AI model for predicting adult cochlear implant candidacy using routine behavioral audiometry

OBJECTIVE

To describe an AI model to facilitate adult cochlear implant candidacy prediction based on basic demographical data and standard behavioral audiometry.

METHODS

A machine-learning approach using retrospective demographic and audiometric data to predict candidacy CNC word scores and AzBio sentence in quiet scores was performed at a tertiary academic center. Data for the model were derived from adults completing cochlear implant candidacy testing between January 2011 and March 2023. Comparison of the prediction model to other published prediction tools and benchmarks was performed.

RESULTS

The final dataset included 770 adults, encompassing 1045 AzBio entries, and 1373 CNC entries. Isophoneme scores and word recognition scores exhibited strongest importance to both the CNC and AzBio prediction models, followed by standard pure tone average and low-frequency pure tone average. The mean absolute difference between the predicted and actual score was 15 percentage points for AzBio sentences in quiet and 13 percentage points for CNC word scores, approximating anticipated test-retest constraints inherent to the variables incorporated into the model. Our final combined model achieved an accuracy of 87 % (sensitivity: 90 %; precision: 80 %).

CONCLUSION

We present an adaptive AI model that predicts adult cochlear implant candidacy based on routine behavioral audiometric and basic demographical data. Implementation efforts include a public-facing online prediction tool and accompanying smartphone program, an embedded notification flag in the electronic medical record to alert providers of potential candidates, and a program to retrospectively engage past patients who may be eligible for cochlear implantation based on audiogram results.

Role of Pre-Operative High-Resolution Computed Tomography for Surgical Planning in Patients Undergoing Cochlear Implantation - An Observational Study

Background

Currently preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain and High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scanning of temporal bones form part of routine Cochlear implantation (CI) assessment. Pre- operative imaging demonstrates anatomic details or anomalies if any, that prove essential in pre-surgical evaluation of patients. These form a road map for the surgeon to anticipate any difficulty during surgery, to aid in decision making to implant the most appropriate ear, plan surgical technique, or select electrode arrays.

Methods

A descriptive observational pilot study was conducted at tertiary care hospital involving 51 paediatric patients worked-up for CI. Patients after detailed clinical evaluation and MRI Brain, a tentative surgical plan was formulated by a candidacy CI screening committee. Patients selected for surgery underwent HRCT temporal bones and surgical plan was modified after analysing the same. Percentage of cases in which surgical plan changed (in terms of laterality of surgery) after correlating with HRCT findings were determined and data analysed.

Results

A total of 51 patients worked up for CI were included in the study. In 37.3% cases, there were unfavourable MRI findings. HRCT scan was used to aid the surgical road map in these patients, which based on MRI findings would have had suboptimal outcome.

Conclusion

With this understanding, we recommend that, MRI with precise interpretation would be sufficient to furnish all necessary information in preoperative assessment of CI patients, and a HRCT temporal bones maybe indicated only in difficult cases or those with unfavourable MRI findings, may aid predict surgical events.

Determining cochlear implant candidacy in children with residual hearing: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review was to summarize what is known about criteria, assessments, and recommendations for evaluating cochlear implant (CI) candidacy in children with residual hearing.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed studies were identified through a systematic search in five electronic databases. Articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. From the eligible studies, data were extracted to summarize and present a narrative synthesis of the findings.

RESULTS

A total of seven articles (two reviews and five primary studies) were included in the final analysis. Hearing levels better than the moderately severe to severe range (65-90 dB HL) tend to be supported as audiological candidacy criteria for pediatric CI. Recommendations for candidacy consideration based on audiologic thresholds range from 65 to 80 dB Hl pure-tone average as the lower boundary. Our review did not identify any specific assessment protocols. However, additional decision-making considerations related to borderline hearing loss configurations and assessment tools (the Speech Intelligibility Index and the Pediatric Minimum Speech Test Battery) were identified. Supplementary assessment considerations were also reported.

CONCLUSION

There is limited information regarding specific assessment protocols for children with residual hearing. The literature is primarily focused on guidelines related to audiologic criteria, although it is widely recommended that other areas of functioning should also be considered. Most recommendations appear to be based on expert opinion, clinical expertise, and evidence from overall pediatric CI outcomes rather than empirical evidence targeting children with residual hearing. There is an ongoing need for research to further develop protocols and tools that can assist clinicians and families in making cochlear implantation decisions for children with residual hearing.

