Neoadjuvant anthracycline-based (5-FEC) or anthracycline-free (docetaxel/carboplatin) chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzmab in HER2 + BC patients according to their TOP2A: a multicentre, open-label, non-randomized phase II trial

PURPOSE

Previous studies have reported the benefit of dual HER2-targeting combined to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-amplified breast cancer (HER2 + BC). Moreover, besides the cardiac toxicity following their association to Trastuzumab, anthracyclines chemotherapy may not profit all patients. The NeoTOP study was designed to evaluate the complementary action of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab, and the relevance of an anthracycline-based regimen according to TOP2A amplification status.

METHODS

Open-label, multicentre, phase II study. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 with untreated, operable, histologically confirmed HER2 + BC. After centralized review of TOP2A status, TOP2A-amplified (TOP2A+) patients received FEC100 for 3 cycles then 3 cycles of Trastuzumab (8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg), Pertuzumab (840 mg/kg then 420 mg/kg), and Docetaxel (75mg/m2 then 100mg/m2). TOP2A-not amplified (TOP2A-) patients received 6 cycles of Docetaxel (75mg/m2) and Carboplatin (target AUC 6 mg/ml/min) plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab. Primary endpoint was pathological Complete Response (pCR) using Chevallier's classification. Secondary endpoints included pCR (Sataloff), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Out of 74 patients, 41 and 33 were allocated to the TOP2A + and TOP2A- groups respectively. pCR rates (Chevallier) were 74.4% (95%CI: 58.9-85.4) vs. 71.9% (95%CI: 54.6-84.4) in the TOP2A + vs. TOP2A- groups. pCR rates (Sataloff), 5-year PFS and OS were 70.6% (95%CI: 53.8-83.2) vs. 61.5% (95%CI: 42.5-77.6), 82.4% (95%CI: 62.2-93.6) vs. 100% (95%CI: 74.1-100), and 90% (95%CI: 69.8-98.3) vs. 100% (95%CI: 74.1-100). Toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed high pCR rates with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab associated to chemotherapy. They were similar in TOP2A + and TOP2A- groups and the current role of neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains questioned.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02339532 (registered on 14/12/14).

Impact of surgery and chemotherapy in ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors from the multicentric Salomé study including 469 patients. A TMRG and GINECO group study

OBJECTIVE

Identifying prognostic factors and evaluating the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with sex cord stromal tumors (SCST) is crucial. In this study, we aimed to address these challenges.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 13 centers of the French Rare malignant gynecological tumors (TMRG) network. We enrolled 469 adult patients with malignant SCST who received upfront surgery since 2011 to July 2015.

RESULTS

75% were diagnosed with adult Granulosa cell tumors, and 23% had another subtype. With a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 154 patients (33%) developed a first recurrence, 82 (17%) two recurrences, and 49 (10%) three recurrences. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 14.7% of patients at initial diagnosis. In relapse, perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 58.5%, 28.2%, and 23.8% of patients, respectively, in the first, second, and third relapse. In the first-line therapy, age under 70 years, FIGO stage, and complete surgery were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy had no impact on PFS in early-stage disease (FIGO I-II). The PFS was similar using BEP or other chemotherapy regimens (HR 0.88 [0.43; 1.81]) in the first-line therapy. In case of recurrence, PFS was statistically prolonged by complete surgery, but perioperative chemotherapy use did not impact PFS.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy use did not impact survival in the first-line or relapse setting in SCST. Only surgery and its quality demonstrated benefit for PFS in ovarian SCST in any lines of treatment.

Efficacy of taxanes rechallenge in first-line treatment of early metastatic relapse of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer previously treated with a (neo)adjuvant taxanes regimen: A multicentre retrospective observational study

Background

Taxanes are one of the most effective chemotherapies (CT) in breast cancer (BC), but the efficacy of taxanes rechallenge in early metastatic relapse has been poorly studied in patients previously treated by taxanes in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Our study aimed to analyse the efficacy of taxane rechallenge in case of early metastatic relapse in a multicentre retrospective observational study compared with other chemotherapies.

Methods

We analysed the French national ESME metastatic BC (MBC) database and selected HER2- MBC patients who received CT in first-line treatment for a metastatic relapse occurring 3–24 months after previous (neo)adjuvant taxanes treatment.

Results

Of 23,501 female patients with MBC in ESME, 1057 met the selection criteria. 58.4% received a taxane-based regimen (75.4% concomitant bevacizumab) and 41.6% received other CT.

In hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- MBC, multivariate analysis showed no difference in OS between taxanes without bevacizumab compared to other CT (HZR = 1.3 [0.97; 1.74], but taxanes was significantly associated with worse PFS (HZR = 1.48 [1.14; 1.93]).

In TNBC, taxanes without bevacizumab and carboplatin/gemcitabine were not superior to other CT for OS (HZR = 1.07 [0.79; 1.44] and HZR = 0.81 [0.58; 1.13], respectively), while for PFS, taxanes was inferior (HZR = 1.33 [1.06–1.67]) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine was superior to other CT (HZR = 0.63 [0.46; 0.87]).

For both subtypes, the worse outcome observed with paclitaxel was no longer observed with the addition of bevacizumab.

Conclusions

With the limitation of retrospective design, taxanes rechallenge in early metastatic relapse of BC may result in a worse PFS in TNBC and HR+/HER2- MBC, which was not observed with the addition of bevacizumab.

•

Patients with HER2-advanced breast cancer (ABC) have often previously received taxanes in the (neo)adjuvant setting.

•

Current guidelines suggest a rechallenge by taxanes in ABC with DFI≥12 months, few data are available for DFI ≤24 months.

•

Taxane rechallenge in early metastatic relapse of BC (DFI ≤24 months) may result in a worse PFS in TNBC and HR+/HER2- ABC.

•

In TNBC, the addition of bevacizumab to taxanes improves PFS and OS for DFI ≤24 months.

Real-World Data on Newly Diagnosed BRCA-Mutated High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: The French National Multicenter ESME Database

Simple Summary

BRCA-mutated high-grade epithelial ovarian cancers represent a specific subset of gynecological malignancies. Real-world comprehensive data have been elusive to date. As such, we conducted a comprehensive description of clinicopathological and therapeutical characteristics via the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) data warehouse, which collects data from 18 French comprehensive cancer centers from the Unicancer network. This led to useful findings regarding the natural disease history of these patients in clinical practice, prior to the advent of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors.

Abstract

Background: In spite of the frequency and clinical impact of BRCA1/2 alterations in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (HGEOC), real-world information based on robust data warehouse has been scarce to date. Methods: Consecutive patients with BRCA-mutated HGEOC treated between 2011 and 2016 within French comprehensive cancer centers from the Unicancer network were extracted from the ESME database. The main objective of the study was the assessment of clinicopathological and treatments parameters. Results: Out of the 8021 patients included in the ESME database, 266 patients matching the selection criteria were included. BRCA1 mutation was found in 191 (71.8%) patients, while 75 (28.2%) had a BRCA2 mutation only; 95.5% of patients received a cytoreductive surgery. All patients received a taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy (median = six cycles). Complete and partial response were obtained in 53.3% and 20.4% of the cases, respectively. Maintenance therapy was administered in 55.3% of the cases, bevacizumab being the most common agent. After a median follow up of 51.7 months, a median progression-free survival of 28.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) [26.5; 32.7]) and an estimated 5-year median overall survival of 69.2% (95% CI [61.6; 70.3]) were reported. Notably, BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated cases exhibited a trend towards different median progression-free survivals, with 28.0 (95% CI [24.4; 32.3]) and 33.3 months (95% CI [26.7; 46.1]), respectively (p-value = 0.053). Furthermore, five-year OS for BRCA1-mutated patients was 64.5% (95% CI [59.7; 69.2]), while it was 82.5% (95% CI [76.6; 88.5]) for BRCA2-mutated ones (p-value = 0.029). Conclusions: This study reports the largest French multicenter cohort of BRCA-mutated HGEOCs based on robust data from the ESME, exhibiting relevant real-world data regarding this specific population.

Optimal timing of interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective study from the ESME national cohort

OBJECTIVE

Interval debulking surgery is recommended after 3-4 cycles (standard IDS) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) not able to received upfront complete debulking surgery. However, real world practices frequently report performing IDS after ≥5 NAC cycles (delayed IDS). The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact on survival of the number of NACT cycles before IDS.

METHODS

We identified from a French national database, women with newly diagnosed EOC who underwent IDS from January 2011 to December 2016. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Cox model with adjustments for confounding factors provided by two propensity score methods: inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and matched-pair analysis.

RESULTS

928 patients treated by IDS for which our propensity score could be applied were identified. After a median follow-up of 49.0 months (95% CI [46.0;52.9]); from the IPTW analysis, median PFS was 17.6 months and 11.5 months (HR = 1.42; CI 95% [1.22-1.67]; p < 0.0001); median OS was 51.2 months and 44.3 months (HR = 1.29; CI 95% [1.06-1.56]; p = 0.0095) for the standard and delayed IDS groups. From the matched-pair analysis (comparing 352 patients for each group), standard IDS was associated with better PFS (HR = 0,77; CI 95% [0.65-0.90]; p = 0.018) but not significantly associated with better OS (HR = 0,84; CI 95% [0.68-1,03]; p = 0.0947).

CONCLUSIONS

Carrying IDS after ≥5 NACT cycles seems to have a negative effect on patients survival. The goal of IDS surgery is complete resection and should not be performed after >3-4 NACT cycles.

