Ampicillin susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae in the routine clinical laboratory by the EUCAST methodology compared to broth microdilution and the presence of ftsI gene mutations

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae and the diagnostic accuracy of the EUCAST recommended disc diffusion method to detect the increasingly prevalent ampicillin resistance due to the presence of PBP3 alterations based on mutations in the ftsI gene.

METHODS

During a 6-month period all consecutive non-duplicate H. influenzae isolates were prospectively collected and stored. MICs of ampicillin were determined by broth microdilution (BMD). PCR was performed to detect mutations in the ftsI gene. Results of routine disc diffusion susceptibility testing, including the penicillin screening test in accordance with the current EUCAST methodology, as well as additional Etest results, were compared to the BMD as the reference method.

RESULTS

In 102 isolates, the prevalence of ampicillin resistance was 28% (29/102) by BMD. There was a good correlation between MICs of ampicillin and the presence of a β-lactamase and/or an ftsI gene mutation. The prevalence of ampicillin resistance was overestimated using the EUCAST method (33% (34/102)) and underestimated when an additional Etest was used (24% (24/102)) (not significant). The sensitivity and specificity of the EUCAST methodology for the detection of ampicillin resistance were 97% ((28/29); 95% CI, 82-100%) and 92% ((67/73); 95% CI, 83-97%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ampicillin resistance was 28%, as determined by BMD. Although the overall diagnostic accuracy of the EUCAST ampicillin disc diffusion was high, misclassification of ampicillin susceptibility may still occur.

Evaluation of Gradient Concentration Strips for Detection of Terbinafine Resistance in Trichophyton spp

The number of dermatophytosis cases resistant to terbinafine is increasing all over the world. Therefore, there is a need for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes for better management of the patients. In the present study, we have evaluated a gradient test (GT) method for testing the susceptibility of dermatophytes to terbinafine. MIC values to terbinafine determined by the EUCAST reference technique and by gradient test were compared for 79 Trichophyton spp. isolates. Overall, MICs were lower with gradient test (MIC50 of 0.002 μg/mL) than with EUCAST (MIC50 of 0.016 μg/mL). Good categorical agreement (>90%) between the 2 techniques was obtained but the essential agreement was variable depending on the batch of gradient test.

Identification and susceptibility testing of oral candidiasis in advanced cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced cancer are prone to develop different opportunistic oral infection due to anti-cancer treatment or the malignancies themselves. Studies of oral fungal samples show an increased prevalence of non-Candida albicans species in mixed oral infections with Candida albicans. Non-C. albicans and C. albicans are associated with varying degrees of resistance to azoles, which may have implications for treatment. This study aimed to assess the diversity and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species detected in the oral cavity.

METHODS

An observational study with microbiological analysis was conducted. Clinical fungal isolates were collected from patients in a hospice unit in 2014-2016. Isolates were re-grown on chromID® Candida plates in 2020. Single colony of each species was re-cultivated and prepared for biochemical identification with a VITEK2® system and verified by gene sequencing. Etest was performed on RPMI agar, and the antifungals fluconazole, amphotericin B, anidulafungin and nystatin were applied.

RESULTS

Fifty-six isolates from 45 patients were identified. Seven different Candida species and one Saccharomyces species were detected. The results of biochemical identification were confirmed with sequencing analysis. Thirty-six patients had mono infection, and nine out of 45 patients had 2-3 different species detected. Of C. albicans strains, 39 out of 40 were susceptible to fluconazole. Two non-C. albicans species were resistant to fluconazole, one to amphotericin B and three to anidulafungin.

CONCLUSION

C. albicans was the predominant species, with a high susceptibility to antifungal agents. Different Candida species occur in both mono and mixed infections. Identification and susceptibility testing may therefore lead to more effective treatment and may prevent the development of resistance among patients with advanced cancer.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

The study Oral Health in Advanced Cancer was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT02067572) in 20/02/2014.

Evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne and Etest in Comparison with CLSI M38-A2 for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Three Azoles, Amphotericin B, Caspofungin, and Anidulafungin, against Aspergillusfumigatus and Other Species, Using New Clinical Breakpoints and Epidemiological Cutoff Values

Aspergillosis is an invasive fungal disease associated with high mortality. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is receiving increasing consideration for managing patients, as well as for surveilling emerging drug resistance, despite having time-consuming and technically complex reference methodologies. The Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) and Etest methods are widely utilized for yeasts but have not been extensively evaluated for Aspergillus isolates. We obtained Posaconazole (POS), Voriconazole (VCZ), Itraconazole (ITC), Amphotericin B (AMB), Caspofungin (CAS), and Anidulafungin (AND) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for both the Etest (n = 330) and SYO (n = 339) methods for 106 sequenced clinical strains. For 84 A. fumigatus, we analyzed the performance of both commercial methods in comparison with the CLSI-AFST, using available cutoff values. An excellent correlation could be demonstrated for Etest-AMB and Etest-VCZ (p < 0.01). SYO-MICs of AMB, VCZ, and POS resulted in excellent essential agreement (>93%), and >80% for AMB, VCZ, and ITC Etest-MICs. High categoric agreement was found for AMB, ITC, and CAS Etest-MICs (>85%) and AMB SYO-MICs (>90%). The considerable number of major/very major errors found using Etest and SYO, possibly related to the proposed cutoffs and associated with the less time-consuming processes, support the need for the improvement of commercial methods for Aspergillus strains.

Assessment of Ceftazidime-Avibactam 30/20-μg Disk, Etest versus Broth Microdilution Results When Tested against Enterobacterales Clinical Isolates

The objective of this research was to evaluate the correlation between inhibitory zones and MIC when testing ceftazidime-avibactam using disk diffusion, Etest, and broth microdilution method established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Four-hundred and 58 isolates of Enterobacterales isolated from 54 medical centers from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2016 to 2020 were collected. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion were performed according to the CLSI. Of the 458 Enterobacterales, 17.2% (79/458) and 82.8%(379/458) were resistant or susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam by broth microdilution, respectively. Compared with the broth microdilution method, the categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) of the Etest were 99.6% (456/458) and 94.8% (434/458), respectively; the major error (ME) and very major error (VME) were both 0.2% (1/458). For disk diffusion, the CA and VME were 99.8% (457/458) and 0.2% (1/458), respectively. For Escherichia coli, the CA and EA of the Etest were 100% and 97.1% (135/139), respectively. The CA of the disk diffusion was 100%. For Klebsiella pneumoniae, the CA and EA of the Etest were 99.3% (288/290) and 93.4% (271/290), respectively, the ME and VME were both 0.3% (1/290). The CA and VME of disk diffusion were 99.7% (289/290) and 0.3% (1/290), respectively. For other Enterobacterales, the CA and EA of the Etest were 100% and 96.6% (28/29), respectively. The CA of the disk diffusion was 100%. Ceftazidime-avibactam disk diffusion (30/20-μg disks) and Etest demonstrated good performance for ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility testing against Enterobacterales clinical isolates. IMPORTANCE Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, especially for extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, are disseminating rapidly around the world. Treatment options for these infections are limited, which prompt the development of novel or combinational therapies to combat the infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. The newly available β-lactam combination agent ceftazidime-avibactam has been demonstrated good in vitro and in vivo activity against ESBL, AmpC, KPC-2, or OXA-48-like-producing isolates and has shown promise in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections. Concerningly, there are few available automated systems for ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility testing, and the broth microdilution method is hard to perform in most routine laboratories. Therefore, we urgently need an economical and practical method for the accurate detection of ceftazidime-avibactam activity against Gram-negative bacilli. Here, we evaluate the performance of the disk diffusion and Etest compared with the reference broth microdilution method against Enterobacterales clinical strains.

Antifungal Susceptibility of 182 Fusarium Species Isolates from 20 European Centers: Comparison between EUCAST and Gradient Concentration Strip Methods

We determined the susceptibility of 182 Fusarium species isolates to five antifungal drugs (amphotericin B, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, and terbinafine) by the EUCAST method. Based on the latest taxonomic insights, isolates collected from 20 European centers were distributed into seven complexes and 27 species. The susceptibility was variable, depending on the species. Comparison with the gradient concentration strip method, which was used for 77 isolates, showed essential agreement values for voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, and amphotericin B of 17%, 91%, 83%, and 70%, respectively.

Comparison of Etest and broth microdilution for evaluating the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae to ceftaroline and of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam

OBJECTIVES

Decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftaroline (CPT) has been reported during antimicrobial resistance surveillance and therapy. Conventional laboratories are unable to provide timely susceptibility testing for CZA and CPT because these antimicrobial agents are not incorporated in automated susceptibility testing systems.

