Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment of patients with COVID-19 taking tacrolimus: case series describing the results of drug-drug interactions

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is a novel drug combination that is authorized by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ritonavir is a cytochrome P450 3A inhibitor and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor that increases the plasma concentration of tacrolimus and other medications. We describe the cases of two patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: a patient who had undergone kidney transplantation and another with a history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Toxic concentrations of tacrolimus were induced in both. This case series highlights the risk associated with the concomitant administration of tacrolimus and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of two structurally analogous CYP3A inhibitors against pathogenic human coronaviruses in vitro

Coronaviruses pose a permanent risk of outbreaks, with three highly pathogenic species and strains (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2) having emerged in the last twenty years. Limited antiviral therapies are currently available and their efficacy in randomized clinical trials enrolling SARS-CoV-2 patients has not been consistent, highlighting the need for more potent treatments. We previously showed that cobicistat, a clinically approved inhibitor of Cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A), has direct antiviral activity against early circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains in vitro and in Syrian hamsters. Cobicistat is a derivative of ritonavir, which is co-administered as pharmacoenhancer with the SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibitor nirmatrelvir, to inhibit its metabolization by CPY3A and preserve its antiviral efficacy. Here, we used automated image analysis for a screening and parallel comparison of the anti-coronavirus effects of cobicistat and ritonavir. Our data show that both drugs display antiviral activity at low micromolar concentrations against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants in vitro, including epidemiologically relevant Omicron subvariants. Despite their close structural similarity, we found that cobicistat is more potent than ritonavir, as shown by significantly lower EC50 values in monotherapy and higher levels of viral suppression when used in combination with nirmatrelvir. Finally, we show that the antiviral activity of both cobicistat and ritonavir is maintained against other human coronaviruses, including HCoV-229E and the highly pathogenic MERS-CoV. Overall, our results demonstrate that cobicistat has more potent anti-coronavirus activity than ritonavir and suggest that dose adjustments could pave the way to the use of both drugs as broad-spectrum antivirals against highly pathogenic human coronaviruses.

Letermovir and tacrolimus interaction effects in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients receiving moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors for antifungal prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Letermovir inhibits cytomegalovirus replication and is approved for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in cytomegalovirus seropositive hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Studies have found that letermovir coadministration has minimal effect on tacrolimus levels prior to the start of voriconazole, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor. However, data are lacking for hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients receiving letermovir and tacrolimus with moderate CYP 3A4 inhibitors as antifungal prophylaxis.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center analysis, we reviewed the charts of 92 consecutive adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients receiving letermovir, tacrolimus, and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors for antifungal prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were evaluated for the first 7 days pre-letermovir and for the first and second 7-day periods after letermovir. The tacrolimus mean C/D ratios [(ng/mL)/(mg/kg/day)] increased significantly with the addition of letermovir: 172.99 (95% confidence interval (CI): 158.2-187.78) pre-letermovir, 268.66 (95% CI: 244.34-292.98) first-week letermovir, and 312.19 (95% CI: 279.39-344.99) second-week letermovir (P < 0.001). The average dosages (mg/kg) of tacrolimus also decreased significantly across the three-time intervals (P < 0.001). Only four patients experienced clinically significant cytomegalovirus reactivation which required systemic treatment.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate a reduction in tacrolimus dosing requirements for patients receiving tacrolimus and letermovir with concomitant moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors. The results of this interaction suggest that frequent monitoring of tacrolimus trough levels is warranted when starting letermovir and that empiric reduction of tacrolimus dosing upon letermovir initiation should be considered.

Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using P-gp and/or CYP450-Interacting Drugs: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are excreted by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and some are metabolized by CYP450 enzymes such as CYP3A4. Although fewer drug interactions are present with NOACs, it is unclear whether NOACs should also be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using pharmacokinetically interacting drugs. Therefore, the benefit-risk profile of NOACs versus VKAs was investigated in AF patients treated with P-gp and/or CYP450-interacting drugs.

METHODS

Using PubMed and Embase, randomized controlled trials and observational studies on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus VKAs in AF patients using P-gp and/or CYP450-interacting drugs were included. A meta-analysis was performed, calculating relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, investigating 10,793 NOAC and 10,096 VKA users treated with P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, whereas no studies on P-gp and/or CYP450-inducing drugs were identified. Compared to VKAs, NOACs were associated with a borderline non-significantly lower stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) risk (RR 0.85, 95%CI (0.72-1.01)), significantly lower intracranial bleeding (RR 0.47, 95%CI (0.34-0.65)) and all-cause mortality risks (RR 0.87, 95%CI (0.79-0.95), but significantly higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR 1.74, 95%CI (1.06-2.86)). Among AF patients using amiodarone, NOACs were associated with significantly lower stroke/SE (RR 0.71, 95%CI (0.54-0.93)) and intracranial bleeding risks (RR 0.51, 95%CI (0.29-0.88)), but significantly higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR 2.15, 95%CI (1.24-3.72)) than VKAs.

CONCLUSION

The benefit-risk profile of NOACs compared to VKAs was preserved in AF patients using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, including amiodarone.

