1
|
Hu S, Chang CP, Snyder J, Deshmukh V, Newman M, Date A, Galvao C, Haaland B, Porucznik CA, Gren LH, Sanchez A, Lloyd S, O’Neil B, Hashibe M. Mental health outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:445-454. [PMID: 37867158 PMCID: PMC10919332 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated mental health disorders comprehensively among patients with prostate cancer on long-term follow-up. The primary aim of our study was to assess the incidence of mental health disorders among patients with prostate cancer compared with a general population cohort. A secondary aim was to investigate potential risk factors for mental health disorders among patients with prostate cancer. METHODS Cohorts of 18 134 patients with prostate adenocarcinomas diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 and 73470 men without cancer matched on age, birth state, and follow-up time were identified. Mental health diagnoses were identified from electronic health records and statewide health-care facilities data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS The hazard ratios for mood disorders, including depression, among prostate cancer survivors increased for all follow-up periods compared with the general population. The hazard ratios for any mental illness increased with Hispanic, Black, or multiple races; people who were underweight or obese; those with advanced prostate cancer; and those undergoing their first course cancer treatment. We also observed statistically significantly increased hazard ratios for mental health disorders among patients with lower socioeconomic status (P < .0001) and increasing duration of androgen-deprivation therapy (P = .0348). Prostate cancer survivors had a 61% increased hazard ratio for death with a depression diagnosis. CONCLUSION Prostate cancer diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of mental health disorders compared with the general population, which was observed as long as 10-16 years after cancer diagnosis. Providing long-term mental health support may be beneficial to increasing life expectancy for patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqi Hu
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Chun-Pin Chang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - John Snyder
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vikrant Deshmukh
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael Newman
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ankita Date
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Carlos Galvao
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Christina A Porucznik
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lisa H Gren
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Alejandro Sanchez
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brock O’Neil
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Malley CL, Lake AA, Moore HJ, Gray N, Bradford C, Petrokofsky C, Papadaki A, Spence S, Lloyd S, Chang M, Townshend TG. Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England. Perspect Public Health 2023; 143:313-323. [PMID: 37572038 PMCID: PMC10683341 DOI: 10.1177/17579139231187492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To explore existing regulatory mechanisms to restrict hot food takeaway (HFT) outlets through further understanding processes at local and national levels. METHODS The Planning Appeals Portal was utilised to identify recent HFT appeal cases across England between December 2016 and March 2020. Eight case study sites were identified using a purposive sampling technique and interviews carried out with 12 professionals involved in planning and health to explore perceptions of and including factors that may impact on the HFT appeal process. Additionally, documents applicable to each case were analysed and a survey completed by seven Local Authority (LA) health professionals. To confirm findings, interpretation meetings were conducted with participants and a wider group of planning and public health professionals, including a representative from the Planning Inspectorate. RESULTS Eight case study sites were identified, and 12 interviews conducted. Participants perceived that LAs would be better able to work on HFT appeal cases if professionals had a good understanding of the planning process/the application of local planning policy and supplementary planning documents; adequate time and capacity to deal with appeals cases; access to accurate, robust, and up to date information; support and commitment from elected members and senior management; good lines of communication with local groups/communities interested in the appeal; information and resources that are accessible and easy to interpret across professional groups. CONCLUSIONS Communication across professional groups appeared to be a key factor in successfully defending decisions. Understanding the impact of takeaway outlets on health and communities in the long term was also important. To create a more robust appeals case and facilitate responsiveness, professionals involved in an appeal should know where to locate current records and statistical data. The enthusiasm of staff and support from senior management/elected officials will play a significant role in driving these agendas forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L O'Malley
- Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK
- Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK c.o'
| | - A A Lake
- Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
- Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - H J Moore
- Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - N Gray
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - C Bradford
- Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
- Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - A Papadaki
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - S Spence
- Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Human Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - S Lloyd
- Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Public Health South Tees, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - M Chang
- Department of Health and Social Care, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, UK
| | - T G Townshend
- Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koric A, Mark B, Chang CP, Lloyd S, Dodson M, Deshmukh VG, Newman M, Date A, Gren LH, Porucznik CA, Haaland B, Henry NL, Hashibe M. Adverse Health Outcomes among Rural and Urban Breast Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1302-1311. [PMID: 37462723 PMCID: PMC10592280 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited population-based studies have focused on breast cancer survivors in rural populations. We sought to evaluate the risk of adverse health outcomes among rural and urban breast cancer survivors and to evaluate potential predictors for the highest risk outcomes. METHODS A population-based cohort of rural and urban breast cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997 and 2017 was identified in the Utah Cancer Registry (UCR). Rural breast cancer survivors were matched on year (±1 year) and age at cancer diagnosis (±1 year) with up to 5 urban breast cancer survivors (2,359 rural breast cancer survivors; 11,748 urban breast cancer survivors). Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate HRs with 99% confidence intervals (CI) for adverse health outcomes overall, within 5 years, and >5 years after cancer diagnosis. RESULTS Compared with urban breast cancer survivors, rural breast cancer survivors had a 39% (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.65) higher risk of heart failure (HF) within the 5 years of follow-up. Overall, there was no increase in the risk of other evaluated adverse health outcomes. A higher baseline body mass index and Charlson Comorbidity Index, family history of cardiovascular diseases, family history of breast cancer, and advanced cancer stage were risk factors for HF for rural and urban breast cancer survivors, with similar levels of HF risk. CONCLUSIONS Rural residence was associated with an increased risk of HF among breast cancer survivors. IMPACT Our study highlights the need for primary preventive strategies for rural cancer survivors at risk of heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alzina Koric
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Division of Public Health | Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Bayarmaa Mark
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Division of Public Health | Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Chun-Pin Chang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Division of Public Health | Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Mark Dodson
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Michael Newman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
- University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Ankita Date
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Lisa H. Gren
- Division of Public Health | Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Christina A. Porucznik
- Division of Public Health | Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - N. Lynn Henry
- Division of Hematology | Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Division of Public Health | Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Silverstein MJ, Kim B, Lloyd S, Chen P, Lin K. ASO Author Reflections: Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT): Will It Survive in the USA? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6090-6092. [PMID: 37481490 PMCID: PMC10495485 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13982-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Melvin J Silverstein
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Brian Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Peter Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang D, Chang CPE, Newman M, Deshmukh V, Snyder J, Date A, Galvao C, Lloyd S, Henry NL, O'Neil B, Hashibe M. Adverse health outcomes among rural prostate cancer survivors: A population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 86:102430. [PMID: 37473579 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rural cancer survivors experience considerable health disparities compared to urban cancer survivors for cancer treatment and survival. The objective of our study was to investigate the risk of developing diseases for rural compared to urban prostate cancer survivors in Utah. METHODS We identified a cohort of 3575 rural prostate cancer survivors and 17,778 urban prostate cancer survivors from the Utah Cancer Registry. The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for diseases in major body systems among rural compared to urban prostate cancer survivors at > 1-5 years and > 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis. RESULTS Rural residence was associated with an increased risk of diseases of the respiratory system at > 5 years (HR: 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.32) after cancer diagnosis compared to urban residence among prostate cancer survivors in Utah. Decreased risks were observed in infectious and parasitic diseases, diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, diseases of the nervous system and sense organs, and diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue for rural prostate cancer survivors between 1 and 5 years after cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Rural prostate cancer survivors in Utah were somewhat healthier compared to urban prostate cancer survivors. Further studies are needed to confirm whether these associations are also supported for rural prostate cancer survivors in other regions of the U.S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daren Huang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Chun-Pin Esther Chang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
| | - Michael Newman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Vikrant Deshmukh
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - John Snyder
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Ankita Date
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Carlos Galvao
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Division of Urology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Silverstein MJ, Kim B, Lin K, Lloyd S, Snyder L, Khan S, Kramme K, Chen P. Risk-Adapted Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) for Breast Cancer: A Novel Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6079-6088. [PMID: 37464138 PMCID: PMC10495476 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13897-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials have shown that risk-adapted intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk breast cancer patients is a safe alternative to whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT). The risk-adapted strategy allows additional WBRT for predefined high-risk pathologic characteristics discovered on final histopathology. The greater the percentage of patients receiving WBRT, the lower the recurrence rate. The risk-adapted strategy, although important and necessary, can make IORT appear better than it actually is. METHODS Risk-adapted IORT was used to treat 1600 breast cancers. They were analyzed by the intention-to-treat method and per protocol to better understand the contribution of IORT with and without additional whole-breast treatment. Any ipsilateral breast tumor event was considered a local recurrence. RESULTS During a median follow-up period of 63 months, local recurrence differed significantly between the patients who received local treatment and those who received whole-breast treatment. For 1393 patients the treatment was local treatment alone. These patients experienced 79 local recurrences and a 5-year local recurrence probability of 5.95 %. For 207 patients with high-risk final histopathology, additional whole-breast treatment was administered. They experienced two local recurrences and a 5-year local recurrence probability of 0.5 % (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS Whole-breast treatment works well at reducing local recurrence, and it is a totally acceptable and necessary addition to IORT as part of a risk-adapted program. However, the more whole-breast treatment that is given, the more it dilutes the original plan of simplifying local treatment and the less we understand exactly what IORT contributes to local control as a stand-alone treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melvin J Silverstein
