Detection of significant vision conditions in children using QuickSee wavefront autorefractor

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the ability of QuickSee to detect children at risk for significant vision conditions (significant refractive error [RE], amblyopia and strabismus).

METHODS

Non-cycloplegic refraction (using QuickSee without and with +2 dioptre (D) fogging lenses) and unaided binocular near visual acuity (VA) were measured in 4- to 12-year-old children. Eye examination findings (VA, cover testing and cycloplegic retinoscopy) were used to determine the presence of vision conditions. QuickSee performance was summarised by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity for various levels of RE. QuickSee referral criteria for each vision condition were chosen to maximise sensitivity at a specificity of approximately 85%-90%. Sensitivity and specificity to detect vision conditions were calculated using multiple criteria. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the benefit of adding near VA (6/12 or worse) for detecting hyperopia. A paired t-test compared QuickSee without and with fogging lenses.

RESULTS

The mean age was 8.2 (±2.5) years (n = 174). RE ranged up to 9.25 D myopia, 8 D hyperopia, 5.25 D astigmatism and 3.5 D anisometropia. The testability of the QuickSee was 94.3%. AUC was ≥0.92 (excellent) for each level of RE. For the detection of any RE, sensitivity and specificity were 84.2% and 87.3%, respectively, using modified Orinda criteria and 94.5% and 78.2%, respectively, using the American Academy for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) guidelines. For the detection of any significant vision condition, the sensitivity and specificity of QuickSee were 81.1% and 87.9%, respectively, using modified Orinda criteria and 93% and 78.6%, respectively, using AAPOS criteria. There was no significant benefit of adding near VA to QuickSee for the detection of hyperopia ≥+2.00 (p = 0.34). There was no significant difference between QuickSee measurements of hyperopic refractive error with and without fogging lenses (difference = -0.09 D; p = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

QuickSee had high discriminatory power for detecting children with hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, anisometropia, any significant refractive error or any significant vision condition.

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): optometric exam improves access and utilization of eye care services

PURPOSE

To describe the benefits of optometric evaluation for detection of vision-affecting conditions in the context of community-based eye health screenings and identify factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam.

METHODS

Enrolled participants were age 40 and older, living independently in affordable housing developments in New York City. Eye health screening failure and criteria for seeing the on-site study optometrist were defined as visual acuity 20/40 or worse in either eye, intraocular pressure 23-29 mmHg, or an unreadable fundus image. The optometrist conducted a manifest refraction using loose lenses and used a portable slit lamp and ophthalmoscope to perform a non-dilated anterior and posterior segment ocular health evaluation. Demographics, social determinants of health, eye health screening results, and rates of suspected ophthalmic conditions were recorded. To determine factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam, which was the main outcome for this statistical analysis, a stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 708 participants were screened, 308 attended the optometric exam; mean age 70.7 ± 11.7 [standard deviation (SD)] years. Among this subgroup, 70.1% identified as female, 54.9% self-identified as African American, 39% as Hispanic/Latino, and 26.6% Dominican ethnicity; 78.2% (241/308) had not undergone a dilated eye exam within the last year, 71.4% reported they did not have an eye care provider. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who self-reported having cataracts (odds ratio (OR) 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-4.47; p = 0.041), self-reported having glaucoma/glaucoma suspect (OR 5.60; 95% CI 2.02-15.43; p = 0.001), or spoke Spanish as their primary language (OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.48-7.11; p = 0.003) had higher odds of having a recent dilated eye exam.

CONCLUSIONS

This community-based screening initiative demonstrated the effectiveness of optometric exams in detecting vision-affecting conditions and identified factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam. Optometrists play a vital role in increasing access to eye care for high-risk, underserved populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04271709).

Association of Sociodemographic Characteristics with Pediatric Vision Screening and Eye Care: An Analysis of the 2021 National Survey of Children's Health

PURPOSE

Vision screening and regular eye care can help detect and treat potentially irreversible vision impairment. This study aims to investigate the associations between sociodemographic and health characteristics and the receipt of eye care among children aged 17 years and younger in the United States.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study used data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), a nationally representative and population-based survey of randomly sampled households.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were children aged 0 to 17 years, residing in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, whose caregivers or parents answered an address-based survey by mail or online.

METHODS

Weighted prevalence calculations were applied to analyze the data, and logistic regression was performed to explore associations between reported eye care and demographic, health, and parent-related variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Caregiver-reported vision screenings, referral to an eye doctor after vision screening, eye doctor visits, and prescription of corrective lenses.

RESULTS

Caregivers reported that 53.2% of children had a vision screening at least once (if child ≤ 5 years) or within the past 2 years (if child > 5 years). Of those screened, 26.9% were referred to an eye doctor. Overall, 38.6% of all children had a previous eye doctor visit, and among them, 55.4% were prescribed corrective lenses during the visit. Factors associated with decreased odds of vision screening included younger age, lack of health care visits, no insurance coverage, parent education high school or less, and lower household income. Non-White ethnicities, households with a non-English primary language, and lower incomes were more likely to be referred to an eye doctor after vision screening. Lower rates of eye doctor visits were associated with younger age, lack of insurance coverage, and primary household languages other than English.

CONCLUSIONS

Children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to receive vision screening and eye care. Targeted strategies are needed to increase vision screening and access to eye care services in these vulnerable groups.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

The newborn screening tests in Brazil: regional and socioeconomic prevalence and inequalities in 2013 and 2019

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the prevalence evolution of Guthrie, hearing, and eye screening testing among newborns in Brazil, between 2013 and 2019, according to demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study with data from 5231 infants from the Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (PNS), in 2013, and 6637 infants, in 2019, for the Guthrie test, hearing, and red reflex tests. The authors analyzed the outcomes according to the region of residence, self-reported color/race, having health insurance, and per capita household income. By using bivariate and multivariate Poisson regression models, the prevalence ratios and their respective 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI95%) were calculated for each year.

RESULTS

In 2013, Guthrie test, hearing, and red reflex tests were performed in 96.5 % (95%CI 95,8;97,0), 65.8 % (95%CI 63,9;67,7), and 60.4 % (95%CI 58,5;62,3) of infants, respectively. In 2019, the prevalence was 97.8 % (95%CI 97,3;98,2) in the Guthrie test, 81.6 % (95%CI 80,3;82,9) in the hearing test, and 78.6 % (95%CI 77,1;79,9) in the red reflex test. The testing frequency was higher among residents of the Southeast and South regions of Brazil, among infants whose mother or guardian was white, had health insurance, and was in the higher income strata; and the most evident differences were in the eye and hearing testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The coverage inequalities according to the region of residence, income, and having health insurance highlight the need to use strategies that enable exams to be carried out, with more information about their importance, encompassing actions from primary care, prenatal care to the puerperium, aiming at universal access and equity.

Barriers and facilitators to using ophthalmic clinical health services following school vision screening: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVE

To identify determinants of the utilisation of ophthalmic clinical health services among students who failed school vision screening.

