Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Duke Activity Status Index in patients with pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), shortness of breath, fatigue, chest pain, and syncope limit exercise capacity. Exercise tests are often time-consuming, expensive, and some patients may not be able to perform such procedures and they are also difficult to apply in the studies including large samples. The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the DASI into Turkish and to investigate its reliability and validity in patients with PH.

METHODS

The final Turkish version of the DASI questionnaire was applied to 109 clinically stable patients with a diagnosis of PH. Exercise capacity of the patients was determined by maximal VO 2 achieved in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and quality of life by the EmPHasis-10 questionnaire. Cronbach alpha (internal consistency) was used to assess the questionnaire's reliability. The validity assessment was performed by using Spearman correlation.

RESULTS

Internal consistency of the DASI was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.99) and the test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.98). Validity was supported by significant correlations of DASI-VO 2 scores with estimated VO 2 (6MWT) scores (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001) and EmPHasis-10 (= -0.62, p < 0.0001). No floor or ceiling effect was present for the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The Turkish version of the culturally adapted DASI questionnaire was found to be a valid and reliable assessment tool. It is a rapidly administered, simple-toscore questionnaire for assessing the functional ability of individuals with PH. The use of the DASI to assess exercise capacity in patients with PH may assist researchers and clinicians detecting functional impairment in these patients.

Cohort profile: the ESC EURObservational Research Programme Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction (NSTEMI) Registry

AIMS

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) Registry aims to identify international patterns in NSTEMI management in clinical practice and outcomes against the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without ST-segment-elevation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutively hospitalised adult NSTEMI patients (n = 3620) were enrolled between 11 March 2019 and 6 March 2021, and individual patient data prospectively collected at 287 centres in 59 participating countries during a two-week enrolment period per centre. The registry collected data relating to baseline characteristics, major outcomes (in-hospital death, acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, bleeding, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and 30-day mortality) and guideline-recommended NSTEMI care interventions: electrocardiogram pre- or in-hospital, pre-hospitalization receipt of aspirin, echocardiography, coronary angiography, referral to cardiac rehabilitation, smoking cessation advice, dietary advice, and prescription on discharge of aspirin, P2Y12 inhibition, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blocker, and statin.

CONCLUSION

The EORP NSTEMI Registry is an international, prospective registry of care and outcomes of patients treated for NSTEMI, which will provide unique insights into the contemporary management of hospitalised NSTEMI patients, compliance with ESC 2015 NSTEMI Guidelines, and identify potential barriers to optimal management of this common clinical presentation associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Risk assessment in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Background

Our objective was to investigate an abbreviated version of the the current European PH guidelines, noninvasive French model, an abridged version of the REVEAL 2.0 risk score calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, and a refined 4-strata risk assessment model, COMPERA 2.0 for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

Methods

We enrolled inoperable CTEPH patients from 8 PAH centers from December 2009 to June 2020 (n=123). 70% of patients were treated with PAH therapies. Noninvasive French model comprising WHO functional class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6 MWD), and N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) or BNP was used for 63 patients. REVEAL Lite 2 including FC, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, 6MWD, BNP/NT-pro BNP, and estimated glomerular filtration rate was used for 71 patients. COMPERA 2.0 including FC, 6MWD and BNP/NT-pro BNP was used for 71 patients. Patients were grouped into three categories according to the French model and REVEAL Lite 2 scores, and into four categories according to COMPERA 2.0. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival was assessed in each risk group with all-cause mortality as the end point. Log-rank test was used to compare estimates.

Results

The mean age was 64±13 years at diagnosis. The median follow-up was 22.7 months. 26 patients had died. None of the patients had balloon pulmonary angioplasty. Most patients had received monotherapy (55%). 23.8% of patients were WHO FC I-II, 65.6% III, and 10.7% IV at initial evaluation (Table 1). All models discriminated risk in our cohort. Patients having none of low-risk criteria or high risk profiles by REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA 2.0 at follow-up had the worst survival. Figure 1 demonstrates KM survival curves for noninvasive French model (A), REVEAL Lite 2 (B), and COMPERA 2.0 (C). 37.3% of patients achieved 2 or more low risk criteria at follow-up. 44.8% of patients were in low risk at follow-up (REVEAL lite 2). 52.1% of patients were in low and intermediate-low risk at follow-up (COMPERA 2.0). The estimated survival rate at 5 years of patients meeting 2 and more low-risk criteria was 86% vs. 55% for patients meeting 0 low-risk criterion (p=0.04). The corresponding survival rate was 45% for high-risk patient, 79% for intermediate-risk patient, and 82% for low-risk patient (REVEAL lite 2) (p=0.029). The corresponding survival rates were 51.1% for high-risk patient and 91.6% for intermediate-low risk patient (COMPERA 2.0) (p=0.017). COMPERA 2.0 seems more accurate based on c-index. Survival was similar between patients treated and not treated with PAH therapies (p=0.735).

