1
|
Liu J, Zhong H, Reynolds M, Illescas A, Cozowicz C, Wu CL, Poeran J, Memtsoudis S. Evidence-based Perioperative Practice Utilization among Various Racial Populations-A Retrospective Cohort Trending Analysis of Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients. Anesthesiology 2023; 139:769-781. [PMID: 37651453 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various studies have demonstrated racial disparities in perioperative care and outcomes. The authors hypothesize that among lower extremity total joint arthroplasty patients, evidence-based perioperative practice utilization increased over time among all racial groups, and that standardized evidence-based perioperative practice care protocols resulted in reduction of racial disparities and improved outcomes. METHODS The study analyzed 3,356,805 lower extremity total joint arthroplasty patients from the Premier Healthcare database (Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc., USA). The exposure of interest was race (White, Black, Asian, other). Outcomes were evidence-based perioperative practice adherence (eight individual care components; more than 80% of these implemented was defined as "high evidence-based perioperative practice"), any major complication (including acute renal failure, delirium, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure, stroke, or in-hospital mortality), in-hospital mortality, and prolonged length of stay. RESULTS Evidence-based perioperative practice adherence rate has increased over time and was associated with reduced complications across all racial groups. However, utilization among Black patients was below that for White patients between 2006 and 2021 (odds ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93 to 0.95]; 45.50% vs. 47.90% on average). Independent of whether evidence-based perioperative practice components were applied, Black patients exhibited higher odds of major complications (1.61 [95% CI, 1.55 to 1.67] with high evidence-based perioperative practice; 1.43 [95% CI, 1.39 to 1.48] without high evidence-based perioperative practice), mortality (1.70 [95% CI, 1.29 to 2.25] with high evidence-based perioperative practice; 1.29 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.51] without high evidence-based perioperative practice), and prolonged length of stay (1.45 [95% CI, 1.42 to 1.48] with high evidence-based perioperative practice; 1.38 [95% CI, 1.37 to 1.40] without high evidence-based perioperative practice) compared to White patients. CONCLUSIONS Evidence-based perioperative practice utilization in lower extremity joint arthroplasty has been increasing during the last decade. However, racial disparities still exist with Black patients consistently having lower odds of evidence-based perioperative practice adherence. Black patients (compared to the White patients) exhibited higher odds of composite major complications, mortality, and prolonged length of stay, independent of evidence-based perioperative practice use, suggesting that evidence-based perioperative practice did not impact racial disparities regarding particularly the Black patients in this surgical cohort. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiabin Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Haoyan Zhong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Michael Reynolds
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Alex Illescas
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Crispiana Cozowicz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christopher L Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jashvant Poeran
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science & Policy/ Department of Orthopedics/Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Stavros Memtsoudis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peel TN, Astbury S, Cheng AC, Paterson DL, Buising KL, Spelman T, Tran-Duy A, Adie S, Boyce G, McDougall C, Molnar R, Mulford J, Rehfisch P, Solomon M, Crawford R, Harris-Brown T, Roney J, Wisniewski J, de Steiger R. Trial of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Surgical Prophylaxis in Arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1488-1498. [PMID: 37851875 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2301401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of vancomycin to beta-lactam prophylaxis in arthroplasty may reduce surgical-site infections; however, the efficacy and safety are unclear. METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind, superiority, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adult patients without known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization who were undergoing arthroplasty to receive 1.5 g of vancomycin or normal saline placebo, in addition to cefazolin prophylaxis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection within 90 days after surgery. RESULTS A total of 4239 patients underwent randomization. Among 4113 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (2233 undergoing knee arthroplasty, 1850 undergoing hip arthroplasty, and 30 undergoing shoulder arthroplasty), surgical-site infections occurred in 91 of 2044 patients (4.5%) in the vancomycin group and in 72 of 2069 patients (3.5%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.73; P = 0.11). Among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, surgical-site infections occurred in 63 of 1109 patients (5.7%) in the vancomyin group and in 42 of 1124 patients (3.7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23). Among patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, surgical-site infections occurred in 28 of 920 patients (3.0%) in the vancomyin group and in 29 of 930 patients (3.1%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.63). Adverse events occurred in 35 of 2010 patients (1.7%) in the vancomycin group and in 35 of 2030 patients (1.7%) in the placebo group, including hypersensitivity reactions in 24 of 2010 patients (1.2%) and 11 of 2030 patients (0.5%), respectively (relative risk, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.49), and acute kidney injury in 42 of 2010 patients (2.1%) and 74 of 2030 patients (3.6%), respectively (relative risk, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS The addition of vancomycin to cefazolin prophylaxis was not superior to placebo for the prevention of surgical-site infections in arthroplasty among patients without known MRSA colonization. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000642280.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha N Peel
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Sarah Astbury
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Allen C Cheng
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - David L Paterson
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Kirsty L Buising
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Tim Spelman
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - An Tran-Duy
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Sam Adie
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Glenn Boyce
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Catherine McDougall
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Robert Molnar
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Jonathan Mulford
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Peter Rehfisch
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Michael Solomon
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Ross Crawford
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Tiffany Harris-Brown
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Janine Roney
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Jessica Wisniewski
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| | - Richard de Steiger
- From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences (T.N.P., S. Astbury, J.W.), and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, the Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health (T.N.P., S. Astbury, A.C.C., J.R., J.W.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute (K.L.B.), the Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital (T.S.), the Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (A.T.-D.), and the Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare (R.S.), University of Melbourne, the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital (K.L.B.), and the Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, VIC, the St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, Sydney (S. Adie, R.M.), Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC (G.B.), the Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (C.M., R.C.), the Department of Medicine (C.M.) and the Centre for Clinical Research (T.H.-B.), University of Queensland, and Queensland University of Technology (R.C.), Brisbane, the Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Launceston, TAS (J.M.), Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Traralgon, VIC (P.R.), and Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW (M.S.) - all in Australia; Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, and the Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.L.P.); and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schneider KN, Bröking JN, Gosheger G, Lübben T, Hardes J, Schorn D, Smolle MA, Theil C, Andreou D. What Is the Implant Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Total Humeral Replacement in Patients with Primary Bone Tumors? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:1754-1764. [PMID: 33595237 PMCID: PMC8277276 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total humeral replacement is an option to reconstruct massive bone defects after resection of locally advanced bone tumors of the humerus. However, implant survivorship, potential risk factors for implant revision surgery, and functional results of total humeral replacement are poorly elucidated because of the rarity of the procedure. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We asked: (1) What is the revision-free implant and overall limb survivorship after total humerus replacement? (2) What factors are associated with implant revision surgery? (3) What is the functional outcome of the procedure as determined by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score? METHODS Between August 1999 and December 2018, 666 patients underwent megaprosthetic reconstruction after resection of a primary malignant or locally aggressive/rarely metastasizing tumor of the long bones at our department. In all, 23% (154) of these patients had a primary tumor located in the humerus. During the study, we performed total humeral replacement in all patients with a locally advanced sarcoma, in patients with pathological fractures, in patients with skip metastases, or in patients with previous intralesional contaminating surgery, who would have no sufficient bone stock for a stable implant fixation for a single joint megaprosthetic replacement of the proximal or distal humerus. We performed no biological reconstructions or reconstructions with allograft-prosthetic composites. As a result, 5% (33 of 666) of patients underwent total humerus replacement. Six percent (2 of 33) of patients were excluded because they received a custom-made, three-dimensionally (3-D) printed hemiprosthesis, leaving 5% (31) of the initial 666 patients for inclusion in our retrospective analysis. Of these, 6% (2 of 31) had surgery more than 5 years ago, but they had not been seen in the last 5 years. Median (interquartile range) age at the time of surgery was 15 years (14 to 25 years), and indications for total humeral replacement were primary malignant bone tumors (n = 30) and a recurring, rarely metastasizing bone tumor (n = 1). All megaprosthetic reconstructions were performed with a single modular system. The implanted prostheses were silver-coated beginning in 2006, and beginning in 2010, a reverse proximal humerus component was used when appropriate. We analyzed endoprosthetic complications descriptively and assessed the functional outcome of all surviving patients who did not undergo secondary amputation using the 1993 MSTS score and the ASES score. The median (IQR) follow-up in all survivors was 75 months (50 to 122 months), with a minimum follow-up period of 25 months. We evaluated the following factors for possible association with implant revision surgery: age, BMI, reconstruction length, duration of surgery, extraarticular resection, pathological fracture, previous intralesional surgery, (neo-)adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy, and metastatic disease. RESULTS The revision-free implant survivorship at 1 year was 77% (95% confidence interval 58% to 89%) and 74% (95% CI 55% to 86%) at 5 years. The overall limb survivorship was 93% (95% CI 75% to 98%) after 1 and after 5 years. We found revision-free survivorship to be lower in patients with extraarticular shoulder resection compared with intraarticular resections (50% [95% CI 21% to 74%] versus 89% [95% CI 64% to 97%]) after 5 years (subhazard ratios for extraarticular resections 4.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 16.5]; p = 0.03). With the number of patients available for our analysis, we could not detect a difference in revision-free survivorship at 5 years between patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy (40% [95% CI 5% to 75%]) and patients who did not (81% [95% CI 60% to 92%]; p = 0.09). The median (IQR) MSTS score in 9 of 13 surviving patients after a median follow-up of 75 months (51 to 148 months) was 87% (67% to 92%), and the median ASES score was 83 (63 to 89) of 100 points, with higher scores representing better function. CONCLUSION Total humeral replacement after resection of locally advanced bone tumors appears to be associated with a good functional outcome in patients who do not die of their tumors, which in our study was approximately one- third of those who were treated with a resection and total humerus prosthesis. However, the probability of early prosthetic revision surgery is high, especially in patients undergoing extraarticular resections, who should be counseled accordingly. Still, our results suggest that if the prosthesis survives the first year, further risk for revision appears to be low. Future studies should reexamine the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on implant survival in a larger cohort and evaluate whether the use of soft tissue coverage with plastic reconstructive surgery might decrease the risk of early revisions, especially in patients undergoing extraarticular resections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Niklas Bröking
- Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| | - Georg Gosheger
- Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| | - Timo Lübben
- Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| | - Jendrik Hardes
- Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| | - Dominik Schorn
- Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| | - Maria Anna Smolle
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christoph Theil
- Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| | - Dimosthenis Andreou
- Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harris IA, Cashman K, Lorimer M, Peng Y, Ackerman I, Heath E, Graves SE. Are responders to patient health surveys representative of those invited to participate? An analysis of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Pilot from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254196. [PMID: 34214088 PMCID: PMC8253407 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to evaluate surgical outcome in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery, however routine collection from the target population is often incomplete. Representative samples are required to allow inference from the sample to the population. Although higher capture rates are desired, the extent to which this improves the representativeness of the sample is not known. We aimed to measure the representativeness of data collected using an electronic PROMs capture system with or without telephone call follow up, and any differences in PROMS reporting between electronic and telephone call follow up. Methods Data from a pilot PROMs program within a large national joint replacement registry were examined. Telephone call follow up was used for people that failed to respond electronically. Data were collected pre-operatively and at 6 months post-operatively. Responding groups (either electronic only or electronic plus telephone call follow up) were compared to non-responders based on patient characteristics (joint replaced, bilaterality, age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score and Body Mass Index (BMI)) using chi squared test or ANOVA, and PROMs for the two responder groups were compared using generalised linear models adjusted for age and sex. The analysis was restricted to those undergoing primary elective hip, knee or shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis. Results Pre-operatively, 73.2% of patients responded electronically and telephone follow-up of non-responders increased this to 91.4%. Pre-operatively, patients responding electronically, compared to all others, were on average younger, more likely to be female, and healthier (lower ASA score). Similar differences were found when telephone follow up was included in the responding group. There were little (if any) differences in the post-operative comparisons, where electronic responders were on average one year younger and were more likely to have a lower ASA score compared to those not responding electronically, but there was no significant difference in sex or BMI. PROMs were similar between those reporting electronically and those reporting by telephone. Conclusion Patients undergoing total joint replacement who provide direct electronic PROMs data are younger, healthier and more likely to be female than non-responders, but these differences are small, particularly for post-operative data collection. The addition of telephone call follow up to electronic contact does not provide a more representative sample. Electronic-only follow up of patients undergoing joint replacement provides a satisfactory representation of the population invited to participate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian A. Harris
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Kara Cashman
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michelle Lorimer
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Yi Peng
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ilana Ackerman
- School of Public Health and Epidemiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma Heath
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stephen E. Graves
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carey K, Morgan JR. Payments for outpatient joint replacement surgery: A comparison of hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgery centers. Health Serv Res 2020; 55:218-223. [PMID: 31971261 PMCID: PMC7080380 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare commercial insurance payments for outpatient total knee and hip replacement surgeries performed in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). DATA SOURCES A large national claims database that contains information on actual prices paid to providers over the period 2014-2017. DATA COLLECTION We identified all patients receiving total knee replacement surgery and total hip replacement surgery in HOPDs and in ASCs for each of the 4 years. STUDY DESIGN For each year, we conducted descriptive and statistical patient-level analyses of the facility component of payments to HOPDs and to ASCs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS For each procedure and for each year, ASC payments exceeded HOPD payments by a wide margin; however, the gap across settings declined over time. In 2014, knee replacement payments to HOPDs (n = 67) were $6016 compared to $23 244 in ASCs (n = 68). By 2017, payments to HOPDs (n = 223) had grown to $10 060 compared to $18 234 in ASCs (n = 602). Similarly, for hip replacements, HOPD payments (n = 43) rose from $6980 in 2014 to $11 139 in 2017 (n = 206) and in ASCs fell from $28 485 in 2014 (n = 82) to $18 595 in 2017 (n = 465). CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that for total joint replacement, common perceptions of cost savings from transition of services from hospitals to ASCs may be misguided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Carey
- Boston UniversitySchool of Public HealthBostonMassachusetts
| | - Jake R. Morgan
- Boston UniversitySchool of Public HealthBostonMassachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ravi B, Leroux T, Austin PC, Paterson JM, Aktar S, Redelmeier DA. Factors associated with emergency department presentation after total joint arthroplasty: a population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open 2020; 8:E26-E33. [PMID: 31992556 PMCID: PMC6996031 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unplanned visits to the emergency department after total joint arthroplasty are far more common than unplanned readmissions. Our objectives were to characterize the prevalence of presentation to an emergency department for any reason after total joint arthroplasty and to identify risk factors for such visits. METHODS Using health administrative databases, we conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of adults (19-89 yr of age) who received their first primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedure for arthritis between April 2011 and March 2016 in Ontario. We made univariate comparisons between patients who presented to the emergency department within 30 days of surgery and those who did not in. We determined differences in use of health care services between groups by comparing the change in use in the year before and after surgery between patients who presented to the emergency department and those who did not. We developed logistic regression models for the occurrence of an emergency department visit using backward variable elimination. RESULTS We identified 42 273 total hip recipients and 70 725 total knee recipients, of whom 5640 (13.3%) and 11 224 (15.9%), respectively, presented to the emergency department within 30 days of surgery. Fewer than 1% of these patients required admission, and nearly half (45%) went to a different institution from where they had their surgery. Among both THA and TKA recipients, patients who presented to the emergency department had a net increase in their median annual health care costs (THA: $501, TKA: $682), compared to a net decrease for the cohort as a whole. Factors associated with increased risk of an emergency visit included increased patient age, male sex, rural residence and various comorbidities. Predictive regression models showed poor discriminative ability for both THA (C-statistic 0.57) and TKA (C-statistic 0.58) recipients. INTERPRETATION One in 7 patients presented to the emergency department within 30 days of THA or TKA. Some may conceivably have been managed remotely, and very few required readmission. There is a crucial need for strategies to minimize these events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bheeshma Ravi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Department of Surgery and Department of Medicine (Redelmeier), University of Toronto; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; ICES (Ravi, Austin, Paterson, Aktar, Redelmeier); Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Leroux), Toronto Western Hospital; Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Austin, Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Timothy Leroux
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Department of Surgery and Department of Medicine (Redelmeier), University of Toronto; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; ICES (Ravi, Austin, Paterson, Aktar, Redelmeier); Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Leroux), Toronto Western Hospital; Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Austin, Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ont
| | - Peter C Austin
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Department of Surgery and Department of Medicine (Redelmeier), University of Toronto; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; ICES (Ravi, Austin, Paterson, Aktar, Redelmeier); Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Leroux), Toronto Western Hospital; Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Austin, Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ont
| | - J Michael Paterson
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Department of Surgery and Department of Medicine (Redelmeier), University of Toronto; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; ICES (Ravi, Austin, Paterson, Aktar, Redelmeier); Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Leroux), Toronto Western Hospital; Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Austin, Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ont
| | - Suriya Aktar
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Department of Surgery and Department of Medicine (Redelmeier), University of Toronto; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; ICES (Ravi, Austin, Paterson, Aktar, Redelmeier); Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Leroux), Toronto Western Hospital; Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Austin, Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ont
| | - Donald A Redelmeier
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Department of Surgery and Department of Medicine (Redelmeier), University of Toronto; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ravi), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; ICES (Ravi, Austin, Paterson, Aktar, Redelmeier); Division of Orthopaedic Surgery (Leroux), Toronto Western Hospital; Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Austin, Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