METHODS

This study employed a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, underpinned by Andersen's Behavioural Model of Health Service Utilisation. Data were initially gathered through interviews with 27 stakeholders-comprising 5 ophthalmologists, 7 community doctors, 7 public health professionals and 8 teachers. The qualitative insights informed the construction of a questionnaire, which subsequently garnered responses from 6215 participants. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis with NVivo V.12, while quantitative data were analysed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression in SAS V.9.4. Data integration was performed using the Pillar Integration Process for a deductive, evidence-based synthesis of findings.

RESULTS

The research revealed that students attending vision demonstration schools and receiving encouragement from schools or communities to access clinical ophthalmic services demonstrated higher adherence to referral (OR=1.66, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.12; OR=1.54, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.80). Conversely, older students and those from higher-income families exhibited lower adherence rates (OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.44; OR=0.34, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.46). Moreover, students with less urgent medical needs were more likely to adhere to referrals compared with those needing immediate referrals (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.45).Four pillars emerged: (a) adherence decreased with age, (b) financial constraints did not pose an obstacle, (c) public health services played a critical role, (d) referral urgency did not linearly correlate with adherence.

CONCLUSION

The utilisation of ophthalmic clinical health services following vision screening failure in students is significantly influenced by public health services provided by schools or communities, such as prompting those with abnormal screening results to access ophthalmic clinical health services.

Association of household language and vision screening among children in the United States

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends annual testing in children beginning at 3 years of age to detect vision problems and prevent amblyopia. However, rates of vision testing in children from non-English primary language (NEPL) households are not well delineated. This study analyzed the 2018-2020 National Survey of Children's Health to examine patterns and predictors of vision testing among children from NEPL households. In this nationally representative cohort of 89,697 children 3-17 years of age, 70.9% of children received vision testing during the previous 12 months. Children from non-English-speaking households were less likely to undergo vision testing (64.3% vs 72.0%; aOR [95% CI] = 0.83 [0.72-0.95], P = 0.008). Decreased vision testing among children from NEPL households was driven by lower rates of testing at school (16.1% vs 21.0%; 0.72 [0.57-0.89], P = 0.009) or from an ophthalmologist or optometrist (49.0% vs 54.0%; 0.72 [0.61-0.85], P = 0.0004), whereas children from NEPL households were more likely to receive vision testing at health clinics (14.4% vs 3.1%; 3.25 [2.40-4.39], P < 0.0001). No differences were observed in rates of testing by a pediatrician (41.1% vs 44.0%; 1.05 [0.89-1.23], P = 0.69). Interventions to improve language services and health literacy are warranted to increase rates of vision testing among children from NEPL households.

Gaps in the Vision Screening Pathway for School-Aged US Children

This cross-sectional study uses a nationally representative survey of the US pediatric population to identify gaps in the vision screening pathway.

Amblyopia Care Trends Following Widespread Photoscreener Adoption

Importance

Amblyopia can result in permanent vision loss if not properly treated before age 7 years. In 2017, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended that vision screening should occur at least once in all children aged 3 to 5 years to detect amblyopia.

Objective

To understand trends and factors associated with screening, referral, or diagnosis of amblyopia before and after photoscreening expansion across a relatively large health care system in late 2017.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This is a retrospective cohort study of electronic health record data from patients with a well child care visit at approximately age 3 years (ages 2.75-3.25 years) in a relatively large, multispecialty group practice in Northern California and linked census data between 2015 and 2022. Data were extracted and analyzed from October 2022 through August 2023.

Exposures

Patient sex, race and ethnicity, immunization records, previous well child care visits, and census-level median household income.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Vision screening, pediatric ophthalmology referral, or amblyopia diagnosis, compared using adjusted odds ratios (AORs).

Results

The study included 2015-2017 data from 23 246 patients aged 3 years with at least 1 well child care visit (11 206 [48.2%] female) compared with 2018-2022 postexpansion data from 34 281 patients (16 517 [48.2%] female). The screening rate increased from 5.7% (424 of 7505) in 2015 to 72.1% (4578 of 6354) in 2022. The referral rate increased from 17.0% (1279 of 7505) in 2015 to 23.6% (1836 of 7792) in 2018. The diagnosis rate was 2.7% (200 of 7505) in 2015, peaked at 3.4% (263 of 7792) in 2018, and decreased to 1.4% (88 of 6354) in 2022. Compared with White patients, patients who were Asian, Black, or Hispanic were less likely to be screened (Asian: AOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.88; Black: AOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96; Hispanic: AOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97). Compared with White patients, patients who were Asian or Hispanic were more likely to be referred (Asian: AOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.36-1.62; Hispanic: AOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.48) and were more likely to be diagnosed (Asian: AOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56; Hispanic: AOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.33-2.11).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, increased availability of photoscreeners was associated with an increase in overall rates of vision screening for children aged 3 years in a relatively large health care system. Given that US rates of visual impairment are predicted to increase, additional targeted interventions would be needed to address remaining disparities in amblyopia care along patient- and clinician-level factors.

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study: (NYC-SIGHT)Tele-Retinal Image Findings and Importance of Photography

Purpose: To describe tele-retinal abnormality image findings from the Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT), which aims to investigate whether community-based eye health outreach strategies using telemedicine can improve visual outcomes among at-risk populations in Upper Manhattan. Methods: A 5-year prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted. Eligible individuals aged 40 years and older were recruited from affordable housing developments and senior centers in New York City. Participants underwent on-site eye health screening (best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure [IOP] measurements, and fundus photography). Fundus images were graded via telemedicine by a retina specialist. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to assess the factors associated with abnormal retinal findings requiring referral to ophthalmology. Results: Participants with a retinal abnormality on fundus photography (n = 157) were predominantly older adults, with a mean age of 68.4 ± 11.1 years, female (63.7%), African American (50.3%), and Hispanic (43.3%). A total of 32 participants in our study passed the vision and IOP screening but had an abnormal retinal image and ocular pathology that would have been missed without fundus photography. Individuals who self-identified as having preexisting glaucoma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.749, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.741-8.074, p = 0.0001) and had severe vision impairment (OR = 4.1034, 95% CI = 2.0740-8.1186, p = 0.000) at the screening had significantly higher odds of having an abnormal retinal image. Conclusion: This community-based study targeted populations at-risk for eye disease, improved access to eye care, detected a significant number of retinal image abnormalities requiring follow-up by using telemedicine, and provided evidence of the importance of fundus photography during eye health screenings. CTR number: NCT04271709.

Predicting myopic changes in children wearing glasses using the Plusoptix photoscreener

INTRODUCTION

With high increase in myopia prevalence, we aimed to assess whether Plusoptix_A09 can be used in myopic children over spectacles to predict visual acuity (VA) and myopic refraction changes.

METHODS

Myopic children underwent a complete ophthalmological examination. Plusoptix_A09 was performed over spectacles. VA changes, refraction changes and time since previous glasses prescription, were determined. Age, current or past history of amblyopia, presence of strabismus and self-perception of VA changes were registered.

