Left atrial strain evaluation and prognostic value in constrictive pericarditis patients undergoing pericardiectomy

Background

Left Atrial (LA) phasic volumes analyses is flawed with geometrical assumption requiring high endocardial border definition. LA strain analysis is an emergent technique that overcome some of these technical limitations. Prior studies of LA mechanics in pericardiectomy patients found improvement in LA strain at follow-up and manifested as symptomatic improvement, however their relationships with survival have not been investigated.

Purpose

We assessed LA strain before and after pericardiectomy and its association with all- cause mortality.

Methods

Consecutive patients with constrictive pericarditis who underwent pericardiectomy from 2000–2017 were retrospectively analyzed, analyzing pre-operative and post-operative (at 12 months) echocardiography. Exclusion criteria included atrial fibrillation, previous left sided valve surgery, concomitant valvular surgery at the index pericardiectomy, more than mild left sided valvulopathy and poor echocardiographic windows. Strain analyses was performed with Vector velocity imaging independent software. Univariate and multivariable analyses were utilized to identify factors associated with reduced survival.

Results

Amongst 190 patients included in the analyses, mean age was 58.5±12.7 years and 37 (19.5%) were female. The etiology of constriction was deemed idiopathic in 61.6% of the cases, median time interval surgery-postoperative echo was 67 days (IQR 6, 312 days). During median follow up of 3.3 years (IQR 0.73, 5.9 years) there were 37 deaths. After surgery, there was a significant decrease in LA reservoir, conduit and regional wall strains. (Table 1). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that postoperative 4C AL strain reservoir was independently associated with all-cause mortality (Table 2).

Conclusions

In pericardiectomy patients, postoperative 4C LA strain reservoir is independently associated with all-cause mortality. Perhaps, compensatory changes of septal and antero-posterior walls during constriction explain why after surgery these walls become less dynamic, negatively impacting the overall function. Overall, LA quantification and strains may become a useful clinical tool for risk stratification in pericardiectomy patients

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Table 1. Left atrial variables.Table 2. All-cause mortality predictors

RESONANCE Registry: rationale and design of the retrospective and prospective longitudinal, observational registry in pediatric and adult patients with recurrent pericarditis

Background

Annually in the United States (US), an estimated 80–90,000 patients are diagnosed with acute pericarditis and 15–30% experience recurrent pericarditis (RP), resulting in increased morbidity and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Treatment options include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine. Corticosteroids (CS) are often added to the treatment plan in RP despite CS-associated adverse events and inherent potentiation of recurrence with long-term treatment. A recent Phase 3 clinical trial RHAPSODY (NCT03737110) demonstrated efficacy and safety of rilonacept, an interleukin-1 α and β cytokine trap, in patients with RP. RHAPSODY data helped support FDA approval of the first therapy for RP. With the emergence of this targeted therapy, there is increased interest to learn more about this disease with the goal to better inform treatment and management decisions and improve long-term outcomes.

Purpose

RESONANCE Registry aims to evaluate the natural history of RP by collecting retrospective and prospective, longitudinal physician- and patient-reported outcomes data in real-world clinical practice across the US.

Methods

RP patients with active disease (recurrence within 3 years) will have both retrospective and prospective data collected (Figure 1) for as long as their RP is managed up to 5 years. For patients with inactive disease (no recurrence within 3 years), data collection will be retrospective (Figure 2). Up to 500 patients in the US are planned for enrollment at pediatric and adult medical centers, with the potential for expansion to European sites. Additionally, patients will be recruited through a novel, internet-based technology platform and screened for eligibility at a “decentralized” trial site. The registry will include variables obtained from health records, including baseline characteristics and medical history, as well as patient reported outcome (PRO) measures collected every 3 months. The RESONANCE protocol is designed to include a broad population of pediatric and adult patients, regardless of etiology or treatment course, including patients treated with rilonacept. Data will be analyzed to understand disease heterogeneity, variability in treatment and management, and impact on HRQoL. The protocol and Case Report Forms (CRFs) were developed in collaboration with physicians, patients, and patient advocates.

Conclusions

Registries utilize real-world data to fill knowledge gaps in the management of less common diseases such as RP. The RESONANCE Registry is the first RP registry designed to collect data across a broad range of patients regardless of treatment. The registry will also serve as a connection point for physicians to further educate and empower patients with information about their disease. In addition, PRO data may enable greater insights into the understanding of the burden of RP from the patient's perspective.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals

Anti-interleukin 1 agents for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis

Background

Corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a challenging management problem, in which conventional anti-inflammatory therapy (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, corticosteroids) is unable to control the disease. Recent data suggest a potential role for anti-interleukin-1 (IL-1) agents for this condition.

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of anti-IL-1 agents in this setting.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies assessing pericarditis recurrences and drug-related adverse events in patients receiving anti-IL-1 drugs for pericarditis.

Results

The meta-analysis assessed 7 studies including 397 pooled patients with RP. The median age was 42 years, 60% were women and the aetiology was idiopathic in 87%. After a median follow-up of 14 months (IQR,12–39), patients receiving anti-IL-1 agents (anakinra or rilonacept) had a significantly reduction in pericarditis recurrences (incidence rate ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.14, see figure), compared with placebo and/or standard medical therapy. Anti-IL-1 agents were associated with increased risk of adverse events compared with placebo (risk ratio (RR) 5.38, 95% CI 2.08 to 13.92): injection-site reactions occurred in 15/41 (36.6%) vs. none (RR 14.98, 95% CI 2.09 to 107.09), infections occurred in 13/51 (25.5%) vs. 3/41 (7.3%; RR 3.65, 95% CI 1.23 to 10.85). Anti-IL-1 agents were not associated with increased risk of severe adverse events.

