Preemptive intravenous human immunoglobulin G suppresses BK polyomavirus replication and spread of infection in vitro

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection causes various diseases in immunocompromised patients. Cells from human lung and kidney were infected with BKPyV and treated with commercially available intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG). Its effects on BKPyV replication and spread of infection were investigated, focusing on administration timing. IVIG treatment 3 hours after infection suppressed BKPyV replication assessed by real-time PCR and expression of the viral capsid protein 1 and large T-antigen. IVIG effectively reduced the number of BKPyV-infected cells 2 weeks after infection in an antibody titer-dependent manner. Virus release in the culture supernatants was not influenced by IVIG treatment 6-80 hours and 3-9 days after infection. Collectively, IVIG did not affect viral release from infected cells but inhibited the spread of infection by neutralizing the released virus and blocking the new infected cell formation, indicating greater efficacy in early localized infection. BKPyV replication resumed in IVIG-treated cultures at 7 days after IVIG removal. Early prophylactic administration of IVIG is expected to reduce the growth and spread of BKPyV infection, resulting in the reduction of infected cell lesions and prevention of BKPyV-associated diseases.

High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin to Treat Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Induction-Related BK Virus and Cytomegalovirus Infection in Patients with ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation is a novel method transplantation method that carries a heightened risk of infection caused by the use of high immunosuppressant doses. This elevated risk is particularly concerning for viral infections, such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and the BK virus (BKV) increases. Herein, we present a case where high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was effective in treating viral infections after transplantation.

METHODS

A 41-year-old man underwent an ABOi transplantation. The initial isoagglutinin titer was 1:32. The patient received 200 mg of rituximab, and 3 rounds of plasmapheresis were performed. Subsequently, renal function remained normal; however, 7 months later, the renal function declined, and BK nephropathy and CMV infection were diagnosed through biopsy and serologic tests. The FK level was reduced, and mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued. Although ciprofloxacin and leflunomide were administered, their effects were minimal. Therefore, high-dose IVIG (1 g/kg) was administered 5 times over 5 weeks, which led to a reduction in BK viral load and CMV infectivity in the serum.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose IVIG may serve as a promising alternative treatment to mitigate early transplant rejection and BKV and CMV infections.

Efficacy of mTOR Inhibitors and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Treatment of Polyoma BK Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Biopsy-Proven Study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the efficacy of a predetermined protocol that consisted of immunosuppressive drug reduction/withdrawal and intravenous immunoglobulin administration for the treatment of polyoma BK virus nephropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven polyoma BK virus nephropathy received a treatment regimen based on discontinuation of both calcineurin inhibitors and antiproliferative agents and switching to mTOR inhibitors accompanied by intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

RESULTS

Our study included 508 patients, with polyoma BK viremia detected in 80 patients. The mean age was 45.3 ± 9.5 years (range, 18-71 y), 64% were male, and mean follow-up was 37 ± 21 months (6-94 mo). All 16 patients who developed polyoma BK virus nephropathy and 9 patients who had highgrade polyoma BK viremia without nephropathy received intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. Compared with patients with viremia, patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy had significantly higher rates of graft loss due to rejection (18.8% vs 1.6%; P = .024) and all-cause graft loss (31.2% vs 6.3%; P = .014). Histopathologically, viral inclusion bodies disappeared and SV40 became negative after treatment in all 13 patients who underwent protocol biopsies. Unfortunately, histopathologically complete recovery without chronic tubular and interstitial tissue damage was achieved in only 4 patients after treatment. In addition, 3 patients lost their grafts due to acute antibody-mediated or mixed-type rejection (18.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy, clearance of viremia and SV40 should not be the sole outcomes to obtain. Aggressive reductions in maintenance immunosuppression and switching to double-drug therapy combined with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to high rates of graft loss/rejection and sequalae of chronic histological changes.

AIDS-Associated BK Virus Nephropathy in Native Kidneys: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BK virus (BKV) is a small DNA virus, a member of the polyomavirus family, that causes an opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients, especially kidney transplant patients. This virus establishes a lifelong infection in most of the population, and once it reactivates in an immunocompromised state, leads to BKV nephropathy. This review seeks to assess the correlation between severe immunosuppression, evident by low CD4 cell counts in HIV-positive patients, and the reactivation of BKV, causing nephropathy. A literature review was conducted, extracting, and analyzing case reports of HIV-positive patients showing correlations between their degree of immunosuppression, as evidenced by their CD4 counts, and the degree of BKV infectivity, confirmed by kidney biopsy. A total of 12 cases of BKV nephropathy in HIV-infected patients were reviewed. A common finding was the presence of profound immunosuppression, with most patients having CD4 counts ≤50 cells/ mm3. A substantial number also had comorbid malignancies, with some undergoing chemotherapy, potentially increasing the risk of BKV reactivation. In addition to the HIV status and malignancies, other risk factors for BKV reactivation included older age, male gender, diabetes mellitus, Caucasian race, and ureteral stent placement. BKV nephropathy in HIV patients with native kidneys is closely correlated with severe immunosuppression. Although therapeutic strategies exist for post-transplant patients, aside from the treatment of HIV with highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART), which potentially helps with clearing BKV by increasing CD4 count, there is no definitive treatment for a native kidney BKV nephropathy in patients with AIDS. The complexity of the cases and severity of comorbidities indicate the need for further research to develop therapeutic strategies tailored to this population.

Treatment of BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Paediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Leflunomide Versus Cidofovir

OBJECTIVES

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is a clinicopathological entity that negatively affects graft function in kidney transplant recipients. We compared the efficacy of leflunomide and cidofovir to treat BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of pediatric recipients with BK viremia for the period 2004 through 2019 were reviewed retrospectively, and patients diagnosed with BK polyomavirusassociated nephro-pathy were included in the study. A serum BK virus level above 104 copies/mL was accepted as BK viremia. We defined BK polyomavirusassociated nephropathy as detection of BK virus SV40 antigen on immunochemistry staining of renal graft tissue accompanied by signs of tubulointerstitial nephritis or elevated serum creatinine in addition to BK viremia.

RESULTS

Of 304 kidney transplant recipients, 53 had persistent BK viremia; 36 of these patients (61.1% male) were included in the study with the diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Twelve patients (33.3%) received cidofovir, and 14 (38.8%) received leflunomide. Results were similar between the cidofovir and leflunomide groups for serum creatinine level at last follow-up (0.91 ± 0.29 vs 0.94 ± 0.37 mg/dL, respectively; P = .843) and graft failure rate (8.3% vs 14.2%, respectively; P = .632). Graft failure was observed in 8.3% of patients with BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Leflunomide and cidofovir showed similar efficacy for treatment of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

Therapeutic strategies against BK polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The selection of antiviral therapy for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection has been extensively debated. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of various treatments for BKPyV infection.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies regarding drug treatments for BKPyV viremia/DNAemia published between January 1, 1970 and September 30, 2022. Two independent authors screened the published studies, extracted pertinent data, and evaluated their methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software version 4.2.2.

