Hypothesis: Paroxetine, a G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 (GRK2) Inhibitor Reduces Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure

The hypothesis that paroxetine decreases morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) is plausible but unproven. Basic research demonstrates that inhibition of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) both in vitro and in vivo in the myocardium may be beneficial. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 antagonism is purported to exert cardioprotective effects immediately following myocardial injury by blunting toxic overstimulation on a recently injured heart. In addition, chronic overexpression of GRK2 inhibits catecholamine induction of vital positive chronotropic and ionotropic effects required to preserve cardiac output leading to worsening of congestive HF. In cardiac-specific GRK2 conditional knockout mice, there is significant improvement in left ventricular wall thickness, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and ejection fraction (EF) compared to controls. Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor which was recently shown to have the ability to directly inhibit GRK2 both in vitro and in vivo. At physiologic temperatures, paroxetine inhibits GRK2-dependent phosphorylation of an activated G-protein-coupled receptor with a half maximal inhibitory concentration of 35 micromoles, a substantially greater affinity than for other G protein-coupled receptor kinases. In a randomized trial in mice with systolic HF and depressed EF postmyocardial infarction, those treated with paroxetine had a 30% increase in EF, improved contractility, and LVEDD and wall thickness compared to those treated with medical therapy alone. While further basic research may continue to elucidate plausible mechanisms of benefit and observational studies will contribute important relevant information, large scale randomized trials designed a priori to do so are necessary to test the hypothesis.

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Antiplatelet Agents Versus Placebo/Control for Treating Peripheral Artery Disease

Effect of aspirin (antiplatelet agents) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) was still controversial. Varying studies reported varying results. Therefore, we did this meta-analysis to investigate if aspirin could reduce cardiovascular events in patients with PAD.A comprehensive literature search (PubMed, CCTR, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM-disc, and relevant websites) was conducted from 1990 to September 2014. The key search terms ("aspirin," "PAD," "peripheral arterial occlusive diseases," and "claudication") produced 9 high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of aspirin versus placebo/control. Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to analysis of the 9 RCTs. The primary outcome was the cardiovascular events.Nine RCTs, composed of 9526 patients (4786 aspirin-treated and 4740 placebo or control-treated patients), were meta-analyzed. The results indicated that compared to placebo/control, aspirin could not significantly reduce the cardiovascular events (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.56-1.15). Moreover, aspirin could not produce better effect on prevention of nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.52-1.84), nonfatal stroke (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.69-1.14), cardiovascular death (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.68-1.38), any death (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.85-1.30), and major bleeding (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.82-1.65) than placebo/control. But aspirin, as monotherapy therapy, did significantly reduce the risk of nonfatal stroke (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21-0.84).Aspirin, as monotherapy or combination therapy, did not result in a significant decrease in the cardiovascular events. But aspirin, as monotherapy therapy, did significantly reduce the risk of nonfatal stroke. Our conclusion might help clinicians in clinical treating PAD. Future studies are needed to draw firm conclusions about the clinical benefit and risks of aspirin and other antiplatelet agents.

Clinical pharmacology of cardiac cyclic AMP in human heart failure: too much or too little?

INTRODUCTION

Cyclic 3', 5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is a major signaling hub in cardiac physiology. Although cAMP signaling has been extensively studied in cardiac cells and animal models of heart failure (HF), not much is known about its actual amount present inside human failing or non-failing cardiomyocytes. Since many drugs used in HF work via cAMP, it is crucial to determine the status of its intracellular levels in failing vs. normal human hearts.

AREAS COVERED

Only studies performed on explanted/excised cardiac tissues from patients were examined. Studies that contained no data from human hearts or no data on cAMP levels per se were excluded from this perspective's analysis.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, there is no consensus on the status of cAMP levels in human failing vs. non-failing hearts. Several studies on animal models may suggest maladaptive (e.g. pro-apoptotic) effects of cAMP on HF, advocating for cAMP lowering for therapy, but human studies almost universally indicate that myocardial cAMP levels are deficient in human failing hearts. It is the expert opinion of this perspective that intracellular cAMP levels are too low in human failing hearts, contributing to the disease. Strategies to increase (restore), not decrease, these levels should be pursued in human HF.

