1
|
Malik AK, Tingle SJ, Chung N, Owen R, Mahendran B, Counter C, Sinha S, Muthasamy A, Sutherland A, Casey J, Drage M, van Dellen D, Callaghan CJ, Elker D, Manas DM, Pettigrew GJ, Wilson CH, White SA. The impact of time to death in donors after circulatory death on recipient outcome in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00134-5. [PMID: 38360185 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
The time to arrest donors after circulatory death is unpredictable and can vary. This leads to variable periods of warm ischemic damage prior to pancreas transplantation. There is little evidence supporting procurement team stand-down times based on donor time to death (TTD). We examined what impact TTD had on pancreas graft outcomes following donors after circulatory death (DCD) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Data were extracted from the UK transplant registry from 2014 to 2022. Predictors of graft loss were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adjusted restricted cubic spline models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome. Three-hundred-and-seventy-five DCD simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients were included. Increasing TTD was not associated with graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.41, P = .901). Increasing asystolic time worsened graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.16-5.43, P = .020). Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a nonlinear relationship between asystolic time and graft survival and no relationship between TTD and graft survival. We found no evidence that TTD impacts pancreas graft survival after DCD simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation; however, increasing asystolic time was a significant predictor of graft loss. Procurement teams should attempt to minimize asystolic time to optimize pancreas graft survival rather than focus on the duration of TTD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Samuel J Tingle
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicholas Chung
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Cramlington, UK
| | - Ruth Owen
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Balaji Mahendran
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Sanjay Sinha
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - John Casey
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martin Drage
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Chris J Callaghan
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Doruk Elker
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK; NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Gavin J Pettigrew
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Colin H Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK; NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malik AK, Figueiredo R, White SA. Comment on: Liver transplantation for elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad426. [PMID: 38207166 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rodrigo Figueiredo
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robertson FP, Lim W, Ratnayake B, Al-Leswas D, Shaw J, Nayar M, White SA, Pandanaboyana S. The development of new onset post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus during hospitalisation is not associated with adverse outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1047-1055. [PMID: 37290990 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) are at increased risk of developing post pancreatitis diabetes mellitus (PPDM). The aim of this study was to explore the incidence, risk factors and sequelae of developing PPDM in a UK tertiary referral centre. METHODS A prospectively collected single centre database was analysed. Patients were grouped according to whether they had DM or not. Patients with DM were further sub-grouped into pre-existing DM or PPDM. Outcomes measured included incidence of PPDM, mortality, ITU admission, overall length of stay (LOS) and local pancreatitis specific complications. RESULTS 401 patients with AP between 2018 and 2021 were identified. Sixty-four (16%) of patients had pre-existing DM. Thirty-eight patients (11%) developed PPDM [mild (n = 4, 8.2%), moderate (n = 19, 10.1%), severe (n = 15, 15.2%), p = 0.326]. 71% required insulin therapy for the duration of follow-up or until death. The development of PPDM was strongly associated with the presence (p < 0.001) and extent of necrosis (p < 0.0001). On multi-variate analysis, the development of PPDM was not an independent predictor for increased LOS, ITU admission or overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of PPDM was 11%. There was a strong correlation with extent of necrosis and the development of PPDM. PPDM did not adversely affect morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis P Robertson
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital Campus, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, UK
| | - Wei Lim
- Translational and Clinical Research Theme, Newcastle University, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Bathiya Ratnayake
- Department of HPB Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Shakespeare Road, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Dhya Al-Leswas
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - James Shaw
- Translational and Clinical Research Theme, Newcastle University, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Manu Nayar
- Department of PB Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK; Department of Population Sciences, University of Newcastle Medical School, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Malik AK, Amer AO, Tingle SJ, Thompson ER, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson C. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents for reducing blood loss in adult liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8:CD010872. [PMID: 37551841 PMCID: PMC10411946 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010872.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection is the optimal treatment for selected benign and malignant liver tumours, but it can be associated with significant blood loss. Numerous anaesthetic and surgical techniques have been developed to reduce blood loss and improve perioperative outcomes. One such technique is the application of topical fibrin-based haemostatic agents (FBHAs) to the resection surface. There is no standard practice for FBHA use, and a variety of commercial agents and devices are available, as well as non-FBHAs (e.g. collagen-based agents). The literature is inconclusive on the effectiveness of these methods and on the clinical benefits of their routine use. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of fibrin-based haemostatic agents in reducing intraoperative blood loss in adults undergoing liver resection. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (CHBG) Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science up to 20 January 2023. We also searched online trial registries, checked the reference lists of all primary studies, and contacted the authors of included trials for additional published or unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered for inclusion all randomised clinical trials evaluating FBHAs versus no topical intervention or non-FBHAs, irrespective of publication type, publication status, language of publication, and outcomes reported. Eligible participants could have any liver pathology and be undergoing major or minor liver resections through open or laparoscopic surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the results of the literature search and used data extraction forms to collate the results. We expressed dichotomous outcome results as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous outcome results as mean differences (MDs), each with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We used a random-effects model for the main analyses. Our primary outcomes were perioperative mortality, serious adverse events, haemostatic efficacy, and health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were efficacy as sealant, adverse events considered non-serious, operating time, and length of hospital stay. We assessed the certainty of the evidence with GRADE and presented results in two summary of findings tables. MAIN RESULTS We included 22 trials (2945 participants) evaluating FBHAs versus no intervention or non-FBHAs; 19 trials with 2642 participants provided data for the meta-analyses. Twelve trials reported commercial funding, one trial reported no financial support, and nine trials provided no information on funding. Below we present the most clinically relevant outcome results, also displayed in our summary of findings table. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents versus no intervention Six trials (1001 participants) compared FBHAs with no intervention. One trial was at low risk of bias in all five domains, and all other trials were at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Two trials were at high risk of bias related to blinding. It is unclear if FBHAs compared with no intervention have an effect on perioperative mortality (RR 2.58, 95% CI 0.89 to 7.44; 4 trials, 782 participants), serious adverse events (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.05; 4 trials, 782 participants), postoperative transfusion (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.40; 5 trials, 864 participants), reoperation (RR 2.92, 95% CI 0.58 to 14.61; 2 trials, 612 participants), or postoperative bile leak (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.48; 4 trials, 782 participants), as the certainty of evidence was very low for all these outcomes. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents versus non-fibrin-based haemostatic agents Sixteen trials (1944 participants) compared FBHAs with non-FBHAs. All trials had at least one domain at high or unclear risk of bias. Twelve trials were at high risk of bias related to blinding. It is unclear if FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs have an effect on perioperative mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.72; 11 trials, 1436 participants), postoperative transfusion (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.25; 7 trials, 599 participants), reoperation (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.90; 3 trials, 358 participants), or postoperative bile leak (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.21; 9 trials, 1115 participants), as the certainty of evidence was very low for all these outcomes. FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs may have little or no effect on the risk of serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03; 9 trials, 1176 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence for the outcomes in both comparisons (FBHAs versus no intervention and FBHAs versus non-FBHAs) was of very low certainty (or low certainty in one instance) and cannot justify the routine use of FBHAs to reduce blood loss in adult liver resection. While the meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of reoperation with FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs, the analysis was confounded by the small number of trials reporting the event and the risk of bias in all these trials. Future trials should focus on the use of FBHAs in people undergoing liver resection who are at particularly high risk of bleeding. Investigators should evaluate clinically meaningful and patient-important outcomes and follow the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Aimen O Amer
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Samuel J Tingle
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emily R Thompson
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Ramshorst TME, Giani A, Mazzola M, Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Esposito A, de Pastena M, Lof S, Edwin B, Sahakyan M, Boggi U, Kauffman EF, Fabre JM, Souche RF, Zerbi A, Butturini G, Molenaar Q, Al-Sarireh B, Marino MV, Keck T, White SA, Casadei R, Burdio F, Björnsson B, Soonawalla Z, Koerkamp BG, Fusai GK, Pessaux P, Jah A, Pietrabissa A, Hackert T, D'Hondt M, Pando E, Besselink MG, Ferrari G, Hilal MA. Benchmarking of robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by using two different methods. Br J Surg 2022; 110:76-83. [PMID: 36322465 PMCID: PMC10364499 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benchmarking is an important tool for quality comparison and improvement. However, no benchmark values are available for minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, either laparoscopically or robotically assisted. The aim of this study was to establish benchmarks for these techniques using two different methods. METHODS Data from patients undergoing laparoscopically or robotically assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy were extracted from a multicentre database (2006-2019). Benchmarks for 10 outcomes were calculated using the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC) and best-patient-in-best-centre methods. RESULTS Overall, 951 laparoscopically assisted (77.3 per cent) and 279 robotically assisted (22.7 per cent) procedures were included. Using the ABC method, the benchmarks for laparoscopically assisted and robotically assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy respectively were: 150 and 207 min for duration of operation, 55 and 100 ml for blood loss, 3.5 and 1.7 per cent for conversion, 0 and 1.7 per cent for failure to preserve the spleen, 27.3 and 34.0 per cent for overall morbidity, 5.1 and 3.3 per cent for major morbidity, 3.6 and 7.1 per cent for pancreatic fistula grade B/C, 5 and 6 days for duration of hospital stay, 2.9 and 5.4 per cent for readmissions, and 0 and 0 per cent for 90-day mortality. Best-patient-in-best-centre methodology revealed milder benchmark cut-offs for laparoscopically and robotically assisted procedures, with operating times of 254 and 262.5 min, blood loss of 150 and 195 ml, conversion rates of 5.8 and 8.2 per cent, rates of failure to salvage spleen of 29.9 and 27.3 per cent, overall morbidity rates of 62.7 and 55.7 per cent, major morbidity rates of 20.4 and 14 per cent, POPF B/C rates of 23.8 and 24.2 per cent, duration of hospital stay of 8 and 8 days, readmission rates of 20 and 15.1 per cent, and 90-day mortality rates of 0 and 0 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION Two benchmark methods for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy produced different values, and should be interpreted and applied differently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess M E van Ramshorst
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Amsterdamum UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Giani
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Fadhel Samir Ftériche
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Sanne Lof
- Amsterdamum UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, also Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy, and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marco V Marino
- General and Emergency Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.,General Surgery Department, Istituto Villa Salus, Siracusa, Italy
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Surgery, Sant'Orsola Malphigi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fernando Burdio
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, theNetherlands
| | - Giuseppe Kito Fusai
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free London, London, UK
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University Hospital, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrea Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Elizabeth Pando
- Department of Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdamum UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giani A, van Ramshorst T, Mazzola M, Bassi C, Esposito A, de Pastena M, Edwin B, Sahakyan M, Kleive D, Jah A, van Laarhoven S, Boggi U, Kauffman EF, Casadei R, Ricci C, Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, White SA, Kamarajah SK, Butturini G, Frigerio I, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Pando E, Sutcliffe RP, Marudanayagam R, Fusai GK, Fabre JM, Björnsson B, Timmermann L, Soonawalla Z, Burdio F, Keck T, Hackert T, Groot Koerkamp B, d’Hondt M, Coratti A, Pessaux P, Pietrabissa A, Al-Sarireh B, Marino MV, Molenaar Q, Yip V, Besselink M, Ferrari G, Hilal MA. Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1124-1130. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS).
