Phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone with and without daratumumab in relapsed multiple myeloma

We conducted a phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) and KPd with daratumumab (Dara-KPd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The primary end points were identification of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of KPd for phase 1, and rates of overall response (ORR) and near complete response (nCR) after 4 cycles of KPd and Dara-KPd, respectively, for phase 2. The MTD for KPd was carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 (cycles 1-8) and days 1, 2, 15, and 16 for cycles 9 and beyond; oral pomalidomide 4 mg on days 1 to 21; and oral dexamethasone 40 mg weekly in 28-day cycles. Sixty-six patients received KPd, including 34 at the MTD. The ORR after 4 cycles of KPd at the MTD was 27/34 (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 62%-91%), meeting the statistical threshold for efficacy. At a median follow-up of 44 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13 months and overall survival (OS) 44 months. Twenty-eight patients received Dara-KPd. The rate of nCR or better after 4 cycles was 11/28 (39%; 95% CI, 22%-59%), meeting the statistical threshold for efficacy. As the best response to Dara-KPd, the ORR was 25/28 (89%) and the rate of measurable residual disease negativity by flow cytometry (10-5) was 17/26 (65%). At a median follow-up of 26 months, the median PFS and OS for Dara-KPd were not reached. Dara-KPd induced deeper and more durable responses than KPd without compromising safety in a predominantly high-risk, lenalidomide-refractory population, warranting further evaluation of this quadruplet. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01665794.

Cannabis Use Patterns among Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in a Large Multicenter Cohort from a State with Legalized Adult Non-Medical Cannabis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Cannabis use among patients with cancer is an area of great interest given its widespread acceptance despite the lack of supporting clinical data. The absence of data limits the understanding of potential clinical benefits of cannabis and the ability of providers to deliver evidence-based recommendations for patient care. We explored cannabis use patterns in patients with early-stage breast cancer in a large multicenter cohort in a state with legalized adult non-medical cannabis.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Initial questions about cannabis use history and frequency were introduced in Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) breast cancer patient surveys on 2/1/2020 for female patients receiving radiation after lumpectomy for non-metastatic breast cancer. Expanded questions were introduced on 6/28/2022 to assess mode of administration, active ingredient, and reason for use. Summary statistics were generated. A multivariable model using logistic regression identified patient characteristics associated with cannabis use.

RESULTS

Among 3948 eligible patients, 2738 (69.35%) completed survey questions, and 2462/2738 (89.9%) completed the initial question on cannabis use. Among those, 364/2462 (14.8%) noted cannabis use in the last 30 days, 588 (23.9%) noted remote use (>30 days ago), 1462 (59.4%) reported never having used cannabis, 44 (1.8%) preferred not to answer cannabis use questions, and 4 (0.4%) did not provide use history. Younger age [age <50 vs 60-70, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.65, 3.79) p<0.001)], Hispanic ethnicity [OR 2.20 (95% CI 1.06, 4.56) p = 0.03], history of smoking [OR 2.56 (95% CI 1.88, 3.48) p<0.001], current smoking [OR 4.70 (95% CI 3.22, 6.86) p<0.001)], and prior chemotherapy [OR 1.40 (95% CI 1.00, 1.96) p = 0.05] predicted recent cannabis use in a multivariable model. Of the 364 patients endorsing cannabis use in the last 30 days, 89 (24.5%), 72 (19.8%), 29 (8.0%), 66 (18.1%), 30 (8.2%), and 78 (21.4%) reported using cannabis 1-2 days, 3-5 days, 6-9 days, 10-19 days, 20-29 days, and all 30 days, respectively. The most common modes of administration among 76 individuals who responded to the expanded questionnaire to date were oral (39.4%), smoking (30.3%), and topical (10.5%). The products used contained tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 26.3%), cannabidiol (CBD; 19.7%), balanced levels of THC and CBD (19.7%), or active ingredients that were unknown to the patient (34.2%). Patients frequently endorsed cannabis use for insomnia, anxiety, and pain.

CONCLUSION

Many patients with early-stage breast cancer are using cannabis. Younger age, Hispanic ethnicity, smoking, and chemotherapy history are predictors of cannabis use. Patients are often unaware of the active ingredients in the products that they use, suggesting an important role for patient education and a need to equip providers to advise patients in their care.

Impact of Breast Volume on Achieving a Conservative Heart and Target Coverage Metric for Patients Receiving Whole Breast Radiotherapy in a Statewide Consortium

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Radiation to large breast volumes (BV) has been associated with increased dose inhomogeneities, breast fibrosis, and induration. Radiation exposure to the heart during breast radiotherapy has been associated with late cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study, therefore, investigates the impact of BV on achieving optimal lumpectomy cavity target coverage (V95% [%] >95) while maintaining mean heart dose constraints (MHD, mean [Gy] <1) across a range of BV from patients enrolled in a statewide consortium.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for 2,506 patients receiving left-sided whole breast moderately-hypofractionated (2.5-2.8 Gy/fx) radiotherapy without nodal fields between 2018-2022. The BV was calculated for each patient from contours in the treatment planning system, and the volume distribution partitioned into quartiles. Dosimetric parameters were calculated from dose-volume histograms. The percentage of patients in which the metrics were achieved was calculated for each BV quartile for different treatment positions: all positions, supine, supine with breathing motion management, and prone.

RESULTS

The BV ranges within the quartiles (∼620 patients/quartile) were ≤720.0 cc, 720.1 to ≤1065.0 cc, 1065.1 to ≤1500.0 cc, and >1500.0 cc for quartiles Q1-Q4, respectively. Of the 2,506 patients, 76% were treated supine (of which 41.6% were treated using breathing motion management techniques), 23.5% were treated prone, and 0.5% were treated decubitus. Discrete percentages of patients able to meet the metrics are provided in the table. An increase in BV from Q1 to Q4 correlated with lower percentages of patients meeting the MHD metric, however no correlation was observed between BV and target coverage. Treating supine with breathing motion management resulted in a higher percentage of patients meeting the MHD metric (odds ratio (OR) = 1.96 relative to supine without motion management, p<0.0001), while the prone setup proved to be the superior technique across all quartiles (OR = 3.95 relative to supine, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Increasing BVs resulted in lower percentages of patients receiving MHD≤1 Gy. Thus, cardiac sparing may be more difficult to achieve in patients with larger BV. Utilization of alternate treatment positions, such as supine with breathing motion management and prone, greatly improved the percentage of patients able to meet the MHD metric without sacrificing target coverage in all quartiles. Prone positioning was the technique least susceptible to BV effects in meeting the MHD≤1 Gy goal.

