1
|
Glicksman RM, Loblaw A, Morton G, Vesprini D, Szumacher E, Chung HT, Chu W, Liu SK, Tseng CL, Correa R, Deabreu A, Mamedov A, Zhang L, Cheung P. Randomized Trial of Concomitant Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Boost Versus Conventionally Fractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Boost for Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer (pHART2-RCT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:100-109. [PMID: 37979707 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work is to report on the results of a phase 2 randomized trial of moderately hypofractionated (MH) versus conventionally fractionated (CF) radiation therapy to the prostate with elective nodal irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a single-center, prospective, phase 2 randomized study. Patients with high-risk disease (cT3, prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score 8-10) were eligible. Patients were randomized to either MH using a simultaneous integrated boost (68 Gy in 25 fractions to prostate; 48 Gy to pelvis) or CF (46 Gy in 23 fractions with a sequential boost to the prostate of 32 Gy in 16 fractions), with long-term androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0). Secondary endpoints included late GI and GU toxicity, quality of life, and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS One-hundred eighty patients were enrolled; 90 were randomized to and received MH and 90 to CF. The median follow-up was 67.4 months. Seventy-five patients (41.7%) experienced a grade ≥2 acute GI and/or GU toxicity, including 34 (37.8%) in the MH and 41 (45.6%) in the CF arms, respectively (P = .29). Late grade ≥2 GI (P = .07) and GU (P = .25) toxicity was not significantly different between arms; however, late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was worse in the MH group (P = .01). There were no statistically significant quality-of-life differences between the 2 treatments. There were no statistically significant differences observed in cumulative incidence of biochemical failure (P = .71) or distant metastasis (P = .31) and overall survival (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS MH to the prostate and pelvis with androgen deprivation therapy for men with high-risk localized prostate cancer was not significantly different than CF with regard to acute toxicity, quality of life, and oncologic efficacy. However, late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was more common in the MH arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Glicksman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stanley K Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Andrea Deabreu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mamedov
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheng SH, Lin YT, Lu HT, Tsuei YC, Chu W, Chu WC. The Evolution of Spinal Endoscopy: Design and Image Analysis of a Single-Use Digital Endoscope Versus Traditional Optic Endoscope. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:99. [PMID: 38275579 PMCID: PMC10813680 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Spinal endoscopy has evolved significantly since its inception, offering minimally invasive solutions for various spinal pathologies. This study introduces a promising innovation in spinal endoscopy-a single-use digital endoscope designed to overcome the drawbacks of traditional optic endoscopes. Traditional endoscopes, despite their utility, present challenges such as fragility, complex disinfection processes, weight issues, and susceptibility to mechanical malfunctions. The digital endoscope, with its disposable nature, lighter weight, and improved image quality, aims to enhance surgical procedures and patient safety. The digital endoscope system comprises a 30-degree 1000 × 1000 pixel resolution camera sensor with a 4.3 mm working channel, and LED light sources replacing optical fibers. The all-in-one touch screen tablet serves as the host computer, providing portability and simplified operation. Image comparisons between the digital and optic endoscopes revealed advantages in the form of increased field of view, lesser distortion, greater close-range resolution, and enhanced luminance. The single-use digital endoscope demonstrates great potential for revolutionizing spine endoscopic surgeries, offering convenience, safety, and superior imaging capabilities compared to traditional optic endoscopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Hao Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-T.L.); (Y.-C.T.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Tsung Lin
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-T.L.); (Y.-C.T.)
| | - Hsin-Tzu Lu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-T.L.); (Y.-C.T.)
| | - Yu-Chuan Tsuei
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-T.L.); (Y.-C.T.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - William Chu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-T.L.); (Y.-C.T.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Woei-Chyn Chu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-T.L.); (Y.-C.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng SH, Chou WH, Tsuei YC, Chu W, Chu WC. Assessment of Cement Leakage in Decompressed Percutaneous Kyphoplasty. J Clin Med 2024; 13:345. [PMID: 38256479 PMCID: PMC10816848 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Symptomatic osteoporotic compression fractures are commonly addressed through vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. However, cement leakage poses a significant risk of neurological damage. We introduced "aspiration percutaneous kyphoplasty", also known as "decompressed kyphoplasty", as a method to mitigate cement leakage and conducted a comparative analysis with high viscosity cement vertebroplasty. We conducted a retrospective study that included 136 patients with single-level osteoporotic compression fractures. Among them, 70 patients underwent high viscosity cement vertebroplasty, while 66 patients received decompressed percutaneous kyphoplasty with low-viscosity cement. Comparison parameters included cement leakage rates, kyphotic angle alterations, and the occurrence of adjacent segment fractures. The overall cement leakage rate favored the decompressed kyphoplasty group (9.1% vs. 18.6%), although statistical significance was not achieved (p = 0.111). Nonetheless, the risk of intradiscal leakage significantly reduced in the decompressed kyphoplasty cohort (p = 0.011), which was particularly evident in cases lacking the preoperative cleft sign on X-rays. Kyphotic angle changes and the risk of adjacent segment collapse exhibited similar outcomes (p = 0.739 and 0.522, respectively). We concluded that decompressed kyphoplasty demonstrates efficacy in reducing intradiscal cement leakage, particularly benefiting patients without the preoperative cleft sign on X-rays by preventing intradiscal leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Hao Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-C.T.); (W.C.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan;
| | - Wen-Hsiang Chou
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan;
| | - Yu-Chuan Tsuei
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-C.T.); (W.C.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan;
| | - William Chu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-C.T.); (W.C.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan;
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Woei-Chyn Chu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; (S.-H.C.); (Y.-C.T.); (W.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schep DG, Vansantvoort J, Dayes I, Lukka H, Quan K, Kapoor A, Chow T, Chu W, Swaminath A. Evaluation of Volumetric Response Assessment From SABR for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)08240-8. [PMID: 38092258 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE SABR is increasingly used to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal method to assess treatment response is unclear. We aimed to quantify changes in both volume and maximum linear size of tumors after SABR and evaluate the utility of the 2 approaches in treatment response assessment. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively studied patients with RCC treated with SABR at our institution between 2013 and 2020. All available follow-up computed tomography scans were aligned, and tumors were contoured on all scans. Volume and maximum linear size were measured at each follow-up, relative to these measurements at the time of computed tomography simulation. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with 25 tumors were included. Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 16-67). Nineteen tumors (76%) had 30% volumetric response at a median time of 7 months after SABR, and 12 tumors (48%) had 30% decrease in maximum linear size at a median time of 16 months. Eighteen tumors (72%) decreased in volume on first follow-up scan and continued to shrink, and 5 tumors (20%) displayed transient growth after SABR (average 24% increase in volume). Compared with T1a tumors, T1b or larger tumors were more likely to have transient growth (8% vs 33%; P = .16) and had higher average relative volume 24 months after SABR (0.47 vs 0.8; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS Volume measurement results in more pronounced and earlier change compared with linear size measurement when assessing response to SABR. These findings may provide guidance when assessing treatment response for patients with RCC treated with SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Schep
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ian Dayes
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Himanshu Lukka
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kimmen Quan
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tom Chow
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ong WL, Cheung P, Chung H, Chu W, Detsky J, Liu S, Morton G, Szumacher E, Tseng CL, Vesprini D, Davidson M, Ravi A, McGuffin M, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Deabreu A, Kulasingham-Poon M, Loblaw A. To Boost or Not to Boost: Pooled Analyses From 2-Fraction SABR Trials for Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1153-1162. [PMID: 37419394 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Focal boost to dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) is an approach for dose escalation in prostate radiation therapy. In this study, we aimed to report the outcomes of 2-fraction SABR ± DIL boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS We included 60 patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer enrolled in 2 phase 2 trials (30 patients in each trial). In the 2STAR trial (NCT02031328), 26 Gy (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions = 105.4 Gy) was delivered to the prostate. In the 2SMART trial (NCT03588819), 26 Gy was delivered to the prostate, with up to 32 Gy boost to magnetic resonance imaging-defined DIL (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions = 156.4 Gy). The reported outcomes included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (ie, <0.4 ng/mL) at 4 years (4yrPSARR), biochemical failure (BF), acute and late toxicities, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS In 2SMART, median DIL D99% of 32.3 Gy was delivered. Median follow-up was 72.7 months (range, 69.1-75.) in 2STAR and 43.6 months (range, 38.7-49.5) in 2SMART. The 4yrPSARR was 57% (17/30) in 2STAR and 63% (15/24) in 2SMART (P = 0.7). The 4-year cumulative BF was 0% in 2STAR and 8.3% in 2SMART (P = 0.1). The 6-year BF in 2STAR was 3.5%. For genitourinary toxicities, there were differences in grade ≥1 urinary urgency in the acute (0% vs 47%; P < .001) and late settings (10% vs 67%; P < .001) favoring 2STAR. For urinary QOL, no difference was observed in the acute setting, but lower proportion in 2STAR had minimal clinically important changes in urinary QOL score in the late setting (21% vs 50%; P = .03). There were no significant differences in gastrointestinal and sexual toxicities and QOL in both acute and late settings between the 2 trials. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the first prospective data comparing 2-fraction prostate SABR ± DIL boost. The addition of DIL boost resulted in similar medium-term efficacy (in 4yrPSARR and BF), with impact on late urinary QOL outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hans Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stanley Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MOLLI Surgical, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Merrylee McGuffin
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mamedov
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ong WL, Davidson M, Cheung P, Chung H, Chu W, Detsky J, Liu S, Morton G, Szumacher E, Tseng CL, Vesprini D, Ravi A, McGuffin M, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Deabreu A, Kulasingham-Poon M, Loblaw A. Dosimetric correlates of toxicities and quality of life following two-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109864. [PMID: 37619656 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no evidence-based data to guide dose constraints in two-fraction prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Using individual patient-data from two prospective trials, we aimed to correlate dosimetric parameters with toxicities and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 60 patients who had two-fraction prostate SABR in the 2STAR (NCT02031328) and 2SMART (NCT03588819) trials. The prescribed dose was 26 Gy to the prostate+/-32 Gy boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesions. Toxicities and QoL data were prospectively collected using CTCAEv4 and EPIC-26 questionnaire. The outcomes evaluated were acute and late grade ≥ 2 toxicities, and late minimal clinical important changes (MCIC) in QoL domains. Dosimetric parameters for bladder, urethra, rectum, and penile bulb were evaluated. RESULTS The median follow-up was 56 months (range: 39-78 months). The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual toxicities were 62%, 3%, and 17% respectively in the acute setting (<3 months), and 57%, 15%, and 52% respectively in late setting (>6 months). There were 36%, 28%, and 29% patients who had late MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual QoL outcomes respectively. Bladder 0.5 cc was significant predictor for late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities, with optimal cut-off of 25.5 Gy. Penile bulb D5cc was associated of late grade ≥ 2 sexual toxicities (no optimal cut-off was identified). No dosimetric parameters were identified to be associated with other outcomes. CONCLUSION Using real-life patient data from prospective trials with medium-term follow-up, we identified additional dose constraints that may mitigate the risk of late treatment-related toxicities for two-fraction prostate SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Stanley Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Molli Surgical, Toronto, Canada