Cardiovascular angiotensin II type 1 receptor biased signaling: Focus on non-Gq-, non-βarrestin-dependent signaling

The physiological and pathophysiological roles of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor, a G protein-coupled receptor ubiquitously expressed throughout the cardiovascular system, have been the focus of intense investigations for decades. The success of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which are AT1R-selective antagonists/inverse agonists, in the treatment of heart disease is a testament to the importance of this receptor for cardiovascular homeostasis. Given the pleiotropic signaling of the cardiovascular AT1R and, in an effort to develop yet better drugs for heart disease, the concept of biased signaling has been exploited to design and develop biased AT1R ligands that selectively activate β-arrestin transduction pathways over Gq protein-dependent pathways. However, by focusing solely on Gq or β-arrestins, studies on AT1R "biased" signaling & agonism tend to largely ignore other non-Gq-, non β-arrestin-dependent signaling modalities the very versatile AT1R employs in cardiovascular tissues, including two very important types of signal transducers/regulators: other G protein types (e.g., Gi/o, G12/13) & the Regulator of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the current state of cardiovascular AT1R biased signaling field with a special focus on the non-Gq-, non β-arrestin-dependent signaling avenues of this receptor in the cardiovascular system, which usually get left out of the conversation of "biased" AT1R signal transduction.

Role of βarrestin1 in AT1 R-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in Wistar and SHR brainstem astrocytes

βarrestin (βarr)-1 and -2 are ubiquitously (outside the retina) expressed G-protein-coupled receptor adapter proteins. They uncouple G-protein-coupled receptors from G proteins, internalize the receptor, and subsequently initiate their own wave of signaling independently of G proteins. Angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 receptor (AT1 R) is a well-established example of a receptor signaling through βarrs. Despite the pivotal role of brain AT1 Rs in the regulation of blood pressure, the involvement of βarr-dependent signaling, mediated by AT1 Rs is not well studied. Particularly, in brain astrocytes very little is known about the effects of βarrs in AT1 R signaling. Herein, we utilized a combination of pharmacological and gene manipulation approaches to investigate the role of βarrs in AT1 R-mediated signaling in isolated brainstem astrocytes from spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and Wistar rats. We observed that βarr1 is the predominant arrestin isoform at the protein level in these cells. Its expression was down-regulated in SHR astrocytes compared to Wistar rat astrocytes. Ang II, contrary to observations in SHR astrocytes where it had no effect, up-regulates βarr1 protein in Wistar rat astrocytes. We observed differential involvement of βarr1 in MAPK activation in brainstem astrocytes of SHR versus Wistar rats. The βarr-biased agonist peptide [Sar1 , Il4 , Il8] Ang-II (SII), induced AT1 R-mediated ERK and p38 activation in Wistar rat astrocytes. SII had no effect on ERK and p38 activation in SHRs brainstem astrocytes. Our results indicate, reduced involvement of βarr1 in dampening Ang II-induced MAPKs activation and diminished βarr1-mediated ERK and p38 activation in SHR brainstem astrocytes. These findings might be mechanistically related to the development of the brain renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system hyperactivity, which leads to pathogenesis of the hypertensive state of the SHR model.

Emerging therapeutic approaches multi-targeting receptor tyrosine kinases and g protein-coupled receptors in cardiovascular disease

Advances in molecular biology and functional genomics have demonstrated that the "one gene-one phenotype-one drug" paradigm, that has dominated pharmaceutical industry and clinical pharmacology thinking, is too simplistic for management of complex polygenic traits. The traditional highly specific drugs with unique target have proven their clinical usefulness. However, they do not always display the required efficacy versus side-effect profile, in major part because polygenic traits are determined by redundant mechanisms. Simultaneously modulating multiple targets may enhance therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of a range of disorders. Multi-targeting can be achieved by the combination of different drugs having specific single target activity. This approach introduces potential problems with pharmacokinetic interactions, toxicity and patient compliance. High efficacy can be achieved, alternatively, by administering selectively non-selective drugs with complex pharmacological profiles directed towards various molecular targets and affording pleiotropic actions. Dual- or multiple-ligands can be discovered accidentally, but can also be rationally designed according to validated medicinal chemical approaches. The merits of multiple-target versus single-target approaches for cardiovascular disease traits are assessed in the present review. The main aim is to make evident the molecular biological basis of the possibility for targeting multiple sites and the subsequently emerging strategies for interventions with superior clinical value by harnessing receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) such as VEGFR, PDGFR, bFGFR, as well as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The premises for lead discovery in this new area and the challenges of medicinal chemistry behind the rational design of multitasked ligands are also discussed.