Clinical Pharmacology of Brigatinib: A Next-Generation Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitor

Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor designed to overcome mechanisms of resistance associated with crizotinib, is approved for the treatment of ALK-positive advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. After oral administration of single doses of brigatinib 30-240 mg, the median time to reach maximum plasma concentration ranged from 1 to 4 h. In patients with advanced malignancies, brigatinib showed dose linearity over the dose range of 60-240 mg once daily. A high-fat meal had no clinically meaningful effect on systemic exposures of brigatinib (area under the plasma concentration-time curve); thus, brigatinib can be administered with or without food. In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model with transit absorption compartments was found to adequately describe brigatinib pharmacokinetics. In addition, the population pharmacokinetic analyses showed that no dose adjustment is required based on body weight, age, race, sex, total bilirubin (< 1.5× upper limit of normal), and mild-to-moderate renal impairment. Data from dedicated phase I trials have indicated that no dose adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, while a dose reduction of approximately 40% (e.g., from 180 to 120 mg) is recommended for patients with severe hepatic impairment, and a reduction of approximately 50% (e.g., from 180 to 90 mg) is recommended when administering brigatinib to patients with severe renal impairment. Brigatinib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, and results of clinical drug-drug interaction studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic analyses have demonstrated that coadministration of strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitors or inducers with brigatinib should be avoided. If coadministration with a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor cannot be avoided, the dose of brigatinib should be reduced by approximately 50% (strong CYP3A inhibitor) or approximately 40% (moderate CYP3A inhibitor), respectively. Brigatinib is a weak inducer of CYP3A in vivo; data from a phase I drug-drug interaction study showed that coadministration of brigatinib 180 mg once daily reduced the oral midazolam area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity by approximately 26%. Brigatinib did not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, or CYP2D6 at clinically relevant concentrations in vitro. Exposure-response analyses based on data from the ALTA (ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of AP26113) and ALTA-1L pivotal trials of brigatinib confirm the favorable benefit versus risk profile of the approved titration dosing regimen of 180 mg once daily (after a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg once daily).

[CYP3A inhibitors as a pharmacokinetic enhancer: pros and cons of drug interactions]

Certain drugs inherently have unfavourable pharmacokinetic properties; for example, they are poorly absorbed or broken down too quickly in the liver. In some cases, the addition of a pharmacokinetic excipient, thus deliberately causing an interaction, may offer a solution. To date, this concept has been most widely applied in HIV treatment where addition of the CYP3A inhibitors ritonavir and cobicistat greatly increases plasma levels of other HIV medications. For the same reason, ritonavir has been added to the new oral antiviral drug against the SARS CoV-2 virus, nirmatrelvir. In addition to a better and/or longer effect, theoretically lower doses can also be used, resulting in cost savings. Deliberately inducing a pharmacokinetic interaction is not without risk: after all, interactions with other CYP3A substrates can also occur. Nevertheless, we believe that with good interaction management, CYP3A inhibitors can be used safely with benefits for patients and society.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Persons living with human immunodeficiency virus are an underserved population for evidence-based cancer treatment. Paclitaxel and carboplatin (PCb) is an active regimen against a variety of solid tumors, including several seen in excess in patients with HIV infection. We performed a pilot trial to evaluate the safety of full-dose PCb in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and cancer.

Methods

Eligible patients, stratified by concurrent antiretroviral therapy (ART) that included CYP3A4 inhibitors or not, received paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) in combination with carboplatin (target AUC 6) intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles.

Results

Sixteen evaluable patients received 64 cycles of PCb, including 6 patients treated with CYP3A4 inhibiting ART (ritonavir). The adverse event profile was consistent with the known toxicity profile of PCb, with no differences between the 2 strata. There were 4 partial responses (25%, 95% CI: 7%-52%), and overall, CD4+ lymphocyte count was similar after completion of therapy (median: 310/μL) compared with baseline values (median: 389/μL). Pharmacokinetic studies in 6 patients revealed no significant differences in C_max or AUC_inf for paclitaxel between the 2 cohorts.

Conclusion

Full doses of PCb chemotherapy are tolerable when given concurrently with ART in people living with human immunodeficiency virus with cancer, including patients receiving CYP3A4 inhibitors.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT01249443.

High Intrapatient Variability in Tacrolimus Exposure Calculated Over a Long Period Is Associated With De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Development and/or Late Rejection in Thai Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Concomitant CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

High intrapatient variability in tacrolimus trough levels (Tac IPV) is associated with poor allograft outcomes. Tac IPV was previously calculated using trough levels 6-12 months after kidney transplantation (KT). Data on the accuracy of Tac IPV calculation over a longer period, the association between high Tac IPV and donor-specific antibody (DSA) development after KT in Asian patients, and the role of IPV in patients receiving concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4/5 inhibitors (CYPinh) are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent KT at our center in 2005-2015, and who received Tac with mycophenolate during the first 2 years after KT was performed. IPV was calculated using Tac levels adjusted by dosage. DSA was monitored annually after KT using a Luminex microbead assay.

RESULTS

In total, 236 patients were enrolled. CYPinh were prescribed to 189 patients (80.1%): 145 (61.4%), 31 (13.1%), and 13 (5.5%) received diltiazem, fluconazole, and ketoconazole, respectively. Mean IPV calculated from adjusted Tac levels for 6-12 months (IPV6-12) and 6-24 months (IPV6-24) after KT were 20.64% ± 11.68% and 23.53% ± 10.39%, respectively. Twenty-six patients (11%) showed late rejection and/or DSA occurrence, and had significantly higher IPV6-24 (29.42% ± 13.78%) than others (22.77% ± 9.64%; P = 0.02). There was no difference in IPV6-12 (24.31% ± 14.98% versus 20.17% ± 10.90%; P = 0.18). IPV6-12 and IPV6-24 were comparable in patients who did and did not receive CYPinh. When using mean IPV6-24 as a cutoff, patients with higher IPV6-24 had a higher probability of developing DSA and/or late rejection (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Tac IPV6-24 was higher and more significantly associated with DSA development and/or late rejection than Tac IPV6-12, independent of Tac trough level. This is the first study to demonstrate the impact of high IPV on DSA development in Asian patients, and that Tac IPV is comparable between patients with and without CYPinh.