There are very few reports of eczema and other prosthetic-related allergic skin complications following arthroplasty. We aimed to assess the risk of eczema after joint replacement.We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study in 2024 joint replacement patients using the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. For comparison, 8096 controls were selected, with 4 control subjects for each joint replacement patient matched for age, sex, and index year, to assess eczema risk. We examined 14-year cumulative eczema incidence associated with age, sex, immunity, disease history, and joint replacement location.Eczema rates in the joint replacement patients were 38% higher than in the control group (57.90 vs 41.84 per 1000 person-years, respectively). Compared with the control group, joint replacement patients showed a 1.35-fold increased risk of eczema according to the multivariable Cox model (95% Confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-1.49). Knee replacement patients had higher eczema risk compared with the control group (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.33-1.70). Stratified by study period, the joint replacement cohort had a higher eczema risk after the 3-month follow-up.Our study revealed that joint arthroplasty increased risk of eczema in this 14-year follow-up study, and this was not related to personal atopic history or gender.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Yuan Wu
- Department of Dermatology, China Medical University Hospital
- School of Medicine, China Medical University
| | | | - Chun-Hao Tsai
- School of Medicine, China Medical University
- Department of Orthopedics, China Medical University Hospital
- Department of Sports Medicine/School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim H, Meath THA, Dobbertin K, Quiñones AR, Ibrahim SA, McConnell KJ. Association of the Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment With Joint Replacement Outcomes in Hospitals With Disadvantaged Patients. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1914696. [PMID: 31693127 PMCID: PMC6865278 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model rewards or penalizes hospitals on the basis of meeting spending benchmarks that do not account for patients' preexisting social and medical complexity or high expenses associated with serving disadvantaged populations such as dual-eligible patients (ie, those enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid). The CJR model may have different implications for hospitals serving a high percentage of dual-eligible patients (termed high-dual) and hospitals serving a low percentage of dual-eligible patients (termed low-dual). OBJECTIVE To examine changes associated with the CJR model among high-dual or low-dual hospitals in 2016 to 2017. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study comprised 3 analyses of high-dual or low-dual hospitals (n = 1165) serving patients with hip or knee joint replacements (n = 768 224) in 67 treatment metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) selected for CJR participation and 103 control MSAs. The study used Medicare claims data and public reports from 2012 to 2017. Data analysis was conducted from February 1, 2019, to August 31, 2019. EXPOSURES The CJR model holds participating hospitals accountable for the spending and quality of care during care episodes for patients with hip or knee joint replacement, including hospitalization and 90 days after discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were total episode spending, discharge to institutional postacute care facility, and readmission within the 90-day postdischarge period; bonus and penalty payments for each hospital; and reductions in per-episode spending required to receive a bonus for each hospital. RESULTS In total, 1165 hospitals (291 high-dual and 874 low-dual) and 768 224 patients with joint replacement (494 013 women [64.3%]; mean [SD] age, 76 [7] years) were included. An episode-level triple-difference analysis indicated that total spending under the CJR model decreased at high-dual hospitals (by $851; 95% CI, -$1556 to -$146; P = .02) and low-dual hospitals (by $567; 95% CI, -$933 to -$202; P = .003). The size of decreases did not differ between the 2 groups (difference, -$284; 95% CI, -$981 to $413; P = .42). Discharge to institutional postacute care settings and readmission did not change among both hospital groups. High-dual hospitals were less likely to receive a bonus compared with low-dual hospitals (40.3% vs 59.1% in 2016; 56.9% vs 76.0% in 2017). To receive a bonus, high-dual hospitals would be required to reduce spending by $887 to $2231 per episode, compared with only $89 to $215 for low-dual hospitals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The study found that high- and low-dual hospitals made changes in care after CJR implementation, and the magnitude of these changes did not differ between the 2 groups. However, high-dual hospitals were less likely to receive a bonus for spending cuts. Spending benchmarks for CJR would require high-dual hospitals to reduce spending more substantially to receive a financial incentive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunjee Kim
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Thomas H. A. Meath
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Konrad Dobbertin
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Ana R. Quiñones
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Said A. Ibrahim
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - K. John McConnell
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
This cohort study examines rates of screening for hyperglycemia before total joint replacement among Medicare enrollees with and without diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey A. MacFarlane
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yinzhu Jin
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patricia D. Franklin
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joyce Lii
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey N. Katz
- Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Seoyoung C. Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liao JM, Emanuel EJ, Venkataramani AS, Huang Q, Dinh CT, Shan EZ, Wang E, Zhu J, Cousins DS, Navathe AS. Association of Bundled Payments for Joint Replacement Surgery and Patient Outcomes With Simultaneous Hospital Participation in Accountable Care Organizations. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1912270. [PMID: 31560389 PMCID: PMC6777392 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance An increasing number of hospitals have participated in Medicare's bundled payment and accountable care organization (ACO) programs. Although participation in bundled payments has been associated with savings for lower-extremity joint replacement (LEJR) surgery, simultaneous participation in ACOs may be associated with different outcomes given the prevalence of LEJR among patients receiving care at ACO participant organizations and potential overlap in care redesign strategies adopted under the 2 payment models. Objective To examine whether simultaneous participation in a Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACO affects the association between hospitals' participation in LEJR episodes under the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative and patient outcomes compared with participation in the BPCI initiative alone. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study, conducted from January 1 to May 31, 2019, used 2011 to 2016 Medicare claims data and incorporated an instrumental variable with a difference-in-differences method among 483 008 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries undergoing LEJR surgery at 212 bundled payment participant hospitals, 105 coparticipant hospitals, and 1413 nonparticipant hospitals in the United States. Exposures Hospital participation in both the BPCI initiative and the MSSP (coparticipants), BPCI only (bundled payment participants), or neither (nonparticipants). Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in clinical outcomes and mean LEJR episode spending. Results A total of 483 008 patients (mean [SD] age, 73.0 [8.4] years; 308 173 [63.8%] female) were included in the study. No differential changes were found in patient and hospital characteristics across participation groups. In adjusted analysis, coparticipants had 1.5% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.2%; P < .001) more unplanned readmissions than did bundled payment participants. Compared with bundled payment participants, coparticipants also had differentially greater decreases in hospital length of stay (adjusted difference-in-differences value, -5.3%; 95% CI, -7.1% to -3.5%; P < .001) and home health care use (adjusted difference-in-differences value, -3.4%; 95% CI, -4.5% to -2.3%; P < .001) and greater increases in postdischarge outpatient follow-up (adjusted difference-in-differences value, 2.1%; 95% CI, 0.9%-3.3%; P < .001). Coparticipants and bundled payment participants did not have differential changes in episode spending (adjusted difference-in-differences value, 0.4%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 1.6%; P = .46), although both groups had more decreased spending compared with nonparticipants. Conclusions and Relevance Among bundled payment participants, coparticipation in ACOs was not associated with LEJR episode savings but was associated with differential changes in postacute care use patterns and unplanned readmissions. These findings support the longer-term benefits of LEJR bundles and suggest that coparticipants may adopt care redesign strategies that differ from hospitals with bundled payments only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua M. Liao
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ezekiel J. Emanuel
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Atheendar S. Venkataramani
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Qian Huang
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Claire T. Dinh
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Eric Z. Shan
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Erkuan Wang
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jingsan Zhu
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Deborah S. Cousins
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Amol S. Navathe
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schnitzer TJ, Easton R, Pang S, Levinson DJ, Pixton G, Viktrup L, Davignon I, Brown MT, West CR, Verburg KM. Effect of Tanezumab on Joint Pain, Physical Function, and Patient Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis Among Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 322:37-48. [PMID: 31265100 PMCID: PMC6613301 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.8044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) may remain symptomatic with traditional OA treatments. OBJECTIVE To assess 2 subcutaneous tanezumab dosing regimens for OA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial from January 2016 to May 14, 2018 (last patient visit). Patients enrolled were 18 years or older with hip or knee OA, inadequate response to OA analgesics, and no radiographic evidence of prespecified joint safety conditions. INTERVENTIONS Patients received by subcutaneous administration either tanezumab, 2.5 mg, at day 1 and week 8 (n = 231); tanezumab, 2.5 mg at day 1 and 5 mg at week 8 (ie, tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg; n = 233); or placebo at day 1 and week 8 (n = 232). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Co-primary end points were change from baseline to week 16 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain (0-10, no to extreme pain), WOMAC Physical Function (0-10, no to extreme difficulty), and patient global assessment of osteoarthritis (PGA-OA) (1-5, very good to very poor) scores. RESULTS Among 698 patients randomized, 696 received 1 or more treatment doses (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [9.6] years; 65.1% women), and 582 (83.6%) completed the trial. From baseline to 16 weeks, mean WOMAC Pain scores decreased from 7.1 to 3.6 in the tanezumab, 2.5 mg, group; 7.3 to 3.6 in the tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg, group; and 7.3 to 4.4 in the placebo group (least squares mean differences [95% CI] vs placebo were -0.60 [-1.07 to -0.13; P = .01] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.73 [-1.20 to -0.26; P = .002] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Mean WOMAC Physical Function scores decreased from 7.2 to 3.7 in the 2.5-mg group, 7.4 to 3.6 in the 2.5/5-mg group, and 7.4 to 4.5 with placebo (differences vs placebo, -0.66 [-1.14 to -0.19; P = .007] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.89 [-1.37 to -0.42; P < .001] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Mean PGA-OA scores decreased from 3.4 to 2.4 in the 2.5-mg group, 3.5 to 2.4 in the 2.5/5-mg group, and 3.5 to 2.7 with placebo (differences vs placebo, -0.22 [-0.39 to -0.05; P = .01] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.25 [-0.41 to -0.08; P = .004] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Rapidly progressive OA occurred only in tanezumab-treated patients (2.5 mg: n = 5, 2.2%; 2.5/5 mg: n = 1, 0.4%). The incidence of total joint replacements was 8 (3.5%), 16 (6.9%), and 4 (1.7%) in the tanezumab, 2.5 mg; tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg; and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with moderate to severe OA of the knee or hip and inadequate response to standard analgesics, tanezumab, compared with placebo, resulted in statistically significant improvements in scores assessing pain and physical function, and in PGA-OA, although the improvements were modest and tanezumab-treated patients had more joint safety events and total joint replacements. Further research is needed to determine the clinical importance of these efficacy and adverse event findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697773.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Analgesics/administration & dosage