RESULTS

In total, 199 patients were included. Spherical power (SP) and spherical equivalent (SE) measured by Plusoptix_A09 over spectacles predicted both VA changes (p < 0.001) and refraction changes (p < 0.001). Values of SP < - 0.06D or SE < - 0.22D indicated a VA decrease (AUC > 0.9, p < 0.01) for sensitivity and specificity of 85.1%, 82.1% and 82.6%, 83.3%, respectively. Age and ophthalmological comorbidities did not influence Plusoptix_A09 measurements (p > 0.05). Plusoptix_A09 over spectacles was a stronger predictor of VA changes when compared to children's self-perception, either in 4-9-year-old patients (p < 0.001 versus p = 0.628) and in 10-18-year-old children (OR <  = 0.066 versus OR = 0.190). A decrease in SP and SE of - 0.10D in Plusoptix_A09 predicted a myopia progression of - 0.04D and - 0.05D, respectively.

CONCLUSION/RELEVANCE

This study unveiled new features for the Plusoptix, a worldwide available photoscreener used in amblyopia screening. When Plusoptix is performed in children with their glasses on, it can rapidly predict myopia progression. For each decrease of - 0.10D in Plusoptix, a myopia progression of -0.05D is expected. Moreover, Plusoptix is more reliable than children's self-perception of visual acuity changes, making it a useful tool either in primary care or ophthalmology practice.

Status of Vision and Eye Care Among Patients in Rehabilitation Hospital Units: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of vision disorders is high among geriatric and hospital inpatient populations, yet they often go undetected, resulting in consequences such as falls or prolonged recovery time. A needs assessment study was conducted to investigate levels of vision and the potential prevalence of unmanaged/undiagnosed ocular disorders among adult inpatients in a hospital-based rehabilitation unit.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Inpatient rehabilitation units of an acute care hospital system in Ontario, Canada. Adults (n = 112) in a hospital inpatient rehabilitation unit participated from October 2018 to February 2019.

METHODS

Participants were surveyed regarding their demographic, ocular, and medical data and spectacle wear. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual fields, and stereoacuity plus the spectacle condition were directly assessed.

RESULTS

The majority (75%) were found to have reduced habitual vision while in hospital. Nearly 60% of participants reported at least some difficulty reading a newspaper or distinguishing a face or were "not happy with their vision." This was despite 80% of participants reporting that they had an eye care practitioner and 70% that they had an eye examination within the last 2 years. More than half (51.8%) of the participants received the recommendation to follow up with their eye care practitioner on discharge from the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Reduced vision and vision disorders has a high prevalence among hospital patients in rehabilitation units and should be evaluated at or soon after hospital intake. By incorporating vision screening tools, necessary precautions may be taken to avoid possible falls and promote recovery.

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Subanalysis of Referral to Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

The Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study aims to provide access to eye care for underserved populations, detect native rates of ocular pathology, and refer participants with eye disease to ophthalmology. This subanalysis describes the reasons for referral to ophthalmology and identifies risk factors associated with being referred.

METHODS

Enrolled participants were aged ≥40 years, living independently in public housing developments and able to provide consent for eye health screenings. Those with habitual visual acuity 20/40 or worse, intraocular pressure (IOP) 23-29 mmHg, or an unreadable fundus image failed and were scheduled with the on-site optometrist. The optometric exam determined whether further referral to ophthalmology for a clinic exam was warranted. Those with an abnormal image or IOP ≥30 mmHg were referred directly to ophthalmology. Main outcome was factors associated with referral to ophthalmology.

RESULTS

A total of 708 individuals completed the eye health screening over 15 months. A total of 468 participants were referred to ophthalmology (250 had an abnormal image and 218 were referred by the optometrist). Those referred were predominantly older adults (mean age 70.0 ± 11.4 years), female (66.7%), African American (55.1%) and Hispanic (39.5%). Seventy percent of participants had not had a recent eye exam. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that participants with pre-existing glaucoma (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.62 to 6.08, p = 0.001), an IOP ≥23 mmHg (OR 5.04, 95% 1.91 to 13.28, p = 0.001), or vision impairment (mild) (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.68 to 3.77, p = 0.001) had significantly higher odds of being referred to ophthalmology.

CONCLUSION

This targeted community-based study in Upper Manhattan provided access to eye care and detected a significant amount of ocular pathology requiring referral to ophthalmology in this high-risk population.

Capabilities and Limitations of Student-Led Free Vision Screening Programs in the United States

Purpose

The Consortium of Student-Led Eye Clinics (CSLEC), founded in 2021, administered a comprehensive survey to document the types of services, most common diagnoses, and follow-up care protocols offered by student-led free vision screening programs (SLFVSP) in the United States.

Methods

An 81-question institutional review board (IRB)-approved survey was administered to student-led vision screening eye clinics from October 1, 2022 to February 24, 2023.

Results

Sixteen SLFVSPs were included in the final analysis, of which 81% (n = 13) conducted variations of fundoscopic examinations and 75% (n = 12) measured intraocular pressure. Cataracts and diabetic retinopathy were reported as the most frequent diagnoses by the majority of SLFVSPs (n = 9, 56%); non-mobile SLFVSPs more commonly reported cataract as a frequent diagnosis (P < 0.05). Most patients screened at participating programs were uninsured or met federal poverty guidelines. Prescription glasses were offered by 56% of the programs (n = 9). SLFVSPs that directly scheduled follow-up appointments reported higher attendance rates (66.5%) than those that only sent referrals (20%). Transportation was the most cited barrier for follow-up appointment attendance.

Conclusions

SLFVSPs, one community vision screening initiative subtype, vary significantly in scope and capabilities of identifying vision threatening disease. The follow-up infrastructure is not uniformly robust and represents a key target for improving care delivery to at-risk populations.

Translational Relevance

The CSLEC aims to develop a consensus-based standardization for the scope of screening services, offer guidelines for diagnostic criteria, promote real-time data stewardship, and identify means to improve follow-up care mechanisms in member communities.

Prevalence of refractive errors among school-going children in a multistate study in India

AIM

Much existing data on childhood refractive error prevalence in India were gathered in local studies, many now dated. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence, severity and determinants of refractive errors among school-going children participating in a multistate vision screening programme across India.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, vision screening was conducted in children aged 5-18 years at schools in five states using a pocket vision screener. Refractive error was measured using retinoscopy, and subjective refraction and was defined both by spherical equivalent (SE) and spherical ametropia, as myopia ≤-0.5 diopters (D), hyperopia ≥+1.0 D and/or astigmatism as >0.5 D. Data from the eye with less refractive error were used to determine prevalence.

RESULTS

Among 2 240 804 children (50.9% boys, mean age 11.5 years, SD ±3.3), the prevalence of SE myopia was 1.57% (95% CI 1.54% to 1.60%) at 5-9 years, 3.13% (95% CI 3.09% to 3.16%) at 10-14 years and 4.8% (95% CI 4.73% to 4.86%) at 15-18 years. Hyperopia prevalence was 0.59% (95% CI 0.57% to 0.61%), 0.54% (95% CI 0.53% to 0.56%) and 0.39% (95% CI 0.37% to 0.41%), respectively. When defined by spherical ametropia, these values for myopia were 0.84%, 2.50% and 4.24%, and those for hyperopia were 2.11%, 2.41% and 2.07%, respectively.Myopia was associated with older age, female gender, private school attendance, urban location and state. The latter appeared to be driven by higher literacy rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive error, especially myopia, is common in India. Differences in prevalence between states appear to be driven by literacy rates, suggesting that the burden of myopia may rise as literacy increases.