Phase Ib INEOV neoadjuvant trial of durvalumab +/- tremelimumab with platinum chemotherapy for patients (pts) with unresectable ovarian cancer (OC): Final complete resection and pathological response rates

5557

Background: We have shown that neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel (NACP) increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and PDL1 expression in OC pts. INEOV evaluated NACP with durvalumab (D) +/- tremelimumab (T) in pts with unresectable OC. We previously reported that NACP with D+/-T was feasible and safe but the addition of T did not improve interval debulking surgery (IDS) rates after 3 cycles (C3) (ESMO 2021). Here we provide an update with longer follow up including data on delayed IDS performed after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment. Key secondary endpoints include complete resection (CC0) and complete pathological response rates. Methods: Pts with stage IIIC/IV OC were randomized to NACP + D (1125mg) alone (arm A) or with T (75mg once at C2) (arm B). Interval debulking surgery (IDS) was planned after C3, or delayed after C6. Pts in arm A not operable after C3 crossed over to arm B, pts in arm B crossed over to standard of care (SOC). Pts were assessed for delayed IDS after C6. Complete pathological response (pCR) was defined as no residual tumor cells found on any surgical specimens, or no residual tumor cells on any samples outside the ovary at IDS. Results: Sixty four (N = 64) of 66 pts (IIIC/IV: 70%/30%) randomized were evaluable. After C3, 66% (21/32) of pts in arm A and 59% (19/32) in arm B had IDS. The 11 pts in arm A not candidate for IDS after C3 crossed over to arm B until C6 and 5/11 benefited from delayed IDS. The 13 pts in arm B inoperable at C3 went on to receive SOC (NACP +/- bevacizumab), and 5/13 became eligible for delayed IDS after C6. Overall, IDS was performed in 50 of 64 evaluable pts, and most (45/50) achieved macroscopically complete resection (CC0), so that the overall CC0 rate was 70% (45/64), with no significant difference between arms (CC0 = 75% vs 65% in arm A vs B). Among the 50 pts who had IDS, complete pathological responses were observed in 18% of pts. Conclusions: Taking into account the whole treatment strategy including delayed IDS after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, we have shown that neoadjuvant CP with D+/- T results in encouraging CC0 (70%) and pCR (18%) rates. However there was no apparent benefit to the addition of T to D. Studies are ongoing to describe the immune features predictive of pCR as well as the impact of treatment on the immune microenvironment. Clinical trial information: NCT03249142.

ENGOT-ov65/KEYNOTE-B96: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of pembrolizumab versus placebo plus paclitaxel with optional bevacizumab for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer

TPS5617

Background: Despite therapeutic advances in ovarian cancer, platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC) remains an area of high unmet clinical need and there is an urgent need for new treatments to further improve clinical outcomes. Addition of bevacizumab to non-platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in patients with PROC but did not show a clear OS benefit. Thus far, the combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab has shown the most promise in treatment of PROC, although the proportion of patients eligible for bevacizumab is limited by treatment-associated toxicities. Combination of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab with weekly paclitaxel showed antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with PROC in a single-arm, phase 2 study (Wenham Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018). The current study ENGOT-ov65/KEYNOTE-B96 (NCT05116189) compares the efficacy and safety of the addition of pembrolizumab to standard of care chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel) with/without bevacizumab vs placebo plus weekly paclitaxel with/without bevacizumab in patients with PROC. Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study, eligible patients are aged ≥18 y with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma with 1-2 prior lines of systemic therapy, including at least 1 prior platinum-based therapy with ≥4 cycles in first line. Patients must have platinum-resistant disease (radiographic evidence of PD ≤6 mo after last platinum-based therapy dose), be eligible for paclitaxel (with/without bevacizumab per investigator discretion), have ECOG PS ≤1, radiographically evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1, and have a tumor sample for central evaluation of PD-L1 status. Approximately 616 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 400 mg IV or placebo Q6W for up to 18 cycles (̃2 y) plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each Q3W cycle (with/without bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W per investigator discretion) until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization is stratified by planned bevacizumab use (yes vs no), region (US vs Europe vs rest of world), and PD-L1 status (combined positive score [CPS] < 1 vs CPS 1- < 10 vs CPS ≥10). Tumor PD-L1 status is determined using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx (Investigational Use Only) diagnostic kit. Tumor imaging is performed Q9W from randomization to week 54 and Q12W thereafter. The primary endpoint is PFS per RECIST version 1.1 by investigator review in patients with tumor PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and in all patients. Secondary endpoints are OS in patients with tumor PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and in all patients, PFS per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review in patients with tumor PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and in all patients, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05116189.

TEDOVA/GINECO-OV244b/ENGOT-ov58 trial: Neo-epitope based vaccine OSE2101 alone or in combination with pembrolizumab versus best supportive care (BSC) as maintenance in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with disease control after platinum

TPS5614

Background: Besides PARP inhibitors and bevacizumab, there are no approved maintenance therapies after platinum based chemotherapy for patients with a platinum sensitive relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as single agents have limited activity in OC. One attractive strategy is to turn OC from immunogenic “cold” to “hot” tumors via vaccination with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). OSE2101 is a multiple-neoepitope vaccine restricted to HLA-A2-positive patients (45% of OC patients) targeting 5 TAAs: TP53, MAGE2, MAGE3, CEA and HER2. These neo-epitopes are modified to increase both major histocompatibility complex and the T cell receptor binding affinity. The proof of concept for this approach was recently demonstrated with OSE2101 improving overall survival in a phase III trial in lung cancer progressing after ICI (Besse et al. 2021). The combination of OSE2101 with an ICI may most effectively harness anti-tumor immunity. Methods: TEDOVA is an international randomized open-label, phase II trial evaluating the benefit of maintenance by OSE2101 alone or in combination with PD1 inhibition (pembrolizumab) after platinum based chemotherapy in relapsed OC, previously treated with bevacizumab (if eligible) and a PARP inhibitor (if eligible). Patients (N=180) with CR/PR/SD at the end of chemotherapy are randomized (1:1:2) to: Observation/BSC (Arm A), OSE2101 alone (Arm B), or OSE2101 in combination with pembrolizumab (Arm C). Experimental treatments are continued until progression, or intolerance, for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, safety, time to subsequent first or second treatment (TTST-1, TTST-2) and overall survival. 180 HLA-A*02 positive patients will be randomized. HLA-A*02 negative patients will be followed in a separate observational cohort. The sample size is calculated to provide 90% power to detect an improvement in PFS for Arm C vs Arm A with a HR of 0.57. Three one-sided Log-rank tests will be considered in a pre-defined sequence: H1: C (OSE2101+pembrolizumab) vs A (BSC); H2: C (OSE2101+pembrolizumab) vs B (OSE2101) and H3: B vs A. The type I error will be α=5%. The type II error will be β=10%. Tests will be one-sided. Status: The TEDOVA/GINECO-OV244b/ENGOT-ov58 trial is currently recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT04713514.

ODALIE Study, a retrospective analysis of a real-life cohort of patients with de novo advanced high grade epithelial ovarian cancer treated with a first-line platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab

e17577

Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) following a first line platinum-based chemotherapy including bevacizumab for HRD-positive advanced ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients (pts) (PAOLA-1 study). We aimed to describe real-world (rw) clinical outcomes in patients with de novo high grade epithelial advanced ovarian cancer (HGEOC) treated with a first-line platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Methods: Using the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Ovarian Cancer (OC) Data Platform [NCT03275298], a French EHR-derived database centralizing deidentified data of consecutive patients diagnosed and/or treated in 18 French comprehensive cancer centers since 2011, we identified all patients with de novo FIGO stage III/IV HGEOC diagnosed between 01 October 2012 and 31 January 2017, with a documented response to a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and a maintenance treatment with bevacizumab ( PAOLA-like control group population). Data cut-off was 06 August 2020. Endpoints (overall survival, PFS and time to subsequent treatment) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroups were analysed according to the BRCA-derived status. Results: Of 10,263 OC cases in the ESME-OC cohort, 382 patients, with a median follow-up of 47.8 months (CI 95% 44.4-49.1), were analysed. Median age was 61 years (q1-q3: 56-68). 290 pts (75.9%) had a FIGO stage III, 361 pts (94.5%) had at least one surgery, 141 (39.1%) and 210 (58.5%) of them had a primary cytoreductive surgery and an interval surgery respectively. BRCA deleterious mutations were present in 72 pts (22.3%). Median progression free survival was 23.2 months (CI 95% 20.9-24.8) in overall population and 25.3 months (CI 95% 19.7-23.8) in BRCA mutated pts, comparable to the control arm of PAOLA-1 when considering the difference in the PFS definition (from first CT versus from randomization in PAOLA study). Estimated 24-months overall survival rate was 45.7% (95% CI: 40.7- 50.7) and 53.9% (95% CI: 42.4 - 65.5) in BRCA mutated pts. Conclusions: Analyses of our large real-world French ESME-OC cohort are powerful tools to confirm clinical outcomes in HGEOC pts. Our data confirmed the reproducibility of the results observed in randomized clinical trials for de novo HGEOC pts with a documented response to a first line with bevacizumab maintenance therapy.

Real-Time Detection of ESR1 Mutation in Blood by Droplet Digital PCR in the PADA-1 Trial: Feasibility and Cross-Validation with NGS

The clinical actionability of circulating tumor DNA requires sensitive detection methods with a short turnaround time. In the PADA-1 phase 3 trial (NCT03079011), metastatic breast cancer patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib were screened every 2 months for activating ESR1 mutations in blood (bESR1_mut). We report the feasibility of the droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and cross-validation with next-generation sequencing (NGS). bESR1_mut testing was centralized in two platforms using the same ddPCR assay. Results were reported as copies/mL of plasma and mutant allele frequency (MAF). We analyzed 200 positive ddPCR samples with an NGS assay (0.5-1% sensitivity). Overall, 12,552 blood samples were collected from 1017 patients from 83 centers. Among the 12,525 available samples with ddPCR results, 11,533 (92%) were bESR1_mut-negative. A total of 267 patients newly displayed bESR1_mut (26% patients/2% samples) with a median copy number of 14/mL (range: 4-1225) and a median MAF of 0.83% (0.11-35), 648 samples (20% patients/5% samples) displayed persistent bESR1_mut, and 77 (<1%) samples encountered a technical failure. The median turnaround time from blood drawing to result notification was 13 days (Q1:9; Q3:21 days). Among 200 ddPCR-positive samples tested, NGS detected bESR1_mut in 168 (84%); 25 of the 32 cases missed by NGS had low MAF and/or low coverage. In these 200 samples, bESR1_mut MAF by both techniques had an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI [0.85; 0.97]). These results from a large-scale trial support the feasibility and accuracy of real-time bESR1_mut tracking by ddPCR, opening new opportunities for therapeutic interventions.

