Alternative Trastuzumab Dosing Schedules Are Associated With Reductions in Health Care Greenhouse Gas Emissions

PURPOSE

Cancer care-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions harm human health. Many cancer drugs are administered at greater-than-necessary doses, frequencies, and durations. Alternative dosing strategies may enable reductions in cancer care GHG emissions without compromising patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used streamlined life-cycle analysis in a case-control simulation to estimate the relative reductions in GHG emissions that would be expected to result from using each of three alternative dosing strategies of trastuzumab (6-month adjuvant treatment duration, once every 4-week dosing, and both) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ breast cancer. Using primary data and conversion factors from the environmental science literature, we estimated per-patient relative reduction in GHG emissions and, using SEER data, health impacts (in terms of disability-adjusted life-years [DALYs] and excess mortality per kg CO2) on bystanders for each alternative dosing strategy.

RESULTS

Compared with the trastuzumab dosing strategy commonly used at baseline (12-month duration of adjuvant therapy and once every 3-week dosing in all settings), adoption of both 6-month adjuvant trastuzumab and once every 4-week trastuzumab dosing would reduce GHG emissions by 4.5%, 18.7%, and 14.6% in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, respectively. We estimate that US-based adoption of alternative trastuzumab dosing would reduce annual DALYs and excess lives lost due to environmental impact of US-based trastuzumab therapy for HER2+ breast cancer by 1.5 and 0.9, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Alternative dosing strategies may materially reduce the population health impacts of cancer care by reducing environmental impact. Regulatory decision making and health technology assessments should consider a treatment's environmental and population health impacts. Clinical trials of alternative dosing strategies are justified on the basis of environmental and population health impacts.

Implementation of Debriefing Services for Pharmacy Residents in a 24-Hour, In-House Clinical Pharmacy On-Call Program: A Pilot Study

Background: This clinical pharmacy on-call program (CPOP) is a 24-hour, in-house service provided by pharmacy residents. During shifts, challenging situations may arise, which may correlate with depression, anxiety, and stress. Objective: This pilot study aims to describe the implementation of a debriefing program and characterize mental health patterns of residents in the CPOP. Methods: A structured debriefing process was developed to provide support to residents in the CPOP. Over a 1-year period, twelve outgoing pharmacy residents and ten incoming pharmacy residents completed a modified Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (mDASS-21) questionnaire and received a stress perception score (SPS) during debriefing. Data from first and final on-call shifts were compared via a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Residents were referred to an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) based on mDASS-21 and SPS results. Scores from final on-call shifts were compared between residency classes via a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Following successful implementation, 106 debriefing sessions were completed. Pharmacy residents responded to a median number of 38 events per shift. Significant reductions in anxiety and stress scores were observed from the first and final on-call shifts. Six residents were referred to EAP. A lower incidence of depression, anxiety, and stress was observed in pharmacy residents who received debriefing compared to previous residents. Conclusion: The debriefing program provided emotional support to pharmacy residents participating in the CPOP. Implementation of debriefing demonstrated a reduction of anxiety and stress from the beginning to the end of the academic year and in comparison to the previous year.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic, Social Vulnerability, and Opioid Overdoses in Chicago

Introduction

This research was undertaken to examine the individual and neighborhood drivers that contributed to increases in opioid overdose deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

The incident location and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (along with the individual indicators) were then geocoded to 1 of the 77 Chicago Community Areas. Changes in opioid overdose death rates were calculated and compared for each Chicago Community Area using linear regression between 2019 and 2020.

Results

Opioid overdose deaths increased by 45% from 2019 to 2020. Chicago Community Areas in the highest 25th percentile of social vulnerability before the pandemic had a 2.8 times higher rate of opioid overdose deaths than Chicago Community Areas in the lowest 25th percentile. The increase in opioid overdose death rate observed from 2019 to 2020 was 10.2 times higher in the most socially vulnerable Chicago Community Areas than in the least vulnerable communities. Chicago Community Areas with the highest degree of social vulnerability had a higher baseline and disproportionate relative increase in opioid overdose death rate compared with the least vulnerable Chicago Community Areas.

Conclusions

COVID-19 has revealed the urgent need for policies that better support the social and economic security of disadvantaged communities, particularly for residents who use opioids.

Pilot Findings of Pharmacogenomics in Perioperative Care: Initial Results From the First Phase of the ImPreSS Trial

BACKGROUND

Pharmacogenomics, which offers a potential means by which to inform prescribing and avoid adverse drug reactions, has gained increasing consideration in other medical settings but has not been broadly evaluated during perioperative care.

METHODS

The Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Decision Support in Surgery (ImPreSS) Trial is a prospective, single-center study consisting of a prerandomization pilot and a subsequent randomized phase. We describe findings from the pilot period. Patients planning elective surgeries were genotyped with pharmacogenomic results, and decision support was made available to anesthesia providers in advance of surgery. Pharmacogenomic result access and prescribing records were analyzed. Surveys (Likert-scale) were administered to providers to understand utilization barriers.

