Incidental findings on staging rectal MRI: clinical significance and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Incidental findings (IFs) are commonly seen in staging rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Their prevalence and clinical significance have not been previously documented.

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence, clinical significance, and outcomes of incidental findings in MRI scans performed for the staging of rectal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed at a tertiary colorectal imaging institution. Consecutive MRI rectal staging scans with correlative pathology confirmed primary rectal cancer between March 2014 and March 2021 were identified. The respective imaging reports were reviewed for IFs, which were classified as high, moderate, and low, according to their clinical significance. Medical records were reviewed to assess the outcomes of the highly significant IFs.

RESULTS

There were 266 eligible patients (97 women; mean age = 64.2 years) during the study period. A total of 120 (45%) patients did not have any IFs. A total of 238 IFs in 146 (55%) patients were found. There were 21 (9%) IFs of high clinical significance, 122 (51%) of moderate clinical significance, and 95 (40%) of low clinical significance. The prostate and uterus had the most IFs of high clinical significance, two of which were subsequently pathology confirmed as prostate adenocarcinomas.

CONCLUSION

IFs were seen in more than half of the staging MRI scans in rectal cancer but less than 10% of these were of high clinical significance. The results of this study highlight the range of potential IFs and can guide future research assessing the potential impact of these IFs on patients and the healthcare system.

Incidental Findings in CT Scans on Screening for COVID-19

Incidentalomas on computed tomography (CT) scans are incidental or unsuspected findings that are detected when obtaining a CT examination for an unrelated reason. Incidentalomas on CT scans are common. This study was conducted to examine the rates of incidental findings on CT chest in patients who were screened for COVID-19. Three thousand one hundred ninety-one CT scans were assessed for incidental findings. These CT scans were taken from an urban diagnostics laboratory in Hyderabad (IN) over a period of 2 months (April to May 2021) when the COVID-19 s wave peaked. Data from these reports were tabulated with demographic information and findings. Out of 3191 scans, 277 (8.68%) showed incidental findings, the most common of which was lung nodules and other individual findings. There were 6 total malignancies detected and a further 92 cases that required follow-up. CT scans are important for the detection of incidental findings. Care should be taken to follow up on patients with incidental findings that are undetermined to catch a lesion in the early stage.

Prevalence and significance of incidental findings on 68 Ga-DOTA-conjugated somatostatin receptor-targeting peptide PET/CT: a systematic review of the literature

Aim

We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of incidental ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-conjugated somatostatin receptor-targeting peptide PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) findings, their clinical significance in the need for follow-up, and their risk of malignancy.

Materials and methods

Studies reporting incidental SSTR PET/CT findings were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science literature published prior to 1^st of May 2020. Studies were filtered by two independent readers for eligibility based on title and abstract, and subsequently on full text. The main exclusion criteria were: 1) pathological findings that matched scan indication, 2) known organ specific disease and/or incidental findings confirmed on other scan modality prior to SSTR PET/CT, 3) lack of diagnosis and/or follow up, and 4) results published in proceedings or conference abstracts.

Results

Twenty-one studies, comprising a total of 2906 subjects, were eligible for the analysis. Studies included were retrospective cohort studies on incidental SSTR PET/CT findings in a specific organ (n = 2888, 7/21) or case reports (n = 18, 14/21). A total of 133 subjects had incidental SSTR PET/CT findings. Incidental findings were predominantly seen in the thyroid gland (n = 65), spine (n = 30), brain (n = 26) and breast (n = 6). Seventeen of 133 (13%) incidental findings were malignant on final diagnosis. Incidental breast findings were associated with the highest risk of malignancy (67%). In the thyroid, incidental SSTR uptake was caused by malignancy in 8%, all presenting as focal uptake. The lowest risk was seen in the spine with a malignancy rate of 3% in patients with incidental SSTR uptake and benign cases were interpreted as vertebral hemangiomas on CT. Incidental SSTR PET/CT findings in other locations were of malignant etiology in two out of six cases (33%) and should be evaluated individually.

