Selegiline transdermal system (STS) as an aid for smoking cessation

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the efficacy and safety of selegiline transdermal system (STS) and brief repeated behavioral intervention (BRBI) for smoking cessation in heavy smokers. We hypothesized that the quit rate of subjects who received STS and BRBI would be significantly greater than that of those who received placebo patch and BRBI.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study in which 246 men and women were randomized to receive either STS (n = 121) or placebo patch (n =125) for 9 weeks. Recruitment targeted heavy smokers, defined as individuals with self-reported use of ≥15 cigarettes/day in the 30 days prior to enrollment, who had smoked cigarettes for the past 5 years, and had an expired CO level ≥9 ppm during screening.

RESULTS

Although STS was well tolerated, the overall results indicated that STS with BRBI was not more effective than placebo plus BRBI for smoking cessation (p = .58).

CONCLUSIONS

The results are discussed in relation to interventions for heavy smokers. Although 2 trials using oral selegiline both showed trends toward improved abstinence, these results indicate that STS with BRBI was not an effective aid for smoking cessation at the end of treatment (10 weeks), 14, or 26 weeks.

Efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine XR 400/600/800mg/day in acute schizophrenia: a post-hoc analysis of data from two pooled randomised studies

Introduction

Data from two, identically designed, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind clinical trials (D1444C00132+D1444C00133) for once-daily extended-release quetiapine fumarate (QTP-XR) were pooled and analysed.

Objective

Evaluate dose response, efficacy and safety for QTP-XR in schizophrenia.

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of data from patients receiving QTP-XR 400, 600, 800 mg/day or placebo. Endpoints: least squares means (LSM) change from baseline to Day 42 in PANSS total and positive and negative subscale scores. No corrections for multiplicity were performed. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

Results

914 patients were included; PANSS scores were assessed in the MITT population (n = 889). LSM change from baseline in PANSS total score diverged significantly from placebo at: Day 14 for QTP-XR 800 mg/day (-15.3 vs -12.1 for placebo; p = 0.018); Day 21 for 600 mg/day (-17.3 vs -14.2; p = 0.039); Day 42 for 400 mg/day (-19.2 vs -15.4; p = 0.033).

Jonckheere-Terpstra analysis of change in PANSS total score at Day 42 showed a significant QTP-XR dose response (p = 0.0196; p < 0.001 with placebo). PANSS positive scores diverged by Day 21 for both QTP-XR 800 (-5.7 vs -4.8; p = 0.049) and 600 mg/day (-5.8 vs -4.8; p = 0.046). PANSS negative scores diverged by Day 21 (-4.0 vs -3.2; p = 0.040) and 42 (-4.8 vs -3.6; p = 0.009) for QTP-XR 800 and 600 mg/day, respectively. AEs occurred in 59.4%, 66.5%, 62.1% and 56.2% of patients in the QTP-XR 800, 600, 400 mg/day and placebo groups, respectively. Most common AEs were somnolence, dry mouth, sedation, insomnia, dizziness, headache, constipation and nausea.

Conclusions

QTP-XR was generally well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy that increased with dose in schizophrenia.

Financial support: AstraZeneca.

[Bastiaans' war: a sobering picture]

BACKGROUND

Recently Bram Enning published his thesis about the Leiden professor J. Bastiaans. After the Second World War Bastiaans treated resistance fighters with a controversial method that involved the use of LSD.

AIM

To paint a picture of Bastiaans’ career and working method and of the controversies that his method caused.

METHOD

Enning’s thesis is discussed.

RESULTS

It is revealing to read how unscientific Bastiaans’ method actually was and it is shocking to see how politics did its utmost to defend his method.

CONCLUSION

The case of Bastiaans makes it clear that in our society scientific values are apparently less relevant than political and social desirability.

