rates of 80% for general medicine trainees, 67% for general pediatric trainees, 58% for adult patients, and 70% for caregivers. Patients and caregivers in the intervention arm had higher understanding of medication changes (76% vs 50%, p = 0.02) and new consultations (90% vs 61%, p = 0.002). Interns had higher understanding of patients' goals in the intervention arm (93% vs 40%, p < 0.001), particularly for adult patients (97% vs 17%, p < 0.001). Caregivers rated communication higher regarding information to help make decisions (p = 0.04). Interviews demonstrated high acceptability. CONCLUSIONS Our text message-based communication intervention was feasible and acceptable to all involved participants, with preliminary signals of efficacy. The intervention may contribute to improved understanding of medication changes and new consultations, as well as help in making decisions. A large, randomized efficacy trial of this intervention is warranted. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Wesevich
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Mikelle Key-Solle
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Colby Feeney
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cruvinel E, Richter KP, Pollak KI, Ellerbeck E, Nollen NL, Gajewski B, Sullivan-Blum Z, Zhang C, Shergina E, Scheuermann TS. Quitting Smoking before and after Pregnancy: Study Methods and Baseline Data from a Prospective Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:10170. [PMID: 36011811 PMCID: PMC9408087 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Smoking during pregnancy and postpartum remains an important public health problem. No known prior study has prospectively examined mutual changes in risk factors and women's smoking trajectory across pregnancy and postpartum. The objective of this study was to report methods used to implement a prospective cohort (Msgs4Moms), present participant baseline characteristics, and compare our sample characteristics to pregnant women from national birth record data. The cohort study was designed to investigate smoking patterns, variables related to tobacco use and abstinence, and tobacco treatment quality across pregnancy through 1-year postpartum. Current smokers or recent quitters were recruited from obstetrics clinics. Analyses included Chi-square and independent sample t-tests using Cohen's d. A total of 62 participants (41 smokers and 21 quitters) were enrolled. Participants were Black (45.2%), White (35.5%), and multiracial (19.3%); 46.8% had post-secondary education; and most were Medicaid-insured (64.5%). Compared with quitters, fewer smokers were employed (65.9 vs 90.5%, Cohen's d = 0.88) and more reported financial strain (61.1% vs 28.6%; Cohen's d = 0.75). Women who continue to smoke during pregnancy cope with multiple social determinants of health. Longitudinal data from this cohort provide intensive data to identify treatment gaps, critical time points, and potential psychosocial variables warranting intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Cruvinel
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Kimber P. Richter
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Edward Ellerbeck
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Nicole L. Nollen
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Byron Gajewski
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Zoe Sullivan-Blum
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Chuanwu Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Elena Shergina
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Taneisha S. Scheuermann
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Maradiaga Panayotti GM, Martinez-Bianchi V, Corsino L, Silberberg M, Zullig LL, Felsman IC, Gonzalez-Guarda R, Nagy GA, Rocha P, Vergara E, Smith L, Peña A, Granados I, Kennedy D, Pollak KI. LATIN-19: A Grassroots Coalition to Mitigate the Effect of COVID-19 on the Latinx Community in North Carolina. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2022; 16:33-38. [PMID: 35912655 DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social inequity is a primary driver of health disparities, creating multiple barriers to good health. These inequities were exacerbated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with Latinx communities suffering more than others. Grassroots collaborations have long existed to address disparities. OBJECTIVE We describe the creation and work of the Latinx Advocacy Team and Interdisciplinary Network for COVID-19 (LATIN-19; http://latin19.org/), a multisector coalition in North Carolina created to address the unique challenges of COVID-19 in the Latinx community. METHODS We discuss challenges and solutions that LATIN-19 addressed and the impact of LATIN-19 on community partners and members. RESULTS LATIN-19 learned of challenges including, lack of awareness, need for data systems to track disparities, the need to increase access to resources, the need for policy changes, and the need to coordinate services by community organizations. CONCLUSIONS LATIN-19 represents a grassroots organization that has had an impact on community and community organizations that spans beyond COVID-19.