Methods
This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk.
Results
A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87).
Conclusion
The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Giani
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda , Milan , Italy
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza , Brescia , Italy
| | - Tess van Ramshorst
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza , Brescia , Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda , Milan , Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital , Verona , Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital , Verona , Italy
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital , Verona , Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo Norway
| | - Mushegh Sahakyan
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo Norway
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo Norway
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - Stijn van Laarhoven
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Surgery, Sant’Orsola Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Claudio Ricci
- Department of Surgery, Sant’Orsola Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital , Clichy , France
| | - Fadhel Samir Ftériche
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital , Clichy , France
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | | | | | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele , Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano , Italy
| | - Giovanni Capretti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele , Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano , Italy
| | - Elizabeth Pando
- Department of Surgery, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - Giuseppe Kito Fusai
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free London , London , UK
| | | | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden
| | | | | | - Fernando Burdio
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein , Campus Lübeck, Lübeck , Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathieu d’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital , Kortrijk , Belgium
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital , Florence , Italy
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University Hospital, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France
| | - Andrea Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo , Pavia , Italy
| | | | - Marco V Marino
- General and Emergency Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello , Palermo , Italy
- General Surgery Department, Istituto Villa Salus , Siracusa , Italy
| | - Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht , Utrecht , the Netherlands
| | - Vincent Yip
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust , London , UK
| | - Marc Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda , Milan , Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza , Brescia , Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Korenblik R, Olij B, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Ahle M, Arslan B, van Baardewijk LJ, Baclija I, Bent C, Bertrand CL, Björnsson B, de Boer MT, de Boer SW, Bokkers RPH, Rinkes IHMB, Breitenstein S, Bruijnen RCG, Bruners P, Büchler MW, Camacho JC, Cappelli A, Carling U, Chan BKY, Chang DH, Choi J, Font JC, Crawford M, Croagh D, Cugat E, Davis R, De Boo DW, De Cobelli F, De Wispelaere JF, van Delden OM, Delle M, Detry O, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Fisher O, Fondevila C, Fretland Å, Borobia FG, Gelabert A, Gérard L, Giuliante F, Gobardhan PD, Gómez F, Grünberger T, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess GF, Hoffmann MH, Iezzi R, Imani F, Nguyen J, Jovine E, Kalff JC, Kazemier G, Kingham TP, Kleeff J, Kollmar O, Leclercq WKG, Ben SL, Lucidi V, MacDonald A, Madoff DC, Manekeller S, Martel G, Mehrabi A, Mehrzad H, Meijerink MR, Menon K, Metrakos P, Meyer C, Moelker A, Modi S, Montanari N, Navines J, Neumann UP, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Qu X, Raptis D, Ratti F, Ridouani F, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Ryan S, Sallemi C, Moragues JS, Sandström P, Sarriá L, Schnitzbauer A, Serenari M, Serrablo A, Smits MLJ, Sparrelid E, Spüntrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe RP, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Udupa V, Valenti D, Fundora Y, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White SA, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IAJ, Binkert CA, Bemelmans MHA, van der Leij C, Schadde E, van Dam RM. Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1391-1398. [PMID: 35790566 PMCID: PMC9458562 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03176-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. RESULTS Not applicable. CONCLUSION DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Korenblik
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - B Olij
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Ahle
- Deparment of Radiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Arslan
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - L J van Baardewijk
- Department of Radiology, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I Baclija
- Department of Radiology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Bent
- Department of Radiology, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, UK
| | - C L Bertrand
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M T de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S W de Boer
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Breitenstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - R C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Bruners
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - U Carling
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B K Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Chang
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Choi
- Department of Surgery, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - J Codina Font
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - M Crawford
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - D Croagh
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - E Cugat
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - R Davis
- Department of Radiology, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D W De Boo
- Department of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - F De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - O M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Delle
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Detry
- Department of Surgery, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Díaz-Nieto
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Dili
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - J I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Fisher
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - C Fondevila
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Å Fretland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - F Garcia Borobia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
| | - A Gelabert
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - L Gérard
- Department of Radiology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - F Giuliante
- Department of Surgery, Gemelli University Hospital Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - F Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Grünberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Guitart
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Heil
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Herrero
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - G F Hess
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M H Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, St. Clara Spital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Iezzi
- Department of Radiology, Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Imani
- Department of Radiology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J C Kalff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T P Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - O Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Lopez Ben
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - V Lucidi
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A MacDonald
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D C Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - S Manekeller
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Martel
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - A Mehrabi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Mehrzad
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - M R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - C Meyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - A Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Modi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - N Montanari
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Maggiore Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Navines
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - U P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Peddu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - J N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - X Qu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - D Raptis
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - F Ratti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Ridouani
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Rogan
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - U Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - S Ryan
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - C Sallemi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - J Sampere Moragues
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Sarriá
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - A Schnitzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Serenari
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Spüntrup
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - G A Stavrou
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - R P Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Tancredi
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J C Tasse
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - V Udupa
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - Y Fundora
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T J Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hosptital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - X Wang
- Department of Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - S A White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - W A Wohlgemuth
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - D Yu
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - I A J Zijlstra
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - M H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - C van der Leij
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Schadde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - R M van Dam
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Malik AK, Amer AO, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson CH. O092 Fibrin-based haemostatic agents for reducing blood loss in adult liver resection: a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac242.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Liver resection can be associated with significant perioperative bleeding. Fibrin based haemostatic agents (FBHAs) are bioabsorbable topical haemostatic agents used to enhance haemostasis and reduce blood loss. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, comparing FBHAs with the standard of care and no topical application (SoC), and comparing FBHAs with non-fibrin-based haemostatic agents (NFHAs) to evaluate their efficacy in reducing blood loss and improving perioperative outcomes.
Method
The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Specialised Register was searched to identify (quasi-) RCTs to include in our meta-analysis. Two authors independently reviewed each study. Primary outcomes were haemostatic efficacy (defined as haemostasis within 4 or 5 minutes post application), adverse events and perioperative mortality (within 30-days of surgery). Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals.
Result
Twenty-seven RCTs (3736 participants) were included in our analysis. FBHAs were found to have superior haemostatic efficacy compared to NFHAs (OR 4.03; 1.73–9.36, p=0.001), and were superior to SoC (OR 13.59; 4.06–45.47, p<0.0001). Incidence of adverse events and perioperative mortality was no different when comparing FBHAs with SoC or NFHAs. No differences were detected when testing for post-operative bile leakage, intra-abdominal collections, volume of abdominal drain output, post-operative transfusion requirements, reoperation rates and length of stay (all p>0.05).
Conclusion
FBHAs appear superior to SoC and NFHAs in achieving haemostasis within 4–5 minutes post-application, however this does not translate into improved post-operative outcomes. FBHAs are not justified for routine use based on the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AK Malik
- Liver Unit, Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - AO Amer
- Liver Unit, Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - SA White
- Liver Unit, Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - DM Manas
- Liver Unit, Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - CH Wilson
- Liver Unit, Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Owen RV, Counter C, Shaw JA, Wilson CH, White SA. O002 Diabetes-associated HLA donor genotypes and pancreas transplant outcomes. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac242.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The genotypes HLA DR3/DR4, DR3/DR3, DR4/DR4 are associated with a predisposition to diabetes. This study evaluated UK recipient outcomes after pancreas transplantation from donors with a diabetes-associated genotypes.
Methods
Data on all UK pancreas transplants from 2004–2019 was obtained from the NHSBT-UK Registry, n=2,938. HLA-DR type was recorded for all organ donors. Re-transplants and those missing patient (PS) or graft (GS) survival were excluded, resulting in a final cohort of n=2,661. We further delineated our categories into SPK, PTA and PAK as a previous study suggested different recipient categories may be adversely affected. Univariate analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and multi-variate analysis using Cox-regression models. Complications were analysed using chi-squared analyses.
Results
The majority of grafts were from donors not associated with diabetes genotypes (90.1%, n=2397) whereas 5.4%(n=145) came from HLA DR3/DR4 donors, 1.6%(n=43) from DR3/DR3 and (n=76)2.9% from DR4/DR4. Comparable outcomes for GS at 1yr (SPK p=0.980, PTA p=0.759, PAK p=0.244) and 3yrs (SPK p=0.708, PTA p=0.744, PAK p=0.275) and PS at 1yr (SPK p=0.553, PTA p=0.527, PAK p=0.756) and 3yrs (SPK p=0.728, PTA p=0.928, PAK p=0.424) were seen. Multivariate analysis also showed no statistically significant difference in GS (p=0.604, HR 1.041, 95%CI 0.895, 1.211) or PS (p=0.623, HR 1.045, 95%CI 0.876, 1.248). There were comparable complication rates.
Conclusion
This multicentre UK study has found comparable survival outcomes and complication rates within our donor-HLA-genotype groups. We do not believe that the presence or absence of a diabetes associated HLA-genotype influences outcomes for any category of pancreas transplant.
