Vaping to quit smoking: Qualitative study of people receiving opioid agonist treatment

INTRODUCTION

Most patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) smoke tobacco. Approved cessation interventions are less effective in this group than the wider population. We investigated how people on OAT experience nicotine vaping to quit smoking.

METHODS

Patients on OAT randomised to the vaping arm of a smoking cessation trial were invited to participate in structured interviews incorporating broad pre-determined themes. A qualitative descriptive approach employing template analysis was used. Four authors coded transcripts, discussed discrepancies, modified the template using both inductive and deductive approaches. Authors made explicit their starting orientations and independent authors sought disconfirmatory data in a subsequent round of analysis.

RESULTS

Four women and eight men (median age 44 years) participated, including four who identified as Aboriginal. Participants reported vaping as cheaper, more acceptable and less stigmatising than smoking but expressed concerns about ongoing accessibility due to the Australian prescription access model. Some found it technically challenging at first, but not more so than standard nicotine replacement therapies. Participants gave accounts of craving and withdrawal experiences, including supplementary use of nicotine patches, and compulsions to vape frequently and intensely, potentially indicating need for higher nicotine dosage. Participants generally reported that vaping helped them quit smoking, though some worried about swapping nicotine addictions. Others were glad to be using a lower-risk alternative.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This group reported varied experiences of nicotine vaping but were mainly optimistic that it could help them and others quit smoking. This was despite initial nicotine cravings and concerns about remaining addicted long-term.

Clinical, electrocardiographic, and diagnostic imaging features and outcomes in cats with electrocardiographic diagnosis of ventricular pre-excitation: a retrospective study of 23 cases (2010-2022)

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Ventricular pre-excitation (VPE) occurs when atrial electrical impulses prematurely excite the ventricles through an aberrant muscle bundle known as an accessory pathway (AP). Orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia is a re-entrant, narrow complex supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), maintained through retrograde conduction over an AP. The study aimed to describe patient signalments, clinical signs, electrocardiographic (ECG) and diagnostic imaging features, treatments, prognostic variables, and outcomes in cats with ECG diagnosis of VPE.

ANIMALS

Twenty-three cats diagnosed with VPE between January 2010 and August 2022 were included in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective study with twenty-three cats diagnosed with VPE between January 2010 and August 2022. Ventricular pre-excitation diagnosis was based on ECG evidence of shortened PR interval, delta wave, and prolonged QRS duration. The median survival time (MST) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve. Log-rank tests were performed to assess for an association between clinical signs or presence of structural heart disease on the MST.

RESULTS

Fourteen (60.8%) cats with VPE also had SVT documented on ECG, with 7 of 14 with ECG confirmation of orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia. Four (17.4%) cats had suspected AP-mediated tachyarrhythmia based on associated clinical signs. Common presenting signs included collapse (15/23; 65.2%) and respiratory distress (14/23; 60.8%). Five (21.7%) cats were asymptomatic. Heart rate during SVT ranged from 310 to 420 bpm (median: 375 bpm). Initial treatment included atenolol (10/18), sotalol (5/18), diltiazem (2/18), and amiodarone (1/18). From the date of diagnosis, MST was 1872 days (5.1 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of cats with VPE also had symptomatic SVT. The prognosis for cats with VPE is considered good with an MST of greater than five years.

Training and assessing convolutional neural network performance in automatic vascular segmentation using Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT

To evaluate a convolutional neural network's performance (nnU-Net) in the assessment of vascular contours, calcification and PET tracer activity using Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT. Patients who underwent Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT imaging over a 12-month period for neuroendocrine investigation were included. Manual cardiac and aortic segmentations were performed by an experienced observer. Scans were randomly allocated in ratio 64:16:20 for training, validation and testing of the nnU-Net model. PET tracer uptake and calcium scoring were compared between segmentation methods and different observers. 116 patients (53.5% female) with a median age of 64.5 years (range 23-79) were included. There were strong, positive correlations between all segmentations (mostly r > 0.98). There were no significant differences between manual and AI segmentation of SUVmean for global cardiac (mean ± SD 0.71 ± 0.22 vs. 0.71 ± 0.22; mean diff 0.001 ± 0.008, p > 0.05), ascending aorta (mean ± SD 0.44 ± 0.14 vs. 0.44 ± 0.14; mean diff 0.002 ± 0.01, p > 0.05), aortic arch (mean ± SD 0.44 ± 0.10 vs. 0.43 ± 0.10; mean diff 0.008 ± 0.16, p > 0.05) and descending aorta (mean ± SD < 0.001; 0.58 ± 0.12 vs. 0.57 ± 0.12; mean diff 0.01 ± 0.03, p > 0.05) contours. There was excellent agreement between the majority of manual and AI segmentation measures (r ≥ 0.80) and in all vascular contour calcium scores. Compared with the manual segmentation approach, the CNN required a significantly lower workflow time. AI segmentation of vascular contours using nnU-Net resulted in very similar measures of PET tracer uptake and vascular calcification when compared to an experienced observer and significantly reduced workflow time.

Meteorological gaps in audits of pedestrian environments: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Weather and season are determinants of physical activity. Therefore, it is important to ensure built environments are designed to mitigate negative impacts of weather and season on pedestrians to prevent these losses. This scoping review aims to identify built environment audits of pedestrian environments developed for use during a specific weather condition or season. Secondly, this review aims to investigate gaps in the inclusion of relevant weather mitigating built environment features in pedestrian environment audit tools.

METHODS

Following a standard protocol, a systematic search was executed in CINAHL, Medline and Web of Science to identify built environment audit tools of pedestrian spaces. These databases were chosen since they are well-known to comprehensively cover health as well as multi-disciplinary research publications relevant to health. Studies were screened, and data were extracted from selected documents by two independent reviewers (e.g., psychometric properties and audit items included). Audit items were screened for the inclusion of weather mitigating built environment features, and the tool's capacity to measure temperature, precipitation, seasonal and sustainability impacts on pedestrians was calculated.

RESULTS

The search returned 2823 documents. After screening and full text review, 27 articles were included. No tool was found that was developed specifically for use during a specific weather condition or season. Additionally, gaps in the inclusion of weather mitigating items were found for all review dimensions (thermal comfort, precipitation, seasonal, and sustainability items). Poorly covered items were: (1) thermal comfort related (arctic entry presence, materials, textures, and colours of buildings, roads, sidewalk and furniture, and green design features); (2) precipitation related (drain presence, ditch presence, hazards, and snow removal features); (3) seasonal features (amenities, pedestrian scale lighting, and winter destinations and aesthetics); and (4) sustainability features (electric vehicle charging stations, renewable energy, car share, and bike share facilities).

CONCLUSIONS

Current built environment audit tools do not adequately include weather / season mitigating items. This is a limitation as it is important to investigate if the inclusion of these items in pedestrian spaces can promote physical activity during adverse weather conditions. Because climate change is causing increased extreme weather events, a need exists for the development of a new built environment audit tool that includes relevant weather mitigating features.

Quantification of Caffeoylquinic Acids and Triterpenes as Targeted Bioactive Compounds of Centella asiatica in Extracts and Formulations by Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry

Centella asiatica (CA) is a culinary vegetable and well-known functional food that is widely used as a medicinal herb and dietary supplement. CA is rich in pentacyclic triterpenes (TTs), including asiaticoside (AS), madecassoside (MS) and the related aglycones asiatic acid (AA), madecassic acid (MA). Traditionally, TTs have been associated with the bioactivity and health promoting effect of CA. Recently, mono-caffeoylquinic acids (MonoCQAs) and di-caffeoylquinic acids (DiCQAs) have been found to contribute to the bioactivity of CA as well. This work reports an analytical strategy based on liquid chromatography coupled to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (LC-MRM-MS) for the simultaneous rapid and accurate quantification of 12 bioactive compounds in CA, namely AS, MS, AA, MA, 5-CQA, 4-CQA, 3-CQA, 1,3-DiCQA, 3,4-DiCQA, 1,5-DiCQA, 3,5-DiCQA, 4,5-DiCQA. Method selectivity, accuracy, precision, repeatability, robustness, linearity range, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were validated. The validated LC-MRM-MS method has been successfully applied to quantify the 12 bioactive compounds in CA aqueous extracts and two related formulations: a standardized CA product (CAP) used in a phase I clinical trial and formulated CA rodent diets used in preclinical studies. The validated method allows us to support the standardization of CA products used for clinical trials and conduct routine LC-MRM-MS analyses of formulated preclinical diets to confirm correct levels of CA phytochemical markers.