METHODS

We evaluated Etest and the Sensititre broth microdilution (BMD) method for testing CZA against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and CPT against important Gram-positive cocci bloodstream isolates. Genotypes of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales were also determined using the Xpert® Carba-R assay.

RESULTS

Etest showed ≥90% agreement with Sensititre BMD for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) (n = 187), carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) (n = 28) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 35); however, the very major error rate exceeded 3%. Agreement between Etest and Sensititre BMD was <90% for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) (n = 81), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (n = 92) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n = 170). Both agents remained potent with a high susceptibility rate by Sensititre BMD as follows: CZA against CRKP (95.0%), CREC (89.3%) and CRPA (84.5%); and CPT against MSSA (100.0%), MRSA (95.3%) and S. pneumoniae (94.3%). CZA was active against blaKPC-carrying CRKP (98.5% susceptible), and resistance in the majority of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales isolates (6 of 10 CRKP and 2 of 3 CREC) was due to the presence of a metallo-β-lactamase gene.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that interpretation of susceptibility results obtained by Etest for both agents should be undertaken cautiously and remains challenging.

Comparison of Disc Diffusion, Etest, and a Modified CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole against Madurella mycetomatis

For many fungal infections, in vitro susceptibility testing is used to predict if an isolate is resistant or susceptible to the antifungal agent used to treat the infection. For Madurella mycetomatis, the main causative agent of mycetoma, in vitro susceptibility testing currently is not performed on a routine basis. The current in vitro susceptibility testing method is labor-intensive, and sonication must be done to generate a hyphal inoculum. For endpoint visualization, expensive viability dyes are needed. Here, we investigated if the currently used in vitro susceptibility method could be adapted to make it amendable for use in a routine setting which can be used in low-income countries, where mycetoma is endemic. First, we developed a methodology in which hyphal fragments can be generated without the need for sonication, by comparing different bead beating methodologies. Next, in vitro susceptibility was assessed using standard broth microdilution assays as well as disc diffusion, Etest, and VIPcheck methodologies. We demonstrate that after a hyphal suspension is generated by glass bead beating, disc diffusion, Etest, and VIPcheck can be used to determine susceptibility of Madurella mycetomatis to itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole. The MICs found with Etest were comparable to those obtained with our modified CLSI-based broth microdilution in vitro susceptibility assay for itraconazole and posaconazole. Furthermore, we found an inverse relationship between the zones of inhibition and MICs obtained with the Etest and those obtained by the modified CLSI broth microdilution technique.

Evaluating the performance characteristics of different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methodologies for testing susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria to tigecycline

Background

The current emergence of multi-drug resistance among nosocomial pathogens has led to increased use of last-resort agents including Tigecycline (TGC). Availability of reliable methods for testing TGC susceptibility is crucial to accurately predict clinical outcomes. We evaluated the influence of different methodologies and type of media on TGC susceptibility of different gram-negative bacteria of clinical origin.

Methods

The TGC susceptibility of 84 clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 29), Escherichia coli (n = 30), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 25) was tested by broth microdilution (BMD), Etest, agar dilution (AD) and disk diffusion (DD) methods using Mueller Hinton agar from Difco and Mueller Hinton broth (MHB) from two different manufacturers (Difco and Condalab). FDA TGC susceptibility breakpoints issued for Enterobacteriaceae were used for interpretation of the results.

Results

MICs determined by BMD using MHB from two suppliers showed a good correlation with overall essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) being 100% and 95% respectively. However, a twofold rise in BMD-Condalab MICs which was detected in 50% of the isolates, resulted in changes in susceptibility categories of few isolates with MICs close to susceptibility breakpoints leading to an overall minor error (MI) rate of 4.7%. Among the tested methods, Etest showed the best correlation with BMD, being characterized with the lowest error rates (only 1% MI) and highest overall EA (100%) and CA (98.8%) for all subsets of isolates. AD yielded the lowest overall agreement (EA 77%, CA 81%) with BMD in a species dependent manner, with the highest apparent discordance being found among the A. baumannii isolates. While the performance of DD for determination of TGC susceptibility among Enterobacteriaceae was excellent, (CA:100% with no errors), the CA was lower (84%) when it was used for A. baumannii where an unacceptably high minor-error rate was noted (16%). No major error or very major error was detected for any of the tested methods.

Conclusions

Etest can be reliably used for TGC susceptibility testing in the three groups of studied bacteria. For the isolates with close-to-breakpoint MICs, testing susceptibility using the reference method is recommended.

Trends of Antimicrobial Resistance and Combination Susceptibility Testing of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patients: a 10-Year Update

Antimicrobial combination therapy is a time/resource-intensive procedure commonly employed in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ten years ago, the most promising antimicrobial combinations were proposed, but there has since been the introduction of new β-lactam plus β-lactamase inhibitor antimicrobial combinations. The aims of this study were to (i) compare in vitro activity of these new antimicrobials with other antipseudomonal agents and suggest their most synergistic antimicrobial combinations and (ii) determine antimicrobial resistance rates and study inherent trends of antimicrobials over 10 years. A total of 721 multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from 183 patients were collated over the study period. Antimicrobial susceptibility and combination testing were carried out using the Etest method. The results were further assessed using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and the susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). Resistance to almost all antimicrobial agents maintained a similar level during the studied period. Colistin (P < 0.001) and tobramycin (P = 0.001) were the only antimicrobials with significant increasing isolate susceptibility, while an increasing resistance trend was observed for levofloxacin. The most active antimicrobials were colistin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and gentamicin. All combinations with β-lactam plus β-lactamase inhibitors produced some synergistic results. Ciprofloxacin plus ceftolozane-tazobactam (40%) and amikacin plus ceftazidime (36.7%) were the most synergistic combinations, while colistin combinations gave the best median SBPI (50.11). This study suggests that effective fluoroquinolone stewardship should be employed for CF patients. It also presents in vitro data to support the efficacy of novel combinations for use in the treatment of chronic P. aeruginosa infections.

Evaluation of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacillus anthracis-, Yersinia pestis- and Francisella tularensis-Positive Blood Cultures

Rapid determination of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility is important for proper treatment of infections. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) has recently published guidelines for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) performed directly from positive blood culture vials. These guidelines, however, were only published for a limited number of common pathogenic bacteria. In this study, we evaluated the applicability of these guidelines to three Tier 1 bioterror agents (Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis and Francisella tularensis) that require prompt antibiotic treatment to mitigate morbidity and mortality. We used spiked-in human blood incubated in a BACTEC™ FX40 system to determine the proper conditions for RAST using disc-diffusion and Etest assays. We found that reliable disc-diffusion inhibition diameters and Etest MIC values could be obtained in remarkably short times. Compared to the EUCAST-recommended disc-diffusion assays that will require adjusted clinical breakpoint tables, Etest-based RAST was advantageous, as the obtained MIC values were similar to the standard MIC values, enabling the use of established category breakpoint tables. Our results demonstrate the promising applicability of the EUCAST RAST for B. anthracis-, Y. pestis- or F. tularensis-positive blood cultures, which can lead to shorter diagnostics and prompt antibiotic treatment of these dangerous pathogens.

False amoxicillin/clavulanic acid susceptibility in Bacteroides fragilis using gradient strip tests

BACKGROUND

Repeatedly, too low MIC results were obtained in Bacteroides fragilis quality assessment strains, using gradient strip tests with a ratio of amoxicillin:clavulanic acid of 2:1. We aimed to find the most accurate available gradient strip tests for susceptibility testing of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in B. fragilis in comparison with agar dilution with EUCAST methodology and breakpoints.

METHODS

Twenty-seven clinical B. fragilis isolates were investigated using gold standard EUCAST amoxicillin/clavulanic acid agar dilution (fixed clavulanic acid concentration at 2 mg/L, with increasing amoxicillin concentrations) as well as three commercial gradient strip tests: XL (ratio), AUG (ratio) or AMC (fixed concentration).

RESULTS

Using agar dilution (fixed concentration), 19 isolates were susceptible, 1 isolate was susceptible increased exposure (I) and 7 isolates were resistant. Categorical agreement of the gradient strip tests with agar dilution (fixed concentration) was 70% for XL (ratio), 71% for AUG (ratio) and 89% for AMC (fixed concentration). Very major error rates in comparison with agar dilution (fixed concentration) were 100%, 0%, and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EUCAST breakpoint usage in amoxicillin/clavulanic acid susceptibility tests for B. fragilis should be accompanied by EUCAST methodology. When using alternative methods such as gradient strip tests, a higher degree of alignment with EUCAST methodology, such as using fixed clavulanic acid concentrations, improves precision.