Design and delivery of the Refractive Errors Among Children (REACH) school-based eye health programme in India

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Optimisation of vision screening programmes can result the detection of refractive anomalies in a high proportion of school children.

BACKGROUND

The Refractive Errors Among Children (REACH) programme aims to optimise outcomes of school-based vision screening in India by collaborating with hospitals and monitoring eye care throughout school attendance.

METHODS

REACH delivers school vision screening using pocket vision screeners (cards presenting rows of seven 0.2 logMAR Sloan letters at a 3 m viewing distance) in five states across India. Children who fail screening are referred for detailed evaluation including refraction, those requiring cycloplegic refraction are referred to partner hospitals. Spectacles are dispensed as needed and compliance is assessed. All data are recorded electronically.

RESULTS

Out of 2,240,805 children aged 5 to 18 (mean 11.5; SD ±3.3) years, 2,024,053 have undergone REACH screening in 10,309 schools predominantly in rural locations (78.7%) and government-funded (76%). Of those screened, 174,706 (8.6%) underwent detailed evaluation. A higher proportion of children in private or urban schools (11.8% and 10.4% respectively) were referred for detailed evaluation than those in government-funded or rural schools (5.9% and 7.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). The proportion referred for detailed evaluation differed by state (p < 0.001), from 4.0% in West Bengal to 14.4% in Kerala.

CONCLUSION

The REACH programme screened a high proportion of school children, providing further care and follow-up to optimise visual outcomes.

Predictors of Clinic Attendance After Community-Based Vision Screening

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze appointment attendance rates and patient characteristics associated with follow-up adherence after referral from a community vision screening event.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients who attended a 2021 or 2022 community vision screening event and were referred to the university clinic for further care. Appointments were offered without charge and scheduled at the event. Associations between patients' clinical and demographic characteristics and appointment attendance were assessed by binary logistical regression.

Results

A total of 935 patients attended the annual community vision screening events held in 2021 and 2022. Of these patients, 117 (13%) were referred to the clinic for follow-up, of whom 56 (48%) attended their scheduled follow-up appointment. The most common reasons for clinic referral included cataract (12, 10%), diabetic retinopathy (11, 9%), glaucoma (9, 8%), and challenging refractive error (9, 8%). Health insurance and male gender were predictors of follow-up (odds ratio [OR] = 3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-7.99, P = 0.021 and OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.10-6.61, P = 0.035, respectively).

Conclusions

Half of the referred patients followed up after vision screening. Providing appointment scheduling at the point of care and offering follow-up care at no cost may help to promote clinic follow-up, but further assessment of barriers to regular eye care is warranted. Health insurance most strongly predicted successful clinic attendance.

Translational Relevance

This study emphasizes the enduring impact of health insurance status as a barrier to accessing comprehensive vision care.

Variations in the prevalence of vision impairment across regions among school children in Telangana State, South India

Purpose

Undetected vision impairment (VI) could negatively affect the overall development in children. School vision screening program is a viable and cost-effective approach for the early identification and management of VI.

Aim

This study aims to estimate the prevalence of VI, its risk factors, and ocular morbidity among school children in Telangana, South India.

Methods

Children aged 4-15 years attending schools in the study area were screened in this study. The vision screenings were performed in schools by trained community eye health workers using 6/12 tumbling E optotypes. Children who failed the test and/or presented with other eye conditions were referred to vision centers or secondary and tertiary eye care centers. A comprehensive eye examination was conducted in these centers, including cycloplegic refraction and fundus examination.

Results

A total of 774,184 children, with a mean age of 9.4 ± 3.27 years, were screened. Overall, 51.49% (N = 398,596) were male. In total, 4.33% [N = 33,528; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.29-4.38] required referral services, while 1.16% (N = 9,002) had a presenting visual acuity of < 6/12. Multivariate analysis showed a high risk of VI among older children [Adj. odds ratio (OR): 5.75; 95% CI: 5.18-6.38], those with disabilities (Adj. OR: 5.12; 95% CI: 4.14-6.33), female gender (Adj. OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.24 - 1.35), and those residing in the urban areas (Adj. OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 2.42-3.39). The main cause of VI was uncorrected refractive errors (74.14%).

Conclusion

The prevalence of VI among school children was 1.16% in Telangana, South India, and refractive error was the leading cause of VI among this population. Increasing age, urban location, female gender and other disabilities increase the risk of VI among children.

Vision Screening Among Children With Private Insurance: 2010-2019

OBJECTIVES

To describe trends in vision screening based on insurance claims for young children in the United States.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used administrative claims data from the 2010-2019 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. We included children aged 1 to <5 years at the beginning of each calendar year. The primary outcome was a vision screening claim within 12 months for chart-based or instrument-based screening. Linear regression was used to evaluate trends over time in vision screening claims and practitioner payment.

RESULTS

This study included a median of 810 048 (interquartile range, 631 523 - 1 029 481) children between 2010 and 2019 (mean [standard deviation] age, 2.5 [1.1] years; 48.7% female). The percentage of children with vision screening claims increased from 16.7% in 2010 to 44.3% in 2019 (difference, 27.5%; 95% confidence interval, 27.4% to 27.7%). Instrument-based screening claims, which were identified in <0.2% of children in 2010, increased to 23.4% of children 1 to <3 years old and 14.4% of children 3 to <5 years old by 2019. From 2013 to 2018, the average of the median practitioner payment for instrument-based screening was $23.70, decreasing $2.10 per year during this time (95% confidence interval, $0.85 to $3.34; P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Vision screening claims among young children nearly tripled over the last decade, and this change was driven by increased instrument-based screening for children aged <3 years. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the decreasing trends in practitioner payment for screening devices will reduce the adoption of vision screening technology in clinical practice.

A population-level post-screening treatment cost framework to help inform vision screening choices for children under the age of seven

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Visual acuity (VA) screening in children primarily detects low VA and amblyopia between 3 and 6 years of age. Photoscreening is a low-cost, lower-expertise alternative which can be carried out on younger children and looks instead for refractive amblyopia risk factors so that early glasses may prevent or mitigate the conditions. The long-term benefits and costs of providing many children with glasses in an attempt to avoid development of amblyopia for some of them needs clarification. This paper presents a framework for modeling potential post-referral costs of different screening models once referred children reach specialist services.

METHODS

The EUSCREEN Screening Cost-Effectiveness Model was used together with published literature to estimate referral rates and case mix of referrals from different screening modalities (photoscreening and VA screening at 2, 3-4 years and 4-5 years). UK 2019-20 published National Health Service (NHS) costings were used across all scenarios to model the comparative post-referral costs to the point of discharge from specialist services. Potential costs were compared between a) orthoptist, b) state funded ophthalmologist and c) private ophthalmologist care.