Factors Associated with Cardiac Radiation Dose Reduction Following Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized, Left-Sided Breast Cancer in a Large Statewide Quality Consortium

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Limiting radiation dose to the heart is important for minimizing the risk of long-term cardiac toxicity in patients with left-sided early-stage breast cancer.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Prospectively collected dosimetric data were analyzed for patients undergoing hypofractionated radiation therapy to the left breast for localized node-negative breast cancer within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) from 2016-2022. Goals for limiting cardiac dose were adjusted over time. From 2016-2020, the cardiac quality metric focused on total mean heart dose (MHD) from the composite whole breast and boost plans, tightening from a goal of MHD ≤2 Gy to MHD ≤1.2 Gy by 2020. In 2021-2022, the cardiac metric transitioned to a combined goal of MHD ≤1.0 Gy from the whole breast plan and ≥95% lumpectomy cavity planning target volume (PTV) receiving 95% of the prescription dose. Separate multivariate logistic regression models were developed to assess for covariates associated with meeting the MHD goal in 2016-2020 and combined MHD/PTV coverage goal in 2021-2022.

RESULTS

In total, 4,165 patients were analyzed with a median age of 64 years. Most patients (86%) had either Tis or T1 disease, and 66% received hormone therapy. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics did not change substantially between treatment periods. Use of breath-hold or motion gating increased from 42% in 2016-2020 to 46% in 2021-2022. Similarly, use of prone positioning increased from 12% to 20%. From 2016-2020, 90.9% of plans achieved the MHD goal, compared to 93.6% of plans achieving the composite MHD/PTV goal from 2021-2022. On multivariate analysis in the 2016-2020 cohort, treatment with motion management (OR 5.20, 95% CI [3.59-7.54], p<0.0001) or prone positioning (OR 3.21, 95% CI [1.85-5.57], p < 0.0001) were associated with meeting the MHD goal, while receipt of boost (OR 0.25, 95% CI [0.17-0.39], p<0.0001) and omission of hormone therapy (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.49-0.88], p = 0.0047), were associated with not meeting the MHD goal. During the era including composite heart dose and PTV coverage goals (2021-2022), treatment with motion management (OR 1.89, 95% CI [1.12-3.21], p = 0.018) or prone positioning (OR 3.71, 95% CI [1.73-7.95], p = 0.0008) were associated with meeting the combined goal, while larger breast volume (≥1440 cc, OR 0.34, 95% CI [0.13 - 0.91], p = 0.031) and treatment at an academic center (OR 0.36, 95% CI [0.22-0.67], p = 0.0009) were associated with not meeting the combined goal.

CONCLUSION

In our statewide consortium, rates of compliance with aggressive targets for limiting cardiac dose remain high, despite tightening of these goals to include lower mean heart doses and inclusion of a concurrent PTV coverage goal. Treatment using motion management or prone positioning is associated with achieving the cardiac dose goals.

Workplace Harassment, Cyber Incivility, and Climate in Academic Medicine

Importance

The culture of academic medicine may foster mistreatment that disproportionately affects individuals who have been marginalized within a given society (minoritized groups) and compromises workforce vitality. Existing research has been limited by a lack of comprehensive, validated measures, low response rates, and narrow samples as well as comparisons limited to the binary gender categories of male or female assigned at birth (cisgender).

Objective

To evaluate academic medical culture, faculty mental health, and their relationship.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A total of 830 faculty members in the US received National Institutes of Health career development awards from 2006-2009, remained in academia, and responded to a 2021 survey that had a response rate of 64%. Experiences were compared by gender, race and ethnicity (using the categories of Asian, underrepresented in medicine [defined as race and ethnicity other than Asian or non-Hispanic White], and White), and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ+) status. Multivariable models were used to explore associations between experiences of culture (climate, sexual harassment, and cyber incivility) with mental health.

Exposures

Minoritized identity based on gender, race and ethnicity, and LGBTQ+ status.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Three aspects of culture were measured as the primary outcomes: organizational climate, sexual harassment, and cyber incivility using previously developed instruments. The 5-item Mental Health Inventory (scored from 0 to 100 points with higher values indicating better mental health) was used to evaluate the secondary outcome of mental health.

Results

Of the 830 faculty members, there were 422 men, 385 women, 2 in nonbinary gender category, and 21 who did not identify gender; there were 169 Asian respondents, 66 respondents underrepresented in medicine, 572 White respondents, and 23 respondents who did not report their race and ethnicity; and there were 774 respondents who identified as cisgender and heterosexual, 31 as having LGBTQ+ status, and 25 who did not identify status. Women rated general climate (5-point scale) more negatively than men (mean, 3.68 [95% CI, 3.59-3.77] vs 3.96 [95% CI, 3.88-4.04], respectively, P < .001). Diversity climate ratings differed significantly by gender (mean, 3.72 [95% CI, 3.64-3.80] for women vs 4.16 [95% CI, 4.09-4.23] for men, P < .001) and by race and ethnicity (mean, 4.0 [95% CI, 3.88-4.12] for Asian respondents, 3.71 [95% CI, 3.50-3.92] for respondents underrepresented in medicine, and 3.96 [95% CI, 3.90-4.02] for White respondents, P = .04). Women were more likely than men to report experiencing gender harassment (sexist remarks and crude behaviors) (71.9% [95% CI, 67.1%-76.4%] vs 44.9% [95% CI, 40.1%-49.8%], respectively, P < .001). Respondents with LGBTQ+ status were more likely to report experiencing sexual harassment than cisgender and heterosexual respondents when using social media professionally (13.3% [95% CI, 1.7%-40.5%] vs 2.5% [95% CI, 1.2%-4.6%], respectively, P = .01). Each of the 3 aspects of culture and gender were significantly associated with the secondary outcome of mental health in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusions and Relevance

High rates of sexual harassment, cyber incivility, and negative organizational climate exist in academic medicine, disproportionately affecting minoritized groups and affecting mental health. Ongoing efforts to transform culture are necessary.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone or lenalidomide alone as maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (ATLAS): interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Lenalidomide is a cornerstone of maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after autologous stem-cell transplantation. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide alone in this patient population.

METHODS

This study is an interim analysis of ATLAS, which is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial in 12 academic and clinical centres in the USA and Poland. Participants were aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, completed any type of induction and had stable disease or better, autologous stem-cell transplantation within 100 days, initiated induction 12 months before enrolment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 and a web-based system to receive up to 36 cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (28-day cycles of carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 administered intravenously in cycle one on days 1 and 2 then 36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 in cycles one to four and 36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 from cycle five up to 36 [per protocol]; lenalidomide 25 mg administered orally on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 20 mg administered orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) or lenalidomide alone (10 mg administered orally for the first three cycles and then at the best tolerated dose [≤15 mg for 28 days in 28-day cycles]) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. After 36 cycles, patients in both treatment groups received lenalidomide maintenance. Randomisation was stratified by response to previous treatment, cytogenetic risk factors, and country. Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. Patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group with no detectable minimal residual disease after cycle six (as per International Myeloma Working Group criteria) and standard-risk cytogenetics were switched to lenalidomide maintenance as of cycle nine. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned patients). Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This unplanned interim analysis was triggered by the occurrence of 59 (61%) of the expected 96 events for the primary analysis and the results are considered preliminary. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02659293 (active, not recruiting) and EudraCT, 2015-002380-42.