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Brian Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Lincoln Snyder
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Sadia Khan
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Kramme
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nielsen S, O'Neil B, Chang CP, Mark B, Snyder J, Deshmukh V, Newman M, Date A, Galvao C, Henry NL, Lloyd S, Hashibe M. Determining the association of rurality and cardiovascular disease among prostate cancer survivors. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:429.e15-429.e23. [PMID: 37455231 PMCID: PMC10787808 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rural disparities in prostate cancer survivorship and cardiovascular disease remain. Prostate cancer treatment also contributes to worse cardiovascular disease outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether rural-urban differences in cardiovascular outcomes contribute to disparities in prostate cancer survivorship. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were collected from the Utah Population Database. Rural and urban prostate cancer survivors were matched by diagnosis year and age. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for cardiovascular disease (levels 1-3) based on rural-urban classification, while controlling for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. We identified 3,379 rural and 16,253 urban prostate cancer survivors with a median follow-up of 9.3 years. RESULTS Results revealed that rural survivors had a lower risk of hypertension (HR 0.90), diseases of arteries (HR 0.92), and veins (HR 0.92) but a higher risk of congestive heart failure (HR 1.17). Interactions between level 2 cardiovascular diseases and rural/urban status, showed that diseases of the heart had a distinct between-group relationship for all-cause (P = 0.005) and cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS This study revealed complex relationships between rural-urban status, cardiovascular disease, and prostate cancer. Rural survivors were less likely to be diagnosed with screen-detected cardiovascular disease but more likely to have heart failure. Further, the relationship between cardiovascular disease and survival was different between rural and urban survivors. It may be that our findings underscore differences in healthcare access where rural patients are less likely to be screened for preventable cardiovascular disease and have worse outcomes when they have a major cardiovascular event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Division of Urology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
| | - Chun-Pin Chang
- Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Bayarmaa Mark
- Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - John Snyder
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Vikrant Deshmukh
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Michael Newman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ankita Date
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Carlos Galvao
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gravbrot N, Hutten R, Lloyd S, Suneja G, Johnson SB. Delay in Time to Oncologic Therapies for Patients with Positive COVID-19 Test. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e586. [PMID: 37785775 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) For several cancers, delays between diagnosis and initiation of treatment has important clinical implications, often affecting trial eligibility, treatment intention, and oncologic outcomes. The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic placed an extraordinary strain on the United States healthcare system, and its effect on oncologic patterns of care has yet to be established. We hypothesize that patients who received a new cancer diagnosis and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19 had delayed oncologic treatment compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19. MATERIALS/METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients who were diagnosed and treated for any of 10 common malignancies from 2019-2020. Included disease sites were head and neck, esophagus, rectum, anus, lung, breast, cervix, uterus, prostate, and primary brain. Those who tested positive for COVID-19 between time of diagnosis and first oncologic treatment (including surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy) were compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19. COVID-19 positivity was assessed using a new variable in the NCDB, "SARSCOV2_POS," which captures whether patients received a positive COVID-19 test via reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing in inpatient, outpatient, or emergency room settings in 2020. Duration in days from cancer diagnosis to time to first treatment (TTFT) was analyzed using two-sample t-tests, with significance level of p<0.05. RESULTS A total of 1,503,127 patients were identified for analysis. Of these, 7,340 (0.5%) tested positive for COVID-19 between diagnosis and start of treatment. Initial treatment was most commonly surgery (55.3%), followed by systemic therapy (17.4%) and radiation (12.7%). Overall, median TTFT was 55 days [interquartile range (IQR) 31-91] for the COVID-19 group versus 34 days (IQR 15-56) for the non-COVID-19 group (p <0.01). Subgroup analysis of the 10 individual sites of disease revealed statistically significant delays in each, with greatest absolute difference in median TTFT in prostate (31.5 days; 95.5 versus 64.0) and greatest relative difference in brain (>700%, 28.5 versus 4.0). CONCLUSION In the first year of the pandemic, patients who tested positive for COVID-19 between oncologic diagnosis and initial management experienced significant delays in initiation of cancer-directed therapy compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19, with median increase in TTFT of 21 days. Additional follow-up is needed to evaluate the clinical impact of these delays, as well as change in patterns of care in later years of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Gravbrot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - R Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - S Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - G Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - S B Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Silverstein MJ, Kim B, Lin K, Lloyd S, Snyder L, Khan S, Kramme K, Chen P. ASO Visual Abstract: Risk-Adapted Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) for Breast Cancer-Novel Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6089. [PMID: 37481488 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13980-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Melvin J Silverstein
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Brian Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Lincoln Snyder
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Sadia Khan
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Kramme
- Department of Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hu S, Chang CP, Snyder J, Deshmukh V, Newman M, Date A, Galvao C, Porucznik CA, Gren LH, Sanchez A, Lloyd S, Haaland B, O'Neil B, Hashibe M. Comparing Active Surveillance and Watchful Waiting With Radical Treatment Using Machine Learning Models Among Patients With Prostate Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2300083. [PMID: 37988640 PMCID: PMC10681553 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In 2021, 59.6% of low-risk patients with prostate cancer were under active surveillance (AS) as their first course of treatment. However, few studies have investigated AS and watchful waiting (WW) separately. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a population-level machine learning model for distinguishing AS and WW in the conservative treatment group, and to investigate initial cancer management trends from 2004 to 2017 and the risk of chronic diseases among patients with prostate cancer with different treatment modalities. METHODS In a cohort of 18,134 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2017, 1,926 patients with available AS/WW information were analyzed using machine learning algorithms with 10-fold cross-validation. Models were evaluated using performance metrics and Brier score. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for chronic disease risk. RESULTS Logistic regression models achieved a test area under the receiver operating curve of 0.73, F-score of 0.79, accuracy of 0.71, and Brier score of 0.29, demonstrating good calibration, precision, and recall values. We noted a sharp increase in AS use between 2004 and 2016 among patients with low-risk prostate cancer and a moderate increase among intermediate-risk patients between 2008 and 2017. Compared with the AS group, radical treatment was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality but higher risks of Alzheimer disease, anemia, glaucoma, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. CONCLUSION A machine learning approach accurately distinguished AS and WW groups in conservative treatment in this decision analytical model study. Our results provide insight into the necessity to separate AS and WW in population-based studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqi Hu
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Chun-Pin Chang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - John Snyder
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Michael Newman
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ankita Date
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Carlos Galvao
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Christina A. Porucznik
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Lisa H. Gren
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Alejandro Sanchez
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Parsons M, Lloyd S, Johnson S, Scaife C, Soares H, Kim R, Kim R, Garrido-Laguna I, Tao R. The Implications of Treatment Delays in Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Cholangiocarcinoma Patients. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:492-500. [PMID: 35445343 PMCID: PMC9020757 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00820-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to understand factors associated with timing of adjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of delays on overall survival (OS). METHODS Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with non-metastatic bile duct cancer from 2004 to 2015 were analyzed. Patients were included only if they underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (RT). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant or palliative treatments were excluded. Pearson's chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the distribution of demographic, clinical, and treatment factors. After propensity score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting, OS was compared between patients initiating therapy past various time points using Kaplan Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS In total, 7,733 of 17,363 (45%) patients underwent adjuvant treatment. The median time to adjuvant therapy initiation was 59 days (interquartile range 45-78 days). Age over 65, black and Hispanic race, and treatment with RT alone were associated with later initiation of adjuvant treatment. Patients with larger tumors and high-grade disease were more likely to initiate treatment early. After propensity score weighting, there was an OS decrement to initiation of treatment beyond the median of 59 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS We identified characteristics that are related to the timing of adjuvant therapy in patients with biliary cancers. There was an OS decrement associated with delays beyond the median time point of 59 days. This finding may be especially relevant given the treatment delays seen as a result of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Skyler Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Courtney Scaife
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Heloisa Soares
- Department of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Rebecca Kim
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Robin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
- Department of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Price RG, Lloyd S, Wang X, Haaland B, Nelson G, Salter B. Adipose Tissue Distribution and Body Mass Index (BMI) Correlation With Daily Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) Shifts of Abdominal Radiation Therapy Patients. Cureus 2023; 15:e40979. [PMID: 37503478 PMCID: PMC10370477 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose There are several studies suggesting a correlation between image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) setup errors and body mass index (BMI). However, abdominal fat content has visceral and subcutaneous components, which may affect setup errors differently. This study aims to analyze a potential workflow for characterizing adipose content and distribution in the region of the target that would allow a quickly calculated metric of abdominal fat content to stratify these patients. Methods IGRT shift data was retrospectively tabulated from daily fan-beam CT-on-rails pre-treatment alignment for 50 abdominal radiation therapy (RT) patients, and systematic and random errors in the daily setup were characterized by tabulating average and standard deviations of shift data for each patient and looking at differences for different distributions of adipose content. Visceral and subcutaneous fat content were defined by visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) using a region-growing algorithm to contour adipose tissue on CT simulation scans. All contours were created for a single slice at the treatment isocenter, on which the VFA and SFA were calculated. A log-rank test was used to test trends in shifts over quartiles of adiposity. Results VFA ranged from 1.9-342.8c m2, and SFA from 11.8-756.0 cm2. The standard definition (SD) of random error (σ) in the lateral axis for Q1 vs. Q4 VFA was 0.10cm vs. 0.29cm, 0.12cm vs. 0.28cm for SFA, and 0.12cm vs. 0.31cm for BMI. The percentage of longitudinal shifts greater than 10mm for Q1 vs. Q4 VFA was 0% vs. 9%, 2% vs. 19% for SFA, and 0% vs. 20% for BMI. Statistically significant trends in shifts vs. the BMI quartile were seen for both pitch and the longitudinal direction, as well as for pitch corrections vs. the VFA quartile. Conclusion Within this dataset, abdominal cancer patients showed statistically significant trends in shift probability vs. BMI and VFA. Also, patients in the upper quartiles of all adiposity metrics showed an increased SD of σ in the lateral direction and increased shifts over 10 mm in the longitudinal direction. However, despite these relationships, neither VFA nor SFA offered discernible advantages in their relationship to shift uncertainty relative to BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan G Price
- Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Xuechen Wang
- Biostatistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Ben Haaland
- Biostatistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Geoff Nelson
- Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Bill Salter
- Medical Physics, Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hallemeier CL, Moughan J, Haddock MG, Herskovic AM, Minsky BD, Suntharalingam M, Zeitzer KL, Garg MK, Greenwald BD, Komaki RU, Puckett LL, Kim H, Lloyd S, Bush DA, Kim HE, Lad TE, Meyer JE, Okawara GS, Raben A, Schefter TE, Barker JL, Falkson CI, Videtic GMM, Jacob R, Winter KA, Crane CH. Association of Radiotherapy Duration With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated in NRG Oncology Trials: A Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e238504. [PMID: 37083668 PMCID: PMC10122174 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance For many types of epithelial malignant neoplasms that are treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), treatment prolongation and interruptions have an adverse effect on outcomes. Objective To analyze the association between RT duration and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Design, Setting, and Participants This study was an unplanned, post hoc secondary analysis of 3 prospective, multi-institutional phase 3 randomized clinical trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 8501, RTOG 9405, and RTOG 0436) of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (formerly the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, RTOG, and Gynecologic Oncology Group). Enrolled patients with nonmetastatic esophageal cancer underwent definitive CRT in the trials between 1986 and 2013, with follow-up occurring through 2014. Data analyses were conducted between March 2022 to February 2023. Exposures Treatment groups in the trials used standard-dose RT (50 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The outcomes were local-regional failure (LRF), distant failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable models were used to examine the associations between these outcomes and both RT duration and interruptions. Radiotherapy duration was analyzed as a dichotomized variable using an X-Tile software to choose a cut point and its median value as a cut point, as well as a continuous variable. Results The analysis included 509 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [57-70] years; 418 males [82%]; and 376 White individuals [74%]). The median (IQR) follow-up was 4.01 (2.93-4.92) years for surviving patients. The median cut point of RT duration was 39 days or less in 271 patients (53%) vs more than 39 days in 238 patients (47%), and the X-Tile software cut point was 45 days or less in 446 patients (88%) vs more than 45 days in 63 patients (12%). Radiotherapy interruptions occurred in 207 patients (41%). Female (vs male) sex and other (vs White) race and ethnicity were associated with longer RT duration and RT interruptions. In the multivariable models, RT duration longer than 45 days was associated with inferior DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = .04). The HR for OS was 1.33, but the results were not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.77; P = .05). Radiotherapy duration longer than 39 days (vs ≤39 days) was associated with a higher risk of LRF (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.65; P = .01). As a continuous variable, RT duration (per 1 week increase) was associated with DFS failure (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28; P = .03). The HR for LRF 1.13, but the result was not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.28; P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study indicated that in patients with esophageal cancer receiving definitive CRT, prolonged RT duration was associated with inferior outcomes; female patients and those with other (vs White) race and ethnicity were more likely to have longer RT duration and experience RT interruptions. Radiotherapy interruptions should be minimized to optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Moughan
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center/American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Arnold M. Herskovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mohan Suntharalingam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland and Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - Kenneth L. Zeitzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Madhur K. Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center–Moses Campus, Bronx, New York
| | - Bruce D. Greenwald
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland and Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - Ritsuko U. Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Lindsay L. Puckett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin and Zablocki Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah Health Science Center, Salt Lake City
| | - David A. Bush
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University Cancer Institute, Loma Linda, California
| | - Harold E. Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Thomas E. Lad
- Department of Medical Oncology, John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joshua E. Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gordon S. Okawara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Raben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care Health Services Inc Community Clinical Oncology Program, Newark, Delaware
| | | | - Jerry L. Barker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, US Oncology Texas Oncology-Sugar Land, Fort Worth
| | - Carla I. Falkson
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | | | - Rojymon Jacob
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - Kathryn A. Winter
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center/American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher H. Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tward JD, Johnson SB, Kokeny KE, Lloyd S, Cannon DM, Dechet CB, ONeil B, Stephenson R, Boucher KM, Gupta S, Swami U, Maughan BL, Agarwal N. Initial results of a phase 2 pilot study of radium-223 and radiotherapy in untreated hormone-naïve men with oligometastatic prostate cancer to bone. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
156 Background: We hypothesized that treatment with Radium-223 (Ra223) and to ≤5 sites of bony metastases (mets) could safely delay the time to start androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and maintain quality of life (QoL). Methods: 20 men previously treated with surgery, radiation, or both for M0 PCa later developed ≤5 bone-only mets were eligible for this prospective trial. Inclusion: testosterone ≥ 100 ng/dL and mets on conventional bone scan, validated by a CT, MRI, or PET/CT. Exclusion: LHRH therapies after initial treatment, or N1 disease at diagnosis of bone mets. Therapy was 6 cycles of Ra223 and SBRT (30 Gy in 5 fractions between cycles 1-2). Bone scan was performed at baseline and q3 months. PSA was evaluated monthly during the Ra223 course, and q3 months after. Therapeutic effectiveness was defined as ≥20% of patients meeting the primary endpoint of freedom from ADT (FFAdt) use at 15 months. Discontinuation of study therapy occurred if: PSA rise > 10% if baseline PSA >20ng/ml, PSA>20 if baseline PSA <20 ng/ml, radiographic progression or a skeletal-related event (SRE). All endpoints were timed from the Cycle 1 radium date. Patients were followed for 2 years. Clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were defined as >1/2 standard deviation from the mean baseline value and were censored after the time of ADT use. Continuous and categorical covariates were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Pearson’s Chi2 tests, respectively, and univariate Cox regression. Statistical significance was considered at P<0.05. Results: The median number of Ra223 cycles was 6. 6 patients had <6 cycles (range 2-5) due to progression. FFAdt at 15 and 24 Months was 49.5% and 38.5%, respectively (p<0.001). The median time to ADT was 14.8 months. There were no significant changes from baseline in any PRO QoL domain (physical functioning, anxiety, depression, fatigue, satisfaction with participation in social roles, sleep disturbance, and pain interference). There were 2 patients with Grade 3 SREs (bone fracture, pain). Grade 2+ events attributed as possible or likely to Ra-223 were seen in 4 patients (bone pain, fatigue, fracture, decreased WBC count, and other). Grade 2+ events attributed as possible or likely to EBRT were seen in 2 patients and included fatigue and other pain. were noted for age, baseline PSA, days from primary treatment, NCCN risk group, TNM stage, ISUP grade group, BMI, or # of lesions in those who met or failed the primary endpoint (all p>0.05). Conclusions: First-line use of Ra223 and SBRT to oligomets in hormone-naïve men in this prospective pilot study resulted in a significant delay in ADT use compared to historical control, is well tolerated, and maintains QoL. Clinical trial information: NCT03304418 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Hunstman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Shane Lloyd
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Brock ONeil
- Hunstman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Sumati Gupta
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Umang Swami
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rock CB, Hutten RJ, Weil CR, Lloyd S, Kerrigan KC, Cannon RB, Hitchcock YJ. Survival outcomes for patients with T3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis treated with definitive radiation alone versus chemoradiation. Head Neck 2023; 45:431-438. [PMID: 36433726 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the poor lymphatics of the glottis, we evaluated omission of chemotherapy in patients treated definitely for T3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the glottis. METHODS We performed survival analysis of patients with T3N0M0 SCC of the glottis identified in the National Cancer Database treated with radiation alone versus chemoradiation. RESULTS A total of 3785 patients were identified. Patients age ≥70 and those with comorbidities were less likely to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% CI [0.25-0.37] and 0.48 [0.31-0.76], respectively). Five-year OS was lower in patients treated with radiation versus chemoradiation (33.8% [30.3%-37.2%] vs. 58.0% [55.8%-60.0%]). In patients <70 with no comorbidities this difference persisted (51.0% [44.5%-57.0%] versus 66.7% [64.0%-69.3%]). CONCLUSION Overall survival was higher in patients treated with chemoradiation compared to radiation alone, even when controlling for age and comorbidities. Radiotherapy with chemotherapy omission is not appropriate in patients with T3N0M0 SCC of the glottis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calvin B Rock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ryan J Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Chris R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kathleen C Kerrigan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Richard B Cannon
- Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ying J Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lloyd S, Bao X. 547 CDK9 Kinase Activation in Association with AFF1-SEC Initiate Epidermal Progenitor differentiation. J Invest Dermatol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.09.563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
17
|
Hutten R, Khouri A, Parsons M, Tward A, Wilson T, Peterson J, Morrell G, Dechet C, O'Neil B, Schmidt B, Kokeny K, Lloyd S, Cannon D, Tward J, Sanchez A, Johnson S. The Clinical Significance of Maximum Tumor Diameter on MRI in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy or Definitive Radiotherapy for Locoregional Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e453-e459. [PMID: 35787979 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maximum tumor diameter (MTD) on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to further risk stratify for men with prostate cancer (PCa) prior to definitive local therapy. We aim to evaluate the prognostic impact of radiographic maximum tumor diameter (MTD) in men with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS From a single-center retrospective cohort of men receiving definitive treatment for PCa (radical prostatectomy [RP] or radiotherapy [RT]) with available pretreatment MRI, we conducted univariable and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models for progression using clinical variables including age, NCCN risk group, radiographic extracapsular extension (ECE), radiographic seminal vesical invasion (SVI), and MTD. RP and RT cohorts were analyzed separately. Covariates were used in a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and progression-free survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS The cohort included 631 patients (n = 428 RP, n = 203 RT). CART analysis identified 4 prognostic groups for patients treated with RP and 2 prognostic groups in those treated with RT. In the RP cohort, NCCN low/intermediate risk group patients with MTD>=15 mm had significantly worse PFS than those with MTD <= 14 mm, and NCCN high-risk patients with radiographic ECE had significantly worse PFS than those without ECE. In the RT cohort, PFS was significantly worse in the cohort with MTD >= 23 mm than those <= 22 mm. CONCLUSION Radiographic MTD may be a useful prognostic factor for patients with locoregional prostate cancer. This is the first study to illustrate that the importance of pretreatment tumor size may vary based on treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ashley Khouri