Osteopontin and LDLR Are Upregulated in Hearts of Sudden Cardiac Death Victims With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), particularly in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, there are no known biomarkers in the population with DM and HFpEF to predict SCD risk. Objectives: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that osteopontin (OPN) and some proteins previously correlated with OPN, low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), dynamin 2 (DNM2), fibronectin-1 (FN1), and 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase-like (OGDHL), are potential risk markers for SCD, and may reflect modifiable molecular pathways in patients with DM and HFpEF. Methods: Heart tissues were obtained at autopsy from 9 SCD victims with DM and HFpEF and 10 age and gender-matched accidental death control subjects from a Finnish SCD registry and analyzed for the expression of OPN and correlated proteins, including LDLR, DNM2, FN1, and OGDHL by immunohistochemistry. Results: We observed a significant upregulation in the expression of OPN, LDLR, and FN1, and a marked downregulation of DNM2 in heart tissues of SCD victims with DM and HFpEF as compared to control subjects (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The dysregulated protein expression of OPN, LDLR, FN1, and DNM2 in patients with DM and HFpEF who experienced SCD provides novel potential modifiable molecular pathways that may be implicated in the pathogenesis of SCD in these patients. Since secreted OPN and soluble LDLR can be measured in plasma, these results support the value of further prospective studies to assess the predictive value of these plasma biomarkers and to determine whether tuning expression levels of OPN and LDLR alters SCD risk in patients with DM and HFpEF.

GRK5 is an essential co-repressor of the cardiac mineralocorticoid receptor and is selectively induced by finerenone

BACKGROUND

In the heart, aldosterone (Aldo) binds the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) to exert damaging, adverse remodeling-promoting effects. We recently showed that G protein-coupled receptor-kinase (GRK)-5 blocks the cardiac MR by directly phosphorylating it, thereby repressing its transcriptional activity. MR antagonist (MRA) drugs block the cardiac MR reducing morbidity and mortality of advanced human heart failure. Non-steroidal MRAs, such as finerenone, may provide better cardio-protection against Aldo than classic, steroidal MRAs, like spironolactone and eplerenone.

AIM

To investigate potential differences between finerenone and eplerenone at engaging GRK5-dependent cardiac MR phosphorylation and subsequent blockade.

METHODS

We used H9c2 cardiomyocytes, which endogenously express the MR and GRK5.

RESULTS

GRK5 phosphorylates the MR in H9c2 cardiomyocytes in response to finerenone but not to eplerenone. Unlike eplerenone, finerenone alone potently and efficiently suppresses cardiac MR transcriptional activity, thus displaying inverse agonism. GRK5 is necessary for finerenone's inverse agonism, since GRK5 genetic deletion renders finerenone incapable of blocking cardiac MR transcriptional activity. Eplerenone alone does not fully suppress cardiac MR basal activity regardless of GRK5 expression levels. Finally, GRK5 is necessary for the anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidative, and anti-fibrotic effects of both finerenone and eplerenone against Aldo, as well as for the higher efficacy and potency of finerenone at blocking Aldo-induced apoptosis, oxidative stress, and fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Finerenone, but not eplerenone, induces GRK5-dependent cardiac MR inhibition, which underlies, at least in part, its higher potency and efficacy, compared to eplerenone, as an MRA in the heart. GRK5 acts as a co-repressor of the cardiac MR and is essential for efficient MR antagonism in the myocardium.

Lack of association between alpha2B-adrenergic receptor polymorphism and risk of restenosis following coronary angioplasty and stent implantation--preliminary report

BACKGROUND

A genetic association/prospective follow-up study was conducted to investigate whether genetic variation of the alpha(2B)-adrenergic receptor gene was associated with the risk of restenosis in 96 Greek coronary artery disease patients undergoing coronary angioplasty and stent implantation.