Randomised, open-label, multicentric phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy, guided by ESR1 mutation monitoring in oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients: study design of PADA-1

INTRODUCTION

The combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) has recently become the gold standard for AI-sensitive first line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. However, most patients receiving this combination will ultimately progress and require further therapies.Several studies have demonstrated that the onset of a ESR1 gene mutation lead to AIs resistance in the advanced setting. ESR1 mutations can be detected in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using a digital PCR assay. Our study aims to prove the clinical efficacy of periodic monitoring for emerging or rise of ESR1 mutations in ctDNA to trigger an early change from AI plus palbociclib to fulvestrant plus palbociclib treatment while assessing global safety.

METHODS

PADA-1 is a randomised, open-label, multicentric, phase III trial conducted in patients receiving AI and palbociclib as first line therapy for metastatic ER +HER2- breast cancer. 1000 patients will be included and treated with palbociclib in combination with an AI. Patients will be screened for circulating blood ESR1 mutation detection at regular intervals. Patients for whom a rising circulating ESR1 mutation is detected without tumour progression (up to N=200) will be randomised (1:1) between (1) Arm A: no modification of therapy; and (2) Arm B: palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant, a selective ER down-regulator. At tumour progression, an optional crossover will be offered to patients randomised in arm A. The coprimary endpoints are (1) Grade ≥3 haematological toxicities and their associations with baseline characteristics and (2) progression-free survival in randomised patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the French medicines agency (ANSM) and by an ethics committee (ref 01/17_1 CPP Ouest-IV Nantes) in January 2017. The trial results will be published in academic conference presentations and international peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

EudraCT: 2016-004360-18; NCT03079011.

Abstract P1-18-28: Phase IV study evaluating effectiveness and safety of talazoparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (ViTAL)

Background: Talazoparib (TALA) is a highly potent PARP inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical benefit in the phase III EMBRACA trial for patients with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2-mutation and a locally advanced or metastatic HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Methods: ViTAL is an ambispective, multi-center longitudinal, phase IV study that aims to ensure the effectiveness and safety of TALA in the real-world setting among patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC, with somatic or germline BRCA mutation (sBRCA or gBRCA). This study includes two cohorts: - Cohort 1: patients treated through the French Early Access Program from November 2018 to September 2019. Inclusion of patients with sBRCA mutation was allowed. - Cohort 2: patients treated according to the European Marketing Approval granted 21/09/2021. The primary endpoint is Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD) for TALA defined as Time between the date of first dose of TALA and the date of last dose or death. Results: We present the results of Cohort 1 in which includes 85 patients. Patients’ characteristics are as follows: median age 50 years; 46% triple negative BC and 54% ER+ BC; 47% BRCA1-mutated and 53% BRCA2-mutated; 94% gBRCA and 6% sBRCA; 95% ECOG PS 0 or 1; 31% premenopausal status; 40% de novo metastatic BC (mBC). Visceral, bones and central nervous system metastases were found in 61%, 54% and 11% of patients, respectively. No breast or ovarian cancer in first degree relative was found in 35 patients (41%). The median number of prior cytotoxic regimen was 2, 15% were chemo-naïve for mBC; 35% received prior platinum in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. For patients with ER+/HER2- mBC the median number of prior endocrine therapy was 2 and 74% of these patients received a CDK4/6 inhibitor prior to TALA. The median follow-up was 17.4 months [range 15.7-20.5]. Of 85 treated patients, 66 patients (78%) experienced permanent discontinuation of TALA due to progressive disease (88%), toxicity (8%), cancer-related death (3%), or other reasons (1.5%). The median TTD for TALA was 9.0 months [range 6.0-11.0] with 35% of patients still in under treatment at 12 months. At least one adverse event (AEs) was recorded in 71% of patients. Hematologic AEs (any grade) occurred in 44% of patients (anemia for 26%, thrombocytopenia for 9%, neutropenia for 8%). The most common non-hematologic AEs were alopecia (6%) and asthenia (5%). Related serious hematologic AEs occurred in 7 (8%) patients including 6 (7%) with anemia. Related serious non-hematologic AEs (vomiting, pyelonephritis) were seen in 2 patients (2%). AEs associated with temporary drug interruption, dose modification and permanent drug discontinuation occurred in 32 (38%), 16 (19%), and 5 (8%) patients respectively. After discontinuation of TALA, 83% of patients received a subsequent treatment with a TTD of 2.4 months [range 1.7-3.3]. The most common subsequent treatments were non-platinum chemotherapy (64%) and platinum therapy (24%). Conclusions: The TTD of 9 months is consistent with the outcomes and safety results of the EMBRACA study. ViTAL, the first real-word study with TALA confirms its interest in locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC. Analysis of Cohort 2 will occur when data are mature. (Ref Litton JK, Rugo HR, Ellt J et al. Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA Mutation. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:753-763.

Citation Format: Delphine Loirat, Marie Duboys de Labarre, Christine Essner, Ioana Hrab, Jean-Christophe Thery, Christelle Jouannaud, Cristian Villanueva, Perrine Vuagnat, Pauline Soibinet-Oudot, Anne Creisson, Audrey Mailliez, Jean-Loup Mouysset, Laura Salabert, Nadine Dohollou, Jean-David Fumet, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Jean-Michel Vauthier, Maylis Decrop, Pascal Pujol. Phase IV study evaluating effectiveness and safety of talazoparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (ViTAL) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-28.

Abstract GS3-05: Fulvestrant-palbociclib vs continuing aromatase inhibitor-palbociclib upon detection of circulating ESR1 mutation in HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients: Results of PADA-1, a UCBG-GINECO randomized phase 3 trial

Background: ESR1 mutations are known drivers of resistance to first line aromatase inhibitors (AI)-based therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients (pts), but their clinical actionability remains unknown. The randomized phase 3 PADA-1 trial aimed at evaluating the clinical benefit associated with a switch to fulvestrant-palbociclib upon the detection of a rising ESR1 mutation in blood (bESR1mut) in HR+ HER2- mBC pts treated by first line AI-palbociclib.. Methods: PADA-1 (NCT03079011), a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, enrolled HR+ HER2- mBC pts with no prior therapy for mBC in the absence of AI-resistance. In the first step, pts were treated with AI-palbociclib as first line therapy and underwent centralized bESR1mut screening every two months. Rising bESR1mut+ pts with no clinical/imaging concomitant disease progression were included in the second step, in which they were randomized between continuing the same therapy (standard arm) or switching to fulvestrant-palbociclib (experimental arm). The third step consisted in an optional crossover to fulvestrant-palbociclib following tumor progression for patients randomized in the standard arm. PADA-1 co-primary endpoints were PFS in the second step, and global safety.. Results: Between 03/2017 and 01/2019, 1,017 pts have been included in the first step. After a median time of 15.6 months in the first step, 172 pts with rising bESR1mut and no synchronous disease progression were randomized to continuing AI-palbociclib (N=84 pts) or to fulvestrant-palbociclib (N=88 pts). Among the 172 randomized pts, N=136 PFS events have been observed in the second step after a median follow-up of 26 months. The median PFS was 5.7 months (95%CI[3.9;7.5]) in the AI-palbociclib arm and 11.9 months (95%CI[9.1;13.6]) in the fulvestrant-palbociclib arm (HR=0.63; 95%CI|0.45-0.88], p=0.007). Among the 70 patients who subsequently developed a disease progression in the AI-palbociclib arm, 47 were included in the optional crossover cohort. With a median follow-up of 14.7 months and 37 events, the median second-PFS observed in the cross-over cohort was 3.5 months (95%CI [2.7-5.1]). Treatment safety and validation of the ESR1mut assay are reported separately (poster session #1). Conclusion: PADA-1 reached its primary objective. This first-of-its-kind liquid biopsy-based trial demonstrates that targeting bESR1mut-associated resistance through a change in the endocrine partner of palbociclib is feasible and allows a doubling in the subsequent median progression free survival.. Funding: Pfizer

Citation Format: François-Clément Bidard, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Yves Pierga, Jean-Luc Canon, Florian Clatot, Fabrice Andre, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Barbara Pistilli, Florence Dalenc, Nadine Dohollou, Olivier Arsene, Thierry Petit, Cécilia Riedl, François Morvan, Adina Marti, Emma Lachaier, Mihaela Achille, Michel Gozy, Anne Escande, Dominique Mille, Fanny Trouboul, Laurent Arnould, Ivan Bieche, Anne Pradines, Jerome Lemonnier, Frederique Berger, Suzette Delaloge. Fulvestrant-palbociclib vs continuing aromatase inhibitor-palbociclib upon detection of circulating ESR1 mutation in HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients: Results of PADA-1, a UCBG-GINECO randomized phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-05.

