Strategies to improve the implementation and effectiveness of community-based psychosocial support interventions for displaced, migrant and host community women in Latin America

As evidence supporting the effectiveness of mental health and psychosocial interventions grows, more research is needed to understand optimal strategies for improving their implementation in diverse contexts. We conducted a qualitative process evaluation of a multicomponent psychosocial intervention intended to promote well-being among refugee, migrant and host community women in three diverse contexts in Ecuador and Panamá. The objective of this study is to describe the relationships among implementation determinants, strategies and outcomes of this community-based psychosocial intervention. The five implementation strategies used in this study included stakeholder engagement, promoting intervention adaptability, group and community-based delivery format, task sharing and providing incentives. We identified 10 adaptations to the intervention and its implementation, most of which were made during pre-implementation. Participants (n = 77) and facilitators (n = 30) who completed qualitative interviews reported that these strategies largely improved the implementation of the intervention across key outcomes and aligned with the study's intervention and implementation theory of change models. Participants and facilitators also proposed additional strategies for improving reach, implementation and maintenance of this community-based psychosocial intervention.

Mixed-methods evaluation of a group psychosocial intervention for refugee, migrant and host community women in Ecuador and Panamá: Results from the Entre Nosotras cluster randomized feasibility trial

Community-based psychosocial interventions are key elements of mental health and psychosocial support; yet evidence regarding their effectiveness and implementation in humanitarian settings is limited. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility and safety of conducting a cluster randomized trial evaluating two versions of a group psychosocial intervention. Nine community clusters in Ecuador and Panamá were randomized to receive the standard version of the Entre Nosotras intervention, a community-based group psychosocial intervention co-designed with community members, or an enhanced version of Entre Nosotras that integrated a stress management component. In a sample of 225 refugees, migrants and host community women, we found that both versions were safe, acceptable and appropriate. Training lay facilitators to deliver the intervention was feasible. Challenges included slow recruitment related to delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, high attrition due to population mobility and other competing priorities, and mixed psychometric performance of psychosocial outcome measures. Although the intervention appeared promising, a definitive cluster randomized comparative effectiveness trial requires further adaptations to the research protocol. Within this pilot study we identified strategies to overcome these challenges that may inform adaptations. This comparative effectiveness design may be a model for identifying effective components of psychosocial interventions.

Evaluating the feasibility of a group psychosocial intervention for migrant and host community women in Ecuador and Panamá: protocol for a multi-site feasibility cluster trial

BACKGROUND

Community- and strengths-based psychosocial interventions are central to mental health and psychosocial support guidelines, but rigorous evidence regarding the effectiveness of these interventions is limited. The complexity and variability that is inherent to many community-based psychosocial interventions requires innovative strategies in order to facilitate the comparability and synthesis across research studies without compromising the fit and appropriateness of interventions to specific study populations and context. Entre Nosotras is a community-based psychosocial intervention developed for migrant and host community women that is designed to be flexible enough to enable integration of external intervention components and adaptable to diverse study contexts and populations. This protocol describes a study that aims to evaluate the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of integrating a standardized stress management intervention into Entre Nosotras.

METHODS

This study will evaluate the appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, and safety of intervention and research procedures for a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness trial conducted in Ecuador and Panamá with migrant and host community women. In this feasibility trial, we will allocate communities nested within the three study sites to the integrated Entre Nosotras + stress management intervention versus Entre Nosotras alone through stratified randomization. Migrant and host community women residing in these study communities who report low to moderate levels of distress will be allocated to the intervention condition that their community is assigned (n = 220 total). We will collect quantitative measures of psychosocial wellbeing, psychological distress, coping, social support, and functioning from study participants. We will collect quantitative measures of fidelity and facilitator competencies through observation and facilitator self-assessment. Data on appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, and safety will be gathered from participants and facilitators through quantitative assessments at 0, 5, and 10 weeks post-enrollment and qualitative interviews conducted with all facilitators and a subset of 70 study participants during the post-intervention follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

Results from this feasibility trial will determine whether a multi-site cluster randomized comparative effectiveness trial of an adaptable community-based psychosocial intervention for migrant and host community women is relevant, acceptable, and feasible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05130944 . Registered November 23, 2021-retrospectively registered.