METHODS

For comparison of genotype frequency, a control group of 83 asymptomatic individuals was also studied. The end-point of the current study was the incidence of restenosis at 7 months of clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (70/96) had the insertion/insertion genotype, fewer patients (23/96) had the insertion/deletion genotype and only 3/96 had the deletion/deletion genotype; overall the frequency distribution was not different from that of the control subjects. Restenosis occurred in 15 of the 96 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the population studied, alpha(2B)-adrenoreceptor polymorphisms were not found to predispose patients to an increased incidence of restenosis. Nevertheless, these findings should be considered as preliminary, taking into account the small number of patients that were studied and the rarity of the deletion/deletion genotype.

The therapeutic potential of targeting cardiac RGS4

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play pivotal roles in regulation of cardiac function and homeostasis. To function properly, every cell needs these receptors to be stimulated only when a specific extracellular stimulus is present, and to be silenced the moment that stimulus is removed. The regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are crucial for the latter to occur at the cell membrane, where the GPCR normally resides. Perturbations in both activation and termination of G protein signaling underlie numerous heart pathologies. Although more than 30 mammalian RGS proteins have been identified, each RGS protein seems to interact only with a specific set of G protein subunits and GPCR types/subtypes in any given tissue or cell type, and this applies to the myocardium as well. A large number of studies have provided substantial evidence for the roles various RGS proteins expressed in cardiomyocytes play in cardiac physiology and heart disease pathophysiology. This review summarizes the current understanding of the functional roles of cardiac RGS proteins and their implications for the treatment of specific heart diseases, such as heart failure and atrial fibrillation. We focus on cardiac RGS4 in particular, since this isoform appears to be selectively (among the RGS protein family) upregulated in human heart failure and is also the target of ongoing drug discovery efforts for the treatment of a variety of diseases.

Reversible Severe Eosinophilic Endomyocardial Fibrosis During Pregnancy: A Case Report

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a condition of unknown origin characterized by clinical manifestations attributable to eosinophilia and eosinophilic infiltration of tissues. Cardiac involvement is rare and threatening accounting for 33% to 43% of death in HES. Management of pregnant patients with HES is challenging and have rarely been reported, particularly in the setting of heart failure.We here report on the case of a 29-year-old woman with HES who developed severe endomyocardial fibrosis with heart failure during pregnancy. Outcome was favorable under treatment with prednisone and azathioprine.This case illustrates a favorable outcome of endomyocardial fibrosis during pregnancy.

RGS Proteins in Sympathetic Nervous System Regulation: Focus on Adrenal RGS4

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) consists largely of two different types of components: neurons that release the neurotransmitter norepinephrine (NE, noradrenaline) to modulate homeostasis of the innevrvated effector organ or tissue and adrenal chromaffin cells, which synthesize and secrete the hormone epinephrine (Epi, adrenaline) and some NE into the blood circulation to act at distant organs and tissues that are not directly innervated by the SNS. Like almost every physiological process in the human body, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) tightly modulate both NE release from sympathetic neuronal terminals and catecholamine (CA) secretion from the adrenal medulla. Regulator of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins, acting as guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating proteins (GAPs) for the Gα subunits of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), play a central role in silencing G protein signaling from a plethora of GPCRs. Certain RGS proteins and, in particular, RGS4, have been implicated in regulation of SNS activity and of adrenal chromaffin cell CA secretion. More specifically, recent studies have implicated RGS4 in regulation of NE release from cardiac sympathetic neurons by means of terminating free fatty acid receptor (FFAR)-3 calcium signaling and in regulation of NE and Epi secretion from the adrenal medulla by means of terminating cholinergic calcium signaling in adrenal chromaffin cells. Thus, in this review, we provide an overview of the current literature on the involvement of RGS proteins, with a particular focus on RGS4, in these two processes, i.e., NE release from sympathetic nerve terminals & CA secretion from adrenal chromaffin cells. We also highlight the therapeutic potential of RGS4 pharmacological manipulation for diseases characterized by sympathetic dysfunction or SNS hyperactivity, such as heart failure and hypertension.