Take-home message
We do not believe that the presence or absence of a diabetes-associated HLA-genotype influences outcomes for any category of pancreas transplant.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kuemmerli C, Fichtinger RS, Moekotte A, Aldrighetti LA, Aroori S, Besselink MGH, D’Hondt M, Díaz-Nieto R, Edwin B, Efanov M, Ettorre GM, Menon KV, Sheen AJ, Soonawalla Z, Sutcliffe R, Troisi RI, White SA, Brandts L, van Breukelen GJP, Sijberden J, Pugh SA, Eminton Z, Primrose JN, van Dam R, Hilal MA. Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:206. [PMID: 35264216 PMCID: PMC8908665 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06112-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A shift towards parenchymal-sparing liver resections in open and laparoscopic surgery emerged in the last few years. Laparoscopic liver resection is technically feasible and safe, and consensus guidelines acknowledge the laparoscopic approach in the posterosuperior segments. Lesions situated in these segments are considered the most challenging for the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this trial is to compare the postoperative time to functional recovery, complications, oncological safety, quality of life, survival and costs after laparoscopic versus open parenchymal-sparing liver resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery setting. METHODS The ORANGE Segments trial is an international multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial conducted in centres experienced in laparoscopic liver resection. Eligible patients for minor resections in the posterosuperior segments will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to undergo laparoscopic or open resections in an enhanced recovery setting. Patients and ward personnel are blinded to the treatment allocation until postoperative day 4 using a large abdominal dressing. The primary endpoint is time to functional recovery. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative outcomes, length of stay, resection margin, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, time to adjuvant chemotherapy initiation, quality of life and overall survival. Laparoscopic liver surgery of the posterosuperior segments is hypothesised to reduce time to functional recovery by 2 days in comparison with open surgery. With a power of 80% and alpha of 0.04 to adjust for interim analysis halfway the trial, a total of 250 patients are required to be randomised. DISCUSSION The ORANGE Segments trial is the first multicentre international randomised controlled study to compare short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open resections in the posterosuperior segments within an enhanced recovery programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03270917 . Registered on September 1, 2017. Before start of inclusion. PROTOCOL VERSION version 12, May 9, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
| | - Robert S. Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alma Moekotte
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
| | | | - Somaiah Aroori
- Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Marc G. H. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Rafael Díaz-Nieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giuseppe M. Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Aali J. Sheen
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Zahir Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Steven A. White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lloyd Brandts
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard J. P. van Breukelen
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siân A. Pugh
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Zina Eminton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - John N. Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ronald van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
| | - on behalf of the ORANGE trials collaborative
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kamarajah SK, Sutandi N, Sen G, Hammond J, Manas DM, French JJ, White SA. Comparative analysis of open, laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatic resection: The United Kingdom's first single-centre experience. J Minim Access Surg 2022; 18:77-83. [PMID: 35017396 PMCID: PMC8830579 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_163_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has potential advantages over its open equivalent open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for pancreatic disease in the neck, body and tail. Within the United Kingdom (UK), there has been no previous experience describing the role of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). This study evaluated differences between ODP, LDP and RDP. METHODS Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy performed in the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery at the Freeman Hospital between September 2007 and December 2018 were included from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was length of hospital stay, and the secondary outcome measures were complication rates graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS Of the 125 patients, the median age was 61 years and 46% were male. Patients undergoing RDP (n = 40) had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grading III compared to ODP (n = 38) and LDP (n = 47) (57% vs. 37% vs. 38%, P = 0.02). RDP had a slightly lower but not significant conversion rate (10% vs. 13%, P = 0.084), less blood loss (median: 0 vs. 250 ml, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of splenic preservation (30% vs. 2%, P < 0.001) and shorter operative time, once docking time excluded (284 vs. 300 min, P < 0.001) compared to LDP. RDP had a higher R0 resection rate than ODP and LDP (79% vs. 47% vs. 71%, P = 0.078) for neoplasms. RDP was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay than LDP and ODP (8 vs. 9 vs. 10 days, P = 0.001). While there was no significant different in overall complications across the groups, RDP was associated with lower rates of Grade C pancreatic fistula than ODP and LDP (2% vs. 5% vs. 6%, P = 0.194). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive pancreatic resection offers potential advantages over ODP, with a trend showing RDP to be marginally superior when compared to conventional LDP, but it is accepted that that this is likely to be at greater expense compared to the other current techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh Kathir Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Nathania Sutandi
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Gourab Sen
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - John Hammond
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Jeremy J French
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
- Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kamarajah SK, Al-Rawashdeh W, Parente A, Atherton P, Salti GI, Dahdaleh FS, Manas D, Hilal MA, White SA. Adjuvant chemotherapy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based comparative cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:1300-1308. [PMID: 34916085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data supporting routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) compared to no AC (noAC) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA) is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether AC improves long-term survival following resection for hCCA. METHODS Patients receiving resection for hCCA followed by AC or no AC from 2010 to 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression was performed to account for selection bias and analyze impact of AC on overall survival. RESULTS Of 924 (56%) noAC and 719 (44%) AC, 320 noAC and 320 AC patients remained after PSM. After matching, AC was associated with improved survival (median: 28.2 vs 19.9 months, p < 0.001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.61, CI95%: 0.50-0.75, p < 0.001). On multivariable interaction analyses, the benefit of AC over no AC persisted irrespective of nodal status: N0 (HR: 0.62, CI95%: 0.41-0.92, p = 0.019), N1 (HR: 0.52, CI95%: 0.36-0.75, p = 0.001), N2 (HR: 0.31, CI95%: 0.11-0.90, p = 0.032), Nx (HR: 0.22, CI95%: 0.09-0.55, p = 0.001) and margin status: R0 (HR: 0.74, CI95%: 0.57-0.97, p = 0.026), R1 (HR: 0.31, CI95%: 0.21-0.47, p < 0.001). Stratified analysis by nodal, margin and AC status demonstrated consistent results. CONCLUSION AC following resection for hCCA was associated with improved survival in this study, even in margin-negative and node-negative disease. These findings suggest incorporation of AC into multimodality therapy for hCCA in all cases, where appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Wasfi Al-Rawashdeh
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Phil Atherton
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - George I Salti
- Department of General Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA; Edward-Elmhurst Health, Department of Surgical Oncology, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Fadi S Dahdaleh
- Edward-Elmhurst Health, Department of Surgical Oncology, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Derek Manas
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kamarajah SK, Gujjuri RR, Hilal MA, Manas DM, White SA. Does minimally invasive liver resection improve long-term survival compared to open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 2021; 111:14574969211042455. [PMID: 34605328 DOI: 10.1177/14574969211042455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minimally invasive liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma has gained widespread interest as an alternative to conventional open liver surgery. However, long-term survival benefits of this approach seem unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate long-term survival following minimally invasive liver surgery. METHOD A systematic review was performed to identify studies comparing long-term survival after minimally invasive liver surgery and open liver surgery until January 2020. The I2 test was used to test for statistical heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed using Egger test. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for all-cause 5-year (main outcome) and 3-year mortality, and disease-specific 5-year and 3-year mortality. Meta-regression was performed for the 5-year and 3-year survival outcomes with adjustment for study factors (region, design), annual center volume, patient factors (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, gender, age, body mass index, cirrhosis, tumor size, and number), and resection extent. Sensitivity analyses were performed on studies by study year, region, annual center volume, and resection type. RESULT The review identified 50 relevant studies including 13,731 patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma of which 4071 (25.8%) underwent minimally invasive liver surgery. Pooled analysis revealed similar all-cause (odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.11, p = 0.3) and disease-specific (odds ratio: 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.09, p = 0.4) 5-year mortality after minimally invasive liver surgery compared with open liver surgery. Sensitivity analysis of published studies from 2010 to 2019 demonstrated a significantly lower disease-specific 3-year mortality (odds ratio: 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.96, p = 0.022) and all-cause 5-year mortality (odds ratio: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.81, p = 0.002). Meta-regression identified no confounding factors in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS Improvement in minimally invasive liver surgery techniques over the past decade appears to demonstrate superior disease-specific mortality with minimally invasive liver surgery compared to open liver surgery. Therefore, minimally invasive liver surgery can be recommended as an alternative surgical approach for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- BMedSci, MBChB Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University NHS Trust Hospitals, NE7 7DN, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rohan R Gujjuri
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Moh'd A Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University NHS Trust Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University NHS Trust Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ward N, Menta A, Peach S, White SA, Jaffe S, Kowaleski C, Grandjean da Costa K, Verghese J, Reid KF. Cognitive Motor Dual Task Costs in Older Adults with Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome. J Frailty Aging 2021; 10:337-342. [PMID: 34549248 DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2021.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to characterize Cognitive Motor Dual Task (CMDT) costs for a community-based sample of older adults with Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome (MCR), as well as investigate associations between CMDT costs and cognitive performance. Twenty-five community-dwelling older adults (ages 60-89 years) with MCR performed single and dual task complex walking scenarios, as well as a computerized cognitive testing battery. Participants with lower CMDT costs had higher scores on composite measures of Working Memory, Processing Speed, and Shifting, as well as an overall cognitive composite measure. In addition, participants with faster single task gait velocity had higher scores on composite measures of Working Memory, Processing Speed, and overall cognition. Taken together, these results suggest that CMDT paradigms can help to elucidate the interplay between cognitive and motor abilities for older adults with MCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Ward
- Nathan Ward, PhD. Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 02155. Telephone: +1-617-627-2645; Fax: +1-617-627-3181; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kamarajah SK, Al-Rawashdeh W, White SA, Abu Hilal M, Salti GI, Dahdaleh FS. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves long-term survival after resection for gallbladder cancer A population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:425-434. [PMID: 34518052 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data supporting routine use of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) compared to without RT (noRT) for gallbladder cancer (GBC) is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether RT improves long-term survival following resection for GBC. METHODS Patients receiving resection for GBC followed by RT from 2004 to 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients with survival <6 months were excluded to account for immortal time bias. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression was performed to account for selection bias and analyze impact of RT on overall survival. RESULTS Of 7514 (77%) noRT and 2261 (23%) RT, 2067 noRT and 2067 RT patients remained after PSM. After matching, RT was associated with improved survival (median: 26.2 vs 21.5 months, p < 0.001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.82, CI95%: 0.76-0.89, p < 0.001). On multivariable interaction analyses, this benefit persisted irrespective of nodal status: N0 (HR: 0.84, CI95%: 0.77-0.93), N1 (HR: 0.77, CI95%: 0.68-0.88), N2/N3 (HR: 0.56, CI95%: 0.35-0.91), margin status: R0 (HR: 0.85, CI95%: 0.78-0.93), R1 (HR: 0.78, CI95%: 0.68-0.88) and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) (HR: 0.67, CI95%: 0.57-0.79). Benefit with RT were also seen in patients with T2 - T4 disease and in patients undergoing simple and extended cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION RT following resection was associated with improved survival in this study, even in margin-negative and node-negative disease. These findings may suggest addition of RT into multimodality therapy for GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Wasfi Al-Rawashdeh
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - George I Salti
- Department of General Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA; Edward-Elmhurst Health, Department of Surgical Oncology, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Fadi S Dahdaleh
- Department of General Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, Arbogast HP, Badet L, Baronti W, Bartlett ST, Benedetti E, Branchereau J, Burke GW, Buron F, Caldara R, Cardillo M, Casanova D, Cipriani F, Cooper M, Cupisti A, Davide J, Drachenberg C, de Koning EJP, Ettorre GM, Fernandez Cruz L, Fridell JA, Friend PJ, Furian L, Gaber OA, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Gunton JE, Han D, Iacopi S, Kauffmann EF, Kaufman D, Kenmochi T, Khambalia HA, Lai Q, Langer RM, Maffi P, Marselli L, Menichetti F, Miccoli M, Mittal S, Morelon E, Napoli N, Neri F, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Öllinger R, Oniscu G, Orlando G, Ortenzi M, Perosa M, Perrone VG, Pleass H, Redfield RR, Ricci C, Rigotti P, Paul Robertson R, Ross LF, Rossi M, Saudek F, Scalea JR, Schenker P, Secchi A, Socci C, Sousa Silva D, Squifflet JP, Stock PG, Stratta RJ, Terrenzio C, Uva P, Watson CJ, White SA, Marchetti P, Kandaswamy R, Berney T. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 Suppl 3:17-59. [PMID: 34245223 PMCID: PMC8518376 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Manas D, White SA. A Network Meta-Analysis of Induction Immunosuppression for Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant From Randomized Clinical Trials. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2021; 19:397-404. [PMID: 34053419 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2020.0231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Induction immunosuppression for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant has helped reduce graft loss due to early rejection. Both thymoglobulin and interleukin 2 receptor antagonists are the most commonly used induction agents; however, some high-volume centers prefer alemtuzumab.Thisnetwork meta-analysis aimedto compare differentinductionregimens for simultaneouspancreaskidney transplantin terms ofbothpancreas and patient graft survival, as well to assess acute rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials up to October 31, 2019, that examined induction regimens for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant. Study characteristics, postoperative data (patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survival), complications (eg, bleeding), infection rates, and malignancy rates were extracted. We compared all regimens using randomeffects network meta-analyses to maintain randomization within trials. RESULTS This study identified 7 randomized clinical trials that involved 536 patients, which reported 5 induction regimens. These regimens included antithymocyte globulin (97 patients), alemtuzumab (42 patients), 2 doses (113 patients) or 5 doses (164 patients) of daclizumab, and no induction therapy (120 patients). In the network meta-analysis, a regimen with 2 doses of daclizumab was consistently ranked first for patient survival and kidney and pancreas graft survival. In contrast, alemtuzumab was ranked best for acute rejection (both pancreas and kidney). Rates of majorinfection (ie, cytomegalovirus) and malignancy were reported in 3 studies, precluding a reliable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Daclizumab with 2 doses, given before simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant, was associated with the best rates of patient and graft survival. Despite the recent withdrawal of daclizumab, an alternative anti-interleukin 2 induction regimen (basiliximab) has demonstrated promising results in nonrandomized series, warranting that further highquality large-scale randomized clinical trials are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- From the Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear; and the Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tingle SJ, Thompson ER, Ali SS, Ibrahim IK, Irwin E, Sen G, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson CH. O6: EARLY ANASTOMOTIC BILIARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab117.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures are common early biliary complications (EBC) following liver transplantation. However, their impact on outcomes remains controversial and poorly described.