Effects of Shengmai San on key enzymes involved in hepatic and intestinal drug metabolism in rats

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Shengmai San (SMS) has been commonly used as a traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, of which drug interactions need to be assessed for the safety concern. There is little evidence for the alterations of hepatic and intestinal drug-metabolizing enzymes after repeated SMS treatments to assess drug interactions.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The studies aim to illustrate the effects of repeated treatments with SMS on cytochrome P450s (CYPs), reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate)-quinone oxidoreductase (NQO), uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) using in vivo rat model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The SMS was prepared using Schisandrae Fructus, Ginseng Radix, and Ophiopogonis Radix (OR) (1:2:2). Chromatographic analyses of decoctions were performed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and LC-mass spectrometry. Sprague-Dawley rats were orally treated with the SMS and its component herbal decoctions for 2 or 3 weeks. Hepatic and intestinal enzyme activities were determined. CYP3A expression and the kinetics of intestinal nifedipine oxidation (NFO, a CYP3A marker reaction) were determined.

RESULTS

Schisandrol A, schisandrin B, ginsenoside Rb1 and ophiopogonin D were identified in SMS. SMS selectively suppressed intestinal, but not hepatic, NFO activity in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Hepatic and intestinal UGT, NQO and GST activities were not affected. A 3-week SMS treatment decreased the maximal velocity of intestinal NFO by 50%, while the CYP3A protein level remained unchanged. Among SMS component herbs, the decoction of OR decreased intestinal NFO activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that 3-week treatment with SMS and OR suppress intestinal, but not hepatic CYP3A function. It suggested that the potential interactions of SMS with CYP 3A drug substrates should be noticed, especially the drugs whose bioavailability depends heavily on intestinal CYP3A.

Four Cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Transferred from a Cruise Ship

An outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that began in Wuhan, China, has spread rapidly to many countries. We herein report four cases of COVID-19 confirmed in Japan among passengers of the cruise ship Diamond Princess and describe the clinical features, clinical course, and progression of chest computed tomographic images, chest radiographs, and treatment. Although these four patients had symptoms that included a fever, malaise, runny nose, and cough, one patient had no symptoms on admission. Two of the four patients needed mechanical ventilation due to respiratory deterioration. One of the patients who required mechanical ventilation was transferred to a higher-level medical institution. Except for that patient, the other three patients were able to return home under their own power. Every patient took lopinavir/ritonavir, which was considered the most effective treatment at the time. We used it after receiving approval from the ethics committee in our hospital. In this case report, we emphasize that some patients need to be carefully monitored, even if their respiratory condition is stable at the initial presentation, as their respiratory status may deteriorate rapidly within a few days after oxygen administration begins.

Impact of Polypharmacy and P-Glycoprotein- and CYP3A4-Modulating Drugs on Safety and Efficacy of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE

To study whether polypharmacy or drug-drug interactions have differential effect on safety and efficacy in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that randomized patients with atrial fibrillation to DOACs or warfarin stratified by the number of concomitant drugs. Outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism (SE), all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated and Mantel-Haenszel random effects were applied.

RESULTS

Two high-quality studies were eligible, including 32,465 participants who received apixaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin, with a median follow-up of 1.9 years. Of participants, 29% used < 5 drugs, 55% used 5-9 drugs, and 16% used ≥ 10 drugs. Drugs interacting with DOACs (P-glycoprotein/CYP3A4) were used by 6460 (20%) of patients. Patients with higher number of drugs (0-4 vs 5-9 vs ≥ 10) had higher rates of mortality (5.8%, 7.9%, 10.0%) and major bleeding (3.4%, 4.8%, 7.7%). Comparative efficacy or safety of DOACs versus warfarin was not affected by polypharmacy status or P-glycoprotein/CYP3A4 inhibitor use. However, the presence of polypharmacy (p = 0.001) or glycoprotein/CYP3A4-modulating drugs (p = 0.03) was correlated with increased risk of major bleeding when compared with warfarin. Overall, DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE (RR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.74-0.94), all-cause mortality (RR, 0.91; 95%CI, 0.84-0.98), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.38-0.70) compared with warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs were more effective than warfarin, and at least as safe. Polypharmacy was associated with adverse outcomes and attenuated the advantage in risk of major bleeding among rivaroxaban users, particularly in the presence of P-glycoprotein/CYP3A4-modulating drugs.