- Analgesics/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Arthralgia/drug therapy
- Arthroplasty, Replacement/statistics & numerical data
- Disease Progression
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Double-Blind Method
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Female
- Humans
- Injections, Subcutaneous
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Nerve Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors
- Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy
- Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology
- Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy
- Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology
- Pain Measurement
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shirley Pang
- St Joseph Heritage Healthcare, Fullerton, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability and source of societal cost in older adults. With an ageing and increasingly obese population, this syndrome is becoming even more prevalent than in previous decades. In recent years, we have gained important insights into the cause and pathogenesis of pain in osteoarthritis. The diagnosis of osteoarthritis is clinically based despite the widespread overuse of imaging methods. Management should be tailored to the presenting individual and focus on core treatments, including self-management and education, exercise, and weight loss as relevant. Surgery should be reserved for those that have not responded appropriately to less invasive methods. Prevention and disease modification are areas being targeted by various research endeavours, which have indicated great potential thus far. This narrative Seminar provides an update on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and future research on osteoarthritis for a clinical audience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Hunter
- Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital and Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Sita Bierma-Zeinstra
- Departments of General Practice and Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Morris AJ, Roberts SA, Grae N, Jowitt D. Getting surgical antibiotic prophylaxis right, lessons from the National Orthopaedic Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme: a call for action! N Z Med J 2019; 132:55-58. [PMID: 30789890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Morris
- Clinical Microbiologist, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland; Clinical Lead NZ SSIIP
| | - Sally A Roberts
- Clinical Microbiologist, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland; Clinical Lead Health Quality and Safety Commission Infection Prevention and Control Programmes
| | - Nikki Grae
- Infection Prevention and Control Specialist, Infection Prevention and Control Programme, Health Quality and Safety Commission, Wellington
| | - Deborah Jowitt
- Infection Prevention and Control Advisor, Infection Prevention and Control Programme, Health Quality and Safety Commission, Wellington
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nielen JTH, Dagnelie PC, Boonen A, Klungel O, van den Bemt B, de Vries F. Impact of the definition of osteoarthritis and of the timing of its onset on the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis: Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019; 148:240-248. [PMID: 30685347 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
AIMS In a previous case-control study in a large primary care database, the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was associated with a decreased rate of total joint replacement (TJR). As this was in contrast to the hypothesis, selection bias due to the used definition of osteoarthritis (OA) or misclassification of the onset of OA were raised as possible explanations. We therefore aimed to explore the effect of the definition of OA, and hypothesized timing of its onset on the association between T2DM and OA. METHODS All patients using a non-insulin anti-hyperglycaemic drug (NIAD) between 1989 and 2012 in the CPRD were included and matched to unexposed patients. Cox proportional hazard models were fitted estimating the risk of TJR or OA in T2DM patients compared to patients without T2DM. These analyses were repeated in sensitivity scenarios and joint-specific analyses. To assess whether misclassification of onset of OA may affect the association, analyses were repeated with addition of a latency period of up to 10 years after start of follow-up. RESULTS The use of TJR as a proxy for OA (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.70-0.78) resulted in a HR that was approximately 0.2 lower than when OA diagnostic codes were used (HR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.90-0.95). The joint-specific subgroup analyses, sensitivity scenarios, and latency analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSION When examining the association between T2DM and OA, the use of TJR as a proxy for OA resulted in a 20% lower estimate than the OA diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes T H Nielen
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter C Dagnelie
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, and CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Olaf Klungel
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bart van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank de Vries
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Siddiqi A, White PB, Murphy W, Terry D, Murphy SB, Talmo CT. Cost Savings in a Surgeon-Directed BPCI Program for Total Joint Arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int 2018; 33:319-325. [PMID: 30029286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few studies available on the savings generated and strategies employed for cost reduction in total joint arthroplasty. In this study, our organization-a group of private practices partnering with a consultant-aimed to analyze the impact of a preoperative protocol on overall cost savings. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using administrative data from the Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative, 771 consecutive total joint arthroplasty patients from 2009-2014 were compared with 408 consecutive BPCI patients from 2014-2017. The 30-day episode and Medicare part B total cost of care was analyzed. This included inpatient and post-discharge expenditure, laboratory and imaging costs, physician and ER visits, and readmission. RESULTS Average total episode cost declined by $3,174 or 13% from $23,925 to $20,752 (p<0.001) in the BPCI period. Readmission rate was unchanged (p=0.20), and there was a 48% reduction in the percent of patients presenting to the emergency room (p=.03). There was a decline of $2,647 (78%) in skilled nursing cost per case, which represented the majority of savings. Post-discharge imaging, laboratory test claims, postoperative emergency room visits, primary care physician (PCP) visits, and cost per episode all decreased. The decrease in PCP utilization did not result in increased medical complications or readmissions. CONCLUSION Our preoperative patient-education protocol has decreased non-home discharge, unnecessary postoperative physician visits, and diagnostic testing resulting in an episode cost savings of 13%. With Advanced BPCI on the horizon, orthopedic surgeon control as the awardee of the bundle, combined with an increasing focus on patient education, will continue to lower costs and improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Siddiqi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter B White
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, Pennsylvania
| | - William Murphy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Stephen B Murphy
- Tufts University School of Medicine, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carl T Talmo
- Tufts University School of Medicine, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zöller B, Svensson PJ, Sundquist J, Sundquist K, Pirouzifard M. Postoperative Joint Replacement Complications in Swedish Patients With a Family History of Venous Thromboembolism. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1:e181924. [PMID: 30646144 PMCID: PMC6324480 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The associations of a family history of venous thromboembolism (FH-VTE) with postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding after joint replacement surgical procedures are unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the risk of VTE and major bleeding in patients after primary hip or knee replacement surgical procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cohort study using nationwide population-based databases of Swedish patients without a history of VTE who underwent joint replacement surgical procedures. Patients who had primary hip or knee replacement surgical procedures between July 1, 2005, and August 31, 2012, were identified. Patients born after 1931 without previous VTE were identified in the Swedish Multi-Generation Register. Only individuals with at least 1 parent and 1 full sibling alive between 1964 and the date for the surgical procedure were included. The data analysis was performed from September 1, 2017, to June 15, 2018. EXPOSURES Family history of VTE in a parent and/or a full sibling before the date of the surgical procedure. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Venous thromboembolism and major bleeding within 90 days of the surgical procedure. RESULTS Of 69 505 study participants, 37 989 (54.7%) were women, and the median (interquartile range) age at the date of discharge was 65 (59-70) years. A total of 803 of 69 505 (1.2%) patients experienced postoperative VTE and 1285 (1.8%) experienced major bleeding. The cumulative VTE risk for those with FH-VTE was 231 of 15 858 (1.5%) and for those without an FH-VTE was 572 of 53 647 (1.1%) (P < .001). The cumulative bleeding risk for those with FH-VTE was 261 of 15 858 (1.6%) and for those without an FH-VTE was 1024 of 53 647 (1.9%) (P = .03). There was an association of patients with an FH-VTE who had increased VTE risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17-1.59) and reduced bleeding risk (adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97). There was an interaction between time after discharge and FH-VTE regarding VTE and major bleeding. An FH-VTE was not associated with VTE after discharge during the first week (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.86-1.49). After 7 days from discharge, FH-VTE was associated with VTE (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.24-1.79). An FH-VTE reduced major bleeding risk during the first 7 days after discharge (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.91) but not thereafter (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.84-1.44). Postoperative VTE heritability (SE) was 20% (6%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Familial and most likely genetic factors appear to affect VTE and major bleeding risk following hip and knee replacement surgical procedures. Prolonged VTE prophylaxis might be beneficial in predisposed individuals. There may be a possible evolutionary advantage of prothrombotic genes protecting against traumatic bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Zöller
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Peter J. Svensson
- Department of Coagulation Disorders, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jan Sundquist
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Kristina Sundquist
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden
| | - MirNabi Pirouzifard
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sibia US, Weltz AS, MacDonald JH, King PJ. Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Is an Independent Risk Factor for Complications and Readmissions After Total Joint Replacements. J Surg Orthop Adv 2018; 27:294-298. [PMID: 30777829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
This study examined the risk for postoperative complications, reoperations, and readmissions for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and patients without diabetes undergoing total joint replacements (TJRs). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all primary TJRs in 2015. The study identified 78,744 TJRs (84.1% nondiabetic patients, 12.0% NIDDM, and 3.9% IDDM). Multiple logistic regression models identified IDDM as an independent risk factor for increased blood loss, myocardial infarctions, pneumonia, renal insufficiency, urinary tract infections, and readmissions when compared with both NIDDM and nondiabetics. Risk for wound complications and reoperations were comparable between all three groups. IDDM increases the risk for medical complications and readmissions after TJRs. Physicians must counsel patients on the increased risks associated with IDDM before elective surgery and provide appropriate medical support for these patients. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(4):294-298, 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udai S Sibia
- Center for Joint Replacement, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Maryland
| | - Adam S Weltz
- Department of Surgery, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Maryland
| | - James H MacDonald