Method
The NHS registry on adult liver transplantation between 2006 and 2017 was retrospectively reviewed (n=8304). Multiple imputations were performed to account for missing data. Adjusted regression models were used to assess predictors of EBC, and their impact on outcomes. 35 potential variables were included, and backwards stepwise selection enabled unbiased selection of variables for inclusion in final models.
Result
EBC occurred in 9.6% of patients. Adjusted cox regression revealed that EBCs have a significant and independent impact on graft survival (Leak HR=1.325; P=0.021, Stricture HR=1.514; P=0.002, Leak plus stricture HR=1.533; P=0.034) and patient survival (Leak HR=1.218; P=0.131, Stricture HR=1.578; P<0.001, Leak plus stricture HR=1.507; P=0.044). Patients with EBC had longer median hospital stay (23 versus 15 days; P<0.001) and increased chance for readmission within the first year (56% versus 32%; P<0.001). On adjusted logistic regression the following were identified as independent risk factors for development of EBC: donation following circulatory death (OR=1.280; P=0.009), accessory hepatic artery (OR=1.324; P=0.005), vascular anastomosis time in minutes (OR=1.005; P=0.032) and ethnicity ‘other’ (OR=1.838; P=0.011).
Conclusion
EBCs prolong hospital stay, increase readmission rates and are independent risk factors for diminished graft survival and increased mortality in liver transplantation. We have identified factors that increase the likelihood of EBC occurrence; further research into interventions to prevent EBCs in these at-risk groups is vital to improve liver transplantation outcomes.
Take-home message
Using a large registry database we have shown that early anastomotic biliary complications are independent risk factors for decreased graft survival and increased mortality after liver transplantation. Research into interventions to prevent biliary complications in high risk groups are essential to improve liver transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SJ Tingle
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - ER Thompson
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - SS Ali
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - IK Ibrahim
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - E Irwin
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - G Sen
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - SA White
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - DM Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - CH Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tingle SJ, Thompson ER, Ali SS, Figueiredo R, Hudson M, Sen G, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson CH. Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis. BJS Open 2021; 5:6226008. [PMID: 33855363 PMCID: PMC8047096 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures are common early anastomotic biliary complications (EABCs) following liver transplantation. However, there are no large multicentre studies investigating their clinical impact or risk factors. This study aimed to define the incidence, risk factors and impact of EABC. Methods The NHS registry on adult liver transplantation between 2006 and 2017 was reviewed retrospectively. Adjusted regression models were used to assess predictors of EABC, and their impact on outcomes. Results Analyses included 8304 liver transplant recipients. Patients with EABC (9·6 per cent) had prolonged hospitalization (23 versus 15 days; P < 0·001) and increased chance for readmission within the first year (56 versus 32 per cent; P < 0·001). Patients with EABC had decreased estimated 5-year graft survival of 75·1 versus 84·5 per cent in those without EABC, and decreased 5-year patient survival of 76·9 versus 83·3 per cent; both P < 0.001. Adjusted Cox regression revealed that EABCs have a significant and independent impact on graft survival (leak hazard ratio (HR) 1·344, P = 0·015; stricture HR 1·513, P = 0·002; leak plus stricture HR 1·526, P = 0·036) and patient survival (leak HR 1·215, P = 0·136, stricture HR 1·526, P = 0·001; leak plus stricture HR 1·509; P = 0·043). On adjusted logistic regression, risk factors for EABC included donation after circulatory death grafts, graft aberrant arterial anatomy, biliary anastomosis type, vascular anastomosis time and recipient model of end-stage liver disease. Conclusion EABCs prolong hospital stay, increase readmission rates and are independent risk factors for graft loss and increased mortality. This study has identified factors that increase the likelihood of EABC occurrence; research into interventions to prevent EABCs in these at-risk groups is vital to improve liver transplantation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Tingle
- National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit (NIHR BTRU) in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - E R Thompson
- National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit (NIHR BTRU) in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - S S Ali
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, UK
| | - R Figueiredo
- National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit (NIHR BTRU) in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - M Hudson
- Department of Hepatology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - G Sen
- National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit (NIHR BTRU) in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - S A White
- National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit (NIHR BTRU) in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - D M Manas
- National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit (NIHR BTRU) in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - C H Wilson
- National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit (NIHR BTRU) in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gujjuri RR, Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Jiao LR, Hilal MA, White SA. P74 Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Resection versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. BJS Open 2021. [PMCID: PMC8030244 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction It remains unclear whether minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) influences long-term survival in periampullary cancers. This review aims evaluate long-term survival between MIPD and OPD for periampullary cancers. Methods A systematic review was performed to identify studies comparing long-term survival after MIPD and OPD. The I2 test was used to test for statistical heterogeneity and publication bias using Egger test. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for all-cause 5-year (main outcome) and 3-year survival, and disease-specific 5-year and 3-year survival. Meta-regression was performed for the 5- year and 3-year survival outcomes with adjustment for study (region, design, case matching), hospital (centre volume), patient (ASA grade, gender, age), and tumor (stage, neoadjuvant therapy, subtype (i.e. ampullary, distal bile duct, duodenal, pancreatic)). Sensitivity analyses performed on studies including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) only. Results The review identified 31 relevant studies. Among all 58,622 patients, 8716 (14.9%) underwent MIPD and 49,875 (85.1%) underwent OPD. Pooled analysis revealed similar 5-year overall survival after MIPD compared with OPD (HR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.50–1.22, p = 0.2). Meta-regression indicated case matching, and ASA Grade II and III as confounding covariates. The statistical heterogeneity was limited (I2 = 12, c2 = 0.26) and the funnel plot was symmetrical both according to visual and statistical testing (Egger test = 0.32). Sensitivity subset analyses for PDAC demonstrated similar 5-year overall survival after MIPD compared with OPD (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.32–1.50, p = 0.3). Conclusion Long-term survival after MIPD is similar to OPD. Thus, MIPD can be recommended as a standard surgical approach for periampullary cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan R Gujjuri
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James R Bundred
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Long R Jiao
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A White
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gujjuri RR, Kamarajah SK, Hilal MA, Manas DM, White SA. P75 Long-Term Survival After Minimally Invasive Resection versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. BJS Open 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has gained widespread interest as an alternative to conventional open liver surgery (OLS). However, long-term survival benefits of this approach seem unclear. This meta- analysis was conducted to investigate long-term survival following MILS.
Methods
A systematic review was performed to identify studies comparing long-term survival after MILS and OLS until January 2020. The I2 test was used to test for statistical heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed using Egger test. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for all-cause 5-year (main outcome) and 3-year mortality, and disease-specific 5-year and 3-year mortality. Meta-regression was performed for the 5-year and 3-year survival outcomes with adjustment for study factors (region, design), annual center volume, patient factors (ASA grade, gender, age, BMI, cirrhosis, tumor size and number), and resection extent. Sensitivity analyses were performed on studies by study year, region, annual centre volume, resection type.
Results
The review identified 50 relevant studies including 13,731 patients undergoing liver resection for HCC of which 4,071 (25.8%) underwent MILS. Pooled analysis revealed similar all-cause (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70 - 1.11, p = 0.3) and disease-specific (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.80 - 1.09, p = 0.4) 5-year mortality after MILS compared with OLS. Sensitivity analysis of published studies from 2010 to 2019 demonstrated a significantly lower disease-specific 3-year mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59 - 0.96, p = 0.022) and all cause 5-year mortality (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50 - 0.81, p = 0.002). Meta- regression identified no confounding factors in all analyses.