RESULTS

Of eligible anesthesiology providers, 166 of 211 (79%) enrolled. A total of 71 patients underwent genotyping and surgery (median, 62 years; 55% female; average American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, 2.6; 58 inpatients and 13 ambulatories). No patients required postoperative intensive care or pain consultations. At least 1 provider accessed pharmacogenomic results before or during 41 of 71 surgeries (58%). Faculty were more likely to access results (78%) compared to house staff (41%; P = .003) and midlevel practitioners (15%) ( P < .0001). Notably, all administered intraoperative medications had favorable genomic results with the exception of succinylcholine administration to 1 patient with genomically increased risk for prolonged apnea (without adverse outcome). Considering composite prescribing in preoperative, recovery, throughout hospitalization, and at discharge, each patient was prescribed a median of 35 (range 15-83) total medications, 7 (range 1-22) of which had annotated pharmacogenomic results. Of 2371 prescribing events, 5 genomically high-risk medications were administered (all tramadol or omeprazole; with 2 of 5 pharmacogenomic results accessed), and 100 genomically cautionary mediations were administered (hydralazine, oxycodone, and pantoprazole; 61% rate of accessing results). Providers reported that although results were generally easy to access and understand, the most common reason for not considering results was because remembering to access pharmacogenomic information was not yet a part of their normal clinical workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pilot data for result access rates suggest interest in pharmacogenomics by anesthesia providers, even if opportunities to alter prescribing in response to high-risk genotypes were infrequent. This pilot phase has also uncovered unique considerations for implementing pharmacogenomic information in the perioperative care setting, and new strategies including adding the involvement of surgery teams, targeting patients likely to need intensive care and dedicated pain care, and embedding pharmacists within rounding models will be incorporated in the follow-on randomized phase to increase engagement and likelihood of affecting prescribing decisions and clinical outcomes.

Carbon emissions and non-biodegradable medical waste generation with alternative dosing strategies

44

Background: Climate change from human activity results in catastrophic environmental effects that endanger human life. Health care is responsible for ̃10% of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, thus health systems are pursuing net-zero emissions care. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, case-control study evaluated the environmental impact of alternative trastuzumab, specifically reducing adjuvant therapy duration from 12 to 6 months (in line with clinical trial evidence) and changing administration frequency from every 3 to every 4 weeks (based on pharmacokinetic simulation). Carbon emissions were estimated from round-trip travel distances, and non-biodegradable waste was estimated by collecting and weighing all single-use items used in trastuzumab preparation and administration. We generated population estimates using SEER data. Results: We identified 192 patients with HER2+ breast cancer who received trastuzumab between 2017 and 2019. At a population level, the environmental impact of continued standard-of-care dosing was 22,919 kg of waste and 1,077,210 kg of carbon emissions, requiring ̃49,000 trees to offset. 12 versus 6 months adjuvant treatment duration led to larger expected environmental benefits: 50,536 kg of waste and 3,265,039 kg of carbon emissions could be avoided with universal adoption of 6-month adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Given health care's increasing emphasis on net-zero care, clinical trials and use of pharmcokinetically equivalent alternative dosing strategies can in part justified by environmental benefits.[Table: see text][Table: see text]

Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusions as Adjunctive Pain Management Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients Admitted for Pain Related to Sickle Cell Disease

Objective

In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive lidocaine and ketamine infusions for opioid reduction in the treatment of sickle cell disease in patients with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC).

Design

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 330 adult sickle-cell crisis hospital encounters with 68 patients admitted to our institution from July 2017 to August 2018.

Methods

Upon institutional IRB approval, we obtained initial data from billing records and performed chart reviews to obtain pain scores and confirm total opioid consumption. If provided by the acute pain consultation service, the patients received either a lidocaine or a ketamine infusion of 0.5–2 mg/min or 2–3 mcg/kg, respectively, for a maximum of 24–48 h. We compared the change in opioid consumption before and after infusion therapy to patients that did not receive ketamine or lidocaine.

Results

Compared to patients that did not receive infusion therapy, ketamine and lidocaine accounted for respective relative decreases of 28 and 23% in average daily morphine consumption (p = 0.02). Patients that received either infusion were 3 to 4 times more likely to decrease their opioid consumption independent of treatment length or baseline opioid doses (p < 0.01). Ketamine and lidocaine therapies were not associated with change in pain scores. When a patient had multiple admissions, opioid reduction was strongly correlated with initiation of infusions in the later visits.

Conclusion

Both ketamine and lidocaine infusion therapies are effective in reducing opioid consumption for patients with vaso-occlusive crisis. Lidocaine infusion is emerging as an agent for stabilizing opioid doses in VOC for patients with high daily MME.

Anesthesia providers as stakeholders to adoption of pharmacogenomic information in perioperative care

OBJECTIVES

Integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical care is being studied in multiple disciplines. We hypothesized that understanding attitudes and perceptions of anesthesiologists, critical care and pain medicine providers would uncover unique considerations for future implementation within perioperative care.

METHODS

A survey (multiple choice and Likert-scale) was administered to providers within our Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care prior to initiation of a department-wide prospective pharmacogenomics implementation program. The survey addressed knowledge, perceptions, experiences, resources and barriers.

RESULTS

Of 153 providers contacted, 149 (97%) completed the survey. Almost all providers (92%) said that genetic results influence drug therapy, and few (22%) were skeptical about the usefulness of pharmacogenomics. Despite this enthusiasm, 87% said their awareness about pharmacogenomic information is lacking. Feeling well-informed about pharmacogenomics was directly related to years in practice/experience: only 38% of trainees reported being well-informed, compared to 46% of those with 1-10 years of experience, and nearly two-thirds with 11+ years (P < 0.05). Regarding barriers, providers reported uncertainty about availability of testing, turnaround time and whether testing is worth financial costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Anesthesiology, critical care and pain medicine providers are optimistic about the potential clinical utility of pharmacogenomics, but are uncertain about practical aspects of testing and desire clear guidelines on the use of results. These findings may inform future institutional efforts toward greater integration of genomic results to improve medication-related outcomes.