Conclusions

In patients with RP, anti-IL-1 agents (anakinra and rilonacept) are efficacious for prevention of recurrences, without severe adverse events.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Dynamic particle swarm optimization of biomolecular simulation parameters with flexible objective functions

Molecular simulations are a powerful tool to complement and interpret ambiguous experimental data on biomolecules to obtain structural models. Such data-assisted simulations often rely on parameters, the choice of which is highly non-trivial and crucial to performance. The key challenge is weighting experimental information with respect to the underlying physical model. We introduce FLAPS, a self-adapting variant of dynamic particle swarm optimization, to overcome this parameter selection problem. FLAPS is suited for the optimization of composite objective functions that depend on both the optimization parameters and additional, a priori unknown weighting parameters, which substantially influence the search-space topology. These weighting parameters are learned at runtime, yielding a dynamically evolving and iteratively refined search-space topology. As a practical example, we show how FLAPS can be used to find functional parameters for small-angle X-ray scattering-guided protein simulations.

POS1202 EXPERIENCE WITH COVID-19 IN GERMAN PAEDIATRIC RHEUMATOLOGY CENTRES

Background:

COVID-19 is a major challenge worldwide. Although the risk for a severe disease course is low among children with COVID-19, symptoms may be exacerbated by underlying disease and/or immunosuppressive medication. We analysed clinical data from COVID-19 cases in among pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in Germany reported to the BIKER registry.

Objectives:

This is an analysis of clinical data for 56 COVID-19 cases reported to the German BIKER registry from 29 German pediatric rheumatology centers and clinics from February 2020 to January 2021.

Methods:

The major task of the German BIKER (Biologics in Paediatric Rheumatology) Registry is surveillance of biologics used in pediatric rheumatology patients. Following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, a survey was established to proactively interview all participating centers regarding the occurrence, presentation and outcome of SARS-CoV-2-infected children with rheumatic diseases. Initially, the interviews were conducted in weekly intervals, later bi-weekly.

A standardized Adverse Event of Special Interest form was developed requesting biographic data, pre-treatment, current medication, data on clinical presentation, course, treatment and outcome of COVID-19 pediatric rheumatology patients.

Results:

In all, 56 patients with JIA and SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported (Table 1). Of these patients, 71% were 12 or more years old.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics. COVID-19 positive patients.

JIA patients, n=56n (%)Age 0-5 years / 6-11years / 12-18years3 (5.4) / 13 (23.2) / 40 (71.4)JIA category•Systemic JIA5 (8.9)•Oligoarthritis JIA9 (16)•Polyarticular JIA32 (57)•Enthesitis-related JIA2 (3.6)•Psoriatic JIA1 (1.8)•Unknown7 (12.5)Uveitis (concomitant)4 (7.1)Treatment•DMARD / MTX23/ 22 (41/39)•Biologics29 (52)•TNF inhibitors20 (36)•Tocilizumab5 (8.9)•Abatacept1 (1.8)•Anakinra1 (1.8)•Ustekinumab1 (1.8)•JAK inhibitors1 (1.8)•Steroids5 (8.9)Asymptomatic13 (23.2)Hospitalized/ICU/Ventilation/Death1/1/1/1 (1.8)

At the time of infection, 41% of the patients received conventional DMARDs and 52% received biologics (Table 1). Forty-four patients (79%) received either a conventional DMARD or a biologic. Most patients had a polyarticular course of their JIA (57%).

In 49 of the 56 cases (88%) COVID-19 was detected directly by PCR (n=46), by antigen test only (n=1) or an undisclosed method (n= 2). Six patients had detectable SARS-CoV2 antibodies and reported to have had typical symptoms. One patient tested negative but developed typical symptoms at approximately the same time a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was returned for a family member.

Symptoms were reported in 43 of the 56 patients (77%): fever n=15, rhinitis n=14, cough n=12, headache n=10, loss of sense of taste and/or smell n=9, pharyngitis n=8, fatigue n=5, musculoskeletal pain n=5, GI symptoms n=2 (abdominal pain n=1, diarrhoea n=1), dizziness n=3, encephalitis/seizure/respiratory failure/death n=1. Thirteen patients (23%) were asymptomatic.

A 3½ -year-old female patient initially diagnosed with systemic JIA developed intracranial oedema and respiratory failure. Her SARS-CoV2 PCR test was positive and pulmonary imaging displayed typical changes in lung texture. Before her SARS-CoV-2 infection, the patient was treated with methotrexate and low-dose steroids. Unfortunately, she died three days following hospital admission. Genetic testing revealed an inborn immunodeficiency. Except for this one patient, all other cases were treated as outpatients and no deaths were reported.

Conclusion:

Apart from one patient with an inborn immunodeficiency who died from her COVID-19 infection, no case of hospitalization or severe COVID-19 was reported in our cohort of JIA patients. At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, nearly 80% of patients in our cohort had been treated with conventional DMARD and/or biologics. This seemed not to have a negative effect on severity or outcome of SARS-CoV2 infection.

Acknowledgements:

Thanks also for contributing Reports for this analysis to: Normi Brück, Frank Dressler, Ivan Foeldvari, Tilman Geikowski, Hermann Girschick, Johannes-Peter Haas, Tilmann Kallinich, Bernd-Ulrich Keck, Eggert Lilienthal, Anna-Hedrich Müller, Ulrich Neudorf, Nils Onken, Peggy Rühmer.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

POS1301 DRUG SURVIVAL OF BIOLOGICS WITH RESPECT TO COMBINATION WITH METHOTREXATE IN TREATMENT OF POLYARTICULAR JIA

Background:

In polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) biologic therapies are often combined with methotrexate (MTX). This combination was shown to increase efficacy in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients. MTX may also have a protective effect on the formation of anti-drug antibodies and thus may prolong drug survival. In pJIA, there are few and sometimes controversial data available.

Objectives:

To compare the effect of combination treatment with MTX on discontinuation due to inefficacy and on drug survival discontinuation of biologics approved for first line treatment of pJIA.

Methods:

Patients from the German BIKER registry with their first treatment course with Adalimumab, Etanercept, Golimumab or Tocilizumab were selected. Rates of ineffectiveness-related withdrawal were analysed and compared using χ2-test, Wald-test and Kaplan-Meier analysis of patients receiving biologic monotherapy or concomitant methotrexate. Cases were censored if MTX was discontinued before the biologic.

Results:

2173 pJIA patients were identified who for the first time received a biologic. Etanercept (ETA) was by far the most frequently used biologic for first line biologic treatment in pJIA (77%) followed by Adalimumab (ADA, 16%). Patients on Golimumab (GOL) received most frequently a combination with MTX (86.5%), while patients on Tocilizumab (TOC) had the lowest rate of combination treatment (53%).