AICAR and metformin, but not exercise, increase muscle glucose transport through AMPK-, ERK-, and PDK1-dependent activation of atypical PKC

Activators of 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-d-ribofuranoside (AICAR), metformin, and exercise activate atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and ERK and stimulate glucose transport in muscle by uncertain mechanisms. Here, in cultured L6 myotubes: AICAR- and metformin-induced activation of AMPK was required for activation of aPKC and ERK; aPKC activation involved and required phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) phosphorylation of Thr410-PKC-zeta; aPKC Thr410 phosphorylation and activation also required MEK1-dependent ERK; and glucose transport effects of AICAR and metformin were inhibited by expression of dominant-negative AMPK, kinase-inactive PDK1, MEK1 inhibitors, kinase-inactive PKC-zeta, and RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated knockdown of PKC-zeta. In mice, muscle-specific aPKC (PKC-lambda) depletion by conditional gene targeting impaired AICAR-stimulated glucose disposal and stimulatory effects of both AICAR and metformin on 2-deoxyglucose/glucose uptake in muscle in vivo and AICAR stimulation of 2-[(3)H]deoxyglucose uptake in isolated extensor digitorum longus muscle; however, AMPK activation was unimpaired. In marked contrast to AICAR and metformin, treadmill exercise-induced stimulation of 2-deoxyglucose/glucose uptake was not inhibited in aPKC-knockout mice. Finally, in intact rodents, AICAR and metformin activated aPKC in muscle, but not in liver, despite activating AMPK in both tissues. The findings demonstrate that in muscle AICAR and metformin activate aPKC via sequential activation of AMPK, ERK, and PDK1 and the AMPK/ERK/PDK1/aPKC pathway is required for metformin- and AICAR-stimulated increases in glucose transport. On the other hand, although aPKC is activated by treadmill exercise, this activation is not required for exercise-induced increases in glucose transport, and therefore may be a redundant mechanism.

Insulin receptor and IGF1R are not required for oocyte growth, differentiation, and maturation in mice

In mammals, insulin and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs: IGF1 and IGF2) act through 2 structurally related receptors, the insulin receptor (INSR) and the type 1 IGF receptor (IGF1R), both of which are expressed in developing oocytes. IGF1 plays an important role in female reproduction, and female Igf1 knockout mice fail to ovulate and are infertile. On the other hand, little is known about the in vivo role of the insulin signaling pathway in oocytes during follicular development, although exposure to insulin or IGF1 in vitro improves oocyte maturation. To further address the significance of insulin/IGF signaling, we used conditional mutant mice and ablated the function of the genes encoding INSR, IGF1R, or both receptors specifically in developing mouse oocytes. Our genetic evidence showed unexpectedly that the female reproductive functions are not affected when Insr, Igf1r or both Insr;Igf1r are ablated in oocytes, as the female mice are fertile and exhibit normal estrous cyclicity, oocyte development and maturation, parturition frequency, and litter size. In view of these novel observations indicating that the insulin/IGF signaling is not essential in oocytes, the IGF1-dependent female fertility is re-evaluated and discussed.

Modafinil for the treatment of cocaine dependence

AIM

Modafinil was tested for efficacy in facilitating abstinence in cocaine-dependent patients, compared to placebo.

METHODS

This was a double-blind placebo-controlled study, with 12 weeks of treatment and a 4-week follow-up. Six outpatient substance abuse treatment clinics participated in the study. There were 210 treatment-seekers randomized, having a diagnosis of cocaine dependence; 72 participants were randomized to placebo, 69 to modafinil 200mg, and 69 to modafinil 400mg, taken once daily on awakening. Participants came to the clinic three times per week for assessments and urine drug screens, and had one hour of individual psychotherapy weekly. The primary outcome measure was the weekly percentage of cocaine non-use days.

RESULTS

The GEE regression analysis showed that for the total sample, there was no significant difference between either modafinil group and placebo in the change in average weekly percent of cocaine non-use days over the 12-week treatment period (p>0.79). However, two secondary outcomes showed significant effects by modafinil 200mg: the maximum number of consecutive non-use days for cocaine (p=0.02), and a reduction in craving (p=0.04). Also, a post hoc analysis showed a significant effect of modafinil that increased the weekly percentage of non-use days in the subgroup of those cocaine patients who did not have a history of alcohol dependence (p<0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that modafinil, in combination with individual behavioral therapy, was effective for increasing cocaine non-use days in participants without co-morbid alcohol dependence, and in reducing cocaine craving.