Impact of electronic interventions on guideline concordant ordering of rituximab infusion rate

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab carries a boxed warning for severe or fatal infusion reactions; most occurring with the initial infusion. Prior studies established that if the initial rituximab infusion is tolerated, subsequent infusions can be given safely over 90 min. The University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) did not have a standardized method to document infusion reactions for outpatient chemotherapy patients, making it challenging for providers to know a patients' eligibility for rapid infusion. This quality improvement project focused on a series of interventions to improve documentation and electronic ordering of rituximab.

METHODS

A flowsheet for nurses to record patients' tolerance of chemotherapy infusions was created within the electronic health record (EHR). Following results of flowsheet impact, a second intervention was implemented to modify ordering of rituximab. The primary endpoint was the incidence of guideline concordant rate ordering of rituximab. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of accurate chair time scheduling pre- and post-interventions and nursing compliance with flowsheet documentation.

RESULTS

Prior to flowsheet implementation, 85% of patients were infused at the guideline concordant rate, compared to 79% post-implementation. Prior to modification of rituximab ordering in the EHR, 85% of patients were infused at the guideline concordant rate, compared to 87% after implementation. Complete nursing documentation was done 89% of the time when the flowsheet was utilized, compared to 11% pre-interventions.

CONCLUSION

No difference in primary or secondary endpoints was found following our interventions. However, the infusion documentation flowsheet, when used, provided more complete reaction data compared to when it was not used.

Impact of Ketamine in the Management of Painful Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-Occlusive Crisis

The aim of the study is to determine if ketamine infusions in combination with opioid therapy for the management of sickle cell disease (SCD) presenting with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) resulted in a length-of-stay difference compared to when ketamine was not utilized. This single center, retrospective, observational study performed at an academic medical center evaluated 12 adult patients with SCD-VOC who received a ketamine infusion with standard opioid therapy between 2014 and 2017. Patients were excluded if the primary diagnosis was not VOC or they did not survive to discharge. Additionally, safety and oral morphine equivalents at various time points were compared. Patients were used as their own control using the previous SCD-VOC hospitalization to evaluate the relative impact of ketamine. Wilcoxon signed-rank and rank sum were used in statistical analysis. When comparing opioid doses during the ketamine infusion, a P-value <.005 was considered statistically significant to account for multiple comparisons. The median length-of stay when ketamine was employed was similar to the previous admission with only opioid therapy (12 vs 12 days, P = .317). The median opioid dose 24 hours prior to starting ketamine was greater than during the first 24 hours of ketamine use (1278 vs 1020 mg, P = .022) and 24 hours after stopping ketamine (1278 vs 1035 mg, P = .014); however, this was not statistically significant. During 5 ketamine infusions, patients experienced side effects; however, only 1 necessitated transfer to the intensive care unit. Compared to standard opioid therapy, ketamine infusions were generally well tolerated and may be effective at reducing opioid use during SCD-VOC but did not decrease hospital length-of-stay.

Treatment Disparities Among the Black Population and Their Influence on the Equitable Management of Chronic Pain

Introduction: Growing evidence suggests disparities in the prevalence, management, progression, and outcomes of chronic, nonmalignant pain-related conditions, especially for African American patients. Objective: The purpose of this review is to explore studied causative factors that influence the management of chronic pain among African Americans, including factors that result in disparate care that may contribute to unfavorable outcomes. Methods: This narrative review is based on available literature published on this topic published within the last 10 years. Results: Assessment of chronic pain is multifaceted, often complicated by patient medical comorbidities and a complex set of biopsychosocial/spiritual/financial and legal determinants. These complexities are further exacerbated by a patient's race, by provider bias, and by structural barriers-all intersecting and culminating in disparate outcomes. Conclusions: A comprehensive analysis is needed to identify quality improvement interventions and to mitigate major barriers contributing to disparities in the management of chronic pain in the African American population.

Applicability of Pharmacogenomically Guided Medication Treatment during Hospitalization of At-Risk Minority Patients

Known disparities exist in the availability of pharmacogenomic information for minority populations, amplifying uncertainty around clinical utility for these groups. We conducted a multi-site inpatient pharmacogenomic implementation program among self-identified African-Americans (AA; n = 135) with numerous rehospitalizations (n = 341) from 2017 to 2020 (NIH-funded ACCOuNT project/clinicaltrials.gov#NCT03225820). We evaluated the point-of-care availability of patient pharmacogenomic results to healthcare providers via an electronic clinical decision support tool. Among newly added medications during hospitalizations and at discharge, we examined the most frequently utilized medications with associated pharmacogenomic results. The population was predominantly female (61%) with a mean age of 53 years (range 19-86). On average, six medications were newly prescribed during each individual hospital admission. For 48% of all hospitalizations, clinical pharmacogenomic information was applicable to at least one newly prescribed medication. Most results indicated genomic favorability, although nearly 29% of newly prescribed medications indicated increased genomic caution (increase in toxicity risk/suboptimal response). More than one of every five medications prescribed to AA patients at hospital discharge were associated with cautionary pharmacogenomic results (most commonly pantoprazole/suboptimal antacid effect). Notably, high-risk pharmacogenomic results (genomic contraindication) were exceedingly rare. We conclude that the applicability of pharmacogenomic information during hospitalizations for vulnerable populations at-risk for experiencing health disparities is substantial and warrants continued prospective investigation.