Conclusion

The most incidental SSTR PET/CT findings were found in the thyroid gland, spine, and brain. The risk of malignancy was greatest in incidental SSTR PET/CT findings in the breast, cranially, and thyroid gland. The results of the present study can prove useful in the interpretation of atypical findings on SSTR PET/CT and in the counseling of clinicians.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-022-00484-0.

Incidentalomas of the female genital tract on 64-slice MDCT: a clinico-radiological pictorial review

Sonography is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing diseases of the female genital tract due to its high resolution, easy availability, low cost and lack of radiation. CT is not advocated for the primary evaluation of the female pelvis. However, with the advent of Multidetector CT (MDCT), females of all ages undergo CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis for myriad non-gynaecological diseases, e.g. subacute intestinal obstruction, abdominal lump, abdominal tuberculosis, appendicitis, ureteric colic, pancreatitis, oncological staging, follow-up, etc. Incidental female genital tract disorders were seen on these scans that are a dilemma for both, the radiologists and the clinicians. The objective of this pictorial review is to characterise the incidentally detected lesions of the female genital tract observed on 64-slice MDCT by correlating with sonography, if necessary, and establishing a clinico-radiological diagnosis. Our aim is to emphasise that the radiologist may be the first person to recognise a gynaecologic disorder and hence can play a significant role in patient management.

The prevalence of pancreatic incidentalomas in patients undergoing surveillance for abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Serial imaging in patients with aortic aneurysms may identify non-vascular disease. However, the prevalence and clinical history of pancreatic incidentalomas in this population is unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study of adults who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) surveillance imaging for abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm at a single academic institution between 2015 and 2020. Descriptive statistics were used for patients with pancreatic lesions.

RESULTS

Of 249 patients, 18 (7.2 %) had a pancreatic incidentaloma. Compared to patients without a lesion, those with a lesion were more likely female (50.0 % vs 24.2 %, p = 0.02) and less likely a smoker (72.2 % vs 90.0 %, p = 0.02). 3 patients with pancreatic lesions underwent intervention, and 1 patient received additional imaging. 2 patients had a surgical oncology referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic incidentalomas are common in patients with aortic aneurysm, but lesion characteristics and management vary. Results suggest that a multi-disciplinary approach, thorough documentation, and referral to pancreatic specialists may be warranted.

Adherence to guidelines for hormonal evaluation in patients with incidentally detected adrenal nodules: effects of radiology report wording and standardized reporting

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rates of hormonal evaluation in patients who had CT reports describing adrenal incidentalomas with and without a specific recommendation for hormonal evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of adult outpatients without a history of cancer who had a CT report describing an incidental adrenal nodule. Radiology reports were reviewed to determine whether a standardized macro was used which gave specific recommendations for hormonal evaluation and endocrinology consultation. If no macro was used it was determined whether the report had a recommendation for hormonal evaluation and endocrinology consultation.

RESULTS

A standardized macro recommending hormonal evaluation and endocrinology referral was used in 45/129 (34.8%) reports that described an incidental adrenal nodule. A recommendation for hormonal evaluation was made in 5/84 (6.0%) reports without a macro. Hormonal evaluation was performed in 24/50 (48.0%) patients whose reports recommended it and in 11/79 (13.9%) patients whose reports did not (p < 0.0001). A recommendation for endocrinology referral was made in 2/84 (2.4%) reports without a macro. Patients were seen by endocrinology in 12/47 (25.5%) patients whose reports recommended an endocrinology referral evaluation and 5/82 (6.1%) patients whose reports did not (p < 0.0001). Hormonal evaluation was performed in 17/17 (100%) patients who were seen by endocrinology and 18/112 (16.1%) patients who were not (p < 0.0001). Eleven patients (8.5%) had an evaluation suggesting hyperfunctioning nodules (4 cortisol producing, 6 aldosterone producing, and 1 pheochromocytoma).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing standardized macros that make specific recommendations for hormonal evaluation in patients with adrenal incidentalomas leads to improved adherence to clinical guidelines.