Wound infection caused by Neisseria zoodegmatis, a zoonotic pathogen: a case report

The isolation of Neisseria zoodegmatis from a 63-year-old female presenting to the emergency department following a cat bite injury to her right hand is described in this report. N. zoodegmatis , also known as Centers for Disease Control (CDC) group EF-4b, is considered to be a zoonotic pathogen, and is usually associated with dog or cat bites. Despite the potential of this organism to cause serious soft tissue infections, it can be overlooked in routine clinical laboratories due to its slow growth characteristics and when the history of animal bite is not provided to the laboratory. This case highlights the importance of appropriate clinical history provision to the microbiology laboratory to help provide important information about potential pathogens and allow microbiologists to optimize culture and identification methods. The introduction of tools such as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) into clinical laboratories allows identification and the interpretation of results to be performed within a few minutes of isolation on proper culture media, as opposed to traditional methods, whose slowness may be problematic, as shown in this case report.

Diversity of antimicrobial resistance genes in Bacteroides and Parabacteroides strains isolated in Germany

OBJECTIVES

Bacteroides spp. are normal constituents of the human intestinal microflora, but they are also able to cause severe diseases. The aim of this study was to determine the diversity of antibiotic resistance genes found in phenotypically resistant Bacteroides and Parabacteroides strains.

METHODS

A total of 71 phenotypically resistant Bacteroides spp. from human clinical specimens were screened for the antibiotic resistance genes cfiA, tetQ, tetM, tet36, cepA, cfxA, nim, ermG, ermF, bexA, bla_VIM, bla_NDM, bla_KPC, bla_OXA-48 and bla_GES. The presence of these genes was compared with phenotypic resistance to ampicillin/sulbactam, cefoxitin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, tigecycline, eravacycline and metronidazole.

RESULTS

tetQ was the most frequently detected gene, followed by cfiA, ermF, cfxA, ermG, cepA, nim and bexA. None of the strains were positive for tetM, tet36, bla_VIM, bla_NDM, bla_KPC, bla_OXA-48 or bla_GES. Resistance to the tested β-lactams was mainly linked to the presence of the cfiA gene. Clindamycin resistance correlated with the presence of the genes ermG and ermF. The bexA gene was found in six strains, but only two of them were resistant to moxifloxacin. Tigecycline and eravacycline showed good activities despite the frequent occurrence of tetQ. The nim gene was detected in six isolates, five of which were resistant to metronidazole.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study support the general belief that antimicrobial resistance within Bacteroides should be taken into consideration. This underlines the necessity of reliable routine antimicrobial susceptibility test methods for anaerobic bacteria and the implementation of antimicrobial surveillance programmes worldwide.

Longitudinal Surveillance and Combination Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Multidrug-Resistant Achromobacter Species from Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Achromobacter spp. are recognized as emerging pathogens in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Though recent works have established species-level identification using nrdA sequencing, there is a dearth in knowledge relating to species-level antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and antimicrobial combinations, which hampers the use of optimal antimicrobial combinations for the treatment of chronic infections. The aims of this study were to (i) identify at species-level referred Achromobacter isolates, (ii) describe species-level antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and (iii) determine the most promising antimicrobial combination for chronic Achromobacter infections. A total of 112 multidrug-resistant (MDR) Achromobacter species isolates from 39 patients were identified using nrdA sequencing. Antimicrobial susceptibility and combination testing were carried out using the Etest method. We detected six species of Achromobacter and found that Achromobacter xylosoxidans was the most prevalent species. Interestingly, sequence analysis showed it was responsible for persistent infection (18/28 patients), followed by Achromobacter ruhlandii (2/3 patients). Piperacillin-tazobactam (70.27%) and co-trimoxazole (69.72%) were the most active antimicrobials. Differences were observed in species-level susceptibility to ceftazidime, carbapenems, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and tetracycline. Antimicrobial combinations with co-trimoxazole or tobramycin demonstrate the best synergy, while co-trimoxazole gave the best susceptibility breakpoint index values. This study enriches the understanding of MDR Achromobacter spp. epidemiology and confirms prevalence and chronic colonization of A. xylosoxidans in CF lungs. It presents in vitro data to support the efficacy of new combinations for use in the treatment of chronic Achromobacter infections.

Beta-lactams susceptibility testing of penicillin-resistant, ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis isolates: a comparative assessment of Etest and disk diffusion methods against broth dilution

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of disk diffusion and Etest methods, compared to that of the broth dilution reference method for identifying beta-lactam susceptibilities of Penicillin-Resistant, Ampicillin-Susceptible Enterococcus faecalis (PRASEF) isolates. Fifty-nine PRASEF and 15 Penicillin-Susceptible, Ampicillin-Susceptible E. faecalis (PSASEF) clinical nonrepetitive isolates were evaluated. The effectiveness of five beta-lactams (ampicillin, amoxicillin, imipenem, penicillin, and piperacillin) was tested. All antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Interpretative discrepancies, such as essential agreement, categorical agreement, and errors, were assessed. The acceptability was ≥ 90% for both categorical agreement and essential agreement. Etest proved to be an accurate method for testing beta-lactam susceptibilities of the emerging PRASEF isolates, disk diffusion presented poor performance, particularly for imipenem and piperacillin.

Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis Show Different Trailing Effect Patterns When Exposed to Echinocandins and Azoles

When Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis isolates were tested for susceptibility to fluconazole and echinocandins using either EUCAST or Etest methods, differential patterns of growth were observed, independently of the methods used. For C. albicans, a trailing phenomenon (incomplete growth inhibition at supra-MICs) was observed with fluconazole in 90% and 93.3% for EUCAST and Etest, respectively, but not with echinocandins (<7% for EUCAST and 0% for Etest). In contrast, for C. dubliniensis, a trailing phenomenon was very rarely observed with fluconazole (20% for EUCAST and 0% for Etest), while the opposite pattern was observed with echinocandins (>50% for EUCAST and >86% for Etest). This suggests that the pathways involved in the trailing effect might be different between these two related species. Furthermore, clinical microbiologists must be aware of these species-specific patterns for a reliable MIC determination.

Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion method for detection of the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China

Background

Ceftazidime-avibactam was approved in China in 2019 for treating complicated intra-abdominal infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and infections caused by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which treatment options are limited. However, no currently available commercial systems have been approved for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of ceftazidime-avibactam in China. Here, we evaluated the Etest and disk diffusion method for detecting the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa in China.

Results

In total, 194 Enterobacterales and 77 P. aeruginosa isolates, which were divided into a random selection group (140 Enterobacterales and 46 P. aeruginosa isolates) and stock group (54 Enterobacterales and 31 P. aeruginosa isolates), were assessed by the Etest, disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. Minimum inhibitory concentrations and zone diameters were interpreted according to the CLSI supplement M100 30th edition. For all 271 tested isolates, no very major errors were found by using Etest, whereas the overall major error rate was 2.0% (4/203). The overall categorical agreement rates of Etest for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 99.5% (193/194) and 96.1% (74/77), respectively, and the essential agreement rates were 95.9% (186/194) and 94.8% (73/77), respectively. The disk diffusion method showed that the very major error and major error rates were 1.5% (3/204) and 2.5% (5/203), respectively. Overall categorical agreement rates values of the disk diffusion method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 98.5% (191/194) and 93.5% (72/77) compared with broth microdilution, respectively.

Conclusions

For Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, both the Etest and disk diffusion method showed acceptable performance as alternatives to the standard broth microdilution method for clinical treatment interpretation. Application of the disk diffusion method in Enterobacterales was slightly better than that in P. aeruginosa.

