Wait Time Advantage for Transplant Candidates With HIV Who Accept Kidneys From Donors With HIV Under the HOPE Act

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant (KT) candidates with HIV face higher mortality on the waitlist compared with candidates without HIV. Because the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act has expanded the donor pool to allow donors with HIV (D + ), it is crucial to understand whether this has impacted transplant rates for this population.

METHODS

Using a linkage between the HOPE in Action trial (NCT03500315) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 324 candidates listed for D + kidneys (HOPE) compared with 46 025 candidates not listed for D + kidneys (non-HOPE) at the same centers between April 26, 2018, and May 24, 2022. We characterized KT rate, KT type (D + , false-positive [FP; donor with false-positive HIV testing], D - [donor without HIV], living donor [LD]) and quantified the association between HOPE enrollment and KT rate using multivariable Cox regression with center-level clustering; HOPE was a time-varying exposure.

RESULTS

HOPE candidates were more likely male individuals (79% versus 62%), Black (73% versus 35%), and publicly insured (71% versus 52%; P  < 0.001). Within 4.5 y, 70% of HOPE candidates received a KT (41% D + , 34% D - , 20% FP, 4% LD) versus 43% of non-HOPE candidates (74% D - , 26% LD). Conversely, 22% of HOPE candidates versus 39% of non-HOPE candidates died or were removed from the waitlist. Median KT wait time was 10.3 mo for HOPE versus 60.8 mo for non-HOPE candidates ( P  < 0.001). After adjustment, HOPE candidates had a 3.30-fold higher KT rate (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.30, 95% confidence interval, 2.14-5.10; P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Listing for D + kidneys within HOPE trials was associated with a higher KT rate and shorter wait time, supporting the expansion of this practice for candidates with HIV.

Fecal microbiota transplantation promotes reduction of antimicrobial resistance by strain replacement

Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization is a fundamental challenge in antimicrobial resistance. Limited studies have shown that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can reduce MDRO colonization, but its mechanisms are poorly understood. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of FMT for MDRO decolonization in renal transplant recipients called PREMIX (NCT02922816). Eleven participants were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to FMT or an observation period followed by delayed FMT if stool cultures were MDRO positive at day 36. Participants who were MDRO positive after one FMT were treated with a second FMT. At last visit, eight of nine patients who completed all treatments were MDRO culture negative. FMT-treated participants had longer time to recurrent MDRO infection versus PREMIX-eligible controls who were not treated with FMT. Key taxa (Akkermansia muciniphila, Alistipes putredinis, Phocaeicola dorei, Phascolarctobacterium faecium, Alistipes species, Mesosutterella massiliensis, Barnesiella intestinihominis, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii) from the single feces donor used in the study that engrafted in recipients and metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids and bile acids in FMT-responding participants uncovered leads for rational microbiome therapeutic and diagnostic development. Metagenomic analyses revealed a previously unobserved mechanism of MDRO eradication by conspecific strain competition in an FMT-treated subset. Susceptible Enterobacterales strains that replaced baseline extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains were not detectable in donor microbiota manufactured as FMT doses but in one case were detectable in the recipient before FMT. These data suggest that FMT may provide a path to exploit strain competition to reduce MDRO colonization.

The effect of induction immunosuppression for kidney transplant on the latent HIV reservoir

The HIV latent viral reservoir (LVR) remains a major challenge in the effort to find a cure for HIV. There is interest in lymphocyte-depleting agents, used in solid organ and bone marrow transplantation to reduce the LVR. This study evaluated the LVR and T cell receptor repertoire in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients using intact proviral DNA assay and T cell receptor sequencing in patients receiving lymphocyte-depleting or lymphocyte-nondepleting immunosuppression induction therapy. CD4+ T cells and intact and defective provirus frequencies decreased following lymphocyte-depleting induction therapy but rebounded to near baseline levels within 1 year after induction. In contrast, these biomarkers were relatively stable over time in the lymphocyte-nondepleting group. The lymphocyte-depleting group had early TCRβ repertoire turnover and newly detected and expanded clones compared with the lymphocyte-nondepleting group. No differences were observed in TCRβ clonality and repertoire richness between groups. These findings suggest that, even with significant decreases in the overall size of the circulating LVR, the reservoir can be reconstituted in a relatively short period of time. These results, while from a relatively unique population, suggest that curative strategies aimed at depleting the HIV LVR will need to achieve specific and durable levels of HIV-infected T cell depletion.

