Earlier Age of First Exposure to Competitive Fighting Has an Adverse Impact on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Brain Volume

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether individuals who began fighting competitively at a younger age experienced adverse brain health outcomes compared to fighters who began competing at an older age.

BACKGROUND

Established literature has made clear that fighting sports such as boxing and mixed martial arts can lead to head injury. Prior work from this group on the Professional Fighters Brain Health Study (PFBHS) found that exposure to repetitive head impacts is associated with lower brain volumes and decreased processing speed in fighters.

DESIGN/METHODS

As part of the PFBHS, current and previously licensed professional fighters were recruited, divided into active and retired cohorts, and matched with a control group that had no prior experience in sports with likely head trauma. This present study examined the relationship between age of first exposure (AFE) to fighting sports and brain structure (MRI regional volume), cognitive performance (CNS Vital Signs, iComet C3), and clinical neuropsychiatric symptoms (PHQ-9, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale).

RESULTS

Brain MRI data showed significant correlations between earlier AFE and smaller bilateral hippocampal and posterior corpus callosum volumes for both retired and active fighters. Earlier AFE in active fighters was correlated with decreased processing speed and decreased psychomotor speed. Retired fighters showed a correlation between earlier AFE and higher measures of depression and impulsivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study help to inform clinicians, governing bodies, parents, and athletes of the risks associated with beginning to compete in fighting sports at a young age.

Developing organoboranes as phase transfer catalysts for nucleophilic fluorination using CsF

Despite the general high fluorophilicity of boron, organoboranes such as BEt₃ and 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃–BPin are shown herein for the first time, to our knowledge, to be effective (solid to solution) phase-transfer catalysts for the fluorination of certain organohalides with CsF. Significant (up to 30% e.e.) chiral induction during nucleophilic fluorination to form β-fluoroamines using oxazaborolidine (pre)catalysts and CsF also can be achieved. Screening different boranes revealed a correlation between calculated fluoride affinity of the borane and nucleophilic fluorination reactivity, with sufficient fluoride affinity required for boranes to react with CsF and form Cs[fluoroborate] salts, but too high a fluoride affinity leading to fluoroborates that are poor at transferring fluoride to an electrophile. Fluoride affinity is only one component controlling reactivity in this context; effective fluorination also is dependent on the ligation of Cs⁺ which effects both the phase transfer of CsF and the magnitude of the [Cs⋯F-BR₃] interaction and thus the B–F bond strength. Effective ligation of Cs⁺ (e.g. by [2.2.2]-cryptand) facilitates phase transfer of CsF by the borane but also weakens the Cs⋯F–B interaction which in turn strengthens the B–F bond – thus disfavouring fluoride transfer to an electrophile. Combined, these findings indicate that optimal borane mediated fluorination occurs using robust (to the fluorination conditions) boranes with fluoride affinity of ca. 105 kJ mol⁻¹ (relative to Me₃Si⁺) under conditions where a signficant Cs⋯F–B interaction persists.

Simple boranes with the optimal fluoride ion affinity are effective as catalysts for phase transfer nucleophilic fluorination with CsF.

Interventions for smoking cessation in Indigenous populations

This review has been withdrawn because it does it does not include recent evidence and does not reflect up-to-date Cochrane methodological standards.

Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth

This review has been withdrawn because it does it does not include recent evidence and does not reflect up-to-date Cochrane methodological standards.

Work-related support in clinical care for patients with chronic diseases: intervention development

Background

Labor participation among patients with chronic diseases is lagging behind, particularly in the Netherlands. Most workers with a chronic disease might be able to deal with their disease and work participation, but a specific group needs support preferably. This study focuses on the development of a work-related support intervention in clinical care to promote sustainable work participation of patients with chronic diseases who regularly visit the outpatient clinic.