RESULTS

A total of 33 published studies involving 986 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, therapeutic interventions comprised immunosuppression reduction alone or in combination with leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), cidofovir, or mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) therapy. The meta-analysis revealed that the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction alone for serum BKPyV clearance was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.77; I2 = 78%). Moreover, the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction in combination with leflunomide, cidofovir, IVIG, or mTORi therapy for serum BKPyV clearance was 61% (95% CI: 0.47-0.74; I2 = 83%), 71% (95% CI: 0.63-0.78; I2 = 0), 87% (95% CI: 0.82-0.93; I2 = 45%), and 80% (95% CI: 0.59-1.00; I2 = 58%), respectively. Compared to immunosuppression reduction alone, immunosuppression reduction combined with IVIG therapy offered a statistically significant benefit in serum BKPyV clearance (P < 0.01) with minimal adverse reactions, whereas other adjunctive drug treatments did not demonstrate considerable effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing immunosuppression remains the primary approach for treating BKPyV infection. Although the combination treatment with IVIG proved to be most effective, other agents might offer varied antiviral advantages of high heterogeneity, which should be substantiated in future long-term randomized controlled trials.

Effect of Leflunomide on Treatment of Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients With BK Virus Infection

OBJECTIVES

Infection with the BK virus is a significant complication after renal transplant and can progress to BK virus nephropathy and graft dysfunction. There is no consensus on the management of BK virus infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients. The most common therapeutic option is immunosuppression reduction, which can increase rejection risk. We aimed to examine the effect of leflunomide, an agent with antiviral and immunosuppressive actions, in a case series of pediatric renal transplant recipients with BK virus infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Routine screening with blood BK virus DNA polymerase chain reaction was performed regularly in all of our renal transplant patients. When BK virus was detected, we reduced tacrolimus levels, discontinued mycophenolate mofetil, and started active treatment with leflunomide. Treatment with leflunomide was continued until BK virus was undetectable by polymerase chain reaction in at least 2 blood samples 2 weeks apart.

RESULTS

All pediatric patients developed BK virus infection in a mean period of 3.9 months after transplant. Graft dysfunction was evident in all patients with 20% to 100% elevation of creatinine from baseline. Afterleflunomide initiation, all patients had undetectable levels of BK virus by plasma polymerase chain reaction in at least 2 different samples within a mean period of 3.4 months, and renal function had normalized back to the baseline. None of our patients had evidence of hepatotoxicity or anemia on regular monitoring, with no other adverse events. Renal function remained stable in the follow-up period with no reoccurrence of BK viremia up to the date of this writing.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with leflunomide resulted in rapid BK virus clearance and preservation of renal function with no adverse effects.

Comparative Study of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Leflunomide Combination Therapy With Intravenous Immunoglobulin Single Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients With BK Virus Infection: Single-Center Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

Nephropathy due to BK virus infection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and loss. No specific treatment has been developed for the BK virus. Here, we compared the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and leflunomide versus intravenous immunoglobulin to treat BK virus nephropathy after renal transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixteen kidney transplant patients with BK virus infection were randomly divided into 2 groups; 1 group received intravenous immunoglobulin, and another group received leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Results of a polymerase chain reaction test for BK virus after 2 months of treatment were negative in 3 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin group and in 7 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group. The amount of BK virus decreased significantly in each group, and a significant difference was observed between the 2 groups after 3 months (P = .014). The average level of creatinine in the intravenous immunoglobulin group at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment was 1.7 ± 0.23, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 1.5 ± 0.3, respectively, and in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group was 2.1 ± 0.75, 1.76 ± 0.37, and 1.4 ± 0.18, respectively (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although BK viral load decreased significantly in both groups, there was a significant difference between patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin versus those who received the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide after 3 months. The addition of leflunomide to the intravenous immunoglobulin treatment seems to have a better effect in reducing BK viral load. However, further studies with a larger sample and longer duration are needed.

Predictive Factors of BK Virus Development in Kidney Transplant Recipients and the Effect of Low-Dose Tacrolimus Plus Everolimus on Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the predictive factors of BK virus viremia/nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients and to evaluate the effects of low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 3654 kidney transplant recipients. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 were BK virus negative (n = 3525, 96.5%) and group 2 were BK virus positive (n = 129, viremia 3.5%, nephropathy 1%). Predictive factors were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression models.We also divided and analyzed patients with BK virus viremia/nephropathy into 2 groups according to immunosuppressive changes. Group 2a had been switched to low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus (n = 54, 41.9%), and group 2b had been switched to other immunosuppressive protocols (n = 75, 58.1%).

RESULTS

We found that use of anti-T-cell lymphocyte globulin and tacrolimus, deceased donor transplant, and rejection were predictive factors for BK virus viremia/nephropathy. In addition, patients who had low-dose calcineurin inhibitor plus mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor regimens showed a low rate of BK virus development(only 6.2% of all cases). In Group 2a, both the BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy rate (n = 23 [42.6%] vs n = 12 [16%] in group 2b; P = .001) and viral load (DNA > 104 copies/mL) (n = 49 [90.7%] vs n = 27 [36%] in group 2b; P = .001) were increased versus group 2b. Graft function, graft survival, viral clearance, and rejection rate were similar between the groups after protocol change.

CONCLUSIONS

BK virus viremia/nephropathy rate was lower in patients who received low-dose calcineurin inhibitor plus mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor protocols; the low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus switch protocol after BK virus was more effective and safe than other protocols.

Increased CMV disease and "severe" BK viremia with belatacept vs. sirolimus three-drug maintenance immunosuppression

OBJECTIVES

Belatacept may provide benefit in delayed graft function, but its association with infectious complications is understudied. We aim to assess the incidence of CMV and BK viremia in patients treated with sirolimus or belatacept as part of a three-drug immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Kidney transplant recipients from 01/01/2015 to 10/01/2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Maintenance immunosuppression was either tacrolimus, mycophenolate and sirolimus (B0) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and belatacept (5.0 mg/kg monthly) (B1). Primary outcomes of interest were BK and CMV viremia which were followed until the end of the study period. Secondary outcomes included graft function (serum creatinine, eGFR) and acute rejection through 12 months.