Conclusions
Improvement in MILS techniques over the past decade appears to demonstrate superior disease-specific mortality with MILS compared to OLS. Therefore, MILS can be recommended as a standard surgical approach for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan R Gujjuri
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Moh’d Abu Hilal
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Derek M Manas
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A White
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Littler P, Reeves H, Manas DM, White SA. Treatment strategies for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:495-505. [PMID: 33309569 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several treatment strategies for early stage hepatocellular cancers (HCC) have been evaluated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to explore the relative effectiveness of these different approaches on their impact on overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). METHODS A systematic review was conducted to identify RCT's reported up to 23rd January 2020. Indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects NMA. RESULTS Twenty-eight RCT's, involving 3,618 patients, reporting 13 different treatment strategies for early stage HCC were identified. Median follow-up, reported in 22 studies, ranged from 12-93 months. In this NMA, RFA in combination with iodine-125 was ranked first for both RFS (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.19-1.31) and OS (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19-0.94). In subgroup with solitary HCC, lack of studies reporting RFS precluded reliable analysis. However, RFA in combination with iodine-125 was associated with markedly better OS (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.93). CONCLUSION This NMA identified RFA in combination with iodine-125 as a treatment delivering better RFS and OS, in patients with early stage HCC, especially for those with solitary HCC. This technique warrants further evaluation in both Asia and Western regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK; Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - James R Bundred
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Research and Innovation Department, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Littler
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Helen Reeves
- Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Hepatopancreatobiliary Multidisciplinary Team, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kamarajah SK, White SA, Naffouje SA, Salti GI, Dahdaleh F. Adjuvant Chemotherapy Associated with Survival Benefit Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6790-6802. [PMID: 33786676 PMCID: PMC8460503 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09823-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Data supporting the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) compared with no AC (noAC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are lacking. This study aimed to determine whether AC improves long-term survival in patients receiving NAC and resection. Methods Patients receiving resection for PDAC following NAC from 2004 to 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Patients with a survival rate of < 6 months were excluded to account for immortal time bias. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression analysis were performed to account for selection bias and analyze the impact of AC on overall survival. Results Of 4449 (68%) noAC patients and 2111 (32%) AC patients, 2016 noAC patients and 2016 AC patients remained after PSM. After matching, AC was associated with improved survival (median 29.4 vs. 24.9 months; p < 0.001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.88; p < 0.001). On multivariable interaction analyses, this benefit persisted irrespective of nodal status: N0 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.72–0.90; p < 0.001), N1 (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67–0.86; p < 0.001), R0 margin status (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75–0.89; p < 0.001), R1 margin status (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.93; p = 0.007), no neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.96; p = 0.009), and use of NART (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.88; p < 0.001). Stratified analysis by nodal, margin, and NART status demonstrated consistent results. Conclusion AC following NAC and resection is associated with improved survival, even in margin-negative and node-negative disease. These findings suggest completing planned systemic treatment should be considered in all resected PDACs previously treated with NAC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09823-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK.,Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Samer A Naffouje
- Department of Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - George I Salti
- Department of General Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Fadi Dahdaleh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Robinson S, Moir JAG, Pedley I, Manas DM, White SA. Chemotherapy for downsizing unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009335.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Robinson
- Department of HPB & Transplant Surgery; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitls NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | | | - Ian Pedley
- Department of Medical Oncology; Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Institute of Transplantation; The Freeman Hospital; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - Steven A White
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Leslie J, Macia MG, Luli S, Worrell JC, Reilly WJ, Paish HL, Knox A, Barksby BS, Gee LM, Zaki MYW, Collins AL, Burgoyne RA, Cameron R, Bragg C, Xu X, Chung GW, Brown CDA, Blanchard AD, Nanthakumar CB, Karsdal M, Robinson SM, Manas DM, Sen G, French J, White SA, Murphy S, Trost M, Zakrzewski JL, Klein U, Schwabe RF, Mederacke I, Nixon C, Bird T, Teuwen LA, Schoonjans L, Carmeliet P, Mann J, Fisher AJ, Sheerin NS, Borthwick LA, Mann DA, Oakley F. Author Correction: c-Rel orchestrates energy-dependent epithelial and macrophage reprogramming in fibrosis. Nat Metab 2021; 3:118-119. [PMID: 33303984 DOI: 10.1038/s42255-020-00326-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Leslie
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Marina García Macia
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Saimir Luli
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Julie C Worrell
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - William J Reilly
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hannah L Paish
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Amber Knox
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ben S Barksby
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lucy M Gee
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marco Y W Zaki
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
| | - Amy L Collins
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel A Burgoyne
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rainie Cameron
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Charlotte Bragg
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Xin Xu
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Git W Chung
- Newcells Biotech, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin D A Brown
- Newcells Biotech, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew D Blanchard
- Fibrosis Discovery Performance Unit, Respiratory Therapy Area, Medicines Research Centre, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Stevenage, UK
| | - Carmel B Nanthakumar
- Fibrosis Discovery Performance Unit, Respiratory Therapy Area, Medicines Research Centre, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Stevenage, UK
| | - Morten Karsdal
- Nordic Bioscience A/S, Biomarkers & Research, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Stuart M Robinson
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Gourab Sen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jeremy French
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sandra Murphy
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Matthias Trost
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Johannes L Zakrzewski
- Center for Discovery and Innovation and John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Ulf Klein
- Division of Haematology & Immunology, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Ingmar Mederacke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Colin Nixon
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tom Bird
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK
- MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Laure-Anne Teuwen
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Schoonjans
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Carmeliet
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jelena Mann
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Fibrofind, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew J Fisher
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Neil S Sheerin
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lee A Borthwick
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Fibrofind, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek A Mann
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Fibrofind, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Fiona Oakley
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
- Fibrofind, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Byrne MHV, Battle J, Sewpaul A, Tingle S, Thompson E, Brookes M, Innes A, Turner P, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson CH. Early protocol computer tomography and endovascular interventions in pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 2020; 35:e14158. [PMID: 33222262 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early vascular complications following pancreatic transplantation are not uncommon (3%-8%). Typically, cross-sectional imaging is requested in response to clinical change. We instituted a change in protocol to request imaging pre-emptively to identify patients with thrombotic complications. METHODS In 2013, protocol computer tomography angiography (CTA) at days 3-5 and day 10 following pancreas transplantation was introduced. A retrospective analysis of all pancreas transplants performed at our institution from January 2001 to May 2019 was undertaken. RESULTS A total of 115 patients received pancreas transplants during this time period. A total of 78 received pancreas transplant without routine CTA and 37 patients with the new protocol. Following the change in protocol, we detected a high number of subclinical thromboses (41.7%). There was a significant decrease in invasive intervention for thrombosis (78.6% before vs 30.8% after, p = .02), and graft survival was significantly higher (61.5% before vs 86.1% after, p = .04). There was also a significant reduction in the number of graft failures (all-cause) where thrombosis was present (23.4% before vs 5.6% after, p = .02). Patient survival was unaffected (p = .48). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of early protocol CTA identifies a large number of patients with subclinical graft thromboses that are more amenable to conservative management and significantly reduces the requirement for invasive intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Battle
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Avinash Sewpaul
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Samuel Tingle
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emily Thompson
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marcus Brookes
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ailsa Innes
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Turner
- Department of Radiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin H Wilson
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kamarajah SK, Abu Hilal M, White SA. Does center or surgeon volume influence adoption of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy? A systematic review and meta-regression. Surgery 2020; 169:945-953. [PMID: 33183790 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been increasing uptake of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy during the past decade, but it remains a highly specialized procedure as benefits over open pancreatoduodenectomy remain contentious. This study aimed to evaluate current evidence on minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy in terms of impact of center volume on outcomes. METHODS A systematic review of articles on comparative cohort and registry studies on minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy published until 31st December 2019 were identified, and meta-analyses were performed. Primary endpoints were International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula and 30-day mortality. RESULTS After screening 7,390 studies, 43 comparative cohort studies (8,755 patients) with moderate methodological quality and 3 original registry studies (43,735 patients) were included. For the cohort studies, the median annual hospital minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy volume was 10. No significant differences were found in grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.78-1.23) or 30-day mortality (odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.65-2.01) between minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy when compared with open. No publication biases were present and meta-regression identified no confounding for grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula, center volume or 30-day mortality. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy was only strongly associated with significantly lower rates of postoperative pulmonary complications and surgical site infection, shorter length of stay, and significantly higher rates of R0 margin resections. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy remains noninferior to open pancreatoduodenectomy for grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula but is strongly associated with significantly lower rates of postoperative pulmonary complications and surgical site infection. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy can be adopted safely with good outcomes irrespective of annual center resection volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Leslie J, Macia MG, Luli S, Worrell JC, Reilly WJ, Paish HL, Knox A, Barksby BS, Gee LM, Zaki MYW, Collins AL, Burgoyne RA, Cameron R, Bragg C, Xu X, Chung GW, Brown CDA, Blanchard AD, Nanthakumar CB, Karsdal M, Robinson SM, Manas DM, Sen G, French J, White SA, Murphy S, Trost M, Zakrzewski JL, Klein U, Schwabe RF, Mederacke I, Nixon C, Bird T, Teuwen LA, Schoonjans L, Carmeliet P, Mann J, Fisher AJ, Sheerin NS, Borthwick LA, Mann DA, Oakley F. c-Rel orchestrates energy-dependent epithelial and macrophage reprogramming in fibrosis. Nat Metab 2020; 2:1350-1367. [PMID: 33168981 PMCID: PMC7116435 DOI: 10.1038/s42255-020-00306-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Fibrosis is a common pathological feature of chronic disease. Deletion of the NF-κB subunit c-Rel limits fibrosis in multiple organs, although the mechanistic nature of this protection is unresolved. Using cell-specific gene-targeting manipulations in mice undergoing liver damage, we elucidate a critical role for c-Rel in controlling metabolic changes required for inflammatory and fibrogenic activities of hepatocytes and macrophages and identify Pfkfb3 as the key downstream metabolic mediator of this response. Independent deletions of Rel in hepatocytes or macrophages suppressed liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride, while combined deletion had an additive anti-fibrogenic effect. In transforming growth factor-β1-induced hepatocytes, c-Rel regulates expression of a pro-fibrogenic secretome comprising inflammatory molecules and connective tissue growth factor, the latter promoting collagen secretion from HMs. Macrophages lacking c-Rel fail to polarize to M1 or M2 states, explaining reduced fibrosis in RelΔLysM mice. Pharmacological inhibition of c-Rel attenuated multi-organ fibrosis in both murine and human fibrosis. In conclusion, activation of c-Rel/Pfkfb3 in damaged tissue instigates a paracrine signalling network among epithelial, myeloid and mesenchymal cells to stimulate fibrogenesis. Targeting the c-Rel-Pfkfb3 axis has potential for therapeutic applications in fibrotic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Leslie
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Marina García Macia
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Saimir Luli
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Julie C Worrell
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - William J Reilly
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hannah L Paish
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Amber Knox
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ben S Barksby
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lucy M Gee
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marco Y W Zaki
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
| | - Amy L Collins
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel A Burgoyne
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rainie Cameron
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Charlotte Bragg
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Xin Xu
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Git W Chung
- Newcells Biotech, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin D A Brown
- Newcells Biotech, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew D Blanchard
- Fibrosis Discovery Performance Unit, Respiratory Therapy Area, Medicines Research Centre, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Stevenage, UK
| | - Carmel B Nanthakumar
- Fibrosis Discovery Performance Unit, Respiratory Therapy Area, Medicines Research Centre, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Stevenage, UK
| | - Morten Karsdal
- Nordic Bioscience A/S, Biomarkers & Research, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Stuart M Robinson
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Gourab Sen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jeremy French
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sandra Murphy