Collapse
|
27
|
Sloan CE, Gutterman S, Davis JK, Campagna A, Pollak KI, Barks MC, Santanam T, Sharma M, Grande DT, Zafar SY, Ubel PA. How can healthcare organizations improve cost-of-care conversations? A qualitative exploration of clinicians' perspectives. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:2708-2714. [PMID: 35440376 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinicians increasingly believe they should discuss costs with their patients. We aimed to learn what strategies clinicians, clinic leaders, and health systems can use to facilitate vital cost-of-care conversations. METHODS We conducted focus groups and semi-structured interviews with outpatient clinicians at two US academic medical centers. Clinicians recalled previous cost conversations and described strategies that they, their clinic, or their health system could use to facilitate cost conversations. Independent coders recorded, transcribed, and coded focus groups and interviews. RESULTS Twenty-six clinicians participated between December 2019 and July 2020: general internists (23%), neurologists (27%), oncologists (15%), and rheumatologists (35%). Clinicians proposed the following strategies: teach clinicians to initiate cost conversations; systematically collect financial distress information; partner with patients to identify costs; provide accurate insurance coverage and/or out-of-pocket cost information via the electronic health record; develop local lists of lowest-cost pharmacies, laboratories, and subspecialists; hire financial counselors; and reduce indirect costs (e.g., parking). CONCLUSIONS Despite considerable barriers to discussing, identifying, and reducing patient costs, clinicians described a variety of strategies for improving cost communication in the clinic. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health systems and clinic leadership can and should implement these strategies to improve the financial health of the patients they serve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline E Sloan
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Sophia Gutterman
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J Kelly Davis
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ada Campagna
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mary Carol Barks
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Taruni Santanam
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Meghana Sharma
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David T Grande
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - S Yousuf Zafar
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter A Ubel
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Barlet MH, Ubel PA, Weinfurt KP, Glass HC, Pollak KI, Brandon DH, Lemmon ME. Decisional Satisfaction, Regret, and Conflict Among Parents of Infants with Neurologic Conditions. J Pediatr 2022; 245:81-88.e3. [PMID: 35227757 PMCID: PMC9232962 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize decisional satisfaction, regret, and conflict among parents of critically ill infants with neurologic conditions. STUDY DESIGN In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled parents of infants with neurologic conditions in the intensive care unit (ICU). Hospital discharge surveys included the validated Family Satisfaction with the ICU (FS-ICU) decision making subscale, Decision Regret Scale (DRS), and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). We defined high satisfaction with decision making as an FS-ICU score ≥75, high decisional regret/conflict as DRS/DCS score >25, and within-couple disagreement as a difference of at least 25 points between scores. RESULTS We enrolled 61 parents of 40 infants (n = 40 mothers, n = 21 fathers); 35 mothers and 15 fathers completed surveys. Most mothers reported high satisfaction with decision making (27 of 35; 77%) and low decision regret (28 of 35; 80%); 40% (14 of 35) reported high decisional conflict. Mothers and fathers reported higher decisional conflict in the domains of uncertainty and values clarity compared with the domain of effective decision making (Bonferroni-corrected P < .05). There were no differences in decision outcomes between paired mothers and fathers; however, within any given couple, there were numerous instances of disagreement (7 of 15 for decision regret and 5 of 15 for decisional conflict). CONCLUSIONS Many parents experience decisional conflict even if they ultimately have high satisfaction and low regret, underscoring the need for decision aids targeting uncertainty and values clarity. Couples frequently experience different levels of decisional regret and conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter A. Ubel
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin P. Weinfurt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hannah C. Glass
- Department of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Debra H. Brandon
- Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Monica E. Lemmon
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Frydman JL, Gelfman LP, Morillo J, Allen OS, Bickell NA, Kwon D, Pollak KI, Smith CB. Racial/ethnic disparities in serious illness communication for patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.6540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6540 Background: Racial/ethnic disparities in serious illness communication exist between patients with cancer and their oncologists. Our prior work has shown that goals of care discussions are three minutes shorter with racial/ethnic minority patients. In this study, we sought to compare oncologist's use of serious illness communication skills, patient participatory behavior, and overall communication quality during encounters with patients with advanced cancer of different self-reported races/ethnicities. Methods: We analyzed baseline recordings from a two-arm multisite randomized controlled trial to test a coaching model of communication skills training for solid tumor oncologists and their newly diagnosed advanced cancer patients. We audio recorded post-imaging patient-oncologist encounters for patients receiving systemic cancer treatment and coded transcripts for oncologist's use of serious illness communication skills (coded as count/encounter): open-ended questions, reflections, empathic responses to patient empathic opportunities, empathic statements, “sorry” statements, and elicitation of questions. We also assessed global codes of oncologist communication (assessed on 5-point Likert scales): flow, concerns addressed, attention, warmth, and respect. Finally, we coded patient participatory behavior (coded as count/encounter): asking questions and assertive responses. We compared the skills and behaviors by race/ethnicity of the patient using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: We included the 56 (38%) recordings with oncologists who did not receive the intervention. The patients in these encounters were 25 (45%) female; 32 (57%) over the age of 65; 23 (41%) White Non-Hispanic, 20 (36%) Black Non-Hispanic, and 11 (20%) Hispanic. Overall, oncologists responded empathically to patients’ emotions only 19% of the time. Oncologists used fewer reflective statements with Black Non-Hispanic patients (mean 0.3 statements/encounter) as compared to White Non-Hispanic patients (1.1) and Hispanic patients (1.1), p = 0.02. Furthermore, coders rated oncologists as being less likely to address concerns of Black Non-Hispanic patients (mean Likert scale 3.1) as compared to White Non-Hispanic (3.8) and Hispanic (3.4) patients, p = 0.04. Finally, coders rated oncologists as having less warmth with Black Non-Hispanic patients (mean Likert scale 2.9) as compared to White Non-Hispanic (3.8) and Hispanic (3.3) patients, p = 0.04. Conclusions: In this diverse sample of patients with advanced cancer, oncologists used fewer reflective statements, were less attentive to concerns, and expressed less warmth with Black Non-Hispanic patients. Interventions are needed to overcome these striking racial/ethnic disparities in serious illness communication for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jose Morillo
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - Nina A. Bickell