RESULTS

Earlier VA screening and photoscreening yield higher numbers of referrals because of lower sensitivity and specificity for disease, and a different case mix, compared to later VA screening. Photoscreening referrals are a mixture of reduced VA caused by amblyopia and refractive error, and children with amblyopia risk factors, most of which are treated with glasses. Costs relate mainly to the secondary care providers and the number of visits per child. Treatment by an ophthalmologist of a referral at 2 years of age can be more than x10 more expensive than an orthoptist service receiving referrals at 5 years, but outcomes can still be good from referrals aged 5.

CONCLUSIONS

All children should be screened for amblyopia and low vision before the age of 6. Very early detection of amblyopia refractive risk factors may prevent or mitigate amblyopia for some affected children, but population-level outcomes from a single high-quality VA screening at 4-5 years can also be very good. Total patient-journey costs incurred by earlier detection and treatment are much higher than if screening is carried out later because younger children need more professional input before discharge, so early screening is less cost-effective in the long term. Population coverage, local healthcare models, local case-mix, public health awareness, training, data monitoring and audit are critical factors to consider when planning, evaluating, or changing any screening programme.

Development and validation of a questionnaire for assessing parents' health literacy regarding vision screening for children: a Delphi study

Preschool vision screening is recommended to reduce the incidence of amblyopia that persists into adulthood. However, parent's perceptions regarding the importance of screening and early intervention may constitute a significant barrier to seeking vision exams and pursuing treatment. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a questionnaire for assessing parent's awareness, perception and health literacy of children's vision tests. The questionnaire was developed using the Delphi method with experts from the fields of pediatric ophthalmology, optometry, orthoptics, pediatric medicine, social sciences and Mother and Child Health Care centers. Experts were provided with drafts of the questions iteratively in three rounds until a consensus was reached independently on the relevant items, coherently language and redundancies. For the first, second and third stages of the Delphi process, 17, 15 and 13 experts participated in the panel respectively. Validity was achieved by wide consensus among the panel on the relevance of each question, of 75%, 85% and 90%, for the three rounds respectively. Here we describe the final questionnaire, EYES: Evaluating Young-Children Eye health Survey, which includes 31 questions regarding demographics, ocular history, parental health literacy, and perceptions of vision and vison exams.

Vision screening outcomes of 4-5 year-olds reflect the social gradient

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Children in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities often do not access follow-up eye care services when referred from vision screenings; whether this is due to lack of availability is not known. This paper highlights the need for vision and eye care for vulnerable children with practicing clinical optometrists well placed to provide vision care.

BACKGROUND

Vision impairments develop from a young age and may inhibit learning experiences and impact life outcomes. Vision screening to detect and refer vision abnormalities supports children in their education and prevents minor vision impairments from worsening. This research describes outcomes from a vision screening programme for 4- to 5-year-olds delivered in Queensland, Australia.

METHODS

The programme involved all prep children from participating schools in Queensland. Vision screening was conducted with the Parr 4 m Visual Acuity Test and Welch Allyn Spot Vision Screener. A cross-sectional study design was adopted. Descriptive data analyses explored the frequency of vision screening and referral outcomes. Inferential analyses examined associations between vision screening and referral outcomes with socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) scores  .

RESULTS

Of 71,003 prep students screened, 4,855 (6.8%) received a referral recommendation. A higher proportion of children who received a referral recommendation was from more disadvantaged locations (?2 = 109.16, p < 0.001). Of the students referred, 3,017 were seen by an eye health professional. Further vision assessment of students by an eye health professional revealed that 43.3% of the referred children were diagnosed with a vision abnormality, 18.9% had no vision abnormality and 37.7% had an 'undetermined' diagnosis. A higher proportion of children confirmed with a vision abnormality were from more disadvantaged locations (?2 = 52.27, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

It is important that vision screening programmes target disadvantaged populations and support families of children who require further health assessment to access health services.

Use and Costs of Instrument-Based Vision Screening for US Children Aged 12 to 36 Months

This cohort study examines patterns and out-of-pocket costs of instrument-based screening among children 12 to 36 months.

Race, poverty, and the lack of follow-up for Arkansas students that fail vision screenings: a cross-sectional study over 7 years

PURPOSE

To analyze rates of follow-up eye care for students that failed school vision screenings over a 7-year period in 238 Arkansas school districts.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, vision screening, demographic, socioeconomic, academic, and eye care provider data were collected. The main outcomes were referral rates, rates of follow-up eye care for students with failed vision screenings, and estimated associations between the rate of follow-up and school district and county-level characteristics, such as race, poverty, insurance coverage, academic achievement, and the number of eye care providers.

RESULTS

A total of 1,744,805 vision screenings over 7 academic years (2013-2020) were included. The average screening rate was 35.4% across the study years. The screening failure rate ranged from 8.0% to 9.4%. Two-thirds of districts had a follow-up rate between 20% and 50%. 91% had follow-up rates of <60%. School districts with higher concentrations of White students (P < 0.001), higher graduation rates (P = 0.024), higher percentages of students on government-assisted insurance (P = 0.035), and higher standardized scores (P < 0.001) had higher rates of follow-up. There were no statistically significant relationships between the rate of follow-up eye care and the number of school nurses per school district or the number of ophthalmologists or optometrists per county.

CONCLUSIONS

Arkansas children in our study cohort that failed vision screenings had inadequate follow-up eye care. Follow-up rates were associated with several key indicators of socioeconomic status.

The blinq™ Vision Screener in Detection of Amblyopia and Strabismus

PURPOSE

The blinq (Rebion Inc) is a new screening device designed to directly detect amblyopia and strabismus rather than amblyopia risk factors. We performed an independent assessment of the effectiveness of the blinq in detecting amblyopia and strabismus.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical validity analysis of a screening device based on sensitivity and specificity.

METHODS

Children presenting for examination in the pediatric ophthalmology clinic underwent screening with the blinq before examination by a pediatric ophthalmologist blinded to the screening results. Results of the blinq and examination findings of strabismus or amblyopia were compared.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 267 children with an average age of 6.3 years, the sensitivity of the blinq to detect amblyopia or any constant strabismus was 87.5% (78.2%-93.8%) and specificity was 51.3% (43.9%-58.7%). Using the previously described "appropriate referral gold standard" criteria, including children with intermittent strabismus and high refractive error, the sensitivity increased to 91.3% and the specificity to 63.2%. We found a high number of children (44 [16%]) upon whom the blinq timed out and were included as automatic referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support use of the blinq as a screening device to detect amblyopia and strabismus in children.

Paediatric vision screening in Urban Lhasa from the Tibetan Plateau of Southwest China

PURPOSE

Few studies of vision screening in school-aged children were reported in Tibetan Plateau. We herein summarize the results of a mandatory vision screening conducted in young children in the Tibetan Plateau of Southwest China.