Updating of in vitro antifungal susceptibility tests

Fungal diseases, including those caused by (multi)drug-resistant fungi, still represent a global public health concern. Information on the susceptibility of these microorganisms to antifungal agents must be quickly produced to help clinicians initiate appropriate antifungal therapies. Unfortunately, antifungal susceptibility tests are not as developed or widely implemented as antibacterial tests, being similar in design, accuracy and reproducibility, but also laborious and slow. In this article, we review the methods of in vitro susceptibility testing, both reference (CLSI and EUCAST), commercial and new methods based on proteomics (MALDI-TOF MS) and in the detection of resistance genes by nucleic acid amplification techniques. In addi-tion, we discuss the newly established clinical breakpoints, as well as the epidemiological cut-off points, which constitute a new category that can help in the early identification of isolates that have acquired resistance mechanisms. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of each of the methods studied. Therefore, we can conclude that, although there has been much progress in studies of in vitro susceptibility testing to antifungals, there are still limitations in its application in the daily routine of microbiology labo-ratories, although it seems that the future is promising with the new technologies based on proteomics and nucleic acid amplification. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled «SEIMC External Quality Control Programme. Year 2016», which is sponsored by Roche, Vircell Microbiologists, Abbott Molecular and Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A. © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosasy Microbiología Clínica. All rights reserved.

Antifungal susceptibility testing practices in mycology laboratories in France, 2018

A survey of mycology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) was undertaken in France in 2018, to better understand the difference in practices between the participating centers and to identify the difficulties they may encounter as well as eventual gaps with published standards and guidelines. The survey captured information from 45 mycology laboratories in France on how they perform AFST (number of strains tested, preferred method, technical and quality aspects, interpretation of the MIC values, reading and interpretation difficulties). Results indicated that 86% of respondents used Etest as AFST method, with a combination of one to seven antifungal agents tested. Most of the participating laboratories used similar technical parameters to perform their AFST method and a large majority used, as recommended, internal and external quality assessments. Almost all the participating mycology laboratories (98%) reported difficulties to interpret the MIC values, especially when no clinical breakpoints are available. The survey highlighted that the current AFST practices in France need homogenization, particularly for MIC reading and interpretation.

Multicenter Evaluation of the New Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Piperacillin-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii Complex

Piperacillin-tazobactam (P/T) is a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination frequently used in the hospital setting. Etest is a gradient diffusion method that represents an alternative to broth microdilution (BMD) for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We conducted a multicenter evaluation of the performance of the new P/T Etest compared to that of BMD following U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard ISO 20776-2 criteria using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-FDA and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) interpretive breakpoints, respectively. A total of 977 isolates (775 Enterobacterales isolates, 119 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, and 83 Acinetobacter baumannii complex isolates) were tested. Overall essential agreement (EA) was 96.4% and 96.6% for Enterobacterales when FDA and ISO 20776-2 criteria, respectively, were followed. EA was 98.3% for P. aeruginosa and 91.6% for the A. baumannii complex when both the FDA and ISO criteria were followed. Applying CLSI-FDA breakpoints, categorical agreement (CA) reached 93.0%, 93.3%, and 89.2% for the Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and the A. baumannii complex, respectively. Two very major errors (VMEs; 1.1%) were found among the Enterobacterales (for 2 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates). No additional major errors (MEs) or VMEs were found. Applying EUCAST breakpoints, CA was 94.8% and 95.8% for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, respectively (no breakpoints are currently available for the A. baumannii complex). No VMEs were observed among the Enterobacterales, but 2 (0.4%) MEs were found. Among the P. aeruginosa isolates, 2 (6.9%) VMEs and 3 (3.3%) MEs were observed. These errors resulted when P/T Etest MICs were 1 doubling dilution apart from the BMD MICs. In conclusion, the new P/T Etest represents an accurate tool for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii complex isolates with limited category errors.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations and resistance for selected antimicrobial agents (including imipenem, linezolid and tigecycline) of bacteria obtained from eye infections

Objective: To determine bacteria obtained from eye infections, both resistance and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) to gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, tigecycline, linezolid and imipenem, in vitro. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was undergone with 50 samples from 50 eyes of patients diagnosed with keratitis or endophthalmitis, who came to a consultation at the Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (Floridablanca, Colombia) from August to November 2014. The MICs of the isolated microorganisms were established through Etest® strips (BioMérieux SA, Marcy-l'Etoile - France). Results: Of the 50 samples in total, 17 different bacteria species or groups were isolated. The main isolate for gram-positives was Methicillin Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus (17 samples), and for gram-negatives was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6 samples). The susceptibility percentages sorted from highest to lowest for gram-positive isolates (n=38) were: imipenem 90.3%, linezolid 87.9%, tigecycline 78.1%, gatifloxacin 68.8% and moxifloxacin 68.8%. For gram-negative isolates (n=12), they were: imipenem 72.7%, gatifloxacin 70%, moxifloxacin 66.7% (no reference cut-off points were found for Pseudomonas aeruginosa), tigecycline 22.2%, and linezolid 0% (as expected according to its inhibition spectrum). Conclusions: Although fourth generation fluoroquinolones are currently the preferred initial empirical monotherapy in our practice, given the increasing bacterial resistance, in cases in which gram-positive bacteria were isolated in the initial staining imipenem, linezolid or tigecycline could be used as an alternative. On the other hand, for cases of gram-negative bacteria, no antimicrobial susceptibility exceeded 80%, so using two antimicrobials looking for a synergy between them could be a better option. Abbreviations: S = Susceptibility, IS = Intermediate susceptibility, R = Resistance.

Variability in Azithromycin Susceptibility Results for Neisseria gonorrhoeae Obtained Using Gradient MIC Strip and Agar Dilution Techniques

Azithromycin is a component of empirical treatment regimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections, but antimicrobial susceptibility testing for this agent is technically challenging. We compared the intertest variability, MIC values, and CLSI/EUCAST categorization of clinical and reference isolates of N. gonorrhoeae treated with azithromycin by testing 107 clinical isolates and nine reference isolates by agar dilution and in duplicates using MIC test strips (Liofilchem, Italy) and Etests (bioMérieux, France). Replicate isolate agreement within 1 log₂ between duplicate tests was 87% for MIC test strips and 100% for Etests (P < 0.001). Essential agreement with the agar dilution method was higher for Etests (91%) than for MIC test strips (44%, P < 0.001). The geometric mean MIC was highest for MIC test strips (0.8 mg/liter) and significantly higher than both Etest (0.47 mg/liter, P < 0.001) and agar dilution (0.26 mg/liter, P < 0.001) methods. Etest MICs were higher than those obtained with agar dilution (P < 0.001). Agar dilution, MIC test strip, and Etest methods categorized 96%, 85%, and 95% (P = 0.003) of clinical isolates, respectively, as susceptible/wild type according to CLSI/EUCAST criteria. Our results illustrate the difficulties underlying azithromycin susceptibility testing for N. gonorrhoeae and demonstrate that results can vary using different methods. This variability could influence antimicrobial resistance reporting between laboratories involved in N. gonorrhoeae surveillance programs.

Antifungal Susceptibly Testing by Concentration Gradient Strip Etest Method for Fungal Isolates: A Review

Antifungal susceptibility testing is an important tool for managing patients with invasive fungal infections, as well as for epidemiological surveillance of emerging resistance. For routine testing in clinical microbiology laboratories, ready-to-use commercial methods are more practical than homemade reference techniques. Among commercially available methods, the concentration gradient Etest strip technique is widely used. It combines an agar-based diffusion method with a dilution method that determinates a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in µg/mL. Many studies have evaluated the agreement between the gradient strip method and the reference methods for both yeasts and filamentous fungi. This agreement has been variable depending on the antifungal, the species, and the incubation time. It has also been shown that the gradient strip method could be a valuable alternative for detection of emerging resistance (non-wild-type isolates) as Etest epidemiological cutoff values have been recently defined for several drug-species combinations. Furthermore, the Etest could be useful for direct antifungal susceptibility testing on blood samples and basic research studies (e.g., the evaluation of the in vitro activity of antifungal combinations). This review summarizes the available data on the performance and potential use of the gradient strip method.

MALDI-TOF MS for the rapid identification and drug susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi

The present study aimed to evaluate the applicability of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for identifying filamentous fungi and assessing the in vitro activities of common antifungal drugs against different kinds of filamentous fungi that are commonly encountered in a clinical setting. A total of 123 strains of filamentous fungi (24 species) were submitted for identification by MALDI-TOF MS, and the findings were compared with those obtained by conventional methods. The discrepancies were further investigated by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence analysis. Then, 79 strains were randomly selected for further testing by the minimum inhibitory concentration Etest method. MALDI-TOF MS correctly identified 114 (92.70%) of the 123 filamentous fungi and failed to identify six isolates (4.9%). By contrast, the conventional identification methods made 113 (91.9%) correct identifications. In addition, 15 isolates of filamentous fungi were further identified by ribosomal DNA-ITS sequencing. In the in vitro antifungal susceptibility test, voriconazole showed the strongest antifungal activity among the tested drugs against a broad range of filamentous fungi. Caspofungin showed a better in vitro antifungal activity than fluconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B. MALDI-TOF MS offers a cost/time-saving, high-throughput and accurate working protocol for identifying filamentous fungi. Voriconazole could still serve as the first-line drug for treating serious infections caused by filamentous fungi, while caspofungin may be another treatment option for fungal infections.