Abstract P1-18-16: First line aromatase inhibitor (AI) + palbociclib with randomized switch to fulvestrant + palbociclib upon detection of circulating ESR1 mutation in HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients: Global safety results of PADA-1, a UCBG-GINECO phase III trial

Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) in combination with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor have been established as the standard first line treatment of non AI-resistant hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients (pts). ESR1 mutations are known drivers of resistance to AIs in the metastatic setting but their actionability remains unknown. The phase 3 PADA-1 trial aimed both at refining the global safety of palbociclib combined to any AI as first line treatment of HR+ HER2- mBC pts, and at evaluating the clinical benefit associated with a switch to fulvestrant-palbociclib upon detection of a rising ESR1 mutation in blood (bESR1mut). Methods: PADA-1 (NCT03079011), a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, enrolled HR+ HER2- mBC pts with no prior therapy for mBC, in the absence of AI-resistance. In the first step, pts received a combination of any AI and palbociclib at standard recommended doses and underwent centralized bESR1mut screening every two months. In the second step, bESR1mut+ pts with no clinical/imaging concomitant disease progression were randomized between continuing the same therapy (standard arm) or switching to fulvestrant-palbociclib (experimental arm). The third step consisted in an optional cross-over after tumor progression for patients randomized in the standard arm. PADA-1 co-primary endpoints were global safety of the combination of palbociclib + endocrine therapy in the whole population of patients, throughout the study, with focus on hematological toxicities; and PFS in the second step. We present here the results of the global safety co-primary endpoint. Results: From 3/2017 to 01/2019, 1017 pts were accrued in 83 sites. As per 05/2021, 272 pts were still in step 1, 35 in step 2, and 8 in step 3. The overall follow-up was 33.7 months. 232 pts have deceased. 333 SAEs have been reported, including 21 grade 5, 35 grade 4, 183 grade 3, 53 grade 2, 26 grade 1 and 15 unknown grade. Among the grade 5 cases, 2 have been declared as potentially related to the underlying treatment (Death of unknown cause, pulmonary embolism). No pt died of SARS-CoV2 infection. The main hematological toxicities encountered, as well as selected non-hematological events are described in Table 1. Permanent discontinuation of the treatment due to toxicity occurred in 39 pts/1017 (3.8%). Palbociclib dose decreases occurred in 419 (41.2%) pts. Conclusion: By the number of included patients, PADA-1 is the largest prospective trial with 1st line AI and palbociclib. Data confirm the favorable safety profile of palbociclib when combined to any AI +/- switch to fulvestrant. Hematological toxicity appears limited and is mostly restricted to non-clinically significant neutropenia. Permanent discontinuation was exceptional. Detailed per-step analyses will be presented.

Table 1.Adverse events (% pts)Grade 3, N (%)Grade 4, N (%)Neutropenia628 (61.8%)83 (8.2%)Febrile neutropenia4 (0.4%)0Thrombocytopenia18 (1.8%)3 (0.3%)Anemia24 (2.4%)0Lymphocytopenia58 (5.7%)5 (0.5%)Insterstitial lung disease4 (0.4%)0Liver enzymes increase (AST/ALT)5 (0.5%)0Mucositis10 (1%)0

Citation Format: Suzette Delaloge, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Yves Pierga, Jean-Luc Canon, Florian Clatot, Fabrice André, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Barbara Pistilli, Florence Dalenc, Nadine Dohollou, Olivier Arsene, Thierry Petit, Cecilia Riedl, François Morvan, Adina Marti, Emma Lachaier, Mihaela Achille, Michel Gozy, Anne Escande, Dominique Mille, Fanny Trouboul, Sandrine Marques, Jerome Lemonnier, Frederique Berger, François-Clément Bidard. First line aromatase inhibitor (AI) + palbociclib with randomized switch to fulvestrant + palbociclib upon detection of circulating ESR1 mutation in HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients: Global safety results of PADA-1, a UCBG-GINECO phase III trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-16.

Real-world evidence of the management and prognosis of young women (⩽40 years) with de novo metastatic breast cancer

Background:

Breast cancer (BC) in young women merits a specific approach given the associated fertility, genetic and psychosocial issues. De novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in young women is an even more serious condition, with limited data available.

Methods:

We evaluated management of women aged ⩽40 years with de novo MBC in a real-life national multicentre cohort of 22,463 patients treated between 2008 and 2016 (NCT0327531). Our primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in young women versus women aged 41–69 years. The secondary objectives were to compare first-line progression-free survival (PFS1) and to describe treatment patterns.

Results:

Of the 4524 women included, 598 (13%) were ⩽40 years. Median age at MBC diagnosis was 36 years (range = 20–40). Compared with women aged 41–69 years, young women had more grade III tumours (49% versus 35.7%, p < 0.0001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplified (HER2+) disease (34.6% versus 26.4%, p < 0.0001) and HR–/HER2– disease known as “triple negative breast cancer” (TNBC) (17.1% versus 12.7%, p < 0.0001). BRCA testing was performed for 260 young women, with a BRCA1/2 mutation in 44 (17% of those tested) In young HR+/HER2– patients, chemotherapy (CT) was given as the frontline treatment more frequently compared with older ones (89.6% versus 68.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). After median follow-up of 49.7 months (95% confidence interval, CI = 48.0–51.7), the median OS of young women was 58.5 months, 20.7 months and not attained in HR+/HER2–, TNBC and HER2+ subgroups, respectively. After adjustment for histological subtype, tumour grade, and number and type of metastasis, young women had significantly better OS compared with older ones, except for the TNBC subgroup, for which the outcome was similar. PFS1 was statistically different only in the TNBC subgroup, with 7.8 months for young women and 6.3 months for older women ( p = 0.0015).

Conclusion:

De novo MBC affects a significant proportion of young women. A subgroup of these patients achieves long OS and merits multidisciplinary care.

Abstract CT189: Characterization of ESR1 mutations at metastatic relapse and outcome under first line aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib in the PADA-1 trial

Background: Palbociclib (Pal) combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) is a standard of care as first line therapy in ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) ESR1 mutation (ESR1mut) status prior to treatment initiation may be associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) under first line Pal+AI; however, the impact of the exact type of ESR1mut, of their quantitative levels and clonality are unknown. In a subsidiary analysis of the first line PADA-1 phase 3 trial, cfDNA samples previously detected as positive by ddPCR were submitted to NGS; mutations types, level and clonality were correlated with patient outcomes under first line Pal+AI. Methods: PADA-1 (NCT03079011) is a phase III trial testing the clinical utility of real time ESR1mut detection in the blood of patients treated with AI-Pal. Main inclusion criteria are patients with ER+ HER2- MBC, who never received adjuvant AI or completed adjuvant AI for &gt;12 months, with neither prior therapy for MBC nor visceral crisis. ESR1mut are tracked in cfDNA from up to 4ml of plasma by a single ddPCR assay targeting E380, L536, Y537 and D538 hotspots (i.e. &gt;90% of known ESR1 activating mutations) with 0.1% sensitivity (Jeannot et al, Oncogene 2020). We sequenced the ddPCR positive cfDNA samples using a short amplicon-based NGS panel spanning 30 genes, including the full sequence of ESR1. We assessed for the correlation between PFS and ESR1mut type (NGS), absolute level (copy/ml, ddPCR) or variant allelic frequency (VAF, NGS & ddPCR), and clonality (NGS, pending the detection of other driver mutations). Results: Among the 1,017 included patients, N=33 (3.2%) had an ESR1mut detected by ddPCR at inclusion (median VAF= 2.5%, range (0.09-46.6%). 26/33 left-over cfDNA samples were available for NGS. ESR1mut VAFs retrieved by NGS and ddPCR showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC= 0.98; 95% CI [0.89;0.99]). In N=3 samples with low VAF by ddPCR (&lt;1%), NGS was not able to detect ESR1mut. ESR1 codons 380, 536, 537 and 538 were mutated in N=5, 6, 10 and 7 patients, respectively (5 patients (19.2%) having polyclonal mutations). Among evaluable patients, ESR1mut were found clonal and subclonal in 11 (47.8%) and 12 (52.2%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 24.8 months (range 0-41.9 months) (485 PFS events among the 1,017 included patients), ESR1mut detection at inclusion was found to be a prognostic factor for PFS (median PFS = 11.6 months 95% CI [8.3; NR] vs 28.5 months 95% CI [23.3;30.2]; HR= 2.2 95% CI = [1.4;3.4]). ESR1mut type, clonality and baseline levels had no significant additional impact on PFS. Conclusion: Presence of ESR1mut detected in cfDNA at metastatic relapse are associated with a shorter PFS under first line AI and palbociclib. ddPCR and NGS yielded similar quantitative results, while supplementary information obtained by NGS (mutation type and clonality) did not add further prognostic information. Funding: Pfizer, French National Cancer Institute (Grant PRT-K 2020-041)

Citation Format: Anne Pradines, Céline Callens, Aurélia Doussine, Ivan Bièche, Jérôme Lemonnier, Marjorie Mauduit, Thomas Bachelot, Florence Dalenc, Alain Lortholary, Barbara Pistilli, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Renaud Sabatier, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Sylvain Ladoire, Frédérique Berger, François-Clément Bidard. Characterization of ESR1 mutations at metastatic relapse and outcome under first line aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib in the PADA-1 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT189.