Multi-center trial of baclofen for abstinence initiation in severe cocaine-dependent individuals

Cocaine dependence is a major public health problem for which there is no FDA-approved pharmacological treatment. Baclofen is a GABA(B) receptor agonist that in preclinical and early pilot clinical trials has shown promise for the treatment of cocaine dependence. The purpose of this multi-site, double-blind study, was to compare the safety and efficacy of baclofen (60 mg/day) vs placebo in an 8-week treatment of individuals with severe cocaine dependence. The primary outcome measure was subjects' self-reported cocaine use substantiated by urine benzoylecgonine (BE). Analysis of the data did not show a significant difference between the groups treated with baclofen and placebo. The current results do not support a role for 60 mg baclofen in treating cocaine dependence in the population studied. The contrast of this result to earlier, preclinical and human pilot data with baclofen may reflect the trial's focus on severe cocaine-dependent users, and/or the need for a higher baclofen dose. Baclofen's potential as a relapse prevention agent was not tested by the current design, but may be a useful target for future studies.

Bupropion for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence

Bupropion was tested for efficacy in increasing weeks of abstinence in methamphetamine-dependent patients, compared to placebo. This was a double-blind placebo-controlled study, with 12 weeks of treatment and a 30-day follow-up. Five outpatient substance abuse treatment clinics located west of the Mississippi participated in the study. One hundred and fifty-one treatment-seekers with DSM-IV diagnosis of methamphetamine dependence were consented and enrolled. Seventy-two participants were randomized to placebo and 79 to sustained-release bupropion 150 mg twice daily. Patients were asked to come to the clinic three times per week for assessments, urine drug screens, and 90-min group psychotherapy. The primary outcome was the change in proportion of participants having a methamphetamine-free week. Secondary outcomes included: urine for quantitative methamphetamine, self-report of methamphetamine use, subgroup analyses of balancing factors and comorbid conditions, addiction severity, craving, risk behaviors for HIV, and use of other substances. The generalized estimating equation regression analysis showed that, overall, the difference between bupropion and placebo groups in the probability of a non-use week over the 12-week treatment period was not statistically significant (p=0.09). Mixed model regression was used to allow adjustment for baseline factors in addition to those measured (site, gender, level of baseline use, and level of symptoms of depression). This subgroup analysis showed that bupropion had a significant effect compared to placebo, among male patients who had a lower level of methamphetamine use at baseline (p<0.0001). Comorbid depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder did not change the outcome. These data suggest that bupropion, in combination with behavioral group therapy, was effective for increasing the number of weeks of abstinence in participants with low-to-moderate methamphetamine dependence, mainly male patients, regardless of their comorbid condition.

A preliminary randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ondansetron in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence

Methamphetamine dependence is an increasing public health problem in the United States. No efficacious medication for methamphetamine dependence has been developed. As ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and modulator of cortico-mesolimbic dopamine function, has been shown to reduce some of the rewarding effects of d-amphetamine in animal and human laboratory studies, we decided to test whether it would be superior to placebo at reducing methamphetamine use. In a preliminary, multi-site, randomized, double-blind, 8-wk controlled trial, 150 methamphetamine-dependent men and women received ondansetron (0.25 mg, 1 mg, or 4 mg b.i.d.) or placebo. Participants were assessed on several measures of methamphetamine use including urine methamphetamine level up to three times per week. As a psychosocial adjunct to the medication condition, cognitive behavioural therapy also was administered three times per week. Ondansetron was well tolerated and was less likely than placebo to be associated with serious adverse events. Nevertheless, none of the ondansetron doses was superior to placebo at decreasing any of the measures of methamphetamine use, withdrawal, craving, or clinical severity of methamphetamine dependence. Our preliminary results do not support the utility of ondansetron, at the doses tested, as a treatment for methamphetamine dependence. These findings should be viewed in light of the possibility that a less intensive cognitive behavioural therapy regimen might have yielded more positive results in this initial phase II trial exploring for the efficacy of ondansetron.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tiagabine for the treatment of cocaine dependence

BACKGROUND

The potential efficacy of tiagabine for treating cocaine dependence is suggested by both pre-clinical research and two small clinical trials.

