1
|
Marques AC, Lidon FC, Coelho ARF, Pessoa CC, Daccak D, Luís IC, Simões M, Scotti-Campos P, Almeida AS, Guerra M, Leitão RG, Bagulho A, Moreira J, Pessoa MF, Legoinha P, Ramalho JC, Semedo JN, Palha L, Silva C, Silva MM, Oliveira K, Pais IP, Reboredo FH. Elemental Composition and Implications on Brown Rice Flour Biofortified with Selenium. Plants (Basel) 2023; 12:1611. [PMID: 37111835 PMCID: PMC10140823 DOI: 10.3390/plants12081611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most economically and socially important cereals in the world. Several strategies such as biofortification have been developed in a way eco-friendly and sustainable to enhance crop productivity. This study implemented an agronomic itinerary in Ariete and Ceres rice varieties in experimental fields using the foliar application of selenium (Se) to increase rice nutritional value. At strategic phases of the plant's development (at the end of booting, anthesis, and at the milky grain stage), they were sprayed with sodium selenate (Na2SeO4) and sodium selenite (Na2SeO3). In the first foliar application plants were sprayed with 500 g Se·ha-1 and in the remaining two foliar applications were sprayed with 300 g Se·ha-1. The effects of Se in the level of micro and macronutrients in brown grains, the localization of Se in these grains, and the subsequent quality parameters such as colorimetric characteristics and total protein were considered. After grain harvesting, the application of selenite showed the highest enrichment in all grain with levels reaching 17.06 µg g-1 Se and 14.28 µg g-1 Se in Ariete and Ceres varieties, respectively. In the Ceres and Ariete varieties, biofortification significantly affected the K and P contents. Regarding Ca, a clear trend prevailed suggesting that Se antagonizes the uptake of it, while for the remaining elements in general (except Mn) no significant differences were noted. Protein content increased with selenite treatment in the Ariete variety but not in Ceres. Therefore, it was possible to conclude, without compromising quality, that there was an increase in the nutritional content of Se in brown rice grain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Coelho Marques
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Fernando C. Lidon
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Ana Rita F. Coelho
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Cláudia Campos Pessoa
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Diana Daccak
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Inês Carmo Luís
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Manuela Simões
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Paula Scotti-Campos
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Ana Sofia Almeida
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Estrada de Gil Vaz 6, 7351-901 Elvas, Portugal
| | - Mauro Guerra
- LIBPhys, Physics Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal (R.G.L.)
| | - Roberta G. Leitão
- LIBPhys, Physics Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal (R.G.L.)
| | - Ana Bagulho
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Estrada de Gil Vaz 6, 7351-901 Elvas, Portugal
| | - José Moreira
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Estrada de Gil Vaz 6, 7351-901 Elvas, Portugal
| | - Maria F. Pessoa
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Paulo Legoinha
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - José C. Ramalho
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Associate Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior Agronomia (ISA), Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 2784-505 Oeiras, Portugal
- PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Associate Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior Agronomia (ISA), Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - José N. Semedo
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Lourenço Palha
- Centro de Competências do Arroz (COTARROZ), 2120-014 Salvaterra de Magos, Portugal (C.S.)
| | - Cátia Silva
- Centro de Competências do Arroz (COTARROZ), 2120-014 Salvaterra de Magos, Portugal (C.S.)