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis associated with bartonella peliosis hepatis following kidney transplantation in a patient with HIV

Bacillary peliosis hepatis is a well recognised manifestation of disseminated Bartonella henselae infection that can occur in immunocompromised individuals. Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is an immune-mediated condition with features that can overlap with a severe primary infection such as disseminated Bartonella spp infection. We report a case of bacillary peliosis hepatis and secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis due to disseminated Bartonella spp infection in a kidney-transplant recipient with well controlled HIV. The patient reported 2 weeks of fever and abdominal pain and was found to have hepatomegaly. He recalled exposure to a sick dog but reported no cat exposures. Laboratory evaluation was notable for pancytopenia and cholestatic injury. The patient met more than five of eight clinical criteria for haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Pathology review of a bone marrow core biopsy identified haemophagocytosis. A transjugular liver biopsy was done, and histopathology review identified peliosis hepatis. Warthin-Starry staining of the bone marrow showed pleiomorphic coccobacillary organisms. The B henselae IgG titre was 1:512, and Bartonella-specific DNA targets were detected by peripheral blood PCR. Treatment with doxycycline, increased prednisone, and pausing the mycophenolate component of his transplant immunosuppression regimen resulted in an excellent clinical response. Secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis can be difficult to distinguish from severe systemic infection. A high index of suspicion can support the diagnosis of systemic Bartonella spp infection in those who present with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, especially in patients with hepatomegaly, immunosuppression, and germane animal exposures.

HOPE in action: A prospective multicenter pilot study of liver transplantation from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV

Liver transplantation (LT) from donors-with-HIV to recipients-with-HIV (HIV D+/R+) is permitted under the HOPE Act. There are only three international single-case reports of HIV D+/R+ LT, each with limited follow-up. We performed a prospective multicenter pilot study comparing HIV D+/R+ to donors-without-HIV to recipients-with-HIV (HIV D-/R+) LT. We quantified patient survival, graft survival, rejection, serious adverse events (SAEs), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) breakthrough, infections, and malignancies, using Cox and negative binomial regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Between March 2016-July 2019, there were 45 LTs (8 simultaneous liver-kidney) at 9 centers: 24 HIV D+/R+, 21 HIV D-/R+ (10 D- were false-positive). The median follow-up time was 23 months. Median recipient CD4 was 287 cells/µL with 100% on antiretroviral therapy; 56% were hepatitis C virus (HCV)-seropositive, 13% HCV-viremic. Weighted 1-year survival was 83.3% versus 100.0% in D+ versus D- groups (p = .04). There were no differences in one-year graft survival (96.0% vs. 100.0%), rejection (10.8% vs. 18.2%), HIV breakthrough (8% vs. 10%), or SAEs (all p > .05). HIV D+/R+ had more opportunistic infections, infectious hospitalizations, and cancer. In this multicenter pilot study of HIV D+/R+ LT, patient and graft survival were better than historical cohorts, however, a potential increase in infections and cancer merits further investigation.

A prospective multicenter pilot study of HIV-positive deceased donor to HIV-positive recipient kidney transplantation: HOPE in action

HIV-positive donor to HIV-positive recipient (HIV D+/R+) transplantation is permitted in the United States under the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act. To explore safety and the risk attributable to an HIV+ donor, we performed a prospective multicenter pilot study comparing HIV D+/R+ vs HIV-negative donor to HIV+ recipient (HIV D-/R+) kidney transplantation (KT). From 3/2016 to 7/2019 at 14 centers, there were 75 HIV+ KTs: 25 D+ and 50 D- (22 recipients from D- with false positive HIV tests). Median follow-up was 1.7 years. There were no deaths nor differences in 1-year graft survival (91% D+ vs 92% D-, P = .9), 1-year mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (63 mL/min D+ vs 57 mL/min D-, P = .31), HIV breakthrough (4% D+ vs 6% D-, P > .99), infectious hospitalizations (28% vs 26%, P = .85), or opportunistic infections (16% vs 12%, P = .72). One-year rejection was higher for D+ recipients (50% vs 29%, HR: 1.83, 95% CI 0.84-3.95, P = .13) but did not reach statistical significance; rejection was lower with lymphocyte-depleting induction (21% vs 44%, HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.87, P = .03). In this multicenter pilot study directly comparing HIV D+/R+ with HIV D-/R+ KT, overall transplant and HIV outcomes were excellent; a trend toward higher rejection with D+ raises concerns that merit further investigation.