RESULTS

Belatacept was initiated in patients with a higher mean kidney donor profile index (B0:0.36 vs. B1:0.44, p = .02) with more delayed graft function (B0:6.1% vs. B1:26.1%, p < .001). Belatacept therapy was associated with more "severe" CMV viremia >25,000 copies/mL (B0:1.2% vs. B1:5.9%, p = .016) and CMV disease (B0:0.41% vs. B1:4.2%, p = .015). However, there was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:9.4% vs. B1:13.5%, p = .28). There was no difference in the incidence of BK viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:29.7% vs. B1:31.1%, p = .78) or BK-associated nephropathy (B0:2.4% vs. B1:1.7%, p = .58), but belatacept was associated with "severe" BK viremia, defined as >10,000 IU/mL (B0:13.0% vs. B1:21.8%, p = .03). The mean serum Cr was significantly higher with belatacept therapy at 1-year follow up (B0:1.24 mg/dL vs. B1:1.43 mg/dL, p = .003). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (B0:1.2% vs. B1:2.6%, p = .35) and graft loss (B0:1.2% vs. B1:0.84%, p = .81) were comparable at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Belatacept therapy was associated with an increased risk of CMV disease and "severe" CMV and BK viremia. However, this regimen did not increase the overall incidence of infection and facilitated comparable acute rejection and graft loss at 12-month follow up.

Endovesical instillation of Cidofovir in the treatment of BK polyomavirus hemorrhagic cystitis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) with BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) that may lead to severe discomfort for the patient and significant morbidity (urinary obstruction, increased transfusion requirements and prolonged hospitalization). So far, there is no clear consensus on how to manage this complication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Here, we report a single-center case series of 9 patients (4 children and 5 adults) treated with cidofovir endovesical (EV) instillation(s) for BKPyV-HC after alloHCT. EV Cidofovir was administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg, for 1 to 3 instillations (with a minimum delay between 2 successive doses of 5 days).

RESULTS

Eight out of the 9 treated patients with EV Cidofovir achieved a complete resolution of HC after 1-3 instillation(s), without recurrence of symptomatic infection within the next 3 months. Only 1 adult patient did not improve after treatment and developed severe morbidity (emphysematous cystitis).

CONCLUSION

Although this single-center case series of EV cidofovir for BKPyV HC after alloHCT shows encouraging results, only large prospective studies will definitively establish the effectiveness of this therapy.

Basiliximab for the therapy of acute T cell–mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipient with BK virus infection: A case report

A 66-year-old Chinese man underwent a deceased donor kidney transplantation. Induction-immunosuppressive protocol consisted of basiliximab (BAS) and methyl prednisolone (MP), followed by maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (PED). The patient’s post-transplantation course was almost uneventful, and the graft was functioning well [serum creatinine (Scr) 2.15 mg/dL]. The MMF and CsA doses were decreased 1-month post-operative as the BK virus activation was serologically positive. His Scr was elevated to 2.45 mg/dL 45 days after the transplant. A graft biopsy showed BKV nephropathy (BKVN) and acute T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) Banff grade IIA (I2, t2, ptc2, v1, c4d1, g0, and SV40 positive). The conventional anti-rejection therapy could deteriorate his BKVN, therefore, we administered BAS to eliminate activated graft-infiltrating T cells and combined with low-dose steroid. He responded well to the therapy after two doses of BAS were given, and the kidney graft status has been stable (recent Scr 2.1 mg/dL).

Belatacept as a Treatment Option in Patients with Severe BK Polyomavirus Infection and High Immunological Risk—Walking a Tightrope between Viral Control and Prevention of Rejection

Balancing the immune system with immunosuppressive treatment is essential in kidney transplant recipients to avoid allograft rejection on the one hand and infectious complications on the other. BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a viral complication that seriously threatens kidney allograft survival. Therefore, the main treatment strategy is to reduce immunosuppression, but this is associated with an increased rejection risk. Belatacept is an immunosuppressant that acts by blocking the CD80/86-CD28 co-stimulatory pathway of effector T-cells with marked effects on the humoral response. However, when compared with calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI), the cellular rejection rate is higher. With this in mind, we hypothesized that belatacept could be used as rescue therapy in severely BKPyV-affected patients with high immunological risk. We present three cases of patients with BKPyVAN-associated complications and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and one patient who developed T-cell-mediated rejection after a reduction in immunosuppression in response to BKPyVAN. Patients were switched to a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen and showed significantly improved viral control and stabilized graft function. The cases presented here suggest that belatacept is a potential treatment option in the complicated situation of refractory BKPyV infection in patients with high immunological risk.

Use of Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in People Living with HIV

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating disease occurring in advanced HIV infection, caused by the reactivation of poliomavirus JC (JCV). The use of pembrolizumab for treatment is based on the inhibition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), potentially improving the anti JCV-specific response. We used pembrolizumab with combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) on a compassionate-use basis. At each administration, clinical evaluation, MRI and laboratory testing, including CD3, CD4, CD8, PD-1 markers, HIV-RNA and JCV-DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/plasma pairs, were performed. The JCV-specific T cell response was analysed by Elispot assay. This study included five HIV patients: four male, median age 43 years (29–52), median CD4 and CD8 count 150 (15–158) and 973 (354–1250) cell/mm3, respectively; median JCV-DNA and HIV-RNA in CSF/plasma pairs 9.540/1.503 cps/mL and 2.230/619 cp/mL, respectively. Overall, patients received between two and seven doses of pembrolizumab. After treatment, we observed JCV-DNA reduction and PD-1 down-regulation both in CSF and in plasma (high in circulating CD4 and CD8 at baseline), which remained stable at low levels in all patients. Three out of five patients showed stability of clinical picture and neuroimaging, while two others died. More data are needed in order to identify predictors of response to therapy.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Intracellular Low Iron Exerts Anti-BK Polyomavirus Effect by Inhibiting the Protein Synthesis of Exogenous Genes

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a small double-stranded DNA virus and ubiquitous human pathogen that particularly affects immunocompromised individuals. Antiviral therapy for BKPyV is urgently needed. Intracellular irons have an important role in many viral infections, yet its contribution to BKPyV and replication has not been explored. In this study, we explored the interaction between BKPyV infection and intracellular iron and the inhibitory effect of iron depletion on BKPyV infection. By creating a low-intracellular-iron environment, we demonstrated that the iron-chelating-induced iron depletion inhibits BKPyV infection in primary renal tubular epithelial cells (RPTECs) and urinary bladder cancer cells (TCCSUP cells). Iron depletion exerts an inhibitory effect after BKPyV enters the nucleus, which might be due to the inhibition of the protein synthesis of exogenous genes in iron-depleted cells. Further exploration of the target proteins of iron-regulating viral infection could potentially be used to develop new strategies for urgently needed anti-BKPyV therapies. IMPORTANCE BKPyV poses a serious threat to the health of immunocompromised patients, and there are currently no curative drugs. Understanding the relationship between the virus and intracellular environment contributes to the discovery of antiviral targets. We demonstrate here that BKPyV is inhibited in cells with a low-iron environment. We also find that iron-chelating-induced iron depletion inhibits viral and exogenous protein synthesis. Further exploration of the target proteins of iron regulation could have great potential in developing new drugs against BKPyV and other viruses.