GRK2 and Beta-Arrestins in Cardiovascular Disease: Established and Emerging Possibilities for Therapeutic Targeting

Heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors, such as the -adrenergic and the angiotensin II type 1 receptors, are the most diverse and therapeutically important family of receptors in the human genome, playing major roles in the physiology of various organs/tissues including the heart and blood vessels. Ligand binding activates heterotrimeric G proteins that transmit intracellular signals by regulating effector enzymes or ion channels. G protein signaling is terminated, in large part, by phosphorylation of the agonist-bound receptor by the family of G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), with GRK2 being its most prominent member, followed by barrestin binding, which uncouples the phosphorylated receptor and G protein and subsequently targets the receptor for internalization. As the receptor-barrestin complex enters the cell, barrestins serve as ligand-regulated scaffolds that recruit a host of intracellular proteins and signal transducers, thus promoting their own wave of signal transduction independently of G-proteins. A large number of preclinical studies in small and large animals over the past several years have pinpointed specific pathophysiologic roles played by these two families of receptor-regulating proteins in various cardiovascular diseases, directly implicating them in disease pathology and suggesting them as potential therapeutic targets. The present review gives an account of what is currently known about the benefits of cardiac and adrenal GRK2 inhibition for cardiovascular disease treatment, and also discusses the exciting new therapeutic possibilities emerging from uncovering the physiological roles of arrestin-mediated signaling in vivo in the cardiovascular system.

Editorial for the IJMS Special Issue on Sglt2 Inhibitors (Volume 2)

The goal of the second volume of this Special Issue was to build upon the success of the first one and to continue to highlight the ever-expanding list of pharmacological properties of the sodium/glucose co-transporter (SGLT) type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor (SGLT2i) drug class (also known as gliflozins) [...].

GTPγS Assay for Measuring Agonist-Induced Desensitization of Two Human Polymorphic Alpha2B-Adrenoceptor Variants

α2-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) mediate many cellular actions of epinephrine and norepinephrine, including inhibition of their secretion (sympathetic inhibition) from adrenal chromaffin cells. Like many other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), they undergo agonist-dependent phosphorylation and desensitization by GPCR kinases (GRKs), a phenomenon recently shown to play a major role in the sympathetic overdrive that accompanies and aggravates chronic heart failure. A three-glutamic acid deletion polymorphism in the human α2B-AR subtype gene (Glu301-303) causes impaired agonist-promoted receptor phosphorylation and desensitization, resulting in enhanced signaling to inhibition of cholinergic-induced catecholamine secretion in adrenal chromaffin cells. One of the various pharmacological assays that can be used to quantify and quantitatively compare the degrees of agonist-dependent desensitization, i.e., G protein decoupling, of these two polymorphic α2B-AR variants (or of any two GPCRs for that matter) is the guanosine-5'-O-3-thiotriphosphate (GTPγS) assay that can directly quantify heterotrimeric G protein activation.

Cardiovascular GPCR regulation by regulator of G protein signaling proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play pivotal roles in regulation of cardiovascular homeostasis across all vertebrate species, including humans. In terms of normal cellular function, termination of GPCR signaling via the heterotrimeric G proteins is equally (if not more) important to its stimulation. The Regulator of G protein Signaling (RGS) protein superfamily are indispensable for GPCR signaling cessation at the cell membrane, and thus, for cellular control of GPCR signaling and function. Perturbations in both activation and termination of G protein signaling underlie many examples of cardiovascular dysfunction and heart disease pathogenesis. Despite the plethora of over 30 members comprising the mammalian RGS protein superfamily, each member interacts with a specific set of second messenger pathways and GPCR types/subtypes in a tissue/cell type-specific manner. An increasing number of studies over the past two decades have provided compelling evidence for the involvement of various RGS proteins in physiological regulation of cardiovascular GPCRs and, consequently, also in the pathophysiology of several cardiovascular ailments. This chapter summarizes the current understanding of the functional roles of RGS proteins as they pertain to cardiovascular, i.e., heart, blood vessel, and platelet GPCR function, with a particular focus on their implications for chronic heart failure pathophysiology and therapy.

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate critically modulates cardiac GLP-1 receptor's anti-inflammatory effects

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonists exert a multitude of beneficial cardiovascular effects beyond control of blood glucose levels and obesity reduction. They also have anti-inflammatory actions through both central and peripheral mechanisms. GLP1R is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), coupling to adenylyl cyclase (AC)-stimulatory Gs proteins to raise cyclic 3`-5`-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in cells. cAMP exerts various anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects via its effectors protein kinase A (PKA) and Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac). However, the precise role and importance of cAMP in mediating GLP1R`s anti-inflammatory actions, at least in the heart, remains to be determined. To this end, we tested the effects of the GLP1R agonist liraglutide on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute inflammatory injury in H9c2 cardiac cells, either in the absence of cAMP production (AC inhibition) or upon enhancement of cAMP levels via phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibition with roflumilast.