METHODS

The Lhasa Childhood vision Screening (LCVS) performed uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA) test on primary school students in urban Lhasa from July to September 2019. Pin-hole corrected VA (PCVA) was obtained for individuals with the UCVA less than 20/25. Decreased VA was defined for UCVA based on the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines 2016 (UCVA < 20/32 for over 60 months). Visual impairment (VI), Mild VI, and moderate VI to blindness, defined as a PCVA less than 20/40, less than 20/40 to 20/63 and less than 20/63 in the better eye, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 34,848 children aged 9.03 ± 1.87 years fulfilled the screening with a response rate of 98.5%. 18,412 (52.8%) of the participants were males, and 30,531(87.6%) were Tibetan. The prevalence of decreased VA, VI, Mild VI, and moderate VI to blindness was 35.6%, 4.4%, 3.5%, and 1.0%, respectively. The prevalence of decreased VA in grade 1-6 students was 28.8%, 20.8%, 26.9%, 40.7%, 50.8%, 59.5%, respectively. The prevalence of VI in grade 1 to 6 students was 1.5%, 1.4%, 2.4%, 5.6%, 7.7% and 9.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study documented a relatively low prevalence of decreased VA and VI in Tibetan primary school students than other urban populations in China. An increasing trend of poor vision with grades was found.

School-Based Delivery of Vision Care in Chicago Public Schools

BACKGROUND

In 2012, Chicago Public Schools and the Chicago Department of Public Health partnered together to create the Chicago School-Based Vision Program (CSBVP). This ongoing, city-wide program provides school-based vision services (eye examinations, eyeglasses provision, and eye care referrals) to students with limited access.

METHODS

Descriptive analysis of the program operations from 2012 to 2020, including number of students served and exam findings during 2017-2020, as well as lessons learned and recommendations for reproducing the successes of the CSBVP in other contexts.

RESULTS

During its first 8 years, the CSBVP provided eye examinations to over 350,000 students. During the years 2017-2020, this included 126,238 eye exams and provision of eyeglasses to 73,751 students.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSBVP is built upon strong community and school relationships. The program offers vision services, equitably, to all students across the district. The lessons learned through the implementation of the CSBVP may provide guidance for future district-wide vision programs.

Combined hearing and vision screening programs: A scoping review

Background and aim

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 1.5 billion and 2.2 billion people have hearing and vision impairment, respectively. The burden of these non-communicable diseases is highest in low- and middle-income countries due to a lack of services and health professionals. The WHO has recommended universal health coverage and integrated service delivery to improve ear and eye care services. This scoping review describes the evidence for combined hearing and vision screening programs.

Method

A keyword search of three electronic databases, namely Scopus, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science, was conducted, resulting in 219 results. After removing duplicates and screening based on eligibility criteria, data were extracted from 19 included studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer Manual and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews were followed. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results

Most studies (63.2%) were from high-income countries, with 31.6% from middle-income and 5.2% from low-income countries. The majority of studies (78.9%) involved children and the four studies reporting on adults all included adults above 50 years of age. Vision screening was most commonly performed with the "Tumbling E" and "Snellen Chart," while hearing was typically screened using pure tone audiometry. Studies reported referral rates as the most common outcome with sensitivity and specificity rates not reported in any included articles. Reported benefits of combined vision and hearing screenings included earlier detection of vision and hearing difficulties to support functioning and quality of life as well as resource sharing for reduced costs. Challenges to combined screening included ineffective follow-up systems, management of test equipment, and monitoring of screening personnel.

Conclusions

There is limited research evidence for combined hearing and vision screening programs. Although potential benefits are demonstrated, especially for mHealth-supported programs in communities, more feasibility and implementation research are required, particularly in low- and middle-income countries and across all age groups. Developing universal, standardized reporting guidelines for combined sensory screening programs is recommended to enhance the standardization and effectiveness of combined sensory screening programs.

[Design of Adjustable Liquid Simulated Eye for Spherical Power Detection of Eccentric Photographic Vision Screening Instrument]

A liquid simulated eye was designed to detect different spherical diopter indexes in the type inspection of medical equipment vision screening instrument. This liquid test simulation eye design is composed of three parts: lens, cavity and retina-imitation piston. By using the principle of geometric optics and the optical scattering effect of human retina, the relationship between the accommodation displacement of the designed adjustable liquid simulated eye and the spherical mirror power was calculated and analyzed. The designed liquid test simulated eye can be applied to vision screening instruments, computer refractometers and other optometry equipments based on photography principle in spherical lens measurement and so on.

Effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener using updated 2021 AAPOS guidelines

PURPOSE

To evaluate the Spot Vision Screener according to updated 2021 AAPOS Vision Screening Committee guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screen validation.

METHODS

As part of an IRB-approved ongoing prospective study, children were screened with the Spot prior to a complete examination.

RESULTS

Spot screening was successful in 1,036 of 1,090 children (95%). Forty-eight percent of participants were referred for further screening using the Spot manufacturer guidelines, and 40% of all children were found to have a 2021 amblyopia risk factor or visually significant refractive error by gold standard examination. The Spot recommendation compared reasonably well to the 2021 criteria, with an overall sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.78. Applying updated guidelines to the Spot for hyperopia, anisometropia, and astigmatism yielded moderate-to-poor sensitivity (0.27-0.77) but excellent specificity (>0.9). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrates overall good prediction performance for the Spot for each diagnosis-myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, anisometropia (range, 0.87-0.97). Results of our study suggest increasing the instrument referral criterion for astigmatism from 1.5 D (manufacturer thresholds of the screener used in this study) to 2 D in older children. Decreasing the anisometropia cut-off from 1 D to 0.75 D would improve sensitivity from 0.59 to >0.8.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study population, the overall predictive ability of the Spot is good, with a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.78. We recommend specific device refractive referral criteria to maximize screening effectiveness using the updated AAPOS guidelines.

Automated vision screening of children using a mobile graphic device

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Can measuring interocular brightness disparity, acuity, and colour vision classify children with amblyopia?

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Two hundred eight subjects (3-14 years) were recruited for a prospective, observational protocol to measure interocular brightness disparity, uniocular acuities with and without a pinhole, and colour vision using an iPad. Subjects looked through polarizing filters and chose the brighter of two spaceships to measure interocular brightness disparity. The differential brightness of image pairs was varied through a staircase algorithm until equal brightness was perceived. Acuities and colour vision were tested with tumbling Es and AO-HRR colour plates, respectively. Unilateral amblyopia was later confirmed in two subjects.

RESULTS

Binocular brightness balance on the iPad detected amblyopes with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Using 20/30 as cutoff for normal acuity, 1 of the amblyopes was detected, and non-amblyopes were excluded by visual acuity pinhole testing. The mean difference between iPad and E-Chart visual acuities with pinhole was 0.02 logMAR with limits of agreement from -0.08 to +0.11 logMAR. iPad and printed plates Colour vision testing produced identical results. Testing times were brief and exit pleasure responses were positive. Mean and range testing times for Brightness Sense, Colour vision, and Visual Acuity were 32.7 s (range = 12-63 s), 52.8 min (range = 17-95 s), and 88.75 s (range = 41-188 s), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Interocular brightness disparity, acuity, and colour vision can be measured in children as young as 3 years old solely through playing a game on a mobile device. Interocular brightness disparity is a sensitive and specific method to detect unilateral amblyopia.

Reaching Target Communities in a Community Preschool Vision Screening Program

PURPOSE

To develop a method to identify preschools with the greatest need for vision screening, correlations between socioeconomic status, preschool capacity, and rates of pediatric vision screenings performed by a community vision screening program were investigated. Geoinformatics mapping software was used to visually display the areas of greatest need.