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Matthew Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Alex Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Trevor Wilson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - John Peterson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Glen Morrell
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Services, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Christopher Dechet
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Bogdana Schmidt
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Kristine Kokeny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Donald Cannon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jonathan Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Alejandro Sanchez
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Skyler Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Urias E, Hutten R, Lloyd S, Tao R. Immunotherapy with Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Cancer: An Analysis from the National Cancer Data Base. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
Hutten RJ, Weil CR, Gaffney DK, Kokeny K, Lloyd S, Rogers CR, Suneja G. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Delay to Initiation of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1694-e1703. [PMID: 35930751 PMCID: PMC9663141 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Delays in initiation of radiotherapy may contribute to inferior oncologic outcomes that are more commonly observed in minoritized populations in the United States. We aimed to examine inequities associated with delayed initiation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried to identify the 10 cancer sites most commonly treated with IMRT. Interval to initiation of treatment (IIT) was broken into quartiles for each disease site, with the 4th quartile classified as delayed. Multivariable logistic regression for delayed IIT was performed for each disease site using clinical and demographic covariates. Differences in magnitude of delay between subsets of patients stratified by race and insurance status were evaluated using two-sample t-tests. RESULTS Among patients (n = 350,425) treated with IMRT between 2004 and 2017, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and Asian patients were significantly more likely to have delayed IIT with IMRT for nearly all disease sites compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. NHB, Hispanic, and Asian patients had significantly longer median IIT than NHW patients (NHB 87 days, P < .01; Hispanic 76 days, P < .01; Asian 74 days, P < .01; and NHW 67 days). NHW, Hispanic, and Asian patients with private insurance had shorter median IIT than those with Medicare (P < .01); however, NHB patients with private insurance had longer IIT than those with Medicare (P < .01). CONCLUSION Delays in initiation of IMRT in NHB, Hispanic, and Asian patients may contribute to the known differences in cancer outcomes and warrant further investigation, particularly to further clarify the role of different insurance policies in delays in advanced modality radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J. Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Christopher R. Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - David K. Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Kristine Kokeny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Charles R. Rogers
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tao R, Chen Y, Kim S, Ocier K, Lloyd S, Poppe MM, Lee CJ, Glenn MJ, Smith KR, Fraser A, Deshmukh V, Newman MG, Snyder J, Rowe KG, Gaffney DK, Haaland B, Hashibe M. Mental health disorders are more common in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and may negatively impact overall survival. Cancer 2022; 128:3564-3572. [PMID: 35916651 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term mental health outcomes were characterized in patients who were diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and risk factors for the development of mental health disorders were identified. METHODS Patients who were diagnosed with HL between 1997 and 2014 were identified in the Utah Cancer Registry. Each patient was matched with up to five individuals from a general population cohort identified within the Utah Population Database, a unique source of linked records that includes patient and demographic data. RESULTS In total, 795 patients who had HL were matched with 3575 individuals from the general population. Compared with the general population, patients who had HL had a higher risk of any mental health diagnosis (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-2.00). Patients with HL had higher risks of anxiety, depression, substance-related disorders, and suicide and intentional self-inflicted injuries compared with the general population. The main risk factor associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with mental health disorders was undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with a hazard ratio of 2.06 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.76). The diagnosis of any mental health disorder among patients with HL was associated with a detrimental impact on overall survival; the 10-year overall survival rate was 70% in patients who had a mental health diagnosis compared with 86% in those patients without a mental health diagnosis (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Patients who had HL had an increased risk of various mental health disorders compared with a matched general population. The current data illustrate the importance of attention to mental health in HL survivorship, particularly for patients who undergo therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Yuji Chen
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Seungmin Kim
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Krista Ocier
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Matthew M Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Catherine J Lee
- Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Martha J Glenn
- Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Ken R Smith
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Alison Fraser
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Vikrant Deshmukh
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Michael G Newman
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - John Snyder
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Kerry G Rowe
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - David K Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Ben Haaland
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lloyd S, Brady M, Rodriguez D, Leon D, McReynolds M, Kweon J, Neely A, Bao X. 460 Rapid activation of epidermal progenitor differentiation via CDK9 activity modulated by AFF1 and HEXIM1. J Invest Dermatol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.05.469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
22
|
Mao YS, Gao SG, Li Y, Hao AL, Liu JF, Li XF, Rong TH, Fu JH, Ma JQ, Xu MQ, Zhang RQ, Xiao GM, Fu XN, Chen KN, Mao WM, Liu YY, Liu HX, Zhang ZR, Fang Y, Fu DH, Wei XD, Yuan LG, Muhammad S, Wei WQ, Chiu PWY, Lloyd S, Schlottmann F, Meredith K, Pimiento JM, Gao YB, He J. Efficacy and safety of esophagectomy via left thoracic approach versus via right thoracic approach for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (NST1501). Ann Transl Med 2022; 10:904. [PMID: 36111056 PMCID: PMC9469177 DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-3810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Left thoracic approach (LTA) has been a favorable selection in surgical treatment for esophageal cancer (EC) patients in China before minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is popular. This study aimed to demonstrate whether right thoracic approach (RTA) is superior to LTA in the surgical treatment of middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC). Methods Superiority clinical trial design was used for this multicenter randomized controlled two-parallel group study. Between April 2015 and December 2018, cT1b-3N0-1M0 TESCC patients from 14 centers were recruited and randomized by a central stratified block randomization program into LTA or RTA groups. All enrolled patients were followed up every three months after surgery. The software SPSS 20.0 and R 3.6.2. were used for statistical analysis. Efficacy and safety outcomes, 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Results A total of 861 patients without suspected upper mediastinal lymph nodes (umLN) were finally enrolled in the study after 95 ineligible patients were excluded. 833 cases (98.7%) were successfully followed up until June 1, 2020. Esophagectomies were performed via LTA in 453 cases, and via RTA in 408 cases. Compared with the LTA group, the RTA group required longer operating time (274.48±78.92 vs. 205.34±51.47 min, P<0.001); had more complications (33.8% vs. 26.3% P=0.016); harvested more lymph nodes (LNs) (23.61±10.09 vs. 21.92±10.26, P=0.015); achieved a significantly improved OS in stage IIIa patients (67.8% vs. 51.8%, P=0.022). The 3-year OS and DFS were 68.7% and 64.3% in LTA arm versus 71.3% and 63.7% in RTA arm (P=0.20; P=0.96). Conclusions Esophagectomies via both LTA and RTA can achieve similar outcomes in middle or lower TESCC patients without suspected umLN. RTA is superior to LTA and recommended for the surgical treatment of more advanced stage TESCC due to more complete lymphadenectomy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02448979.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You-Sheng Mao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Geng Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - An-Lin Hao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Jun-Feng Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xiao-Fei Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Military University Hospital, Xi’an, China
| | - Tie-Hua Rong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Hua Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Qun Ma
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Heilongjiang Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Mei-Qing Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Ren-Quan Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Gao-Ming Xiao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Xiang-Ning Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ke-Neng Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei-Min Mao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yong-Yu Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Hong-Xu Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhi-Rong Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Fang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Dong-Hong Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Xu-Dong Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Li-Gong Yuan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shan Muhammad
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Qiang Wei
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Philip Wai-Yan Chiu
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kenneth Meredith
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, Sarasota Memorial Institute for Cancer Care, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - Jose M. Pimiento
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yi-Bo Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hardikar S, Weil CR, Lloyd S, Cohan JN, Supiano MA, Ose J, Peoples AR, Gupta SV, Pelletier K, Extermann M, Siegel EM, Shibata D, Ulrich CM. Abstract 36: Treatment patterns in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients over 65 years of age. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Older patients (>65 years) are frequently under-represented in clinical trials that determine cancer treatment guidelines. We sought to characterize treatment patterns among older patients and identify factors for receipt of non-standard of care (SOC) treatment.
Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to describe treatment patterns in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients (2004-2017) over 65 years of age. Patients with metastatic disease and non-adenocarcinoma histology were excluded. SOC therapy was defined as any recommended treatment option listed within site- and stage-specific National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Clinicodemographic characteristics and treatment patterns were compared between colon and rectal cancer patients by ten-year age-groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with receipt of treatment, by tumor site and stage.
Results: Of the 498,285 patients who met inclusion criteria, 47% were 65-75 years while 15% were >85 years old (median age: 76 years). The majority were non-Hispanic White (88%), female (52%), Medicare insured (86%), colon cancer patients (76%) with a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 (63%). Significant differences in treatment patterns by age were observed; for e.g., 11% of stage I colon cancer patients >85 years of age did not receive SOC surgical treatment but rather received radiation-only treatment compared to only 2% patients 65-75 years of age who received radiation-only treatment. In logistic regression analyses adjusted for diagnosis year, sex, race/ethnicity, CCI, insurance, income, education, hospital type, treatment facility, rurality, and geographic region, older patients were more likely to receive non-SOC treatments for colon cancer stage I [OR(95% CI) for 76-85 years 1.31(1.23,1.40); >85 years 3.41(3.17,3.66)], stage II-III [OR(95% CI) for 76-85 years 1.96(1.92,2.01); >85 years 3.50(3.40,3.60)], rectal cancer stage I [OR(95% CI) for 76-85 years 2.06(1.89,2.24); >85 years 6.36(5.77,7.02)], and stage II-III [OR(95% CI) for 76-85 years 2.14(2.07,2.22); >85 years 9.02(8.33,9.77)] compared to 65-75 year old patients. Other predictors of receiving non-SOC treatments for both colon and rectal cancers included Black race (p<0.001), CCI >3 (p<0.001), lack of insurance (p<0.001), and treatment at a community cancer clinic (p<0.001).
Discussion: Compared to 65-75 year-old stage I-III colorectal cancer patients, older patients at all disease stages are more likely to not receive SOC treatment. Other predictors for receiving non-SOC treatment are Black race, presence of comorbidities, lack of insurance, and treatment at a community cancer clinic. Future observational and randomized studies are needed to define the optimal treatment paradigms in older colorectal cancer patients, identify and address disparities, and better support these patients.