A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19

BACKGROUND

No therapeutics have yet been proven effective for the treatment of severe illness caused by SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial involving hospitalized adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, which causes the respiratory illness Covid-19, and an oxygen saturation (Sao₂) of 94% or less while they were breathing ambient air or a ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen (Pao₂) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio₂) of less than 300 mm Hg. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg and 100 mg, respectively) twice a day for 14 days, in addition to standard care, or standard care alone. The primary end point was the time to clinical improvement, defined as the time from randomization to either an improvement of two points on a seven-category ordinal scale or discharge from the hospital, whichever came first.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent randomization; 99 were assigned to the lopinavir-ritonavir group, and 100 to the standard-care group. Treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir was not associated with a difference from standard care in the time to clinical improvement (hazard ratio for clinical improvement, 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.80). Mortality at 28 days was similar in the lopinavir-ritonavir group and the standard-care group (19.2% vs. 25.0%; difference, -5.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -17.3 to 5.7). The percentages of patients with detectable viral RNA at various time points were similar. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, lopinavir-ritonavir led to a median time to clinical improvement that was shorter by 1 day than that observed with standard care (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.91). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the lopinavir-ritonavir group, but serious adverse events were more common in the standard-care group. Lopinavir-ritonavir treatment was stopped early in 13 patients (13.8%) because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized adult patients with severe Covid-19, no benefit was observed with lopinavir-ritonavir treatment beyond standard care. Future trials in patients with severe illness may help to confirm or exclude the possibility of a treatment benefit. (Funded by Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development and others; Chinese Clinical Trial Register number, ChiCTR2000029308.).

A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19

BACKGROUND

No therapeutics have yet been proven effective for the treatment of severe illness caused by SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial involving hospitalized adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, which causes the respiratory illness Covid-19, and an oxygen saturation (Sao₂) of 94% or less while they were breathing ambient air or a ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen (Pao₂) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio₂) of less than 300 mm Hg. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg and 100 mg, respectively) twice a day for 14 days, in addition to standard care, or standard care alone. The primary end point was the time to clinical improvement, defined as the time from randomization to either an improvement of two points on a seven-category ordinal scale or discharge from the hospital, whichever came first.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent randomization; 99 were assigned to the lopinavir-ritonavir group, and 100 to the standard-care group. Treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir was not associated with a difference from standard care in the time to clinical improvement (hazard ratio for clinical improvement, 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.80). Mortality at 28 days was similar in the lopinavir-ritonavir group and the standard-care group (19.2% vs. 25.0%; difference, -5.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -17.3 to 5.7). The percentages of patients with detectable viral RNA at various time points were similar. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, lopinavir-ritonavir led to a median time to clinical improvement that was shorter by 1 day than that observed with standard care (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.91). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the lopinavir-ritonavir group, but serious adverse events were more common in the standard-care group. Lopinavir-ritonavir treatment was stopped early in 13 patients (13.8%) because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized adult patients with severe Covid-19, no benefit was observed with lopinavir-ritonavir treatment beyond standard care. Future trials in patients with severe illness may help to confirm or exclude the possibility of a treatment benefit. (Funded by Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development and others; Chinese Clinical Trial Register number, ChiCTR2000029308.).

Concomitant Filled Prescriptions of Oxymorphone or Oxycodone with CYP3A Inhibitors and Inducers

BACKGROUND

Oxymorphone's metabolism does not involve the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. The effect of this pharmacokinetic feature of oxymorphone on opioid prescribing is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative frequency with which oxymorphone and oxycodone (a CYP3A-metabolized opioid analgesic) were each prescribed to patients concomitantly receiving CYP3A-modifying drugs (i.e., inducers and inhibitors) to characterize opioid-prescribing patterns in patients at risk for CYP3A-related drug interactions.

METHODS

We analyzed the Sentinel Distributed Database from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016, to identify the proportion of patients with concomitant dispensing of selected CYP3A modifiers among initiators of oxymorphone. We then repeated the analysis using oxycodone instead of oxymorphone. We conducted sensitivity analyses that varied the washout periods for each opioid to account for potential opioid switching.

RESULTS

In the primary analysis, the proportion of patients with concomitant incident dispensings of oxymorphone and selected CYP3A modifiers was 3.26% (95% CI = 3.09%-3.43%), and the proportion of patients with incident dispensings of oxycodone and selected CYP3A modifiers was 2.82% (95% CI = 2.79%-2.85%). The difference between proportions was 0.43% (95% CI = 0.26%-0.60%). Sensitivity analyses that varied the washout periods for each opioid with respect to the other opioid to account for switching yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed similar proportions of patients using selected CYP3A modifiers concomitantly with both oxymorphone and oxycodone. While the CIs of the point estimates did not overlap, the absolute differences between the proportions were small.

DISCLOSURES

This project was supported by Task Order HHSF22301001T under Master Agreement HHSF223201400030I from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA approved the study protocol, including the statistical analysis plan, and reviewed and approved the manuscript. Coauthors from the FDA participated in the results interpretation and in the preparation and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Coyle, Money, Staffa, Meyer, and Woods are employed by the FDA. The other authors have no financial conflicts of interest to report. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Amentoflavone suppresses cell proliferation and induces cell death through triggering autophagy-dependent ferroptosis in human glioma

AIMS

Glioma is the most common type of malignant tumor of the nervous system, and aggressiveness and recurrence are major obstacles for treatment. This study is designed to explore the effects of amentoflavone (AF) on glioma, and to investigate the underlying mechanism of the anti-cancer activities of AF.

METHODS

Cell morphology was recorded under microscopy. Cell viability and cell death ratio were determined by CCK-8 assay and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay, respectively. Cell cycle progression was assessed by flow cytometry. The levels of iron, MDA (malondialdehyde), lipid ROS, and GSH (reduced glutathione) were assessed by ELISA kit. The cycle-related proteins, ferroptosis-related protein, autophagy-related protein, and the phosphorylation of AMPK, mTOR and p70S6K were analyzed by western blotting. The autophagic flux was observed by transfecting cells with mRFP-GFP-LC3 plasmids. The xenograft murine models were established to analyze the effects of amentoflavone in vivo. The immunohistochemistry assay was performed to analyze the expression of LC3B, Beclin1, ATG5, ATG7, and ferritin heavy chain (FTH).