1078. Renal Transplant Recipient Resistomes Reveal Expansive Sub-Clinical Burden of Resistance After Treatment for ESBL-Producing Bacterial Infections

Background

Renal transplant recipients have frequent infection and colonization with antibiotic resistant (AR) bacteria. However, little is known about the burden of AR following targeted antibiotic treatment.

Methods

This was a prospective study conducted as part of a single center clinical trial at Emory University. Demographic and clinical data regarding transplant and AR bacterial infection were abstracted. Stool samples were collected from renal transplant recipients treated with antibiotics for ESBL-producing gram negative infections. Bacterial cultures with AR-selective media and Illumina short-read sequencing were performed on stool samples. Confirmatory phenotypic isolate AR testing was performed with the Vitek2 platform. Resistome profiles were produced by assembling short reads into scaffolds using MetaSPAdes, predicting protein coding sequences using Prodigal and classifying proteins as antimicrobial resistance determinants using AMRFinderPlus. AMRFinderPlus results for patients were then compared to fecal metagenomes from 3 healthy Human Microbiome Project controls. Differences in AR genes in renal transplant patients vs controls were compared.

Results

Metagenome sequencing was performed for 6 (5 female) patient stool samples. Stools were collected a median of 30 days after infection. The median number of AR genes per patient metagenome was 48.5 (range 23 to 87 genes). The median number of AR genes per control metagenome was 24 (range 16 to 25 genes). We detected 97 unique AR genes across all samples, 63 of which (65%) were detected in patient samples but not controls. All AR genes found in control metagenomes were present in at least one patient metagenome. No AR genes detected in patients were common to all patients. Subsets of clinically relevant genes corresponded with patient stool AR bacteria culture results.

Antimicrobial resistance gene detection heatmap for renal transplant recipient stool samples after antibiotic treatment for ESBL infection.

Conclusion

Viable AR bacteria and diverse AR gene profiles were frequently detected from renal transplant recipient stool samples after antibiotic treatment for infection. These data suggest that AR bacterial colonization and AR gene profiles may require distinct treatments other than systemic antibiotics for eradication.

Disclosures

All Authors: No reported disclosures

COVID-19 in solid organ transplant: A multi-center cohort study

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant reductions in transplantation, motivated in part by concerns of disproportionately more severe disease among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, clinical features, outcomes, and predictors of mortality in SOT recipients are not well-described.

Methods

We performed a multi-center cohort study of SOT recipients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Data were collected using standardized intake and 28-day follow-up electronic case report forms. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the primary endpoint, 28-day mortality, among hospitalized patients.

Results

Four hundred eighty-two SOT recipients from >50 transplant centers were included: 318 (66%) kidney or kidney/pancreas, 73 (15.1%) liver, 57 (11.8%) heart, and 30 (6.2%) lung. Median age was 58 (IQR 46-57), median time post-transplant was 5 years (IQR 2-10), 61% were male, and 92% had ≥1 underlying comorbidity. Among those hospitalized (376 [78%]), 117 (31%) required mechanical ventilation, and 77 (20.5%) died by 28 days after diagnosis. Specific underlying comorbidities (age >65 [aOR 3.0, 95%CI 1.7-5.5, p<0.001], congestive heart failure [aOR 3.2, 95%CI 1.4-7.0, p=0.004], chronic lung disease [aOR 2.5, 95%CI 1.2-5.2, p=0.018], obesity [aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.4, p=0.039]) and presenting findings (lymphopenia [aOR 1.9, 95%CI 1.1-3.5, p=0.033], abnormal chest imaging [aOR 2.9, 95%CI 1.1-7.5, p=0.027]) were independently associated with mortality. Multiple measures of immunosuppression intensity were not associated with mortality.

Conclusions

Mortality among SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 was 20.5%. Age and underlying comorbidities rather than immunosuppression intensity-related measures were major drivers of mortality.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections and the Potential Role for Dalbavancin: A Case Report

Left ventricular assist device infections (LVADIs) are common but challenging to treat, often requiring prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics. Dalbavancin could have a role in treating patients with chronic LVADIs given its less frequent dosing requirements. Here, we illustrate a case in which dalbavancin was used as suppressive therapy for an LVADI for greater than 7 months.