ETA/ADA/GOL/TOC was given as monotherapy in 500(30%)/89(26%)/5(13.5%)/46(47%) and combined with MTX in 1179 (70%)/259(74%)/32(86.5%)/51(53%) cases. More patients with rheumatoid-factor negative (54 vs 50%; p=0.04) and rheumatoid-factor positive pJIA (13 vs 10%, p=0.04) received combination with MTX, while more patients in the monotherapy cohort had extended oligoarthritis (40 vs 32%, p<0.001). Patients with MTX had a shorter disease duration (4 vs 5.5years, p<0.001) and received concomitant steroid more often (34 vs 24%), p<0.001). There was no statistical difference regarding disease activity parameters (active joint count, patient assessment and physician assessment of disease activity, ESR, CRP, CHAQ-DI, JADAS10). Discontinuation due to ineffectiveness was reported for ETA/ADA/GOL/TOC in 20%/18%/14%/28% of patients, respectively in 3.7/4.9/6/10.5 patients/100 treatment years. Thus discontinuation due to inefficacy was reported less frequently with ETA compared to ADA (p=0.046) and TOC (p<0.001) and with ADA compared to TOC (p<0.001).

Patients on ETA and ADA had a slightly, but not statistically significant lower rate of withdrawal for ineffectiveness if on methotrexate (Figure 1). There was no difference regarding baseline disease activity parameters in patients with ETA/ADA monotherapy compared with combination with MTX, apart from patients with ETA+MTX receiving more often systemic steroids at baseline (36vs 24%,p<0-001). For both GOL and TOC treatment, no baseline differences in disease activity between cohorts with monotherapy and MTX combination could be shown. The combination with MTX led to significantly lower rates of discontinuation due to inefficacy (p<0.05) with GOL and TOC (Figure 1).

Conclusion:

Patients with pJIA mostly were treated with a combination of the biologic and MTX rather than with biologic monotherapy. Treatment was discontinued due to lack of efficacy in 14% to 28%. No statistically significant effect of combination treatment with MTX versus monotherapy could be observed regarding the rate of treatment failures in patients treated with ETA or ADA. However, combination treatment with MTX significantly prolonged the survival of GOL and TOC in patients with polyarticular JIA. The results are limited by low patient numbers in the GOL cohort and possible bias by JIA category.

Figure 1.

Kaplan Meier plot of drug survival in patients with monotherapy or with combination with MTX of the indicated biologic

Disclosure of Interests:

Gerd Horneff Speakers bureau: MSD, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Roche, Chugai, MSD, Daniel Windschall: None declared, Kirsten Minden Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Toni Hospach: None declared, Frank Dressler: None declared, Frank Weller-Heinemann: None declared, Boris Huegle: None declared, Ivan Foeldvari Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Ariane Klein: None declared

POS0075 SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF GOLIMUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF POLYARTICULAR JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS - AN UPDATE FROM THE BIKER REGISTRY

Background:

Golimumab (GOL) is approved for treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) in patients 2 years and older. Data on long-term safety of GOL in this indication are limited.

Objectives:

To assess long-term safety and efficacy of GOL in pJIA patients.

Methods:

In this ongoing non-interventional observational study, clinical characteristics, disease activity and safety parameters were analysed using the German Biologics in Paediatric Rheumatology (BiKeR) registry. 81 pJIA-patients treated with GOL were body weight-matched with 162 patients receiving alt. tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and 81 biologic–naïve patients under methotrexate (MTX)-therapy.

Results:

Baseline parameters of GOL patients differed from the alternative TNFi and MTX cohorts. In patients starting with GOL treatment, disease duration was longer, corticosteroid use was less and disease activity, measured by the mean number of active joints and the JADAS10, was lower (Table 1).

The long-term clinical efficacy of GOL in pJIA is highlighted by a decrease of the mean JADAS 10 from 11.6 (baseline) to 5.2 after 24 months. After 2 years, a JADAS 10 minimal disease activity was reached by 44.4 % of patients, whereas 22.2 % of patients were in remission and the JIA ACR 30/50/70/90 response rates were 77.8/72.2/66.7/55.6% respectively.

AE, SAE and infectious AE rates between the three cohorts were comparable (Table 1). In the GOL cohort, 4 SAE (1 uveitis, 1 arthritis flare, 1 fibromyalgia syndrome and 1 abscess) were reported, while in the alt. TNFi group 7 SAEs and in the MTX cohort 1 SAE were noted (Table 1). One serious infectious event (1 abscess) was documented in the GOL cohort, 2 alt. TNFi patients had influenza and no serious infectious events were seen in the MTX control group.

Table 1.

Baseline parameters and adverse events

GOLn=81alt. TNFin=162MTXn=81p-value ∞GOL vs alt. TNFip-value∞ GOL vs MTXGender female °67 (83)127 (78)64 (79)0.50.7Disease duration (yrs)7.1±4.34.3±3.71.2±2.1<0.0001<0.0001RF neg. Polyarthritis °40 (49)79 (49)50 (62)1.00.15RF pos. Polyarthritis °8 (10)22 (14)16 (20)0.50.1Extended Oligoarthritis °30 (37)54 (33)13 (16)0.60.004Psoriatic arthritis °3 (4)7 (4)2 (3)1.0/1.01.0Pretreatment bDMARD °68 (84.0)35 (21.6)0<0.0001<0.0001Concomitant systemic steroids, n (%)13 (16)38 (24)39 (48)0.2<0.0001Active joint count #4.6±4.84.9±5.79.6±6.50.4<0.0001CHAQ DI #0.4±0.50.5±0.50.6±0.60.10.02JADAS10 #11.6±6.212.1±6.116.8±5.30.6<0.0001AE *91 (107.4; 88-132)213 (88.7; 78-101)113 (119.8; 100-144)0.10.4SAE *4 (4.7; 2-13)7 (2.9; 1-6)1 (1.1; 0.1-8)0.40.2Serious infections *1 (1.2; 0.2-8.4)2 (0.8; 0.2-3.3)00.7n.a.Autoimmune process (%)2 (2.4)3 (1.9)1 (1.2)1.01.0Patients with uveitis new manifestation after study entry *1 (1.2; 0.2-8)2 (0.8; 0.5-3)00.7n.a.Patients with uveitis flare events with preexisting uveitis at baseline*6 (7.1; 3-16)00n.a.n.a.