Leflunomide in the treatment of BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy in kidney transplanted patients - A systematic review

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is seen in about 5% of renal transplant patients and can lead to chronic graft failure or graft loss. No effective therapy is available. Leflunomide has shown promising results in BKVAN. We performed a systematic review about the use of leflunomide for the treatment of BKVAN. The recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook of systematic Reviews were followed. Due to different study designs and endpoints no meta-analysis was performed. The literature search for primary studies yielded 274 results. Finally, twelve studies were included with a total of 267 patients. Clearance of BKPyV viremia was reported in 33.3% to 92.3% of cases and 27 graft losses (10.1%). The included studies were very heterogeneous, especially in terms of leflunomide dosing. Pharmacokinetics seem to have an important impact on the efficacy of leflunomide in BKVAN. There was no correlation between leflunomide serum levels and virus reduction. New adverse events of leflunomide have been described, e.g. haemolytic anaemia and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, the risk of bias in the studies was assessed as high and the quality of evidence was rated low. The role of leflunomide in BKVAN remains unclear, but further studies seem reasonable and should address pharmacokinetic aspects.

Renal Allograft Biopsies with Polyomavirus BK Nephropathy: Turin Transplant Center, 2015-19

Background: In kidney transplant patients, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) represents a serious complication; the key factor for the development of PVAN is immunosuppression level and modulation of anti-rejection treatment represents the first line of intervention. Allograft biopsy and histology remain the criterion standard for diagnosing PVAN. Methods: All consecutive renal biopsies with the diagnosis of PVAN carried out at the University Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin over a five-years period were studied. Renal allograft biopsy was performed due to renal function alterations associated to medium-high polyomavirus BK (BKV)-DNA levels on plasma specimen. Results: A total of 21 patients underwent a first biopsy to diagnose a possible BKV nephropathy, in 18, a second biopsy was made, in eight, a third biopsy, and finally, three underwent the fourth renal biopsy; following the results of each biopsies, immunosuppressant agents dosages were modified in order to reduce the effect of PVAN. Conclusions: In this study, the clinical and histological features of 21 kidney transplant recipients with BKV reactivation and development of PVAN are described. To date, the only treatment for PVAN consists in the reduction of immunosuppressive agents, constantly monitoring viral load.

Viremia Negativization After BK Virus Infection in Kidney Transplantation: A National Bicentric Study

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV) infection represents a potentially dreadful complication after kidney transplantation (KT). When BK viremia is detected, the best therapeutic approach remains not entirely clarified. Critical elements of BK viremia treatment are immunosuppression minimization and introduction of drugs like leflunomide, everolimus, and fluoroquinolones. The study aimed to analyze the results of the BK viremia management in 2 collaborative Italian centers.

METHODS

Ten patients undergoing KT in the 2 collaborative Italian centers of Sapienza University of Rome and University of L'Aquila from January 2013 to December 2017 and showing a post-KT diagnosis of BK viremia were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

Mean time from KT to BKV positivity was 7 months (range: 1-19 months). At diagnosis, the mean viral load was 683,842 copies/mL (range: 5800-4,052,415 copies/mL), with an average zenith of 2,428,410 copies/mL (range: 6762-18,022,500 copies/mL). In the 5 patients with BKV nephropathy, we observed a switch from antimetabolite to leflunomide (n = 5), a switch from tacrolimus to everolimus (n = 3), or an introduction of fluoroquinolones (n = 3). BKV clearance was achieved in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Early BKV diagnosis and stepwise minimization of immunosuppression remain the first-line approach in patients with BK viremia. In the presence of BKV nephropathy, a combination of antiviral drugs like leflunomide and fluoroquinolones/everolimus should favor viremia clearance.

Reducing calcineurin inhibitor first for treating BK polyomavirus replication after kidney transplantation: long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Reducing immunosuppression is the mainstay of treating BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) viraemia after kidney transplantation, but the best approach, efficacy and impact are undefined. We established a standard operating procedure (SOP) treating BKPyV viraemia based on first reducing calcineurin inhibitor ('CNI first'). The aim of this study was to investigate long-term outcomes in 644 consecutive transplantations using this SOP.

METHODS

Patients were monitored for active BKPyV infection by urinary decoy cells and, if positive, by BKPyV viraemia. In case of sustained BKPyV viraemia >1000 copies/mL, immunosuppression was reduced stepwise according to the SOP. Patients were classified as 'no decoy cells' [n = 432 (66%)], 'decoy cells/no viraemia' [n = 107 (17%)] and 'viraemia' [n = 105 (17%)].

RESULTS

At 6-years post-transplant, graft survival was ∼84%, the clinical rejection rate was ∼25% and they were not different among the three groups (P = 0.14; P = 0.91). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at the last follow-up was similar (range 49-53 mL/min, P = 0.08). Of 105 viraemic patients, 101 (96%) cleared BKPyV viraemia. In 39% of patients, viraemia clearance followed a tacrolimus reduction. A reduction of mycophenolic acid was required in 43% and discontinuation in 3%. No short-term graft loss was directly attributable to BKPyV-associated nephropathy. After a median follow-up of 5 years after clearance of BKPyV viraemia, 11/101 patients (11%) developed clinical rejection: 7 (7%) T-cell-mediated rejection and 4 (4%) antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression reduction based on 'CNI first' leads to similar long-term outcomes in patients with/without BKPyV viraemia and is associated with a low risk for ABMR after clearance of BKPyV viraemia. Randomized trials are needed to compare the risks and benefits of immunosuppression reduction strategies in kidney transplant patients with BKPyV viraemia.

Acute kidney injury due to sucrose-containing intravenous immunoglobulins

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) are pooled polyvalent immunoglobulin G antibodies extracted from the human plasma. Stabilizers in IVIG may include sugars, such as sucrose, glucose, or maltose. Sucrose in IVIG preparations may cause acute kidney injury (AKI). We report the case of a renal transplant patient who developed AKI due to sucrose nephropathy following the administration of sucrose-containing IVIG.

Acute kidney injury due to sucrose-containing intravenous immunoglobulins

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) are pooled polyvalent immunoglobulin G antibodies extracted from the human plasma. Stabilizers in IVIG may include sugars, such as sucrose, glucose, or maltose. Sucrose in IVIG preparations may cause acute kidney injury (AKI). We report the case of a renal transplant patient who developed AKI due to sucrose nephropathy following the administration of sucrose-containing IVIG.

