963 THE IMPACT OF AGE, SEX AND MORBIDITY COUNT ON EARLY TERMINATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA FROM CLINICAL TRIALS

Introduction

Multimorbidity is found in around half of people with any long-term condition but is substantially less common in randomised controlled trials (‘trials’). Multimorbidity may diminish a participant’s ability to complete a trial. However, empirical estimates of the association between individual patient characteristics and early termination are lacking.

Method

Individual patient-level data were obtained from Phase 3/4 trials contained within two clinical trial repositories. Eligible trials for inclusion were identified according to pre-specified criteria (PROSPERO CRD42018048202). Within each trial, the association between morbidity count and early termination (failure for any reason to complete the final trial visit) was estimated in logistic regression models, adjusting for age and sex. These estimates were meta-analysed in Bayesian linear models, with partial pooling across index conditions and drug classes. Using these estimates, the impact of morbidity count on early termination was modelled for a set of notional trials.

Results

In 92 trials across 20 index conditions and 17 drug classes, the mean morbidity count ranged from 0.3–2.7. Neither age nor sex was associated with early termination (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98–1.11; OR 1.00, 95% PI 0.95–1.07 respectively). Morbidity count was associated with early termination (OR per additional morbidity: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.14). There was no evidence of non-linearity in the association between morbidity count and early termination, and there was minimal variation across drug classes and index conditions. For a notional trial with high level of early termination in individuals without multimorbidity, doubling the mean morbidity count from 1 to 2 increases risk of early termination from 29% to 31%.

Conclusion

Multimorbidity, irrespective of age and sex, is associated with a relatively modest increased odds of early termination of trial participation. The benefit of increased generalisability of trials by including patients with multimorbidity appears likely to outweigh the disadvantages of lower retention.

955 ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT RATES AS A MARKER OF TRIAL REPRESENTATIVENESS

Introduction

The applicability of randomised controlled trials of pharmacological agents to older people with frailty/multimorbidity is often uncertain, due to concerns that trials are not representative. However, assessing trial representativeness is challenging and complex. We explore an approach assessing trial representativeness by comparing rates of trial Serious Adverse Events (SAEs: most of which reflect hospitalisations/deaths) to rates of hospitalisation/death in routine care (which, in a trial setting, would be SAEs be definition).

Method

We identified 483 trials (n = 636,267) from clinicaltrials.gov across 21 index conditions. A routine care comparison was identified from SAIL databank (n = 2.3 M). SAIL data were used to derive the expected rate of hospitalisations/deaths by age, sex and index condition. We then calculated the expected number of SAEs for each trial compared to the observed number of SAEs (observed/expected SAE ratio). We then re-calculated the observed/expected SAE ratio additionally accounting for comorbidity count in 125 trials for which we accessed individual participant data.

Results

For 12/21 index conditions the observed/expected SAE ratio was <1, indicating fewer SAEs in trials than expected given community rates of hospitalisations and deaths. A further 6/21 had point estimates <1 but the 95% CI included the null. The median observed/expected SAE ratio was 0.60 (95% CI 0.56–0.65; COPD) and the interquartile range was 0.44 (0.34–0.55; Parkinson’s disease) to 0.88 (0.59–1.33; IBD). Higher comorbidity count was associated with SAEs and hospitalisations/deaths across index conditions. For most trials, the observed/expected ratio was attenuated but remained <1 after additionally accounting for comorbidity count.

Conclusion

Trial participants experience fewer SAEs than expected based on age/sex/condition specific hospitalisation/death rates in routine care, confirming the predicted lack of representativeness. This difference is only partially explained by differences in multimorbidity. Assessing observed/expected SAE may help assess applicability of trial findings to older populations in whom multimorbidity and frailty are common.

The Implication of the First Wave of COVID-19 on Mental Health: Results from a Portuguese Sample

The social conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic had a great potential to affect the mental health of individuals. Meta-analyses indicate a rise in these problems in these periods among general populations, patients and health professionals, even with substantial heterogeneous results. This paper examines mental health impacts specifically during the first wave of COVID-19. An online survey was conducted with a Portuguese convenience sample (N = 1.062) comprising questions about substance use, perceived stress, post-traumatic stress disorder and self-damage behaviors. The results concerning substance use show an extensive use of medication to sleep or calm down, especially among women and older respondents, a small percentage of alcohol consumers with a high pattern of use and less frequent cannabis consumption, even with a quarter of users who began only in the COVID-19 period. The rates of perceived stress and PTSD were higher compared with international prevalence estimations during the pandemic conditions. Both correlated measures were worse for women and young people. Another problematic issue was the rate of suicidal ideation, with a relevant proportion of starters during this period. These data reinforce the need to promote access to mental health services.