METHODS

Vision screening data from a community vision screening program, child care facility data from California Department of Social Services, and income data from the U.S. Census Bureau through ArcGIS software (Esri) were collected. When possible, data were consolidated at the ZIP code level. Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis was used to determine correlations between data elements. Licensed child care facilities were scored on a scale (from 1 to 5) based on the socioeconomic status of the ZIP code and the facility capacity. The scoring system prioritized larger facilities in lower income communities to most efficiently use vision screening program resources.

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between the capacity of the child care facility and the median household income (P = .005). Second, we found a positive correlation between child care capacity and the median household income (P = .005). Licensed child care facilities were mapped and colored using GIS software according to their cumulative score.

CONCLUSIONS

Challenges to vision screening in under-served communities include the lack of child care facilities and smaller facility size. The use of a scoring system and mapping software can direct vision screening programs to reach a greater number of children with the most efficient use of resources. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(6):375-379.].

Access to Pediatric Eye Care Following Vision Screening

PURPOSE

To quantify the accessibility of eye care providers from photoscreening centers within the vision screening region in relation to population density and median household income.

METHODS

Driving times between vision screening locations and eye care centers were mapped and analyzed using OpenStreetMap software (Open Street Map Foundation). U.S. Census Bureau data of population density and median household income were linked with screening centers using ArcGIS Online (Esri) to determine correlations with driving times.

RESULTS

A total of 290 driving times for 145 photo-screening centers, 147 optometrists, and 7 pediatric ophthalmologists were calculated and mapped. Median driving times from a photoscreening center to the nearest optometrist and ophthalmologist were 4.74 and 25.10 minutes, respectively, with 90% of the screening centers residing within 12.46 and 67.19 minutes of the nearest optometrist and ophthalmologist, respectively. Driving times to optometrists are far less than times to pediatric ophthalmologists due to the greater number of optometrists. Decreasing driving times with increasing population and median household income indicate the concentration of optometrists and pediatric ophthalmologists within urbanized areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Most photoscreening centers reside within 5 and 70 minutes of the nearest optometrist and pediatric ophthalmologist, respectively. Driving times indicate the region's greater accessibility to optometrists than to pediatric ophthalmologists. Eye care centers tend to be localized within urbanized areas with higher population densities and higher median household incomes. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(6):369-374.].

Characteristics Associated with Barriers to Eye Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey at a Free Vision Screening Event

INTRODUCTION

Social determinants of health can limit access to regular eye care, but their role in ophthalmology is underexamined. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between patient characteristics and self-reported barriers to eye care.

METHODS

This anonymous, cross-sectional survey was conducted at a 2-day free eye clinic event in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Adult patients presenting for vision screening were eligible to participate. Patient characteristics (demographics, health status) and self-reported barriers to eye care were collected. Predictors of barriers to eye care were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 269 eligible, consecutive patients approached for survey completion, 183 comprised the volunteer sample. The 183 participants (105 female patients [59%]) had a mean (standard deviation) age of 53 (15) years and generally self-identified as Black (74, 46%) or White (67, 41%). While a third reported having no health insurance (60, 34%), the remaining two-thirds of participants had public (84, 48%) or private coverage (34, 19%). Three-quarters of respondents reported at least one barrier to receiving regular eye care (136, 76%), most commonly medical costs (89, 50%) and insurance issues (73, 41%). Not having health insurance or vision insurance was strongly associated with reporting at least one barrier to care (OR: 5.00, p = 0.002, and OR: 7.46, p < 0.001, respectively). Those with self-reported eye disease were more likely to report transportation difficulties (OR: 4.45, p = 0.013), and employed participants reported difficulty getting time off work to attend eye exams (OR: 7.73, p = 0.002). Finally, compared to Black race, White race was associated with a higher likelihood of reporting any barrier to care (OR: 2.79, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Three-quarters of vision screening attendees reported at least one barrier to regular eye care, most commonly medical costs and insurance.

Vision Screening in Children: The New South Wales Statewide Eyesight Preschooler Screening Program

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate universality of access, screening rate, and outcomes from the New South Wales (NSW) Statewide Eyesight Preschooler Screening (StEPS) over the period of 2009 to 2016.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, observational study.

METHODS

The StEPS program provides vision screening to 4-year-old children residing in NSW and is administered within Local Health Districts (LHDs). Visual acuity (VA) was examined by trained lay and nurse screeners using HOTV logMAR. Children who had VA <6/9-2 were referred to local practitioners while those with VA <6/18 were referred to public hospital pediatric ophthalmic outpatient clinics where available. Activity data were collected by NSW Health and screening rates determined from population projections of 4-year-olds per LHD based on adjusted 2014 Census data. To determine factors impacting screening and referral rates, a random effects panel analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

A total of 719,686 (96.4%) NSW 4-year-old children were offered StEPS vision screening between 2009 and 2016, 84% accepted and 564,825 children (75.6%) were screened. The screening rate increased from 67.3% in 2009 to 74.5% in 2016, with an 80% target reached for 3 consecutive years from 2013 to 2015. Of those screened, 19.2% were referred to an eye health professional or advised to have a vision retest in 12 months. This referral rate remained steady over the period studied, with little variation between metropolitan, and rural and regional LHDs.

CONCLUSIONS

StEPS is an ideal service model for preschool vision screening providing coverage that is comparable to school-based screening programs and at an age likely to facilitate optimal treatment outcomes.

Vision Screening for Motor Vehicle Collision Involvement among Older Drivers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the epidemiologic association between visual acuity and other measures of visual function and motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) as well as their performance as screening tests for MVCs.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2000 licensed drivers aged 70 years and older who resided in the environs of Jefferson County, Alabama.

METHODS

Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, useful field of view, Motor-free Visual Perception Test, and visual field sensitivity were measured at a baseline visit. Study participants were followed for up to 4 years for the occurrence of MVC involvement. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to determine the screening performance of each visual function measure with respect to MVC occurrence. Poisson regression was used to estimate rate ratios (RRs) for the association between each visual function measure and MVC occurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Police-reported MVCs.

RESULTS

For all visual function measures, the AUC values were only slightly higher than 0.50; additionally, none of the measures exhibited adequate values for both sensitivity and specificity (i.e., > 80%). For all visual function measures except visual acuity, there were statistically significant positive RRs for the association between vision impairment and MVC occurrence, although the magnitude of the associations was weak (i.e., < 2.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The negative impact of involuntary driving cessation on mobility and the associated mental health implications likely outweigh the safety benefit of vision screening. Alternative approaches to improving older driver safety should be considered.