Rheumatoid factor (RF), biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD), childhood health assessment questionnaire disability index (CHAQ Di), juvenile arthritis disease activity index (JADAS), adverse event (AE), patient year (PY), ° n (%), # mean (SD), * n (rate/100PY; 95%CI), Golimumab (GOL), alternative tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (alt. TNFi), methotrexate (MTX), ∞ by t-test or χ2-test as appropriate.

Few autoimmune processes occurred: 2 incident events in the GOL cohort (1 uveitis, 1 psoriasis), 3 cases in the alt. TNFi group (2 uveitis, 1 psoriasis,) and 1 event in MTX-patients (celiac disease) (Table 1). Out of the 20 GOL patients with preexisting uveitis at baseline, 6 had flare events; there were no reported uveitis flares of the 17 patients in the alt. TNFi group and no patients with preexisting uveitis in the MTX-group. No malignancies or deaths were reported.

Conclusion:

Our interim results show an acceptable safety profile of GOL therapy, comparable to treatment with alt. TNFi or MTX. No new safety signals occurred. The efficacy outcome data confirm long-term benefits of GOL treatment in pJIA patients.

Acknowledgements:

We greatly appreciate the kind support of Z. Huang, S. Calhoun.

Disclosure of Interests:

Angela Zimmer: None declared, Ariane Klein: None declared, Kirsten Minden: None declared, Toni Hospach: None declared, Frank Weller-Heinemann: None declared, Jasmin Kuemmerle-Deschner: None declared, Maria Fasshauer: None declared, Nadja Hofmann: None declared, Hans Koessel: None declared, Ivan Foeldvari: None declared, Sonja Mrusek: None declared, Daniel Windschall: None declared, Nils Onken: None declared, Markus Hufnagel: None declared, Dirk Foell: None declared, Normi Brueck: None declared, Prassad Thomas Oommen: None declared, Frank Dressler: None declared, Astrid Helling-Bakki: None declared, Gerd Horneff Speakers bureau: MSD.

OP0165 RISK FOR UVEITIS EVENTS AFTER WITHDRAWAL OF DISEASE MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH EXTENDED OLIGOARTHRITIS OR RHEUMATOID FACTOR NEGATIVE POLYARTHRITIS

Background:

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) associated uveitis is an extra-articular manifestation of the JIA disease that may cause vision-threatening complications and an uncontrolled uveitis may even lead to blindness. Uveitis occurs in up to 20% of patients with JIA, depending on the JIA category. The majority of patients develop uveitis within the first two years after JIA symptom onset, but uveitis can continue into adulthood.

Objectives:

The main objective of this study was to analyze the risk for uveitis events after discontinuing disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in patients with extended oligoarthritis and rheumatoid factor (RF)-negative polyarthritis.

Methods:

Data of the two ongoing multicenter biologic registers: German Biologics in Pediatric Rheumatology (BiKeR) and the Juvenile arthritis Methotrexate/Biologics long-term Observation (JuMBO) were used to analyze the adverse-event (AE) and events of special interest (ESI) reports about uveitis events during treatment and after discontinuation of DMARDs. Biker started recruitment of children and adolescent patients with JIA exposed to biological (b) or conventional (cs) DMARD’s in 2001. The patients were further followed in JuMBO after reaching the age of 18 or transitioning to an adult rheumatologist. Disease characteristics, treatment data, AE’s and ESI’s were reported by the pediatric or adults rheumatologist, respectively.

Results:

A total of 2,041 patients with RF-negative polyarthritis (n=1,280) or extended oligoarthritis (n=761) were included into the analyses. The mean follow-up of this study was 7.6 years (SD 5.3). About half of the patients were enrolled in BiKeR with start of etanercept (1,137, 55.7%), followed by 635 (31.1%) patients with start of methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy or adalimumab (ADA, n=198, 9.7%). A history of uveitis was reported for 238 (11.7%) patients at enrolment in BiKeR. More patients with a history of uveitis treated with ADA were included in BiKeR initiating ADA (n=98 of 238, 41.2%). Patients with uveitis had a lower age at JIA onset in comparison to patients without uveitis (mean 3.6 (SD 3.0) versus 7.0 (SD 4.5) years). A total of 142 recurrent (84% of 169) uveitis events were reported in 93 patients and for 27 patients (1.3% of 2,041) was an incident uveitis reported during follow-up. More than one uveitis event was reported for 32 patients with a maximum number of 4 uveitis flares in 3 patients. Nineteen uveitis flares (11.2% of 169) were reported for patients after the age of 18. The longer the time since DMARD discontinuation the fewer uveitis events occurred. Uveitis events were significantly more often reported in the first 24 months after MTX discontinuation (<6 months: OR=3.19, 95%CI: 1.70 to 5.96; 6 to <12 months: OR=2.06, 95%CI: 1.01 to 4.66; 12 to <24 months: OR=2.20, 95%CI: 1.14 to 4.25) and in the first three months after biological DMARD discontinuation (OR=5.4, 95%CI: 1.56 to 18.33). Patients with a MTX dose of ≤ 10 mg/m2 at last MTX intake had a higher likelihood for uveitis events (OR=1.40, 95%CI: 1.02 to 1.92).

Conclusion:

This is the first study that analyzed the risk of uveitis after DMARD withdrawal. Uveitis relapses are common. Patients who discontinued DMARD therapy were at high risk for uveitis within the first 3 to 24 months after discontinuation. Rheumatologists and ophthalmologists should be aware about this risk which should lead to a regular uveitis screening after DMARD withdrawal.