Sensitivity Pattern Of Salmonella typhi And Paratyphi A Isolates To Chloramphenicol And Other Anti-Typhoid Drugs: An In Vitro Study

Purpose

To investigate the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of commonly prescribed antimicrobials (chloramphenicol, cefixime, ofloxacin, azithromycin, and ceftriaxone) against Salmonella enterica isolates.

Methods

Blood culture positive isolates of S. typhi and S. paratyphi A (N = 251) received at Metropolis Healthcare Limited (Mumbai, India) from four zones of India (North, South, West, and East) between April and August 2018 were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by E-test method. Based on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the organism was categorized as sensitive, intermediate, and resistant against the respective antibiotics as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria 2018.

Results

Out of 251 Salmonella isolates, 192 (76.5%) were S. typhi and 59 (23.5%) were S. paratyphi A. All 251 (100%) Salmonella isolates were sensitive to cefixime, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin; 237/251 (94.4%) isolates to chloramphenicol and only 9/251 (3.6%) isolates were sensitive to ofloxacin. Based on average MIC and MIC breakpoints, Salmonella isolates were found to be sensitive to chloramphenicol (MIC: 3.89±6.94 µg/mL), cefixime (MIC: 0.13±0.11 µg/mL), azithromycin (MIC: 3.32±2.19 µg/mL), and ceftriaxone (MIC: 0.11±0.18 µg/mL) and resistant to ofloxacin (MIC: 2.95±6.06 µg/mL). More than 20% of Salmonella isolates had MICs of chloramphenicol as 1.5 µg/mL (27.85% isolates) and 2 µg/mL (29.53% isolates).

Conclusion

Our study confirms the re‑emergence of susceptibility of Salmonella isolates to chloramphenicol. Further, the concern about fluoroquinolone-decreased susceptibility as indicated by the intermediate susceptibility or resistance was reiterated in this study. Though cefixime, azithromycin, and ceftriaxone showed susceptibility, the possibility of antibiotic resistance with the irrational use of these antibiotics cannot be deterred. This study thus emphasizes the need for continuous evaluation and judicious use of antimicrobials, considering the ever-changing landscape.

Evaluation of the Gradient Concentration Strip Method for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Isavuconazole and Comparators for Mucorales Species

MIC values for amphotericin B and three azoles determined by the EUCAST reference technique and by gradient concentration strips were compared for 30 Mucorales isolates belonging to clinically important species. Essential agreement (EA) within ±2 dilution steps at 24 hours between the techniques was 83.3% for isavuconazole. EAs for itraconazole, amphotericin B, and posaconazole were 86.7%, 73.3%, and 56.7%, respectively. A good agreement was obtained between visual and spectrophotometric readings for EUCAST.

A Multicenter Study To Evaluate Ceftaroline Breakpoints: Performance in an Area with High Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 5 Lineage

Ceftaroline (CPT) is a broad-spectrum agent with potent activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The sequence type 5 (ST5) Chilean-Cordobés clone, associated with CPT nonsusceptibility, is dominant in Chile, a region with high rates of MRSA infections. Here, we assessed the in vitro activity of CPT against a collection of MRSA isolates collected between 1999 and 2018 from nine hospitals (n = 320) and community settings (n = 41) in Santiago, Chile, and evaluated performance across testing methodologies. We found that our hospital-associated isolates exhibited higher CPT MIC distributions (MIC50 and MIC90 of 2 mg/liter) than the community isolates (MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.5 mg/liter), a finding that was consistent across time and independent of the culture source. High proportions (64%) of isolates were CPT nonsusceptible despite the absence of CPT use in Chile. Across methodologies, the Etest underestimated the MIC relative to the gold standard broth microdilution (BMD) test (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 and 1.5 mg/liter, respectively). There was low (∼51%) categorical agreement (CA) between Etest and BMD results across CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. The recent revision of CLSI guidelines abolished "very major error" (VME) from the previous guidelines (81%), which perform similarly to the EUCAST guidelines. The level of concordance between CLSI and EUCAST for BMD testing and Etest was >95%. Disk diffusion performed poorly relative to BMD under CLSI (CA, 55%) and EUCAST (CA, 36%) guidelines. Comparison of EUCAST to CLSI for disk diffusion (with EUCAST used as the reference) showed low agreement (CA, 25%; VME, 70%). In summary, CPT-nonsusceptible MRSA are dominant in clinical settings in Chile. Our results provide data to support the reevaluation of CPT breakpoints and to improve agreement across methodologies and agencies.

Evaluation of in vitro methods for testing tigecycline combinations against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) frequently involves combination therapy with various antimicrobial agents in the hope of achieving synergistic effects. Routine laboratory antimicrobial synergy testing is a service that is currently unavailable owing to the laborious nature of the reference time-kill assay (TKA) as well as the widely used chequerboard method. In this study, we explored whether easier methods, based on the Etest technique, might offer a suitable alternative.

METHODS

In vitro interactions of tigecycline combination with colistin, gentamicin, fosfomycin or meropenem against 26 CPKP isolates were evaluated employing the TKA, chequerboard method and three Etest methodologies (the MIC/MIC ratio, the cross formation and the agar/Etest method). Rates of consequent synergy and concordance of the studied methods were determined.

RESULTS

All antimicrobial combinations demonstrated some degree of synergy against the CPKP isolates tested. No antagonism was observed for any of the combinations. All methods showed poor synergy concordance with the TKA, producing non-significant kappa (κ) results. Etest methods (MIC/MIC ratio and agar/Etest) exhibited fair agreement (κ=0.29 and 0.38, respectively) with the chequerboard method.

CONCLUSION

There is a poor correlation between synergy testing methods of tigecycline combinations, which may be associated with their different endpoints. To elucidate method comparability and reliability, their correlation with clinical outcomes appears important.

Evaluation of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin Disk Diffusion and Etest Using the 2019 Enterobacteriaceae CLSI Breakpoints

In 2019, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) published revisions to the Enterobacteriaceae ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin breakpoints. We evaluated the performance of disk diffusion and Etest compared to that of reference broth microdilution by use of the revised breakpoints. Fifty-eight Enterobacteriaceae isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs of 0.5 μg/ml or 1.0 μg/ml on initial testing were specifically selected for evaluation. These MICs are susceptible by the 2018 breakpoints and not susceptible by the 2019 breakpoints. For ciprofloxacin disk diffusion, the categorical agreement (CA) was 46.6%, with 0 very major errors (VME), 4 major errors (ME) (21.1%), and 27 minor errors (mE) (46.6%) using the 2019 CLSI disk breakpoints. For levofloxacin, the CA was 72.4%, with 0 VME, 0 ME, and 16 mE (27.6%) using the 2019 CLSI disk breakpoints. Using an error rate-bound evaluation method, levofloxacin but not ciprofloxacin disk diffusion yielded an acceptable minor error rate of <40% for isolates with an MIC plus or minus 1 doubling dilution of the intermediate breakpoint. For Etest compared to the reference broth microdilution, the essential agreement was 100% for both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin and the CA was 81.0% and 65.5%, respectively. No VME or ME were observed by Etest, and 11 minor errors for ciprofloxacin (19.0%) and 20 (34.5%) for levofloxacin were observed. By the error rate-bound method, the minor error rate for ciprofloxacin was acceptable, but minor error rates for levofloxacin remained outside the acceptance range (i.e., 42.6% for isolates with an MIC within 1 dilution of the breakpoint). In general, the disk diffusion and Etest methods performed well with this challenging collection of isolates, although laboratories must be aware of minor errors, particularly for isolates with results near the breakpoint.