Quality improvement and reconciliation process for automated dispensing cabinet medication overrides

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To describe a pharmacist-led reconciliation process for automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) medication override setting maintenance at an academic medical center.

SUMMARY

ADC override management requires alignment of people, processes, and technology. This evaluation describes system-wide improvements to enhance institutional medication override policy compliance by establishing a formalized evaluation and defined roles to streamline ADC dispense setting management. A pharmacist-led quality improvement initiative revised the institutional medication override list to improve medication dispensing practices across an academic medical center campus with a pediatric hospital and 2 adult hospitals. This initiative included removal of patient care unit designations from the medication override list, revision of institutional override policy, creation of an online submission form, and selection of ADC override metrics for surveillance. A conceptual framework guided decisions for unique dosage forms and interdisciplinary engagement. Employing this framework revised workflows for stakeholders in the medication-use process through clinical pharmacist evaluation, existing shared governance structure communication, and pharmacy automation support.The revised policy increased the number of medications available for override from 80 to 106 (33% increase) and unique dosage forms from 166 to 191 (15% increase). The total number of medication dispense settings was reduced from 5,600 to 541 (90% decrease). The proportion of override dispenses compliant with policy increased from 59% to 98% (P < 0.001). Median monthly ADC overrides remained unchanged following policy revision (P = 0.995). ADC override rate reduction was observed across the institution, with the rate decreasing from 1.4% to 1.2% (P < 0.001). Similar ADC override rate reductions were observed for adult, pediatric, and emergency department ADCs.

CONCLUSION

This initiative highlights pharmacists' role in leading institutional policy changes that influence the medication-use process through ADC dispensing practices. A pharmacist-led reconciliation process that removed practice area designations from our medication override policy streamlined ADC setting maintenance, increased the compliance rate of ADC override transactions, and provided a formalized process for future evaluation of medication overrides.

Patient out-of-pocket savings with lower-dose trastuzumab

e18828

Background: Trastuzumab-related costs of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer treatment are significant, approaching $70,000 per patient in the adjuvant setting alone. Recently developed population pharmacokinetic models demonstrate that therapeutic levels of trastuzumab are maintained despite decreased maintenance dose or dose frequency, potentially improving trastuzumab’s value proposition. In this observational study, we evaluate the potential patient- and health system-level financial implications of low-dose trastuzumab. Methods: We identified 196 individuals who received treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab or its biosimilars at a single urban comprehensive cancer center between January 1, 2017 and October 31, 2019. We estimate, using publicly available information, patient-experienced out-of-pocket costs using deterministic modeling under different conditions corresponding to changes in dosing practices, geographic site of trastuzumab administration, patient employment status, intent of treatment, and billing procedures, as well as Medicare cost-savings estimates. Results: Both reducing the maintenance dose of trastuzumab from the FDA-labeled dose of 6 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg Q3W and reducing maintenance dose frequency of trastuzumab from 6 mg/kg Q3W to Q4W were each associated with significant patient savings on drug- and administration-related out-of-pocket costs. Depending on billing practice and clinical scenario, patient savings as a percentage of total costs were 9-20% (neoadjuvant), 17-22% (adjuvant), and 14-19% (metastatic) with 6 mg/kg Q4W dosing. Similarly, 4 mg/kg Q3W dosing had savings of 15-25% (neoadjuvant), 19-28% (adjuvant), and 13-28% (metastatic). Utilization of off-label dosing regimens could result in $2.69 billion USD in annual Medicare spending on trastuzumab, an estimated savings of $670-810 million USD. Conclusions: Meaningful patient-level and system-level financial savings in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer can be achieved using pharmacokinetically near-equivalent low-dose or reduced frequency maintenance trastuzumab dosing. Given the significant potential savings, further prospective studies aimed at reducing dose or frequency of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of cancer are warranted.

Changes in Intravenous Immunoglobulin Usage for Hypogammaglobulinemia After Implementation of a Stewardship Program

PURPOSE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to replenish immunoglobulins in hypogammaglobulinemia (HG) caused by hematologic malignancies (HM) or their treatment (autologous stem-cell transplantation [ASCT] and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy [CAR-T]), in an effort to reduce the risk of infections. However, there is limited evidence to support this use, and IVIG supplies are limited and shortages are common.

METHODS

An IVIG stewardship program (ISP) was implemented with the following requirements for IVIG administration: immunoglobulin G (IgG) level < 400 mg/dL (corrected for paraprotein) for post-ASCT and post-CAR-T patients, or IgG < 400 mg/dL with a history of a bacterial infection within the preceding 3 months for those with HM. Comparisons of the amount of IVIG administered, the incidence of infections, and the use of antimicrobials were performed between the 3 months before ISP and the 3 months after ISP.

RESULTS

IVIG administered for HG decreased from 4,902 g in 86 patients before ISP to 1,777 g in 55 patients after ISP, a cost savings of $44,700. Adherence to ISP guidelines was 80%. Compared with before ISP, patients who stopped receiving IVIG after ISP had lower nadir IgG, fewer infections/patient-months, less antimicrobial usage, and a lower hospitalization rate for infection; no deaths occurred. Compared with before ISP, patients receiving IVIG after ISP had lower predose IgG and fewer infections/patient-months; the antibiotic usage, hospitalization rate for infection, and deaths from infection remained stable.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first ISP to lead to a dramatic decrease in IVIG usage with high adherence, primarily by selecting out patients at low risk of infection after IVIG discontinuation. Such an ISP is replicable and warrants adoption.