RESULTS

Our results showed that AF treatment led to reduction in cell viability and cell death. In addition, AF was found to block cell cycle progression in a dose-dependent manner in vitro. Following treatment with AF, the intracellular levels of iron, MDA, and lipid OS were increased, and the levels of GSH and the mitochondrial membrane potential were reduced. In addition, our results showed that AF promoted the autophagic by regulating autophagy-relevant proteins. Our results also showed that the autophagy-induction by AF was associated with regulation of AMPK/mTOR signaling. Mechanistically, the inhibition effects of AF on glioma cell were reversed by DFO, ferreostatin-1 as well as upregulation of FTH. Meanwhile, the FTH levels were increased by compound C and knockdown of ATG7. Moreover, both autophagy inhibitor Baf A1 and knockdown of ATG7 were able to compromising AF-induce ferroptosis and cell death. In vivo, the tumor growth was suppressed by AF in a dose-dependent manner. The level of MDA in the tumor tissue was increased while the level of GSH in tumor tissue was decreased by AF in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the expression of LC3B, Beclin1, ATG5, ATG7 were increased, and the expression of FTH were decreased by AF in a dose-dependent manner in vivo. Conclusion These results demonstrate that AF triggered ferroptosis in autophagy-dependent manner. Our results suggest that AF has the potential to be considered as a novel treatment agent in glioma.

Medical treatment options for COVID-19

Therapeutic options for coronavirus disease 2019 are desperately needed to respond to the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Both antiviral drugs and immunomodulators might have their place in the management of coronavirus disease 2019. Unfortunately, no drugs have been approved yet to treat infections with human coronaviruses. As it will take years to develop new therapies for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the current focus is on the repurposing of drugs that have been approved or are in development for other conditions. Several clinical trials have already been conducted or are currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of such drugs. Here, we discuss the potential of these therapies for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019.

Case of the Index Patient Who Caused Tertiary Transmission of COVID-19 Infection in Korea: the Application of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for the Treatment of COVID-19 Infected Pneumonia Monitored by Quantitative RT-PCR

Since mid-December of 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has been spreading from Wuhan, China. The confirmed COVID-19 patients in South Korea are those who came from or visited China. As secondary transmissions have occurred and the speed of transmission is accelerating, there are rising concerns about community infections. The 54-year old male is the third patient diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in Korea. He is a worker for a clothing business and had mild respiratory symptoms and intermittent fever in the beginning of hospitalization, and pneumonia symptoms on chest computerized tomography scan on day 6 of admission. This patient caused one case of secondary transmission and three cases of tertiary transmission. Hereby, we report the clinical findings of the index patient who was the first to cause tertiary transmission outside China. Interestingly, after lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, AbbVie) was administered, β-coronavirus viral loads significantly decreased and no or little coronavirus titers were observed.

[Adverse effects of lopinavir/ritonavir in critically ill patients with COVID-19]

During the SARSCoV-2 pandemic many drugs have been used as potential treatments in order to improve the clinical outcome and reduce the mortality. But since it is a currently unknown disease, the evidence about efficacy and safety is built as the drugs are prescribed. In this context, intensive pharmacovigilance allows early detection of adverse events, and thereby infer the safety profile of the indication. We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study involving adult patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. All adverse events detected in 23 patients in the Intensive Care Unit between March 15 and June 15, 2020 were registered. We describe type and severity of the adverse events and if treatment suspension was needed. The results show a high rate of adverse events (10/23, 43%) in treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir. In most cases early treatment suspension was required. Even though the limitations of our study derived from the small sample size, these results could help in building evidence about the safety of using lopinavir/ritonavir for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Interferon-Free Regimen: Equally Effective in Treatment Naive and Experienced HCV Patients

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Interferon-free regimen has been reported to be highly efficient in treatment of HCV infection, including patients with compensated cirrhosis. We compared the efficacy of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Ritonavir, Dasabuvir and Ribavirin (OBT/PTV/r, with DSV and RBV) therapy in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis with and without prior treatment experience with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (IFN/RBV).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective two-center study was conducted in Mures County Hospital and Brasov County Hospital, Romania in period November 2015-July 2016. Both treatment naïve and PegIFN/RBV experienced patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection received 12 weeks of OBT/PTV/r, with DSV and RBV. Sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the treatment and eventual discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events were assessed in order to estimate safety and efficiency of therapeutic regimen.

RESULTS

Fifty nine patients were included in study, 35 (59.3%) of them were previously treated with IFN/RBV. Forty four (74.5%) patients were previously diag-nosed with cirrhosis Child Pugh score 5, while 15 (25.4%) with Child Pugh score 6. All 59 patients achieved a SVR12 of 100% and one patient from treatment naïve cohort discontinued the therapy due to hyperbilirubinemia and encephalopathy. However viral load assessed at 12 weeks after discontinuation of therapy in this patient was undetectable. Conclusion An all-oral regimen of co-for-mulated OBT/PTV/r with DSV and RBV results in high rate of sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 among HCV GT1b infected patients associated with compensated cirrhosis, regardless of previous treatment experience with PegIFN/RBV.