The effect on the T-14 paediatric throat disorders outcome score of delaying adenotonsillectomy surgery due to COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Adenotonsillectomy is commonly performed for recurrent tonsillitis and obstructive sleep apnoea. These conditions may improve with age. The COVID-19 pandemic led to all UK elective surgery being suspended. This study aimed to determine whether delaying surgery had any effect on a patient's symptoms using the validated T-14 paediatric throat disorders outcome test.

METHODS

Patients completed a T-14 questionnaire when the child was listed for surgery; this was repeated on the revised surgery date and a paired t test was used to compare the responses.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were completed by 29 patients a mean of 6.4 months apart. There was a significant improvement in scores (p<0.02) for five domains: eating habits, visits to a doctor/A&E, antibiotics for less than 2 weeks, chronic infections and school missed due to sore throats.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that following delays resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, paediatric patients experienced an improvement in some aspects of their quality of life while awaiting tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. This was most apparent in quality-of-life measures relating to recurrent tonsillitis, namely visits to a doctor/A&E, antibiotics for less than 2 weeks, chronic infections and school missed due to sore throats. Patients may experience an improvement in some of their individual symptoms, in particular their infective symptoms, during an observation period.

COGNITIVE STATUS AND HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION IN AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: EARLY RESULTS OF A LONGITUDINAL PILOT STUDY

Many people living with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) never receive a formal disease diagnosis. This compromises wellbeing and increases health services utilization and care costs. Wider screening and assessment for ADRD may increase access to supportive care, improve allocation of medical care, and foster interventions that prevent or delay disease progression. A sample of Medicare-enrolled individuals 65+ (n=60) consecutively presenting to the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) emergency department (ED) in Portland, Oregon consented to the study and were administered the TICS, a validated tool for telephone-based assessments of cognition, post-discharge from the ED. Study participants were asked about their physical health via the modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (M-CIRS), and their cognitive health via the PROMIS Cognitive Measure Questions on Mental Clarity. Care utilization patterns were measured via review of participants’ electronic health records (EHR) for three years prior to study enrollment focusing on total hospitalizations, ED visits, and primary care (PC) visits.Medicare-enrolled adults 65+ recently discharged from the ED were a feasible population to perform a cognitive assessment. The study enrollment rate was 24.2% (n=60). Enrollment was limited to patients with their PC affiliated with the OHSU health system, which excluded the majority (792, 73.8%) of ED patients Medicare-enrolled, 65+ from our study (1,072). This study provides preliminary evidence to support focusing on older ED patients to administer cognitive assessments, linking outcomes to the EHR, and ultimately providing a platform for future research on impacts of under-diagnosed ADRD on population-level health outcomes and care utilization.

DECLINE OF AN ONLINE COGNITIVE COMPOSITE ASSOCIATED WITH MODIFIABLE LIFESTYLE FACTORS

Voluntary, self-administered online assessment platforms have gained popularity in monitoring cognition and lifestyle behaviors. This study used the AARP Staying Sharp online brain health assessment platform to estimate the progression of a cognitive composite and correlate it with six modifiable lifestyle behaviors (physical activity, diet, sleep, stress, social activity, and brain engagement) in 147,939 participants (68.6 ± 7.0 years old; 70% female). A cognitive composite was created using attention, immediate and delayed recall, and working memory tasks and lifestyle behaviors were collected by self-report. A lower frequency of exercise (p=0.01), a higher frequency of sitting (p=0.03), a lower frequency of getting in touch with family and friends (p=0.04), and the inability to manage stress (p=0.02) were associated with a decline in the online cognitive composite. A self-administered online assessment platform may be useful in informing lifestyle modification interventions for risk reduction of cognitive impairment and dementia.