| | - Merrylee McGuffin
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mamedov
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liao PH, Huang YJ, Ho CS, Chu W. Application of machine learning and its effects on the development of a nursing guidance mobile app for sarcopenia. BMC Nurs 2023; 22:369. [PMID: 37814285 PMCID: PMC10561499 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01545-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aging leads to changes in the body system, such as sarcopenia. This can result in several health issues, particularly physical and mobility dysfunction. Asian people typically have little awareness of sarcopenia. Thus, this study incorporated nursing instruction into the mobile application design to allow users to easily learn about sarcopenia. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated a model for predicting high-risk populations for sarcopenia in home settings. We further developed a sarcopenia nursing guidance mobile application and assessed the effectiveness of this application in influencing sarcopenia-related knowledge and self-care awareness among participants. METHODS Using a one-group pretest-posttest design, data were collected from 120 participants at a teaching hospital in northern Taiwan. This study used an artificial intelligence algorithm to evaluate a model for predicting high-risk populations for sarcopenia. We developed and assessed the sarcopenia nursing guidance mobile application using a questionnaire based on the Mobile Application Rating Scale. RESULTS The application developed in this study enhanced participants' sarcopenia-related knowledge and awareness regarding self-care. After the three-month intervention, the knowledge and awareness was effectively increase, total score was from 4.15 ± 2.35 to 6.65 ± 0.85 and were significant for all questionnaire items (p values < 0.05). On average, 96.1% of the participants were satisfied with the mobile app. The artificial intelligence algorithm positively evaluated the home-use model for predicting high-risk sarcopenia groups. CONCLUSIONS The mobile application of the sarcopenia nursing guidance for public use in home settings may help alleviate sarcopenia symptoms and reduce complications by enhancing individuals' self-care awareness and ability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05363033, registered on 02/05/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Hung Liao
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jie Huang
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Shie Ho
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - William Chu
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chow R, Biswas T, Liu H, Pryor DI, Chu W, Swaminath A, Chung HT, Schellenberg D, Grindrod N, Lee YY, Gaede S, Sachdeva R, Lock MI. Radiotherapy for Liver Cancer: An International Multi-Centre Pooled Analysis of 925 Cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e319-e320. [PMID: 37785141 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Primary and secondary liver cancer incidence is growing and has a poor prognosis. The standard use of radiation has been hampered by studies with a wide range of patients, different management protocols and varied outcomes. To overcome this heterogeneity in the literature, larger and higher-level trials are warranted, but, so far, have been difficult to implement. Therefore, pooled analyses may offer the best way to determine the benefit of radiation, identify treatment parameters needed to optimize treatment techniques, and identify patient factors that allow for better patient selection. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with liver cancer treated by radiotherapy at centers in Canada, United States and Australia was pooled. Patient and treatment characteristics were noted, as well as the clinical outcomes of local control within 1 year, recurrence and mortality. Stepwise Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify significant predictors for recurrence and mortality. Patients were stratified by center, and primary versus metastatic disease. RESULTS A total of 925 patients were included in this study. Mean age was 67 years, and 45% had a primary diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. 1-year local control rate was 80%. Median survival was 1.8 years (1.9 years for primary liver cancer, and 1.4 years for metastatic liver cancer). Higher total dose and BED was associated with better survival. Median time to recurrence was 1.5 years. Higher total dose was associated with lower risk of recurrence CONCLUSION: As one of the largest pooled analyses in hepatic cancer, this international multi-center study provides pragmatic data on clinical outcomes of patients receiving radiotherapy for liver cancer. This database may assist in better selection of patients for future studies and answer questions such as what is the optimal dose and which patients benefit from treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Chow
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - T Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - H Liu
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - D I Pryor
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - W Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - H T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Y Y Lee
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Greenslopes, QLD, Australia
| | - S Gaede
- Department of Medical Physics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - R Sachdeva
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - M I Lock
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tan VS, Correa RJM, Warner A, Ali M, Muacevic A, Ponsky L, Ellis RJ, Lo SS, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Kwon YS, Morgan SC, Cury F, Teh BS, Mahadevan A, Kaplan ID, Chu W, Hannan R, Staehler M, Grubb W, Louie AV, Siva S. 5-Year Renal Function Outcomes after SABR for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Report from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium of the Kidney (IROCK). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S84. [PMID: 37784588 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presents uncommonly in patients with a congenital solitary kidney or prior contralateral nephrectomy. The objective of this study was to compare renal function outcomes of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with solitary vs. bilateral kidneys. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with primary RCC with ≥2 years of follow-up at 12 participating International Radiosurgery Consortium for Kidney (IROCK) institutions were included. Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma or metastatic disease were excluded. Renal function was measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). For patients where eGFR was not recorded, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation was used to estimate eGFR based on known creatinine. Baseline characteristics and renal function outcomes were compared between solitary vs. bilateral kidneys. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of eGFR decline ≥ 15 mL/min and any eGFR increase evaluated at 1-year post-SABR. RESULTS One hundred and ninety patients with solitary (n = 56) or bilateral kidneys (n = 134) underwent SABR and were followed for a median of 5.0 years (IQR: 3.4-6.8). Pre-SABR eGFR (mean ± SD) was similar in patients with solitary (61.1 ± 23.2 mL/min) vs. bilateral kidneys (58.0 ± 22.3 mL/min, p = 0.324). Mean tumor size was 3.70 ± 1.40 cm in solitary and 4.35 ± 2.50 cm in bilateral kidneys (p = 0.026). After SABR, an initial compensatory increase in eGFR was observed in both cohorts (22.7% solitary and 17.7% bilateral at 1 year). This compensatory increase persisted in patients with bilateral but not a solitary kidney (10.3% vs. 0% at 3-years and 21.1% vs. 0% at 5-years, respectively). At 5-years post-SABR, eGFR decreased by -14.5 ± 7.6 in solitary and -13.3 ± 15.9 mL/min in bilateral kidneys (p = 0.665). At all timepoints assessed, there were no significant differences in eGFR decline between solitary vs. bilateral cohorts (all p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences in post-SABR end-stage renal disease (7.1% vs. 6.7%) or dialysis (3.6% vs. 3.7%) in solitary vs. bilateral, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that increasing tumor size (OR per 1 cm: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.14-2.16, p = 0.006) and baseline eGFR (OR per 10 mL/min: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.66, p = 0.034) was more likely to be associated with eGFR decline ≥ 15 mL/min. There was no significant association between solitary vs. bilateral kidney and eGFR decline (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.45-3.34, p = 0.693). CONCLUSION There was no observed difference between renal function outcomes in patients with a solitary vs. bilateral kidneys. While larger tumor size may increase the risk of eGFR decline post-SABR, treatment of a solitary kidney does not appear to increase the risk of renal dysfunction long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V S Tan
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - R J M Correa
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - A Warner
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - M Ali
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Muacevic
- University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany
| | - L Ponsky
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - S S Lo
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - H Onishi
- University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan
| | - A Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Y S Kwon
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - S C Morgan
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - F Cury
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - B S Teh
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - A Mahadevan
- NYU Langone Health Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - I D Kaplan
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - W Chu
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Hannan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - M Staehler
- University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany
| | - W Grubb
- Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - A V Louie
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Taggar A, Chu W, Chan K, Earle C, Wong S. Real-World Experience of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Anal Cancer with Long-Term Follow up and Clinical Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e342. [PMID: 37785194 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The standard treatment for epidermoid anal cancer (AC) is concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). Here we present real world evidence of the safety and outcomes of AC patients managed by IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy at a single academic cancer center. MATERIALS/METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 180 AC patients treated with definitive CRT between 2011 and 2018. Patients were managed according to a prospectively designed protocol of IMRT with radiation dose escalated according to tumor stage: 50.4, 55.8 and 63 Gy for T1, T2 and T3/T4 disease respectively, and 36 Gy for elective nodal RT. Involved nodes were given the same dose based on T category. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of mitomycin C (MMC, 12 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU, 1000 mg/m2/day x 4 days) given on week 1 and 5. There was no planned treatment break. Univariate and multivariate analysis for outcomes were performed using Cox proportional hazard method and likelihood ratio statistics. Overall survival (OS) disease free (DFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS) and local failure rates (LFR) were described by Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS There were 128 female and 52 male patients with a median age of 64 (IQR 55-74). The median size of the primary was 4.0 cm (0.6-11.0 cm). There were 18 T1, 91 T2, 38 T3 and 33 T4 lesions; 50.6% (91/180) of the patients had N0 disease. Thirteen (7.2%) did not receive concurrent chemotherapy, and 16 (8.9%) failed to complete treatment as planned. Forty-three (23.9%) patients had a treatment gap >5 (6-33) days. Eighteen of 147 (12%) with T1-3 disease failed locally, LF was observed in 13/33 (39%) T4 lesions (P = 0.0002). The 5-year OS, DFS, CFS and LFR were 85.1%, 75.6%, 87.6% and 15.5% respectively. On multivariate analysis, increasing age and N+ disease were significant for worse OS, and increasing size of the primary tumor was the only significant factor for worse DFS, CFS and LFR. Grade ≥3 acute toxicities were observed in 42.8% of patients, with grade ≥3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia observed in 18.9% and 13.9% of patients respectively. Six patients (3.3%) died of acute toxicities. Thirteen (7%) patients experienced grade ≥3 late toxicities. CONCLUSION Size of the primary appears to be the most important determinant of outcome following standard CRT using IMRT for AC. Despite IMRT, almost 1 in 4 patients required a treatment break, and over 40% experienced grade ≥3 acute toxicities including neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Future studies with RT dose escalation or de-escalation, stratifying patients based on tumor size, HPV status and molecular markers are necessary to improve outcomes and decrease treatment related toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Taggar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - K Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C Earle