FINDINGS

Between June 10, 2016, and Oct 21, 2020, 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (n=93) or lenalidomide alone (n=87; intention-to-treat population). The median age of patients was 59·0 years (IQR 49·0-63·0); 84 (47%) patients were female and 96 (53%) were male. With a median follow-up of 33·8 months (IQR 20·9-42·9), median progression-free survival was 59·1 months (95% CI 54·8-not estimable) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group versus 41·4 months (33·2-65·4) in the lenalidomide group (hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·31-0·86]; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (44 [48%] in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group vs 52 [60%] in the lenalidomide group), thrombocytopenia (12 [13%] vs six [7%]), and lower respiratory tract infections (seven [8%] vs one [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 28 (30%) patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group and 19 (22%) in the lenalidomide group. One treatment-related adverse event led to death (respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group.

INTERPRETATION

This interim analysis provides support for considering carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who completed any induction regimen followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation, which requires confirmation after longer follow-up of this ongoing phase 3 trial.

FUNDING

Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb).

Phase I trial of ribociclib with platinum chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

New therapeutic combinations to improve the outcome of ovarian cancer patients are clearly needed. Preclinical studies with ribociclib (LEE-011), a CDK4/6 cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor, demonstrate a synergistic effect with platinum chemotherapy and efficacy as a maintenance therapy after chemotherapy. We tested the safety and initial efficacy of ribociclib in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This phase I trial combined weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy with ribociclib followed by ribociclib maintenance in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Primary objectives were safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ribociclib when given with platinum and taxane chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints were response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Patients had a mean 2.5 prior lines of chemotherapy, and 51% received prior maintenance therapy with Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or Bevacizumab. The MTD was 400mg. The most common AEs included anemia (82.9%), neutropenia (82.9%), fatigue (82.9%), and nausea (77.1%). Overall RR was 79.3% with a stable disease (SD) rate of 18% resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 96.6%. The PFS was 11.4 months. RR and PFS did not differ based on number of lines of prior chemotherapy or prior maintenance therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates the combination of ribociclib with chemotherapy in ovarian cancer is feasible and safe. With a clinical benefit rate of 97%, this work provides encouraging evidence of clinical efficacy in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT03056833.

FUNDING

This investigator-initiated trial was supported by Novartis who provided drug and funds for trial execution.

The Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium: A Novel Initiative to Improve the Quality of Radiation Oncology Care

PURPOSE

Numerous quality measures have been proposed in radiation oncology, and initiatives to improve access to high-complexity care, quality, and equity are needed. We describe the design and evaluate impact of a voluntary statewide collaboration for quality improvement in radiation oncology initiated a decade ago.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We evaluate compliance before and since implementation of annual metrics for quality improvement, using an observational dataset with information from over 20,000 patients treated in the 28 participating radiation oncology practices. At thrice-yearly meetings, experts have spoken regarding trends within the field and inspired discussions regarding potential targets for quality improvement. Blinded data on practices at various sites have been provided. Following Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines, we describe the approach and measures the program has implemented. To evaluate impact, we compare compliance at baseline and now with active measures using mixed effects regression models with site-level random effects.

RESULTS

Compliance has increased, including use of guideline-concordant hypofractionated radiotherapy, doses to targets/normal tissues, motion management, and consistency in delineating and naming contoured structures (a precondition for quality evaluation). For example, use of guideline-concordant hypofractionation for breast cancer increased from 47% to 97%, adherence to target coverage goals and heart dose limits for dose increased from 46% to 86%, motion assessment in patients with lung cancer increased from 52% to 94%, and use of standard nomenclature increased from 53% to 82% for lung patients and from 80% to 94% for breast patients (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although observational analysis cannot fully exclude secular trends, contextual data revealing slow uptake of best practices elsewhere in the US and qualitative feedback from participants suggests that this initiative has improved the consistency, efficiency, and quality of radiation oncology care in its member practices and may be a model for oncology quality improvement more generally.

Shifts in learning assistants' self-determination due to COVID-19 disruptions in Calculus II course delivery

BACKGROUND

The Learning Assistant (LA) model with its subsequent support and training has evidenced significant gains for undergraduate STEM learning and persistence, especially in high-stakes courses like Calculus. Yet, when a swift and unexpected transition occurs from face-to-face to online, remote learning of the LA environment, it is unknown how LAs are able to maintain their motivation (competence, autonomy, and relatedness), adapt to these new challenges, and sustain their student-centered efforts. This study used Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to model theoretical aspects of LAs' motivations (persistence and performance) both before and after changes were made in delivery of a Calculus II course at Texas Tech University due to COVID-19 interruptions.

RESULTS

Analysis of weekly written reflections, a focus group session, and a post-course questionnaire of 13 Calculus II LAs throughout Spring semester of 2020 showed that LAs' reports of competence proportionally decreased when they transitioned online, which was followed by a moderate proportional increase in reports of autonomy (actions they took to adapt to distance instruction) and a dramatic proportional increase in reports of relatedness (to build structures for maintaining communication and building community with undergraduate students).

CONCLUSIONS

Relatedness emerged as the most salient factor from SDT to maintain LA self-determination due to the COVID-19 facilitated interruption to course delivery in a high-stakes undergraduate STEM course. Given that online learning continues during the pandemic and is likely to continue after, this research provides an understanding to how LAs responded to this event and the mounting importance of relatedness when LAs are working with undergraduate STEM learners. Programmatic recommendations are given for enhancing LA preparation including selecting LAs for autonomy and relatedness factors (in addition to competence), modeling mentoring for remote learners, and coaching in best practices for online instruction.

Abstract PD4-07: Contemporary practice patterns for the use of regional nodal irradiation during post-lumpectomy radiotherapy for patients with N0/N1 breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Current national guidelines encourage consideration for treating the at-risk regional nodes (axillary, supraclavicular, and/or internal mammary) with directed regional nodal irradiation (RNI) during post-lumpectomy radiotherapy for high risk N0 (node negative) and N1 (1-3 nodes positive) breast cancer patients. This recommendation is based on the results of several randomized trials published over the last decade. Evidence regarding translation of these trials into clinical practice in the United States has been limited to date. In this study, we sought to characterize the temporal changes in and clinical factors associated with the utilization of RNI during post-lumpectomy radiotherapy for N0-N1 breast cancer across a contemporary, statewide consortium of radiation oncology practices.