Nutritional Management of Children with Food Allergies

Purpose of the Review

The purpose of the review is to review the evidence for the nutritional management of paediatric food allergy and provide a practical approach for healthcare professionals working in this area.

Recent Findings

Dietary elimination remains the mainstay for management of food allergies in children. However, the elimination of food allergens increases the risk for growth faltering, micronutrient deficiencies and feeding difficulties. Breastmilk remains the ideal source of nutrition for infants, but when not available, the vast majority will tolerate an extensively hydrolysed formula, and rice hydrolysate has also been suggested as a suitable alternative. Only in severe cases, including anaphylaxis, eosinophilic oesophagitis and growth faltering, is an amino acid formula indicated. The early introduction of peanut and egg and avoiding the delay in the introduction of other allergens, when not already allergic, has been highlighted by recent studies.

Summary

Whilst the elimination of allergens increases the risk of developing poor growth, micronutrient deficiencies and feeding difficulties, optimal, early dietary input, including advice on active introduction of allergens and alternative feeds, ideally from a registered dietitian/nutritionist, may be prevent and improve outcomes.

Unobtrusive Sensing Technology Detects Ecologically Valid Spatiotemporal Patterns of Daily Routines Distinctive to Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment

BACKGROUND

The ability to capture people's movement throughout their home is a powerful approach to inform spatiotemporal patterns of routines associated with cognitive impairment. The study estimated indoor room activities over 24 hours and investigated relationships between diurnal activity patterns and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-one older adults (26 with MCI) living alone (age = 78.9 ± 9.2) were included from 2 study cohorts-the Oregon Center for Aging & Technology and the Minority Aging Research Study. Indoor room activities were measured by the number of trips made to rooms (bathroom, bedroom, kitchen, living room). Trips made to rooms (transitions) were detected using passive infrared motion sensors fixed on the walls for a month. Latent trajectory models were used to identify distinct diurnal patterns of room activities and characteristics associated with each trajectory.

RESULTS

Latent trajectory models identified 2 diurnal patterns of bathroom usage (high and low usage). Participants with MCI were more likely to be in the high bathroom usage group that exhibited more trips to the bathroom than the low-usage group (odds ratio [OR] = 4.1, 95% CI [1.3-13.5], p = .02). For kitchen activity, 2 diurnal patterns were identified (high and low activity). Participants with MCI were more likely to be in the high kitchen activity group that exhibited more transitions to the kitchen throughout the day and night than the low kitchen activity group (OR = 3.2, 95% CI [1.1-9.1], p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

The linkage between bathroom and kitchen activities with MCI may be the result of biological, health, and environmental factors in play. In-home, real-time unobtrusive-sensing offers a novel way of delineating cognitive health with chronologically-ordered movement across indoor locations.

Evaluation of prognostic risk models for postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and international external validation cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stratifying risk of postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery allows clinicians to modify risk through targeted interventions and enhanced monitoring. In this study, we aimed to identify and validate prognostic models against a new consensus definition of postoperative pulmonary complications.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and international external validation cohort study. The systematic review was done in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched MEDLINE and Embase on March 1, 2020, for articles published in English that reported on risk prediction models for postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. External validation of existing models was done within a prospective international cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing major abdominal surgery. Data were collected between Jan 1, 2019, and April 30, 2019, in the UK, Ireland, and Australia. Discriminative ability and prognostic accuracy summary statistics were compared between models for the 30-day postoperative pulmonary complication rate as defined by the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine Core Outcome Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC). Model performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC).