Clinical and Psychosocial Factors Considered When Deciding Whether to Offer Deep Brain Stimulation for Childhood Dystonia

INTRODUCTION

Childhood dystonia is often nonresponsive to medications, and refractory cases are increasingly being treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, many have noted that there is little consensus about when DBS should be offered, and there has been little examination of clinicians' decision-making process when determining whether to offer DBS for childhood dystonia.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify and examine the factors considered by pediatric movement disorder specialists before offering DBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Semistructured interviews (N = 29) with pediatric dystonia clinicians were conducted, transcribed, and coded. Using thematic content analysis, nine central themes were identified when clinicians were asked about key factors, clinical factors, and psychosocial factors considered before offering pediatric DBS.

RESULTS

Clinicians identified nine main factors. Five of these were classified primarily as clinical factors: early intervention and younger age (raised by 86% of respondents), disease progression and symptom severity (83%), etiology and genetic status (79%), clinicians' perceived risks and benefits of DBS for the patient (79%), and exhaustion of other treatment options (55%). The remaining four were classified primarily as psychosocial factors: social and family support (raised by 97% of respondents), patient and caregiver expectations about outcomes and understanding of DBS treatment (90%), impact of dystonia on quality of life (69%), and financial resources and access to care (31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Candidacy determinations, in this context, are complicated by an interrelation of clinical and psychosocial factors that contribute to the decision. There is potential for bias when considering family support and quality of life. Uncertainty of outcomes related to the etiology of dystonia makes candidacy judgments challenging. More systematic examination of the characteristics and criteria used to identify pediatric patients with dystonia who can significantly benefit from DBS is necessary to develop clear guidelines and promote the well-being of these children.

Negotiation of collective and individual candidacy for long Covid healthcare in the early phases of the Covid-19 pandemic: Validated, diverted and rejected candidacy

This analysis of people's accounts of establishing their need and experiences of healthcare for long Covid (LC) symptoms draws on interview data from five countries (UK, US, Netherlands, Canada, Australia) during the first ∼18 months of the Covid-19 pandemic when LC was an emerging, sometimes contested, condition with scant scientific or lay knowledge to guide patients and professionals in their sense-making of often bewildering constellations of symptoms. We extend the construct of candidacy to explore positive and (more often) negative experiences that patients reported in their quest to understand their symptoms and seek appropriate care. Candidacy usually considers how individuals negotiate healthcare access. We argue a crucial step preceding individual claims to candidacy is recognition of their condition through generation of collective candidacy. "Vanguard patients" collectively identified, named and fought for recognition of long Covid in the context of limited scientific knowledge and no established treatment pathways. This process was technologically accelerated via social media use. Patients commonly experienced "rejected" candidacy (feeling disbelieved, discounted/uncounted and abandoned, and that their suffering was invisible to the medical gaze and society). Patients who felt their candidacy was "validated" had more positive experiences; they appreciated being believed and recognition of their changed lives/bodies and uncertain futures. More positive healthcare encounters were described as a process of "co-experting" through which patient and healthcare professional collaborated in a joint quest towards a pathway to recovery. The findings underpin the importance of believing and learning from patient experience, particularly vanguard patients with new and emerging illnesses.

Applying the 'Candidacy' Model to understand access to key nutrition, food & health services in LMIC contexts: a qualitative study in Odisha, India

In order to make progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 2 - Zero Hunger - we must acquire a better understanding of what continues to hamper achieving food security, particularly in contexts where progress has been achieved, but has then faltered. This article investigates access to nutrition and food services in three of the Indian state of Odisha's traditionally poorer districts, where a large number of the state's most marginalised populations live. Semi-structured interviews were carried out in 11 villages. The Dixon-Woods Candidacy Model was employed to provide greater insight into the experiences of access to health and nutrition services, from both the supply and the demand sides. We found that there are many points along the journey that hamper access. We identified two levels of gatekeepers that can create (or remove) barriers, the first as front-line service providers and the second as high-level officials. The candidacy model shows that marginalisation caused by identity, poverty and education disparities hampers progress throughout this journey. This article aims to provide a view to improve our understanding of access to health, food and nutrition services, to improve food security, and to show the value of the candidacy model applied to an LMIC health setting.