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Matthias Trost
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Johannes L Zakrzewski
- Center for Discovery and Innovation and John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Ulf Klein
- Division of Haematology & Immunology, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Ingmar Mederacke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Colin Nixon
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tom Bird
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK
- MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Laure-Anne Teuwen
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Schoonjans
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Carmeliet
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jelena Mann
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Fibrofind, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew J Fisher
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Neil S Sheerin
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lee A Borthwick
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Fibrofind, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek A Mann
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Fibrofind, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Fiona Oakley
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
- Fibrofind, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Manas D, Jiao LR, Hilal MA, White SA. Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Liver Resections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Scand J Surg 2020; 110:290-300. [PMID: 32762406 DOI: 10.1177/1457496920925637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Theoretical advantages of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery include improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization, and better ergonomics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine advantages of robotic surgery over laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing liver resections. METHOD A systematic literature search was conducted for studies comparing robotic assisted or totally laparoscopic liver resection. Meta-analysis of intraoperative (operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, conversion rate), oncological (R0 resection rates), and postoperative (bile leak, surgical site infection, pulmonary complications, 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, 90-day readmission and reoperation rates) outcomes was performed using a random effects model. RESULT Twenty-six non-randomized studies including 2630 patients (950 robotic and 1680 laparoscopic) were included, of which 20% had major robotic liver resection and 14% had major laparoscopic liver resection. Intraoperatively, robotic liver resection was associated with significantly less blood loss (mean: 286 vs 301 mL, p < 0.001) but longer operating time (mean: 281 vs 221 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in conversion rates or transfusion rates between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in overall complications, bile leaks, and length of hospital stay between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection. However, robotic liver resection was associated with significantly lower readmission rates than laparoscopic liver resection (odds ratio: 0.43, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Robotic liver resection appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both techniques appear equivalent. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomized trial comparing both techniques is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - J Bundred
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Manas
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - L R Jiao
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, HPB Surgical Unit, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - M A Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - S A White
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Moekotte AL, Malleo G, van Roessel S, Bonds M, Halimi A, Zarantonello L, Napoli N, Dreyer SB, Wellner UF, Bolm L, Mavroeidis VK, Robinson S, Khalil K, Ferraro D, Mortimer MC, Harris S, Al-Sarireh B, Fusai GK, Roberts KJ, Fontana M, White SA, Soonawalla Z, Jamieson NB, Boggi U, Alseidi A, Shablak A, Wilmink JW, Primrose JN, Salvia R, Bassi C, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in subtypes of ampullary adenocarcinoma: international propensity score-matched cohort study. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1171-1182. [PMID: 32259295 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether patients who undergo resection of ampullary adenocarcinoma have a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to compare survival between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of ampullary adenocarcinoma in a propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS An international multicentre cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2017, in 13 centres in six countries. Propensity scores were used to match patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy with those who did not, in the entire cohort and in two subgroups (pancreatobiliary/mixed and intestinal subtypes). Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 1163 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma. After excluding 187 patients, median survival in the remaining 976 patients was 67 (95 per cent c.i. 56 to 78) months. A total of 520 patients (53·3 per cent) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In a propensity score-matched cohort (194 patients in each group), survival was better among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy than in those who did not (median survival not reached versus 60 months respectively; P = 0·051). A survival benefit was seen in patients with the pancreatobiliary/mixed subtype; median survival was not reached in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and 32 months in the group without chemotherapy (P = 0·020). Patients with the intestinal subtype did not show any survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma may benefit from gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy, but this effect may be reserved for those with the pancreatobiliary and/or mixed subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Moekotte
- Departments of Surgery, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G Malleo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - S van Roessel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Bonds
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - A Halimi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Zarantonello
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Napoli
- Department of Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - S B Dreyer
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.,West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - U F Wellner
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - L Bolm
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - V K Mavroeidis
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S Robinson
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - K Khalil
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Ferraro
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M C Mortimer
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - S Harris
- Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - B Al-Sarireh
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - G K Fusai
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K J Roberts
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Fontana
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - S A White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Z Soonawalla
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - N B Jamieson
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.,West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - U Boggi
- Department of Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - A Shablak
- Departments of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - J W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - R Salvia
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - C Bassi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Departments of Surgery, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Despite major advances in structured education, insulin delivery and glucose monitoring, diabetes self-management remains an unremitting challenge. Insulin therapy is inextricably linked to risk of dangerous hypoglycaemia and sustained hyperglycaemia remains a leading cause of renal failure. This review sets out to demystify transplantation for diabetes multidisciplinary teams, facilitating consideration and incorporation within holistic overall person-centred management. Deceased and living donor kidney, whole pancreas and isolated islet transplant procedures, indications and potential benefits are described, in addition to outcomes within the integrated UK transplant programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J S Flatt
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - D Bennett
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - C Counter
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - A L Brown
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - S A White
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - J A M Shaw
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pine JK, Haugk B, Robinson SM, Darne A, Wilson C, Sen G, French JJ, White SA, Manas DM, Charnley RM. Prospective assessment of resection margin status following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after standardisation of margin definitions. Pancreatology 2020; 20:537-544. [PMID: 31996296 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection remains the only curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The prognostic value of resection margin status following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial. Standardised pathological assessment increases positive margins but limited data is available on the significance of involved margins. We investigated the impact of resection margin status in PDAC on patient outcome. METHOD We identified all patients with PD for PDAC at one pancreatic cancer centre between August 2008 and December 2014. Demographic, operative, adjuvant therapeutic and survival data was obtained. Pathology data including resection margin status of specific anatomic margins was collected and analysed. RESULTS 107 patients were included, all pathologically staged as T3 with 102 N1. 87.9% of patients were R1 of which 53.3% showed direct extension to the resection margin. Median survival for R0 patients versus R1<1 mm and R1 = 0 mm was 28.4 versus 15.4 and 25.1 versus 13.4 months. R1 = 0 mm status remained a predictor of poor outcome on multivariate analysis. Evaluation of individual margins (R1<1 mm) showed the SMV and SMA margins were associated with poorer overall survival. Multiple involved margins impacted negatively on outcome. SMA margin patient outcome with R1 = 1-1.9 mm was similar to R1=>2 mm. CONCLUSION Using an R1 definition of <1 mm and standardised pathology we demonstrate that R1 rates in PDAC can approach 90%. R1 = 0 mm remained an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Using R1<1 mm we have shown that involvement of medial margins and multiple margins has significant negative impact on overall survival. We conclude that not all margin positivity has the same prognostic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Pine
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
| | - B Haugk
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - S M Robinson
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - A Darne
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - C Wilson
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - G Sen
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - J J French
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - S A White
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - D M Manas
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - R M Charnley
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kamarajah SK, Wilson CH, Bundred JR, Lin A, Sen G, Hammond JS, French JJ, Manas DM, White SA. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of parenchymal transection techniques during hepatectomy: an appraisal of current randomised controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:204-214. [PMID: 31668587 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major liver resection can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Blood loss is one of the most important factors predicting a good outcome. Although various transection methods have been reported, there is no consensus on the best technique. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to characterise and identify the best reported technique for elective parenchymal liver transection based on published randomised controlled trials (RCT's). METHODS A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central to identify RCT's up to 5th June 2019 that examined parenchymal transection for liver resection. Data including study characteristics and outcomes including intraoperative (blood loss, operating time) and postoperative measures (overall and major complications, bile leaks) were extracted. Indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects network meta-analyses (NMA) which maintains randomisation within trials. RESULTS This study identified 22 RCT's involving 2360 patients reporting ten parenchymal transection techniques. Bipolar cautery has lower blood loss and shorter operating time than stapler (mean difference: 85 mL; 22min) and Tissue Link (mean difference: 66 mL; 29min). Bipolar cautery was ranked first for blood loss and operating time followed by stapler and TissueLink. Harmonic scalpel is associated with lower overall complications than Hydrojet (Odds ratio (OR): 0.48), BiClamp forceps (OR: 0.46) and clamp crushing (OR: 0.41). CONCLUSION Bipolar cautery techniques appear to best at reducing blood loss and associated with shortest operating time. In contrast, Harmonic scalpel appears best for overall and major complications. Given the paucity of data and selective outcome reporting, it is still hard to identify what is the best technique for liver resection. Therefore, further high-quality large-scale RCT's are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
| | - Colin H Wilson
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| | - James R Bundred
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron Lin
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gourab Sen
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| | - John S Hammond
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy J French
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
White SA, Ward N, Verghese J, Kramer AF, Grandjean da Costa K, Liu CK, Kowaleski C, Reid KF. NUTRITIONAL RISK STATUS, DIETARY INTAKE AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE IN OLDER ADULTS WITH MOTORIC COGNITIVE RISK SYNDROME. JAR Life 2020; 9:47-54. [PMID: 36034540 PMCID: PMC9410506 DOI: 10.14283/jarlife.2020.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Modifiable lifestyle factors such as diet are associated with cognitive decline and dementia. Greater understanding of the nutritional intake of older adults who are at increased risk for cognitive decline may allow for the development of more effective dietary interventions to prevent or delay the onset of dementia. Objectives The purpose of this study was to characterize the nutritional status, diet quality and individual nutritional components of older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR). MCR is a pre-dementia syndrome classified by slow gait speed and subjective memory impairments. Design Cross-sectional analysis. Setting A community-based senior center located in an urban setting. Participants Twenty-five community-dwelling older adults with MCR aged 60-89 yrs. Measurements Nutritional risk status was determined using the Nestle Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). A food frequency questionnaire was used to quantify: overall dietary quality using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI); adherence to the Mediterranean-DASH for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) dietary pattern; and intake of individual nutritional components shown to be protective or harmful for cognitive function in older adults. Participants completed a computerized cognitive testing battery to assess cognitive abilities. Results More than one third (36%) of participants were at increased risk for malnutrition. Participants at lower risk for malnutrition had better working memory (r = 0.40, p = 0.04), executive functioning (r = 0.44, p = 0.03), and overall cognition (r = 0.44, p = 0.03). While participants generally consumed a reasonable quality diet (HEI = 65.15), 48% of participants had poor adherence to a neuroprotective MIND dietary pattern. Higher intake of B-complex vitamins was associated with better task switching (r = 0.40, p ≤ 0.05) and faster processing speeds (r = 0.39, p ≤ 0.05). Higher vitamin C intake was associated with better executive functioning (r = 0.40, p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions Our findings suggest that a significant proportion of older adults with MCR may be at increased risk for malnutrition. While the diet quality of older adults with MCR appeared to need improvement, future studies should investigate the effects of more specific nutritional interventions, including the MIND diet, on cognition in at-risk older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A White
- Nutrition, Exercise Physiology and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human, Nutrition Research on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - N Ward
- Tufts University Department of Psychology, Medford, MA, USA
| | - J Verghese
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.,Institute of Aging Research, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - A F Kramer
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.,Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | | | - C K Liu
- Nutrition, Exercise Physiology and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human, Nutrition Research on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.,Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - C Kowaleski