- Center for Joint Replacement, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Maryland
| | - Paul J King
- Center for Joint Replacement, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Maryland; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gwam C, Mistry JB, Piuzzi N, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Thomas M, Elmallah RK, Muschler G, Mont MA, Harwin SF, Delanois RE. What Influences How Patients with Depression Rate Hospital Stay After Total Joint Arthroplasty? Surg Technol Int 2017; 30:373-378. [PMID: 28537649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent healthcare reform has spurred important changes to provider reimbursement. With the implementation of the Value Based Purchasing program, significant weight is placed on patient experience of care. The Press Ganey (PG) survey is currently used by over 10,000 hospitals, as it serves to help optimize patient satisfaction. However, confounding factors, such as clinical depression, are not screened against by PG. Thus, arthroplasty surgeons performing lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) may have difficulty optimizing patient satisfaction while caring for patients with clinical depression. Therefore, we asked: 1) What Press Ganey elements affect the overall hospital rating in patients who suffer from clinical depression? and 2) Are survey responses different between patients who do and do not have clinical depression? MATERIALS AND METHODS We queried our institutional PG database for patients who underwent a TJA from November 2009 to January 2015. Our search yielded 1,454 patients, of which 204 suffered from depression and 1,250 did not. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the influence (b weight) of selected PG survey domains on overall hospital rating. The weighted mean for domain was also calculated. RESULTS Multiple regression analyses showed that overall hospital ratings were significantly influenced by communication with nurses (b-weight = 0.881, p< 0.001) in post-TJA patients with depression. The remaining domains were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in individual PG elements for patients who did and did not have depression. CONCLUSION Overall patient satisfaction among patients with depression was greatly influenced by communication with nurses. Understanding these challenges may encourage care coordination across disciplines for the management of patients with depression before and after surgery. As a result, this could optimize orthopedic surgery outcomes, but, more importantly, patient health and satisfaction, while reducing costs of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chukwuweike Gwam
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jaydev B Mistry
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nicolas Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Morad Chughtai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anton Khlopas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Melbin Thomas
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Randa K Elmallah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Mississippi Jackson, Mississippi
| | - George Muschler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael A Mont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steven F Harwin
- Center for Reconstructive Joint Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ronald E Delanois
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Said A Ibrahim
- From the Perelman School of Medicine and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, and the Veterans Affairs (VA) National Center of Innovation for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia VA Medical Center - both in Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Furuya-Kanamori L, Doi SAR, Smith PN, Bagheri N, Clements ACA, Sedrakyan A. Hospital effect on infections after four major surgical procedures: outlier and volume-outcome analysis using all-inclusive state data. J Hosp Infect 2017; 97:115-121. [PMID: 28576454 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital volume is known to have a direct impact on the outcomes of major surgical procedures. However, it is unclear if the evidence applies specifically to surgical site infections. AIMS To determine if there are procedure-specific hospital outliers [with higher surgical site infection rates (SSIRs)] for four major surgical procedures, and to examine if hospital volume is associated with SSIRs in the context of outlier performance in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. METHODS Adults who underwent one of four surgical procedures (colorectal, joint replacement, spinal and cardiac procedures) at a NSW healthcare facility between 2002 and 2013 were included. The hospital volume for each of the four surgical procedures was categorized into tertiles (low, medium and high). Multi-variable logistic regression models were built to estimate the expected SSIR for each procedure. The expected SSIRs were used to compute indirect standardized SSIRs which were then plotted in funnel plots to identify hospital outliers. FINDINGS One hospital was identified to be an overall outlier (higher SSIRs for three of the four procedures performed in its facilities), whereas two hospitals were outliers for one specific procedure throughout the entire study period. Low-volume facilities performed the best for colorectal surgery and worst for joint replacement and cardiac surgery. One high-volume facility was an outlier for spinal surgery. CONCLUSIONS Surgical site infections seem to be mainly a procedure-specific, as opposed to a hospital-specific, phenomenon in NSW. The association between hospital volume and SSIRs differs for different surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Furuya-Kanamori
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - S A R Doi
- Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia; Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - P N Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia; Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - N Bagheri
- Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - A C A Clements
- Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - A Sedrakyan
- Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia; Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jansson V, Steinbrück A, Hassenpflug J. [What can we learn in future from the data of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) in comparison to other registries?]. Unfallchirurg 2017; 119:488-92. [PMID: 27160728 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-016-0171-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) was founded in 2010 and has been in full operation since 2014. Previous attempts at a systematic data collection of elective and non-elective knee and hip replacement in Germany failed mainly because of the long-term lack of funding. The EPRD is an interdisciplinary collaborative partnership between the German Association of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery (DGOOC), all implant manufacturers of the German Medical Technology Association (BVMed), health insurers (AOK and the Association of Additional Healthcare Insurance) and hospitals (German Hospital Federation). As part of this cooperation a worldwide unique implant database has been set up, which includes all relevant components and a detailed description of implant specifications. This implant library enables a detailed evaluation of implant survival, revision rates and possible inferior implant performance of knee and hip replacements in Germany. At the end of 2015 the EPRD encompassed over 200,000 registered operations. Due to the high number of hip and knee arthroplasties in Germany with many different implants from different manufacturers there will be a rapid growth of data that are available for a national and also international comparison of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Jansson
- Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Campus Großhadern, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - A Steinbrück
- Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Campus Großhadern, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| | - J Hassenpflug
- Klinik für Orthopädie, Universitäts-Klinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
- Said A Ibrahim
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia2Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Hyunjee Kim
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - K John McConnell
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Onoriobe U, Miloro M, Sukotjo C, Mercuri LG, Lotesto A, Eke R. How Many Temporomandibular Joint Total Joint Alloplastic Implants Will Be Placed in the United States in 2030? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74:1531-8. [PMID: 27186874 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to provide a statistical projection of the number of alloplastic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) total joint replacements (TJRs) that will be performed in the United States through the year 2030. MATERIALS AND METHODS The program directors of all 101 Commission on Dental Accreditation-accredited oral and maxillofacial surgery training programs in the United States were surveyed online by use of a questionnaire developed using Redcap (Chicago, IL) over a 6-week period (February 2015-March 2015). The questionnaire included 19 questions related to each program's TMJ disorder and TMJ TJR curricula, as well as clinical experience. In addition, members of the American Society of Temporomandibular Joint Surgeons were surveyed online using Redcap and via direct survey forms. Moreover, requests for the total number of TMJ TJR devices produced and implanted during the same period were made to the 3 manufacturers of Food and Drug Administration-approved TMJ TJR devices in the United States. RESULTS The response rate among program directors was 52.5%, and the total number of TMJ TJR devices implanted in oral and maxillofacial surgery programs in 2005 was 412. This total increased by 38% to 572 in 2014. Statistically, this projects an increase of 58% over the next 16 years to 902 TMJ TJR operations by 2030 (95% prediction limits, 768 and 1,037). The total number of TMJ TJR devices distributed by one manufacturer increased from 430 in the year 2000 to 1,004 in 2014 (133%). By use of these data, statistically over the next 16 years, the number of TMJ TJR devices distributed by this company is projected to be 1,658 (95% prediction limits, 1,380 and 1,935). CONCLUSIONS The data presented in this study show an increasing demand for the use of TMJ TJR devices in the management of end-stage TMJ disorders to the year 2030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uvoh Onoriobe
- Dental Student, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael Miloro
- Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
| | - Cortino Sukotjo
- Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Louis G Mercuri
- Visiting Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Clinical Consultant, TMJ Concepts, Ventura, CA
| | - Anthony Lotesto
- Dental Student, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ransome Eke
- Clinical Instructor, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Halawi MJ, Greene K, Barsoum WK. Optimizing Outcomes of Total Joint Arthroplasty Under the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2016; 45:E112-E113. [PMID: 26991575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad J Halawi
- Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pierce TP, Elmallah RK, Lavernia CJ, Chen AF, Harwin SF, Thomas CM, Mont MA. Racial Disparities in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty Outcomes and Use. Orthopedics 2015; 38:e1139-46. [PMID: 26652337 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20151123-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Race-associated disparities often occur in patients who undergo lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although it is imperative to elucidate and describe the disparities in race and ethnicity that may influence patient perception, satisfaction, and surgical outcomes, there is a paucity of reports detailing the nature of potential racial disparities in TJA. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to examine racial and ethnic disparities in the (1) physician-patient relationship; (2) use of TJA; (3) intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications; and (4) patient-reported outcomes. Although there are limited studies that evaluated this topic, it has been shown that there are race-specific differences in physician-patient relationships. Specifically, African American patients report lower satisfaction rates in communication with their physician than their Caucasian counterparts and physicians were more apt to describe African Americans as less "medically cooperative." The majority of the studies the authors found regarding TJA use indicated that African Americans and Hispanics were less likely to undergo lower extremity TJA than Caucasians. Furthermore, racial minorities may have higher 30-day readmission and intra- and postoperative complication rates compared with Caucasians. Despite these compelling findings, concrete conclusions are difficult to make due to the presence of multiple confounding patient factors, and more studies examining the racial and ethnic disparities in patients with TJA are needed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- Marshall H Chin
