The tyrosine phosphatase STEP constrains amygdala-dependent memory formation and neuroplasticity

STriatal-Enriched protein tyrosine Phosphatase (STEP; PTPN5) is expressed in brain regions displaying adult neuroplasticity. STEP modulates neurotransmission by dephosphorylating regulatory tyrosine residues on its substrates. In this way, STEP inactivates extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), limiting the duration and spatial distribution of ERK signaling. Two additional substrates, the tyrosine kinase Fyn and the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor, link STEP to glutamate receptor internalization in the synapse. Thus, STEP may act through parallel pathways to oppose the development of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity. We examined the hypothesis that the absence of STEP facilitates amygdala-dependent behavioral and synaptic plasticity (i.e., fear conditioning and long-term potentiation) using STEP-deficient mice (STEP KO). These mice show no detectable expression of STEP in the brain along with increases in Tyr phosphorylation of STEP substrates. Here we demonstrate that STEP KO mice also display augmented fear conditioning as measured by an enhancement in conditioned suppression of instrumental response when a fear-associated conditioned stimulus was presented. Deletion of STEP also increases long-term potentiation and ERK phosphorylation in the lateral amygdala. The current experiments demonstrate that deletion of STEP can enhance experience-induced neuroplasticity and memory formation and identifies STEP as a target for pharmacological treatment aimed at improving the formation of long-term memories.

The striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase gates long-term potentiation and fear memory in the lateral amygdala

BACKGROUND

Formation of long-term memories is critically dependent on extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling. Activation of the ERK pathway by the sequential recruitment of mitogen-activated protein kinases is well understood. In contrast, the proteins that inactivate this pathway are not as well characterized.

METHODS

Here we tested the hypothesis that the brain-specific striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) plays a key role in neuroplasticity and fear memory formation by its ability to regulate ERK1/2 activation.

RESULTS

STEP co-localizes with the ERKs within neurons of the lateral amygdala. A substrate-trapping STEP protein binds to the ERKs and prevents their nuclear translocation after glutamate stimulation in primary cell cultures. Administration of TAT-STEP into the lateral amygdala (LA) disrupts long-term potentiation (LTP) and selectively disrupts fear memory consolidation. Fear conditioning induces a biphasic activation of ERK1/2 in the LA with an initial activation within 5 minutes of training, a return to baseline levels by 15 minutes, and an increase again at 1 hour. In addition, fear conditioning results in the de novo translation of STEP. Inhibitors of ERK1/2 activation or of protein translation block the synthesis of STEP within the LA after fear conditioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these data imply a role for STEP in experience-dependent plasticity and suggest that STEP modulates the activation of ERK1/2 during amygdala-dependent memory formation. The regulation of emotional memory by modulating STEP activity may represent a target for the treatment of psychiatric disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic, and anxiety disorders.

Spinal mechanisms of NPY analgesia

We review previously published data, and present some new data, indicating that spinal application of neuropeptide Y (NPY) reduces behavioral and neurophysiological signs of acute and chronic pain. In models of acute pain, early behavioral studies showed that spinal (intrathecal) administration of NPY and Y2 receptor agonists decrease thermal nociception. Subsequent neurophysiological studies indicated that Y2-mediated inhibition of excitatory neurotransmitter release from primary afferent terminals in the substantia gelatinosa may contribute to the antinociceptive actions of NPY. As with acute pain, NPY reduced behavioral signs of inflammatory pain such as mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia; however, receptor antagonist studies indicate an important contribution of spinal Y1 rather than Y2 receptors. Interestingly, Y1 agonists suppress inhibitory synaptic events in dorsal horn neurons (indeed, well known mu-opioid analgesic drugs produce similar cellular actions). To resolve the behavioral and neurophysiological data, we propose that NPY/Y1 inhibits the spinal release of inhibitory neurotransmitters (GABA and glycine) onto inhibitory neurons, e.g. disinhibition of pain inhibition, resulting in hyporeflexia. The above mechanisms of Y1- and Y2-mediated analgesia may also operate in the setting of peripheral nerve injury, and new data indicate that NPY dose-dependently inhibits behavioral signs of neuropathic pain. Indeed, neurophysiological studies indicate that Y2-mediated inhibition of Ca(2+) channel currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons is actually increased after axotomy. We conclude that spinal delivery of Y1 agonists may be of use in the treatment of chronic inflammatory pain, and that the use of Y1 and Y2 agonists in neuropathic pain warrants further consideration.