Conclusions

Noninvasive French model, REVEAL Lite 2, and COMPERA 2.0 may provide a simplified method of risk assessment for inoperable CTEPH. This analysis also supports the value of goal-oriented treatment in CTEPH. Patients who have not achieved low risk category at follow-up may benefit from escalation of their treatment regimen.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes: a multinational study

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 has challenged the health system organization requiring a fast reorganization of diagnostic/therapeutic pathways for patients affected by time-dependent diseases such as acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

AIM

To describe ACS hospitalizations, management, and complication rate before and after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared.

DESIGN

Ecological retrospective study. Methods: We analyzed aggregated epidemiological data of all patients > 18 years old admitted for ACS in twenty-nine hub cardiac centers from 17 Countries across 4 continents, from December 1st, 2019 to April 15th, 2020. Data from December 2018 to April 2019 were used as historical period.

RESULTS

A significant overall trend for reduction in the weekly number of ACS hospitalizations was observed (20.2%; 95% confidence interval CI [1.6, 35.4] P = 0.04). The incidence rate reached a 54% reduction during the second week of April (incidence rate ratio: 0.46, 95% CI [0.36, 0.58]) and was also significant when compared to the same months in 2019 (March and April, respectively IRR: 0.56, 95%CI [0.48, 0.67]; IRR: 0.43, 95%CI [0.32, 0.58] p < 0.001). A significant increase in door-to-balloon, door-to-needle, and total ischemic time (p <0.04 for all) in STEMI patents were reported during pandemic period. Finally, the proportion of patients with mechanical complications was higher (1.98% vs. 0.98%; P = 0.006) whereas GRACE risk score was not different.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant decrease in ACS hospitalizations rate, an increase in total ischemic time and a higher rate of mechanical complications on a international scale.

Risk assessment tool implementation in congenital heart disease associated pulmonary arterial hypertension

Background

Risk assessment is recommended for patients with congenital heart disease associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CHD-PAH). Patients in intermediate or high risk may need intensified therapies to improve their survival.

Purpose

To compare an abbreviated version of the risk assessment strategy proposed by the current European PH guidelines, noninvasive French model, and an abridged version of the REVEAL 2.0 risk score calculator, REVEAL Lite 2.

Methods

We enrolled a mixed prevalent and incident cohort of patients with CHD-PAH from 6 PAH centers from January 2006 to December 2019 (n=126). Noninvasive French model comprising WHO functional class (FC), 6-minute walk distance (6 MWD), and N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) or BNP was used. REVEAL Lite 2 includes FC, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, 6MWD, BNP/NT-pro BNP, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients were grouped into three categories according to the number of non-invasive low-risk criteria (French model) and REVEAL Lite 2 scores. Risk was calculated based on the last available assessment at 12 months' follow-up, starting from enrollment. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival was assessed in patients in each risk group with all-cause mortality as the end point. Log-rank test was used to compare estimates.

Results

The mean age was 32±16 years at diagnosis. The mean follow up was 99.41±58.2 months. 32 patients had died. Most patients were Eisenmenger Syndrome (39.4%) and simple defects (19.7%). Most patients had received monotherapy (74.5%). 66.6% of patients were WHO FC I–II, 29.3% III, and 3.9% IV (Table). Both models effectively discriminated risk in our cohort (p=0.0001). Patients achieving two or more noninvasive low-risk criteria or low risk category by REVEAL Lite 2 at follow-up had a significantly reduced risk of death. Figure demonstrates KM survival curves for noninvasive French model (A) and REVEAL Lite 2 (B). 51% of patients achieved 2 or more low risk criteria at follow-up. 56% of patients were in low risk at follow-up (REVEAL lite 2). The estimated survival rate at 5 years of patients meeting 2 and more low-risk criteria at follow-up was 100% vs. 86.8% for patients meeting 1 low-risk criterion and 59.6% for patients meeting 0 low-risk criterion. The corresponding survival rate was 65% for high-risk patient, 76.2% for intermediate-risk patient, and 100% for low-risk patient (REVEAL lite 2) (p=0.0001 by log-rank test; Figure). REVEAL Lite 2 approximates noninvasive French model at discriminating among patients at low, intermediate, or high risk based on c-index.

Conclusions

Both noninvasive French model and REVEAL Lite 2 provide a simplified and robust method of risk assessment for CHD-PAH. This analysis also supports the value of goal-oriented treatment in CHD-PAH. Patients who have less than 2 low-risk criteria or who have not achieved low risk category at follow-up may benefit from escalation of their treatment regimen.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.