| | - Maria Manuela Silva
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Karliana Oliveira
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Isabel P. Pais
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Fernando H. Reboredo
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Antoshkina M, Golubkina N, Poluboyarinov P, Skrypnik L, Sekara A, Tallarita A, Caruso G. Effect of Sodium Selenate and Selenocystine on Savoy Cabbage Yield, Morphological and Biochemical Characteristics under Chlorella Supply. Plants (Basel) 2023; 12:1020. [PMID: 36903880 PMCID: PMC10005640 DOI: 10.3390/plants12051020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Biofortification of Brassica oleracea with selenium (Se) is highly valuable both for human Se status optimization and functional food production with direct anti-carcinogenic activity. To assess the effects of organic and inorganic Se supply for biofortifying Brassica representatives, foliar applications of sodium selenate and selenocystine (SeCys2) were performed on Savoy cabbage treated with the growth stimulator microalgae Chlorella. Compared to sodium selenate, SeCys2 exerted a stronger growth stimulation of heads (1.3 against 1.14 times) and an increase of leaf concentration of chlorophyll (1.56 against 1.2 times) and ascorbic acid (1.37 against 1.27 times). Head density was reduced by 1.22 times by foliar application of sodium selenate and by 1.58 times by SeCys2. Despite the greater growth stimulation effect of SeCys2, its application resulted in lower biofortification levels (2.9 times) compared to sodium selenate (11.6 times). Se concentration decreased according to the following sequence: leaves > roots > head. The antioxidant activity (AOA) was higher in water extracts compared to the ethanol ones in the heads, but the opposite trend was recorded in the leaves. Chlorella supply significantly increased the efficiency of biofortification with sodium selenate (by 1.57 times) but had no effect in the case of SeCys2 application. Positive correlations were found between leaf and head weight (r = 0.621); head weight and Se content under selenate supply (r = 0.897-0.954); leaf ascorbic acid and total yield (r = 0.559), and chlorophyll (r = +0.83-0.89). Significant varietal differences were recorded for all the parameters examined. The broad comparison performed between the effects of selenate and SeCys2 showed significant genetic differences as well as important peculiarities connected with the Se chemical form and its complex interaction with Chlorella treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Antoshkina
- Analytical Laboratory Department, Federal Scientific Vegetable Center, 143072 Moscow, Russia
| | - Nadezhda Golubkina
- Analytical Laboratory Department, Federal Scientific Vegetable Center, 143072 Moscow, Russia
| | - Pavel Poluboyarinov
- Medical Faculty, Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Penza State University, 440026 Penza, Russia
| | - Liubov Skrypnik
- Institute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236040 Kaliningrad, Russia
| | - Agnieszka Sekara
- Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
| | - Alessio Tallarita
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Caruso
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang K, Yuan Y, Luo X, Shen Z, Huang Y, Zhou H, Gao X. Effects of exogenous selenium application on nutritional quality and metabolomic characteristics of mung bean ( Vigna radiata L.). Front Plant Sci 2022; 13:961447. [PMID: 36061759 PMCID: PMC9433778 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.961447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Selenium (Se) biofortification is an important strategy for reducing hidden hunger by increasing the nutritional quality of crops. However, there is limited metabolomic information on the nutritional quality of Se-enriched mung beans. In this study, physiological assays and LC-MS/MS based widely targeted metabolomics approach was employed to reveal the Se biofortification potential of mung bean by evaluating the effect of Se on mung bean nutraceutical compounds and their qualitative parameters. Physiological data showed that foliar application of 30 g ha-1 Se at key growth stages significantly increased the content of Se, protein, fat, total phenols, and total flavonoids content in two mung bean varieties. Widely targeted metabolomics identified 1,080 metabolites, among which L-Alanyl-L-leucine, 9,10-Dihydroxy-12,13-epoxyoctadecanoic acid, and 1-caffeoylquinic acid could serve as biomarkers for identifying highly nutritious mung bean varieties. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the metabolic pathways of different metabolites were different in the Se-enriched mung bean. Specifically, P1 was mainly enriched in the linoleic acid metabolic pathway, while P2 was mainly enriched in the phosphonate and phosphinate metabolic pathways. Overall, these results revealed the specific Se enrichment mechanism of different mung bean varieties. This study provides new insights into the comprehensive improvement of the nutritional quality of mung beans.