Methods

The first four steps of the Intervention Mapping (IM) approach were used to develop the intervention for a Dutch university hospital. A needs assessment based on a literature review, expert opinions and experiences, a qualitative study with healthcare professionals (n = 9) and consultation with financial staff (Step 1) was used to formulate objectives of the intervention (Step 2). Guided by theory-based methods and practical applications (Step 3), an intervention program, including training and tools for healthcare professionals (medical specialists and nurse specialists), was developed (Step 4).

Results

The needs assessment revealed the importance of stepped care comprising: screening; risk stratification; and if targeted, a problem assessment and providing tailored work-related support, including follow-up. In order to provide work-related support in clinical care, behavioral change of healthcare professionals is necessary. To change their behavior, a program, two training sessions for healthcare professionals and practical tools (screening list, conversation cards and a map with work-related support options) were developed.

Conclusions

To provide work-related support in clinical care for patients with chronic diseases, healthcare professionals need information, skill building training and tools. Despite providing support in care-as-usual, additional time is needed and must be financed. Cost effectiveness evaluation of the intervention is a necessary next step.

Key messages

Healthcare professionals should discuss ‘work’ with targeted patients. To provide work-related support in clinical care, healthcare professionals need knowledge, skills, tools and time.

Prevalence of Major Depressive Episode in 27 European Countries

Background

Information about the prevalence of current Major Depressive Episode (MDE) across European countries is essential for its monitoring and for the development of evidence- based mental health policies. The aims were to: 1) estimate the prevalence of MDE by country in Europe; and 2) assess variations in prevalence between countries.

Methods

Data from participants of 27 countries that completed the questionnaire of the second wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS-2) were analysed (n = 258,888). The prevalence of MDE was quantified using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) with a cut-off score of ≥ 10. Prevalence and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were estimated for each country. Variation in prevalence (country vs the rest) was evaluated using bivariable and multivariable negative binomial regression models considering the specific country as the main explanatory variable. From these models, crude Prevalence Ratios (PR) and adjusted Prevalence Ratios (aPR) were obtained.

Results

The overall prevalence of current MDE in Europe was 6.38% (6.24%-6.52%). The country with the lowest prevalence was the Czech Republic (2.58%, 2.14%-3.02%) and the country with highest prevalence Iceland (10.33%, 9.33%-11.32%). In all the countries (except for Finland and Croatia) prevalence was higher in women than in men. The countries with the highest aPR were Germany (aPR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.71-1.89) and Luxembourg (aPR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.35-1.66), while Slovakia (aPR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.24-0.33) and the Czech Republic (aPR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.27-0.38) exhibited the lowest aPR.

Conclusions

Considerable variability in the prevalence of MDE by country in Europe was observed without a clear pattern. These results serve as baseline for monitoring the prevalence of MDE at a European level and suggest a need for developing preventive strategies against depression, particularly in those countries identified with the highest prevalence.

Key messages

The results of this study show that the overall prevalence of MDE is high (6.38%), with important variation across countries (ranging from 2.58% in the Czech Republic to 10.33% in Iceland). The results found could serve as a reference for the monitoring of MDE in Europe and for the development of screening and preventive strategies both at European level as well as at a country level.

Increased aortic stiffness and elevated blood pressure in response to exercise in adult survivors of prematurity

Objectives

Adults born prematurely have an increased risk of early heart failure. The impact of prematurity on left and right ventricular function has been well documented, but little is known about the impact on the systemic vasculature. The goals of this study were to measure aortic stiffness and the blood pressure response to physiological stressors; in particular, normoxic and hypoxic exercise.

Methods

Preterm participants (n = 10) were recruited from the Newborn Lung Project Cohort and matched with term‐born, age‐matched subjects (n = 12). Aortic pulse wave velocity was derived from the brachial arterial waveform and the heart rate and blood pressure responses to incremental exercise in normoxia (21% O₂) or hypoxia (12% O₂) were evaluated.

Results

Aortic pulse wave velocity was higher in the preterm groups. Additionally, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure were higher throughout the normoxic exercise bout, consistent with higher conduit artery stiffness. Hypoxic exercise caused a decline in diastolic pressure in this group, but not in term‐born controls.