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2007 Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hanchate AD, Kapoor A, Katz JN, McCormick D, Lasser KE, Feng C, Manze MG, Kressin NR. Massachusetts health reform and disparities in joint replacement use: difference in differences study. BMJ 2015; 350:h440. [PMID: 25700849 PMCID: PMC4353277 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the impact of the insurance expansion in 2006 on use of knee and hip replacement procedures by race/ethnicity, area income, and the use of hospitals that predominantly serve poor people ("safety net hospitals"). DESIGN Quasi-experimental difference in differences study examining change after reform in the share of procedures performed in safety net hospitals by race/ethnicity and area income, with adjustment for patients' residence, demographics, and comorbidity. SETTING State of Massachusetts, United States. PARTICIPANTS Massachusetts residents aged 40-64 as the target beneficiaries of reform and similarly aged residents of New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania as the comparison (control) population. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Number of knee and hip replacement procedures per 10 000 population and use of safety net hospitals. Procedure counts from state discharge data for 2.5 years before and after reform, and multivariate difference in differences. Poisson regression was used to adjust for demographics, economic conditions, secular time, and geographic factors to estimate the change in procedure rate associated with health reform by race/ethnicity and area income. RESULTS Before reform, the number of procedures (/10 000) in Massachusetts was lower among Hispanic people (12.9, P<0.001) than black people (28.1) and white people (30.1). Overall, procedure use increased 22.4% during the 2.5 years after insurance expansion; reform in Massachusetts was associated with a 4.7% increase. The increase associated with reform was significantly higher among Hispanic people (37.9%, P<0.001) and black people (11.4%, P<0.05) than among white people (2.8%). Lower income was not associated with larger increases in procedure use. The share of knee and hip replacement procedures performed in safety net hospitals in Massachusetts decreased by 1.0% from a level of 12.7% before reform. The reduction was larger among Hispanic people (-6.4%, P<0.001) than white people (-1.0%), and among low income residents (-3.9%, p<0.001) than high income residents (0%). CONCLUSIONS Insurance expansion can help reduce disparities by race/ethnicity but not by income in access to elective surgical care and could shift some elective surgical care away from safety net hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amresh D Hanchate
- VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alok Kapoor
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Danny McCormick
- Cambridge Health Alliance and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Karen E Lasser
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chen Feng
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meredith G Manze
- City University of New York, School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy R Kressin
- VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sieber PA. [The Swiss champion prosthesis implantation]. Rev Med Suisse 2015; 11:226. [PMID: 25831623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
|
29
|
Westermann RW, Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States: A Comparison of National Volume, Patient Demographics, Complications, and Surgical Indications. Iowa Orthop J 2015; 35:1-7. [PMID: 26361437 PMCID: PMC4492145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shoulder arthroplasty is increasing in the United States. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as an alternative treatment for end-stage glenohumeral pathology. Until recently, administrative coding practices have not differentiated RSA from traditional total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and thus national procedural volume has been unknown. The purpose of this study was to define the utilization, patient characteristics, indications and complications for RSA, and contrast these to TSA and hemiarthroplasty (HA). METHODS The 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) dataset was queried using ICD-9-CM codes to identify patients undergoing RSA, TSA, or HA. We used weighted estimates of national procedure volume, per-capita utilization, patient comorbidities, and inpatient complications denned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and identified them using standard methods described by Elixhauser. ANOVA statistical analysis was used and significance was denned as p value <0.05. RESULTS In 2011, 66,485 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty; there were 21,692 cases of RSA, 29,359 of TSA, and 15,434 of HA. Utilization of RSA and TSA increased between 2002-2011, and decreased for HA. RSA patients were older (72.7 years vs 67.4 TSA vs 66.8 HA) and more commonly female. Comorbidity burden was highest in patients undergoing HA. Inpatient complications were highest after RSA (p < 0.001). When compared to TSA, RSA was more commonly used in the setting of rotator cuff disease, and posttraumatic sequelae (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our findings represent the first national estimates of RSA within the United Sates. RSA is a significant contributor to increasing shoulder arthroplasty utilization nationally representing one-third of arthroplasty cases. Conditions traditionally managed with HA in older populations appear to now be more commonly managed with RSA. RSA is performed on older patients with expanded indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Westermann
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - Andrew J Pugely
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - Christopher T Martin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - Yubo Gao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - Brian R Wolf
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - Carolyn M Hettrich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Day JS, Ramsey ML, Lau E, Williams GR. Risk of venous thromboembolism after shoulder arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24:98-105. [PMID: 25467306 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2014] [Revised: 09/01/2014] [Accepted: 09/12/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered standard of care after lower but not after upper extremity arthroplasty. Medicare claims data were analyzed to determine the national incidence of symptomatic VTE after shoulder arthroplasty during the index surgical admission and after discharge. METHODS Incidence of VTE was compared between shoulder arthroplasty and lower extremity arthroplasty, and patient-specific risk factors for pulmonary embolism were determined for shoulder arthroplasty. Finally, the incidence of surgical site bleeding was determined for each type of procedure. RESULTS VTE complications occurred in 1.2% of lower extremity and 0.53% of shoulder arthroplasties. Patient factors that were associated with an increased risk of VTE included a principal diagnosis of fracture, history of VTE, cardiac arrhythmia, presence of a metastatic tumor, coagulopathy, congestive heart failure, alcohol abuse, and obesity. Adjusted rates of VTE were generally higher for lower extremity compared with shoulder arthroplasties. Prevalence of readmission for VTE was higher for shoulder hemiarthroplasty than for total shoulder arthroplasty. Wound hematoma rates were similar between shoulder and lower extremity procedures. CONCLUSIONS VTE rates after shoulder arthroplasty were generally lower than those after lower extremity arthroplasty. We believe that the risk of bleeding combined with the lower rates of VTE with existing lower rates of chemoprophylaxis does not warrant the routine use of anticoagulation. Use of mechanical prophylaxis combined with aspirin may be sufficient for shoulder arthroplasty patients who are not at increased risk of VTE. Chemoprophylaxis with agents other than aspirin may be warranted in patients with a demonstrated risk of VTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judd S Day
- Exponent, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA; Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew L Ramsey
- Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Gerald R Williams
- Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Griffin JW, Hadeed MM, Novicoff WM, Browne JA, Brockmeier SF. Patient age is a factor in early outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23:1867-1871. [PMID: 24957847 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2014] [Revised: 04/04/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly and young patients alike are undergoing shoulder replacement at increased rates. In an era of outcomes reporting, risk adjustment, and cost containment, identifying patients likely to have adverse events is increasingly important. Our objective was to determine whether patient age is independently associated with postoperative in-hospital complications or increased hospital charges after shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to analyze 58,790 patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty between 2000 and 2008. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression modeling was used to compare groups. Our objective was to determine whether age had an independent impact on the likelihood of postoperative in-hospital complications, mortality rate, length of stay, or charges after shoulder arthroplasty. RESULTS Patients aged 80 years or older had an increased in-hospital mortality rate (0.5%) compared with patients aged 50 to 79 years (0.1%) and patients aged younger than 50 years (0.1%). Predictors of death included female gender, total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty, and Deyo score. Increased age was associated with slightly increased hospital charges. Length of stay was longer in patients aged 80 years or older compared with younger patients. After shoulder arthroplasty, postoperative anemia occurred more often in patients aged 80 years or older. Other postoperative complications including pulmonary embolism, infection, and cardiac complications were similar among groups. CONCLUSION Older patients tend to have longer hospital stays, an increased incidence of postoperative anemia, and slightly higher charges after shoulder arthroplasty. Advanced age is not associated with an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism, infection, and cardiac complications. Further research is warranted to explain the relationship between age and early postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin W Griffin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Michael M Hadeed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Wendy M Novicoff
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - James A Browne
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Stephen F Brockmeier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Davis DE, Paxton ES, Maltenfort M, Abboud J. Factors affecting hospital charges after total shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of the National Inpatient Sample database. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23:1860-1866. [PMID: 25156958 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2014] [Revised: 04/05/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) performed in the United States increases yearly. At the same time, cost containment in health care continues to be a major concern. Therefore, it is imperative to identify specific variables that affect the cost of shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS The U.S. National Inpatient Sample database was queried (1993-2010) to evaluate total hospital charges for shoulder arthroplasty. Etiology of arthritis, multiple medical comorbidities, and patient and hospital demographics were evaluated for their effect on total inpatient hospital charges by a multivariate analysis. RESULTS Hospital charges for TSA increased from 1993 to 2010. Gender, race, and obesity were not associated with these differences in hospital charges. Post-traumatic and rheumatoid arthritis resulted in increased hospital charges; however, osteoarthritis resulted in decreased charges from the baseline. Multiple comorbidities (diabetes, lung disease, heart disease, and kidney disease) resulted in increased hospital charges after TSA. Regionally, the western and southern United States had the highest total charges above baseline. Larger hospitals and private urban hospitals also showed charges above baseline. CONCLUSIONS The factors related to increased hospital charges after TSA are multifactorial and include medical comorbidities, patient demographics, and regionalization. As the future of health care continues to evolve, it is important for practitioners, legislators, insurance administrators, and hospitals to recognize factors that increase costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E Davis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - E Scott Paxton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Mitchell Maltenfort