Management of incidental brain tumors in children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Due to technical advancements and availability of neuroimaging, detection of incidental pediatric brain tumors (IPBT) is growing rapidly. The management of these asymptomatic lesions remains unclear; radiological, pathological, and clinical risk factors for further growth and malignant transformation (MT) are not well defined.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature on the dilemmas and management of IPBT suggestive of a low-grade brain tumor (LGBT). Keyword searches of the PubMed and Medline (NCBI) databases identified studies on IPBT describing the prevalence, neuroimaging, management, or risk of MT through July 2019. References of the identified articles were also reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 2021 records were screened. Fifty-nine full-text articles were reviewed, and 34 published studies were included. IPBT are diagnosed in 0.2-5.7% of children undergoing brain imaging for various reasons. The accepted approach for management of lesions showing radiological characteristics suggestive of LGBT is radiological follow-up. The rate at which additional intervention is required during follow-up for these apparently low-grade lesions is 9.5%. Nevertheless, the dilemma of early surgical resection or biopsy vs. clinical and radiological follow-up of IPBT is still unresolved. The risk in these cases is missing a transformation to a higher grade tumor. However, MT of pediatric LGBT is very rare, occurring in less than 3% of the cases of proven low-grade gliomas in children. The risk of future MT in pediatric low-grade gliomas seems to be greater in the presence of specific molecular markers such as BRAF V-600E, CDKN2A, and H3F3A K27M.

CONCLUSIONS

The natural history, management, and prognosis of IPBT remain ambiguous. It seems that lesions suggestive of LGBT can initially be followed, since many of these lesions remain stable over time and MT is rare. However, controversy among centers concerning the ideal approach still exists. Further observational and prospective cohort studies, focusing on potential clinical and radiological characteristics or risk factors suggestive of high-grade tumors, tumor progress, or MT of IPBT, are needed.

Glucose metabolism disorders in patients with adrenal gland disorders: pathophysiology and management

The aim of this review is to explore and discuss disorders of glucose metabolism that can arise in individuals with adrenal gland disorders, as well as to enumerate the available therapeutic treatments for these while considering their benefits and drawbacks. Hyperfunctioning adrenal glands, as in hypercortisolism, hyperaldosteronism, and malignancy, or hypofunctioning of adrenal glands, as in adrenal insufficiency, can lead to carbohydrate metabolism dysregulation with subsequent glucometabolic repercussions, either hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. Glycemic disorders further affect patients' quality of life and represent a therapeutic dilemma for physicians. Current management strategies for glycemic dysregulation in individuals with adrenal gland disorders are fighting the underlying causes, as well as utilizing antidiabetic therapies that aid in maintaining euglycemia. Further research focused on discovering drug preparations of greater accuracy and effectiveness tailored to patients with adrenal problems as well as studies investigating optimal lifestyle management models for these individuals will assist towards achieving optimal regulation of glucose metabolism.

Pediatric posterior fossa incidentalomas

PURPOSE

Pediatric brain incidentalomas are increasingly being diagnosed. As the posterior fossa (PF) is the location of most brain tumors in children, lesions of this region are of special interest. Currently, the natural history of incidental lesions in the PF is unknown. We present our experience treating such lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out in two large tertiary pediatric centers. Patients were included if they had an incidental PF lesion suspected of being a tumor, and diagnosed before the age of 20 years. We analyzed treatment strategy, pathology, and outcome of operated and non-operated cases.

RESULTS

Seventy children (31 females) with a mean age of 8.4 ± 6.1 years were included. The three most common indications for imaging were headaches (16, assumed to be unrelated to the lesions), workup of unrelated conditions (14), and unspecified reasons (14). Twenty-seven patients (39%) were operated immediately, and 43 followed, of which 12 were eventually operated due to radiological changes, 28.9 ± 16.2 months after diagnosis. The most commonly found pathology was pilocytic astrocytomas (21 of 39 operated cases). Almost 10% were found to be malignant tumors including medulloblastomas (5) and ATRT (1).