- Division of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tulsky JA, Steinhauser KE, LeBlanc TW, Bloom N, Lyna PR, Riley J, Pollak KI. Triadic agreement about advanced cancer treatment decisions: Perceptions among patients, families, and oncologists. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:982-986. [PMID: 34384640 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES When patients make cancer treatment decisions, they consider the needs and preferences of family caregivers and clinicians. We examined how much all three triad members agreed about goals of treatment and caregivers' influence on decision-making. METHODS We surveyed 70 triads of patients, caregivers, and oncologists who had recently made an advanced cancer treatment decision. We assessed each triad member's perception of the goal of treatment and the caregiver's influence on the decision. Participants also completed scales related to decisional conflict, satisfaction, and regret. RESULTS In only 28/70 triads (40%), all three agreed on the goal of treatment with the most common goal being to live longer (n = 22). Whereas patients and caregivers tended to think the goal was to cure or live longer, oncologists were less optimistic. In only 22 triads (31%), all three agreed on how much influence the caregiver had on decision-making. Oncologists tended to underestimate caregiver influence. Patients and caregivers had low decisional conflict (M=15.40, SD=4.51; M=17.09, SD=6.34, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Advanced cancer treatment decision-making occurs amid incomplete understanding among patients, caregivers, and oncologists. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Confirming agreement about goals of care and influence on treatment decision-making may increase the likelihood of goal-concordant care throughout the illness trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Karen E Steinhauser
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nick Bloom
- Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Pauline R Lyna
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennie Riley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Farley S, Bansal S, Barks MC, Pollak KI, Kaye EC, Quarles A, Briglia K, Johnson E, Lakis K, Lemmon ME. Role of Social Workers in Family Conferences for Critically Ill Infants. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:1236-1242. [PMID: 35285675 PMCID: PMC9347387 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Communication challenges in the neonatal intensive care unit include fragmented communication, challenges managing expectations amidst uncertainty, and navigating complex medical information. Social workers are well suited to mitigate these challenges. Objective: In this study, we aimed to characterize the extent and nature of social worker participation in family conferences for critically ill infants. Design: We used a longitudinal observational mixed-methods design, enrolling infants with a neurological condition, their parent(s), and their clinicians. All audio-recorded conferences were transcribed and de-identified. Emergent themes and subthemes were identified using conventional content analysis. Results: We enrolled 40 infants and 61 parents. Sixty-eight conferences were held and audio recorded for 24 infants. Social workers were present for 51 of these conferences (n = 51/68, 75%) across 18 cases (n = 18/24, 75%). We identified four themes, conceptualized as distinct roles played by social workers in family conferences: (1) Translator: social workers served as a communicative bridge between parents and the medical team; (2) Coordinator: social workers simplified logistics and connected parents to community resources, including home health agencies and financial assistance; (3) Expectation manager: social workers provided anticipatory guidance and helped parents conceptualize the remainder of the hospital stay, discharge, and life at home; and (4) Advocate: social workers validated parental values and concerns and provided immediate emotional support. Conclusions: Social workers participated in three-quarters of family conferences for critically ill infants. When they participated, they facilitated communication, coordinated care, managed expectations, and advocated for families. These findings underscore the important, varied, and concurrent roles social workers play in the care of critically ill infants. Future communication and family support interventions should leverage these distinct roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Farley
- Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Mary Carol Barks
- Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erica C. Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Anna Quarles
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kathleen Briglia
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erika Johnson
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kristen Lakis
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Monica E. Lemmon
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Parents and clinicians caring for infants with neurologic disease often make high-stakes decisions about infant care. To characterize how these decisions occur, we enrolled infants with neurologic conditions, their parents, and their clinicians in a longitudinal mixed methods study of decision making. We audio recorded family conferences as they occurred and analyzed conferences using a directed content analysis approach. We enrolled 40 infants and 61 parents who participated in 68 family conferences. Thirty-seven conferences contained a treatment decision. We identified 4 key domains of the decision-making process: medical information exchange, values-based exchange, therapeutic partnership, and integration of values into decision making. Discussion of values was typically parent initiated (n = 20, 83%); approximately one-third of conferences did not contain any discussion of parent values. Integration of family values and preferences into decision making occurred in approximately half of conferences. These findings highlight opportunities for interventions that promote values discussion and the integration of values into decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Peter A. Ubel
- Duke University School of Medicine,Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University
| | - Debra Brandon
- Duke University School of Nursing,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Monica E. Lemmon
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Barks MC, Schindler EA, Ubel PA, Jiao MG, Pollak KI, Huffstetler HE, Lemmon ME. Assessment of parent understanding in conferences for critically ill neonates. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:599-605. [PMID: 34130892 PMCID: PMC8664893 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to characterize the use and impact of assessments of understanding in parent-clinician communication for critically ill infants. METHODS We enrolled parents and clinicians participating in family conferences for infants with neurologic conditions. Family conferences were audio recorded as they occurred. We used a directed content analysis approach to identify clinician assessments of understanding and parent responses to those assessments. Assessments were classified based on an adapted framework; responses were characterized as "absent," "yes/no," or "elaborated." RESULTS Fifty conferences involving the care of 25 infants were analyzed; these contained 374 distinct assessments of understanding. Most (n = 209/374, 56%) assessments were partial (i.e. okay?); a minority (n = 60/374, 16%) were open-ended. When clinicians asked open-ended questions, parents elaborated in their answers most of the time (n = 55/60, 92%). Approximately three-quarter of partial assessments yielded no verbal response from parents. No conferences included a teach-back. CONCLUSIONS Although common, most clinician assessments of understanding were partial or close-ended and rarely resulted in elaborated responses from parents. Open-ended assessments are an effective, underutilized strategy to increase parent engagement and clinician awareness of information needs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians hoping to facilitate parent engagement and question-asking should rely on open-ended statements to assess understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C Barks
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Emma A Schindler
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter A Ubel
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Megan G Jiao
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hanna E Huffstetler
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Monica E Lemmon
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pollak KI, Finset A. Weighing the pros and cons of clinicians talking to their patients about weight. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:495-496. [PMID: 35181178 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn I Pollak
- Duke University, Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke Cancer Institute, Patient Education and Counseling, USA.