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Song J, Corkum MT, Loblaw DA, Chung HT, Tseng CL, Cheung P, Szumacher E, Liu SK, Chu W, Davidson MTM, Wronski M, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Morton G. Dosimetric Parameters Predictive of Treatment-Related Toxicity in High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e438-e439. [PMID: 37785424 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer and is increasingly being offered as a 2-fraction protocol. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal dosimetric planning parameters to use, or whether there is any benefit summating dosimetric parameters from more than one implant. Our goal is to determine planning parameters associated with disease control, toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). MATERIALS/METHODS Data were collected on 83 patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who received 2 fractions of 13.5 Gy HDR brachytherapy without androgen-deprivation therapy as part of a randomized phase II clinical trial. An in-house deformable, registration algorithm was used to co-register and dose-summate the plans from both implants for each patient. Acute and late GU and GI toxicities were measured using CTCAE 4.0 and HRQOL was measured in urinary, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains using the EPIC scores. Treatment efficacy was assessed through PSA measurement and imaging with or without biopsy where indicated. Covariates included baseline clinical factors, disease characteristics and treatment dosimetric parameters. Cox proportional hazards was performed to evaluate covariates impact on treatment toxicity and efficacy, and logistic regression analysis evaluated covariates impact on HRQOL. RESULTS Among the 83 patients, median prostate volume was 46.7cm3. Median summated planning target volume receiving 100% prescription dose (PTV V100%) was 97.4%, median PTV V150% 42.4% and median PTV V200% 15.5%. Median highest dose to the 1cm3 rectum (D1cc) was 66.9% of the prescription dose and median rectum V80% was 0.008cm3. Median urethral D1cc was 99.0% of the prescription dose, median urethral Dmax 121.7% and median urethral D10% 116.2%. Grade ≥2 GI toxicity was uncommon (3.7% acute and 8.5% late), but grade ≥2 GU toxicity was reported in 73.2% (acute) and 46.3% (late) patients. Rectum D1cc and V80% were found to be significantly associated with grade 2 or higher acute GI toxicity, while use of a-blocker at baseline was associated with grade ≥2 acute GU toxicity. Similarly, use of a-blocker was associated with late grade ≥2 GU toxicity, but with no dosimetric associations. No other variables were associated with treatment-related toxicities. Only rectum D1cc was significantly associated with changes in bowel EPIC scores. Estimated 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was 93.9% and 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 3.8%. CONCLUSION HDR monotherapy with 27 Gy delivered in 2 fractions in treatment of prostate cancer is well tolerated with high rates of disease control and minimal toxicity. Dose summation between 2 fractions of HDR brachytherapy is feasible, with rectal dose predicting acute GI toxicity. The lack of association between dose metrics and urinary toxicity raises the potential for further dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M T Corkum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D A Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - H T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C L Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - P Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S K Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M T M Davidson
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Wronski
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Mamedov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - G Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ong WL, Davidson MTM, Cheung P, Chung HT, Chu W, Detsky J, Liu SK, Morton G, Szumacher E, Tseng CL, Vesprini D, Ravi A, McGuffin M, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Deabreu A, Kulasingham-Poon M, Loblaw DA. Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicities and Quality of Life Following Two-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e425-e426. [PMID: 37785394 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) There is emerging interest in two-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (2#SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. However, there is limited data to guide organs at risk (OAR) dose constraints in 2#SBRT. We aim to identify dosimetric predictors of toxicities and quality of life (QoL) using real life patient data from two prospective 2#SBRT trials. MATERIALS/METHODS We included 60 patients who had 2#SBRT in the 2STAR (NCT02031328) and 2SMART (NCT03588819) phase 2 trials. The prescribed dose was 26Gy to the prostate +/- focal boost of 32Gy to the dominant intraprostatic lesions. Toxicities and QoL data were prospectively collected using CTCAEv4 and EPIC26 questionnaires. For QoL, we reported the minimal clinical important changes (MCIC), defined as changes in QoL score of >0.5 standard deviation from baseline QoL score. We evaluated the bladder, urethra, rectum, and penile bulb dosimetry (urethra dosimetry only available in 30 patients in 2SMART trial). Some of the dosimetric parameters were log-transformed to normalize the distribution. Cox regression was used to identify dosimetric predictors for acute and late grade ≥2 GU toxicities. Logistic regression was used to identify dosimetric predictors for late MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual QoL domains. Backward stepwise selection was used to identify significant dosimetric parameters. For GU toxicities and urinary QoL, three additional clinical factors (age, prostate volume and IPSS) were included in the final model as confounding factors. Receiver operating characteristics curve was used to identify cut-off for significant dosimetric parameters. RESULTS The median follow-up for the cohort was 56 months (range: 39-78 months). The cumulative acute and late grade ³2 GU toxicities were 62% (37/60) and 57% (34/60) respectively. No bladder or urethra dosimetric parameter was associated with acute grade ≥2 GU toxicities. Bladder D0.5cc was significant predictor of late grade ≥2 GU toxicities in univariate model (P = 0.05), but not in multivariate model. Baseline IPSS score was the single strongest predictor for late grade ≥2 GU toxicities (HR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.1-3.4; P = 0.03). For late QoL outcomes, there were 36% (21/58), 28% (16/58), and 29% (17/58) of patients with MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual QoL domains respectively. Bladder V10Gy was associated with late urinary MCIC in multivariate model after adjusting for clinical confounders (HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1-6.6; P = 0.04). 48% (14/29) and 24% (7/29) of patients with bladder V10Gy>13.9% and V10Gy≤13.9% respectively had late urinary MCIC. No rectum and penile bulb dosimetry parameters was identified to be associated with late bowel or sexual QoL. CONCLUSION Using real life patient data from prospective clinical trials with medium term follow-up, we identified statistically significant bladder dosimetry parameter predictive of late urinary QoL. This finding could be useful to guide OAR dose constraints in prostate 2#SBRT trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W L Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M T M Davidson
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - P Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - H T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S K Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - G Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C L Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Ravi
- Molli Surgical, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M McGuffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Mamedov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Deabreu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Kulasingham-Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D A Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nguyen EK, Korol R, Ali S, Cumal A, Erler D, Louie AV, Nguyen TK, Poon I, Cheung P, Chu W, Soliman H, Vesprini D, Sahgal A, Chen H. Predictors of pathologic fracture and local recurrence following stereotactic body radiation therapy to 505 non-spine bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109792. [PMID: 37414253 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied to treat non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) though data remains limited on this approach. In this retrospective study, we report outcomes and predictors of local failure (LF) and pathological fracture (PF) post-SBRT for NSBM using a mature single-institution database. METHODS Patients with NSBM treated with SBRT between 2011 and 2021 were identified. The primary objective was to assess the rates of radiographic LF. Secondary objectives were to assess the rates of in-field PF, overall survival (OS), and late grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Competing risks analysis was used to assess rates of LF and PF. Univariable regression and multivariable regression (MVR) were performed to investigate predictors of LF and PF. RESULTS A total of 373 patients with 505 NSBM were included in this study. Median follow-up was 26.5 months. The cumulative incidence of LF at 6, 12, and 24 months were 5.7%, 7.9%, and 12.6%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of PF at 6, 12, and 24 months were 3.8%, 6.1%, and 10.9%, respectively. Lytic NSBM (HR = 2.18; p < 0.01), a lower biologically effective dose (HR = 1.11 per 5 Gy10 decrease; p = 0.04), and a PTV ≥ 54 cc (HR = 4.32; p < 0.01) predicted for a higher risk of LF on MVR. Lytic NSBM (HR = 3.43; p < 0.01), mixed (lytic/sclerotic) lesions (HR = 2.70; p = 0.04), and rib metastases (HR = 2.68; p < 0.01) predicted for a higher risk of PF on MVR. CONCLUSION SBRT is an effective modality to treat NSBM with high rates of radiographic local control with an acceptable rate of PF. We identify predictors of both LF and PF that can serve to inform practice and trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric K Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Center, Niagara Health, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 0A9, Canada
| | - Renee Korol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Saher Ali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Aaron Cumal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Darby Erler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Timothy K Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lu HT, Lin JY, Tsuei YC, Hsu YF, Chen CY, Cheng SH, Chu W, Li C, Chu WC. Impact of Aspiration Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Reducing Bone Cement Leakage and Enhancing Distribution-An Ex Vivo Study in Goat Vertebrae. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:795. [PMID: 37508822 PMCID: PMC10376675 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10070795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis-induced vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) occurs commonly in people over the age of 50, especially among menopausal women. Besides conservative therapy, minimally invasive percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and kyphoplasty (PKP) have been widely used in clinical treatment and achieved good efficacy. However, the leakage of bone cement (CL) during vertebroplasty (PV) is a major risk that can cause (serious) complications such as compression of the spinal cord, pulmonary embolism, or even paraplegia. In this study, we introduced a new aspiration technique with standard PV procedures (APV) to ameliorate the risk of leakage with quantitative verifications of its effectiveness. APV intends to create a differential pressure to guide the direction of cement flow within the vertebrae. To test this technique, Nubian goats' ex vivo vertebral bodies (VBs) were used to simulate the PV surgical process in humans. Results show that the proposed APV has a lower leakage rate of 13% compared to the 53% of conventional PV. Additionally, the APV approach achieves more uniform cement distribution via the 9-score method with a value of 7 ± 1.30 in contrast to 4 ± 1.78 by conventional PV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Tzu Lu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Jia-Yi Lin
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chuan Tsuei
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Fu Hsu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Yi Chen
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hao Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - William Chu
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Chuan Li
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Woei-Chyn Chu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chu W, Taggar A, Ung Y, Chan KKW, Earle CC, Karotki A, Pasetka M, Presutti J, Wong J, Zhang L, Wong CS. Risk-adjusted chemoradiation according to human papilloma viral status for anal cancer: a pilot study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1183854. [PMID: 37456246 PMCID: PMC10346840 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1183854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose HPV-associated or positive (HPV+) anal cancer patients may have better outcome compared to those with HPV negative (HPV-) disease. We report a planned interim analysis of a prospective registry study that tailors chemoradiation (CRT) for anal cancer according to HPV status. Materials and methods HPV+ patients received de-escalated radiation doses of 45, 50.4 and 55.8 Gy, while HPV- received 50.4, 55.8 and 63 Gy for T1, T2 and T3/T4 disease respectively. Chemotherapy consisted of a single dose of mitomycin-C and oral capecitabine on days of RT. All patients were planned by VMAT following CT, PET/CT and MR simulation. This cohort (n = 24) had a minimum 24-month follow-up. Disease free survival (DFS) and local failure rates (LFR) were compared with 180 patients managed by standard CRT (2 cycles of mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil, radiation doses 50.4-63 Gy based on T-category) from 2011-2018. Propensity score comparison was performed using a retrospective to prospective 2 to 1 match based on tumor size and N-category. Results In the HPV+ cohort (n = 20), there were 2 local failures. Two of 4 HPV- patients failed locally. The 30-month DFS and LFR were 79% and 17% respectively. Similar DFS and LFR were observed in the retrospective (80% and 15% respectively) and matched patients (76% and 16% respectively). No grade ≥3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in the registry cohort whereas 19% and 14% respectively were seen in the retrospective patients. Conclusion De-escalation of CRT for HPV+ anal cancer may result in decreased acute toxicities and similar cancer outcomes compared to standard CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amandeep Taggar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yee Ung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kelvin K. W. Chan