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang J, Qian J, Wang S, Li Y, Zhai X, Olajide TM, Shen GX, Liao X. Effect of selenium biofortification on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in germinated black soybean. J Food Sci 2022; 87:1009-1019. [PMID: 35122243 DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Biofortification using inorganic selenium has become an effective strategy to enhance selenium content in crops. In the present study, the effects of selenium biofortification on the chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of black soybean (BS) during germination were studied. The contents of selenium, total sugar, vitamin C, γ-aminobutyric acid, total polyphenols, and total flavonoids in selenium biofortified germinated black soybeans (GBS-Se) significantly increased compared to germinated black soybeans (GBS). However, the contents of soluble protein, fat, and reducing sugar were decreased, while fatty acid composition was not significantly different between GBS and BS. HPLC analysis showed that 12 phenolic acids of all samples, which mainly existed in free forms. Their contents increased at low concentration of selenium and decreased along with the rise of selenium concentrations. The antioxidant activity of GBS-Se as analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis positively correlated with the accumulation of phenolic substances. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that GBS and GBS-Se were significantly different from BS. Moreover, the physicochemical indexes of GBS showed regularly changes with increasing selenium content, and those of GBS-Se50 and GBS-Se75 were significantly different from GBS. The results provide a systematic evaluation on the effect of selenium fortification on the germination of seeds and useful information for the development of Se-enriched functional foods. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The organic selenium black soybean (BS) produced by the germination method can be directly processed and eaten to improve human health. In addition, complexes of organic selenium, vitamin C, and γ-aminobutyric acid of germinated BS can be developed into functional substances and applied to food or health products as functional ingredient and/or natural antioxidant supplements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyi Huang
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiana Qian
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Wang
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingqiu Li
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaolin Zhai
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tosin Michael Olajide
- Wilmar (Shanghai) Biotechnology Research & Development Center Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Garry X Shen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Xianyan Liao
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Del Pino AM, Regni L, D’Amato R, Di Michele A, Proietti P, Palmerini CA. Persistence of the Effects of Se-Fertilization in Olive Trees over Time, Monitored with the Cytosolic Ca 2+ and with the Germination of Pollen. Plants (Basel) 2021; 10:plants10112290. [PMID: 34834652 PMCID: PMC8624298 DOI: 10.3390/plants10112290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Selenium (Se) is an important micronutrient for living organisms, since it is involved in several physiological and metabolic processes. Biofortification with Se increases the nutritional and qualitative values of foods in Se-deficient regions and increases tolerance to oxidative stress in olive trees. Many studies have shown that Se, in addition to improving the qualitative and nutritional properties of EVO oil, also improves the plant's response to abiotic stress. This study addressed this issue by monitoring the effects of Se on cytosolic Ca2+ and on the germination of olive pollen grains in oxidative stress. The olive trees subjected to treatment with Na-selenate in the field produced pollen with a Se content 6-8 times higher than the controls, even after 20 months from the treatment. Moreover, part of the micronutrient was organic in selenium methionine. The higher selenium content did not produce toxic effects in the pollen, rather it antagonized the undesirable effects of oxidative stress in the parameters under study. The persistence of the beneficial effects of selenium observed over time in pollens, in addition to bringing out an undisputed adaptability of olive trees to the micronutrient, suggested the opportunity to reduce the number of treatments in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Marco Del Pino
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences (DSA3), University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy; (A.M.D.P.); (R.D.); (C.A.P.)
| | - Luca Regni
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences (DSA3), University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy; (A.M.D.P.); (R.D.); (C.A.P.)
- Correspondence: (L.R.); (P.P.)
| | - Roberto D’Amato
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences (DSA3), University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy; (A.M.D.P.); (R.D.); (C.A.P.)
| | - Alessandro Di Michele
- Department of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, Via Pascoli, 06123 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Primo Proietti
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences (DSA3), University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy; (A.M.D.P.); (R.D.); (C.A.P.)