METHODS: Within a statewide radiation oncology quality consortium, 12,170 breast cancer patients were consecutively enrolled between 1/1/2013 and 10/31/2019 in both academic (teaching) and community (non-teaching) facilities. Data on receptor status, adjuvant systemic therapy, age, TNM stage, extent of axillary surgery, race, body mass index (BMI), type of treating facility, and year completing radiotherapy (RT) were collected. Eligibility for the present analysis was limited to patients with N0 and N1 disease not receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy and receiving adjuvant radiotherapy after lumpectomy for non-metastatic breast cancer. Multiple variable logistic regression models were separately fit to explain the use of directed RNI (to the axilla, supraclavicular region, and/or internal mammary region) for the N0 and N1 populations separately and described using odds ratios (OR), with significant ORs (p&lt;0.05) reported.

RESULTS: A total of 8,468 patients from 29 treating facilities met the inclusion criteria: 6,929 (81.8%) with N0 and 1,539 (18.2%) N1 disease. RNI was performed in addition to whole breast radiation in 95 (1.4%) and 908 (59%) patients in the N0 and N1 cohorts respectively. For the N0 cohort, significant correlates of RNI on multivariable analysis (MVA) were receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.7), higher T-stage (OR 1.9 for T2 vs T1 and 27.3 for T3/T4 vs T1), axillary surgery [compared to sentinel node biopsy (SLN) alone : no axillary surgery (OR 14.5), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with 10+ nodes removed (OR 15.1) ALND after SLN (OR 2.7)], and underweight BMI (OR 4.9 compared to overweight, which was the reference as the largest BMI category). For the N1 cohort, MVA suggested adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.8) and larger tumors (OR 1.6 [T2 vs T1]) were significantly associated with use of RNI. The year completing RT was also significantly associated with RNI use, with 22% and 15% increases per year from 2013 to 2019 in the N0 and N1 cohorts, respectively. Lastly, receiving treatment in an academic facility compared to a community facility was significantly associated with receipt of RNI in both the N0 (OR 1.8) and N1 (OR 2.2) cohorts.

CONCLUSION: In this large cohort, selective use of RNI added to post-lumpectomy whole breast radiotherapy is estimated to have increased over time, suggesting growing implementation of recent trial data and current clinical practice guidelines. Patient, treatment, and tumor characteristics appear to factor into the decision to treat with RNI, but differences in use between academic and community practices suggest opportunities for improving the consistency of care across care delivery settings. Ongoing trials seeking to identify subgroups of N1 patients in whom RNI can safely be omitted may be especially important to inform decisions, given the almost even split (59% receiving, 41% not) in practice observed in this large American cohort.

Citation Format: Derek Bergsma, Kent Griffith, Reshma Jagsi, Michael Dominello, Thomas Boike, Joshua Dilworth, Amit Bhatt, Frank Vicini, Maggie Grubb, Jean Moran, James Hayman, Lori Pierce, on behalf of MROQC, the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium. Contemporary practice patterns for the use of regional nodal irradiation during post-lumpectomy radiotherapy for patients with N0/N1 breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-07.

Abstract A07: A phase II study of metformin therapy in ovarian cancer with translational endpoints

Epidemiologic studies suggest that metformin can improve outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer. Preclinical studies suggest metformin may work in part via effects on cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) to maintain platinum sensitivity. We therefore performed a phase II clinical trial evaluating adjuvant metformin therapy in nondiabetic patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The primary aims were translational studies evaluating the impact of metformin on CSC and chemotherapy resistance. Secondary aims included progression-free and overall survival. Thirty-eight patients with confirmed stage IIC (n=1)/III (n=25)/IV (n=12) EOC were treated with either (i) neoadjuvant metformin followed by primary debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy + metformin, or (ii) three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and metformin, followed by interval debulking surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy + metformin. Thirty-two patients (84%) completed six cycles metformin + chemotherapy. Metformin was well tolerated with one grade III/IV treatment-related adverse event (3%). Median PFS was 18.0 months (95% CI 14.0-21.6). Median OS was surprisingly long at 57.9 months (95% CI 28.0 – not estimable). For patients with recurred platinum sensitive disease, response to second-line therapy was 85%. Translational studies comparing metformin-treated tumors and historical controls found that metformin-treated tumors had a 2.6-fold decrease in ALDH+/CD133+ CSC (p&lt;0.0001). Consistent with this, metformin-treated tumor cells (i) had an increased sensitivity to cisplatin in vitro, (ii) maintained cisplatin sensitivity over time (p&lt;0.001), and (iii) demonstrated reduced ability to amplify CSC with serial passages (p&lt;0.001). To understand the mechanism of metformin-induced maintenance of platinum response, we evaluated tumor cells and carcinoma-associated mesenchymal stem cells (CA-MSC), cells in the TME we previously reported could increase “stemness” and chemotherapy resistance. While we could not identify significant changes in bulk tumor cells, analysis of DNA methylation in CA-MSC demonstrated metformin treatment resulted in an epigenetic shift. Suggesting CA-MSC alteration drives metformin impact, compared to control CA-MSC, CA-MSC from metformin-treated patients were unable to drive chemotherapy resistance ex vivo. In conclusion, this is the first prospective study of metformin in EOC patients. Metformin therapy was associated with better than expected overall survival, reduction in CSC number, and epigenetic modification of cells in the TME. This was associated with maintenance of platinum sensitivity in vitro and could explain the better than expected median overall survival. This work supports the use of metformin in phase III studies.

Citation Format: Ronald J. Buckanovich, Daniel Chan, Jessica Shank, Kent Griffith, Huihui Fan, Robert Szulawski, Kun Yang, Kevin Reynolds, Carolyn Johnston, Karen McLean, Shitanshu Uppal, Rebecca Liu, Laura Cabrera, Sarah Taylor, Hui Shen, Geeta Mehta, Lan Coffman. A phase II study of metformin therapy in ovarian cancer with translational endpoints [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A07.

Abstract PD6-6: Identifying patients at higher risk of toxicity after breast radiotherapy: Analysis of patient-reported outcomes in the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium cohort

Objective: Patient-reported toxicities after breast radiotherapy merit understanding in order to inform decisions and target supportive care interventions.