Alpelisib and fulvestrant efficacy in HR-positive HER2-negative PIK3CA-mutant advanced breast cancer: Data from the French early access program

1064

Background: In 11.2018, the PIK3CA-inhibitor alpelisib was made available in France through an early access program (EAP), in combination with fulvestrant in pre-treated PIK3CA-mutant, HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. Patients had to received two or more prior systemic treatments for ABC, including an aromatase inhibitor and a CDK4/6 inhibitor in the absence of contraindications. This retrospective real-life, EAP-based study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of alpelisib/fulvestrant combination in the post CDK4/6 inhibitor setting. Methods: The IRB-approved protocol and call for data were sent on 10.2020 to the cancer centers which participated the most in the EAP prospective registry. Eligible patients were women who started alpelisib/fulvestrant between 11. 2018 and 10.2020 as part of the EAP (which excluded patients with visceral crisis or inflammatory BC). Alpelisib and fulvestrant were used at standard doses. Primary endpoint was PFS by local investigators using RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate and safety (NCI CTCAE v5.0). Results: 10 centers provided individual data regarding 209 consecutive patients. Patients had received a median number of 4 (1-14) previous systemic treatments for ABC, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, chemotherapy, fulvestrant (alone or in combination) and everolimus for 206 (98.8%), 159 (76.1%), 163 (78%) and 123 (58.8%) patients, respectively. With a median FU of 7.0 months, median PFS was 4.0 months (95%CI [3.5;5.0]) and 35.4% of 164 evaluable patients had an objective response. After stratification on the number of prior lines of treatment, prior exposure to everolimus had no impact on PFS (mPFS in the 123 patients pretreated with everolimus: 4.0m, 95%CI [3.5-5.5]). Of note, this population was enriched in patients who had a long disease control by everolimus (median time spent on everolimus: 7.0m, range (6.5-9.0)). In multivariable analysis, characteristics significantly associated with longer PFS were PS < 3 (HR = 0.03, 95%CI [0.02-0.29]) and prior treatment with fulvestrant (HR = 0.53, 95%CI [0.32-0.89]). N = 81(38.8%) patients discontinued alpelisib due to adverse events (AEs). Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs were hyperglycemia, skin rash, diarrhea and fatigue occurring in 13.4, 8.1, 4.8 and 1.9 % of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Despite heavy pre-treatments, alpelisib +fulvestrant had a clinically relevant efficacy in the French EAP population. Interestingly, prior treatment with either everolimus or fulvestrant did not overtly impair alpelisib-fulvestrant efficacy. The best treatment sequence for PI3KCA/mTOR inhibitors could be examined in future trials in PIK3CA-mutant ER+/HER2- ABC patients.

Efficacy of AI and palbociclib in ER+ HER2- advanced breast cancer patients relapsing during adjuvant tamoxifen: An exploratory analysis of the PADA-1 trial

1070

Background: In PADA-1 (NCT03079011), a phase III trial testing the clinical utility of ESR1mut detection, ER+ HER2- advanced breast patients (ABC pts) received Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) and Palbociclib (Pal) +/- LHRH agonist as first line therapy. PADA-1 was open to “AI-sensitive” pts, including those with de novo stage IV disease or metastatic relapse after adjuvant endocrine therapy but also pts with metastatic relapses during adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM). In this subsidiary analysis, we report the efficacy of AI+PAL as first line therapy in patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM. Methods: Main inclusion criteria in PADA-1 are: pre- or post-menopausal pts with ER+ HER2- ABC, who did not receive any prior therapy for ABC and who had no adjuvant AI or completed adjuvant AI for > 12 months or who had disease recurrence while on adjuvant TAM. Results: From 04/2017 to 01/2019, 1017 ABC pts have been included in PADA-1, of which 115 (11.3%) had a metastatic relapse while on adjuvant TAM (TAM only (N = 112) or TAM+GnRH agonist (N = 3)). Median age at inclusion was 46 years (range 25-81), and 58 (50.4%) patients had visceral disease. The median PFS under AI+PAL was 20.4 months (95%CI16.1;27.8) in patients relapsing during adjuvant TAM. In contrast, median PFS in patients with de novo metastatic disease and metastatic relapses after the completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy were 30.6 months (95%CI26.7;Not reached) and 27.8 months (95%CI24.1;30.)], respectively. A subgroup analysis among patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM showed that those relapsing during the first two years of adjuvant TAM had a shorter PFS (11.4 months 95%CI[8.7;20.7]) than those relapsing after 2 years of adjuvant TAM (23.8 months 95%CI[20.2;Not reached]). Conclusions: To our knowledge, these are the first data on first line AI+CDK4/6 inhibitor in patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM. While PFS on AI + PAL appears primarily driven by endocrine resistance status, our data show that AI+PAL is a valuable option also in patients relapsing during adjuvant TAM. Clinical trial information: NCT03079011 .

Abstract PS7-46: Enrollment of older metastatic breast cancer patients in clinical trials

Background: About 40% of breast cancer cases occur in women 65 years old (yo) or older and 20% in women over 75 yo. These numbers are expected to increase in the near future. Ironically, older patients remain underrepresented in clinical trials with no improvement in the past decade, although they may present different efficacy/toxicity profiles compared with younger adults. In this context, real life cohorts may bring valuable insight to identify potential barriers to recruitment of older patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical trials. Methods: We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC Data Platform, a multi-center real life database using a retrospective data collection process in 18 French Cancer Centers. Cases selected were adult patients with MBC whose first metastasis was treated between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016. We selected MBC women over 70 yo at the time of MBC diagnosis, with at least one line of systemic treatment and no other cancer in the 5 years before MBC. The primary objective was to describe factors associated with enrollment in clinical trials in older patients, using a multivariable Cox model. Factors included in this model were age (continuous, and by class), period (2008-2011 vs 2012-2016), phenotype (ER+, HER2+, or ER- HER2-), ECOG Performance Status (PS), treatment, metastatic sites (brain, visceral, nodes/bone only) and number, and volume of hospital activity. No geriatric description could be extracted from the database. Results: There were 5846 patients ≥70yo (median age 77) and 15892 patients &lt; 70 yo. Of the older ones, 245 (4.2%) were enrolled in a clinical trial in first line compared with 1602 (10%) for younger ones. Most of the older patients in this cohort (66%) had ER+ HER2+ disease, half had visceral metastases (&lt; 3 metastatic sites in 82%). Median follow-up of older patients was 46.3 months; 95%CI 44.8-49.0. Cause of death was related to disease in 1155 (33.9%) older patients, and related to another cause or unknown in 2156 (63.3%), data were missing for 2441 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 34.1 months in the older population, 95%CI 32.9-35.4, and specific overall survival was 70.8 months, 95%CI 66.3-80.0. Significant factors identified in the multivariable analysis for enrollment in 1st line treatment clinical trial ≥70 are shown in table. Volume of activity was not identified as one.

By multivariate analysis, participation of older patients to a clinical trial was associated with an increased OS (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) but not with a better breast cancer specific survival (HR 0.94; 95%CI 0.68-1.29). Conclusions: In this large real-life database, few older MBC patients were enrolled in a trial compared with younger ones. Factors associated with such participation to clinical research were younger age (&lt; 80 yo), good PS, HER2+ disease, and investigational treatment consisting of chemotherapy or targeted therapy. There was a small improvement in accruing older patients between 2007-2011 and 2012-2016 (2.6% versus 5.5%). Most of these factors raise questions on drug availability and perceived potential benefits by investigators and medical teams. Accrual of older patients with cancer in other disease types should be more encouraged.

VariableOR95%CIAge vs 70-75 75-80 80-85 85+0.74 0.47 0.170.54-1 0.31-0.71 0.06-0.37MBC diagnosis period vs 2008-2011 2012-20161.671.23-2.27Phenotype vs Others HER2+1.761.26-2.45PS vs 0 1 2-40.71 0.150.5-1 0.08-0.26Treatment4.88 5.253.08-7.9 3.48-8.14Chemotherapy vs others4.883.08-7.9Targeted treatment vs others5.253.48-8.14

Citation Format: Michael Bringuier, Matthieu Carton, Christelle Levy, Anne Patsouris, David Pasquier, Marc Debled, Olivier Rigal, William Jacot, Anthony Gonçalves, Isabelle Desmoulins, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Florence Dalenc, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Thierry Petit, Michael Chevrot, Coralie Courtinard, Lionel Uwer, Jean-Sebastien Frenel, Capucine Baldini. Enrollment of older metastatic breast cancer patients in clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-46.

Abstract PD10-08: Outcomes of germline BRCA carriers versus non-carriers in the french national metastatic breast cancer ESME cohort 2008-2016

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) carry a deleterious germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm). Retrospective studies suggest that overall survival (OS) is equivalent between gBRCAm carriers and non-carriers with metastatic BC (MBC). We aimed to use the large ESME multicentre national MBC database to compare outcomes of gBRCAm carriers, gBRCA wild-type (WT) and not tested (NT) pts. METHODS: We used the large ESME MBC database (NCT03275311), a unique national cohort of all consecutive pts who initiated a first-line treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. All pts with data available regarding gBRCA testing were selected for the present analysis. 26 pts with non-BRCA germline mutations were classified in the WT group. The primary endpoint was OS from date of treatment initiation in the 3 groups of patients: gBRCAm, gBRCA WT and gBRCA NT.Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival under first line treatment (PFS1), clinical and biological characteristics of the 3 groups and prognostic factors for OS. Multivariable analyses included the main known prognostic factors (age at MBC, MBC subtype, disease-free interval, presence of visceral disease, number of metastatic sites). They were conducted using Cox proportional analyses. RESULTS: 20624 pts were included in this analysis (414 gBRCAm, 1710 WT, 18500 gBRCA NT). Pts and disease characteristics are summarized in table 1. As expected, patients with gBRCAm were younger and had a higher rate of TNBC and G3 tumors.

Median follow-up was 50.5 months (95%CI 49.7-51.5). Non-adjusted median OS was 30.6 months [21.9-34.3] in the gBRCAm group, 35.8 [32.2-37.8] in the WT and 39.3 [38.3-40.3] in NT groups. Median PFS1 was 7.9 months [6.6-9.3] in the gBRCAm group, 7.8 [7.3-8.5] in the WT and 9.7 months [ 9.5-10.0] in the NT groups. In multivariable analyses, OS and PFS were not significantly different between MBC patients with gBRCA and others (respective HRs 1.01 [0.88;1.17], p=0.87 and 0.94 [0.84;1.06], p=0.31). CONCLUSION: In this large scale real-life ESME MBC database analysis, outcomes of gBRCAm carriers with MBC do not differ from non carriers or not tested subgroups, when adjusted for other prognostic factors.