Detection of Echinocandin-Resistant Candida glabrata in Blood Cultures Spiked with Different Percentages of FKS2 Mutants

Infections caused by the coexistence of Candida glabrata echinocandin-resistant and echinocandin-susceptible cells may be possible, and the detection of FKS mutants when the proportions of FKS mutants are underrepresented poses a problem. We assessed the role of EUCAST and methods directly performed on positive blood cultures-Etest (ET_DIR) and anidulafungin-containing agar plate assays-for detecting resistance in C. glabrata isolates containing different amounts of echinocandin-susceptible and -resistant Candida glabrata isolates. We studied 10 pairs of C. glabrata isolates involving parental echinocandin-susceptible isolates and isogenic echinocandin-resistant FKS mutant isolates. Three inocula per pair (1 ×  10³ to 5  ×  10³, 1 ×  10² to 5  ×  10², and 10 to 50 CFU/ml) spanning suspensions with different amounts of susceptible/resistant isolates (9/1, 5/5, and 1/9 proportions for each the three inocula) were prepared. The suspensions were spiked in Bactec bottles and incubated until they were positive, and the three methods were compared. The EUCAST method showed echinocandin resistance when the bottles were spiked with susceptible/resistant isolates at 5/5 and 1/9 proportions; the results for the suspensions with a 9/1 proportion of susceptible/resistant isolates were susceptible for three pairs. We observed with the ET_DIR resistance to both echinocandins in all pairs (resistance to micafungin and anidulafungin; MICs, ≥0.064  mg/liter and ≥0.125  mg/liter, respectively) and a double ring of growth inhibition in two pairs. The anidulafungin-containing plates showed fungal growth in the 90 spiked blood cultures at 48 h. Testing of echinocandin susceptibility with the ET_DIR directly on the positive blood culture bottles is a reliable and rapid method to detect echinocandin resistance in C. glabrata On the other hand, resistance can be missed with the EUCAST method when resistant isolates are underrepresented.

Outbreak of Candida auris in Spain: A comparison of antifungal activity by three methods with published data

Candida auris is an emerging pathogen causing candidaemia outbreaks in several countries for which azole, amphotericin B (AmB) and echinocandin resistance has been reported. In this study, the antifungal susceptibilities of 73 Spanish C. auris isolates (56 bloodstream and 17 urine) to eight antifungal agents were determined using three methods. Isolates were identified by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of fluconazole, isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, anidulafungin, micafungin and AmB were determined by EUCAST methodology and Sensititre^® YeastOne^® (SYO) (bloodstream isolates) and Liofilchem^® MIC Test Strip (all isolates). Agreement between the methods was analysed and the MICs (ours and published data) were categorised using recently proposed epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs). Fluconazole MICs were >64 mg/L, whilst >60% of voriconazole MICs were >1 mg/L by the three methods. Posaconazole was the most active azole (EUCAST geometric mean MIC, 0.053 mg/L), followed by isavuconazole (0.066 mg/L) and itraconazole (0.157 mg/L). Echinocandins MICs were ≤0.5 mg/L by SYO and EUCAST. The overall lowest AmB MICs (≤0.25 mg/L) were obtained by EUCAST. Essential agreement (±2 dilutions) between EUCAST and SYO was >93% for the eight antifungals. For this new C. auris clade, all isolates were resistant to fluconazole, and MICs for anidulafungin, micafungin and AmB were ≤1 mg/L using dilution methods. Voriconazole MICs were method-dependent. The number of non-wild-type (non-WT) isolates depended on the ECV applied; by the 97.5% ECV all isolates were WT except for isavuconazole (1.8% non-WT). Good essential agreement (>93%) was observed between EUCAST and SYO.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing in Extended-Spectrum Betalactamase- and Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria of Various Clonal Lineages

Nowadays, multidrug-resistant bacteria are considered as an increasing serious threat to public health worldwide. Global and local surveillance data are helpful in the application of the most efficient antimicrobial agent in bacterial infections. In the current study, we aimed to analyze the activity of the previously cleared agent ceftolozane/ tazobactam (C/T) in African and European multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Susceptibility testing was performed on 147 extended-spectrum β-lactamase (107 Escherichiacoli and 40 Klebsiellapneumoniae) and 103 carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria using Etest according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) clinical breakpoints. Among the extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing isolates, 91 Escherichiacoli isolates (85%) and 23 Klebsiellapneumoniaeisolates (57.5%) were susceptible towards C/T whereas out of the 103 carbapenemase-producing isolates 102 (99.0%) were C/T-resistant. C/T should be included in susceptibility testing to fairly administer this antimicrobial agent in infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. It may be considered as a therapy option for infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing bacteria once susceptibility to this antimicrobial combination has been confirmed.

Breakpoint to MIC quotient: A parameter to rapidly evaluate the in vitro bactericidal activity of β-lactams on Enterobacteriaceae

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) do not completely predict the bactericidal nature of the antimicrobial agent. Patients with pathogens having MICs near the clinical breakpoint experience a higher risk of clinical failure. This study defined an indicator, breakpoint to MIC quotient (BMQ), that incorporates MIC and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint. The BMQ was inversely correlated with MBC in antibiotic combinations against Enterobacteriaceae strains (Spearman coefficient ≤ -0.96). This new parameter may provide timely additional insight for choosing an antibiotic for a severe bacterial infection.

Clinical relevance of in vitro synergistic activity of antibiotics for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to investigate the outcomes of patients infected with multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria following synergy-guided antibiotic combination therapy (SGACT).

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. Published studies of any design reporting outcomes of patients with MDR Gram-negative bacteria treated with SGACT were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the relevancy and quality of the retrieved articles and extracted the available data.

RESULTS

Nineteen reports (530 patients) were included. Eleven case reports/series described 26 cases of systemic infection due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria treated with SGACT. Five deaths were reported, two of which were attributed to the infection. Six studies (including one randomised controlled trial) provided comparative data for patients treated with SGACT and those treated with unguided combination therapy (UCT) or active monotherapy. In the pooled analysis of unadjusted data from these studies (504 patients), there was no difference between SGACT and UCT or monotherapy (OR=0.47, 95% CI 0.21-1.04; I²=52%). Analysis of adjusted data showed that SGACT was significantly associated with survival (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.98; I²=54%).

CONCLUSION

These limited but promising findings warrant further investigation of SGACT in the outcome of patients with MDR Gram-negative infections in well-designed trials.

Performance characteristics of newer MIC gradient strip tests compared with the Etest for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

For Neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility testing, Etest, comparable to agar dilution, is frequently used. In recent years, newer MIC gradient strip tests have been commercialized. However, these tests have not been appropriately evaluated for gonococci. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, quality, availability of antimicrobials and cost of the MIC Test Strip (Liofilchem), M.I.C.Evaluator (Oxoid) and Ezy MIC Strip (HiMedia), compared to the reference Etest (bioMérieux), for gonococcal susceptibility testing. The MICs of eight antimicrobials in 103 gonococcal international reference strains (n = 29) and clinical isolates (n = 74) were examined. Coefficient of determination (R² ), complete agreement, essential agreement, SIR categorical agreement, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated. R² of the MICs for the antimicrobials ranged between 0.674-0.996, 0.617-0.993, and 0.643-0.994 for the MIC Test Strip, M.I.C.Evaluator strips and Ezy MIC Strips respectively. The essential agreement (SIR categorical agreement) was 99.6% (88.6%), 100% (87.1%) and 93.0% (83.1%) respectively. M.I.C.Evaluator strips for gonococcal key antimicrobials were lacking and the Ezy MIC Strips showed an inconsistent accuracy, quality and some strips were contaminated. The Liofilchem MIC Test Strips had limitations, but might be relatively accurate alternatives to Etest for gonococci. Strict quality assurance (at manufacturing and testing laboratory), including quality controls, are required.

Variability of Daptomycin MIC Values for Enterococcus faecium When Measured by Reference Broth Microdilution and Gradient Diffusion Tests