Conclusions

In this first report of the blood pressure response to exercise in adults born prematurely, we found exercise‐induced hypertension relative to a term‐born control group that is associated with increased large artery stiffness. These experiments performed in hypoxia reveal abnormalities in vascular function in adult survivors of prematurity that may further deteriorate as this population ages.

MR compatibility, safety and accuracy of the redesigned UMC Utrecht single needle implant device

Purpose. The Utrecht single needle implant device (SNID) was redesigned to increase needle insertion velocity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the magnetic resonance compatibility, safety and accuracy of the implant device preparing its application in a patient study to investigate the feasibility of inserting a brachytherapy needle into the prostate to a defined tumor target point.Methods. Several experiments were performed to evaluate the mechanical and radiofrequency safety of the needle system, the magnetic field perturbation, the calibration of the implant device in the MR coordinate system, functioning of the implant device during imaging and accuracy of needle insertion.Results. Endurance experiments showed the mechanical safety of the needle system. Magnetic field perturbation was acceptable with induced image distortions smaller than 0.5 mm for clinical MR sequences. Calibration of the implant device in the MR coordinate system was reproducible with average error (mean±standard deviation) of 0.2 ± 0.4 mm, 0.1 ± 0.3 mm and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm in thex,y- andz- direction, respectively. The RF safety measurement showed for clinical MR imaging sequences maximum temperature rises of 0.2 °C at the entry and tip points of the needle. Simultaneous functioning of the implant device and imaging is possible albeit with some intensity band artifacts in the fast field echo images. Finally, phantom measurements showed deviations amounting 2.5-3.6 mm measured as target-to-needle distance at a depth of 12 cm.Conclusions. This preclinical evaluation showed that the MR compatibility, safety and accuracy of the redesigned UMC Utrecht SNID allow its application in a patient study on the feasibility of inserting a brachytherapy needle into the prostate to a defined tumor target point.

POS0615 TOCILIZUMAB IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Average life spans of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are approaching those of the general population. This results in a large proportion of RA patients being elderly at some point and underlines effective RA treatments needed for this population. Pivotal clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for the treatment of RA. However, real-world studies that explore the effectiveness of TCZ especially in the elderly are lacking. ICHIBAN was a large, observational study that followed patients with RA treated with TCZ under real-world conditions in Germany for up to 2 years.

Objectives:

In this analysis of ICHIBAN, we examined the safety and effectiveness of long-term TCZ treatment according to patient baseline (BL) age (<50, 50–65, >65 years).

Methods:

ICHIBAN (NCT01194401) was a prospective, non-interventional study that observed adult patients with active moderate to severe RA in German rheumatology clinics and practices. Patients were treated with TCZ according to the local label. The safety analyses set (SAF) included all patients who received at least one dose of TCZ. The effectiveness set (EFF) included all patients from the SAF who had no prior TCZ therapy. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed using the visual analogue scale. Last observation carried forward was used to substitute for missing values.

Results:

At baseline (BL), 3,164 patients were included in the SAF: 29.2% <50 years, 47.3% 50–65 years, and 23.5% >65 years old (1.2% ≥80 years). Patients >65 years old were not only the most likely to have comorbidities such as hypertension, anaemia, renal insufficiency, osteoporosis, diabetes, and coronary heart disease, but also had the highest BL disease activity according to Disease Activity Score-28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (Table 1).

Proportions of patients with adverse events (AEs) considered related to treatment were similar in patients <50 (22.3%), 50–65 (21.9%) and >65 years (22.2%). More patients >65 years (20.2%) and 50–65 years (14.4%) experienced serious AEs (SAEs) than patients <50 years (11.5%). Slightly more patients >65 years old experienced infectious SAEs (4.8%) than younger patients (<50 years, 3.2% and 50–65 years, 3.1%). Yet, similar proportions of patients across all age groups discontinued TCZ due to AE (7.0% <50 years; 9.6% 50–65 years; 7.8% >65 years).