The Lung Transplant Candidate, Indications, Timing, and Selection Criteria

Lung transplantation can be lifesaving for patients with advanced lung disease. Demographics are evolving with recipients now sicker but determining candidacy remains predicated on one's underlying lung disease prognosis, along with the likelihood of posttransplant success. Determining optimal timing can be challenging, and most programs favor initiating the process early and proactively to allow time for patient education, informed decision-making, and preparation. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation is used to elucidate disease progrnosis and identify risk factors for poor posttransplant outcomes. Candidacy criteria vary significantly by center, and close communication between referring and transplant providers is necessary to improve access to transplant and outcomes.

An ethical analysis of obesity as a contraindication of pediatric kidney transplant candidacy

The inclusion of body mass index (BMI) as a criterion for determining kidney transplant candidacy in children raises clinical and ethical challenges. Childhood obesity is on the rise and common among children with kidney failure. In addition, obesity is reported as an independent risk factor for the development of CKD and kidney failure. Resultantly, more children with obesity are anticipated to need kidney transplants. Most transplant centers around the world use high BMI as a relative or absolute contraindication for kidney transplant. However, use of obesity as a relative or absolute contraindication for pediatric kidney transplant is controversial. Empirical data demonstrating poorer outcomes following kidney transplant in obese pediatric patients are limited. In addition, pediatric obesity is distributed inequitably among groups. Unlike adults, most children lack independent agency to choose their food sources and exercise opportunities; they are dependent on their families for these choices. In this paper, we define childhood obesity and review (1) the association and impact of obesity on kidney disease and kidney transplant, (2) existing adult guidelines and rationale for using high BMI as a criterion for kidney transplant, (3) the prevalence of childhood obesity among children with kidney failure, and (4) the existing literature on obesity and pediatric kidney transplant outcomes. We then discuss ethical considerations related to the use of obesity as a criterion for kidney transplant.

Considerations in pediatric device candidacy: An emphasis on spoken language

As cochlear implant (CI) candidacy expands to consider children with more residual hearing, the use of a CI and a hearing aid (HA) at the non-implanted ear (bimodal devices) is increasing. This case study examines the contributions of acoustic and electric input to speech perception performance for a pediatric bimodal device user (S1) who is a borderline bilateral cochlear implant candidate. S1 completed a battery of perceptual tests in CI-only, HA-only and bimodal conditions. Since CIs and HAs differ in their ability to transmit cues related to segmental and suprasegmental perception, both types of perception were tested. Performance in all three device conditions were generally similar across tests, showing no clear device-condition benefit. Further, S1's spoken language performance was compared to those of a large group of children with prelingual severe-profound hearing loss who used two devices from a young age, at least one of which was a CI. S1's speech perception and language scores were average or above-average compared to these other pediatric CI recipients. Both segmental and suprasegmental speech perception, and spoken language skills should be examined to determine the broad-scale performance level of bimodal recipients, especially when deciding whether to move from bimodal devices to bilateral CIs.

UK healthcare services for people with fibromyalgia: results from two web-based national surveys (the PACFiND study)

Background

The UK’s “Getting It Right First Time” programme recommends that management of people with fibromyalgia should centre on primary care. However, it remains unclear as to how best to organise health systems to deliver services to optimise patient outcomes.

Aim

To profile UK healthcare services for people with fibromyalgia: provision of National Health Services (NHS) and use of non-NHS services by people with fibromyalgia.

Methods

Two online open surveys (A and B) incorporating questions about diagnosis, treatment and management of fibromyalgia and gaps in healthcare services were conducted between 11th September 2019 and 3rd February 2020. These were targeted to NHS healthcare professionals consulting with people with fibromyalgia (Survey A) and people ≥16 years diagnosed with fibromyalgia using non-NHS services to manage their condition (Survey B). Descriptive statistics were used to report quantitative data. Thematic analysis was undertaken for qualitative data.

Results

Survey A received 1701 responses from NHS healthcare professionals across the UK. Survey B received 549 responses from people with fibromyalgia. The results show that NHS services for people with fibromyalgia are highly disparate, with few professionals reporting care pathways in their localities. Diagnosing fibromyalgia is variable among NHS healthcare professionals and education and pharmacotherapy are mainstays of NHS treatment and management. The greatest perceived unmet need in healthcare for people with fibromyalgia is a lack of available services. From the pooled qualitative data, three themes were developed: ‘a troublesome label’, ‘a heavy burden’ and ‘a low priority’. Through the concept of candidacy, these themes provide insight into limited access to healthcare for people with fibromyalgia in the UK.