Photorefraction with Spot Vision Screener versus Visual Acuity Testing as Community-Based Preschool Vision Screening at the Age of 3.5 Years in Japan

Nationwide in Japan, a community-based vision-screening program in 3.5-year-old children is conducted in three steps: questionnaires and home visual acuity testing as the primary screening; visual acuity testing by nurses and pediatricians’ inspection in community health centers as the secondary screening; and examinations by ophthalmologists as the tertiary screening. In this study, we introduced photorefraction with a Spot vision screener in addition to visual acuity testing to answer the clinical question of whether photorefraction could better detect eye diseases and potentially replace visual acuity testing. Photorefraction was performed on 813 consecutive 3.5-year-old children in a center. The children were sent to tertiary examinations, which were based on the Spot vision screener standard, in addition to the visual acuity testing standard: failure in either eye to pass 0.5 visual acuity in a center. A notice to visit ophthalmologists was issued for 95 children (11%), and documents with the diagnosis were sent back to the Heath Office for 76 children (80%). The rate of children with anisometropic or ametropic amblyopia or accommodative esotropia as treatment-requiring diseases was highest in cases of no pass at both standards (10/15 = 66%), and higher in cases of no pass only at the Spot vision screener standard (13/45 = 28%), compared with cases of no pass only at the visual acuity testing standard (6/33 = 18%, p = 0.0031). Photorefraction, in addition to visual acuity testing and inspection led to additional eye diseases detection at 3.5 years. Visual acuity testing at home would not be omitted in the introduction of photorefraction.

Demographics, clinical interests, and ophthalmology skills confidence of medical student volunteers and non-volunteers in an extracurricular community vision screening service-learning program

BACKGROUND

Medical school curricular hours dedicated to ophthalmology are low and declining. Extracurricular ophthalmology activities, such as participation in community vision screenings, may serve an important adjunctive role in medical school curricula. The Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Vision Screening In Our Neighborhoods (ViSION) Program is an example of a voluntary medical student-directed community service-learning program.

METHODS

We used a mixed-methods cross-sectional approach, including an online survey and semi-structured interviews. JHU School of Medicine students enrolled in MD or MD/PhD programs during the 2019-2020 academic year were surveyed regarding demographics, career and service interests, involvement in ophthalmology-related activities, and confidence in their ophthalmology-related skills. Survey responses were compared between ViSION volunteers and non-volunteers using Fisher's exact chi-square tests. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via webconference with 8 prior or current ViSION volunteers and responses analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Data were collected when ViSION volunteers were in variable stages of their medical education and involvement with the ViSION program.

RESULTS

A total of 118 medical students were included, representing an overall response rate of 24.6% of JHU medical students. ViSION volunteers reported greater involvement in ophthalmology-related research (42% vs. 4%, p < 0.001), intent to apply to ophthalmology residency programs (35% vs. 1%, p = 0.001), and confidence with multiple ophthalmology knowledge and clinical skill domains. In particular, ViSION volunteers were more likely to feel confident estimating cup-to-disc ratio using direct ophthalmoscopy (20% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). In open-ended survey and interview questions, most volunteers attributed at least some degree of their ophthalmology skill development and desire to pursue ophthalmology and public health careers to their ViSION experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students who volunteered with a student-led community vision screening program were more likely to have a prior interest in ophthalmology than those who did not volunteer, but only 1/3 of volunteers planned to pursue a career in ophthalmology. Overall, volunteers reported higher confidence performing ophthalmology-related clinical skills, suggesting that student-led community vision screening programs may provide an important avenue for medical students to explore public health aspects of ophthalmology, while practicing ophthalmology exam skills and learning about common ophthalmic pathologies, regardless of their career intentions.

Vision screening as part of the school health policy in South Africa from the perspective of school health nurses

Background

Vision screenings of school-going children are essential in the early detection of visual anomalies common in different age categories, which may negatively affect their academic ability and social development. Hence, their inclusion in school health policies is imperative. The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of vision screening protocols in the current Integrated School Health Screening policy of South Africa from the perspective of school health personnel.

Aim

The study sought to explore the perceptions, experiences and attitudes of the school health nurses on vision screenings included as part of the school health screenings in Gauteng province (South Africa).

Setting

This study was located across three public healthcare facilities across Gauteng at primary healthcare levels.

Methods

Three teams of 13 school health personnel from three primary healthcare facilities in the district of Ekurhuleni were invited to participate in the study. Focus group interviews were conducted for generating information on collective opinions and the rationale behind their views.

Results

Results of the collected qualitative data revealed challenges related to training, vision screening tests, referral criteria and follow-ups or referral pathways. In addition, further challenges reported were related to communication, time, space and consent forms not signed by the parents.

Conclusion

Improved cohesion and communication between all role players will enable reasonable and professional provision of validated vision screening services that have the best chance of early detection of children with vision anomalies to negate possible adverse effects on their scholarly performance.

Lessons Learned From School-Based Delivery of Vision Care in Baltimore, Maryland

ABSTRACT

In an effort to address health care disparities in pediatric eye care, school-based vision programs have been established. These programs, while not universally available, have been established at individual schools or across school districts in at least 20 states in the United States (US). They play a critical role for students who are not accessing eye care, especially in disadvantaged communities. In the US, school-based vision programs often provide vision screenings, eye exams, and eyeglasses directly in the school setting. The rationale for involving schools in vision care delivery is the recognition of the inter-relatedness between health and education, including how poor vision can impact learning. Vision for Baltimore is a citywide school-based vision program that provides vision care for all Baltimore City Public Schools elementary and middle school students (age range 4 to 16 years). The goal of this paper is to summarize lessons learned from our work on clinical outcomes from screenings and eye exams, the academic impact of Vision for Baltimore, and qualitative work about consent challenges and stakeholder engagement. While school-based vision programs may vary in operations, we hope the lessons learned through our work may help demonstrate the transformative impact on vision and learning, as well as the importance of addressing stakeholder needs to maximize impact and ensure program sustainability.

Vision Screening, Vision Disorders, and Impacts of Hyperopia in Young Children: Outcomes of the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Studies

ABSTRACT

This review summarizes clinically relevant outcomes from the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and VIP-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) studies. In VIP, refraction tests (retinoscopy, Retinomax, SureSight) and Lea Symbols Visual Acuity performed best in identifying children with vision disorders. For lay screeners, Lea Symbols single, crowded visual acuity (VA) testing (VIP, 5-foot) was significantly better than linear, crowded testing (10-foot). Children unable to perform the tests (<2%) were more likely to have vision disorders than children who passed and should be referred for vision evaluation. Among racial/ethnic groups, the prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus was similar while that of hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia varied. The presence of strabismus and significant refractive errors were risk factors for unilateral amblyopia, while bilateral astigmatism and bilateral hyperopia were risk factors for bilateral amblyopia. A greater risk of astigmatism was associated with Hispanic, African American, and Asian race, and myopic and hyperopic refractive error. The presence and severity of hyperopia were associated with higher rates of amblyopia, strabismus, and other associated refractive error. In the VIP-HIP study, compared to emmetropes, meaningful deficits in early literacy were observed in uncorrected hyperopic 4- and 5-year-olds [≥+4.0 diopter (D) or ≥+3.0 D to ≤+6.0 D associated with reduced near visual function (near VA 20/40 or worse; stereoacuity worse than 240")]. Hyperopia with reduced near visual function also was associated with attention deficits. Compared to emmetropic children, VA (distance, near), accommodative accuracy, and stereoacuity were significantly reduced in moderate hyperopes, with the greatest risk in those with higher hyperopia. Increasing hyperopia was associated with decreasing visual function.