Substantia Gelatinosa neurons in defined-medium organotypic slice culture are similar to those in acute slices from young adult rats

Peripheral nerve injury promotes an enduring increase in the excitability of the spinal dorsal horn. This change, that likely underlies the development of chronic pain, may be a consequence of prolonged exposure of dorsal horn neurons to mediators such as neurotrophins, cytokines, and neurotransmitters. The long-term effects of such mediators can be analyzed by applying them to spinal neurons in organotypic slice culture. To assess the validity of this approach, we established serum-free, defined-medium organotypic cultures (DMOTC) from E13-14 prenatal rats. Whole-cell recordings were made from neurons maintained in DMOTC for up to 42 days. These were compared with recordings from neurons of similar age in acute spinal cord slices from 15- to 45-day-old rats. Five cell types were defined in acute slices as 'Tonic', 'Irregular', 'Delay', 'Transient' or 'Phasic' according to their discharge patterns in response to depolarizing current. Although fewer 'Phasic' cells were found in cultures, the proportions of 'Tonic', 'Irregular', 'Delay', and 'Transient' were similar to those found in acute slices. GABAergic, glycinergic, and 'mixed' inhibition were observed in neurons in acute slices and DMOTC. Pure glycinergic inhibition was absent in 7d cultures but became more pronounced as cultures aged. This parallels the development of glycinergic inhibition in vivo. These and other findings suggest that fundamental developmental processes related to neurotransmitter phenotype and neuronal firing properties are preserved in DMOTC. This validates their use in evaluating the cellular mechanisms that may contribute to the development of chronic pain.

Opioid-Like Actions of Neuropeptide Y in Rat Substantia Gelatinosa: Y1 Suppression of Inhibition and Y2 Suppression of Excitation

Neuropathic pain that results from injury to the peripheral or CNS responds poorly to opioid analgesics. Y1 and Y2 receptors for neuropeptide Y (NPY) may, however, serve as targets for analgesics that retain their effectiveness in neuropathic pain states. In substantia gelatinosa neurons in spinal cord slices from adult rats, we find that NPY acts via presynaptic Y2 receptors to attenuate excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) and predominantly on presynaptic Y1 receptors to attenuate glycinergic and GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs). Because NPY attenuates the frequency of TTX-resistant miniature EPSCs and IPSCs, perturbation of the neurotransmitter release process contributes to its actions at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. These effects, which are reminiscent of those produced by analgesic opioids, provide a cellular basis for previously documented spinal analgesic actions mediated via Y1 and Y2 receptors in neuropathic pain paradigms. They also underline the importance of suppression of inhibition in spinal analgesic mechanisms.

Effects and consequences of nerve injury on the electrical properties of sensory neurons

Nociceptive pain alerts the body to potential or actual tissue damage. By contrast, neuropathic or "noninflammatory" pain, which results from injury to the nervous system, serves no useful purpose. It typically continues for years after the original injury has healed. Sciatic nerve lesions can invoke chronic neuropathic pain that is accompanied by persistent, spontaneous activity in primary afferent fibers. This activity, which reflects changes in the properties and functional expression of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ channels, initiates a further increase in the excitability of second-order sensory neurons in the dorsal horn. This change persists for many weeks. The source of origin of the pain thus moves from the peripheral to the central nervous system. We hypothesize that this centralization of pain involves the inappropriate release of peptidergic neuromodulators from primary afferent fibers. Peptides such as substance P, neuropeptide Y (NPY), calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may promote enduring changes in excitability as a consequence of neurotrophic actions on ion channel expression in the dorsal horn. Findings that form the basis of this hypothesis are reviewed. Study of the neurotrophic control of ion channel expression by spinal peptides may thus provide new insights into the etiology of neuropathic pain.