FINDINGS

In total, we identified 2903 records from our literature search; of which, 2514 (86·6%) unique records were screened, 121 (4·8%) of 2514 full texts were assessed for eligibility, and 29 unique prognostic models were identified. Nine (31·0%) of 29 models had score development reported only, 19 (65·5%) had undergone internal validation, and only four (13·8%) had been externally validated. Data to validate six eligible models were collected in the international external validation cohort study. Data from 11 591 patients were available, with an overall postoperative pulmonary complication rate of 7·8% (n=903). None of the six models showed good discrimination (defined as AUROCC ≥0·70) for identifying postoperative pulmonary complications, with the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia score showing the best discrimination (AUROCC 0·700 [95% CI 0·683-0·717]).

INTERPRETATION

In the pre-COVID-19 pandemic data, variability in the risk of pulmonary complications (StEP-COMPAC definition) following major abdominal surgery was poorly described by existing prognostication tools. To improve surgical safety during the COVID-19 pandemic recovery and beyond, novel risk stratification tools are required.

FUNDING

British Journal of Surgery Society.

"You can't just eat 16 teaspoons of sugar so why would you drink 16 teaspoons' worth of sugar?": a qualitative study of young adults' reactions to sugary drink warning labels

Background

Several jurisdictions have introduced nutrient warning front of pack (FoP) labels in an effort to curb consumption of ultra-processed foods and beverages high in free sugars (sugars added to foods and beverages, and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices and fruit juice concentrates). This study aimed to explore consumer understanding and perceptions of FoP warning labels that convey different nutritional and health information messages regarding the consumption of sugary drinks.

Methods

Sixteen focus groups were held with 4–8 young adults per group (aged 18–24; n = 105 participants in total) stratified by education level, location (rural centres, large cities) and gender (males, females) to ensure diversity. Labels shown to participants during group discussions included text warning labels of health effects, exercise equivalents, calorie/kilojoule information and sugar content as a “high in” label and as teaspoons (text and pictograms). Thematic analysis was undertaken.

Results

Four themes were identified related to participants’ perceived effectiveness of labels: the extent to which labels were perceived to be useful, relevant and credible; the extent to which a label elicited shock or disgust (perceived aversiveness); the extent to which the label message was resistant to self-exemption; and participants’ perceived potential of the label to reduce purchasing and consumption behaviour. Across all four themes, labels communicating the number of teaspoons of sugar in a sugary drink (whether by text or pictogram) were perceived as the most impactful, resistant to self-exemption and to have the greatest potential to reduce consumption, with enhanced reactions to the pictogram label. Labels depicting health effects, exercise equivalents, calorie/kilojoule information or a general ‘high in sugar’ warning were perceived by consumers to be less effective in one or more themes.

Conclusions

Labels conveying the amount of sugar in a beverage in teaspoons were perceived as highly factual, relatable and interpretable, and as having the greatest potential to impact consumption attitudes and intentions. Further quantitative studies are required to compare the potential effectiveness of the teaspoons of sugar labels in reducing purchasing and consumption behaviour than other alternative warning labels, such as health effects or “high in” sugar labels.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13648-1.

AB1397 WORK SMARTER NOT HARDER

Background

In 2014 we were a small team with only 1 WTE (Whole Time Equivalent) CNS (Clinical Nurse Specialist) and 2 WTE consultants for a population of 220,000. Most CNS clinic appointments were taken up for drug counselling. Waiting times were approx. 6 weeks for drug counselling. Consultants would often counsel for DMARDs.

That year at a national meeting a virtual group MDT (multidisciplinary) was presented by the team at Manchester Royal infirmary (MRI). They used a good quality presentation for patients starting bDMARDs as a tool for drug counselling.

After having to put on an extra clinic to counsel 5 patients, all for rituximab, frustratingly I asked why can’t I get them all in the same room to save time? We needed to work smarter, not harder, utilise time & space to ensure best practice but also ensure gold standard, patient centered care continued. We modified the format used at MRI to a face to face group education and counselling of patients to improve waiting times and patient flow.

Objectives

Reduce the amount of clinic appointments used to counsel patients for sDMARDs (synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) and bDMARDs (biologic).

Free up clinic appointments for follow up/ review and flares.

Standardise information given out to ensure they are all given the same gold standard information and education.