Evaluation of prescribing practices of denosumab and zoledronic acid in breast and prostate cancer patients at University of Chicago Medicine

e24144

Background: Zoledronic acid (ZA) and denosumab are both bone-modifying agents (BMAs) approved for use in patients with bone metastases with breast or prostate cancer as well as patients who are receiving aromatase inhibitors (breast cancer) or androgen deprivation therapy (prostate cancer). There are various frequencies of administration, doses, and duration of these agents depending on indication and extent of disease. Currently there is data to show that ZA can be given every 3 months in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer, however, there is no data that clearly indicates that denosumab every 3 months is non-inferior to every 28 days. This study aimed to analyze current prescribing patterns of ZA and denosumab in metastatic breast cancer and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients at The University of Chicago Medicine (UCM). Methods: This was a retrospective study of 80 patients who received at least one dose of ZA or denosumab between July 1st 2018 to June 30th 2019 from UCM outpatient oncology clinic for the purpose of treating metastatic breast cancer or metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer in conjunction with standard antineoplastic therapy. All included patients must have bone metastases. Patients were divided into four groups by disease state (breast or prostate cancer) and BMA agent (ZA or denosumab). The primary outcome was BMA therapy adherence rate, which was defined by those who received greater than or equal to 80% of appropriately scheduled doses. Descriptive statistics were used for skeletal-related events (SREs) and BMA associated adverse effects. Results: Patients who received ZA achieved higher adherence rates (100% breast, 86% prostate) compared to patients that received denosumab (63% breast, 23% prostate). The most common reason for the lower adherence rate in denosumab groups was scheduling convenience. During the study period, there were 3, 0, 2 and 5 patients had SREs in the above four groups respectively. The predominant adverse event across all groups was hypocalcemia and two patients with prostate cancer on denosumab developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. The cost analysis showed using ZA as primary BMA agent might save up to 2.5 million dollars per year at UCM. Conclusions: The use ofZA was associated with higher adherence rates compared to denosumab. Implementing a pharmacy driven protocol for ZA use for patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer may improve BMA regimen adherence rates and significantly reduce costs.

Changes in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) usage for hypogammaglobulinemia (HG) after implementation of a stewardship program

e19225

Background: IVIG is used to replenish immunoglobulins in HG due to hematologic malignancies (HM) or their treatment (stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T)), in an effort to reduce the risk of infections. There is limited high-level evidence to support this use, and IVIG supplies are limited with a recent shortage leading to restricted allotments. We report the results of a stewardship program designed to safely reduce IVIG usage. Methods: An IVIG stewardship plan (ISP) was implemented with the following requirements for IVIG administration: IgG level < 400 mg/dL (corrected for paraprotein) for post-ASCT and post-CAR-T patients, or IgG < 400 mg/dL with evidence of a bacterial infection within the last 3 months that required hospitalization or an emergency department encounter for those with HM. We evaluated the amount of IVIG administered, the incidence of infections, and antibiotic administration before and after implementation of an ISP. Results: In the 3 months pre-ISP, HG accounted for 38% (72/188) of total IVIG orders. 86 pts received IVIG for HG in the 3 months pre-ISP. The amount of IVIG given decreased from 1907 g/month pre-ISP to 670 g/month post-ISP; estimated cost savings in IVIG was $57,561/month. The pre-ISP median IgG level prior to dosing of IVIG was 550 (range 40-1189) mg/dL. Compared to pre-ISP, pts who stopped receiving IVIG post-ISP had lower median pre-dose IgG (444, range 93-819 mg/dL, p<0.05), infections/patient-months (14/141 vs 56/255, p<0.001), antibiotic usage (12/47 vs 44/86, p<0.05), and hospitalization rate for infection (4/55 vs 21/86, p<0.05); no deaths occurred. For those receiving IVIG post-ISP, adherence to guidelines was 64%. Compared to pre-ISP, median pre-dose IgG was lower (328, range 51-1011 mg/dL, p<0001), infections/patient-months decreased (27/163 vs 56/255, p<0.001), and antibiotic usage, hospitalization rate for infection, and deaths from infection all remained stable. Conclusions: An ISP for HG led to a dramatic and sustainable decrease in IVIG usage, primarily by selecting out patients who are low risk for infection after discontinuation of IVIG. Such an ISP is replicable and warrants adoption.

Impact of transitioning inpatient chemotherapy regimens to the outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy regimens historically have required admission of the patient to the hospital for extended infusions running over multiple days to complete each cycle of therapy. With the evolution of monitoring strategies readily available, a renaissance in patient care and healthcare cost utilization is necessary as transitioning the administration of these agents to the outpatient setting is seemingly achievable and is potentially more cost-effective.