Management of BK Polyomavirus Infection in Kidney and Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients: A Review Article

BK virus (BKV) can cause graft dysfunction or failure in kidney transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) emerged as a common complication in the late 1990s, probably due to the introduction of potent immunosuppressive agents. BKVAN occurred in up to 5% of kidney transplant recipients, with graft failure in up to 70%. Since universal implementation of effective screening and treatment strategies, BKV is no longer a common cause of graft failure; reported graft loss is only 0% to 5%. This article briefly describes BK virology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

In vitro toxicity and efficacy of verdinexor, an exportin 1 inhibitor, on opportunistic viruses affecting immunocompromised individuals

Infection of immunocompromised individuals with normally benign opportunistic viruses is a major health burden globally. Infections with viruses such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), Kaposi's sarcoma virus (KSHV), adenoviruses (AdV), BK virus (BKPyV), John Cunningham virus (JCPyV), and human papillomavirus (HPV) are significant concerns for the immunocompromised, including when these viruses exist as a co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). These viral infections are more complicated in patients with a weakened immune system, and often manifest as malignancies resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Vaccination is not an attractive option for these immune compromised individuals due to defects in their adaptive immune response. Verdinexor is part of a novel class of small molecules known as SINE (Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export) compounds. These small molecules demonstrate specificity for the nuclear export protein XPO1, to which they bind and block function, resulting in sequestration of XPO1-dependent proteins in the nucleus of the cell. In antiviral screening, verdinexor demonstrated varying levels of efficacy against all of the aforementioned viruses including previously with HIV. Studies by other labs have discussed likely mechanisms of action for verdinexor (ie. XPO1-dependence) against each virus. GLP toxicology studies suggest that anti-viral activity can be achieved at a tolerable dose range, based on the safety profile of a previous phase 1 clinical trial of verdinexor in healthy human volunteers. Taken together, these results indicate verdinexor has the potential to be a broad spectrum antiviral for immunocompromised subjects for which vaccination is a poor option.

Detection of JC virus archetype in cerebrospinal fluid in a MS patient with dimethylfumarate treatment without lymphopenia or signs of PML

We report a 76-year-old MS patient, treated with DMF for 3 years. Lymphocytes never showed values below 1240/µl. CSF analysis revealed 1,988,880 copies/ml of JCV-DNA, JCV-DNA was detectable in serum and anti-JCV-antibody in CSF and serum were highly positive. Stratify®-JCV-test was positive. CD8-positive T-lymphocytes were reduced. Therapy with mefloquine, mirtazapine and cidofovir resulted in complete elimination of the virus in serum and 90% reduction of viral load in CSF. This case shows that despite careful monitoring for lymphopenia JCV spreading to the CSF may occur during treatment with DMF.

Treatment for presumed BK polyomavirus nephropathy and risk of urinary tract cancers among kidney transplant recipients in the United States

Recent case series describe detection of BK polyomavirus (BKV) in urinary tract cancers in kidney transplant recipients, suggesting that BKV could contribute to the development of these cancers. We assessed risk for urinary tract cancers in kidney recipients with or without treatment for presumed BKV nephropathy (tBKVN) using data from the United States Transplant Cancer Match Study (2003-2013). Among 55 697 included recipients, 2015 (3.6%) were reported with tBKVN. Relative to the general population, incidence was similarly elevated (approximately 4.5-fold) for kidney cancer in recipients with or without tBKVN, and incidence was not increased in either group for prostate cancer. In contrast, for invasive bladder cancer, incidence was more strongly elevated in recipients with versus without tBKVN (standardized incidence ratios 4.5 vs. 1.7; N = 48 cases), corresponding to an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-8.2), adjusted for sex, age, transplant year, and use of polyclonal antibody induction. As a result, recipients with tBKVN had borderline increased incidence for all urothelial cancers combined (renal pelvis, ureter, and bladder cancers: adjusted IRR 2.2, 95% CI 0.9-5.4; N = 89 cases). Together with reports describing BKV detection in tumor tissues, these results support an association between BKV and urothelial carcinogenesis among kidney transplant recipients.

Absence of JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) viremia in early post-transplant JCPyV nephropathy: A case report

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV)-associated nephropathy (JCPyVAN) occurs in <3% of PVAN cases after renal transplantation. We report the first confirmed case to our knowledge of JCPyVAN diagnosed by kidney biopsy in the early 6 months post transplant in Thailand. In this case report, recovery of renal allograft function was not observed after reduction of immunosuppressive agents and administration of intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir. Despite persistent JCPyV viruria, no significant further decline in allograft function was documented at 15 months post transplant.

Biology of the BKPyV: An Update

The BK virus (BKPyV) is a member of the Polyomaviridae family first isolated in 1971. BKPyV causes frequent infections during childhood and establishes persistent infections with minimal clinical implications within renal tubular cells and the urothelium. However, reactivation of BKPyV in immunocompromised individuals may cause serious complications. In particular, with the implementation of more potent immunosuppressive drugs in the last decade, BKPyV has become an emerging pathogen in kidney and bone marrow transplant recipients where it often causes associated nephropathy and haemorrhagic cystitis, respectively. Unfortunately, no specific antiviral against BKPyV has been approved yet and the only therapeutic option is a modulation of the immunosuppressive drug regimen to improve immune control though it may increase the risk of rejection. A better understanding of the BKPyV life cycle is thus needed to develop efficient treatment against this virus. In this review, we provide an update on recent advances in understanding the biology of BKPyV.

Increased Frequency of BK Virus-Specific Polyfunctional CD8+ T Cells Predict Successful Control of BK Viremia After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

BK virus infection remains an important cause of loss of allograft function after kidney transplantation. We sought to determine whether polyfunctional T cells secreting multiple cytokines simultaneously, which have been shown to be associated with viral control, could be detected early after start of BK viremia, which would provide insight into the mechanism of successful antiviral control.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected during episodes of BK viral replication were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry after stimulation by overlapping peptide pools of BK virus antigen to determine frequency of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells expressing 1 or more cytokines simultaneously, as well as markers of T-cell activation, exhaustion, and maturation.

RESULTS

BK virus controllers, defined as those with episodes of BK viremia of 3 months or less, had an 11-fold increase in frequency of CD8+ polyfunctional T cells expressing multiple cytokines, as compared with patients with prolonged episodes of BK viremia. Patients with only low level BK viremia expressed low frequencies of polyfunctional T cells. Polyfunctional T cells were predominantly of the effector memory maturation subtype and expressed the cytotoxicity marker CD107a.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive techniques for immune assessment of peripheral blood can provide insight into the mechanism of control of BK virus replication and may allow for future patient risk stratification and customization of immune suppression at the onset of BK viremia.