Table 1: characteristics of patients and diseasegBRCAm. gBRCA WT. gBRCA NT Pvalue (chi-2)N = 414 N = 1710 N = 18500 Age (years) median [range]45 [23-82]48 [20- 88]61 [22-103]p&lt;0.0001Grade 3 N (%) Missing data202 (57.7) 64598 (41.1) 2545337 (34.5)3036p&lt;0.0001Triple negative breast cancer N (%)158 (38.2)370 (21.6)2331 (12.6)p&lt;0.0001De novo MBC N (%)74 (17.9)359 (21)5914 (32)p&lt;0.0001Disease-free interval (months) median [range]39.0 [-1.5- 425.7]36.3 [-2.1- 549.6]31.8 [-2.9- 657.8]p&lt;0.0001Metastatic sites ≥3 N (%)113 (27.3)349 (20.4)3943 (21.3)p=0.008Visceral metastases N (%)279 (67.4)964 (56.4)10659(57.6)p=0.0002Central Nervous System Metastases N (%)66 (15.9)132 (7.7)1145 (6.2)p&lt;0.0001

Citation Format: Audrey Mailliez, Veronique D'Hondt, Amelie Lusque, Olivier Caron, Luc Cabel, Antony Goncalves, Marc Debled, Laurence Gladieff, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Thierry Petit, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Gaëtane Simon, Suzette Delaloge. Outcomes of germline BRCA carriers versus non-carriers in the french national metastatic breast cancer ESME cohort 2008-2016 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-08.

Borderline ovarian tumors: French guidelines from the CNGOF. Part 1. Epidemiology, biopathology, imaging and biomarkers

The incidence (rate per 100 000) of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) increases progressively with age, starting at 15-19 years and peaking at around 4.5 cases per 100 000 at an age of 55-59 years (LE3) with a median age of 46 years. The five year survival for FIGO stages I, II, III and IV is 99.7 % (95 % CI: 96.2-100 %), 99.6 % (95 % CI: 92.6-100 %), 95.3 % (95 % CI: 91.8-97.4 %) and 77.1 % (95 % CI: 58.0-88.3 %), respectively (LE3). An epidemiological association exists between the individual risk of BOT and family history of BOT and certain other cancers (pancreatic, lung, bone, leukemia) (LE3), a personal history of benign ovarian cyst (LE2), a personal history of tubo-ovarian infection (LE3), the use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LE3), oral contraceptive use (LE3), multiparity (LE3), Hormonal replacement therapy (LE3), high consumption of Coumestrol (LE4), medical treatment for infertility with progesterone (LE3) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (LE3). Screening for BOTs is not recommended for patients (Grade C). The overall risk of recurrence of BOTs varies between 2% and 24 %, with an overall survival greater than 94 % at 10 years, and the risk of an invasive recurrence of a BOT ranges from 0.5 % to 3.8 %. The use of scores and nomograms can be useful in assessing the risk of recurrence, and providing patients with information (Grade C). The WHO classification is recommended for classifying BOTs. It is recommended that the presence of a microinvasive focus (<5 mm) and microinvasive carcinoma (<5 mm with an atypical nuclei and a desmoplastic stroma reaction) within a BOT be reported. In cases of serous BOT, it is recommended to specify the classic histological subtype or micropapillary / cribriform type (Grade C). When confronted with a BOT, it is recommended that the invasive or non-invasive nature of peritoneal implants can be investigated based solely on the invasion and destruction of underlying adipose or peritoneal tissue which has a desmoplastic stromal reaction where in contact with the invasive clusters (Grade B). For bilateral mucinous BOTs and / or in cases with peritoneal implants or peritoneal pseudomyxoma, it is recommended to also look for a primitive digestive or pancreato-biliary cancer (Grade C). It is recommended to sample ovarian tumors suspected of being BOTs by focusing samples on vegetations and solid components, with at least 1 sample per cm in tumors with a size less than 10 cm and 2 samples per cm in tumors with a size greater than 10 cm (Grade C). In cases of BOTs and in the absence of macroscopic omental involvement after careful macroscopic examination, it is recommended to perform at least 4-6 systematic sampling blocks and to include all peritoneal implants (Grade C). It is recommended to consult an expert pathologist in gynecology when a BOT suspicion requires intraoperative extemporaneous histology (grade C). Endo-vaginal and suprapubic ultrasonography are recommended for the analysis of an ovarian mass (Grade A). In case of an undetermined ovarian lesion on ultrasonography, it is recommended that a pelvic MRI be performed (Grade A). To analyze an adnexal mass with MRI, it is recommended to use an MRI protocol with T2, T1, T1 Fat Sat, dynamic and diffusion sequences as well as gadolinium injection (Grade B). To characterize an adnexal mass with MRI, it is recommended to include a score system for malignancy (ADNEX MR/O-RADS) (Grade C) in the report and to formulate a histological hypothesis (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended to characterize a tumor suspected of being a BOT (Grade C). Macroscopic MRI features should be analyzed to differentiate BOT subtypes (Grade C). Pelvic ultrasound is the first-line examination for the detection and characterization of adnexal masses during pregnancy (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended from 12 weeks of gestation in case of an indeterminate adnexal mass and should provide a diagnostic score (Grade C). Gadolinium injection must be minimized as fetal impairment has been proven (Grade C). It is recommended that serum levels of HE4 and CA125 be evaluated and that the ROMA score for the diagnosis of an indeterminate ovarian mass on imaging be used (grade A). In case of suspicion of a mucinous BOT on imaging, dosage of serum levels of CA 19-9 can be considered (Grade C). If the determination of tumor markers is normal preoperatively, routine dosage of tumor markers in BOT follow-up is not recommended (Grade C). In case of preoperative elevation in tumor markers, the determination of serum CA 125 levels is recommended in the follow-up of BOT (Grade B). When conservative treatment of a BOT has been adopted, the use of endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography is recommended during follow-up (Grade B).

Borderline ovarian tumors: French guidelines from the CNGOF. Part 2. Surgical management, follow-up, hormone replacement therapy, fertility management and preservation

In the Early Stages (ES) of Borderline Ovarian Tumor (BOT), if surgery without risk of tumor rupture is possible, then laparoscopy with protected extraction is recommended over laparotomy (Grade C). In case of bilateral serous ES BOT treatment with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, bilateral cystectomy is recommended if possible (Grade B). In case of mucinous BOT treatment with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, unilateral adnexectomy is recommended (grade C). In the case of a mucinous BOT in a patient who has had an initial cystectomy, unilateral adnexectomy is recommended (grade C). In the case of treatment of a serous ES BOT in a patient who has had an initial cystectomy, with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, restaging surgery for adnexectomy is not recommended in the absence of suspicious residual lesions at the time of surgery and/or postoperative imaging (reference ultrasonography or pelvic MRI) (grade C). For serous or mucinous ES BOTs, routine hysterectomy is not recommended (Grade C). In cases of ES BOTs, lymphadenectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, appendectomy is recommended only if there is a macroscopically pathological aspect to the appendix (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in case of a serous BOT with a micropapillary aspect and an unsatisfactory inspection of the abdominal cavity during initial surgery (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in cases of mucinous BOT if only a cystectomy has been performed or if the appendix has not been evaluated (Grade C). If restaging surgery is decided for an ES BOT, the following procedures should be performed: peritoneal cytology (grade C), omentectomy (there is no data in literature to recommend which type of omentectomy should be performed) (grade B), complete exploration of the abdominal cavity with peritoneal biopsies (grade C), visualization of the appendix +/- appendectomy in case of pathological macroscopic appearance (grade C) and unilateral adnexectomy in case of a mucinous BOT (grade C). In advanced stages of BOT it is not recommended to perform a lymphadenectomy as a routine procedure (Grade C). In cases of an advanced stage BOT, in a patient with a desire to fall pregnant, conservative treatment involving preservation of the uterus and all or part of the ovary may be proposed after a multidisciplinary meeting (Grade C). Second surgery aimed at removing all lesions, if not performed initially, is recommended in cases of advanced stage BOT (Grade C). It is not recommended to perform completion surgery after conservative treatment (preservation of the ovaries and the uterus) and after the achievement of fertility desire for a serous BOT (Grade B). After treatment for a BOT, follow-up beyond 5 years is recommended due to the median time to recurrence (Grade B). It is recommended that a systematic clinical examination be carried out during follow-up of a treated BOT (Grade B). In the particular case of an initial elevation of CA 125 levels, it is recommended to monitor CA 125 during follow up (Grade B). In cases treated conservatively (ovarian and uterine conservation), it is recommended to use endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography during the follow up period (Grade B). In the event of a recurrence of a BOT, in a woman of childbearing age, a conservative treatment strategy can again be proposed (Grade C). In the presence of non-invasive BOT implants, conservative treatment may be considered after a first non-invasive recurrence in women who wish to preserve their fertility (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended after 12 weeks of amenorrhea in case of an undetermined adnexal mass and should be concluded with a diagnostic score (Grade C). The injection of gadolinium, in case of pregnancy, should be discussed on a case-by-case basis due to the proven risks for the foetus (Grade C). If feasible, a laparoscopic approach should be preferred during pregnancy (Grade C). A consultation with a specialist reproductive physician should be offered to patients with a BOT and of childbearing age (Grade C). It is recommended that patients be provided with full information on the risk of decreased ovarian reserve following to surgical treatment. It is recommended that the ovarian reserve be evaluated prior to surgical management of a suspected BOT (Grade C). When possible, a conservative surgical strategy is recommended to preserve fertility in women of childbearing age (Grade C). There is no specific data on the management of infertility following to conservative treatment of BOT. In case of durable infertility following to conservative treatment of BOT, a consultation with a specialist reproductive physician is required (Grade C). In the case of optimally treated BOT, there is no evidence in literature to contraindicate the use of Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART). The use of hormonal contraception after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (Grade C). After treatment of a mucinous BOT, for women aged under 45 years, given the benefit of hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular and bone risks, and the lack of hormone-sensitivity of mucinous BOTs, it is recommended to offer HRT (Grade C). After treatment of a mucinous BOT, for women over 45 years of age, there is no argument to contraindicate the use of HRT. HRT can be prescribed in case of a climacteric syndrome, as part of an individual benefit to risk assessment (Grade C).