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Craig C. Earle
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aliaksandr Karotki
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Pasetka
- Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joe Presutti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John Wong
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C. Shun Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lalani AKA, Kapoor A, Basappa NS, Bhindi B, Bjarnason GA, Bosse D, Breau RH, Canil CM, Cardenas LM, Castonguay V, Chavez-Munoz C, Chu W, Dudani S, Graham J, Heng DYC, Kollmannsberger C, Lattouf JB, Morgan S, Reaume MN, Richard PO, Swaminath A, Tanguay S, Wood LA, Lavallée LT. Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma: 2023 Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum consensus statement. Can Urol Assoc J 2023; 17:E154-E163. [PMID: 37185210 PMCID: PMC10132379 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several recent randomized trials evaluated the impact of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy on post-surgical outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with disparate results. The objective of this consensus statement is to provide data-driven guidance regarding the use of ICIs after complete resection of clear-cell RCC in a Canadian context. METHODS An expert panel of genitourinary medical oncologists, urologic oncologists, and radiation oncologists with expertise in RCC management was convened in a dedicated session during the 2022 Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum in Toronto, Canada. Topic statements on the management of patients after surgery for RCC, including counselling, risk stratification, indications for medical oncology referral, appropriate followup, eligibility and management for adjuvant ICIs, as well as treatment options for patients with recurrence who received adjuvant immunotherapy, were discussed. Participants were asked to vote if they agreed or disagreed with each statement. Consensus was achieved if greater than 75% of participants agreed with the topic statement. RESULTS A total of 22 RCC experts voted on 14 statements. Consensus was achieved on all topic statements. The panel felt patients with clear-cell RCC at increased risk of recurrence after surgery, as per the Keynote-564 group definitions, should be counselled about recurrence risk by a urologist, should be informed about the potential role of adjuvant ICI systemic therapy, and be offered referral to discuss risks and benefits with a medical oncologist. The panel felt that one year of pembrolizumab is currently the only regimen that should be considered if adjuvant therapy is selected. Panelists emphasized current opinions are based on disease-free survival given the available results. Significant uncertainty regarding the benefit and harms of adjuvant therapy remains, primarily due to a lack of consistent benefit observed across similar trials of adjuvant ICI-based therapies and immature overall survival (OS) data. CONCLUSIONS This consensus document provides guidance from Canadian RCC experts regarding the potential role of ICI-based adjuvant systemic therapy after surgery. This rapidly evolving field requires frequent evidence-based re-evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aly-Khan A Lalani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Naveen S Basappa
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Bimal Bhindi
- Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Georg A Bjarnason
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dominick Bosse
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Christina M Canil
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Luisa M Cardenas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Vincent Castonguay
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval (CRCHUQc-UL), Centre de recherche sur le cancer (CRC) de l'Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Claudia Chavez-Munoz
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Department of Oncology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Scott Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - M Neil Reaume
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick O Richard
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke and Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lori A Wood
- Division of Medical Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Luke T Lavallée
- Division of Urology and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sodergren SC, Johnson CD, Gilbert A, Darlington AS, Cocks K, Guren MG, Rivin Del Campo E, Brannan C, Christensen P, Chu W, Chung H, Dennis K, Desideri I, Gilbert DC, Glynne-Jones R, Jefford M, Johansson M, Johnsson A, Juul T, Kardamakis D, Lai-Kwon J, McFarlane V, Miguel IMC, Nugent K, Peters F, Riechelmann RP, Turhal NS, Wong S, Vassiliou V. International Validation of the EORTC QLQ-ANL27, a Field Study to Test the Anal Cancer-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1155-1164. [PMID: 36402360 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) health-related quality of life questionnaire for anal cancer (QLQ-ANL27) supplements the EORTC cancer generic measure (QLQ-C30) to measure concerns specific to people with anal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study tested the psychometric properties and acceptability of the QLQ-ANL27. METHODS AND MATERIALS People with anal cancer were recruited from 15 countries to complete the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-ANL27 and provide feedback on the QLQ-ANL27. Item responses, scale structure (multitrait scaling, factor analysis), reliability (internal consistency and reproducibility) and sensitivity (known group comparisons and responsiveness to change) of the QLQ-ANL27 were evaluated. RESULTS Data from 382 people were included in the analyses. The EORTC QLQ-ANL27 was acceptable, comprehensive, and easy to complete, taking an average 8 minutes to complete. Psychometric analyses supported the EORTC QLQ-ANL27 items and reliability (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.71-0.93 and test-retest coefficients above 0.7) and validity of the scales (particularly nonstoma bowel symptoms and pain/discomfort). Most scales distinguished people according to treatment phase and performance status. Bowel (nonstoma), pain/discomfort, and vaginal symptoms were sensitive to deteriorations over time. The stoma-related scales remained untested because of low numbers of people with a stoma. Revisions to the scoring and question ordering of the sexual items were proposed. CONCLUSIONS The QLQ-ANL27 has good psychometric properties and is available in 16 languages for people treated with chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. It is used in clinical trials and has a potential role in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kim Cocks
- KCStats Consultancy, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - Marianne G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eleonor Rivin Del Campo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon University Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | | | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Duncan C Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Michael Jefford
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mia Johansson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Therese Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dimitrios Kardamakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Julia Lai-Kwon
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vicky McFarlane
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Karen Nugent
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Femke Peters
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Shun Wong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vassilios Vassiliou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Center, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ong WL, Cheung P, Chung HT, Chu W, Detsky J, Liu SK, Morton G, Szumacher E, Tseng CL, Vesprini D, Davidson M, Ravi A, McGuffin M, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Deabreu A, Poon M, Loblaw A. Two-fraction stereotactic MRI-guided ablative radiotherapy with simultaneous boost to dominant intraprostatic lesion: Results from the 2SMART phase 2 trial. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
349 Background: Prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for localised prostate cancer is commonly delivered over 5 fractions. Focal boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) seen on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an approach for dose-escalation in prostate SABR. This is the first report of the outcomes of the 2SMART trial, a phase 2 single-arm study using 2-fraction prostate SABR with DIL boost. Methods: Men with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. Three gold fiducial markers were inserted for image guidance. The clinical target volume (CTV) included the prostate gland, and the planning target volume (PTV) was a 2mm expansion antero-posterior and laterally, and 2.5mm supero-inferiorly. The DIL was contoured on fused mpMRI. The prescribed dose was 26Gy in 2 fractions (EQD2 110Gy, α/β of 1.4) to the CTV, and up to 32Gy in 2 fractions (EQD2 164Gy) to the DIL as long as the dose constraints for the organs at risks were not exceeded. Each fraction was delivered 1 week apart. Daily image guidance with cone-beam computed tomography was used pre- and post-treatment. The primary endpoint was acute (≤3 months) changes in quality of life (QOL), assessed using the EPIC questionnaire. Minimal clinically important change (MCIC) in QOL was defined as an EPIC score decrease of >0.5 standard deviation of the baseline EPIC score for each domain. Secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicities (assessed using CTCAEv4), and biochemical failure (based on Phoenix criteria). Results: 30 men were enrolled in the study, of which 2 (7%) had low risk and 28 (93%) had intermediate risk prostate cancer. The median follow-up was 44 months (range: 39-49 months). The median PSA nadir was 0.2ng/mL, with median time to nadir of 37 months. One patient (3%) had biochemical failure at 44 months post-treatment. 1 (3%) and 17 (57%) had acute Grade 2 GU and GI toxicities, while 3 (10%) and 15 (50%) had late (>6 months) Grade 2 GU and GI toxicities. No acute or late Grade ≥3 GU or GI was reported. 10 (33%), 6 (20%), and 3 (10%) men had acute MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual domains respectively. 15 (50%), 9 (30%) and 13 (43%) had late MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual domain respectively. Conclusions: Two-fraction prostate SABR with DIL boost is a safe approach for dose-escalation for localised prostate cancer, with minimal impact on acute QOL, and no grade 3-4 toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT03588819 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hans T. Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stanley K. Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Merrylee McGuffin
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mamedov
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Meghan Poon
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lalani AKA, Swaminath A, Pond GR, Morgan SC, Azad A, Chu W, Kapoor A, Bonert M, Bramson JL, Surette MG, Bosse D, Siva S, Bjarnason GA, Gopaul D, Basappa NS, Wright J, Hotte SJ. Phase II trial of cytoreductive stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy with combination ipilimumab/nivolumab for metastatic kidney cancer (CYTOSHRINK). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.tps750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
TPS750 Background: Randomized data from the interferon era demonstrated survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Results from SURTIME and CARMENA, conducted in the VEGF-targeted therapy era, have challenged the routine use of upfront CN in most IMDC intermediate and poor risk patients. Furthermore, the treatment landscape in mRCC now includes multiple first-line doublet combination immunotherapy approvals. The Checkmate-214 trial showed that intermediate/poor risk patients have improved overall survival and durable objective responses with ipilimumab and nivolumab (I/N) compared to sunitinib. However, patients with a primary kidney lesion in situ appeared to have less benefit than patients with prior nephrectomy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides a convenient method for cytoreduction of the primary kidney lesion and may induce an enhanced systemic anti-tumor immune response. We hypothesize that SBRT to the primary kidney mass will enhance the efficacy of I/N compared to standard of care I/N alone in this unique subset of de novo mRCC patients. We also hypothesize that the combination of SBRT and I/N will lead to upregulation of key components of immune modulation as well as unique perturbation of the host gut microbiome compared to I/N alone. Methods: This phase II trial randomizes untreated mRCC patients in a 2:1 fashion to I/N plus SBRT (30-40 Gy in 5 fractions) to the primary kidney mass between cycles 1 and 2 (experimental arm, E), versus standard of care I/N alone (standard arm, S). Eligible patients have biopsy-proven mRCC (any histology) and IMDC intermediate/poor risk disease. Patients with a primary kidney lesion ≥ 20cm, previous abdominal radiation precluding SBRT, or who have a contraindication to I/N are excluded. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of I/N plus SBRT versus I/N alone, as determined by the hazard ratio for progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety, overall survival, objective response rate, and health-related quality of life. Exploratory analyses include: (1) immune and genomic profiling of liquid biopsies; (2) transcriptional profiling of baseline tumor biopsies; and (3) interrogation of the gut microbiome and bacterial functionality. Blood and fecal samples will be prospectively collected at baseline, prior to cycle 2 of each arm, and at time of disease progression or the 12-month mark, whichever comes first. Up to 78 patients will be enrolled under the assumption of an improved 12-month PFS from 50% (S) to 75% (E), using a two-sided α=0.1, power=80%, and accounting for loss-to-follow-up and stratification using IMDC criteria 1-2 vs 3-6. Trial is enrolling in Canada and Australia. Clinical trial information: NCT04090710 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aly-Khan A. Lalani