Successful Treatment of BK Virus Hemorrhagic Cystitis (HC) Post Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Low Dose Cidofovir

BK virus (BKV) hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT) in patients with hematological malignancies. Around half of allogenic HSCT patients present with BKV viruria at some point after HSCT; about 5-40% of these patients subsequently develop active HC. Supportive care including bladder irrigation, blood transfusions and symptomatic pain management remains the mainstay of therapy; the acyclic nucleoside analogue cidofovir is currently the front-line drug for BKV-HC treatment. Here we report the first case of severe hemorrhagic cystitis from India who was successfully treated with low dose cidofovir therapy.

Impact of Desensitization on Antiviral Immunity in HLA-Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients

Viral infections represent significant morbidity and mortality factors in kidney transplant recipients, with CMV, EBV, and BKV infections being most common. Desensitization (DES) with IVIg and rituximab with/without plasma exchange followed by kidney transplantation with alemtuzumab induction increased successful transplant rates in HLA-sensitized patients but may represent an increased risk for viral infections due to severe lymphocyte depletion. Here, we report on the posttransplant viral infection status in 372 DES versus 538 non-DES patients. CMV and EBV viremia were significantly lower in DES patients, while BKV viremia was similar. This trend was observed primarily in CMV sero(-), EBV sero(+), and sero(-) patients. No patient developed PTLD. The incidence of BKAN, allograft, and patient survival was similar in both groups. These viral infections were not associated with subsequent allograft rejection which occurred within 6 months after the infection. Conclusions. The IVIg + rituximab desensitization combined with alemtuzumab induction with triple immunosuppression maintenance does not increase the risk for CMV, EBV, and BKV infections. Possible factors include, in addition to posttransplant antiviral prophylaxis and PCR monitoring, presence of memory T cells and antibodies specific to CMV and likely EBV, NK cell-mediated ADCC despite lymphocyte depletion, elimination of EBV and CMV reservoirs by rituximab and alemtuzumab, and use of IVIg with antiviral properties.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Active Treatment Versus Minimization of Immunosuppressive Agents in Patients With BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy After Kidney Transplant

OBJECTIVES

There is no active treatment for postrenal transplant BK virus-associated nephropathy proven to be effective so far. We assessed the effectiveness of actively treating this condition with combined leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin, and ciprofloxacin on long-term graft outcome compared with minimization of immunosuppressive drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Kidney transplant recipients were screened for BK virus-associated nephropathy. Group 1 comprised 22 kidney trans plant recipients with twice-positive BK virus polymerase chain reaction results in urine and blood. After diagnosis was confirmed with graft biopsy, antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) was changed to leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin and oral ciprofloxacin were given. Group 2 comprised 33 BK virus-associated nephropathy patients treated conventionally with reduced immunosuppressive medications.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were treated (38 males [69%], 28 patients [50.9%] with type 2 diabetes mellitus). Mean HLA antigen mismatches were 3.65, and 28 patients (50.9%) were HLA-Cw7 negative. All patients received induction therapy, 30 patients (55.6%) received thymoglobulin, and 29 patients (52.7%) received antirejection therapy before BK virus-associated nephropathy diagnosis. Maintenance immunosuppression was prednisolone in 53 patients (96.3%), mycophenolate mofetil (2 g daily) in 52 patients (94.5%), and tacrolimus in 28 patients (50.9%). Subsequent rejection episodes occurred in 38% of patients after diagnosis. Basal mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 52.5 ± 25.5, which was reduced significantly to 38.1 ± 27.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P < .0001) at end of study but without significant differences between the groups (P = .08 and P = .17). Follow-up was 7.3 ± 4.99 years. Although no significant differences were shown in patient outcome, graft survival was significantly better in group 2 (P = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of 3 different anti-BK virus agents (leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin, ciprofloxacin) added no benefit to longterm outcome in patients with BK virus-associated nephropathy. Reduction of immunosuppressive medications appears to be a more effective treatment.

Risk factors in the progression of BK virus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. It has an unfavorable clinical course, and no definite treatment guidelines have yet been established. Here, we report our center's experience with biopsy-proven BKVAN and investigate factors associated with its progression.

METHODS

From January 2004 to April 2013, 25 patients with BKVAN were diagnosed by biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of the 25 patients, 10 were deceased-donor transplant recipients and 15 were living-donor transplant recipients. Three of the patients underwent retransplantation. The primary immunosuppressant used was tacrolimus in 17 patients and cyclosporine in eight patients.

RESULTS

BKVAN was observed at a mean duration of 22.8 ± 29.1 months after transplantation. The mean serum creatinine level at biopsy was 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/dL. BKVAN occurred with acute rejection in eight patients (28%). Immunosuppression modification was performed in 21 patients (84%). Additionally, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin were administered to 13 patients (52%) and two (8%), respectively. Allograft loss occurred in five patients (27.8%) during the follow- up period at 0.7, 17.1, 21.8, 39.8, and 41.5 months after the BKVAN diagnosis. Advanced stages of BKVAN, increased creatinine levels, and accompanying acute rejection at the time of BKVAN diagnosis increased the risk of allograft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven BKVAN were unfavorable in the present study, especially in patients with advanced-stage BKVAN, poor renal function, and acute allograft rejection.

Management of BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients at the Royal Hospital - Clinical Audit - Oman

OBJECTIVES

Nephropathy from BK virus (BKV) infection is a growing challenge in kidney transplant recipients globally. It is the result of contemporary potent immunosuppressives aimed at reducing acute rejection and improving allograft survival. Untreated BK virus infections lead to kidney allograft dysfunction or loss. Decreased immunosuppression is the principle treatment but predisposes to acute and chronic rejection. Screening for early detection and prevention of symptomatic BK virus nephropathy may improve outcomes. Although no approved antiviral drug is available, leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, and intravenous immunoglobulin have been used. Since the introduction of the new immunosuppressive agents in the transplant regimen at the Royal Hospital, Few cases of BK virus have been detected, and the challenge was to decide upon the best treatment option.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The audit was carried out at the Royal Hospital-Oman between January 2010 and December 2012. The nephrology consultant and the clinical pharmacist reviewed all the BK cases and the Royal Hospital. Extensive literature review carried out by the pharmacist to look into the prevalence, prognosis and treatment of BK nephropathy. A treatment protocol was prepared by the clinical pharmacist through guidance of the consultant and was peer reviewed by team of clinical pharmacists and nephrology doctors and approved by the consultant.

RESULTS

The audit included 19 patients with positive BK virus ployoma nephropathy. The treatment options were applied stepwise in all the patients with BK virus nephropathy with success rate more than 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

BK virus nephropathy is emerging at an alarming rate and requires increasing awareness. The uses of current treatment options are still questionable. Our audit confirms that reducing immunosuppression appears to be the criterian standard for the treatment of BK nephropathy.