CONCLUSION

Incidental PF lesions in children include both benign and malignant tumors. While certain lesions may be followed, others may require surgical treatment. Specific treatment decisions are based on initial radiological appearance, change in radiological characteristics over time, location, and evolving symptoms. The surgical risks must be balanced vis-à-vis the risk of missing a high-grade tumor and the very rare risk of malignant transformation.

Prevalence, documentation, and communication of incidental findings in focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examinations

BACKGROUND

As the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination becomes increasingly ubiquitous in the emergency department (ED), a parallel increase in incidental findings can also be expected. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, documentation, and communication of incidental findings on emergency physician-performed FAST examinations.

METHODS

Retrospective review at two academic EDs. Adult trauma patients undergoing FAST examinations used for clinical decision-making at the bedside were identified from an ED ultrasound image archival system. Expert sonologists reviewed ultrasound images for incidental findings, as well as electronic medical records for demographic information, mechanism of injury, type of incidental findings, documentation of incidental findings, and communication of incidental findings to the patient.

RESULTS

A total of 1,452 FAST examinations were reviewed. One hundred and thirty-seven patients with incidental findings were identified (9.4%); 7 patients had an additional incidental finding. Renal cysts were most common (49/144, 34.0%), followed by pelvic cysts in women (32/144, 22.2%). While 31/144 (21.5%) incidental findings were identified and documented in the ultrasound reports or medical records by ED providers, only 6/137 (4.4%) patients were noted to be informed of their incidental findings.

CONCLUSION

Incidental findings were often encountered in FAST examinations, with cysts of the kidneys and pelvis being the most common findings. A vast majority of incidental findings were not documented or noted to be communicated to patients, which can be a barrier to follow-up care.

Incidentalomas in Spine and Spinal Cord Imaging

Incidentalomas are common in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine. These incidental findings (IFs) can be seen involving the spinal cord, nerve root, vertebral body, posterior arch and the extraspinal region. This review article describes the imaging findings, stratifies the IFs similar to the computed tomography (CT) colonography reporting and data system and briefly mentions the current recommendations for further evaluation and management of IFs. Radiologists are the first to detect these lesions, suggest further evaluation and management of IFs. It is therefore mandatory for them to be aware of recommendations in clinical practice in order to avoid increased patient anxiety, excessive healthcare expenditure and inadvertent therapeutic procedures.

[Overdiagnosis in cancer]

Overdiagnosis of cancer is the detection of asymptomatic cancers that do not grow or they are growing with such slowness, that they would never have caused medical problems in the patient during the course of their life. Often they are tumours that are detected through population screenings but also in the clinical context due to incidental findings from image tests with advanced technology. Some of these tumours could even disappear spontaneously without treatment. The patient may die as a result of another disease before the cancer has caused symptoms. For that reason, the diagnosis of these tumours is an important cause of over-treatment, which can include serious risks and toxicity. Although overdiagnosis can occur in any disease, it is more relevant in the case of cancer.

Epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of non-functioning pituitary adenomas

PURPOSE

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are benign pituitary neoplasms that do not cause a hormonal hypersecretory syndrome. An improved understanding of their epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis is needed.

METHOD

A literature review was performed using Pubmed to identify research reports and clinical case series on NFPAs.

RESULTS

They account for 14-54% of pituitary adenomas and have a prevalence of 7-41.3/100,000 population. Their standardized incidence rate is 0.65-2.34/100,000 and the peak occurence is from the fourth to the eighth decade. The clinical spectrum of NFPAs varies from being completely asymptomatic to causing significant hypothalamic/pituitary dysfunction and visual field compromise due to their large size. Most patients present with symptoms of mass effect, such as headaches, visual field defects, ophthalmoplegias, and hypopituitarism but also hyperprolactinaemia due to pituitary stalk deviation and less frequently pituitary apoplexy. Non-functioning pituitary incidentalomas are found on brain imaging performed for an unrelated reason. Diagnostic approach includes magnetic resonance imaging of the sellar region, laboratory evaluations, screening for hormone hypersecretion and for hypopituitarism, and a visual field examination if the lesion abuts the optic nerves or chiasm.