- Correspondence: (L.R.); (P.P.)
| | - Carlo Alberto Palmerini
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences (DSA3), University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy; (A.M.D.P.); (R.D.); (C.A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu Y, Huang S, Jiang Z, Wang Y, Zhang Z. Selenium Biofortification Modulates Plant Growth, Microelement and Heavy Metal Concentrations, Selenium Uptake, and Accumulation in Black-Grained Wheat. Front Plant Sci 2021; 12:748523. [PMID: 34733304 PMCID: PMC8560013 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.748523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
In Se-deficient populations, Selenium- (Se-) enriched wheat is a source of Se supplementation, and Se content can be improved by agronomic biofortification. Thus, black-grained wheat (BGW) and white-grained wheat (WGW) (as the control) were grown in Se naturally contained soils at different concentrations (11.02, 2.21, 2.02, and 0.20 mg·kg-1). Then, a field experiment was conducted to assess agronomic performance, the concentration of microelements and heavy metals, and the uptake and distribution of Se in the BGW under the application of Se ore powder. The results showed that the grain yield and grain Se concentration of wheat respectively show a significant increase and decrease from high Se to low Se areas. Higher grain yield and crude protein content were observed in Se-rich areas. The soil application of Se ore powder increased wheat grain yield and its components (biomass, harvest index, grain number, and 1,000 kernels weight). The concentrations of Zn, Fe, Mn, total Se, and organic Se in the grains of wheat were also increased, but Cu concentration was decreased. The concentrations of Pb, As, Hg, and Cr in wheat grains were below the China food regulation limits following the soil application of Se ore powder. Compared with the control, Se ore powder treatment increased the uptake of Se in various parts of wheat plants. More Se accumulation was observed in roots following Se ore powder application, with a smaller amount in grains. In addition, compared with the control, BGW had significantly higher concentrations of Zn, Fe, and Mn and accumulated more Se in grains and shoots and less Se in roots. The results indicate that wheat grown in Se-rich areas increases its grain yield and crude protein content. The soil application of Se ore powder promotes wheat growth and grain yield. Compared with WGW, BGW accumulated more Se in grains and had a higher concentration of organic Se in grains. In conclusion, the application of Se ore powder from Ziyang as Se-enriched fertilizer could be a promising strategy for Se biofortification in the case of wheat, and BGW is the most Se-rich potential genotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxiu Liu
- College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Shuhua Huang
- College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Zonghao Jiang
- College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Yizhao Wang
- College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| | - Zhengmao Zhang
- College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hu W, Zhao C, Hu H, Yin S. Food Sources of Selenium and Its Relationship with Chronic Diseases. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13051739. [PMID: 34065478 PMCID: PMC8160805 DOI: 10.3390/nu13051739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient for mammals, and its deficiency seriously threatens human health. A series of biofortification strategies have been developed to produce Se-enriched foods for combating Se deficiency. Although there have been some inconsistent results, extensive evidence has suggested that Se supplementation is beneficial for preventing and treating several chronic diseases. Understanding the association between Se and chronic diseases is essential for guiding clinical practice, developing effective public health policies, and ultimately counteracting health issues associated with Se deficiency. The current review will discuss the food sources of Se, biofortification strategies, metabolism and biological activities, clinical disorders and dietary reference intakes, as well as the relationship between Se and health outcomes, especially cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic inflammation, cancer, and fertility. Additionally, some concepts were proposed, there is a non-linear U-shaped dose-responsive relationship between Se status and health effects: subjects with a low baseline Se status can benefit from Se supplementation, while Se supplementation in populations with an adequate or high status may potentially increase the risk of some diseases. In addition, at supra-nutritional levels, methylated Se compounds exerted more promising cancer chemo-preventive efficacy in preclinical trials.