Disclosure of Interests:

Jens Klotsche: None declared, Ariane Klein: None declared, Martina Niewerth: None declared, Tilmann Kallinich: None declared, Daniel Windschall: None declared, Johannes-Peter Haas: None declared, Frank Weller-Heinemann Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, SOBI, Roche, Novartis, Toni Hospach: None declared, Frank Dressler: None declared, Kirsten Minden: None declared, Gerd Horneff: None declared

OP0163 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ETANERCEPT BIOSIMILAR AND ORIGINATOR USE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: DATA FROM THE GERMAN BIKER-REGISTRY

Background:

In 2017, 2 Etanercept biosimilars became approved. Comparative studies performed in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or psoriasis by extrapolation led to approval for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Objectives:

So far there is limited experience with Etanercept biosimilars in JIA: The large national data base of the BIKER-registry was used to describe experience with Etanercept biosimilars in clinical practice.

Methods:

In this retrospective analysis patients exposed to ETA were identified in the German BIKER-registry and grouped into cohorts according to initiation of treatment after 2017, use of the originator and of biosimilars. The course of JADAS10, Physician global assessment VAS 0–100-mm, Parent/patient global assessment VAS 0–100-cm, Active joint count 0-71, truncated at 10, ESR and CHAQ-DI was analyzed. Descriptive statistics was used for demographic, clinical data, drug exposure, adverse events (AEs) and events of special interest (ESI).

Results:

Until 31.10.2020, 2917 JIA patients were reported to have received Etanercept. Since January 1 2017, in 39 centres treatment with Etanercept was started in 439 patients (377 (85.9%) started with the originator and 62 (14.1%) started a Biosimilar). Biosimilars were prescribed n 17 centres (44%). In 12 centres (31%), Etanercept biosimilars were used first line in 62 patients. In 17 centres (44%), 63 patients switched for the originator to a biosimilar. 3 patients reswitched from the biosimilar to the originator. 4 patient switched from a biosimilar to the originator). 22 centres (56%) had not prescribed a biosimilars so far.

In not a single centre, initiation of a biosimilar was more frequent than of the originator.

The patients’ characteristics and disease activity parameters were widely comparanble. Patients receiving biosimilar first line were slightly older at disease onset and had a longer disease duration. Patients receiving biosimilar first line had more often rheumatoid factor (RF) negative polyarthritis while extended oligoarthritis was more frequent in the originator cohort. In the switching cohort, more patients had extended oligoarthritis and fewer had RF negative polyarthritis and ERA JIA.

No difference in disease activity parameters was noted, neither at baseline, during the course of treatment nor at last observation upon treatment. A decrease of the JADAS10 indicates improvement in both groups (Figure 1). At the time of switching, 68% had JADAS minimal disease activity (MDA) and 43% were in JASDAS remission. At month 6 and 12 these numbers increased to 74%/65% and 62%/50%.

In total, 66 adverse events (AE) were reported in 45 patients upon biosimilar treatment.

33 patients had 1, 5 patients 2, 5 patients had 3 and 2 reported 4 events. Adverse event of special interest were hypersensitivity n=1, injection site reaction n=1, new onset of psoriasis n=1, celiac disease n=1, Crohn‘s diesease n=1, elevated transaminases n=2, depression n=1 and disease deterioration (arthritis flare) in n=21. In 20 patients, the etanercept biosimilar was discontinued.

Conclusion:

This analysis is the first attempt to present a large data sample on JIA patients exposed to Etanercept biosimilars. Biosimilar were used in a minority of patients and by a minority of centers although no difference in efficacy or safety was noted from our analysis. Until today, the use of the originator is by far exceeding the use of biosimilars. The prescription of a biosimilar either first line or by switching from the originator is limited to a part of centres. Differences in efficacy between first line biosimilar users and originator users could not be observed. Also, after switching, no loss of efficacy was observed.

Disclosure of Interests:

Gerd Horneff Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Daniel Windschall: None declared, Toni Hospach: None declared, Sonja Mrusek: None declared, Michael Rühlmann: None declared, Ariane Klein: None declared

POS1303 EXPERIENCE WITH ADALIMUMAB BIOSIMILAR USE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: DATA FROM THE GERMAN BIKER-REGISTRY

Background:

In 2017, Adalimumab Biosimilars became approved. Comparative studies to the originator have been performed in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriasis and extrapolation led to approval for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Objectives:

So far there is limited experience with biosimilars in JIA: The large national data base of the BIKER-registry was used to describe experience with Adalimumab biosimilars in clinical practice

Methods:

This retrospective analysis used data of the German BIKER-registry. The data basis war screened for patients exposed to Adalimumab. Subcohorts with initiation of treatment after 2017, use of the originator and of biosimilars were built. The course of JADAS10, Physician global assessment VAS 0–100-mm, Parent/patient global assessment VAS 0–100-cm, Active joint count 0-71, truncated at 10, ESR and CHAQ-DI was analyzed. Descriptive statistics was used for demographic, clinical data, drug exposure, adverse events (AEs) and events of special interest (ESI).

Results:

Until 31.10.2020, 1173 JIA patients were reported to have received Adalimumab. 352 treatments have been started after January 1, 2017. A biosimilar was used first line in 44 patients. Further 55 patients switched for the originator to a biosimilar. 2 patient switched from a biosimilar to the originator. 3 patients switched to a second biosimilar while 5 patients who switched from the originator to a biosimilar reswitched back to the originator.

After 2017, 33 pediatric rheumatology centres reported initiation of Adalimumab treatment. 17 have used a biosimilar. 15 centres have swichted at least 1 patient from the originator to a biosimilar and 14 have used first line a biosimilar in at least 1 patient. In a single centre, initiation of a biosimilar was used more frequently (8 versus 7).

The patients’ characteristics and disease activity parameters were brightly comparable. The JIA category rheumatoid factor (RF) negative polyarthritis was less frequent in the biosimilar first cohort while RF positive polyarthritis and psoriatic arthritis was more frequent. In patients with idiopathic uveitis the originator was used more often. In the switching cohort, more patients had RF negative polyarthritis, persistent oligoarthritis but less had psoriatic arthritis and no had RF positive polyarthritis.

No difference in disease activity parameters between patients receiving the originator or biosimilars were noted, neither at baseline, during the course of treatment nor at last observation upon treatment (Figure 1). At the time of switching, 46 (92%) had JADAS minimal disease activity (MDA) and 30 (69%) were in JASDAS remission. At last observation, those numbers were comparable with 42 (86%) with JADAS MDA and 28 (57%) with JADAS remission.