Citation Format: Sheetal Hardikar, Christopher R. Weil, Shane Lloyd, Jessica N. Cohan, Mark A. Supiano, Jennifer Ose, Anita R. Peoples, Sumati V. Gupta, Kaitlyn Pelletier, Martine Extermann, Erin M. Siegel, David Shibata, Cornelia M. Ulrich. Treatment patterns in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients over 65 years of age [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 36.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheetal Hardikar
- 1Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Shane Lloyd
- 1Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jessica N. Cohan
- 1Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Jennifer Ose
- 1Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Anita R. Peoples
- 1Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Sumati V. Gupta
- 1Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Erin M. Siegel
- 3H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - David Shibata
- 4University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gupta S, Grass GD, Maughan BL, Jain RK, Dechet CB, Sanchez A, O Neil B, Poch MA, Li R, Lloyd S, Tward JD, Phunrab TK, Hawks J, Swami U, Boucher KM, Agarwal N. NEXT: A single-arm, phase 2, open-label study of adjuvant nivolumab after completion of chemo-radiation therapy in patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
506 Background: Nivolumab has known efficacy as adjuvant therapy after radical cystectomy in localized muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We are evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab adjuvant to definitive chemo-radiation therapy (CRT) in MIBC. Methods: In the NEXT study, we are currently enrolling patients with localized MIBC undergoing standard CRT. Participants are started on nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks (up to 12 doses) within 90 days of completion of CRT. Cystoscopic and scan-based assessments are done every 3 months for the first two years (yrs). The primary endpoint is failure-free survival (FFS) at 2 yrs from the start of CRT, with failure defined as local or systemic disease recurrence. Secondary endpoints include toxicity and quality of life (QOL) assessments. We have planned correlative studies on peripheral blood and tumor tissue. We performed a protocol-defined interim safety and efficacy analysis to assess the 6-month FFS rate with CRT and adjuvant nivolumab. Results: From 8/03/2017 to 9/28/2021, 20 patients were enrolled at two centers; median age is 76 yrs, clinical stage range is T2-T4b, N0-N+, M0; the median number of nivolumab cycles is 6.5, and the median follow-up is 8.9 months. The estimated 6-month FFS rate is 88.2% (95% CI 74.2% - 100%). Disease has progressed in 9 patients, of which 4 have local bladder recurrence (T1 in 3/4) and 5 have distant metastases. The estimated median FFS is 17.1 months (95% CI 8.71 months - infinity). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) are noted in 3/20 patients (15%): elevated transaminases, diarrhea, and polymyalgia rheumatica. Grade 3 radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) AEs occurred in 2 patients. QOL measures are serially evaluable in 13 patients for the first 3 months of adjuvant nivolumab, and are stable in the domains of disease-related physical symptoms, treatment side effects, and function/well-being, while are significantly improved (p=0.023) in the domain of disease-related emotional symptoms. Conclusions: In this first report of the role of immunotherapy adjuvant to CRT for localized bladder cancer, adjuvant nivolumab is well tolerated and has promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT03171025.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumati Gupta
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Brock O Neil
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Roger Li
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Josiah Hawks
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Umang Swami
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Twining M, Prentice L, Lloyd S, Adsett J, Prasad S, Atherton J, Denaro C. Low Prevalence of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in a Public Hospital Setting. Heart Lung Circ 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
26
|
Hutten RJ, Weil CR, Gaffney DK, Kokeny K, Lloyd S, Rogers CR, Suneja G. Worsening racial disparities in utilization of intensity modulated radiotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100887. [PMID: 35360509 PMCID: PMC8960883 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The benefits of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared with standard 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy have been demonstrated in many cancer sites and include decreased acute and late toxicity, improved quality of life, and opportunities for dose escalation. Limited literature suggests non-white patients may have lower utilization of IMRT. We hypothesized that as the use of IMRT has increased in recent years, racial inequities have persisted and disproportionately affect non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients. We aim to evaluate temporal trends in IMRT utilization focusing on disparities among minoritized populations. Methods and Materials The National Cancer Database was queried to identify the 10 disease sites with the highest total number of cancer patients treated with definitive intent IMRT in 2017, the most recent year for which data are available. Exclusions included stage IV, age <18 years, unknown insurance status, unknown race, and palliative intent radiation. Race and ethnicity variables were combined and classified as non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, NHB, Asian, Native American/Eskimo, and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Multivariable logistic regression for IMRT utilization was performed for each disease site for both early (2004-2010) and contemporary (2011-2017) cohorts, adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates. Results Among the 10 selected disease sites, 1,010,292 patients received radiation therapy as part of definitive treatment between 2004 and 2017. Overall IMRT utilization rates increased from 22.0% in 2004 to 57.8% in 2017. After adjustment and compared with non-Hispanic White patients, NHB patients were significantly less likely to receive IMRT in 1 of 10 disease sites in the 2004 to 2010 cohort, and 5 of 10 disease sites in the 2011 to 2017 cohort. Conclusions Despite greater awareness of racial disparities in cancer care and outcomes, this study demonstrates worsening disparities in the use of IMRT, particularly for NHB patients. These differences may exacerbate racial disparities in cancer outcomes; therefore, identification of underlying drivers of differential IMRT utilization is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J. Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Chris R. Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - David K. Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Kristine Kokeny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Charles R. Rogers
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Corresponding author: Gita Suneja, MD, MSHP
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Twining M, Prentice L, Lloyd S, Adsett J, Prasad S, Atherton J, Denaro C. Spectrum of Serum BNP Elevation in a Real World Cohort of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Heart Lung Circ 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
28
|
Fenlon JB, Hutten RJ, Weil CR, Lloyd S, Cannon DM, Kerrigan K, Cannon RB, Hitchcock YJ. Comparing adjuvant radiation to adjuvant chemoradiation in postsurgical p16+ oropharyngeal carcinoma patients with extranodal extension or positive margins. Head Neck 2021; 44:606-614. [PMID: 34931386 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant guidelines in surgically resected p16+ oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) with positive surgical margins (PSM) or extranodal extension (ENE) are based on randomized controlled trials predating p16 status. It remains unclear if adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary in p16+ patients with these features. METHODS The National Cancer Database was used to identify cases of nonmetastatic p16+ OPC diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. Patients treated with surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation (aRT) or adjuvant chemoradiation (aCRT) were eligible for analysis. RESULTS A total of 14 071 patients were eligible for analysis. Overall survival (OS) was not statistically different between aRT and aCRT in patients with PSM (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.28), ENE (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.27) or both (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41-1.31). CONCLUSIONS In patients with p16+ OPC with ENE, PSM, or both, adding chemotherapy to aRT was not associated with improved OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan B Fenlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ryan J Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Christopher R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Donald M Cannon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kathleen Kerrigan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Richard B Cannon
- Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ying J Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hutten R, Parsons M, Khouri A, Tward A, Wilson T, Peterson J, Morrell G, Kokeny K, Lloyd S, Cannon D, Tward J, Sanchez A, Johnson S. The Clinical Significance of Maximum Tumor Diameter on MRI in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy or Definitive Radiotherapy for Locoregional Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
30
|
Hutten R, Weil C, Gaffney D, Kokeny K, Lloyd S, Rogers C, Suneja G. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Delay to Initiation of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
31
|
Parsons MW, Hutten RJ, Tward A, Khouri A, Peterson J, Morrell G, Lloyd S, Cannon DM, Johnson SB. The Effect of Maximum Tumor Diameter by MRI on Disease Control in Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Brachytherapy Boost. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:e68-e74. [PMID: 34776367 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Larger maximum tumor diameter (MTD) has been associated with worse prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. However, the impact of MTD in PCa treated with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost (EBRT+BB) remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with PCa treated with EBRT+BB were identified from an institutional database. Clinical data including MTD, age, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use, prostate specific antigen (PSA), International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) group, clinical T-stage, and presence of adverse pathology on imaging were retrospectively collected. Multivariable and univariable cox proportional hazards models for biochemical failure (BF) and distant metastasis (DM) were produced with MTD grouped by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) cut-point. Cumulative hazard functions for BF and DM were compared with log-rank test and stratified by ISUP group. RESULTS Of 191 patients treated with EBRT+BB, 113 had MTD measurements available. Larger MTD was associated with increased ADT use and seminal vesicle involvement. ROC optimization identified MTD of 24 mm as the optimal cut-point for both BF and DM. MTD was independently associated with both BF (HR 8.61, P = .048, 95% CI 1.02-72.97) and DM (HR 8.55, P = .05, 95% CI 1.00-73.19). In patients with ISUP group 4 to 5 disease, MTD > 24 mm was independently associated with increased risk of DM (HR 10.13, P = .04, 95% CI 1.13-91.12). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to evaluate MTD in the setting of EBRT+BB. These results demonstrate that MTD is independently associated with BF and metastasis. This suggests a possible role for MTD in risk assessment models and clinical decision-making for men receiving EBRT+BB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W Parsons
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ryan J Hutten
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Alexander Tward
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ashley Khouri
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - John Peterson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Glen Morrell
- University of Utah, Department of Radiology and Imaging Services, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Shane Lloyd
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Donald M Cannon
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Peacock S, Briggs D, Barnardo M, Battle R, Brookes P, Callaghan C, Clark B, Collins C, Day S, Diaz Burlinson N, Dunn P, Fernando R, Fuggle S, Harmer A, Kallon D, Keegan D, Key T, Lawson E, Lloyd S, Martin J, McCaughan J, Middleton D, Partheniou F, Poles A, Rees T, Sage D, Santos-Nunez E, Shaw O, Willicombe M, Worthington J. BSHI/BTS guidance on crossmatching before deceased donor kidney transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2021; 49:22-29. [PMID: 34555264 PMCID: PMC9292213 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
All UK H&I laboratories and transplant units operate under a single national kidney offering policy, but there have been variations in approach regarding when to undertake the pre‐transplant crossmatch test. In order to minimize cold ischaemia times for deceased donor kidney transplantation we sought to find ways to be able to report a crossmatch result as early as possible in the donation process. A panel of experts in transplant surgery, nephrology, specialist nursing in organ donation and H&I (all relevant UK laboratories represented) assessed evidence and opinion concerning five factors that relate to the effectiveness of the crossmatch process, as follows: when the result should be ready for reporting; what level of donor HLA typing is needed; crossmatch sample type and availability; fairness and equity; risks and patient safety. Guidelines aimed at improving practice based on these issues are presented, and we expect that following these will allow H&I laboratories to contribute to reducing CIT in deceased donor kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Peacock
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Briggs