| | - Arnstein Finset
- Duke University, Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke Cancer Institute, Patient Education and Counseling, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Parente V, Stark A, Key-Solle M, Olsen M, Sanders LL, Bartlett KW, Pollak KI. Caregiver Inclusivity and Empowerment During Family-Centered Rounds. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:e72-e77. [PMID: 35079809 PMCID: PMC9881425 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite widespread adoption of family-centered rounds, few have investigated differences in the experience of family-centered rounds by family race and ethnicity. The purpose of this study was to explore racial and ethnic differences in caregiver perception of inclusion and empowerment during family-centered rounds. METHODS We identified eligible caregivers of children admitted to the general pediatrics team through the electronic health record. Surveys were completed by 99 caregivers (47 non-Latinx White and 52 Black, Latinx, or other caregivers of color). To compare agreement with statements of inclusivity and empowerment, we used the Wilcoxon rank sum test in unadjusted analyses and linear regression for the adjusted analyses. RESULTS Most (91%) caregivers were satisfied or extremely satisfied with family-centered rounds. We found no differences by race or ethnicity in statements of satisfaction or understanding family-centered rounds content. However, in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, we found that White caregivers more strongly agreed with the statements "I felt comfortable participating in rounds," "I had adequate time to ask questions during rounds," and "I felt a valued member of the team during rounds" compared with Black, Latinx, and other caregivers of color. CONCLUSIONS Congruent with studies of communication in other settings, caregivers of color may experience barriers to inclusion in family-centered rounds, such as medical team bias, less empathic communication, and shorter encounters. Future studies are needed to better understand family-centered rounds disparities and develop interventions that promote inclusive rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Parente
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ashley Stark
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mikelle Key-Solle
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maren Olsen
- Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina,Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Linda L. Sanders
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina,Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Noonan D, Lyna P, Kennedy DL, Gao X, Bejarano Hernandez S, Fish LJ, Pollak KI. Trajectories of Situational Temptations in Pregnant Smokers participating in a Scheduled Gradual Reduction Cessation Trial. Matern Child Health J 2022; 26:24-30. [PMID: 34860350 PMCID: PMC8770600 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03321-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper was to examine changes in situational temptations to smoke among women in early to late pregnancy enrolled in a texting trial to help them quit smoking. We compared changes between (1) intervention arms, (2) those who quit, (3) those who reduced by 50% or more, and (4) those who reduced by less than 50%. We also examined cravings overtime in the intervention arm and the relationship between real-time cravings assessed via text message and situational temptations. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of the Baby Steps trial, a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a text-based scheduled gradual reduction (SGR) intervention on cessation. We used t-tests to examine changes across intervention arms and repeated measured proc mixed to explore changes in situational temptations and cravings. RESULTS Among all women, situational temptations decreased from early to late pregnancy for the positive, negative, and habitual subscales, (ps < 0.001). We found no difference in situational temptations across arms. We found a positive relationship between negative situational temptation and average craving during the Weeks 2 and Weeks 3 of the intervention. Negative ST increased by 0.11 for each unit increase of craving at Week 2. CONCLUSIONS As women progress through pregnancy their temptation to smoke reduces. A different relationship might exist, however with negative affect situations in which women reported higher craving but not in response to other temptations. Future work might have a particular focus on the intersection of negative affect with cravings and temptations to promote cessation during pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL NCT01995097.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon Noonan
- School of Nursing, Duke University, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
| | - Pauline Lyna
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Danielle L Kennedy
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Xiaomei Gao
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | | | - Laura J Fish
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wasp GT, Knutzen KE, Murray GF, Brody-Bizar OC, Liu MA, Pollak KI, Tulsky JA, Schenker Y, Barnato AE. Systemic Therapy Decision Making in Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Oncologist Encounters. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 18:e1357-e1366. [PMID: 34855459 PMCID: PMC9377707 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to characterize patient-oncologist communication and decision making about continuing or limiting systemic therapy in encounters after an initial consultation, with a particular focus on whether and how oncologists foster shared decision making (SDM). METHODS We performed content analysis of outpatient oncology encounters at two US National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers audio recorded between November 2010 and September 2014. A multidisciplinary team used a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. We used a combination of random and purposive sampling. We restricted quantitative frequency counts to the coded random sample but included all sampled encounters in qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS Among 31 randomly sampled dyads with three encounters each, systemic therapy decision making was discussed in 90% (84 of 93) encounters. Thirty-four (37%) broached limiting therapy, which 27 (79%) framed as temporary, nine (26%) as completion of a standard regimen, and five (15%) as permanent discontinuation. Thematic analysis of these 93 encounters, plus five encounters purposively sampled for permanent discontinuation, found that (1) patients and oncologists framed continuing therapy as the default, (2) deficiencies in the SDM process (facilitating choice awareness, discussing options, and incorporating patient preferences) contributed to this default, and (3) oncologists use persuasion rather than deliberation when broaching discontinuation. CONCLUSION In this study of outpatient encounters between patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists, when discussing systemic therapy, there exists a default to continue systemic therapy, and deficiencies in SDM contribute to this default.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett T Wasp
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.,Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Kristin E Knutzen
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Genevra F Murray
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Matthew A Liu
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - James A Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Yael Schenker
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Amber E Barnato