Guiding dose adjustment of amlodipine after co-administration with ritonavir containing regimens using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

Amlodipine, a commonly prescribed anti-hypertensive drug, shows increased systemic exposure with cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitors. Ritonavir (RTV) is a potent mechanism-based and reversible CYP3A inhibitor and moderate inducer that is used as a pharmacokinetic enhancer in several antiviral treatment regimens. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) between RTV and amlodipine is due to mixed inhibition and induction of CYP3A4, which is challenging to predict without a mechanistic model that accounts for the complexity of both mechanisms occurring simultaneously. A novel physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed for amlodipine, and the model was verified using published clinical PK and DDI data. The verified amlodipine PBPK model was linked to a pharmacodynamics model that describes changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) during and after co-administration with RTV. The magnitude and time course of RTV effects on amlodipine plasma exposures and SBP were evaluated, to provide guidance on dose adjustment of amlodipine during and after co-administration with RTV-containing regimens. Model simulations suggested that the increase in amlodipine's plasma exposure by RTV diminishes by approximately 80% within 5 days after the last dose of RTV. PBPK simulations suggested that resuming a full dose of amlodipine [5 mg once daily (QD)] immediately after RTV's last dose would decrease daily average SBP by a maximum of 3.3 mmHg, while continuing with the reduced dose (2.5 mg QD) for 5 days after the last dose of RTV would increase daily average SBP by a maximum of 5.8 mmHg. Based on these results, either approach of resuming amlodipine's full dose could be appropriate when combined with appropriate clinical monitoring.

Hepatic safety of ketoconazole in Cushing's syndrome: results of a Compassionate Use Programme in France

OBJECTIVE

Ketoconazole (KTZ) is one of few available treatments for Cushing's syndrome (CS). Although KTZ has been associated with severe hepatotoxicity, little information is available about hepatic safety in CS. The aim of this study was to document changes in liver function in patients with CS treated with KTZ.

DESIGN

An observational prospective French cohort study (Compassionate Use Programme (CUP)).

METHODS

Enrolled patients were stratified into a KTZ-naive cohort and a cohort already treated by another formulation of ketoconazole (KTZ-switch cohort). Liver function markers (alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyltransferase and bilirubin) were monitored at regular intervals. Patients with ALT > 3 × ULN (upper limit of normal), total bilirubin > 2 × ULN or both ALP > 2 × ULN and ALT > ULN were considered to have liver injury.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 patients were analysed (47 KTZ-naïve; 61 KTZ-switch). The median KTZ dose was 600 mg/day. Most abnormalities observed were asymptomatic mild increases of liver enzymes. Four patients in the KTZ-naïve cohort (8.5%) and two in the KTZ-switch cohort (3.3%) developed liver injury, considered related to KTZ in three cases (all KTZ-naïve in the first month of treatment). Five patients had mild liver function abnormalities at baseline and two had proven liver metastases. Two patients recovered on discontinuation of KTZ and the remaining patient died of unrelated causes.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the need for close monitoring of liver enzymes especially during the first six months of treatment. Liver enzyme abnormalities usually occurred within four weeks were asymptomatic and could be reversed on timely discontinuation of KTZ.

Aprepitant and fosaprepitant drug interactions: a systematic review

AIMS

Aprepitant and fosaprepitant, commonly used for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, alter cytochrome P450 activity. This systematic review evaluates clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with aprepitant and fosaprepitant and describes adverse events ascribed to drug interactions with aprepitant or fosaprepitant.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature to September 11, 2016, to identify articles evaluating drug interactions involving aprepitant/fosaprepitant. The clinical significance of each reported pharmacokinetic drug interaction was evaluated based on the United States Food and Drug Administration guidance document on conducting drug interaction studies. The probability of an adverse event reported in case reports being due to a drug interaction with aprepitant/fosaprepitant was determined using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 4377 publications were identified. Of these, 64 met inclusion eligibility criteria: 34 described pharmacokinetic drug interactions and 30 described adverse events ascribed to a drug interaction. Clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between aprepitant/fosaprepitant and bosutinib PO, cabazitaxel IV, cyclophosphamide IV, dexamethasone PO, methylprednisolone IV, midazolam PO/IV, oxycodone PO and tolbutamide PO were identified, as were adverse events resulting from an interaction between aprepitant/fosaprepitant and alcohol, anthracyclines, ifosfamide, oxycodone, quetiapine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for a drug interaction with aprepitant and fosaprepitant should be considered when selecting antiemetic therapy.

Effects of Ketoconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Mifepristone, a Competitive Glucocorticoid Receptor Antagonist, in Healthy Men

Introduction

Mifepristone, a competitive glucocorticoid receptor antagonist approved for Cushing syndrome, and ketoconazole, an antifungal and steroidogenesis inhibitor, are both inhibitors of and substrates for cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic effects of concomitant ketoconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on mifepristone.

Methods

In an open-label, two-period, single-center study, healthy adult men received mifepristone 600 mg orally daily for 12 days (period 1) followed by mifepristone 600 mg daily plus ketoconazole 200 mg orally twice daily for 5 days (period 2). Serial pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected predose and over 24 h postdose on days 12 (period 1) and 17 (period 2). A cross-study comparison (using data on file) further examined whether systemic exposure to mifepristone plus ketoconazole exceeded the exposure following mifepristone 1200 mg orally administered for 7 days.

Results

Sixteen subjects were enrolled and 14 completed the study. Concomitant administration with ketoconazole increased the systemic exposure to mifepristone, based on geometric least squares mean ratios, by 28% for C_max and 38% for AUC_0–24. This increase was 85% and 87% of the exposure observed following mifepristone’s highest label dose of 1200 mg/day for C_max and AUC_0–24, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 56.3% (9/16) of subjects during administration of mifepristone alone and in 57.1% (8/14) during combination with ketoconazole. No serious AEs were reported.