Conclusion

This study highlights problems across the NHS in service provision and access for people with fibromyalgia, including several issues less commonly discussed; potential bias towards people with self-diagnosed fibromyalgia, challenges facing general practitioners seeking involvement of secondary care services for people with fibromyalgia, and a lack of mental health and multidisciplinary holistic services to support those affected. The need for new models of primary and community care that offer timely diagnosis, interventions to support self-management with access to specialist services if needed, is paramount.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08324-4.

Strength of clinical indication and therapeutic impact of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD) has revolutionized the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the identification of ideal candidates remains challenging. We aimed to describe the long-term impact of the ICD for primary prevention in patients with HCM based on stringent (high SCD risk) vs lenient indications (need for pacing/personal choice).

METHODS

Data from two Italian HCM Cardiomyopathy Units were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients >1 follow-up visits were divided into two groups according to ICD candidacy:stringent (high SCD risk) and lenient (need for pacing, patients' choice, physician advice despite lack of high SCD risk). Major cardiac events (composite of appropriate shock/intervention and SCD) was the primary endpoint. A safety endpoint was defined as a composite of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

RESULTS

Of 2009 patients, 252(12.5%) received an ICD, including 27(1.3%) in secondary prevention and 225(11.2%) in primary prevention (age at implantation 49 ± 16 years; men 65.3%). Among those in primary prevention, 167(74.2%) had stringent, while 58(25.8%) had lenient indications. At 5 ± 4 years, only stringent ICD patients experienced major cardiac events (2.84%/year, 5-year cumulative incidence: 8.1%, 95%CI [3.5-14.1%]). ICD-related complications were similar across stringent and lenient subgroups. However, patients implanted >60 years had a significantly higher risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

One third of ICD recipients with HCM in primary prevention received a lenient implantation and had no appropriate intervention. ICD implantation due to systematic upgrade in patients requiring pacing and increased risk perception may offer little advantage and increase complication rates.

Organisational barriers to implementing the MAMAACT intervention to improve maternity care for non-Western immigrant women: A qualitative evaluation

BACKGROUND

In Europe, the number of children born by non-Western immigrant women is rising and these women have an increased risk of negative pregnancy and birth outcomes, compared to the host populations. Several individual and system barriers are associated with immigrant women's access to maternity care. Scientific evaluations of interventions to enhance the health of immigrant women in the maternity setting are lacking, and there is a need for further development of the evidence base on how health care system initiatives may mitigate ethnic inequities in reproductive health. In Denmark, the MAMAACT intervention was developed to improve midwives' as well as non-Western immigrant women's response to pregnancy complications and to promote midwives' intercultural communication and cultural competence. The intervention included a training course for midwives as well as a leaflet and a mobile application. This study focuses on the significance of the antenatal care context surrounding the implementation of the MAMAACT intervention (Id. No: SUND-2018-01).

OBJECTIVES

To explore the main organisational barriers, which impacted the intended mechanisms of the MAMAACT intervention in Danish antenatal care.

DESIGN

A qualitative study design was used for data collection and analysis.

SETTING

Midwifery visits at ten antenatal facilities affiliated to five Danish maternity wards formed the setting of the study.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Data consisted of nine focus group interviews with midwives (n = 27), twenty-one in-depth interviews with non-Western immigrant women, forty observations of midwifery visits, and informal conversations with midwives at antenatal care facilities (50 h). Data were initially analysed using systematic text condensation. The candidacy framework was applied for further interpretation of data.

RESULTS

Analysis of data revealed three main categories: 'Permeability of antenatal care services', 'The interpreter as an aid to candidacy´, and 'Local conditions influencing the production of candidacy'.

CONCLUSIONS

Several organisational barriers impacted the intended mechanisms of the MAMAACT intervention. Major barriers were incomplete antenatal records, insufficient referrals to specialist care, inadequate interpreter assistance, and lack of local time resources for initiating a needs-based dialogue with the women. Immigrant targeted interventions must be understood as events within complex systems, and training midwives in intercultural communication and cultural competence cannot alone improve system responses to pregnancy complications among immigrant women. Changes in the legal, social, and political context of the health care system are needed to support organisational readiness for the MAMAACT intervention.