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Abboud
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jain NB, Yamaguchi K. The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23:1905-1912. [PMID: 25304043 PMCID: PMC4252758 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2014] [Revised: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 06/27/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to overall utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty and present age- and sex-stratified national rates of shoulder arthroplasty. We also assessed contemporary complication rates, mortality rates, and indications for shoulder arthroplasty, as well as estimates and indications for revision arthroplasty. METHODS We used the Nationwide Inpatient Samples for 2009 through 2011 to calculate estimates of shoulder arthroplasty and assessed trends using Joinpoint (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) regression. RESULTS The cumulative estimated utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty) increased significantly from 52,397 procedures (95% confidence interval [CI], 47,093-57,701) in 2009 to 67,184 cases (95% CI, 60,638-73,731) in 2011. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty accounted for 42% of all primary shoulder arthroplasty procedures in 2011. The concomitant diagnosis of osteoarthritis and rotator cuff impairment was found in only 29.8% of reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases. The highest rate of reverse shoulder arthroplasty was in the 75- to 84-year-old female subgroup (77 per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 67-87). Revision cases comprised 8.8% and 8.2% of all shoulder arthroplasties in 2009 and 2011, respectively, and 35% of revision cases were because of mechanical complications/loosening whereas 18% were because of dislocation. CONCLUSIONS The utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty significantly increased in just a 3-year time span, with a major contribution from reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 2011. Indications appear to have expanded because a large percentage of patients did not have rotator cuff pathology. The burden from revision arthroplasties was also substantial, and efforts to optimize outcomes and longevity of primary shoulder arthroplasty are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin B Jain
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Ken Yamaguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jones L. Preface: musculoskeletal healthcare. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2014; 24:191-3. [PMID: 25399452 DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2014011424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
35
|
Hollatz MF, Stang A. Nationwide shoulder arthroplasty rates and revision burden in Germany: analysis of the national hospitalization data 2005 to 2006. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23:e267-74. [PMID: 24618200 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2013] [Revised: 11/26/2013] [Accepted: 12/03/2013] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to provide nationwide shoulder arthroplasty rates in Germany based on the national hospitalization file and to estimate the revision burden for shoulder arthroplasty and its determinants. METHODS We analyzed the nationwide, population-based, German diagnosis-related groups data from the years 2005 and 2006. Procedure codes and diagnosis were analyzed for each hospitalization. Overall, 16,488 primary shoulder arthroplasties and 1302 revisions were performed during the study period. Age-standardized rates, age-specific rates, rates by indication, and revision burden were calculated. RESULTS The age-standardized hemiarthroplasty (HA) rates were 3.6 per 100,000 person-years (standard error [SE], 0.1) for men and 9.3 per 100,000 person-years (SE, 0.1) for women and clearly exceeded the age-standardized total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) rates of 1.7 per 100,000 person years (SE, 0.1) for men and 3.7 per 100,000 person-years (SE, 0.1) for women. The revision burden was 4.7% for HA and 15.0% for TSA. Multivariable-adjusted analysis showed increasing age was associated with a lower relative burden of revision, and an increased Charlson comorbidity index and male gender were associated with a higher relative burden of revision. The adjusted relative burden of revision was considerably higher for TSA than for HA (adjusted relative burden of revision, 2.89; 95% confidence interval, 2.60-3.22). CONCLUSION We found more than 2-fold higher primary rates for HA than for TSA and up to 3-fold higher shoulder arthroplasty rates for women than for men. TSA had a 3-fold higher relative burden of revision than HA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias F Hollatz
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Andreas Stang
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Assareh H, Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ, Hillman K, Flabouris A. Rate of venous thromboembolism among surgical patients in Australian hospitals: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e005502. [PMID: 25280806 PMCID: PMC4187993 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Revised: 08/25/2014] [Accepted: 08/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among surgical patients on health systems in Australia, data on VTE incidence and its variation within Australia are lacking. We aim to explore VTE and subsequent mortality rates, trends and variations across Australian acute public hospitals. SETTING A large retrospective cohort study using all elective surgical patients in 82 acute public hospitals during 2002-2009 in New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS Patients underwent elective surgery within 2 days of admission, aged between 18 and 90 years, and who were not transferred to another acute care facility; 4 362 624 patients were included. OUTCOME MEASURES VTE incidents were identified by secondary diagnostic codes. Poisson mixed models were used to derive adjusted incidence rates and rate ratios (IRR). RESULTS 2/1000 patients developed postoperative VTE. VTE increased by 30% (IRR=1.30, CI 1.19 to 1.42) over the study period. Differences in the VTE rates, trends between hospital peer groups and between hospitals with the highest and those with the lowest rates were significant (between-hospital variation). Smaller hospitals, accommodated in two peer groups, had the lowest overall VTE rates (IRR=0.56:0.33 to 0.95; IRR=0.37:0.23 to 0.61) and exhibited a greater increase (64% and 237% vs 19%) overtime and greater between-hospital variations compared to larger hospitals (IRR=8.64:6.23 to 11.98; IRR=8.92:5.49 to 14.49 vs IRR=3.70:3.32 to 4.12). Mortality among patients with postoperative VTE was 8% and remained stable overtime. No differences in post-VTE death rates and trends were seen between hospital groups; however, larger hospitals exhibited less between-hospital variations (IRR=1.78:1.30 to 2.44) compared to small hospitals (IRR>23). Hospitals performed differently in prevention versus treatment of postoperative VTE. CONCLUSIONS VTE incidence is increasing and there is large variation between-hospital and within-hospital peer groups suggesting a varied compliance with VTE preventative strategies and the potential for targeted interventions and quality improvement opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Assareh
- Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Epidemiology, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jack Chen
- Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lixin Ou
- Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephanie J Hollis
- Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth Hillman
- Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arthas Flabouris
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital & Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Muppavarapu RC, Chaurasia AR, Schwarzkopf R, Matzkin EG, Cassidy CC, Smith EL. Total joint arthroplasty surgery: does day of surgery matter? J Arthroplasty 2014; 29:1943-5. [PMID: 25015754 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2014] [Revised: 05/25/2014] [Accepted: 06/04/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Length of stay (LOS) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) impacts the expense to the hospital. Our purpose was to evaluate the impact that day of surgery has on postoperative LOS. 547 patients who had a primary TJA at two tertiary care hospitals were identified retrospectively. TJA patients admitted on day of surgery and who had primary elective surgery were included in our sample. Patients were subdivided into one of four groups: those who had operations on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday respectively. Patients who had surgery on Thursday and Friday had significantly longer LOS when compared to Monday and Tuesday. This variation in LOS between the groups may be due to inconsistencies in weekend functionality, less experienced part-time staffing, and inaccessibility of rehabilitation personnel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghuveer C Muppavarapu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ran Schwarzkopf
- Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California
| | | | | | - Eric L Smith
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- David C Ayers
- The Arthritis and Joint Replacement Center, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605. E-mail address:
| | - Patricia D Franklin
- Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Marques E, Noble S, Blom AW, Hollingworth W. Disclosing total waiting times for joint replacement: evidence from the English NHS using linked HES data. Health Econ 2014; 23:806-820. [PMID: 23788234 DOI: 10.1002/hec.2954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2012] [Revised: 04/23/2013] [Accepted: 05/08/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
For the last decade, stringent monitoring of waiting time performance targets provided English hospitals with incentives to reduce official waiting times for elective surgery. It is less clear whether the total amount of time patients waited in secondary care, from first referral to outpatient clinic until treatment, has also fallen. We used Hospital Episode Statistics inpatient data for patients undergoing total joint replacement during a period of active monitoring of targets (between 2006/7 and 2008/9) and linked it to outpatient data to reconstruct patients' pathway in the 3 years before surgery and provide alternative measurements of waiting times. Our findings suggest that although official waiting times decreased drastically in our study period, total waiting time in secondary care has not declined. Patients with shorter official waits spent a longer time in a 'work-up' period prior to inclusion in the official waiting list, and socio-economic inequities persisted in waiting times for joint replacement. We found no evidence that target policies achieved efficiency gains during our study period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsa Marques
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Deegan BF, Richard RD, Bowen TR, Perkins RM, Graham JH, Foltzer MA. Impact of chronic kidney disease stage on lower-extremity arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2014; 37:e613-8. [PMID: 24992055 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20140626-51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2013] [Accepted: 12/18/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
End-stage renal disease and dialysis is commonly associated with poor outcomes after joint replacement surgery. The goal of this study was to evaluate postoperative complications in patients with less advanced chronic kidney disease undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients who underwent THA or TKA between 2004 and 2011 with stage 1, 2, or 3 chronic kidney disease were retrospectively reviewed via an electronic medical record. The authors compared 377 patients who had stage 1 to 2 chronic kidney disease with 402 patients who had stage 3 chronic kidney disease. No significant differences in 90-day readmission or revision rates were found between the stage 1 to 2 and stage 3 patient groups. For patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease, the overall mortality rate was greater than that in patients with stage 1 to 2 chronic kidney disease. However, when adjusted for comorbid disease, no significant increases were seen in joint infection, readmission, or early revision between patients with stage 1 to 2 chronic kidney disease vs patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease. The overall incidence of infection was high (3.5%) but far less than reported for patients with end-stage renal disease, dialysis, and kidney transplant. In conclusion, patients with stage 1, 2, or 3 chronic kidney disease may have a higher than expected rate of prosthetic joint infection (3.5%) after total joint arthroplasty. Patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease are at higher risk for postoperative mortality compared with those with lesser stages of kidney disease.