A Guide to Selecting Participatory Research Methods Based on Project and Partnership Goals

Participatory research engages community stakeholders in the research process, from problem identification and developing the research question, to dissemination of results. There is increasing recognition in the field of health research that community-engaged methods can be used throughout the research process. The volume of guidance for engaging communities and conducting participatory research has grown steadily in the past 40+ years, in many countries and contexts. Further, some institutions now require stakeholder engagement in research as a condition of funding. Interest in collaborating in the research process is also growing among patients and the public. This article provides an overview for selecting participatory research methods based on project and partnerships goals.

Global developments in social prescribing

Social prescribing is an approach that aims to improve health and well-being. It connects individuals to non-clinical services and supports that address social needs, such as those related to loneliness, housing instability and mental health. At the person level, social prescribing can give individuals the knowledge, skills, motivation and confidence to manage their own health and well-being. At the society level, it can facilitate greater collaboration across health, social, and community sectors to promote integrated care and move beyond the traditional biomedical model of health. While the term social prescribing was first popularised in the UK, this practice has become more prevalent and widely publicised internationally over the last decade. This paper aims to illuminate the ways social prescribing has been conceptualised and implemented across 17 countries in Europe, Asia, Australia and North America. We draw from the 'Beyond the Building Blocks' framework to describe the essential inputs for adopting social prescribing into policy and practice, related to service delivery; social determinants and household production of health; workforce; leadership and governance; financing, community organisations and societal partnerships; health technology; and information, learning and accountability. Cross-cutting lessons can inform country and regional efforts to tailor social prescribing models to best support local needs.

The links of stress, substance use and socio-demographic factors with domestic violence during the Covid-19 pandemic in Portugal

BACKGROUND

Lockdown, as a measure implemented to combat the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, left many domestic violence (DV) victims trapped with their abusers. This study intends to explore the links between perceived stress, substance use and socio-demographic factors with DV experiences during COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 1062 participants over 16 years old, residing in Portugal. Data were collected through an online survey conducted between April and October 2020. The associations between potential factors and DV were investigated using bivariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of DV reported was 13.75% (n = 146), disaggregated into psychological violence (13%, n = 138), sexual violence (1.0%, n = 11) and physical violence (0.9%, n = 10). Multivariable analyses confirmed that perceived financial difficulties (OR = 1.608; P = 0.019), use of medications to sleep or calm down (OR = 1.851; P = 0.002) and perceived stress (OR = 2.443; P = 0.003) were responsible for DV exposure during COVID-19 pandemic. Younger age (<25 years old) and consumption of alcohol were associated with a higher risk of DV victimization.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions aimed at preventing and confronting DV are necessary within the strategies to combat COVID-19 in Portugal, especially aimed at groups in vulnerable situations, during and after the pandemic.

Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy after Implementation of a Mass Vaccination Campaign

An online cross-sectional study on COVID-19 vaccination adhesion was conducted in Portugal nine months after vaccination rollout (September–November 2021). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with hesitancy to take the COVID-19 vaccine in the community-based survey, “COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion”. Hesitancy was 11%; however, of those, 60.5% stated that they intended to take the vaccine. Hesitancy was associated with factors such as lower monthly household income; no intention of taking the flu vaccine this year; perceived reasonable health status; having two or more diseases; low confidence in the health service response; worse perception of the adequacy of anti-COVID-19 government measures; low or no perceived risk of getting COVID-19; feeling agitated, anxious or sad some days; and lack of trust in the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Confidence in vaccines, namely against COVID-19, is paramount for public health and should be monitored during vaccination rollout. Clear communication of the risks and benefits of vaccination needs improvement to increase adherence and public confidence.

Non-attendance in cervical cancer screening among migrant women in Portugal: A cross-sectional study

Objectives:

Cervical cancer has a high mortality rate among women worldwide. Although cervical cancer screening (CCS) is an effective strategy in reducing mortality of the disease, inequalities in accessing screening exist, particularly among migrant women. This study aims to characterize migrant women’s participation in CCS and determine factors associated with non-attendance to CCS.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study based on a web-based survey targeting adult migrant women living in Portugal was conducted. Prevalence of non-attendance to CCS was examined, and its associations with socioeconomic, migration-related, and health-related factors were determined using adjusted logistic regression models.