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Birmingham Vincent Drive, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Barnardo
- Clinical Transplant Immunology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - R Battle
- H&I Laboratory, SNBTS, Edinburgh, UK
| | - P Brookes
- H&I Laboratory, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - C Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Clark
- H&I Laboratory, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - C Collins
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Birmingham Vincent Drive, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Day
- H&I Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - N Diaz Burlinson
- Transplantation Laboratory, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - P Dunn
- Transplant Laboratory, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - R Fernando
- H&I Laboratory, The Anthony Nolan Laboratories, Royal Free Hospital, UK
| | - S Fuggle
- Organ Donation & Transplantation, NHSBT, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, UK
| | - A Harmer
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Barnsley Centre, Barnsley, UK
| | - D Kallon
- H & I Laboratory, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Keegan
- Department of H&I, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, UK
| | - T Key
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Barnsley Centre, Barnsley, UK
| | - E Lawson
- Organ Donation and Transplantation, NHSBT, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Lloyd
- Welsh Transplantation & Immunogenetics Laboratory, Cardiff, UK
| | - J Martin
- H&I Laboratory, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - J McCaughan
- H&I Laboratory, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - D Middleton
- H&I Laboratory, Liverpool Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - F Partheniou
- H&I Laboratory, Liverpool Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Poles
- H&I Laboratory, University Hospitals Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.,H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Filton, Bristol, UK
| | - T Rees
- Welsh Transplantation & Immunogenetics Laboratory, Cardiff, UK
| | - D Sage
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Tooting Centre, London, UK
| | - E Santos-Nunez
- H&I Laboratory, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - O Shaw
- H&I Laboratory, Viapath, Guys & St Thomas, London, UK
| | - M Willicombe
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, UK
| | - J Worthington
- Transplantation Laboratory, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Coffman AR, Tao R, Cohan JN, Huang LC, Pickron TB, Torgeson AM, Lloyd S. Factors associated with the refusal of surgery and the associated impact on survival in patients with rectal cancer using the National Cancer Database. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:1482-1497. [PMID: 34532104 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical resection is an integral component of the curative-intent treatment for most patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer. However, some patients refuse surgery for a number of reasons. Utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we investigated the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with patients who were coded as having been offered but refused surgery, and the factors affecting overall survival (OS) in these patients. Methods Adult patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum (excluding T1N0M0 and M1 disease) diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with refusal of surgery. OS of patients refusing surgery was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimate, log-rank test, propensity score matching, and proportional hazards regression. Results A total of 55,704 patients were identified: 54,266 received definitive surgery (97.4%) and 1,438 refused (2.6%). Of patients refusing surgery, 135 (9.4%) were stage I, 709 (49.3%) were stage II, and 594 (41.3%) were stage III. Patients were more likely to refuse surgery as the study period progressed (P<0.01). Factors associated with refusal of surgery on multivariate analysis include: age ≥70 years, Black race, non-private insurance, and tumor size greater than 2 cm (all values P≤0.01). The 5-year OS was 61.6% for the surgery cohort and 35.7% for the refusal cohort. In the propensity matched groups, median survival was 84.2 months in patients who received definitive surgery compared to 43.7 months in patients who refused surgery. As an index for comparison, patients who refused surgery but received both radiotherapy and chemotherapy had a median survival of 48.5 months. Among patients that refused surgery, those that received radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or radiotherapy and chemotherapy (compared to no treatment) experienced a survival benefit (all values P≤0.01). Conclusions In patients with non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the rectum reported in the NCDB, age, race, and insurance status were associated with refusal of surgery. Refusal of surgery was more common in the later years of the study. Survival is poor in patients who refused surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex R Coffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jessica N Cohan
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Lyen C Huang
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - T Bartley Pickron
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Anna M Torgeson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hutten RJ, Parsons MW, Weil CR, Tward JD, Lloyd S, Sanchez A, Lester-Coll N, Johnson SB. Temporal Trends and Predictors in Diagnosing Pathologic Node-Positive Prostate Cancer in Clinically Node-Negative Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:e360-e366. [PMID: 34130915 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Managing pathologically node positive (pN+) prostate cancer (PCa) is controversial. We describe temporal patterns and predictors of pN+ PCa in men with initially surgically managed clinically node negative (cN-) PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS This observational retrospective analysis of nonmetastatic, cN- PCa uses the National Cancer Database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify covariates associated with pN+ disease. Cox proportional hazards modeling and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate survival patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). RESULTS The rates of radical prostatectomy in men with grade group (GG) 4 and GG5 increased from 47.6% to 53.1% and from 42.5% to 49.5%, respectively. The annual rate increased from 2.02% in 2010 to 5.12% in 2017 (P < .001). The annual rates of PLND increased from 54.3% to 71.7%. The most significant predictor of pN+ PCa was ISUP GG4 (odds ratio [OR] 12.5, P< .001) and GG 5 (OR 26.2, P < .001). Rates of pN+ identification increased from 5.5% to 9.4% in men with GG4 and from 13.4% to 19.5% in men with GG5 (P< .001). In GG4 and GG5, patients undergoing PLND had superior survival to those managed without PLND (P < .01). CONCLUSION Among patients with cN- PCa, the diagnosis of pN+ PCa has become more common over time. GG4 and GG5 are the strongest independent predictors of pN+ disease. Because incidental pN+ results in upstaging these data are useful for informing discussions before radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Matthew W Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Christopher R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jonathan D Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Alejandro Sanchez
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Nataniel Lester-Coll
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chen X, Lloyd S, Bao X. 156 MYC-CPSF-HNRNPA3 cooperation promotes epidermal progenitor maintenance through modulating intronic transcription termination. J Invest Dermatol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.02.176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
36
|
Odell DW, Albrechtsen RD, Sindt JE, Gole R, Brown S, Parsons MW, Paxton AB, Sarkar V, Lloyd S, Brogan SE, Tao R. The Effect of Measured Radiotherapy Dose on Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Function. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:1204-1208. [PMID: 33624320 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Radiation therapy (RT) and intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are often used concurrently to optimize pain management in patients with cancer. Concern remains among clinicians regarding the potential for IDDS malfunction in the setting of RT. Here we assessed the frequency of IDDS malfunction in a large cohort of patients treated with RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cancer patients with IDDS and subsequent RT at our institution from 2011 to 2019 were eligible for this study. Patients were excluded in the rare event that their IDDS was managed by an outside clinic and follow-up documentation was unavailable. Eighty-eight patients aged 22-88 years old (43% female, 57% male) representing 106 separate courses of RT were retrospectively identified. Patients received varying levels of radiation for treatment of cancer and cumulative dose to the IDDS was calculated. IDDS interrogation was subsequently performed by a pain specialist. Malfunction was recorded as deviation from the expected drug volume and/or device errors reported upon interrogation as defined by the manufacturer. RESULTS Total measured RT dose to the IDDS ranged from 0 to 18.0 Gy (median = 0.2 Gy) with median dose of 0.04 Gy/fraction (range, 0-3.2 Gy/fraction). Ten pumps received a total dose >2 Gy and three received ≥5 Gy. Eighty-two percentage of patients had follow-up with a pain specialist for IDDS interrogation and all patients underwent follow-up with a healthcare provider following RT. There were zero incidences of IDDS malfunction related to RT. No patient had clinical evidence of radiation related pump malfunction at subsequent encounters. CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence that RT in patients with IDDS led to device failure or dysfunction. While radiation oncologists and pain specialists should coordinate patient care, it does not appear that RT dose impacts the function of the IDDS to warrant significant clinical concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel W Odell
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Jill E Sindt
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ryan Gole
- University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Spencer Brown
- University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Matthew W Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Adam B Paxton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vikren Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shane E Brogan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Parsons M, Hutten R, Khouri A, Tward A, Morrell G, Peterson JS, Cannon DM, Lloyd S, Johnson SB. The effect of maximum tumor diameter on disease control in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy boost. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
252 Background: Larger maximum tumor diameter (MTD) has been associated with worse prostate cancer outcomes for those undergoing surgery as well as salvage radiation. MTD is also an important consideration for patients weighing active surveillance. However, the impact of MTD in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy boost is unknown. We set out to evaluate MTD of the dominant nodule on MRI as a prognostic factor in patients treated with EBRT and brachytherapy boost for localized prostate cancer. Methods: Patients with prostate cancer treated with EBRT and brachytherapy boost were identified from an institutional database. In patients with a pretreatment MRI, data on MTD were retrospectively collected. Clinical data including age, ADT use, pretreatment PSA, International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) group, clinical T-stage, and presence of adverse pathology on imaging (either seminal vesicle invasion or extraprostatic extension) were also collected. Multivariable and univariable cox proportional hazards models for biochemical failure (BF) and distant metastasis (DM) were produced in patients with MTD grouped by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) cutpoint. Cumulative hazard functions for BF and DM were compared with log-rank test and stratified by ISUP group. Results: Of 191 patients treated with EBRT and brachytherapy boost, 113 had pretreatment MRI and available MTD measurement. Median follow up was 40 months (interquartile range 23-66 months) and median MTD was 17 mm (interquartile range 13-22mm). Increasing MTD was associated with higher T stage and increased ADT use. ROC cutpoint optimization identified MTD of 24mm to be the optimal cut-point for both BF and DM. On univariate log-rank analysis, patients with MTD > 24mm had higher 5-year BF (31% vs 4%, p = 0.004) and DM (21% vs 4%, p = 0.002) than those with MTD≤24. Stepwise multivariable cox model for BF (P = 0.130, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.21) and DM (P = 0.115, HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98-1.23), MTD did not demonstrate statistical significance when controlling for clinical t-stage, adverse pathologic features on imaging, ISUP group, and ADT use. However, in patients with ISUP group 4-5 disease, MTD > 24 was independently associated with increased risk of DM (P = 0.032, HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.37). Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate MTD on MRI as a prognostic factor in the setting of brachytherapy boost. These results demonstrate that for patients treated with EBRT and brachytherapy boost, MTD is independently associated with risk for metastasis in patients with ISUP grade 4 and 5 disease. Although these results require further validation, this suggests a possible role for MTD as a factor in risk assessment models and clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan Hutten
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shane Lloyd
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Weil C, Hutten R, Tward JD, Lloyd S, Johnson SB. Patterns of care and treatment outcomes in locoregional squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