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total ankle replacement (TAR) has gained acceptance as an alternative to traditional ankle arthrodesis (AA) for end-stage ankle arthritis. Little is known about long-term trends in volume, utilization, and patient characteristics. The objective of this study was to use longitudinal data to examine temporal trends in TAR and AA. METHODS We identified all United States fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who underwent TAR and AA between 1991 and 2010 (n = 5871 and 29 532, respectively). We examined changes in patient demographics and comorbidity, nationwide and hospital volume, per capita utilization, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS Between 1991 and 2010, both TAR and AA patients had modest shifts in characteristics, with higher rates of diabetes and obesity. Overall, TAR Medicare volume increased by more than 1000% from 72 procedures in 1991 to 888 in 2010, while per-capita standardized utilization increased 670.8% (P < .001). AA volume increased 35.8% from 1167 procedures in 1991 to 1585 in 2010, while per-capita standardized utilization declined 15.6% (P < .001). The percentage of all US hospitals performing TAR increased nearly 4-fold from 3.1% in 1991 to 12.6% in 2010, while the proportion performing AA remained relatively unchanged. LOS decreased dramatically from 8.7 days in 1991 to 2.3 days in 2010 in TAR and from 5.5 days to 3.2 days in AA (P < .001). CONCLUSION Between 1991 and 2010, Medicare beneficiaries undergoing either TAR or AA became more medically complex. Both volume and per-capita utilization of TAR increased dramatically but remained nearly constant for AA. At the same time, mean hospital volume for both procedures remained low. Further research should be directed toward determining design, surgeon, and hospital variables that relate to optimal outcomes following TAR, which has become increasingly used for the treatment of ankle arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, comparative series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Pugely
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Maurer A, Jones LC. Musculoskeletal healthcare disparities: influence of patient sex, race, and ethnicity on utilization of total joint arthroplasty. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2014; 24:233-240. [PMID: 25272223 DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2014010610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Total joint arthroplasty is an effective treatment of musculoskeletal diseases including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, and other diseases of the major joints. Based on data obtained from the National Inpatient Survey from 2000 through 2010, substantial differences in the rates of utilization of total hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty were detected with respect to race, ethnicity, and gender/sex. The results of this study support the likelihood that it is the interaction between multiple factors (patient, physician, and system/institutional) that contributes to musculoskeletal health disparities. Our study shows that disparities in the utilization of total joint arthroplasty that were evident in 2000 continue to exist. Additional studies evaluating innovative approaches to reducing musculoskeletal disparities relating to total joint arthroplasty are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lynne C Jones
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Boguski RM, Miller BS, Carpenter JE, Mendenhall S, Hughes RE. Variation in use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty across hospitals. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22:1633-8. [PMID: 24135418 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2013] [Revised: 09/07/2013] [Accepted: 09/10/2013] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The opportunity for variation exists in the choice between anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Quality improvement methods seek to reduce variation. We used supply-chain data to characterize variation in the selection of anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty across hospitals and to analyze the effect of hospital volume on this variation. METHODS Mendenhall Associates, Inc (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) provided us with a database of hospital supply-chain data from orthopaedic surgical cases. This study included hospitals in which at least one total shoulder arthroplasty was performed. We calculated, for each hospital, the percentages of each type of prosthesis implanted and examined the distribution of these percentages across all hospitals. We also divided the sample of hospitals into tertiles, by volume of total shoulder arthroplasties performed, and examined the distributions of percentage reverse shoulder arthroplasty performed in each tertile. RESULTS Across all hospitals, we saw wide variation in the volume of total shoulder arthroplasties and the percentage of reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed. Hospitals with lower total shoulder arthroplasty volumes exhibited greater variation in the percentages of each type of total shoulder arthroplasty performed. Higher volume hospitals exhibited smaller variation. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed wide variation in the selection of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty across all hospitals and an inverse relationship between hospital volume and variation. This variation signals uncertainty about the best application of each device and that there is need for improvement in the consistency of treatment of patients with shoulder disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, cost-effectiveness study, economic and decision analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Boguski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Klein GR, Parcells BW, Levine HB, Dabaghian L, Hartzband MA. The economic recession and its effect on utilization of elective total joint arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2013; 42:499-504. [PMID: 24340319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
The United States economy entered a recession in December 2007. This study aims to determine whether the utilization of elective orthopedic surgeries has been impacted by this recession. From January 2007 to December 2009 at a single private practice in New Jersey, 4820 total joint replacement procedures were scheduled, of which 649 of those were cancelled. The rate of cancellation for financial reasons was compared to multiple economic measures by linear regression analysis. The results show that the rate of financially motivated cancellations increased over time concurring with multiple financial markers reflecting the economic recession. The results suggest that the recession has created a financial barrier for a significant number of Americans, leading to decreased utilization of care. While there was a statistically significant increase in cancellations for financial reasons, the overall rate of cancellations in the total joint population is still low, representing only about 1% of all cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregg R Klein
- Hartzband Center for Hip and Knee Replacement, Paramus, NJ
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Oliphant SS, Ghetti C, McGough RL, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Inpatient procedures in elderly women: an analysis over time. Maturitas 2013; 75:349-54. [PMID: 23707727 PMCID: PMC3713166 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2012] [Revised: 04/12/2013] [Accepted: 04/28/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe inpatient surgical and diagnostic/therapeutic procedures in women ≥65 years old and assess procedure trends over time. STUDY DESIGN Procedure data for all women ≥65 years was collected using the National Hospital Discharge Survey, a federal dataset drawn from a representative sampling of U.S. inpatient hospitals which includes patient and hospital demographics and ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for admissions from 1979 to 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Age-adjusted rates (AAR) per 1000 women were created using 1990 U.S. Census data to compare trends over time. RESULTS Over 96 million procedures were performed in women age≥65 years from 1979 to 2006. Women age≥65 years constituted 17% of women with ≥1 inpatient procedure in 1979, rising to 32% in 2006. The most common surgical procedures were lower extremity joint replacement, open reduction internal fixation, and cholecystectomy. The most common concurrent diagnosis was femoral neck fracture. Women with femoral neck fracture were more likely to undergo open reduction internal fixation compared to joint replacement. AARs for ORIF fell from 4.3 to 3.2 (p=.02) from 1979 to 2006, while AARs for joint replacement increased from 0.2 to 3.4 (p≤.001, 1979-1988; p=.14, 1990-2006). CONCLUSIONS The rate of women age≥65 years undergoing inpatient procedures has increased dramatically in the last 30 years. Hip fracture was the most common diagnosis for elderly women, highlighting the impact of osteoporosis and falls and the importance of prevention strategies and optimization of peri-operative care in this population. Further comparative study of hip fracture treatment strategies in this population is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sallie S Oliphant
- Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh-School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hooper G. The ageing population and the increasing demand for joint replacement. N Z Med J 2013; 126:5-6. [PMID: 23831871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
|
47
|
Zhou H, Wang L, Yao T, Wang C. [Research and analysis of failure data of contemporary artificial joint registration system]. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 2013; 30:375-379. [PMID: 23858766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
This paper is aimed to focus on the joint prosthesis failure event, to collect the statistic data about the failure of artificial joints issued by authoritative organizations at home and aboard, and to compare the functions of different types of the artificial joints. We generalized and compared current study analyzing the failure reason and type of joint prosthesis, and categorized the failure events according to the failure occurring time, i. e. short-term, medium-term and long-term. This paper could be helpful for improving and summarizing of artificial joint replacement surgery, and could put forward the requirements for the future artificial joints.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement/adverse effects
- Arthroplasty, Replacement/statistics & numerical data
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data
- Humans
- Joint Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Failure/etiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Zhou
- Institute of Biomedical Manufacturing and Life Quality Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Energy Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
|
49
|
Torre M, del Prever EB, Costa L, Romanini E, Masciocchi M, Manno V. [Innovative materials in orthopaedics: the crosslinked polyethylene (XPE)]. Ann Ig 2011; 23:81-90. [PMID: 21736010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
More than 150.000 hip and knee arthroplasties are performed every year in Italy. More than 50% of the patients receive a polyethylene component (Ultra High Molecular Weight PolyEthylene, UHMWPE). Polyethylene abrasive wear induces over time in vivo a foreign-body response and consequently osteolysis, pain and need of implant revision. Furthermore, oxidative wear due to gamma-rays sterilization caused in the '90ies several and severe failures. To solve these problems, since then, the orthopaedics research has been addressed to: 1) develop new cross linked polyethylene with a higher molecular mass than UHMWPE and, consequently, a higher abrasive wear resistance; 2) avoid the oxidative wear induced by gamma-rays sterilization, by using other sterilization methods and by stabilizing UHMWPE by means of antioxidants such as Vitamin E. According to the most recent studies, performed on limited cohorts and mostly funded by manufacturers, cross linked polyethylene shows a better abrasive wear resistance if compared to the conventional polyethylene but no significant differences have been detected in the clinical outcomes. Clinical follow up of Vitamin E stabilized PE are not yet available. The organization of national arthroplasties registries, able to trace and characterize the implanted devices and based on the whole patients population, will facilitate the early detection of devices that show a performance inferior than the expected one. In Italy, the National Institute of Health has been entrusted by the Ministry of Health to organize the national arthroplasty registry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Torre
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Centro Nazionale di Epidemiologia Sorveglianza e Promozione della Salute, Roma.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sahinbegovic E, Dallos T, Aigner E, Axmann R, Engelbrecht M, Schöniger-Hekele M, Karonitsch T, Farkas M, Karger T, Willeit J, Stölzel U, Keysser G, Datz C, Kiechl S, Schett G, Zwerina J. Hereditary hemochromatosis as a risk factor for joint replacement surgery. Am J Med 2010; 123:659-62. [PMID: 20609690 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2009] [Revised: 01/06/2010] [Accepted: 01/17/2010] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hemochromatosis is an inherited disease with iron overload and joint involvement resembling osteoarthritis. To determine the rate of joint replacement surgery in patients with hemochromatosis, we performed a cross-sectional cohort study. METHODS A total of 199 individuals with hereditary hemochromatosis were included. The prevalence of joint replacement surgery in hip, knee, and ankle joints because of secondary osteoarthritis was assessed. Data were compared with 917 healthy subjects from the population-based Bruneck study. RESULTS A total of 32 of 199 individuals with hemochromatosis received joint replacement surgery with a total number of 52 joints replaced. Compared with expected rates in healthy individuals, patients with hemochromatosis had a significantly higher risk for joint replacement surgery (odds ratio 9.0; confidence interval, 4.6-17.4). Joint replacement occurred significantly earlier in life in patients with hemochromatosis; 21.9% of the patients with hemochromatosis and 1.7% of healthy individuals required joint replacement before the age of 50 years (P=.0027). Moreover, patients with hemochromatosis were more likely to require multiple joint replacements (8.5%) than the control group (expected rate 0.3%; P=.0001). CONCLUSION Hemochromatosis is a risk factor for joint replacement surgery because of severe secondary osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enijad Sahinbegovic
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|