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH.,Section of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Malhotra C, Hazirah M, Tan LL, Malhotra R, Yap P, Balasundaram B, Tong KM, Pollak KI. Family Caregiver Perspectives on Suffering of Persons With Severe Dementia: A Qualitative Study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:20-27.e2. [PMID: 33246072 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Dementia involves suffering. Assessing the experience of suffering among persons with severe dementia is instrumental to delivering quality end-of-life care to them and their caregivers. OBJECTIVES We aimed to assess dimensions of suffering from the perspective of family caregivers and the resulting impact on their decisions for the care of persons with severe dementia. METHODS Between July 2018 and February 2019, we conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 27 family caregivers of community-dwelling persons with severe dementia with Functional Assessment Staging Test staging 7. We asked caregivers if they perceived persons with severe dementia to be suffering and explored reasons for their perceptions. We analyzed data using principles of reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS We conceptualized five dimensions of suffering among persons with severe dementia from the perspective of their caregivers: 1) untreated physical or behavioral symptoms, 2) emotional pain, 3) loss of agency, 4) loss of engagement with society, and 5) loss of personhood. Suffering among persons with severe dementia influences their caregivers' expression of a wish for their death and caregivers' decision regarding the use of life-prolonging interventions for them. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that suffering among persons with severe dementia can occur independent of physical symptoms and requires provision of person-centered care. The study adds to the understanding of end-of-life care in persons with severe dementia and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| | - Mohamad Hazirah
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Lay Ling Tan
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Psychogeriatric Service, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Rahul Malhotra
- Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Philip Yap
- Geriatric Centre, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Malhotra C, Mohamad H, Østbye T, Pollak KI, Balasundaram B, Malhotra R, Tong KM, Hum AYM, Allen JC, Seow D, Yong JR, Yoon S. Discordance between dementia caregivers' goal of care and preference for life-extending treatments. Age Ageing 2021; 50:1382-1390. [PMID: 33890622 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many older adults with severe dementia receive potentially life-extending treatments even when caregivers do not wish to prolong their life inappropriately. OBJECTIVE Explore factors that influence caregiver preferences for potentially life-extending treatments for older adults with severe dementia, and reasons for discordance between overall end-of-life care goal and treatment preferences. DESIGN Semi-structured in-depth interviews asking caregivers their overall end-of-life care goal for older adults and preferences for intravenous (IV) antibiotics, tube feeding and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). PARTICIPANTS A total of 26 caregivers of community-dwelling older adults with severe dementia in Singapore. APPROACH Reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Most caregivers' (77%) overall end-of-life care goal was 'no life extension'. Yet, 80% preferred IV antibiotics for a life-threatening infection, 60% preferred tube feeding and 45% preferred CPR. Caregivers preferred these treatments because they (1) perceived letting go by withholding treatments as unethical, (2) felt they had no choice as they deferred to the health care provider, (3) wanted to alleviate suffering rather than extend life and (4) desired trying minimally invasive treatments that had the potential to be withdrawn. Themes explaining discordance were (1) feared regret about making the 'wrong' decision, (2) considered treatments to address immediate needs even when long-term goal did not match providing that treatment and (3) anticipated disagreement with other family members on overall goal of care. CONCLUSION To reduce discordance between caregivers' overall end-of-life care goal and preferences for life-extending treatments, clinicians can use a shared decision-making approach involving discussions of both their overall end-of-life care goal and treatment preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Hazirah, Mohamad
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Truls Østbye
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | | | - Rahul Malhotra
- Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Allyn Yin Mei Hum
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
| | - John Carson Allen
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Dennis Seow
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jing Rong Yong
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Sungwon Yoon
- Regional Health System, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Knutzen KE, Sacks OA, Brody-Bizar OC, Murray GF, Jain RH, Holdcroft LA, Alam SS, Liu MA, Pollak KI, Tulsky JA, Barnato AE. Actual and Missed Opportunities for End-of-Life Care Discussions With Oncology Patients: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2113193. [PMID: 34110395 PMCID: PMC8193430 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Early discussion of end-of-life (EOL) care preferences improves clinical outcomes and goal-concordant care. However, most EOL discussions occur approximately 1 month before death, despite most patients desiring information earlier. Objective To describe successful navigation and missed opportunities for EOL discussions (eg, advance care planning, palliative care, discontinuation of disease-directed treatment, hospice care, and after-death wishes) between oncologists and outpatients with advanced cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This study is a secondary qualitative analysis of outpatient visits audio-recorded between November 2010 and September 2014 for the Studying Communication in Oncologist-Patient Encounters randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted at 2 US academic medical centers. Participants included medical, gynecological, and radiation oncologists and patients with stage IV malignant neoplasm, whom oncologists characterized as being ones whom they "…would not be surprised if they were admitted to an intensive care unit or died within one year." Data were analyzed between January 2018 and August 2020. Exposures The parent study randomized participants to oncologist- and patient-directed interventions to facilitate discussion of emotions. Encounters were sampled across preintervention and postintervention periods and all 4 treatment conditions. Main Outcomes and Measures Secondary qualitative analysis was done of patient-oncologist dyads with 3 consecutive visits for EOL discussions, and a random sample of 7 to 8 dyads from 4 trial groups was analyzed for missed opportunities. Results The full sample included 141 patients (54 women [38.3%]) and 39 oncologists (8 women [19.5%]) (mean [SD] age for both patients and oncologists, 56.3 [10.0] years). Of 423 encounters, only 21 (5%) included EOL discussions. Oncologists reevaluated treatment options in response to patients' concerns, honored patients as experts on their goals, or used anticipatory guidance to frame treatment reevaluation. In the random sample of 31 dyads and 93 encounters, 35 (38%) included at least 1 missed opportunity. Oncologists responded inadequately to patient concerns over disease progression or dying, used optimistic future talk to address patient concerns, or expressed concern over treatment discontinuation. Only 4 of 23 oncologists (17.4%) had both an EOL discussion and a missed opportunity. Conclusions and Relevance Opportunities for EOL discussions were rarely realized, whereas missed opportunities were more common, a trend that mirrored oncologists' treatment style. There remains a need to address oncologists' sensitivity to EOL discussions, to avoid unnecessary EOL treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin E. Knutzen
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Olivia A. Sacks
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Genevra F. Murray
- Department of General Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raina H. Jain
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | | | - Shama S. Alam
- Pharmaceutical Product Development, Evidera, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew A. Liu
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | - James A. Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amber E. Barnato