Collapse
|
8
|
Marques AC, Lidon FC, Coelho ARF, Pessoa CC, Luís IC, Campos PS, Simões M, Almeida AS, Pessoa MF, Galhano C, Guerra M, Leitão RG, Legoinha P, Ramalho JC, Semedo JN, Rodrigues AP, Marques P, Silva C, Ribeiro-Barros A, Silva MJ, Silva MM, Oliveira K, Ferreira D, Pais IP, Reboredo FH. Effect of Rice Grain ( Oryza sativa L.) Enrichment with Selenium on Foliar Leaf Gas Exchanges and Accumulation of Nutrients. Plants (Basel) 2021; 10:288. [PMID: 33546440 DOI: 10.3390/plants10020288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
An agronomic itinerary for Se biofortification of two rice cultivars (Ariete and Ceres) through foliar fertilization with sodium selenate and sodium selenite with different concentrations (25, 50, 75 and 100 g Se.ha-1), was implemented in experimental fields. The selenium toxicity threshold was not exceeded, as shown by the eco-physiological data obtained through leaf gas exchanges. The highest Se enrichment in paddy grains was obtained with selenite for both cultivars, especially at the highest doses, i.e., 75 and 100 g Se.ha-1, with approximately a 5.0-fold increase compared with control values. In paddy grains, Zn was the most affected element by the treatments with Se with decreases up to 54%. When comparing the losses between rough and polished grains regardless of the cultivars, Se species and concentrations, it was observed that only Cu, Mg and Zn exhibited losses <50%. The remaining elements generally had losses >70%. The loss of Se is more pronounced in Ceres cultivar than in Ariete but rarely exceeds 50%. The analysis by µ-EDXRF showed that, in Ariete cultivar, Se is mostly homogeneously distributed in the grain regardless of any treatments, while in Ceres cultivar, the Se distribution seems to favor accumulation in the periphery, perhaps in the bran.
Collapse
|
9
|
Marques AC, Lidon FC, Coelho ARF, Pessoa CC, Luís IC, Scotti-Campos P, Simões M, Almeida AS, Legoinha P, Pessoa MF, Galhano C, Guerra MAM, Leitão RG, Ramalho JC, Semedo JMN, Bagulho A, Moreira J, Rodrigues AP, Marques P, Silva C, Ribeiro-Barros A, Silva MJ, Silva MM, Oliveira K, Ferreira D, Pais IP, Reboredo FH. Quantification and Tissue Localization of Selenium in Rice ( Oryza sativa L., Poaceae) Grains: A Perspective of Agronomic Biofortification. Plants (Basel) 2020; 9:plants9121670. [PMID: 33260543 PMCID: PMC7760205 DOI: 10.3390/plants9121670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In worldwide production, rice is the second-most-grown crop. It is considered a staple food for many populations and, if naturally enriched in Se, has a huge potential to reduce nutrient deficiencies in foodstuff for human consumption. This study aimed to develop an agronomic itinerary for Se biofortification of Oryza sativa L. (Poaceae) and assess potential physicochemical deviations. Trials were implemented in rice paddy field with known soil and water characteristics and two genotypes resulting from genetic breeding (OP1505 and OP1509) were selected for evaluation. Plants were sprayed at booting, anthesis and milky grain phases with two different foliar fertilizers (sodium selenate and sodium selenite) at different concentrations (25, 50, 75 and 100 g Se·ha−1). After grain harvesting, the application of selenate showed 4.9–7.1 fold increases, whereas selenite increased 5.9–8.4-fold in OP1509 and OP1505, respectively. In brown grain, it was found that in the highest treatment selenate or selenite triggered much higher Se accumulation in OP1505 relatively to OP1509, and that no relevant variation was found with selenate or selenite spraying in each genotype. Total protein increased exponentially in OP1505 genotype when selenite was applied, and higher dosage of Se also increased grain weight and total protein content. It was concluded that, through agronomic biofortification, rice grain can be enriched with Se without impairing its quality, thus highlighting its value in general for the industry and consumers with special needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Coelho Marques
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Fernando C. Lidon
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| | - Ana Rita F. Coelho
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| | - Cláudia Campos Pessoa
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| | - Inês Carmo Luís
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| | - Paula Scotti-Campos
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal;
| | - Manuela Simões
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| | - Ana Sofia Almeida
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal;
| | - Paulo Legoinha
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| | - Maria Fernanda Pessoa
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| | - Carlos Galhano
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| | - Mauro A. M. Guerra
- LIBPhys, Physics Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (M.A.M.G.); (R.G.L.)