Conclusion

Systemic exposure to mifepristone increased following multiple doses of mifepristone 600 mg daily plus ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily. Little to no increase in AEs occurred. Dose adjustment of mifepristone may be needed when given with ketoconazole.

Funding

Corcept Therapeutics.

Acute Kidney Injury from Excessive Potentiation of Calcium-channel Blocker via Synergistic CYP3A4 Inhibition by Clarithromycin Plus Voriconazole

CYP3A4-inhibitors can potentiate the hypotensive effect of calcium-channel blockers. However, insufficient attention to such drug interactions may result in serious adverse reactions. A 71-year-old hypertensive man prescribed nifedipine was hospitalized for infectious endophthalmitis. Antimicrobial therapy with voriconazole lowered the blood pressure, and then clarithromycin further lowered it through the excessively elevated nifedipine concentration, leading to ischemic acute kidney injury. After the discontinuation of clarithromycin and voriconazole, the blood pressure and renal function were recovered. The combination of CYP3A4-inhibitors such as clarithromycin plus voriconazole can synergistically potentiate calcium-channel blockers. Co-prescription of multiple CYP3A4-inhibitors with calcium-channel blockers increases the risk of hypotension and acute kidney injury.

Effects of CYP3A4 Inhibitors Ketoconazole and Verapamil and the CYP3A4 Inducer Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Fostamatinib: Results from In Vitro and Phase I Clinical Studies

BACKGROUND

Fostamatinib (R788) is a spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor. The active metabolite of fostamatinib, R406, is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize hepatic microsomal metabolism of R406 and confirm the role of CYP3A4 in R406 metabolism, determining whether co-administration of CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole, verapamil) or inducers (rifampicin) affects R406 pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

R406 stability was determined using human hepatic microsomes. The CYP450 isoforms responsible for R406 metabolism in humans were identified using expressed CYP450 isoforms and specific chemical inhibitors. The ketoconazole interaction study (double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover) involved fostamatinib administration (single 80-mg dose), alone and with ketoconazole (200 mg twice daily). The verapamil and rifampicin interaction studies (open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence) involved fostamatinib administration (single 150-mg dose), alone and with immediate-release verapamil (80 mg three times daily) or rifampicin (600 mg once daily). Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in all studies.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

Hepatic microsomes showed time-dependent loss of R406 and formation of para-O-demethylated R406. Microsomal metabolism of R406 was markedly inhibited by CYP3A4 inhibitors and, in the expressed CYP450 studies, the rate of R406 disappearance was greatest with CYP3A4. In the clinical studies, co-administration of ketoconazole caused a 2-fold (CI 1.77-2.30) increase in R406 exposure. Verapamil increased R406 exposure (39% increase, CI 8-80), whereas rifampicin co-administration decreased exposure by 75% (CI 68-81). Fostamatinib was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The oxidative metabolism of R406 is predominantly catalyzed by CYP3A4. In clinical studies, exposure to R406 is affected by concomitant administration of CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors. These findings should be taken into account when considering co-prescription of fostamatinib with such agents.

The hunt for a selective 17,20 lyase inhibitor; learning lessons from nature

Given prostate cancer is driven, in part, by its responsiveness to androgens, treatments historically employ methods for their removal from circulation. Approaches as crude as castration, and more recently blockade of androgen synthesis or receptor binding, are still of limited use long term, since other steroids of adrenal origin or tumor origin can supersede that role as the 'castration resistant' tumor re-emerges. Broader inhibition of steroidogenesis using relatively nonselective P450 inhibitors such as ketoconazole is not an alternative since a general disruption of steroid biosynthesis is neither safe nor effective. The recent emergence of drugs more selectively targeting CYP17 have been more effective, and yet extension of life has been on the scale of months rather than years. It is now becoming clear this shortcoming arises from the adaptive capabilities of many tumors to initiate local steroid synthesis and/or become responsive to novel early pathway adrenal steroids that are synthesized when lyase activity is not selectively blocked, and ACTH rises in the face of declining cortisol feedback. Abiraterone has been described as a lyase selective inhibitor, yet its use still requires co-administration of prednisone to suppress such a rise of ACTH and fall in cortisol. So is creation of a selective lyase inhibitor even possible? Can C19 steroid production be achieved without a prominent decline in cortisol and corresponding rise in ACTH? Decades of scientific study of CYP17 in humans and nonhuman primates, as well as nature's own experiments of gene mutations in humans, reveal 'true' or 'isolated' 17,20 lyase deficiency does quite selectively prevent C19 steroid biosynthesis whereas simple 17 hydroxylase deficiency also suppresses cortisol. We propose these known outcomes of natural mutations should be used to guide analysis of clinical trials and long term outcomes of CYP17 targeted drugs. In this review, we use that framework to re-evaluate the basic and clinical outcomes of many compounds being used or in development for treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer. Specifically, we include the nonselective drug ketoconazole, and then the CYP17 targeted drugs abiraterone, orteronel (TAK-700), galaterone (TOK-001), and seviteronel (VT-464). Using this framework, we can fully discriminate the clinical outcomes for ketoconazole, a drug with broad specificity, yet clinically ineffective, from that of abiraterone, the first CYP17 targeted therapy that is limited by its need for prednisone co-therapy. We also can identify potential next generation CYP17 targeted drugs now emerging that show signs of being far more 17,20 lyase selective. We conclude that a future for improved therapy without substantial cortisol decline, thus avoiding prednisone co-administration, seems possible at long last.