The limitation of risk factors as a means of prognostication in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder of perinatal onset

OBJECTIVE

The management of hearing loss due to auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) in neonates and infants is challenging because speech and language development prognosis cannot be directly inferred from early audiometric hearing thresholds. Consequently, appropriate intervention with hearing aids or cochlear implantation (CI) can be delayed. Our objective was to determine whether any features of patient history could be used to identify CI candidates with ANSD at an earlier age.

METHOD

A database was maintained over 11 years to monitor cases of perinatal onset ANSD. Risk factors associated with the perinatal time period considered pertinent to hearing outcomes were assessed, including prematurity, birth weight, APGAR score, ototoxic drugs, and hyperbilirubinemia. Children with cochlear nerve aplasia and genetic mutations were excluded. Hearing outcome was determined according to mode of auditory rehabilitation beyond 30 months of age: A) no hearing device; B) hearing aid; C) CI.

RESULTS

Of twenty-eight children with ANSD, nine (32%) had behavioural thresholds and language development sufficient to require no assistive device, 9 (32%) were fitted with hearing aids and 10 (36%) had CIs. The average age at CI (3.45 ± 2.07 years) was significantly older than the age at CI of other children in our program with prelingual hearing loss (2.05 ± 1.14 years; p = 0.01 Mann-Witney U Test). None of the putative risk factors for hearing loss reliably predicted the need for subsequent CI.

CONCLUSION

The small sample size in this study is sufficient to confirm that clinical history alone does not reliably predict which young children with perinatal-onset ANSD will require CI. Consequently, timing for CI remains delayed in these children, potentially affecting speech and language outcome. The pathogenesis of perinatal-onset ANSD remains undetermined and novel means of assessment are required for prognostication in affected infants.

Candidacy for medial unicompartmental knee replacement declines with age

BACKGROUND

The effect of age on the percentage of primary knee replacements appropriate for unicompartmental replacement (UKR), defined as candidacy, is unknown. The aim was to determine the candidacy and outcome of UKR in different age groups.

HYPOTHESIS

Age is associated with candidacy for medial UKR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study determined UKR candidacy from preoperative radiographs, including stress views, from 457 consecutive knee replacements (TKR or UKR) in a specialist joint replacement centre. Candidacy, estimated from radiographs and from usage, was determined for all knees and then stratified by age group<50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, and 80+. The outcome of UKR implanted in these groups was also assessed. To avoid overestimating, candidacy estimated by usage was used for the primary analysis.

RESULTS

Candidacy decreased with age (OR 0.98, p=0.008) and was 61% (CI 42-78), 52% (CI 43-61), 43% (CI 35-51), 41% (CI 31-52), and 36% (CI 22-52) respectively. Candidacy estimated by radiographs was slightly higher overall (49% compared to 46%) and in all age groups than candidacy estimated from usage. Neither functional outcome (p=0.47) nor implant survival (p=0.54) was affected by age. Overall 80% achieved good/excellent Knee Society objective scores, and the five-year implant survival was 99%.

DISCUSSION

There is a strong association of candidacy for UKR with age in that younger patients are more likely to be candidates (61% in those<50 and 36% in those 80+). Good outcomes can be expected in patients of all ages who are appropriate for UKR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Prognostic cross-sectional study.

Perceived Candidacy for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Paris, France