Methods: As part of a collaborative quality improvement initiative, the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium prospectively collects patient-reported outcomes data from women treated for breast cancer at 26 practices across the state. Of all 11,107 patients treated with lumpectomy and whole breast radiation therapy between 1/1/2012 and 12/31/2018, 2817 refused patient surveys. We describe here the maximal toxicity reported by the 7689 patients who provided survey responses within 7 days of end of treatment and for whom we had sufficient data to determine dose-fractionation and treatment fields. Multivariable logistic regression models separately identified the individual and treatment characteristics associated with 1) breast pain, 2) a bother scale (related to itching, stinging/burning, swelling, or hurting of the treated breast), and 3) fatigue. Breast pain was considered moderate or severe when score ≥4 on modified 10-point Brief Pain Inventory measure. Bother from multiple breast symptoms was considered frequent when score ≥3 on a scaled measure (range 0-4) averaging responses on four items derived from the Skindex. Fatigue was considered severe when rated as present “always” or “most of the time” over past four weeks.

Results: Moderate or severe breast pain was reported by 2882 (37.5%) overall: 1022 (28.3%) of those receiving hypofractionation (HF) and 1860 (45.7%) of those receiving conventional fractionation (CF). Frequent bother from multiple breast symptoms was reported by 1029 (13.4%) overall: 288 (8.0%) after HF and 741 (18.2%) after CF. Severe fatigue was reported by 1795 (23.4%) overall: 681 (18.8%) after HF and 1114 (27.4%) after CF. In addition to treatment fractionation (p&lt;0.001), younger age, higher BMI, and smoking were highly significant (p&lt;0.001) predictors of all three forms of toxicity, as detailed in the Table. Black race (p&lt;0.001) independently predicted greater breast pain (OR 1.9) and breast symptom bother (OR 1.6). Receipt of boost treatment also predicted greater breast pain (p=0.0006) and bother (p=0.04).

Conclusions: In this large observational dataset of patient-reported toxicities after whole breast radiotherapy, substantial differences existed by radiotherapy dose-fractionation. Race differences in breast pain and bother existed despite controlling for multiple other factors, including age, body habitus, comorbidities, and treatment characteristics; further research is needed to understand what drives these differences in order to target potentially modifiable factors. Intensification of supportive care may be appropriate for subgroups identified as being vulnerable to greater toxicity.

Multivariable Models of Patient-Reported Toxicity OutcomesIndependent VariableOdds Ratio (CI) [p value] in Model with Dependent Variable=Moderate or Severe Breast PainOdds Ratio (CI) [p value] in Model with Dependent Variable=Frequent Bother from Multiple Breast SymptomsOdds Ratio (CI) [p value] in Model with Dependent Variable=Severe FatigueAge 70+ vs 60-690.77 (0.67 - 0.89) [p&lt;0.001]0.63 (0.48 - 0.81) [p&lt;0.001]0.99 (0.84 - 1.16) [p&lt;0.001]Age 50-59 vs 60-691.49 (1.32 - 1.69)1.82 (1.52 - 2.17)1.34 (1.17 - 1.54)Age &lt;50 vs 60-691.90 (1.63 - 2.21)2.66 (2.17 - 3.25)1.44 (1.21 - 1.71)BMI: Normal 18.5-&lt;25 vs Overweight 25-&lt;300.78 (0.68 - 0.90) [p&lt;.0001]0.89 (0.72 - 1.09) [p&lt;.0001]0.74 (0.63 - 0.87) [p&lt;.0001]BMI: Obesity I 30-&lt;35 vs Overweight 25-&lt;301.32 (1.15 - 1.51)1.15 (0.94 - 1.40)1.22 (1.04 - 1.41)BMI: Obesity II 35-&lt;40 vs Overweight 25-&lt;301.50 (1.28 - 1.77)1.61 (1.29 - 2.01)1.34 (1.12 - 1.61)BMI: Obesity III &gt;40 vs Overweight 25-&lt;302.14 (1.79 - 2.57)1.86 (1.47 - 2.36)1.59 (1.31 - 1.94)BMI: Underweight &lt;18.5 vs Overweight 25-&lt;300.98 (0.68 - 1.42)0.82 (0.46 - 1.46)1.08 (0.72 - 1.62)Race: Black vs White1.94 (1.70 - 2.21) [p&lt;.0001]1.58 (1.33 - 1.87) [p&lt;.0001]0.96 (0.83 - 1.12) [p=0.88]Race: Asian vs White1.32 (0.89 - 1.96)0.84 (0.46 - 1.52)1.15 (0.74 - 1.80)Race: Other vs White1.74 (1.24 - 2.45)1.94 (1.31 - 2.90)1.01 (0.68 - 1.51)Hypertension: Yes vs No0.95 (0.84 - 1.06) [p=0.33]0.92 (0.78 - 1.08) [p=0.28]1.09 (0.96 - 1.24) [p=0.17]Diabetes: Yes vs No1.25 (1.08 - 1.44) [p=0.003]1.22 (1.00 - 1.49) [p=0.05]1.29 (1.10 - 1.51) [p=0.0015]Smoking Status: Former smoker vs Never smoker1.25 (1.12 - 1.39) [p&lt;.0001]1.33 (1.14 - 1.55) [p&lt;.0001]1.12 (0.99 - 1.27) [p&lt;.0001]Smoking Status: Current smoker vs Never smoker1.65 (1.41 - 1.93)2.02 (1.66 - 2.46)1.59 (1.34 - 1.89)Fractionation: Conventional vs Hypofractionation1.67 (1.49 - 1.86) [p&lt;.0001]1.85 (1.58 - 2.17) [p&lt;.0001]1.51 (1.34 - 1.71) [p&lt;.0001]Boost: Boost vs No boost1.30 (1.12 - 1.51) [p=0.0006]1.29 (1.01 - 1.65) [p=0.04]1.00 1.00 (0.84 - 1.18) [p=0.96]SCV Nodal field treatment: Yes vs No1.02 (0.87 - 1.20) [p=0.81]1.11 (0.91 - 1.36) [p=0.30]0.86 (0.71 - 1.03) [p=0.10]

Citation Format: Reshma Jagsi, Kent Griffith, Frank Vicini, Jay Burmeister, Michael Dominello, Inga Grills, James Hayman, Jean Moran, Peter Paximadis, Jeffrey Radawski, Eleanor Walker, Lori Pierce. Identifying patients at higher risk of toxicity after breast radiotherapy: Analysis of patient-reported outcomes in the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-6.

Mentorship in Radiation Oncology: Role of Gender Diversity in Abstract Presenting and Senior Author Dyads on Subsequent High-Impact Publications

Purpose

To generate insights regarding the role of gender in research mentorship, we analyzed characteristics of abstracts selected for oral and poster discussion presentations at the American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meeting and subsequent high-impact publications.

Methods and Materials

Clinical radiation oncology abstracts selected for oral and poster discussion presentations at the American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meetings in 2014 and 2015 were reviewed. A multivariable logistic regression model evaluated factors associated with subsequent higher-impact publications among abstracts that led to manuscript publications. The primary independent variable was the presenting–senior (last) author gender dyad (divided into 4 groups based on gender of presenting and senior authors, respectively; eg, “MF” indicates male presenting and female senior). Dyads were classified as MF, FM, MM, or FF.