Interim Analysis of a Randomized Phase II Study of the Novel Ii-Key Hybrid HER2/Neu Peptide (AE37) Vaccine To Prevent Breast Cancer Recurrence: United States Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study I-05

BACKGROUND: CD4+ T helper peptides from HER2/neu have been evaluated in vaccine trials. The Ii-Key addition, a 4-amino-acid (LRMK) modification, increases vaccine potency when compared to unmodified class II epitopes. We present results of a prospective, randomized, single-blinded phase II clinical trial of the Ii-Key hybrid HER2/neu peptide (AE37) + GM-CSF immunoadjuvant vaccine versus GM-CSF alone in the adjuvant setting in disease-free, high risk breast cancer (BCa) patients to prevent recurrence.METHODS: Disease-free, high risk BCa patients who have completed standard adjuvant therapy were enrolled and randomized to receive six monthly inoculations of either 500 mcg of AE37 with 62.5 or 125 mcg of GM-CSF (Peptide group; PG) or 62.5 or 125 mcg of GM-CSF alone (adjuvant group; AG). Toxicity was assessed after each inoculation using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). Immunologic response was monitored using delayed type hypersensitivity reactions (DTH) and 3H-thymidine proliferative assays for both hybrid AE37 (LRMK+HER2/neu:776-790) and AE36 (unmodified HER2/neu:776-790) peptides. Patients were clinically, radiographically, and pathologically monitored for recurrence of BCa.RESULTS: Thus far, 120 (49 PG, 71 AG) of the planned 200 patients have completed the primary series. The PG and AG have similar demographic/prognostic characteristics (Table 1). Toxicity profiles in the PG and AG were almost identical with no grade 4-5 local toxicities and no grade 3-5 systemic toxicities in either arm. Median DTH reaction to AE36 and AE37 increased significantly from baseline at 1 month after completion of the primary series in the PG group (AE36: 0.0±0.8 cm to 15.3 ±2.1 cm; AE37: 0.0±0.7 cm to 24.5±2.6 cm; p<0.0001) and did not change in the AG group (AE36: 0.0±0.5 cm to 0.0±1.4 cm; AE37: 0.0±0.7 cm to 0.0±1.6 cm; p>0.05). Median proliferation response to AE36 and AE37 increased significantly from baseline at 3, 6, and 12 months after the start of the vaccine series in the PG (p<0.015) and did not change significantly in the AG. At a median follow up of 13 months, there have been no (0.0%) recurrences in the PG (0/49) compared to 7.0% (5/71) in the AG (p=0.08).CONCLUSIONS: The modified peptide AE37 is safe with mild toxicities observed primarily due to the GM-CSF immunoadjuvant. AE37 elicits a strong HER2/neu-specific in-vivo and ex-vivo immune response to the modified and unmodified peptides. Importantly, the AE37 peptide vaccine may protect against BCa recurrences. peptideadjuvantp valueN=4971 Age (median)49520.06Node Positive75.5%62.1%0,16Grade 348.9%57.8%0.44Tumor ≥2 cm55.1%56.1%1ER/PR negative38.8%40.9%0.84HER2 over-expressor59.2%60.6%1 

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3183.

NOTE: This abstract was accepted for presentation at the Symposium after the Abstract Book went to press.

Changes in gravity influence rat postnatal motor system development: from simulation to space flight

Our research examines the role of the environment in postnatal nervous system development. Recently we have been studying the effects of changes in gravity on the motor system of rats from postnatal day (P) 2 to 31 using kinematic analysis of swimming, walking, and righting reflexes. Using the tail suspension model of weightlessness we identified sensitive and critical periods of motor system development corresponding to the time during which a motor skill is first achieved. Motor performance in suspended animals was marked by slow swimming, walking, and air-righting, all of which were characterized by hindlimb extension. (Walton et al, Neurosci. 52,763,1992). The critical periods identified in these studies contributed to determining the age of animals for a small payload, NIH.R3. This 9-day mission (STS-72) included 2 litters at P5, P7, or P15 at launch. The P7-16 and P15-24 groups were studied post-flight. On the landing day (R+0) surface righting, swimming and walking were slower in flight compared to control animals. Differences were more marked in the younger animals and the hindlimbs were more affected than the forelimbs with marked, prolonged extension of, at least, the ankle joint angle. Readaptation to 1G was slower in the P7-16 group with righting reflexes adapting first, walking last. We have shown that gravity is an important factor in postnatal nervous system development and that its affect depends on the age of the animal, duration of the perturbation, and the motor function studied.

The rate limiting step in the reticulocyte uptake of transferrin and transferrin iron. Effects of some incubation variables

Reticulocytes incubated in an isotonic NaCl saline medium containing glucose, glutamine and amino acids, were able to detach both iron atoms from all the transferrin incorporated by them. In the absence of these metabolites, although transferrin uptake was the same, the reticulocytes failed to remove completely the iron from the transferrin which they incorporated. It has been shown before that there is unspecific as well as specific binding of transferrin to the reticulocyte. By incubating the cells in the presence of a high concentration of bovine serum albumin, we have been able to prevent the unsepcific attachment of transferrin. At least 94% of the iodinated transferrin was capable of donating its iron to the reticulocytes.