- City of Somerville Council on Aging, Health and Human Services Department, Somerville, MA, USA
| | - K F Reid
- Nutrition, Exercise Physiology and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human, Nutrition Research on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Paish HL, Reed LH, Brown H, Bryan MC, Govaere O, Leslie J, Barksby BS, Garcia Macia M, Watson A, Xu X, Zaki MY, Greaves L, Whitehall J, French J, White SA, Manas DM, Robinson SM, Spoletini G, Griffiths C, Mann DA, Borthwick LA, Drinnan MJ, Mann J, Oakley F. A Bioreactor Technology for Modeling Fibrosis in Human and Rodent Precision-Cut Liver Slices. Hepatology 2019; 70:1377-1391. [PMID: 30963615 PMCID: PMC6852483 DOI: 10.1002/hep.30651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Precision cut liver slices (PCLSs) retain the structure and cellular composition of the native liver and represent an improved system to study liver fibrosis compared to two-dimensional mono- or co-cultures. The aim of this study was to develop a bioreactor system to increase the healthy life span of PCLSs and model fibrogenesis. PCLSs were generated from normal rat or human liver, or fibrotic rat liver, and cultured in our bioreactor. PCLS function was quantified by albumin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Fibrosis was induced in PCLSs by transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFββ) stimulation ± therapy. Fibrosis was assessed by gene expression, picrosirius red, and α-smooth muscle actin staining, hydroxyproline assay, and soluble ELISAs. Bioreactor-cultured PCLSs are viable, maintaining tissue structure, metabolic activity, and stable albumin secretion for up to 6 days under normoxic culture conditions. Conversely, standard static transwell-cultured PCLSs rapidly deteriorate, and albumin secretion is significantly impaired by 48 hours. TGFβ1/PDGFββ stimulation of rat or human PCLSs induced fibrogenic gene expression, release of extracellular matrix proteins, activation of hepatic myofibroblasts, and histological fibrosis. Fibrogenesis slowly progresses over 6 days in cultured fibrotic rat PCLSs without exogenous challenge. Activin receptor-like kinase 5 (Alk5) inhibitor (Alk5i), nintedanib, and obeticholic acid therapy limited fibrogenesis in TGFβ1/PDGFββ-stimulated PCLSs, and Alk5i blunted progression of fibrosis in fibrotic PCLS. Conclusion: We describe a bioreactor technology that maintains functional PCLS cultures for 6 days. Bioreactor-cultured PCLSs can be successfully used to model fibrogenesis and demonstrate efficacy of antifibrotic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L. Paish
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Lee H. Reed
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Helen Brown
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Mark C. Bryan
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Olivier Govaere
- Liver Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Jack Leslie
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Ben S. Barksby
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Marina Garcia Macia
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Abigail Watson
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Xin Xu
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Marco Y.W. Zaki
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Laura Greaves
- Newcastle University LLHW Centre for Ageing and VitalityNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of NeuroscienceNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Julia Whitehall
- Newcastle University LLHW Centre for Ageing and VitalityNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Jeremy French
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Steven A. White
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Derek M. Manas
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Stuart M. Robinson
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Gabriele Spoletini
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Clive Griffiths
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Derek A. Mann
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Lee A. Borthwick
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Michael J. Drinnan
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Jelena Mann
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Fiona Oakley
- Newcastle Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kamarajah SK, Sutandi N, Robinson SR, French JJ, White SA. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1107-1118. [PMID: 30962137 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery offers theoretical advantages to conventional laparoscopic surgery including improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization and better ergonomics. This review aimed to determine if these theoretical advantages translate into improved patient outcomes in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy through laparoscopic (LDP) or robotic (RDP) approaches. METHOD A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting minimally invasive surgery for distal pancreatectomy. Meta-analysis of intraoperative (blood loss, operating times, conversion and R0 resections) and postoperative outcomes (overall complications, pancreatic fistula, length of hospital stay) was performed using random effects models. RESULT Twenty non-randomised studies including 3112 patients (793 robotic and 2319 laparoscopic) were considered appropriate for inclusion. LDP had significantly shorter operating time than RDP (mean: 28, p < 0.001) but no significant difference in blood loss (mean: 52 mL, p = 0.07). RDP was associated with significantly lower conversion rates than LDP (OR 0.48, p < 0.001), but no difference in spleen preservation rate and R0 resection. There were no significant differences in overall and major complications, overall and high-grade pancreatic fistula. However, RDP was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (mean: 1, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Robotic distal pancreatectomy appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both techniques appear equivalent. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomised trial comparing both techniques are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Academic Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
| | - Nathania Sutandi
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Academic Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Stuart R Robinson
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Academic Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Jeremy J French
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Academic Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Academic Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lof S, Moekotte AL, Al-Sarireh B, Ammori B, Aroori S, Durkin D, Fusai GK, French JJ, Gomez D, Marangoni G, Marudanayagam R, Soonawalla Z, Sutcliffe R, White SA, Abu Hilal M. Multicentre observational cohort study of implementation and outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1657-1665. [PMID: 31454072 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is increasingly being performed as an alternative to open surgery. Whether the implementation and corresponding learning curve of LDP have an impact on patient outcome is unknown. The aim was to investigate the temporal trends in practice across UK centres. METHODS This was a retrospective multicentre observational cohort study of LDP in 11 tertiary referral centres in the UK between 2006 and 2016. The learning curve was analysed by pooling data for the first 15 consecutive patients who had LDP and examining trends in surgical outcomes in subsequent patients. RESULTS In total, 570 patients underwent LDP, whereas 888 underwent open resection. For LDP the median duration of operation was 240 min, with 200 ml blood loss. The conversion rate was 12·1 per cent. Neuroendocrine tumours (26·7 per cent) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (19·7 per cent) were commonest indications. The proportion of LDPs increased from 24·4 per cent in 2006-2009 (P1) to 46·0 per cent in 2014-2016 (P3) (P < 0·001). LDP was increasingly performed for patients aged 70 years or more (16 per cent in P1 versus 34·4 per cent in P3; P = 0·002), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (6 versus 19·1 per cent; P = 0·005) and advanced malignant tumours (27 versus 52 per cent; P = 0·016). With increasing experience, there was a trend for a decrease in blood transfusion rate (14·1 per cent for procedures 1-15 to 3·5 per cent for procedures 46-75; P = 0·008), ICU admissions (32·7 to 19·2 per cent; P = 0·021) and median duration of hospital stay (7 (i.q.r. 5-9) to 6 (4-7) days; P = 0·002). After 30 procedures, a decrease was noted in rates of both overall morbidity (57·7 versus 42·2 per cent for procedures 16-30 versus 46-75 respectively; P = 0·009) and severe morbidity (18·8 versus 9·7 per cent; P = 0·031). CONCLUSION LDP has increased as a treatment option for lesions of the distal pancreas as indications for the procedure have expanded. Perioperative outcomes improved with the number of procedures performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lof
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - A L Moekotte
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - B Al-Sarireh
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - B Ammori
- Department of Surgery, University of Manchester and Salford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Aroori
- Department of Surgery, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - D Durkin
- Department of Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - G K Fusai
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Free London, London, UK
| | - J J French
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - D Gomez
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - G Marangoni
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Z Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S A White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Marc OS, Jiao LR, Manas D, Abu Hilal M, White SA. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:6-14. [PMID: 31409513 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) offers theoretical advantages to conventional laparoscopic surgery including improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization and better ergonomics. This review aimed to determine if these theoretical advantages translate into improved patient outcomes comparing patients having either robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy or laparoscopic (LPD) equivalent. METHOD A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting minimally invasive surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy either robotic assisted or totally laparoscopic. Meta-analysis of intra-operative (blood loss, operating times, conversion and R0 resections) and postoperative outcomes (overall complications, pancreatic fistula, length of hospital stay) was performed using a random effects model. RESULT This review identified 44 studies, of which six were non-randomised comparative studies including 3462 patients (1025 robotic and 2437 laparoscopic). Intraoperatively, RPD was associated with significantly lower conversion rates (OR 0.45, p < 0.001) and transfusion rates (OR: 0.60, p = 0.002) compared to LPD. However, no significant difference in blood loss (mean: 220 vs 287 mL, p = 0.1), operating time (mean: 405 vs 418 min, p = 0.3) was noted. Postoperatively RPD was associated with a shorter hospital stay (mean: 12 vs 11 days, p < 0.001) but no significant difference was noted in postoperative complications, incidence of pancreatic fistulae and R0 resection rates. CONCLUSION RPD appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both approaches appear to offer equivalent clinical outcomes. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomised trial comparing both techniques is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
| | - James Bundred
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Olivier Saint Marc
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Orleans, Orleans, France
| | - Long R Jiao
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, HPB Surgical Unit, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Derek Manas
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
McDaniel M, Carter J, Keller JM, White SA, Baird A. Open Source Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Framework: Tutorial on the BioGears Engine. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2019; 8:12-25. [PMID: 30411537 PMCID: PMC6363067 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BioGears is an open-source, lumped parameter, full-body human physiology engine. Its purpose is to provide realistic and comprehensive simulations for medical training, research, and education. BioGears incorporates a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model that is designed to be applicable to a diversity of drug classes and patients and is extensible to future drugs. In addition, BioGears also supports drug interactions with various patient insults and interventions allowing for a realistic research framework and accurate dose-patient responses. This tutorial will demonstrate how the generic BioGears PK/PD model can be extended to a new substance for prediction of drug administration outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jonathan M Keller
- Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineWISH Simulation CenterUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | - Austin Baird
- Applied Research Associates, Inc.RaleighNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tingle SJ, Severs GR, Goodfellow M, Moir JA, White SA. NARCA: A novel prognostic scoring system using neutrophil-albumin ratio and Ca19-9 to predict overall survival in palliative pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:680-686. [PMID: 30196571 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Several serum based-markers and ratios have been investigated for their prognostic value in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This cohort study aimed to combine these into a novel prognostic scoring system. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed on 145 patients with unresectable histologically-confirmed PDAC. Based on the existing literature the following markers were investigated: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-albumin ratio (NAR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), fibrinogen, and Ca19-9. These values were dichotomized about their medians for Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Univariate Cox regression revealed statistically significant prognostic value for: NLR, NAR, PLR, fibrinogen, and Ca19-9. When combining these using Cox regression analysis adjusting for other prognostic indicators, only NAR (hazard ratios [HR] = 3.174, P = 0.022) and Ca19-9 (HR = 2.697, P = 0.031) were independent predictors of survival. Combining NAR and Ca19-9 we split the cohort into three "NARCA" groups: NARCA0 = NAR ≤ 0.13 and Ca19-9 ≤ 770, NARCA1 = either NAR > 0.13 or Ca19-9 >770, NARCA2 = NAR > 0.13 and Ca19-9 > 770. Median survival was 20.5, 9.7 and 4.1 months in NARCA0, 1, and 2 respectively ( P < 0.0005, log-rank test). A separate validation cohort confirmed the prognostic significance of the score ( P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Combining NAR and Ca19-9 into a prognostic score allows stratification of unresectable PDAC patients into groups with significantly different overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Tingle
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - George R Severs
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Goodfellow
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - John A Moir
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kamarajah SK, Robinson D, Littler P, White SA. Small, incidental hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma the role of ablative therapy in borderline patients. J Surg Case Rep 2018; 2018:rjy223. [PMID: 30151113 PMCID: PMC6101624 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjy223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is an extremely rare tumor of vascular origin with an incidence of <0.1 per 100 000 population. We describe a 70-year-old man with renal cell carcinoma managed via robotic right partial nephrectomy who was also found to have a solitary 10 mm lesion on a pre-operative staging computer tomography (CT) scan. The patient underwent percutaneous biopsy and local ablation of the lesion consistent with an epithelioid hepatic haemangioendothelioma. Post-procedure CT scan after 1 month showed adequate ablation margins with no new lesions. The role of local ablation for solitary, small HEHE is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Robinson
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Pete Littler
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Milburn JA, Leeds JS, White SA. Endoscopic management of duodeno-ileal fistula secondary to diffuse B-cell lymphoma. J Surg Case Rep 2017; 2017:rjx249. [PMID: 29423158 PMCID: PMC5798150 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjx249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymphoma arising in the gastrointestinal tract is relatively common and can affect multiple sites. The development of a gastrointestinal fistula secondary to lymphoma is very rare and has not previously been reported between the duodenum and ileum. This is the first reported care where a fistula secondary to lymphoma has been treated by an endoscopic covered duodenal stent occluding the defect rather than surgical intervention. This strategy permitted early commencement of curative intent chemotherapy which led to tumour shrinkage and fistula closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Milburn
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| | - John S Leeds
- Department Gastroenterology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Affiliation(s)
- P R Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Leicester University, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ratsma Y, Lungu K, Hofman JJ, White SA. Erratum: Title of article: Why more mothers die - Confidential enquiries into institutional maternal deaths in the Southern Region of Malawi, 2001. Malawi Med J 2016; 17:159. [PMID: 27529003 DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v17i3.10882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article on p. 73 in vol. 17.].