In total, 45 adverse events (AE) were reported in 45 patients upon biosimilar treatment. 26 patients had 1, 12 patients had 2 and 6 patients reported 3 and 1 reported 4 events. Adverse event of special interest were Infection associated leukopenia (n=1), COVID 19 infection (n=1), Uveitis flare (n=8), other disease deterioration (arthritis flare) (n=20), injection site reaction n=2. A single serious AE was reported. A 16 year old female adolescent was admitted for unexpected CK elevation. In 10 patients, Adalimumab was discontinued, in 2 it was temporarily paused.

Conclusion:

This article is the first attempt to present a large sample of data on JIA patients exposed to Adalimumab biosimilars. Since approval of Adalimumab-Biosimilars, limited experience from clinical practice is available. Biosimilars are used in a minority of patients and by a minority of centers although no difference in efficacy or safety was noted from our analysis.

Disclosure of Interests:

Gerd Horneff Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Sobi, Grant/research support from: MSD, Roche, Frank Dressler: None declared, Michael Rühlmann: None declared, Tilmann Geikowski: None declared, Sonja Mrusek: None declared, Ariane Klein: None declared

POS1199 CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF SARS-CoV2 INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULUSKELETAL DISEASES – SURVEY DATA FROM GERMANY

Background:

Although children and adolescents are less likely to develop COVID-19 and generally show milder disease courses, it is unclear what impact the SARS-CoV2 infection has on children and adolescents with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMD). Due to their underlying disease as well as therapeutic immunosuppression these patients may be at higher risk of being more severely affected by SARS-CoV2. Furthermore, SARS-CoV2 infection might trigger a flare of the underlying disease.

Objectives:

To evaluate clinical characteristics and disease course of COVID-19 in children and adolescents with RMD and to analyze possible effects of SARS-CoV2 infection on the underlying disease under different therapeutic regimens.

Methods:

Data from juvenile patients with RMD recorded via the SARS-CoV2 questionnaire within the National Pediatric Rheumatology Database and the registry for hospitalized children and adolescents with COVID-19 of the German Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases were analyzed. In addition to age, sex and diagnosis, information was collected about the date and method of a positive SARS-CoV2 testing, reason for testing, on clinical manifestations, disease course, treatment and outcome of COVID-19, on drug therapy at the time of virus detection, on disease activity (NRS 0 – 10, 0 = best) of the underlying disease at the last visit before and after the SARS-CoV2 infection.

Results:

From April 17th 2020 until January 25th 2021, data of 67 patients with RMD and confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection were collected. Mean age was 13.5 ± 3.9 years with equal sex distribution. The majority of patients were diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA, 64%), 12 (18%) patients had an autoinflammatory disease (FMF, CAPS, PFAPA, TRAPS) and 5 (7%) a connective tissue disease. Fifty-two patients (78%) were treated with a disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), 39% with a biological DMARD and 9% systemic glucocorticoids at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nineteen patients (28%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 because of typical symptoms, the majority (67%) because of contact to an infected person. PCR was used most often (in 60 %).

52 patients (78%) developed symptoms of COVID-19, 15 patients remained asymptomatic. The most common symptom of COVID-19 was rhinitis (42%) and fever (38%), followed by fatigue (34%), taste/smell disorder (33%), sore throat (27%) and cough (23%).

Disease severity was graded as mild in 44 of 52 (85%) symptomatic patients, only two patients were hospitalized, one of whom required intensive care and died of cardiorespiratory failure 3 days after symptom onset. In 22 of 26 (85%) SARS-CoV2-positive patients, no relevant increase in disease activity (difference in NRS ≤ 1 before/after infection) of the underlying disease was observed 31 days after symptom onset (median, IQR 17-52 days). One patient, who had paused tocilizumab for 2 doses, experienced a flare of his seronegative polyarthritis 2 months after asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Conclusion:

In our cohort, the clinical picture of COVID-19 in children and adolescents with RMD was similar to that of healthy peers. The majority of patients showed mild disease course with good outcome under various medications, however, one patient with a severe course of COVID-19 died. In addition, SARS-CoV2 infection does not appear to have a relevant impact on the underlying disease activity, whereas discontinuation of therapy might pose a risk of flare.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

Computer-assisted contralateral side comparison of the ankle joint using flat panel technology

PURPOSE

Reduction and osteosynthesis of ankle fractures is a challenging surgical procedure when it comes to the verification of the reduction result. Evaluation is conducted using intra-operative imaging of the injured ankle and depends on the expertise of the surgeon. Studies suggest that intra-individual variance of the ankle bone shape and pose is considerably lower than the inter-individual variance. It stands to reason that the information gain from the healthy contralateral side can help to improve the evaluation.

METHOD

In this paper, an assistance system is proposed that provides a side-to-side view of the two ankle joints for visual comparison and instant evaluation using only one 3D C-arm image. Two convolutional neural networks (CNN) are employed to extract the relevant image regions and pose information of each ankle so that they can be aligned with each other. A first U-Net uses a sliding window to predict the location of each ankle. The standard plane estimation is formulated as segmentation problem so that a second U-Net predicts the three viewing planes for alignment.

RESULTS

Experiments were conducted to assess the accuracy of the individual steps on 218 unilateral ankle datasets as well as the overall performance on 7 bilateral ankle datasets. The experiments on unilateral ankles yield a median position-to-plane error of [Formula: see text] mm and a median angular error between 2.98[Formula: see text] and 3.71[Formula: see text] for the plane normals.

CONCLUSION

Standard plane estimation via segmentation outperforms direct pose regression. Furthermore, the complete pipeline was evaluated including ankle detection and subsequent plane estimation on bilateral datasets. The proposed pipeline enables a direct contralateral side comparison without additional radiation. This has the potential to ease and improve the intra-operative evaluation for the surgeons in the future and reduce the need for revision surgery.