PURPOSE

This evaluation sought to primarily measure cost-savings for an institution by transitioning inpatient chemotherapy regimens to the outpatient setting. Secondary outcomes evaluated the effect of this transition on overall patient length of stay, prevalence of adverse effects, and overall chemotherapy schedule adherence as a result of implementing transitions in sites of care. Barriers to receiving care in the outpatient setting were assessed by evaluating the acuity of performance status as well as distance from the hospital.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective, quantitative chart and expense analysis evaluated patients receiving rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (R-EPOCH) or rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (R-ICE) chemotherapy regimens based on treatment setting at a single institution. Included patients were treated at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Those receiving inpatient-only management as compared with patients who received therapy in outpatient settings were compared in a matched cohort analysis. The control group was matched from the period before transition of therapy was instituted between November 2014 and November 2015, with those patients transitioned to outpatient therapy (December 2015 to November 2016), using demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and clinical status data to assure group similarity. Mean cost of therapy was compared between inpatient and outpatient regimens. Descriptive and demographic categorical data were compared using the Fisher's exact test. Continuous data were evaluated using the Student's t test. A significance level of alpha <0.05 was used for all analysis.

RESULTS

The cost of R-EPOCH therapy represented a significant difference across groups. R-ICE therapy similarly saw significant cost differences between inpatient and outpatient groups. If this was made standard of care for qualifying patients a retrospective annualized estimation of $466,507.85 with R-EPOCH therapy and $205,977.60 for R-ICE therapy could have been saved if this was utilized for patients who previously received their therapy as an inpatient.

CONCLUSION

The population of patients cared for at the University of Chicago Medicine during this time-period qualified for outpatient treatment for those treated with R-EPOCH and R-ICE regimens with no significantly identifiable prohibitive barriers between groups. As no significant complications manifested, it is reasonable to continue transitioning patients receiving these regimens to the outpatient setting where appropriate. R-EPOCH and R-ICE therapies were shown to be reasonable outpatient therapy while providing significant cost-savings for the institution.

Efficacy and toxicity of reduced vs. standard dose pegylated asparaginase in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Incorporation of asparaginase (ASNase) and pegylated asparaginase (PEG-ASP) into pediatric-inspired regimens for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has led to improved treatment outcomes albeit with increased toxicities. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the Children's Oncology Group standard PEG-ASP (SD) dosing (>1000, median 2500 IU/m²/dose) in adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy vs reduced dose PEG-ASP (RED) (≤1000, median 500 IU/m²/dose) during induction. 51 patients were included, 26 in RED and 25 in SD (median age 49 vs 37 years, p = .027). Median day 7 ASNase activity level for RED was 0.16 IU/mL. All 11 patients who received PEG-ASP 1000 IU/m² and 9/11 patients who received 500 IU/m² achieved an ASNase level ≥0.1 IU/mL. Patients receiving RED experienced fewer total grade 3/4 toxicities during induction compared to SD (p = .02) while still attaining therapeutic ASNase levels. RED permits safer ASNase use in adults with ALL and should be tested in a larger cohort prospectively.

Moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin for antibacterial prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients

Objective

The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the incidence of febrile neutropenia among patients receiving either moxifloxacin or levofloxacin for antibacterial prophylaxis. Secondary endpoints were number of documented infections and in-hospital mortality in patients who develop febrile neutropenia.

Methods

A single-center retrospective cohort analysis at a large tertiary care academic medical center was conducted. This study included adult acute leukemia patients (age ≥18 years old) who received inpatient antibacterial prophylaxis (moxifloxacin or levofloxacin) from 1 July 2012 to 1 October 2014. Patients were excluded from the study if they were treated with antimicrobial therapy in the preceding five days or admitted to the hospital with neutropenic fever. Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical data and Mann–Whitney test for continuous data. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for febrile neutropenia.

Results

Eighty-five patients were included in the final analysis with 40 patients who received moxifloxacin and 45 patients who received levofloxacin. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Twenty-two patients experienced febrile neutropenia requiring intravenous antibiotics in the moxifloxacin group and 30 patients in the levofloxacin group (P = 0.190). Age and duration of neutropenia appeared to predict for febrile neutropenia; however, after multivariate analysis, longer duration of neutropenia was shown to be the best predictor for febrile neutropenia with an odds ratio of 4.69 (95% CI, 1.697–12.968). Both groups had similar rates of documented infections and in-hospital morality.

Conclusion

Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin showed similar rates of febrile neutropenia when used for neutropenic antibacterial prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients.

Posaconazole–digoxin drug–drug interaction mediated by inhibition of P-glycoprotein

Drug–drug interactions between digoxin and the triazole antifungal agents, mediated via various cytochrome P450 isozymes, have been described in the literature. Posaconazole is not extensively metabolized by these isozymes but is both a p-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate and inhibitor. To our knowledge, there have been no published cases of clinically significant posaconazole-digoxin drug–drug interactions. We report an interaction between posaconazole (300 mg by mouth daily) and digoxin (0.25 mg by mouth daily, Monday through Friday) resulting in atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response and degenerating into polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

Impact of a Clinical Decision Support Tool on Cancer Pain Management in Opioid-Tolerant Inpatients

Background: Pain is both common and undertreated in the hematology/oncology population despite national guidelines and a focus from The Joint Commission. Objective: Herein, we describe the features of a pain clinical decision support tool (PCDST) embedded into the electronic medical record (EMR) and report its impact on oncology inpatients at risk for uncontrolled pain. Methods: The PCDST was developed to identify patients with potentially uncontrolled pain, defined as a pain score ≥4. Clinical pharmacists were encouraged to use the tool to determine whether interventions were needed to better control pain. Pain and safety outcomes between 2 cohorts of opioid-tolerant adult inpatients presenting with severe pain were compared prior to and following the implementation of the PCDST. Results: The primary endpoint, attainment of analgesia at 24 hours from admission, was met in 10 of 30 (33.3%) patients in the preimplementation group and in 14 of 32 (43.8%) of patients in the postimplementation group (P = .78). Secondary endpoints including time to analgesia, mean pain score, frequency of pharmacy intervention, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-adherent pain regimens were not found to be statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The number of mean nursing pain assessments in the first 24 hours from admission was found to be significantly higher in the postimplementation group compared with the preimplementation group (12 vs 7.4, P < .001). Safety events were rare and not statistically different between groups. Conclusion: Overall, a modest, but statistically nonsignificant, improvement in pain outcomes was associated with patients admitted after the implementation of a pharmacist-managed electronic pain scoring tool.