Prognostic impact of ESR1 mutations in ER+ HER2- MBC patients prior treated with first line AI and palbociclib: An exploratory analysis of the PADA-1 trial

1010

Background: The question of which is the best endocrine partner to CDK4/6 inhibitors in first line for ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains open. ESR1 mutations might be of paramount importance, as they confer resistance to AI but not to SERD. In pts treated with first line palbociclib-AI combination (PADA-1 trial, NCT03079011), we investigated ESR1mut detection rate at inclusion, prior to any therapy, and their prognostic impact. Methods: The PADA-1 phase 3 trial (NCT03079011, UCBG-GINECO) evaluates the utility of monitoring the onset of ESR1mut in cell-free DNA (with a ddPCR assay [Jeannot et al, Oncogene 2020]) of pts receiving AI-palbociclib in first line. Included pts had no prior therapy for MBC and no overt resistance to AI. Results: N = 1017 ER+ HER2- MBC pts were included in 22 months from 04/2017 and had their cfDNA tested for ESR1mut at inclusion and during therapy. N = 33/1017 pts had a detectable circulating ESR1mut at inclusion (3.2%, 95%CI [2.2;4.5]), ESR1mut positivity being associated with a prior exposure to AI in the adjuvant setting (p < 0.01). N = 1 pt died after 1 month on treatment. In N = 25/32 evaluable pts (78%), ESR1mut became undetectable in cfDNA (AF < 0.1%) within the first 5 months on treatment, with a median time to ESR1mut ‘clearance’ of 34 days. Among these 25 pts, 14 pts (56%) had ESR1mut detected again during therapy; 2 pts (8%) experienced a progression with no ESR1mut detected; the remaining 9 patients (36%) were still both ESR1mut -free and progression-free at time of analysis. With a median FU time of 12.4 months (range: 0-25.3m) under AI-palbociclib, the 33 ESR1mut-positive pts had a shorter PFS (median: 17.5mo, 95%CI[10.5-NR]) than the 984 ESR1mut-negative pts (median not reached), with an estimated HR = 2.8 [1.6;5.0]. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: ESR1mut are rarely detected in the cfDNA of ER+ HER2- MBC patients with no overt resistance to AI. The quick ‘clearance’ of ESR1mut under treatment and the observed 17.5 months-long median PFS both suggest that the AI-palbociclib combination retain a clinical activity in this population. ESR1mut-positivity prior was however associated with a significantly shorter PFS, suggesting that ESR1mut positivity at baseline could accelerate the onset of resistance to AI-palbociclib. These findings may put into perspective the incoming results of the PARSIFAL trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03079011 .

How and when to refer patients for oncogenetic counseling in the era of PARP inhibitors

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are targeted therapy for cancers with homologous repair deficiency (HRD). They were first approved for ovarian cancer and have changed current treatment strategies. They have also demonstrated efficacy in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and advanced prostate cancer with BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations. Patients with somatic and/or germline BRCA1/2 mutations benefit more from these treatments than other patients. Nowadays, the diagnosis of HRD is largely based on germline genetic testing, which is performed after an in-person genetic counseling session, even for patients without any family history of cancer. However, with the increasing number of PARP inhibitor indications across different tumor types, rapid access to oncogenetic consultations will become a challenge. To meet this demand, tumor genomic testing could be offered at initial diagnosis. Telephone counseling and other referral systems could replace in-person consultations for certain subgroups of patients deemed to have a low risk of harboring a germline mutation. This article reviews international guidelines for genetic counseling testing. We herein propose new care pathways for breast, prostate and ovarian cancers, including tumor genomic testing at initial diagnosis in order to help triage genetic counseling referrals.

Therapeutic innovations in breast cancer

Managing endocrine resistance and resistance to endocrine therapy for ER+ HER2- breast cancer with the CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the metastatic setting. New antibodies drug conjugates for HER2+ and TNBC. Targeting DNA damage and synthetic lethality strategies with PARP inhibitors for breast cancer patients harboring BRCA mutation. Immunotherapies in 1st line metastatic setting of TNBC.

How far do laypersons believe in the cure of cancer? Results of the EDIFICE6 survey

11616

Background: Advances in therapy and early detection, by population-based screening in particular, have significantly increased the number of patients cured from cancer. However, cancer patients’ chances of being cured varies strongly from one cancer to another. We studied the understanding of the concept of cure in the lay population and the factors associated with believing that cancer can be cured. Methods: The French nationwide observational survey, EDIFICE 6, was conducted online (June 26-July 28, 2017) on a core sample of 12 046 individuals (age, 18-69y). Representativeness was ensured by quota sampling on age, sex, profession, and stratification by geographical area/type of urban district. This analysis focused on understanding of the meaning of cure in breast (BC), cervical (CC), colorectal (CRC), lung (LC) and bladder (BLC) cancer for individuals with no history of cancer. Results: The majority of respondents believed that cure exists (BC 95%; CC 91%; CRC 89%; BLC 87%, LC 71%). Some agreed with the definition that cure is the disappearance of the disease (BC 42%; CC 38%; CRC 35%; BLC 33%, LC 25%), while others preferred the definition that cure is several years without disease (BC, CC 53%; CRC, BLS 54%; LC 46%). More men than women (P < 0.05) believed that cure exists for CRC, BLC and LC. Socially non-vulnerable individuals were more likely to believe in cure than their vulnerable counterparts (P < 0.05), as were individuals aged 50-69y (P < 0.05) versus those of 18-50y, and for all cancer types except LC. In multivariate analysis, the variable “clinical research enables progress” was correlated with believing that cure exists (BC, OR = 2.93; CC, OR = 1.86; CRC, OR = 2.22; LC, OR = 1.57, BLC, OR = 2.06), as was “progress is rapid” (BC, OR = 1.61; CC, OR = 1.66; CRC, OR = 1.7; LC, OR = 1.84; BLC OR = 1.68), and also social non-vulnerability. However, the variables “prevention”, respectively screening/treatments, “are important for cancer control” had a low impact on the belief in cure (OR~1). Conclusions: The lay population is relatively optimistic about the cure for cancer. Confidence in the existence of cure relies on medical progress. However, factors related to individual behavior, e.g., prevention and screening, did not affect the perception of cure.

Opportunistic off-target cancer screening in organized programs: The EDIFICE 6 survey

1535

Background: The efficacy and benefit/risk ratio of organized nationwide cancer screening programs rely on the age range of eligible average-risk populations. We studied the characteristics of off-target populations who underwent opportunistic screening for colorectal (CRC), breast (BC) or cervical (CC) cancer, ≤5y prior to the recommended age. Methods: The French nationwide observational survey, EDIFICE 6, was conducted online (June 26-July 28, 2017) on a core sample of 12 046 individuals (18-69y). Representativeness was ensured by quota sampling on age, sex, profession, and stratification by geographical area/type of urban district. Opportunistic screening for BC (in 533 women, age 45-49y), CRC (in 1331 individuals, age 45-49y) or CC (in 633 women, age 20-24y) was assessed in terms of smoking status (current, former/never smoker), marital status (single, living with a partner), type of residential area (urban, rural), having a close relative with cancer, social vulnerability (EPICES score), and self-reporting own cancer risk (higher, identical/lower than average). Results: In the off-target populations, screening rates were 78% for BC (N = 418, mammogram), 13% for CRC (N = 172, fecal test or colonoscopy) and 42% for CC (N = 264, cervical Pap smear test). Premature BC screening rates were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in non-vulnerable than in vulnerable individuals (84% vs 69%), and among those self-reporting their own BC risk as higher than average (84% vs 76% reporting own BC risk as identical/lower than average). Premature CC screening rates were correlated with: smoking status (66% in current smokers vs 35% in former/never smokers), and marital status (63% in those living with a partner vs 34% single). Lastly, factors correlated with premature CRC screening were: type of residential area (urban, 15% vs rural, 8%), and believing own risk of CRC to be higher than average (27% vs 8% of those who self-reported their own CRC risk as identical/lower than average). Conclusions: This analysis reveals several factors related to premature screening for BC, CRC and CC, provides clear insight into off-target cancer screening uptake profiles, and hints at new strategies to ensure the optimal risk/benefit ratio of screening practices.

[Fertility sparing treatment in women affected by cervical cancer larger than 2cm]

OBJECTIVE

We report our experience on fertility sparing treatment in young women affected by cervical cancer of more than 2cm.

METHODS

Between July 2012 and February 2014, five patients presenting cervical tumors larger than 2cm (IB1>2cm) (23-35) and wishing to preserve fertility have been treated at our institution. Laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed for all patients. When lymph nodes were free of disease, patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical conservative treatment.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent a cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy before conservative surgery: radical trachelectomy or simple trachelectomy. One patient with nodal involvement underwent a 3cycle chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy. Hematologic toxicity grade 3 was observed in one patient leading to a change of chemotherapy. Two patients showed complete disappearance of tumor and two a partial response to neoadjuvant treatment. After a mean follow up of 20.5months (14-33), no relapse was observed. To date, no pregnancy was obtained.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node staging followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical trachelectomy seems to be a promising treatment scheme for patients with cervical tumors IB1>2cm pN0 seeking parenthood.