Results

Data were derived from 390 oral and 142 poster discussions. Presenting and senior author pairings were MM for 286 (53.8%), FF for 67 (12.6%), MF for 84 (15.8%), and FM for 94 (17.7%) abstracts. Overall, 403 abstracts led to subsequent publications, of which 52.1% (210) were in a higher-impact journal. Eventual publication in a higher-impact journal was significantly associated with senior author H-index (odds ratio [OR] 3.30 for H ≥ 41 vs < 17; group P = .007), grant support for the study (OR 2.09 for funded vs not, P = .0261), and with the presenting and senior author gender pairing (group P = .0107). Specifically, FM pairings (OR 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.66) and MF pairings (OR 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-4.77) had higher odds of high-impact publication than MM pairings, whereas there was no significant difference in this outcome between FF and MM pairings.

Conclusions

Although unmeasured confounding remains possible, MF and FM dyads of presenting and senior authors were more likely than MM dyads to obtain journal publication in a higher-impact journal. Institutions and the profession should support the development and maintenance of respectful, collaborative cross-gender mentorship.

Progesterone signaling during pregnancy in the lab opossum, Monodelphis domestica

To investigate subtle pregnancy-associated changes in the lab opossum, Monodelphis domestica, an induced ovulator, we compared pregnant with non-pregnant and pseudopregnant animals with regard to serum P₄ levels and progesterone receptor (PR) expression. Using video-verified, time-mated lab opossums as sources of biological material, we compared ovaries, uteri and sera obtained on odd-numbered days of the 14.5-day pregnancy in this animal. Females that mated successfully but did not produce embryos were classified as pseudopregnant. P₄ levels differed significantly between pregnant (N = 21) and either non-pregnant (N = 3) or pseudopregnant (N = 3) opossums, but not between the non-pregnant and pseudopregnant groups. A significant decline in serum P₄ occurred between pregnancy days 3 and 5, coinciding with an elevated probability of pregnancy failure between days 5 and 9. PR was detected in the nuclei of uterine-gland epithelial cells on pregnancy days 5 and 7 as well as variably in the corpora lutea (CL) of animals on pregnancy days 3-11. PR expression in the CL suggests that P₄ may be autostimulatory in lab opossums and that certain levels of this steroid are required during normal pregnancy. The significant day-3 drop in P₄ may explain why pregnancy failure in this polyovular metatherian is likeliest to occur between days 5 and 9, an interval during which the extended period of blastocyst morphogenesis and expansion occurs. Taken together, these results suggest that P₄ may have unrecognized signaling roles not only in pregnancy but perhaps embryonic development as well in the lab opossum.

Dosimetric predictors for acute esophagitis during radiation therapy for lung cancer: Results of a large statewide observational study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to identify dosimetric variables that best predict for acute esophagitis in patients treated for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a prospectively accrued statewide consortium.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients receiving definitive radiation therapy for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium were included in the analysis. Dose-volume histogram data were analyzed to determine absolute volumes (cc) receiving doses from 10 to 60 Gy (V10, V20, V30, V40, V50, and V60), as well as maximum dose to 2 cc (D2cc), mean dose (MD), and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD). Logistic regression models were used to characterize the risk of toxicity as a function of dose and other covariates. The ability of each variable to predict esophagitis, individually or in a multivariate model, was quantified by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

There were 533 patients who met study criteria and were included; 437 (81.9%) developed any grade of esophagitis. Significant variables on univariate analysis for grade ≥2 esophagitis were concurrent chemotherapy, V20, V30, V40, V50, V60, MD, D2cc, and gEUD. For grade ≥3 esophagitis, the predictive variables were: V30, V40, V50, V60, MD, D2cc, and gEUD. In multivariable modeling, gEUD was the most significant predictor of both grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 esophagitis. When gEUD was excluded from the model, D2cc was selected as the most predictive variable for grade ≥3 esophagitis. For an estimated risk of grade ≥3 esophagitis of 5%, the threshold values for gEUD and D2cc were 59.3 Gy and 68 Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we report the novel finding that gEUD and D2cc, rather than MD, were the most predictive dose metrics for severe esophagitis. To limit the estimated risk of grade ≥3 esophagitis to <5%, thresholds of 59.3 Gy and 68 Gy were identified for gEUD and D2cc, respectively.

Contemporary Statewide Practice Pattern Assessment of the Palliative Treatment of Bone Metastasis

PURPOSE

Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases is often viewed as a single entity, despite national guidelines providing input principally only for painful uncomplicated bone metastases. Data surrounding the treatment of bone metastases are often gleaned from questionnaires of what providers would theoretically do in practice or from population-based data lacking critical granular information. We investigated the real-world treatment of bone metastases with radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty diverse institutions across the state of Michigan had data extracted for their 10 most recent cases of radiation therapy delivered for the treatment of bone metastases at their institution between January and February 2017. Uni- and multivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess the use of single fraction (8 Gy × 1) radiation therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 196 cases were eligible for inclusion. Twenty-eight different fractionation schedules were identified. The most common schedule was 3 Gy × 10 fractions (n = 100; 51.0%), 4 Gy × 5 fractions (n = 32; 16.3%), and 8 Gy × 1 (n = 15; 7.7%). The significant predictors for the use of single fraction radiation therapy were the presence of oligometastatic disease (P = .008), previous overlapping radiation therapy (P = .050), and academic practice type (P = .039). Twenty-nine cases (14.8%) received >10 fractions (median 15, range 11-20). Intensity modulated radiation therapy was used in 14 cases (7.1%), stereotactic body radiation therapy in 11 (5.6%), and image guidance with cone beam computed tomography in 11 (5.6%). Of the cases of simple painful bone metastases (no previous surgery, spinal cord compression, fracture, soft tissue extension, or overlapping previous radiation therapy; n = 70), only 12.9% were treated with 8 Gy × 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone metastases represent a heterogeneous disease, and radiation therapy for bone metastases is similarly diverse. Future work is needed to understand the barriers to single fraction use, and clinical trials are necessary to establish appropriate guidelines for the breadth of this complex disease.

Abstract P1-15-12: Development of a photonumeric scale for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients

Purpose

Scales for rating acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) are inconsistent and have not been validated despite decades of clinical use, making ARD difficult to report reliably. We sought to design a photonumeric scale to consistently describe ARD in breast cancer patients undergoing radiation (RT).