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Arun Azad
- Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Bonert
- St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Department of Pathology, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan L. Bramson
- McMaster Immunology Research Center, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael G. Surette
- Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Georg A. Bjarnason
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Jim Wright
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sebastien J. Hotte
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Leung KM, Chu W. Designing an eSports intervention for middle-aged and older adults in Hong Kong: Social marketing approach. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284504. [PMID: 37104392 PMCID: PMC10138831 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
This study examined the perceptions and experiences of middle-aged and older adult participants in electronic sports (eSports) in Hong Kong (HK), China, by using the social marketing (SM) approach. This qualitative study applied SM approach to the design of a center-based eSports intervention for middle-aged and older adults in HK. Interviews were conducted with 39 adults stratified in terms of age (i.e., 45-64 vs. ≥65 years) and experience with eSports. Ten administrators working in community elderly centers were invited for semistructured interviews. Thematic analysis was performed on the data by incorporating SM. Main findings are presented in terms of five P's. The product component of an eSports intervention includes the foundation of eSports (e.g., safety, eSports training), suitable games for older adults, and professional equipment (e.g., large-screen devices and motion-controlled Nintendo Switches). The price component comprises affordability and the frequency and duration of each eSport session, and the place component includes accessibility and spaces to play eSports. The promotion component should be educational in nature and can incorporate free trials and gaming days, short films about older adults playing eSports, promotional channels, physical evidence and annual eSports competitions. The people component consists of support from administrators and the center in charge, the availability of skilled program instructors and staff, and appropriate partnering, team sizes and instructor-to-participant ratios. The 5P's enhance the design of future center-based eSports interventions and can help researchers and practitioners determine which aspects encourage middle-aged and older adults to participate in eSports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka-Man Leung
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Social Science, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - William Chu
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Social Science, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Glicksman RM, Cheung P, Korol R, Niglas M, Nusrat H, Erler D, Vesprini D, Swaminath A, Davidson M, Zhang L, Chu W. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Oncological and Renal Function Outcomes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:20-28. [PMID: 35948465 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate oncological and renal function outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable patients with localised renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients treated with curative intent SBRT (30-45 Gy in five fractions or 42 Gy in three fractions) were included. Data on local control (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1), distant metastasis, impact on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proportional ipsilateral and contralateral renal functions (measured through renal scans) were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine association of variables with oncological and renal function outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-four patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 27.8 months (interquartile range 17.6-41.7). Fifty-seven per cent had tumours ≥ T1b. One-, 2- and 4-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 5.85, 7.77 and 7.77%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of distant metastasis at 2 years was 4.24%. On multivariable analysis, a lower planning target volume (PTV) mean dose (P = 0.019) and a larger PTV (P = 0.005) were significantly associated with the risk of developing local failure. A lower PTV maximum dose (P = 0.039) was significantly associated with the risk of developing distant metastasis. The median change in global eGFR (ml/min) from pre-SBRT levels was -7.0 (interquartile range -14.5 to -1.0) at 1 year and -11.5 (interquartile range -19.5 to -4.0) at 2 years. The proportion of ipsilateral (differential) renal function decreased over time from 47% of overall renal function pre-SBRT to 36% at 2 years, whereas the proportion of contralateral renal function correspondingly improved. On multivariable analysis, a higher volume of uninvolved renal cortex (P < 0.0001) was significantly associated with a smaller decrease in eGFR over time. CONCLUSION In this large institutional cohort, oncological outcomes of renal cell carcinoma treated with SBRT were favourable and a longitudinal decline in renal function in the ipsilateral kidney and compensatory increase in the contralateral kidney were observed. Clinical and dosimetric factors were significantly associated with oncological and renal function outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Glicksman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - P Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Korol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Niglas
- R.S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - H Nusrat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Erler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Davidson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - L Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - W Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liu J, Zhao JH, Chu W, Jiao HY, Hao GM, Gao J. [Retrospective analysis for 424 330 first-line screening results of non-invasive prenatal testing in Hebei province]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2022; 57:900-906. [PMID: 36562223 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220711-00453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as first-line screening in fetal chromosome aneuploidy screening practice, and to provide evidence for the prevention and control strategy of birth defects. Methods: Since July 2019, Hebei province had carried out the NIPT project providing first-line screening for eligible pregnant women in the area (except for those who were not applicable). Pregnant women with high risk received genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis and intervention guidance. Low risk and false-positive ones received continuous detection and moved to prenatal diagnosis center for counseling and diagnosis if abnormities were discovered. All pregnant women were followed up to learn about pregnancy outcomes and newborn health status. Detection results and clinical data of pregnant women participating the NIPT project from July 2019 to July 2020 were collected. The detection results and effect of NIPT were analyzed. Results: (1) Basic information of the screened population: A total of 424 330 pregnant women were screened, and 423 596 were successfully detected, with a success rate of 99.83% (423 596/424 330). The age of pregnant women was (28.8±4.5) years old; the gestational age of screening was (16.6±2.3) weeks; the proportion of advanced-age pregnant women (≥35 years old) was 10.18% (43 132/423 596); in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) rate was 1.58% (6 713/423 596); the twin rate was 1.38% (5 849/423 596); the proportion of primipara was 34.23% (144 977/423 596). (2) Screening results and detection performance: totally, 325, 73 and 20 pregnant women were diagnosed with trisomy 21, 18 and 13; the sensitivity were 99.39%, 100.00% and 100.00%; the specificity were 99.98%, 99.99% and 99.98%; the positive predictive value were 75.76%, 68.87% and 21.51%, respectively. Besides, 249 190 pregnant women were received supplementary reports as well, and 255, 10 and 9 were confirmed for sex chromosome aneuploidy, other autosomal aneuploidy and deletion/duplication syndrome; the positive predictive value were 37.78%, 6.06% and 32.14%, respectively. The sensitivity of NIPT for target trisomy (trisomy 21, 18 and 13) screening in advanced-age, IVF-ET and twin pregnant women were 99.29%, 100.00% and 90.00%, respectively; the specificity were 99.93% for all; the positive predictive value were 82.25%, 61.54% and 69.23%, respectively. Conclusions: NIPT has a significant effect and good performance in the first-line screening of fetal chromosome aneuploidy in the whole population, which might provide reference for the improvement of birth defect prevention and control strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Liu
- Business Management Department, Hebei Province Maternal and Child Care Center, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
| | - J H Zhao
- Clinical Inspection Center, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
| | - W Chu
- Department of Reproduction and Genetics, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
| | - H Y Jiao
- Prenatal Diagnosis Branch Center, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
| | - G M Hao
- Reproductive Center, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
| | - J Gao
- Department of Reproduction and Genetics, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Siva S, Ali M, Correa RJM, Muacevic A, Ponsky L, Ellis RJ, Lo SS, Onishi H, Swaminath A, McLaughlin M, Morgan SC, Cury FL, Teh BS, Mahadevan A, Kaplan ID, Chu W, Grubb W, Hannan R, Staehler M, Warner A, Louie AV. 5-year outcomes after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis from IROCK (the International Radiosurgery Consortium of the Kidney). Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1508-1516. [PMID: 36400098 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00656-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive treatment option for primary renal cell carcinoma, for which long-term data are awaited. The primary aim of this study was to report on long-term efficacy and safety of SABR for localised renal cell carcinoma. METHODS This study was an individual patient data meta-analysis, for which patients undergoing SABR for primary renal cell carcinoma across 12 institutions in five countries (Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, and the USA) were eligible. Eligible patients had at least 2 years of follow-up, were aged 18 years or older, had any performance status, and had no previous local therapy. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma or upper-tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. SABR was delivered as a single or multiple fractions of greater than 5 Gy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed local failure per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, and was evaluated using cumulative incidence functions. FINDINGS 190 patients received SABR between March 23, 2007, and Sept 20, 2018. Single-fraction SABR was delivered in 81 (43%) patients and multifraction SABR was delivered in 109 (57%) patients. Median follow-up was 5·0 years (IQR 3·4-6·8). 139 (73%) patients were men, and 51 (27%) were women. Median age was 73·6 years (IQR 66·2-82·0). Median tumour diameter was 4·0 cm (IQR 2·8-4·9). 96 (75%) of 128 patients with available operability details were deemed inoperable by the referring urologist. 56 (29%) of 190 patients had a solitary kidney. Median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 60·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (IQR 42·0-76·0) and decreased by 14·2 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (IQR 5·4-22·5) by 5 years post-SABR. Seven (4%) patients required dialysis post-SABR. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 5 years was 5·5% (95% CI 2·8-9·5) overall, with single-fraction SABR yielding fewer local failures than multifraction (Gray's p=0·020). There were no grade 3 toxic effects or treatment-related deaths. One (1%) patient developed an acute grade 4 duodenal ulcer and late grade 4 gastritis. INTERPRETATION SABR is effective and safe in the long term for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma. Single-fraction SABR might yield less local failure than multifraction, but further evidence from randomised trials is needed to elucidate optimal treatment schedules. These mature data lend further support for renal SABR as a treatment option for patients unwilling or unfit to undergo surgery. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Muhammad Ali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander Muacevic
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany
| | - Lee Ponsky
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mark McLaughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Scott C Morgan
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Fabio L Cury
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irving D Kaplan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William Chu
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William Grubb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrew Warner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chu W, Taggar A, Ung Y, Chan K, Earle C, Karotki A, Pasetka M, Presutti J, Wong J, Wong S. Risk-Adjusted Chemoradiation according to Human Papilloma Virus Status for Anal Cancer: A Pilot Registry Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