Results:

A total of 1100 migrant women were included in the study. Prevalence of CCS non-attendance was 24.5%. CCS non-attendance was associated with younger age, being born in Africa or Asia, being single/divorced/widowed, never having had a GP appointment in Portugal and not having regular gynecology appointments. Being born in South and Central America, shorter length of stay in Portugal, having had HPV vaccination, and not having children are associated with CCS attendance.

Conclusion:

These findings point out that an important percentage of migrant women do not attend CCS. Strategies to increase participation should be developed, considering the inequalities identified and designed to target the specific needs of migrant women to improve their CCS attendance and increase cervical cancer prevention.

Factors Associated with the Patient's Decision to Avoid Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in changes in healthcare use. This study aimed to identify factors associated with a patient's decision to avoid and/or delay healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used data from a community-based survey in Portugal from July 2020 to August 2021, "COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion", which included data regarding health services use, risk perception and confidence in health services. We framed our analysis under Andersen's Behavioural Model of Health Services Use and utilised Poisson regression to identify healthcare avoidance associated factors. Healthcare avoidance was high (44%). Higher prevalence of healthcare avoidance was found among women; participants who reported lower confidence in the healthcare system response to COVID-19 and non-COVID-19; lost income during the pandemic; experienced negative emotions due to physical distancing measures; answered the questionnaire before middle June 2021; and perceived having worse health, the measures implemented by the Government as inadequate, the information conveyed as unclear and confusing, a higher risk of getting COVID-19, a higher risk of complications and a higher risk of getting infected in a health institution. It is crucial to reassure the population that health services are safe. Health services should plan their recovery since delays in healthcare delivery can lead to increased or worsening morbidity, yielding economic and societal costs.

'You want to deal with power while riding on power': global perspectives on power in participatory health research and co-production approaches

INTRODUCTION

Power relations permeate research partnerships and compromise the ability of participatory research approaches to bring about transformational and sustainable change. This study aimed to explore how participatory health researchers engaged in co-production research perceive and experience 'power', and how it is discussed and addressed within the context of research partnerships.

METHODS

Five online workshops were carried out with participatory health researchers working in different global contexts. Transcripts of the workshops were analysed thematically against the 'Social Ecology of Power' framework and mapped at the micro (individual), meso (interpersonal) or macro (structural) level.

RESULTS

A total of 59 participants, with participatory experience in 24 different countries, attended the workshops. At the micro level, key findings included the rarity of explicit discussions on the meaning and impact of power, the use of reflexivity for examining assumptions and power differentials, and the perceived importance of strengthening co-researcher capacity to shift power. At the meso level, participants emphasised the need to manage co-researcher expectations, create spaces for trusted dialogue, and consider the potential risks faced by empowered community partners. Participants were divided over whether gatekeeper engagement aided the research process or acted to exclude marginalised groups from participating. At the macro level, colonial and 'traditional' research legacies were acknowledged to have generated and maintained power inequities within research partnerships.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'Social Ecology of Power' framework is a useful tool for engaging with power inequities that cut across the social ecology, highlighting how they can operate at the micro, meso and macro level. This study reiterates that power is pervasive, and that while many researchers are intentional about engaging with power, actions and available tools must be used more systematically to identify and address power imbalances in participatory research partnerships, in order to contribute to improved equity and social justice outcomes.

Double jeopardy from the COVID-19 pandemic: risk of exposure and income loss in Portugal

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence indicates that the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had immediate health and social impact, disproportionately affecting certain socioeconomic groups. Assessing inequalities in risk of exposure and in adversities faced during the pandemic is critical to inform targeted actions that effectively prevent disproportionate spread and reduce social and health inequities. This study examines i) the socioeconomic and mental health characteristics of individuals working in the workplace, thus at increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, and ii) individual income losses resulting from the pandemic across socioeconomic subgroups of a working population, during the first confinement in Portugal.

METHODS

This study uses data from 'COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion', a community-based online survey in Portugal. The sample for analysis comprised n = 129,078 workers. Logistic regressions were performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of factors associated with working in the workplace during the confinement period and with having lost income due to the pandemic.