Methods

We visited the team at MRI to view the format of their virtual clinic. It didn’t meet the needs of our service so we modified and adapted the presentation.

Set up a group education session to discuss the most common sDMARDs and bDMARDs used for Inflammatory Arthritis.

I developed a power point presentation and booklet that can be used by CNS- ensuring the same information is given to every patient, both attending the group session and those not suitable for group session (ie Language barriers) who would be seen individually. We use a screening proforma to ensure safety of commencement for the individual prior to attending clinics which has a tick list for screening requirements.

The session is undertaken in our education centre. Pre Covid the session could accommodate up to 10 patients per session per week, uptake on average 8-10 patients for sDMARDs and 5-6 for bDMARDs. We alternated biologic and sDMARD sessions, if demand required, we changed a session to accommodate. The room is booked for 1½ hours every week, the sDMARD presentation lasts approximately ½ an hour & bDMARD session 50 minutes, time is allowed for group & individual questions if required at the end. This contrasts with 25 minute appointment for sDMARD & 50 minute for bDMARD counselling 1:1.

The booklet, along with information pack, is given at the group session to all patients. This includes all the information the patient requires (advice line information, blood forms). Prior to the group clinic admin team prepare the patient packs for the CNS to give to patients.

Results

We received 102 anonymous responses back from 136 patients asked. (75% response)

Following these sessions we found less calls to the advice line regarding medication queries, able to add in further cDMARDs or switch to alternate due to S/Es over the telephone

Feedback from patients.-120 comments received.

Clear simple information about a number of possible drugs used to treat my condition not just the 1 I am prescribed. If my medication needs changing I already know about it.

The lecture aspect of the types/contra-indications of meds was very useful & removed the ‘fear’ attached to these specialist drugs.

The session with other patients present stopped me from feeling alone in this position. The booklet is brilliant as it includes everything that was in the session. Also it took away the ‘fear’ of the side effects.

Conclusion

7 years on we feel that Group Counselling has been a huge success, we noticed how successful this was once we had to deal with the pandemic and cancel the group sessions. Patients feedback proves that they like the session and find them valuable. Whilst being beneficial and impoving work productivity and streamling the service.

Acknowledgements

The Rheumatology Team at The Kellgren Centre Manchester Royal Infirmary

Disclosure of Interests

Kelly Tempest Speakers bureau: Abbvie

Sanofi

Galapogos, Hanu Reddy: None declared, Samantha Johns: None declared, Kathryn Wright: None declared, Shabina Sultan Speakers bureau: Amgen, Grant/research support from: lilly

A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of chloroquine phosphate, hydroxychloroquine sulphate and lopinavir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 in Lagos State: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that was first identified in Wuhan, Hubei, China, in December 2019. It was recognized as a pandemic by the World Health Organization on 11 March 2020. Outbreak forecasting and mathematical modelling suggest that these numbers will continue to rise. Early identification of effective remedies that can shorten the duration and severity of illness is critical for Lagos State, which is the epi-centre of the disease in Nigeria.

Methods

This is a multi-centre, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled superiority trial. The study investigates the efficacy of chloroquine phosphate, hydroxychloroquine sulphate and lopinavir/ritonavir added on to standard of care compared to standard of care only in patients with COVID-19 disease. The primary outcome is the clinical status of patients measured using a 7-point ordinal scale at day 15. Research participants and clinicians will be blinded to the allocated intervention. Outcome measures will be directly assessed by clinicians. Statistical analysis will be done by a team blinded to the identity and allocation of research participants. Data analysis will follow intention-to-treat methods, using R software.

Discussion

The current study is of strategic importance for Lagos State in potentially curbing the health, social and economic burden of COVID-19 disease. Should the current study demonstrate that either of the three intervention drugs is more efficacious than standard therapy alone, the State Ministry of Health will develop an evidence-based guideline for the management of COVID-19 in Lagos State. The findings will also be shared nationally and with other states which may lead to a standardized national guideline for the treatment of COVID-19 in Nigeria.

Trial registration

Pan African Clinical Trials Register PACTR202004801273802. Registered prospectively on April 2, 2020

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05675-x.