Treatment patterns in Cushing's disease patients in two large United States nationwide databases: application of a novel, graphical methodology

PURPOSE

Data on real-world treatment patterns for Cushing's disease (CD) are limited. We used a novel graphical technique to analyze treatment patterns in CD patients in the United States.

METHODS

Two combined US claims databases were used to identify CD patients with claims with Cushing's syndrome diagnosis and either benign pituitary adenoma or hypophysectomy and newly-treated in 2008 (no treatment in prior 6 months). Patients were followed from first treatment day until end of enrollment or 12/31/2010. We compared summary statistics with a novel graphical methodology that simultaneously displays individual color-coded patient treatment histories.

RESULTS

Among 228 newly-treated CD patients, 180 (78.9%) had surgery as first observed treatment, 42 (18.4%) had pharmacotherapy, and 6 (2.6%) had radiotherapy. In 42 patients who had pharmacotherapy as first treatment, dopamine agonists were used as first pharmacotherapy in 24 (57.1%), ketoconazole in 17 (40.5%), and mitotane in one patient (2.4%). In 180 patients with surgery as first treatment, 15 (8.3%) later had radiotherapy and 14 (7.8%) had pharmacotherapy. In 42 patients who had pharmacotherapy as first treatment, 10 (23.8%) later had surgery and 2 (4.8%) had radiotherapy. Mean duration of first pharmacotherapy varied: 369.5 days for dopamine agonists, 157.1 for ketoconazole, and 30.0 for mitotane.

CONCLUSIONS

This study addresses a need for US data on real-world treatment patterns for CD patients. The majority of CD patients undergo surgery as initial therapy. Patients using pharmacotherapy had limited persistence with treatment. Neither reasons for discontinuation of therapy nor the impact of a recent FDA warning on potentially fatal liver toxicity from ketoconazole could be assessed.

Medical therapy for Cushing's disease: adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor blockers

Morbidity and mortality in Cushing's disease (CD) patients are increased if patients are not appropriately treated. Surgery remains the first line therapy, however the role of medical therapy has become more prominent in patients when biochemical remission is not achieved/or recurs after surgery, while waiting effects of radiation therapy or when surgery is contraindicated. Furthermore, use of preoperative medical therapy has been also recognized. In addition to centrally acting therapies (reviewed elsewhere in this special issue), adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors, and glucocorticoid receptor antagonists are frequently used. A PubMed search of all original articles or abstracts detailing medical therapy in CD, published within 12 months (2013-2014), were identified and pertinent data extracted. Although not prospectively studied, ketoconazole and metyrapone have been the most frequently used medical therapies. A large retrospective ketoconazole study showed that almost half of patients who continued on ketoconazole therapy achieved biochemical control and clinical improvement; however almost 20% discontinued ketoconazole due to poor tolerability. Notably, hepatotoxicity was usually mild and resolved after drug withdrawal. Etomidate remains the only drug available for intravenous use. A new potent inhibitor of both aldosterone synthase and 11β-hydroxylase, following the completion of a phase II study LCI699 is being studied in a large phase III with promising results. Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, has been approved for hyperglycemia associated with Cushing's syndrome based on the results of a prospective study where it produced in the majority of patients' significant clinical and metabolic improvement. Absence of both a biochemical marker for remission and/or diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency remain, however, a limiting factor. Patient characteristics and preference should guide the choice between different medications in the absence of clinical trials comparing any of these therapies. Despite significant progress, there is still a need for a medical therapy that is more effective and with less adverse effects for patients with CD.

Medical combination therapies in Cushing's disease

INTRODUCTION

There has been growing interest on medical therapy for the management of Cushing's disease (CD), particularly in cases of persistent or recurrent hypercortisolism. Ketoconazole, an inhibitor of adrenal steroidogenesis, is the most widely used drug, whereas cabergoline and pasireotide are the most promising centrally acting agents. The main purpose of this review article is to highlight the options of medical treatment for CD, with a special emphasis on combination therapies, a topic that has only been addressed by a limited number of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of these studies, combination therapies involving medications with additive or synergistic effects on ACTH and cortisol secretion seem quite attractive as they yield higher probability of longterm control of the hypercortisolism at lower doses, a lower incidence of side-effects, and possibly a lower rate of treatment escapes. Currently, ketoconazole, cabergoline, and pasireotide are the best drugs to be prescribed in combination.

Meta-analysis of first-line triple therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication in Korea: is it time to change?

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy consisting of PPI, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin, is the recommended first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the eradication rate of triple therapy has declined over the past few decades. We analyzed the eradication rate and adverse events of triple therapy to evaluate current practices in Korea. A comprehensive literature search was performed up to August 2013 of 104 relevant studies comprising 42,124 patients. The overall eradication rate was 74.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.1%-77.2%) by intention-to-treat analysis and 82.0% (95% CI, 80.8%-83.2%) by per-protocol analysis. The eradication rate decreased significantly from 1998 to 2013 (P < 0.001 for both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses). Adverse events were reported in 41 studies with 8,018 subjects with an overall incidence rate of 20.4% (95% CI, 19.6%-21.3%). The available data suggest that the effectiveness of standard triple therapy for H. pylori eradication has decreased to an unacceptable level. A novel therapeutic strategy is warranted to improve the effectiveness of first-line treatment for H. pylori infection in Korea.