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Koontz BF, Levine E, McSherry F, Niedzwiecki D, Sutton L, Dale T, Streicher M, Rushing C, Owen L, Kraus WE, Bennett G, Pollak KI. Increasing physical activity in Cancer Survivors through a Text-messaging Exercise motivation Program (ICanSTEP). Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:7339-7349. [PMID: 34050402 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06281-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer survivors are often sedentary. Self-monitoring may promote physical activity through self-activation. We conducted a pilot trial to evaluate whether wearable activity tracker with personalized text message feedback would increase physical activity. METHODS We enrolled 30 patients with solid tumor cancers into a non-randomized prospective intervention trial (NCT02627079): 15 had completed treatment in the past year and 15 under active treatment. Each participant received an activity tracker and daily text messages personalized to their activity level. We assessed patient-reported outcomes and 6-min walk (6 MW) at baseline and 3 months. RESULTS Twenty-six participants completed the study. There was substantial variation in baseline activity. Overall, 39% of participants increased their steps taken by at least 20%, and 23% increased their 6 MW distance by 20% or more. More participants who had completed treatment strongly agreed (73%) that the intervention increased their exercise levels than those receiving active treatment (47%). At 3 months, there was a significant improvement in median Beck Depression Inventory-II and Godin Leisure Index composite scores. At 6 months, 72% still wore their activity tracker at least 4 days per week. CONCLUSION We found that the intervention was well-accepted with a high completion rate at 3 months and continued self-use at 6 months. In this pilot study of combined activity tracker and motivational messaging, we found a signal for increased physical activity over a 3-month period. Future research is needed to study this technique for its impact on activity and other physical and psychological measures of well-being. IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Activity tracker with personalized motivational messaging may be useful in promoting physical activity in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget F Koontz
- Department of Radiation Oncology,, Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 3085, NC, 27710, Durham, USA.
| | - Erica Levine
- Arnhold Institute for Global Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, New York, USA.,Duke Digital Health Science Center, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Frances McSherry
- Duke Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Duke Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Linda Sutton
- Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Duke Cancer Network, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Tykeytra Dale
- Department of Radiation Oncology,, Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 3085, NC, 27710, Durham, USA
| | - Martin Streicher
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Christel Rushing
- Duke Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - William E Kraus
- Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Gary Bennett
- Duke Digital Health Science Center, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lakin JR, Gundersen DA, Lindvall C, Paasche-Orlow MK, Tulsky JA, Brannen EN, Pollak KI, Kennedy D, McLeggon JA, Stout JJ, Volandes A. A Yet Unrealized Promise: Structured Advance Care Planning Elements in the Electronic Health Record. J Palliat Med 2021; 24:1221-1225. [PMID: 33826860 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) may help enable reliable, rapid data management for many uses, such as facilitating communication of advance care planning (ACP). However, issues with validity and accuracy of EHRs hinder the use of ACP information for practical applications. Design: We present a cross-sectional pilot study of 433 older adults with cancer from three large health care systems, participating in an ongoing multisite pragmatic trial (4UH3AG060626-02). We compared data extracted from dedicated structured EHR fields for ACP to a chart review of corresponding ACP documentation contained in the medical chart. Results: Structured ACP data existed for 43.2% of patients and varied by site (25.7% -48.9%). Of the identified structured ACP data elements, 59.2% of recorded elements were correct, 23.7% were incorrect, and 17.1% were duplicates with heterogeneity across sites. Conclusion: Structured ACP data in EHRs were frequently incorrect. This represents a problem for patients and their families, as well as quality improvement and research efforts. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03609177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Lakin
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel A Gundersen
- Survey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael K Paasche-Orlow
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James A Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elise N Brannen
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Danielle Kennedy
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jody-Ann McLeggon
- Institute of Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | | | - Angelo Volandes
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tarnasky AM, Tran GN, Nicolla J, Friedman FAP, Wolf S, Troy JD, Sung AD, Shah K, Oury J, Thompson JC, Gagosian B, Pollak KI, Manners I, Zafar SY. Mobile Application to Identify Cancer Treatment-Related Financial Assistance: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e1440-e1449. [PMID: 33797952 PMCID: PMC8791821 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Insured patients with cancer face high treatment-related, out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and often cannot access financial assistance. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of Bridge, a patient-facing app designed to identify eligible financial resources for patients. We hypothesized that patients using Bridge would experience greater OOP cost reduction than controls. METHODS We enrolled patients with cancer who had OOP expenses from January 2018 to March 2019. We randomly assigned patients 1:1 to intervention (Bridge) versus control (financial assistance educational websites). Primary and secondary outcomes were self-reported OOP costs and subjective financial distress 3 months postenrollment. In post hoc analyses, we analyzed application for and receipt of financial assistance at 3 months postenrollment. We used chi-square, Mann-Whitney tests, and logistic regression to compare study arms. RESULTS We enrolled 200 patients. The median age was 57 years (IQR, 47.0-63.0). Most patients had private insurance (71%), and the median household income was $62,000 in US dollars (USD) (IQR, $36,000-$100,000 [USD]). Substantial missing data precluded assessment of primary and secondary outcomes. In post hoc analyses, patients in the Bridge arm were more likely than controls to both apply for and receive financial assistance. CONCLUSION We were unable to test our primary outcome because of excessive missing follow-up survey data. In exploratory post hoc analyses, patients who received a financial assistance app were more likely to apply for and receive financial assistance. Ultimately, our study highlights challenges faced in identifying measurable outcomes and retaining participants in a randomized, controlled trial of a mobile app to alleviate financial toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Steven Wolf
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Jesse D Troy
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Anthony D Sung
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Kanan Shah
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | | | - S Yousuf Zafar
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kennedy DL, Olsen MK, Yang H, Gao X, Alkon A, Prose NS, Dunbar K, Jackson LR, Pollak KI. Communication Coaching in Cardiology (CCC): A study protocol and methodological challenges and solutions of a randomized controlled trial in outpatient cardiology clinics. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 105:106389. [PMID: 33798730 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Given the role of effective communication in improving patient adherence and satisfaction, high quality patient-clinician communication is critical. Building on previous communication interventions in oncology and pediatrics, we developed a tailored communication coaching intervention to improve empathic communication quality and patient-centered care. In this randomized controlled trial, cardiologists record their patient encounters for review by a communication coach who provides tailored feedback. We are recruiting 40 cardiologists and 400 patients, or 4 patients per cardiologist in the Pre-intervention phase and 6 patients per cardiologists in the Post-intervention phase, from outpatient cardiology clinics within the Duke Health System. The primary goal of the trial is to determine the efficacy of the clinician communication coaching versus usual care in the post-intervention phase (240 patient encounters). In this paper, we describe the development of the communication coaching intervention. We also describe the details of the methods and outcomes of the ongoing trial. Finally, we discuss the challenges, solutions, and lessons learned during the start-up phase of the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle L Kennedy
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America.