Exposure to Anti-Tobacco Messaging and Quit Attempts among Adolescent and Young Adult in Lagos, Nigeria: A Population-based Study

BACKGROUND

Health behavior theories suggest that knowledge about the health risks of the behavior precedes behavior change. Tobacco control messages aim to promote knowledge of health risks associated with tobacco use and encourage smoking cessation behaviors such as quit attempts and intention to quit. This study assessed the relationship between exposure to Anti-Tobacco Messaging (ATM) and quit attempts among adolescents and young adults in Lagos, Nigeria.

METHODS

This was an online cross-sectional survey of 947 participants aged between 15-35 years. The survey obtained sociodemographic information, smoking status, exposure to ATM, intention to quit and quit attempts in the past 12-months. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the relationship between exposure to ATM and quit attempts; pvalues <0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was done using STATA-15.0 software.

RESULTS

The mean age of respondents was 23.4 years (SD:4.0). Less than one-third of the respondents were smokers (23.4%). The most common source of ATM were digital sources (online and social media - 29.6%). Based on the multivariable logistic regression model, younger age (p:0.03) and an intention to quit (p: <0.001) were significantly associated with a quit attempt. Exposure to ATM in the past 12 months was also significantly associated with higher odds of a quit attempt (OR:5.33; 95% CI: 1.26,22.60; p: 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest an association between exposure to ATM and quit attempts among adolescent and young adult smokers in Lagos State, Nigeria. Policymakers should consider measures aimed at promoting tobacco control education and improving access to smoking cessation services.

A scoping review of systematic reviews on reducing lifestyle risk behaviours in disadvantaged groups

Background

Lifestyle risk behaviours are key risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Some disadvantaged groups face particularly poor health outcomes, which may be exacerbated by high prevalence of risk behaviours. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and bring together evidence from systematic reviews on reducing risk behaviours in these groups and highlight where there is insufficient evidence to inform policy.

Methods

MEDLINE and Embase were searched up to October 2020 for English language reviews, with supplementary searching in Epistemonikos and Health Systems Evidence. Systematic reviews reporting behavioural outcomes of interventions targeting smoking, alcohol use, diet or physical inactivity in nine disadvantaged groups were eligible. Reviews of population-level policies reporting differential effects for these groups and qualitative reviews of barriers or facilitators to change were included. Literature was mapped based on the group and behaviour targeted.

Results

Ninety-two systematic reviews were included. The majority (n = 68) focused on low income or socio-economic status. Fewer reviews were identified that included prisoners (n = 14), deprived areas (n = 12), homeless people (n = 10), people with learning disabilities (n = 9), unemployed people (n = 3) and refugees or asylum seekers (n = 2). We identified no reviews on care leavers or Gypsies, Travellers or Roma. In total only 11 reviews targeted alcohol use. There were some gaps for specific group and behaviour combinations and no intervention reviews on refugees.

Conclusions

A number of gaps were identified, highlighting where new syntheses or primary studies could add value. For example, reviews on interventions in refugees, Gypsies, Travellers and Roma, and care leavers could be useful for policy-making. Other useful contributions might include an overview of the perceptions of disadvantaged groups allowing common barriers to behaviour change to be identified as well as factors unique to specific groups.

Key messages

Nearly 100 systematic reviews focused on reducing risk behaviours in disadvantaged groups; they addressed different combinations of behaviours and groups. Gaps in the literature were identified where new syntheses could make a useful contribution to developing programmes and policies.

OP0102 DECLINE IN EXCESS RISK OF HEART FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN RECENT YEARS

Background:

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common cardiovascular conditions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous studies showed a 2-fold excess risk of HF in RA versus the general population (1). Whether this has changed over time is not known. Longitudinal studies on trends in occurrence of HF in RA patients over time, and studies comparing trends in HF in RA versus the general population are lacking.

Objectives:

1) To assess trends in incidence of HF in patients with incident RA in 1980-2009; and 2) To compare incidence of HF in RA patients and population-based comparators without RA with RA incidence/ index date in 1980-2009.