Daptomycin has become a mainstay therapy for the treatment of serious vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections. However, concern exists that current testing methods do not accurately predict the clinical success of daptomycin therapy. We evaluated a collection of 40 isolates of E. faecium across three centers by reference broth microdilution (BMD), and two gradient strips, to determine the precision of daptomycin MICs by these methods and the correlation of daptomycin MIC testing with mutations in the liaFSR system, one of the primary daptomycin resistance mechanisms among the enterococci. Daptomycin MICs spanned 3-log₂ dilutions by BMD for 60.0% of isolates, 17.5% spanned 4 dilutions, 2.5% spanned 5 dilutions, and 20.0% spanned 6 or more dilutions. Fifteen isolates had MICs interpreted as susceptible by some tests and nonsusceptible by others. Neither BMD nor gradient diffusion tests could reliably differentiate isolates with or without mutations in liaFSR, resulting in a 59.8% very major error rate compared to determination of genotype by BMD, 63.5% by Etest, and 68.5% by MIC test strip. Imprecision in daptomycin MIC determination for E. faecium make establishment of a revised breakpoint challenging. Clinicians should be aware of this testing variability when making treatment decisions for patients with serious infections caused by this organism.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (in combination with metronidazole) and complicated urinary tract infections. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the C/T Etest, a gradient diffusion method. C/T Etest was compared to broth microdilution (BMD) for 51 Enterobacteriaceae challenge isolates and 39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge isolates at three clinical sites. Essential agreement (EA) between the methods ranged from 47 to 49/51 (92.2 to 96.1%) for the Enterobacteriaceae, and categorical agreement (CA) ranged from 49 to 51/51 (96.1 to 100.0%). EA and CA for P. aeruginosa were 100% at all sites. The C/T Etest was also compared to BMD for susceptibility testing on 966 clinical isolates (793 Enterobacteriaceae, including 167 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 159 Escherichia coli isolates, in addition to 173 P. aeruginosa isolates) collected at four clinical sites. EA between Etest and BMD was 96.9% for Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 98.8% for P. aeruginosa isolates. Within the Enterobacteriaceae, isolates from each species examined had >96% CA. For the clinical isolates, no very major errors were identified but two major errors were found (one for K. pneumoniae and one for Providencia rettgeri). By BMD, 47.0% of Enterobacteriaceae and 46.2% of P. aeruginosa challenge strains were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria; 8.2% of clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 12.1% of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria. In conclusion, Etest is accurate and reproducible for C/T susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.

Molecular Analysis of Resistance and Detection of Non-Wild-Type Strains Using Etest Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Amphotericin B and Echinocandins for Bloodstream Candida Infections from a Tertiary Hospital in Qatar

A total of 301 Candida bloodstream isolates collected from 289 patients over 5 years at a tertiary hospital in Qatar were evaluated. Out of all Candida infections, 53% were diagnosed in patients admitted to the intensive care units. Steady increases in non-albicans Candida species were reported from 2009 to 2014 (30.2% for Candida albicans versus 69.8% for the other Candida species). Etest antifungal susceptibility testing was performed on all recovered clinical isolates to determine echinocandin (micafungin and anidulafungin) and amphotericin B susceptibilities and assess non-wild-type (non-WT) strains (strains for which MICs were above the epidemiological cutoff values). DNA sequence analysis was performed on all isolates to assess the presence of FKS mutations, which confer echinocandin resistance in Candida species. A total of 3.9% of isolates (12/301) among strains of C. albicans and C. orthopsilosis contained FKS hot spot mutations, including heterozygous mutations in FKS1 For C. tropicalis, the Etest appeared to overestimate strains non-WT for micafungin, anidulafungin, and amphotericin B, as 14%, 11%, and 35% of strains, respectively, had values above the epidemiological cutoff value. However, no FKS mutations were identified in this species. For all other species, micafungin best reported the echinocandin non-WT strains relative to the FKS genotype, as anidulafungin tended to overestimate non-wild-type strains. Besides C. tropicalis, few strains were classified as non-WT for amphotericin B.

Fosfomycin Etest for Enterobacteriaceae: Interobserver and interlaboratory agreement

OBJECTIVES

The increasing use of fosfomycin requires reliable susceptibility testing in clinical practice. The reference standard, agar dilution (AD), is rarely used in routine settings. The fosfomycin Etest (BioMérieux) is frequently used, although reading MICs can be hampered by the interpretation of the growth of macrocolonies in the inhibition zone. We investigated the interobserver (IO), interlaboratory (IL), and interobserver-interlaboratory (IOIL) agreement of the fosfomycin Etest and evaluated the agreement with AD.

METHODS

Etests were performed for 57 extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae of four bacterial species (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca and Enterobacter cloacae) in two laboratories. Photographs of fosfomycin Etests were interpreted by four observers following manufacturer's instructions.

RESULTS

Essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) between Etest and AD were 57% and 89% (κ-value 0.68), respectively, with an underestimation of Etest interpretations compared with AD of 0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.48) 2-fold dilutions. Between Etest observations, IO-EA and -CA were reached in 82% and 94% of comparisons; IL-EA and -CA in 38% and 85% of comparisons; and IOIL-EA and -CA in 40% and 85% of comparisons, respectively. Agreement of the Etest with AD and between Etests was better for E. coli than for other species. Ignoring all macrocolonies and haze during Etest interpretation improved the agreement with AD (CA κ-value 0.80) and between Etests (CA κ-value from 0.68 to 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study on 57 ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, IOIL agreement was low with an EA of 40% and a CA of 85%, affected most by IL agreement and to a lesser extent by IO agreement.

Resistance to Echinocandins in Candida Can Be Detected by Performing the Etest Directly on Blood Culture Samples

We examined the rapid evaluation of susceptibility to echinocandins in Candida spp. using the Etest performed directly on positive blood cultures and anidulafungin-containing agar plates. We prospectively collected 80 positive blood cultures (Bactec-FX system, Becton-Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD, USA) with echinocandin-susceptible Candida spp. (n = 60) and echinocandin-intermediate Candida parapsilosis (n = 20) from patients with candidemia. Additionally, blood culture bottles of nonfungemic/bacteremic patients were spiked with 35 echinocandin-resistant Candida species isolates. A total of 2 to 4 drops of medium from each bottle were stroked directly onto both RPMI 1640 agar plates with micafungin and anidulafungin Etest strips (ET_DIR) and Sabouraud agar plates containing 2 mg/liter of anidulafungin. The isolates were tested according to the EUCAST method and Etest standard (ET_SD). Essential and categorical agreement between the methods was calculated. The essential agreement and categorical agreement between the EUCAST method and ET_DIR and ET_SD were both >97.4%. The essential agreement between ET_DIR and the EUCAST method for both echinocandins was >97%. The categorical agreement between the FKS sequence and ET_DIR was 97.4%. The ET_DIR MICs of anidulafungin and micafungin (≥0.19 mg/liter and ≥0.064 mg/liter, respectively) effectively separated all susceptible FKS wild-type isolates from the resistant FKS mutant isolates. The categorical agreement (62.6%) between the EUCAST method and growth on anidulafungin-containing plates was poor, with the best agreement observed for Candida glabrata (94.2%). When performed directly on positive blood cultures from patients with candidemia, the Etest with micafungin and anidulafungin is a reliable procedure for the rapid testing of susceptibility to echinocandins in Candida species isolates.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli: comparison between Etest and a broth dilution method

Background

Campylobacter is a leading cause of foodborne gasteroenteritis worldwide. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Campylobacter spp. is not routinely performed by most clinical laboratories. However, the emergence of resistant isolates strengthens the importance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the critical need for epidemiologic surveillance. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Etest and Sensititre kit (a broth microdilution method) as methods for susceptibility tests and the critical need for epidemiologic surveillance. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Etest and Sensititre kit (a broth microdilution method) as methods for susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. to tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin.

Methods

Sixty-six Campylobacter isolates were collected from feces samples and subjected to susceptibility testing by Etest and Sensititre, a broth microdilution kit for tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) results of each method were determined and compared.

Results

Similar MIC interpretations for tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin were found in 97%, 98.5%, and 100% of the isolates, respectively, indicating a good level of agreement between Etest and Sensititre (p < 0.0001); additionally, the correlation between the two methods was highly significant for the three tested antibiotics (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Both the broth microdilution and the Etest are reliable and convenient methods for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. The Sensititre kit has the advantages of high availability and the automation.

A multicenter survey of antimicrobial susceptibility of Prevotella species as determined by Etest methodology

Knowledge about the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of different Prevotella species is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the current antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates of Prevotella species from different parts of Europe, Kuwait and Turkey. Activity of 12 antimicrobials against 508 Prevotella isolates, representing 19 species, were tested according to Etest methodology. EUCAST, CLSI and FDA guidelines were used for susceptibility interpretations. All Prevotella species were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, tigecycline and metronidazole. Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin also showed good activity. Ampicillin, clindamycin, tetracycline and moxifloxacin were less active; 51.2%, 33.7%, 36.8% and 18.3% of isolates were non-susceptible, respectively. A total of 49 (9.6%) isolates were resistant to three or more antimicrobials. Prevotella bivia was the most prevalent species (n = 118) and accounted for most of the multidrug-resistant isolates. In conclusion, the level of non-susceptibility to antimicrobials, which may be used for treatment of infections involving Prevotella species, are a cause of concern. This data emphasizes the need for species level identification of clinical Prevotella isolates and periodic monitoring of their susceptibility to guide empirical treatment.