| | - Roberta G. Leitão
- LIBPhys, Physics Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (M.A.M.G.); (R.G.L.)
| | - José C. Ramalho
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Instituto Superior Agronomia (ISA), Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - José Manuel N. Semedo
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal;
| | - Ana Bagulho
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I. P. (INIAV), Estrada de Gil Vaz 6, 7351-901 Elvas, Portugal
| | - José Moreira
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I. P. (INIAV), Estrada de Gil Vaz 6, 7351-901 Elvas, Portugal
| | - Ana Paula Rodrigues
- PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Instituto Superior Agronomia (ISA), Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Paula Marques
- Centro Operativo e Tecnológico do Arroz (COTARROZ), 2120-014 Salvaterra de Magos, Portugal; (P.M.); (C.S.)
| | - Cátia Silva
- Centro Operativo e Tecnológico do Arroz (COTARROZ), 2120-014 Salvaterra de Magos, Portugal; (P.M.); (C.S.)
| | - Ana Ribeiro-Barros
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Instituto Superior Agronomia (ISA), Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Maria José Silva
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Instituto Superior Agronomia (ISA), Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Maria Manuela Silva
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- ESEAG-COFAC, Avenida do Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Karliana Oliveira
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- Instituto Politécnico de Beja (IPBeja), 7800-295 Beja, Portugal
| | - David Ferreira
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
| | - Isabel P. Pais
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. (INIAV), Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal;
| | - Fernando Henrique Reboredo
- Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (F.C.L.); (A.R.F.C.); (C.C.P.); (I.C.L.); (M.S.); (P.L.); (M.F.P.); (C.G.); (D.F.); (F.H.R.)
- GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; (P.S.-C.); (J.C.R.); (J.M.N.S.); (A.B.); (J.M.); (A.R.-B.); (M.J.S.); (M.M.S.); (K.O.); (I.P.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xia Q, Yang Z, Shui Y, Liu X, Chen J, Khan S, Wang J, Gao Z. Methods of Selenium Application Differentially Modulate Plant Growth, Selenium Accumulation and Speciation, Protein, Anthocyanins and Concentrations of Mineral Elements in Purple-Grained Wheat. Front Plant Sci 2020; 11:1114. [PMID: 32849686 PMCID: PMC7396501 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient for human health. Deficiency and suboptimality of Se in human populations are a potential health risk. The reduction of such health risk by biofortification of crops, particularly in wheat has drawn much attention, especially for color-grained wheat as it is rich in anthocyanins and can be used as a major source of antioxidants in diet. Herein, a two-year field study on the purple-grained wheat cultivar (202w17) and common wheat cultivar (Shannong 129) was conducted with soil application (SeS) and foliar spray (SeF) of selenium. Results showed that the SeS increased shoot dry weight and grain yield. Both SeS and SeF enhanced the concentration of organic Se, but the higher concentration of organic Se in the grain of two cultivars was observed in SeF in comparison with SeS. The concentration of organic Se in the grain of 202w17 treated with SeF was approximately 1.5-fold of that in Shannong 129 with SeF. The analysis of Se accumulation in different parts of the plant revealed that 202w17 accumulated more Se in shoots and grain than Shannong 129, and 202w17 had also higher levels of total protein, total free amino acids and anthocyanin in grain than Shannong 129. In addition, SeF significantly increased the concentrations of zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) in both cultivars, but decreased the concentration of chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pd), which phenomenon was more significant in 202w17. Our results indicate that SeS increases plant growth, leading to higher grain yield in two cultivars tested. The purple-grained wheat (202w17) could accumulate more Se in grain and have a higher concentration of orgainic Se in grain than the common wheat (Shannong 129).
Collapse
|