Tree AC, Ostler P, van der Voet H, Chu W, Loblaw A, Ford D, Tolan S, Jain S, Martin A, Staffurth J, Armstrong J, Camilleri P, Kancherla K, Frew J, Chan A, Dayes IS, Duffton A, Brand DH, Henderson D, Morrison K, Brown S, Pugh J, Burnett S, Mahmud M, Hinder V, Naismith O, Hall E, van As N. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): 2-year toxicity results from an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1308-1320. [PMID: 36113498 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00517-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Localised prostate cancer is commonly treated with external beam radiotherapy and moderate hypofractionation is non-inferior to longer schedules. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows shorter treatment courses without impacting acute toxicity. We report 2-year toxicity findings from PACE-B, a randomised trial of conventionally fractionated or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy versus SBRT. METHODS PACE is an open-label, multicohort, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial conducted at 35 hospitals in the UK, Ireland, and Canada. In PACE-B, men aged 18 years and older with a WHO performance status 0-2 and low-risk or intermediate-risk histologically-confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason 4 + 3 excluded) were randomly allocated (1:1) by computerised central randomisation with permuted blocks (size four and six), stratified by centre and risk group to control radiotherapy (CRT; 78 Gy in 39 fractions over 7·8 weeks or, following protocol amendment on March 24, 2016, 62 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) or SBRT (36·25 Gy in five fractions over 1-2 weeks). Androgen deprivation was not permitted. Co-primary outcomes for this toxicity analysis were Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity at 24 months after radiotherapy. Analysis was by treatment received and included all patients with at least one fraction of study treatment assessed for late toxicity. Recruitment is complete. Follow-up for oncological outcomes continues. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01584258. FINDINGS We enrolled and randomly assigned 874 men between Aug 7, 2012, and Jan 4, 2018 (441 to CRT and 433 to SBRT). In this analysis, 430 patients were analysed in the CRT group and 414 in the SBRT group; a total of 844 (97%) of 874 randomly assigned patients. At 24 months, RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicity was seen in eight (2%) of 381 participants assigned to CRT and 13 (3%) of 384 participants assigned to SBRT (absolute difference 1·3% [95% CI -1·3 to 4·0]; p=0·39); RTOG grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 11 (3%) of 382 participants in the CRT group versus six (2%) of 384 participants in the SBRT group (absolute difference -1·3% [95% CI -3·9 to 1·1]; p=0·32). No serious adverse events (defined as RTOG grade 4 or worse) or treatment-related deaths were reported within the analysis timeframe. INTERPRETATION In the PACE-B trial, 2-year RTOG toxicity rates were similar for five fraction SBRT and conventional schedules of radiotherapy. Prostate SBRT was found to be safe and associated with low rates of side-effects. Biochemical outcomes are awaited. FUNDING Accuray.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | | | | | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Ford
- University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shaun Tolan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Alexander Martin
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - John Armstrong
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St Lukes Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Andrew Chan
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Ian S Dayes
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Douglas H Brand
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Kirsty Morrison
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Julia Pugh
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Olivia Naismith
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Radiotherapy Trials QA Group, London, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Nicholas van As
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Correa R, Siva S, Muhammad A, Muacevic A, Ponsky L, Ellis R, Lo SS, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Mclaughlin M, Morgan S, Cury F, Teh BS, Mahadevan A, Kaplan I, Chu W, Hannan R, Staehler M, Warner A, Louie AV. 44: Long-Term Outcomes of SABR to Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Centre Analysis from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney (IROCK). Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)04323-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
27
|
Glicksman R, Cheung P, Korol R, Niglas M, Nusrat H, Erler D, Vesprini D, Swaminath A, Davidson M, Zhang L, Chu W. 75: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Oncologic and Renal Function Outcomes. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)04354-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Correa R, Morton G, Chung H, Tseng C, Cheung P, Chu W, Liu S, McGuffin M, Shahid A, Davidson M, Ravi A, Helou J, Alayed Y, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Loblaw A. PO-1408 Two-fraction prostate SABR vs. two-fraction HDR brachytherapy: does dose heterogeneity matter? Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03372-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
29
|
Liao PH, Chu W, Ho CS. An Analysis of Waiting Time for Emergency Treatment and Optimal Allocation of Nursing Manpower. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10050820. [PMID: 35627957 PMCID: PMC9140927 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10050820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Emergency care is the frontline of the healthcare system. Taiwanese typically seek emergency care when suffering from an acute or unknown illness, which leads to a large number of emergency patients and the related misallocation of nursing manpower, and the excessive workloads of emergency service providers have become serious issues for Taiwan’s medical institutions. Participants: This study conducted purposive sampling and recruited patients and nursing staffs from the emergency room of a medical center in New Taipei City as the research participants. Methods: This study applied the queueing theory and the derived optimal model to solve the problems of excessive workloads for emergency service providers and misallocation of nursing manpower, in an attempt to provide decision makers with more flexible resource allocation and process improvement suggestions. Results: This study analyzed the causes of emergency service overload and identified solutions for improving nursing manpower utilization. Conclusions: A wait-time model and the queueing theory were used to determine resource parameters for the optimal allocation of patient waiting times and to develop the best model for estimating nursing manpower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Hung Liao
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (P.-H.L.); (W.C.)
| | - William Chu
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (P.-H.L.); (W.C.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Shie Ho
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology, Taipei 112, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-2-2822-7101 (ext. 3185)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kang YN, Ho YW, Chu W, Chou WS, Cheng SH. Effects and Safety of Lumbar Fusion Techniques in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Global Spine J 2022; 12:493-502. [PMID: 33752459 PMCID: PMC9121149 DOI: 10.1177/2192568221997804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common indication for spinal fusion. Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is popular method to achieve arthrodesis, but previous syntheses usually used head-to-head comparison of 2 surgical methods, and no of them pooled analysis with high-quality. This network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out to simultaneously compare fusion techniques in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS Three databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic. After critical appraisal, fusion rate, overall adverse events, operative time, Oswestry Disability Index, and pain were extracted for analysis. We conduced network meta-analysis using contrast-based method. Primary outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Fifteen RCTs (n = 992) met our eligibility criteria. The RCTs treated patients posterolateral fusion (PLF), posterior LIF (PLIF), transforaminal LIF (TLIF), minimally invasive (MIS) TLIF, extreme lateral LIF (XLIF), and circumferential fusion. The pooled estimate showed that circumferential fusion led to significantly higher fusion rate than PLF (RR = 2.15, 95%CI:1.41-3.28), PLIF (RR = 2.11, 95%CI:1.38-3.22), TLIF (RR = 2.13, 95%CI:1.39-3.27), MIS-TLIF (RR = 2.13, 95%CI:1.35-3.35), and XLIF (RR = 2.01, 95%CI: 1.25-3.22). Moreover, circumferential fusion exhibited the best balance in probability between fusion rate and adverse event rate. No evidence showed inconsistency or small-study effect in the results. CONCLUSIONS Collectively, circumferential fusion might be worth to be recommended because it exhibits the best balance between fusion rate and overall adverse event. PLF is still an inferior procedure and requires shorter operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-No Kang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Medical University Hospital, Taipei,Research Center of Big Data and Meta-analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei,Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei,Institute of Health Policy & Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - Yu-Wan Ho
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei
| | - William Chu
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General hospital, Taipei
| | - Wen-Shiang Chou
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General hospital, Taipei
| | - Shih-Hao Cheng
- Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General hospital, Taipei,Department of Orthopedics, Wan Fang Hospital, Medical University Hospital, Taipei,Shih-Hao Cheng, Department of Orthopedics, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kapoor A, Niazi T, Noonan K, Rendon RA, Alimohamed N, Kassouf W, Berlin A, Chu W, Kollmannsberger C, So AI. 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium: Meeting highlights. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:125-131. [PMID: 35358413 PMCID: PMC9054327 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary (GU) Cancers Symposium was held in San Francisco and online from February 17–19, 2022. Following the symposium, on February 22, the Canadian Urological Association (CUA) held an online webinar where Canadian experts highlighted key research findings in prostate, bladder, and kidney cancers. In this report, we summarize these exciting advances in GU oncology. The entire webinar can be viewed on the CUA website, and meeting abstracts can be viewed at the ASCO meeting library.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Kapoor
- Urologic Cancer Centre for Research and Innovation (UCCRI), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Krista Noonan
- BC Cancer and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Cancer Digital Intelligence Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alan I. So
- Department of Urological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lalani AKA, Swaminath A, Pond GR, Morgan SC, Azad A, Chu W, Winquist E, Kapoor A, Bonert M, Bramson JL, Surette MG, Canil CM, Siva S, Bjarnason GA, Levine MN, Wright J, Hotte SJ. Phase II trial of cytoreductive stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy with combination ipilimumab/nivolumab for metastatic kidney cancer (CYTOSHRINK). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.tps398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS398 Background: Randomized data from the interferon era demonstrated survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Results from SURTIME and CARMENA, conducted in the VEGF-targeted therapy era, have challenged the routine use of upfront CN in most IMDC intermediate and poor risk patients. Furthermore, the treatment landscape in mRCC now includes multiple first-line combination immunotherapy approvals. Five-year follow-up from the Checkmate-214 trial showed that intermediate/poor risk patients have improved overall survival and durable objective responses with ipilimumab and nivolumab (I/N) compared to sunitinib. However, patients with a primary kidney lesion in situ appeared to have less benefit than patients with prior nephrectomy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides a convenient method for cytoreduction of the primary kidney lesion and may induce an enhanced systemic anti-tumor immune response. We hypothesize that SBRT to the primary kidney mass will enhance the efficacy of I/N compared to standard of care I/N alone in this unique subset of de novo mRCC patients. We also hypothesize that the combination of SBRT and I/N will lead to upregulation of key components of immune modulation as well as unique perturbation of the host gut microbiome compared to I/N alone. Methods: This phase II trial randomizes untreated mRCC patients in a 2:1 fashion to I/N plus SBRT (30-40 Gy in 5 fractions) to the primary kidney mass between cycles 1 and 2 (experimental arm, E), versus standard of care I/N alone (standard arm, S). Eligible patients have biopsy-proven mRCC (any histology) and IMDC intermediate/poor risk disease. Patients with a primary kidney lesion ≥ 20cm, previous abdominal radiation precluding SBRT, or who have a contraindication to I/N are excluded. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of I/N plus SBRT versus I/N alone, as determined by the hazard ratio for progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety, overall survival, objective response rate, and health-related quality of life. Exploratory analyses include: (1) immune and genomic profiling of liquid biopsies; (2) transcriptional profiling of baseline tumor biopsies; and (3) interrogation of the gut microbiome and bacterial functionality. Blood and fecal samples will be prospectively collected at baseline, prior to cycle 2 of each arm, and at time of disease progression or the 12-month mark, whichever comes first. Up to 78 patients will be enrolled under the assumption of an improved 12-month PFS from 50% (S) to 75% (E), using a two-sided α = 0.1, power = 80%, and accounting for loss-to-follow-up and stratification using IMDC criteria 1-2 vs 3-6. Trial is enrolling in Canada and Australia. Clinical trial information: NCT04090710.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aly-Khan A. Lalani
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Arun Azad
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Bonert
- St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Department of Pathology, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan L. Bramson
- McMaster Immunology Research Center, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael G. Surette
- Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Georg A. Bjarnason
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Norman Levine