Association of Vancomycin MIC and Molecular Characteristics with Clinical Outcomes in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Acute Hematogenous Osteoarticular Infections in Children

Strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), particularly those belonging to the USA300 pulsotype, have been well described to cause severe osteoarticular infections (OAIs). A vancomycin MIC of ≥1.5 μg/ml has been demonstrated to contribute to disease severity in adults with MRSA and even methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. Little data exist describing the outcomes of MSSA OAIs in terms of molecular characteristics and vancomycin MIC. All patients/isolates were chosen from a surveillance study at Texas Children's Hospital (TCH). S. aureus OAI isolates were identified from 2011 to 2016 and subjected to vancomycin Etests, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and PCR to determine Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) production and agr group. Two hundred fifty-two cases of S. aureus OAI were identified; 183 cases were MSSA (72.6%). During the study period, a decrease in the proportion of cases secondary to MRSA was observed, declining from 37.8% to 15.9% (P = 0.02). Of the MSSA isolates, 26.2% and 23.5% were USA300 and PVL positive, respectively. An increase in the proportion of MSSA isolates with a vancomycin MIC of ≥1.5 μg/ml occurred in the study period (P = 0.004). In MSSA, an elevated vancomycin MIC was associated with multiple surgical procedures and venous thromboses, even when adjusting for empirical β-lactam use. An increase in vancomycin MIC was noted among isolates belonging to agr group 4 during the study period. Methicillin resistance is declining among S. aureus OAI isolates at TCH. Simultaneously, vancomycin Etest MICs are increasing among MSSA isolates. Vancomycin MICs of ≥2 μg/ml are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in MSSA irrespective of antibiotic choice, suggesting that this may be a surrogate for organism virulence.

Species Identification and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of Aspergillus terreus Species Complex Clinical Isolates from a French Multicenter Study

Aspergillus section Terrei is a species complex currently comprised of 14 cryptic species whose prevalence in clinical samples as well as antifungal susceptibility are poorly known. The aims of this study were to investigate A. Terrei clinical isolates at the species level and to perform antifungal susceptibility analyses by reference and commercial methods. Eighty-two clinical A. Terrei isolates were collected from 8 French university hospitals. Molecular identification was performed by sequencing parts of beta-tubulin and calmodulin genes. MICs or minimum effective concentrations (MECs) were determined for 8 antifungal drugs using both EUCAST broth microdilution (BMD) methods and concentration gradient strips (CGS). Among the 79 A. Terrei isolates, A. terreus stricto sensu (n = 61), A. citrinoterreus (n = 13), A. hortai (n = 3), and A. alabamensis (n = 2) were identified. All strains had MICs of ≥1 mg/liter for amphotericin B, except for two isolates (both A. hortai) that had MICs of 0.25 mg/liter. Four A. terreus isolates were resistant to at least one azole drug, including one with pan-azole resistance, yet no mutation in the CYP51A gene was found. All strains had low MECs for the three echinocandins. The essential agreements (EAs) between BMD and CGS were >90%, except for those of amphotericin B (79.7%) and itraconazole (73.4%). Isolates belonging to the A section Terrei identified in clinical samples show wider species diversity beyond the known A. terreus sensu stricto Azole resistance inside the section Terrei is uncommon and is not related to CYP51A mutations here. Finally, CGS is an interesting alternative for routine antifungal susceptibility testing.

Posaconazole MIC Distributions for Aspergillus fumigatus Species Complex by Four Methods: Impact of cyp51A Mutations on Estimation of Epidemiological Cutoff Values

Estimating epidemiological cutoff endpoints (ECVs/ECOFFS) may be hindered by the overlap of MICs for mutant and nonmutant strains (strains harboring or not harboring mutations, respectively). Posaconazole MIC distributions for the Aspergillus fumigatus species complex were collected from 26 laboratories (in Australia, Canada, Europe, India, South and North America, and Taiwan) and published studies. Distributions that fulfilled CLSI criteria were pooled and ECVs were estimated. The sensitivity of three ECV analytical techniques (the ECOFFinder, normalized resistance interpretation [NRI], derivatization methods) to the inclusion of MICs for mutants was examined for three susceptibility testing methods (the CLSI, EUCAST, and Etest methods). The totals of posaconazole MICs for nonmutant isolates (isolates with no known cyp51A mutations) and mutant A. fumigatus isolates were as follows: by the CLSI method, 2,223 and 274, respectively; by the EUCAST method, 556 and 52, respectively; and by Etest, 1,365 and 29, respectively. MICs for 381 isolates with unknown mutational status were also evaluated with the Sensititre YeastOne system (SYO). We observed an overlap in posaconazole MICs among nonmutants and cyp51A mutants. At the commonly chosen percentage of the modeled wild-type population (97.5%), almost all ECVs remained the same when the MICs for nonmutant and mutant distributions were merged: ECOFFinder ECVs, 0.5 μg/ml for the CLSI method and 0.25 μg/ml for the EUCAST method and Etest; NRI ECVs, 0.5 μg/ml for all three methods. However, the ECOFFinder ECV for 95% of the nonmutant population by the CLSI method was 0.25 μg/ml. The tentative ECOFFinder ECV with SYO was 0.06 μg/ml (data from 3/8 laboratories). Derivatization ECVs with or without mutant inclusion were either 0.25 μg/ml (CLSI, EUCAST, Etest) or 0.06 μg/ml (SYO). It appears that ECV analytical techniques may not be vulnerable to overlap between presumptive wild-type isolates and cyp51A mutants when up to 11.6% of the estimated wild-type population includes mutants.

Determination of Elizabethkingia Diversity by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and Whole-Genome Sequencing

In a hospital-acquired infection with multidrug-resistant Elizabethkingia, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA gene analysis identified the pathogen as Elizabethkingia miricola. Whole-genome sequencing, genus-level core genome analysis, and in silico DNA-DNA hybridization of 35 Elizabethkingia strains indicated that the species taxonomy should be further explored.

Performance of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Etest, MIC Test Strips, and Disk Diffusion Compared to Reference Broth Microdilution for β-Lactam-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates

The performance characteristics of the ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), MIC test strips (MTS; Liofilchem, Italy), and disk diffusion (Hardy, Santa Ana, CA) were evaluated for a collection of 308 beta-lactam-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa recovered from three institutions in Los Angeles, CA. Reference testing was performed by the reference broth microdilution (rBMD) method. MIC and disk results were interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Overall, 72.5% of the isolates were susceptible to C-T by rBMD. Etest and disk diffusion demonstrated acceptable performance, whereas MTS yielded a greater than acceptable percentage of minor errors. Categorical agreement was 96.8% for Etest, 87.0% for MTS, and 92.9% for disk diffusion. No very major errors were observed by any test, and no major errors (ME) were observed by Etest or disk diffusion. Two ME (0.9% of susceptible isolates) were observed by MTS. The incidence of minor errors was 3.2%, 12.3%, and 7.1% for Etest, MTS, and disk diffusion, respectively. Essential agreement (EA) for Etest was excellent, at 97.7%, whereas the MICs obtained by MTS tended to be 1 to 2 dilutions higher than those obtained by rBMD, with an EA of 87.0%.

Invasive Infections with Multidrug-Resistant Yeast Candida auris, Colombia

Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungus that causes a wide range of symptoms. We report finding 17 cases of C. auris infection that were originally misclassified but correctly identified 27.5 days later on average. Patients with a delayed diagnosis of C. auris had a 30-day mortality rate of 35.2%.

Verification of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing Methods against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are newly approved agents for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance to both agents has been described clinically. Susceptibility testing on automated systems is unavailable for either agent. Our objective was to compare the disk diffusion and Etest methods to standard broth microdilution (BMD) methods for testing ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against a diverse collection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRP) isolates, respectively. Among 74 ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible and -resistant CRE isolates, BMD categorical agreement was higher with Etest (96%) than with disk diffusion (72%; P = 0.0003). Twenty-eight percent of ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible CRE isolates were classified as resistant by disk diffusion. Results were comparable to those obtained with resistance defined genotypically. Among 72 ceftolozane-tazobactam-susceptible and -resistant CRP isolates, the levels of BMD categorical agreement with disk diffusion and Etest were 94% and 96%, respectively; the only errors identified were minor. Our findings demonstrate that Etest measurements of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam susceptibility correlate closely with standard BMD methods, suggesting a useful role clinically. On the other hand, disk diffusion measurements overcalled CRE resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam. A better understanding of ceftazidime-avibactam interpretive breakpoints is needed before disk diffusion is used routinely in the clinic. Until clinicians and microbiologists understand Etest and disk diffusion performance at their centers, test results should be interpreted cautiously.