260 Background: Primary pure prostate squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare, aggressive disease accounting for less than 0.5-1% of prostate cancer diagnoses. PSCC is a distinct entity from adenocarcinoma with historically poor outcomes, often presenting in younger patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and normal PSA. There are currently no established treatment guidelines. Case reports are limited but describe multiple treatment approaches including various combinations of surgery, platinum and non-platinum-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy, with selected reports showing longer survival times with a combined modality approach. Methods: Seeking to identify practice patterns and treatment outcomes, we performed a retrospective analysis of the United States National Cancer Database to identify 66 males with locoregional, nonmetastatic primary pure squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate and treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy between 2004 and 2015. Clinical factors in analysis included pretreatment PSA, clinical T-stage, histology, treatment modality and demographic factors including age, comorbidity index, race, insurance status and treatment facility type. Patients were stratified into treatment groups consisting of local therapy alone (n = 40, 60%), local therapy and chemotherapy (n = 13, 20%), chemotherapy alone (n = 7, 11%), and observation (n = 6, 9%). Survival analysis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed with log-rank testing. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between patient characteristics and survival. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify covariates associated with receipt of each treatment modality. Results: With an overall median follow-up of 21.9 months, median survival was 19.7 months for patients treated with local therapy alone, 10.9 months with chemotherapy alone, and 36.5 months with combined local therapy and chemotherapy. Overall survival was not statistically significant between treatment groups. Statistically significant predictors of death included age (HR 1.1, 95% CI [1.03-1.17]) and clinical stage ≥T3a (HR 4.05, 95% CI [1.35-12.2]). Statistically significant predictors of receipt of chemotherapy were clinical stage T3a or greater (OR 34.6, 95% CI [2.65-364]) and age (OR 0.91, 95% CI [0.82-99]). Conclusions: This analysis represents the largest reported cohort analysis of locoregional pure PSCC. Unfortunately, due to the rarity of this disease, prospective or randomized trials to determine the optimal treatment strategy are not feasible. Despite limitations in sample size, and in the absence of prospective data, this analysis suggests the addition of chemotherapy to local therapy is a reasonable treatment approach in appropriately selected patients and may result in improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Weil
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ryan Hutten
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Shane Lloyd
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Parsons M, Lloyd S, Johnson SB, Scaife CL, Garrido-Laguna I, Tao R. The implications of treatment delays in adjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
291 Background: To understand the factors associated with timing of adjuvant therapy in the management of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of delays on overall survival (OS). Methods: Data from the NCDB for patients with pathologically proven non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile ducts from 2004 to 2014 were pooled and screened. Patients were included only if they underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (CMT) and/or radiotherapy (RT). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy or received CMT or RT with palliative intent were excluded. Pearson’s chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the distribution of demographic, clinical, and treatment factors. After propensity-score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting, OS was compared between patients who had initiation of adjuvant therapy past various time points using Kaplan Meier analyses and doubly-robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: In total, 7,422 patients in our analysis underwent adjuvant treatment. This represented 43% of the study cohort of 17,123 patients. Of the patients who underwent adjuvant treatment, 3,956 (53%) initiated adjuvant therapy by two months, 6,234 (84%) by 3 months and 6,987 (94%) by four months. High-grade disease, macroscopically positive margins, tumors larger than five centimeters, and unknown LVSI status, were associated with earlier initiation of adjuvant treatment at two months or earlier. Patients who received early adjuvant therapy were also more likely to be treated with a combination of CMT and RT. Factors associated with delay of adjuvant therapy beyond three months post-surgery included Charlson scores of one or greater and Hispanic race. After propensity score weighting, there was no survival difference between groups when comparing initiation of adjuvant therapy before or after two, three or four month time points Conclusions: We identified a number of patient characteristics related to the timing of initiating adjuvant therapy in patients with biliary cancers. There were no significant difference in OS associated with delaying adjuvant therapy beyond two, three or four month time-points. Our findings are relevant in the era of COVID-19 when minimizing patient exposure to health-care settings during a pandemic may need to be considered when deciding on the timing of adjuvant therapy. If a delay is necessary, our results suggest that there is no survival detriment to initiating adjuvant therapy beyond three or four months after surgery for biliary cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Randa Tao
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hutten RJ, Weil CR, Tward JD, Lloyd S, Johnson SB. Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes in Locoregional Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 23:30-33. [PMID: 34337486 PMCID: PMC8317810 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary squamous cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive disease with historically poor outcomes and no established treatment guidelines. Case reports are limited but describe multiple treatment approaches. Seeking to identify practice patterns and treatment outcomes, we used the US National Cancer Data Base to identify 66 males with locoregional primary squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy between 2004 and 2015. Patients were stratified into treatment groups consisting of local therapy alone (n = 40; 61%), local therapy and chemotherapy (n = 13; 20%), chemotherapy alone (n = 7; 11%), and observation (n = 6; 9%). Patients with clinical stage T3–T4 disease were significantly more likely to receive combined chemotherapy and local therapy on multivariable analysis. Median survival was 20 mo for patients treated with local therapy alone, 37 mo with local therapy and chemotherapy, and 11 mo with chemotherapy alone. Overall survival was not significantly different between treatment groups. Despite limitations in sample size, these data suggest that addition of chemotherapy to local therapy is a reasonable treatment approach for select patients. Patient summary Squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate is an extremely rare disease. Our review of patterns of care using data from the National Cancer Data Base shows inconsistent use of combined local and systemic therapy. The small sample size for this rare disease limits any conclusions regarding survival differences, but the data suggest that a combination approach using chemotherapy in addition to surgery or radiation is a reasonable treatment option for disease confined to the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Christopher R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jonathan D Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sarkar V, Lloyd S, Paxton A, Dial C, Rassiah P, Szegedi MW, Hitchcock YJ, Salter BJ. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of changes in shoulder position on target coverage for spine SBRT to metastases in the lower cervical spine region. J Radiosurg SBRT 2021; 7:321-328. [PMID: 34631233 PMCID: PMC8492048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
For patients treated with SBRT for spinal metastases in the cervical area, a thermoplastic mask is the usual immobilization technique. This project investigates the impact of shoulder position variability on target coverage for such cases. Eight HN patients treated in a suite equipped with a CT-on-rails system (CTOR) were randomly chosen. Of these, three were treated with shoulder depressors. For each patient, their planning CT was used to contour spine targets at the C5, C6 and C7 levels for which two VMAT plans were developed to deliver 18 Gy to each target per the RTOG 0631 protocol. One plan used full arcs while the other used avoidance sectors around the lateral positions. For each patient, IGRT CTOR images were used to recalculate doses that would have been delivered from these plans. Target coverage and dose to the spinal cord were compared for four scenarios: full and partial arcs, with or without depressors. A Dunn test showed significant differences between groups with and without shoulder depressors, but not between those with full versus partial arcs. For most of the investigated cases, the coverage ended up being higher than planned due to the shoulder position being inferior at treatment compared to simulation. In some cases, this led to higher spinal cord doses than allowed per protocol. The results of this study confirm that, when treating lower cervical spine lesions with SBRT, special care should be taken to ensure that the shoulders are positioned as they were during planning CT acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikren Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Adam Paxton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Christian Dial
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Prema Rassiah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Martin W Szegedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Ying J Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Bill J Salter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tinkle CL, Singh C, Lloyd S, Guo Y, Li Y, Pappo AS, DuBois SG, Lucas JT, Haas-Kogan DA, Terezakis SA, Braunstein SE, Krasin MJ. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastatic and Recurrent Solid Tumors in Children and Young Adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1396-1405. [PMID: 33259934 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in pediatric patients has been underreported. We reviewed practice patterns, outcomes, and toxicity of SBRT in this population. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this multi-institutional study, 55 patients with 107 non-central nervous system lesions treated with SBRT between 2010 and 2016 were reviewed. Treatment response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 and modified RECIST v1.1 criteria for soft-tissue and bone lesions, respectively. Patterns of local failure (LF) were assessed dosimetrically. The cumulative incidence of LF and toxicity were estimated accounting for the competing risk event of death. Predictors of LF were identified through joint frailty models for clustered competing risks. RESULTS The median (range) dose/fraction was 7 (4.5-25) Gy, the total (range) dose/site was 35 (12-45), and the median (range) number of fractions was 5 (1-9). The radiographic response rates of bone and soft-tissue lesions were 90.6% and 76.7%, respectively. Symptom improvement was observed for 62% of symptomatic sites. A total of 27 LFs were documented, with 14 in-field, 9 marginal, and 4 out-of-field LFs. The 1-year estimated cumulative LF rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 25.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.2%-36.1%), 17.5% (95% CI, 9.0%-34.1%), and 61% (95% CI, 48.9%-76.1%), respectively. Lesion type (soft tissue vs bone) was the only significant predictor of LF on multivariable analysis (P = .04), with increased hazard for soft-tissue lesions. No acute or late toxicity of grade 4 or higher was observed; the estimated 1-year cumulative incidence of late toxicity of any grade was 7.5% (95% CI, 3.6%-12.1%). CONCLUSIONS The SBRT was well tolerated and resulted in radiographic response and symptom palliation in most pediatric patients with advanced disease. The 1-year cumulative LF rate of 25% will serve as a benchmark for further modifications to radiation therapy indications, parameters, and combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L Tinkle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
| | - Charu Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Yian Guo
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Yimei Li
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Alberto S Pappo
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Steven G DuBois
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - John T Lucas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Matthew J Krasin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rogers BC, Dunn G, Hammer K, Novalia W, de Haan FJ, Brown L, Brown RR, Lloyd S, Urich C, Wong THF, Chesterfield C. Water Sensitive Cities Index: A diagnostic tool to assess water sensitivity and guide management actions. Water Res 2020; 186:116411. [PMID: 32949887 PMCID: PMC7480447 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Cities are wrestling with the practical challenges of transitioning urban water services to become water sensitive; capable of enhancing liveability, sustainability, resilience and productivity in the face of climate change, rapid urbanisation, degraded ecosystems and ageing infrastructure. Indicators can be valuable for guiding actions for improvement, but there is not yet an established index that measures the full suite of attributes that constitute water sensitive performance. This paper therefore presents the Water Sensitive Cities (WSC) Index, a new benchmarking and diagnostic tool to assess the water sensitivity of a municipal or metropolitan city, set aspirational targets and inform management responses to improve water sensitive practices. Its 34 indicators are organised into seven goals: ensure good water sensitive governance, increase community capital, achieve equity of essential services, improve productivity and resource efficiency, improve ecological health, ensure quality urban spaces, and promote adaptive infrastructure. The WSC Index design is a quantitative framework based on qualitative rating descriptions and a participatory assessment methodology, enabling local contextual interpretations of the indicators while maintaining a robust universal framework for city comparison and benchmarking. The paper demonstrates its application on three illustrative cases. Rapid uptake of the WSC Index in Australia highlights its value in helping stakeholders develop collective commitment and evidence-based priorities for action to accelerate their city's water sensitive transition. Early testing in cities in Asia, the Pacific and South Africa has also showed the potential of the WSC Index internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B C Rogers