METHOD

One hundred and forty one participants who met DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence were enrolled into this 12-week, double blind, placebo controlled outpatient trial. Participants received either tiagabine (20 mg/day) or matching placebo. All participants received 1h of manualized individual cognitive behavioral therapy on a weekly basis. Outcome measures included cocaine use as determined by self-report confirmed with urine benzoylecgonine (BE) results, and qualitative and quantitative urine toxicology measures. Safety measures included adverse events, EKGs, vital signs, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine participants (i.e., 56%) completed the 12-week trial. The safety results suggest that tiagabine was safe and generally well tolerated by the participants. Participants in both groups improved significantly on cocaine craving and global functioning, with no significant differences between the groups. There were no significant changes in cocaine use as measured by self-report confirmed by urine BE or by quantitative urine toxicology results. Qualitative urine toxicology results suggest a possible weak effect for tiagabine in reducing cocaine use.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that tiagabine, at a dose of 20 mg/day, did not have a robust effect in decreasing cocaine use.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of reserpine for the treatment of cocaine dependence

BACKGROUND

Cocaine's increase of dopamine is strongly associated with its reinforcing properties and, thus, agents that reduce dopamine have received much attention as candidate cocaine-dependence treatments. The potential efficacy of reserpine, a dopamine depletor, for treating cocaine dependence is suggested by both pre-clinical research and a small clinical trial.

METHOD

One hundred and nineteen participants who met DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence were enrolled into this 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient trial. Participants received either reserpine (0.5 mg/day) or matching placebo. All participants received 1h of manualized individual cognitive behavioral therapy on a weekly basis. Outcome measures included cocaine use as determined by self-report confirmed with urine benzoylecgonine results, cocaine craving, addiction severity index scores, and clinical global impression scores. Safety measures included adverse events, EKGs, vital signs, laboratory tests, and the Hamilton Depression Inventory.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine participants (i.e., 66%) completed the 12-week trial. The safety results suggest that reserpine was safe and well tolerated by the participants. The efficacy measures indicated no significant differences between reserpine and placebo.

CONCLUSION

These results do not support the efficacy of reserpine as a cocaine-dependence treatment.

Prevalence of abnormal liver-associated enzymes in cocaine experienced adults versus healthy volunteers during phase 1 clinical trials

The frequency and nature of elevation of liver-associated enzymes (LAE) are important safety endpoints in Phase 1 clinical trials of new anti-cocaine agents, yet very little information is available on the prevalence of abnormal LAE in cocaine experienced adults. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the alterations of liver-associated enzymes (LAE) aspartate- (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), and bilirubin in healthy "normal" (HN) and cocaine experienced (actively using cocaine preadmission (CE)) adults participating in long term inpatient clinical trials. We examined LAE values collected from 3 inpatient Phase 1 trials of anti-cocaine agents. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to determine the significance of various factors on LAE alterations. Gender, baseline BMI, treatment did not demonstrate significant group differences in LAE levels. CE study volunteers were found to have significantly higher AST and ALT values than HN volunteers (P<0.05) during their respective inpatient stays. 94.1% of the 17 subjects with abnormal LAE were CE, and 37.5% of these CE received placebo. In conclusion, despite normal baseline values, most subjects demonstrated an increase in the ALT level even on placebo. For CE subjects, differences (Delta ALT and Delta AST) between baseline and the maximum observed values were significantly higher than that observed for HN subjects. The potential to obscure important signals for hepatotoxicity during Phase 1 research may be higher in the CE study population.