Incidence of asparaginase-related hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, and thrombotic events in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with a pediatric-inspired regimen

Asparaginase is a critical component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment in children; however, its use in adults is often avoided as a result of toxicities including hepatotoxicity, thrombosis, and pancreatitis which have been reported more commonly in adults than in children. In this retrospective analysis, short-acting L-asparaginase (L-ASP) and long-acting polyethylene glycol (PEG)-asparaginase (PEG-ASP) were compared for grade 3-4 toxicities and characterized by patient and drug-related factors to identify strategies for toxicity avoidance in adults with ALL. Asparaginase was administered during sequential courses of chemotherapy using a pediatric-inspired treatment regimen. Forty-eight patients who received PEG-ASP and nine patients who received L-ASP were identified. The rates of toxicity were as follows for the PEG-ASP and L-ASP groups, respectively: hepatotoxicity (60% vs. 33%, P = 0.275), pancreatitis (17% vs. 22%, P = 0.650), thrombosis (19.0% vs. 0%, P = 0.328), or any grade 3-4 toxicity (71% vs. 44%, P = 0.143). Toxicity did not correlate with dose, either by individual dose based on flat or BSA-based measures. Logistic regression identified obesity as a risk factor for heptatotoxicity (OR = 8.44, 95% CI: 1.395-51.117). Hypofibrinogenemia was identified as a pharmacodynamic marker for predicting hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, grade 3-4 toxicity was not statistically different between adult ALL patients receiving PEG-ASP and L-ASP, but toxicity was strongly associated with obesity and hypofibrinogenemia, not dose.

Efficacy of single-agent decitabine in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Improving therapy for relapsed/refractory AML remains a challenge. We performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes following decitabine treatment in 34 patients with relapsed/refractory AML (median age, 62; median Charlson comorbidity score, 6). Decitabine, 20 mg/m² daily, was given in 5- (25%) or 10-day (75%) cycles. Overall response rate (OR) was 30% with 21% complete remission and 9% partial remission rate. Patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN) and secondary AML had a significantly higher OR compared to those with de novo AML (70 vs. 30%; p = .02). Median overall survival of all patients was 8.5 months. Median survival in patients with t-MN or secondary AML was 12.4 months compared to 8 months in those with de novo AML (p = .20). Fifteen (44%) patients proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. These data support using 10-day treatment cycles of decitabine in patients with relapsed/refractory AML, particularly for those with secondary or therapy-related AML.

Retrospective chart evaluation of hypercalcemia management in oncology patients at the University of Chicago Medical Center

Introduction Due to the lack of formal guideline recommendations, available primary literature was used to develop a proposed protocol for management of hypercalcemia of malignancy at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Methods A retrospective, single center, observational study was performed including adult patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of hypercalcemia and active malignancy. Patients were retrospectively identified as treated in a manner aligned with the proposed protocol ("per protocol") or not treated according to the proposed protocol ("off protocol"), and the outcomes were compared. The primary outcome for efficacy was normalization of corrected calcium within four and seven days of treatment. Results Normalization of corrected calcium was observed in 66% of patients managed per protocol compared to 65% of patients managed off protocol ( p = 1.00) at day four, and in 73% of per protocol patients compared to 65% of off protocol patients ( p = 0.44) at day seven. Areas identified where prospective implementation of the proposed protocol can improve management include: decreasing utilization of bisphosphonates in mild hypercalcemia, optimizing bisphosphonate dosing in renal impairment, decreasing intravenous phosphate repletion, and ensuring proper fluid management and calcitonin dosing. Conclusion Although a statistical difference was not detected in terms of normalization of corrected calcium levels, areas for optimization in management were identified. Therefore, implementation of the proposed protocol is expected to promote evidence-based management of hypercalcemia of malignancy management at University of Chicago Medical Center.

TP53 and Decitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

BACKGROUND

The molecular determinants of clinical responses to decitabine therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are unclear.

METHODS

We enrolled 84 adult patients with AML or MDS in a single-institution trial of decitabine to identify somatic mutations and their relationships to clinical responses. Decitabine was administered at a dose of 20 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day for 10 consecutive days in monthly cycles. We performed enhanced exome or gene-panel sequencing in 67 of these patients and serial sequencing at multiple time points to evaluate patterns of mutation clearance in 54 patients. An extension cohort included 32 additional patients who received decitabine in different protocols.