Multi-drug-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia in a liver transplant recipient

Introduction

Enterococcus faecium is a commensal organism commonly colonizing the human gastrointestinal tract. Although it is generally a non-virulent organism, E. faecium can cause significant morbidity and mortality due to its inherent and acquired resistances to commonly used antimicrobials. Patients who are immunosuppressed are particularly vulnerable.

Case presentation

A 65–75-year-old patient with a history of an orthotopic liver transplant for hepatitis C infection and diabetes was re-admitted to the hospital with abdominal pain and fever. The patient had several recent admissions related to the presentation reported here, which included treatment with a prolonged course of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The patient was found to have a recurrent liver abscess and blood cultures grew vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, non-susceptible to all tested agents: ampicillin, penicillin, vancomycin, daptomycin and linezolid. The patient was started initially on chloramphenicol intravenously while awaiting additional susceptibility testing, which ultimately revealed chloramphenicol non-susceptibility. Tigecycline was started but the patient ultimately decided to pursue hospice care.

Conclusion

Multi-drug-resistant organisms are increasingly being recognized and are associated with poorer outcomes, particularly in immunosuppressed patients. We describe a particularly resistant organism and discuss potential therapeutic options.

109. Differences in Gram-Negative Antibiotic Susceptibility Among Patients Receiving Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Clostridioides difficile

Background

Decreases in multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization and antibiotic resistance gene abundance have been reported after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), but data on clinical microbiology culture and susceptibility results after FMT are limited.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the available microbiology results for patients who underwent FMT for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (RCDI) at Emory University from July 7, 2012 until December 2017 and had microbiology results within 1 year pre- and post-FMT. Demographic and clinical characteristics were abstracted by trained reviewers, and statistical tests of differences in central tendency were tested with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results

Of 236 unique patients undergoing FMT during the study period, 18 had growth of Gram-negative bacteria on culture pre- and post-FMT. Of these, 8 had Gram-negative growth in urine culture (the most common site) pre- and post-FMT. Fourteen (14/18, 78%) patients were female, 4/18 (22%) were black, 14/22 (78%) were white, and 18/18 (100%) were non-Hispanic. The mean number of CDI episodes prior to first FMT was 4 (range 3–7 episodes). Differences in counts of susceptible, intermediate, and resistant susceptibility test results before and after FMT are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Although a trend in reduction of resistant reports is visually suggested, this was not statistically significant by Wilcoxon signed-rank testing (P = 0.10 for all cultures, P = 0.21 for urine). Ten patients had pre-FMT micro results and no micro results after FMT, but reduction of count of infectious syndromes in FMT could not be tested with this study design. Abstraction of viral quantitative PCR results did not suggest clinical recognition of new infection or reactivation of viruses after FMT.

Conclusion

FMT may reduce clinical burden of antimicrobial resistance, but statistically significant differences in resistance were not detected in this study. Further study with RCTs is needed.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Risk factors and epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients during the peritransplant period

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients represent a high-risk group for developing Clostridium difficile (CD) infection (CDI). We aimed to identify specific risk factors for CDI in an HSCT patient population during the peritransplant period.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study within a cohort of HSCT patients who received a transplant from November 2010 to March 2013. Cases had a clinical presentation compatible with CDI and a positive stool sample Xpert^® C. difficile test. Controls were CDI negative and matched on age, gender, and transplant type. Peritransplant period was defined as -30 days or time of stem cell mobilization maneuver to 30 days post transplant in autologous SCT or 90 days post transplant in allogeneic SCT.

RESULTS

Of 781 HSCTs performed during the study period, 650 (83.2%) had a stool sample submitted for CD testing. Eight-six (13.2%) cases with CDI were identified. Most of the cases were diagnosed within a week after transplantation (median of 5 days). In adjusted analysis, prior hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-3.36), prior cephalosporin administration (OR 2.72, 95% CI: 1.54-4.83), and prior chemotherapy (OR: 3.26, 95% CI: 1.92-5.5) were significantly associated with CDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization, and prior antibiotic and chemotherapy use are risk factors that are not easily modifiable, which emphasizes the need to start investigating preventive or prophylactic strategies in this high-risk population.