CONCLUSION

This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical behaviour and diagnostic approach of non-functioning pituitary adenomas.

Incidence and Economic Impact of Incidental Findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging

PURPOSE

The study sought to determine the incidence of incidental findings on whole-body positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging and the average costs of investigations to follow-up or further characterize incidental findings.

METHODS

Imaging reports of 215 patients who underwent whole-body PET/CT imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Our provincial picture archiving and communication system was queried and patient charts were reviewed to identify all investigations performed to follow-up incidental findings within 1 year of the initial PET/CT study. Costs of follow-up imaging studies (professional and technical components) and other diagnostic tests and procedures were determined in Canadian dollars (CAD) and U.S. dollars (USD) using the 2015 Ontario Health Insurance Plan Schedule of Benefits and Fees and 2016 U.S. Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, respectively.

RESULTS

At least 1 incidental finding was reported in 161 reports (74.9%). The mean number of incidental findings ranged from 0.64 in patients <45 years of age to 2.2 in patients 75 years of age and older. Seventy-five recommendations for additional investigations were made for 64 (30%) patients undergoing PET/CT imaging, and 14 of those were carried out specifically to follow-up incidental findings. Averaged across all 215 patients, the total cost of investigations recommended to follow-up incidental findings was CAD$105.51 (USD$127.56) per PET/CT study if all recommendations were acted on, and CAD$22.77 (USD$29.14) based on investigations actually performed.

CONCLUSIONS

As the incidence of incidental findings increases with age and a larger proportion of elderly patients is expected as population demographics change, it will be increasingly important to consider incidental findings on PET/CT imaging with standardized approaches to follow-up.

Malignant transformation of a conservatively managed incidental childhood cerebral mass lesion: controversy regarding management paradigm

BACKGROUND

Incidental findings on neuroimaging in the pediatric population are an emerging treatment challenge. Treatment options for these incidental childhood brain mass lesions, which radiologically may be assumed to be low-grade gliomas (LGG), vary, ranging from careful conservative "wait and scan" treatment to surgical biopsy, gross total resection, and upfront radiation and/or chemotherapy. As malignant transformation of LGG in children is extremely rare, some series advocate careful conservative management of these lesions; however, universal treatment protocols are not totally agreed upon.

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

We present the case of a 10-year-old boy with a fronto-basal incidental cerebral mass lesion, suspected to be a low-grade glial neoplasm. Initially, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to rule out a pathology causing his growth to be delayed. A treatment with growth hormone was initiated. After close clinical and radiological follow-up of this asymptomatic lesion for 6 years, a minimal growth of the lesion was seen, which we decided to continue following. After 7 years, a clear growth with new contrast enhancement was seen on routine MRI. At this point, the lesion was surgically resected. The diagnosis was, surprisingly, glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV, BRAF V-600E mutation).

DISCUSSION

Malignant transformation of LGGs in children is a very rare phenomenon. This is to our knowledge the first well-documented case describing malignant transformation of a suspected benign pediatric cerebral mass lesion, which did not undergo radiation, in a patient without a cancer predisposition syndrome (e.g., neurofibromatosis), with the transformation occurring after such a long follow-up period. The management of these lesions is still controversial. Unfortunately, radiological risk factors for malignant transformation of such lesions in the pediatric age group are lacking.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment of incidental cerebral mass lesions in children seems a valid option. These lesions should probably be followed indefinitely, while carefully watching for changes in imaging characteristics.