Low perception of HIV risk is a challenge to PrEP implementation. We analyzed associations between perceptions of PrEP candidacy, behavioral indications for PrEP, and sexual behaviors. We recruited a sample of 580 MSM from a geosocial-networking smartphone application in Paris, France. A modified Poisson regression model was conducted to examine associations between perceived candidacy for PrEP and behavioral indications for PrEP, and relationships among engagement in group sex, transactional sex, HIV test history, and indications for PrEP. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. For the outcome of perceived candidacy for PrEP, a multinomial logistic regression was performed, and adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRR) were calculated. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for socio-demographics. Respondents who considered themselves PrEP candidates were more likely to meet PrEP eligibility criteria compared to those who did not consider themselves candidates (aRR 1.65; 95% CI 1.34-2.03). Those who had engaged in group or transactional sex were more likely to have behavioral indications for PrEP (aRR 1.27; 95% CI 1.07-1.50, aRR 1.32; 95% CI 1.13-1.56, respectively), whereas HIV test history was not significantly associated with behavioral indications for PrEP. Respondents who had engaged in group sex or transactional sex were more likely to perceive themselves as candidates for PrEP (aRRR 2.24; 95% CI 1.21-4.16, aRRR 2.58; 95% CI 1.09-6.13, respectively), although those never tested for HIV were less likely to perceive themselves as candidates for PrEP (aRRR 0.18; 95% CI 0.03-0.91). The elucidation of candidacy perceptions and risk behaviors is key to furthering the effective implementation of PrEP engagement interventions.

Exploring adolescents and young people's candidacy for utilising health services in a rural district, South Africa

BACKGROUND

We use the 'candidacy framework' to describe adolescents' and young people's (AYP) experiences of health services in a rural KwaZulu-Natal district, South Africa.

METHODS

A qualitative approach was used including group discussions, in-depth and key informant interviews with a purposive sample of AYP (n = 70), community leaders (n = 15), school health teams (n = 10), and health service providers (n = 6).

RESULTS

Findings indicate tacit understanding among AYP that they are candidates for general health services. However, HIV stigma, apprehensions and misconceptions about sexual and reproductive health, and socio-cultural views which disapprove of AYP pre-marital sex undermine their candidacy for sexual and reproductive services.

CONCLUSION

Consideration and understanding of the vulnerabilities and reasons AYP exclude themselves will inform interventions to address their health needs. AYP's participation in the design of health services will increase their acceptability and encourage uptake of services.

Using the candidacy framework to understand how doctor-patient interactions influence perceived eligibility to seek help for cancer alarm symptoms: a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

'Candidacy' is concerned with the way people consider their eligibility for accessing health services. We used the Candidacy Framework to explore how the doctor-patient relationship can influence perceived eligibility to visit their General Practitioner (GP) among people experiencing cancer alarm symptoms.

METHODS

We carried out a secondary analysis of qualitative interviews with 29 women and 33 men, aged ≥50 years experiencing cancer alarm symptoms, recruited through primary care. Interviews focused on symptom experience, help-seeking and primary care use. Framework analysis was used to analyse transcripts with a focus on GP-patient interactions.

RESULTS

Perceived (im)permeability of services acted as a barrier to help-seeking, due to limited availability of appointments, time-limited communication and difficulties asserting candidacy. There was also a focal role of communication in building a positive doctor-patient relationship, with some participants describing resisting offers of appointments as a result of previous negative GP adjudication. These factors not only influenced the current consultation but had longer-term consequences for future consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

Candidacy provides a valuable theoretical framework to understand the interactional factors of the doctor-patient relationship which influence perceived eligibility to seek help for possible cancer alarm symptoms. We have highlighted areas for targeted interventions to improve patient-centred care and improve earlier diagnosis.

"One Big Family": Pastoral Care and Treatment Seeking in an Egyptian Coptic Church in England

Little is known about Coptic migrants' chronic disease health beliefs and treatment-seeking behaviours. Interviews to explore these issues and their relationship with church membership were conducted with 15 Coptic migrants in Southern England. Obesity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were most frequently identified as health risks for Coptic migrants. CVD was ascribed to stress and considered amenable to spiritual healing. Lay referral to medical practitioners who were church members was common but may devalue perceptions of family medicine. The Coptic Church functions as a community that addresses members' wider vulnerability. Central to this is the "parish nurse" role of the priest.

Medical homelessness and candidacy: women transiting between prison and community health care

Background

Women in contact with the prison system have high health needs. Short periods in prison and serial incarcerations are common. Examination of their experiences of health care both in prison and in the community may assist in better supporting their wellbeing and, ultimately, decrease their risk of returning to prison.

Methods

We interviewed women in prisons in Sydney, Australia, using pre-release and post-release interviews. We undertook thematic analysis of the combined interviews, considering them as continuing narratives of their healthcare experiences. We further reviewed the findings using the theoretical lens of candidacy to generate additional insights on healthcare access.