Morphine-3beta-D-glucuronide suppresses inhibitory synaptic transmission in rat substantia gelatinosa

High doses of intrathecally applied morphine or morphine-3beta-D-glucuronide (M3G) produce allodynia and hyperalgesia. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from substantia gelatinosa neurons in transverse slices of adult rat lumbar spinal cord to compare the actions of M3G with those of the mu-opioid agonist, DAMGO ([D-Ala(2),N-Met-Phe(4),Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin), and the ORL(1) agonist, nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ). M3G (1-100 microM) had little or no effect on evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC) and no effect on postsynaptic membrane conductance. In contrast, 1 microM DAMGO and 1 microM N/OFQ reduced the amplitude of evoked EPSCs and activated an inwardly rectifying K(+) conductance. M3G did not attenuate the effect of DAMGO or N/OFQ on evoked EPSC amplitude. However, 1 to 100 microM M3G reduced the amplitude of evoked GABAergic and glycinergic inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) by up to 48%. This effect was naloxone-insensitive. The evoked IPSC was also attenuated by DAMGO, but not by N/OFQ. Because M3G reduced the frequency of tetrodotoxin-insensitive miniature IPSCs and increased paired-pulse facilitation, it appeared to act presynaptically to disinhibit substantia gelatinosa neurons. This effect, which does not appear to involve mu-opioid or ORL(1) receptors, may contribute to the allodynia and hyperalgesia observed after intrathecal application of high doses of morphine.

The nociceptin receptor as a potential target in drug design

There are now four types of opioid receptors. The new designations OP(1), OP(2) and OP(3) correspond, respectively, to the classic delta-, kappa- and micro-nomenclature. OP(4) was previously known as ORL(1), the receptor for the endogenous heptadecapeptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ. Although the cellular effects of nociceptin resemble those of conventional OP(1), OP(2), and OP(3) opioid agonists, its effects on nociceptive processes are quite different. Nociceptin produces spinal analgesia but appears to antagonize the effects of opioids. Following the recent synthesis of the nonpeptide OP(4) agonist Ro-64-6198 by Hoffmann-La Roche and the nonpeptide OP(4) antagonist J-113397 by Banyu, the nociceptin-OP(4) system now represents a viable and intriguing new target for drug design. OP(4) agonists may be of use in the management of neuropathic pain, anxiety, anorexia, epilepsy, drug dependence, male impotence, hypertension, cerebral ischemia and neurogenic bladder. They may also serve as novel diuretics and to help to reduce gastrointestinal motility. OP(4) antagonists may be of use as general analgesics and in the improvement of memory function. This review covers the recent exciting progress in this field, compares the actions of OP(4) agonists and antagonists with those of classic opioids, and seeks to predict some of the untoward effects that may be seen with such drugs.

Cellular neurophysiological actions of nociceptin/orphanin FQ

Cellular actions of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) resemble those of micro-, delta-, and kappa-opioids, i.e. activation of inwardly rectifying K(+) conductance, inhibition of high-voltage-activated Ca(2+) channel currents, and impediment of neurotransmitter release. Differences in ORL(1) and micro-receptor distribution lead to: 1) more widespread actions of N/OFQ on periaqueductal gray neurons than opioids and 2) differential effects of N/OFQ and opioids in the brainstem. Also, unlike opioids, N/OFQ inhibits T-type Ca(2+) channel current in sensory neurons. Opioids and N/OFQ may modulate glutamate responses in different ways, and certain actions of N/OFQ are potentiated following nerve injury whereas those of micro-opioids are attenuated. Agonists at ORL(1) receptors may therefore be of clinical interest in the management of neuropathic pain.