Methods

Patients undergoing RT for breast cancer were enrolled on a prospective study that included photographs and reporting of physician-rated erythema, hyperpigmentation, and CTCAE toxicity score at baseline and 2, 4, and 6 weeks after initiating RT. Erythema and hyperpigmentation were also quantified using a hand-held colorimetric device. Photographs were taken using a standardized protocol that included 3 views to fully assess the breast/chest wall, axilla, and inframammary fold. 209 photographs from 35 patients with white skin (Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV) and 369 photographs from 50 patients with skin of color (Fitzpatrick skin types V-VI) were clustered according to the apparent severity of ARD. Due to the prevalence of hyperpigmentation that obscured erythema in patients with skin of color, separate images were used to illustrate ARD in this population. Two photonumeric scales (for white skin and skin of color) were developed via an iterative process until group consensus was achieved. Four raters with experience in the evaluation of ARD in breast cancer patients used the photonumeric scale to independently score the entire collection of photographs, sequenced in random order. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were assessed using weighted kappa scores.

Results

Of the 35 patients with white skin, 20% experienced severe erythema, and 40% experienced dry or moist desquamation. Of the 50 patients with skin of color, 34% experience severe hyperpigmentation, and 48% experienced dry or moist desquamation. Using the photonumeric scales, we observed high intra-rater agreement for independent ratings of erythema or hyperpigmentation (70 to 89% agreement fraction, kappa 0.55 to 0.81) and desquamation (79 to 87% agreement fraction, kappa 0.52 to 0.64). Similarly, we observed moderate to high inter-rater agreement for independent ratings of erythema or hyperpigmentation (61 to 76% agreement fraction, kappa 0.40 to 0.62) and desquamation (69 to 84% agreement fraction, kappa 0.36 to 0.58). Quantitative measurements of erythema in white patients using colorimetry correlated strongly with photonumeric grade (correlation coefficient 0.76, p&lt;0.001), as did physician-rated erythema at the point-of-care (p&lt;0.001). Fitzpatrick score was not significantly associated with maximum photonumeric erythema grade (p = 0.14).

Conclusions

We report a new photonumeric scale with high intra- and inter-rater reliability for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients. To our knowledge, this is the first rigorously evaluated scale that is applicable to patients across the spectrum of skin pigmentation, including white skin and skin of color. The photonumeric scale will facilitate consistent reporting of acute radiation dermatitis in research and clinical settings using a simple, standardized instrument. Future work will include prospective real-time clinical validation with multiple raters and correlation with patient-reported outcomes.

Funded by a Munn Idea Grant (G011480).

Citation Format: Dean Shumway, Eleanor M Walker, Nirav Kapadia, Thy Thy Do, Kent Griffith, Mary Feng, Bonnie DePalma, Reshma Jagsi, Yolanda Helfrich, Erin Gillespie, Alexandria Miller, Adam Liss, Lori J Pierce. Development of a photonumeric scale for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-12.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Use Among Melanoma Patients 75 Years of Age and Older

INTRODUCTION

While SLN biopsy is recommended for melanoma ≥1 mm in depth, its use among the elderly population is more controversial. We reviewed our experience at the University of Michigan with melanoma patients ≥75 years of age.

METHODS

A total of 952 melanoma patients ≥75 years of age from 1996 to 2011 were identified from our institutional review board-approved database. In addition to clinicopathologic features and outcome data, comorbidity data were collected to calculate the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to characterize predictors of outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generate survival curves.

RESULTS

Among 553 clinically node-negative patients with melanoma ≥1 mm in Breslow thickness, 213 had wide excision alone, whereas 340 had excision and SLN biopsy, with 83 (24 %) having a positive SLN. SLN biopsy was less likely with older age (p < 0.0001) and H&N location (p = 0.007), but not CCI. SLN involvement was associated with female gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.15, p = 0.009], Breslow thickness [OR 1.23/mm increase, p = 0.004], and satellitosis (OR 4.43, p = 0.004). Distant disease-specific survival was negatively associated with male gender (OR 1.5, p = 0.007), increasing age (OR 1.05/year, p < 0.001), increasing Breslow thickness (OR 1.07/year, p = 0.013), ulceration (OR 1.51, p = 0.004), a positive SLN (OR 2.61, p < 0.001), and not having a SLN biopsy (OR 1.72, p < 0.001). CCI did not predict worse disease-free or melanoma-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

WLE and SLN biopsy was not only strongly prognostic, but compared with WLE alone was associated with improved outcome, even after factoring for age and comorbidities. If otherwise healthy, SLN biopsy should be strongly considered for this population.

The Administration of Prehospital Ketamine for Chemical Restraint does not Prolong On-Scene Times Compared to Haloperidol Based Sedation

IntroductionAgitated patients who present a danger to themselves or emergency medical services (EMS) providers may require chemical restraints.  Haloperidol is employed for chemical restraint in many EMS services.  Recently, ketamine has been introduced as an alternate option for prehospital sedation.  On-scene time is a unique metric in prehospital medicine which has been linked to outcomes in multiple patient populations. When used for chemical restraint, the impact of ketamine relative to haloperidol on on-scene time is unknown.Objective: To evaluate whether the use of ketamine for chemical restraint was associated with a clinically significant (≥5 minute) increased on-scene time compared to a haloperidol based regimen.MethodsPatients who received haloperidol or ketamine for chemical restraint were identified by retrospective chart review.  On-scene time was compared between groups using an unadjusted Student t-test powered to 80% to detect a ≥5 minute difference in on-scene time.Results110 cases were abstracted (Haloperidol = 55; Ketamine = 55). Of the patients receiving haloperidol, 11/55 (20%) were co-administered a benzodiazepine, 4/55 (7%) received diphenhydramine and 34/55 (62%) received the three drugs in combination. There were no demographic differences between the haloperidol and ketamine groups.  On-scene time was not statistically different for patients receiving a haloperidol based regimen compared to ketamine (18.2 minutes, [95% CI 15.7-20.8] vs. 17.6 minutes, [95% CI 15.1-20.0]; p = 0.71).ConclusionsThe use of prehospital ketamine for chemical restraint was not associated with a clinically significant (≥5 minute) increased on-scene time compared to a haloperidol based regimen.  

Perfusionist techniques of reducing acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass: an evidence-based review

Cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass has come a long way since its introduction nearly 60 years ago. In the early days, end-organ damage was linked to contact of the blood with the extracorporeal circuit. One potential cardiac surgery complication known to result in significant morbidity and mortality is acute kidney injury (AKI). Causes of AKI are multifaceted, but most of them are associated with techniques that perfusionists employ during extracorporeal circuit management. These can cause patients to either go on dialysis or renal replacement therapy. Patients with AKI have longer lengths of stay and consume significant resources beyond those with normal kidney function. Few current evidence-based markers determine if the kidneys are adequately protected during surgery. Most relevant literature does not address perfusion-specific techniques that reduce the incidence of AKI. This paper reviews the pathophysiology of the kidney and focuses on perfusion techniques that may reduce the incidence of AKI.