Treatment of BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis with low-dose intravenous cidofovir in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

BK virus (BKV) has been associated with late-onset hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Cidofovir has been used at higher doses (3 to 5 mg/kg/wk) with probenecid prophylaxis; however, cidofovir may result in nephrotoxicity or cytopenia at high doses.

METHODS

Allogeneic HSCT recipients with BKV-associated HC are treated with 1 mg/kg intravenous cidofovir weekly at our institution. A microbiological response was defined as at least a one log reduction in urinary BKV viral load, and a clinical response was defined as improvement in symptoms and stability or reduction in cystitis grade.

RESULTS

Eight patients received a median of 4 weekly (range, 2 to 11) doses of cidofovir. HC occurred a median 69 days (range, 16 to 311) after allogeneic HSCT. A clinical response was detected in 7/8 patients (86%), and 4/5 (80%) had a measurable microbiological response. One patient died of uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease; therefore, we could not measure the clinical response to HC treatment. One microbiological non-responder had a stable BKV viral load with clinical improvement. Only three patients showed transient grade 2 serum creatinine toxicities, which resolved after completion of concomitant calcineurin inhibitor treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly intravenous low-dose cidofovir without probenecid appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with BKV-associated HC.

BK Virus in Recipients of Kidney Transplants

Since its discovery in 1971, the BK virus, a human polyomavirus, has emerged as a significant cause of renal dysfunction and transplant graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Improved screening methods have been effective in assisting in the early identification of the virus, and thus, prompt intervention to prevent the progression of the disease. Treatment options for the virus are limited; therefore, lowering immunosuppressive medications should be considered the first line of treatment. Current adjunctive therapies are not guaranteed to control the viral activity and may have limited therapeutic value.

Monitoring of polyomavirus BK replication and impact of preemptive immunosuppression reduction in renal-transplant recipients in China: a 5-year single-center analysis

This provides the long-term patient/graft survival and outcome of BK viremia and BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) in renal transplant recipients in the setting of intensive monitoring and preemptive of reduction of immunosuppression. Quantitative BKV DNA PCR and urinary cytology surveillance were performed regularly after transplantation in 229 kidney recipients. Patients with BK viremia and BKVAN were treated with 30-50% reduction in doses of tacrolimus and/or mycophenolate mofetil and were monitored for BKV every 3-6 months. All the patients were followed for 5 years. Overall 5-year patient and graft survival were 95.6% and 92.1%, respectively, and independent of presence of decoy cells, BK viruria, viremia, or BKVAN. After reduction of immunosuppression, BK viremia (n = 38) resolved in 100% of patients, without increased acute rejection. Recurrent BK viremia was not observed in viremic patients without BKVAN (n = 30). All BKVAN patients (n = 7, 3.1%) cleared viremia with a mean time of 5.9 months (range 1-15 months) and manifested no decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from 1 month to 5 years after transplantation. Viral monitoring and preemptive reduction of immunosuppression resulted in the successful resolution of BK viremia and BKVAN with excellent graft survival and renal function at 5 years.

The HSP70 modulator MAL3-101 inhibits Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and highly aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer for which no effective treatment is available. MCC represents a human cancer with the best experimental evidence for a causal role of a polyoma virus. Large T antigens (LTA) encoded by polyoma viruses are oncoproteins, which are thought to require support of cellular heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) to exert their transforming activity. Here we evaluated the capability of MAL3-101, a synthetic HSP70 inhibitor, to limit proliferation and survival of various MCC cell lines. Remarkably, MAL3-101 treatment resulted in considerable apoptosis in 5 out of 7 MCC cell lines. While this effect was not associated with the viral status of the MCC cells, quantitative mRNA expression analysis of the known HSP70 isoforms revealed a significant correlation between MAL3-101 sensitivity and HSC70 expression, the most prominent isoform in all cell lines. Moreover, MAL3-101 also exhibited in vivo antitumor activity in an MCC xenograft model suggesting that this substance or related compounds are potential therapeutics for the treatment of MCC in the future.

Antivirals for the treatment of polyomavirus BK replication

Antiviral drugs with specific activity against polyomavirus replication have not been developed in the past. This deficiency has become fully apparent with the emergence of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in kidney-transplant recipients, with a prevalence rate of up to 10%. In most cases, high BK virus replication in tubular epithelial cells causes significant cytopathology, leading to permanently impaired renal allograft function and return to hemodialysis within 6-60 months. In 5-10% of allogenic bone marrow/hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, high-level BK virus replication in the ureter/bladder mucosa has been associated with postengraftment hemorrhagic cystitis, which appears to involve significant immunopathology. Thus, in view of the increasing clinical need, a number of drugs have been studied in small case series. We review the antiviral strategies explored to date and specifically discuss available in vivo and in vitro data on cidofovir, leflunomide, fluoroquinolones and intravenous immunoglobulins, regarding mechanism, administration, dosing and outcome and provide a perspective on future therapy options.

Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the Treatment of Persistent BK Viremia and BK Virus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients

BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVN) can cause clinically significant viral infections in renal transplant recipients, leading to allograft dysfunction and loss. The usual management of BKVN involves reduction of immunosuppression and the addition of leflunomide, quinolones, and cidofovir, but the rate of graft loss remains high. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on the outcome of BKVN in renal transplant recipients. Upon diagnosis of BKVN, patients remained on anti-polyomavirus treatment consisting of reduction of immunosuppression and the use of leflunomide therapy. Treatment with IVIG was given only to patients who did not respond to 8 weeks of the adjustment of immunosuppression and leflunomide. All 30 patients had persistent BK viremia and BKVN with their mean BK viral loads higher than the baseline (range 15,000 - 2 millions copies/mL). Mean peak BK load was 205,314 copies/mL compared to 697 copies/mL after one year follow-up. Twenty-seven patients (90%) had positive responses in clearing viremia. The actuarial patient and graft survival rates after 12 months were 100% and 96.7%, respectively. IVIG administration appeared to be safe and effective in treating BK viremia and BKVN and in preventing graft loss in patients who had inadequate response to immunosuppression reduction and leflunomide therapy.

Impact of combined acute rejection on BK virus-associated nephropathy in kidney transplantation

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is one of the major causes of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant (KT) patients. We compared BKVAN combined with acute rejection (BKVAN/AR) with BKVAN alone in KT patients. We retrospectively analyzed biopsy-proven BKVAN in KT patients from 2000 to 2011 at Seoul National University Hospital. Among 414 biopsies from 951 patients, biopsy-proven BKVAN was found in 14 patients. Nine patients had BKVAN alone, while 5 patients had both BKVAN and acute cellular rejection. BKVAN in the BKVAN alone group was detected later than in BKVAN/AR group (21.77 vs 6.39 months after transplantation, P=0.03). Serum creatinine at diagnosis was similar (2.09 vs 2.00 mg/dL). Histological grade was more advanced in the BKVAN/AR group (P=0.034). Serum load of BKV, dose of immunosuppressants, and tacrolimus level showed a higher tendency in the BKVAN alone group; however it was not statistically significant. After anti-rejection therapy, immunosuppression was reduced in the BKVAN/AR group. Renal functional deterioration over 1 yr after BKVAN diagnosis was similar between the two groups (P=0.665). These findings suggest that the prognosis of BKVAN/AR after anti-rejection therapy followed by anti-BKV therapy might be similar to that of BKVAN alone after anti-BKV therapy.