RESULTS

Over a third of the participants reported working in the workplace during the first confinement. This was more likely among those with lower income [AOR = 2.93 (2.64-3.25)], lower education [AOR = 3.17 (3.04-3.30)] and working as employee [AOR = 1.09 (1.04-1.15)]. Working in the workplace was positively associated with frequent feelings of agitation, anxiety or sadness [AOR = 1.14 (1.09-1.20)] and perception of high risk of infection [AOR = 11.06 (10.53-11.61)]. About 43% of the respondents reported having lost income due to the pandemic. The economic consequences affected greatly the groups at increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, namely those with lower education [AOR = 1.36 (1.19-1.56)] and lower income [AOR = 3.13 (2.47-3.96)].

CONCLUSIONS

The social gradient in risk of exposure and in economic impact of the pandemic can result in an accumulated vulnerability for socioeconomic deprived populations. The COVID-19 pandemic seems to have a double effect in these groups, contributing to heightened disparities and poor health outcomes, including in mental health. Protecting the most vulnerable populations is key to prevent the spread of the disease and mitigate the deepening of social and health disparities. Action is needed to develop policies and more extensive measures for reducing disproportionate experiences of adversity from the COVID-19 pandemic among most vulnerable populations.

Factors associated with motivation to avoid meeting family and friends during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The widespread adherence to behaviours that prevent the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus depends on human will. There is a paucity of research on the factors that influence adherence to social distancing. Available research suggests that it varies with the specific behaviour and that reducing contact with family and friends is the hardest one. This study aims to identify factors associated with motivation to avoid meeting with family and friends during the second lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal.

Methods

We used data from a community-based survey, “COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion”, which includes sociodemographics, psychosocial variables, and subjective health and wellbeing indicators from 20th February to 19th March 2021. We included 1336 participants who answered the question “To what extent is it easy for you to avoid visiting family and friends?”. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with difficulty to avoid visiting family and friends.

Results

Preliminary data shows that 38.4% (513) had difficulties avoiding meeting with family and friends. Those with greater difficulty were the ones who have less education, higher negative emotionality, do not work remotely, have more difficulties to stay home and practice physical distancing and consider the Government's measures inadequate. Contrarily, those who have less difficulty avoiding visiting friends and family are older and have low risk perception of COVID-19 infection.

Conclusions

This study suggests higher difficulty in avoiding visiting friends and family for those whose routines demand not staying at home, with low agreement with Government measures, and struggle with higher negative emotionality, confirming the personal costs of these behaviours and the importance of habits. Older people had less difficulty, suggesting that these measures may be closer to their usual routines. Interventions should consider the specificities of social interaction.

Key messages

Social distancing comes at an enormous cost to people's livelihoods and it also depends on people living circumstances.

Interventions to improve adherence to social distancing should consider the specificity of social interaction and the potential dissonance created by the overall routines.

Perceived need of health care and barriers in access to health services among migrants in Portugal

 

Health care has been pointed out as a key determinant of migrants' health and social integration, but there is evidence of disparities in its access across subgroups. A deeper understanding of the barriers in access to health care, particularly among vulnerable groups, is needed. Our study aims to examine perceived need of health care, access to health services and barriers among migrants in Portugal. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 1126 adult migrants (53.4% females), originated from African, Middle East, Asian countries and Brazil, living in Portugal for no longer than 10 years. The collected data included sociodemographic characteristics, perceived need of health care, access to health services and difficulties experienced. Differences between groups were analysed through chi-square tests. Results showed that most of the participants (64.7%) have needed health care in the previous 12 months in Portugal. Of these, 87.8% accessed a health care service. However, even needing health care, 3.3% decided not to seek care and 8.8% were not able to access a health care service. Reporting no access to health care was more frequent among migrants with shorter length of stay in the country (&lt;1 year: 19.4% vs. 1 to 5 years: 7.3% and 6 to 10 years: 4.6%; p = 0.001) and those with non-regular migration status (in regularisation process: 11.5% and undocumented: 9.5% vs. documented: 7.2%; p = 0.040). Most common barriers were lack of the National Health Service user card (38%), financial constraints (15%), undocumented status (11%) and language difficulties (7%). Although efforts have been made over the past decades in Portugal to adopt inclusive policies and promote migrants' access to health care, strategies are needed to improve information on migrants' health rights, especially of those undocumented and recently arrived. Economic and language difficulties should be further addressed in comprehensive interventions to promote equal access to health care.