RESULTS

Of the 116 patients, 53 (46%) had bone marrow blast clearance (<5% blasts). Response rates were higher among patients with an unfavorable-risk cytogenetic profile than among patients with an intermediate-risk or favorable-risk cytogenetic profile (29 of 43 patients [67%] vs. 24 of 71 patients [34%], P<0.001) and among patients with TP53 mutations than among patients with wild-type TP53 (21 of 21 [100%] vs. 32 of 78 [41%], P<0.001). Previous studies have consistently shown that patients with an unfavorable-risk cytogenetic profile and TP53 mutations who receive conventional chemotherapy have poor outcomes. However, in this study of 10-day courses of decitabine, neither of these risk factors was associated with a lower rate of overall survival than the rate of survival among study patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetic profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AML and MDS who had cytogenetic abnormalities associated with unfavorable risk, TP53 mutations, or both had favorable clinical responses and robust (but incomplete) mutation clearance after receiving serial 10-day courses of decitabine. Although these responses were not durable, they resulted in rates of overall survival that were similar to those among patients with AML who had an intermediate-risk cytogenetic profile and who also received serial 10-day courses of decitabine. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01687400 .).

Impact of a clinical pathway on appropriate empiric vancomycin use in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia

Objectives Febrile neutropenia management guidelines recommend the use of vancomycin as part of an empiric antimicrobial regimen when specific criteria are met. Often, vancomycin use among patients with febrile neutropenia is not indicated and may be over utilized for this indication. We sought to evaluate the impact of implementing a febrile neutropenia clinical pathway on empiric vancomycin use for febrile neutropenia and to identify predictors of vancomycin use when not indicated. Methods Adult febrile neutropenia patients who received initial therapy with an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam with or without vancomycin were identified before (June 2008 to November 2010) and after (June 2012 to June 2013) pathway implementation. Patients were assessed for appropriateness of therapy based on whether the patient received vancomycin consistent with guideline recommendations. Using a comorbidity index used for risk assessment in high risk hematology/oncology patients, we evaluated whether specific comorbidities are associated with inappropriate vancomycin use in the setting of febrile neutropenia. Results A total of 206 patients were included in the pre-pathway time period with 35.9% of patients receiving vancomycin therapy that was inconsistent with the pathway. A total of 131 patients were included in the post-pathway time period with 11.4% of patients receiving vancomycin inconsistent with the pathway ( p = 0.001). None of the comorbidities assessed, nor the comorbidity index score were found to be predictors of vancomycin use inconsistent with guideline recommendations. Conclusion Our study has demonstrated that implementation of a febrile neutropenia pathway can significantly improve adherence to national guideline recommendations with respect to empiric vancomycin utilization for febrile neutropenia.

Does adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines improve pain-related outcomes? An evaluation of inpatient cancer pain management at an academic medical center

CONTEXT

Evidence-based guidelines are in place for the management of cancer-related pain, yet adherence remains problematic throughout health systems because of efficacy and safety concerns.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines on pain management among cancer inpatients and assess whether adherence is associated with pain control.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the hematology/oncology service at an academic medical center between April 1, 2011 and September 30, 2011 was conducted, and patients were allocated into groups based on adherence to NCCN guidelines. Pain control and safety outcomes were compared between adherence groups for the first 24 hours of hospital admission. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of regimens nonadherent to guidelines and predictors of inadequate achievement of analgesia.

RESULTS

Among a random sample of 193 inpatients, 109 met the inclusion criteria of which 70 were guideline adherent and 39 nonadherent. A total of 63% of the patients initiated on NCCN adherent guidelines obtained analgesia at 24 hours compared with 41% in the nonadherent group (P=0.028). Average pain scores across the 24-hour period were lower in the adherent compared with the nonadherent group (3.5 vs. 4.4, respectively, P<0.001). Naloxone use, respiratory depression, and hypoxia did not significantly vary between adherence groups. Chronic home opioid exposure was significantly associated with nonadherent therapy (vs. adherent; odds ratio=3.04, confidence interval=1.28-7.18, P=0.01) and achievement of analgesia at 24 hours (vs. not; odds ratio=0.30, confidence interval=0.12-0.73, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to NCCN guidelines remains insufficient, with nonadherence being associated with inadequate analgesia. Opioid-tolerant patients remain at higher risk for guideline nonadherence and inadequate analgesia. Quality improvement initiatives should target opioid-tolerant patients.

Evaluation of a low, weight-based dose of rasburicase in adult patients for the treatment or prophylaxis of tumor lysis syndrome

PURPOSE

Rasburicase is a recombinant urate oxidase enzyme generally reserved for the treatment or prevention of hyperuricemia in patients that are at high risk of developing tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and characterize the outcomes of patients receiving low dose rasburicase for treatment or prophylaxis of hyperuricemia secondary to TLS.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A retrospective chart review between April 1, 2007 and September 31, 2008 was completed. All adult patients who received a dose of 0.05mg/kg with either a leukemia or lymphoma diagnosis in addition to at least two TLS risk factors: WBC ≥ 50 × 109/L, LDH 2 × ULN, uric acid ≥ 8 mg/dl, SCr ≥ 1.5 mg/dl were included. Forty-eight patients received rasburicase for prophylaxis (n = 18) or treatment (n = 30) of TLS.

RESULTS

Forty patients achieved and maintained a uric acid less than 8 mg/dL, 24 h after receipt of a single dose of rasburicase without the requirement for renal replacement therapy. A statistically significant decrease in UA was achieved in all patients when compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Cost analysis revealed a $ 1.96 million (96%) direct cost savings for the 48 patients in this study when compared to the cost of manufacturer's dosing recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose rasburicase was efficacious and cost effective for both prophylaxis and treatment of TLS. Administration of a single dose of 0.05mg/kg of rasburicase was sufficient in correcting uric acid levels for most patients.