Pituitary incidentalomas: A guide to assessment, treatment and follow-up

Pituitary incidentalomas are lesions which are detected incidentally in the pituitary gland during imaging procedures for unrelated causes, such as headache, trauma or symptoms involving the neck or central nervous system. The wide application of sensitive brain imaging techniques (CT, MRI) has led to an increasing recognition of such lesions. Although the etiology of pituitary incidentalomas covers a wide range of pathologies, most of them (∼90%) are benign adenomas; nonetheless, they may result in visual and/or neurologic abnormalities. By definition, micro-incidentalomas have maximum diameter of less than 1cm, while macro-incidentalomas are at least 1cm. Micro-incidentalomas have a reported mean prevalence in normal individuals of around 10%. The endocrinologist facing a pituitary incidentaloma has to solve two main diagnostic problems: (i) the nature and extent of the lesion, and (ii) whether hormonal excess or deficits result from the lesion. The former is achieved by the use of pituitary MRI and visual field (VF) examination and the latter by basal or dynamic hormonal assessments. The answers to these two questions will guide the treatment and follow-up. VF deficits or neurological disturbances due to compression of the optic chiasm or nerve by the incidentaloma are the strongest recommendations for surgery. Furthermore, hormonally active incidentalomas, with the exception of prolactinomas, should be treated by surgery. Most cases of pituitary incidentalomas do not meet criteria for surgical excision, but may require follow-up. The follow-up strategy consists of clinical evaluation, pituitary MRI, VF examination and hormonal assessments. Macro-incidentalomas require more extensive initial investigation, as well as closer MRI surveillance, than micro-incidentalomas. Diagnostic, treatment and follow-up strategies should be in alignment with the optimal personalized clinical benefit.

Adrenal incidentalomas: A guide to assessment, treatment and follow-up

Adrenal incidentalomas are clinically unsuspected lesions that are detected in adrenal glands during imaging procedures for other causes. With widespread use of imaging - both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - adrenal incidentalomas are now a common clinical problem. The two main clinical issues to be determined in this setting are the risk of malignancy and the hormonal activity of these lesions. The answers to these two questions, along with the clinical characteristics of each individual patient and co-morbidities, will guide the treatment strategy, which can vary from simple follow-up to surgical resection. The objective of this article is to present updated information on the definition, prevalence, imaging and functional features of adrenal incidentalomas and to provide a guide to their optimal assessment, treatment and follow-up. This review collected, analyzed and qualitatively re-synthesized information regarding: (1) the various clinical entities known as "adrenal incidentalomas", (2) the initial assessment of risk of malignancy, (3) the initial assessment of whether the lesion is hormonally active or non-functioning, (4) the absolute and relative indications for surgical treatment, (5) the follow-up of patients who are not deemed to need surgical treatment after initial assessment, and (6) the post-operative follow-up of patients who undergo surgical treatment. The evidence calls for clinicians to bear in mind the Hippocratian advice "ωϕελέειν ή μη βλάπτειν" ("first do no harm").

Collateral findings during computed tomography scan for atrial fibrillation ablation: Let’s take a look around

The growing number of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation procedures warranted the development of advanced cardiac mapping techniques, such as image integration between electroanatomical map and cardiac computed tomography. While scanning the chest before catheter ablation, it is frequent to detect cardiac and extracardiac collateral findings. Most collateral findings are promptly recognized as benign and do not require further attention. However, sometimes clinically relevant collateral findings are detected, which often warrant extra diagnostic examinations or even invasive procedure, and sometimes need to be followed-up over time. Even though reporting and further investigating collateral findings has not shown a clear survival benefit, almost all the working groups providing data on collateral findings reported some collateral findings eventually coming out to be malignancies, sometimes at an early stage. Therefore, there is currently no clear agreement about the right strategy to be followed.

Parathyroid incidentaloma

Incidentalomas are lesions which are asymptomatic and detected incidently during imaging or surgery. Parathyroid incidentalomas are a rare entity. Enlargement of gland without hyperfunction may be an early stage of disease. Symptomatology is usually non-specific or related to renal and skeletal system. Total serum calcium estimation may be used as a screening modality. Sestamibi scan is a more accurate imaging technique than USG. FNAB - PTH measurement is the most reliable minimally invasive nonsurgical test for parathyroid tissue verification. Incidently discovered enlarged parathyroid gland may be removed to avoid a re-do surgery.