Duration of response to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and efficacy of secondary hormone therapy, docetaxel (D), and cabazitaxel (C) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

282

Background: Early CRPC (<12 months, m) with 1st hormonal therapy (HT) was found to predict poor efficacy of 2nd HT, but did not seem to impair the benefit of D-based chemotherapy. We evaluated the impact of this variable in our cohort of patients (pts) treated also with second-line chemotherapy C. Methods: Records of 132 consecutive mCRPC pts were retrospectively collected in 9 centers. PSA response ≥ 30% and time to biochemical progression (TTBP) with 1st- and 2nd-HT, D and C were evaluated according to time to progression to CRPC (<12 m and ≥12 m). PSA-response, TTBP and Overall Survival (OS) were compared using exact, Wilcoxon and log-rank tests, respectively. Results: All patients received first HT, D and C, and 94 of them received second HT. Time to CRPC <12 m was associated with a reduced OS and poor PSA-response and TTBP with second HT. Taxanes showed a similar PSA response whatever the time to CRPC but TTBP was slightly shorter in men with time to CRPC <12m. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis of 132 pts with mCRPC suggests that rapid progression to CRPC (<12 m) is associated with a poor prognosis and a low response to second-HT. PSA response to taxanes does not seem to be affected by time to CRPC, but TTBP is shorter in men with early CRPC. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results. [Table: see text]

Prognostic factors of survival in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabazitaxel: Sequencing might matter

5063

Background: Recently, several new drugs have demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit in patients (pts) with mCRPC. Their use must be optimized to maximize patient outcomes. We evaluated prognostic factors of OS in mCRPC pts treated with cabazitaxel (C), a new taxane developed to overcome docetaxel (D) resistance. Methods: Records of 125 consecutive mCRPC pts (median 67 yrs) treated with C (after D) were retrospectively collected in 9 centers (France, n=8; Turkey, n=1). Baseline characteristics, disease history, PSA response, OS and radiological and/or clinical progression-free survival (PFS) were collected. The influence of selected variables on OS was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results: At C initiation, 83.3% of pts were ECOG 0-1, 50.8% had an initial Gleason score of 8-10, 62.9% had pain and 84.8% had radiological or clinical progression. Median duration of response to first-line androgen deprivation therapy was 20 months (mo) and 22% received ≥2 prior D lines. New hormonal agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) were given before C in 33% of pts and after C in 16%. Median number of C cycles received was 6 (range 2-14). A PSA decrease of ≥50% and ≥30% was reached in 41.3% and 48.8% of patients treated with C. Median OS from first C cycle was 13.3 mo and median clinical and/or radiological PFS was 6.5 mo. In multivariate analysis, OS was significantly reduced in pts with ECOG 2 (HR: 6.05), alkaline phosphatase ≥1.5 ULN (HR: 2.64), lymph node involvement (HR: 1.89). Conversely, OS was significantly prolonged in pts with ≥2 prior D lines (HR: 0.35), prior curative therapy (HR: 0.55), a PSA decrease ≥30% with C (HR: 0.21) and in pts treated with abiraterone/enzalutamide after C (HR: 0.37). Median OS from the first D dose was 65 mo in pts treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide after C versus 39 mo in pts receiving these agents before C. Conclusions: Patients with ≥ 2 prior D lines, PSA response ≥30% with C and treated with new hormonal agents after C experienced a prolonged OS. Conversely, intake of new hormonal agents before C rather than after was associated with a reduced OS from the first D dose. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Efficacy of cabazitaxel and its relationship with predictors of poor response to second hormonal therapies (2d HT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

137

Background: Potential predictors of low response to 2d HT including new agents have been recently identified: high Gleason score, rapid progression with first androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), chemotherapy lines >1 and low baseline testosterone (T) levels. We evaluated the influence of these factors on the efficacy of cabazitaxel (C), a new taxane developed to overcome docetaxel (D) resistance. Methods: Records of 84 consecutive mCRPC pts (median 67 yrs) treated with C for disease progression on D or after D were retrospectively collected in 8 French centers. Baseline characteristics, disease history, PSA response, overall survival (OS) and radiological or clinical progression-free survival (PFS) were collected. Results: At C initiation, 84% of pts were ECOG 0-1, 59% had pain and 24% received ≥2 prior chemotherapy lines. Metastases were located in bone (93%), lymph nodes (49%) and visceral/soft tissues (9%). Gleason score was 8-10 in 47%, median time to progression with first ADT was 20 months and median T was 0.1 ng/ml. Median number of C cycles received was 6 (range 2-14). Efficacy of C was not influenced by Gleason score, response duration to first ADT, prior number of chemo lines, or baseline T (table). Main grade ≥ 3 toxicities were neutropenia (32%), anaemia (17%), thrombocytopenia (8%), diarrhoea (6%), and febrile neutropenia (5%). There was no grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy and no toxic death. Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests that C is effective and shows an acceptable safety profile. Efficacy was not influenced by predictors of poor response to 2d HT (high Gleason, short response to first ADT, Number of chemo lines, low T levels). If these results are confirmed in further investigations, cabazitaxel could be proposed whatever the baseline characteristics of mCRPC pts. [Table: see text]

Retrospective registry evaluating the PSA flare phenomenon with cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

122

Background: PSA initial flare followed by a decrease is documented in up to 18% of mCRPC patients (pts) treated with docetaxel (D). There is no standard definition of this phenomenon, and its significance in terms of treatment efficacy and prognosis remains unclear. We evaluated the PSA flare incidence and characteristics with cabazitaxel (C), a new taxane developed to overcome D resistance, and its impact on outcome. Methods: A retrospective review of 84 consecutive pts (median 67 yrs) treated with C for mCRPC progressing during or after D was conducted in 8 French centers. Baseline characteristics, disease history, PSA values before and during C, overall survival (OS) and radiological or clinical progression-free survival (PFS) were collected. Results: At C initiation, most pts (84%) were ECOG 0-1, 59.5% had pain and 23.8% received ≥2 chemotherapy lines. Metastases were located in bone (92.9%), lymph nodes (48.8%) and visceral/soft tissues (9.5%). Median number of C cycles was 6 (range 2-14). Median OS and PFS from first C cycle were 16.4 and 6.7 months, respectively. Flare incidence, PFS and OS varied with the definition used (table). Definition [3] seems to us the most clinically relevant, and showed a close estimate of PFS compared to pts with immediate PSA decrease from baseline. We recommend to use this definition in clinical practice. Conclusions: PSA flare occurred in 16% pts treated with C and was associated with as good outcome as immediate responders. C should not be withdrawn prematurely in case of isolated initial PSA rise. This finding supports the PCWG 2 recommendation that early rise (prior to 12 weeks) with cytotoxics should be ignored in determining PSA response. [Table: see text]

Frequency of cognitive impairment (CI) in elderly patients (pts) suffering from malignancies and impact on therapeutic decision

6110

Background: Therapeutic decision remains complex when a cancer is diagnosed in elderly pts. Our aim was to evaluate the frequency of CI in this population and its impact on therapeutic decision. Methods: An oncogeriatric evaluation including Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is systematically performed for all elderly cancer pts referred in our unit. We reviewed data of all pts assessed by geriatric oncologist at our institution from January 2009 to June 2011. Results: 378 pts were identified, among them a CI was noted in 87. Median age was 84 years (range 71 –94), 70 % ≥ 80 years. Most of the pts (78/87) were referred at the time of diagnosis. Metastatic disease was diagnosed in 32 pts (52%) and Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma stage III or IV in 21 pts (81 %). In 41 pts, CI was already diagnosed: Alzheimer disease (AD) (n=38) and Vascular Dementia (n=3). CGA help to identify CI in 46 additional pts: AD (n=36); Vascular Dementia (n=2) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (n=8). 45/87 pts (52 %) were dependant for at least one activity of daily living (ADL). As a result of CGA and benefit/risk oncologic assessment, best supportive care was recommended in 12 pts. Among them, only 4 pts presented with advanced metastatic disease (main reason for palliative care). Pts in whom “best supportive care” decision (n=12) was recommended were more dependants than those who received specific anticancer therapy (n=75): dependence for at least 2 ADL: 10/12 pts (83%) versus 16/75 (21%); and presented more AD already diagnosed (11/12 versus 30/75). In the remaining 75 pts, specific cancer therapy was proposed, including chemotherapy (n=67), surgery (n=5), radiotherapy (n=3) and hormonotherapy (n=9). Treatment was initiated as recommended in all but 4 pts (best supportive care decision taken following discussion with pts and relatives). During the follow-up, only 11/75 pts needed to be placed in nursing home because of loss of autonomy. A survival ≥ 1 year was observed in 27/75 (36%) pts. An update of cognitive performance will be presented. Conclusions: Our data support that even if CI is frequent in elderly pts with malignancies, specific anticancer therapy remains feasible and should be considered in most elderly pts with CI.

Renal cell carcinoma: focus on safety and efficacy of temsirolimus

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma has harboured a poor prognosis for decades with immunotherapy being the only available therapy with high toxicity and modest effect. Dependance of renal cell carcinoma oncogenesis on the mTOR pathway has led to clinical development of temsirolimus in this setting. This sirolimus derivative has shown clinical efficacy in monotherapy for poor-risk renal cell carcinoma leading to an overall survival of 10.8 months in the pivotal phase III trial of this agent. Its specific adverse events consist of metabolic dysregulation (hyperlipemia, hyperglycemia), mucositis, rash and pneumonitis which can be severe and need careful monitoring and management. In this review, we will discuss of the clinical development of this molecule, its efficacy, its safety profile and future perspectives.