Results

Sixty-nine interviews were conducted with 40 women pre-release and 29 of these post-release. Most had histories of substance misuse. Women saw prison as an opportunity to address neglected health problems, but long waiting lists impeded healthcare delivery. Both in prison and in the community, the dual stigmas of substance misuse and being a prisoner could lead to provider judgements that their claims to care were not legitimate. They feared they would be blocked from care even if seriously ill. Family support, self-efficacy, assertiveness, overcoming substance misuse, compliance with health system rules and transitional care programs increased their personal capacity to access health care.

Conclusions

For women in transition between prison and community, healthcare access could be experienced as ‘medical homelessness’ in which women felt caught in a perpetual state of waiting and exclusion during cycles of prison- and community-based care. Their healthcare experiences were characterized by ineffectual attempts to access care, transient relationships with healthcare providers, disrupted medical management and a fear that stigma would prevent candidacy to health care even in the event of serious illness. Consideration of the vulnerabilities and likely points of exclusion for women in contact with the criminal justice system will assist in increasing healthcare access for this marginalised population.

Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care

Reaching a decision about whether and when to visit the doctor can be a difficult process for the patient. An early visit may cause the doctor to wonder why the patient chose to consult when the disease was self-limiting and symptoms would have settled without medical input. A late visit may cause the doctor to express dismay that the patient waited so long before consulting. In the UK primary care context of constrained resources and government calls for cautious healthcare spending, there is all the more pressure on both doctor and patient to meet only when necessary. A tendency on the part of health professionals to judge patients' decisions to consult as appropriate or not is already described. What is less well explored is the patient's experience of such judgment. Drawing on data from 52 video-elicitation interviews conducted in the English primary care setting, the present paper examines how patients seek to legitimise their decision to consult, and their struggles in doing so. The concern over wasting the doctor's time is expressed repeatedly through patients' narratives. Referring to the sociological literature, the history of 'trivia' in defining the role of general practice is discussed, and current public discourses seeking to assist the patient in developing appropriate consulting behaviour are considered and problematised. Whilst the patient is expected to have sufficient insight to inform timely consulting behaviour, it becomes clear that any attempt on the part of doctor or patient to define legitimate help-seeking is in fact elusive. Despite this, a significant moral dimension to what is deemed appropriate consulting by doctors and patients remains. The notion of candidacy is suggested as a suitable framework and way forward for encompassing these struggles to negotiate eligibility for medical time.

An evaluation of hearing preservation outcomes in routine cochlear implant care: Implications for candidacy

INTRODUCTION

A retrospective evaluation of pre- and post-operative audiometric data at a single large UK cochlear implant centre over 25 years was undertaken.

METHODS

Analysis of pre-operative hearing levels showed that there was a modest but significant reduction in average pre-operative hearing thresholds among patients referred between 1990 and 2015, particularly in the low frequencies.

OUTCOMES

The proportion of those referred who would meet widely-accepted candidacy criteria for electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) grew significantly over time but in the period 2011-2015 just 9% of those referred had sufficient residual hearing for EAS. On average, implant recipients lost 20 dB hearing at frequencies ≤1000 Hz as a result of the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that hearing preservation is now widely achievable, and that both candidacy criteria and referrer education should take into account potential EAS benefit.

Criteria versus guidelines: Are we doing the best for our paediatric patients?

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance for the provision of cochlear implants (NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance 166. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. 2009. National Health Service National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.) are used to develop candidacy criteria by public health funding bodies within the UK. Often the guidance is interpreted as strict 'criteria' whereby clinicians adhere to specific audiometric thresholds without accounting for the acceptable range of performance on individual tests or a child's functional development. In this paper four clinical paediatric case studies are described from two cochlear implant centres which serve to illustrate difficulties in applying NICE guidance as strict criteria. These are presented in the context of recommending more flexible interpretation based on the content of the current guidance along with considerations of circumstances where NICE guidance might be adapted to optimise use of cochlear implant technology within a national framework.

Expert opinion: Can different assessments be used to overcome current candidacy issues?

Since the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) review of cochlear implantation in 2009, (NICE, 2009) there have been a number of significant changes to our understanding of the impact of severe-to-profound hearing loss on quality of life and comorbidity with life limiting illness. There have been questions about the validity of current methods of assessing candidacy for cochlear implants. There have also been significant improvements in the effectiveness of implants, the age of successful implantation and a reduction in costs. Additionally, the costs to the health and welfare system of not addressing severe-to-profound hearing loss are often not considered when assessing costs and benefits of this technology and when assessing candidacy criteria. Consideration of these changes since the NICE review suggests the need for an urgent review of the current guidance.

Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical utility of the City University of New York sentence test in a cohort of post-lingually deafened cochlear implants recipients over time.

METHODS

117 post-lingually deafened, Australian English-speaking CI recipients aged between 23 and 98 years (M = 66 years; SD = 15.09) were recruited. CUNY sentence test scores in quiet were collated and analysed at two cut-offs, 95% and 100%, as ceiling scores.

RESULTS

CUNY sentence scores ranged from 4% to 100% (M = 86.75; SD = 20.65), with 38.8% of participants scoring 95% and 16.5% of participants reaching the 100% scores. The percentage of participants reaching the 95% and 100% ceiling scores increased over time (6 and 12 months post-implantation). The distribution of all post-operative CUNY test scores skewed to the right with 82% of test scores reaching above 90%.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that the CUNY test cannot be used as a valid tool to measure the speech perception skills of post-lingually deafened CI recipients over time. This may be overcome by using adaptive test protocols or linguistically, cognitively or contextually demanding test materials.

CONCLUSION

The high percentage of CI recipients achieving ceiling scores for the CUNY sentence test in quiet at 3 months post-implantation, questions the validity of using CUNY in CI assessment test battery and limits its application for use in longitudinal studies evaluating CI outcomes. Further studies are required to examine different methods to overcome this problem.

Bone-anchored hearing aid: why do some patients refuse it?

OBJECTIVE

Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA™) is a proven tool to improve hearing. Nevertheless, there are patients who are candidates for BAHA™ implants that end up refusing the surgery. The objective of this study is to review our BAHA™ experience with particular emphasis on reasons behind the refusal of some candidates.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 100 consecutive new candidates referred to The BAHA™ program in a tertiary health care center. Candidates' demographics, hearing status, Co-morbidities and audiometeric tests were all recorded. Patients' acceptance or refusal was noted alongside the reasons to refuse BAHA™.

RESULTS

100 new candidates were seen for BAHA™ assessment, 10 patients were excluded due to incomplete data. There were 68 children and 22 adults. Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss was the most common reason for consultation (40%), followed by unilateral SNHL (23.3%). Aural Atresia was the commonest clinical finding (36.6%). The commonest reason for refusal was social acceptance by the parents due to concern with cosmesis.

CONCLUSION

The main reason of BAHA™ surgery refusal, in otherwise eligible candidates, is related to cosmesis. Patients with congenital anomalies were the most likely candidates to accept BAHA™ implants.

A qualitative study of patient choices in using emergency health care for long-term conditions: the importance of candidacy and recursivity

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore how patients with long-term conditions choose between available healthcare options during a health crisis.

METHODS

Patients in North-West England with one or more of four long-term conditions were invited to take part in a questionnaire cohort study of healthcare use. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of fifty consenting patients. Data were analysed qualitatively, using a framework approach.

RESULTS

Patients described using emergency care only in response to perceived urgent need. Their judgements about urgency of need, and their choices about what services to use were guided by previous experiences of care, particularly how accessible services were and the perceived expertise of practitioners.

CONCLUSION

Recursivity and candidacy provide a framework for understanding patient decision-making around emergency care use. Patients were knowledgeable and discriminating users of services, drawing on experiential knowledge of healthcare to choose between services. Their sense of 'candidacy' for specific emergency care services, was recursively shaped by previous experiences.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Strategies that emphasise the need to educate patients about healthcare services use alone are unlikely to change care-seeking behaviour. Practitioners need to modify care experiences that recursively shape patients' judgements of candidacy and their perceptions of accessible expertise in alternative services.

Patient selection, candidacy, and treatment planning for hair restoration surgery

Patient consultation, examination, and selection are crucial for successful outcomes in hair restoration surgery. The hair restoration surgeon must take a holistic approach in identifying those patients who are and who are not candidates for surgery. In this article, an overview of the consultation, pertinent physical examination features relating to patient candidacy, and several treatment paradigms are discussed. Additionally, those findings that may lead to poor results and conditions that are contraindications to hair restoration surgery are reviewed.