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - G Dunn
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Uisce Consulting International, Vancouver, Canada
| | - K Hammer
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - W Novalia
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - F J de Haan
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Australia
| | - L Brown
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; Foundry Associates, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R R Brown
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Lloyd
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; e2designlab, Melbourne, Australia
| | - C Urich
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - T H F Wong
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
| | - C Chesterfield
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dinh TKT, Mitin T, Bagshaw HP, Hoffman KE, Hwang C, Jeffrey Karnes R, Kishan AU, Liauw SL, Lloyd S, Potters L, Showalter TN, Taira AV, Vapiwala N, Zaorsky NG, D'Amico AV, Nguyen PL, Davis BJ. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Radiation Treatment of Node-Negative Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:953-963. [PMID: 33127490 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Definitive radiation therapy (RT), with or without concurrent chemotherapy, is an alternative to radical cystectomy for patients with localized, muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are either not surgical candidates or prefer organ preservation. We aim to synthesize an evidence-based guideline regarding the appropriate use of RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses literature review using the PubMed and Embase databases. Based on the literature review, critical management topics were identified and reformulated into consensus questions. An expert panel was assembled to address key areas of both consensus and controversy using the modified Delphi framework. RESULTS A total of 761 articles were screened, of which 61 were published between 1975 and 2019 and included for full review. There were 7 well-designed studies, 20 good quality studies, 28 quality studies with design limitations, and 6 references not suited as primary evidence. Adjuvant radiation therapy after cystectomy was not included owing to lack of high-quality data or clinical use. An expert panel consisting of 14 radiation oncologists, 1 medical oncologist, and 1 urologist was assembled. We identified 4 clinical variants of MIBC: surgically fit patients who wish to pursue organ preservation, patients surgically unfit for cystectomy, patients medically unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and borderline cystectomy candidates based on age with unilateral hydronephrosis and normal renal function. We identified key areas of controversy, including use of definitive radiation therapy for patients with negative prognostic factors, appropriate radiation therapy dose, fractionation, fields and technique when used, and chemotherapy sequencing and choice of agent. CONCLUSIONS There is limited level-one evidence to guide appropriate treatment of MIBC. Studies vary significantly with regards to patient selection, chemotherapy use, and radiation therapy technique. A consensus guideline on the appropriateness of RT for MIBC may aid practicing oncologists in bridging the gap between data and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tru-Khang T Dinh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Timur Mitin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Hilary P Bagshaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Clinics, Palo Alto, California
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clara Hwang
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stanley L Liauw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Louis Potters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Al V Taira
- Sutter Health Radiation Oncology, San Mateo, California
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer, Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer, Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Szegedi M, Boehm C, Paxton A, Rassiah‐Szegedi P, Sarkar V, Zhao H, Su F, Kokeny KE, Lloyd S, Tward J, Salter BJ. Comparison of transperineal ultrasound image guidance technique to transabdominal technique for prostate radiation therapy. Med Phys 2020; 47:6113-6121. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Szegedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| | - Christine Boehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie Düsseldorf Germany
| | - Adam Paxton
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| | | | - Vikren Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| | - Hui Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| | - Frances Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| | - Kristine E. Kokeny
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| | - Jonathan Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| | - Bill J. Salter
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Utah Salt Lake City UT84112USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Allen BC, Oto A, Akin O, Alexander LF, Chong J, Froemming AT, Fulgham PF, Lloyd S, Maranchie JK, Mody RN, Patel BN, Schieda N, Turkbey IB, Vapiwala N, Venkatesan AM, Wang CL, Yoo DC, Lockhart ME. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Surveillance of Bladder Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 16:S417-S427. [PMID: 31685109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Urothelial cancer is the second most common cancer, and cause of cancer death, related to the genitourinary tract. The goals of surveillance imaging after the treatment of urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder are to detect new or previously undetected urothelial tumors, to identify metastatic disease, and to evaluate for complications of therapy. For surveillance, patients can be stratified into one of three groups: (1) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer with no symptoms or additional risk factors; (2) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer with symptoms or additional risk factors; and (3) muscle invasive bladder cancer. This article is a review of the current literature for urothelial cancer and resulting recommendations for surveillance imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian C Allen
- Panel Vice-Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Aytekin Oto
- Panel Chair, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Oguz Akin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Pat F Fulgham
- Urology Clinics of North Texas, Dallas, Texas, American Urological Association
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | - Bhavik N Patel
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Nicola Schieda
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and the Department of Radiology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Neha Vapiwala
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Carolyn L Wang
- University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Don C Yoo
- Rhode Island Hospital/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mark E Lockhart
- Specialty Chair, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lloyd S, Coffman A, Torgeson A, Tward J, Johnson S, Tao R, Cohan J, Huang L, Pickron B. Factors Associated with the Refusal of Surgery and the Associated Impact on Survival in Patients with Rectal Cancer using the National Cancer Database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
48
|
Dinh TK, Mitin T, Hoffman K, Hwang C, Karnes RJ, Kishan A, Liauw S, Lloyd S, Potters L, Showalter T, Taira A, Vapiwala N, Zaorsky N, D'Amico A, Nguyen P, Davis B. Towards Evidence Based Practice: The American Radium Society (ARS) and American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriate Use Guidelines on Radiation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
49
|
Hendrickson PG, Luo Y, Kohlmann W, Schiffman J, Maese L, Bishop AJ, Lloyd S, Kokeny KE, Hitchcock YJ, Poppe MM, Gaffney DK, Tao R. Radiation therapy and secondary malignancy in Li-Fraumeni syndrome: A hereditary cancer registry study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:7954-7963. [PMID: 32931654 PMCID: PMC7643676 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Li‐Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a rare cancer‐predisposing condition caused by germline mutations in TP53. Conventional wisdom and prior work has implied an increased risk of secondary malignancy in LFS patients treated with radiation therapy (RT); however, this risk is not well‐characterized. Here we describe the risk of subsequent malignancy and cancer‐related death in LFS patients after undergoing RT for a first or second primary cancer. Methods We reviewed a multi‐institutional hereditary cancer registry of patients with germline TP53 mutations who were treated from 2004 to 2017. We assessed the rate of subsequent malignancy and death in the patients who received RT (RT group) as part of their cancer treatment compared to those who did not (non‐RT group). Results Forty patients with LFS were identified and 14 received RT with curative intent as part of their cancer treatment. The median time to follow‐up after RT was 4.5 years. Fifty percent (7/14) of patients in the curative‐intent group developed a subsequent malignancy (median time 3.5 years) compared to 46% of patients in the non‐RT group (median time 5.0 years). Four of seven subsequent malignancies occurred within a prior radiation field and all shared histology with the primary cancer suggesting recurrence rather than new malignancy. Conclusion We found that four of14 patients treated with RT developed in‐field malignancies. All had the same histology as the primary suggesting local recurrences rather than RT‐induced malignancies. We recommend that RT should be considered as part of the treatment algorithm when clinically indicated and after multidisciplinary discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Hendrickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Yukun Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Josh Schiffman
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Luke Maese
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kristine E Kokeny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ying J Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Matthew M Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David K Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rogers BC, Dunn G, Novalia W, de Haan FJ, Brown L, Brown RR, Hammer K, Lloyd S, Urich C, Wong THF, Chesterfield C. Water Sensitive Cities Index: A diagnostic tool to assess water sensitivity and guide management actions. Water Res X 2020:100063. [PMID: 32875284 PMCID: PMC7451097 DOI: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Cities are wrestling with the practical challenges of transitioning urban water services to become water sensitive; capable of enhancing liveability, sustainability, resilience and productivity in the face of climate change, rapid urbanisation, degraded ecosystems and ageing infrastructure. Indicators can be valuable for guiding actions for improvement, but there is not yet an established index that measures the full suite of attributes that constitute water sensitive performance. This paper therefore presents the Water Sensitive Cities (WSC) Index, a new benchmarking and diagnostic tool to assess the water sensitivity of a municipal or metropolitan city, set aspirational targets and inform management responses to improve water sensitive practices. Its 34 indicators are organised into seven goals: ensure good water sensitive governance, increase community capital, achieve equity of essential services, improve productivity and resource efficiency, improve ecological health, ensure quality urban spaces, and promote adaptive infrastructure. The WSC Index design as a quantitative framework based on qualitative rating descriptions and a participatory assessment methodology enables local contextual interpretations of the indicators, while maintaining a robust universal framework for city comparison and benchmarking. The paper demonstrates its application on three illustrative cases. Rapid uptake of the WSC Index in Australia highlights its value in helping stakeholders develop collective commitment and evidence-based priorities for action to accelerate their city's water sensitive transition. Early testing in cities in Asia and the Pacific has also showed the potential of the WSC Index internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B C Rogers
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - G Dunn
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Uisce Consulting International, Vancouver, Canada
| | - W Novalia
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - F J de Haan
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L Brown
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- Foundry Associates, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R R Brown
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - K Hammer
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Lloyd
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- e2designlab, Melbourne, Australia
| | - C Urich
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - T H F Wong
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
| | - C Chesterfield
- Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|