| | - Maren K Olsen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America; Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, United States of America
| | - Hongqiu Yang
- Duke Cancer Research Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | - Xiaomei Gao
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | - Aviel Alkon
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | - Neil S Prose
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | - Kayla Dunbar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Department of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pollak KI, Oliver JA, Pieper C, Davis JM, Gao X, Noonan D, Kennedy D, Granados I, Fish LJ. Cue-based treatment for light smokers: A proof of concept pilot. Addict Behav 2021; 114:106717. [PMID: 33109394 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Light smoking (smoking ≤ 10 cigarettes per day or on some days) has become increasingly prevalent in the US and increases morbidity and mortality. Many light smokers do not experience significant nicotine withdrawal but instead smoke in response to cues. Minimal evidence exists supporting interventions to help light smokers quit smoking. METHODS We present results from a proof-of-concept pilot study designed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a cue-based smoking cessation intervention targeted to light daily and intermittent smokers. Participants were randomized to one of two arms: Arm 1) standard smoking cessation treatment or Arm 2) standard smoking cessation treatment + enhanced cue-based treatment that included interactive texting to extend cue exposure treatment to real-world settings and cue management counseling.Outcomes included feasibility (number of participants who were recruited and who completed the intervention), acceptability (intervention ratings), and preliminary efficacy (7-day point prevalence abstinence). RESULTS We randomized 24 English and Spanish-speaking light smokers, 13 to the treatment arm and 11 to the control arm. Across both arms, 77% attended all counseling sessions, 90% rated these sessions as very useful and 100% said that they would recommend the intervention to a friend. 15% in the treatment arm had biochemically-validated smoking abstinence compared to 0% in the standard counseling arm. CONCLUSIONS Results from this proof-of-concept study demonstrated that a cue-based intervention is feasible and acceptable among light smokers and suggests the need for a fully powered study to assess this approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03416621.
Collapse
|
46
|
LeBlanc MR, LeBlanc TW, Leak Bryant A, Pollak KI, Bailey DE, Smith SK. A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Living With Multiple Myeloma. Oncol Nurs Forum 2021; 48:151-160. [PMID: 33600390 DOI: 10.1188/21.onf.151-160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the ways in which multiple myeloma affects an individual's life in the modern treatment era. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING 15 individuals with multiple myeloma and 10 clinicians were recruited from two academic medical centers in the southeastern United States. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH Semistructured interviews were conducted with individuals with multiple myeloma and clinicians to explore the effect of a multiple myeloma diagnosis and treatment on individuals' lives. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. FINDINGS The following four themes emerged from the analysis. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING The treatment journey for those with multiple myeloma can be lifelong and may require frequent visits to an oncologist and, potentially, many successive lines of therapy. Life effects are far-reaching and long-term. Nurses should be aware of the interprofessional resources to help meet these individuals' needs. With thorough assessment, care planning, and education, nurses can play a key role in mitigating the negative effects of multiple myeloma and its treatment.