Collapse
|
45
|
Robinson SM, Mann DA, Manas DM, Oakley F, Mann J, White SA. Response to 'Comment on 'The potential contribution of tumour-related factors to the development of FOLFOX-induced sinusoidal obstruction syndrome'’. Br J Cancer 2016; 115:e8. [PMID: 27632370 PMCID: PMC5061903 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
46
|
Fraley ER, Burkett ZD, Day NF, Schwartz BA, Phelps PE, White SA. Mice with Dab1 or Vldlr insufficiency exhibit abnormal neonatal vocalization patterns. Sci Rep 2016; 6:25807. [PMID: 27184477 PMCID: PMC4868998 DOI: 10.1038/srep25807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic and epigenetic changes in components of the Reelin-signaling pathway (RELN, DAB1) are associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) risk. Social communication deficits are a key component of the ASD diagnostic criteria, but the underlying neurogenetic mechanisms remain unknown. Reln insufficient mice exhibit ASD-like behavioral phenotypes including altered neonatal vocalization patterns. Reelin affects multiple pathways including through the receptors, Very low-density lipoprotein receptor (Vldlr), Apolipoprotein receptor 2 (Apoer2), and intracellular signaling molecule Disabled-1 (Dab1). As Vldlr was previously implicated in avian vocalization, here we investigate vocalizations of neonatal mice with a reduction or absence of these components of the Reelin-signaling pathway. Mice with low or no Dab1 expression exhibited reduced calling rates, altered call-type usage, and differential vocal development trajectories. Mice lacking Vldlr expression also had altered call repertoires, and this effect was exacerbated by deficiency in Apoer2. Together with previous findings, these observations 1) solidify a role for Reelin in vocal communication of multiple species, 2) point to the canonical Reelin-signaling pathway as critical for development of normal neonatal calling patterns in mice, and 3) suggest that mutants in this pathway could be used as murine models for Reelin-associated vocal deficits in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R Fraley
- Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Physiology Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Z D Burkett
- Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Physiology Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - N F Day
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - B A Schwartz
- Undergraduate Interdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - P E Phelps
- Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Physiology Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - S A White
- Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Physiology Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Abstract Post-transriptional regulation of yeast ribosomal protein L30, RPL30, requires the formation of a complex comprised of RPL30 and its RNA transcript [J. Vilardell and J. R. Warner, Genes & Dev. 8, 211-220 (1994)]. Mutational analysis of both the RNA and the protein reveals that an asparagine-adenosine contact is important. Replacement of the asparagine by alanine weakens binding dramatically, but substitution of the adenosine by cytidine or guanosine slightly increases or decreases respective binding affinities for RPL30. The structure of the complex has been solved by NMR and shows a conserved asparagine in position to form two hydrogen bonds with adenosine's Watson-Crick face [H. Mao, S. A. White and J. R. Williamson, Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 1139-1147 (1999)]. Asparagine is necessary for this interaction but relatively small differences in binding affinity are measured for three different nucleotides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Shipilov
- a Chemistry Department , Bryn Mawr College , Bryn Mawr , PA , 19010
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Robinson SM, Fan L, White SA, Charnley RM, Mann J. The role of exosomes in the pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2016; 75:131-9. [PMID: 27017975 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Exosomes are small membrane bound vesicles secreted by cancer cells that have a cytosol rich in proteins and nucleic acids which are capable of modulating the phenotype of neighbouring cells which take them up. In this review we explore the mechanisms through which exosomes are able to impact on the pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal cancer through the modulation of tumour formation and development and exploitation of the tumour microenvironment to modulate both the adaptive and innate immune response. In addition we highlight the potential utility of exosomes not only as biomarkers of disease but also as tools to be used in the therapeutic armamentarium against this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart M Robinson
- Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom; Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom.
| | - Lavender Fan
- Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A White
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M Charnley
- Department of HPB Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Mann
- Fibrosis Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Probert PM, Palmer JM, Alhusainy W, Amer AO, Rietjens IMCM, White SA, Jones DE, Wright MC. Progenitor-derived hepatocyte-like (B-13/H) cells metabolise 1'-hydroxyestragole to a genotoxic species via a SULT2B1-dependent mechanism. Toxicol Lett 2015; 243:98-110. [PMID: 26739637 PMCID: PMC4729325 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Revised: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Rat B-13 progenitor cells are readily converted into functional hepatocyte-like B-13/H cells capable of phase I cytochrome P450-dependent activation of pro-carcinogens and induction of DNA damage. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the cells are also capable of Phase II sulphotransferase (SULT)-dependent activation of a pro-carcinogen to an ultimate carcinogen. To this end we therefore examined the bioactivation of the model hepatic (hepato- and cholangio-) carcinogen estragole and its proximate SULT1A1-activated genotoxic metabolite 1'-hydroxyestragole. Exposing B-13 or B-13/H cells to estragole (at concentrations up to 1mM) resulted in the production of low levels of 1'-hydroxyestragole, but did not result in detectable DNA damage. Exposing B-13/H cells - but not B-13 cells - to 1'-hydroxyestragole resulted in a dose-dependent increase in DNA damage in comet assays, confirmed by detection of N(2)-(trans-isoestragol-3'-yl)-2'-deoxyguanosine adducts. Genotoxicity was inhibited by general SULT inhibitors, supporting a role for SULTS in the activation of 1-hydroxyestragole in B-13/H cells. However, B-13 and B-13/H cells did not express biologically significant levels of SULT1A1 as determined by qRT-PCR, Western blotting and its associated 7-hydroxycoumarin sulphation activity. B-13 and B-13/H cells expressed - relative to intact rat liver - high levels of SULT2B1 (primarily the b isoform) and SULT4A1 mRNAs and proteins. B-13 and B-13/H cells also expressed the 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulphate synthase 1 required for the generation of activated sulphate cofactor 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulphate. However, only B-13/H cells expressed functional SULT activities towards SULT2B1 substrates DHEA, pregnenolone and 4 methylumbelliferone. Since liver progenitor cells are bi-potential and also form cholangiocytes, we therefore hypothesised that B-13 cells express a cholangiocyte-like SULT profile. To test this hypothesis, the expression of SULTs was examined in liver by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. SULT2B1 - but not SULT1A1 - was determined to be expressed in both rat and human cholangiocytes. Since 1'-hydroxyestragole exposure readily produced DNA injury in B-13/H cells, these data suggest that cholangiocarcinomas generated in rats fed estragole may be dependent, in part, on SULT2B1 activation of the 1'-hydroxyestragole metabolite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip M Probert
- Institute Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy M Palmer
- Institute Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Wasma Alhusainy
- Division of Toxicology, Wageningen University, Tuinlaan 5, 6703HE Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Aimen O Amer
- Institute Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Ivonne M C M Rietjens
- Division of Toxicology, Wageningen University, Tuinlaan 5, 6703HE Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven A White
- Institute Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - David E Jones
- Institute Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew C Wright
- Institute Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Brooks AMS, Carter V, Liew A, Marshall H, Aldibbiat A, Sheerin NS, Manas DM, White SA, Shaw JAM. De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Are Associated With Rapid Loss of Graft Function Following Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:3239-46. [PMID: 26227015 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2014] [Revised: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Outcomes after islet transplantation continue to improve but etiology of graft failure remains unclear. De novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) posttransplant are increasingly recognized as a negative prognostic marker. Specific temporal associations between DSA and graft function remain undefined particularly in programs undertaking multiple sequential transplants. Impact of de novo DSA on graft function over 12 months following first islet transplant was determined prospectively in consecutive recipients taking tacrolimus/mycophenolate immunosuppression at a single center. Mixed-meal tolerance test was undertaken in parallel with HLA antibody assessment pretransplant and 1-3 months posttransplant. Sixteen participants received a total of 26 islet transplants. Five (19%) grafts were associated with de novo DSA. Five (31%) recipients were affected: three post-first transplant; two post-second transplant. DSA developed within 4 weeks of all sensitizing grafts and were associated with decreased stimulated C-peptide (median [interquartile range]) at 3 months posttransplant (DSA negative: 613(300-1090); DSA positive 106(34-235) pmol/L [p = 0.004]). De novo DSA directed against most recent islet transplant were absolutely associated with loss of graft function despite maintained immunosuppression at 12 months in the absence of a rescue nonsensitizing transplant. Alemtuzumab induction immunosuppression was associated with reduced incidence of de novo DSA formation (p = 0.03).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M S Brooks
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - V Carter
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - A Liew
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - H Marshall
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - A Aldibbiat
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - N S Sheerin
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - D M Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - S A White
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - J A M Shaw
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|