Key messages

Migrants residing in the country for less than a year and those with non-regular migration status reported more frequently not being able to access health care. Despite the efforts to adopt inclusive policies and promote migrants’ access to health care, strategies are needed to improve information on migrants’ health rights and promote equal access to care.

Developing evidence on social prescribing initiative in Lisbon: Challenges and insights for improving

Social prescribing is recent in Portugal and evidence is needed on the potential of this complex intervention to improve health and wellbeing outcomes but also to inform the commissioning of these programmes. In a collaborative approach, an evaluation protocol of the social prescribing in two primary healthcare units in Lisbon was developed, aiming to assess its implementation and impact at three levels: patients, health system and health-social sector intersection, within a mixed-methods approach. Exploring the social prescribing contribution to enhance patients' quality of life, well-being and activation involves assessing these outcomes throughout a longitudinal perspective. In an exploratory, prospective study, baseline data collection and three follow-ups are included. Secondary data comprise health status indicators collected from patients' medical records as well as referral and social responses elaborated within the intervention. Patients' experiences on the social prescribing activities performed, perceived changes in lifestyle, and perspectives about positive and negative aspects are assessed in semi-structured interviews. The need for further understanding the impact at the health system' level calls for an attentive look at the processes of change in patients' patterns of healthcare services use (appointments in primary healthcare units, hospital admissions and emergency episodes), but also changes in the services' reorganization to better integrative health care. At a broader level, insights will be obtained on the effects on the intersection between the health and social sectors and the experiences of networking, through focus group discussions with all the stakeholders involved. The social prescribing implementation process, barriers, facilitators and suggestions for improvement will also be explored. In this presentation, challenges will be debated, as well as insights for reflection about opportunities for improving evidence development.

The COVID-19 policy response in Spain and Portugal: a study of measures to slow down infection rate

Background

The COVID-19 global pandemic triggered massive policy responses worldwide. Measures taken during the pandemic differed across countries and time. Governance systems may influence the capacity of countries to respond promptly and mobilize the necessary resources in time. Identifying measures and when they appeared are critical questions to assess emergency response strategies. The objective of this study was to analyze the policy response to slow down the infection rate of COVID-19 cases in Portugal and Spain according to timing (related to death rates) and stringency.

Methods

A descriptive comparative study of non-pharmaceutical interventions was conducted through a content analysis of policies and records review of official government sources. Portugal and Spain were selected considering the similarities between national health systems, but different government organization and epidemic impact. The Autonomous Community of Madrid was also included as example of subnational systems. Death rates were retrieved from daily statistics of open secondary sources.

Results

Results show that countries responded with a complex mix of measures across policy sectors, following dynamic patterns established by the epidemic evolution and governance systems. Policies aimed to reduce the spread of the virus, enable individuals and businesses to comply with restrictions, and reinforce National Health System's capacity. The declaration of state of emergency was a critical tool to organize actions under clear leadership, especially in devolved contexts.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that, in early epidemic phases, a centralized command can be more effective at timely enacting nationwide stringent measures. Evidence from this study contributes to the argument that a fast, robust, and early response might have been more effective at containing spread at the initial stages of the pandemic.

Key messages

The policy response included measured to reduce spread of infection, enhance adherence and strengthen health systems capacity to deal with the pandemic.

The declaration of state of emergency was essential to ensure an organized, coherent, timely, and robust response, especially in devolved contexts.

Sociocultural factors of cervical cancer screening uptake among migrant women: a mixed methods study

 