METHODS & RESULTS

Liraglutide dose-dependently inhibited LPS-induced apoptosis and increased cAMP levels in H9c2 cells, with roflumilast but also PDE8 inhibition further enhancing cAMP production by liraglutide. GLP1R-stimulated cAMP markedly suppressed the LPS-dependent induction of pro-inflammatory tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, interleukin (IL)-1b, and IL-6 cytokine expression, of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and nuclear factor (NF)-kB activity, of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 levels and activities, and of myocardial injury markers in H9c2 cardiac cells. The effects of liraglutide were mediated by the GLP1R since they were abolished by the GLP1R antagonist exendin(9-39). Importantly, AC inhibition completely abrogated liraglutide`s suppression of LPS-dependent inflammatory injury, whereas roflumilast significantly enhanced the protective effects of liraglutide against LPS-induced inflammation. Finally, PKA inhibition or Epac1/2 inhibition alone only partially blocked liraglutide`s suppression of LPS-induced inflammation in H9c2 cardiac cells, but, together, PKA and Epac1/2 inhibition fully prevented liraglutide from reducing LPS-dependent inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

cAMP, via activation of both PKA and Epac, is essential for GLP1R`s anti-inflammatory signaling in cardiac cells and that cAMP levels crucially regulate the anti-inflammatory efficacy of GLP1R agonists in the heart. Strategies that elevate cardiac cAMP levels, such as PDE4 inhibition, may potentiate the cardiovascular, including anti-inflammatory, benefits of GLP1R agonist drugs.

Effect of sulfhydryl modification on rat kidney basolateral plasma membrane transport function

Transport processes are the hallmark of functioning kidney. Various nephrotoxicants disrupt the transport processes to manifest nephrotoxicity. Of several nephrotoxicants, mercuric chloride (HgCl(2)) depletes the reduced glutathione (GSH) in kidney and has been observed to affect the in vitro p-aminohippurate (PAH) transport by basolateral (BL) membrane vesicles. The role of renal nonprotein sulfhydryls such as, reduced GSH has been demonstrated to affect the PAH transport by BL membrane vesicles. The role of protein sulfhydryls in transport process of PAH by BL membrane is not known. Due to mercury mediated effects on sulfhydryls, the effects of protein-sulfhydryls (-SH) modifying reagents in the current study were investigated on PAH transport by BL membrane. It was observed that modification of -SH by p-chloromercuribenzoate sulphate (pCMBS), and mercuric chloride (HgCl(2)) decreased while recovering the protein -SH with dithiothreitol treatment provided protection against the effects of pCMBS, and HgCl(2) on PAH transport by BL membrane vesicles.

Editorial to the IJMS Special Issue on Sglt2 Inhibitors Vol. 1

The goal of this Special Issue is to highlight the ever-increasing progress in pharmacological research on sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors or gliflozins [...].

Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate in Cardiac and Sympathoadrenal GLP-1 Receptor Signaling: Focus on Anti-Inflammatory Effects

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a multifunctional incretin hormone with various physiological effects beyond its well-characterized effect of stimulating glucose-dependent insulin secretion in the pancreas. An emerging role for GLP-1 and its receptor, GLP-1R, in brain neuroprotection and in the suppression of inflammation, has been documented in recent years. GLP-1R is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that couples to Gs proteins that stimulate the production of the second messenger cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). cAMP, acting through its two main effectors, protein kinase A (PKA) and exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac), exerts several anti-inflammatory (and some pro-inflammatory) effects in cells, depending on the cell type. The present review discusses the cAMP-dependent molecular signaling pathways elicited by the GLP-1R in cardiomyocytes, cardiac fibroblasts, central neurons, and even in adrenal chromaffin cells, with a particular focus on those that lead to anti-inflammatory effects by the GLP-1R. Fully elucidating the role cAMP plays in GLP-1R's anti-inflammatory properties can lead to new and more precise targets for drug development and/or provide the foundation for novel therapeutic combinations of the GLP-1R agonist medications currently on the market with other classes of drugs for additive anti-inflammatory effect.