[Age at diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder depending on ethno-cultural background or migratory status: A systematic literature review]

INTRODUCTION

The early identification and access to health care of toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) - or at risk of developing it - is a crucial public health issue, as care and intervention may be more effective in younger children in order to improve their development and prognosis. However, there are still disparities in identification and health care access for children with ASD despite better screening methods. Given that misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are often due to the cultural gap between clinician and patient in some psychiatric disorders such as depression or schizophrenia, we examined this question concerning ASD and wondered to what extent ethno-cultural or migratory status might have an impact on the age at which a child is diagnosed. The only published review looking for independent factors influencing age of diagnosis concludes that the factors that have been proved to play a role are: socioeconomic status; symptom severity; level of parental concern, and family interactions with the health and education systems prior to diagnosis. The impact of ethno-cultural or migratory status is less clear. And yet, all these factors may be interconnected: migrants have on average a lower socioeconomic status, minorities don't have the same access to health care, and cultural background can have an influence on what is expected of a child's development and health. In order to try and clarify this issue and to analyze the way in which the international literature approaches the subject, we carried out a systematic review.

METHOD

Six databases were interrogated: Pubmed, Embase, Psychinfo, WebOfScience, Cochrane and Cinahl using the key words "ASD", "pervasive developmental disorder", "diagnosis", "age", "migrant", "ethnicity", "cross cultural". We narrowed neither the period of time not selected the articles by their method, as our objective was to collect the entirety of the articles written on the subject. We completed this review by including the pertinent references made in the articles.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included, all epidemiological and observational, about children diagnosed in specialized centers. Published between 2002 and 2019, they cover a 20-year research period, between 1992 and 2016. The methods are disparate: the diagnosis criteria used are from DSM IV, IV TR and ICD; data originate from medical records, phone or internet surveys, and Medicaid healthcare claims. Comparison of the age at diagnosis is the principal objective for only thirteen studies; statistical data analyses vary, especially concerning adjustments. Seventy-five percent of the articles originate from North America where the compared populations are defined by ethnic and racial categories that are not used in some other countries, notably in Europe. Only five explore the link between migratory status and age at diagnosis. The research results concerning the impact of ethnicity are contradictory, while those concerning migratory status seem to indicate that migrant children are likely to be diagnosed later. But the articles and their methods being too heterogeneous, it was difficult to make a meta-analysis and impossible to reach a scientific conclusion.

CONCLUSION

Nevertheless, this review highlights the existence of a lot of confounding factors and raises many issues. It shows that the United States produces most of the studies whose conclusions cannot be generalized because of the particular history and organization of this country. In Europe, where belonging to minority groups is thought to be through migratory status, studies are rare. There is an urgent need for new research in order to clarify the connection between migratory status and socioeconomic factors, to precisely define the independent variables influencing diagnosis -such as access to healthcare- and finally to explore the possibility of different symptomatic expressions depending on cultural backgrounds. This review falls within studies currently carried out by the psychiatric service at Avicenne hospital in Bobigny, France about ASD in a transcultural context.

Characterization of one anastomosis gastric bypass and impact of biliary and common limbs on bile acid and postprandial glucose metabolism in a minipig model

The alimentary limb has been proposed to be a key driver of the weight-loss-independent metabolic improvements that occur upon bariatric surgery. However, the one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedure, consisting of one long biliary limb and a short common limb, induces similar beneficial metabolic effects compared to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) in humans, despite the lack of an alimentary limb. The aim of this study was to assess the role of the length of biliary and common limbs in the weight loss and metabolic effects that occur upon OAGB. OAGB and sham surgery, with or without modifications of the length of either the biliary limb or the common limb, were performed in Gottingen minipigs. Weight loss, metabolic changes, and the effects on plasma and intestinal bile acids (BAs) were assessed 15 days after surgery. OAGB significantly decreased body weight, improved glucose homeostasis, increased postprandial GLP-1 and fasting plasma BAs, and qualitatively changed the intestinal BA species composition. Resection of the biliary limb prevented the body weight loss effects of OAGB and attenuated the postprandial GLP-1 increase. Improvements in glucose homeostasis along with changes in plasma and intestinal BAs occurred after OAGB regardless of the biliary limb length. Resection of only the common limb reproduced the glucose homeostasis effects and the changes in intestinal BAs. Our results suggest that the changes in glucose metabolism and BAs after OAGB are mainly mediated by the length of the common limb, whereas the length of the biliary limb contributes to body weight loss.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Common limb mediates postprandial glucose metabolism change after gastric bypass whereas biliary limb contributes to weight loss.

Outcome of children with oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis compared to polyarthritis on methotrexate- data of the German BIKER registry

BACKGROUND

Oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (oligoJIA) is the most commonly diagnosed category of chronic arthritis in children. Nevertheless, there are no evidence- based guidelines for its treatment, in particular for the use of methotrexate (MTX). The primary objective of this analysis is to evaluate the outcomes in patients with persistent oligoJIA compared to those with extended oligoJIA and rheumatoid factor (RF) negative polyarthritis treated with methotrexate.

METHODS

Patients with persistent or extended oligoJIA or RF negative PA recorded in the Biologics in Pediatric Rheumatology Registry (BiKeR), receiving methotrexate for the first time were included in the analyses. Efficacy was determined using the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (JADAS 10). Safety assessment included the documentation of adverse and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

From 2005 through 2011, 1056 patients were included: 370 patients with persistent oligoJIA, 221 patients with extended oligoJIA and 467 patients with RF negative PA. Therapeutic efficacy was observed following the start of methotrexate. Over a period of 24 months JADAS-minimal disease activity (JADAS ≤2) was reached in 44% of patients with persistent oligoJIA, 38% with extended oligoJIA, 46% with RF negative PA, JADAS-remission defined as JADAS ≤1 was reached in 33% of patients with persistent oligoJIA, 29% with extended oligoJIA and 35% (RF negative PA). Patients with extended oligoJIA achieved JADAS remission significantly later and received additional biologic disease-modifying drugs significantly more often than patients with persistent oligoJIA or RF negative PA (p < 0.001). Tolerability was comparable. New onset uveitis occurred in 0.3 to 2.2 per 100 patient years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with persistent oligoJIA taking methotrexate are at least as likely to enter remission as patients with extended oligo JIA or polyarticular JIA. Patients with extended oligoJIA achieved JADAS remission significantly later. Within 2 years, almost half of the patients with persistent oligoJIA achieved JADAS-minimal disease activity.

Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure by echocardiography: incremental diagnostic information from left atrial strain

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority

Background

Elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is an important diagnostic feature of heart failure.

Objectives

To investigate determinants of left atrial (LA) reservoir and pump strain and if these parameters may serve as markers of LV filling pressure.

Methods

In a multicenter study of 322 patients with cardiovascular disease of different etiologies, LA strain by speckle tracking echocardiography was compared to conventional echocardiographic markers using invasive pressure as reference.

Results

Left ventricular filling pressure correlated well with LA reservoir and pump strain (r-values

‑0.52 and ‑0.57, respectively) (Figure). However, LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was the strongest determinant of LA reservoir strain (r = 0.64), and correlated well with LA pump strain (r = 0.51).  For both LA strains, association with filling pressure was strongest in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction. In patients with normal GLS (≥18%), atrial strains provided no information regarding filling pressure (Figure). Reservoir strain &lt;18% and pump strain &lt;8% predicted elevated LV filling pressure better (p &lt; 0.05) than the conventional indices LA volume, ratio of mitral early filling velocity/annular velocity and tricuspid regurgitation velocity. Accuracy to classify filling pressure as normal or elevated was 75% for both LA strains . When any one of the conventional indices were missing, and were replaced by LA strains, the combination of indices had accuracy 82% to correctly classify filling pressure.

Conclusions

Left atrial reservoir and pump strain may serve as clinical markers of LV filling pressure, but will be useful predominantly in patients with reduced systolic function.  Due to limited diagnostic accuracy, LA strain should be used in combination with other indices.

Abstract Figure

Racial disparities in COVID-19 hospitalizations do not lead to disparities in outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is the identification of racial differences in characteristics and comorbidities in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and the impact on outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

The study design is a retrospective observational study.

METHODS

Data for all patients admitted to seven community hospitals in Michigan, United States, with polymerase chain reaction confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 from March 10 to April 15, 2020 were analyzed. The primary outcomes of racial disparity in inpatient mortality and intubation were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

The study included 336 Black and 408 White patients. Black patients were younger (62.9 ± 15.0 years vs 71.8 ± 16.4, P < .001), had a higher mean body mass index (32.4 ± 8.6 kg/m2 vs 28.8 ± 7.5, P < .001), had higher prevalence of diabetes (136/336 vs 130/408, P = .02), and presented later (6.6 ± 5.3 days after symptom onset vs. 5.4 ± 5.4, P = .006) compared with White patients. Younger Black patients had a higher prevalence of obesity (age <65 years, 69.9%) than older Black patients (age >65 years, 39.2%) and younger White patients (age < 65, 55.1%). Intubation did not reach statistical significance for racial difference (Black patients 61/335 vs. 54/406, P = .08). Mortality was not higher in Black patients (65/335 vs. 142/406 in White patients, odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 0.99, 2-sided P = .05) in multivariate analysis, accounting for other risk factors associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher prevalence of obesity and diabetes in young Black populations may be the critical factor driving disproportionate COVID-19 hospitalizations in Black populations. Hospitalized Black patients do not have worse outcomes compared with White patients.

Description of Participants in the "Atout Age Mobility" Prevention Workshops at the University Hospital Center of La Réunion: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

As the population ages, loss of autonomy is becoming a priority public health issue. "Atout Age Mobility" prevention interventions for seniors aim to limit frailty, which is a predictive and reversible factor in the loss of autonomy and disability.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to describe the impact of these interventions on the physical performance and quality of life of a pilot sample of participants.

DESIGN

We conducted a prospective study named 5P PILOT with 3 months of follow up.

SETTINGS

Subjects were recruited by convenience sampling from participants in the "Atout Age Mobility" workshops at Saint Joseph from 04/09/2017 to 29/01/2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Retired people over 55 years old with no contraindications to physical activity recruited from participants in the "Atout Age Mobility" workshops in Saint Joseph. Intervention(s) (for clinical trials) or Exposure(s) (for observational studies): All participants completed 12 weeks of physical exercise called the "Atout Age Mobility" workshop, which lasted 60 minutes each week and was supervised by physical activity coaches. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): Physical performance was assessed by Short physical performance battery (SPPB), 10-m gait speed and grip strength measurement. Quality of life through the SF-36 test.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were included and 55 (57.3%) completed the study. There was a significant improvement in gait speed (1.35±0.26m/s vs. 1.27±0.24m/s; p=0.008). There was no significant change in SF-36, grip strength dominant arm and SPPB at the 0.01 significance level.

CONCLUSION

The "Atout Ages Mobility" workshops seem to significantly improve gait speed but not other aspects of physical performance or quality of life.

Safety and efficacy of anakinra as first-line or second-line therapy for systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis - data from the German BIKER registry

Background: The IL-1 receptor-antagonist anakinra is recommended for the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and was recently approved for first-line treatment. Long-term data from clinical practise are scarce. Methods: SJIA patients from the German biologics in pediatric rheumatology (BIKER) registry starting anakinra were grouped into two cohorts: Patients in the first-line cohort received no prior sJIA treatment except NSAID and a maximum of 3 days of steroids. Second-line cohort patients were pre-treated with steroids; DMARDs or biologics. Patient characteristics, disease-activity parameters, efficacy, and safety-parameters were compared. Results: Until December 2018, 51 anakinra patients were documented, representing 117.96 patient-years. Mean disease duration was 3.5 (± 3.8) years. At baseline, all anakinra first-line users had active systemic disease compared to 82% in the second-line users. Significant JADAS-10 improvement at last follow-up was observed in both cohorts (p = 0.02, p = 0.0014). Substantial numbers of patients in both groups reached JADAS-MDA/JADAS-remission/inactive disease (66.7%50%50% in first-liners and 60%45%70% in second-liners). Rates of serious adverse events were comparable and consistent with the overall AE profile of anakinra in patients. Conclusion: This analysis adds to the established safety profile of anakinra and demonstrates that anakinra is effective as first-line or second-line treatment.