Collapse
|
47
|
Bennett GG, Steinberg D, Bolton J, Gallis JA, Treadway C, Askew S, Kay MC, Pollak KI, Turner EL. Optimizing an Obesity Treatment Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy Framework: Protocol for a Randomized Factorial Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e19506. [PMID: 33459600 PMCID: PMC7850907 DOI: 10.2196/19506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective weight loss interventions exist, yet few can be scaled up for wide dissemination. Further, none has been fully delivered via text message. We used the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) to develop multicomponent interventions that consist only of active components, those that have been experimentally determined to impact the chosen outcome. Objective The goal of this study is to optimize a standalone text messaging obesity intervention, Charge, using the MOST framework to experimentally determine which text messaging components produce a meaningful contribution to weight change at 6 months. Methods We designed a 6-month, weight loss texting intervention based on our interactive obesity treatment approach (iOTA). Participants are randomized to one of 32 experimental conditions to test which standalone text messaging intervention components produce a meaningful contribution to weight change at 6 months. Results The project was funded in February 2017; enrollment began in January 2018 and data collection was completed in June 2019. Data analysis is in progress and first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2021. Conclusions Full factorial trials are particularly efficient in terms of cost and logistics when leveraged for standalone digital treatments. Accordingly, MOST has the potential to promote the rapid advancement of digital health treatments. Subject to positive findings, the intervention will be low cost, immediately scalable, and ready for dissemination. This will be of great potential use to the millions of Americans with obesity and the providers who treat them. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03254940; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03254940 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/19506
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary G Bennett
- Duke Global Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Dori Steinberg
- Duke Global Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jamiyla Bolton
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - John A Gallis
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Cayla Treadway
- Duke Global Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Sandy Askew
- Duke Global Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Melissa C Kay
- Duke Global Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Populations Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Elizabeth L Turner
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Noonan D, Silva S, Fish LJ, Peter K, Conley C, Simmons LA, Severson H, Pollak KI. Feasibility of a text-based reduction intervention in helping rural and underserved smokeless tobacco users quit. Addict Behav 2020; 108:106434. [PMID: 32361367 PMCID: PMC7337980 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Smokeless tobacco (ST) use significantly affects morbidity and mortality and remains disproportionally prevalent in rural and medically underserved communities. Few programs exist for rural smokeless tobacco users. Text-based interventions may increase the reach of cessation interventions; yet, none has tested them in ST users. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a text-based Scheduled Gradual Reduction (SGR) intervention in rural and underserved ST users. METHODS ST users were randomized in 2:1 fashion to the SGR group (N = 65), a text-based reduction program plus text-based support counseling messages or text-based support messages only group (N = 33). We surveyed participants at 30-days post intervention initiation to assess feasibility and acceptability and examined self-report 7-day point prevalence cessation at 30-days and 6-months post intervention initiation in the two arms. RESULTS We achieved benchmarks for feasibility and acceptability. Among the SGR participants 51% (n = 48) reported that intervention was useful in helping them quit, 83% (n = 48) indicated that they would recommend the intervention to a friend. Over 95% (n = 39) of SGR participants said that they read all alert texts. The SGR participants had a higher quit rate at 30-days compared to support messages alone (SGR = 21.5%, Control = 9.1%, p = 0.1627, Cohen's d equivalent = 0.56, medium effect). However, the quit rate at 6-months was 21% (p = 0.9703) for both groups. CONCLUSIONS A text-based intervention was feasible and acceptable among underserved ST users. SGR helped promote short-term cessation. The text-based interventions both had long-term efficacy. Given that text-based interventions have the potential to increase reach in underserved ST users, further testing is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon Noonan
- Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Insitute, 20 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| | - Susan Silva
- Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Laura J Fish
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Insitute, 20 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 602, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Kellen Peter
- Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Cherie Conley
- Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Leigh Ann Simmons
- Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, United States; University of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, 301 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States
| | - Herbert Severson
- Oregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Dr, Eugene, OR 97403, United States
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Insitute, 20 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Pupulation Health Sciences, 2424 Erwin Road Suite 602, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Fridman I, Ubel PA, Blumenthal-Barby J, England CV, Currier JS, Eyal N, Freedberg KA, Halpern SD, Kelley CF, Kuritzkes DR, Le CN, Lennox JL, Pollak KI, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Scherr KA. "Cure" Versus "Clinical Remission": The Impact of a Medication Description on the Willingness of People Living with HIV to Take a Medication. AIDS Behav 2020; 24:2054-2061. [PMID: 31900813 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02769-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Many people living with HIV (PLWHIV) state that they would be willing to take significant risks to be "cured" of the virus. However, how they interpret the word "cure" in this context is not clear. We used a randomized survey to examine whether PLWHIV had a different willingness to take a hypothetical HIV medication if it causes flu-like symptoms, but provides: (a) cure, (b) remission that was labeled "cure", or (c) remission. PLWHIV (n = 454) were more willing to take a medication that provided a "cure" versus a "remission" if the side effects lasted less than 1 year. PLWHIV were more willing to take a medication that provided a remission that was labeled "cure" versus a "remission" (p = 0.01) if the side effects lasted 2 weeks. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of the impact of the word "cure" and ensure that PLWHIV fully understand the possible outcomes of their treatment options.
Collapse
|
50
|
Pollak KI, Lyna P, Gao X, Noonan D, Bejarano Hernandez S, Subudhi S, Swamy GK, Fish LJ. Efficacy of a Texting Program to Promote Cessation Among Pregnant Smokers: A Randomized Control Trial. Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22:1187-1194. [PMID: 31647564 PMCID: PMC7291805 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Smoking during pregnancy poses serious risks to baby and mother. Few disseminable programs exist to help pregnant women quit or reduce their smoking. We hypothesized that an SMS text-delivered scheduled gradual reduction (SGR) program plus support texts would outperform SMS support messages alone. METHODS We recruited 314 pregnant women from 14 prenatal clinics. Half of the women received theory-based support messages throughout their pregnancy to promote cessation and prevent relapse. The other half received the support messages plus alert texts that gradually reduced their smoking more than 3-5 weeks. We conducted surveys at baseline, end of pregnancy, and 3 months postpartum. Our primary outcome was biochemically validated 7-day point prevalence abstinence at late pregnancy. Our secondary outcome was reduction in cigarettes per day. RESULTS Adherence to the SGR was adequate with 70% responding to alert texts to smoke within 60 minutes. Women in both arms quit smoking at the same rate (9%-12%). Women also significantly reduced their smoking from baseline to the end of pregnancy from nine cigarettes to four; we found no arm differences in reduction. CONCLUSIONS Support text messages alone produced significant quit rates above naturally occurring quitting. SGR did not add significantly to helping women quit or reduce. Sending support messages can reach many women and is low-cost. More obstetric providers might consider having patients who smoke sign up for free texting programs to help them quit. IMPLICATIONS A disseminable texting program helped some pregnant women quit smoking.Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT01995097.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Pauline Lyna
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Xiaomei Gao
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Devon Noonan
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.,School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Sonia Subudhi
- Doctor of Medicine Program, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, DUMC 3083, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Laura J Fish
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|