2,902 patients were included in the EFF. Patients <50 years experienced DAS28-ESR remission at least once during the treatment period (65.4%) more often than patients aged 50–65 years (59.8%) or >65 years (59.5%). However, patients >65 years had numerically greater improvements in DAS28-ESR (Table 1). Patients <50 years had the best physical functioning at BL and the greatest reduction in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disease Index (HAQ-DI) score (Figure 1A). All age groups had similar improvements in PROs such as fatigue, strength of pain, and sleep disturbances (Figure 1B).

Table 1.

Model summary for prediction of DAS28CRP using time and etanercept originator (relative to biosimilar)

<50 years50–65 years>65 yearsDAS28-ESR, mean ± SDn*7771237617BL4.9 ± 1.45.3 ± 1.35.4 ± 1.3Last visit2.8 ± 1.73.1 ± 1.73.2 ± 1.7Change from BL-2.0 ± 1.7-2.2 ± 1.7-2.2 ± 1.8CDAI, mean ± SDn*7681217590BL25.7 ± 12.828.4 ± 13.328.8 ± 12.8Last visit13.3 ± 12.814.6 ± 13.214.5 ± 12.8Change from BL-12.5 ± 13.6-13.8 ± 14.0-14.3 ± 13.8

*271 patients with missing data at BL

**327 patients with missing data at BL

Conclusion:

Although elderly patients experienced a higher rate of infections, the proportion of patients withdrawing due to AE was not higher than in the other age groups. Starting with higher baseline disease activity, patients >65 years had similar benefits to disease activity and PROs when compared with younger patients. Overall, these results indicate that long-term TCZ treatment of elderly patients is effective and has an acceptable safety profile.

Disclosure of Interests:

Christof Specker Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Lilly, Novartis, Sobi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Boehringer, Chugai, GSK, and Roche, Martin Aringer Speakers bureau: Roche and Chugai, Consultant of: Roche and Chugai, Grant/research support from: Roche, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Consultant of: Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Roche, Grant/research support from: Roche, Marvin Peters Employee of: Roche Pharma AG, Michael W. Hofmann Employee of: Chugai Pharma Germany GmbH, Herbert Kellner Consultant of: Roche, Grant/research support from: Roche, Frank Moosig Grant/research support from: Roche, Hans-Peter Tony Speakers bureau: Roche, Abbvie, BMS, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi, and Lilly, Consultant of: Roche, Abbvie, BMS, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi, and Lilly, Grant/research support from: Roche, Gerhard Fliedner Grant/research support from: Roche, Chugai, Abbvie, and Lilly

Severe asthma assessment, management and the organisation of care in Australia and New Zealand: expert forum roundtable meetings

Severe asthma imposes a significant burden on individuals, families and the healthcare system. Treatment is complex, due to disease heterogeneity, comorbidities and complexity in care pathways. New approaches and treatments improve health outcomes for people with severe asthma. However, emerging multidimensional and targeted treatment strategies require a reorganisation of asthma care. Consensus is required on how reorganisation should occur and what areas require further research. The Centre of Excellence in Severe Asthma convened three forums between 2015 and 2018, hosting experts from Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The forums were complemented by a survey of clinicians involved in the management of people with severe asthma. We sought to: (i) identify areas of consensus among experts; (ii) define activities and resources required for the implementation of findings into practice; and (iii) identify specific priority areas for future research. Discussions identified areas of unmet need including assessment and diagnosis of severe asthma, models of care and treatment pathways, add-on treatment approaches and patient perspectives. We recommend development of education and training activities, clinical resources and standards of care documents, increased stakeholder engagement and public awareness campaigns and improved access to infrastructure and funding. Further, we propose specific future research to inform clinical decision-making and develop novel therapies. A concerted effort is required from all stakeholders (including patients, healthcare professionals and organisations and government) to integrate new evidence-based practices into clinical care and to advance research to resolve questions relevant to improving outcomes for people with severe asthma.

Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma: An Expert Consensus Framework to Characterize Phenotypes in a Global Real-Life Severe Asthma Cohort

BACKGROUND

Phenotypic characteristics of patients with eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma are not well characterized in global, real-life severe asthma cohorts.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the prevalence of eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in the population with severe asthma, and can these phenotypes be differentiated by clinical and biomarker variables?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an historical registry study. Adult patients with severe asthma and available blood eosinophil count (BEC) from 11 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2019) were categorized according to likelihood of eosinophilic phenotype using a predefined gradient eosinophilic algorithm based on highest BEC, long-term oral corticosteroid use, elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide, nasal polyps, and adult-onset asthma. Demographic and clinical characteristics were defined at baseline (ie, 1 year before or closest to date of BEC).

RESULTS

One thousand seven hundred sixteen patients with prospective data were included; 83.8% were identified as most likely (grade 3), 8.3% were identified as likely (grade 2), and 6.3% identified as least likely (grade 1) to have an eosinophilic phenotype, and 1.6% of patients showed a noneosinophilic phenotype (grade 0). Eosinophilic phenotype patients (ie, grades 2 or 3) showed later asthma onset (29.1 years vs 6.7 years; P < .001) and worse lung function (postbronchodilator % predicted FEV₁, 76.1% vs 89.3%; P = .027) than those with a noneosinophilic phenotype. Patients with noneosinophilic phenotypes were more likely to be women (81.5% vs 62.9%; P = .047), to have eczema (20.8% vs 8.5%; P = .003), and to use anti-IgE (32.1% vs 13.4%; P = .004) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (50.0% vs 28.0%; P = .011) add-on therapy.

INTERPRETATION

According to this multicomponent, consensus-driven, and evidence-based eosinophil gradient algorithm (using variables readily accessible in real life), the severe asthma eosinophilic phenotype was more prevalent than previously identified and was phenotypically distinct. This pragmatic gradient algorithm uses variables readily accessible in primary and specialist care, addressing inherent issues of phenotype heterogeneity and phenotype instability. Identification of treatable traits across phenotypes should improve therapeutic precision.

New-Onset Seizure With Possible Limbic Encephalitis in a Patient With COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review

With the outbreak of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) as a global pandemic, various of its neurological manifestations have been reported. We report a case of a 54-year-old male with new-onset seizure who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from a nasopharyngeal swab sample. Investigative findings, which included contrast-enhancing right posterior temporal lobe T2-hyperintensity on brain magnetic resonance imaging, right-sided lateralized periodic discharges on the electroencephalogram, and elevated protein level on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, supported the diagnosis of possible encephalitis from COVID-19 infection. The findings in this case are placed in the context of the existing literature.

Diabetes care and pregnancy outcomes for women with pregestational diabetes in Ireland

AIMS

Pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to examine pregnancies affected by PGDM; report on these pregnancy outcomes and compare outcomes for patients with type 1 versus type 2 diabetes mellitus; compare our findings to published Irish and United Kingdom (UK) data and identify potential areas for improvement.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2018 information on 679 pregnancies from 415 women with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and 244 women with type 2 diabetes was analysed. Data was collected on maternal characteristics; pregnancy preparation; glycaemic control; pregnancy related complications; foetal and maternal outcomes; unscheduled hospitalisations; congenital anomalies and perinatal deaths.

RESULTS

Only 15.9% of women were adequately prepared for pregnancy. Significant deficits were identified in availability and attendance at pre-pregnancy clinic, use of folic acid, attaining appropriate glycaemic targets and appropriate retinal screening. The majority of pregnancies (n = 567, 83.5%) resulted in a live birth but the large number of infants born large for gestational age (LGA) (n = 280, 49.4%), born prematurely <37 weeks and requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission continue to be significant issues.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective cohort study identifies multiple targets for improvements in the provision of care to women with pre-gestational DM which are likely to translate into better pregnancy outcomes.