Provider perspectives on presenting risk information and managing worry about recurrence among breast cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Although worry about recurrence is a persistent concern among breast cancer survivors, little is known about physicians' confidence about presenting recurrence risk information, identifying women with considerable worry, and helping women manage worry.

METHODS

Between January and June 2012, we surveyed 750 surgeons and 750 medical oncologists randomly sampled from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We tested differences between surgeons and medical oncologists on confidence of presenting risk, identifying and managing worry using chi-square statistic and Student's t-tests and developed multiple variable logistic regression models to explain odds regarding confidence and use of different strategies for managing worry.

RESULTS

The analytic sample included 403 surgeons and 363 medical oncologists (n = 766; response rate = 60%). Compared with surgeons, medical oncologists were significantly more likely to report confidence in: presenting risk information (87.5% vs 73.2%), identifying women who are worried (74.1% vs 63.9%), and managing worry (66.9% vs 52.4%). Confidence in managing worry was associated with more regular inquiry about worry (p = 0.009). Models of the likelihood of using different management strategies varied by provider type (e.g., surgeons more likely than medical oncologists to recommend support group or online resources, oncologists more likely to refer to psychologist or use medications, all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cancer providers, particularly surgeons, may benefit from educational training to raise confidence in identifying women with high levels of worry and managing women with considerable worry. Communication between specialties and primary care physicians on efforts to manage worry is necessary for coordinated, quality care for women with breast cancer.

Phase 1 study of radiosensitization using bortezomib in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving radioimmunotherapy with 131I-tositumomab

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is effective treatment for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), but response durations are usually limited, especially in aggressive NHL. We hypothesized that administration of bortezomib as a radiosensitizer with RIT would be tolerable and improve efficacy in NHL. This phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluated escalating doses of bortezomib combined with 131I-tositumomab in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Twenty-five patients were treated. Treatment was well tolerated, with primarily hematologic toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 0.9 mg/m2 bortezomib, in combination with a standard dose of 75 cGy 131I-tositumomab. Sixteen patients responded (64%), including 44% complete responses (CRs), with 82% CR in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). At a median follow-up of 7 months, median progression-free survival was 7 months, and seven of 11 patients with FL remained in remission at a median of 22 months. In conclusion, bortezomib can be safely administered in combination with 131I-tositumomab with promising response rates.

Effect of estrogen depletion on pain sensitivity in aromatase inhibitor-treated women with early-stage breast cancer

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs), which are used to treat breast cancer, inhibit estrogen production in postmenopausal women. AI-associated musculoskeletal symptoms occur in approximately half of treated women and lead to treatment discontinuation in 20 to 30%. The etiology may be due in part to estrogen deprivation. In premenopausal women, lower estrogen levels have been associated with increased pain as well as with impairment of descending pain inhibitory pathways, which may be a risk factor for developing chronic pain. We prospectively tested whether AI-induced estrogen deprivation alters pain sensitivity, thereby increasing the risk of developing AI-associated musculoskeletal symptoms. Fifty postmenopausal breast cancer patients underwent pressure pain testing and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) assessment prior to AI initiation and after 3 and 6 months. At baseline, 26 of 40 (65%) assessed patients demonstrated impaired CPM, which was greater in those who had previously received chemotherapy (P = .006). No statistically significant change in pressure pain threshold or CPM was identified following estrogen deprivation. In addition, there was no association with either measure of pain sensitivity and change in patient-reported pain with AI therapy. AI-associated musculoskeletal symptoms are not likely due to decreased pain threshold or impaired CPM prior to treatment initiation, or to effects of estrogen depletion on pain sensitivity.

PERSPECTIVE

This article presents our findings of the effect of estrogen deprivation on objective measures of pain sensitivity. In postmenopausal women, medication-induced estrogen depletion did not result in an identifiable change in pressure pain threshold or CPM. Impaired CPM may be associated with chemotherapy.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase in combination with CD133 defines angiogenic ovarian cancer stem cells that portend poor patient survival

Markers that reliably identify cancer stem cells (CSC) in ovarian cancer could assist prognosis and improve strategies for therapy. CD133 is a reported marker of ovarian CSC. Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity is a reported CSC marker in several solid tumors, but it has not been studied in ovarian CSC. Here we report that dual positivity of CD133 and ALDH defines a compelling marker set in ovarian CSC. All human ovarian tumors and cell lines displayed ALDH activity. ALDH(+) cells isolated from ovarian cancer cell lines were chemoresistant and preferentially grew tumors, compared with ALDH(-) cells, validating ALDH as a marker of ovarian CSC in cell lines. Notably, as few as 1,000 ALDH(+) cells isolated directly from CD133(-) human ovarian tumors were sufficient to generate tumors in immunocompromised mice, whereas 50,000 ALDH(-) cells were unable to initiate tumors. Using ALDH in combination with CD133 to analyze ovarian cancer cell lines, we observed even greater growth in the ALDH(+)CD133(+) cells compared with ALDH(+)CD133(-) cells, suggesting a further enrichment of ovarian CSC in ALDH(+)CD133(+) cells. Strikingly, as few as 11 ALDH(+)CD133(+) cells isolated directly from human tumors were sufficient to initiate tumors in mice. Like other CSC, ovarian CSC exhibited increased angiogenic capacity compared with bulk tumor cells. Finally, the presence of ALDH(+)CD133(+) cells in debulked primary tumor specimens correlated with reduced disease-free and overall survival in ovarian cancer patients. Taken together, our findings define ALDH and CD133 as a functionally significant set of markers to identify ovarian CSCs.

Adjuvant and definitive radiotherapy for adrenocortical carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of both adjuvant and definitive radiotherapy on local control of adrenocortical carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Outcomes were analyzed from 58 patients with 64 instances of treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma at the University of Michigan's Multidisciplinary Adrenal Cancer Clinic. Thirty-seven of these instances were for primary disease, whereas the remaining 27 were for recurrent disease. Thirty-eight of the treatment regimens involved surgery alone, 10 surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy, and 16 definitive radiotherapy for unresectable disease. The effects of patient, tumor, and treatment factors were modeled simultaneously using multiple variable Cox proportional hazards regression for associations with local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Local failure occurred in 16 of the 38 instances that involved surgery alone, in 2 of the 10 that consisted of surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy, and in 1 instance of definitive radiotherapy. Lack of radiotherapy use was associated with 4.7 times the risk of local failure compared with treatment regimens that involved radiotherapy (95% confidence interval, 1.2-19.0; p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy seems to significantly lower the risk of local recurrence/progression in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be strongly considered after surgical resection.