[Efficiency of cycloferon against slow viral infection caused by SV-40 in monkeys and man]

The latent infection caused by Simian virus (SV-40) defeats monkeys and others animals. Currently there are not the prophylactic and therapeutic measures against this disease. We showed the infringement of immunity of M. mulatta infected by SV-40. The use of the preparation Cyclopheron for the treatment of this infection led to the normalization of the functions of immunity of monkeys and to disappearance of the virus from the organism. We suggested the new method for prophylaxis and treatment of latent SV-40 infection by Cyclopheron, may be used for the correction of the immunity.

BK virus infection in transplant recipients: clinical manifestations, treatment options and the immune response

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is ubiquitously present amongst the general population establishing a latent, seemingly asymptomatic infection in immunocompetent individuals. In transplant recipients, however, BKV reactivation is common and can lead to distinctive pathological entities in different patient groups: in renal transplant (RT) recipients, it is associated with nephropathy (BKVN) and ureteral stenosis, and in haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with haemorrhagic cystitis (HC). Furthermore, BKV employs several potentially oncogenic mechanisms to promote its replication in cells and has been inconsistently linked to the development of malignancies. BKVN is currently a major cause of allograft failure in RT recipients. HC causes prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality in HSCT recipients. Despite its discovery more than 40 years ago, few advances have been made with regard to therapeutic strategies. Current therapies aim to restore the impaired immune response, e.g. by lowering immunosuppressive agents in RT recipients. However, this is a double-edged sword since it also increases the chance of rejection. Therefore, more specific and effective treatment strategies are urgently needed. Here, we will review the current knowledge on the structure and lifecycle of BKV, characteristics of the BKV-specific immune response, its clinical manifestations and the strengths and limitations of available treatments Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is ubiquitously present amongst the general population establishing a latent, seemingly asymptomatic infection in immunocompetent individuals. In transplant recipients, however, BKV reactivation is common and can lead to distinctive pathological entities in different patient groups: in renal transplant (RT) recipients, it is associated with nephropathy (BKVN) and ureteral stenosis, and in haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with haemorrhagic cystitis (HC). Furthermore, BKV employs several potentially oncogenic mechanisms to promote its replication in cells and has been inconsistently linked to the development of malignancies. BKVN is currently a major cause of allograft failure in RT recipients. HC causes prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality in HSCT recipients. Despite its discovery more than 40 years ago, few advances have been made with regard to therapeutic strategies. Current therapies aim to restore the impaired immune response, e.g. by lowering immunosuppressive agents in RT recipients. However, this is a double-edged sword since it also increases the chance of rejection. Therefore, more specific and effective treatment strategies are urgently needed. Here, we will review the current knowledge on the structure and lifecycle of BKV, characteristics of the BKV-specific immune response, its clinical manifestations and the strengths and limitations of available treatments methods.

The influence of immunosuppressive agents on BK virus risk following kidney transplantation, and implications for choice of regimen

The increasing incidence of BK-associated nephropathy following kidney transplantation has prompted an examination of strategies for risk reduction and management through immunosuppression manipulation. Evidence from retrospective and prospective studies suggests that BK viruria and viremia, and the need for BK virus treatment, are higher with tacrolimus than cyclosporine. Combined therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid may be associated with a particularly higher risk of BK infection, but data are conflicting as to whether mycophenolic acid per se is an independent risk factor. The incidence of BK-related events may be reduced in patients receiving mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus) with cyclosporine vs a calcineurin inhibitor with mycophenolic acid. De novo immunosuppression regimens that avoid rabbit antithymocyte globulin and tacrolimus, particularly tacrolimus with mycophenolic acid, may be advantageous, whereas low-exposure cyclosporine with an mTOR inhibitor appears a favorable option. Routine screening for BK infection during the first 2 years posttransplant is recommended to allow preemptive modification of the immunosuppressive regimen. In patients at high risk of BK virus infection, appropriate de novo immunosuppression or very early conversion to an mTOR inhibitor to facilitate reduction or discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitors or antimetabolites should be considered. Extensive further research into optimal avoidance, screening, and treatment strategies is required.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy: a comparison of 2 different strategies for immunosuppression reduction

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an increasing cause of renal allograft dysfunction, but the optimal management of immunosuppression for these patients is unclear. We examined the clinical course of 58 patients with biopsy-proven PVAN diagnosed from 1997 to 2008 at Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. Immunosuppression management was analyzed as 2 different immunosuppression reduction strategies, the first centered on eliminating a single immunosuppressive drug and reducing the doses of all other immunosuppressive drugs (Strategy A, n = 40), compared with the second, centered on reducing the doses of all immunosuppressive drugs and eliminating none (Strategy B, n = 18). Primary outcome was graft failure, defined as a 50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate, or the need for dialysis within 2 years of PVAN diagnosis. Graft failure developed in 17 (29%) patients during follow-up. In unadjusted and adjusted Cox models, both strategies of immunosuppression reduction had similar efficacy in preventing graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-2.06; p = 0.43). Rejection after PVAN occurred in 24 of 58 patients and was associated with a 3-fold higher risk of graft failure (HR, 2.99; p = 0.005). Ancillary therapies (cidofovir or leflunomide) were associated with a trend toward faster clearance of viremia (p = 0.65) but were not predictive of outcome.In conclusion, the 2 strategies of immunosuppression reduction had similar efficacy in preventing graft failure. Post-PVAN rejection leads to graft failure. Early repeat allograft biopsy should be considered in the management of PVAN with persistent graft dysfunction.

BK virus associated nephropathy in renal transplantation: where do we stand

BK virus is an increasingly identified complication in renal allograft recipients. During the last decade, the use of potent immunosuppressive medications has led to reemergence of this virus. Despite the paucity of randomized trials, we have come a long way in the knowledge of BK virus associated nephropathy. This review highlights the epidemiological, pathogenic, pathological, and clinical aspects of BK virus. It summarizes advances made in prophylaxis and treatment strategies to curtail this virus in an era of modern immunosuppression. The old word of wisdom- prevention is better than cure- might be relevant in context of BK virus prophylaxis with flouroquinolones in years to follow.