Cervical cancer has a high mortality in Europe despite being preventable by cervical cancer screening (CCS). Migrant women have a lower CCS attendance compared to non-migrants. This study aims to describe CCS uptake among migrant women in Portugal and explore sociocultural influences. Within a mixed-methods approach, an online survey and focus group discussions (FGs) were conducted. The survey included 655 migrant women and collected data on sociodemographics, attendance and attitudes toward CCS. Four FGs with 12 healthcare workers and a FG with 5 community workers were conducted exploring perceptions on CCS attendance and barriers among migrant women. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive analysis and Chi-Square test and qualitative data through content analysis. Survey data shows that 24.9% of women never had CCS or had it over 5 years ago, more Asian and African women (51.3% and 36.7%, respectively) (p &lt; 0.001). Non-attenders reported significantly more often embarrassment towards CCS (21.7% vs. 18.8% of CCS attenders, p = 0.002) and being unaware of their risk of cancer and the relevance of CCS (28.8% vs. 12.5%, p &lt; 0.001). Around 24% of non-attenders reported concern with having a consultation with a male doctor. For FGs participants, CCS is a taboo in some communities, particularly African, Asian and Muslim. Lack of information about CCS along with feelings of embarrassment and discomfort related to pap smear and with being seen by a male doctor were referred as reasons for avoidance of CCS. Participants also stated that some women have low autonomy and often their husbands have a key role in deciding whether they should attend CCS. Lack of a preventive mindset was also stated as reason for low CCS attendance. The sociocultural background can influence migrant women's attendance to CCS. A culturally grounded approach is needed to provide tailored information on CCS and to create opportunities to engage migrant communities on CCS and improve their uptake.

Key messages

Lack of information, embarrassment and low autonomy hinder some migrant women’s attendance to CCS. The sociocultural influences on CCS uptake call for a culturally grounded approach to provide tailored information and engage migrant communities on CCS.

Factors associated with avoidance of emergency department visits in Portugal during the pandemic

Background

Avoiding an emergency department (ED) visit risks irreversible negative consequences for patients' health. EDs are a frequent access point to the Portuguese health system. Previous studies have shown that patients may avoid visiting ED during the pandemic. This study aims to identify factors associated with avoidance of ED visits in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We used data from a community-based survey, “COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion”, which includes healthcare utilisation, health status, and risk perception in Portugal from 11th April 2020 to 16th April 2021. We included respondents that reported having needed ED care. Data were collected on sociodemographics, health status (comorbidities, mental health), risk perception (COVID-19 and complications), level of trust in health services and self-assessment of the severity of the reason for ED visit. The outcome of interest was the decision to avoid ED care. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the decision to avoid ED.

Results

Preliminary data showed that 914 respondents reported needing ED care (74.8% female; mean age 43 years). From those, 224 (25%) decided to avoid ED care. ED visits avoidance was higher during lockdowns (28%). People reporting specific comorbidities (cardiac, autoimmune, respiratory) avoided ED more than those without them. Perception of no severe reason for ED visit, poor mental health, perception of higher risk of COVID-19 and complications, and low trust in health services response to the pandemic were associated with higher odds of ED visit avoidance.

Conclusions

People avoiding ED visits represented a considerable share. The decision to avoid ED visit was associated with clinical characteristics, but the perception of risk and assessment of the context and health system response also played a role in decision making.

Key messages

The effect of avoided ED visits on health should be a research and policy concern. People with certain comorbidities or perception of high risk of COVID-19 and complications may be closely monitored.

Assessing health literacy among migrants and associated socioeconomic factors

 

Health literacy, the ability to understand, access, appraise, remember and use health information and health services, has great potential to reduce health inequalities and improve access to and quality of health care, particularly among groups that experience vulnerability, including migrant groups. Across Europe, including in Portugal, little is known about the health literacy strengths, needs and preferences among migrants. We aimed to assess the health literacy of diverse migrants living in Portugal and identify if health literacy needs differ across sociodemographic subgroups. A cross-sectional survey was administered to migrants living in Portugal. Data were collected using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), an internationally tested and robust multi-dimensional measurement tool with nine scales, and a demographic and socioeconomic questionnaire. Associations were tested using Welch's ANOVA. In total, 1126 adult migrants were surveyed: 53.4% female, mean age of 35.8 years (range 18-77), 48.9% from African countries, 29.5% from Middle East/Asian countries, 21.6% from Brazil. Low scores on most HLQ scales were clearly associated with sociodemographic characteristics such as lower levels of education: 1. Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers (p = 0.045); 2. Having sufficient information to manage health (p &lt; 0.001); 3. Actively managing health (p = 0.036); 4. Social support for health (p = 0.001); 5. Appraisal of health information (p &lt; 0.001); 7. Navigating the health system (p = 0.031); 8. Finding health information (p = 0.007). Similar patterns were found for participants who were unemployed and with lower income (&lt;650€). Health literacy needs of migrant communities should be taken into account when designing interventions aiming to mitigate health inequalities and to promote health literacy. This is even more pertinent in the current context of the COVID-19, where its adverse social and economic impacts are likely to aggravate health inequalities.