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jim Wright
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hudson JM, Chung HTK, Chu W, Taggar A, Davis LE, Hallet J, Law CHL, Singh S, Myrehaug S. Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Management of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Preliminary Study. Neuroendocrinology 2022; 112:153-160. [PMID: 33530088 DOI: 10.1159/000514914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Liver metastases are common in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. The role of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is not well understood in this population. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SABR in treating well-differentiated neuroendocrine liver metastases (WD-NELM). METHODS A retrospective review of patients with WD-NELM treated with SABR was conducted between January 2015 and July 2019. Demographic, treatment, and clinical/radiographic follow-up data were abstracted. RECIST 1.1 criteria were applied to each individual target to evaluate the response to treatment. Local control (LC) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Toxicity was reported according to the CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS Twenty-five patients with a total of 53 liver metastases treated with SABR were identified. Most patients (68%) had midgut tumors, were grade 2 (80%), and had high-volume intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic disease (76%). The median number of liver metastases treated was 2, with a median size of 2.5 cm. The median radiation dose delivered was 50 Gy/5 fractions. The median follow-up was 14 months; 24 of the 25 patients were alive at the time of analysis. The objective response rate was 32%, with improvement or stability in 96% of lesions treated. The median time to best response was 9 months. The 1-year LC and PFS were 92 and 44%, respectively. No grade 3/4 acute or late toxicity was identified. CONCLUSIONS Liver SABR is a safe and promising means of providing LC for WD-NELM. This treatment modality should be evaluated in selected patients in concert with strategies to manage systemic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Monte Hudson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hans Tse-Kan Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amandeep Taggar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Ellen Davis
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Calvin How Lim Law
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simron Singh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cheung P, Patel S, North SA, Sahgal A, Chu W, Soliman H, Ahmad B, Winquist E, Niazi T, Patenaude F, Lim G, Heng DYC, Dubey A, Czaykowski P, Wong RKS, Swaminath A, Morgan SC, Mangat R, Keshavarzi S, Bjarnason GA. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Oligoprogression in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Patients Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A Phase 2 Prospective Multicenter Study. Eur Urol 2021; 80:693-700. [PMID: 34399998 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the paucity of prospective evidence, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is increasingly being considered in the setting of oligoprogression to delay the need to change systemic therapy. OBJECTIVE To determine the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy, and overall survival (OS) after SRT to oligoprogressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) lesions in patients who are on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the use of SRT in oligoprogressive mRCC patients. Patients with mRCC who had previous stability or response after ≥3 mo of TKI therapy were eligible if they developed progression of five of fewer metastases. Thirty-seven patients with 57 oligoprogressive tumors were enrolled. INTERVENTION Oligoprogressive tumors were treated with SRT, and the same TKI therapy was continued afterward. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Competing risk analyses and the Kaplan-Meir methodology were used to report the outcomes of interest. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median duration of TKI therapy prior to study entry was 18.6 mo; 1-yr LC of the irradiated tumors was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-98%). The median PFS after SRT was 9.3 mo (95% CI 7.5-15.7 mo). The cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy was 47% (95% CI 32-68%) at 1 yr, with a median time to change in systemic therapy of 12.6 mo (95% CI 9.6-17.4 mo). One-year OS was 92% (95% CI 82-100%). There were no grade 3-5 SRT-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS LC of irradiated oligoprogressive mRCC tumors was high, and the need to change systemic therapy was delayed for a median of >1 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY The use of stereotactic radiotherapy in metastatic kidney cancer patients, who develop growth of a few tumors while on oral targeted therapy, can significantly delay the need to change to the next line of drug therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Scott A North
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Belal Ahmad
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francois Patenaude
- Department of Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gerald Lim
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel Yick Chin Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Arbind Dubey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Piotr Czaykowski
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Rebecca K S Wong
- Radiation Medicine Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Scott C Morgan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sareh Keshavarzi
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Georg A Bjarnason
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cozma A, Lai W, McGuffin M, Erler D, Morton G, Chung H, Tseng C, Zhang L, Cheung P, Chu W, Vesprini D, Davidson M, Korol R, Ravi A, Loblaw D. Biochemical Failure and Toxicity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dose Painting to Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion in Prostate High Dose Rate Brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
36
|
Glicksman R, Liu S, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Chu W, Chung H, Morton G, Deabreu A, Davidson M, Ravi A, Musunuru H, Helou J, Ho L, Zhang L, Loblaw D. Elective Nodal Ultra Hypofractionated Radiation for Prostate Cancer: Safety and Efficacy From Four Prospective Clinical Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
37
|
Cheung P, Tseng C, Chung H, Chu W, Vesprini D, Liu S, Morton G, Sahgal A, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Detsky J, Szumacher E, Chung P, Helou J, Emmenegger U, Mamedov A, Shahid A, Zhang L, Loblaw D. Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy Plus Comprehensive Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (CROP). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
38
|
Corkum M, Loblaw D, Chung H, Tseng C, McGuffin M, Davidson M, Paudel M, Wronski M, Cheung P, Chu W, Szumacher E, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Morton G. Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicity and Quality of Life Following Single Fraction High Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
39
|
Musunuru HB, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Liu SK, Chu W, Chung HT, Morton G, Deabreu A, Davidson M, Ravi A, Helou J, Ho L, Zhang L, Loblaw A. Gantry-Based 5-Fraction Elective Nodal Irradiation in Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: Outcomes From 2 Prospective Studies Comparing SABR Boost With MR Dose-Painted HDR Brachytherapy Boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:735-743. [PMID: 34637882 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario recommend brachytherapy boost for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer. SABR is an emerging technique for prostate cancer, but its use in high-risk disease is limited. Efficacy, toxic effects, and quality of life (QoL) were compared in patients treated on 2 prospective protocols that used SABR boost or magnetic resonance-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with 6 to 18 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS AND MATERIALS In SATURN study (study 1), patients received 40 Gy to the prostate and 25 Gy to the pelvis in 5 weekly fractions. In SPARE (study 2), patients received HDR-BT (15 Gy × 1) to the prostate and ≤22.5 Gy to the magnetic resonance imaging nodule, followed by 25 Gy in 5 weekly fractions to the pelvis. All patients received between 6 and 18 months of ADT. RESULTS Thirty patients (7% unfavorable intermediate risk and 93% high risk, per National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] criteria) completed study 1, and 31 patients (3% favorable intermediate risk, 47% unfavorable intermediate risk, and 50% high risk) completed treatment as per study 2. The median follow-up times were 72 and 62 months, respectively. In study 2, 6 patients had biochemical failure, and all 6 developed metastatic disease. Actuarial 5-year biochemical failure was 0% for study 1 and 18.2% for study 2 (P = .005). There was no significant difference in the worst acute or late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity. Grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity was noted in 3% of the patients in study 2 (HDR-BT boost). There was either no significant difference or minimal clinically important change in QoL. CONCLUSIONS In the context of 5-fraction pelvic radiation therapy and ADT, there did not appear to be a significant difference in toxicity or QoL between SABR and HDR-BT boost. Although efficacy favored the SABR boost cohort, this should be viewed in the context of limitations and biases associated with comparing 2 sequential phase 2 studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hima Bindu Musunuru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Stanley K Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Hans T Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Joelle Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ling Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Liying Zhang
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cozma A, Lai WY, McGuffin M, Erler D, Morton G, Chung H, Tseng CL, Zhang L, Cheung P, Chu W, Vesprini D, Davidson M, Ravi A, Korol R, Loblaw A. 5: Biochemical Failure and Toxicity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dose Painting to Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion in Prostate High Dose Rate Brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08804-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
41
|
Glicksman R, Loblaw A, Morton G, Szumacher E, Hans T, Chung, Vesprini D, Chu W, Liu SK, Choo R, Deabreu A, Mamedov A, Zhang L, Cheung P. 1: Elective Pelvic Nodal Irradiation with a Simultaneous Hypofractionated Integrated Prostate Boost for Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer: Long Term Results from a Prospective Clinical Trial. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08800-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
42
|
Corkum MT, Loblaw A, Chung HT, Tseng CL, McGuffin M, Davidson M, Paudel M, Wronski M, Cheung P, Chu W, Szumacher E, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Morton G. 8: Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicity and Quality of Life Following Single Fraction High Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08807-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
43
|
Glicksman RM, Liu SK, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Chu W, Chung HT, Morton G, Deabreu A, Davidson M, Ravi A, Musunuru HB, Helou J, Ho L, Zhang L, Loblaw A. Elective nodal ultra hypofractionated radiation for prostate cancer: Safety and efficacy from four prospective clinical trials. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:159-164. [PMID: 34487764 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in localized prostate cancer (PCa) is controversial. With increasing use of SBRT to the prostate, data is needed regarding the safety and efficacy of ENI using ultra-hypofractionated radiation (UHRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2013-2020, 4 prospective clinical trials of intermediate or high-risk PCa receiving dose-escalated RT to the prostate (via HDR brachytherapy or SBRT boost) and ENI using UHRT (25 Gy in 5 weekly fractions) were conducted. Primary endpoints included acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities (CTCAE v3.0/4.0), and secondary endpoints included late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities, patient-reported quality of life (EPIC) and biochemical failure (Phoenix definition). RESULTS One-hundred sixty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 98 (59%) had high-risk disease. ADT was used in 141 (85%). Median follow-up was 38 months (IQR 10-63). The worst acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities respectively were 48% and 7.5% for grade 2, and 2.7% and 0% for grade 3. Cumulative incidence of late grade 2+ genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities at 36 months were 58% and 11.3% and for late grade 3+ toxicities were 1% and 0%, respectively. No grade 4+ acute or late toxicities were observed. Bowel and sexual toxicity significantly worsened up to 1-year compared to baseline. Over time, urinary (p < 0.0001), bowel (p = 0.0018) and sexual (p < 0.0001) scores significantly improved. The 3-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 98%. CONCLUSION ENI using UHRT is associated with low incidence of grade 3+ toxicity, while grade 1-2 acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity is common. Randomized phase 3 trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stanley K Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans T Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Joelle Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada
| | - Ling Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Leung KM, Chung PK, Chu W, Ng K. Physical and psychological health outcomes of a sitting light volleyball intervention program on adults with physical disabilities: a non-randomized controlled pre-post study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2021; 13:100. [PMID: 34454587 PMCID: PMC8403424 DOI: 10.1186/s13102-021-00328-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with physical disabilities (PWPD) have limited opportunities to participate in sport activities. Sitting light volleyball (SLVB) is an adapted sport that combines light volleyball and paralympic sitting volleyball. This study examined the effectiveness of an SLVB intervention program to improve the physical and psychological health outcomes of PWPD in Hong Kong, China. METHODS Thirty-two PWPD [13 women; SLVB group, n = 18; control group (CG), n = 14] with an average age of 48.89 years (SD = 14.42 years) participated in a 16-week intervention consisting of basic SLVB skills, and they also received instructions on the required posture, team tactics, and SLVB rules. Physical (i.e., muscular strength, muscular endurance, body composition, flexibility, and aerobic endurance) and psychological (i.e., physical activity enjoyment and quality of life) health outcomes were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS Individuals in the SLVB group exhibited statistically significant improvements in cardiovascular endurance [F(1,29) = 4.23, p = .049], body composition [F(1,23) = 6.67, p = .017], and physical activity enjoyment [F(1,29) = 16.94, p = .001] compared with adults in the CG. CONCLUSIONS Participating in SLVB has physical and psychological benefits for adults with physical disabilities in this study. Registration number of trial registry: The trial is registered at chictr.org.cn, number ChiCTR2000032971 on 17/05/2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka-Man Leung
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pak-Kwong Chung
- Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
| | - William Chu
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kwok Ng
- School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Physical Activity for Health, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tree A, Hall E, Ostler P, van der Voet H, Loblaw A, Chu W, Ford D, Tolan S, Jain S, Martin A, Staffurth J, Camilleri P, Kancherla K, Frew J, Brand D, Chan A, Dayes I, Brown S, Pugh J, Burnett S, Dufton A, Griffin C, Mahmud M, Naismith O, van As N, of the O. OC-0289 Comparison of side effects at 2 years in the randomised PACE-B trial (SBRT vs standard radiotherapy). Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06839-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
46
|
Glicksman RM, Loblaw A, Morton G, Szumacher E, Chung HT, Vesprini D, Chu W, Liu SK, Choo R, Deabreu A, Mamedov A, Zhang L, Cheung P. Elective pelvic nodal irradiation with a simultaneous hypofractionated integrated prostate boost for localized high risk prostate cancer: Long term results from a prospective clinical trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:21-31. [PMID: 34324914 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To report on long-term results of elective pelvic nodal irradiation (EPNI) and a simultaneous hypofractionated prostate boost for high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective single-arm study. Patients with high-risk disease (cT3, PSA >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score 8-10) were eligible. Patients received 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes with a simultaneous intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost of 22.5 Gy to the prostate (total dose 67.5 Gy in 25 fractions), with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 2-3 years. The primary endpoint was biochemical failure. Secondary endpoints included distant metastases and overall survival. Multivariable analysis was performed to look for predictive factors. Late toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v3.0. RESULTS 230 patients enrolled. Median follow-up was 11.2 years (IQR 8.1-12.9). At 10 years, cumulative incidence of biochemical failure was 33.4%, distant metastasis was 16.5%, and overall survival was 76.3%. On multivariable analysis, PSA nadir ≥0.05 ng/mL was associated with biochemical failure (HR 6.8, 95% CI 4-11.8, p < 0.001) and distant metastases (HR 7.5, 95% CI 3.9-14.5, p < 0.0001). PSA nadir ≥0.1 ng/mL (HR 5.2, 95% 2.2-12, p = 0.0001) and ADT use ≤12 months (versus >24 months) (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-3.9, p = 0.004) were associated with worse survival. The 5-year cumulative incidence of any late grade ≥3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was 2.3% and 7.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION EPNI and a simultaneous hypofractionated prostate boost combined with long-term ADT for high-risk prostate cancer resulted in acceptable 10-year biochemical control and survival with low grade ≥3 toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stanley K Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mamedov
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wong CS, Chu W, Ashamalla S, Fenech D, Berry S, Kiss A, Koritzinsky M. Metformin with neoadjuvant chemoradiation to improve pathologic response in rectal cancer: A pilot phase I/II trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 30:60-64. [PMID: 34401534 PMCID: PMC8350187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
A prospective pilot phase I/II study on metformin given concurrently with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in non-diabetic rectal cancer patients. Three patients had a clinical complete response (cCR) and did not have surgical resection. Of the 12 patients who underwent surgery, there were two pCRs. For the combined pCR/cCR rate of 33% (95% CI 19–47%), a total of 85 patients will be required to yield a 95% CI with a 10% margin of error. These pilot results are encouraging, and will serve to refine the design and conduct of a future phase 2 trial to determine whether adding metformin to CRT improves pCR/cCR rates.
Purpose Neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy decreases the risk of local recurrence after surgery for rectal cancer. Emerging data suggest that diabetic patients on metformin may have improved cancer outcome after radiotherapy. A single institutional pilot study was performed to determine if metformin given concurrently with long course chemoradiation (CRT) may improve pathologic complete response (pCR) in non-diabetic rectal cancer patients. The study was designed to construct a confidence interval (CI) for the pCR rate to determine the sample size for a phase 2 trial. Methods Non-diabetic patients with biopsy confirmed rectal cancer deemed candidates for long course neoadjuvant CRT were invited to participate. Radiation consisted of 50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions with concurrent daily capecitabine (825 mg/m2 twice daily). Participants self-administered metformin (500 mg of twice daily) 2 weeks prior to, during and for 4 weeks after CRT. Results A total of 16 patients were accrued. One patient withdrew from the study. Only grade 1 or 2 adverse events were observed. Three patients had a clinical complete response (cCR) and did not undergo surgery. Of the 12 patients who underwent surgery, there were two pCRs. For the combined pCR/cCR rate of 33% (95% CI 19–47%), a total of 85 patients will be required to yield a 95% CI with a 10% margin of error. Conclusions Adding metformin to neoadjuvant CRT for rectal cancer does not appear to enhance toxicities. These results will be used to refine the design and conduct of a future phase 2 trial to determine whether adding metformin to CRT improves pCR/cCR rates.
Collapse
Key Words
- ALT, alanine aminotransferase
- AST, aspartate aminotransferase
- CBC, complete blood counts
- CI, confidence interval
- CRT, chemoradiation
- CT, computerized tomography
- CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
- ICF, Informed Consent Form
- IHC-GCP, International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- Metformin
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiation
- Pathologic response
- REB, Research Ethics Board
- Rectal cancer
- TME, total mesorectal excision
- cCR, clinical complete response
- pCR, pathological complete response
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - W Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S Ashamalla
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Fenech
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S Berry
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Kiss
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Koritzinsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
In neurosurgical or orthopedic clinics, the differential diagnosis of lower back pain is often time-consuming and costly. This is especially true when there are several candidate diagnoses with similar symptoms that might confuse clinic physicians. Therefore, methods for the efficient differential diagnosis can help physicians to implement the most appropriate treatment and achieve the goal of pain reduction for their patients.In this study, we applied data-mining techniques from artificial intelligence technologies, in order to implement a computer-aided auxiliary differential diagnosis for a herniated intervertebral disc, spondylolithesis, and spinal stenosis. We collected questionnaires from 361 patients and analyzed the resulting data by using a linear discriminant analysis, clustering, and artificial neural network techniques to construct a related classification model and to compare the accuracy and implementation efficiency of the different methods.Our results indicate that a linear discriminant analysis has obvious advantages for classification and diagnosis, in terms of accuracy.We concluded that the judgment results from artificial intelligence can be used as a reference for medical personnel in their clinical diagnoses. Our method is expected to facilitate the early detection of symptoms and early treatment, so as to reduce the social resource costs and the huge burden of medical expenses, and to increase the quality of medical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Chu
- Department of Orthopedic, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Shie Ho
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Oriental Institute of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Hung Liao
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Tan H, Cheung P, Louie AV, Myrehaug S, Niglas M, Atenafu EG, Chu W, Chung HT, Poon I, Sahgal A, Soliman H. Outcomes of extra-cranial stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Treatment indication matters. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:159-165. [PMID: 34119585 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To summarize the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) from a large institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with mBC who received extra-cranial SBRT to metastatic lesions from 2011 to 2017 were identified. Treatment indications were: oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumor (CDT). Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and cumulative incidence of starting/changing chemo or hormonal therapy (SCT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive factors. RESULTS We analyzed 120 patients (193 treated metastatic lesions) with a median follow up of 15.25 months. 1-and 2-year LC rates were 89% and 86.6%, respectively. 1-and 2-year OS rates were 83.5% and 70%, respectively, with treatment indication and molecular subtype being the predictive factors on MVA. 1-year OS was 91.0%, 78.5% and 63.9% for oligometastases, oligoprogression and CDT, respectively (p = 0.003). The worst OS was seen in basal subtype with 1-and 2-year OS rates of 59.2% and 39.5% (p = 0.01). Treatment indication was found to be predictive for PFS and lower rates of SCT on MVA. 1-and 2-year PFS rates were 45% and 32%, respectively. The 1-year PFS for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and CDT was 66%, 19.6%, and 14.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of SCT at 1-year was 12% for oligometastases, 39.7% for oligoprogression and 53.3% for CDT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients treated for oligometastases have better OS and PFS than those treated for oligoprogression or CDT. SBRT may delay SCT in mBC patients, particularly those with oligometastases. SBRT provided an excellent LC in mBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrick Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark Niglas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RS Mclaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Musunuru HB, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Liu SK, Chu W, Chung HT, Morton G, Deabreu A, Davidson M, Ravi A, Helou J, Ho L, Zhang L, Loblaw A. Stereotactic pelvic radiotherapy with HDR boost for dose escalation in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (SPARE): Efficacy, toxicity and quality of life. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:40-46. [PMID: 34089752 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ASCO/CCO guidelines recommend brachytherapy (BT) boost for eligible intermediate- (IR) or high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients. We present efficacy, toxicity and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes in patients treated on a prospective protocol of MRI dose-painted high-dose-rate BT boost (HDR-BT) followed by 5-fraction pelvic radiotherapy (RT) and 6-18 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS In this phase I/II study, IR or HR PCa patients received HDR-BT 15 Gy × 1 to prostate and up to 22.5 Gy to MRI nodule, followed by 25 Gy in 5, weekly fractions to pelvis. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAEv3.0, and QoL was captured using EPIC questionnaire. Biochemical failure (BF; nadir + 2.0), and proportion of patients with PSA < 0.4 ng/ml at 4-years (4yPSARR) were evaluated. A minimally clinically important change (MCIC) was recorded if QoL score decreased >0.5 standard deviation of baseline scores. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (NCCN 3.2% favorable IR, 48.4% unfavorable IR and 48.4% HR) completed treatment with a median follow-up of 61 months. Median D90 to MR nodule was 19.0 Gy and median prostate V100% was 96.5%. The actuarial 5-year BF rate was 18.2%, and the 4yPSARR was 71%. One patient died of PCa. Acute grade 2 and 3 toxicities: GU: 50%, 7%, and GI: 3%, none, respectively. Late grade 2 and 3 toxicities were: GU: 23%, 3%, and GI: 7%, none, respectively. Proportion of patients with MCIC was 7.7% for urinary domain and 32.0% for bowel domain. CONCLUSIONS This novel treatment protocol incorporating MRI dose-painted HDR-BT boost and 5-fraction pelvic RT with ADT is well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Stanley K Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans T Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Joelle Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada
| | - Ling Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|