Methods:

The study population comprised Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with incident RA (age ≥18 years, 1987 ACR criteria met in 1980-2009) and non-RA subjects from the same underlying population with similar age, sex and calendar year of index. All subjects were followed until death, migration, or 04/30/2019. Incident HF was defined using Framingham criteria. Patients with HF prior to RA incidence/index date were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare incident HF events by decade, adjusting for age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors: smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia. Cumulative incidence of HF adjusted for death was also computed.

Results:

The study included 905 patients with RA (mean age 55.9 years; 69% female; median follow-up 13.4 years). The 10-year cumulative incidence of HF in RA cohort in the 1980s was 8.5% (95%CI 5.3-13.6%), 1990s was 10.8% (95%CI 7.7-15.1%), and 2000s was 7.1% (95%CI 4.9-10.3%). There was no difference in incidence of HF in 1990s (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.62-1.35) and 2000s (HR 0.73; 95%CI 0.46-1.18) compared to 1980s. Patients with incident RA were then compared to 903 individuals without RA (mean age 56.0 years; 69% female; median follow-up 13.8 years). The 10-year cumulative incidence of HF in these individuals in the 1980s was 7.4% (95%CI 4.5-12.3%), 1990s was 7.5% (95%CI 4.9-11.3%), and 2000s was 7.3% (95%CI 5.0-10.7%). Similar to RA, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence of HF in 1990s (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.60-1.51) and 2000s (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.44-1.30) compared to the 1980s. When comparing the risk of HF in RA and non-RA subjects, patients with RA in 2000s had no excess in HF risk as compared to the general population (HR 1.14, 95%CI 0.73-1.78, Figure 1). This is in contrast to the 2-fold excess risk of HF in patients with RA in 1980s (HR 2.20, 95%CI 1.44-3.34) and ~1.5-fold increase in risk of HF in 1990s (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.04-2.29).

Figure 1.

Cumulative incidence of any HF event in RA and non-RA patients by decade of RA incidence/index

Conclusion:

We found a reduction in excess HF risk in patients with RA compared to individuals without RA in 2000s compared to 1980s. There were no statistically significant changes in incidence of HF in patients with RA and in individuals without RA over time. More studies are needed to understand the reasons and implications of these trends.

References:

[1]Nicola PJ, et al. The risk of congestive heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study over 46 years. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:412–20.

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, NIAMS (R01 AR46849) and NHLBI (HL120859). Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG034676. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosure of Interests:

Elena Myasoedova: None declared, John M Davis III Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Sara Achenbach: None declared, Kerry Wright: None declared, Reto Kurmann: None declared, Rekha Mankad: None declared, Veronique Roger: None declared, Cynthia S. Crowson: None declared

Concomitant botanical medicine use among patients participating in commercial prostate cancer trials

OBJECTIVES

Patients with cancer frequently use botanical medications. The concomitant use of such medications by patients on commercial trials has not been well-described, despite the importance of these trials for evaluating the safety and efficacy of new agents. We sought to describe the use of botanical medications taken by patients with prostate cancer enrolled on global commercial trials.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Regulatory repository of commercial clinical trial data.

INTERVENTIONS

Anti-cancer therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Botanical and medication use data were pooled across six international commercial randomized trials for metastatic prostate cancer with detailed information on medication and indications. Botanical products were considered to have potential for drug interaction if they led to a change in drug exposure in human trials. Potential for interaction was ascertained by PubMed review. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of 7318 enrolled patients, 700 (10 %) reported botanical use at any time and 653 (9%) reported use of botanical products while on trial. Nearly half of botanical product types were not classified by plant (43 %). The highest proportion of botanical use was among patients in Asian countries (32 %), followed by patients in North America (13 %). Eighty-six different types of botanical products were used; of these, nineteen had a patient-reported anti-cancer indication.

CONCLUSIONS

Botanical medicine use among patients with prostate cancer in commercial trials is moderate, although it varies by region. Practitioners should be aware of the use of botanical interventions in a clinical trial context.