Key messages

Lower health literacy is related to lower socioeconomic status. Mapping health literacy needs can inform interventions to mitigate health inequalities among vulnerable migrant groups.

Causes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis from the perspectives of health providers: challenges and strategies for adherence to treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a serious phenomenon on a global scale that can worsen with the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aimed to understand the perceptions of health professionals about MDR-TB, their strategies to ensure adherence to treatment and their challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in a priority municipality for disease control.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study and recruited 14 health providers (four doctors, three nurses, three nursing technicians, three nursing assistants and a social worker) working in a city in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Remote semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants. For data analysis, the thematic content analysis technique was applied according to the study's theoretical framework.

RESULTS

The study revealed the causes of MDR-TB are associated with poverty, vulnerability, and social risk. A pre-judgement from the providers was observed, namely, all patients do not adhere due their resistance and association with drug abuse or alcoholism. The study also observed difficulty among health providers in helping patients reconstruct and reframe their life projects under a care perspective, which would strengthen adherence. Other issues that weakened adherence were the cuts in social protection and the benefits really necessary to the patients and a challenge for the providers manage that. The participants revealed that their actions were impacted by the pandemic and insecurity and fear manifested by patients after acquiring COVID-19. For alleviating this, medical appointments by telephone, delivery of medicine in the homes of patients and visits by health professionals once per week were provided.

CONCLUSION

The study advances knowledge by highlighting the challenges faced by the health system with the adherence of patients with MDR-TB in a context aggravated by the pandemic. An improvement in DOT is really necessary to help the patients reframe their lives without prejudices, face their fears and insecurity, recover their self-esteem and motivate in concluding their treatment.

Understanding Cervical Cancer Screening Barriers among Migrant Women: A Qualitative Study with Healthcare and Community Workers in Portugal

Cervical cancer screening (CCS) has been proven to reducing mortality of cervical cancer; yet migrant women show a lower participation in screening compared to non-migrants. This study explores the perspectives of healthcare workers and community workers on the factors influencing the CCS participation of migrant women living in Portugal. A qualitative study with online focus groups was conducted. Healthcare workers experienced in CCS and community workers working with migrant communities were purposively sampled. A semi-structured guide was used covering the participation of migrant women in CCS, barriers, and strategies to overcome them. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Participants considered that migrant women have low participation in CCS related to insufficient knowledge, low risk perception, and lack of interest on preventive care. Other barriers such as difficulties in accessing the healthcare services, relationship with healthcare workers, language, and cultural differences were highlighted. Promoting continuity of care, disseminating culturally tailored information, and use of self-sampling methods were suggested to improve participation in CCS. Inequalities in access to CCS among migrant women are mostly caused by information gaps and healthcare system-related barriers. Building a migrant-friendly healthcare system that creates opportunities for healthcare workers to establish relationships with their patients and delivering culturally and linguistically adapted information may contribute to overcoming those barriers and increasing the participation of migrant women in screening.

Factors related to condomless anal intercourse between men who have sex with men: results from a European bio-behavioural survey

Background

Relationship status is an important factor associated with condomless anal intercourse (CAI) amongst men who have sex with men (MSM).

Methods

A multi-centre bio-behavioural survey with MSM was conducted in 13 European cities (n = 4901) exploring factors associated with CAI via bivariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regression analyses.

Results

Likelihood of CAI with casual partners was associated with being ‘out’ to a majority (AOR = 1.19;95% CI 1,1.42); knowing their HIV status (AOR = 1.86; 95% CI 1.25,2.76); using substances (1–2 AOR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.16,1.63, 2+ AOR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.35,2.42); being older (AOR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.97,0.99); successful sero-communication (AOR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.67,0.94); and, not having a recent HIV test (AOR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.66,0.92). CAI with steady partners was associated with successful sero-communication (AOR = 2.72; 95% CI 2.72,3.66); not having a recent HIV test (AOR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.09,1.46), and; being older (AOR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.98,0.99).

Conclusions

Understandings of partner type and/or relationship status in relation to CAI amongst MSM can potentially play an important role in the development of culturally appropriate HIV/STI prevention and risk-reduction efforts targeting at-risk MSM. Our results speak to the need to consider segmented and tailored public health and health promotion initiatives for MSM with differing CAI behaviours and relationship profiles.

Evaluation of the Impact and Implementation of Social Prescribing in Primary Healthcare Units in Lisbon: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol

BACKGROUND

Social Prescribing (SP) is an intervention to link users of the primary healthcare services to non-clinical organizations based on the community to tackle social determinants of health. Despite the potential benefits of SP, the effectiveness of this complex intervention remains uncertain. This paper presents the study protocol of the evaluation of the first SP project in Portugal.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study will be conducted to evaluate the SP project. For the quantitative component, a longitudinal, prospective study with a pre-post design will be performed. Data on patients referred to SP will be collected in four different points in time throughout the intervention, using questionnaires on patients' health status and sociodemographic characteristics, and scales on patients' well-being, quality of life and activation. The secondary data will be collected using patients' medical records and SP's forms about the referral and social responses elaborated within the intervention. Semi-structured interviews with patients and focus groups with stakeholders will be conducted to assess experiences of participation and improvement suggestions on SP.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive and complementary evidence will provide insights and learning for the implementation of future SP interventions. This can contribute to inform policy and practice, and to increase investment in social prescribing interventions.

Migrant Communities at the Center in Co-design of Health Literacy-Based Innovative Solutions for Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Risk Reduction: Application of the OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access (Ophelia) Process

The drivers of high prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCD) among migrants are well-documented. Health literacy is regarded as a potential tool to reduce health inequalities and improve migrant's access to and quality of health care. Yet, little is known about the health literacy needs among these groups and how to address them. This paper outlines the protocol for a migrant community-based co-design project that seeks to optimize health literacy, health promotion, and social cohesion in support of prevention of NCDs among migrants in Lisbon using the OPtismizing HEalth LIteracy and Access (Ophelia) process. This participatory implementation research project starts with a mixed-methods needs assessment covering health literacy strengths, weaknesses and needs of migrants, and local data about determinants of health behaviors, service engagement, and organizational responsiveness. Diverse migrant groups will be engaged and surveyed using the Health Literacy Questionnaire and questions on sociodemographic and economic characteristics, health status, use of health services, and perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Semi-structured interviews with migrants will also be conducted. Based on data collected, vignettes will be developed representing typical persons with diverse health literacy profiles. Migrants and stakeholders will participate in ideas generation workshops for depth co-creation discussions in simulated real-world situations based on the vignettes, to design health literacy-based multisectoral interventions. Selected interventions will be piloted through quality improvement cycles to ensure ongoing local refinements and ownership development. Through a genuine engagement, the project will evaluate the uptake, effectiveness and sustainability of the interventions. This protocol takes a grounded approach to produce evidence on real health literacy needs from the perspective of key stakeholders, especially migrants, and embodies strong potential for effective knowledge translation into innovative, locally relevant, culturally and context congruent solutions for prevention of NCDs among migrants. Given the diverse communities engaged, this protocol will likely be adaptable to other migrant groups in a wide range of contexts, particularly in European countries. The scale-up of interventions to similar contexts and populations will provide much needed evidence on how health literacy interventions can be developed and applied to reduce health inequality and improve health in diverse communities.

Tuberculosis infection in HIV vs. non-HIV patients

OBJECTIVES

Tuberculosis (TB) is the most common opportunistic infection and cause of mortality among people living with HIV, and it is possible that it may also influence the evolution of the HIV infection. We assessed the differences between HIV-positive and -negative people infected with TB.

METHODS

The present study is a cross-sectional retrospective study by electronic record revision. We included patients admitted to a tertiary hospital with a diagnosis of TB between 2011 and 2016, comparing those with HIV coinfection with non-HIV patients, according to demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

This study included 591 patients, of whom 32% were HIV-coinfected. HIV-TB patients were younger, with a predominance of male gender. Considering TB risk factors, there was a higher prevalence of homelessness and intravenous drug use in the HIV group. In the non-HIV group, direct contact with other patients with TB and immunosuppression were more prevalent. Relative to TB characteristics, the HIV-coinfected group presents with a higher prevalence of disseminated disease and a higher occurrence of previous TB infection. Cancer was the most frequent cause of immunosuppression in the HIV group and the number testing positive for TB via microbiological culture was lower. Assessment of microbiological resistance and in-hospital mortality showed similar numbers in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few papers comparing clinical course of TB between HIV-infected and non-infected patients. Our study differs from others in the literature as we focused on a country with middling incidence of TB and further characterized the differences between HIV-infected and non-infected patients which can contribute to the management of these patients.